Next Article in Journal
Prevalence of Histoplasma Antigenuria among Outpatient Cohort with Advanced HIV in Kampala, Uganda
Previous Article in Journal
Conidia Fusion: A Mechanism for Fungal Adaptation to Nutrient-Poor Habitats
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 9
Issue 7
10.3390/jof9070756
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antimicrobial Activity the Essential Oil from Croton pluriglandulosus Carn. Leaves against Microorganisms of Clinical Interest

by
Rayara J. P. Carvalho
1,
Pedro F. N. Souza
1,2,*,
Ellen A. Malveira
1,
Nilton A. S. Neto
1,
Romério R. S. Silva
1,
Gabriel L. C. Melo
3,
Ayrles F. B. Silva
1,
Leandro B. Lima
4,
Cynthia C. de Albuquerque
5,
Rafael W. Bastos
6,
Gustavo H. Goldman
7,* and
Cleverson D. T. de Freitas
1
1
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60020-181, Brazil
2
Drug Research and Development Center, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60430-160, Brazil
3
Department of Fishery Engineering, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60356-000, Brazil
4
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, State University of Rio Grande do Norte, Mossoró 59650-000, Brazil
5
Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, State University of Rio Grande do Norte, Mossoró 59650-000, Brazil
6
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Biosciences Center, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-970, Brazil
7
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 14040-903, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(7), 756; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9070756
Submission received: 8 May 2023 / Revised: 11 July 2023 / Accepted: 13 July 2023 / Published: 17 July 2023
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Multiresistant pathogens pose a serious threat to human health. The genus Candida is one class of human pathogenic yeasts responsible for infections affecting healthy and immunocompromised patients. In this context, plant essential oils emerged as a future natural alternative to control the diseases caused by these pathogens. Based on that, the present study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial potential of essential oil from C. pluriglandulosus and understand the mechanism of action. Here, it highlighted antimicrobial activity and the mechanisms of action of the essential oil extracted from C. pluriglandulosus Carn.-Torres & Riina (CpEO) leaves on human pathogenic microorganisms in planktonic and biofilm lifestyles. In addition, for the first time, the oil composition was revealed by GC-MS analysis and the toxicity to human red blood cells (HRBC). Twenty-six chemical compounds were identified in CpEO, elemicin, bicyclogermacrene, caryophyllene, brevifolin, and 2,4,6-trimethoxy-styrene. Through hemolytic assay, it was shown that CpEO has no toxicity to human RBCs. At the concentration of 50 μg mL−1, CpEO did not show great antibacterial potential. However, promising data were found for C. krusei and C. parapsilosis inhibiting by 89.3% and 80.7% of planktonic cell growth and 83.5% and 77.9% the biofilm formation, respectively. Furthermore, the mechanisms of action CpEO were elucidated by fluorescence. Scanning electron microscopy revealed damage to the cell membrane and pore formation, ROS overproduction, and induction of apoptosis in candida cells. Our results reinforce the potential of CpEO as an effective alternative molecule of pharmaceutical interest.

1. Introduction

Pathogens seriously threaten human health and generate global concern due to drug resistance. The Candida genus holds many species, including Candida albicans, the most common and prevalent human pathogenic yeast [1]. However, recent studies emphasize increasing clinical cases of non-albicans yeasts, such as C. glabrata, C. krusei, and C. lusitaniae, affecting healthy and immunocompromised patients [2,3]. The infection establishment can be non-invasive or invasive, causing local and systemic manifestations [4].
The treatment of such infections is made with antifungal agents that directly interfere with the cell structure and metabolism of the fungus. However, due to the misuse, these fungi acquired resistance and became less susceptible to conventional drugs [5]. One form of resistance is the formation of biofilms, which are aggregates of microbial cells embedded in an extracellular polymer matrix that adheres to surfaces and exhibits drug resistance [6].
Plants are a source of promising alternative molecules to control infections. Among these molecules are the secondary metabolites with antimicrobial action [7,8]. Essential oils (EOs) are natural products with antifungal action. Hydrophobic and volatile substances are usually obtained through plants’ plant organs (leaves, stem, root, and fruits) [9].
The genus Croton, from the Euphorbiaceae family, adapted to the Caatinga biome, is recognized for grouping diverse species with the potential for producing essential oils and active ingredients. These plants are widely used in folk medicine as anti-inflammatory teas to reduce pain and intestinal problems [10]. In addition, some species are aromatic and produce essential oils with antifungal, insecticidal, and antimicrobial properties [11]. Among them C. zehntneri; C. pulegioides Baill; C. jacobinensis Baill; C. nepetaefolius and C. blanchetianus show activity against human pathogens [3,10,12,13].
Despite this large amount of data on Croton species, works with essential oils and their biological applications are still scarce. An example is the C. pluriglandulosus Carn.-Torres & Riina, for which the only information reported in the literature is about the characteristics of the plant, such as being classified as a shrub and the morphology of its leaves as ovate. It has many trichomes on the leaves, latex, and acropeculiar glands. In Brazil, it is predominantly found in regions with the caatinga biome [14]
Given the phytotherapeutic and microbial potential of species belonging to the Croton genus, the present work aimed to understand and determine the activity and mechanisms of action of the essential oil extracted from the leaves of Croton pluriglandulosus (CpOE) Carn.-Torres & Riina, which is poorly studied regarding the control of microorganisms in planktonic and biofilm form.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Biological Material

C. albicans (ATCC 10231), C. krusei (ATCC 6258), C. parapsilosis (ATCC22019), and the bacteria B. subtilis (ATCC 6633), Enterobacter aerogenes (ATCC 13048), Escherichia coli (ATCC 8739), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 10031), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 25619), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), and Salmonella enterica (ATCC 14028) were all obtained from the Laboratory of Plant Toxins, Federal University of Ceará, Brazil (Fortaleza, CE, Brazil).

2.2. Plant Material and Extraction of Essential Oil

The harvest of the leaves of C. pluriglandulosus Carn. (CpEO) were performed in Serra do Lima, in the city of Patu in Rio Grande do Norte (6°06′36″ S, 37°38′12″ O) state. A voucher specimen was deposited in the Dáardano de Andrade Lima Herbarium of the Federal University of Rural Semiarid (UFERSA, Angicos, RN, Brazil), with volume number MOSS 15058. The technique used for oil extraction was based on Oliveira et al. [15], with modifications established by Malveira et al. [16]. Fresh leaves of CpEO (approximately 630 g) were subjected to hydrodistillation in a Clevenger apparatus for 2 h. The fresh leaf biomass was weighed and placed in a 5 L volumetric flask containing 2 L of distilled water. The extracted oil was dehydrated with ether and anhydrous sodium sulfate and stored in an amber glass bottle under refrigeration until analysis.

2.3. Characterization of CpEO by GC/MS Analysis

Identification of the major chemical compounds of CpEO was performed by gas chromatography coupled to a mass spectrometer (GC/MS) analysis (Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010 SE, Kyoto, Japan), equipped with an Rtx®-5MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm. The CpEO (55 μL) was placed in a vial (2 mL vial with 250 μL inserts) and injected for data acquisition. The operating conditions of the GC-MS/MS were optimized as follows: 70 eV, carrier gas (He), a flow rate of 1.7 mL.min−1, and a pressure of 53.5 KPa. Injector and detector interface temperatures were 25 °C and 230 °C, respectively. The oven temperature program was 100 °C for 3 min−1 and then 310 °C at a heating rate of 3.5 °C min−1 and maintained at 310 °C for 5 min−1. All the data acquisition was done in a run of 52 min in total. The identification of the constituents of the essential oils was investigated by comparing the mass spectra and Kovats index (IK) values with those of the research reference library. The identification was done following the method published by Adams [17].

2.4. Antimicrobial Activity

The anti-Candida assay with adaptations was performed using the microdilution test based on the methodology described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLST, 2008, Berwyn, PA, USA). Colonies were suspended in Sabouraud Dextrose medium (twice concentrated) and diluted to (2.5 × 106 CFU mL−1). Before the assay, the CpEO solutions were prepared by dilution of concentrated oil into the desired concentrations in 5% DMSO. For antimicrobial evaluation, aliquots of 50 μL of medium and yeast cells were added to wells of 96-well plates along with 50 μL of CpEO (ranging from 50 to 0.008 μg mL−1). The antifungal drug Itraconazole (1000 μg mL−1 in 5% DMSO) was used as a positive control for inhibition, and DMSO 5% negative control for inhibition. The plates were incubated for 24 h at 30 °C. The yeast development was monitored using a microplate reader (Epoch, Bio-Tek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA) at an absorbance of 600 nm. The antibacterial susceptibility assay was based on the method determined by Oliveira et al. [18], with modifications. The Mueller-Hinton Broth medium was used to grow the strains. The experimental setup followed the same principles as the abovementioned test, with only the positive control using ciprofloxacin (1000 μg mL−1 in 5% DMSO). For antimicrobial activity calculation, the formula was used: the OD of treated cells x 100/OD of cells treated with DMSO. The data are presented as the means of three biological replicates done individually, each with three technical replicates for each sample.

2.5. Antibiofilm Assay

For the evaluation of the inhibition of biofilm formation, the assay was based method described by Dias et al. [19]. The assay was based on two moments, (1) to evaluate the inhibition of biofilm formation and (2) to evaluate the ability in reduced the preformed biofilm. To evaluate the inhibition of biofilm formation, planktonic cells (2.5 × 106 CFU mL −1, Sabouraud Dextrose medium) were incubated with CpEO for 48 h. After that, the supernatant was removed and washed three times with 0.15 M NaCl. Next, 200 μL of 100% methyl alcohol for 15 min at 37 °C was added to fix the cells. A 0.1% crystal violet solution (200 μL) was added and incubated for 30 min. Then, the wells were washed with distilled water, and 200 μL of 33% acetic acid was added for 15 min. Finally, it was read at an absorbance of 590 nm using a plate reader.
To evaluate the reduction of mature biofilm, cells (2.5 × 106 CFU mL−1 Sabouraud Dextrose medium) were incubated for 24 h in 96-well plates to form biofilm. Then, CpEO was added and incubated for 24 h to evaluate its ability to reduce biofilm mass. After that, the supernatant was removed and washed three times with 0.15 M NaCl. Next, 200 μL of 100% methyl alcohol for 15 min at 37 °C was added to fix the cells. A 0.1% crystal violet solution (200 μL) was added and incubated for 30 min. Then, the wells were washed with distilled water, and 200 μL of 33% acetic acid was added for 15 min. Finally, it was read at an absorbance of 590 nm using a plate reader.

2.6. Mechanisms of Action

2.6.1. Cell Membrane Integrity

The concentration of 50 μg mL−1 was selected to be evaluated for mechanisms of action. According to Oliveira et al. [20], cell membrane integrity was analyzed with modifications. For the experiment, propidium iodide (PI) was implemented to evaluate CpEO-induced pore formation. First, 50 μL of C. krusei and C. parapsilosis (2.5 × 106 CFU mL−1, in Sabouraud liquid medium) were added in the presence of 50 μL of CpEO (50 μg mL−1) and incubated for 24 h at a temperature of 30 °C. Subsequently, each treatment was washed with 100 μL of 0.15 M NaCl and centrifuged (5000× g, 5 min at 4 °C) three times. The samples were resuspended in 50 μL of 0.15 M NaCl and 3 μL of 1 mM propidium iodide (PI) and incubated for 30 min in the dark at 37 °C. Finally, all treated were washed twice with 0.15 M NaCl, centrifuged to remove excess PI, and observed under a fluorescence microscope (Olympus System BX 60) with an excitation wavelength of 585 nm and emission wavelength of 617 nm. Red fluorescence is indicative of membrane pore formation.
Additionally, the methodology described by Malveira et al. [16] evaluated the size of pores formed. The cells of C. neoformans were treated as above and incubated with 10 μM of conjugated fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-Dextran with 6 kDa (Sigma Aldrich, São Paulo, SP, Brazil). After incubation for 30 min at 25 °C in the dark, the cells were washed as above and observed under a fluorescence microscope (Olympus System BX60) with an excitation wavelength of 490 nm and emission wavelength of 520 nm.

2.6.2. Detection of ROS Overproduction

To evaluate CpEO-induced ROS generation, the method described by Dikalov and Harrison [21], with modifications, was used. All samples were prepared as previously described in Section 2.4. Subsequently, each treatment was washed with 100 μL of 0.15 M NaCl and centrifuged (5000× g, 5 min at 4 °C) three times. The samples were resuspended in 50 μL of 0.15 M NaCl, and 9 μL of 0.2 mM DCFH-DA (2′,7′-Dichlorofluorescein diacetate) was added and incubated for 30 min in the dark. Then, cells were washed to remove the excess of fluorophore and observed under a microscope (Olympus System BX60) using an excitation wavelength of 485 nm and an emission wavelength of 538 nm.

2.6.3. Induction of Apoptosis

The induction of apoptosis in the species studied was based on using CellEvent (ThermoFisher, São Paulo, SP, Brazil), following the manufacturer’s restrictions for detecting caspase action. Samples were prepared following the pattern described in the previous tests, and 9 μL of CellEvent® reagent (ThermoFisher, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) was added. Finally, washes and centrifugations were performed as before. Finally, the treatments were observed with a microscope (Olympus System BX60) using an excitation wavelength of 342 nm and an emission wavelength of 441 nm.

2.7. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

SEM (Billerica, MA, USA) analysis was performed to evaluate cell morphological changes based on the method described by Staniszewska et al. [22]. The cells were treated under the same conditions described in the previous sections, then fixed with 1% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in 0.15 M sodium phosphate buffer at pH 7.2 for 16 h at room temperature. This was followed by three washes with sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.2 and centrifuged (5000× g for 5 min at 4 °C). The samples were dehydrated with ethanol (30%, 50%, 70%, 100%, 100% (v/v) for 10 min each and centrifuged as above. Finally, 50% hexamethyldisilane (HMDS, Sigma, St. Louis, MI, USA) was diluted in ethanol, left for 10 min, followed by centrifugation, and 1000% HMDS was added. 15 μL was transferred to a coverslip to dry at room temperature. The cells were coated with a gold layer with an aluminum surface using a positron emission tomography (PET) coating machine (Emitech-Q150TES, Quorum Technologies, Lewes, UK), and the images observed on a scanning electron microscope (Quanta 450 FEG, FEI, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.8. Hemolytic Analysis

Hemolytic analysis of CpEO was evaluated with human erythrocyte blood types A, B, and O, as Oliveira et al. [20] described. Three concentrations were tested, including the one used in all the assays mentioned above. Blood was centrifuged at 5000× g for 5 min at 10 °C, washed with 0.15 M NaCl, and diluted to a concentration of 2.5%. Each blood type was incubated (300 μL) with the CpEO solution (300 μL) at concentrations of 1, 3, and 5 mg mL−1 for 30 min at 37 °C. DMSO-NaCl (5%) and 0.1% Triton X-100 (100%) were used as negative and positive controls for hemolysis. The samples were centrifuged (5000× g for 5 min at 4 °C, Eppendorf 5810 centrifuge, Hannover, Germany). Then the supernatants were collected and directed into 96-well plates, and the hemolysis (%) was calculated by an absorbance of 414 nm using a microplate reader.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Three independent replicates were performed for all analyses performed. Data were subjected to the application of the ANOVA test, followed by Tukey’s method using GraphPad Prism software version 5.01 (GraphPad Software company, Santa Clara, CA, USA). A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. GC-MS/MS Analysis of CpEO

The GC-MS/MS analysis identified 26 metabolites in CpEO. Elemicin (25.77%), bicyclogermacrene (9.37%), caryophyllene (8.99%), brevifolin (4.60%), and 2,4,6-trimethoxy-styrene (3.96%) represent the compounds in the highest amount (Supplementary Table S1). Many metabolites identified in CpEO belong to the terpenoid family, classified as monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes, and present several biological activities, including antimicrobial activity [23]. Elemicin has only a few reports in the literature about its potential against human pathogens; however, Rossi et al. [24] revealed the antimicrobial activity against the bacterium Campylobacter jejuni. Bicyclogermacrene and 2,4,6-trimethoxy-styrene, both compounds found in CpEO, have antifungal, antioxidant, larvicidal, and anti-inflammatory activities [25,26,27]. Caryophyllene is a molecule with many biological activities that could be applied in health and agriculture [28,29]. Many biological properties, such as antimicrobial against fungi, bacteria, and viruses, anticancer, antioxidant, and insecticidal activities, were associated with caryophyllene [28,29]. For example, it has been reported the anti-candidal potential of caryophyllene against C. albicans [29].
Some compounds exhibit anti-candidal activity. One example is eucalyptol and α-terpineol (Table 1). According to the literature, eucalyptol exhibits anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-candidal action [30,31]. Studies show that α-terpineol has activity against yeasts and filamentous fungi, including Candida species (PINTO et al., 2014). In addition, β-elemene, 4-terpineol, and δ-elemene were associated with antifungal, antibacterial, and anticancer activities [32,33]. Many of the components identified in CpEO are present in other species of the genus Croton, however, in different quantities [16]. This difference is related to factors such as location, climate, stage of plant development, and the organ used for the study [34,35,36].

3.2. Antimicrobial Activity of CpEO

The inhibitory activity of CpEO (50 μg mL−1) against fungal and bacterial strains is shown in Table 2. The CpEO was not effective against bacterial pathogens (Table 1). In a recent study, Malveira et al. [16] reported that the essential oil from C. blanchetianus is ineffective against bacteria. Nevertheless, a significant reduction in the growth of two candida species tested was observed, 89.3% for C. krusei and 80.7% for C. parapsilosis at 50 μg mL−1. This is a fascinating result compared to other oils [16,37,38]. For instance, Carev et al. [28] reported that the essential oil from Centaurea triumfetii at a concentration of 500 μg mL−1 inhibited 75% of the growth of C. albicans. This concentration is 10-fold higher than the concentration employed by CpEO. The inhibition of biofilm formation for the same microorganisms was 83.5% for C. krusei and 77.9% for C. parapsilosis. The search for alternatives to treating infectious diseases caused by yeasts from the Candida genus has a significant impact, mainly because of the antifungal resistance, which is rapidly developing due to the indiscriminate use of antifungal agents [39]. In this context, plant essential oils emerged as a promising alternative for treating these pathogens.
The inhibition of biofilm formation was an excellent achievement for CpEO. There were few reports on the antibiofilm potential of essential oils against fungal biofilms. Most studies are related to antibacterial biofilms, which was not found in our analysis. Biofilm is a structure of high resistance to drugs developed by pathogens to facilitate their growth and spread, as well as difficulty in the action of drugs [18]. Microbial biofilm is a complex mixture of proteins, carbohydrates, and even extracellular DNA, forming a matrix that provides a suitable environment to grow and protect cells [28]. It has been reported that biofilm development could enhance drug resistance 1000 times.
Malveira et al. [16] reported that the essential oil of C. blanchetianus possesses activity against C. albicans and C. parapsilosis in planktonic cells and biofilm using the same concentration tested in this study. Asdade et al. [40] showed the antifungal action of Vitex agnus-castus L. essential oil, rich in monoterpene and sesquiterpene compounds, against clinical Candida strains. Taweechaisupapong et al. [41] also obtained satisfactory results using lemongrass (Cymbopogon flexuosus) oil aiming at biofilm inhibition of Candida isolates at 0.8 and 0.4 mg mL−1, concentrations 16 and 8 times higher the concentration presented by CpEO. The essential oil from lemongrass and Pistachio also presented activity against C. albicans cells. The lemongrass oil presented only 30% inhibition against C. albicans cells at a 5 mg mL−1 concentration. The oil from Pistachio had activity at a 2.5 mg mL−1 concentration, 100 and 50 times higher than the concentration presented by CpEO.
A study with C. rhamnifolioides oil revealed activity against Aeromonas hydrophila, E. coli, Listeria monocytogenes, S. Enteritidis, and S. aureus [42]. Filho et al. [43] reported that the oil of the Himatanthus obovathus flowers was efficient against C. krusei; however, for C. albicans, the oil was ineffective. Moremi et al., 2021 pointed out the Croton species from Southern Africa; C. gratissimus Burch., C. megalobotrys Müll, Arg., C. menyhartii Gȕrke, C. pseudopulchellus Pax, C. steenkampianus Gerstner, and C. sylvaticus Schltdl. showed low inhibitory capacity against Escherichia coli. These results suggest the selectivity of essential oils against distinct species of bacteria and fungi.
Furthermore, the antimicrobial activity of CpEO may come from compounds such as elimicin, eucalyptol, bicyclogermacrene, α-terpineol β-elemene, 4-terpineol, and δ-elemene, already mentioned in the topic above. These compounds induce cell instability, causing membrane damage, interference with ATP synthesis, and causing extravasation of intracellular contents [44]. Additionally, it has been reported that genes such as ALS1, ALS3, and HWP1, involved in the biofilm formation process, can be silenced by the action of some plant chemical compounds [45]. This shows the effectiveness of the substances found in oils, which can act as new methods of natural control against microorganisms.

3.3. Mechanisms of Action

3.3.1. Cell Membrane Integrity

Fluorescence microscopy was used to understand the mechanisms of action of the CpEO. The PI cell membrane fluorescent dye became helpful in the identification of damage to yeast cell membranes, and PI binds to the DNA structure and emits red fluorescence. This substance cannot cross the membrane of living cells because they are impermeable, so PI only moves throughout damaged membranes [46].
As expected, the control with DMSO-NaCl showed no fluorescence. However, red fluorescence indicated membrane damage in the planktonic cells of C. krusei and C. parapsilosis (Figure 1). The same damage on membranes was observed in the biofilm cells in the presence of the CpEO (Figure 2). Even though it seems to have more cells in the treated light field, some are not viable, as revealed by PI uptake. An et al. [47] highlight α-terpineol and terpene-4-ol as compounds that induced damage to the membranes of Aspergillus niger, leading to cell death. These same compounds were also identified in CpEO.
It is worth noting that the PI does not reveal the pore size. For this purpose, a new analysis was performed with dextran (6 kDa) in conjunction with FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate—green fluorescence) in planktonic and biofilm cells (Figure 1 and Figure 2, right panel). The formation of pores in the membrane is revealed by the fluorescence (green), which was more robust in the biofilm, indicating a 6-kDa-sized pore in the cell membranes. The results presented by FITC-Dextran are significant. Although largely used, sometimes PI does not reveal a pore formed. That happens because PI sometimes increases the membrane permeability, which is not necessarily a pore formation. Another problem with PI is that the size of the pore is too small, allowing the cells to recover [48]. PI has a diameter size of around 0.1 nm, which is tiny and allows cells to recover or handle it in another way. In contrast, the pore formed by FITC-Dextran has a size of 1 nm being classified as a huge pore, which leads to leakage of cytoplasmic content, membrane depolarization, induction of programmed cell death, making it impossible for the cell to recover, driving cell to death. Therefore, both PI and FITC-Dextran assays provided robust results suggesting membrane pore formation [16].
It is feasible to suggest that the damage caused by CpEO to the cell membrane of yeasts is given the presence of components in CpEO that were already mentioned in previous topics. Since these compounds interfere with the enzymatic mechanism that supports the structural system of the cell wall, causing morphological damage [49]. For example, the mechanism of action of caryophyllene is focused on the cellular membrane [50]. Moo et al. [50] reported that it alters the membrane permeability as revealed by Zeta-potential measurements. This membrane permeability leads to extravasation of cellular content and death [50].
There is another point related to pore formation. The ability to induce pore formation in the membrane is a potential achievement to prospect synergism action between CpEO and other drugs that have cytoplasmatic targets [51,52]. This type of analysis could help to bring good results for drugs that are becoming useless. Recently, Bezerra et al. [51,52] reported the synergism of antifungal drugs with synthetic peptides. Those peptides also could induce pore formation in the membrane of Candida spp. Maybe these pores increase the intracellular concentration of drugs, enhancing their activity. Thinking this way, CpEO could also be employed with drugs, given the ability to induce pore formation.

3.3.2. ROS Overproduction and Induction of Apoptosis

CpEO induced a slight ROS production in planktonic cells (Figure 3) and biofilm (Figure 4). As expected, DMSO-NaCl did not induce ROS in any treatment. For planktonic cells, CpEO induced ROS accumulation in C. krusei and C. parapsilosis (Figure 3). It is important to highlight that it is possible to see some of the particles in the light field are rests of dead cells (Figure 3 light field). However, for a biofilm lifestyle, CpEO was more efficient against C. krusei (Figure 4). In the experiment with biofilm, it is trustworthy to mention that in the light field, the number of cells in the treatment with CpEO is smaller than control (Figure 4—light field). Other reports of ROS overproduction in human pathogenic cells induced by essential oils [16,38,53]. Recently, it was shown that the lavender (Lavandula angustifolia) induced ROS accumulation in Klebsiella pneumoniae cells, followed by programmed cell death [38].
Essential oils’ chemical constituents are involved in ROS formation resulting from a disorder in biochemical processes [54]. Different Cymbopogon martinii essential oil concentrations stimulated ROS production in A. flavus [55]. Thymoquinone, a phytochemical compound found in essential oil, generated oxidative stress in C. glabrata [56]. It was recently demonstrated that the essential oil from C. blanchetianus leaves, rich in terpene compounds, could induce ROS in planktonic and biofilm cells of Candida species [16] hence corroborating with the data found in this research.
ROS are essential for maintaining cellular balance and even establishing biofilms but only at optimal levels [57]. Nonetheless, the levels of ROS must be tightly controlled; if there is an imbalance, their accumulation can cause cell apoptosis by damaging proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, and nucleic acids [58].
Keeping in mind that ROS accumulation induced by CpEO could lead to cell death in C. krusei and C. parapsilosis, it was performed the analysis of apoptosis in Candida cells. Caspase-3/7 activity was observed in all oil-treated cells, less intense in planktonic cells (Figure 5 and Figure 6). Even though it seems to have a number of cells in treated samples, cells treated with CpEO, although in higher numbers, are all dead or in apoptosis-inducing event, as revealed by the green fluorescence. As expected, the control (DMSO-NaCl solution) did not induce DNA degradation, as no fluorescence was detected. Thus, CpEO induced DNA damage in C. krusei and C. parapsilosis. Sun et al. [59] showed that cells treated with eucalyptol and β-cyclocitral activated caspase-3 and caspase-9, proteases involved in the apoptosis process.
It is known that caspase-3 initiates apoptotic DNA fragmentation and triggers a series of reactions involved in this process [60]. It is worth noting that few studies with essential oils show this type of test in yeast, not describing the mechanism of action of the oil. A recent study revealed by proteomics that limonene induced a higher accumulation of proteins involved in DNA damage and apoptosis [61].

3.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

SEM was used to evaluate the damage caused by CpEO in planktonic cells of C. krusei and C. parapsilosis after all treatments. The images depict that the control cells for both species have healthy anatomy without damage (Figure 7A and Figure 8A). In contrast, the damage is visible in CpEO-treated cells. Among them, in cell morphology, deformations in the structure, damaged cell walls, and contorted cells (Figure 7B–F and Figure 8B–F). For both Candida species is clear that CpEO induced deadly damage. It is possible to see holes in the cell structure, indicating that some parts of the membrane and cell wall are gone.

3.5. Hemolytic Assay

CpEO did not show hemolytic activity against any human blood type tested (Table 2), even at the concentration of 3 mg mL−1. Thus, CpEO was not toxic to human red blood cells. This result reinforces the pharmacological application of CpEO, as it does not present toxicity risks. This is one of the strong reasons these substances can be used clinically as drugs [18]. For example, Malveira et al. [16] revealed the oil from C. blanchetianus was toxic to red blood cells type O.
Not harmful to human red blood cells is a critical feature of molecules that could be applied in treatment once blood is the vehicle for these molecules. Therefore, CpEO has excellent potential to be assessed as a source of new antimicrobial molecules.

4. Conclusions

Our research reveals that the essential oil from C. pluriglandulosus Carn.-Torres & Riina leaves is a possible alternative for controlling human pathogens that already present resistance to conventional drugs offered by the pharmaceutical industry. The data related to the mechanism of action are vital to understanding the potential application in treating infection caused by C. parapsilosis and C. krusei. Another important feature of CpEO is the absence of toxicity to human red blood cells opens perspectives for the application of CpEO in the development of a new treatment. Additionally, CpEO showed relevance against biofilms, which is a great structure of resistance produced by yeasts. Altogether, these reveal the potential of CpEO as a source of therapeutical molecules.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof9070756/s1, Supplementary Table S1. Main chemical components of C. pluriglandulosus essential oil by GC-MS analysis.

Author Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions. The conception and design of the study and acquisition of data, analysis, and interpretation were performed by R.J.P.C., P.F.N.S., E.A.M., N.A.S.N., R.R.S.S., G.L.C.M., A.F.B.S., L.B.L., C.C.d.A., R.W.B., G.H.G. and C.D.T.d.F. Microscopic analyses were carried out by A.F.B.S., L.B.L., C.C.d.A., R.W.B., G.H.G. and C.D.T.d.F. Writing or revising the article was done by R.J.P.C., P.F.N.S. and G.H.G. Final approval and submission P.F.N.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Pedro F. N. Souza has a grant for a senior researcher from CNPq at process number 305003/2022-4.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available under reasonable requirements.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Central Analítica at UFC for providing SEM analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Butler, G.; Rasmussen, M.D.; Lin, M.F.; Santos, M.A.S.; Sakthikumar, S.; Munro, C.A.; Rheinbay, E.; Grabherr, M.; Forche, A.; Reedy, J.L.; et al. Evolution of Pathogenicity and Sexual Reproduction in Eight Candida Genomes. Nature 2009, 459, 657–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Fu, J.; Ding, Y.; Wei, B.; Wang, L.; Xu, S.; Qin, P.; Wei, L.; Jiang, L. Epidemiology of Candida Albicans and Non-C.Albicans of Neonatal Candidemia at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Western China. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Lima, I.d.O.; Oliveira, R.d.A.G.; Lima, E.d.O.; Farias, N.M.P.; de Souza, E.L. Atividade Antifúngica de Óleos Essenciais Sobre Espécies de Candida. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2006, 16, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vieira, F.; Nascimento, T. Resistência a Fármacos Antifúngicos Por Candida e Abordagem Terapêutica. Rev. Port. Farmacoter. 2017, 9, 29–36. [Google Scholar]
  5. Arendrup, M.C.; Patterson, T.F. Multidrug-Resistant Candida: Epidemiology, Molecular Mechanisms, and Treatment. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 216, S445–S451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. do Vale, J.P.C.; Vasconcelos, M.A.; Arruda, F.V.S.; Firmino, N.C.S.; Pereira, A.L.; Andrade, A.L.; Saker-Sampaio, S.; Sampaio, A.H.; Marinho, E.S.; Teixeira, A.M.R.; et al. Evaluation of Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Potential of Essential Oil from Croton Piauhiensis Müll. Arg. Curr. Microbiol. 2021, 78, 1926–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Benini, P.C.; Schwan-Estrada, K.R.F.; Klais, E.C.; Cruz, M.E.S.; Itako, A.T.; Mesquini, R.M.; Stangarlin, J.R.; Tolentino Júnior, J.B. Efeito in vitro do óleo essencial e extrato aquoso de Ocimum gratissimum colhido nas quatro estações do ano sobre fitopatógenos. Arq. Inst. Biol. 2010, 77, 677–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Souza, A.E.F.; Araújo, E.; Nascimento, L.C. Atividade Antifúngica de Extratos de Alho e Capim-Santo Sobre o Desenvolvimento de Fusarium Proliferatum Isolado de Grãos de Milho. Fitopatol. Bras. 2007, 32, 465–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dudareva, N.; Klempien, A.; Muhlemann, J.K.; Kaplan, I. Biosynthesis, Function and Metabolic Engineering of Plant Volatile Organic Compounds. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 16–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Arrais, L.G.; Lyra, H.F.S.; Batista, D.C.A.; Coutinho, F.N.; Saraiva, A.M.; Pereira, R.C.A.; Pisciottano, M.N.C.; Xavier, H.S.; Melo, S.J. Atividade Antimicrobiana Dos Extratos Metanólicos Da Raiz, Caule e Folhas de Croton Pulegioides Baill. (Zabelê). Rev. Bras. Plantas Med. 2014, 16, 316–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Guerra, A.M.N.d.M.; Silva, D.d.S.; Santos, P.S.; dos Santos, L.B. Teste de Repelência de Óleos Essenciais Sobre Callosobruchus Maculatus. Rev. Bras. Agropecu. Sustent. 2019, 9, 583–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Da Costa, J.G.M.; Rodrigues, F.F.G.; Angélico, E.C.; Pereira, C.K.B.; de Souza, E.O.; Caldas, G.F.R.; Silva, M.R.; Santos, N.K.A.; Mota, M.L.; dos Santos, P.F. Composição Química e Avaliação Da Atividade Antibacteriana e Toxicidade Do Óleo Essencial de Croton Zehntneri (Variedade Estragol). Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2008, 18, 583–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. De Vasconcelos, E.C.; Paganini, C.C.; de Figueiredo, E.A.T.; de Aragão, G.M.F. Ação Antimicrobiana Dos Compostos Voláteis Do Óleo Essencial Das Folhas Secas de Croton Blanchetianus Baill. Res. Soc. Dev. 2022, 11, e28011124785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Riina, R.; Van Ee, B.W.; Beatriz Rossi Caruzo, M.; Santos Carneiro-Torres, D.; Freitas dos Santos, R.; Berry, P.E. The neotropical croton section geiseleria (Euphorbiaceae): Classification update, phylogenetic framework, and seven new species from South America 1. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 2021, 106, 111–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. De Oliveira, A.R.M.F.; Jezler, C.N.; Oliveira, R.A.; Mielke, M.S.; Costa, L.C.B. Determinação Do Tempo de Hidrodestilação e Do Horário de Colheita No Óleo Essencial de Menta. Hortic. Bras. 2012, 30, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Malveira, E.A.; Souza, P.F.N.; Neto, N.A.S.; Aguiar, T.K.B.; Rodrigues, N.S.; Henrique, C.W.B.; Silva, A.F.B.; Lima, L.B.; Albuquerque, C.C.; Freitas, C.D.T. Essential Oil from Croton Blanchetianus Leaves: Anticandidal Potential and Mechanisms of Action. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Waterman, P.G. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1996, 6, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Souza, P.F.N.; Marques, L.S.M.; Oliveira, J.T.A.; Lima, P.G.; Dias, L.P.; Neto, N.A.S.; Lopes, F.E.S.; Sousa, J.S.; Silva, A.F.B.; Caneiro, R.F.; et al. Synthetic Antimicrobial Peptides: From Choice of the Best Sequences to Action Mechanisms. Biochimie 2020, 175, 132–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dias, L.P.; Souza, P.F.N.; Oliveira, J.T.A.; Vasconcelos, I.M.; Araújo, N.M.S.; Tilburg, M.F.V.; Guedes, M.I.F.; Carneiro, R.F.; Lopes, J.L.S.; Sousa, D.O.B. RcAlb-PepII, a Synthetic Small Peptide Bioinspired in the 2S Albumin from the Seed Cake of Ricinus Communis, Is a Potent Antimicrobial Agent against Klebsiella Pneumoniae and Candida Parapsilosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2020, 1862, 183092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Oliveira, J.T.A.; Souza, P.F.N.; Vasconcelos, I.M.; Dias, L.P.; Martins, T.F.; Van Tilburg, M.F.; Guedes, M.I.F.; Sousa, D.O.B. Mo-CBP3-PepI, Mo-CBP3-PepII, and Mo-CBP3-PepIII Are Synthetic Antimicrobial Peptides Active against Human Pathogens by Stimulating ROS Generation and Increasing Plasma Membrane Permeability. Biochimie 2019, 157, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dikalov, S.I.; Harrison, D.G. Methods for Detection of Mitochondrial and Cellular Reactive Oxygen Species. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2014, 20, 372–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Staniszewska, M.; Bondaryk, M.; Swoboda-Kopec, E.; Siennicka, K.; Sygitowicz, G.; Kurzatkowski, W. Candida Albicans Morphologies Revealed by Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2013, 44, 813–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Sharifi-Rad, J.; Sureda, A.; Tenore, G.; Daglia, M.; Sharifi-Rad, M.; Valussi, M.; Tundis, R.; Sharifi-Rad, M.; Loizzo, M.; Ademiluyi, A.; et al. Biological Activities of Essential Oils: From Plant Chemoecology to Traditional Healing Systems. Molecules 2017, 22, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rossi, P.-G.; Bao, L.; Luciani, A.; Panighi, J.; Desjobert, J.-M.; Costa, J.; Casanova, J.; Bolla, J.-M.; Berti, L. (E)-Methylisoeugenol and Elemicin: Antibacterial Components of Daucus Carota L. Essential Oil against Campylobacter Jejuni. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 7332–7336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Saldanha, A.A.; Vieira, L.; Ribeiro, R.I.M.d.A.; Thomé, R.G.; dos Santos, H.B.; Silva, D.B.; Carollo, C.A.; de Oliveira, F.M.; Lopes, D.d.O.; de Siqueira, J.M.; et al. Chemical Composition and Evaluation of the Anti-Inflammatory and Antinociceptive Activities of Duguetia Furfuracea Essential Oil: Effect on Edema, Leukocyte Recruitment, Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Production, INOS Expression, and Adenosinergic and Opioid. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019, 231, 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nogueira Sobrinho, A.C.; de Morais, S.M.; Marinho, M.M.; de Souza, N.V.; Lima, D.M. Antiviral Activity on the Zika Virus and Larvicidal Activity on the Aedes Spp. of Lippia Alba Essential Oil and β-Caryophyllene. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 162, 113281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Maia, D.S.; Lopes, C.F.; Saldanha, A.A.; Silva, N.L.; Sartori, Â.L.B.; Carollo, C.A.; Sobral, M.G.; Alves, S.N.; Silva, D.B.; de Siqueira, J.M. Larvicidal Effect from Different Annonaceae Species on Culex Quinquefasciatus. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 36983–36993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Carev, I.; Gelemanović, A.; Glumac, M.; Tutek, K.; Dželalija, M.; Paiardini, A.; Prosseda, G. Centaurea Triumfetii Essential Oil Chemical Composition, Comparative Analysis, and Antimicrobial Activity of Selected Compounds. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 7475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dahham, S.S.; Tabana, Y.M.; Iqbal, M.A.; Ahamed, M.B.K.; Ezzat, M.O.; Majid, A.S.A.; Majid, A.M.S.A. The Anticancer, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties of the Sesquiterpene β-Caryophyllene from the Essential Oil of Aquilaria Crassna. Molecules 2015, 20, 11808–11829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Seol, G.H.; Kim, K.Y. Eucalyptol and Its Role in Chronic Diseases. In Drug Discovery from Mother Nature; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 389–398. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mishra, P.; Gupta, P.; Srivastava, A.K.; Poluri, K.M.; Prasad, R. Eucalyptol/β-Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complex Loaded Gellan/PVA Nanofibers as Antifungal Drug Delivery System. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 609, 121163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sousa, O.V.; Del-Vechio-Vieira, G.; Alves, M.S.; Araújo, A.A.L.; Pinto, M.A.O.; Amaral, M.P.H.; Rodarte, M.P.; Kaplan, M.A.C. Chemical Composition and Biological Activities of the Essential Oils from Duguetia Lanceolata St. Hil. Barks. Molecules 2012, 17, 11056–11066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Xie, C.-Y.; Yang, W.; Li, M.; Ying, J.; Tao, S.-J.; Li, K.; Dong, J.-H.; Wang, X.-S. Cell Apoptosis Induced by δ-Elemene in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Cells via a Mitochondrial-Mediated Pathway. YAKUGAKU ZASSHI 2009, 129, 1403–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Moremi, M.P.; Kamatou, G.P.; Viljoen, A.M.; Tankeu, S.Y. Croton Gratissimus—Essential Oil Composition and Chemometric Analysis of an Ethnomedicinally Important Tree from South Africa. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 138, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Moremi, M.P.; Makolo, F.; Viljoen, A.M.; Kamatou, G.P. A Review of Biological Activities and Phytochemistry of Six Ethnomedicinally Important South African Croton Species. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 280, 114416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Thompson, J.D.; Chalchat, J.C.; Michet, A.; Linhart, Y.B.; Ehlers, B. Qualitative and Quantitative Variation in Monoterpene Co-Occurrence and Composition in the Essential Oil of Thymus Vulgaris Chemotypes. J. Chem. Ecol. 2003, 29, 859–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Yammine, J.; Chihib, N.-E.; Gharsallaoui, A.; Dumas, E.; Ismail, A.; Karam, L. Essential Oils and Their Active Components Applied as: Free, Encapsulated and in Hurdle Technology to Fight Microbial Contaminations. A Review. Heliyon 2022, 8, e12472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Yang, S.K.; Yusoff, K.; Thomas, W.; Akseer, R.; Alhosani, M.S.; Abushelaibi, A.; Lim, S.H.E.; Lai, K.S. Lavender Essential Oil Induces Oxidative Stress Which Modifies the Bacterial Membrane Permeability of Carbapenemase Producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Bhattacharya, S.; Sae-Tia, S.; Fries, B.C. Candidiasis and Mechanisms of Antifungal Resistance. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Asdadi, A.; Hamdouch, A.; Oukacha, A.; Moutaj, R.; Gharby, S.; Harhar, H.; El Hadek, M.; Chebli, B.; Idrissi Hassani, L.M. Study on Chemical Analysis, Antioxidant and in Vitro Antifungal Activities of Essential Oil from Wild Vitex Agnus-Castus L. Seeds Growing in Area of Argan Tree of Morocco against Clinical Strains of Candida Responsible for Nosocomial Infections. J. Mycol. Med. 2015, 25, e118–e127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Taweechaisupapong, S.; Aieamsaard, J.; Chitropas, P.; Khunkitti, W. Inhibitory Effect of Lemongrass Oil and Its Major Constituents on Candida Biofilm and Germ Tube Formation. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2012, 81, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Da Costa, A.C.V.; Melo, G.F.A.; Madruga, M.S.; da Costa, J.G.M.; Garino Junior, F.; Queiroga Neto, V. Chemical Composition and Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oil of a Croton Rhamnifolioides Leaves Pax & Hoffm. Semin. Ciências Agrárias 2013, 34, 2853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Filho, A.C.; Castro, C.F.; da Silva, A.; da Cruz, R. Efeito Antifúngico Sobre Candida Pelo Óleo Essencial Da Flor de Himatanthus Obovathus (Müell. Arg.) Woodson (Apocynaceae). Rev. Arq. Científicos 2021, 4, 72–78. [Google Scholar]
  44. Tariq, S.; Wani, S.; Rasool, W.; Shafi, K.; Bhat, M.A.; Prabhakar, A.; Shalla, A.H.; Rather, M.A. A Comprehensive Review of the Antibacterial, Antifungal and Antiviral Potential of Essential Oils and Their Chemical Constituents against Drug-Resistant Microbial Pathogens. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 134, 103580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Raut, J.S.; Shinde, R.B.; Chauhan, N.M.; Mohan Karuppayil, S. Terpenoids of Plant Origin Inhibit Morphogenesis, Adhesion, and Biofilm Formation by Candida Albicans. Biofouling 2013, 29, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Neto, N.A.S.; Oliveira, J.T.A.; Aguiar, T.K.B.; Bezerra, L.P.; Branco, L.A.C.; Mesquita, F.P.; Freitas, C.D.T.; Souza, P.F.N. Synergistic Antibiofilm Activity between Synthetic Peptides and Ciprofloxacin against Staphylococcus Aureus. Pathogens 2022, 11, 995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. An, P.; Yang, X.; Yu, J.; Qi, J.; Ren, X.; Kong, Q. α-Terpineol and Terpene-4-Ol, the Critical Components of Tea Tree Oil, Exert Antifungal Activities in Vitro and in Vivo against Aspergillus Niger in Grapes by Inducing Morphous Damage and Metabolic Changes of Fungus. Food Control 2019, 98, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Etxaniz, A.; González-Bullón, D.; Martín, C.; Ostolaza, H. Membrane Repair Mechanisms against Permeabilization by Pore-Forming Toxins. Toxins 2018, 10, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. De Billerbeck, V.G.; Roques, C.G.; Bessière, J.-M.; Fonvieille, J.-L.; Dargent, R. Effects of Cymbopogon nardus (L.) W. Watson Essential Oil on the Growth and Morphogenesis of Aspergillus Niger. Can. J. Microbiol. 2001, 47, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Moo, C.L.; Yang, S.K.; Osman, M.A.; Yuswan, M.H.; Loh, J.Y.; Lim, W.M.; Lim, S.H.E.; Lai, K.S. Antibacterial Activity and Mode of Action of β-Caryophyllene on Bacillus Cereus. Polish J. Microbiol. 2020, 69, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Andrade, C.R.D.; Bel, O.; Amaral, L.; Neto, N.A.S.; Silva, R.G.G. Combined Antibiofilm Activity of Synthetic Peptides and Antifungal Drugs against Candida spp. Future Microbiol. 2022, 17, 1133–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bezerra, L.P.; Freitas, C.D.T.; Silva, A.F.B.; Amaral, J.L.; Neto, N.A.S.; Silva, R.G.G.; Parra, A.L.C.; Goldman, G.H.; Oliveira, J.T.A.; Mesquita, F.P.; et al. Synergistic Antifungal Activity of Synthetic Peptides and Antifungal Drugs against Candida Albicans and C. Parapsilosis Biofilms. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ding, Y.; Zhang, K.; Yin, Y.; Wu, J. D319 Induced Antifungal Effects through ROS-Mediated Apoptosis and Inhibited Isocitrate Lyase in Candida Albicans. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2022, 1866, 130050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Tang, X.; Shao, Y.-L.; Tang, Y.-J.; Zhou, W.-W. Antifungal Activity of Essential Oil Compounds (Geraniol and Citral) and Inhibitory Mechanisms on Grain Pathogens (Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus ochraceus). Molecules 2018, 23, 2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Lin, L.; Chen, S.; Xia, W.; Li, T.; Dong, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; Zhao, Y.; Fu, X. A New Strategy: Inhibitory Effect and Mechanism of Cymbopogon Martinii Essential Oil on Aspergillus Flavus. Food Biosci. 2023, 51, 102315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Almshawit, H.; Macreadie, I. Fungicidal Effect of Thymoquinone Involves Generation of Oxidative Stress in Candida Glabrata. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 195, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Čáp, M.; Váchová, L.; Palková, Z. Reactive Oxygen Species in the Signaling and Adaptation of Multicellular Microbial Communities. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2012, 2012, 976753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Perrone, G.G.; Tan, S.X.; Dawes, I.W. Reactive Oxygen Species and Yeast Apoptosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2008, 1783, 1354–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Sun, Q.; Zhou, M.; Zuo, Z. Toxic Mechanism of Eucalyptol and β-Cyclocitral on Chlamydomonas Reinhardtii by Inducing Programmed Cell Death. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 389, 121910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Janssens, S.; Tinel, A. The PIDDosome, DNA-Damage-Induced Apoptosis and Beyond. Cell Death Differ. 2012, 19, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Thakre, A.; Zore, G.; Kodgire, S.; Kazi, R.; Mulange, S.; Patil, R.; Shelar, A.; Santhakumari, B.; Kulkarni, M.; Kharat, K.; et al. Limonene Inhibits Candida Albicans Growth by Inducing Apoptosis. Med. Mycol. 2018, 56, 565–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jof 09 00756 g001 550
Figure 1. Fluorescence images showing membrane pore formation and their respective size in planktonic cells of C. krusei and C. parapsilosis. The control was DMSO-NaCl, treated with CpEO at 50 μg mL−1. Membrane pore formation was measured by propidium iodide (PI) uptake assay, and pore size used a 6 kDa dextran-FITC. White bars indicate 100 μm.
Figure 1. Fluorescence images showing membrane pore formation and their respective size in planktonic cells of C. krusei and C. parapsilosis. The control was DMSO-NaCl, treated with CpEO at 50 μg mL−1. Membrane pore formation was measured by propidium iodide (PI) uptake assay, and pore size used a 6 kDa dextran-FITC. White bars indicate 100 μm.
Jof 09 00756 g001
Jof 09 00756 g002 550
Figure 2. Fluorescence images showing membrane pore formation and their respective size in biofilm cells of C. krusei and C. parapsilosis. The control used was DMSO-NaCl, treated with CpEO at 50 μg mL−1. Membrane pore formation was measured by propidium iodide (PI) uptake assay, and pore size used a 6 kDa dextran-FITC. White bars indicate 100 μm.
Figure 2. Fluorescence images showing membrane pore formation and their respective size in biofilm cells of C. krusei and C. parapsilosis. The control used was DMSO-NaCl, treated with CpEO at 50 μg mL−1. Membrane pore formation was measured by propidium iodide (PI) uptake assay, and pore size used a 6 kDa dextran-FITC. White bars indicate 100 μm.
Jof 09 00756 g002
Jof 09 00756 g003 550
Figure 3. Fluorescence images showing overproduction of ROS in planktonic cells of C. krusei and C. parapsilosis. The control was DMSO-NaCl, treated with CpEO at 50 μg mL−1. White bars indicate 100 μm.
Figure 3. Fluorescence images showing overproduction of ROS in planktonic cells of C. krusei and C. parapsilosis. The control was DMSO-NaCl, treated with CpEO at 50 μg mL−1. White bars indicate 100 μm.
Jof 09 00756 g003
Jof 09 00756 g004 550
Figure 4. Fluorescence images showing overproduction of ROS in biofilm cells of C. krusei and C. parapsilosis. The control used was DMSO-NaCl, treated with CpEO at 50 μg mL−1. White bars indicate 100 μm. The white arrows show the fluorescent cells in both light and fluorescence fields.
Figure 4. Fluorescence images showing overproduction of ROS in biofilm cells of C. krusei and C. parapsilosis. The control used was DMSO-NaCl, treated with CpEO at 50 μg mL−1. White bars indicate 100 μm. The white arrows show the fluorescent cells in both light and fluorescence fields.
Jof 09 00756 g004
Jof 09 00756 g005 550
Figure 5. Induction of apoptosis in planktonic cells of C. krusei and C. parapsilosis using CpEO at 50 μg mL−1 concentration. White bars indicate 100 μm. Black arrows indicate the fluorescent cells and their correspondence in the light field.
Figure 5. Induction of apoptosis in planktonic cells of C. krusei and C. parapsilosis using CpEO at 50 μg mL−1 concentration. White bars indicate 100 μm. Black arrows indicate the fluorescent cells and their correspondence in the light field.
Jof 09 00756 g005
Jof 09 00756 g006 550
Figure 6. Induction of apoptosis in biofilm cells of C. krusei and C. parapsilosis using CpEO at a concentration of 50 μg mL−1. White bars indicate 100 μm.
Figure 6. Induction of apoptosis in biofilm cells of C. krusei and C. parapsilosis using CpEO at a concentration of 50 μg mL−1. White bars indicate 100 μm.
Jof 09 00756 g006
Jof 09 00756 g007 550
Figure 7. Scanning electron microscopy of C. krusei cells treated with CpEO. (A) Control C. krusei cells treated with DMSO-NaCl solution. (B–F) C. krusei cells treated with CpEO. White arrows show damage to cell structure.
Figure 7. Scanning electron microscopy of C. krusei cells treated with CpEO. (A) Control C. krusei cells treated with DMSO-NaCl solution. (B–F) C. krusei cells treated with CpEO. White arrows show damage to cell structure.
Jof 09 00756 g007
Jof 09 00756 g008 550
Figure 8. Scanning electron microscopy of C. parapsilosis cells treated with CpEO. (A) Control C. parapsilosis cells treated with DMSO-NaCl solution. (B–F) C. parapsilosis cells treated with CpEO. White arrows show damage to cell structure.
Figure 8. Scanning electron microscopy of C. parapsilosis cells treated with CpEO. (A) Control C. parapsilosis cells treated with DMSO-NaCl solution. (B–F) C. parapsilosis cells treated with CpEO. White arrows show damage to cell structure.
Jof 09 00756 g008
Table
Table 1. Antimicrobial effects of C. pluriglandulosus Carn. essential oil against planktonic cells and biofilm.
Table 1. Antimicrobial effects of C. pluriglandulosus Carn. essential oil against planktonic cells and biofilm.
CpEO (50 μg mL−1)
Anti-Candidal Activity
MicroorganismsInhibition of Planktonic Cells Growth (%)Significance aInhibition of Biofilm Formation (%)Significance aBiomass Reduction of Preformed Biofilm (%)Significance aItraconazoleSignificance a
C. albicans00.00p > 0.0500.00p > 0.0500.00p > 0.0500.00p > 0.05
C. krusei89.3 ± 0.02p < 0.0583.5 ± 0.01p < 0.0500.00p > 0.0574.5 ± 0.05p < 0.05
C. parapsilosis80.70 ± 0.03p < 0.0577.9 ± 0.07p < 0.0500.00p > 0.0580.0 ± 0.03p < 0.05
Antibacterial ActivityCiprofloxacin
B. subtilis00.00p > 0.0500.00p > 0.0500.00p > 0.0567.5 ± 0.06p < 0.05
E. aerogenes00.00p > 0.0500.00p > 0.0500.00p > 0.0578.7 ± 0.02p < 0.05
E. coli00.00p > 0.0500.00p > 0.0500.00p > 0.0568.5 ± 0.007p < 0.05
K. pneumoniae8.76 ± 0.09p > 0.0500.00p > 0.0500.00p > 0.0572.8 ± 0.06p < 0.05
P. aeruginosa14.92 ± 0.04p < 0.0500.00p > 0.0500.00p > 0.0577.3 ± 0.07p < 0.05
S. aureus14.30 ± 0.01p < 0.0500.00p > 0.0500.00p > 0.0587.2 ± 0.07p < 0.05
S. enterica6.07 ± 0.01p > 0.0500.00p > 0.0500.00p > 0.0562.3 ± 0.01p < 0.05
The results are presented as the mean ± SD. a indicates statistical significance or not based on p-value compared to control.
Table
Table 2. Hemolytic activity of CpEO Against human red Blood cells.
Table 2. Hemolytic activity of CpEO Against human red Blood cells.
Blood Type% of Hemolysis
0.1 % Triton5% DMSOCpOE 1 mg mL−1CpOE 1.25 mg mL−1CpOE 3 mg mL−1
A1000000
B1000000
O1000000
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Carvalho, R.J.P.; Souza, P.F.N.; Malveira, E.A.; Neto, N.A.S.; Silva, R.R.S.; Melo, G.L.C.; Silva, A.F.B.; Lima, L.B.; de Albuquerque, C.C.; Bastos, R.W.; et al. Antimicrobial Activity the Essential Oil from Croton pluriglandulosus Carn. Leaves against Microorganisms of Clinical Interest. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 756. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9070756

AMA Style

Carvalho RJP, Souza PFN, Malveira EA, Neto NAS, Silva RRS, Melo GLC, Silva AFB, Lima LB, de Albuquerque CC, Bastos RW, et al. Antimicrobial Activity the Essential Oil from Croton pluriglandulosus Carn. Leaves against Microorganisms of Clinical Interest. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(7):756. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9070756

Chicago/Turabian Style

Carvalho, Rayara J. P., Pedro F. N. Souza, Ellen A. Malveira, Nilton A. S. Neto, Romério R. S. Silva, Gabriel L. C. Melo, Ayrles F. B. Silva, Leandro B. Lima, Cynthia C. de Albuquerque, Rafael W. Bastos, and et al. 2023. "Antimicrobial Activity the Essential Oil from Croton pluriglandulosus Carn. Leaves against Microorganisms of Clinical Interest" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 7: 756. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9070756

APA Style

Carvalho, R. J. P., Souza, P. F. N., Malveira, E. A., Neto, N. A. S., Silva, R. R. S., Melo, G. L. C., Silva, A. F. B., Lima, L. B., de Albuquerque, C. C., Bastos, R. W., Goldman, G. H., & de Freitas, C. D. T. (2023). Antimicrobial Activity the Essential Oil from Croton pluriglandulosus Carn. Leaves against Microorganisms of Clinical Interest. Journal of Fungi, 9(7), 756. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9070756

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop