Next Article in Journal
Metagenomic Analysis of Bacterial Diversity in Traditional Fermented Foods Reveals Food-Specific Dominance of Specific Bacterial Taxa
Previous Article in Journal
Strain-Specific Responses by Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Competition by Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Vitro Screening of Plant Materials to Reduce Ruminal Protozoal Population and Mitigate Ammonia and Methane Emissions

by
Pichad Khejornsart
1,
Anusorn Cherdthong
2,* and
Metha Wanapat
2
1
Faculty of Natural Resources and Agro-Industry, Kasetsart University Chalermphrakiat Sakon Nakhon Province Campus, Sakon Nakhon 47000, Thailand
2
Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2021, 7(3), 166; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7030166
Submission received: 9 July 2021 / Revised: 23 August 2021 / Accepted: 24 August 2021 / Published: 26 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Fermentation Process Design)

Abstract

:
Alternative feed sources can be utilized to reduce enteric methane (CH4) emissions, a major greenhouse gas that contributes to global warming. This study aimed to evaluate the potential use of tropical plants to improve digestibility, reduce protozoal populations, improve rumen fermentation, and minimize methane emissions from ruminants. The plants considered herein grow in tropical climates, are easily accessible in large quantities, and are directly related to human food production. Nine plants that grow naturally in tropical climates were assessed. Plant supplementation substantially enhanced accumulative gas production at 24 h (p < 0.05). The apparent organic matter digestibility (AOMDvt) of the diet was not affected by five of the nine plants. With the addition of the plant material, ammonia nitrogen concentrations were reduced by up to 47% and methane concentrations were reduced by 54%. Five of the nine plant materials reduced methane production in terms of CH4/dry matter and CH4/digestibility of the organic matter by 15–35% and 8–24%, respectively. In conclusion, supplementation with plants with high tannin contents was shown to be a viable strategy for improving rumen fermentation, reducing protozoal populations, and limiting methane emissions. In this regard, the leaves of Piper sarmentosum, Acmella oleracea, Careya arborea, and Anacardium occidentale were especially promising.

1. Introduction

Livestock production has long been important in agricultural farming in developing countries. It is essential for the production of meat, dairy, and agricultural dung, and has a significant effect on regional stability and improving livelihoods [1]. The animal production industry is thought to contribute up to 16.5% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, which have become a major concern in recent decades [2,3]. Enteric fermentation and feed production activities, which account for almost 45% of the sector’s overall emissions, are the main source of GHG emissions in ruminant agriculture [4]. Methane (CH4) is the second most important GHG emitted by human activities [5]. Enteric CH4 is produced primarily in the rumen by methanogenic archaea, which convert the hydrogen (H2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) produced by a diverse community of microorganisms through fermentation [6]. Furthermore, methane production provides for approximately 5–7% of the feed gross energy, or nearly 16–26 g/kg of feed consumed [7], and it is often regarded as a source of energy loss for the animal. As a result, the use of plant secondary metabolites is one of the primary options being investigated for reducing enteric CH4 in this sector [8,9,10]. Secondary metabolites (tannins, saponins, etc.), which are found in many plant species, were found to have the capacity to modify the rumen methanogenic bacteria population. The use of such feed products may be an effective way to decrease methane emissions by improving the overall rumen ecosystem and, as a result, ruminant animal productivity by properly using secondary compounds in tropical plants [11]. Furthermore, tropical regions across the world have a diverse variety of forage resources with favorable chemical compositions that could be used as feed for livestock production systems.
Research into nutrient-rich local resources is critical for improving the cost and efficiency of tropical livestock systems while also reducing their environmental effects. The tropical environment has many natural resources, including fodder trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants, which have the potential to reduce CH4 emissions from cattle while also recovering deteriorated areas [11,12]. Tropical plants have many uses, including as food flavoring agents, in traditional medicine, and for synthetic insecticides. Certain plant species have been shown to include alkaloids, xanthophylls, polyphenols, lignans, organosulfide, flavonoids, tannin, and saponin. Moreover, the negative effects of flavonoid-rich plants on CH4 emissions and methanogenic bacteria were determined in vitro [13] and in vivo [14,15]. However, phytochemicals, such as secondary compounds and essential oils, have consistently demonstrated consistent results, varying from a significant reduction to a modest increase in enteric CH4 emissions [16]. The aim of this research was to investigate the in vitro fermentation, protozoal population, and enteric methane mitigation capability of nine plants with high polyphenol or tanniniferous contents.

2. Materials and Methods

The study was conducted at the Animal Science Research Unit, the Department of Agriculture and Resources, Kasetsart University Chalermphrakiat Sakon Nakhon Province Campus, Thailand. Animal procedures were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Kasetsart University (record no. ACKU64-CSC-004-19/07/2021), based on the Ethic of Animal Experimentation of National Research Council of Thailand.

2.1. Plant Materials Preparation

In the present study, plant samples (rhizome, leaves, and tender stems) were hand harvested in Sakon Nakhon Province, Thailand, during the seasons indicated (Table 1). The following nine plant materials were tested: the rhizome of Zingiber officinale (ginger), Alpinia galanga (galanga), Zingiber cassumunar (cassumunar ginger), and Curcuma longa (turmeric); the stem and leaf part of Cymbopogon citratus (lemon grass), Piper sarmentosum (wild pepper), and Acmella oleracea (toothache plant); and the leaf of Careya arborea (Ceylon oak) and Anacardium occidentale (cashew nut). Farmers’ plots from three districts, i.e., Sakon Nakhon Province, Maung Sakon Nakhon, Phonnakeaw, and Phuphan, were randomly selected to harvest all plant material. The plant materials were dried at 45 °C in a hot air oven dryer to a consistent weight before being mashed through a 0.1 cm mesh (Polymix PX-MFC 90D, Kinematica, Switzerland).

2.2. Chemical Composition Analysis

Plant materials, roughage, and concentrate samples were chemically analyzed for dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), ash, and crude protein (CP), according to the method of AOAC [17]. Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) in substrates were determined according to Van Soest et al. [18], adapted to an Ankom Fiber Analyzer A2000 (Ankom Technology Corp., Macedon, NY, USA). Ether extract content was determined using the Soxhlet method. Total phenols (TP) were estimated using the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent method [19]. According to spectrophotometer measurements, the condensed tannin (CT) fraction was determined using the HCl-butanol method described by Terrill et al. [20].

2.3. Rumen Collection

In this experiment, three crossbred steers weighing 380 ± 28 kg each were used as rumen fluid donors. Total mix ration (TMR) diet (basal diet in Table 2) was offered to the animals at a daily intake of 2.5% of their body weight (BW). The cattle were provided access to mineral blocks and kept in separate cages with clean water. Rumen fluid was collected using stomach tube with a vacuum pump prior to feeding TMR in the morning (06.00 a.m.), filtered through cheesecloth into warmed flasks, and then transported to the laboratory. Before preparing a batch culture, ruminal fluid from the three cattle was mixed in equal proportions.

2.4. In Vitro Gas Production

The in vitro method described by Menke and Steingass [21] was used to estimate gas production. Two sets of modified 100 mL glass syringes were used for incubation: one for fluid sampling and the other for gas sampling. In this study, 15 mg of plant material were supplemented into 200 mg of basal diet (in DM basis). TMR (basal diet) was comprised of rice straw and concentrate in a 70:30 ratio (Table 2). Samples with plant supplementation were accurately weighed into 100 mL glass syringes fitted with plungers. The solution was then dissolved in a 1:2 ratio with a buffer according to Menke and Steingass’ technique [21]. In the laboratory, the obtained solutions were mixed together in one beaker under a continuous stream of CO2 and maintained in a water bath at 39 °C before being added to the syringes. Rumen liquid was filtered through four layers of gauze and mixed in a 1:2 ratio with a buffer solution according to Menke and Steingass’ technique [21]. For each treatment, 30 mL of rumen fluid-buffer mixture was loaded into syringes (six runs per plant material sample). Each run contained a duplicate of blanks and two syringes, with the basal diet as a negative control for a total of 64 incubations.

2.5. In Vitro Rumen Fermentation Characteristics

The syringes were put into a 39 °C incubator, and the accumulative gas volume was measured using the calibrated scale written on the syringes after 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h of incubation. The data for cumulative gas were fitted to Ørskov and McDonald’s model [22]. A pH meter was used to measure the pH of the incubation solution immediately after collection (pH: HI 8424 microcomputer pH meter, Singapore). After 24 h of inoculation, the incubation liquid was collected and analyzed for ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) content [17], with only distillation and titration steps. The concentration of volatile fatty acid (VFA) was analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (Agilent 1200 series, Agilent Technologies Inc. Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a diode array detector (Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm)) using 0.1 M phosphate buffer as the mobile phase. A total of 150 μL of fermentation gas was collected from the incubation syringes and injected into a gas chromatograph using a gas-tight Hamilton syringe (Agilent Technologies Inc. 5977B Single Quadrupole, Bellefonte, PA, USA) with the following specifications: Carboxen 1000, 45/60, 2 m 1/8″ (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) column with flame ionization detector. In vitro digestibility was determined after 24 h of incubation when the contents were filtered through pre-weighed Gooch crucibles and residual dry matter was measured after 48 h of oven drying at 60 °C. The residual sample from each was utilized for AOMDvt following Tilley and Terry’s method [23]. Net energy for lactation (NEL) was estimate using the equation of Menke and Steingass [21] as given below (Equation (1)).
NEL (MJ/kg DM) = − 0.22 + 0.1062 GP + 0.048 CP + 0.1329 EE
where GP denotes 24 h of net gas production (mL/200 mg), CP denotes crude protein (%), and EE denotes ether extract (%).

2.6. Bacterial and Protozoal Count

After 24 h of fermentation, a 1 mL sample of the incubation liquid was immediately added to 6 mL of 10% formaldehyde. The population of protozoa and bacteria were determined using the method of Galyean [24]. The incubation fluid was diluted with 10 times the amount of autoclaved distilled water and protozoa and bacteria were counted with a hemacytometer (Boeco, Hamburg, Germany) and under a light microscopic (150×) (Olympus BX51-DIC-B, Olympus Optical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

All data were obtained using the SAS general linear model procedure (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Tukey’s test was used to examine differences between treatment means, and differences between means with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The statistical model and experimental design were as follows:
Yij = μ + Mi + εij
where Yij denotes the observation variable, μ denotes the overall mean, M denotes the influence of the plant material (i = 1–9), and εij denotes the residual effect. The incubation run (n = 6) was categorized as a random effect (n = 6), whereas the plant material (including the basal diet alone) was classified as a fixed effect (n = 10).

3. Results

3.1. Chemical Analyses of Plant Materials

Table 3 shows the chemical analysis of the plant materials used in this study. The crude protein levels varied from 54.8 to 234.5 g/kg DM. The highest levels were detected in Acmella oleracea (234.5 g/kg DM) and the lowest in Zingiber officinale (76.9 g/kg DM). EE was found in small quantities in Anacardium occidentale (11.9 g/kg DM), followed by Cymbopogon citratus (18.7 g/kg DM); in contrast, almost eight times as much EE was detected in Curcuma longa (about 80 g/kg DM). NDF and ADF levels were highest in Cymbopogon citratus (649.4 and 424.0 g/kg DM), followed by Piper sarmentosum (647.2 and 398.6 g/kg DM), and lowest in Curcuma longa rhizome (404.9 and 131.9 g/kg DM). Among all the plant materials, Careya arborea and Anacardium occidentale had the highest CT content (159.2 and 165.7 g/kg DM, respectively), whereas Alpinia galangal had the highest TP levels (385.4 g/kg DM).

3.2. In Vitro Gas Production Parameters

The gas production kinetic parameters and cumulative gas production parameters at 48 h of incubation are shown in Table 4. The quantity of gas produced from the rapidly soluble fractions (a), the amount of gas produced from the insoluble fraction (b), and the potential extent of gas produced (a + b) all varied considerably (p < 0.05). The insoluble fraction (c) gas production rate constants, on the other hand, exhibited no statistically significant influence when plant materials were added (p > 0.05). Adding Zingiber cassumunar and Curcuma longa to a 200 mg basal diet lowered the kinetic gas parameters. After 48 h of incubation, a similar pattern was found in cumulative gas generation, which was statistically enhanced when tree leaf foliage was added (p < 0.05); however, rhizomes in the substrate lowered the cumulative gas production.

3.3. In Vitro Rumen Fermentation, Bacterial, and Protozoal Population Characteristics

After a 24-h incubation period, the fermentation fluid had a pH range of 6.6–6.9. Table 5 shows that all plant materials reduced NH3-N concentrations by 47% as compared to the basal diet, especially when Anacardium occidentale was supplemented (p < 0.05). The bacterial count was affected by certain plant materials (p < 0.05), e.g., a high count was observed with Cymbopogon citratus meal and a low count was observed with Curcuma longa. Protozoal counts were significantly decreased as a result of all plant materials supplements when compared to the basal diet; however, Zingiber officinale did not have an effect (p < 0.05). The total volatile fatty acid (TVFA) concentration decreased after supplementation with all plant materials (p < 0.05). The propionate (C3) proportion in plant material additives was significantly altered, particularly in Cymbopogon citratus, Acmella oleracea, and Careya arborea, but acetate (C2) and butyrate (C4) were not changed as compared to the basal diet. Curcuma longa had the greatest acetate to propionate (C2:C3) ratio (3.78), while Careya arborea had the lowest at 3.39 (p < 0.05).

3.4. In Vitro Apparent OM Digestibility, Methane Production, and Net Energy for Lactation

In comparison to the basal diet, supplementation with plant materials had no effect on total gas production during the 24-h incubation period. Supplementation with Curcuma longa, Careya arborea, and Anacardium occidentale, on the other hand, considerably reduced the total gas volume (p < 0.05). In vitro apparent organic matter digestibility (AOMDvt) and the amount of organic matter (OM) digested in 24 h both decreased with the addition of Curcuma longa, Acmella oleracea, Careya arborea, and Anacardium occidentale (p < 0.05) (Table 6). In comparison to the control, all plant material supplements reduced methane (CH4) production per digested unit of OM (dOM) (p < 0.05). Methane production per unit of ingested OM and total CH4 production in mL/24 h were both similar. Zingiber officinale had the smallest effect; whereas Acmella oleracea and Careya arborea had the greatest CH4-mitigating effect. The CH4 to TVFA ratio was dramatically lowered as a result of all plant materials, with the addition of Careya arborea yielding the lowest value (p < 0.05) (Table 4). Supplementing four plant materials to a level ranging from 0.47 (Careya arborea) to 0.79 (Anacardium occidentale) MJ/kg DM reduced the NEL content of the basal diet (Table 6).

4. Discussion

4.1. Chemical Analyses of Plant Materials

In the concentrate diet, cassava chips were utilized as an energy source, providing 58.5% of the DM, and urea was used as a fermentable nitrogen source (1.5% DM). A substrate containing rice straw (CP at 2.8% DM) was used as a roughage source, and the concentrate diet comprised 14.0% CP. Carious factors, including species, season, and geographical zone, can alter the composition of woody plants, which vary considerably in terms of nutritional and CT content, and methanogenesis capacity [26]. Tannin and total phenolic component concentrations in plant material may impact the protozoal population and rumen fermentation (Table 5). Research into natural resources with high nutritional values is important for enhancing the profitability and productivity of livestock systems in tropical regions, and reducing their environmental impact [8,9,10,12,13,14]. Several mitigation strategies are associated with an increase in animal production efficiency based on various nutritional and environmental improvements [27]. Furthermore, as a result of the obvious strong interest in CT biological activity in the bovine habitat, it is important to mention that not all forms of CT are beneficial for ruminant nutrition. Anacardium occidentale had the greatest CT content (165.7 g/kg DM) in our study, followed by Careya arborea (159.2 g/kg DM) and Acmella oleracea (104.1 g/kg DM). Despite having a higher CT content than the other plants investigated, Anacardium occidentale did not produce the best biological effect. Various plants, particularly the ginger plant or the Zingiberaceae family, are widely used as a spice and flavoring agent in foods, but can also be added to animal feed to improve productivity, e.g., as a flavoring, to increase digestion and performance, for stress management, to enhance animal welfare, for example, in the form of odor stabilizers, to improve the local environment, and as antibacterial agents, such as is the case for certain essential oils that can replace in-feed antibiotics [27,28].

4.2. In Vitro Gas Production Parameters

It has been demonstrated that the availability of nutrients in plant material stimulates kinetic gas production. This was supposed to be attributed in part to the availability of plant material in the mixture, which supplied soluble carbohydrates (molasses) and protein (urea). This was thought to be when the basal diet included plant material, which provided soluble carbohydrates (molasses) and protein (urea). In vitro gas production has been shown to be a more efficient method of evaluating tannin effects than in sacco and is an indirect measure of substrate degradation [29,30]. The effects of tannins from diverse sources on ruminal gas production and ammonia quantities have been studied [31]. There was a consistent increase in gas production over a 48-h period; moreover, there were significant differences in the total gas volume between plant supplementations (Table 4). Supplements with low tannin levels provided the most net gas, whereas additions with higher tannin levels produced the lowest. Getachew et al. [32] and Terranova et al. [33] demonstrated strong connections between CT and gas production, and their findings are consistent with ours. According to Cherdthong et al. [13], a positive correlation between gas production and high-CT pellet supplementation could be due to microbial activity stimulation caused by increased adverse microbiological conditions. The lower gas output for tannin treatments as compared to the control indicated that high tannin levels in plant material supplements limited ruminal carbohydrate fermentation [34]. This finding was enhanced in part by the fact that high-CT plant materials supplementation resulted in significantly lower VFA concentrations. However, high CT and TP contents in plant materials in the substrate may have a negative effect on rumen microbial activity, decreasing gas kinetics and production [33,35].

4.3. In Vitro Rumen Fermentation, Bacteria, and Protozoal Population Characteristics

The plant supplementation had an in vitro ruminal pH of 6.6–6.9, which was within the typical range of ruminal pH of 5.5–7.0. In contrast to the control, increased tannin in the plant materials decreased TVFA concentrations, which is in accordance with the findings of Wanapat et al. [14] and Min et al. [36]. Reduced NH3-N concentrations indicate increased nitrogen utilization by rumen bacteria for MCP production. The first case was substantiated by the lower molar proportions of branch chain volatile fatty acids, i.e., end products of the deamination of feed amino acids, in plant supplementation as compared to the control; the second case was supported by the higher MCP concentrations in the supplementation as compared to the control. Moreover, Aderinboye and Olanipekun [37] found that turmeric inclusion above 5 mg/g DM of substrate can modify the rumen by causing a reduction in fermentation end products, and a reduction in ammonia production at 15 mg/g, which significantly reduced microbial biomass, has implications for lowering microbial protein synthesis. In this study, both occurrences were confirmed in the plant materials with high tannin contents. Similarly, decreasing ruminal protozoal populations were related to CT and TP contents in plant material supplementations, particularly the addition of Curcuma longa, which reduced protozoa by 64% when compared to a basal diet. Methane production was negligible as compared to protozoal number. The protozoal population was reduced (Table 5) and methane production was decreased by supplementing with plant materials with high CT and TP concentrations in the fermentation substrate (Table 6). This finding was consistent with those of Sarnataro et al. [38], who found that adding Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni extract and chestnut wood tannin to the rumen reduced the in vitro protozoal population while having no effect on the fermentation parameters; whereas Jayanegara et al. [39] found dietary tannins had no effect on protozoal numbers in an in vitro study. Newbold et al. [40] recommended complete rumen protozoal elimination as a means to increase microbial protein supply by 30% while reducing methane production by up to 11%. However, Dai and Faciola [41] recommended partial rumen protozoal reduction strategies, and tannin supplementation, to reduce methane production. Plant material supplementation resulted in reduced TVFA concentrations, supporting the findings of Min et al. [36] concerning lower TVFA concentrations as compared to the control. This could be the result of decreased DM and NDF degradation as was shown by Chen et al. [34]. In the present study, nine of the plant additives resulted in a higher proportion of propionate, while practically all of the plant additives had no effect on the proportions of acetate and butyrate. As a result, these nine plant components reduced the acetate-to-propionate ratio. This study found an increase in propionate, which is similar to the findings of Cieslak et al. [42] who focused on Vaccinium vitis idaea extract supplementation, Wang et al. [43] who focused on Atractylodes rhizome and Amur cork tree supplementation, and Chen et al. [34] who focused on tannins. Propionate synthesis and methanogenesis are two competing processes for hydrogen metabolism in the rumen. As a result, processes that increase propionate may result in decreased methanogenesis, as was demonstrated by the findings of this study. Furthermore, Zhou et al. [44] reported that feeding Piper sarmentosum extract at 1200 mg/kg decreased the ratio of acetate to propionate and reduced the population of protozoa, fungi, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and Fibrobacter succinogenes in goats.

4.4. In Vitro Apparent OM Digestibility, Methane Production, and Net Energy for Lactation

The inclusion of plant materials had no effect on total gas production throughout the 24-h incubation period in the current study. Furthermore, AOMDvt was comparable to that of the basal diet for several of the plant supplements. AOMDvt and total gas production were likewise lowest in plant materials with the lowest TVFA content. This may be related to the total bacteria and TVFA formation, as shown in Table 5. However, Akanmu et al. [45] observed that using plant extracts increased AOMDvt, while Cieslak et al. [42] showed that utilizing Vaccinium vitis idaea extract decreased methane without interfering with feed digestibility. According to Cielak et al. [46], plant secondary metabolites reduce nutrient digestibility, but only at higher levels of Sanguisorba officinalis supplementation. Nevertheless, Akanmu et al. [47] observed that plant extracts had a significant defaunating impact in the rumen, increasing the richness of bacteria, ruminal cellulolytic, and fungus populations. The reduction in ruminal fibrolytic bacterial populations caused tannins and saponins to have an inhibitory effect on nutrient digestion [27,34,44]. The addition of plant materials rich in CT and TP to ruminant feed is a promising strategy for reducing CH4 emissions. Supplementation with Careya arborea reduced the CH4-mitigating influence of the plant materials used in this study by up to 54%, which was much more pronounced than Cherdthong et al. [13,15] reported. This may be due to the difference in the basal diet. Similarly, supplementing the basal diet with these plant materials resulted in low NEL, CH4/OM, and CH4/TVFA levels. Regardless of the fact that methanogenic archaea use H2 and CO2 as substrates to produce ruminal CH4, it is generally known that tannins can reduce ruminal CH4 production in two ways: (1) by inhibiting the activity of several rumen microbes affected in CH4 production; and (2) by reducing carbohydrate digestion by forming stable complexes with carbohydrates [48,49,50]. Chen et al. [34] found that plant extracts containing both HT and CT had a stronger capacity to decrease methanogenesis than those containing only HT. The current study’s reduction in CH4 revealed that plants known to contain secondary metabolites are capable of inhibiting methanogenesis, and this was most probably due to a reduction in fiber degradation [50,51].

5. Conclusions

Methane formation per unit of digestible OM was reduced by five out of the nine plant materials as compared with the basal diet. Moreover, all materials decreased ammonia formation. The majority of the plant supplements tested had no adverse effect on in vitro digestibility. Plant materials, such as the leaves of Piper sarmentosum, Acmella oleracea, Careya arborea, and Anacardium occidentale, should be used as primary substrates in future in vitro investigations. Furthermore, future in vivo experiments should focus on the palatability of plant materials, confirm their mitigating effects, and evaluate their effect on production.

Author Contributions

Authors all made considerable contributions to the conception and design, M.W., P.K. and A.C.; data collection, review and evaluation of the data, P.K.; assisted in the writing or revision of the paper P.K. and A.C.; crucial to significant intellectual content P.K.; agreed to submit it to the current journal M.W. and A.C.; gave final approval to the version to be published, P.K.; and agreed to be responsible for all aspects of the work, M.W. and A.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors are grateful to the Post-Doctoral Training from Research and Graduate Studies, Khon Kaen University (KKU) (PD 2563-02-18), Research Program on the Research and Development of Winged Bean Root Utilization as Ruminant Feed and the Increase Production Efficiency and Meat Quality of Native Beef and Buffalo Research Group for granting funding for the research.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Approval no. ACKU64-CSC- 004-19/07/2021 was issued by the Animal Ethics Committees of Kasetsart University.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors greatly acknowledge the Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University and the Department of Agricultural and Resources, Faculty of Natural Resources and Agro-Industry, Kasetsart University, Chalermphrakiat Sakon Nakhon Province Campus, Thailand for providing research facilities support. All technical assistance offered by scientists and grade students from the Department of Agriculture and Resources is greatly valued.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors confirm that they have no conflict of interest to declare for this publication.

References

  1. Wanapat, M.; Kang, S.; Polyorach, S. Development of feeding systems and strategies of supplementation to enhance rumen fermentation and ruminant production in the tropics. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2013, 4, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Twine, R. Emissions from animal agriculture-6.5% is the new minimum figure. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lazarus, O.; McDermid, S.; Jacquet, J. The climate responsibilities of industrial meat and dairy producers. Clim. Chang. 2021, 165, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Opio, C.; Gerber, P.; Mottet, A.; Falcucci, A.; Tempio, G.; MacLeod, M.; Vellinga, T.; Henderson, B.; Steinfeld, H. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ruminant Supply Chains—A Global Life Cycle Assessment; Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2013; p. 214. [Google Scholar]
  5. Pachauri, R.K.; Allen, M.R.; Barros, V.R.; Broome, J.; Cramer, W.; Christ, R.; Church, J.A.; Clarke, L.; Dahe, Q.; Dasgupta, P.; et al. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014; p. 151. [Google Scholar]
  6. Patra, A.K. Recent advances in measurement and dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions in ruminants. Front. Vet. Sci. 2016, 3, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Beauchemin, K.A.; Ungerfeld, E.; Eckard, R.J.; Wang, M. Review: Fifty years of research on rumen methanogenesis: Lessons learned and future challenges for mitigation. Animal 2020, 14, s2–s16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Banik, B.K.; Durmic, Z.; Erskine, W.; Ghamkhar, K.; Revell, C. In vitro ruminal fermentation characteristics and methane production differ in selected key pasture species in Australia. Crop. Pasture Sci. 2013, 64, 935–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wanapat, M.; Kongmun, P.; Poungchompu, O.; Cherdthong, A.; Khejornsart, P.; Pilajun, R.; Kaenpakdee, S. Effects of plants containing secondary compounds and plant oils on rumen fermentation and ecology. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2011, 44, 399–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wanapat, M.; Kang, S.; Khejornsart, P. Effects of plant herb combination supplementation on rumen fermentation and nutrient digestibility in beef cattle. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 26, 1127–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Wanapat, M.; Chanthakhoun, V.; Pilajun, R.; Khejornsart, P. Feed resources, rumen fermentation, manipulation and production in swamp buffalo: A review. In The Buffaloes (Bubalus Bubalis)—Production and Research; Presicce, P.A., Ed.; Bentham Science Publishers: Rome, Italy, 2017; pp. 145–179. [Google Scholar]
  12. Patra, A.K.; Park, T.; Kim, M.; Yu, Z. Rumen methanogens and mitigation of methane emissions by anti-methanogenic com-pounds and substances. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 8, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Cherdthong, A.; Prachumchai, R.; Wanapat, M. In vitro evaluations of pellets containing Delonix regia seed meal for rumi-nants. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2019, 51, 2003–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wanapat, M.; Khejornsart, P.; Pakdee, P.; Wanapat, S. Effect of supplementation of garlic powder on rumen ecology and digestibility of nutrients in ruminants. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2008, 88, 2231–2237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cherdthong, A.; Khonkhaeng, B.; Foiklang, S.; Wanapat, M.; Gunun, N.; Gunun, P.; Chanjula, P.; Polyorach, S. Effects of supplementation of Piper sarmentosum leaf powder on feed efficiency, rumen ecology and rumen protozoal concentration in Thai native beef cattle. Animals. 2019, 9, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Honan, M.; Feng, X.; Tricarico, J.; Kebreab, E. Feed additives as a strategic approach to reduce enteric methane production in cattle: Modes of action, effectiveness and safety. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 19th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  18. Van Soest, P.; Robertson, J.; Lewis, B. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 3583–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Makkar, H.P.S. Quantification of Tannins in Tree and Shrub Foliage: A Laboratory Manual; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003; p. 102. [Google Scholar]
  20. Terril, T.H.; Rowan, A.M.; Douglas, G.B.; Barry, T.N. Determination of extractable and bound condensed tannin concentrations in forage plants, protein concentrate meals and cereal grains. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1992, 58, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Menke, K.H.; Steingass, H. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Dev. 1988, 28, 7–55. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ørskov, E.R.; McDonald, I. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J. Agric. Sci. 1979, 92, 499–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Tilley, J.M.A.; Terry, R.A. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass Forage Sci. 1963, 18, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Galyean, M. Laboratory Procedure in Animal Nutrition Research; Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University: Lubbock, TX, USA, 1989; p. 192. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tassone, S.; Fortina, R.; Peiretti, P.G. In vitro techniques using the DaisyII incubator for the assessment of digestibility: A review. Animals 2020, 10, 775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Marius, L.N.; Shipandeni, M.N.T.; Rodríguez-Campos, L.A.; Osafo, E.L.K.; Mpofu, I.D.T.; Ansah, T.; Shiningavamwe, K.L.; Attoh-Kotoku, V.; Antwi, C. Seasonal variation in chemical composition and in-vitro gas production of woody plant species of semi-arid condition of Namibia. Agrofor. Syst. 2021, 95, 1191–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Patra, A.K.; Min, B.-R.; Saxena, J. Dietary tannins on microbial ecology of the gastrointestinal tract in ruminants. Diet. Phytochem. Microbes 2012, 237–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, T.; Chen, H.; Bai, Y.; Wu, J.; Cheng, S.; He, B.; Casper, D.P. Calf starter containing a blend of essential oils and prebiotics affects the growth performance of Holstein calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 2315–2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Rymer, C.; Huntington, J.; Williams, B.; Givens, D. In vitro cumulative gas production techniques: History, methodological considerations and challenges. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2005, 123–124, 9–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Elberg, K.; Steuer, P.; Habermann, U.; Lenz, J.; Nelles, M.; Südekum, K.-H. A small scale in vitro system for high throughput gas production analysis—A comparison with the Hohenheim gas test. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2018, 241, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. El-Zaiat, H.; Kholif, A.; Moharam, M.; Attia, M.; Abdalla, A.; Sallam, S. The ability of tanniniferous legumes to reduce methane production and enhance feed utilization in Barki rams: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. Small Rumin. Res. 2020, 193, 106259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Getachew, G.; Makkar, H.; Becker, K. Tropical browses: Contents of phenolic compounds, in vitro gas production and stoi-chiometric relationship between short chain fatty acid and in vitro gas production. J. Agric. Sci. 2002, 139, 341–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Terranova, M.; Kreuzer, M.; Braun, U.; Schwarm, A. In vitro screening of temperate climate forages from a variety of woody plants for their potential to mitigate ruminal methane and ammonia formation. J. Agric. Sci. 2018, 156, 929–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, L.; Bao, X.; Guo, G.; Huo, W.; Xu, Q.; Wang, C.; Li, Q.; Liu, Q. Effects of hydrolysable tannin with or without condensed tannin on alfalfa silage fermentation characteristics and in vitro ruminal methane production, fermentation patterns, and microbiota. Animals. 2021, 11, 1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fagundes, G.M.; Benetel, G.; Carriero, M.M.; Sousa, R.L.M.; Muir, J.P.; Macedo, R.O.; Bueno, I.C.S. Tannin-rich forage as a methane mitigation strategy for cattle and the implications for rumen microbiota. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2021, 61, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Min, B.R.; Castleberry, L.; Allen, H.; Parker, D.; Waldrip, H.; Brauer, D.; Willis, W. Associative effects of wet distiller’s grains plus solubles and tannin-rich peanut skin supplementation on in vitro rumen fermentation, greenhouse gas emissions, and microbial changes. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 97, 4668–4681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Aderinboye, R.Y.; Olanipekun, A.O. An in-vitro evaluation of the potentials of turmeric as phytogenic feed additive for rumen modification. Niger. J. Anim. Prod. 2021, 48, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sarnataro, C.; Spanghero, M.; Lavrenčič, A. Supplementation of diets with tannins from Chestnut wood or an extract from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni and effects on in vitro rumen fermentation, protozoa count and methane production. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jayanegara, A.; Leiber, F.; Kreuzer, M. Meta-analysis of the relationship between dietary tannin level and methane formation in ruminants from in vivo and in vitro experiments. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2011, 96, 365–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Newbold, C.J.; De La Fuente, G.; Belanche, A.; Ramos-Morales, E.; McEwan, N. The role of ciliate protozoa in the rumen. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Dai, X.; Faciola, A.P. Evaluating strategies to reduce ruminal protozoa and their impacts on nutrient utilization and animal performance in ruminants—A meta-analysis. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Cieslak, A.; Zmora, P.; Pers-Kamczyc, E.; Szumacher-Strabel, M. Effects of tannins source (Vaccinium vitis idaea L.) on rumen microbial fermentation in vivo. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2012, 176, 102–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, W.; Wang, S.; Luo, D.; Zhao, X.; Yin, M.; Zhou, C.; Liu, G. Effect of Chinese herbal medicines on rumen fermentation, methanogenesis and microbial flora in vitro. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 49, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhou, L.; Wang, D.; Hu, H.; Zhou, H. Effects of Piper sarmentosum extract supplementation on growth performances and rumen fermentation and microflora characteristics in goats. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 104, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Akanmu, A.M.; Hassen, A. The use of certain medicinal plant extracts reduced in vitro methane production while improving in vitro organic matter digestibility. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2018, 58, 900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Cieślak, A.; Zmora, P.; Matkowski, A.; Nawrot-Hadzik, I.; Pers-Kamczyc, E.; El-Sherbiny, M.; Bryszak, M.; Szumacher-Strabe, M. Tannins from Sanguisorba officinalis affect in vitro rumen methane production and fermentation. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2016, 26, 54–62. [Google Scholar]
  47. Akanmu, A.M.; Hassen, A.; Adejoro, F.A. Gas production, digestibility and efficacy of stored or fresh plant extracts to reduce methane production on different substrates. Animals 2020, 10, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kumar, S.; Choudhury, P.K.; Carro, M.D.; Griffith, G.; Dagar, S.S.; Puniya, M.; Calabro, S.; Ravella, S.R.; Dhewa, T.; Upadhyay, R.C.; et al. New aspects and strategies for methane mitigation from ruminants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 98, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Min, B.R.; Solaiman, S.; Waldrip, H.M.; Parker, D.; Todd, R.W.; Brauer, D. Dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions from ruminants: A review of plant tannin mitigation options. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 6, 231–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Gunun, P.; Gunun, N.; Cherdthong, A.; Wanapat, M.; Polyorach, S.; Sirilaophaisan, S.; Wachirapakorn, C.; Kang, S. In vitro rumen fermentation and methane production as affected by rambutan peel powder. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2017, 46, 626–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Kang, S.; Wanapat, M.; Cherdthong, A. Effect of banana flower powder supplementation as a rumen buffer on rumen fer-mentation efficiency and nutrient digestibility in dairy steers fed on high concentrate diet. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2014, 196, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. The scientific names, plant parts, and harvesting times of the plant samples tested (n = 3).
Table 1. The scientific names, plant parts, and harvesting times of the plant samples tested (n = 3).
Plant Species.Plant FamilyCommon NamePlant PartHarvest Time
Zingiber officinale RoscoeZingiberaceaeGingerRhizomeJuly
Alpinia galanga L.ZingiberaceaeGalangaRhizomeSeptember
Cymbopogon citratusPoaceaeLemon grassStem + LeafJuly
Zingiber cassumunar Roxb.ZingiberaceaeCassumunar gingerRhizomeSeptember
Curcuma longa L.ZingiberaceaeTurmericRhizomeSeptember
Piper sarmentosum Roxb.PiperaceaeWild pepperStem + LeafJuly
Acmella oleracea L.AsteraceaeToothache plantStem + LeafMay
Careya arborea Roxb.LecythidaceaeWild guava, Ceylon oakLeafMay
Anacardium occidentale L.AnacardiaceaeCashew nutLeafMay
Table 2. Ingredients and chemical composition of the basal diet.
Table 2. Ingredients and chemical composition of the basal diet.
ItemsConcentrateRice Straw
Ingredients (% DM)
Cassava chips58.5
Rice bran14.0
Palm kernel meal14.0
Soy bean meal6.0
Mineral mixed *1.0
Sulfur1.0
Urea1.5
Salt1.0
Molasses3.0
Chemical composition
Dry matter (%)93.594.5
Organic matter (% DM)92.793.1
Crude protein (% DM)14.02.8
Neutral detergent fiber (% DM)12.565.8
Acid detergent fiber (% DM)8.943.3
* Mineral (each kg contain): Fe 45 g; Zn 30 g; Mn 60 g; Co 0.01 g; Cu 5 g; Se 0.04 g; I 0.01 g.
Table 3. Chemical composition of the plant samples tested (n = 3).
Table 3. Chemical composition of the plant samples tested (n = 3).
Scientific NamesChemical Composition (g/kg DM)
OMCPEENDFADFCTTP
Zingiber officinale832.276.963.6563.2369.727.6155.8
Alpinia galanga831.581.868.1625.0368.163.9385.4
Cymbopogon citratus897.454.818.7649.4427.015.424.6
Zingiber cassumunar957.0136.258.8423.8184.714.0236.4
Curcuma longa952.5104.778.8404.9131.929.4289.6
Piper sarmentosum940.1188.563.9647.2398.689.391.2
Acmella oleracea946.8234.552.2434.1189.3104.1135.7
Careya arborea966.0150.359.8514.1309.3159.2201.5
Anacardium occidentale928.397.511.9458.4391.5165.7194.3
OM: organic matter; CP: crude protein; EE: ether extract; NDF: neutral detergent fiber; ADF: acid detergent fiber; CP: crude protein; CT: condense tannins; TP: total phenol.
Table 4. The effect of plant supplementation on the in vitro gas kinetics and cumulative gas production at 48 h after incubation.
Table 4. The effect of plant supplementation on the in vitro gas kinetics and cumulative gas production at 48 h after incubation.
TreatmentsGas Production Kinetic ParametersCumulative Gas (mL/48 h)
abca + b
Basal diet2.07 ab102.60 f0.062104.53 d99.80 e
Zingiber officinale3.05 bc78.44 bc0.06081.49 b80.15 b
Alpinia galanga1.36 a73.96 ab0.05275.42 a72.90 a
Cymbopogon citratus2.02 ab84.22 c0.05086.42 b84.95 c
Zingiber cassumunar1.35 a72.04 a0.03473.39 a70.40 a
Curcuma longa1.74 a72.86 a0.03073.59 a70.70 a
Piper sarmentosum1.91 a80.74 c0.04382.65 b81.90 b
Acmella oleracea3.41 c96.42 e0.04899.83 d98.40 e
Careya arborea2.18 ab80.69 c0.06082.79 b80.50 b
Anacardium occidentale2.32 ab90.55 d0.05492.87 c91.55 d
SEM0.3251.7060.0111.7230.956
a–f Significant difference with p < 0.05; SEM: standard error of the mean.
Table 5. The effects of basal diet as a control substrate and plant supplementation on ruminal fermentation parameters.
Table 5. The effects of basal diet as a control substrate and plant supplementation on ruminal fermentation parameters.
Plant Species Ammonia (mg/dL)Total Bacteria (109/mL)Total Protozoa (104/mL)SCFA (mmol/dL) and the Molar Proportions (mmol/100 mol)
TVFAC2C3C4C2/C3
Basal diet13.98 c5.76 c5.73 c94.19 c69.6118.24 a11.853.75 d
Zingiber officinale9.85 ab4.48 bc4.96 bc87.64 ab69.7518.98 abc11.273.67 bcd
Alpinia galanga8.94 ab4.82 bc4.32 b85.60 a69.8018.69 abc11.513.73 cd
Cymbopogon citratus9.45 ab5.05 bc2.25 a88.78 ab69.2019.65 bc11.153.52 ab
Zingiber cassumunar9.52 ab3.14 b2.64 a86.28 ab69.9618.42 ab11.623.80 d
Curcuma longa10.70 b1.26 a2.04 a85.15 a69.5618.40 ab12.043.78 d
Piper sarmentosum9.38 ab4.46 bc2.88 a89.30 bc68.9319.54 abc11.533.53 abc
Acmella oleracea9.78 ab5.00 bc2.91 a85.48 a68.3119.72 bc10.973.46 a
Careya arborea8.59 ab3.75 b2.72 a90.5 bc68.9620.29 c10.753.39 a
Anacardium occidentale7.39 a4.25 bc2.33 a84.58 a69.1818.62 ab12.203.72 bcd
SEM0.7410.5820.4391.3950.6340.4870.3510.063
a–d Significant difference p < 0.05; SCFA: short-chain fatty acids; TVFA: total volatile fatty acids; C2: acetate; C3: propionate; C4: butyrate; C2/C3: acetate/propionate ratio; SEM: standard error of the mean.
Table 6. The effects of plant supplementation with basal diet on gas production, in vitro apparent organic matter digestibility, methane production, and NEL content in DM.
Table 6. The effects of plant supplementation with basal diet on gas production, in vitro apparent organic matter digestibility, methane production, and NEL content in DM.
Plant Species Total Gas (mL/24 h)AOMDvt (%)dOM (mg/24 h)CH4/OM (mL/g)CH4 (mL/24 h)CH4/TVFA (mmol/mol)NEL (MJ/kg DM)
Basal diet69.24 cd67.62 c135.24 c57.01 f7.71 e132.19 e5.16 d
Zingiber officinale75.20 d67.28 c134.56 c50.16 e6.75 d116.09 d4.68 abc
Alpinia galanga70.78 cd66.55 c133.10 cd38.47 c5.12 c110.45 c5.21 d
Cymbopogon citratus66.80 c66.80 c133.60 cd39.75 c5.31 c108.88 c4.50 ab
Zingiber cassumunar65.88 c65.89 bc131.78 bcd32.79 b4.32 b100.04 a5.06 cd
Curcuma longa58.09 ab59.96 a119.92 a43.95 d5.27 c110.96 c4.96 cd
Piper sarmentosum65.95 c64.50 b129.01 bc33.64 b4.34 b104.57 b4.92 bcd
Acmella oleracea63.80 bc63.84 b127.68 b28.52 a3.64 a101.65 ab5.00 cd
Careya arborea53.67 a59.85 a119.70 a29.49 a3.53 a99.29 a4.69 abc
Anacardium occidentale53.92 a58.96 a117.92 a32.74 b3.86 ab104.71 b4.37 a
SEM0.8240.7611.5230.6950.1941.1450.135
a–f Significant difference p < 0.05; CH4: methane; AOMDvt: apparent organic matter digestibility in vitro [25]; dOM: digestibility of organic matter; TVFA: total volatile fatty acids; SEM: standard error of the mean.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khejornsart, P.; Cherdthong, A.; Wanapat, M. In Vitro Screening of Plant Materials to Reduce Ruminal Protozoal Population and Mitigate Ammonia and Methane Emissions. Fermentation 2021, 7, 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7030166

AMA Style

Khejornsart P, Cherdthong A, Wanapat M. In Vitro Screening of Plant Materials to Reduce Ruminal Protozoal Population and Mitigate Ammonia and Methane Emissions. Fermentation. 2021; 7(3):166. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7030166

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khejornsart, Pichad, Anusorn Cherdthong, and Metha Wanapat. 2021. "In Vitro Screening of Plant Materials to Reduce Ruminal Protozoal Population and Mitigate Ammonia and Methane Emissions" Fermentation 7, no. 3: 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7030166

APA Style

Khejornsart, P., Cherdthong, A., & Wanapat, M. (2021). In Vitro Screening of Plant Materials to Reduce Ruminal Protozoal Population and Mitigate Ammonia and Methane Emissions. Fermentation, 7(3), 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7030166

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop