Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification of the 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic Acid Synthase (ACS) Genes and Their Possible Role in Sand Pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) Fruit Ripening
Next Article in Special Issue
RsSOS1 Responding to Salt Stress Might Be Involved in Regulating Salt Tolerance by Maintaining Na+ Homeostasis in Radish (Raphanus sativus L.)
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Glucosinolate Content, Composition and Expression Level of Biosynthesis Pathway Genes in Different Chinese Kale Varieties
Previous Article in Special Issue
Expression Profiling of Heat Shock Protein Genes as Putative Early Heat-Responsive Members in Lettuce
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Horticulturae
Volume 7
Issue 10
10.3390/horticulturae7100399
horticulturae-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Unravelling the Role of Piriformospora indica in Combating Water Deficiency by Modulating Physiological Performance and Chlorophyll Metabolism-Related Genes in Cucumis sativus

by
Mohamed E. Abdelaziz
1,
Mohamed A. M. Atia
2,†,
Mohamed Abdelsattar
3,
Suzy M. Abdelaziz
4,
Taha A. A. Ibrahim
1 and
Emad A. Abdeldaym
1,*
1
Department of Vegetable, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt
2
Molecular Genetic and Genome Mapping Laboratory, Genome Mapping Department, Agriculture Genetic Engineering Research Institute (AGERI), Agriculture Research Centre (ARC), Giza 12619, Egypt
3
Plant Molecular Biology Department, Agricultural Genetic Engineering Research Institute (AGERI), Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Giza 12619, Egypt
4
Department of Cross-Pollinated Vegetable Crops, Horticulture Research Institute, Giza 12611, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Equal contribution with the 1st author.
Horticulturae 2021, 7(10), 399; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7100399
Submission received: 7 September 2021 / Revised: 9 October 2021 / Accepted: 10 October 2021 / Published: 14 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Abiotic Stress Responses of Vegetable Crops)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Water stress is the most critical aspect restricting the development of agriculture in regions with scarce water resources, which requires enhancing irrigation water-saving strategies. The current work discusses the potential application of the plant-strengthening root endophyte Piriformospora indica against moderate (25% less irrigation water) and severe (50% less irrigation water) water stress in comparison to the optimum irrigation conditions of greenhouse cucumbers. P. indica improved growth, nutrient content, and photosynthesis apparatus under normal or water-stress conditions. On the other hand, moderate and severe water stress reduced yield up to 47% and 83%, respectively, in non-colonized cucumber plants, while up to 28 and 78%, respectively, in P. indica-colonized plants. In terms of water-use efficiency (WUE), P. indica improved the WUE of colonized cucumber plants grown under moderate (26 L/kg) or severe stress (73 L/kg) by supporting colonized plants in producing higher yield per unit volume of water consumed by the crop in comparison to non-colonized plants under the same level of moderate (43 L/kg) or severe (81 L/kg) water stress. Furthermore, P. indica increased the indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) content, activity levels of catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD) with an apparent clear reduction in the abscisic acid (ABA), ethylene, malondialdehyde (MDA), proline contents and stomatal closure compared to non-stressed plants under both water-stress levels. In addition, chlorophyll a, b, a + b contents were increased in the leaves of the colonized plants under water-stress conditions. This improvement in chlorophyll content could be correlated with a significant increment in the transcripts of chlorophyll biosynthesis genes (protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase [POR], chlorophyll a oxygenase [CAO]) and a reduction in the chlorophyll degradation genes (PPH, pheophorbide a oxygenase [PAO], and red chlorophyll catabolite reductase [RCCR]). In conclusion, P. indica has the potential to enhance the cucumber yield grown under moderate water stress rather than severe water stress by improving WUE and altering the activity levels of antioxidant enzymes and chlorophyll metabolism-related genes.

1. Introduction

Cucumber is one of the main protected culture crops grown in the Mediterranean region because it has potential health benefits and is quite well adapted to grow under different protected culture conditions [1,2,3]. Furthermore, the greenhouse industry has rapidly expanded worldwide, together with demanding new strategies to solve specific biotic and abiotic stress-limiting production factors [4,5,6,7]. Water stress is one of the most important factors restricting the development of agricultural extension in countries and regions with scarce water resources. The problem of irrigation water shortage and its low quality has become a concern for semi-arid zones [8,9] and is considered a real challenge to development and progress in food security [10,11]. Hence, the competition for water resources is increasing dramatically nowadays, which requires enhancing water-use efficiency strategies [12,13]. Consequently, water deficiency alters a suite of modifications that obstruct several biochemical and metabolic processes of the plant [14], reduce plant photosynthesis through chlorophyll degradation, disrupt electron transfer [15], and decrease growth and yield [16,17]. Plant strategies to cope with water shortage include several adaptive changes, such as developing larger and deeper root systems [18,19], stomatal closure mechanisms [20], osmotic pressure adjustment [21], and generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging systems [22]. A leaf is the first plant organ to reflect the harmful effects of drought [23]. Accordingly, water stress is specified to destruct and decrease chlorophyll content in plant fresh leaves, which is considered an indicator of photosynthetic incapability of plant machinery [24,25,26]. Besides, water stress triggers the leaf senescence programme as an adaptative technique in plants subjected to water shortage to reduce the water demand cumulated over the whole plant cycle [27]. Mainly, chlorophyll a and b are essential for the primary photosynthetic reaction [28]. In consequence, chlorophyll degradation is a necessary integral process of leaf senescence, which is catalyzed sequentially by a series of chlorophyll catabolic enzymes [29]. Therefore, to alleviate the adverse effects caused by water stress, symbiotic fungi have been declared to improve colonized plants’ tolerance to various biotic and abiotic stresses [30,31,32]. The root endophyte fungi enhance the physical and chemical properties of the soil, nutrient absorption, and translocation [33]. The mutualistic root fungus Piriformospora indica has been reported to colonize a wide range of plants [34]. P. indica promotes plant growth [35], stress tolerance [36,37,38], and production of IAA, gibberellin, cytokinin [39,40], and secondary metabolites [41]. Several reports have indicated the potential of P. indica application in commercial production practices due to its ability to propagate axenically in different media, which makes its use more practically feasible than mycorrhiza [42,43,44]. The current work aims to study the potential of P. indica utilization on greenhouse cucumber plants grown under three irrigation levels to improve plant growth, production, and resistance to irrigation water stress. In this respect, morphophysiological traits, photosynthetic activity, hormone quantification, the activity levels of antioxidant enzymes, and specific chlorophyll metabolism related genes were evaluated under normal irrigation and moderate and severe water-stress conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials, Greenhouse Conditions, and Experimental Design

Cucumber seeds (Cucumis sativus cv. Sama) were surface sterilized with sodium hypochlorite (1.5%) for 15 min, rinsed three times with distilled water, and then sown in cell trays filled with a sterilized mixture of peat moss, sand, and vermiculite (1:1:1). Three-week old cucumber seedlings were transplanted in 40-L plastic pots filled with sandy soil and grown in a 560 m2 fiberglass greenhouse at the Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Egypt, during the two spring seasons of 2019 and 2020. Each treatment had 16 pots with two grown plants per pot and two and a half plants per square meter. The greenhouse was equipped with a pad and fan cooling system. The fan “on-off” switch was connected to a sensor located in the middle of the greenhouse, one meter above the plants, to keep cold air flow among crop lines and keep day/night temperatures between 26/18 °C. Each compartment was connected to a drip irrigation system serving the individual planting rows with two drippers per pot; each dripper provided 4 L of irrigation water. One week post transplanting, the cucumber plants were subjected to three irrigation levels, applied as follows: W (normal irrigation), W-25 (moderate water stress, equal to 25% less than normal irrigation), and W-50 (severe water stress, equal to 50% less than normal irrigation).

2.2. P. indica Propagation and Inoculation

Piriformospora indica was propagated on a solid KM medium and incubated at 24 °C for two weeks [45]. Briefly, 250 mL liquid KM medium was supplied with five fungal plugs and incubated at 26 °C/130 rpm in a rotary shaker for ten days. Pure white mycelium was collected and washed three times with sterilized water. For root inoculation, 3 g of P. indica mycelium was mixed with 100 mL sterilized water to produce a 3% P. indica suspension (±2.3 × 106 spores/mL). Later, 10 mL of P. indica suspension was inoculated into the root zone of cucumber plants at 3, 7, and 15 days after transplanting. Based on P. indica inoculation, three other treatments were conducted as follows: PI (inoculation with P. indica under normal irrigation), PI-25 (inoculation with P. indica under 25% less than normal irrigation), and PI-50 (inoculation with P. indica under 50% less than normal irrigation), as shown in Figure 1.

2.3. P. indica Staining and Spore Monitoring

One month post inoculation, root samples of the cucumber plants were monitored for P. indica colonization under a light microscope (Figure S1). Roots were washed, cut into segments (1–2 cm length), bleached in 10% KOH for 30 min at 90 °C, and submerged in 2 N HCl for 2 min. Samples were stained with trypan blue (0.05%) in lactoglycerol for 15 min at 90 °C in a water bath and bleached in lactic acid according to Johnson et al. [46].

2.4. Morphological Traits

Sixty-seven days post transplantation, the leaf and root samples were randomly evaluated for growth performance. Plant height, plant fresh weight, root fresh and dry weight, root length and leaf area of the fifth fully expanded leaf from the top were assessed for 24 plants either inoculated or non-inoculated with P. indica under two different irrigation water-stress conditions in comparison to normal irrigation.

2.5. Yield and WUE

The cucumber fruits were harvested 2–3 times per week and the average fruit weight, number of fruits per plant, and total yield were recorded for the two successive growing seasons. WUE was estimated as the ratio of the total fruit yield and the total water applied using the following equation: WUE (L/kg) = water applied (L/m2)/total yield (kg/m2) as described by Zipadelli et al. [47].

2.6. Macronutrient Quantification

Dry leaves were digested in acidic solution as described by Linder [48] to determine nitrogen content using the Micro-Keelhaul and phosphorus content using molybdophosphoric blue according to Chapman and Parker [49], while potassium, calcium, and magnesium were measured using a flame photometer [50].

2.7. Chlorophyll Content and Photosynthesis Parameters

One gram of fresh cucumber leaves was ground in 80% acetone (v/v), the homogenate was filtered on Whatman paper, and the extraction was adjusted to 100 mL. Chlorophyll a, b, and a + b were determined using the spectrophotometer at 645, 663, and 652 nm, respectively [51]. Photosynthetic measurements were recorded at 8–10 am, under a constant greenhouse temperature (26–28 °C), with 65% relative humidity, through the two growing seasons. The infrared gas analyzer Li-COR 6400 (Lincoln, NE, USA) was used to determine the photosynthesis and transpiration rates in the fifth fresh leaf of the cucumber plants.

2.8. ABA, IAA, and Ethylene Assays

Twenty grams of the fifth cucumber leaves were kept in liquid nitrogen to quantify the ABA and IAA hormones. Ten mg of freeze-dried cucumber leaves were milled into a fine powder using a mortar and pestle. The powdered samples were washed three times (once for three hours and twice for one hour) with 80% methanol (v/v) and 2,6-bis (1,1-dimethyl ethyl)-4-methylphenol at 4 °C in darkness. The extract was centrifuged at 4000 rpm, the supernatant was poured and adjusted to pH 8.6, and then the residues were extracted twice with an equal volume of pure ethyl acetate. The combined supernatant with ethyl acetate extracts was dehydrated over anhydrous sodium sulphate then filtered. The filtrated supernatant was evaporated under vacuum at 35 °C and redissolved in 1 mL absolute methanol. The quantification of the ABA and IAA was performed with Ati-Unicum gas-liquid chromatography, 610 Series, equipped with a flame ionization detector, according to the method stated by Furniss [52].
For ethylene hormone, fresh samples of cucumber leaves were cut into 1-cm pieces (1 cm) and incubated in a sealed 9 mL glass vial containing water (50 μL) overnight. After incubation, a 0.5 mL sample was taken from the headspace, and ethylene was quantified as described by Iwai et al. [53].

2.9. Antioxidant Enzymes, Malondialdehyde, and Proline Assays

The preparation method of leaf samples to assess the activity levels of antioxidant enzymes was described by Polle et al. [54] and Abdelaziz et al. [43], where 500 mg of the fresh cucumber leaves was ground in liquid nitrogen and mixed with 5 mL of potassium phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 7.0) containing 0.5% Triton X-100, 2% (w/v) N-vinylpyrrolidinone, 5 mM ethylene diaminete traacetic acid disodium salt dehydrates, and 1 mM ascorbic acid. The resulted mixture was centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 17 min, and the supernatants were used to measure the activity levels of peroxidase (POD) according to Nakano and Asada [55], catalase (CAT) by Aebi [56] and superoxide dismutase (SOD) by Beauchamp and Fridovich [57].
Malondialdehyde (MDA) was determined according to Heath and Packer [58], with some modifications. Briefly, samples were homogenized with trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and then centrifuged for 5 min at 20 °C. Next, the supernatant was mixed with TCA and thiobarbituric acid. Then, the absorbance of the supernatants was then detected at 532 nm. For proline quantification, fresh leaves were ground in 5 mL of 3% aqueous sulphosalicylic acid, the filtrate was mixed with 2% (v/v) ninhydrin and determined at 546 nm [59].

2.10. Polyethylene Glycol Assay (PEG 6000)

To pattern how P. indica affects stomatal closure, we grow cucumbers in an experiment with separate pots filled with sterilized peatmoss and sand mixer (1:1 v:v) for seed germination. Seedlings were irrigated with two levels of polyethylene glycol, 5% and 10%, to stimulate moderate and severe water stress in comparison to non-colonized plants. For P. indica co-cultivation, seedlings were supplied with 3% P. indica suspension at 3, 7, and 15 days post-germination. One week post-germination, seedlings were treated with full-strength Hoagland’s nutrient solution as a single treatment or mixed with 5% or 10% polyethylene glycol (PEG-6000) for water-stress treatments as described by Fan et al. [60]. Thirty-six plants received each treatment, while leaf samples were collected 21 days post-germination and kept in liquid nitrogen for RNA extraction.

2.11. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Fresh samples of cucumber leaves were prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM), using the method described by Daud et al. [61]. First, leaf disks were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde and 2% glutaraldehyde in a 0.1 mM sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2), and then dehydrated in an ethanol isoamyl series (50, 70, 80, 90, 95, and 100%) using a critical point dryer and liquid carbon dioxide. The dehydrated samples were mounted on metal stubs coated with gold palladium and examined by SEM (JEOL-JSM 35, Tokyo, Japan).

2.12. Real-Time PCR Analysis of Chlorophyll Synthesis and Degradation Genes

The cucumber leaves were stored in liquid nitrogen for RNA extraction using Trizol and DNase I, while cDNA was synthesized for the three biological replicates using the SuperScriptTMII according to the manufacturer’s manual (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA, Cat.#: 18064014). The sequences of the primers of genes related to the chlorophyll pathway—glutamyl-tRNA reductase (Glu-TR), protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase (POR), chlorophyll a oxygenase (CAO), pheophytinase (PPH), pheophorbide a oxygenase (PAO), red chlorophyll catabolite reductase (RCCR) and the reference gene (Actin)—are listed in Supplementary Table S1. In addition, the qRT-PCR assessment was performed according to Beaubois et al. [62] using the Mx3000P QPCR System (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA).

2.13. Statistical Analysis

The data for the two successive seasons, 2019 and 2020, were subjected to combined analysis after performing the normality distribution test [63] and homogeneity test [64]. In addition, the obtained data from the combined analysis were subjected to the statistical analysis of variance, and means were compared at the 0.05 level according to Duncan’s test using the Statistica 7 program. Each experiment was conducted in three replicates, and differences among gene expression datasets were assessed using a paired student t-test based on three biological replicates.

3. Results

3.1. P. indica Colonization Improves the Growth of Water-Stressed Cucumber Plants

Water stress significantly decreased plant height, plant fresh weight, and average leaf area in colonized or non-colonized cucumber plants when subjected to 25% (W-25, as moderate stress) and 50% (W-50, as severe stress) reduction in irrigation water (Figure 2A–C). On the other hand, gradual increases were observed in root length, combined with a significant decrease in fresh and dry weight of water-stressed plants compared to non-stressed plants (Figure 2D–F). Colonizing cucumber with P. indica improved the above growth traits under normal or stress conditions compared to non-colonized plants.

3.2. P. indica Colonization Enhances Macronutrients Content and Photosynthesis Rate

The data in Table 1 reveal that P. indica colonization increased the N, P, K, Ca, and Mg content and photosynthesis apparatus of cucumber leaves grown in normal (W), moderate (W-25), or severe (W-50) water stress more so than non-colonized plants. Notably, moderate water stress caused slight decreases in the values of the tested parameters compared to the nonstress plants. Meanwhile, decreasing irrigation water up to 50% (severe stress) resulted in a significant reduction in all traits of colonized or non-colonized plants.

3.3. P. indica Augments Fruit Production and WUE

Limiting irrigation water applications decreased yield and the components of colonized and non-colonized cucumber plants (Figure 3A–C). In comparison to normal irrigation, moderate (W-25) and severe (W-50) water stress reduced yield down to 47% and 83% with non-colonized plants, and 28% and 78% with P. indica-colonized plants, respectively (Figure 3A). However, no significant differences were observed among colonized and non-colonized plants under normal conditions regarding the average fruit weight or the number of fruits per plant (Figure 3B,C). On the contrary, P. indica improved fruit weight and increased the number of fruits per colonized plant under moderate stress (W-25). However, P. indica did not affect fruit characteristics under normal or high-water stress (W-50). In terms of WUE (Figure 3D), irrigation water reduction (W-25 and W-50) caused a significant demand for required irrigation water (43 and 81 L) to produce 1 kg of fresh cucumber compared to normal irrigation (27 L/kg). Markedly, with P. indica colonization, WUE at moderate stress (W-25) resulted in lower values (26 L/kg) in comparison to non-colonized plants (43 L). Meanwhile, under severe stress (W-50), P. indica reduced WUE value up to seven liters less than noncolonized, despite colonized and non-colonized production of a similar yield (~4 kg.m−2).

3.4. P. indica Alters Antioxidant Enzymes, Proline, and Chlorophyll Content in Water-Stressed Plants

Water stress increased the level of the CAT, POD, and SOD enzyme activates and the contents of MDA and proline in the leaves of W-25 and W-50 water-stressed cucumber plants when compared to non-stressed plants (Figure 4A–E). Remarkably, colonization with P. indica increased the activity levels of CAT and POD enzymes (Figure 4A,B), while significant decreases were observed in the accumulation of MDA and proline in colonized plants compared to non-colonized plants (Figure 4D–E) under both water-stress conditions. In addition, Chl. a, b, a + b tended to decrease in plants exposed to water stress, while P. indica improved chlorophyll accumulation in leaves of colonized plants under W-25 or W-50 stress conditions (Figure 4F).

3.5. P. indica Alters Phytohormone Content under Moderate and Severe Water Stress

Leaves of non-colonized cucumber plants revealed a lower content of IAA with increasing levels of water stress compared to colonized plants (Figure 5A). On the contrary, water stress increased levels of ABA and ethylene up to two-fold and four-fold in comparison to non-stressed plants. Notably, P. indica colonization caused a similar pattern, although the levels of ABA and ethylene were lower than in non-colonized plants (Figure 5B,C).

3.6. P. indica Colonization Reduces the Stomatal Closure of Water-Stressed Cucumber Plants

The leaf surfaces were scanned with SEM to observe the stomatal closure of the water-stressed cucumber plants. As shown in Figure 6A–F, water stress induced stomatal closure in the leaves of the stressed cucumber plants. Likely, stomatal closure was higher in severe stress treatment (10% PEG-6000) than in moderate stress (5% PEG-6000). Colonization with P. indica reduced stomatal closure under both water-stress levels (Figure 6E,F). This enhancement was more evident under severe water-stress treatment in colonized plants than in non-colonized ones (Figure 6C,F).

3.7. Gene Expression of the Chlorophyll Metabolism-Related Genes in Cucumber

The transcript levels of the Glu-TR gene involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis were increased in cucumber leaves grown in the presence of P. indica colonization under severe water stress compared to the non-colonized plants (Figure 7A). However, P. indica colonization strongly upregulated POR expression up to six-fold and four-fold under moderate (PEG5%, equivalent to W-25) and severe (PEG10%, equivalent to W-50) water stress, respectively, in comparison to normal irrigation (Figure 7B). Moreover, water shortage gradually increased CAO expression in non-colonized plants by 20-fold and 40-fold under stress conditions (Figure 7C), while colonized plants presented 3-fold and 11-fold increases over control. Regarding the effect of P. indica on chlorophyll degradation genes, data in Figure 7D–F show that colonizing cucumber roots with the fungus showed reduced levels of PPH and RCCR genes when compared to non-colonized plants, particularly under severe water-stress conditions (PEG10%). At the same time, no significant differences were observed among colonized and non-colonized plants under normal or moderate water stress.

4. Discussion

Renewable freshwater resources for the agriculture industry are decreasing, meaning that one-third of irrigated crop production challenges are related to high-water stress [65,66]. The harmful effects of water deficits on plant growth performance and productivity have been intensively explained, with challenging efforts to enhance water-stress tolerance, particularly for crops with economic impact [67]. Therefore, the association between endophytic fungi and cost-effective crops can effectively overcome the adverse effects of water stress [68]. In this respect, the potential role of P. indica in sustainable agriculture has become promising in the past decade [69].
Here, we demonstrate that reducing irrigation water decreases cucumber growth, yield, and physiological traits. At the same time, colonization with P. indica could be utilized to improve cucumber water-stress tolerance mechanisms under moderate and severe irrigation stress at the commercial level. Data presented in this work show that cucumbers exposed to a limited quantity of irrigation water, either 25% (W-25) or 50% (W-50) lower than normal irrigation water levels (W), resulted in a significant decrease in plant height, plant fresh weight, leaf area, and root biomass (Figure 1). Similar outcomes were obtained by Pokluda et al. [69], Abdelaziz and Taha [70], and Tsai et al. [71]. This negative effect of water stress on plant growth characteristics refers to the impact of water stress on cellular dehydration, reduction of cell volume and turgor [72], alongside inhibiting cell elongation by interrupting water flow from the xylem to the cells [73]. Particularly, reduction in the levels of irrigation water increased cucumber root length compared to non-stressed plants (Figure 2D). This consequence could be explained by the fact that plants subjected to water stress can increase root length as a defense technique to absorb more water under lower moisture conditions [74].
Furthermore, reducing irrigation water slightly (W-25) did not change the root biomass as much as severe water stress (W-50) (Figure 2E,F). A comparable conclusion was reported by Navarro et al. [75], who mentioned that moderate water stress caused non-significant changes in root development, while a severe water deficit clearly reduced the root dry weight of C. albidus by 48% [76]. Water stress caused a gradual decrease in cucumber yield traits under the W-25 and W-50 treatments. To mitigate the harmful impact of water stress, the mutualistic fungus P. indica was utilized to inoculate cucumber plants during the two cultivation seasons. In this experiment, successfully colonized cucumber roots 30 days post inoculation under normal and water-stress conditions were monitored by a light microscope (Figure S1). However, colonization with P. indica markedly improved shoot and root growth under water stress (W-25 and W-50) or normal water conditions (W). Nemours reports emphasize the potential of P. indica to mitigate abiotic stress in different host plants [77]. Besides, the positive effect of P. indica colonization on the growth of cucumbers under water stress was combined with a significant increase in fruit number per plant (17.8%), fruit weight (37.5%), and total yield (7.3%), mainly under moderate water stress (W-25). Simultaneously, no differences were recorded between colonized and non-colonized plants under severe water reduction (W-50) treatment, as shown in Figure 3A–C.
A similar trend was stated by Murphy et al. [78] and Ahmadvand and Hajinia [79], who validated the ability of P. indica to stimulate the yield of colonized plants under stress conditions. Earlier, Fakharo et al. [80] found that early harvest tomato colonized with P. indica produced twice as much fruit, while Abdelaziz et al. [43] and Atia et al. [44] reported 22% and 34% yield increases in tomato and cucumber, respectively. Therefore, our results clearly reflect the effect of P. indica inoculation in enhancing the growth performance of colonized plants compared to non-colonized under stress. In this respect, it could be suggested that the correlation between P. indica colonization and improvement in root systems might be a direct cause of elevated nutrient uptake efficiency. This suggestion is confirmed in Table 1, which shows that leaf photosynthesis rates and macronutrient content of colonized plants were significantly increased compared to non-colonized plants, either in normal or stress conditions [35,38,79,80].
Several reports have mentioned that P. indica promotes plant growth by facilitating nutrient acquisition [81,82,83] or by upregulating mineral transportation [82]. Moreover, from a sustainable agricultural perspective (Figure 3D), these improvements in plant growth and yield positively reflected WUE. WUE is considered an indicator of the actual irrigation water consumed to produce 1 kg of fruit [47] and shows whether the water has been used effectively [83,84,85].
According to our results, it could be concluded that P. indica improves WUE by supporting colonized plants to produce a higher yield per unit volume of water consumed by the crop in comparison to non-colonized plants under moderate stress or severe water stress. However, it is evident in our experiment that the fitness of colonized plants under water stress was better than non-colonized ones. Accordingly, many reports have explained the capability of P. indica to improve water-stress tolerance either by altering antioxidant enzyme activity, production of secondary metabolites, or hormonal modification [35,86,87].
Generally, our findings revealed that P. indica colonization mediated water-stress tolerance by introducing CAT and POD enzymes (Figure 4A,B) and IAA content (Figure 5A). For indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), the P. indica promotion of IAA has been described as the primary mechanism that enhances plant growth under both normal and stress conditions by promoting root elongation and lateral root formation, stimulating adventitious roots [35,88]. The enhancement in IAA levels in the leaf tissue of colonized cucumber plants could be attributed to the interference of P. indica with auxin production and signaling cucumber plants to increase plant development. Several studies have reported that endophyte P. indica interferes with auxin metabolism and signaling in host plants and is accountable for, or at least contributes to, plant growth [88,89,90,91,92,93,94]. Nirenberg et al. [88] found that P. indica produced IAA separately in liquid culture and that fungal auxin production affects plant growth. The auxin content varies significantly in different plant species inoculated by endophyte P. indica, which has been determined directly or deduced from the expression of auxin-responsive genes. Growth promotion of colonized Chinese cabbage and barley seedlings has been associated with improved auxin content in plant roots [88,89,90]. Interestingly, Lee and his colleagues [88] found that auxin levels were raised in Chinese cabbage by P. indica colonization, indicating the vital role of the fungus in plant auxin production [88].
Regarding antioxidant enzyme activity, many studies have reported that drought stress increases the ROS levels (e.g., hydrogen peroxide, superoxide and hydroxyl radicals) as well as MDA level [95]. Levels of radical scavengers and antioxidant enzymes represent a crucial factor for alleviating oxidative stress in plants. Therefore, any imbalance in the ratio of antioxidants to ROS can cause severe cellular damage [96]. Recent studies have suggested that water stress increases oxidative pressure on plants, resulting in tissue damage [71]. Several studies have shown that P. indica improves the plant’s drought tolerance by increasing the activity levels of antioxidant enzymes and coping with other water deficiency’s harmful effects [95,96].
In contrast, contents of MDA, proline (Figure 4D,E), ABA, and ethylene (Figure 4B,C) were significantly decreased with the elevated water stress of colonized plants and with a significant induction in non-colonized plants. Abscisic acid mediates the early response to water stress by limiting the stomatal aperture to prevent water loss [97], while MDA is a well-known critical marker of oxidative damage to cells [98]. In addition, high proline content in the leaves of stressed plants has been reported to improve plant tolerance against osmotic stress [99]. Clearly, reducing the above three key water-stress tolerance markers confirms that P. indica colonization enhances the water-stress tolerance of colonized plants [99,100].
Another way to explore the impact of P. indica on WUE under water stress is to begin at the leaf level. It is well-known that water stress alters stomata closure to minimize water loss due to transpiration [100]. Simulation of water stress by polyethylene glycol (PEG-6000) increased osmotic stress on the treated plants and presented a significant deviation compared to the control [101].
The data in Figure 6 show that P. indica-colonized plants presented lower stomatal closure under stress than noncolonized. This result indicates that association with P. indica supports plants’ coping with water stress, which is reflected in improving stomatal opening. In addition, colonized cucumber plants with P. indica have higher photosynthesis and transpiration rates (Table 1) combined with a significant increase in leaf chlorophyll a and b content (Figure 4F). These results agree with several reports showing a notable increase in chlorophyll and photosynthetic pigments due to P. indica colonization. In this respect, Atia et al. [44] stated that P. indica inoculation improved the chlorophyll content, photosynthesis rate, and water-use efficiency of cucumber plants compared to non-colonized plants. In tomatoes, P. indica colonization increased levels of chlorophyll b under salt stress [43]. Likewise, Shahabad et al. [102] indicated that the presence of P. indica significantly enhanced the chlorophyll a and b of sunflower plants under Cd stress. Chlorophyll plays a crucial role in harvesting and transducing light energy in plants [103].
Chlorophyll is indispensable for plant metabolic pathways and dynamically changes during stress responses [104]. Our findings revealed that the relative expression of Glu-TR, which handles 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) synthesis, decreased under drought conditions. Furthermore, this expression was accompanied by a decrease in the expression level of the POR gene (chlorophyll a synthesis), indicating that water stress reduced the expression of chlorophyll biosynthesis genes. However, the potential P. indica application can reverse the adverse effects caused by either moderate or severe water-stress conditions in cucumber leaves by boosting the expression levels of Glu-TR and POR genes [71]. Subsequently, overexpression of CAO plays a pivotal role in the chlorophyll cycle to convert chlorophyll a to chlorophyll b, resulting in increased chlorophyll b, which was obvious in the presence of P. indica under drought conditions [105]. Moreover, the fittest ratio of chlorophyll a to chlorophyll b may indicate that CAO tends to rebalance the photosynthesis rate, either in the presence of P. indica or drought conditions [103]. Finally, the PPH, PAO and RCCR are the central reactions of chlorophyll degradation genes. Previous studies have suggested that the significant reduction in these genes may result in accelerated cell death due to the high accumulation of the substrates of these enzymes [104]. The current results agree with the previous findings of Mo et al., (2016), who demonstrated that arbuscular mycorrhiza, a P. indica-like fungus mycorrhiza, in combination with drought stress, slightly increased the expression level of PPH and PAO in watermelon. Although both PI and non-PI treatments revealed an increased expression pattern either in normal or stress conditions, the expression of the RCCR gene was found to alleviate the chlorophyll degradation ratio in colonized stressed cucumber plants (PI at PEG 10%). Thus, this might explain why the expression of PAO and RCCR was fine-tuned by P. indica treatment under water-stress conditions.
Our results show that P. indica supports chlorophyll metabolism by inducing biosynthesis genes and downregulating selected chlorophyll degradation genes. These enhancements in chlorophyll content and leaf greening conclude that P. indica colonization indirectly delays leaf senescence under water stress. In this regard, ethylene has been quantified in the leaves of colonized and non-colonized plants under stress conditions to confirm this suggestion. Here, P. indica colonization reduced ethylene content under moderate and severe water stress compared to normal conditions. Ethylene is one of the most important hormones regulating leaf senescence under stress [106] and involves activating and regulating plant innate immunity [107]. Meanwhile, chlorophyll degradation and leaf abscission are the most common visual symptoms of leaf senescence [108,109].

5. Conclusions

The mutualistic fungus P. indica, like mycorrhiza, shows clear potential to support the growth performance and yield production of several plants under water stress. However, the P. indica mechanism used to support plants against different abiotic stresses is still not fully explained. Here, we present that P. indica enhanced growth, nutrient content, and stress tolerance traits and affected chlorophyll biosynthesis and degradation genes in the leaves of cucumber plants grown under two water-stress irrigations, 25% and 50% less than normal irrigation. This improvement in plant fitness, either under normal or water-stress conditions, was found to save irrigation water under greenhouse conditions by enhancing the efficiency of colonized plants. This work implies that P. indica plays an essential novel role in mitigating the harmful consequences of water stress.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/horticulturae7100399/s1, Figure S1: Spores and hypha of P. indica in roots of cucumber at 30 days post inoculation, Table S1: list of selected chlorophyll synthesis and degradation genes, according to [4].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization E.A.A., M.E.A., M.A.M.A. and M.A.; methodology, E.A.A., T.A.A.I., M.A.M.A., S.M.A., and M.A.; software, E.A.A., M.E.A., and M.A.M.A.; validation, E.A.A., M.E.A., and S.M.A.; formal analysis, E.A.A., M.E.A., S.M.A., M.A. and M.A.M.A.; investigation, E.A.A., T.A.A.I., M.A.M.A., M.A., and M.E.A.; resources, E.A.A., M.E.A., S.M.A., M.A., and M.A.M.A.; data curation, E.A.A., M.A., and M.E.A.; writing—original draft preparation, E.A.A., M.E.A., M.A.M.A., S.M.A., and M.A.; writing—review and editing, E.A.A., M.E.A., M.A., S.M.A., and M.A.M.A.; visualization, E.A.A., M.E.A., M.A.M.A., S.M.A and M.A.; supervision, E.A.A., M.A.M.A.; M.A. and M.E.A.; project administration, E.A.A., M.A.M.A. and M.E.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Cairo University Funding Authority, grant number “2017-221” under “Basic and Applied Research Grants”. The APC was funded by Cairo University Funding Authority.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Department of Vegetable Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University and Agricultural Genetic Engineering Research Institute (AGERI) at Agriculture, Research Centre for providing some facilities and equipment to finalize this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdelaziz, M.E.; Abdeldaym, E.A. Cucumber growth, yield and quality of plants grown in peatmoss sand as affected by rate of foliar applied postassium. Biosci. Res. 2018, 15, 2871–2879. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alharbi, A.R.; Campen, J.; Sharaf, M.; De Zwart, F.; Voogt, W.; Scheffers, K.; Tsafaras, I.; Abdelaziz, M.E.; Babiker, O.; Gruda, N.; et al. Effect of Clear and Defuse Glass Covering Materials on Fruit Yield and Energy Efficiency of Greenhouse Cucumber Grown in Hot Climate. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2021, 20, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chakraborty, S.; Rayalu, S. Health Beneficial Effects of Cucumber. In Cucumber Economic Values and Its Cultivation and Breeding; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021; Available online: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/76616 (accessed on 15 April 2021). [CrossRef]
  4. Oka, M.; Shimoda, Y.; Sato, N.; Inoue, J.; Yamazaki, T.; Shimomura, N.; Fujiyama, H. Abscisic acid substantially inhibits senescence of cucumber plants (Cucumis sativus) grown under low nitrogen conditions. J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 169, 789–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Abdeldym, E.A.; El-Mogy, M.M.; Abdellateaf, H.R.L.; Atia, M.A.M. Genetic Characterization, Agro-Morphological and Physiological Evaluation of Grafted Tomato under Salinity Stress Conditions. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cocozza, C.; Abdeldaym, E.A.; Brunetti, G.; Nigro, F.; Traversa, A. Synergistic effect of organic and inorganic fertilization on the soil inoculum density of the soilborne pathogens Verticillium dahliae and Phytophthora spp. under open-field conditions. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2021, 8, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vwioko, E.D.; El-Esawi, M.A.; Imoni, M.E.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Ali, H.M.; El-Sheekh, M.M.; Abdeldaym, E.A.; Al-Dosary, M.A. Sodium Azide Priming Enhances Waterlogging Stress Tolerance in Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.). Agronomy 2019, 9, 679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Iqbal, A.; Wang, T.; Wu, G.; Tang, W.; Zhu, C.; Wang, D.; Li, Y.; Wang, H. Physiological and transcriptome analysis of heteromorphic leaves and hydrophilic roots in response to soil drying in desert Populus euphratica. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Abuarab, M.E.; Hafez, S.M.; Shahein, M.M.; Hassan, A.M.; El-Sawy, M.B.; El-Mogy, M.M.; A Abdeldaym, E. Irrigation scheduling for green beans grown in clay loam soil under a drip irrigation system. Water SA 2020, 46, 573–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abuarab, M.E.; El-Mogy, M.M.; Hassan, A.M.; Abdeldaym, E.A.; Abdelkader, N.H.; El-Sawy, M.B.I. The Effects of Root Aeration and Different Soil Conditioners on the Nutritional Values, Yield, and Water Productivity of Potato in Clay Loam Soil. Agronomy 2019, 9, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Mancosu, N.; Snyder, R.L.; Kyriakakis, G.; Spano, D. Water Scarcity and Future Challenges for Food Production. Water 2015, 7, 975–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mao, X.; Mengyu, L.; Xinyuan, W.; Changming, L.; Zhimin, H.; Shi, J. Effects of deficit irrigation on yield and water use of greenhouse grown cucumber in the North China Plain. Agric. Water Manag. 2003, 61, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hatfield, J.L.; Dold, C. Water-Use Efficiency: Advances and Challenges in a Changing Climate. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. De Vasconcelos, A.C.F. Amelioration of Drought Stress on Plants under Biostimulant Sources; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020; Available online: https://www.intechopen.com/books/plant-stress-physiology/amelioration-of-drought-stress-on-plants-under-biostimulant-sources (accessed on 13 February 2021). [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, X.; Li, L.; Li, M.; Su, L.; Lian, S.; Zhang, B.; Li, X.; Ge, K.; Li, L. AhGLK1 affects chlorophyll biosynthesis and photosynthesis in peanut leaves during recovery from drought. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Tamburino, R.; Vitale, M.; Ruggiero, A.; Sassi, M.; Sannino, L.; Arena, S.; Costa, A.; Batelli, G.; Zambrano, N.; Scaloni, A.; et al. Chloroplast proteome response to drought stress and recovery in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Chen, Z.; Xu, J.; Wang, F.; Wang, L.; Xu, Z. Morpho-physiological and proteomic responses to water stress in two contrasting tobacco varieties. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 18523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Zwicke, M.; Picon-Cochard, C.; Morvan-Bertrand, A.; Prud’Homme, M.-P.; Volaire, F. What functional strategies drive drought survival and recovery of perennial species from upland grassland? Ann. Bot. 2015, 116, 1001–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Chmielewska, K.; Rodziewicz, P.; Swarcewicz, B.; Sawikowska, A.; Krajewski, P.; Marczak, L.; Ciesiołka, D.; Kuczyńska, A.; Mikołajczak, K.; Ogrodowicz, P.; et al. Analysis of Drought-Induced Proteomic and Metabolomic Changes in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Leaves and Roots Unravels Some Aspects of Biochemical Mechanisms Involved in Drought Tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ouyang, W.; Struik, P.C.; Yin, X.; Yang, J. Stomatal conductance, mesophyll conductance, and transpiration efficiency in relation to leaf anatomy in rice and wheat genotypes under drought. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 5191–5205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Jia, H.; Wang, L.; Li, J.; Sun, P.; Lu, M.; Hu, J. Comparative metabolomics analysis reveals different metabolic responses to drought in tolerant and susceptible poplar species. Physiol. Plant. 2019, 168, 531–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Le Roux, M.-S.L.; Burger, N.F.V.; Vlok, M.; Kunert, K.J.; Cullis, C.A.; Botha, A.-M. Wheat Line “RYNO3936” Is Associated with Delayed Water Stress-Induced Leaf Senescence and Rapid Water-Deficit Stress Recovery. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hussain, B.; Ali, B. Leaf longevity in plants under water stress—A review. Indian J. Plant Sci. 2015, 4, 127–133. [Google Scholar]
  24. Fariduddin, Q.; Khanam, S.; Hasan, S.A.; Ali, B.; Hayat, S.; Ahmad, A. Effect of 28-homobrassinolide on the drought stress-induced changes in photosynthesis and antioxidant system of Brassica juncea L. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2009, 31, 889–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pattanagul, W. Exogenous Abscisic Acid Enhances Sugar Accumulation in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Drought Stress. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2011, 10, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sakuraba, Y.; Kim, D.; Paek, N.C. Salt Treatments and Induction of Senescence. In Plant Senescence; Methods in Molecular, Biology; Guo, Y., Ed.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2018; Volume 1744, pp. 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pic, E.; de La Serve, B.T.; Tardieu, F.; Turc, O. Leaf senescence induced by moderate water deficit follows the same sequence of macroscopic, biochemical, and molecular events as monocarpic senescence in pea. Plant Physiol. 2002, 128, 236–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Croft, H.; Chen, J.M.; Luo, X.; Bartlett, P.; Chen, B.; Staebler, R.M. Leaf chlorophyll content as a proxy for leaf photosynthetic capacity. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2017, 23, 3513–3524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hörtensteiner, S. Update on the biochemistry of chlorophyll breakdown. Plant Mol. Biol. 2013, 82, 505–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Jardin, P.D. Plant biostimulants: Definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 196, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. González-Teuber, M.; Urzua, A.; Plaza, P.; Bascuñán-Godoy, L. Effects of root endophytic fungi on response of Chenopodium quinoa to drought stress. Plant Ecol. 2017, 219, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rani, S.; Kumar, P.; Suneja, P. Biotechnological interventions for inducing abiotic stress tolerance in crops. Plant Gene 2021, 27, 100315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Peripolli, M.; Dornelles, S.H.B.; Lopes, S.J.; Tabaldi, L.A.; Trivisiol, V.S.; Rubert, J. Application of biostimulants in tomato subjected to water deficit: Physiological, enzymatic and production responses. Braz. J. Agric. Environ. Eng. 2021, 25, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Varma, A.; Bakshi, M.; Lou, B.; Hartmann, A.; Oelmueller, R. Piriformospora indica: A Novel Plant Growth-Promoting Mycorrhizal Fungus. Agric. Res. 2012, 1, 117–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Abdelaziz, M.E.; Kim, D.; Ali, S.; Fedoroff, N.V.; Al-Babili, S. The endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica enhances Arabidopsis thaliana growth and modulates Na+/K+ homeostasis under salt stress conditions. Plant Sci. 2017, 263, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Jiang, W.; Pan, R.; Wu, C.; Xu, L.; Abdelaziz, M.E.; Oelmüller, R.; Zhang, W. Piriformospora indica enhances freezing tolerance and post-thaw recovery in Arabidopsis by stimulating the expression of CBF genes. Plant Signal. Behav. 2020, 15, 1745472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Azizi, M.; Fard, E.M.; Ghabooli, M. Piriformospora indica affect drought tolerance by regulation of genes expression and some morphophysiological parameters in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Sci. Hortic. 2021, 287, 110260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jha, Y.; Yadav, A.N. Piriformospora indica: Biodiversity, Ecological Significances, and Biotechnological Applications for Agriculture and Allied Sectors. In Industrially Important Fungi for Sustainable Development; Fungal, Biology; Abdel-Azeem, A.M., Yadav, A.N., Yadav, N., Usmani, Z., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  39. Bakshi, M.; Sherameti, I.; Meichsner, D.; Thürich, J.; Varma, A.; Johri, A.K.; Yeh, K.-W.; Oelmüller, R. Piriformospora indica Reprograms Gene Expression in Arabidopsis Phosphate Metabolism Mutants But Does Not Compensate for Phosphate Limitation. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Rostami, S.; Azhdarpoor, A. The application of plant growth regulators to improve phytoremediation of contaminated soils: A review. Chemosphere 2019, 220, 818–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mensah, R.A.; Li, D.; Liu, F.; Tian, N.; Sun, X.; Hao, X.; Lai, Z.; Cheng, C. Versatile Piriformospora indica and Its Potential Applications in Horticultural Crops. Hortic. Plant J. 2020, 6, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Varma, A.; Sree, K.S.; Arora, M.; Bajaj, R.; Prasad, R.; Kharkwal, A. Functions of Novel Symbiotic Fungus—Piriformospora indica. Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad. 2014, 80, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Abdelaziz, M.E.; Abdelsattar, M.; Abdeldaym, E.A.; Atia, M.A.M.; Mahmoud, A.W.M.; Saad, M.M.; Hirt, H. Piriformospora indica alters Na+/K+ homeostasis, antioxidant enzymes and LeNHX1 expression of greenhouse tomato grown under salt stress. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 256, 108532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Atia, M.A.; Abdeldaym, E.A.; Abdelsattar, M.; Ibrahim, D.S.; Saleh, I.; Elwahab, M.A.; Osman, G.H.; Arif, I.A.; Abdelaziz, M.E. Piriformospora indica promotes cucumber tolerance against Root-knot nematode by modulating photosynthesis and innate responsive genes. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hill, T.W.; Kafer, E. Improved protocols for Aspergillus minimal medium: Trace element and minimal medium salt stock solutions. Fungal Genet. Rep. 2001, 48, 20–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Johnson, M.J.; Sherameti, I.; Ludwig, A.; Nongbri, P.L.; Sun, C.; Lou, B.; Varma, A.; Oelmüller, R. Protocols for Arabidopsis thaliana and Piriformospora indica co-cultivation—A model system to study plant beneficial traits. Endocytobiosis Cell Res. 2011, 21, 101–113. [Google Scholar]
  47. Zotarelli, L.; Scholberg, J.M.; Dukes, M.; Muñoz-Carpena, R.; Icerman, J. Tomato yield, biomass accumulation, root distribution and irrigation water use efficiency on a sandy soil, as affected by nitrogen rate and irrigation scheduling. Agric. Water Manag. 2009, 96, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lindner, R.C. Rapid Analytical Methods for Some of the More Common Inorganic Constituents of Plant Tissues. Plant Physiol. 1944, 19, 76–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Chapman, H.D.; Parker, F. Methods of analysis for soil, plant and water. J. Plant Nutr. 1961, 22, 121–128. [Google Scholar]
  50. Brown, J.D.; Lilliland, O. Rapid determination of potassium and sodium in plant material and soil extracts by flame photometer. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Soc. 1964, 48, 341–346. [Google Scholar]
  51. Dhopte, A.M.; Manuel, L.M. Principles and Techniques for Plant Scientists, 1st ed.; Updesh Purohit for Agrobios (India): Odhpur, India, 2002; p. 373. ISBN 81-7754-116-1. [Google Scholar]
  52. Furniss, B.S. Vogel’s Textbook of Practical Organic Chemistry; Pearson Education: Delhi, India, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  53. Iwai, T.; Miyasaka, A.; Seo, S.; Ohashi, Y. Contribution of Ethylene Biosynthesis for Resistance to Blast Fungus Infection in Young Rice Plants. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 1202–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Polle, A.; Otter, T.; Mehne-Jakobs, B. Effect of magnesium deficiency on antioxidative systems in needles of Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] grown with different ratios of nitrate and ammonium as nitrogen sources. New Phytol. 1994, 128, 621–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nakano, Y.; Asada, K. Hydrogen Peroxide is Scavenged by Ascorbate-specific Peroxidase in Spinach Chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 1981, 22, 867–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Aebi, H. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 1984, 105, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Beauchamp, C.; Fridovich, I. Superoxide dismutase: Improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 1971, 44, 276–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Heath, R.L.; Packer, L.J. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts. I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1968, 125, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Claussen, W. Proline as a measure of stress in tomato plants. Plant Sci. 2005, 168, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fan, H.-F.; Ding, L.; Du, C.-X.; Wu, X. Effect of short-term water deficit stress on antioxidative systems in cucumber seedling roots. Bot. Stud. 2014, 55, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Daud, M.; Sun, Y.; Dawood, M.; Hayat, Y.; Variath, M.; Wu, Y.-X.; Mishkat, U.; Najeeb, U. Cadmium-induced functional and ultrastructural alterations in roots of two transgenic cotton cultivars. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 161, 463–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Beaubois, É.; Girard, S.; Lallechere, S.; Davies, E.; Paladian, F.; Bonnet, P.; Ledoigt, G.; Vian, A. Intercellular communication in plants: Evidence for two rapidly transmitted systemic signals generated in response to electromagnetic field stimulation in tomato. Plant Cell Environ. 2007, 30, 834–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Shapiro, S.S.; Wilk, M.B. Analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 1965, 52, 591–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hartley, H. The maximum F-ratio as a short cut test for homogeneity of variance. Biometrika 1950, 37, 308–312. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. World Recourses Institute. One-Third of All Irrigated Crops Face Extremely High-Water Stress. 2019. Available online: https://www.wri.org/news/release-one-third-all-irrigated-crops-face-extremely-high-water-stress (accessed on 28 January 2021).
  66. Shehata, S.A.; Abdelrahman, S.Z.; Megahed, M.M.A.; Abdeldaym, E.A.; El-Mogy, M.M.; Abdelgawad, K.F. Extending Shelf Life and Maintaining Quality of Tomato Fruit by Calcium Chloride, Hydrogen Peroxide, Chitosan, and Ozonated Water. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mishra, D.; Kumar, A.; Tripathi, S.; Chitara, M.K.; Chaturvedi, P. Endophytic fungi as biostimulants: An efficient tool for plant growth promotion under biotic and abiotic stress conditions. In Biostimulants for Crops from Seed Germination to Plant Development; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 365–391. [Google Scholar]
  68. Abdel-Azeem, A.M.; Yadav, A.N.; Yadav, N.; Usmani, Z. Industrially Important Fungi for Sustainable Development. Volume 1: Biodiversity and Ecological Perspectives; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; Volume 609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Pokluda, R.; Petříková, K.; Abdelaziz, M.E.; Jezdinský, A. Effect of water stress on selected physiological characteristics of tomatoes. Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendel. Brun. 2010, 58, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Abdelaziz, M.E.; Taha, S. Foliar potassium and zinc stimulates tomato growth, yield and enzymes activity to tolerate water stress in soilless culture. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2018, 16, 113–118. [Google Scholar]
  71. Tsai, H.-J.; Shao, K.-H.; Chan, M.-T.; Cheng, C.-P.; Yeh, K.-W.; Oelmüller, R.; Wang, S.-J. Piriformospora indica symbiosis improves water stress tolerance of rice through regulating stomata behavior and ROS scavenging systems. Plant Signal. Behav. 2020, 15, 1722447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Zhang, W.; Cao, Z.; Xie, Z.; Lang, D.; Zhou, L.; Chu, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, Y. Effect of water stress on roots biomass and secondary metabolites in the medicinal plant Stellaria dichotoma L. var. lanceolata Bge. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 224, 280–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Nonami, H. Plant water relations and control of cell elongation at low water potentials. J. Plant Res. 1998, 111, 373–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sánchez-Blanco, M.; Rodríguez, P.; Morales, M.; Ortuño, M.F.; Torrecillas, A. Comparative growth and water relations of Cistusalbidus and Cistusmonspeliensis plants during water deficit conditions and recovery. Plant Sci. 2002, 162, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Navarro, A.; Álvarez, S.; Castillo, M.; Bañón, S.; Sánchez-Blanco, M.J. Changes in tissue-water relations, photosynthetic activity, and growth of Myrtus communis plants in response to different conditions of water availability. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2009, 84, 541–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Ghabooli, M.; Khatabi, B.; Ahmadi, F.S.; Sepehr, M.; Mirzaei, M.; Amirkhani, M.A.; Jorrín-Novo, J.V.; Salekdeh, G.H. Proteomics study reveals the molecular mechanisms underlying water stress tolerance induced by Piriformospora indica in barley. J. Proteom. 2013, 94, 289–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Jiang, W.; Pan, R.; Buitrago, S.; Wu, C.; Abdelaziz, M.E.; Oelmüller, R.; Zhang, W. Transcriptome analysis of Arabidopsis reveals freezing-tolerance related genes induced by root endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2021, 27, 189–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Murphy, B.R.; Doohan, F.; Hodkinson, T. Yield increase induced by the fungal root endophyte Piriformospora indica in barley grown at low temperature is nutrient limited. Symbiosis 2014, 62, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ahmadvand, G.; Hajinia, S. Effect of fungus Piriformospora indica on yield of soybean and millet in intercropping via competition indices. Electron. J. Crop Prod. 2017, 9, 155–178. [Google Scholar]
  80. Fakhro, A.; Andrade-Linares, D.R.; Von Bargen, S.; Bandte, M.; Büttner, C.; Grosch, R.; Schwarz, D.; Franken, P. Impact of Piriformospora indica on tomato growth and on interaction with fungal and viral pathogens. Mycorrhiza 2010, 20, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Sherameti, I.; Tripathi, S.; Varma, A.; Oelmüller, R. The Root-Colonizing Endophyte Pirifomospora indica Confers Drought Tolerance in Arabidopsis by Stimulating the Expression of Drought Stress–Related Genes in Leaves. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2008, 21, 799–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Abdeldaym, E.A.; El-Sawy, M.B.I.; El-Helaly, M.A. Combined application of different sources of nitrogen fertilizers for improvement of potato yield and quality. Plant Arch. 2019, 19, 2513–2521. [Google Scholar]
  83. Jha, Y. The importance of zinc-mobilizing rhizosphere bacteria to the enhancement of physiology and growth parameters for paddy under salt-stress conditions. Jordan J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 12, 167–173. [Google Scholar]
  84. Shrivastava, N.; Jiang, L.; Li, P.; Sharma, A.K.; Luo, X.; Wu, S.; Pandey, R.; Gao, Q.; Lou, B. Proteomic approach to understand the molecular physiology of symbiotic interaction between Piriformospora indica and Brassica napus. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Rahil, M.; Qanadillo, A. Effects of different irrigation regimes on yield and water use efficiency of cucumber crop. Agric. Water Manag. 2015, 148, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kim, D.; Abdelaziz, M.E.; Ntui, V.O.; Guo, X.; Al-Babili, S. Colonization by the endophyte Piriformospora indica leads to early flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana likely by triggering gibberellin biosynthesis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 490, 1162–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Saddique, M.A.B.; Ali, Z.; Khan, A.S.; Rana, I.A.; Shamsi, I.H. Inoculation with the endophyte Piriformospora indica significantly affects mechanisms involved in osmotic stress in rice. Rice 2018, 11, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Sirrenberg, A.; Göbel, C.; Grond, S.; Czempinski, N.; Ratzinger, A.; Karlovsky, P.; Santos, P.; Feussner, I.; Pawlowski, K. Piriformospora indica affects plant growth by auxin production. Physiol. Plant. 2007, 131, 581–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lee, Y.-C.; Johnson, J.M.; Chien, C.-T.; Sun, C.; Cai, D.; Lou, B.; Oelmüller, R.; Yeh, K.-W. Growth Promotion of Chinese Cabbage and Arabidopsis by Piriformospora indica Is Not Stimulated by Mycelium-Synthesized Auxin. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2011, 24, 421–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Hilbert, M.; Voll, L.M.; Ding, Y.; Hofmann, J.; Sharma, M.; Zuccaro, A. Indole derivative production by the root endophyte Piriformospora indica is not required for growth promotion but for biotrophic colonization of barley roots. New Phytol. 2012, 196, 520–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Dong, S.; Tian, Z.; Chen, P.J.; Kumar, R.S.; Shen, C.H.; Cai, D.; Oelmüllar, R.; Yeh, K.W. The maturation zone is an important target of Piriformospora indica in Chinese cabbage roots. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 4529–4540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Ye, W.; Shen, C.-H.; Lin, Y.; Chen, P.-J.; Xu, X.; Oelmüller, R.; Yeh, K.-W.; Lai, Z. Growth Promotion-Related miRNAs in Oncidium Orchid Roots Colonized by the Endophytic Fungus Piriformospora indica. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e84920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Kao, C.-W.; Bakshi, M.; Sherameti, I.; Dong, S.; Reichelt, M.; Oelmüller, R.; Yeh, K.-W. A Chinese cabbage (Brassica campetris subsp. Chinensis) τ-type glutathione-S-transferase stimulates Arabidopsis development and primes against abiotic and biotic stress. Plant Mol. Biol. 2016, 92, 643–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Hua, M.D.-S.; Kumar, R.S.; Shyur, L.-F.; Cheng, Y.-B.; Tian, Z.; Oelmüller, R.; Yeh, K.-W. Metabolomic compounds identified in Piriformospora indica-colonized Chinese cabbage roots delineate symbiotic functions of the interaction. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Xu, L.; Wang, A.; Wang, J.; Wei, Q.; Zhang, W. Piriformospora indica confers drought tolerance on Zea mays L. through enhancement of antioxidant activity and expression of drought-related genes. Crop. J. 2017, 5, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Gill, S.S.; Gill, R.; Trivedi, D.K.; Anjum, N.A.; Sharma, K.K.; Ansari, M.W.; Ansari, A.A.; Johri, A.K.; Prasad, R.; Pereira, E.; et al. Piriformospora indica: Potential and Significance in Plant Stress Tolerance. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Wilkinson, S.; Davies, W.J. ABA-based chemical signalling: The co-ordination of responses to stress in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25, 195–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Kong, W.; Liu, F.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, J.; Feng, H. Non-destructive determination of Malondialdehyde (MDA) distribution in oilseed rape leaves by laboratory scale NIR hyperspectral imaging. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zarea, M.; Hajinia, S.; Karimi, N.; Goltapeh, E.M.; Rejali, F.; Varma, A. Effect of Piriformospora indica and Azospirillum strains from saline or non-saline soil on mitigation of the effects of NaCl. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2012, 45, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Jha, Y.; Subramanian, R.B. Reduced cell death and improved cell membrane integrity in rice under salinity by root associated bacteria. Theor. Exp. Plant Phys. 2015, 3, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Jiang, Y.; Macdonald, S.E.; Zwiazek, J.J. Effects of cold storage and water stress on water relations and gas exchange of white spruce (Picea glauca) seedlings. Tree Physiol. 1995, 15, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Shahabivand, S.; Parvaneh, A.; Aliloo, A.A. Root endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica affected growth, cadmium partitioning and chlorophyll fluorescence of sunflower under cadmium toxicity. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 145, 496–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Zhao, Y.; Han, Q.; Ding, C.; Huang, Y.; Liao, J.; Chen, T.; Feng, S.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, Y.; et al. Effect of Low Temperature on Chlorophyll Biosynthesis and Chloroplast Biogenesis of Rice Seedlings during Greening. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Wang, P.; Grimm, B. Connecting Chlorophyll Metabolism with Accumulation of the Photosynthetic Apparatus. Trends Plant Sci. 2021, 26, 484–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Biswal, A.; Pattanayak, G.K.; Pandey, S.S.; Leelavathi, S.; Reddy, V.S.; Tripathy, B.C. Light Intensity-Dependent Modulation of Chlorophyll b Biosynthesis and Photosynthesis by Overexpression of Chlorophyllide a Oxygenase in Tobacco. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159, 433–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Iqbal, N.; Khan, N.A.; Ferrante, A.; Trivellini, A.; Francini, A.; Khan, M.I.R. Ethylene Role in Plant Growth, Development and Senescence: Interaction with Other Phytohormones. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Liu, H.; Senthilkumar, R.; Ma, G.; Zou, Q.; Zhu, K.; Shen, X.; Tian, D.; Hua, M.S.; Oelmüller, R.; Yeh, K.W. Piriformospora indica-induced phytohormone changes and root colonization strategies are highly host-specific. Plant Signal. Behav. 2019, 14, 1632688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Lewington, R.J.; Talbot, M.; Simon, E.W. The Yellowing of Attached and Detached Cucumber Cotyledons. J. Exp. Bot. 1967, 18, 526–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Abouseadaa, H.H.; Atia, M.A.; Younis, I.Y.; Issa, M.Y.; Ashour, H.A.; Saleh, I.; Osman, G.H.; Arif, I.A.; Mohsen, E. Gene-targeted molecular phylogeny, phytochemical profiling, and antioxidant activity of nine species belonging to family Cactaceae. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 1649–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Horticulturae 07 00399 g001 550
Figure 1. Scheme of the experimental setup. Horizontal lines characterize different plant treatments as follow: W (normal irrigation), W-25 (moderate water stress; equal 25% less than normal irrigation; equivalent to PEG 5%), W-50 (severe water stress; equal 50% less than normal irrigation; equivalent to PEG 10%), PI (inoculation with P. indica under normal irrigation), PI-25 (inoculation with P. indica under 25% less than normal irrigation; equivalent to PEG 5%), and PI-50 (inoculation with P. indica under 50% less than normal irrigation; equivalent to PEG 10%).
Figure 1. Scheme of the experimental setup. Horizontal lines characterize different plant treatments as follow: W (normal irrigation), W-25 (moderate water stress; equal 25% less than normal irrigation; equivalent to PEG 5%), W-50 (severe water stress; equal 50% less than normal irrigation; equivalent to PEG 10%), PI (inoculation with P. indica under normal irrigation), PI-25 (inoculation with P. indica under 25% less than normal irrigation; equivalent to PEG 5%), and PI-50 (inoculation with P. indica under 50% less than normal irrigation; equivalent to PEG 10%).
Horticulturae 07 00399 g001
Horticulturae 07 00399 g002 550
Figure 2. Impact of P. indica on growth performance of cucumber plants grown under well and limited water irrigation regimes: W (normal irrigation), W-25 (moderate water stress; equal 25% less than normal irrigation), W-50 (severe water stress; equal 50% less than normal irrigation), PI (inoculation with P. indica under normal irrigation), PI-25 (inoculation with P. indica under 25% less than normal irrigation), and PI-50 (inoculation with P. indica under 50% less than normal irrigation). (A) Plant height, (B) plant fresh weight, (C) leaf area, (D) root length, (E) root fresh weight, and (F) root dry weight. Data are means of combined analysis of two growing seasons. Means marked by the same lower-case letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05). Error bars represent standard error of the means (SE), n = 24.
Figure 2. Impact of P. indica on growth performance of cucumber plants grown under well and limited water irrigation regimes: W (normal irrigation), W-25 (moderate water stress; equal 25% less than normal irrigation), W-50 (severe water stress; equal 50% less than normal irrigation), PI (inoculation with P. indica under normal irrigation), PI-25 (inoculation with P. indica under 25% less than normal irrigation), and PI-50 (inoculation with P. indica under 50% less than normal irrigation). (A) Plant height, (B) plant fresh weight, (C) leaf area, (D) root length, (E) root fresh weight, and (F) root dry weight. Data are means of combined analysis of two growing seasons. Means marked by the same lower-case letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05). Error bars represent standard error of the means (SE), n = 24.
Horticulturae 07 00399 g002
Horticulturae 07 00399 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) Total yield, (B) average fruit weight, (C) number of fruits per plant, (D) water-use efficiency (WUE) of cucumber grown under well and limited water irrigation regimes. W (normal irrigation), W-25 (moderate water stress; equal 25% less than normal irrigation), W-50 (severe water stress; equal 50% less than normal irrigation), PI (inoculation with P. indica under normal irrigation), PI-25 (inoculation with P. indica under 25% less than normal irrigation), and PI-50 (inoculation with P. indica under 50% less than normal irrigation). Data are means of combined analysis of two growing seasons. Means marked by the same lower-case letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05). Error bars represent standard error of the means (SE), n = 24.
Figure 3. (A) Total yield, (B) average fruit weight, (C) number of fruits per plant, (D) water-use efficiency (WUE) of cucumber grown under well and limited water irrigation regimes. W (normal irrigation), W-25 (moderate water stress; equal 25% less than normal irrigation), W-50 (severe water stress; equal 50% less than normal irrigation), PI (inoculation with P. indica under normal irrigation), PI-25 (inoculation with P. indica under 25% less than normal irrigation), and PI-50 (inoculation with P. indica under 50% less than normal irrigation). Data are means of combined analysis of two growing seasons. Means marked by the same lower-case letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05). Error bars represent standard error of the means (SE), n = 24.
Horticulturae 07 00399 g003
Horticulturae 07 00399 g004 550
Figure 4. (A) Catalase (CAT), (B) peroxidase (POD), (C) superoxide dismutase (SOD), (D) malondialdehyde (MDA), (E) proline, (F) chlorophyll content in leaves of cucumber plants at 60 days post P. indica inoculation, under well and limited water irrigation regimes. W (normal irrigation), W-25 (moderate water stress; equal 25% less than normal irrigation), W-50 (severe water stress; equal 50% less than normal irrigation), PI (inoculation with P. indica under normal irrigation), PI-25 (inoculation with P. indica under 25% less than normal irrigation), and PI-50 (inoculation with P. indica under 50% less than normal irrigation). Data are means of combined analysis of two growing seasons. Means marked by the same lower-case letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05). Error bars represent standard error of the means (SE), n = 6.
Figure 4. (A) Catalase (CAT), (B) peroxidase (POD), (C) superoxide dismutase (SOD), (D) malondialdehyde (MDA), (E) proline, (F) chlorophyll content in leaves of cucumber plants at 60 days post P. indica inoculation, under well and limited water irrigation regimes. W (normal irrigation), W-25 (moderate water stress; equal 25% less than normal irrigation), W-50 (severe water stress; equal 50% less than normal irrigation), PI (inoculation with P. indica under normal irrigation), PI-25 (inoculation with P. indica under 25% less than normal irrigation), and PI-50 (inoculation with P. indica under 50% less than normal irrigation). Data are means of combined analysis of two growing seasons. Means marked by the same lower-case letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05). Error bars represent standard error of the means (SE), n = 6.
Horticulturae 07 00399 g004
Horticulturae 07 00399 g005 550
Figure 5. Hormone quantification (A) IAA, (B) ABA, (C) ethylene in leaves of cucumber plants grown under well and limited water irrigation regimes. W (normal irrigation), W-25 (moderate water stress; equal 25% less than normal irrigation), W-50 (severe water stress; equal 50% less than normal irrigation), PI (inoculation with P. indica under normal irrigation), PI-25 (inoculation with P. indica under 25% less than normal irrigation), and PI-50 (inoculation with P. indica under 50% less than normal irrigation). Data are means of combined analysis of two growing seasons. Means marked by the same lower-case letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05). Error bars represent standard error of the means (SE), n = 6.
Figure 5. Hormone quantification (A) IAA, (B) ABA, (C) ethylene in leaves of cucumber plants grown under well and limited water irrigation regimes. W (normal irrigation), W-25 (moderate water stress; equal 25% less than normal irrigation), W-50 (severe water stress; equal 50% less than normal irrigation), PI (inoculation with P. indica under normal irrigation), PI-25 (inoculation with P. indica under 25% less than normal irrigation), and PI-50 (inoculation with P. indica under 50% less than normal irrigation). Data are means of combined analysis of two growing seasons. Means marked by the same lower-case letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05). Error bars represent standard error of the means (SE), n = 6.
Horticulturae 07 00399 g005
Horticulturae 07 00399 g006 550
Figure 6. Scanning electron microscopy for stomatal closure of cucumber leaves grown under 2 PEG-6000 levels (5 and 10%) 15 days post P. indica co-cultivation. (A) No-stress, (B) 5% PEG-6000, (C) 10% PEG-6000, (D) P. indica-colonized plants, (E) P. indica+ 5% PEG-6000, (F) P. indica + 10% PEG-6000. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Figure 6. Scanning electron microscopy for stomatal closure of cucumber leaves grown under 2 PEG-6000 levels (5 and 10%) 15 days post P. indica co-cultivation. (A) No-stress, (B) 5% PEG-6000, (C) 10% PEG-6000, (D) P. indica-colonized plants, (E) P. indica+ 5% PEG-6000, (F) P. indica + 10% PEG-6000. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Horticulturae 07 00399 g006
Horticulturae 07 00399 g007 550
Figure 7. qPCR expression profile of chlorophyll biosynthesis and degradation genes in the third leaf of cucumber grown under 2 PEG levels (5 and 10%) 15 days post P. indica co-cultivation. (A) Glu-TR, glutamyl-tRNA reductase (B) POR, protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase (C) CAO, chlorophyll a oxygenase (D) PPH, pheophytinase (E) PAO, pheophorbide a oxygenase, (F) RCCR, red chlorophyll catabolite reductase for colonized and non-colonized P. indica (PI) plants. Actin gene was used for normalization. Data are mean fold changes of three independent experiments each containing three repeats. Asterisks indicate significance at ** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05 by student t-test.
Figure 7. qPCR expression profile of chlorophyll biosynthesis and degradation genes in the third leaf of cucumber grown under 2 PEG levels (5 and 10%) 15 days post P. indica co-cultivation. (A) Glu-TR, glutamyl-tRNA reductase (B) POR, protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase (C) CAO, chlorophyll a oxygenase (D) PPH, pheophytinase (E) PAO, pheophorbide a oxygenase, (F) RCCR, red chlorophyll catabolite reductase for colonized and non-colonized P. indica (PI) plants. Actin gene was used for normalization. Data are mean fold changes of three independent experiments each containing three repeats. Asterisks indicate significance at ** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05 by student t-test.
Horticulturae 07 00399 g007
Table
Table 1. Macronutrient content, transpiration rate and photosynthesis rate of cucumber leaves at 60 days post P. indica inoculation, under well and limited water irrigation regimes.
Table 1. Macronutrient content, transpiration rate and photosynthesis rate of cucumber leaves at 60 days post P. indica inoculation, under well and limited water irrigation regimes.
TreatmentNPKTranspiration RatePhotosynthesis Rate
(g.kg−1)(g.kg−1)(g.kg−1)(mmol H2O m−2 s−1)(μmol CO2 m−2 s−2)
W29.89 ± 3.9 b2.8 ± 0.34 b26.4 ± 1.6 b6.10 ± 0.23 c15.21 ± 0.12 b
W-2525.50 ± 2.7 c2.4 ± 0.09 c27.3 ± 2.9 b6.06 ± 0.31c15.10 ± 0.11 c
W-5019.70 ± 1.4 d1.9 ± 0.18 d20.1 ± 2.7 c3.64 ± 0.13 e9.08 ± 0.07 e
PI35.81 ± 2.4 a3.5 ± 0.08 a31.01 ± 3.2 a8.14 ± 0.22 a20.30 ± 0.16 a
PI-2530.02 ± 3.3 b3.4 ± 0.40 a32.3 ± 3.5 a6.45 ± 0.24 b16.07 ± 0.13 b
PI-5026.71 ± 1.7 c2.5 ± 0.23 bc26.06 ± 2.3 c5.39 ± 0.23 d13.45 ± 0.10 d
W (normal irrigation), W-25 (moderate water stress; equal 25% less than normal irrigation), W-50 (severe water stress; equal 50% less than normal irrigation), PI (inoculation with P. indica under normal irrigation), PI-25 (inoculation with P. indica under 25% less than normal irrigation) and PI-50 (inoculation with P. indica under 50% less than normal irrigation). Data are means of combined analysis of two growing seasons. Means marked by the same lower-case letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05). Error bars represent standard error of the means (SE), n = 12.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abdelaziz, M.E.; Atia, M.A.M.; Abdelsattar, M.; Abdelaziz, S.M.; Ibrahim, T.A.A.; Abdeldaym, E.A. Unravelling the Role of Piriformospora indica in Combating Water Deficiency by Modulating Physiological Performance and Chlorophyll Metabolism-Related Genes in Cucumis sativus. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 399. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7100399

AMA Style

Abdelaziz ME, Atia MAM, Abdelsattar M, Abdelaziz SM, Ibrahim TAA, Abdeldaym EA. Unravelling the Role of Piriformospora indica in Combating Water Deficiency by Modulating Physiological Performance and Chlorophyll Metabolism-Related Genes in Cucumis sativus. Horticulturae. 2021; 7(10):399. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7100399

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abdelaziz, Mohamed E., Mohamed A. M. Atia, Mohamed Abdelsattar, Suzy M. Abdelaziz, Taha A. A. Ibrahim, and Emad A. Abdeldaym. 2021. "Unravelling the Role of Piriformospora indica in Combating Water Deficiency by Modulating Physiological Performance and Chlorophyll Metabolism-Related Genes in Cucumis sativus" Horticulturae 7, no. 10: 399. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7100399

APA Style

Abdelaziz, M. E., Atia, M. A. M., Abdelsattar, M., Abdelaziz, S. M., Ibrahim, T. A. A., & Abdeldaym, E. A. (2021). Unravelling the Role of Piriformospora indica in Combating Water Deficiency by Modulating Physiological Performance and Chlorophyll Metabolism-Related Genes in Cucumis sativus. Horticulturae, 7(10), 399. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7100399

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop