Next Article in Journal
Enhancement of Melanogenic Inhibitory Effects of the Leaf Skin Extracts of Aloe barbadensis Miller by the Fermentation Process
Next Article in Special Issue
Production and Analysis of Beer Supplemented with Chlorella vulgaris Powder
Previous Article in Journal
Improving the Synthesis Efficiency of Amino Acids Such as L-Lysine by Assembling Artificial Cellulosome Elements Dockerin Protein In Vivo
Previous Article in Special Issue
Considerations When Brewing with Fruit Juices: A Review and Case Study Using Peaches
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Consumption of Amino Acids and Production of Volatile Aroma Compounds by Yarrowia lipolytica in Brewers’ Wort

by
Anders Bagger Sørensen
1,2,*,
Mikael Agerlin Petersen
1,
Arvid Garde
2 and
Nils Arneborg
1
1
Department of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, 1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark
2
Carlsberg Research Laboratory, J. C. Jacobsens Gade 4, 1799 Copenhagen, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2022, 8(11), 579; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8110579
Submission received: 4 October 2022 / Revised: 21 October 2022 / Accepted: 22 October 2022 / Published: 26 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Beverages, Food, Yeast and Brewing Research 2.0)

Abstract

:
The yeast Yarrowia lipolytica is well known for its versatile production of metabolites from various substrates, but, although isolated from, e.g., wild-fermented Belgian Sour beers, it is rarely considered a starter culture in fermented beverages. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the ability of Y. lipolytica to ferment brewers’ wort containing iso-α-acid for 7 days at low and high aeration and at 20 °C and 30 °C, with a special focus on amino acid consumption and production of volatile aroma compounds. Y. lipolytica was able to grow in the wort under all four conditions, although the growth was inhibited. Furthermore, it only consumed glucose and fructose, and no ethanol was formed. Moreover, under high aeration conditions, Y. lipolytica consumed 75–80% of the amino acids in the wort. Interestingly, no esters were produced during the fermentations, and only five higher alcohols (1-propanol, 2-methyl-1-propanol, 3-methyl-1-butanol, 3-methyl-3-buten-1-ol, and 2-phenylethanol), two aldehydes (3-methylbutanal and (E)-2-nonenal), two ketones (cyclopentanone and 9-oxabicyclo [6.1.0]nonan-4-one), one fatty acid (3-methyl-butanoic acid), and one benzene derivate (1,2,4-trimethyl-benzene) were produced. These results may contribute to the potential use of Y. lipolytica in a traditional brewery for the production of novel beers; e.g., alcohol-free beer.

1. Introduction

The non-conventional, non-pathogenic, dimorphic yeast Yarrowia lipolytica has been extensively researched since it was identified and described in 1972 by David Yarrow [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Y. lipolytica is being used as a model organism for non-conventional yeast, and it harbours severe physiological differences compared to other model yeasts, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae [7,8]. Y. lipolytica has been isolated from various, often lipid-containing, food sources, such as cheese and meat products [5]. It has, however, also been isolated from traditional Belgian sour beer [9,10].
It is well established that Y. lipolytica is an obligate aerobic yeast [2,8]. Additionally, it is Crabtree-negative, thus unable to produce ethanol under aerobic conditions [11]. Furthermore, wild-type strains of Y. lipolytica are from natural side able to assimilate a variety of carbon sources. They range from simple sugars (glucose and fructose) over various alcohol types to more complex substrates, such as organic acids, free fatty acids, animal-derived fats and multiple forms of hydrocarbons [12,13,14]. There is general consent that the optimal growth temperature for strains of Y. lipolytica is somewhere in the range between 25 °C and 30 °C, and growth is generally not seen above 35 °C [2].
Y. lipolytica can synthesise and secrete a great variety of compounds, including organic acids, sugar alcohols and interesting aroma compounds such as 2-phenylethanol and γ-decalactone [3,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. How external factors affect the physiology, metabolism, and gene expression of Y. lipolytica has been studied in various substrates [14,15,20,21,22]. Braga and Belo [20], e.g., showed that it was possible to increase the production of γ-decalactone by increasing the agitation and aeration of their medium. Until today, most focus has been on optimising the production of one or more metabolites, e.g., citrate, 2-phenylethanol, sugar alcohols and lipids, in various substrates to purify the metabolites later for further usage. Only a few examples, where Y. lipolytica has been used as a starter culture in food, have been seen, mainly in dairy and meat production. Here, the catabolism of amino acids, various lipids, sugars and organic acids by Y. lipolytica has been examined. It was found that Y. lipolytica can contribute significantly to the flavour of cheese and dried fermented sausages through the production of volatile compounds, such as alcohols, acids, aldehydes, ketones, terpenes, alkanes and cyclic hexane as well as free fatty acids and some organic acids [5,14,23,24]. Spitaels et al. (2015) isolated and identified Y. lipolytica from spontaneous fermented Belgian sour beers and suggested that Y. lipolytica may play a vital role in producing some Belgian sour beers [10]. However, it seems that no further studies have been published on the effect of Y. lipolytica on sour beer.
Amino acid consumption by Y. lipolytica in complex media has only been the subject of very few published scientific papers. Mansour et al. (2008) found that the specific consumption of different amino acids by Y. lipolytica in a defined cheese-like medium containing high and low concentrations of amino acids varied depending on factors, such as amino acid concentration and the presence of lactate [14]. In common for all treatments, Y. lipolytica consumed most proline, followed by glutamine [14]. This contrasts sharply with what is typically found for S. cerevisiae in aerobic fermentations of beer wort, where proline is the last amino acid consumed [25].
In this paper, we report the use of Y. lipolytica as a starter for fermenting brewers’ wort, as a proof-of-concept study for the production of novel beers. We have investigated the growth and fermentation properties, including consumption of amino acids and production of volatile aroma compounds, of an in-house strain of Y. lipolytica in brewers’ wort at low and high aeration and at 20 °C and 30 °C.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microorganisms and Media

Yarrowia lipolytica FNC0006 was obtained from the inhouse Carlsberg Research Laboratory (J.C. Jacobsens Gade 4, DK-1799 Copenhagen V, Denmark, CRL) yeast collection. The yeast was stored in a −80 °C freezer in 20% (v/v) glycerol until used. Yeast cells were prepared by spreading the content of a 1 µL inoculation needle of the yeast/glycerol mix onto a regular YDP agar plate (Yeast extract 10 g, Peptone 20 g, Dextrose 20 g) and incubating for 96 h at 30 °C. Subsequently, the yeast was tested for microbial contamination using internal methods.

2.2. Fermentation Medium

In these experiments, the medium was standard brewers’ wort from the same 258 L batch (produced after a standard protocol at Carlsberg Research Laboratory). Raw materials for the brew were: 100% pilsner malt 39.25 kg (Viking malt batch: 3727). Additives: Enzyme: Ultraflo Max 5.89 g (Novozymes, Bagsværd, Denmark), salts: CaCl2 41.62 g and ZnSO4 1.32 g, acid for pH adjustment: H3PO4 290 mL of a 25% solution (Brenntag Nordic A/S) to reach pH 5.2, and pre-isomerised α-acid 27 mL of 30% solution (Barth-HassGroup, IsoHop®, Nürnberg, Germany), corresponding to 28 IBUs in the wort, to mimic hop-addition to the wort.

2.3. Fermentation Conditions

Fermentations were carried out in a Sartorius Biostat A Bioreactor system (Sartorius, Guxhagen, Germany). The working volumes in the fermenters were one litre. The wort was pre-fermentation, sterilised in 5 L blue cap bottles by autoclaving at 120 °C for 45 min before it was homogenised and transferred into the autoclaved fermenters. The density in the autoclaved wort was 11.2 °Plato.
The fermentations were carried out at 20 °C and low aeration (L20), 30 °C and low aeration (L30), 20 °C and high aeration (H20), and 30 °C and high aeration (H30). Low and high aeration levels were obtained by having two different agitation rates in the fermenters, 400 rpm (rounds per minute) and 1400 rpm, respectively. To create an environment that is possible to recreate in a traditional brewery, the air was dosed at 0.4 vvm into the headspace of the fermenters. All parameters were controlled by the Sartorius system and Lucullus software (Ramcon, Birkerød, Denmark). pH and temperature data were measured by an Endress + Hauser (Ceragel CPS71D) pH probe in the fermenters and logged continuously using Lucullus software. All fermentations were conducted over seven days in biological triplicates. Samples were taken at an interval of 24 h. All samples were centrifuged at 6000× g for 10 min, and the supernatants were subsequently filtered through a 0.2 µm syringe filter and stored at −21 °C until analysis.

2.4. Preculture and Inoculation

Precultures for inoculation were prepared by dosing 1 µL of cells from several colonies on the YPD plate, using a 1 µL–inoculation loop, into 100 mL of 10 °Plato brewers’ wort. The inoculum was cultivated for 16 h in Erlenmeyer flasks on a shaking table (120 rpm) at 23 °C to a cell density of 1.0 × 107 cells/mL; 10 mL of inoculum were transferred to each fermenter, equivalent to an inoculation concentration of 1.0 × 105 cells/mL.

2.5. Analytical Methods

2.5.1. Analyses of Growth and Sugars

At each sampling point, 5 mL of the culture broth was withdrawn from each fermenter and diluted to an appropriate level for optical density at 600 nm (OD600) measurement using an Eppendorf BioPhotometer (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany).
Six sugars were measured (glucose, fructose, sucrose, maltose, maltotriose, maltotetraose) using a high-pressure ion chromatography system (HPLC, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Glostrup, Denmark). The system was a Dionex ICS-6000 DC connected to a Dionex ICS-6000 HPAEC-PAD, equipped with a CarboPac PA-200 (3 × 250 mm) BioLC column and a Pulsed Amperometric Detector with a disposable Au electrode. Two eluents were used. Eluents A (50 mM potassiumhydroxide) and B (50 mM potassiumhydroxide + 100 mM potassium acetate) were graduated with 5% gradient curve from 100% eluent A to 100% eluent B over the time of 58 min. The injection volume was 10 µL, and the flow was 0.5 mL/min. The temperatures of the column and detector were 40 °C and 30 °C, respectively. The system was controlled using Chromeleon software (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Glostrup, Denmark).

2.5.2. Analysis of Ethanol

Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometry SIM mode (GC-MS SIM) was used to detect and quantify ethanol levels. The system used was Agilent technologies 7890B GC (Agilent Technologies Denmark ApS, Glostrup, Denmark) fitted with an Agilent J&W GC DB-wax column, coupled with a computer with the analytical software MassHunter (version B.08.00). The analytical conditions were as follows: constant helium flow of 1.5 mL/min, transfer line temp. 250 °C, ion source temperature 230 °C, MS quad temp. 150 °C, injection temp. 250 °C. Samples were incubated for 10 min at 60 °C with agitation of 500 rpm. The injection was performed with static headspace with a gas-tight syringe. The injection volume was 100 µL. The column temperature programme was: 7 min at 50 °C, from 50 °C to 240 °C at 30 °C·min−1. The programme was finished upon reaching 240 °C.

2.5.3. Analysis of Amino Acids

Samples were degassed for 10 min in an ultrasonic bath and centrifuged for 10 min at 4000× g 400 µL sample + 40 µL 30% sulfosalicylic acid were mixed by a vortex mixer for 10 s and allowed to stand for 15 min. The samples were then centrifuged for four minutes at 14,000× g; 300 µL of the supernatant of the sample was extracted and mixed with 30 µL 1 M sodium hydroxide. The mixtures were vortex mixed for 10 s. Samples were diluted from undiluted to 10 × in Milli-Q water as necessary. AccQ-Tag Ultra reagent powder was reconstituted according to producers’ guidelines (Waters, Milford, MA, USA); 20 µL of the reconstituted AccQ-Tag Ultra reagent was added to the sample mixture and vortex mixed for 5 s immediately after. When all samples were ready, they were heated in vials for 15 min at 55 °C in a preheated oven.
Samples were analysed using a UPLC from Waters (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) with a Photo Diode Array detector and an ACCQ-Tag Ultra (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 µm) column (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Two eluents were used; eluents A (50 mM potassium hydroxide) and B (50 mM potassium hydroxide + 100 mM potassium acetate) were graduated with a 6% gradient curve from 99% eluent A to 40% eluent A and 60% eluent B over the time of 10 min. The column temperature was 51 °C, and the sample temperature was kept at 8 °C. Data were collected using MassLynx version 4.2 software (Waters, Milford, MA, USA), where concentrations were calculated based on internal standard curves.

2.5.4. Analysis of Volatile Compounds

Trapping and separation of volatile aroma compounds by Dynamic Headspace Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS) were performed as previously described by Liu et al. [26] using Tenax-TA traps (Markes International, Llantrisant, UK) in a dynamic headspace sampling system and a ZB-Wax capillary column (30 m × 0.25 × 0.50 µm) (Phenomenex, Værløse, Denmark), respectively; 1 mL internal standard (5 ppm 4-methyl-1-pentanol (Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) in water) was added to each sample.
Peak areas and mass spectra were extracted from the chromatograms using the PARAFAC2-based software PARADISe (University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark), as described by Johnsen et al. [27]. The NIST05 database was used for the identification of the mass spectra of the volatiles. Peak areas, normalized using the internal standard, were used as relative measures of concentration. Volatile compound identification was confirmed by comparison with retention indices (RI) of authentic reference compounds or retention indices reported in the literature. The results were presented as peak areas of the identified compounds.

2.6. Statistics

A one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test was used for each volatile compound to test if there was a significant difference (95% level) between the sampling points; day 0, day 4, and day 7. All statistics were conducted using Microsoft Excel with the add-in XLSTAT (Addinsoft, Paris, France).

3. Results

3.1. Growth, Sugar Consumption, and Ethanol Production

In the two experiments with high aeration, the OD600 values of Y. lipolytica increased linearly from 1.4 (±0.0) on day 0 of fermentation to 13.2 (±0.1) and 12.5 (±0.2) on day 7 of fermentation in H20 and H30, respectively. Furthermore, in these experiments, only glucose and fructose were consumed from the wort (Figure 1A). The other sugars found in wort (i.e., maltose, maltotriose, maltotetraose and sucrose) were not consumed (Figure S1). Regardless of the temperature, the glucose and fructose concentrations steadily declined from 12.0 g/L (±0.4) and 4.0 (±0.2), respectively, on day 0 to 0.8 g/L (±0.6) and 2.3 g/L (±0.2), respectively, on day 5. From day 5 to day 7, glucose was fully depleted at both temperatures, whereas fructose was completely consumed in H30 and to 1.0 g/L (±0.3) in H20 (Figure 1A).
In the two low aeration experiments, the OD600 values of Y. lipolytica increased linearly from 1.6 (±0.1) on day 0 of fermentation to 3.1 (±0.0) and 3.9 (±0.1) on day 7 of fermentation in L20 and L30, respectively. Moreover, in these experiments, glucose decreased slightly from day 0 (11.5 g/L (±0.5)) to day 7 (9.3 g/L (±0.5)). No differences were detected between the two temperatures (Figure 1B). Fructose and the other sugars found in the wort (i.e., maltose, maltotriose, maltotetraose and sucrose) were not consumed (Figure 1 and Figure S1).
Ethanol was not produced in any of the experiments (Figure S2).

3.2. Consumption of Amino Acids

As for the sugars, more amino acids were consumed by Y. lipolytica in the two high-aeration treatments than in the two low-aeration treatments. The consumption of total amino acids on day 4 was 61.1% in H20, 62.6% in H30, 13.2% in L20, and 4.7% in L30, and on day 7 it was 74.9% in H20, 79.7% in H30, 24.9% in L20, and 16.4% in L30 (Table 1).
In the two fermentation experiments with high aeration, most amino acids were consumed by Y. lipolytica to a level where 20–100% of the initial concentration of a given amino acid was consumed on day 7 (Figure 2). Threonine and tryptophan, however, were hardly consumed (<20%) (Figure 2 and Table 2). For phenylalanine, 37% of the initial concentration was consumed on day 4 for both temperatures and on day 7 66% (H20) and 69% (H30) of the initial concentration were consumed.
In the two experiments with low aeration, only aspartic acid and glutamic acid were consumed close to depletion by Y. lipolytica (>96% of initial concentration consumed) on day 7. Regardless of temperature, proline, alanine, and asparagine were consumed too, but to a lesser degree (>26% of initial concentration consumed on day 7). In the low aeration experiment at 20 °C, 30% of glutamine was also consumed, whereas, in the experiment with low aeration and 30 °C, it was not consumed at all. For all remaining amino acids 0–20% of the initial concentration of a given amino acid was consumed on day 7 (Figure 2).
In Table 2, the amino acids were classified into four groups according to the rate with which they were taken up by Y. lipolytica from the wort, that is, group 1; fast (more than 80% of the total of a given amino acid taken up before day 4), group 2; intermediate (more than 50%, but less than 80%, of the total of a given amino acid taken up before day 4), group 3; slow (more than 10% consumed on day 7, but less than 50% on day 4, of the total of a given amino acid), and group 4; little or no absorption (less than 10% of the total of a specific amino acid taken up on day 7).
Regardless of the temperature, proline, alanine, arginine, asparagine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, and glycine were all classified in group 1 in the two experiments with high aeration. In H20, lysine was classified in group 1 and serine in group 2. In H30, serine was classified in group 1 and lysine in group 2. Methionine was classified in group 2 in both experiments with high aeration.
Regardless of temperature, leucine, phenylalanine, valine, tyrosine, isoleucine, histidine, tryptophan, and glutamine were all placed in group 3 in the two experiments with high aeration. Threonine was placed in groups 3 and 4 in H30 and H20, respectively (Table 2).
A different picture was seen in the two experiments with low aeration than in those with high aeration. In L20, only aspartic acid and glutamic acid were placed in group 1. In L30, only aspartic acid was placed in group 1, and glutamic acid in group 2. No amino acids were placed in group 2, and proline, alanine, arginine, serine, asparagine, and glutamine were placed in group 3 in L20. The same results were observed in L30, except for glutamine. All remaining amino acids were placed in group 4, regardless of the temperature (Table 2).

3.3. Production of Volatile Compounds

Sixty-four volatile compounds were detected in the samples from the four different fermentation experiments with Y. lipolytica (Table 3 and Table S1). Interestingly no esters were detected (Table 3 and Table S1).
The measurements on the fermented wort on days 0, 4 and 7 show that most of the volatile compounds, including phenolic compounds, aldehydes, ketones, benzene derivates and furans, found on day 0 were stagnant or degraded over time. It was, in fact, only five higher alcohols (1-propanol, 2-methyl-1-propanol, 3-methyl-1-butanol, 3-methyl-3-buten-1-ol, and 2-phenylethanol), two aldehydes (only in H20, 3-methyl-butanal and (E)-2-nonenal), two ketones (cyclopentanone and 9-oxabicyclo [6.1.0]nonan-4-one), one fatty acid (only in H20, 3-methyl-butanoic acid) and one benzene derivate (only in H20, 1,2,4-trimethyl-benzene) that increased significantly (p < 0.05) in the peak area during the seven days of fermentation (Table 3 and Table S1).
Regardless of aeration, no marked effect of temperature was observed on the production of volatile compounds (Table 3 and Table S1). Regardless of temperature, the same compounds decreased in the peak areas. However, more compounds increased in peak area in H20 (i.e., 11, see above) and H30 (i.e., seven, see above), only two compounds, 3-methyl-3-buten-1-ol and cyclopentanone, were found to increase significantly in L20 and L30 (Table 3 and Table S1).

4. Discussion

This work is the first of its kind, presenting the performance of a Y. lipolytica strain in the highly complex environment that is brewers’ wort. It is essential to consider that our process in the current work is aerobic, whereas normal beer fermentation is anaerobic. Hence, it is not possible to compare the two processes directly.
Hoppy wort can hinder the growth of some non-conventional yeasts, such as Debaryomyces hansenii and Torulaspora delbrueckii, due to the antimicrobial effect of iso-α-acids and β-acids deriving from hops [28]. Interestingly, we have shown that Y. lipolytica can grow in a wort containing iso-α-acid, meaning that it will most likely also be able to grow in a traditional brewers’ wort, which typically contains less β-acids than wort used for craft beers due to different hop addition strategies [28]. This trait is, therefore, essential for any further use in a traditional brewery.
The growth of Y. lipolytica was almost linear in both the high and low aeration experiments, indicating that it is inhibited under these conditions. The growth-inhibiting factor is most probably a lack of available oxygen in the wort since Y. lipolytica is an obligate aerobe [7,8], and since our aeration strategies, even at the high agitation rate, may be unable to dose enough oxygen into the wort. It may, however, also be the iso-α-acid added to the medium, as described above, or a combination of both.
The most typical carbon sources in brewers’ wort are fermentable sugars, such as maltose, fructose, sucrose, maltotriose and glucose, of which maltose is the most predominant [29]. In a “normal” beer fermentation, S. cerevisiae (brewers’ yeast) will assimilate all of these sugars [30]. In our study, the only sugars which were assimilated by Y. lipolytica from a typical brewers’ wort were the two hexoses: fructose and glucose. This assimilation is expected since Y. lipolytica can only degrade hexoses and is considered a maltose-negative yeast [6,12]. Fructose assimilation was considerably slower compared to glucose. These data correspond with previous findings by Moeller et al., suggesting that Y. lipolytica favours glucose over fructose uptake [31].
No ethanol was detected during any of the aerated fermentations with Y. lipolytica. These data are as expected, since Y. lipolytica is a Crabtree-negative yeast [11], and they may suggest the use of Y. lipolytica for the production of alcohol-free beer.
Under traditional anaerobic beer fermentation, brewers’ yeast will roughly assimilate 50% of the amino nitrogen in wort and utilise all fermentable sugars [29,32]. In our study, Y. lipolytica consumed much higher levels of amino acids under the high aeration conditions (i.e., 75–80%), even though it consumed markedly less sugar, as compared to normal beer fermentations. To the best of our knowledge, this trait of a yeast species has yet not been shown in brewers’ wort. It could play a key role in producing alternative fermented beverages since low amino acid levels can prolong the flavour stability (less precursors for Strecker Aldehydes) and lower the potential bioactivity of such a beverage [25,32].
Interestingly, Y. lipolytica consumed proline and alanine at a fast rate in the experiments with high aeration. These observations are very different from what is typically seen for S. cerevisiae under aerobic conditions, where proline and alanine are usually placed in either the slow or no uptake groups [25], suggesting that Y. lipolytica may have other amino acid preferences than S. cerevisiae. This hypothesis, however, needs to be further elucidated.
Although Y. lipolytica exhibited very slow growth and uptake of sugars in the experiments with low aeration, a substantial part of the amino acids were taken up, and some were even depleted. This indicates that even under low aeration conditions, Y. lipolytica has an affinity for amino acid uptake despite nearly no other activity. Additionally, it may indicate that our Y. lipolytica strain, under the given conditions, can assimilate amino acids as both carbon and nitrogen source. This trait has earlier been suggested by Mansour et al. in a cheese-like medium [14], but it will need further investigation within a beer context.
Volatile esters play a vital role in the flavour profile of fermented beverages, typically contributing to fruity attributes [33]. No volatile esters were found in our experiments with Y. lipolytica. In brewers’ yeast, the synthesis of volatile esters is catalysed by the ester synthases alcohol acetyltransferase I and II, encoded by the genes ATF1 and ATF2 [33]. High oxygen levels are known to repress the expression of ATF1 and ATF2 and thus inhibit the synthesis of esters in brewers’ yeast in beer fermentations [34,35]. A similar effect in Y. lipolytica may explain the missing esters in the present study. This issue, however, needs to be further studied.
2-Phenylethanol is an important flavour compound used in the food and cosmetic industry and is described as having a fresh and rose-like odour [19]. It has previously been reported that Y. lipolytica can synthesise 2-phenylethanol [19,36,37], and these data correspond with the findings in this study. It is well established that phenylalanine is a precursor for 2-phenylethanol in brewers’ yeast through the Ehrlich pathway [38,39,40]. This also seems to be the case for Y. lipolytica, since the decrease in phenylalanine corresponds with the increase in 2-phenylethanol in the experiments with high aeration, both at 20 °C and 30 °C.
Regardless of aeration, no marked effect of fermentation temperature was found on the amounts of volatile compounds. In contrast, it is reported that a standard beer fermentation, using S. cerevisiae, yields higher concentrations of especially higher alcohols and ethyl esters at high, than at low, temperatures [41,42,43,44]. This indicates that the production of volatiles by Y. lipolytica cannot be controlled by temperature in the same way as for S. cerevisiae.
To the best of our knowledge, the literature describing standard beer fermentations does not report the effect of continuous aeration on aroma production. Lehnert et al. [45] did, however, describe the effect of oxygen supply in a continuous alcohol-free beer production using a synthetic media and a strain of S. cerevisiae. Here it was reported that increased aeration increases the production of total higher alcohols as well as decreases the production of aldehydes. This increase in higher alcohols and decrease in aldehydes correspond with the findings in the current study, except for two (3-methyl-butanal and (E)-2-nonenal) which were produced in the high aeration experiment at 20 °C but not in the low aeration treatments. Furthermore, research has shown that an increased oxygen transfer rate can boost the production of the interesting aroma compound γ-decalactone by Y. lipolytica [20,21,46]. The same effect of oxygen on γ-decalactone was, however, not seen in our study. The reasons for this discrepancy could be due to the different yeast strains and/or different fermentation conditions used in the different studies.

5. Conclusions

In this work, we have shown that Y. lipolytica can be used to ferment a normal brewers’ wort containing iso-α-acid, which is vital for the possible use of this yeast in a standard brewery. The growth of Y. lipolytica is, however, inhibited under the given conditions. Not surprisingly, our strain of Y. lipolytica can only utilize glucose and fructose out of the sugars found in a regular brewers’ wort, and it does not produce ethanol in the presence of oxygen. For the first time, however, we report that Y. lipolytica under high aeration conditions, despite the low sugar uptake, can consume a large part of the amino acids (75–80%) in the wort. Furthermore, we report an assimilation order of amino acids for Y. lipolytica in brewers’ wort. Interestingly, Y. lipolytica can assimilate proline rapidly and almost to depletion. Finally, Y. lipolytica does not seem to produce volatile esters under the given conditions, whereas it seems able to produce 2-phenylethanol under high aeration conditions, corresponding with a decrease in phenylalanine in the brewers’ wort. This work improves our understanding of how Y. lipolytica grows, consumes amino acids, and produces volatile aroma compounds in a traditional brewers’ wort, and it may contribute to the potential use of this non-conventional yeast in a traditional brewery for the production of novel beers, e.g., alcohol-free beer.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/fermentation8110579/s1, Figure S1. Concentrations of maltose (squares), sucrose (crosses), maltotriose (diamond), m and malitotetraose (triangles) during fermentation of brewer’s wort with Y. lipolytica at high aeration and 20 °C (solid curves) high aeration and 30 °C (short dotted curves), low aeration and 20 °C (inter mediate dotted curves), and low aeration and 30 °C (long dotted curves). Data are average values from triplicate experiments, and error bars indicate standars deviations. Figure S2. Ethanol concentrations during fermentation of brewer’s wort with Y. lipolytica at (A) high aeration and (B) low aeration and 20 °C (dotted curves) and 30 °C (solid curves). Data are average values from triplicate experiments, and error bars indicate standard deviations. Table S1. Development of volatile compounds (peak areas/10.000) during fermentation of brewer’s wort with Y. lipolytica.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B.S., A.G. and N.A.; methodology, A.B.S., M.A.P., A.G. and N.A.; software, A.B.S. and M.A.P.; formal analysis, A.B.S. and M.A.P.; investigation, A.B.S.; resources, A.B.S., M.A.P., A.G. and N.A.; data curation, A.B.S. and M.A.P.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B.S.; writing—review and editing, A.B.S., M.A.P., A.G. and N.A.; visualization, A.B.S.; supervision, A.B.S., M.A.P., A.G. and N.A.; project administration, A.B.S.; funding acquisition, A.B.S., A.G. and N.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Innovation Fund Denmark, grant number 7038–00197B. The APC was funded by Carlsberg A/S.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Trine Tving Jensen, Kenneth Heide Preisler, Jack Olsen and Stine Steffensen for excellent analytical assistance, Rolf Ringborg and Iuliana Stoica for help with data treatment, and Finn Lok, Lene Kierkegaard and Pia Vaag for quality feedback.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yarrow, D. Four New Combinations in Yeasts. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 1972, 38, 357–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Barth, G.; Gaillardin, C. Physiology and Genetics of the Dimorphic Fungus Yarrowia lipolytica. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1997, 19, 219–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fickers, P.; Cheng, H.; Sze Ki Lin, C. Sugar Alcohols and Organic Acids Synthesis in Yarrowia lipolytica: Where Are We? Microorganisms 2020, 8, 574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Groenewald, M.; Boekhout, T.; Neuvéglise, C.; Gaillardin, C.; Van Dijck, P.W.M.; Wyss, M. Yarrowia lipolytica: Safety Assessment of an Oleaginous Yeast with a Great Industrial Potential. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 40, 187–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zinjarde, S.S. Food-Related Applications of Yarrowia lipolytica. Food Chem. 2014, 152, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Coelho, M.A.; Priscilla, A.; Isabel, B. Yarrowia lipolytica: An Industrial Workhorse. In Current Research, Technology and Education Topics in Applied Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology; Formatex: Badajoz, Spain, 2010; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  7. Nicaud, J.-M. Yarrowia lipolytica. Yeast 2012, 29, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sutherland, J.B.; Cornelison, C.; Crow, S.A. Yarrowia lipolytica (Candida lipolytica). In Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology, 2nd ed.; Batt, C.A., Tortorello, M.L., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 374–378. ISBN 978-0-12-384733-1. [Google Scholar]
  9. Spitaels, F.; Wieme, A.D.; Janssens, M.; Aerts, M.; Daniel, H.-M.; Van Landschoot, A.; De Vuyst, L.; Vandamme, P. The Microbial Diversity of Traditional Spontaneously Fermented Lambic Beer. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e95384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Spitaels, F.; Wieme, A.D.; Janssens, M.; Aerts, M.; Van Landschoot, A.; De Vuyst, L.; Vandamme, P. The Microbial Diversity of an Industrially Produced Lambic Beer Shares Members of a Traditionally Produced One and Reveals a Core Microbiota for Lambic Beer Fermentation. Food Microbiol. 2015, 49, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Dashko, S.; Zhou, N.; Compagno, C.; Piškur, J. Why, When, and How Did Yeast Evolve Alcoholic Fermentation? FEMS Yeast Res. 2014, 14, 826–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Spagnuolo, M.; Shabbir Hussain, M.; Gambill, L.; Blenner, M. Alternative Substrate Metabolism in Yarrowia lipolytica. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Beopoulos, A.; Desfougeres, T.; Sabirova, J.; Zinjarde, S.; Neuvéglise, C.; Nicaud, J.M. The Hydrocarbon-Degrading Oleaginous Yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. In Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 2111–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mansour, S.; Beckerich, J.M.; Bonnarme, P. Lactate and Amino Acid Catabolism in the Cheese-Ripening Yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 6505–6512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Hackenschmidt, S.; Bracharz, F.; Daniel, R.; Thürmer, A.; Bruder, S.; Kabisch, J. Effects of a High-Cultivation Temperature on the Physiology of Three Different Yarrowia lipolytica Strains. FEMS Yeast Res. 2019, 19, foz068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, H.-H.; Ji, X.-J.; Huang, H. Biotechnological Applications of Yarrowia lipolytica: Past, Present and Future. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015, 33, 1522–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bankar, A.; Jadhav, L.; Phalke, V. Metagenomic Insights of Yarrowia lipolytica in Food Industry. In Metagenomic Systems Biology; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 159–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Małajowicz, J.; Nowak, D.; Fabiszewska, A.; Iuliano, A. Comparison of Gamma-Decalactone Biosynthesis by Yeast Yarrowia lipolytica MTLY40-2p and W29 in Batch-Cultures. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2020, 34, 330–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Celińska, E.; Kubiak, P.; Białas, W.; Dziadas, M.; Grajek, W. Yarrowia lipolytica: The Novel and Promising 2-Phenylethanol Producer. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 40, 389–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Braga, A.; Belo, I. Production of γ-Decalactone by Yarrowia lipolytica: Insights into Experimental Conditions and Operating Mode Optimization. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2015, 90, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kothari, S.; Vadgama, R.; Bhat, K.; Lali, A.; Anil, A. Process Optimization for Production and Purification of γ-Decalactone from Ricinoleic Acid Using Yarrowia lipolytica NCIM 3590. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2022, 39, 102285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kebabci, Ö.; Cihangir, N. Comparison of Three Yarrowia lipolytica Strains for Lipase Production: NBRC 1658, IFO 1195, and a Local Strain. Turk. J. Biol. 2012, 36, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Iucci, L.; Patrignani, F.; Belletti, N.; Ndagijimana, M.; Elisabetta Guerzoni, M.; Gardini, F.; Lanciotti, R. Role of Surface-Inoculated Debaryomyces Hansenii and Yarrowia lipolytica Strains in Dried Fermented Sausage Manufacture. Part 2: Evaluation of Their Effects on Sensory Quality and Biogenic Amine Content. Meat Sci. 2007, 75, 669–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Patrignani, F.; Iucci, L.; Vallicelli, M.; Guerzoni, M.E.; Gardini, F.; Lanciotti, R. Role of Surface-Inoculated Debaryomyces hansenii and Yarrowia lipolytica Strains in Dried Fermented Sausage Manufacture. Part 1: Evaluation of Their Effects on Microbial Evolution, Lipolytic and Proteolytic Patterns. Meat Sci. 2007, 75, 676–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jones, M.; Pierce, J.S. Absorbtion of Amino Acids from Wort by Yeasts. J. Inst. Brew. 1964, 70, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, J.; Toldam-Andersen, T.B.; Petersen, M.A.; Zhang, S.; Arneborg, N.; Bredie, W.L.P. Instrumental and Sensory Characterisation of Solaris White Wines in Denmark. Food Chem. 2015, 166, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Johnsen, L.G.; Skou, P.B.; Khakimov, B.; Bro, R. Gas Chromatography—Mass Spectrometry Data Processing Made Easy. J. Chromatogr. A 2017, 1503, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Methner, Y.; Hutzler, M.; Matoulková, D.; Jacob, F.; Michel, M. Screening for the Brewing Ability of Different Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts. Fermentation 2019, 5, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hough, J.S.; Briggs, D.E.; Stevens, R.; Young, T.W. Metabolism of Wort by Yeast. In Malting and Brewing Science: Volume II Hopped Wort and Beer; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1982; pp. 566–614. ISBN 978-1-4615-1799-3. [Google Scholar]
  30. D’Amore, T.; Russell, I.; Stewart, G.G. Sugar Utilization by Yeast during Fermentation. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1989, 4, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Moeller, L.; Zehnsdorf, A.; Aurich, A.; Bley, T.; Strehlitz, B. Substrate Utilization by Recombinant Yarrowia lipolytica Growing on Sucrose. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 93, 1695–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ferreira, I.M.; Guido, L.F. Impact of Wort Amino Acids on Beer Flavour: A Review. Fermentation 2018, 4, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Verstrepen, K.J.; Van Laere, S.D.M.; Vanderhaegen, B.M.P.; Derdelinckx, G.; Dufour, J.-P.; Pretorius, I.S.; Winderickx, J.; Thevelein, J.M.; Delvaux, F.R. Expression Levels of the Yeast Alcohol Acetyltransferase Genes ATF1, Lg-ATF1, and ATF2 Control the Formation of a Broad Range of Volatile Esters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 5228–5237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Verbelen, P.J.; Saerens, S.M.; Van Mulders, S.E.; Delvaux, F.; Delvaux, F.R. The Role of Oxygen in Yeast Metabolism during High Cell Density Brewery Fermentations. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 82, 1143–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fujii, T.; Kobayashi, O.; Yoshimoto, H.; Furukawa, S.; Tamai, Y. Effect of Aeration and Unsaturated Fatty Acids on Expression of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Alcohol Acetyltransferase Gene. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 910–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Celińska, E.; Olkowicz, M.; Grajek, W. L-Phenylalanine Catabolism and 2-Phenylethanol Synthesis in Yarrowia lipolytica—Mapping Molecular Identities through Whole-Proteome Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Analysis. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015, 15, fov041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Hua, D.; Xu, P. Recent Advances in Biotechnological Production of 2-Phenylethanol. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29, 654–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Etschmann, M.M.W.; Bluemke, W.; Sell, D.; Schrader, J. Biotechnological Production of 2-Phenylethanol. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 59, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Gu, Y.; Ma, J.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, P. Refactoring Ehrlich Pathway for High-Yield 2-Phenylethanol Production in Yarrowia lipolytica. ACS Synth. Biol. 2020, 9, 623–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Hazelwood, L.A.; Daran, J.-M.; van Maris, A.J.A.; Pronk, J.T.; Dickinson, J.R. The Ehrlich Pathway for Fusel Alcohol Production: A Century of Research on Saccharomyces cerevisiae Metabolism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 2259–2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Dufour, J.-P.; Malcorps, P.H.; Silcock, P. Control of Ester Synthesis During Brewery Fermentation. In Brewing Yeast Fermentation Performance, 2nd ed.; Smart, K., Ed.; Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2008; pp. 213–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Saerens, S.M.G.; Verbelen, P.J.; Vanbeneden, N.; Thevelein, J.M.; Delvaux, F.R. Monitoring the Influence of High-Gravity Brewing and Fermentation Temperature on Flavour Formation by Analysis of Gene Expression Levels in Brewing Yeast. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 80, 1039–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Saerens, S.M.G.; Delvaux, F.; Verstrepen, K.J.; Van Dijck, P.; Thevelein, J.M.; Delvaux, F.R. Parameters Affecting Ethyl Ester Production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae during Fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 454–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Landaud, S.; Latrille, E.; Corrieu, G. Top Pressure and Temperature Control the Fusel Alcohol/Ester Ratio through Yeast Growth in Beer Fermentation. J. Inst. Brew. 2001, 107, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lehnert, R.; Kuřec, M.; Brányik, T. Effect of Oxygen Supply on Flavor Formation during Continuous Alcohol-Free Beer Production: A Model Study. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2008, 66, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Gomes, N.; Aguedo, M.; Teixeira, J.; Belo, I. Oxygen Mass Transfer in a Biphasic Medium: Influence on the Biotransformation of Methyl Ricinoleate Into γ-Decalactone by the Yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Biochem. Eng. J. 2007, 35, 380–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. OD values (diamonds) as well as glucose (triangles) and fructose (squares) concentrations during fermentation of brewers’ wort with Y. lipolytica at (A) high aeration and (B) low aeration and at 20 °C (dashed curves) and 30 °C (solid curves). Data are average values from triplicate experiments, and error bars indicate standard deviations.
Figure 1. OD values (diamonds) as well as glucose (triangles) and fructose (squares) concentrations during fermentation of brewers’ wort with Y. lipolytica at (A) high aeration and (B) low aeration and at 20 °C (dashed curves) and 30 °C (solid curves). Data are average values from triplicate experiments, and error bars indicate standard deviations.
Fermentation 08 00579 g001
Figure 2. Amino acid concentrations during fermentation of brewers’ wort with Y. lipolytica at (A) high aeration and 20 °C, (B) high aeration and 30 °C, (C) low aeration and 20 °C, and (D) low aeration and 30 °C on day 0 (black), day 4 (white) and day 7 (grey). Arrows indicate amino acids that belong to the group of Strecker aldehyde precursors. Data are average values from triplicate experiments, and error bars indicate standard deviations.
Figure 2. Amino acid concentrations during fermentation of brewers’ wort with Y. lipolytica at (A) high aeration and 20 °C, (B) high aeration and 30 °C, (C) low aeration and 20 °C, and (D) low aeration and 30 °C on day 0 (black), day 4 (white) and day 7 (grey). Arrows indicate amino acids that belong to the group of Strecker aldehyde precursors. Data are average values from triplicate experiments, and error bars indicate standard deviations.
Fermentation 08 00579 g002
Table 1. Total amino acid uptake (g/L) during 7 days of fermentation of brewer’s wort with Y. lipolytica.
Table 1. Total amino acid uptake (g/L) during 7 days of fermentation of brewer’s wort with Y. lipolytica.
High AerationLow Aeration
20 °C30 °C20 °C30 °C
Day 02.40 ± 0.11 (0%)2.38 ± 0.03 (0%)2.30 ± 0.10 (0%)2.32 ± 0.01 (0%)
Day 40.93 ± 0.08 (61.1%)0.89 ± 0.08 (62.6%)2.00 ± 0.11 (13.2%)2.21 ± 0.06 (4.7%)
Day 70.60 ± 0.04 (74.9%)0.48 ± 0.04 (79.7%)1.73 ± 0.04 (24.9%)1.94 ± 0.05 (16.4%)
Red indicates the highest of the two compared values. If both values are red, no statistically significant different were found. Blue indicates the lowest of the two values. If both red and blue a values are shown on a day the values are significantly different (p < 0.05). Values in g/L and uptake in percentage (in brackets) calculated based on initial concentration.
Table 2. Assimilation order of amino acids from brewers’ wort fermented using Y. lipolytica.
Table 2. Assimilation order of amino acids from brewers’ wort fermented using Y. lipolytica.
High AerationLow Aeration
20 °C30 °C20 °C30 °C
Group 1
Fast
More than 80% on day 4
Proline
Alanine
Lysine
Arginine
Asparagine
Aspartic Acid
Glutamic Acid
Glycine
Proline
Alanine
Arginine
Serine
Asparagine
Aspartic Acid
Glutamic Acid
Glycine
Aspartic Acid
Glutamic Acid
Aspartic Acid
Group 2
Intermediate
Between 50% and 80% on day 4
Serine
Methionine
Lysine
Methionine
Glutamic Acid
Group 3
Slow
More than 10% on day 7 and less than 50% on day 4
Leucine
Phenylalanine
Valine
Tyrosine
Isoleucine
Histidine
Tryptophan
Glutamine
Leucine
Phenylalanine
Valine
Tyrosine
Isoleucine
Threonine
Histidine
Tryptophan
Glutamine
Proline
Alanine
Arginine
Serine
Asparagine
Glutamine
Proline
Alanine
Arginine
Serine
Asparagine
Group 4
Little or no absorption
Less than 10% on day 7
Threonine-Leucine
Phenylalanine
Valine
Lysine
Tyrosine
Isoleucine
Threonine
Histidine
Tryptophan
Glycine
Methionine
Leucine
Phenylalanine
Valine
Lysine
Tyrosine
Isoleucine
Threonine
Histidine
Tryptophan
Glycine
Methionine
Glutamine
Table 3. Volatile compounds (peak areas) during fermentation of brewers’ wort with Y. lipolytica.
Table 3. Volatile compounds (peak areas) during fermentation of brewers’ wort with Y. lipolytica.
High AerationLow Aeration
20 °C 30 °C20 °C 30 °C
Day047 047047 047
Esters
Not detected
Higher Alcohols
1-propanol
2-methyl-1-propanol
3-methyl-1-butanol
3-methyl-3-buten-1-ol
1-pentanol
1-hexanol
(E)-2-nonen-1-ol
2-ethyl-1-hexanol
1-octanol
propylene glycol
α,α-dimethyl-benzenemethanol
2-phenylethanol
2-dodecyl 1,3-propanediol
Phenolic Compounds
2-methoxy-4-vinylphenol
2-naphthalenol
phenol
Aldehydes
3-methyl-butanal
2-methyl-propanal
2-methyl-butanal
hexanal
heptanal
3-methyl-2-butenal
octanal
decanal
(E)-2-nonenal
Ketones
acetone
2-butanone
2,3-butanedione
2,3-pentanedione
cyclopentanone
5-methyl-2-hexanone
acetoin
1-hydroxy-2-propanone
9-oxabicyclo [6.1.0]nonan-4-one
6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one
4-Cyclopentene-1,3-dione
Acetophenone
β-damascenone
geranylacetone
Fatty Acids
acetic acid
formic acid
propanoic acid
2-methyl-propanoic acid
butanoic acid
3-methyl-butanoic acid
pentanoic acid
hexanoic acid
heptanoic acid
octanoic acid
nonanoic acid
n-decanoic acid
benzoic acid
Benzene Derivates
(1-methylethyl)-benzene
1,2,4-trimethyl-benzene
1,3-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-benzene
benzaldehyde
benzeneacetaldehyde
Furans
2-pentyl-furan
dihydro-2-methyl-3(2H)-furanone
furfural
1-(2-furanyl)-ethanone
2-furanmethanol
Others
methanesulfonyl chloride
thiazole
α-methylstyrene
A one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test was used for each compound to test for significant differences (95% level) between the sampling points; day 0, 4, and 7. Differences in colours presented indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between peak areas on the sampling days. Blue (Tukey letter A) is the lowest value, yellow (Tukey letter C) the intermediate, and red (Tukey letter B) the highest value. Purple (Tukey letters AB) indicates a value that is not significantly different from either of the values in the other treatment.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sørensen, A.B.; Petersen, M.A.; Garde, A.; Arneborg, N. The Consumption of Amino Acids and Production of Volatile Aroma Compounds by Yarrowia lipolytica in Brewers’ Wort. Fermentation 2022, 8, 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8110579

AMA Style

Sørensen AB, Petersen MA, Garde A, Arneborg N. The Consumption of Amino Acids and Production of Volatile Aroma Compounds by Yarrowia lipolytica in Brewers’ Wort. Fermentation. 2022; 8(11):579. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8110579

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sørensen, Anders Bagger, Mikael Agerlin Petersen, Arvid Garde, and Nils Arneborg. 2022. "The Consumption of Amino Acids and Production of Volatile Aroma Compounds by Yarrowia lipolytica in Brewers’ Wort" Fermentation 8, no. 11: 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8110579

APA Style

Sørensen, A. B., Petersen, M. A., Garde, A., & Arneborg, N. (2022). The Consumption of Amino Acids and Production of Volatile Aroma Compounds by Yarrowia lipolytica in Brewers’ Wort. Fermentation, 8(11), 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8110579

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop