Next Article in Journal
Functional Cheeses: Updates on Probiotic Preservation Methods
Next Article in Special Issue
Bio-Dealcoholization of Wines: Can Yeast Make Lighter Wines?
Previous Article in Journal
Sourdoughs as Natural Enhancers of Bread Quality and Shelf Life: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Impact of Fermentation on Brown Rice: Health Benefits and Value-Added Foods—A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Probiotic Functional Yogurt: Challenges and Opportunities

by
Marinêz de Souza
,
Deisy Alessandra Drunkler
and
Eliane Colla
*
Departamento de Alimentos, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Avenida Brasil, 4232, Bairro Independência, Medianeira 85884-000, PR, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2024, 10(1), 6; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10010006
Submission received: 21 November 2023 / Revised: 11 December 2023 / Accepted: 19 December 2023 / Published: 21 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Review Papers in Fermentation for Food and Beverages 2023)

Abstract

:
This article aims to explore the challenges and opportunities inherent in producing probiotic functional yogurt through information on the benefits of consuming this food, emphasizing its nutritional characteristics and importance for health. It explains the advantages of regular consumption, including improved digestion, gastrointestinal health, immunity, and increased absorption of minerals. The discussion focuses on the perspectives within the production of functional probiotic yogurt, with emphasis on microbial dynamics, inhibition of undesirable microorganisms, and strategies to improve the quality of this product. It highlights the challenges in maintaining the viability of probiotics during production and storage, addressing factors such as pH, exposure to oxygen, temperature regulation, and interactions between strains and ingredients. Additionally, it highlights the integration of natural compounds in probiotic functional yogurt and their sensory impacts associated with health benefits. The article is a comprehensive overview that emphasizes the critical factors that influence the fermentation process of functional probiotic yogurt and the fundamental role of probiotic viability for consumer health.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The consumption of fermented milk is related to the image of healthy and nutritious foods, as several biochemical changes occur in the raw material during fermentation, which provides beneficial effects for its consumers [1].
Yogurt is a fermented milk that is characterized as a source of mineral salts, including potassium, zinc, phosphorus, and calcium, the latter of which is essential for the formation of bones and teeth, benefiting the growth of children and reducing the risk of osteoporosis in adults [2,3]. However, other benefits are associated with the regular consumption of yogurt, such as better digestibility of proteins and sugars compared to milk; stimulation of peristaltic movements as a result of the presence of lactic acid, facilitating digestion; combating oral problems; colonization of the gastrointestinal tract by beneficial microorganisms; development and maintenance of the support system; combating of inflammation and stimulation of the immune system; stimulation of the production of hormones and enzymes; ease of absorption of mineral salts; etc. [4].
This food is produced through the fermentation of milk, where the bacteria used in its elaboration are known as starter cultures [5]. During the fermentation process, bacteria produce lactic acid, which acts on the milk protein, giving the product its texture and specific characteristics [6].
Yogurt is understood as the product resulting from the fermentation of pasteurized or sterilized milk, with fermentation carried out using protosymbiotic cultures of Streptococcus salivarius subsp. Thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus [7]. Moreover, yogurt is considered a suitable vehicle for administering probiotic bacteria to consumers, typically incorporating starter bacteria along with probiotic cultures [8,9].
In the case of yogurt, starter culture bacteria do not survive gastrointestinal conditions or lack the ability to colonize the human intestine, making it unlikely that they provide therapeutic benefits [10]. For this reason, probiotic microorganisms are added along with yogurt starter cultures to achieve functional benefits for humans, as they are living microorganisms capable of passing through the gastrointestinal tract and benefiting consumer health [11].
Several species of the Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp. genera have been receiving attention as probiotics. Furthermore, in recent years, new microorganisms have been identified as probiotics, such as those belonging to the Bacillus genus (Bacillus subtilis [12] and Bacillus coagulans [13]) and Saccharomyces (Saccharomyces boulardii [14,15]). Among the benefits associated with these microorganisms are their contributions to a quicker recolonization of the intestinal microbiota after antibiotic administration, treatment and prevention of diarrhea, relief of constipation, possible treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, reduction in lactose intolerance in some individuals, reduction in serum cholesterol levels, increased resistance to microbial infections, impact on immune function, and a potential role in cancer prevention [16,17].
In contemporary times, various food components have been added to foods to promote health [18], as is the case for functional probiotic yogurt. A food that, in addition to its basic nutritional composition, has a beneficial effect on one or more physiological functions, such as improving health or reducing the risk of developing diseases, can be considered functional [19]. Therefore, functional foods possess nutrient-rich ingredients but can also be enriched with vitamins, minerals, probiotics, prebiotics, and fibers [20].
In this context, this research aims to explore the challenges and opportunities inherent in producing functional probiotic yogurt through an existing literature review. We seek to understand the microbial dynamics in the presence of probiotic strains and evaluate alternatives to inhibit the growth of unwanted microorganisms. The investigation aims to contribute to understanding the fermentation process of functional probiotic yogurt and identifying innovative strategies to enhance the quality of these products.
Therefore, this study provides an overview of the advances and challenges in the context of functional probiotic yogurt, highlighting its significant contribution to human health. The analysis addresses the interaction between microbial dynamics and the production of this functional food, emphasizing the need for innovative strategies to maintain the viability of probiotic microorganisms. The article underscores the importance of selecting and caring for probiotic strains, controlling fermentation processes, and incorporating natural compounds, demonstrating the influence of each factor on the final product’s quality and the associated health benefits.

2. Yogurts and Functional Foods: A Contemporary Perspective

Functional foods can be defined as those in which concentrations of one or more ingredients are modified to enhance their contributions to a healthy diet [6]. They can be natural or processed foods but must contain biologically active compounds that confer proven health benefits [21] when consumed in adequate amounts, including probiotic foods.
Initially, a probiotic was defined as a live microbial food supplement capable of positively affecting the host by improving intestinal microbial balance [22]. Subsequently, this definition was modified by Havenaar and Huis in’t Veld (1992), attributing this term to a “single or mixed culture of live microorganisms that promotes improvement in the properties of the native microflora of humans and other animals” [6]. However, a new reformulation of this definition occurred, and probiotics came to be defined as “live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts and consumed regularly, confer a health benefit to the host” [23].
Since then, there has been a growing interest in the food industry to develop and market innovative dairy products containing probiotic microorganisms with potential for human health [24]. Probiotic products are divided into two categories: one comprises food supplements and fermented milk that use probiotic bacteria in their formulations, and the other includes dietary supplements, where probiotics are commercialized in the form of capsules, tablets, and sachets containing lyophilized bacterial cultures [6].
Among the most common forms of probiotic use are dairy products, such as fermented milk and cheeses, as these products promote the growth of these microorganisms during the fermentation phase, besides providing an excellent nutrient density [5,25]. Although each microorganism strain is unique, some aspects must be considered when selecting a probiotic: the technological properties of the probiotic microorganism and the food matrices and production processes, as both can affect the strain’s viability in the final product and in the intestine [21].
In this regard, it is important to emphasize that the survival of probiotic microorganisms in the product throughout its shelf life is considered a requirement because it is how the beneficial effects of the strains are verified [4]. The authors of [26] highlighted the importance of maintaining the viability of probiotic strains and the desirable characteristics of fermented foods during processing and storage to ensure the safety and beneficial effects of these products when consumed.
Therefore, it can be said that the preparation of probiotic foods needs to be defined by the presence of viable microorganisms in sufficient numbers to alter the host’s intestinal microbiota [6], meaning that, to provide health benefits, probiotic microorganisms must remain viable in the food at an effective dose throughout the manufacturing and shelf life of a product, and the recommended minimum daily intake of probiotics is 6–9 Log CFU/g or mL, or at least 8 Log CFU per serving [23,26,27].
However, the quantity of probiotic strains in foods depends on factors such as ingredients used in manufacturing, starter cultures used in conjunction with probiotic cultures, processing conditions, temperatures used during production, aeration conditions, packaging conditions, storage, and product transportation [4].
Moreover, [28] emphasizes that in a probiotic functional food, the microorganisms used should present the following properties: known source or origin, resistance to pH and bile salts, adhesion and colonization capacity, competitive exclusion of pathogens, immune regulation, safety, stability to food processing conditions, good sensory evaluation, and consumer acceptance and efficacy in human clinical trials.
Similarly, the authors [4,29,30] highlight that when adding probiotic strains to fermented foods, it is important to consider the physiological state of the added microorganisms (logarithmic or stationary growth phase), the microorganism concentration at the time of consumption, the physical storage conditions of the product, the chemical composition of the product where probiotic strains are added, and the possibility of interaction between probiotic strains and starter cultures.
Another aspect to be considered refers to the ingredients used in the formulation of the food matrix, as they can play a protective, neutral, or detrimental role in the stability of probiotic strains [31].
The compatibility of probiotic microorganisms with the different ingredients used has a significant role in their survival [32]. Thus, substances such as glucose, vitamins, minerals, casein, whey protein hydrolysates, yeast extract, and antioxidants can be used in dairy products to increase the multiplication rate of probiotic species such as lactobacilli and bifidobacteria [4,32]. Other compounds of interest for increasing the viability of probiotics in dairy products are prebiotics, which can be defined as compounds that are selectively used by beneficial microorganisms, bringing health benefits [33]. The simultaneous use of probiotics and prebiotics is called synbiotic [34].
Given this context, research on fermented dairy products containing probiotic cultures has been encouraged as it represents an option for the industrial production of functional foods with these ingredients. It also represents a lucrative and expanding market niche and stands as a promising alternative in positively influencing the composition and/or metabolic activity of the human intestinal microbiota.

Probiotic Microorganisms

Probiotic microorganisms consist mainly of strains from the Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium genera, but species of Bacillus, Pediococcus and some yeasts have also been identified for their positive aspects related to health, as they play a significant role in protecting the body against harmful agents and strengthening the immune system [35].
In the fermented food and dairy industry, lactic acid bacteria (LAB), classified as Gram-positive, non-spore-forming, and catalase-negative, have been used due to their fermentative capacity and probiotic potential. For instance, species of the Lactobacillus genus are crucial for humans [36].
Lactobacillus species produce lactic acid through the fermentation of carbohydrates and colonize the digestive system and female genital mucosa in humans. The main microorganisms belonging to this group include Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus antri, Lactobacillus gastricus, Lactobacillus kalixensis, Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus ultunensis, Lactobacillus gasseri, Lactobacillus jensenii, Lactobacillus vaginalis, Lactobacillus iners, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus delbrueckii, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus [37,38].
When administered in adequate amounts in the diet, Lactobacillus microorganisms provide benefits to the host, such as producing short-chain fatty acids that reduce luminal pH, stimulating the growth of beneficial intestinal bacteria, reducing pathogenic bacteria like Clostridium difficile, which is associated with diarrhea, colon cancer, atopic dermatitis, inflammatory bowel diseases, type II diabetes, and nervous system disorders, among other effects [23,39]. Authors such as [28] have highlighted that strains of Lactobacillus acidophilus can metabolize cholesterol, which is believed to reduce serum cholesterol levels in humans. Similarly, [40] emphasizes the role of these microorganisms in patients with chronic diseases such as obesity, diabetes, and hypertension.
Used in human diets for a long time, some bacteria in this genus have high resistance to the destructive effects of the digestive system, remaining viable in the intestine and promoting benefits through barrier protection, absorption of toxic substances, immune system stimulation, competition for nutrients, and production of antimicrobial compounds. This reduces the chances of infections, making therapeutic use favorable for correcting the host’s microbiota balance [41].
However, there is a growing use of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis in conjunction with other bacteria such as Lactobacillus acidophilus. Bifidobacterium genus microorganisms are Gram-positive rods with varied shapes and sizes, found individually or forming chains, considered lactic acid bacteria and heterofermentative, non-motile, non-spore-forming, and anaerobic, although some can tolerate O2 [28,42].
Among the most known species are Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium animalis, Bifidobacterium longum, Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium infantis, Bifidobacterium angulatum, Bifidobacterium catenulatum, Bifidobacterium dentium, and Bifidobacterium adolescentis [28,43], with most species inhabiting the mammalian intestinal tract [42]. The species Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Bifidobacterium longum are found in adult humans [43].
Bifidobacteria can be associated with immune modulation, improvements in intestinal function, prevention or relief of infectious diarrhea, contribution to the nutrition and metabolism process, and antagonism against pathogens through the secretion of antibacterial factors [44].
Some genera of Bacillus (B. cereus, B. clausii, B. coagulans, B. licheniformis, B. polyfermenticus, B. pumilus, and B. subtilis), both in vegetative and sporulated forms, have been highlighted due to their probiotic properties, as they present good technological characteristics (resistance to heat, acidity, and humidity), viability during passage through the digestive tract and antimicrobial, anticancer, antioxidant, anti-diabetic, and vitamin production properties. However, the possibility of producing toxic compounds (toxins-emetic or enterotoxin; bipartite exotoxins and biogenic amines) and resistance to antibiotics, as well as the limited study of their use in humans, means that these microorganisms require further studies to ensure their safe use [45,46].
Among yeasts, Saccharomyces cerevisiae subsp. boulardii stands out due to its impact on bowel micro-flora and on enteric pathogens: it is a unique probiotic known to survive gastric acidity, it is not adversely affected or inhibited by antibiotics, and it does not alter or adversely affect the normal microbiota in the bowel [47].
In this sense, the advantages [47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56] and disadvantages [57,58,59] of using probiotic microorganisms in functional yogurts stand out, as shown in Figure 1.
In summary, it can be inferred that probiotic microorganisms are a promising tool in health promotion; however, their use requires care and more significant investigation regarding their complexity, especially when considering individual factors.
Furthermore, although some characteristics of probiotics are known, there are gaps regarding their use: long-term effects of regular consumption of probiotics and their microbial diversity, especially concerning the combined use of strains; understanding and establishing the ideal dosage and survival capacity of these microorganisms during the manufacturing and storage processes; identification of the risk of developing antibiotic resistance mechanisms by probiotic strains; impact on individuals with autoimmune diseases, allergies, and neurological disorders; innovations for some probiotic species; studies with humans in probiotic dairy product formulations, aiming to maintain the stability of the strains and meet dietary restrictions.
These considerations highlight the importance of continued and more comprehensive research into probiotics, aiming to assess the risks of their use to develop mitigation strategies, improve product development, and explore the unknown potential of these microorganisms.

3. Probiotic Functional Yogurts Enriched with Natural Compounds

In recent years, the intersection of probiotics and functional foods has been growing in the dairy industry, with probiotic functional yogurts representing a significant advancement in this direction. Moreover, it is essential to highlight the incorporation of natural compounds in this food, which not only enhances sensory attributes but also aids in promoting health benefits for consumers.
Functional yogurts enriched with probiotics are a promising category in pursuing healthier dietary choices. However, beyond their benefits, the association with natural additives has become a subject of investigation.
Recent studies [60,61,62,63] have emphasized the significance of these additives, distinguishing them from synthetic chemical additives due to their natural sources and food safety.
In this sense, incorporating coffee extracts into functional yogurt deserves attention. Coffee, a globally appreciated beverage with documented health benefits [64], not only presents a distinctive flavor but also possesses antioxidant, anticarcinogenic, and anti-inflammatory properties [65]. Its composition includes caffeine, chlorogenic acids, and melanoidins [66], giving the yogurt matrix a unique flavor profile.
To extend shelf life and protect against undesirable microorganisms, researchers [67,68] advocate using natural preservatives. Adding plant-based antioxidants, such as those from coffee extract, proves effective in controlling free radicals and preserving dairy products. This dual role—flavor enhancement and food preservation—positions them as essential ingredients in functional yogurt formulations.
Researchers [69] studied the antimicrobial potential of arabica coffee (Coffea arabica) and robusta coffee (Coffea canephora) extracts on the growth of pathogenic microorganisms and lactic acid bacteria. They observed that the extracts did not affect the microbial growth of Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus rhamnosus but inhibited the biological activity of the tested pathogenic bacteria (Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus). They concluded that using coffee extracts could serve as a preservative in functional foods, enabling the growth of probiotics while inhibiting pathogenic microorganisms.
The effect of coffee extract on unwanted microbial growth is technologically intriguing as it can prolong the shelf life of foods complementarily to heat treatment. This not only ensures product safety but also paves the way to explore factors related to inhibiting deteriorating and pathogenic microorganisms in food.
However, other natural compounds are also making their mark in the formulation of probiotic yogurts. The Spirulina spp., known for its nutritional properties, joins this repertoire.
Spirulina platensis contains a protein content of 55–70%, in addition to vitamins (B1, B2, B12, E, and provitamin A), minerals (Fe, Mg, Ca, P, Cr, Cu, Na, Zn), pigments (phycocyanin, chlorophylls, and carotenoids), and essential fatty acids (γ-linolenic acid) [70,71]. It is recognized as safe (Generally Recognized as Safe-GRAS) for human consumption and has been added to food products [72,73]. Among Spirulina’s bioactive properties is its antioxidant capacity attributed to compounds like α-tocopherol and phycocyanin [74]. Furthermore, evidence suggests that β-tocopherols and δ-tocopherols are associated with anti-inflammatory effects [75].
A study [76] emphasized Spirulina’s antibacterial properties and its potential as a multifunctional bioactive agent. Authors [77] have also reported that Spirulina spp. promotes the growth of probiotic bacteria by providing essential compounds such as adenine, hypoxanthine, and free amino acids to these microorganisms.
However, the combinations of probiotics with compounds like cocoa polyphenols, rich in bioactives such as flavonoids, polyphenols (epicatechin, catechins, and theobromine), and alkaloids, also stand out [78,79,80]. The research by [81] highlighted the advantageous properties of cocoa polyphenols, including their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and cardiovascular protective effects. The conclusions of [80] contribute information on the neurological benefits of cocoa compounds, suggesting that these compounds could enhance brain function by improving blood flow to the brain, providing protection against neurodegenerative diseases. This highlights cocoa’s potential not only for bodily health but also for cognitive well-being.
The interaction between cocoa polyphenols and the intestinal microbiota is explained by [82]. These authors highlight that cocoa polyphenols can modulate the intestinal environment, promoting the proliferation of beneficial bacteria while inhibiting the growth of harmful strains. Research [80] suggests that incorporating cocoa extract into probiotic yogurt formulations may contribute to improving intestinal health and reducing inflammation. Furthermore, [83] states that cocoa compounds play a protective role, safeguarding the integrity of probiotics in yogurt, protecting them from degradation, and emphasizing improvements in both sensory and health-related aspects of consuming probiotic yogurts infused with cocoa.
In this context, extracts of turmeric (Curcuma longa) and saffron (Crocus sativus) also warrant attention, not only contributing to flavor diversity but also conferring beneficial health properties.
Turmeric is recognized for its curcuminoids (curcumin, demethoxycurcumin, and bisdemethoxycurcumin), a group of bioactive compounds [84,85] that possess antioxidant capacity, protecting cells from the harmful effects of free radicals [86]. The integration of turmeric extract into yogurt, as demonstrated in the study by the latter author, enhanced the yogurt’s antioxidant capacity, anti-inflammatory activity, and antimicrobial properties.
Regarding saffron, the carotenoids (crocin), aldehydes (safranal), and glycosides (picrocrocin) stand out as bioactive compounds [87,88,89,90,91]. Its anticancer properties were corroborated by [92], who reported that this extract contributes to yogurt stability. The same was observed by [93], affirming that saffron extract contributed to extending the yogurt’s shelf life. The antimicrobial efficacy of saffron is further emphasized by [92,94] who identified an increase in the viability of probiotic bacteria in yogurt.
Considering the mentioned natural additives, the advantages and disadvantages of the use of coffee [64,65,66,68,95,96], cocoa polyphenols [79,80,81,82,97,98], turmeric [84,85,86,99], saffron [87,88,89,90,91,100,101], and Spirulina spp. [70,71,74,75,102,103,104,105] in foods are established, which can be visualized in Figure 2.
This analysis indicates that natural additives can offer benefits. Still, manufacturers must evaluate their negative sides before incorporating them into food products because each extract offers advantages; it is crucial to consider consumer preferences and their sensitivity to flavor.
However, natural additives can serve multiple purposes, and their inclusion in foods can improve both organoleptic properties [106,107,108,109,110,111,112] and biological activity [113,114,115,116,117,118,119]. In this sense, the synergy of these factors in integrating plant extracts in probiotic yogurts stands out, as seen in Figure 3.
Given the information presented, it can be inferred that the balance between organoleptic value and biological activity helps in the development of a product that is sensorially attractive to consumers and potentially beneficial to health; at the same time, the challenges inherent to this combination in functional probiotic yogurt are considered. However, the synergy between probiotics and natural compounds in functional yogurts needs further exploration. In this sense, [63] emphasizes the need for continuous innovation to improve methods of obtaining natural additives. This, in turn, can contribute to the functionality of probiotic yogurts and new dairy formulations.
Other studies related to using natural compounds in probiotic yogurt are in Table S1. Studies have indicated various benefits when enriching this food, including aspects related to health and consumer acceptance. In summary, it can be said that using natural additives in probiotic yogurts results in healthier and more attractive products.
Thus, after analyzing the research carried out concerning natural additives in functional probiotic yogurts, we highlight areas of knowledge to be deepened: specific interactions between these compounds and probiotic strains, stability and survival of strains over time, direct impact on human health, determination of ideal doses of the compounds, and exploration of less studied extracts. An improved understanding of these aspects will contribute to optimizing food production.

4. Aspects Related to the Fermentation of Probiotic Functional Yogurt

The production of yogurt begins with heating the milk (to around 85 to 95 °C), which in addition to destroying pathogenic microorganisms and reducing contaminating microorganisms, denatures the serum proteins so that they associate with the casein micelles, collaborating to improve technological and sensorial properties. Pasteurization and UHT processes are the most used in the dairy industry; however, studies have suggested the application of emerging technologies, such as ohmic heating (OH), moderate electric fields (MEF), pulsed electric fields (PEF), ultrasound (US), and high hydrostatic pressures (HHP). Most of these processes are non-thermal and could in addition, reduce fermentation time, guarantee or increase the viability of the probiotic, and improve taste and nutritional-quality properties, in addition to increasing shelf life [120]. Subsequently, the milk is cooled (to around 42 to 45 °C) so that starter and probiotic cultures can be added. This temperature must be maintained until a pH of 4.6 is reached, which may vary between four to seven hours of fermentation [4,6].
Yogurt fermented with probiotics presents unique challenges in ensuring the viability of beneficial bacteria during its production, storage, and consumption. To develop a successful product, critical steps must be carefully managed to maintain the viability and effectiveness of probiotics.
Among the factors that significantly impact the viability of probiotic bacteria in fermented dairy products like yogurt are pH and titratable acidity, exposure to oxygen, temperature control, variability of probiotic strains, and yogurt starter ingredients and cultures [32].
The pH and titratable acidity influence the growth and metabolic characteristics of probiotic bacteria, affecting their performance in yogurt [32]. Lactobacilli thrive in low-pH environments, while bifidobacteria require a higher pH for optimal growth [32].
Oxygen levels during fermentation and storage impact the survival of probiotics, as lactobacilli are microaerophilic while bifidobacteria are sensitive to oxygen [121]. Oxygen barriers have been employed in packaging to maintain probiotic microorganism levels [122].
The temperature during fermentation and storage plays a crucial role in maintaining probiotics, both in terms of optimal growth conditions and in reducing the counts of these microorganisms [123,124].
The variety of probiotic strains must be considered as each exhibits variations in their resistance characteristics to adverse conditions in yogurt, impacting the survival rates of these microorganisms differently [125]. Probiotic products may contain one or several probiotic bacterial strains, mainly Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium [126]. Probiotic strains should undergo safety assessments, including genomic analysis, to identify antibiotic resistance genes and enzymatic activities [127].
Therefore, all ingredients used in yogurt formulation, including the fat content, can influence the growth of probiotics [122]. Moreover, interactions between starter and probiotic cultures during fermentation can affect the survival rates of each group of microorganisms [128].
Hence, it can be said that the production process of probiotic functional yogurt presents unique challenges and demands careful attention to a series of factors, aiming to optimize the viability of probiotic microorganisms during production, storage, and consumption. Therefore, to achieve a quality product, the critical steps mentioned must be managed to preserve the effectiveness of probiotics, which should be present in high counts in the final product.

4.1. Technical Challenges Associated with Probiotic Functional Yogurt Fermentation

The fermentation of yogurt with probiotics poses challenges in ensuring the viability of beneficial bacteria throughout the process from fermentation to commercialization.
Fermented milk stands as one of the primary carriers of probiotics in the dairy industry [129]. The combination of probiotics with traditional fermentation cultures has been explored, aiming for improvements in the sensory and physiological characteristics of food products [130]. Studies conducted by [131] showcased the successful use of probiotic strains in milk fermentation, resulting in foods with health benefits. However, the selection of starter cultures, temperature, and fermentation duration are important aspects defining the flavor and texture of yogurt [132].
Thus, probiotic yogurt fermentation faces technical challenges, from the careful selection of strains to the maintenance of stability during production and probiotic counts in the final product. To overcome these challenges, researchers and manufacturers have been exploring innovative methods, such as encapsulation techniques, that aim to protect probiotics during all stages of the production chain [133,134,135].
In this context, optimizing growth conditions is essential due to the possibilities of non-synergistic interactions between starter cultures and probiotic strains [136,137]. The appropriate choice of probiotic cultures allows for the production of fermented foods with desired sensory attributes of texture, aroma, and taste [138] and should consider safety criteria as well as technological and functional properties [139].
Maintaining probiotics in acidic environments also poses a challenge, but studies have shown promising results in the viability [140]. Furthermore, probiotic supplementation in yogurt can influence texture, aroma, and consumer acceptance, requiring strategies to maintain the desired consistency and flavor [140].
The production of probiotic yogurt is a promising area involving the integration of defined probiotic strains that must be kept viable in the final product and fermentation techniques that optimize sensory and nutritional attributes. However, technical challenges such as probiotic survival and preserving desired yogurt characteristics remain a focus in the dairy industry. With technological and research advances, more efficient production methods and improved probiotic strains can be expected, which can increase the health benefits and sensory characteristics of this food.

4.2. Challenges in Maintaining Viability and Microbiological Quality of Yogurt

Among the challenges in maintaining the viability and microbiological quality of yogurt are deteriorating and pathogenic microorganisms as well as sources of contamination [141,142,143,144], as can be seen in Figure 4.
Determining undesirable microorganisms in food is important to ensure the consumption of quality products and is established through legal microbial count limits in each country.
Firstly, it is important to differentiate between deteriorating microorganisms and pathogens since fermented products can become contaminated by them [145].
Most of the time, deteriorating microbial agents are part of the food’s natural microbiota and are, therefore, mostly harmless to human health, but they promote sensory alterations in color, taste, odor, and/or texture in the food [4].
Microbial activity causing deterioration involves numerous mechanisms and directly impacts consumer product acceptance, either due to the visible growth of microorganism colonies, texture changes resulting from the degradation of proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids, or the perception of unpleasant odors and flavors [146]. It also leads to economic losses, damage to reputation, and legal penalties in the food industry [145].
Pathogenic microorganisms result from food contamination, mainly due to inadequate hygiene conditions during the production process [4]. This jeopardizes food safety as it represents a health risk for consumers since their ingestion can lead to foodborne illnesses [145,146].
Sources of contamination can affect the microbiological quality of yogurt by introducing unwanted microorganisms during the production process, which can cause changes in the organoleptic characteristics of yogurt or even pose a threat to consumer health.
In this context, the main sources of yogurt contamination (Figure 4) include raw materials, equipment and utensils, the processing environment, handling, ingredients, packaging, and storage [143], as well as the method of conservation [144]. Given this context, it can be said that maintaining yogurt quality involves specific challenges that require constant attention: temperature control, contamination risks, storage conditions, preservation of viability, quality of ingredients, supply chain challenges, and awareness and consumer handling.
It is important to emphasize that microbial cultures require specific conditions in all processing phases (production, storage, and transport) of yogurt, and temperature fluctuations can compromise their viability, which impacts the final quality of this food. Contamination risks are also ongoing concerns, as unwanted bacteria can affect the flavor, texture, and safety of yogurt, making it essential to establish strict hygiene protocols during production. Storage conditions, including post-production temperature, are essential to prevent starter and probiotic culture degradation. Preserving bacterial viability during the shelf life of the food is another challenging aspect, as it is influenced by factors such as acidity, additives, and storage conditions.
Last but not the least of the challenges are the quality of ingredients, especially milk, which can impact crop growth and overall product quality; challenges in the supply chain, during transport and distribution, which make it difficult to maintain ideal microbiological conditions; and awareness and proper handling by consumers, which can harm the viability of microbial cultures in cases of inadequate storage. Therefore, maintaining yogurt’s viability and microbiological quality involves challenges in controlling and preserving beneficial microbial cultures while mitigating contamination risks.
Given that yogurt serves as an appropriate substrate for the action of deteriorating and/or pathogenic microorganisms [1], the presence of unwanted microorganisms in these foods remains a problem. To reduce these risks, yogurt manufacturers implement strict hygiene practices, microbiological monitoring, quality control, and adequate employee training. Furthermore, regular testing during the production process helps identify and correct problems affecting this food’s quality. However, consumers also play an important role by following storage guidelines and consuming products before expiration.
Suggestions to overcome these challenges include continuous investment in research and development, exploration of production techniques, packaging innovations, storage method improvement, and strict quality control measures. Furthermore, using advanced technology to monitor and maintain ideal conditions throughout production and distribution is an effective strategy to mitigate such obstacles. The establishment and adherence to strict quality assurance protocols, following regulatory standards required by each country, also play a decisive role both from the point of view of microbiological quality and the food safety of products such as yogurt.

5. Conclusions

Integrating probiotics into functional foods such as yogurt represents a promising technological alternative. However, ensuring the quality of these products requires the consideration of various critical factors, such as the viability of probiotic microorganisms throughout the food’s shelf life, emphasizing the importance of rigorous hygiene measures in the manufacturing processes, storage conditions, and food matrix formulation.
Research highlights that probiotic strains must meet minimum recommended levels to provide the expected health benefits to consumers. However, this condition is affected by several factors, such as the physiological state of adverse microorganisms, food matrix composition, and interactions between probiotic strains and starter cultures.
Moreover, the incorporation of natural compounds such as coffee extract, Spirulina spp., cocoa polyphenols, turmeric, and saffron into yogurt formulations has not only improved sensory attributes but also imparted beneficial characteristics to human health. These natural additives possess bioactive properties, including antimicrobial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and even neuroprotective attributes.
Nevertheless, challenges in processing functional probiotic yogurt persist, requiring improvements from strain selection to maintaining stability during production, as probiotics are susceptible to pH variations, exposure to oxygen, temperature fluctuations, and interactions within the yogurt matrix.
Microbiological quality and safety in yogurt are also critical, considering the presence of deteriorating and pathogenic microorganisms, as well as identifying sources of contamination. Strategies to inhibit unwanted microbiota while preserving probiotics are being explored, highlighting the use of natural antimicrobial substances derived from vegetables.
Therefore, the urgency for continuous research to overcome technical challenges, such as probiotic stability and predictions, along with effective microbiological management in production environments, is confirmed. Finally, this study underscores the need for future investigations focused on innovations that drive the development of functional probiotic yogurts, enhancing both their effectiveness and market accessibility with a positive impact on consumer health.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/fermentation10010006/s1, Table S1: Effect of different plant extracts on probiotic yogurt [106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,147,148,149,150,151].

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior–Brazil (CAPES)–Finance Code 001.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and supplementary materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdelhamid, S.M.; Edris, A.E.; Sadek, Z. Novel approach for the inhibition of Helicobacter pylori contamination in yogurt using selected probiotics combined with eugenol and cinnamaldehyde nanoemulsions. Food Chem. 2023, 417, 135877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Demirkol, M.; Tarakci, Z. Effect of grape (Vitis labrusca L.) pomace dried by different methods on physicochemical, microbiological and bioactive properties of yoghurt. LWT 2018, 97, 770–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Maharani, M.B.S.; Soviana, S.; Pisestyani, H. Examination of milk quality from milk shops in the residential areas of IPB dramaga and Cilibende. J. Kaj. Veter. 2020, 8, 24–33. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ribeiro, B.D.; Do Nascimento, R.P.; Pereira, K.S.; Coelho, M.A.Z. Microbiologia Industrial: Alimentos; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; Volume 1, pp. 329–370. [Google Scholar]
  5. Deshwal, G.K.; Tiwari, S.; Kumar, A.; Raman, R.K.; Kadyan, S. Review on factors affecting and control of post-acidification in yoghurt and related products. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 109, 499–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cooper, G. Food Microbiology; Larsen and Keller Education: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  7. Tewari, S.; David, J.P.; Gautam, A. A review on probiotic dairy products and digestive health. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2019, 8, 368–372. [Google Scholar]
  8. Arab, M.; Sohrabvandi, S.; Khorshidian, N.; Mortazavian, A.M. Combined effects of salt-related variables on qualitative characteristics of probiotic fermented milk. Curr. Nutr. Food Sci. 2019, 15, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Terpou, A.; Papadaki, A.; Bosnea, L.; Kanellaki, M.; Kopsahelis, N. Novel frozen yogurt production fortified with sea buckthorn berries and probiotics. LWT 2019, 105, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fazilah, N.F.; Arif, A.B.; Khayat, M.E.; Rios-Solis, L.; Halim, M. Influence of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics and bioactive phytochemicals on the formulation of functional yogurt. J. Funct. Foods 2018, 48, 387–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guimarães, J.T.; Balthazar, C.F.; Silva, R.; Rocha, R.S.; Graça, J.S.; Esmerino, E.A.; Silva, M.C.; Sant’Ana, A.S.; Duarte, M.C.K.H.; Freitas, M.Q.; et al. Impact of probiotics and prebiotics on food texture. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2020, 33, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Luo, H.; Bao, Y.; Zhu, P. Development of a novel functional yogurt rich in lycopene by Bacillus subtilis. Food Chem. 2023, 407, 135142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cao, J.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Yu, L.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Chen, W.; Zhai, Q. Effects of Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, 6086 as an adjunct starter culture on the production of yogurt. Food Res. Int. 2022, 160, 111398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Niamah, A.K. Physicochemical and Microbial Characteristics of Yogurt with Added Saccharomyces Boulardii. Curr. Res. Nutr. Food. Sci. 2017, 5, 300–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sarwar, A.; Aziz, T.; Al-Dalali, S.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, J.; Ud Din, J.; Chen, C.; Cao, Y.; Yang, Z. Physicochemical and Microbiological Properties of Synbiotic Yogurt Made with Probiotic Yeast Saccharomyces boulardii in Combination with Inulin. Foods 2019, 8, 468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Barengolts, E.; Smith, E.D.; Reutrakul, S.; Tonucci, L.; Anothaisintawee, T. The effect of probiotic yogurt on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes or obesity: A meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials. Nutrients 2019, 11, 671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Noorbakhsh, H.; Yavarmanesh, M.; Mortazavi, S.A.; Adibi, P.; Moazzami, A.A. Metabolomics analysis revealed metabolic changes in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome and metabolic responses to a synbiotic yogurt intervention. Eur. J. Nutr. 2019, 58, 3109–3119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lai, P.Y.; How, H.; Pui, L.P. Microencapsulation of Bifidobacterium lactis Bi-07 with galaactooligosaccharides using co-extrusion technique. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2022, 11, e2416. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ballini, A.; Charitos, I.A.; Cantore, S.; Topi, S.; Bottalico, L.; Santacroce, L. About Functional Foods: The Probiotics and Prebiotics State of Art. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Baker, M.T.; Lu, P.; Parrella, J.A.; Leggette, H.R. Investigating the Effect of Consumers Knowledge on Their Acceptance of Functional Foods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Foods 2022, 11, 1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Meybodi, N.M.; Mortazavian, A.M.; Arab, M.; Nematollahi, A. Probiotic viability in yoghurt: A review of influential factors. Int. Dairy J. 2020, 109, 104793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fuller, R. Probiotics: The Scientific Basis; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hill, C.; Guarner, F.; Reid, G.; Gibson, G.R.; Merestein, D.J.; Pot, B.; Morelli, L.; Canani, R.B.; Flint, H.J.; Salminen, S.; et al. International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014, 11, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Champagne, C.P.; Da Cruz, A.G.; Daga, M. Strategies to improve the functionality of probiotics in supplements and foods. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2018, 22, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fenster, K.; Freeburg, B.; Hollard, C.; Wong, C.; Laursen, R.R.; Ouwehand, A.C. The Production and Delivery of Probiotics: A Review of a Practical Approach. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sharma, S.; Sekhon, A.S.; Unger, P.; Lampien, A.; Galland, A.T.; Bhavnani, K.; Michael, M. Impact of ultrafine bubbles on the survivability of probiotics in fermented milks. Int. Dairy J. 2023, 140, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pimentel, T.C.; Da Costa, W.K.A.; Barão, C.E.; Rosset, M.; Magnani, M. Vegan probiotic products: A modern tendency or the newest challenge in functional foods. Food Res. Int. 2021, 140, 110–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ray, B.; Bhunia, A. Fundamental Food Microbiology, 5th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  29. Schillinger, U. Isolation and identification of lactobacilli from novel-type probiotic and mild yoghurts and their stability during refrigerated storage. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1999, 47, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Rivera-Espinoza, Y.; Gallardo-Navarro, Y. Non-dairy probiotic products. Food Microbiol. 2010, 27, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Forssten, S.D.; Sindelar, C.W.; Ouwehand, A.C. Probiotics from an industrial perspective. Anaerobe 2011, 17, 410–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tripathi, M.K.; Giri, S.K. Probiotic functional foods: Survival of probiotics during processing and storage. J. Funct. Foods 2014, 9, 225–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gibson, G.R.; Hutkins, R.; Sanders, M.E.; Prescott, S.L.; Reimer, R.A.; Salminen, S.J.; Scott, K.; Stanton, C.; Swanson, K.S.; Cani, P.D.; et al. Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 14, 491–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kariyawasam, M.G.M.; Kariyawasam, M.; Lee, N.; Paik, H. Synbiotic yoghurt supplemented with novel probiotic Lactobacillus brevis KU200019 and fructooligosaccharides. Food Biosci. 2021, 39, 100835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Soccol, C.R.; Vandenberghe, L.P.S.; Spier, M.R.; Medeiros, A.B.P.; Yamaguishi, C.T.; Lindner, J.D.; Pandey, A.; Thomaz-Soccol, V. The potential of probiotics: A review. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2010, 48, 413–434. [Google Scholar]
  36. Pei, Z.; Sadiq, F.A.; Han, X.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Ross, R.P.; Lu, W.; Chen, W. Identification, characterization, and phylogenetic analysis of eight new inducible prophages in Lactobacillus. Virus Res. 2020, 286, 198003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Westerik, N.; Kort, R.; Sybesma, W.; Reid, G. Lactobacillus rhamnosus probiotic foods as a training tool across the value chain in Africa. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1501–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zheng, J.; Wittouck, S.; Salvetti, E.; Franz, C.M.A.P.; Harris, H.M.B.; Mattarelli, P.; O’Toole, P.W.; Pot, B.; Vandamme, P.; Walter, J.; et al. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 2782–2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Plaza-Diaz, J.; Ruiz-Ojeda, F.J.; Gil-Campos, M.; Gil, A. Mechanisms of Action of Probiotics. Adv. Nutr. 2019, 10, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kemgang, T.S.; Kapila, S.; Shanmugam, P.V.; Reddi, S.; Kapila, R. Leite fermentado com probiótico Lactobacillus rhamnosus S1K3 (MTCC5957) protege camundongos da salmonela aumentando os mecanismos de proteção imune e não imune no nível da mucosa intestinal. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2016, 30, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Song, J.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Suo, H. Lactobacillus rhamnosus 2016SWU.05.0601 regulates immune balance in ovalbumin-sensitized mice by modulating expression of the immune-related transcription factors and gut microbiota. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 4930–4939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Forsythe, S.J. Microbiologia da Segurança dos Alimentos; Artmed: Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  43. Shah, N.P.; Lankaputhra, W.E.V. Bifidobacterium spp.: Morphology and physiology. Encycl. Dairy Sci. 2002, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Trabulsi, L.R.; Alterthum, F. Microbiologia, 6th ed.; Editora Atheneu: São Paulo, Brazil, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  45. Lee, N.K.; Kim, W.S.; Paik, H.D. Bacillus strains as human probiotics: Characterization, safety, microbiome, and probiotic carrier. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 28, 1297–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Todorov, S.D.; Ivanova, I.V.; Popov, I.; Weeks, R.; Chikindas, M.L. Bacillus spore-forming probiotics: Benefits with concerns? Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2022, 48, 513–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ansari, F.; Samakkhah, S.A.; Bahadori, A.; Jafari, S.M.; Ziaee, M.; Khodayari, M.T.; Pourjafar, H. Health-promoting properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii as a probiotic; characteristics, isolation, and applications in dairy products. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 63, 457–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zúñiga, M.; Monedero, V.; Yebra, M.J. Utilization of Host-Derived Glycans by Intestinal Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium Species. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Feng, Y.; Duan, Y.; Xu, Z.; Lyu, N.; Liu, F.; Liang, S.; Zhu, B. An examination of data from the American Gut Project reveals that the dominance of the genus Bifidobacterium is associated with the diversity and robustness of the gut microbiota. MicrobiologyOpen 2019, 8, e939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. James, A.; Wang, Y. Characterization, health benefits and applications of fruits and vegetable probiotics. CYTA J. Food 2019, 17, 770–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chugh, B.; Kamal-Eldin, A. Bioactive Compounds Produced by Probiotics in Food Products. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2020, 32, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Delgado, S.; Sánchez, B.; Margolles, A.; Ruas-Madiedo, P.; Ruiz, L. Molecules Produced by Probiotics and Intestinal Microorganisms with Immunomodulatory Activity. Nutrients 2020, 12, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Parvarei, M.M.; Khorshidian, N.; Fazeli, M.R.; Mortazavian, A.M.; Nezhad, S.S.; Mortaza, S.A. Comparative effect of probiotic and paraprobiotic addition on physicochemical, chemometric and microstructural properties of yogurt. LWT 2021, 144, 111177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Widyastuti, Y.; Febrisiantosa, A.; Tidona, F. Health-Promoting Properties of Lactobacilli in Fermented Dairy Products. Front Microbiol. 2021, 12, 673890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Khalifa, A.; Sheikh, A.; Ibrahim, H.I.M. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Enriched Camel Milk Attenuated Colitis Symptoms in Mice Model. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Almada-Érix, C.N.; Almada, C.N.; Cabral, L.; Barros de Medeiros, V.P.; Roquetto, A.R.; Santos-Junior, V.A.; Fontes, M.; Gonçalves, A.E.S.S.; dos Santos, A.; Lollo, P.C.; et al. Orange Juice and Yogurt Carrying Probiotic Bacillus coagulans GBI-30 6086: Impact of Intake on Wistar Male Rats Health Parameters and Gut Bacterial Diversity. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 623951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Abriouel, H.; Casado Muñoz, M.D.C.; Lavilla Lerma, L.; Pérez Montoro, B.; Bockelmann, W.; Pichner, R.; Kabisch, J.; Cho, G.S.; Franz, C.M.A.P.; Gálvez, A.; et al. New insights in antibiotic resistance of Lactobacillus species from fermented foods. Food Res. Int. 2015, 78, 465–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Vyas, V.; Mian, S.; Paolino, K.; Siddique, Z. Lactobacillus masticator abscess after probiotics consumption. Bayl. Univ. Med. Cent. 2020, 34, 93–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Sharma, M.; Wasan, A.; Sharma, R.K. Recent developments in probiotics: An emphasis on Bifidobacterium. Food Biosci. 2021, 41, 100993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Carocho, M.; Morales, P.; Ferreira, I.C. Antioxidants: Reviewing the chemistry, food applications, legislation and role as preservatives. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 71, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Martins, F.C.O.L.; Sentanin, M.A.; Souza, D. Analytical methods in food additives determination: Compounds with functional applications. Food Chem. 2019, 272, 732–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Nogueira, W.V. Realidades e Perspectivas em Ciência dos Alimentos Nova Xavantina, 2020. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348310105_Realidades_e_Perspectivas_em_Ciencia_dos_Alimentos (accessed on 12 November 2023).
  63. Zang, E.; Jiang, L.; Cui, H.; Li, X.; Yan, Y.; Liu, Q.; Chen, Z.; Li, M. Only plant-based food additives: An overview on application, safety, and key challenges in the food industry. Food Rev. Int. 2022, 39, 5132–5163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Shazly, A.B.; Fouad, M.T.; Elaaser, M.; Sayed, R.S.; Abd El-Aziz, M. Probiotic coffee ice cream as an innovative functional dairy food. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2022, 46, e17253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sales, A.L.; Paula, J.; Silva, C.M.; Cruz, A.; Miguel, M.A.L.; Farah, A. Effects of regular and decaffeinated roasted coffee (Coffea arabica and Coffea canephora) extracts and bioactive compounds on in vitro probiotic bacterial growth. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 1410–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Muttaqin, Z.; Hadi, L.; Maghfirah, Z. Efficacy of Robusta Coffee Bean Extract (Coffea robusta) Against Bacterial Growth of Staphylococcus aureus. Biosci. Med. J. Biomed. Transl. Res. 2022, 6, 1675–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yangilar, F.; Yildiz, P.O. Effects of using combined essential oils on quality parameters of bio-yogurt. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2018, 42, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Benguedouar, K.; Betina, S.B.; Erenler, R.; Genç, N.; Gok, M.; Sebti, M.; Madi, N.; Mekdade, L.; Gali, L.; Barkat, M. Evaluation of the antioxidant properties and total phenolic content of a dairy product (yogurt) supplemented with Thymus willdenowii essential oil from Algeria. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2022, 16, 3568–3577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Canci, L.A.; De Toledo Benassi, M.; Canan, C.; Kalschne, D.L.; Colla, E. Antimicrobial potential of aqueous coffee extracts against pathogens and Lactobacillus species: A food matrix application. Food Biosci. 2022, 47, 101756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Alfadhly, N.K.; Alhelfi, N.; Altemimi, A.B.; Verma, D.K.; Cacciola, F.; Narayanankutty, A. Trends and technological advancements in the possible food applications of Spirulina and their health benefits: A Review. Molecules 2022, 27, 5584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Elfar, O.A.; Billa, N.; Lim, H.R.; Chew, K.W.; Cheah, W.Y.; Munawaroh, H.S.H.; Balakrishnan, D.; Show, P.L. Advances in delivery methods of Arthrospira platensis (Spirulina) for enhanced therapeutic outcomes. Bioengineered 2022, 13, 14681–14718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Yang, Y.; Du, L.; Hosakawa, M.; Miyashita, K. Spirulina lipids alleviate oxidative stress and inflammation in mice fed a high-fat and high-sucrose diet. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Nakata, H.; Nakayama, S.M.M.; Kataba, A.; Yohannes, Y.B.; Ikenaka, Y.; Ishizuka, M. Evaluation of the ameliorative effect of Spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) supplementation on parameters relating to lead poisoning and obesity in C57BL/6J mice. J. Funct. Foods 2021, 77, 104344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Montalvo, G.E.B.; Vandenberghe, L.P.D.S.; Soccol, V.T.; Carvalho, J.C.D.; Soccol, C.R. The antihypertensive, antimicrobial and anticancer peptides from Arthrospira with therapeutic potential: A mini review. Curr. Mol. Med. 2020, 20, 593–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. El Baky, H.H.A.; El Baroty, G.S.; Mostafa, E.M. Optimization growth of Spirulina (Arthrospira) platensis in photobioreactor under varied nitrogen concentration for maximized biomass, carotenoids and lipid contents. Recent Pat. Food Nutr. Agric. 2020, 11, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Silva, S.C.; Fernandes, I.P.; Barros, L.; Fernandes, A.; Alves, M.J.; Calhelha, R.C.; Pereira, C.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Manrique, Y.; Colla, E.; et al. Spray-dried Spirulina platensis as an effective ingredient to improve yogurt formulations: Testing different encapsulating solutions. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 60, 103427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Patel, P.; Jethani, H.; Radha, C.; Vijayendra, S.V.N.; Mudliar, S.N.; Sarada, R.; Chauhan, V.S. Development of a carotenoid enriched probiotic yogurt from fresh biomass of Spirulina and its characterization. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 3721–3731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Martin, M.A.; Ramos, S.; Mateos, R.; Granado Serrano, A.B.; Izquierdo-Pulido, M.; Bravo, L.; Goya, L. Protection of human HepG2 cells against oxidative stress by cocoa phenolic extract. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 7765–7772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Hii, C.; Law, C.; Sharif, S.; Jati, M.; Cloke, M. Polyphenols in cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.). Asian J. Food Agroind. 2009, 2, 702–722. [Google Scholar]
  80. Carballeda Sangiao, N.; Chamorro, S.; de Pascual-Teresa, S.; Goya, L. Aqueous extract of cocoa phenolic compounds protects differentiated neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells from oxidative stress. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. De La Luz Cádiz-Gurrea, M.; Fernández De Las Nieves, I.; Saez, L.M.A.; Fernández-Arroyo, S.; Legeai-Mallet, L.; Bouaziz, M.; Segura-Carretero, A. Bioactive Compounds from Theobroma cacao: Effect of Isolation and Safety Evaluation. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2019, 74, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Sorrenti, V.; Ali, S.; Mancin, L.; Davinelli, S.; Paoli, A.; Scapagnini, G. Cocoa Polyphenols and Gut Microbiota Interplay: Bioavailability, Prebiotic Effect, and Impact on Human Health. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Hossain, M.D.; Ranadheera, S.; Fang, Z.; Ajlouni, S. Impact of encapsulating probiotics with cocoa powder on the viability of probiotics during chocolate processing, storage, and in vitro gastrointestinal digestion. J. Food Sci. 2021, 86, 1629–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Ahmad, R.S.; Hussain, M.B.; Sultan, M.T.; Arshad, M.S.; Waheed, M.; Shariati, M.A.; Plygun, S.; Hashempur, M.H. Biochemistry, Safety, Pharmacological Activities, and Clinical Applications of Turmeric: A Mechanistic Review. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2020, 10, 7656919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Singletary, K. Turmeric: Potential health benefits. Nutr. Today 2020, 55, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Martina, E.C.; Oludayo, A.K.; Linda, N.C.; Chinasa, O.P.; Ambrose, O.C.; Muoneme, O.T. Effect of the incorporation of graded levels of turmeric (Curcuma longa) on different qualities of stirred yoghurt. Afr. J. Food Sci. 2020, 14, 71–85. [Google Scholar]
  87. Popescu, L.; Ghendov-Moșanu, A.; Baerle, A.; Savcenco, A.; Tatarov, P. Color stability of yogurt with natural yellow food dye from safflower (carthamus tinctorius L.). J. Eng. Sci. 2022, 29, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ghaffari, S.; Roshanravan, N. Saffron: An updated review on biological properties with special focus on cardiovascular effects. Biomed. Pharmacother 2019, 109, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. El Khoudri, M.; Ouahhoud, S.; Lahmass, M.; Khoulati, A.; Benyoussef, S.; Mamri, S.; Saalaoui, E. Biological effects and pharmacological activities of saffron of Crocus sativus. Arab. J. Med. Aromat. Plants 2021, 7, 254–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Roshanravan, N.; Ghaffari, S. The therapeutic potential of Crocus sativus Linn.: A comprehensive narrative review of clinical trials. Phytother Res. 2022, 36, 98–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. El Midaoui, A.; Ghzaiel, I.; Vervandier-Fasseur, D.; Ksila, M.; Zarrouk, A.; Nury, T.; Lizard, G. Saffron (Crocus sativus L.): A source of nutrients for health and for the treatment of neuropsychiatric and age-related diseases. Nutrients 2022, 14, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Gaglio, R.; Gentile, C.; Bonanno, A.; Vintaloro, L.; Perrone, A.; Mazza, F.; Barbaccia, P.; Settanni, L.; Di Grigoli, A. Effect of Saffron Addition on the Microbiological, Physicochemical, Antioxidant and Sensory Characteristics of Yoghurt. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2019, 72, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Cerdá-Bernad, D.; Valero-Cases, E.; Julián Pastor, J.; Frutos, M.J. Microencapsulated Saffron Floral Waste Extracts as Functional Ingredients for Antioxidant Fortification of Yogurt: Stability during the Storage. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 184, 114976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Dabbagh Moghaddam, A.; Garavand, F.; Razavi, S.H.; Talatappe, H.D. Production of Saffron-based Probiotic Beverage by Lactic Acid Bacteria. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2018, 12, 2708–2717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Camandola, S.; Plick, N.; Mattson, M.P. Impact of Coffee and Cacao Purine Metabolites on Neuroplasticity and Neurodegenerative Disease. Neurochem. Res. 2019, 44, 214–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Pinsuwan, A.; Suwonsichon, S.; Chompreeda, P.; Prinyawiwatkul, W. Sensory drivers of consumer acceptance, purchase intent and emotions toward brewed black coffee. Foods 2022, 11, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Jean-Marie, E.; Bereau, D.; Robinson, J.C. Benefits of polyphenols and methylxanthines from cocoa beans on dietary metabolic disorders. Foods 2021, 10, 2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Jean-Marie, E.; Jiang, W.; Bereau, D.; Robinson, J.C. Theobroma cacao and Theobroma grandiflorum: Botany, Composition and Pharmacological Activities of Pods and Seeds. Foods 2022, 11, 3966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Boroumand, N.; Samarghandian, S.; Hashemy, S.I. Immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant effects of curcumin. J. Herbmed. Pharmacol. 2018, 7, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Azami, S.; Shahriari, Z.; Asgharzade, S.; Farkhondeh, T.; Sadeghi, M.; Ahmadi, F.; Forouzanfar, F. Therapeutic potential of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) in ischemia stroke. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2021, 2021, 6643950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Kothari, D.; Thakur, R.; Kumar, R. Saffron (Crocus sativus L.): Gold of the spices-A comprehensive review. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2021, 62, 661–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kumar, T.M.; Padmavathi, M.N.T. Development and evaluation of spirulina ragi biscuits. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Sci. 2020, 8, 208–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Jahan, F.; Mishra, S. Preparation and Quality Evaluation of Iron Binding Protein Augumented Dhokla Using Spirulina and Other Natural Ingredients. Asian J. Agric. Res. 2021, 8, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Koli, D.K.; Rudra, S.G.; Bhowmik, A.; Pabbi, S. Nutritional, Functional, Textural and Sensory Evaluation of Spirulina Enriched Green Pasta: A Potential Dietary and Health Supplement. Foods 2022, 11, 979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Yamgar, P.V.; Dhamak, M. Therapeutics role of spirulina platensis in disease prevention and treatment. Int. J. Compr. Adv. Pharmacol. 2022, 7, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Atwaa, E.S.H.; Shahein, M.R.; El-Sattar, E.S.A.; Hijazy, H.H.A.; Albrakati, A.; Elmahallawy, E.K. Bioactivity, physicochemical and sensory properties of probiotic yoghurt made from whole milk powder reconstituted in aqueous fennel extract. Fermentation 2022, 8, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kim, E.D.; Lee, H.S.; Kim, K.T.; Paik, H.D. Antioxidant and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitory activities of yogurt supplemented with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum NK181 and Lactobacillus delbrueckii KU200171 and sensory evaluation. Foods 2021, 10, 2324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Akan, E.; Yerlikaya, O.; Bayram, O.Y.; Kinik, O. Viability of Probiotics, Rheological and the Sensorial Properties of Probiotic Yogurts Fortified with Aqueous Extracts of Some Plants. An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc. 2022, 94, e20211274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Valencia-Avilés, E.; García-Pérez, M.E.; Garnica-Romo, M.G.; de Dios Figueroa-Cárdenas, J.; Paciulli, M.; Martinez-Flores, H.E. Chemical composition, physicochemical evaluation and sensory analysis of yogurt added with extract of polyphenolic compounds from Quercus crassifolia oak bark. Funct. Foods Health Dis. 2022, 12, 502–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zhao, X.; Liang, Q. EPS-Producing Lactobacillus plantarum MC5 as a compound starter improves rheology, texture, and antioxidant activity of yogurt during storage. Foods 2022, 11, 1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Ali, H.I.; Dey, M.; Alzubaidi, A.K.; Alneamah, S.J.A.; Altemimi, A.B.; Pratap-Singh, A. Effect of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) supplementation on probiotic yoghurt: Physicochemical properties, microbial content, and sensory attributes. Foods 2021, 10, 2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Moghadam, R.M.; Ariaii, P.; Ahmady, M. The effect of microencapsulated extract of pennyroyal (Mentha pulegium. L) on the physicochemical, sensory, and viability of probiotic bacteria in yogurt. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2021, 15, 2625–2636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Gouda, A.S.; Adbelruhman, F.G.; Alenezi, H.S.; Mégarbane, B. Theoretical benefits of yogurt-derived bioactive peptides and probiotics in COVID-19 patients-A narrative review and hypotheses. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 5897–5905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Mahfudh, N.; Hadi, A.; Solechan, R.A.Z. Immunomodulatory activity of yogurt fortified with roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) extract. Int. Food Res. J. 2021, 28, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Ahmed, I.A.M.; Alqah, H.A.; Saleh, A.; Al-Juhaimi, F.Y.; Babiker, E.E.; Ghafoor, K.; Hassan, A.B.; Osman, M.A.; Fickak, A. Physicochemical quality attributes and antioxidant properties of set-type yogurt fortified with argel (Solenostemma argel Hayne) leaf extract. LWT 2021, 137, 110389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Gris, C.C.T.; Frota, E.G.; Guarienti, C.; Vargas, B.K.; Gutkoski, J.P.; Biduski, B.; Bertolin, T.E. In vitro digestibility and stability of encapsulated yerba mate extract and its impact on yogurt properties. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2021, 15, 2000–2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Song, M.W.; Park, J.Y.; Lee, H.S.; Kim, K.T.; Paik, H.D. Co-fermentation by Lactobacillus brevis B7 improves the antioxidant and immunomodulatory activities of hydroponic ginseng-fortified yogurt. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Zahid, H.F.; Ranadheera, C.S.; Fang, Z.; Ajlouni, S. Functional and healthy yogurts fortified with probiotics and fruit peel powders. Fermentation 2022, 8, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ziarno, M.; Kozłowska, M.; Ścibisz, I.; Kowalczyk, M.; Pawelec, S.; Stochmal, A.; Szleszyński, B. The Effect of Selected Herbal Extracts on Lactic Acid Bacteria Activity. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Morales-de la Peña, M.; Miranda-Mejía, G.A.; Martín-Belloso, O. Recent Trends in Fermented Beverages Processing: The Use of Emerging Technologies. Beverages 2023, 9, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Afzaal, M.; Khan, A.U.; Saeed, F.; Ahmed, A.; Ahmad, M.H.; Maan, A.A.; Tufail, T.; Anjum, F.M.; Hussain, S. Functional exploration of free and encapsulated probiotic bacteria in yogurt and simulated gastrointestinal conditions. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 3931–3940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Ranadheera, C.S.; Evans, C.A.; Adams, M.C.; Baines, S.K. Probiotic viability and physico-chemical and sensory properties of plain and stirred fruit yogurts made from goat’s milk. Food Chem. 2012, 135, 1411–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Mortazavian, A.M.; Ghorbanipour, S.; Mohammadifar, M.A.; Mohammadi, M. Biochemical properties and viable probiotic population of yogurt at different bacterial inoculation rates and incubation temperatures. Phil. Agric. Sci. 2011, 94, 111–116. [Google Scholar]
  124. Beheshtipour, H.; Mortazavian, A.M.; Haratian, P.; Darani, K.K. Effects of Chlorella vulgaris and Arthrospira platensis addition on viability of probiotic bacteria in yogurt and its biochemical properties. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2012, 235, 719–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Akalın, A.S.; Unal, G.; Dinkci, N.; Hayaloglu, A.A. Microstructural, textural, and sensory characteristics of probiotic yogurts fortified with sodium calcium caseinate or whey protein concentrate. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95, 3617–3628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. De Simone, C. The unregulated probiotic market. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 17, 809–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Saarela, M.H. Safety aspects of next generation probiotics. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2018, 30, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Turgut, T.; Cakmakci, S. Probiotic strawberry yogurts: Microbiological, chemical and sensory properties. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2018, 10, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Gao, J.; Li, X.; Zhang, G.; Sadiq, F.A.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Xiao, J.; Sang, Y. Probióticos na indústria de laticínios—Avanços e oportunidades. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 3937–3982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Ilango, S.; Usha, A. Microrganismos probióticos de alimentos fermentados tradicionais não lácteos. Trends. Food. Sci. Technol. 2021, 118, 617–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Parker, M.; Zobrist, S.; Donahue, C.; Edick, C.; Mansen, K.; Nadjari, M.H.Z.; Heerikhuisen, M.; Sybesma, W.; Molenaar, D.; Diallo, A.M.; et al. Naturally Fermented Milk From Northern Senegal: Bacterial Community Composition and Probiotic Enrichment With Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. El Bouchikhi, S.; Pagès, P.; El Alaoui, Y.; Ibrahimi, A.; Bensouda, Y. Syneresis investigations of lacto-fermented sodium caseinate in a mixed model system. BMC Biotechnol. 2019, 19, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Fu, Y.; Liu, L.; Zhang, J.; Wang, L.; Dong, M.; McClements, D.J.; Wan, F.; Shen, P.; Li, Q. Reinforcing Alginate Matrixes by Tea Polysaccharide Conjugates or Their Stabilized Nanoemulsion for Probiotics Encapsulation: Characterization, Survival after Gastrointestinal Digestion and Ambient Storage. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 253, 126828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Vimon, S.; Kertsomboon, T.; Chirachanchai, S.; Kris Angkanaporn, K.; Nuengjamnong, C. Matrices-charges of Agar-alginate Crosslinked Microcapsules via O/w Microemulsion: A Non-spore Forming Probiotic Bacteria Encapsulation System for Extensive Viability. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 321, 121302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Rojas-Muñoz, Y.V.; Santagapita, P.R.; Quintanilla-Carvajal, M.X. Probiotic Encapsulation: Bead Design Improves Bacterial Performance during In Vitro Digestion. Polymers 2023, 15, 4296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Bisanz, J.E.; Macklaim, J.M.; Gloor, G.B.; Reid, G. Bacterial metatranscriptome analysis of a probiotic yoghurt using an RNA-Seq approach. Int. Dairy J. 2014, 39, 284–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Terpou, A.; Bekatorou, A.; Kanellaki, M.; Koutinas, A.A.; Nigam, P. Enhanced probiotic viability and aromatic profile of yogurts producedusing wheat bran (Triticum aestivum) as cell immobilization carrier. Process Biochem. 2017, 55, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Marsh, A.J.; Colin, H.; Paul, R.P.; Cotter, P.D. Fermented beverages with health-promoting potential: Past and future perspectives. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 38, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Kamal, R.M.; Alnakip, M.E.; El Aal, S.F.A.; Bayoumi, M.A. Bio-controlling capability of probiotic strain Lactobacillus rhamnosus against some common foodborne pathogens in yoghurt. Int. Dairy J. 2018, 85, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Zhang, T.; Jeong, C.H.; Cheng, W.N.; Bae, H.; Seo, H.G.; Petriello, M.C.; Han, C.G. Moringa extract enhances the fermentative, textural, and bioactive properties of yoghurt. LWT 2019, 101, 276–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Aryana, K.J.; Olson, D.W.A. 100-year review: Yoghurt and other cultured dairy products. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 9987–10013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Franco, B.D.G.M.; Landgraf, M. Microbiologia dos Alimentos, 2nd ed.; Atheneu: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2023; p. 292. [Google Scholar]
  143. Hekmat, S.; Soltani, H.; Rei, G. Growth and survival of Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 in yogurt for use as a functional food. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2009, 10, 293–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Abd El-Gawad, I.A.; El-Sayed, E.M.; El-Zeini, H.M.; Hafez, S.A.; Saleh, F.A. Antibacterial activity of probiotic yoghurt and soy-yoghurt against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2014, 4, 1000303. [Google Scholar]
  145. Matejčeková, Z.; Spodniaková, S.; Koňuchová, M.; Liptáková, D.; Valík, L. In Vitro Growth Competition of Lactobacillus plantarum HM1 with Pathogenic and Food Spoilage Microorganisms. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2019, 58, 236–244. [Google Scholar]
  146. Barba, F.J.; Sant’ana, A.S.; Orlien, V.; Koubaa, M.; Barba, F.; Sant’ana, A. Innovative Technologies for Food Preservation: Inactivation of Spoilage and Pathogenic Microorganisms; Academic Press: Cambridge, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  147. Sarwar, A.; Al-Dalali, S.; Aziz, T.; Yang, Z.; Ud Din, J.; Khan, A.A.; Daudzai, Z.; Syed, Q.; Nelofer, R.; Qazi, N.U.; et al. Effect of chilled storage on antioxidant capacities and volatile flavors of synbiotic yogurt made with probiotic yeast Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 in combination with inulin. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Hosseini, S.M.; Behbahani, M. Enhancement of probiotics viability and lactic acid production in yogurts treated with Prangos ferulaceae and Carum copticum plant extracts. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 35, 102084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Ghafoor, K.; Sarker, M.Z.I.; Al-Juhaimi, F.Y.; Mohamed Ahmed, I.A.; Babiker, E.E.; Alkaltham, M.S.; Almubarak, A.K. Bioactive Compounds Extracted from Saudi Dates Using Green Methods and Utilization of These Extracts in Functional Yogurt. Foods 2023, 12, 847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Inocente-Camones, M.A.; Arias-Arroyo, G.C.; Mauricio-Alza, S.M.; Bravo-Araujo, G.T.; Capcha-Siccha, M.F.; Cabanillas-Alvitrez, E. Polyphenols, carotenoids and flavonoids in an antioxidant probiotic yogurt made with tumbo pulp (Passiflora tripartita Kunth). Braz. J. Food Technol. 2022, 25, e2021175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Safdari, Y.; Vazifedoost, M.; Didar, Z.; Hajirostamloo, B. The Effect of Banana Fiber and Banana Peel Fiber on the Chemical and Rheological Properties of Symbiotic Yogurt Made from Camel Milk. Int. J Food Sci. 2021, 15, 5230882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Advantages and disadvantages of probiotic microorganisms.
Figure 1. Advantages and disadvantages of probiotic microorganisms.
Fermentation 10 00006 g001
Figure 2. Advantages and disadvantages of natural additives in food.
Figure 2. Advantages and disadvantages of natural additives in food.
Fermentation 10 00006 g002
Figure 3. Integration of plant extracts into probiotic yogurts: organoleptic value, biological activity, and challenges.
Figure 3. Integration of plant extracts into probiotic yogurts: organoleptic value, biological activity, and challenges.
Fermentation 10 00006 g003
Figure 4. Factors influencing the microbiological quality of yogurt.
Figure 4. Factors influencing the microbiological quality of yogurt.
Fermentation 10 00006 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de Souza, M.; Drunkler, D.A.; Colla, E. Probiotic Functional Yogurt: Challenges and Opportunities. Fermentation 2024, 10, 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10010006

AMA Style

de Souza M, Drunkler DA, Colla E. Probiotic Functional Yogurt: Challenges and Opportunities. Fermentation. 2024; 10(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10010006

Chicago/Turabian Style

de Souza, Marinêz, Deisy Alessandra Drunkler, and Eliane Colla. 2024. "Probiotic Functional Yogurt: Challenges and Opportunities" Fermentation 10, no. 1: 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10010006

APA Style

de Souza, M., Drunkler, D. A., & Colla, E. (2024). Probiotic Functional Yogurt: Challenges and Opportunities. Fermentation, 10(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10010006

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop