Next Article in Journal
Pilot-Scale Production of the Natural Colorant Laetiporic Acid, Its Stability and Potential Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Insight into the Substrate Specificity of Lactobacillus paracasei Aspartate Ammonia-Lyase
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Starter Cultures and Type of Casings on the Microbial Features and Volatile Profile of Fermented Sausages
Previous Article in Special Issue
Galactitol Transport Factor GatA Relieves ATP Supply Restriction to Enhance Acid Tolerance of Escherichia coli in the Two-Stage Fermentation Production of D-Lactate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Research Progress on the Effect of Autolysis to Bacillus subtilis Fermentation Bioprocess

Key Laboratory of Industrial Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, School of Biotechnology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Fermentation 2022, 8(12), 685; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8120685
Submission received: 2 November 2022 / Revised: 22 November 2022 / Accepted: 25 November 2022 / Published: 28 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applied Microorganisms and Industrial/Food Enzymes)

Abstract

:
Bacillus subtilis is a gram-positive bacterium, a promising microorganism due to its strong extracellular protein secretion ability, non-toxic, and relatively mature industrial fermentation technology. However, cell autolysis during fermentation restricts the industrial application of B. subtilis. With the fast advancement of molecular biology and genetic engineering technology, various advanced procedures and gene editing tools have been used to successfully construct autolysis-resistant B. subtilis chassis cells to manufacture various biological products. This paper first analyses the causes of autolysis in B. subtilis from a mechanistic perspective and outlines various strategies to address autolysis in B. subtilis. Finally, potential strategies for solving the autolysis problem of B. subtilis are foreseen.

1. Introduction

B. subtilis is a generally recognized as safe (GRAS) microorganism [1], which is famous for its strong ability for heterologous expression, clear physiological and biochemical characteristics, and legacy relatively simple to operate. In addition, they have the advantages of being easy to cultivate and robust in industrial fermentations [2]. Using B. subtilis as the chassis cell, the exogenous introduction of the desired synthetic pathway and the systematic optimization of the strain’s own global metabolism and the coordination of the balance between the strain’s metabolic network and the exogenous pathway allow for the efficient production of a large number of products. As a crucial industrial biotechnology powerful chassis cell, B. subtilis produces valuable enzymes and biopolymers [3]. For example, xylanase can be fermented in a recombinant strain of Bacillus subtilis to obtain an enzymatic activity of 38 U/mL [4], and L-asparaginase (ASN) can reach a yield of 407.6 U/mL (2.5 g/L) by Bacillus subtilis fermenters [5]. Biopolymers are primarily represented by riboflavin, surface activator, ethylene coupling, phytase, xylanase, L-asparaginase, chondroitin, N-ethyleneglycolate phytase, xylanase, L-asparaginase, chondroitin, N-acetyl acyl glucosamine, etc. [6] (shown in Figure 1). The yield of riboflavin in Bacillus subtilis was ahead of other strains of the chassis. As early as 1999, Perkins et al. applied genetic engineering technology to construct a high-yielding strain of riboflavin using Bacillus subtilis as the substrate cells, and the yield of riboflavin could reach 15 g/L at 56 h of fermentation [7]. In the agriculture field, B. subtilis is not only used to treat plant and animal illnesses and to replace hazardous chemical fungicides to minimize the danger to other species and the environment [8]. Regarding probiotic foods, B. subtilis can enter animals in the form of spores [9]. After germination, it can produce many antibacterial substances to inhibit the growth of harmful intestinal microorganisms such as Escherichia coli to achieve the effect of gastrointestinal protection [10].
However, there is a problem with cell autolysis in fermentation cultures of B. subtilis. Cell autolysis is widespread in microorganisms, such as bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi. The researchers defined the self-structural degradation process that bacteria undergo at the end of their life cycle as “autolysis” and found that “autolysins” such as cytosolic hydrolases and peptidoglycan hydrolases, which catalyze the hydrolysis of the cell wall peptidoglycan layer, are closely related to the autolysis process. Reduced cell autolysis in B. subtilis leads to a significant increase in cell secretion of recombinant proteins [11] and other productions. In a later stage of fermentation or under fermentation conditions unsuitable for cell growth, the cells will begin to autolyze. This effect leads to a substantial reduction in cell biomass, which seriously affects the expression of products and fermentation efficiency [12]. In particular, high-yield strains modified by metabolic engineering are more likely to occur during cell autolysis. For example, WB800 [13] (B. subtilis with eight extracellular proteases knocked out), most often applied to express extracellular proteases, has more severe cell autolysis [14]. Therefore, it is essential to study the autolysis of B. subtilis. Studies have shown that the root cause of B. subtilis autolysis is that the activity of autolysins is controlled by various conditions to perform their respective functions and thus hydrolyze the peptidoglycan of the cells. These autolysis enzymes include those closely related to the growth and development of B. subtilis and those from prophages.
This review analyzes the relevant factors of B. subtilis autolysis in terms of mechanism, summarizes the functions of critical autolysins in its autolysis process, and outlines the various effective strategies that have been used in recent years to address autolysis in B. subtilis and the results they have achieved. Finally, future research directions for solving the autolysis problem of B. subtilis have been prospected.

2. Mechanism and Causative Factors of Autolysis Phenomenon

Microbial autolysis is mainly manifested in the action of enzymes on the cell wall. As shown in Figure 2, the cell wall of B. subtilis consists primarily of peptidoglycan and anionic polymers. The anionic polymers provide chemical bonds that can be hydrolyzed, thus generating a more significant number of potential active sites for bacterial autolysins action [15]. These actions eventually lead to disrupting the cross-linked structure of peptidoglycan and the peptidoglycan cleavage [16]. The following figure shows the structural units and autolysis action sites (four in total) of the B. subtilis metrocyte cell wall and spore cortex.
In addition to the normal senescence and death of cells, any factors that are unsuitable for the growth and physiological metabolism of microorganisms and cause extreme disturbance in their physiological state can effectively induce autolysis expression and cause microbial autolysis. Comprehensive of the existing reports at home and abroad, we summarize the various factors that can cause cell autolysis in B. subtilis, as shown in Figure 1.

2.1. Physical Factors That Induce Autolysis

The main physical factors are temperature, osmotic pressure, and pH. Among them, temperature variation is an essential environmental parameter affecting microbial cell growth and reproduction. High-temperature fermentation has some advantages in production because it creates a harsh environment (preventing the growth of hybrid bacterium) that promotes the growth of the target strain. Nonetheless, raising the high temperature of the culture might have a detrimental impact on microorganism development and lead to autolysis of the cultured cells in certain situations.
B. subtilis can grow at 25~40 °C, and the optimum temperature for its growth is 35 °C. As mentioned in the article by Regamey and Karamat et al. [17], after B. subtilis was subjected to thermal excitation at 50 °C, prophage spβ was induced, and many cells underwent autolysis. Similarly, Nandy et al. [18] found that moving B. subtilis from 37 °C to 48 °C water bath conditions caused massive autolysis of B. subtilis cells. According to Antelmann et al. [19], high-temperature incubation caused the production of autolysis enzymes in some bacteria, leading to massive cell autolysis of these microorganisms. This phenomenon poses a severe threat to microbial culture. Therefore, using a higher temperature to culture microorganisms and avoid cell autolysis has become one of the main obstacles to high-temperature culture microorganisms. One of the most successful strategies to overcome this issue is to improve microbial strains to adapt to high-temperature fermentation settings [20]. In addition to this, autolysis of B. subtilis induced by supercooling was also found by Yamanaka et al. [21]. Following a rapid decrease in temperature, the physiology of B. subtilis cells changes profoundly; this phenomenon is called cold shock [22]. B.subtilis vegetative cells undergo autolysis when exposed to cold shock treatment.
In the aspect of osmotic pressure, the suitable osmotic pressure for Bacillus subtilis is converted to a culture speed of approximately 200–250 rpm. Svarachorn et al. [23] discovered that when B. subtilis cells lose their capacity to regulate osmotic pressure, the intracellular potassium ions of the bacterium will leak, and the cells will not take up glucose. If the bacterium is continuously incubated at 37 °C in high concentrations of near-monovalent cations, autolysis of cells will be observed. Sahoo et al. [24] and Yamanaka et al. [21] exposed B. subtilis to drastic pressure change conditions (rate of 1.482/s). After 10 h incubation, they found that the biomass of the bacterium decreased drastically. The effect of high pressure on the autolysis of B. subtilis can also be understood during the decontamination of HHP (high hydrostatic pressure) [25].
pH is a very important parameter for microbial growth, a comprehensive indicator of metabolic activity, and closely related to microbial autolysis. Different species of microorganisms have different pH requirements. The optimum pH for most bacteria is 6.5–7.5. The optimal culture pH for B. subtilis is about 7. Jolliffe et al. [26] found that Bacillus subtilis showed the highest autolysis of its cells when it was in alkaline medium (pH = 9).

2.2. Chemical Factors That Induce Autolysis

Chemical factors are mainly the effects of monovalent cations and antibiotics on cell autolysis. These substances affect the normal expression of autolytic enzymes and proteases in cells. For example, Svarachorn et al. [27] found that monovalent cations such as K+, NH4+, Na+, Cs+, and Li+ could cause intracell autolysis of B. subtilis 168 when the concentration of K+, NH4+, Na+, Cs+, and Li+ was 100 mM. The autolysis rate of cells in the above buffer was in the range of 2.8–4.0 k × 102/min. This shows that high concentrations of monovalent cations in buffers can promote autolysis in B. subtilis 168, mainly due to activating important, internal, and significant N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase inside this bacterium, e.g., NH+, Li+, Rb+, Cs+, and Na+ at 100 mM. Their enzyme activities were increased by 6.4, 3.9, 3.9, 3.6, and 3.4 times, respectively. Autolysis is more likely to occur when protein synthesis is active, but peptidoglycan synthesis is inadequate.
The role of proteases in antibiotic-induced cell lysis is also a more complex process [28]. Jolliffe et al. [29] investigated the impact of nafcillin on B. subtilis intracell autolysis and discovered that mutants that release many proteases are incredibly resistant to nafcillin-induced fatal and lytic effects. Under nafcillin induction, however, protease-deficient bacteria were more sensitive to mortality and lysis.

2.3. Biological Factors That Induce Autolysis

Biological factors mainly include external and internal factors, which are the microbial interactions and alterations in the autolysin gene expression level of B. subtilis. Among the external factors, B. subtilis in the same culture system compete with each other for nutrients. The interaction between microorganisms causes autolysis. As for internal factors, mutations in some genes that can affect the expression of autolysis enzymes can also have a consequence on cell autolysis.

2.3.1. Cell Autolysis Caused by Cannibalism

The phenomenon of “kill one’s kind” in B. subtilis was reported by Pastor et al. [30]. They found that B. subtilis cells forming spores are prone to cannibalism, whereby the bacteria delay the formation of spores in other cells by cannibalism. The nature of cannibalism is that B. subtilis that have entered sporulation can produce and export a killing factor and a signaling protein. Synergistic action prevents other sister cells from forming spores and causes sister cell autolysis. Immediately after Allenby et al. [31] discovered the significance of the phenomenon of cannibalism, when B. subtilis was subjected to phosphate-deficient conditions, the harsh conditions significantly induced the lysis of non-spores, thus providing a good source of nutrients for other cells. To test this idea, the researchers transferred B. subtilis to a carbon-deficient medium and the bacteria underwent rapid cell autolysis [31,32]. Nandy et al. [33] revealed that this crucial regulatory protein of B. subtilis, Spo0A, which controls spore development, uses a certain antimicrobial factor to lyse E. coli cells under its regulation.
Gonzalez-Pastor et al. [34] analyzed the nature of B. subtilis “conspecific” and concluded that those cells entering the spore pathway produce and export a killing factor (SkfA) and a signal peptide protein (SdpC). The genes encoding these two proteins are located on the skfA operon and the sdpC operon, respectively, where the skf operon element is responsible for the output of SkfA and the product of immune function against SkfA [30]. Together, skfA and sdpC cause sister cell autolysis and prevent the formation of spores. The processing and secretion of the sdpC gene also produces a sporulation-delaying protein (SDP). SDP is a peptide toxin that kills cells outside the biofilm to support continued growth. SDP rapidly collapses the proton motive force (PMF) of B. subtilis, which induces dramatic autolysin-mediated lysis [35,36].
The sdpC operon is also expressed in Spo0A-active cells, producing a signaling protein (called delaying the formation of spore protein, SdpC) that causes transcription of the yvbA gene into the protein YvbA. The YvbA protein turns on the operon containing the ATP synthase gene (atp) and the lipid catabolism inhibitor gene (yusLKJ), thereby delaying the entry of Spo0A-activated cells to delay entry into the bud formation process. However, in Spo0A-inactivated cells, SdpC signaling protein also induces the production of YvbA protein, which promotes the death of Spo0A-inactivated cells by inhibiting a σW factor. The opened element of the metabolic inhibitor gene (yusLKJ) decomposes, thereby delaying the entry of Spo0A-inactivated cells into the formation process of spores. However, in Spo0A-inactivated cells, the SdpC signaling protein also induces the production of YvbA protein, which promotes the death of Spo0A-inactivated cells by inhibiting a σW factor. (This σW factor is associated with antibiotic resistance and detoxification and protects cells from lysis by killing aspects.) Thus, in Spo0A-inactivated cells, YvbA assists the killing factor in causing cell autolysis. The final result of the above process is that the nutrients released by the dead cells are used as food for the Spo0A-activated cells, keeping the Spo0A-activated cells growing instead of entering the formation process of spores [34].

2.3.2. Gene Mutations Cause Cell Autolysis

In B. subtilis, the expression of autolysis enzymes is regulated by a variety of genes. However, with the use of B. subtilis in industrial development, many of the mutants produced by genetic modification to improve fermentation yield are more prone to autolysis because they disrupt this regulatory balance. According to Kodama, the B. subtilis gene mutant is an excellent host for exogenous protease synthesis [37]. Stephenson [14] reported in the early years that mutants deficient in the extracellular proteases NprE and AprE were more likely to increase the intracellular hydrolysis of B. subtilis between the transition and stabilization phases of batch cultures of the bacterium. Afterward, the Wong group [38] constructed deletion mutants of eight major exogenous protease genes in B. subtilis. Although the production of cellulase was improved in this mutant, the cells were highly susceptible to autolysis during culture. In recent studies, a number of other genes have also been found to be associated with autolysis. Palomino et al. [39] found that high salt and pbpE mutations lead to cell wall defects. The resulting mutant peptidoglycan shows increased solubility and sensitivity to mutant autolysins. Perez [40] found that spoVG mutations decreased and spoVS mutations increased sigma(D)-directed gene expression, causing cell separation and autolysis.

2.4. Other Factors That Induce Autolysis

Autolysis of bacterial cells is readily caused by the severe circumstances to which bacteria are exposed, including nutritional deficits. Such harsh conditions act as an inducing factor, resulting in the cannibalism mentioned above. For example, Allenby et al. [30] reported that when B. subtilis was subjected to phosphate-deficient conditions, the harsh conditions significantly induced transcription of the skfA operon element in B. subtilis, which made it enter a state of cannibalism, leading to cell autolysis. It is worth adding that Jolliffe et al. [41] discovered that adding chemicals that distribute charge or pH gradients to B. subtilis cells might lyse the bacterium.

3. B. subtilis Key Autolysins Enzymes

From the above studies, it is clear that autolysis in B. subtilis is ultimately caused by autolysins. The final results of various evoked autolytic factors are stimulated autolysins expression. Therefore, the research conducted on autolysins is the key to solving the autolysis problem. B. subtilis produces several hydrolases during the trophic growth phase [42,43,44]. Smith et al. [45] nicely summarized the autolysins associated with B. subtilis growth and development. Based on the specificity of autolysins’ hydrolysis of B. subtilis cell wall peptidoglycan and the specificity of the hydrolytic chemical bonds of the autolysins, autolysins and peptidoglycan hydrolases can be classified as muramidase, acetyl-glucosaminidase, acetylmuramoyl alanine amidase, and endopeptidase. The functions of several of the most critical enzymes and their mechanisms of action in autolysis are detailed in Figure 3.

3.1. Analysis of the Mechanism of Action of Related Enzymes

The respective functions of the life cycle of B. subtilis autolysis enzymes are demonstrated in Figure 3. Among these hydrolases, N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase (amidase, LytC or CwIB) and N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase (glucosaminidase, LytD or CwlG) are two of the significant autolysins [46,47,48]. During the nutritional development stage of bacteria, they carry the majority of the autolysis activity. Inactivation of LytC and LytD show that these two autolysins bear 95% of the autolytic activity of the cells [49,50]. In addition to the main autolysins described above, other less significant enzymes were discovered individually in nutritional cell surface extracts, including LytF (CwlE) and LytE (CwIF) [51,52,53]. Table 1 summarizes the peptidoglycan hydrolase-related genes. People are still researching the roles of various additional, less significant, but potentially vital autolysins. Different groups studying the functions of the above autolysins have come to different conclusions due to subtle differences in strain genetic background and experimental conditions. Still, they all have the same impression about these autolysins. There is a high degree of functional redundancy in these various multifunctional autolysins.

3.1.1. The Role of Autolysins in the Formation of Spores

Autolysins aid cell differentiation. Regarding B. subtilis differentiation activities, including the formation of spores and germination, which need substantial peptidoglycan rearrangements and alterations, almost all of them are affected by autolysins [54,55].
Even though spores have considerable resistance and dormancy, they possess a stress-sensitive system that reacts to germination agents. Maternal cell autolysis aids in the dispersion of mature spores to a more favorable environment. Foster et al. [56] found the presence of a 30 kDa sized protein associated with maternal cell autolysis in the formation of spores that are well expressed before maternal cell autolysis occurs. It is presumed to be primarily responsible for maternal cell autolysis. Then, Kuroda et al. [57] cloned and identified the gene responsible for encoding this protein and named it “cwlC.” They tested the function of the cwlC deletion mutant. They showed that the mutant did not undergo significant phenotypic changes in shoot cell formation, germination, and shoot resistance to heat and autolysins. Moreover, in the cwlC mutant, the mother cell still underwent cell autolysis. They also found that CwlC proteins hydrolyze both the nutrient cell wall peptidoglycan of B. subtilis and the peptidoglycan of spores. Mother cell autolysis required for the release of mature endosperms during the formation of spores is mainly dependent on two amidases of the LytC family, CwlC and LytC; CwlC and LytC play complementary roles in hydrolyzing the cell wall peptidoglycan of mother cells [44,56].
In addition, endospore formation in B. subtilis produces a germination-specific lyase (GSLE) that can only be isolated from germinating spores in its active form and can only hydrolyze the stress peptidoglycan of permeabilized, undamaged spores in vitro. GSLE is present in dormant spores as an inactive preprotein [58].

3.1.2. Role of Autolysins in the Digestion of the Asymmetric Septum, Cortical

Maturation, and Related Differentiation Processes

The B. subtilis autolysins play an essential role in asymmetric septum digestion, cortical maturation, and related differentiation processes [15]. spoIID is involved in the digestion of the asymmetric septum, as strains carrying mutations in this gene are found when the septum is only partially digested and remains in an encircled state around the cell. spoIID encodes a modified protein similar to the LytB sequence. Studies claim that spoIID may control the movement of an autolysin to digest peptidoglycan from asymmetric septa [59].

3.1.3. The Role of Autolysins during the Vegetative Phase

The main autolysins during the vegetative phase of B. subtilis are LytC and LytD; the lytC gene encodes LytC, and lytC is located within the operon element lytLABC [50]. lytC is active at the end of the logarithmic growth phase of B. subtilis, and this autolytic activity is maintained until late in the stabilization phase. It remains active even during the formation of spores (referred to in Section 3.1.1 mentioned above). LytC and LytD are the main autolysins produced by B. subtilis during growth. Both of them are transcriptionally regulated by sigD. sigma D is expressed during vegetative growth and is associated with exponential growth and transcription of genes expressed during early stationary periods [60,61]. Furthermore, both proteins are required for bacterial motility. Knocking out the lytC gene in B. subtilis ATCC 6051 increased bacteriophage density and amylase activity by 1.6-fold. lytC and lytD deletion also inhibited cell lysis, but the inhibition was less than in the lytC-only mutant.
lytE and lytF encode peptide chain endopeptidases and are involved in bacterial segregation. Deleting lytE and lytF alone resulted in mutants with defective growth segregation (division or separation). Still, the inhibitory effect on cell autolysis was not significant. In addition, during cell growth, cells must expand covalently closed macromolecules of the cell membrane [62]. B. subtilis contains two functionally redundant D, L-endopeptidases (CwlO and LytE) that cleave peptide crosslinks to allow expansion of PG (the cell wall peptidoglycan) [63]. Double deletion of lytE with the cwlO mutant, which affects cell length increase, leads to a bacteriophage lethal effect [64].

3.2. Prophage Autolysins

In addition to the numerous autolysins involved in the growth and development, there are also autolysins from B. subtilis prophage. When the expression of autolysin encoded by prophages (PBSX) is induced, pores with auxiliary or unknown functions are produced in the peptidoglycan cell wall. The cytoplasmic membrane material protrudes through these openings and is released as a membrane sac (MV) [65]. The induced cells eventually die due to loss of membrane integrity. The vesicle-producing cell leads to cell autolysis through the enzymatic action of releasing autolysin, which induces the formation of MV in neighboring cells [66]. The study of prophage sequences has been studied since as early as 1997; Presecan [67] identified many potentially non-essential chromosomal motifs in the whole genome nucleotide sequence of B. subtilis, particularly 10 relatively large AT-rich regions representing known prophages and prophage-like regions scattered across the genome. Analog sequences (pro1-7) are obtained by horizontal gene transfer [68,69,70]. Prophage PBSX, spβ, and skin remain lysogenic [17,71,72]. Lysogenic phages usually encode peptidoglycan hydrolases, called prophage autolysins. Under certain conditions, it can lyse host cell walls and release phage particles after replication.

3.2.1. Prophage Autolysins PBSX

PBSX, a phage-like phibacin of B. subtilis 168, carried by bacteria can be induced to lyse DNA-damaging agents and produce PBSX particles; however, these particles cannot transmit the PBSX genome [73]. This suicide reaction produces particles that kill non-lysogenic strains of PBSX. The prophage PBSX includes xlyA, which encodes the peptidoglycan hydrolase XlyA mentioned above, xepA encodes an export protein XepA, xhIA encodes a membrane-associated protein XhlA, and xhIB encodes a perforin protein XhIB. The proteins encoded by the latter three genes play an assisting role in cell autolysis. In subsequent studies conducted by Krogh et al. [74], it was found that a late operon located within B. subtilis PBSX was used to express autolysins associated with the prophage PBSX, as shown in Figure 3. Four different genes on late operon encode these autolysins proteins [73].
Table 1. Summary of peptidoglycan hydrolase-related genes.
Table 1. Summary of peptidoglycan hydrolase-related genes.
GeneCommentsFunctionRef
1cwlCAmidase, mother cell-specificCell separation, spore[43,55]
2lytCAmidase, vegetative/sporulation expressed only during vegetative growthCell separation, motility, cell lysis, mother cell lysis[46,47,48]
3lytDGlucosaminidase, vegetativeMotility[48,49]
4lytE lytFEncoding peptide chain endopeptidaseParticipation in bacteriophage isolationCell separation, motility, cell lysis, mother cell lysis[46,47,48,50,51,52]
5gslEgslEGSLE-related proteinsGSLE-related proteinsCortex hydrolysisCortex hydrolysis[57]
6spoIIDlytE lytFControl of the activity of an autolysin to digest peptidoglycan from asymmetric septaEncoding peptide chain endopeptidasedigestion of the asymmetric septumParticipation in bacteriophage isolation[50,51,52,59]
7xlyAspoIIDAmidase, mitomycin C-inducibleControl of the activity of an autolysin to digest peptidoglycan from asymmetric septaPBSX lysisdigestion of the asymmetric septum[59,75]
8cwlAcwlCAmidase, silent gene in the skin elementAmidase, mother cell-specificCryptic prophageCell separation, spore[43,55,76,77]

3.2.2. XlyA Amidase Family

As further research into it, Longchamp et al. [72] divided and identified two peptidoglycan hydrolases of the XlyA amidase family, XlyA and YomC, and found YomC is within the spβ, respectively, and belongs to the B. subtilis prophage autolysins. Another enzyme from the XlyA family, N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase, is an active peptidoglycan hydrolase [75]. The protein N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase (CwlA) is related to cell autolysis. Later studies showed that CwlA is an autolysin gene located within the skin component of the prophage [76]. Kunst et al. [77] also found that the two open reading frames yqxH and yqxG immediately adjacent to cwlA encode two other proteins, respectively, which they hypothesized to be related to the autolytic activity of CwlA and named them “Yqxh” (similar to holin) and “Yqxg” (similar to phage-related lytic exoenzyme), respectively.

3.2.3. Prophage Autolysins BlyA

Regamey and Karamata [17] identified and characterized a DNA fragment in B. subtilis and named it “blyA” gene, which encodes a protein with a molecular weight of 39.6 kDa and contains 367 amino acids (BlyA). BlyA exhibited N-acetylcytidyl-L-alanine amidase activity associated with spβ phage-mediated cell autolysis. They conclusively demonstrated that BlyA belongs to the prophage spβ autolysins and that heat stimulation of B. subtilis CU1147 (CU1147 is an Spβc2 lysogenic strain, and Spβc2 is a temperature-sensitive phage) would induce this Spβc2 to express BlyA and lead to cell autolysis.

3.3. The Effect of Phosphopiridic Acid on Peptidoglycan Hydrolase

It has been shown that the peptidoglycan hydrolase associated with B. subtilis autolysis is regulated by lipoteichoic acid in the cell wall and the action of extracellular proteases. Lipoteichoic acid (LTA) can absorb Mg2+ to support the activity of several synthetic enzymes in the cell membrane. It also functions as a storage element and regulates the activity of intracell autolysis enzymes [78]. In B. subtilis, LTA modification is controlled by the dltA-E operon. Previous studies have shown that deletion of the dltA-D gene disrupts LTA modification, which further alters the cell surface microenvironment and enhances cell autolysis [79,80,81].

3.4. Effect of Proteases on Cell Autolysis

B. subtilis produces at least eight extracellular proteases [82]. Some examples suggest that these extracellular proteases are associated with cell autolysis. Jolliffe et al. reported that B. subtilis protease mutants have autolysin levels in the cell wall equal to or higher than wild-type strains [35]. Extracellular proteases have been identified as involved in degrading peptidoglycan hydrolases in the cell walls. Extracellular protease deficient strains showed increased lysis, where the extracellular proteases AprE and NprE had a greater ability to stabilize autolysins than NprB, Bpr, Mpr, and Epr [83]. Coxon et al. [84] found that the B. subtilis protease deletion mutant had a higher peptidoglycan folding rate while increasing susceptibility to intracell autolysis. In his research, Stephenson found that B. subtilis strains with inactivated protease genes exhibited cell autolysis, and mutants lacking multiple extracellular proteases became more susceptible to autolysis [14].

4. Strategies to Inhibit Cell Autolysis in B. subtilis

4.1. Inactivation-Associated Autolysins Genes

Inactivating single or few autolysin genes in B. subtilis cells becomes the first choice on the road to solving the autolysis problem. The strategies and results for modifying the autolysis aspects are presented in Table 2. Starting from the main control of autolysis gene lytC, Kuroda and Sekiguchi et al. [49] reported that lytC mutants are resistant to cell autolysis even after 6 days of culture at 37 °C. Similarly, Yamamoto et al. [64] found that inactivation of the lytC gene effectively inhibited the cell autolysis in wild-type B. subtilis cells and found that it can reduce the cell wall hydrolysis activity in stable cells by approximately 90%. On this basis, Smith and Foster et al. [44] found that dual mutants of the lytC and cwlC genes were effective against autolysis of mother cells during late B. subtilis bacteriophage formation. Nugroho et al. [85] reported that a double mutant of the cwlC and cwlH genes inhibited autolysis in B. subtilis cells. In addition, other knockout strategies for spore-associated autolysin genes are gradually emerging. Gonzalez-Pastor et al. [34] found that a mutant of a killing factor (SkfA) in B. subtilis protects non-spores from lysis by cells forming spores. Kodama et al. [37] found that introducing a significant autolysin gene mutation (lytC mutation) into B. subtilis mutant strain with a deletion of spo0A effectively suppressed cell autolysis caused by the spo0A mutation. Chen R. et al. [60] demonstrated that appropriate deletion of autolysin genes could improve recombinant protein yield in extracellular protease-deficient strains, and knockdown of autolysin-related genes lytC and sigD in tandem with eight extracellular proteases could effectively increase exogenous protein yield and delay autolysis.

4.2. Inactivation Operons and Regulatory Genes

Inhibition of autolysis can also be achieved by regulating the operon of autolysin, phibacin, or other regulatory genes. The dlt operon mediates lysophosphatidic acid-D-alanylation, the primary net adverse charge modification process on the cell surface. dlt operon deficiency can improve the net negative charge of the cell wall. dltABCD deletion studied by Chen et al. [78] increased nattokinase, α-amylase, and β-mannanase of B. subtilis by 37.13%, 44.53%, and 53.06%.
Genevieve S Dobihal et al. [86] enabled artificial control of B. subtilis cell wall hydrolysis by regulating the WalRK two-component signaling pathway, homeostasis of cell membrane cleavage, and elongation. They also found that the cleavage products of PG hydrolases (LytE and CwlO) in the WalR regulon could effectively inhibit WalK signaling, thus offering the potential for therapeutic development.
Zhou et al. [87] knocked down spo0A, a regulatory gene regulating skf and sdp. They found that the knockdown spo0A strains showed significantly faster autolysis rate and lower production of exogenous alkaline protease. The results also confirmed the complexity of the regulatory gene spo0A in the whole metabolic network of the bacterium, and further exploration of the critical regulators and signaling of the genes related to similar feeding is needed.
In the operon of prophage autolysins, it was reported that inactivation of Pcf factor would inhibit the expression of the prophage PBSX autolysin genes xlyA, xhlA, xhIB, and xepA, thereby inhibiting the cell autolysis of the bacterium [88].

4.3. Deletion of the Prophage Sequence

As previously stated, prophage sequences include many hydrolytic enzymes related to cell autolysis. Therefore, the elimination of these sequences improves autolysis significantly. Analysis of the genome of B. subtilis revealed that 4.2 Mb B. subtilis genome contains 10 horizontally obtained prophages (PBSX and spβ) and prophage-like sequences (pro1-7 and skin) [89]. In addition, 2.8% of the genome contains two large operons that produce secondary metabolites (pks and pps). Westes reported a 7.7% (0.53 Mb) reduction in the genome of B. subtilis Δ6 mutant strains produced by deleting two prophages (spβ and PBSX), three primary phage-like sequences (pro1, pro6, and skin), and the pks operon [12]. Takuya Morimoto et al. [90] generated a strain MGB469 in which all prophage and prophage-like sequences except pro7 and pks and pps operons were deleted. In this case, cell growth was normal. Li et al. [91] deleted all known prophages (prophage1-7, spβ, skin, and PBSX) on the B. subtilis 168 genomes, and the autolysis rate of the deleted strain B. subtilis BSK756 was significantly reduced compared to that of the parents, which further confirms that the deletion of the prophage sequence containing autolysin has an ameliorating effect on cell autolysis.

4.4. Tool-Mediated Genome-Wide Editing by CRISPR and Others

As the research of the cell hydrolytic enzymes of B. subtilis continues, key genes are being explored and genetic editing is being carried out in large quantities to improve autolysis and produce a variety of products efficiently. In this process, CRISPR, a tool more suitable for large-scale gene editing, has played an important role. Gerald E. M et al. [92] found that sequential deletion of skfA, sdpC, and xpf genes reduced cell lysis and increased biomass. Zhao et al. [93] inactivated peptidoglycan hydrolase-related genes alone or in different combinations, including sigD, lytE, lytF, lytC, lytD, and lytG. Compared to B. subtilis 168, mutants with multiple gene inactivations (e.g., ΔsigD ΔlytE ΔlytD) exhibited easier sedimentation, significantly increased growth rate, improved sensitivity to antibiotics, and improved α-amylase production. Mutants ΔsigD ΔlytE ΔlytD and ΔsigD ΔlytE ΔlytC ΔlytD also showed increased tolerance to the high osmotic pressure of sodium chloride. They allowed unsterilized fermentation, all of which contributed to lower processing costs.
Table 2. Strategies and results of the modification of autolysis aspects.
Table 2. Strategies and results of the modification of autolysis aspects.
GeneRemodeling MethodRemodeling ResultsRef
1skfADeactivationProtects cells that do not form budding spores from lysis[29]
2lytC, cwlCDeactivationThe cells were still resistant to autolysis after six days of incubation at 37 °C.[56]
3lytC + sigDKnockoutSlowed autolysis, improved exogenous protein production[59]
4dlt operonKnockoutNattokinase, α-amylase, and β-mannanase increased by 37.13%, 44.53%, and 53.06%, respectively.[77]
5bylA, cwlHDeactivationReduction of heat stress-induced autolysis[84]
6PcfDeactivationInhibition of autolysis genes and thus cell autolysis.[87]
7prophage1-7 + spβ + skin + PBSXDeletSignificantly lower autolysis rate[88]
8sigD + lytE + lytD + lytCKnockoutEasier sedimentation, significantly increased growth rate, improved sensitivity to antibiotics, and increased alpha-amylase production. Tolerance to the high osmotic pressure of sodium chloride was improved.[93]
Liu et al. [94] used B. subtilis ATCC6051 as the expression host and deleted eight extracellular proteases (aprE, nprE, nprB, epr, mpr, bpr, vpr, and wprA), spoIIAC, and srfAC to produce mutant B. subtilis ATCC6051∆10. The final maximum extracellular PUL activity (625.5 U/mL) showed the highest expression level (stem cell weight 18.7 g/L).
Zhang et al. [95] used B. subtilis strain WS5 (already deficient in the protease-encoding genes nprE and aprE) as a starting strain and disrupted the six protease-encoding genes (nprB, bpr, mpr, epr, vpr, and wprA) in the genome in sequence using the CRISPR/Cas9 system to finally obtain a recombinant strain WS9PUL that achieved 5951.8 U/mL of branched-chain amylase activity.
Wang et al. [11] reduced cell lysis and enhanced biomass by deleting skfA, sdpC, xpf, and lytC alone. A multiple deletion mutant LM2531 (skfA sdpC lytC xpf) was constructed. After 4 h of incubation, its biomass production was significantly increased compared to the prototype B. subtilis 168 (wild type) strain, lysing 15% and 92% of cells in LM2531 and wild-type cultures, respectively. In addition, two expression vectors were constructed under the control of the P43 promoter to produce recombinant proteins (β-galactosidase and nattokinase). Cultures of LM2531 and wild-type transformants had 13,741 U/mL and 7991 U/mL of intracellular β-galactosidase, respectively (1.72-fold increase). In addition, strain LM2531 produced a 2.6-fold increase in secreted nattokinase compared to the wild type (5226 IU/mL and 2028 IU/mL, respectively).

4.5. Minimal Genome of B. subtilis

As more and more autolysis-related genes are deleted, it has been found that “minimal genome” may also be an effective approach for addressing autolysis. Since completing the whole genome sequencing of B. subtilis, Kunst et al. [77] found that the construction of the minimal genome of B. subtilis has also started to develop rapidly. The B. subtilis genome has been deleted from 7.7% in the beginning to 36.5% in the present. The corresponding non-essential genes (e.g., spore, motility, antibiotic synthesis, secondary carbon sources metabolism, and unknown function genes) have been heavily depleted [96]. The strains obtained by deleting different fragment lengths have various performances. Specialized B. subtilis genomic databases have been established, such as DBTBS, SubiWiki, MetaCyc, SubtiList, SubtiPathways, and SubtInteract databases. Researchers can extract the required information from these databases and analyze data, including DNA sequences, metabolic pathways, protein interactions, and gene transcriptional regulation, to enable genomic modification of B. subtilis as a chassis host.

5. Conclusions

This review is devoted to the summary of autolysis in B. subtilis. We proceed from the mechanism of autolysis in B. subtilis (effect of autolysin on the cell wall) to (1) analyze the external and internal causes of autolysis, (2) introduce the currently known autolysis function, and (3) propose the solution measures to resist autolysis in recent decades. Researchers have been working on the autolysis problem of B. subtilis because the ability to produce recombinant proteins is a major advantage of using it, and the yield of these heterologous proteins is often tied to cellular biomass. In the case of the β-galactosidase described in the article by Wang et al. [11], wild bacteria, for example, and enzyme production began to decrease along with biomass after 7 h of incubation, while the biomass of the modified autolysis-resistant strain was still increasing and accompanied by enzyme production. Therefore, it can also be further understood that reducing the autolysis problem of B. subtilis can also extend the fermentation cycle and meet the needs of energy saving and efficient production. Although the external factors that induce autolysis in B. subtilis are largely understood, controlling these factors also provides researchers with a challenge. Moreover, multiple genes control autolysis in B. subtilis; therefore, it is currently difficult to accurately assess the specific contribution of each autolysis enzyme in the cell autolysis process. Researchers have been working to inactivate multiple autolysis-related genes simultaneously. With the in-depth study of autolysis enzyme function in B. subtilis, more and more regulatory factors controlling autolysis have been discovered and applied, and the study of prophages has led to the gradual implementation of minimal genome construction. In the future, more precise metabolic regulation techniques and holographic analysis will help to overcome the bottleneck of cell autolysis, and by combining techniques and strategies from the histological investigation, laboratory evolution, metabolic engineering, and synthetic biology, B. subtilis will be able to maintain stable biomass under high temperature and other environments, especially in industrial large-scale high-density fermentation production. New metabolic engineering tools such as the CRISPR-Cas system will be the mainstay to achieve this [97]. As research advances and bioinformatics, structural biology, and other fields advance, adopting innovative methods will be even more effective in improving the B. subtilis autolysis issue. In the future, with the deepening of the autolysis problems investigation and research, the precise autolyzed-related gene research and control, to further improve the fermentation production of B. subtilis such as chassis cell production capacity and efficiency, make the training cost reduced in the process of its application which is expected to achieve even closely integrated biomass and yield of high-efficiency production.

Author Contributions

K.R., Q.W., M.H., Y.C., R.X., J.Y., M.X., X.Z. and Z.R. conducted the literature and drafted the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2021YFC2100900), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32171471, No. 32071470), Project funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2022M711365), Key Research and Development Program of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region (No. 2020BFH01001), the Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, and Top-notch Academic Programs Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Harwood, C.R. Bacillus subtilis and its relatives: Molecular biological and industrial workhorses. Trends Biotechnol. 1992, 10, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Young, E.J. Engineering the Bacterial Microcompartment Domain for Molecular Scaffolding Applications. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Liu, Y. Pathway engineering of Bacillus subtilis for microbial production of N-acetylglucosamine. Metab. Eng. 2013, 19, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Panahi, R. Auto-inducible expression system based on the SigB-dependent ohrB promoter in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Biol. 2014, 48, 852–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Feng, Y. Enhanced extracellular production of L-asparaginase from Bacillus subtilis 168 by B. subtilis WB600 through a combined strategy. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 1509–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Schallmey, M.; Singh, A.; Ward, O.P. Developments in the use of Bacillus species for industrial production. Can. J. Microbiol. 2004, 50, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Perkins, J. Genetic engineering of Bacillus subtilis for the commercial production of riboflavin. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1999, 22, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Montesinos, E. Development, registration and commercialization of microbial pesticides for plant protection. Int. Microbiol. 2003, 6, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hoa, T.T. Fate and dissemination of Bacillus subtilis spores in a murine model. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 3819–3823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. D’Arienzo, R. Bacillus subtilis spores reduce susceptibility to Citrobacter rodentium-mediated enteropathy in a mouse model. Res. Microbiol. 2006, 157, 891–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wang, Y. Deleting multiple lytic genes enhances biomass yield and production of recombinant proteins by Bacillus subtilis. Microb. Cell Factories 2014, 13, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Westers, H. Genome engineering reveals large dispensable regions in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2003, 20, 2076–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Nguyen, T.T.; Quyen, T.D.; Le, H.T. Cloning and enhancing production of a detergent- and organic-solvent-resistant nattokinase from Bacillus subtilis VTCC-DVN-12-01 by using an eight-protease-gene-deficient Bacillus subtilis WB800. Microb. Cell Fact. 2013, 12, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Stephenson, K.; Bron, S.; Harwood, C.R. Cellular lysis in Bacillus subtilis; the affect of multiple extracellular protease deficiencies. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1999, 29, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Smith, T.J.; Blackman, S.A.; Foster, S.J. Autolysins of Bacillus subtilis: Multiple enzymes with multiple functions. Microbiology 2000, 146, 249–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Ghuysen, J.-M. Penicillin and beyond: Evolution, protein fold, multimodular polypeptides, and multiprotein complexes. Microb. Drug Resist. 1996, 2, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Regamey, A.; Karamata, D. The N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase encoded by the Bacillus subtilis 168 prophage SP beta. Microbiology 1998, 144, 885–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Nandy, S.K.; Prasad, V.; Venkatesh, K.V. Effect of Temperature on the Cannibalistic Behavior of Bacillus subtilis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 7427–7430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Antelmann, H. The extracellular proteome of Bacillus subtilis under secretion stress conditions. Mol. Microbiol. 2003, 49, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Abdel-Monem, M.O.; Al-Zubeiry, A.H.S.; Al-Gheethi, A.A.S. Biosorption of nickel by Pseudomonas cepacia 120S and Bacillus subtilis 117S. Water Sci. Technol. 2010, 61, 2994–3007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yamanaka, K. Characterization of Bacillus subtilis mutants resistant to cold shock-induced autolysis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1997, 150, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Graumann, P.L.; Marahiel, M.A. Cold shock response in Bacillus subtilis. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1999, 1, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Svarachorn, A. Autolysis of Bacillus-subtilis induced by low-temperature. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1991, 71, 281–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sahoo, S.; Rao, K.K.; Suraishkumar, G.K. Reactive oxygen species induced by shear stress mediate cell death in Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006, 94, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Inaoka, T. Characterization of high hydrostatic pressure-injured Bacillus subtilis cells. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2017, 81, 1235–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Svarachorn, A. Autolysis of Bacillus subtilis 168 induced by monovalent cations and effects of mono- and divalent cations on autolysin activity in vitro. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1989, 30, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rogers, H.J.; Thurman, P.F.; Burdett, I.D. The bactericidal action of beta-lactam antibiotics on an autolysin-deficient strain of Bacillus subtilis. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1983, 129, 465–478. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jolliffe, L.K.; Doyle, R.J.; Streips, U.N. Extracellular proteases increase tolerance of Bacillus subtilis to nafcillin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1982, 22, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Gallardo, O.; Diaz, P.; Pastor, F.I.J. Cloning and production of Xylanase B from Paenibacillus barcinonensis in Bacillus subtilis hosts. Biocatal. Biotransformation 2007, 25, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Allenby, N.E.E. Phosphate starvation induces the sporulation killing factor of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 5299–5303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Schmeisser, F. A new mutation in spo0A with intragenic suppressors in the effector domain. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2000, 185, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Rice, K.C.; Bayles, K.W. Death’s toolbox: Examining the molecular components of bacterial programmed cell death. Mol. Microbiol. 2003, 50, 729–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Nandy, S.K.; Bapat, P.M.; Venkatesh, K.V. Sporulating bacteria prefers predation to cannibalism in mixed cultures. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Gonzalez-Pastor, J.E.; Hobbs, E.C.; Losick, R. Cannibalism by sporulating bacteria. Science 2003, 301, 510–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jolliffe, L.K.; Doyle, R.J.; Streips, U.N. Extracellular proteases modify cell wall turnover in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 1980, 141, 1199–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Tipper, D.J. Mechanism of autolysis of isolated cell walls of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 1969, 97, 837–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Kodama, T. Effect of Bacillus subtilis spo0A mutation on cell wall lytic enzymes and extracellular proteases, and prevention of cell lysis. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2007, 103, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cho, H.-Y. Production of minicellulosomes from Clostridium cellulovorans in Bacillus subtilis WB800. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 5704–5707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Palomino, M.M.; Sanchez-Rivas, C.; Ruzal, S.M. High salt stress in Bacillus subtilis: Involvement of PBP4*as a peptidoglycan hydrolase. Res. Microbiol. 2009, 160, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Perez, A.R.; Abanes-De Mello, A.; Pogliano, K. Suppression of engulfment defects in Bacillus subtilis by elevated expression of the motility regulon. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 1159–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Jolliffe, L.K.; Doyle, R.J.; Streips, U.N. The energized membrane and cellular autolysis in Bacillus subtilis. Cell 1981, 25, 753–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Fukushima, T. A polysaccharide deacetylase gene (pdaA) is required for germination and for production of muramic delta-lactam residues in the spore cortex of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 2002, 184, 6007–6015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Rashid, M.H.; Sato, N.; Sekiguchi, J. Analysis of the minor autolysins of Bacillus-subtilis during vegetative growth by zymographY. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1995, 132, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Smith, T.J.; Foster, S.J. Characterization of the involvement of 2 compensatory autolysins in mother cell-lysis during sporulation of Bacillus-subtilis-168. J. Bacteriol. 1995, 177, 3855–3862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Smith, T.J.; Blackman, S.A.; Foster, S.J. Peptidoglycan hydrolases of Bacillus subtilis 168. Microb. Drug Resist. Mech. Epidemiol. Dis. 1996, 2, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Herbold, D.R.; Glaser, L. Bacillus subtilis N-acetylmuramic acid L-alanine amidase. J. Biol. Chem. 1975, 250, 1676–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Rogers, H.J. Purification and properties of autolytic endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase and the N-acetylmuramyl-L-alanine amidase from Bacillus subtilis strain 168. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1984, 130, 2395–2402. [Google Scholar]
  48. Margot, P.; Mauel, C.; Karamata, D. The gene of the n-acetylglucosaminidase, a Bacillus-subtilis-168 cell-wall hydrolase not involved in vegetative cell autolysis. Mol. Microbiol. 1994, 12, 535–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kuroda, A.; Sekiguchi, J. Molecular-cloning and sequencing of a major Bacillus-subtilis autolysin gene. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 7304–7312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Lazarevic, V. Sequencing and analysis of the Bacillus-subtilis lytrabc divergon—A regulatory unit encompassing the structural genes of the n-acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase and its modifier. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1992, 138, 1949–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Ishikawa, S.; Yamane, K.; Sekiguchi, J. Regulation and characterization of a newly deduced cell wall hydrolase gene (cwlJ) which affects germination of Bacillus subtilis spores. J. Bacteriol. 1998, 180, 1375–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Margot, P. The lytE gene of Bacillus subtilis 168 encodes a cell wall hydrolase. J. Bacteriol. 1998, 180, 749–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ohnishi, R.; Ishikawa, S.; Sekiguchi, J. Peptidoglycan hydrolase LytF plays a role in cell separation with Cw1F during vegetative growth of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 3178–3184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Park, S.S. Bacillus subtilis subtilisin gene (aprE) is expressed from a sigma A (sigma 43) promoter in vitro and in vivo. J. Bacteriol. 1989, 171, 2657–2665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Tipper, D.J.; Linnett, P.E. Distribution of peptidoglycan synthetase activities between sporangia and forespores in sporulating cells of Bacillus sphaericus. J. Bacteriol. 1976, 126, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Foster, S.J. Analysis of the autolysins of Bacillus-subtilis-168 during vegetative growth and differentiation by using renaturing polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis. J. Bacteriol. 1992, 174, 464–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Kuroda, A.; Asami, Y.; Sekiguchi, J. Molecular-cloning of a sporulation-specific cell-wall hydrolase gene of Bacillus-subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 1993, 175, 6260–6268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Foster, S.J.; Johnstone, K. Purification and properties of a germination-specific cortex-lytic enzyme from spores of Bacillus megaterium KM. Biochem. J. 1987, 242, 573–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Illing, N.; Errington, J. Genetic-regulation of morphogenesis in Bacillus-subtilis—roles of sigma-e and sigma-f in prespore engulfment. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 3159–3169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Chen, R. Role of the sigma(D)-Dependent Autolysins in Bacillus subtilis Population Heterogeneity. J. Bacteriol. 2009, 191, 5775–5784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Márquez, L.M. Studies of sigma D-dependent functions in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 3435–3443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Rohs, P.D.A.; Bernhardt, T.G. Growth and Division of the Peptidoglycan Matrix. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 75, 315–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Buist, G. LysM, a widely distributed protein motif for binding to (peptido)glycans. Mol. Microbiol. 2008, 68, 838–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Yamamoto, H.; Kurosawa, S.I.; Sekiguchi, J. Localization of the vegetative cell wall hydrolases LytC, LytE, and LytF on the Bacillus subtilis cell surface and stability of these enzymes to cell wall-bound or extracellular proteases. J. Bacteriol. 2003, 185, 6666–6677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Abe, K. Autolysis-mediated membrane vesicle formation in Bacillus subtilis. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 23, 2632–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Toyofuku, M. Prophage-triggered membrane vesicle formation through peptidoglycan damage in Bacillus subtilis. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Presecan, E. The Bacillus subtilis genome from gerBC (311 degrees) to licR (334 degrees). Microbiology 1997, 143, 3313–3328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Zahler, R.S.; Sussmann, H.J. Claims and accomplishments of applied catastrophe theory. Nature 1977, 269, 759–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wood, H.E.; Devine, K.M.; McConnell, D.J. Characterisation of a repressor gene (xre) and a temperature-sensitive allele from the Bacillus subtilis prophage, PBSX. Gene 1990, 96, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Takemaru, K.-i. Complete nucleotide sequence of a skin element excised by DNA rearrangement during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Microbiology 1995, 141, 323–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Arigoni, F. SpoIIE governs the phosphorylation state of a protein regulating transcription factor sigma F during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 3238–3242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Longchamp, P.F.; Mauel, C.; Karamata, D. Lytic enzymes associated with defective prophages of Bacillus subtilis: Sequencing and characterization of the region comprising the N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase gene of prophage PBSX. Microbiology 1994, 140, 1855–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Buxton, R.S. Selection of Bacillus subtilis 168 Mutants with Deletions of the PBSX Prophage. J. Gen. Virol. 1980, 46, 427–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Krogh, S.; Jørgensen, S.T.; Devine, K.M. Lysis genes of the Bacillus subtilis defective prophage PBSX. J. Bacteriol. 1998, 180, 2110–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Sekiguchi, J. Nucleotide sequences of the Bacillus subtilis flaD locus and a B. licheniformis homologue affecting the autolysin level and flagellation. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1990, 136, 1223–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Foster, S.J. Cloning, expression, sequence-analysis and biochemical-characterization of an autolytic amidase of Bacisllus-subtilis 168 trpc2. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1991, 137, 1987–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Kunst, F. The complete genome sequence of the Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Nature 1997, 390, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Chen, Y.Z. Enhanced production of heterologous proteins by Bacillus licheniformis with defective d-alanylation of lipoteichoic acid. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 34, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Hyyrylainen, H.L. D-Alanine substitution of teichoic acids as a modulator of protein folding and stability at the cytoplasmic membrane/cell wall interface of Bacillus subtilis. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 26696–26703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kiriukhin, M.Y.; Neuhaus, F.C. D-alanylation of lipoteichoic acid: Role of the D-alanyl carrier protein in acylation. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 2051–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Kovács, M. A functional dlt operon, encoding proteins required for incorporation of d-alanine in teichoic acids in gram-positive bacteria, confers resistance to cationic antimicrobial peptides in Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 5797–5805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Antelmann, H. Stabilization of cell wall proteins in Bacillus subtilis: A proteomic approach. Proteomics 2002, 2, 591–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ferrari, E.; Howard, S.M.; Hoch, J.A. Effect of stage 0 sporulation mutations on subtilisin expression. J. Bacteriol. 1986, 166, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Coxon, R.D.; Harwood, C.R.; Archibald, A.R. Protein export during growth of Bacillus-subtilis—The effect of extracellular protease deficiency. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1991, 12, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Nugroho, F.A. Characterization of a new sigma-K-dependent peptidoglycan hydrolase gene that plays a role in Bacillus subtilis mother cell lysis. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 6230–6237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Dobihal, G.S. Homeostatic control of cell wall hydrolysis by the WalRK two-component signaling pathway in Bacillus subtilis. Elife 2019, 8, e52088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Zhou, C.X. Optimization of alkaline protease production by rational deletion of sporulation related genes in Bacillus licheniformis. Microb. Cell Factories 2019, 18, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. McDonnell, G.E. Genetic-control of bacterial suicide—regulation of the induction of pbsx in Bacillus-subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 1994, 176, 5820–5830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Westers, L.; Westers, H.; Quax, W.J. Bacillus subtilis as cell factory for pharmaceutical proteins: A biotechnological approach to optimize the host organism. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2004, 1694, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Morimoto, T. Enhanced Recombinant Protein Productivity by Genome Reduction in Bacillus subtilis. DNA Res. 2008, 15, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Li, Y. Characterization of genome-reduced Bacillus subtilis strains and their application for the production of guanosine and thymidine. Microb. Cell Factories 2016, 15, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. McDonnell, G.E.; McConnell, D.J. Overproduction, isolation, and DNA-binding characteristics of Xre, the repressor protein from the Bacillus subtilis defective prophage PBSX. J. Bacteriol. 1994, 176, 5831–5834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Zhao, L. Engineering peptidoglycan degradation related genes of Bacillus subtilis for better fermentation processes. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 248 Pt A, 238–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Liu, X. Efficient production of extracellular pullulanase in Bacillus subtilis ATCC6051 using the host strain construction and promoter optimization expression system. Microb. Cell Factories 2018, 17, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Zhang, K.; Su, L.; Wu, J. Enhanced extracellular pullulanase production in Bacillus subtilis using protease-deficient strains and optimal feeding. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 5089–5103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Reuß, D.R. Large-scale reduction of the Bacillus subtilis genome: Consequences for the transcriptional network, resource allocation, and metabolism. Genome Res. 2017, 27, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Liu, D.Y. Development and characterization of a CRISPR/Cas9n-based multiplex genome editing system for Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2019, 12, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Application of B. subtilis as industrial production chassis and factors related to autolysis of B. subtilis.
Figure 1. Application of B. subtilis as industrial production chassis and factors related to autolysis of B. subtilis.
Fermentation 08 00685 g001
Figure 2. Mechanisms of autolysis in Bacillus subtilis site of action of autolysin. The peptidoglycan PG in the cell wall structure is the backbone component of the cell wall, and the side chains of the peptidoglycan are linked to anionic polymers, which provide the sites of action for autolysis enzymes.
Figure 2. Mechanisms of autolysis in Bacillus subtilis site of action of autolysin. The peptidoglycan PG in the cell wall structure is the backbone component of the cell wall, and the side chains of the peptidoglycan are linked to anionic polymers, which provide the sites of action for autolysis enzymes.
Fermentation 08 00685 g002
Figure 3. The role of key autolysis enzymes of B. subtilis in life processes and the factors affecting them.
Figure 3. The role of key autolysis enzymes of B. subtilis in life processes and the factors affecting them.
Fermentation 08 00685 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ren, K.; Wang, Q.; Hu, M.; Chen, Y.; Xing, R.; You, J.; Xu, M.; Zhang, X.; Rao, Z. Research Progress on the Effect of Autolysis to Bacillus subtilis Fermentation Bioprocess. Fermentation 2022, 8, 685. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8120685

AMA Style

Ren K, Wang Q, Hu M, Chen Y, Xing R, You J, Xu M, Zhang X, Rao Z. Research Progress on the Effect of Autolysis to Bacillus subtilis Fermentation Bioprocess. Fermentation. 2022; 8(12):685. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8120685

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ren, Kexin, Qiang Wang, Mengkai Hu, Yan Chen, Rufan Xing, Jiajia You, Meijuan Xu, Xian Zhang, and Zhiming Rao. 2022. "Research Progress on the Effect of Autolysis to Bacillus subtilis Fermentation Bioprocess" Fermentation 8, no. 12: 685. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8120685

APA Style

Ren, K., Wang, Q., Hu, M., Chen, Y., Xing, R., You, J., Xu, M., Zhang, X., & Rao, Z. (2022). Research Progress on the Effect of Autolysis to Bacillus subtilis Fermentation Bioprocess. Fermentation, 8(12), 685. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8120685

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop