Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Known and Mapping Future Directions in Biopesticides Research: A Bibliometric Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular, Metabolic, and Physiological Responses to Progressive Biotic Stress Caused by Cucumber Mosaic Virus and Turnip Mosaic Virus in Saffron
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Using Brown Algae in the Plant–Soil System: A Sustainable Approach to Improving the Yield and Quality of Agricultural Crops

by
Oscar Sariñana-Aldaco
1,
Luz Leticia Rivera-Solís
2,
Adalberto Benavides-Mendoza
3,
Armando Robledo-Olivo
4,
Rosa María Rodríguez-Jasso
5,* and
Susana González-Morales
6,*
1
Postgraduate Program in Protected Agriculture, Antonio Narro Autonomous Agrarian University, Saltillo 25315, Coahuila, Mexico
2
Postgraduate Program in Horticulture, Antonio Narro Autonomous Agrarian University, Saltillo 25315, Coahuila, Mexico
3
Horticulture Department, Antonio Narro Autonomous Agrarian University, Saltillo 25315, Coahuila, Mexico
4
Fermentations and Biomolecules Laboratory, Food Science and Technology Department, Antonio Narro Autonomous Agrarian University, Saltillo 25315, Coahuila, Mexico
5
Biorefinery Group, Food Research Department, Autonomous University of Coahuila, Saltillo 25280, Coahuila, Mexico
6
National Council of Humanities, Sciences and Technologies (CONAHCYT), Antonio Narro Autonomous Agrarian University, Saltillo 25315, Coahuila, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2025, 11(1), 94; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11010094
Submission received: 14 December 2024 / Revised: 11 January 2025 / Accepted: 14 January 2025 / Published: 16 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Nutrition)

Abstract

:
The growing demand for food production and increasing stress scenarios increase the crucial need for sustainable alternatives to achieve increased crop yield and quality without affecting the environment. The use of brown macroalgae, being a renewable resource, is a promising option with various application options in agricultural systems, mainly in the form of extracts, direct applications, and compost. Brown algae are a source of active biomolecules and minerals that are currently used as agricultural biostimulants, since they increase crop productivity. This type of biostimulants derived from brown algae improve seed germination, increase the accumulation of plant biomass by accelerating cell division and elongation, activating the antioxidant system of plants, making them more resistant to stress, and contributes to the absorption and translocation of nutrients present in the soil. These products are also compatible with other agricultural inputs, such as synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, which makes them ideal for comprehensive applications and maintaining a balance in agroecosystems. This review incorporates fundamental and applied aspects of brown seaweeds that impact yields, biochemical quality, physiology, stress mitigation, and soil properties. Based on the above, the review is divided into different Sections that show the formulation of brown seaweed products; their effect on crop yield, quality, and physiology; their effect on biotic and abiotic stress mitigation; and their impact on soil physical, chemical, and biological properties.

1. Introduction

The term algae refers to a large and diverse set of organisms that live in water or in very humid environments [1]. They are characterized as photosynthesizing organisms with higher efficiency than vascular plants [2], where carbon (C), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) are the main elements required for photosynthesis and growth [3,4]. They are autotrophic organisms with simple structure, no cell differentiation and complex tissues and are therefore considered thallophytes [5,6]. Marine macroalgae are divided into three groups (green, red, and brown) [7]. Brown algae belong to one of the most abundant groups and are used in different areas (biorefinery, food, agriculture, among others); they comprise about 2000 species and 250 genera, including Ascophyllum spp., Fucus spp., Laminaria spp., Sargassum spp., Ecklonia spp., Stoechospermum spp, etc. [8]. Taxonomically, brown algae are eukaryotes grouped in the class of Phaeophyceae, in which xanthophylls, pigments that give their characteristic brown coloring, predominate [9]. Xanthophylls, such as fucoxanthin, are carotenoids that play an important role in the adaptation of these organisms to environmental changes [10]. Their cell wall is basically made up of cellulose, alginates, and sulphated polysaccharides (fucoidan) consisting of fucose, mannose, galactose, xylose, and glucose [11].
Products derived from brown algae contain a large number of bioactive compounds (carbohydrates, phytohormones, vitamins, phenolic compounds, proteins, amino acids, carotenoids, and beneficial and essential elements) and have an important impact on agriculture due to their effectiveness to improve plants growth [12,13]. Brown algae products improve plants growth and mitigate some stresses by regulating molecular, biochemical, and physiological processes [14]. The brown algae most commonly used in agriculture are Fucus vesiculosus, Ecklonia maxima, Sargassum johnstonii, and Ascophyllum nodosum, the latter being the most studied [14,15].
The use of brown algae in agriculture is increasing, and its main uses are in the form of extracts, direct applications, and composts [16,17]. The use of the extracts allows the plants to directly obtain the bioactive compounds present; however, the direct applications and the composts modify the characteristics of the soil [18,19]. Seaweed extracts have always been considered biostimulants; however, some authors do not consider direct applications or composts to be biostimulants [20]. That being said, when algae are applied directly or composted to soil or any other growing medium, some biostimulation effects similar to other types of biostimulants can be obtained [21], so they do have a biostimulant function, which is discussed in Section 5.
Brown algae products are considered one of the most promising biostimulants, as they contain different effector biomolecules, compared to other biostimulants that act alone. These different biomolecules contained in brown algae act together and potentiate their biostimulant effect, which can cause more marked changes due to their high biological activity [8]. As already mentioned, the function of these products is direct when the biomolecules act directly on the plants and cause changes in the omics levels and is indirect when they modify the soil characteristics [18,19]. However, these products have biomolecules with antimicrobial, nematicidal, and insecticidal properties against crop pathogens, so they can be used as biopesticides [22]. It is important to differentiate the concept of biostimulant and biostimulation to avoid future confusion. These concepts are recent, and everything stems from biostimulants, which are any substance or microorganism applied to plants that promote nutritional efficiency, stress tolerance, and improved crops quality, regardless of their nutrient content [20]. Now, biostimulation is a biological response triggered by biostimulants, which causes the adaptive modification of metabolic processes, so that the organism makes adjustments that lead to a more efficient use of resources [23].
Accordingly, and considering the purpose of conserving agroecosystems and the growing demand for food, the application of brown algae in agriculture is feasible, since its use reduces the application of agrochemicals and offers products free of toxic residues to consumers, which is beneficial to the environment [24]. Therefore, the aim of this review is to present the advances published in the literature on brown algae, their derivatives, their composition, and their function in agriculture plants and soil, considering genera and species, application methods, environmental conditions, and crops production systems.

2. Formulations of Brown Algae

Brown macroalgae can be applied in agriculture in the form of extracts, direct application of fresh or dried stems and in the form of composts [25,26]. The algae extracts will directly biostimulate the metabolism of the plants, due to their action at low concentrations, while for direct applications and composts, it is advisable to carry out a mineral analysis to the products, soil, and water and thus establish a program of proper application [26,27,28]. Brown algae in agriculture are very enriching and a very promising future use is foreseen [29]. The agricultural use of these algae today is based on their application forms, which cause varied effects on plants.

2.1. Extracts

It has been more than 60 years since the first seaweed extracts were manufactured for agricultural purposes; these extracts allowed, for the first time, the direct use of the soluble substances contained in seaweeds on specific parts or organs of plants, such as seeds, roots, leaves, and fruits, thus allowing for a more varied use of seaweeds and therefore different plants responses to such applications [18,30].
Different institutions and companies use different procedures for the extraction of compounds of interest from brown algae biomass; these extractions are performed under different techniques using different solvents, such as water [31], ethanol [14], potassium hydroxide [32], methanol [33], chloroform [34], among others. According to the extraction technique, any of the different solvents can be used; these techniques can be microwave, ultrasound, hydrothermal, and supercritical fluid [22].
Extractions are also enzymatic, where the use of solvents is null [22]. Enzymatic extraction of bioactive compounds in algae offers the advantage of not using solvents, and the extraction can be more efficient than other methods by degrading complex molecules present in the cell wall or bound with polymers in the cytoplasm, achieving a more effective release and keeping their biological properties intact [35].
The different methods of extraction, application, and the different genera and species of brown algae make the biological activity of extracts very varied when applied to plants [36]. In agriculture, diluted extracts are applied to promote growth, prevent the incidence of pathogenic organisms, and increase the quality of harvested products [34]. Its efficiency is probably based on the phytohormones, vitamins, phenolic compounds, carbohydrates, proteins, amino acids, and beneficial elements present in the extracts [37].
There are different conditions to be considered when applying brown algae extracts. One of them is that they have to be used as supplements to increase yields and crops quality and not as nutrient substitutes [38]. It is possible to combine the extracts with inorganic fertilizer to achieve synergy and achieve higher productivity, profitability, and sustainability [38,39]. Foliar applications, applications to the soil (drench), and applications on seeds can be made, which will show different but positive responses, since the form of application influences the results (Figure 1) [40]. Soil applications should be made directly or incorporated into the nutrient solution or irrigation water [41].
The application of brown algae extracts will also depend on the concentration used, since the use of this type of biostimulant normally works at relatively low doses, as long as an application schedule is established [26]. For the use of this type of biostimulants, different application intervals are normally used, ranging from 7, 10, 15, 20, and 30 days [42,43,44,45,46]. An important point is that, according to existent studies, it is more common to use foliar extracts, for which it is advisable to do so in the early morning or at dusk to avoid burning the foliage and to make the application more effective [47,48].

2.2. Direct Applications

The first uses of brown seaweed were as a fertilizer, and this use was as direct application. This term refers to the practice of incorporating fresh or dried seaweed into the soil as it is obtained [49]. Normally this activity is limited to coastal areas, as transport and availability reduces its use in areas far from the sea [50]. Direct applications of brown seaweed can also be in the form of granules, powder, or the pulp residues remaining after extractions [24]. The direct application of brown algae improves the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of the soil or substrate [24]. This phenomenon is attributed to the process of incorporation and decomposition of the algae into the soil, as they encourage the multiplication of native soil bacteria [51]. This conditioning action improves the soil structure, making it more porous and stable, and therefore increasing its capacity to retain water, while nutrients are released for assimilation of plants (Figure 1) [52].
An important point that has to be considered in the direct application of brown algae to the soil or substrate is the concentration of salts and sand that may bring the algae, so it is advisable to wash it before application [53]. In addition, at the cellular level, algae contain different heavy metals, which are a point to consider before their application [53,54].
The direct application of brown algae represents a potential alternative for soil improvement, due to the gradual decomposition of its compounds that enrich the soils organic matter [55]. The incorporation of fresh or dried algae into the soil can be achieved by first crushing the material to facilitate its decomposition, then leaving it in the surface and incorporation it with a plow or hand equipment, as if it where the incorporation of stubble, as described by Reeves et al. [56].
Some authors relate the soil remediation effects to the presence of alginic acid and mannitol, which comprise a large part of the carbohydrate content of algae and their function is related to the complexation of contaminating compounds [15]. It has also been shown that the effect of algae depends to a large extent on the presence of nutrients that are mineralized with the help of soil microorganisms [57]. One benefit of the application of algae to cultivated soils in tropical areas is the reduction in leaching of nutrients during heavy rainfall [58]. This happens thanks to carbohydrates, which form high-molecular-weight complexes with metal ions in the soil; the structure and water retention capacity are improved, and, consequently, the root growth of the plants is increased, which in turn increase the level of exploration for nutrient absorption [15].
When algae are incorporated into the soil, they undergo a process of decomposition, which is facilitated by fungi and bacteria that metabolize and decompose organic materials [59]. Terrestrial plants and brown algae are mainly composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, proteins, and other carbohydrates; however, brown algae have a more complex composition of structural sulphated polysaccharides in the cell wall [59,60,61]. This variability in the composition of sulfate polysaccharides that is not associated with terrestrial plants require metabolic pathways that are not common in the environment, which makes decomposition difficult [59,61]. Sabate et al. [59] mention that the current understanding of microbial communities involved in the degradation of brown algae in soil is still poor, which has important considerations for its application in agriculture, as degradation regulates the availability of essential nutrients and bioactive compounds.

2.3. Composts

One of the proposals to remove marine biomass from the coasts in an efficient, environmentally balanced, economically and technologically feasible way is algae composting [62]. This action is defined as a gradual biological decomposition, which allows the production of compounds of interest from organic waste, in other words, the aerobic process in which thermophilic microorganisms transform organic materials into a stable soil-like product (humus) [63]. The use of algae in the compost is a potential practice for increasing nutrients in the soil, favoring plant growth [54]. This phenomenon can be attributed to the increase in beneficial biota interacting with the plant root system, increasing nutrient availability (Figure 1) [64].
Before composting the seaweed, it is important to wash the seaweed to remove any salts present and then prepare the compost mixture [65]. The mixture consists of the primary materials (shredded brown seaweed), amendment (material to balance the C:N ratio), and bulking agent (sawdust or straw) [66]. There are different composting techniques, but the most recommended is the traditional windrow composting technique, which allows for more practical handling [65,66]. When the mixture is ready, the composting process begins, which depends on indigenous organisms responsible for the degradation of the organic material; these organisms need certain environmental and nutritional conditions to be able to function properly and survive [67]. Several studies indicate that during the thermophilic phase of the composting process, temperatures of 50 °C are normally reached, which is ideal for the degradation of organic material through microbial growth [68]. Subsequently, the temperature drops to ambient levels [66]. It is very important to improve the biological activity by periodically rotating the mixture [69].
In contrast to traditional composting, brown algae composting is more complex due to the composition of the algae, which have a complex structure of polysaccharides (fucoidan and alginates) in the cell wall [61,70]. This structure has to be degraded by specialized microorganisms so that the release of other compounds (minerals, phytohormones, phenolic compounds, and carotenoids) can take place [59,70]. There are several studies that recommend the inoculation of effective microorganisms to accelerate the decomposition process. Tang et al. [70] inoculated Gracilibacillus sp. to compost Undaria pinnatifida; this bacterium has the characteristic of degrading alginate, which was reflected in the decrease in this at the end of composting, indicating that the degradation ended in the release of the monosaccharides that constitute them (D-manuronic and L-guluronic), and therefore, cell lysis was facilitated, causing the release of different bioactive compounds. These monosaccharides have structural and defense functions in plants, as well as facilitating the assimilation and transport of nutrients, while bioactive compounds act on natural biochemical processes in plants, which are of interest for improving the productivity and quality of harvested products [48,71]. At the end of the composting process, the microorganisms will have converted the organic material into a stable product (humus) and residual products [72]. This tells us that the material obtained will be different from the material that was initially mixed, which will be homogenous.
When talking about organisms specialized in the degradation of algae in composting, we are not only referring to microorganisms, since the use of worms is also common to speed up this process. With the use of these organisms, in addition to obtaining the product (vermicompost), it is also possible to obtain leachate or liquid worm humus, which is an organic compound that provides different benefits for the soil and plants [73]. Under this system, earthworms in a humid environment consume organic matter and transform them into nutrients that plants can use [74].
The composting time will depend on the type of algae used, additional materials, and whether the mixture is inoculated with specialized organisms. Illera-Vives et al. [75] composted Laminaria spp. algae, Cystoseira spp. algae, and fish waste for 10 weeks. The piles were turned weekly for the first six weeks and fortnightly for the remaining four weeks. Cole et al. [76] composted a mixture of macroalgae and sugar cane bagasse for 16 weeks, the authors indicate that this is the adequate time to transform into a mature compost, according to the material used. Madejón et al. [62] composted macroalgae remains (brown, red, and green) with garden-pruning waste for 23 weeks, which resulted in the total degradation of the material used. All these mentioned investigations were for experimental purposes to evaluate the composting time.
The decomposition process of algae as a source of compost increases the availability of nutrients when applied to the soil, which is reflected in water retention and resistance to stress in some crops, and is influenced by the C:N ratio, temperature, humidity, heavy metals, and salinity of the algae [66]. Unlike inorganic fertilizers that are commonly limited to releasing the key macronutrients (N, P, and K+), compost is diverse in several micronutrients that will help plant health [54].
The use of brown algae in any form as indicated above is based on the characterization of the algae and, above all, on the characteristics of the soil and crop in which the amendment will be applied, as shown by Hernández-Herrera et al. [77] and Nieto-Garibay et al. [78]. This is important in order to be able to make decisions and assess how feasible it is to use these algae and to be able to use them without any problems, since their use is not always beneficial.

3. Applications and Effects of Brown Algae in Plants

The impact of brown algae on plants depends on factors such as algae species, environmental conditions, cultivar type, and type of application. These effects include improved seeds germination [77], nutrients uptake, increased crops yield, and quality [79], as well as increased resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses (Figure 1) [80]. Brown algae contain large amounts of metabolites, but carbohydrates and minerals predominate in greater quantities [81], making them ideal candidates for use in agriculture. Genera such as Ascophyllum, Fucus, and Ecklonia are among the most widely used in agriculture because of the amount of N and K they contain, which are similar to animal manure and organic fertilizers, but with a low P content [79].
Each of the compounds that make up brown algae has a specific function when applied to plants. The carbohydrates that make up a large part of the content of brown algae are the most important regulators that facilitate many physiological processes, such as photosynthesis, flowering, seeds germination, and tolerance to various abiotic stresses in crop plants [82]. Carbohydrates in plants participate as signaling molecules in response to various environmental and nutritional conditions and are therefore important for maintaining their metabolic homeostasis during stress, as well as providing energy and helping to make signaling more effective [83]. Other important components in brown algae are amino acids, proteins, and fatty acids [84], which have very specific functions when applied to plants. Proteins are very important metabolites in plants, having diverse functions, such as catalysis, transport, defense, structure, regulation, signaling, and reserve [85]. Amino acids are another coarse group of metabolites in brown algae, and their function is vital when applied to plants, as they are involved in N assimilation, nutrient transport, and environmental stress mitigation [86]. Among the amino acids present in brown algae, proline and phenylalanine stand out, as they are involved in the mitigation of osmotic stress by retaining a greater amount of water in the cytoplasm and in the synthesis of phenolic compounds, which are important metabolites of the antioxidant system of plants [87,88]. Amino acids are generally considered as precursors and constituents of proteins and play and important role in plants metabolism and development [89].
Fatty acids in plants, like carbohydrates and proteins, have essential functions not only because they are major components of all cells but also because they are an important source of energy for various metabolic processes and can also function as mediators of signal transduction in stress by acting as intracellular and extracellular signals [90].
The main biomolecules are not the only ones that make brown algae desirable for agriculture. There are compounds which can regulate different physiological and biochemical processes [91]. Among these compounds are phytohormones, such as auxins, gibberellins, and cytokinins, which act on cells as chemical messengers and are able to regulate various vital phenomena in plants [92]. Studies by Kingman and Moore [93] on A. nodosum show contents of up to 50 mg of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) per gram of dry extract. In addition, brown algae contain considerable concentrations of abscisic acid (ABA), salicylic acid (SA), and jasmonic acid (JA) [94]. These three molecules are phytohormones with a well-documented role in plant response to biotic and abiotic stress [95]. The action of these hormones against stress develops through synergistic and antagonistic actions [96].
There are other substances in brown algae that have a biostimulant effect on plants, such as phenolic compounds, which perform certain defense functions to deal with biotic and abiotic factors, and in addition to this, it fulfills important functions in plants by providing certain colors, flavors, and function as an attractant for pollinators [97]. Brown algae products also contain betaines [98]. This compound plays a very important role in plants, one of which is to mitigate osmotic stress induced by water deficit or salinity, as well as increasing chlorophyll by inhibiting its degradation in treated plants [98,99].
Selenium (Se), silicon (Si), and iodine (I) are beneficial elements that brown algae contain and have very important biostimulants functions in plants [100]. It has been shown that Se helps plants to improve their growth and defense system; in addition to this, its electronic configuration is like that of sulfur (S), where it is shown that it has the ability to replace it and perform its functions [101]. The Si has certain benefits in plants, such as greater growth, stronger plants, greater photosynthesis, and increased tolerance to stress [102]. The Si also regulates cuticular water loss due to its accumulation in the epidermis [103]. There are studies that indicate that I was one of the first inorganic antioxidants that allowed organisms to resist oxidative stress [104]. The function of I is widely proven in marine algae, where the element neutralizes the superoxide anion (O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and singlet oxygen (1O2) [104]. In addition to this, there are studies that show that in terrestrial plants, I applications increase antioxidant capacity, thus conferring greater resistance to abiotic stress [105]. Brown algae products, applied directly or composted, improve soil health, making it more fertile, benefiting plant nutrition [28].

3.1. Brown Algae Products on Growth, Yield, Physiology, and Quality of Crops

As already mentioned, brown algae in agriculture have been used as nutritional supplements and as an alternative to chemical products, which has had a satisfactory impact on crops production [106]. Rajendran et al. [107] applied A. nodosum extracts via foliar application to bell pepper crop and reported increases in agronomic, biochemical, physiological, and mineral variables in fruits and leaves at a dose of 0.5%. The authors attribute the effects to the chemical composition of the extract, since it contains dissolved nutrients and functional organic molecules that promote plant growth and activate the antioxidant system (phytohormones, carbohydrates, and proteins). Subramaniyan et al. [108] applied a commercial extract of A. nodosum to tomato crop in the form of drench (2.5, 5, and 10 L ha−1), and their results indicate that growth and yield, plant physiology, and fruit quality parameters were improved. The authors attribute the effects to the sulfated polysaccharides contained in the extracts, which stimulate several signaling processes, improving nutrient use efficiency and stimulating N metabolism, thus improving tomato growth, yield, and quality.
The uptake of plants nutrients depends on several factors, and one of them is a function of the roots, where they are normally available in the soil solution; therefore, an extensive root system is a requirement to ensure sufficient nutrients uptake [109]. Several studies have shown that plants biostimulants, such as the brown algal extracts, boost root system development, which is reflected in a higher level of soil exploration, thus allowing for increased crops yield [48], as mentioned by Hernández-Herrera et al. [110], who treated tomato seeds with 1% Macrocystis pyrifera extracts and indicated that root length, shoot length, and germination percentage increased. The authors mentioned that according to principal component analysis and hierarchical cluster plots, the improvement in germination was related to the sterol content in the extracts, while shoot and root length were related to the levels of K, Zn, B, Na, N, carbohydrates, and phenolic compounds. Similarly, Villa e Vila et al. [111] indicated that foliar and soil application of A. nodosum extracts to tomato and eggplant seedlings improved growth parameters and biomass of aerial and root parts along with foliar chlorophyll content. Sariñana-Aldaco et al. [48] evaluated the foliar application of Sargassum spp. extracts produced under different conditions of temperature, extraction time, and percentage of ethanol on tomato seedlings at a dose of 1.5%. Their results show that the extract produced at 160 °C/30 min/50% ethanol increased to a greater extent the growth and biomass of the aerial and root parts and the foliar concentration of pigments and antioxidant metabolites. The authors indicate that these effects were the result of the higher concentration of proteins, glutathione, and amino acids in the extract, which are metabolites capable of stimulating the metabolism of N and C in plants.
The improvement of crops production and yield depends mainly on its genetic characteristics and on the other side by environmental conditions; therefore, the interaction of these factors determines the yield of the crops, and for this reason it has a high variability over time [112]. Considering the conditions that determine yield, there are studies that have shown that the use of biostimulants such as algal extracts have the potential to boost crops production and yield characteristics [109]. Engel et al. [113] evaluated seed priming and foliar application of A. nodosum extracts on soybean at doses of 0.25 and 0.5% and showed in their results an increase in leaf and stem biomass, a higher number of pods and seeds, and a higher number of nodules. The authors mentioned that these increases were related to the higher activity of enzymes involved in N metabolism, which also increased N, S, Mg, and K uptake. The better nutrient uptake is possible thanks to the amino acids and sugars contained in the extracts, as they have a complexing function, together with the fact that these extracts are enriched with some nutrients [52].
The use of macroalgae in general is very extensive, given that different types of brown, green, or red algae can be used, which have varied effects on plants. Patel et al. [114] evaluated the effect of the application of brown (S. johnstonii) and green (Ulva lactuca) seaweed extracts on seeds germination and initial growth of eggplant, tomato, and chili seedlings. The findings of the study showed that the brown seaweed extracts gave better results in both germination and initial seedlings growth variables at a dose of 4%. The results are attributed to the considerable content of micronutrients and phytohormones in the extracts. Similarly, Vasantharaja et al. [115] applied foliar extracts of brown (Sargassum swartzii) and red (Kappaphycus alvarezii) seaweeds in cowpea cultivation, and their results show that brown seaweed extracts showed the best effects on yield and nutraceutical quality at a dose of 3%. The authors conclude that the reason why brown seaweed extracts were more effective is due to the higher concentration of macronutrients and micronutrients compared to red seaweed extracts. Machado et al. [116] evaluated seeds germination and initial vegetative development of bean seedlings in response to the application of watery extract of brown (Sargassum vulgare) and red algae (Osmundaria obtusiloba). Their results indicated that 25% red algae extract gave the best results. Within the experiment, the concentration of proteins and carbohydrates in the extracts was determined, with the red algae having the highest concentration, which is why it is believed to have produced the best results. All these results are also a product of the conditions in which macroalgae develop, where their biochemical composition is influenced by spatial changes in environmental parameters, so the content of active ingredients varies between and within species [117], resulting in different responses when applied to crops.
In addition to the above, Mzibra et al. [118] applied seaweed extracts as sources of polysaccharides by collecting 17 species and determining the polysaccharides content and selecting the best six, two red, two green, and two brown seaweed species. Their results indicated that the brown algae extract (Fucus spiralis and Bifurcaria bifurcata) significantly improved seed germination percentage, tomato plant growth, and leaf chlorophyll concentration compared to the other algae and the control, at a dose of 0.1 mg mL−1. Carbohydrates are a group of molecules that have a stimulant effect on crops development, so Klykov et al. [119] applied in wheat and barley laminaran and fucoidan derived from Laminaria cichorioides, whose biopolymers contain carbohydrates. The research shows a stimulant effect at a dose of 10 µg mL−1 on plant height, ear length, number of seeds per ear, and seeds weight per ear, which was reflected in the yield of both crops. de Sousa et al. [120] evaluated different foliar applications of A. nodosum extracts on productive and quality parameters in apples. The applications were made in full bloom, and improvements in fruit yield and quality were observed with the best dose of 0.3%. The authors indicate that this is possible thanks to the compounds contained in the biostimulants derived from A. nodosum, including essential nutrients, carbohydrates, amino acids, and phytohormones.
The use of brown algae in agriculture is normally intended to be used in the form of extracts, but they are also used in compost and direct form, as indicated by Nasution et al. [121], who added Sargassum polycystum compost to rice cultivation, and indicated that brown algae compost improved soil chemical properties, biomass, and yield, compared to an absolute control and a compost of plant residues. The authors attribute these effects to the increase in organic C and total N in the soil due to the effect of S. polycystum compost, which is richer in nutrients than the compost of plant residues.
As mentioned above, it is important to consider different factors when using brown algae as amendments, since if they are not considered, negative results can be obtained, as shown by Adderley et al. [122], who applied an amendment of algae Sargassum sp. in powder form in the cherry tomato crop and showed as results an increase in nutrients in the soil and a decrease in plant growth. The authors mention that the results were attributed to the fact that the pH of the soil in which the experiment was carried out affected the bioavailability of the nutrients released by the algae.
These studies confirm the above-mentioned, that the effects and the biochemical composition of the extracts will depend on the environmental conditions in which the seaweed develops, so it is difficult to predict the results, which is why it is important to have the characterization of the seaweed, the characteristics of the crop, and the environmental conditions in which the research will be carried out in order to have some control over the study. Table 1 shows the investigations described above and others in a more dynamic and simplified way.

3.2. Effect of Brown Algae Products in the Induction of Tolerance to Stress in Crops

Stress in plants is any condition or substance that affects growth, development, or metabolism. This stress can be caused by natural or anthropogenic factors. Some types of stress that plants can experience are extreme temperatures, lack or excess of light, lack or excess of nutrients, salinity, drought, and pathogen attack [128]. All of these stressors are responsible for large production losses worldwide, so the use of products based on brown algae is a feasible option to mitigate their effects, all through the positive regulation of morphological, physiological, genomic, and metabolic parameters, which subsequently leads to the activation of the plants defense system [129]. Shukla et al. [130] treated soybean plants under drought stress conditions with A. nodosum extracts (7 mL L−1 via drench). Their results show that plants treated with the extracts had higher relative water content, higher stomatal conductance, and higher antioxidant capacity compared to control treatment. They also indicate that extracts in stressed treatments promoted changes in the expression of stress-progressive genes in leaves: GmCYP707Ala, GmCYP707A3b, GmRD22, GmRD20, GmDREB1B, GmERD1, GmNFYA3, FIB1a, GmPIP1b, GmGST, GmBIP, and GmTp55. Each of these genes has a specific function, coding for certain protection proteins, water transport (aquaporins), signal transduction, osmolyte synthesis, and antioxidants, which provide certain tolerance to plants [131,132,133].
The use of brown algae products has the characteristic of helping plants to use water efficiently in stressful conditions. This level of tolerance related to the efficient use of water is linked to changes in the concentration of osmolytes and the expression of defense genes, as shown by Goñi et al. [134], who applied extracts (0.33% foliar) of A. nodosum to tomato plants under drought stress and showed that the tolerance process occurred thanks to the accumulation of osmolytes and the expression of the TAS14 gene in leaves. The TAS14 gene encodes a late embryogenesis abundant protein (LEA) called dehydrin, which is induced by osmotic stress and ABA [7]. The function of this dehydrin is related to the protection of membranes and macromolecules against denaturation, which prevents loss of function [135]. Melo et al. [136] foliarly applied A. nodosum extracts (1 L ha−1) in soybeans under water stress (50%) and indicated that there was a decrease in MDA, an increase in relative water content, and an increase in photosynthetic activity.
As mentioned above, products derived from brown algae have the ability to regulate stress in plants through metabolic processes, as indicated by Khedia et al. [137] who foliarly applied extracts of Sargassum tenerrimum (10%) on tomato plants to induce resistance to Macrophomina phaseolina. Their results indicate that plants treated with the extracts and the fungus showed the maximum accumulation of SA, ABA, and IAA in the leaves during the vegetative stage. They also show that there was a regulation of O2∙− and H2O2 mediated by the antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX). These enzymes are the first line of defense against stress in plants and cooperatively reduce the oxidative state [138].
Another obstacle faced by plants in these times is heat stress, which is caused by high temperatures. This stress causes a series of irreversible damage to crop plants and is usually the cause of low yields [139]. Carmody et al. [140] tested the efficiency of extracts (0.106%) of A. nodosum to mitigate long-term moderate heat stress in tomato plants during the reproductive stage. Their results show that foliar applications of the extracts in stressed treatments significantly improved flower development, pollen viability, and fruits production compared to plants that were only stressed. They also indicate that there were important transcriptional changes with increased thermotolerance. Expression analysis of genes encoding for heat shocks proteins (HSPs) was performed in tomato flowers, where it can be observed that HSP101.1, HSP70.9, and HSP17.7C-CI genes were differentially expressed. These HSPs normally increase in concentration under heat stress conditions and protect stress-sensitive proteins from denaturation or misfolding [141].
Salinity is another stress that causes negative effects on crops growth and yield by causing osmotic and ionic stresses that affect physiological and omics processes [142]. Hashem et al. [143] evaluated the use of Cystoseira spp. as a soil amendment (15 g of powder seaweed per 5 kg of soil) to mitigate salinity stress (NaCI 75 and 150 mM) in canola. The authors indicate that applications of the algae successfully alleviated the damaging effects of the stress. They mentioned that the tolerance process occurred because the synthesis of antioxidants and osmo-protectants (phenolic compounds, flavonoids, anthocyanins, carbohydrates, and proline) was adequately modulated. Antioxidants help to neutralized stress-synthesized free radicals, and osmo-protectants help cells to retain water in the presence of high salt concentrations [144]. Yildiztekin et al. [145] evaluated the effect of extracts (1, 2, and 3 g L−1) of A. nodosum on pepper crop under salinity stress (NaCl 100 mM) in irrigation water. The results indicate that stress negatively affected all growth parameters of the crop. Moreover, the use of the extracts improved plants growth at all concentration levels applied under salinity conditions. The authors indicate that the use of the seaweed extracts on stressed plants increased the activity of antioxidant enzymes in leaves such as SOD, POD, and CAT, and therefore, they suggest that brown algae products are suitable for improving productivity and mitigating the effects of salinity stress in crop plants.
Similarly, Zou et al. [146] evaluated the use of Lessonia nigrescens polysaccharides in wheat seedlings under salinity stress (NaCl 150 mM). Extraction of the polysaccharides was performed using 100 g of the algae and 2 L of 80% ethanol. After extraction, the polysaccharides were purified and applied to the nutrient solution. The results indicated that the use of the polysaccharides under the stressful conditions promoted seedling growth, increased antioxidant capacity, decreased membrane lipid peroxidation, and improved intracellular ion flux coordination. Sariñana-Aldaco et al. [14] evaluated the foliar application of extracts of Sargassum spp. in tomato seedlings under salinity stress (100 mM) at a dose of 1.5%. Their results indicate that the extracts activated the enzymatic antioxidant system (CAT, APX, and PAL), non-enzymatic (ascorbic acid, phenols, flavonoids, and glutathione), and the expression of defense genes (NCED1, HSP70, PIP2, P5CS1, ERD15, Fe-SOD, CAT1, cAPX2, and PAL5-3) under stressful and non-stressful conditions. In addition to this, the growth and biomass of the seedlings was improved. The NCED1 gene encodes the enzyme 9-cis-expoxycarotenoid dioxygenase 1, which catalyzes the synthesis of ABA in chloroplasts [147]. The P5CS1 gene encodes the enzyme ∆1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase 1, which catalyzes the synthesis of proline that functions as an osmotic agent, protecting plants from dehydration [148].
Another limiting factor in crops production is stress caused by nutrients deficiency, which is causing increasing losses in terms of yield and quality of harvested products [149]. Soppelsa et al. [150] evaluated the efficacy of extracts (4 g L−1) of A. nodosum on strawberry crop under nutrients deficit stress conditions, the nutrient-limiting condition was imposed by supplying plants with a single fertilization at transplanting and excluding any additional nutrients supply during the experiment. The results show that the foliar application of the extracts induced tolerance in the plants, resulting in higher growth and crop yield. In addition, they obtained fruits with higher content of phenolic compounds, anthocyanins, and antioxidant capacity, and they obtained leaves with higher photosynthetic activity and transpiration. The extracts contained high concentrations of iron (Fe), copper (Cu), and Si. Carrasco-Gil et al. [94] applied extracts of A. nodosum and Durvillaea potatorum in Fe-deficient tomato plants, and their results indicate that the A. nodosum extract at a dose of 0.2 mL L−1 increased SOD activity in roots and leaves, the concentration of malondialdehyde in the leaves decreased, and the dry biomass of roots increased. The D. potatorum extract at a dose of 1.1 mL L−1 only increased the activity of CAT in roots. In this study, the concentration of micronutrients, auxins, gibberellins, cytokinins, ABA, SA, and JA in the extracts, compounds responsible for the effects mentioned above, were quantified.
A stress that has been little studied in plants and with the use of brown algae is that of heavy metals. This stress affects plants because they alter their physiological, metabolic, and molecular processes, which affects the yields and quality of the harvested products [151]. Shaari et al. [152] treated Brassica chinensis plants with S. polycystum extracts (25, 50, and 100 mL L−1 foliar and drench) contaminated with cadmium (Cd) (100 mg kg−1). The authors mention that there was an increase in biomass and activity of the enzymes CAT, APX, and POD. They also mention that histological characteristics of the leaves such as the size and opening of stomata, mesophyll tissues, and vascular bundles were improved. Regarding the accumulation of Cd, it was demonstrated that as the concentration of the extract increased, the concentration of Cd in the roots and shoots was reduced, which is due to the complexing action of some metabolites of the extracts, such as sulfated polysaccharides [153]. The expression of the rbcL gene was also determined, where an overexpression is observed with the use of the extracts of S. polycystum and Cd. The rbcL gene encodes the RuBisCO enzyme, which catalyzes the assimilation of atmospheric CO2 in the photosynthetic process for the production of photoassimilates and, on the other hand, catalyzes the reaction that initiates the photorespiration process [154]. Table 2 shows the investigations described above and others in a more dynamic and simplified way.

4. Soil Applications of Brown Algae

Soil is the main non-renewable resource and faces the threat of degradation with the growth of agriculture [166]. Intensive agriculture has led to overexploitation of soils, causing erosion problems and ecosystem deterioration [167]. The deficiencies of soils in conjunction with the nutritional need of crops, and the increasing demand for chemical supplies has directed the efforts of the agricultural sector towards the use of available resources [168]. Recently, the use of algae (direct application and composted) as a fertilizer has allowed the gradual replacement of conventional synthetic fertilizers [52]. Brown algae have been widely exploited in the agricultural sector, due to their richness in beneficial trace elements, essential nutrients, and hormones that stimulate plant growth [169]. The application potential of brown algae in soil lies in their ability to compensate for N, P, and K+ deficiency in soils [170]. In addition to activating signaling pathways in the plants and imparting tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses, thereby improving crops productivity [168].

4.1. Impact on the Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Soil

Soil fertility is a determining factor for crop production, preservation of ecosystems and cultivable areas [171]. The incorporation of brown algae into the soil is a practice developed since ancient times in coastal areas to improve crops productivity and for the recovery of degraded soils, where nutrients deficiencies are frequent [172]. Brown algae have a great ability to improve the physical and chemical properties of the soil, and they can be applied directly as composts, granules, powders, and extracts [57,173,174]; however, the form of application must be considered to avoid problems of salinity, sand residues, and heavy metals [175]. Brown algae also contain a wide range of mineral elements and compounds with complexing functions (sugars and amino acids) that, when applied to the soil, enrich soil fertility, improve soil structure, increase water retention capacity, and total soil porosity [169]. The influence of algae on soil nutrients and aggregated stability is diverse, depending on the organic composition of the algae and the initial nutrients concentrations in the biomass [176].
Brown algae, when applied in composted or direct form (powders, granules, etc.), contribute to increasing the organic matter in the soil, and this matter influences very important parameters, such as pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and nutrient content [76,177]. On the pH of the soil, humified organic matter has a buffer effect, which reduces the risk of sudden changes in pH, which favors the life of microorganisms, the availability of nutrients, and the elimination of contaminating substances [178,179]. Microorganisms can slowly adapt to acidic and basic pH values of the soil, but they do not resist the sudden changes that occur with the addition of synthetic fertilizers [180]; for this reason, the use of brown algae products is a promising option. Now, organic matter balances the N in the soil, and thanks to its numerous functional groups, it provides a high capacity for change, which increases the potential for absorption and ionic exchange of the soil, and as a result, increases the retention of nutrients such as calcium (Ca2+), magnesium (Mg2+), K+, etc. [181,182].
The humified organic matter derived from brown algae has a very marked effect on the physical characteristics of the soil, forming aggregates and giving it structural stability, uniting with the clays and forming the exchange complex, which favors the penetration of water and its retention [54]. When all this is achieved, erosion is reduced, and gas exchange is favored [183]. The humus particles from the organic matter are electrically unbalanced and attract water molecules and retain them, and this facilitates the settlement of the vegetation, making the action of erosive agents difficult [183,184]. Organic matter, having colloidal properties, due to its charges, in the soil can retain water, swell, contract, fix solutions on the surface, disperse, and flocculate [184].
The organic matter coming from brown algae, unlike that coming from other plants remains, can have more beneficial effects on the physical–chemical characteristics of the soil; this is because its composition is richer in different biomolecules, mainly alginate, fucoidan, and mannitol. These biomolecules applied to the soil can interact with metal ions (nutrients) and form high molecular weight complexes that absorb water, which improves the structure of the soil, resulting in greater aeration and capillarity of the pores [15].
The usefulness of these algae has always represented a challenge, as good results should be obtained and at the same time less favorable results, as shown by Gayosso-Rodríguez et al. [185], where they discard the use of Sargassum spp. for compost production, due to the high content of Na, K, and Mg. It was also demonstrated that the addition of A. nodosum improved soil stability, increased root biomass, water use efficiency, and onion crop yield [156].
The roots frequently breathe carbon dioxide (CO2), which in contact with soil water becomes carbonic acid (H2CO3), which rapidly dissociates into H+ and bicarbonate (HCO3) [186,187]. H+ ions diffuse into the soil particles and displace other cations that are adsorbed, and thus pass into the soil solution, where they can be absorbed by the roots [186]. The roots can directly diffuse H+ into the soil particles, similarly displacing adsorbed cations into the soil solution [186,188]. In this way, a cationic exchange phenomenon is generated between the soil and the plants. Now, with the application of brown algae products (organic matter) the CEC is improved, since the colloidal load and complexing compounds in the soil are increased [66]. These compounds can be fucoidan, alginates, mannitol, humic acids, etc., which at the same time improve water absorption, aeration, and the formation of aggregates in the soil [66,189]. Figure 2 shows schematically those described above. The Figure also illustrates how the OM together with the complexing compounds provide a greater nutrient retention capacity; that is, they have a greater CEC than the soil particles (clays) [190].

4.2. Impact on the Rhizosphere

The use of brown algae or their products has a positive impact on the rhizosphere (Figure 1 and Figure 2), which comprises the interaction zone between plants roots and soil microorganisms [191,192]. This is related to the increase in beneficial soil organisms, which can solubilize nutrients and produce conditioning substances due to the addition of brown algae [191].
Soil biota (organisms), including microorganisms, use organic matter (brown algae) as food; therefore, they can increase their colonization in the rhizosphere [15]. By having a good amount and activity of beneficial biota in the rhizosphere due to the application of brown algae, the availability of some nutrients for plants can be improved [15]. The biological fixation of N can be improved by the action of bacteria of the genus Rhizobium, Azotobacter, Azospirillum, etc. [193]. Likewise, the solubilization of P (Pseudomonas, Erwinia, Bacillus, etc.) and K+ (Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Arthrobacter, etc.) increases due to the action of their respective bacteria [194,195,196]. Now, these bacteria need certain conditions to be able to perform their functions and survive, and the same organic matter from brown algae provides these conditions. In addition to this, there are bacteria (Mycobacterium or Nocardia) that produce siderophores, which have complexing functions and can capture Fe2+ and keep it available for plants [193,197]. Genera such as Arthrobacter, Azospirillum, Bradyrhizobium, Bacillus, Pseudomonas, and Rhizobium also produce phytohormones, such as auxins and cytokinins, with important functions for plants [193,198]. Brown algae and their products also improve the development and growth of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, where these fungi have a very marked effect on the solubilization of P in the rhizosphere [199].
The aforementioned tells us about the benefits that brown algae applications provide to the rhizosphere, by improving microbial biomass. These microorganisms also create a protective barrier against fungi and pathogenic bacteria in the roots of the plants [200]. In addition, certain compounds present in brown algae have antifungal, antibacterial, and nematicidal functions when applied to the rhizosphere [12]. These antimicrobial compounds can be mainly phenolic compounds, alginates, laminarin, and fucoidan [201,202]. The latter is possibly the most effective for controlling pathogens, since it is a sulfur compound with proven antimicrobial action [203].
As mentioned above, brown algae are mostly composed of carbohydrates, mainly alginates, which stimulate the growth of beneficial microorganisms in the soil [81,204]. It has been demonstrated that the use of alginate oligosaccharides extracted from brown algae enhanced the growth and development of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and improved their infection in orange tree roots [205].
Likewise, the use of brown algae as soil conditioners has been found to reduce the development of weedy plants and other pathogenic that compete with the crops [168]. Julia et al. [161] evaluated the efficacy of M. pyrifera extracts in combination with A. brasilense in lettuce seedlings with water deficit. Their results indicate that the combination of algae with beneficial bacteria showed a new formula that improved the root development of the seedlings; this is probably due to the synergy between the metabolites of the extracts and the beneficial bacteria. In view of the above, brown algae represent a potential source of exploitation in the agricultural sector, with high importance for the incorporation into the soil. Table 1 shows other research describing the benefits of brown algae on soil health and their effects on agricultural crops.
It is important to keep in mind that the direct use of brown algae sometimes causes problems to the soil and plants, due to the fact that they are not stabilized materials [72,206]. In addition, algae are characterized by a low C/N ratio and high salinity, which can be solved by composting, a more promising option to avoid these problems [206]. However, another limitation can be the concentration of heavy metals in the algae that can be transferred to the soil and subsequently to agricultural crops, where the concentration can be higher with the direct use or composting of the algae [10,54]. With the use of extracts, heavy metals are not really a problem, since very high dilutions are used to apply them. Currently on the market are different brown algae products that can be applied to all types of crops; however, they are normally products to be applied in the form of extracts. If direct or composted applications are required, large quantities of algae would be needed, and the limitation is that this practice is only viable for producers who are established near the coasts where algae can be obtained. These are some of the limitations that the use of brown algae in agriculture can present, which is why in the different Sections of this manuscript, the characterization of the raw material to be used is recommended.

5. Mechanism of Action of Algae Products on Plants and Agricultural Soil

When brown algal extracts are applied to plants (foliar, drench, and seeds), they react in different ways through a cell-signaling cascade [8]. All these cellular signaling processes that gives rise to a defense response develop mainly with the binding of biostimulants metabolites to membrane receptors [207]. Said union generates the activation of G proteins, which have the function of inducing the opening of Ca2+ channels so that it enters and can bind to calmodulins proteins [208,209]. The complex formed between Ca2+ and calmodulins can activate mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), whose function is to phosphorylate transcription factors [208]. These factors travel to the nucleus and bind to specific DNA sequences and turn on numerous defense genes [7]. Figure 3 shows the process described above.
The other pathway marked in Figure 3 shows signaling by proteins kinases. This MAPKs pathway guides in the signal transduction to downstream transcription factors that produce cellular responses such as proliferation, growth, motility, and the defense response to external stress factors, through differential expression of genes [208,210].
This is one of the ways by which the metabolites of the brown algae extracts activate the plants defense system; however, there are others that involve different signaling molecules and second messengers, such as SA, ABA, JA, H2O2, etc. [22,211].
This signaling process takes place when the cell responds to external substances (biostimulants) or environmental factors (temperature, humidity, and irradiance) through signaling molecules that are on the surface or inside the cell [21,22,23]. It is important to mention that the cellular reception mechanisms are still not well understood, and the process involves a very complex network of molecules. In addition to this, biostimulants molecules do not only bind to receptors, since it is also possible that they are transported into the cell by means of membrane transporter proteins and initiate the signaling process directly [212,213].
The direct use of seaweed (fresh, dried, or powder) and compost works differently than extracts. Firstly, the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of the soil improve, such as fertility, CEC, porosity, structure, and microbial biomass [62,76]. The increase in microbial biomass increases the biological fixation of N, the solubilization of K and P, and the production of siderophores [214,215]. In addition, there are microorganisms that can synthesize phytohormones [214]. This mode of action that takes place in the rhizosphere brings, as a benefit, crops with better yields, quality, and more tolerance to stress [216]. For this reason, these products are also considered biostimulants, since they can positively modify soil characteristics, thus benefiting plants [21]. In addition, the use of extracts in the form of drench in the root zone is not only used by the roots but can also modify soil characteristics in some way [217]. As a result of these mentioned mechanisms, a new phenotype is obtained, with a higher stress tolerance threshold and higher functional quality of the harvested products, which translates into better crops yields [21].

6. Conclusions and Perspectives

Observing the current agricultural panorama, the practices carried out in all production systems are dependent on synthetic chemical products, whether to nourish the crops, eradicate weeds, pathogenic fungi, or insect pests. In accordance with this information, brown algae are a viable option to reduce the use of synthetic chemicals that cause deterioration of the environment and in turn that of the plants. Brown algae products can act as growth stimulants of nutraceutical quality and mitigate biotic an abiotic stress in crop plants due to the content of bioactive compounds they contain.
Most of the research carried out focuses on the use of brown algae foliar extracts, the most studied being A. nodosum, and the direct and composted use of such algae is the least experimented. In general, the use of brown algae in the form of extracts, compost, or direct use has positive effects on the growth and development of crop plants; however, it is important to consider the biological model of study, the concentrations to be used, the form of application (foliar, drench, nutrient solution, seeds or amendment), and the characterization of the product, which will give a broader picture of the effectiveness of brown algae products.
However, all application methods are adequate, since they depend on the objectives sought. If the aim is to produce in soils with problems, it is advisable to apply to the soil to improve its characteristics. Now, if there are no problems in the soil, it is feasible to make applications to the seeds or foliage, to directly stimulate the metabolism of the plants and improve their productivity.
As already mentioned, the use of these products is recommended at low concentrations in order to prevent negative impacts on crops; therefore, it is necessary to carry out more research on the following topics: (a) the response of the products of brown algae in the morphological, physiological, and biochemical processes of plants; (b) the impacts of brown algae products and their potential toxicity on various plant species; (c) the influence of brown algae products on gene regulation and expression in plants subjected to various stressors; (d) the influence of brown algae products on the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of the soil; and (e) the characterization of brown algae products in terms of the concentration of heavy metals and their possible accumulation in the consumption organs of agricultural crops.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.G.-M. and R.M.R.-J.; writing—original draft preparation, O.S.-A. and L.L.R.-S.; writing—review and editing, A.B.-M. and A.R.-O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro and the Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila for the support provided. This research is part of the PhD Program of Sciences in Protect Agriculture and Master of Sciences in Horticulture at the Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Pereira, L. Macroalgae. Encyclopedia 2021, 1, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, Z.; Zhang, X.; Fang, H.; Lin, X.; Dai, X.; Liu, H. Photosynthetic Toxicity of Enrofloxacin on Scenedesmus obliquus in an Aquatic Environment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Roleda, M.Y.; Hurd, C.L. Seaweed nutrient physiology: Application of concepts to aquaculture and bioremediation. Phycologia 2019, 58, 552–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, Z.; Wu, C.; Jiang, P. Cloning and characterization of nitrate reductase gene in kelp Saccharina japonica (Laminariales, Phaeophyta). BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gutiérrez-Cuesta, R.; González-García, K.L.; Valdés-Iglesias, O.d.R.; Hernández-Rivera, Y.; Acosta-Suárez, Y. Seaweeds As Sources of Bioactive Compounds in the Benefit of Human Health: A Review. Biotecnia 2016, 18, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lombardi, T.; Bertacchi, A.; Pistelli, L.; Pardossi, A.; Pecchia, S.; Toffanin, A.; Sanmartin, C. Biological and Agronomic Traits of the Main Halophytes Widespread in the Mediterranean Region as Potential New Vegetable Crops. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. González-Morales, S.; Solís-Gaona, S.; Valdés-Caballero, M.V.; Juárez-Maldonado, A.; Loredo-Treviño, A.; Benavides-Mendoza, A. Transcriptomics of Biostimulation of Plants Under Abiotic Stress. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 583888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kergosien, N.; Stiger-Pouvreau, V.; Connan, S.; Hennequart, F.; Brébion, J. Mini-Review: Brown macroalgae as a promising raw material to produce biostimulants for the agriculture sector. Front. Agron. 2023, 5, 1109989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lemesheva, V.; Islamova, R.; Stepchenkova, E.; Shenfeld, A.; Birkemeyer, C.; Tarakhovskaya, E. Antibacterial, Antifungal and Algicidal Activity of Phlorotannins, as Principal Biologically Active Components of Ten Species of Brown Algae. Plants 2023, 12, 821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ryabushko, V.I.; Prazukin, A.V.; Gureeva, E.V.; Bobko, N.I.; Kovrigina, N.G.; Nekhoroshev, M.V. Fucoxanthin and heavy metals in brown algae of genus Cystoseira C. Agardh from water areas with different anthropogenic influences (Black Sea). Mar. Biol. J. 2017, 2, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wang, P.; Imre, B.; Wong, A.C.Y.; Hsieh, Y.S.Y.; Wang, D. Brown algae carbohydrates: Structures, pharmaceutical properties, and research challenges. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Esserti, S.; Smaili, A.; Rifai, L.A.; Koussa, T.; Makroum, K.; Belfaiza, M.; Kabil, E.M.; Faize, L.; Burgos, L.; Alburquerque, N.; et al. Protective effect of three brown seaweed extracts against fungal and bacterial diseases of tomato. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 1081–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Drira, M.; Ben Mohamed, J.; Ben Hlima, H.; Hentati, F.; Michaud, P.; Abdelkafi, S.; Fendri, I. Improvement of Arabidopsis thaliana salt tolerance using a polysaccharidic extract from the brown algae Padina pavonica. Algal Res. 2021, 56, 102324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sariñana-Aldaco, O.; Benavides-Mendoza, A.; Robledo-Olivo, A.; González-Morales, S. The Biostimulant Effect of Hydroalcoholic Extracts of Sargassum spp. in Tomato Seedlings under Salt Stress. Plants 2022, 11, 3180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yurkevich, M.; Suleymanov, R.; Ikkonen, E.; Dorogaya, E.; Bakhmet, O. Effect of Brown Algae (Fucus vesiculosus L.) on Humus and Chemical Properties of Soils of Different Type and Postgermination Growth of Cucumber Seedlings. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Catarino, M.D.; Silva-Reis, R.; Chouh, A.; Silva, S.; Braga, S.S.; Silva, A.M.S.; Cardoso, S.M. Applications of Antioxidant Secondary Metabolites of Sargassum spp. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Massimi, M.; Radócz, L.; Csótó, A. Impact of Organic Acids and Biological Treatments in Foliar Nutrition on Tomato and Pepper Plants. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Craigie, J.S. Seaweed extract stimuli in plant science and agriculture. J. Appl. Phycol. 2011, 23, 371–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Berthon, J.Y.; Michel, T.; Wauquier, A.; Joly, P.; Gerbore, J.; Filaire, E. Seaweed and microalgae as major actors of blue biotechnology to achieve plant stimulation and pest and pathogen biocontrol—A review of the latest advances and future prospects. J. Agric. Sci. 2021, 159, 523–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. du Jardin, P. Plant biostimulants: Definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 196, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Garza-Alonso, C.A.; Olivares-Sáenz, E.; González-Morales, S.; Cabrera-De la Fuente, M.; Juárez-Maldonado, A.; González-Fuentes, J.A.; Tortella, G.; Valdés-Caballero, M.V.; Benavides-Mendoza, A. Strawberry Biostimulation: From Mechanisms of Action to Plant Growth and Fruit Quality. Plants 2022, 11, 3463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shukla, P.S.; Mantin, E.G.; Adil, M.; Bajpai, S.; Critchley, A.T.; Prithiviraj, B. Ascophyllum nodosum-based biostimulants: Sustainable applications in agriculture for the stimulation of plant growth, stress tolerance, and disease management. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Juárez-Maldonado, A.; Tortella, G.; Rubilar, O.; Fincheira, P.; Benavides-Mendoza, A. Biostimulation and toxicity: The magnitude of the impact of nanomaterials in microorganisms and plants. J. Adv. Res. 2021, 31, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Baweja, P.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, G. Organic Fertilizer from Algae: A Novel Approach Towards Sustainable Agriculture. In Biofertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture and Environment; Giri, B., Prasad, R., Wu, Q.Q., Varma, A., Eds.; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 353–370. ISBN 9783030189334. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zamljen, T.; Šircelj, H.; Veberič, R.; Hudina, M.; Slatnar, A. Impact of Two Brown Seaweed (Ascophyllum nodosum L.) Biostimulants on the Quantity and Quality of Yield in Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Foods 2024, 13, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Górka, B.; Korzeniowska, K.; Lipok, J.; Wieczorek, P.P. The Biomass of Algae and Algal Extracts in Agricultural Production. In Algae Biomass: Characteristics and Applications; Chojnacka, K., Wieczorek, P.P., Schroeder, G., Michalak, I., Eds.; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 103–114. ISBN 9783319747033. [Google Scholar]
  27. Franzoni, G.; Cocetta, G.; Prinsi, B.; Ferrante, A.; Espen, L. Biostimulants on Crops: Their Impact under Abiotic Stress Conditions. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dang, B.-T.; Ramaraj, R.; Huynh, K.-P.-H.; Le, M.-V.; Tomoaki, I.; Pham, T.-T.; Luan, V.H.; Le Na, P.T.; Tran, D.P.H. Current application of seaweed waste for composting and biochar: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 375, 128830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zubia, M.; Andréfouët, S.; Payri, C. Distribution and biomass evaluation of drifting brown algae from Moorea lagoon (French Polynesia) for eco-friendly agricultural use. J. Appl. Phycol. 2015, 27, 1277–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. La Bella, S.; Consentino, B.B.; Rouphael, Y.; Ntatsi, G.; De Pasquale, C.; Iapichino, G.; Sabatino, L. Impact of Ecklonia maxima seaweed extract and Mo foliar treatments on biofortification, spinach yield, quality and NUE. Plants 2021, 10, 1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Mohammed, S.; El-Sheekh, M.M.; Hamed Aly, S.; Al-Harbi, M.; Elkelish, A.; Nagah, A. Inductive role of the brown alga Sargassum polycystum on growth and biosynthesis of imperative metabolites and antioxidants of two crop plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1136325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ali, N.; Farrell, A.; Ramsubhag, A.; Jayaraman, J. The effect of Ascophyllum nodosum extract on the growth, yield and fruit quality of tomato grown under tropical conditions. J. Appl. Phycol. 2016, 28, 1353–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jithesh, M.N.; Shukla, P.S.; Kant, P.; Joshi, J.; Critchley, A.T.; Prithiviraj, B. Physiological and Transcriptomics Analyses Reveal that Ascophyllum nodosum Extracts Induce Salinity Tolerance in Arabidopsis by Regulating the Expression of Stress Responsive Genes. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2019, 38, 463–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mostafa, Y.S.; Alamri, S.A.; Alrumman, S.A.; Hashem, M.; Taher, M.A.; Baka, Z.A. In Vitro and In Vivo Biocontrol of Tomato Fusarium Wilt by Extracts from Brown, Red, and Green Macroalgae. Agriculture 2022, 12, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rodríguez-Bernaldo de Quirós, A.; López-Hernández, J. An overview on effects of processing on the nutritional content and bioactive compounds in seaweeds. Foods 2021, 10, 2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Goñi, O.; Fort, A.; Quille, P.; McKeown, P.C.; Spillane, C.; O’Connell, S. Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Two Ascophyllum nodosum Extract Biostimulants: Same Seaweed but Different. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 2980–2989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chwastowska-Siwiecka, I.; Miciński, J. Characteristics and applications of marine algae in the agri-food industry and animal nutrition. J. Elem. 2023, 28, 855–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lefi, E.; Badri, M.; Hamed, S.B.; Talbi, S.; Mnafgui, W.; Ludidi, N.; Chaieb, M. Influence of Brown Seaweed (Ecklonia maxima) Extract on the Morpho-Physiological Parameters of Melon, Cucumber, and Tomato Plants. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Patil, S.D.; More, V.R.; Bhalerao, G.A.; Jagtap, M.P. Effect of combination of inorganic fertilizer and seaweed extract on yield, yield attributes and economics of soybean crop. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2019, 8, 1741–1744. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kumari, S.; Sehrawat, K.D.; Phogat, D.; Sehrawat, A.R.; Chaudhary, R.; Sushkova, S.N.; Voloshina, M.S.; Rajput, V.D.; Shmaraeva, A.N.; Marc, R.A.; et al. Ascophyllum nodosum (L.) Le Jolis, a Pivotal Biostimulant toward Sustainable Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Billard, V.; Etienne, P.; Jannin, L.; Garnica, M.; Cruz, F.; Garcia-Mina, J.M.; Yvin, J.C.; Ourry, A. Two Biostimulants Derived from Algae or Humic Acid Induce Similar Responses in the Mineral Content and Gene Expression of Winter Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L.). J. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 33, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chrysargyris, A.; Charalambous, S.; Xylia, P.; Litskas, V.; Stavrinides, M.; Tzortzakis, N. Assessing the biostimulant effects of a novel plant-based formulation on tomato crop. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rouphael, Y.; Giordano, M.; Cardarelli, M.; Cozzolino, E.; Mori, M.; Kyriacou, M.C.; Bonini, P.; Colla, G. Plant-and seaweed-based extracts increase yield but differentially modulate nutritional quality of greenhouse spinach through biostimulant action. Agronomy 2018, 8, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rouphael, Y.; Colla, G.; Giordano, M.; El-Nakhel, C.; Kyriacou, M.C.; De Pascale, S. Foliar applications of a legume-derived protein hydrolysate elicit dose-dependent increases of growth, leaf mineral composition, yield and fruit quality in two greenhouse tomato cultivars. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 226, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Praveen, T.M.; Patil, S.R.; Patil, B.C.; Seetharamu, G.K.; Rudresh, D.L.; Pavankumar, P.; Patil, R.T. Influence of biostimulants on growth and yield of floribunda rose cv. Mirabel. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2021, 10, 2701–2705. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sariñana-Aldaco, O.; Sanchez-Chavez, E.; Fortis-Hernández, M.; González-Fuentes, J.A.; Moreno-Resendez, A.; Rojas-Duarte, A.; Preciado-Rangel, P. Improvement of the nutraceutical quality and yield of tomato by application of salicylic acid. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2020, 48, 882–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kaloko, A. Time and direction effect of boron (B) and silicon (Si) application on oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) through leaves. AGROLAND Agric. Sci. J. 2017, 4, 16–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sariñana-Aldaco, O.; Benavides-Mendoza, A.; Juárez-Maldonado, A.; Robledo-Olivo, A.; Rodríguez-Jasso, R.M.; Preciado-Rangel, P.; Gonzalez-Morales, S. Efecto de extractos de Sargassum spp. en el crecimiento y antioxidantes de plántulas de tomate. Ecosistemas Recur. Agropecu. 2021, 8, e2814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Piwowar, A.; Harasym, J. The importance and prospects of the use of algae in agribusiness. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fleurence, J. Perspectives on the Use of Algae in Agriculture and Animal Production. Phycology 2021, 1, 79–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ammar, E.E.; Aioub, A.A.A.; Elesawy, A.E.; Karkour, A.M.; Mouhamed, M.S.; Amer, A.A.; EL-Shershaby, N.A. Algae as Bio-fertilizers: Between current situation and future prospective. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 3083–3096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Espinosa-Antón, A.A.; Zamora-Natera, J.F.; Zarazúa-Villaseñor, P.; Santacruz-Ruvalcaba, F.; Sánchez-Hernández, C.V.; Águila Alcántara, E.; Torres-Morán, M.I.; Velasco-Ramírez, A.P.; Hernández-Herrera, R.M. Application of Seaweed Generates Changes in the Substrate and Stimulates the Growth of Tomato Plants. Plants 2023, 12, 1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Soares, C.; Švarc-Gajić, J.; Oliva-Teles, M.T.; Pinto, E.; Nastić, N.; Savić, S.; Almeida, A.; Delerue-Matos, C. Mineral composition of subcritical water extracts of Saccorhiza polyschides, a brown seaweed used as fertilizer in the North of Portugal. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Michalak, I.; Tuhy, Ł.; Chojnacka, K. Co-Composting of Algae and Effect of the Compost on Germination and Growth of Lepidium sativum. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2016, 25, 1107–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Badar, R.; Khan, M.; Batool, B.; Shabbir, S. Effects of organic amendments in comparison with chemical fertilizer on cowpea growth. Int. J. Appl. Res. 2015, 1, 24–29. [Google Scholar]
  56. Reeves, S.H.; Somasundaram, J.; Wang, W.J.; Heenan, M.A.; Finn, D.; Dalal, R.C. Effect of soil aggregate size and long-term contrasting tillage, stubble and nitrogen management regimes on CO2 fluxes from a Vertisol. Geoderma 2019, 337, 1086–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sharma, H.S.S.; Fleming, C.; Selby, C.; Rao, J.R.; Martin, T. Plant biostimulants: A review on the processing of macroalgae and use of extracts for crop management to reduce abiotic and biotic stresses. J. Appl. Phycol. 2014, 26, 465–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. van der Merwe, R.D.T.; Goosen, N.J.; Pott, R.W.M. Macroalgal-Derived Alginate Soil Amendments for Water Retention, Nutrient Release Rate Reduction, and Soil pH Control. Gels 2022, 8, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sabate, K.; Masutani, S.; Yoza, B. Microbiological degradation of macroalgae waste and its potential considerations for agricultural applications. J. Appl. Phycol. 2021, 33, 2645–2654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rodrigues Mota, T.; Matias de Oliveira, D.; Marchiosi, R.; Ferrarese-Filho, O.; Dantas dos Santos, W. Plant cell wall composition and enzymatic deconstruction. AIMS Bioeng. 2018, 5, 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ihua, M.W.; Guihéneuf, F.; Mohammed, H.; Margassery, L.M.; Jackson, S.A.; Stengel, D.B.; Clarke, D.J.; Dobson, A.D.W. Microbial population changes in decaying Ascophyllum nodosum result in macroalgal-polysaccharide-degrading bacteria with potential applicability in enzyme-assisted extraction technologies. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Madejón, E.; Panettieri, M.; Madejón, P.; Pérez-de-Mora, A. Composting as Sustainable Managing Option for Seaweed Blooms on Recreational Beaches. Waste Biomass Valorization 2021, 13, 863–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Han, W.; Clarke, W.; Pratt, S. Composting of waste algae: A review. Waste Manag. 2014, 34, 1148–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Juniara, M.I.; Harahap, E.M.; Lubis, A. The Effect of Various Water Content Levels and The Application of Several Brown Algae (Sargassum polycystum) Composts in Increasing The Production of Soybean (Glycine max L.) Plant. J. Online Agroekoteknologi 2021, 9, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sembera, J.A.; Meier, E.J.; Waliczek, T.M. Composting as an alternative management strategy for Sargassum drifts on coastlines. HortTechnology 2018, 28, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Michalak, I.; Chojnacka, K. Algal compost-toward sustainable fertilization. Rev. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 33, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ghinea, C.; Leahu, A. Monitoring of fruit and vegetable waste composting process: Relationship between microorganisms and physico-chemical parameters. Processes 2020, 8, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Di Piazza, S.; Houbraken, J.; Meijer, M.; Cecchi, G.; Kraak, B.; Rosa, E.; Zotti, M. Thermotolerant and thermophilic mycobiota in different steps of compost maturation. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Dinca, M.N.; Ferdes, M.; Paraschiv, G.; Ungureanu, N.; Zabava, B.; Ionescu, M.; Moiceanu, G. Recovery of Organic Waste Through Composting Process. Acta Technol. Corviniensis-Bull. Eng. 2019, 12, 119–122. [Google Scholar]
  70. Tang, J.; Wang, M.; Zhou, Q.; Nagata, S. Improved composting of Undaria pinnatifida seaweed by inoculation with Halomonas and Gracilibacillus sp. isolated from marine environments. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 2925–2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ciereszko, I. Regulatory roles of sugars in plant growth and development. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2018, 87, 3583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sayara, T.; Basheer-Salimia, R.; Hawamde, F.; Sánchez, A. Recycling of organic wastes through composting: Process performance and compost application in agriculture. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hoque, M.N.; Imran, S.; Hannan, A.; Paul, N.C.; Mahamud, M.A.; Chakrobortty, J.; Sarker, P.; Irin, I.J.; Brestic, M.; Rhaman, M.S. Organic Amendments for Mitigation of Salinity Stress in Plants: A Review. Life 2022, 12, 1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Rehman, S.U.; De Castro, F.; Aprile, A.; Benedetti, M.; Fanizzi, F.P. Vermicompost: Enhancing Plant Growth and Combating Abiotic and Biotic Stress. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Illera-Vives, M.; Seoane Labandeira, S.; López-Mosquera, M.E. Production of compost from marine waste: Evaluation of the product for use in ecological agriculture. J. Appl. Phycol. 2013, 25, 1395–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Cole, A.J.; Roberts, D.A.; Garside, A.L.; de Nys, R.; Paul, N.A. Seaweed compost for agricultural crop production. J. Appl. Phycol. 2015, 28, 629–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hernández-Herrera, R.M.; Santacruz-Ruvalcaba, F.; Ruiz-López, M.A.; Norrie, J.; Hernández-Carmona, G. Effect of liquid seaweed extracts on growth of tomato seedlings (Solanum lycopersicum L.). J. Appl. Phycol. 2014, 26, 619–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Nieto-Garibay, A.; Murillo-Amador, B.; Troyo-Diéguez, E.; Larrinaga-Mayoral, J.Á.; García-Hernández, J.L. El uso de compostas como alternativa ecológica para la producción sostenible del Chile (Capsicum annuum L.) en zonas áridas. Interciencia 2002, 27, 417–421. [Google Scholar]
  79. Trejo Valencia, R.; Sánchez Acosta, L.; Fortis Hernández, M.; Preciado Rangel, P.; Gallegos Robles, M.Á.; Antonio Cruz, R.D.; Vázquez Vázquez, C. Effect of seaweed aqueous extracts and compost on vegetative growth, yield, and nutraceutical quality of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) fruit. Agronomy 2018, 8, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Martynenko, A.; Shotton, K.; Astatkie, T.; Petrash, G.; Fowler, C.; Neily, W.; Critchley, A.T. Thermal imaging of soybean response to drought stress: The effect of Ascophyllum nodosum seaweed extract. SpringerPlus 2016, 5, 1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Vijay, K.; Balasundari, S.; Jeyashakila, R.; Velayathum, P.; Masilan, K. Proximate and mineral composition of brown seaweed from Gulf of Mannar. Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud. 2017, 5, 106–112. [Google Scholar]
  82. Jeandet, P.; Formela-Luboińska, M.; Labudda, M.; Morkunas, I. The Role of Sugars in Plant Responses to Stress and Their Regulatory Function during Development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Janse van Rensburg, H.C.; Van den Ende, W.; Signorelli, S. Autophagy in plants: Both a puppet and a puppet master of sugars. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Reboleira, J.; Freitas, R.; Pinteus, S.; Silva, J.; Alves, C.; Pedrosa, R.; Bernardino, S. Brown seaweeds. In Nonvitamin and Nonmineral Nutritional Supplements; Nabavi, S.M., Silva, A.S., Eds.; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 171–176. [Google Scholar]
  85. Bhatnagar-Mathur, P.; Vadez, V.; Sharma, K.K. Transgenic approaches for abiotic stress tolerance in plants: Retrospect and prospects. Plant Cell Rep. 2008, 27, 411–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Heinemann, B.; Hildebrandt, T.M. The role of amino acid metabolism in signaling and metabolic adaptation to stress-induced energy deficiency in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 4634–4645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zuo, S.; Li, J.; Gu, W.; Wei, S. Exogenous Proline Alleviated Low Temperature Stress in Maize Embryos by Optimizing Seed Germination, Inner Proline Metabolism, Respiratory Metabolism and a Hormone Regulation Mechanism. Agriculture 2022, 12, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zamljen, T.; Medic, A.; Hudina, M.; Veberic, R.; Slatnar, A. Biostimulatory Effects of Amino Acids on Phenylalanine Ammonia Lyase, Capsaicin Synthase, and Peroxidase Activities in Capsicum baccatum L. Biology 2022, 11, 674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Decouard, B.; Bailly, M.; Rigault, M.; Marmagne, A.; Arkoun, M.; Soulay, F.; Caïus, J.; Paysant-Le Roux, C.; Louahlia, S.; Jacquard, C.; et al. Genotypic Variation of Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Amino Acid Metabolism in Barley. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 12, 807798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Mata-Pérez, C.; Padilla, M.N.; Sánchez-Calvo, B.; Begara-Morales, J.C.; Valderrama, R.; Chaki, M.; Barroso, J.B. Biological properties of nitro-fatty acids in plants. Nitric Oxide Biol. Chem. 2018, 78, 176–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kim, G.; Ryu, H.; Sung, J. Hormonal Crosstalk and Root Suberization for Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sharma, A.; Zheng, B. Molecular responses during plant grafting and its regulation by auxins, cytokinins, and gibberellins. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kingman, A.R.; Moore, J. Isolation, Purification and Quantitation of Several Growth Regulating Substances in Ascophyllum nodosum (Phaeophyta). Bot. Mar. 1982, 25, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Carrasco-Gil, S.; Hernandez-Apaolaza, L.; Lucena, J.J. Effect of several commercial seaweed extracts in the mitigation of iron chlorosis of tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Plant Growth Regul. 2018, 86, 401–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhao, B.; Liu, Q.; Wang, B.; Yuan, F. Roles of Phytohormones and Their Signaling Pathways in Leaf Development and Stress Responses. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 3566–3584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Huang, S.; Zhang, X.; Fernando, W.G.D. Directing Trophic Divergence in Plant-Pathogen Interactions: Antagonistic Phytohormones With NO Doubt? Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 600063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Kumar, K.; Debnath, P.; Singh, S.; Kumar, N. An Overview of Plant Phenolics and Their Involvement in Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Stresses 2023, 3, 570–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Samuels, L.J.; Setati, M.E.; Blancquaert, E.H. Towards a Better Understanding of the Potential Benefits of Seaweed Based Biostimulants in Vitis vinifera L. Cultivars. Plants 2022, 11, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Estaji, A.; Kalaji, H.M.; Karimi, H.R.; Roosta, H.R.; Moosavi-Nezhad, S.M. How glycine betaine induces tolerance of cucumber plants to salinity stress? Photosynthetica 2019, 57, 753–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Singhal, R.K.; Fahad, S.; Kumar, P.; Choyal, P.; Javed, T.; Jinger, D.; Singh, P.; Saha, D.; Md, P.; Bose, B.; et al. Beneficial elements: New Players in improving nutrient use efficiency and abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 100, 237–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. González-Morales, S.; Pérez-Labrada, F.; García-Enciso, E.L.; Leija-Martínez, P.; Medrano-Macías, J.; Dávila-Rangel, I.E.; Juárez-Maldonado, A.; Rivas-Martínez, E.N.; Benavides-Mendoza, A. Selenium and sulfur to produce Allium functional crops. Molecules 2017, 22, 558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Liu, C.; Cui, B.; Huang, P.; Hu, C.; Zhao, J.; Li, Z.; Wang, J. Silicon Improves Soil Environment and Promotes Crop Growth under Compound Irrigation via Brackish Water and Reclaimed Water. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. González-García, Y.; Flores-Robles, V.; Cadenas-Pliego, G.; Benavides-Mendoza, A.; Cabrera De La Fuente, M.; Sandoval-Rangel, A.; Juárez-Maldonado, A. Application of two forms of silicon and their impact on the postharvest and the content of bioactive compounds in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) fruits. Biocell 2022, 46, 2497–2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Medrano-Macías, J.; Leija-Martínez, P.; González-Morales, S.; Juárez-Maldonado, A.; Benavides-Mendoza, A. Use of iodine to biofortify and promote growth and stress tolerance in crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. García Fuentes, J.E.; Herrera Castellanos, B.F.; Rivas Martínez, E.N.; Narváez Ortiz, W.A.; Benavides Mendoza, A.; Medrano Macías, J. Outcomes of foliar iodine application on growth, minerals and antioxidants in tomato plants under salt stress. Folia Hortic. 2022, 34, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ramya, S.S.; Vijayanand, N.; Rathinavel, S. Foliar application of liquid biofertilizer of brown alga Stoechospermum marginatum on growth, biochemical and yield of Solanum melongena. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric. 2015, 4, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Rajendran, R.; Jagmohan, S.; Jayaraj, P.; Ali, O.; Ramsubhag, A.; Jayaraman, J. Effects of Ascophyllum nodosum extract on sweet pepper plants as an organic biostimulant in grow box home garden conditions. J. Appl. Phycol. 2022, 34, 647–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Subramaniyan, L.; Veerasamy, R.; Prabhakaran, J.; Selvaraj, A.; Algarswamy, S.; Karuppasami, K.M.; Thangavel, K.; Nalliappan, S. Biostimulation Effects of Seaweed Extract (Ascophyllum nodosum) on Phytomorpho-Physiological, Yield, and Quality Traits of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Horticulturae 2023, 9, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. De Pascale, S.; Rouphael, Y.; Colla, G. Plant biostimulants: Innovative tool for enhancing plant nutrition in organic farming. Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 2017, 82, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Hernández-Herrera, R.M.; González-González, M.F.; Velasco-Ramírez, A.P.; Velasco-Ramírez, S.F.; Santacruz-Ruvalcaba, F.; Zamora-Natera, J.F. Seaweed Extract Components Are Correlated with the Seeds Germination and Growth of Tomato Seedlings. Seeds 2023, 2, 436–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Villa e Vila, V.; Piedade, S.M.; Bouix, C.P.; Rezende, R.; Wenneck, G.S.; Terassi, D.D.; Matumoto-Pintro, P.T.; Marques, P.A.A. Use of a Biostimulant Based on Seaweed Extract as a Sustainable Input to Enhance the Quality of Solanaceous Seedlings. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Khaki, S.; Wang, L. Crop yield prediction using deep neural networks. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Engel, D.C.H.; Feltrim, D.; Rodrigues, M.; Baptistella, J.L.C.; Mazzafera, P. Algae Extract Increases Seed Production of Soybean Plants and Alters Nitrogen Metabolism. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Patel, R.V.; Pandya, K.Y.; Jasrai, R.T.; Brahmbhatt, N. Significance of green and brown seaweed liquid fertilizer on seed germination of Solanum melongena, Solanum lycopersicum and Capsicum annum by paper towel and pot method. Int. J. Recent Sci. Res. 2018, 9, 24065–24072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Vasantharaja, R.; Abraham, L.S.; Inbakandan, D.; Thirugnanasambandam, R.; Senthilvelan, T.; Jabeen, S.K.A.; Prakash, P. Influence of seaweed extracts on growth, phytochemical contents and antioxidant capacity of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019, 17, 589–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Machado, L.P.; dos Santos, N.H.S.; Bastos, K.V.; Costa, D.M. Biostimulant effect of seaweed extracts applied on beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Cult. Agron. Rev. Ciências Agron. 2018, 27, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Xu, P.; Tan, H.; Jin, W.; Li, Y.; Santhoshkumar, C.; Li, P.; Liu, W. Antioxidative and antimicrobial activities of intertidal seaweeds and possible effects of abiotic factors on these bioactivities. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2018, 36, 2243–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Mzibra, A.; Aasfar, A.; El Arroussi, H.; Khouloud, M.; Dhiba, D.; Kadmiri, I.M.; Bamouh, A. Polysaccharides extracted from Moroccan seaweed: A promising source of tomato plant growth promoters. J. Appl. Phycol. 2018, 30, 2953–2962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Klykov, A.G.; Anisimov, M.M.; Chaikina, E.L.; Shevchenko, N.M.; Parskaya, N.S. Carbohydrate containing biopolymers derived from brown algae as promoters of growth, development and productivity of agricultural crops. Indian J. Agric. Res. 2019, 53, 609–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. de Sousa, A.M.; Ayub, R.A.; Viencz, T.; Botelho, R.V. Fruit set and yield of apple trees cv. Gala treated with seaweed extract of Ascophyllum nodosum and thidiazuron. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 2019, 41, e-072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Nasution, C.B.; Lubis, A.; Harahap, E.M. Pengaruh Pemberian Kompos Ganggang Coklat (Sargassum polycystum) Dan Kompos Sampah Sayuran Pada Berbagai Penyiraman Air Tanah Ultisol Serta Pertumbuhan Tanaman Padi Gogo. J. Online Agroekoteknologi 2020, 8, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Adderley, A.; Wallace, S.; Stubbs, D.; Bowen-O’Connor, C.; Ferguson, J.; Watson, C.; Gustave, W. Sargassum sp. as a biofertilizer: Is it really a key towards sustainable agriculture for The Bahamas? Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 2023, 47, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Drygaś, B.; Piechowiak, T.; Balawejder, M.; Matłok, N.; Kreczko, J.; Puchalski, C. The Eliciting Effect of Aqueous Extracts from Ascophyllum nodosum Algae on the Cultivation of Arugula (Eruca sativa Mill.) Microgreens. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Mzibra, A.; Aasfar, A.; Khouloud, M.; Farrie, Y.; Boulif, R.; Kadmiri, I.M.; Bamouh, A.; Douira, A. Improving growth, yield, and quality of tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.) by the application of moroccan seaweed-based biostimulants under greenhouse conditions. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Baroud, S.; Tahrouch, S.; Hatimi, A. Effect of brown algae as biofertilizer materials on pepper (Capsicum annuum) growth, yield, and fruit quality. Asian J. Agric. 2024, 8, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Kocira, A.; Świeca, M.; Kocira, S.; Złotek, U.; Jakubczyk, A. Enhancement of yield, nutritional and nutraceutical properties of two common bean cultivars following the application of seaweed extract (Ecklonia maxima). Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2016, 25, 563–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Prasedya, E.S.; Kurniawan, N.S.H.; Kirana, I.A.P.; Ardiana, N.; Abidin, A.S.; Ilhami, B.T.K.; Jupri, A.; Widyastuti, S.; Sunarpi, H.; Nikmatullah, A. Seaweed Fertilizer Prepared by EM-Fermentation Increases Abundance of Beneficial Soil Microbiome in Paddy (Oryza sativa L.) during Vegetative Stage. Fermentation 2022, 8, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Manghwar, H.; Zaman, W. Plant Biotic and Abiotic Stresses. Life 2024, 14, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Shahzad, R.; Harlina, P.W.; Gallego, P.P.; Flexas, J.; Ewas, M.; Leiwen, X.; Karuniawan, A. The seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum-based biostimulant enhances salt stress tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) by remodeling physiological, biochemical, and metabolic responses. J. Plant Interact. 2023, 18, 2266514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Shukla, P.S.; Shotton, K.; Norman, E.; Neily, W.; Critchley, A.T.; Prithiviraj, B. Seaweed extract improve drought tolerance of soybean by regulating stress-response genes. AoB Plants 2018, 10, plx051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Jia, J.; Liang, Y.; Gou, T.; Hu, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Huo, H.; Guo, J.; Gong, H. The expression response of plasma membrane aquaporins to salt stress in tomato plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 178, 104190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Ozturk, M.; Turkyilmaz Unal, B.; García-Caparrós, P.; Khursheed, A.; Gul, A.; Hasanuzzaman, M. Osmoregulation and its actions during the drought stress in plants. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 172, 1321–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Goñi, O.; Quille, P.; O’Connell, S. Ascophyllum nodosum extract biostimulants and their role in enhancing tolerance to drought stress in tomato plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 126, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Mikołajczak, K.; Kuczyńska, A.; Krajewski, P.; Kempa, M.; Witaszak, N. Global Proteome Profiling Revealed the Adaptive Reprogramming of Barley Flag Leaf to Drought and Elevated Temperature. Cells 2023, 12, 1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Melo, G.B.; da Silva, A.G.; da Costa, A.C.; Alves da Silva, A.; Rosa, M.; Bessa, L.A.; Rodrigues, C.R.; Castoldi, G.; Vitorino, L.C. Foliar Application of Biostimulant Mitigates Water Stress Effects on Soybean. Agronomy 2024, 14, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Khedia, J.; Dangariya, M.; Nakum, A.K.; Agarwal, P.; Panda, A.; Parida, A.K.; Gangapur, D.R.; Meena, R.; Agarwal, P.K. Sargassum seaweed extract enhances Macrophomina phaseolina resistance in tomato by regulating phytohormones and antioxidative activity. J. Appl. Phycol. 2020, 32, 4373–4384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Kapoor, D.; Singh, S.; Kumar, V.; Romero, R.; Prasad, R.; Singh, J. Antioxidant enzymes regulation in plants in reference to reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS). Plant Gene 2019, 19, 100182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Fahad, S.; Bajwa, A.A.; Nazir, U.; Anjum, S.A.; Farooq, A.; Zohaib, A.; Sadia, S.; Nasim, W.; Adkins, S.; Saud, S.; et al. Crop production under drought and heat stress: Plant responses and management options. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Carmody, N.; Goñi, O.; Łangowski, Ł.; O’Connell, S. Ascophyllum nodosum Extract Biostimulant Processing and Its Impact on Enhancing Heat Stress Tolerance During Tomato Fruit Set. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. ul Haq, S.; Khan, A.; Ali, M.; Khattak, A.M.; Gai, W.-X.; Zhang, H.-X.; Wei, A.-M.; Gong, Z.-H. Heat shock proteins: Dynamic biomolecules to counter plant biotic and abiotic stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Jameel, J.; Anwar, T.; Majeed, S.; Qureshi, H.; Siddiqi, E.H.; Sana, S.; Zaman, W.; Ali, H.M. Effect of salinity on growth and biochemical responses of brinjal varieties: Implications for salt tolerance and antioxidant mechanisms. BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 24, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Hashem, H.A.; Mansour, H.A.; El-Khawas, S.A.; Hassanein, R.A. The potentiality of marine macro-algae as bio-fertilizers to improve the productivity and salt stress tolerance of canola (Brassica napus L.) plants. Agronomy 2019, 9, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. El-Beltagi, H.S.; Mohamed, H.I.; Sofy, M.R. Role of Ascorbic acid, Glutathione and Proline Applied as Singly or in Sequence Combination in Improving Chickpea Plant through Physiological Change and Antioxidant Defense under Different Levels of Irrigation Intervals. Molecules 2020, 25, 1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Yıldıztekın, M.; Tuna, A.L.; Kaya, C. Physiological effects of the brown seaweed (Ascophyllum nodosum) and humic substances on plant growth, enzyme activities of certain pepper plants grown under salt stress. Acta Biol. Hung. 2018, 69, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Zou, P.; Lu, X.; Zhao, H.; Yuan, Y.; Meng, L.; Zhang, C.; Li, Y. Polysaccharides derived from the brown algae Lessonia nigrescens enhance salt stress tolerance to wheat seedlings by enhancing the antioxidant system and modulating intracellular ion concentration. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Holsteens, K.; De Jaegere, I.; Wynants, A.; Prinsen, E.L.J.; Van de Poel, B. Mild and severe salt stress responses are age-dependently regulated by abscisic acid in tomato. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 982622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Guan, C.; Huang, Y.-H.; Cen, H.-F.; Cui, X.; Tian, D.-Y.; Zhang, Y.-W. Overexpression of the Lolium perenne L. Delta1-pyrroline 5-carboxylate synthase (LpP5CS) gene results in morphological alterations and salinity tolerance in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0219669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Andreotti, C. Management of abiotic stress in horticultural crops: Spotlight on biostimulants. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Soppelsa, S.; Kelderer, M.; Casera, C.; Bassi, M.; Robatscher, P.; Matteazzi, A.; Andreotti, C. Foliar applications of biostimulants promote growth, yield and fruit quality of strawberry plants grown under nutrient limitation. Agronomy 2019, 9, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Yang, T.; Pang, B.; Zhou, L.; Gu, L.; Wang, H.; Du, X.; Wang, H.; Zhu, B. Transcriptome Profiling, Physiological and Biochemical Analyses Reveal Comprehensive Insights in Cadmium Stress in Brassica carinata L. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Shaari, N.E.M.; Khandaker, M.M.; Tajudin, M.T.F.M.; Majrashi, A.; Alenazi, M.M.; Badaluddin, N.A.; Adnan, A.F.M.; Osman, N.; Mohd, K.S. Enhancing the Growth Performance, Cellular Structure, and Rubisco Gene Expression of Cadmium Treated Brassica chinensis Using Sargassum polycystum and Spirulina platensis Extracts. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Iddrisu, L.; Danso, F.; Cheong, K.-L.; Fang, Z.; Zhong, S. Polysaccharides as Protective Agents against Heavy Metal Toxicity. Foods 2024, 13, 853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Bouvier, J.W.; Emms, D.M.; Kelly, S. Rubisco is evolving for improved catalytic efficiency and CO2 assimilation in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2024, 121, e2321050121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Gunupuru, L.R.; Patel, J.S.; Sumarah, M.W.; Renaud, J.B.; Mantin, E.G.; Prithiviraj, B. A plant biostimulant made from the marine brown algae Ascophyllum nodosum and chitosan reduce Fusarium head blight and mycotoxin contamination in wheat. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0220562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Al-Maliki, S.; Adnan, A.; Al-Mammory, K.A.A.H.; Almoslimawi, A.A. Effect of Ascophyllum Extract and Water Stress on Soil Biological Properties and Growth of Onion (Allium cepa L.). Indian J. Ecol. 2019, 46, 796–802. [Google Scholar]
  157. Di Stasio, E.; Cirillo, V.; Raimondi, G.; Giordano, M.; Esposito, M.; Maggio, A. Osmo-priming with seaweed extracts enhances yield of salt-stressed tomato plants. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Campobenedetto, C.; Agliassa, C.; Mannino, G.; Vigliante, I.; Contartese, V.; Secchi, F.; Bertea, C.M. A biostimulant based on seaweed (Ascophyllum Nodosum and Laminaria digitata) and yeast extracts mitigates water stress effects on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Agriculture 2021, 11, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. El-Katony, T.M.; Deyab, M.A.; El-Adl, M.F.; Ward, F.M.E.-N. Extracts of the Brown Alga Dictyota dichotoma (Hudson) J.V. Lamouroux Alleviate Salt Stress in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) During Germination. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 40, 986–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Rouphael, Y.; De Micco, V.; Arena, C.; Raimondi, G.; Colla, G.; De Pascale, S. Effect of Ecklonia maxima seaweed extract on yield, mineral composition, gas exchange, and leaf anatomy of zucchini squash grown under saline conditions. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 459–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Julia, I.; Oscar, M.; Analía, L.; Zocolo Guilherme, J.; Virginia, L. Biofertilization with Macrocystis pyrifera algae extracts combined with PGPR-enhanced growth in Lactuca sativa seedlings. J. Appl. Phycol. 2020, 32, 4361–4371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Hernández-Herrera, R.M.; Sánchez-Hernández, C.V.; Palmeros-Suárez, P.A.; Ocampo-Alvarez, H.; Santacruz-Ruvalcaba, F.; Meza-Canales, I.D.; Becerril-Espinosa, A. Seaweed Extract Improves Growth and Productivity of Tomato Plants under Salinity Stress. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Babazadeh, B.A.; Sadeghzadeh, N.; Hajiboland, R. The impact of algal extract as a biostimulant on cold stress tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). J. Appl. Phycol. 2023, 35, 2919–2933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Alharbi, K.; Amin, M.A.; Ismail, M.A.; Ibrahim, M.T.S.; Hassan, S.E.-D.; Fouda, A.; Eid, A.M.; Said, H.A. Alleviate the Drought Stress on Triticum aestivum L. Using the Algal Extracts of Sargassum latifolium and Corallina elongate Versus the Commercial Algal Products. Life 2022, 12, 1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Khan, Z.; Gul, H.; Rauf, M.; Arif, M.; Hamayun, M.; Ud-Din, A.; Sajid, Z.A.; Khilji, S.A.; Rehman, A.; Tabassum, A.; et al. Sargassum wightii Aqueous Extract Improved Salt Stress Tolerance in Abelmoschus esculentus by Mediating Metabolic and Ionic Rebalance. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9, 853272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Giovannetti, M.; Salvioli di Fossalunga, A.; Stringlis, I.A.; Proietti, S.; Fiorilli, V. Unearthing soil-plant-microbiota crosstalk: Looking back to move forward. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 13, 1082752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Sun, B.; Luo, Y.; Yang, D.; Yang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, J. Coordinative Management of Soil Resources and Agricultural Farmland Environment for Food Security and Sustainable Development in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Begum, M.; Bordoloi, B.C.; Singha, D.D.; Ojha, N.J. Role of seaweed extract on growth, yield and quality of some agricultural crops: A review. Agric. Rev. 2018, 39, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Hamed, S.M.; Abdelrhman, A.A.; Abdel-Raouf, N.; Ibraheem, I.B.M. Role of Marine Macroalgae in Plant Protection & Improvement for Sustainable Agriculture Technology. Beni-Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. 2018, 7, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Nabti, E.; Jha, B.; Hartmann, A. Impact of seaweeds on agricultural crop production as biofertilizer. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 14, 1119–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Furey, G.N.; Tilman, D. Plant biodiversity and the regeneration of soil fertility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2111321118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Pereira, L.; Morrison, L.; Shukla, P.S.; Critchley, A.T. A concise review of the brown macroalga Ascophyllum nodosum (Linnaeus) Le Jolis. J. Appl. Phycol. 2020, 32, 3561–3584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Uribe-Orozco, M.E.; Mateo-Cid, L.E.; Mendoza-González, A.C.; Amora-Lazcano, E.F.; González-Mendoza, D.; Duran-Hernández, D. Efecto del alga marina Sargassum vulgare C. Agardh en suelo y el desarrollo de plantas de cilantro. Idesia (Arica) 2018, 36, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Michalak, I.; Chojnacka, K. Algae as production systems of bioactive compounds. Eng. Life Sci. 2015, 15, 160–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Rai, A.; Santana, M.M.; Maia, R.N.; Tavares, J.; Nabti, E.; Cruz, C. Bacterial Inoculation and Extracts of Opuntia Rackets or Marine Algae Trigger Distinct Proline Balances in Tomato Salt Stress Alleviation. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Flavel, T.C.; Murphy, D.V. Carbon and Nitrogen Mineralization Rates after Application of Organic Amendments to Soil. J. Environ. Qual. 2006, 35, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Abujabhah, I.S.; Bound, S.A.; Doyle, R.; Bowman, J.P. Effects of biochar and compost amendments on soil physico-chemical properties and the total community within a temperate agricultural soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2015, 98, 243–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Shi, R.; Liu, Z.; Li, Y.; Jiang, T.; Xu, M.; Li, J.; Xu, R. Mechanisms for increasing soil resistance to acidification by long-term manure application. Soil Tillage Res. 2019, 185, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Sun, Y.; Xiong, X.; He, M.; Xu, Z.; Hou, D.; Zhang, W.; Ok, Y.S.; Rinklebe, J.; Wang, L.; Tsang, D.C.W. Roles of biochar-derived dissolved organic matter in soil amendment and environmental remediation: A critical review. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 424, 130387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Pahalvi, H.N.; Rafiya, L.; Rashid, S.; Nisar, B.; Kamili, A.N. History of Botany (1530–1860), 2nd ed.; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1906. [Google Scholar]
  181. Murphy, B.W. Impact of soil organic matter on soil properties—A review with emphasis on Australian soils. Soil Res. 2015, 53, 605–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Adeleke, R.; Nwangburuka, C.; Oboirien, B. Origins, roles and fate of organic acids in soils: A review. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2016, 108, 393–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Diacono, M.; Montemurro, F. Long-term effects of organic amendments on soil fertility. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2010, 30, 401–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Oldfield, E.E.; Wood, S.A.; Bradford, M.A. Direct effects of soil organic matter on productivity mirror those observed with organic amendments. Plant Soil 2018, 423, 363–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Gayosso-Rodríguez, S.; Borges-Gómez, L.; Villanueva-Couoh, E.; Estrada-Botello, M.; Garruña, R. Caracterización Física Y Química De Materiales Orgánicos Para Sustratos Agrícolas. Agrociencia 2018, 52, 639–652. [Google Scholar]
  186. Huntley, B.J. Soil, Water and Nutrients. In Ecology of Angola: Terrestrial Biomes and Ecoregions; Huntley, B.J., Ed.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 127–147. ISBN 978-3-031-18922-7. [Google Scholar]
  187. Raza, S.; Na, M.; Wang, P.; Ju, X.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, J.; Kuzyakov, Y. Dramatic loss of inorganic carbon by nitrogen-induced soil acidification in Chinese croplands. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2020, 26, 3738–3751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Gámez-Arjona, F.M.; Sánchez-Rodríguez, C.; Montesinos, J.C. The root apoplastic pH as an integrator of plant signaling. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 931979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Thompson, T.M.; Young, B.R.; Baroutian, S. Pelagic Sargassum for energy and fertiliser production in the Caribbean: A case study on Barbados. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 118, 109564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Ramos, F.T.; de Carvalho Dores, E.F.; dos Santos Weber, O.L.; Beber, D.C.; Campelo Jr, J.H.; de Souza Maia, J. Soil organic matter doubles the cation exchange capacity of tropical soil under no-till farming in Brazil. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 3595–3602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Khan, W.; Rayirath, U.P.; Subramanian, S.; Jithesh, M.N.; Rayorath, P.; Hodges, D.M.; Critchley, A.T.; Craigie, J.S.; Norrie, J.; Prithiviraj, B. Seaweed Extracts as Biostimulants of Plant Growth and Development. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2009, 28, 386–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Hassan, M.K.; McInroy, J.A.; Kloepper, J.W. The Interactions of Rhizodeposits with Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria in the Rhizosphere: A Review. Agriculture 2019, 9, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Suman, J.; Rakshit, A.; Ogireddy, S.D.; Singh, S.; Gupta, C.; Chandrakala, J. Microbiome as a Key Player in Sustainable Agriculture and Human Health. Front. Soil Sci. 2022, 2, 821589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Patiño-Torres, C.O.; Sanclemente-Reyes, O.E. Los Microorganismos solubilizadores de Fosforo (MSF): Una Alternativa Biotecnológica Para Una Agricultura Sostenible. Entramado 2014, 10, 288–297. [Google Scholar]
  195. Ding, Z.; Ali, E.F.; Almaroai, Y.A.; Eissa, M.A.; Abeed, A.H.A. Effect of Potassium Solubilizing Bacteria and Humic Acid on Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) Plants Grown on Sandy Loam Soils. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2021, 21, 791–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Pérez-Pérez, R.; Hernández-Forte, I.; Sanabria Álvarez, Y.O.; Salcedo Benítez, J.C.; Sosa-del Castillo, D.; Pérez-Martínez, S. Characterization of potassium solubilizing bacteria isolated from corn rhizoplane. Agron. Colomb. 2021, 39, 415–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Schneider, K.; Rose, I.; Vikineswary, S.; Jones, A.L.; Goodfellow, M.; Nicholson, G.; Beil, W.; Süssmuth, R.D.; Fiedler, H.-P. Nocardichelins A and B, Siderophores from Nocardia Strain Acta 3026. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 932–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Mekonnen, H.; Kibret, M. The roles of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in sustainable vegetable production in Ethiopia. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2021, 8, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Hines, S.; van der Zwan, T.; Shiell, K.; Shotton, K.; Prithiviraj, B. Alkaline extract of the seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum stimulates arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and their endomycorrhization of plant roots. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Liu, H.; Li, J.; Carvalhais, L.C.; Percy, C.D.; Verma, J.P.; Schenk, P.M.; Singh, B.K. Evidence for the plant recruitment of beneficial microbes to suppress soil-borne pathogens. New Phytol. 2021, 229, 2873–2885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Jayaraman, J.; Norrie, J.; Punja, Z.K. Commercial extract from the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum reduces fungal diseases in greenhouse cucumber. J. Appl. Phycol. 2011, 23, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Ali, O.; Ramsubhag, A.; Jayaraman, J. Phytoelicitor activity of Sargassum vulgare and Acanthophora spicifera extracts and their prospects for use in vegetable crops for sustainable crop production. J. Appl. Phycol. 2021, 33, 639–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Mahgoub, H.A.; El-Adl, M.A.M.; Martyniuk, C.J. Fucoidan ameliorates acute and sub-chronic in vivo toxicity of the fungicide cholorothalonil in Oreochromis niloticus (Nile tilapia). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C 2021, 245, 109035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Bouissil, S.; El Alaoui-Talibi, Z.; Pierre, G.; Michaud, P.; El Modafar, C.; Delattre, C. Use of alginate extracted from Moroccan brown algae to stimulate natural defense in date palm roots. Molecules 2020, 25, 720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Ishii, T.; Aikawa, J.; Kirino, S.; Kitabayashi, H.; Matsumoto, I.; Kadoya, K. Effects of alginate oligosaccharide and polyamines on hyphal growth of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and their infectivity of citrus roots. In Proceedings of the 9th International Society of Citriculture Congress, Orlando, FL, USA, 3–7 December 2000; pp. 1030–1032. [Google Scholar]
  206. Madejón, E.; Madejón, P.; García de Arboleya, C.; Puente, P.; Pérez de Mora, A. Proceso de compostaje de algas marinas. Limitaciones y perspectivas. Red Española Compost. 2020, 1, 232–236. [Google Scholar]
  207. Bertoldo, G.; Chiodi, C.; Della Lucia, M.C.; Borella, M.; Ravi, S.; Baglieri, A.; Lucenti, P.; Ganasula, B.K.; Mulagala, C.; Squartini, A.; et al. Brown Seaweed Extract (BSE) Application Influences Auxin- and ABA-Related Gene Expression, Root Development, and Sugar Yield in Beta vulgaris L. Plants 2023, 12, 843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Yuan, P.; Tanaka, K.; Poovaiah, B.W. Calcium/Calmodulin-Mediated Defense Signaling: What Is Looming on the Horizon for AtSR1/CAMTA3-Mediated Signaling in Plant Immunity. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 12, 795353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Khatri, N.; Katiyar, A.; Mudgil, Y. Role of G Protein Signaling Components in Plant Stress Management. Plant Stress 2012, 6, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  210. Zhang, Y.; Xu, J.; Li, R.; Ge, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, R. Plants’ Response to Abiotic Stress: Mechanisms and Strategies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Medrano-Macías, J.; Flores-Gallegos, A.C.; Nava-Reyna, E.; Morales, I.; Tortella, G.; Solís-Gaona, S.; Benavides-Mendoza, A. Reactive Oxygen, Nitrogen, and Sulfur Species (RONSS) as a Metabolic Cluster for Signaling and Biostimulation of Plants: An Overview. Plants 2022, 11, 3203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Zhang, Q.; Gong, M.; Xu, X.; Li, H.; Deng, W. Roles of Auxin in the Growth, Development, and Stress Tolerance of Horticultural Plants. Cells 2022, 11, 2761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Ali, O.; Ramsubhag, A.; Ramnarine, S.D.B.J.; Jayaraman, J. Transcriptomic changes induced by applications of a commercial extract of Ascophyllum nodosum on tomato plants. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 8042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Gómez-Godínez, L.J.; Aguirre-Noyola, J.L.; Martínez-Romero, E.; Arteaga-Garibay, R.I.; Ireta-Moreno, J.; Ruvalcaba-Gómez, J.M. A Look at Plant-Growth-Promoting Bacteria. Plants 2023, 12, 1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Masrahi, A.S.; Alasmari, A.; Shahin, M.G.; Qumsani, A.T.; Oraby, H.F.; Awad-Allah, M.M.A. Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria in Improving Yield, Yield Components, and Nutrients Uptake of Barley under Salinity Soil. Agriculture 2023, 13, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Shao, Z.; Arkhipov, A.; Batool, M.; Muirhead, S.R.; Harry, M.S.; Ji, X.; Mirzaee, H.; Carvalhais, L.C.; Schenk, P.M. Rhizosphere Bacteria Biofertiliser Formulations Improve Lettuce Growth and Yield under Nursery and Field Conditions. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Asimakis, E.; Shehata, A.A.; Eisenreich, W.; Acheuk, F.; Lasram, S.; Basiouni, S.; Emekci, M.; Ntougias, S.; Taner, G.; May-Simera, H.; et al. Algae and Their Metabolites as Potential Bio-Pesticides. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Effects of applying brown algae products (extracts, composts, and direct applications) on agricultural crops.
Figure 1. Effects of applying brown algae products (extracts, composts, and direct applications) on agricultural crops.
Horticulturae 11 00094 g001
Figure 2. CEC between soil and plant root system influenced by brown algae products. OM: Organic matter. Reference is made to the fact that OM and complexing compounds are derived from brown algae.
Figure 2. CEC between soil and plant root system influenced by brown algae products. OM: Organic matter. Reference is made to the fact that OM and complexing compounds are derived from brown algae.
Horticulturae 11 00094 g002
Figure 3. Mode of action of brown algae extracts at the cellular level. GPCR: G-proteins coupled receptors; MAPKs: Mitogen-activated protein kinases; P: Phosphate groups; TF: Transcription factors; DREB: Dehydration responsive element-binding; CBF: Core binding factor; MYB: Myeloblastosis; bZIP: Basic leucine zipper; ABRE: Abscisic acid-responsive element; HB: Homeobox; NPK1: Nicotiana protein kinase 1; CTR1: Constitutive triple response 1; EDR1: Enhanced disease resistance 1; PR: Pathogenesis-related proteins; HSP: Heat shock proteins; LEA: Late embryogenesis abundant; COR: Cold-regulated; SOS: Salt overly sensitive; PIP: Plasma membrane intrinsic proteins; SOD: Superoxide dismutase; CAT: Catalase; APX: Ascorbate peroxidase; GPX: Glutathione peroxidase; PAL: Phenylalanine ammonium lyase; ABA: Abscisic acid.
Figure 3. Mode of action of brown algae extracts at the cellular level. GPCR: G-proteins coupled receptors; MAPKs: Mitogen-activated protein kinases; P: Phosphate groups; TF: Transcription factors; DREB: Dehydration responsive element-binding; CBF: Core binding factor; MYB: Myeloblastosis; bZIP: Basic leucine zipper; ABRE: Abscisic acid-responsive element; HB: Homeobox; NPK1: Nicotiana protein kinase 1; CTR1: Constitutive triple response 1; EDR1: Enhanced disease resistance 1; PR: Pathogenesis-related proteins; HSP: Heat shock proteins; LEA: Late embryogenesis abundant; COR: Cold-regulated; SOS: Salt overly sensitive; PIP: Plasma membrane intrinsic proteins; SOD: Superoxide dismutase; CAT: Catalase; APX: Ascorbate peroxidase; GPX: Glutathione peroxidase; PAL: Phenylalanine ammonium lyase; ABA: Abscisic acid.
Horticulturae 11 00094 g003
Table 1. Effect of brown algae products on growth, yield, physiology, and quality of crops.
Table 1. Effect of brown algae products on growth, yield, physiology, and quality of crops.
AlgaeApplication FormEffectReferences
A. nodosumExtract/Foliar at a dose of 0.5%Increased growth, number of fruits, yield, carbohydrates, phenols, amino acids, proteins, chlorophylls, and minerals in bell pepper[107]
A. nodosumExtract/Drench at a dose of 2.5, 5, and 10 L ha−1 Increase in plant height, leaf area, dry biomass, yield and nutraceutical quality of fruits, chlorophylls, photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration of tomato plants[108]
A. nodosumExtract/Foliar at a dose of 0.3%Increase in total soluble solids, titratable acidity and yield as measured by number, length and diameter of apples[120]
A. nodosumExtract/Seeds and Foliar at a dose of 0.25, and 0.5% Increased biomass, greater number of pods, seeds and nodules, greater absorption of macronutrients and increased activity of glutamine synthetase, glutamate synthase, and nitrate reductase in soybeans[113]
A. nodosumExtract/Foliar (0.2%) and Drench (0.1, 0.2, and 0.3%)Increased growth and aerial and root biomass of tomato and eggplant seedlings along with increased foliar chlorophylls[111]
A. nodosumExtract/Drench at a dose of 2.5, 5 and 10%Increase in total phenols, flavonoids, antioxidant capacity, and enzymatic activities (CAT, SOD, PPO, and PAL) in arugula plants[123]
B. bifurcateExtract/Drench at a dose of 0.1 mg mL−1Increased yield of tomatoes and their components and higher concentration of sugars, organic acids, and lycopene in fruits[124]
C. gibraltarica, B. bifurcate, and F. spiralisExtract/Foliar (0.5, 1 y 2%) and Amendment/Soil (2.5, 5 and 10 g pot−1)Increased yield of pepper and its components, increased foliar N, and higher concentration of sugars in fruits[125]
E. maximaExtracts/Foliar at a dose of 0.2 and 0.4%Increased yield and higher antioxidant capacity and concentration of phenolic compounds and anthocyanins in bean seeds[126]
E. maximaExtract/Foliar at a dose of 3 mL L−1High yield and increased nutraceutical (ascorbic acid and phenols) and nutritional (N, P, K, and Mg) quality of spinach[30]
F. spiralis and B. bifurcataExtract/Seeds at a dose of 0.1 mg mL−1Increased seed germination percentage, plant growth, and chlorophyll accumulation in tomato plants[118]
F. vesiculosusGranular/Soil at a dose of 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, and 10%Increases in organic matter, carbon, and minerals and decrease in acidity in soils with cucumber production[15]
L. cichorioidesExtract/Drench at a dose of 10 µg mL−1 Increase in height, ear length, number of seeds per ear, and seed weight per ear in wheat and barley[119]
M. pyriferaExtract/Seeds at a dose of 1%Increased seed germination and length of shoots and radicles in tomato seedlings[110]
M. pyrifera and Grammatophora spp.Extract/Foliar at a dose of 10%Greater concentration of ascorbic acid, phenolic compounds, and antioxidant capacity in cucumber fruits[79]
S. johnstoniiExtract/Seeds at a dose of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5% Improvement of seeds germination percentage and growth of chili, tomato, and eggplant seedlings[114]
S. marginatumExtract/Foliar at a dose of 1.5%Improvement of yield and its components, moisture content, photosynthetic pigments, proteins, amino acids, reducing sugars, ascorbic acid, and nitrate reductase activity in eggplant crop[106]
S. polycystumCompost/Soil at a dose of 15 ton ha−1Increased growth and yield of rice crop. Soil organic C, N, and C/N ratio were also increased[121]
Sargassum spp.Extract/Foliar at a dose of 1.5%Increased growth and aerial and root biomass and higher concentration of chlorophylls, carotenoids, glutathione, phenols, flavonoids, and foliar proteins in tomato seedlings[48]
Sargassum sp.Powder/Soil at a dose of 1, 5 and 10%They increased soil nutrients, organic matter, and salinity. However, they negatively affected the growth of cherry tomato plants [122]
S. swartziiExtract/Foliar at a dose of 3%Increased yield, proteins, phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and antioxidant capacity of cowpea crop[115]
S. vulgareExtract/Seeds at a dose of 25%Lower germination speed index, length, and biomass of bean seedlings compared to those treated with extracts of the algae O. obtusiloba[116]
S. cristaefolium, S. crassifolium, and S. polycystumFermented compost/Soil at a dose of 50, 75, and 100%Increased growth of rice plants and increased N-fixing bacteria in the soil[127]
Table 2. Brown algae products in the induction of tolerance to stress in crops.
Table 2. Brown algae products in the induction of tolerance to stress in crops.
AlgaeApplication FormEffectReference
A. nodosumExtract/Foliar at a dose of 1 L ha−1Decrease in MDA, increase in relative water content and increase in photosynthetic activity of soybean under water deficit[136]
A. nodosumExtract/Irrigation water at a dose of 1, 2, and 3 g L−1Tolerance to salinity stress in pepper through increased SOD, POD, and CAT activity[145]
A. nodosumExtract/Foliar at a dose of 0.33% Increased osmolytes and expression of defense genes (TAS14) against drought in tomato[134]
A. nodosumExtract/Foliar at a dose of 4 g L−1Increased growth, yield, phenols, and anthocyanins in fruits, and increased photosynthetic activity and transpiration in strawberry leaves, grown under nutrient limitation[150]
A. nodosumExtract/Foliar at a dose of 0.106% Tolerance to heat stress in tomato measured by pollen viability, fruits production, and expression of defense genes in flowers (HSP101.1, HSP70.9, and HSP17.7C-Cl) [140]
A. nodosumExtract/Drench at a dose of 7 mL L−1Increased relative water content, stomatal conductance, antioxidant capacity, and defense gene expression in drought-stressed soybean[130]
A. nodosumExtract/Drench at a dose of 5 and 15 mL L−1Reduction in head blight in wheat caused by F. graminearum measured by the expression of the defense genes TaPR1.1, TaPR2, TaPR3 and TaGlu2 and the antioxidant enzymes POD and PPO[155]
A. nodosumExtract/Drench at a dose of 5 g L−1Increased soil microbial activity and better aggregate stability, increased water use efficiency, and higher onion yield under water deficit conditions[156]
A. nodosumExtract/Seeds at a dose of 2 and 2.5 mL L−1Increased yield, aboveground and root biomass, and greater water use efficiency in tomato under salt stress[157]
A. nodosum and D. potatorumExtract/Foliar at a dose of 0.2 and 1.1 mL L−1In Fe-deficient tomato plants, A. nodosum increased SOD activity in roots and leaves, decreased malondialdehyde concentration in leaves, and increased root dry biomass. D. potatorum increased CAT activity in roots[94]
A. nodosum and L. digitata Extract/Foliar at a dose of 2 mL L−1Lower concentration of MDA and ABA, increased stem water potential and photosynthetic pigments in tomato plants under water stress[158]
Cystoseira spp.Powder/Soil at a dose of 3 g kg−1Accumulation of total phenols, flavonoids, anthocyanins, carbohydrates, and proline in canola under salinity conditions[143]
D. dichotomaExtract/Seeds at a dose of 20 g L−1Higher germination percentage of rice seeds and increased radicle and plumule length under salt stress[159]
E. maximaExtract/Foliar at a dose of 3 mL L−1Increased yield and its components, total soluble solids, CO2 assimilation rate, chlorophylls, and high K and low Na accumulation in zucchini under salt stress[160]
L. nigrescensExtract/Nutrient solution at a dose of 5%Increased growth and antioxidant capacity, decreasing lipid peroxidation, and better coordination of intracellular ion flux in wheat seedlings subjected to salinity stress[146]
M. pyriferaExtract/Seeds at a dose of 30%Synergy between the extracts and Azospirillum brasilense that improved the root development of lettuce seedlings under water deficit[161]
P. gymnosporaExtract/Drench at a dose of 0.2%Increased root and shoot length, early flowering and greater weight and nutraceutical quality of tomato fruits under salt stress[162]
S. angustifoliumExtract/Nutrient solution at a dose of 5 mL L−1Increased quantum yield of PSII, photosynthetic pigments, proline, phenols, sugars and antioxidant enzymes in barley subjected to low temperature stress[163]
S. dentifoliumPowder/Soil at a dose of 1g kg−1Decreased severity of tomato disease caused by F. oxysporum and increased yield in plants treated with the algae[34]
S. latifoliumExtract/Foliar at a dose of 5%Increased carbohydrates, proteins, GA3, and IAA in wheat under drought stress[164]
S. polycystumExtract/Foliar and drench at a dose of 25, 50, and 100 mL L−1Improvement of biomass, CAT, APX, and POD enzymes, histological variables, expression of the rbcL gene, and decrease in Cd accumulation in B. chinensis[152]
S. tenerrimumExtract/Foliar at a dose of 10% Resistance to M. phaseolina in tomato by modulating SA, ABA, IAA, and antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, and APX)[137]
Sargassum spp.Extract/Foliar at a dose of 1.5%Greater growth and biomass, activation of the enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant system, and expression of defense genes in tomato seedlings under salt stress[14]
S. wightiiExtract/Foliar at a dose of 2 and 4%Increased growth, yield, carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, carotenoids and proline and decreased H2O2 and ABA levels in okra plants under salt stress. The K+/Na+, Mg2+/Na+ and Ca2+/Na+ ratios were modulated with the application of the extracts[165]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sariñana-Aldaco, O.; Rivera-Solís, L.L.; Benavides-Mendoza, A.; Robledo-Olivo, A.; Rodríguez-Jasso, R.M.; González-Morales, S. Using Brown Algae in the Plant–Soil System: A Sustainable Approach to Improving the Yield and Quality of Agricultural Crops. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11010094

AMA Style

Sariñana-Aldaco O, Rivera-Solís LL, Benavides-Mendoza A, Robledo-Olivo A, Rodríguez-Jasso RM, González-Morales S. Using Brown Algae in the Plant–Soil System: A Sustainable Approach to Improving the Yield and Quality of Agricultural Crops. Horticulturae. 2025; 11(1):94. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11010094

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sariñana-Aldaco, Oscar, Luz Leticia Rivera-Solís, Adalberto Benavides-Mendoza, Armando Robledo-Olivo, Rosa María Rodríguez-Jasso, and Susana González-Morales. 2025. "Using Brown Algae in the Plant–Soil System: A Sustainable Approach to Improving the Yield and Quality of Agricultural Crops" Horticulturae 11, no. 1: 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11010094

APA Style

Sariñana-Aldaco, O., Rivera-Solís, L. L., Benavides-Mendoza, A., Robledo-Olivo, A., Rodríguez-Jasso, R. M., & González-Morales, S. (2025). Using Brown Algae in the Plant–Soil System: A Sustainable Approach to Improving the Yield and Quality of Agricultural Crops. Horticulturae, 11(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11010094

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop