Next Article in Journal
Visualization and Parameters Determination of Supersonic Flows in Convergent-Divergent Micro-Nozzles Using Schlieren Z-Type Technique and Fluid Mechanics
Previous Article in Journal
An Application of Upwind Difference Scheme with Preconditioned Numerical Fluxes to Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flows
Previous Article in Special Issue
Machine Learning Model for Gas–Liquid Interface Reconstruction in CFD Numerical Simulations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A Machine Learning Approach to Volume Tracking in Multiphase Flow Simulations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Massachusetts—Dartmouth, Dartmouth, MA 02747, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fluids 2025, 10(2), 39; https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10020039
Submission received: 30 October 2024 / Revised: 22 December 2024 / Accepted: 27 January 2025 / Published: 2 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Multiphase Flow Simulation with Machine Learning)

Abstract

This work presents a machine learning (ML) approach to volume-tracking for computational simulations of multiphase flow. It is an alternative to a commonly used procedure in the volume-of-fluid (VOF) method for volume tracking, in which the phase interfaces are reconstructed for flux calculation followed by volume advection. Bypassing the computationally expensive steps of interface reconstruction and flux calculation, the proposed ML approach performs volume advection in a single step, directly predicting the volume fractions at the next time step. The proposed ML function is two-dimensional and has eleven inputs. It was trained using MATLAB’s (R2021a) Deep Learning Toolbox with a grid search method to find an optimal neural network configuration. The performance of the ML function is assessed using canonical test cases, including translation, rotation, and vortex tests. The errors in the volume fraction fields obtained by the ML function are compared with those of the VOF method. In ideal conditions, the ML function speeds up the computations four times compared to the VOF method. However, in terms of overall robustness and accuracy, the VOF method remains superior. This study demonstrates the potential of applying ML methods to multiphase flow simulations while highlighting areas for further improvement.
Keywords: volume-of-fluid; two-phase flow; multiphase flow; computational fluid dynamics; machine learning; deep learning volume-of-fluid; two-phase flow; multiphase flow; computational fluid dynamics; machine learning; deep learning

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mak, A.; Raessi, M. A Machine Learning Approach to Volume Tracking in Multiphase Flow Simulations. Fluids 2025, 10, 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10020039

AMA Style

Mak A, Raessi M. A Machine Learning Approach to Volume Tracking in Multiphase Flow Simulations. Fluids. 2025; 10(2):39. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10020039

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mak, Aaron, and Mehdi Raessi. 2025. "A Machine Learning Approach to Volume Tracking in Multiphase Flow Simulations" Fluids 10, no. 2: 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10020039

APA Style

Mak, A., & Raessi, M. (2025). A Machine Learning Approach to Volume Tracking in Multiphase Flow Simulations. Fluids, 10(2), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10020039

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop