Next Article in Journal
Metamitron Thinning Efficacy of Apple Fruitlets Is Affected by Different Rates, Timings and Weather Factors in New York State
Next Article in Special Issue
Xylella fastidiosa, Possible New Threat to Chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) in Italy
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Silver Nanoparticles in Response of In Vitro Boysenberry Plants to Drought Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Bioprotective Potential of Halophilic Bacteria against Major Postharvest Fungal Pathogens of Citrus Fruit Penicillium digitatum and Penicillium italicum
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Horticulturae
Volume 9
Issue 11
10.3390/horticulturae9111178
horticulturae-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Advances in Mechanisms Underlying Defense Responses of Horticultural Crops to Botrytis cinerea

by
Rui Li
and
Yulin Cheng
*
Key Laboratory of Plant Hormones and Development Regulation of Chongqing, School of Life Sciences, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2023, 9(11), 1178; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9111178
Submission received: 14 September 2023 / Revised: 24 October 2023 / Accepted: 26 October 2023 / Published: 27 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Pathology in Horticultural Production)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Horticultural crops are a crucial component of agriculture worldwide and have great economic value. The notorious plant fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea can cause gray mold disease in over 200 horticultural crops, leading to severe economic losses. Investigating the mechanisms underlying plant defense responses to pathogens is crucial for developing new strategies for effectively controlling plant diseases, and much progress has occurred in the mechanisms underlying defense responses of horticultural crops to B. cinerea mainly due to the completion of genome sequencing and the establishment of efficient tools for functional genomics. In this review, recent progress in mechanisms underlying defense responses and natural products that can enhance the resistance of horticultural crops to B. cinerea are summarized, and future research directions are also discussed.

1. Introduction

Horticultural crops include fruits, vegetables, and ornamental plants, containing enormous nutritional and ornamental value. Production and consumption of horticultural products are developing rapidly, thereby attracting much attention [1]. However, horticultural crops are seriously threatened by various pathogens in the field, transport, storage, and even market [2]. B. cinerea, the second most important fungal plant pathogen, can cause gray mold disease in over 200 horticultural crops, such as tomato, strawberry, grape, and rose, resulting in severe economic losses [3,4]. Health or environmental risks derived from synthetic fungicides and fungicide resistance are increasingly concerning [5,6]. Thus, it is imperative to develop new strategies for effectively controlling gray mold disease.
During pathogen–plant interactions, plants have evolved unique disease resistance mechanisms and strategies to deal with pathogens to reduce the damage [7]. With the development of genome sequencing [8], and the establishment of efficient tools for functional genomics [9], there have been numerous important advances in our understanding of the molecular biology of members in plant defense response to pathogens. Pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) is a key component of plant immune responses to B. cinerea [10], and components in plant PTI signaling, transcription factors, and proteins in hormone synthesis and signaling were proven to be important regulators against B. cinerea infection [11]. This article reviews the research progress on defense response mechanisms of horticultural crops and natural products that enhance resistance to B. cinerea in recent years, and prospects for future research directions.

2. Physiological Responses to B. cinerea in Horticultural Crops

2.1. Increase in the Production of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and Nitric Oxide (NO)

The so-called reactive oxygen species (ROS) include various forms of reducing and chemically reactive molecules such as superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical, or hydroperoxyl group. The outbreak of ROS is one of the main immune responses of plants to resist the invasion of pathogens [12]. Oxygen acts as a signaling molecule, and the production of reactive oxygen species can serve as a marker for the successful identification of infection and activation of plant defense (Figure 1). The infection of B. cinerea caused changes in the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzymes, ascorbate peroxidase, flavonoid peroxidase, catalase, and other antioxidant enzymes in apple fruit [13]. Furthermore, some other crops also showed varying degrees of change, for instance, the activities of three antioxidant enzymes SOD, peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT)) in infected grape berries were improved to different degrees [14], and the content of H2O2 and O2− as well as the activity of SOD, POD, and CAT were influenced in infected cucumber [15]. These situations indicate that modifying ROS homeostasis by altering the regulatory components of ROS production in plant immunity contributes to engineering or breeding broad-spectrum disease-resistant crops [16].
Nitric oxide (NO) also plays a key role in different physiological processes of plants (Figure 1). The production of NO usually involves two main pathways: the NR pathway, reducing nitrite to NO; and the oxidation pathway of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) [17]. The accumulation of nitric oxide in tomatoes increased resistance to B. cinerea [18,19]. Higher NO supply resulted in much metabolism in tomatoes, which led to higher resistance against B. cinerea [20]. NO accumulated in tomato chloroplasts [21] and the level of NO influenced the activities of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), chitinase (CHI), β-1, 3-glucanase (GLU), and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) [19,22,23], while the accumulation of H2O2 decreased [24], which eventually improved the resistance against B. cinerea. In potato leaves, B. cinerea induces massive accumulation of nitric oxide and H2O2 and ultimately induces programmed cell death [25]. Generally, NO can induce ROS production and enhance ROS-related enzymatic activities [26,27].

2.2. Change in Plant Metabolites

A large number of plant metabolites including primary metabolites and secondary metabolites (Figure 1) are involved in the process of plant disease resistance. Several processes involved in the metabolism of amino acids and carbohydrates were triggered by B. cinerea in grape berries, and a large number of peptides, fatty acids, hydroxy fatty acids, glycerophospholipids, and glycosphingolipids were accumulated [28]. Other aromatic compounds, including acetophenones, benzoic acid derivatives, methoxyphenols, and phenolic glycosides, showed increased abundance upon B. cinerea infection [28]. The content of vitamin C and phenolic substances, which are two antioxidant metabolites, was increased in the apple fruit epidermis upon B. cinerea infection [13]. When the tomato was treated with B. cinerea, glycolysis products were reduced and TCA intermediates as well as short-chain fatty acids caproic acid and its derivatives were increased. Significantly, the content of tryptophan and shikimic acid has changed [29]. The glucosinolate biosynthesis pathway is involved in many plant defense responses to pathogens, and a study in roses showed that key metabolites of the glucosinolate biosynthesis pathway, including L-valine, L-isoleucine, and L-leucine, were altered upon B. cinerea infection [30]. B. cinerea-infected strawberries were found to show increased content of hexadecanoic acid, octadecanoic acid, sucrose, and β-lyxopyranose [31]. Overall, different plant species showed various accumulations of metabolites upon B. cinerea infection [32], and the change in plant metabolites is an important plant response to B. cinerea.

3. Regulators of Disease Resistance to B. cinerea in Horticultural Crops

3.1. Components of Plant PTI Signaling

3.1.1. Receptor-like Kinases

The pattern is generally specific to pathogenic microorganisms and pathogen-related molecular patterns (PAMPs) are one of the patterns. The recognition of PAMPs depends on the pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) on the surface of plant cells (Figure 1). Generally, pattern recognition receptors can be divided into receptor-like kinases (RLKs) containing kinase regions and receptor-like proteins (RLPs) which have no kinase region. The receptor for chitin recognition in tomato is LYK [33], and SlLYK4 and SlCERK1 mediate tomato resistance to B. cinerea [34]. Meanwhile, TPK1 complexes with SlLYK1 to recognize chitin, which implies that these PRRs may be involved in chitin-induced immunity. Receptor-like kinases SlPSKR1 in tomato conferred resistance to B. cinerea [35]. In addition, wall-associated kinase (WAK)/WAK-like (WAKL) is one of the subfamilies of kinase (RLK) receptors, and a total of 68 RcWAK/RcWAKL gene family members were identified in the rose genome, among which RcWAK4 [36], RcWAK8, and RcWAK22 [37] were involved in plant resistance to B. cinerea.

3.1.2. Receptor-like Cytoplasmic Kinases

The receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases (RLCKs)—with no extracellular domain and no transmembrane helix, but only the cytosolic kinase domain—also have an important role in triggering PTI immune responses [38]. Typically, RLCKs are phosphorylated by PRRs, which in turn activate their immune functions that induce downstream immune signals [39]. Overexpression of receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase SlRIPK confers broad-spectrum disease resistance without a yield penalty in tomato plants. Although few RLCKs have been reported, some results indicate that RLCK has played an important role in defense response to B. cinerea.

3.1.3. Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) Cascade

MAPK cascade is a conserved signal transduction module that can convert in vitro signals into in vivo signals [40]. Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) are key signaling regulators of PTI [41]. MAPK cascades mainly include three types of protein kinases, including MAPKKK, MAPKK, and MAPK. It is the way to further transmit and expand these signals [40] (Figure 1 and Table 1). In tomato, SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 positively regulate the resistance response, but the specific action pathway is not yet clear [42]. Inhibition of SlMPK1/2/3 disrupted defense signaling pathways and enhanced the susceptibility to B. cinerea [43]. For instance, SlMAPK3 plays a positive role in the defense response by regulating the accumulation of ROS and the SA/JA pathway [44]. In addition, treatment of MAPK inhibitor reduced tomato resistance to B. cinerea and overexpression of LeMAPK1, LeMAPK2, and LeMAPK3 increased tomato resistance to B. cinerea [45], which implies that MAPK is crucial for tomato resistance to B. cinerea. Other crop species also showed similar results, for example, potato StMKK1 improved plant resistance to B. cinerea by regulating PTI responses and salicylic acid-related signaling pathways [46]. Strawberry FaMAPK5 and FaMAPK10 regulated plant resistance to B. cinerea mainly by regulating the content of abscisic acid (ABA) and ROS as well as the enzymatic activities of related enzymes [47]. Strawberry FaMAPK19 has also participated in plant resistance to B. cinerea, but how it works remains unclear [48]. In conclusion, the MAPK cascade also plays an important role in defense response to B. cinerea.

3.2. Transcription Factors

Transcription factors (TFs), also known as trans-acting factors, refer to DNA-binding proteins that can specifically interact with cis-acting elements of eukaryotic genes to activate or inhibit gene transcription. TFs play an important regulatory role in disease resistance to B. cinerea in horticultural crops [49] (Figure 1 and Table 1).

3.2.1. WRKY Transcription Factors

WRKY transcription factors are a large family that responds to biological stress. Tomato SlDRW1 has two WRKY domains and belongs to the WRKY family Group I; its expression was induced by B. cinerea and increased plant resistance to B. cinerea [50]. Strawberry WRKY11 influences the expression of other TFs such as WRKY1, WRKY70, and MYB1, and then positively regulates plant resistance to B. cinerea [51]. Other WRKY transcription factors including WRKY10 in cucumber and grapevine [15], WRKY25 [52] and WRKY50 [53] in strawberry, WRKY31 [54] and WRKY46 in tomato [55], and rose WRKY41 [56] were also reported to improve resistance to B. cinerea, while Lily WRKY39 and WRKY41a [57] have negative roles in plant resistance to B. cinerea. In addition, rose WRKY13 promoted resistance to B. cinerea by enhancing cytokinin content and reducing abscisic acid signaling [58].

3.2.2. MYB Transcription Factors

MYB family transcription factor is one of the largest transcription factors in plants [59]. It refers to a class of transcription factors containing the MYB domain. The MYB domain is a peptide segment of about 51–52 amino acids. Similarly, the MYB transcription factor can pass different pathways to regulate disease resistance responses [60]. MYB transcription factors are generally involved in plant resistance to B. cinerea by mediating the JA defense pathway, such as rose MYB84 and MYB123, which have opposite functions [61]. Tomato SlMYB75 increased the accumulation of JA and activated the JA defense signaling pathway upon B. cinerea infection [62]. Tomato SlMYB1 binds to the promoters of lycopene synthesis-related genes (SlLCY1 and SlPSY2) and the pathogen-related gene SlPR5 to regulate lycopene production and plant resistance to B. cinerea [63]. VvMYB44 directly activated the transcripts of enzyme-encoding genes involved in phenylpropanoid and sucrose metabolism [64]. MYB1, MYB10, MYB44.2, and MYB44.3 in strawberries were also involved in plant resistance to B. cinerea [48].

3.2.3. bHLH Transcription Factors

Basic helix-loop-helix proteins (bHLHs) are also one of the largest transcription factor families and have a basic region and an HLH (helix-loop-helix) region [64,65]. SlJIG belongs to the bHLH family and participated in tomato resistance to B. cinerea [66]. Rose RcbHLH13, RcbHLH35, RcbHLH41, RcbHLH44, and RcbHLH49 were upregulated after B. cinerea treatment, which indicates that these bHLHs may be engaged in alleviating biotic stress [67]. As a subfamily of bHLH TFs, tomato SlMYC2 plays an important role in methyl-jasmonate-induced fruit resistance to B. cinerea [68].

3.2.4. NAC Transcription Factors

NAC transcription factors are a type of transcription factor that is unique to plants, and there are over 100 NAC transcription factors in plants. Tomato SlSRN1 has a typical NAC domain and affects the amount of ROS and resistance to B. cinerea by affecting superoxide dismutase and catalase [69]. Moreover, grapevine VvNAC1 is a crucial regulatory component of the plant signaling defense cascade [70].

3.3. Proteins in Hormone Synthesis and Signaling

Plant hormones are an important signal transduction pathway in plant disease resistance. Salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), and ethylene (ET) play a major role in this process; at the same time, regulators such as gibberellins (GAs), auxin (AUX), and ABA also participate in this process [58,71,72,73,74]. Plant hormones can not only interact with each other but can also be involved in multiple resistance reactions [75] (Figure 1).

3.3.1. Jasmonic Acid

JA is generally involved in the resistance response to necrotic pathogens and is a class of endogenous signaling molecules of hydroxyl lipids [76]. JA is synthesized in plastids, peroxisomes, and cytoplasm, and enzymes involved in JA synthesis mainly include LOX, AOS, and AOC [77]. JA synthesis genes affected crops resistance to B. cinerea [78,79]. Tomato SlTD2 is a threonine deaminase that converts threonine to α-ketobutyrate and ammonia as the committed step in isoleucine (Ile) biosynthesis and contributes to JA responses by producing the Ile needed to make the bioactive JA–Ile conjugate [80]. SlBBX20 attenuates JA signaling and regulates resistance to B. cinerea in tomato [81]. Methyl jasmonic acid and isoleucine jasmonic acid are derivatives of JA and play important roles in plants. COI1 is a receptor for jasmonic acid [82] and normally forms a complex with SCF ubiquitination enzymes, so the changes of these major genes influence the production of JA. JA influences multiple processes including ROS, resistance genes, and disease resistance enzymes. Extensive research has established that ROS is the most notable change in the JA pathway [55,83,84]. Extensive research in different plant species and various biological situations has revealed that there might be different expression levels of downstream genes. For example, these PR family genes including PR1, PR2a, PR2b, PR3a, and PR3b were reduced in the tomato slarg2 mutants [85]. Overexpression of VvCOI1 in strawberry fruit resulted in upregulation of the expression levels of a series of plant defense-related genes, such as PAL gene, superoxide dismutase (SOD) gene, POD gene, chitinase gene, polyphenol oxidase (PPO) gene, and β-1, 3-glucanase (BG) gene, thus enhancing the resistance to B. cinerea [86]. SlARG2 contributed to MeJA-induced defense responses to B. cinerea in tomato fruit by regulating PRs, defensive enzyme activities, and arginine metabolism [85]. The mediator complex links transcription factors to the RNA polymerase II transcriptional machinery. Tomato mediator subunit 8 (SlMED8) is an essential component in JA-dependent defense response against B. cinerea [87]. JAZ proteins are repressors of the JA signaling pathway and have conserved Jas and ZIM/TIFY domains. SlVQ15 could interact with JAZ1 and positively affect the defense against B. cinerea [54]. The Jas domain binds the COI1 receptor and MYC2 transcription factor, and the ZIM domain binds other JAZ proteins and NINJA proteins [88]. When plant endogenous JA increased, the COI1-JA-JAZ ternary complex formed and then induced the degradation of JAZ protein [89], and then higher JA content brings resistance to B. cinerea [81].

3.3.2. Salicylic Acid

SA generally plays a role mainly in the infection of biotrophic pathogens. There are generally two pathways for SA synthesis, including the phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) pathway and isochorismate synthase (ICS) pathway [89,90,91]. The expressions of SA-biosynthetic genes EDS1 (Enhanced Disease Susceptibility 1), PAD4 (Phytoalexin Deficient 4), and SA marker gene PR1 were increased in tomato upon B. cinerea infection. However, the expression of JA-biosynthetic gene LoxC (lipoxygenase) as well as two JA-dependent genes, PI I and PI II (proteinase inhibitors I and II), were decreased upon B. cinerea infection [44]. SA induced substantial transcriptional expression [92], including downstream NPR1, PR, and some WRKY genes. NPR1 plays an important role in salicylic-acid-induced plant immunity and can activate downstream PR1, PR2, and PR5 [93]. The defense pathways regulated by SA and JA are mutually antagonistic. For instance, SA activates the NPR1 gene, which repressed the PI gene activated by JA in tomato [94], and thus, knockdown of tomato SlNPR1 via modulation of ROS homeostasis and JA/ET signaling enhances resistance to B. cinerea [39,85]. Rose RcTGA1 interacted with NPR1 to regulate plant resistance to B. cinerea [30]. Strawberry FaSnRK1α increased the resistance of fruit to B. cinerea via SA signaling pathway, regulated the expression of six strawberry PR genes, and interacted with FaWRKY33.2 [95].

3.3.3. Ethylene

ET is a simple gaseous hormone with biological activity. Plants can regulate their physiological processes through ethylene biosynthesis and signal transduction pathways. The two enzymes of ethylene synthesis are ACS and ACO; ACS catalyzes the formation of ACC from AdoMet, and ACO catalyzes the conversion of ACC to ethylene [96]. Ethylene receptors including ETR1, ERS1, ETR2, ERS2, and EIN4 were identified [38,97,98,99]. CTR1 is a negative regulator of ethylene signaling pathway [100], and CTR1 is inactive in the presence of ethylene and active in the absence of ethylene [101]. EIN2 is a key regulator of the ethylene signaling pathway and its loss of function results in a complete loss of ethylene response in plants. In the absence of ethylene in plants, CTR1 phosphorylates the C-terminal domain of EIN2, EIN3, EIL1, and EIL2. The box proteins EBF1 and EBF2 are rapidly degraded by the ubiquitinated proteasome pathway. CTR1 fails to phosphorylate EIN2 in the presence of ethylene [102,103,104,105]. EIN3 is a core factor in the interaction between ethylene and other hormones. Both JAZ and MYC can affect the ethylene response pathway by inhibiting EIN3 [106]. Ethylene has been reported to increase resistance to B. cinerea in tomato, but the exact mechanism of action is unknown [71,107,108]. ERF is also a plant-specific transcription factor that usually functions in the last step of the ethylene transduction pathway, but ERF has also been reported to function in the JA and SA pathways, such as tomato SlERF2 [109], SlERF3b, and SlERF5 [110], which play a role in methyl jasmonate-induced resistance to B. cinerea. Tomato ERF. A1, ERF. B4, ERF. C3, and ERF. A3 belongs to the B3 Group as well as ERF. C1, C3, C4, C6, D2, D7, ERF. A4, B12, B13, D6, F4, and H9 were necessary for tomato resistance to B. cinerea, but the specific mechanism remains to be clarified [111,112]. ERF. A1, Pti5 (also named ERF. G2), Pti6 (also named ERF. C6), and ERF. A4) were increased in tomato response to B. cinerea infection [113], and Pti4 plays a crucial role in the response to B. cinerea infection [114]. Grapevine VaERF16, which interacts with VaMYB306, was induced by B. cinerea infection and positively modulated plant resistance to B. cinerea [115].

3.3.4. Other Hormones

Cytokinin (CTK) plays a positive role in the resistance to B. cinerea, while abscisic acid has an opposite role [58]. The other hormones have also been reported in crops. When Vitis vinifera was infected with B. cinerea, genes associated with the ‘ABA biosynthetic process’, ‘ABA catabolic process’, and ‘response to ABA’ were highly induced [116]. AUX, CTK, GAs, ABA, ET, brassinosteroid, JA, and SA signal transduction in grape berries and kiwifruits have changed to counter the B. cinerea [14]. Co-silencing of ABA receptors SlRCAR9, SlRCAR11, SlRCAR12, and SlRCAR13 weakened the ethylene biosynthesis and signaling pathway that enhanced fruit firmness and altered the shelf-life and susceptibility to B. cinerea [117]. AcTPR2, which is associated with IAA signaling pathways, confers resistance to B. cinerea [118]. All of these examples shed light on the role of phytohormones and their interaction with each other [75].

3.4. Other Proteins

In addition to the reported major proteins, other proteins also play a role in the resistance of B. cinerea. Tomato SlDQD/SDH2 plays a key role in flavonoid biosynthesis and fruit resistance to B. cinerea [119]. Strawberry MANNOSE-BINDING LECTIN 1 (MBL1) is a member of the G-type lectin family and was involved in plant defense against B. cinerea [120]. Loss-of-function tomato phosphoinositide specific phospholipase C2 SlPLC2 lines showed increased resistance to B. cinerea [121,122]. SlIMP3 functions as a bifunctional enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of AsA and myoinositol and increases fruit resistance to B. cinerea [123]. FaPG1 has a key role in remodeling pectins during strawberry softening and regulating plant resistance to B. cinerea [124]. Tomato β-1, 3-GLUCANASE10 (SlBG10) regulates fruit resistance to B. cinerea by modulating callose deposition [125].
Table 1. Proteins and genetic techniques involved in resistance to B. cinerea in different horticultural crops.
Table 1. Proteins and genetic techniques involved in resistance to B. cinerea in different horticultural crops.
ProteinsCropsGenetic TechniquesReferences
RcTGA1RoseVIGS[30]
SlDQD/SDH2TomatoCRISPR/Cas9[119]
SlTD2TomatoRNAi[80]
SlPLC2TomatoCRISPR/Cas9, VIGS[121,122]
SlPSKR1TomatoCRISPR/Cas9[35]
SlRIPKTomatoVIGS[16]
SlRCAR9, SlRCAR11, SlRCAR12, SlRCAR13TomatoRNAi[117]
SlVQ15TomatoCRISPR/Cas9[54]
SlBBX20TomatoCRISPR/Cas9[81]
AcTPR2KiwifruitVIGS[118]
FaSnRK1αStrawberryVIGS[95]
SlARG2TomatoVIGS[85]
FaPG1StrawberryCRISPR/Cas9[124]
SlBG10TomatoCRISPR/Cas9[125]
SlMED8Tomatoantisense[87]
SlMKK2, SlMKK4TomatoVIGS[42]
SlMPK3TomatoCRISPR/Cas9[44]
StMKK1PotatoRNAi[46]
FaMAPK19Strawberryantisense[48]
SlDRW1TomatoVIGS[50]
SlWRKY31TomatoCRISPR/Cas9[54]
FvWRKY50StrawberryRNAi[53]
FaWRKY25StrawberryRNAi[52]
FaWRKY11StrawberryRNAi[51]
RcWRKY41RoseVIGS[56]
RcWRKY13RoseVIGS[58]
RcMYB84,
RcMYB123		RoseVIGS[61]
VaMYB306GrapeRNAi[115]
SlJIGTomatoCRISPR/Cas9[66]
SlMYC2TomatoCRISPR/Cas9[68]

4. Natural Products That Can Enhance the Resistance to B. cinerea in Horticultural Crops

Though genetic improvement by altering the expression of the defense genes is an effective method, it is also urgent to search for natural products that can improve the resistance to B. cinerea.

4.1. Microbial Elicitors

Elicitors can activate plant defenses based on their recognition as putative pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) [126], causing reactive oxygen species (ROS) burst, calcium (Ca2+) influx, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation, and defense-related gene expression [127,128]. Several studies have identified B. cinerea elicitors that could induce plant immune responses. B. cinerea elicitors can be classified into two categories, including saccharide elicitors and protein elicitors [129]. Extracellular proteins secreted by B. cinerea, such as BcNEP1 and BcNEP2 [130], Xyn11A [131], BcSpl1 [132], and BcGs1 [133], can induce plant defenses. In the case of endopolygalacturonases [134] and xylanases [135], the ability to activate plant defenses is based on their recognition as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by the plant immune system [126], causing reactive oxygen species (ROS) burst, calcium (Ca2+) influx, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation, and defense-related gene expression [127,128]. Intracellular proteins include effector proteins, which induce the resistance responses inside the plant cell, such as Bccrh1 [136] and BcSSP2 [137]. Chitin, the well-known fungal PAMP, is a polysaccharide made of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (GlcNAc) and is the second most abundant polysaccharide after cellulose [138], which can also lead to plant immune response [139]. Several microbial elicitors, including chitin, AsES, BcGs1, Oli-D1, and Oli-D2, were proven to enhance the resistance to B. cinerea in horticultural crops (Table 2).

4.2. Plant Natural Products

Natural products from plants or phytohormones and their derivates were proven to enhance the resistance to B. cinerea in horticultural crops (Table 2). Melatonin is used to treat strawberry [140] and tomato [141], which shows great resistance to B. cinerea. In addition, 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) [113,142] and 2, 5-norbornadiene [113] are useful in the ET signaling pathway. Phenylalanine is one of the essential amino acids and it can be used to control gray mold disease [143]. Ferulic acid is a phenolic acid commonly found in the cell walls of grains, vegetables, and fruit and it has a positive effect on defense against B. cinerea [19]. Piperonylic acid is the inhibitor of the phenylpropanoid pathway, which induces broad-spectrum disease resistance in tomato [144]. Moreover, the defense response against necrotrophic fungi is greatly dependent on phytohormones and the crosstalk between them [75]. Thus, it reminds us that certain concentrations of phytohormones and their derivates can help to control B. cinerea. 6-benzylaminopurine [58,73], zeatin [58], abscisic acid [58], salicylic Acid [74], MeJA [72,145,146,147], Ile [148], brassinosteroid [146,149], ethylene [113], and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid [150] were also used for enhancing the resistance to B. cinerea in rose, tomato, and strawberry.
Table 2. Natural products used to control gray mold in horticultural crops.
Table 2. Natural products used to control gray mold in horticultural crops.
CategoryCompoundCrops SpeciesTissueConcentrationStageReferences
Hormone-
related natural products from plants		6-benzylaminopurineRosePetal100 µMPostharvest[58]
TomatoLeaf100 µL L−1Postharvest[73]
ZeatinRosePetal100 µMPostharvest[58]
MeJATomatoFruit10 mMPostharvest[72]
StrawberryLeaf and petal10 µMPostharvest[145]
RosePetal0.2 mMPostharvest[146,147]
IleRosePetal10 mMPostharvest[148]
StrawberryFruit
BrassinosteroidStrawberryFruit10 µMPostharvest[149]
RosePetal1 µMPostharvest[146]
EthyleneTomatoFruit1 µL L−1Postharvest[113]
1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acidRosePetal50 µM, 100 µM, 200 µM, 400 µMPostharvest[150]
1-methylcyclopropeneRosePetal1 µL L−1Postharvest[142]
2, 5-norbornadieneTomatoFruit5 μL L−1Postharvest[113]
Microbial elicitorschitinTomatoFruit0.5%Postharvest[151]
AsESStrawberryLeaf60 nMPreharvest[152]
BcGs1TomatoLeaf250 nMPostharvest[137]
Oli-D1, Oli-D2TomatoLeaf1 μMPostharvest[153]
Other natural products from plantsMelatoninStrawberryFruit100 μMPostharvest[140]
TomatoFruit0.1 mMPreharvest[141]
PhenylalanineChrysanthemumPetal6 mMPostharvest[143]
Ferulic acidTomatoFruit100 μMPostharvest[19]
Piperonylic acidTomatoLeaf300 μMPostharvest[144]

5. Conclusions and Prospects

This review summarizes recent advances in mechanisms underlying defense responses of horticultural crops to B. cinerea, including physiological responses, change of metabolites, crucial proteins in PTI signaling pathways, TFs, and hormone pathways, which provides significant insights into horticultural crops against B. cinerea. These findings suggest that transcriptional regulation and hormone transduction pathways undoubtedly play important roles in the defense responses of horticultural crops to B. cinerea. However, there are few reports on epigenetic modification, phase separation, and other new regulatory aspects for underlying defense responses of horticultural crops to B. cinerea. Therefore, future research should focus on these new regulatory aspects.
We proposed approaches to improve horticultural crops resistance to B. cinerea by modifying genes including TFs, MAPK proteins, and some other proteins in different processes [154]. These abundant gene resources can not only improve plants disease resistance but also plants development and fruit quality [124,125]. Elicitors from B. cinerea and some other microbes can induce the resistance of horticultural crops to B. cinerea by inducing obvious plant defense responses [133,152]. Additionally, certain concentrations of natural products can also be used to control gray mold disease on horticultural crops.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.C. and R.L.; writing—review and editing, R.L. and Y.C.; funding acquisition, Y.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD1000407), Project of Chongqing Science and Technology Commission (cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0160 and CSTB2022NSCQ-MSX0959), and Chongqing Talents: Exceptional Young Talents Project (cstc2021ycjh-bgzxm0042).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xu, X.; Chen, Y.; Li, B.; Zhang, Z.; Qin, G.; Chen, T.; Tian, S. Molecular mechanisms underlying multi-level defense responses of horticultural crops to fungal pathogens. Hortic. Res. 2022, 9, uhac066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Weiberg, A.; Wang, M.; Lin, F.-M.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, Z.; Kaloshian, I.; Huang, H.-D.; Jin, H. Fungal small RNAs suppress plant immunity by hijacking host RNA interference pathways. Science 2013, 342, 118–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Van Baarlen, P.; Woltering, E.J.; Staats, M.; Van Kan, J.A.L. Histochemical and genetic analysis of host and non-host interactions of Arabidopsis with three Botrytis species: An important role for cell death control. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2007, 8, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Williamson, B.; Tudzynski, B.; Tudzynski, P.; Van Kan, J.A.L. Botrytis cinerea: The cause of grey mould disease. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2007, 8, 561–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ciliberti, N.; Fermaud, M.; Roudet, J.; Rossi, V. Environmental conditions affect Botrytis cinerea infection of mature grape berries more than the strain or transposon genotype. Phytopathology 2015, 105, 1090–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Elmer, P.A.G.; Michailides, T.J.; Elad, Y.; Williamson, B.; Tudzynski, P.; Delen, N. Epidemiology of Botrytis cinerea in orchard and vine crops. In Botrytis: Biology, Pathology and Control; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 243–272. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mengiste, T. Plant immunity to necrotrophs. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2012, 50, 267–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Abu Qamar, S.F.; Moustafa, K.; Tran, L.-S.P. ‘Omics’ and plant responses to Botrytis cinerea. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1658. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Petrasch, S.; Knapp, S.J.; van Kan, J.A.L.; Blanco-Ulate, B. Grey mould of strawberry, a devastating disease caused by the ubiquitous necrotrophic fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea. Mol Plant Pathol. 2019, 20, 877–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liao, C.-J.; Hailemariam, S.; Sharon, A.; Mengiste, T. Pathogenic strategies and immune mechanisms to necrotrophs: Differences and similarities to biotrophs and hemibiotrophs. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2022, 69, 102291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. AbuQamar, S.; Moustafa, K.; Tran, L.S. Mechanisms and strategies of plant defense against Botrytis cinerea. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2017, 37, 262–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Torres, M.A. ROS in biotic interactions. Physiol. Plant. 2010, 138, 414–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bui, T.T.; Wright, S.A.; Falk, A.B.; Vanwalleghem, T.; Van Hemelrijck, W.; Hertog, M.L.; Keulemans, J.; Davey, M.W. Botrytis cinerea differentially induces postharvest antioxidant responses in ‘Braeburn’ and ‘Golden Delicious’ apple fruit. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 5662–5670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Song, Z.; Pang, Q.; Lu, S.; Yu, L.; Pervaiz, T.; Fu, W.; Jia, H.; Fang, J. Transcriptomic and metabolmic approaches to counter the effect of Botrytis cinerea in grape berry with the application of nitric oxide. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 296, 110901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, M.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, C.; Meng, T.; Wang, L.; Chen, C.; Ren, Z. CsWRKY10 mediates defence responses to Botrytis cinerea infection in Cucumis sativus. Plant Sci. 2020, 300, 110640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, R.; Li, C.; Li, Q.; Ai, Y.; Huang, Z.; Sun, X.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, Y.; Liang, Y. Tomato receptor-like cytosolic kinase RIPK confers broad-spectrum disease resistance without yield penalties. Hortic. Res. 2022, 9, uhac207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Gupta, K.J.; Fernie, A.R.; Kaiser, W.M.; van Dongen, J.T. On the origins of nitric oxide. Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, R.; Sheng, J.; Shen, L. Nitric oxide plays an important role in β-aminobutyric acid-induced resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato plants. Plant Pathol. J. 2020, 36, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Shu, P.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Yao, L.; Sheng, J.; Shen, L. Exogenous ferulic acid treatment increases resistance against Botrytis cinerea in tomato fruit by regulating nitric oxide signaling pathway. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2021, 182, 111678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lacrampe, N.; Colombié, S.; Dumont, D.; Nicot, P.; Lecompte, F.; Lugan, R. Nitrogen-mediated metabolic patterns of susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea infection in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) stems. Planta 2023, 257, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nawrocka, J.; Szymczak, K.; Maćkowiak, A.; Skwarek-Fadecka, M.; Małolepsza, U. Determination of reactive oxygen or nitrogen species and novel volatile organic compounds in the defense responses of tomato plants against Botrytis cinerea induced by Trichoderma virens TRS 106. Cells 2022, 11, 3051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zheng, Y.; Shen, L.; Yu, M.; Fan, B.; Zhao, D.; Liu, L.; Sheng, J. Nitric oxide synthase as a postharvest response in pathogen resistance of tomato fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2011, 60, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lai, T.; Wang, Y.; Li, B.; Qin, G.; Tian, S. Defense responses of tomato fruit to exogenous nitric oxide during postharvest storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2011, 62, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Małolepsza, U.; Różalska, S. Nitric oxide and hydrogen peroxide in tomato resistance: Nitric oxide modulates hydrogen peroxide level in o-hydroxyethylorutin-induced resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2005, 43, 623–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Floryszak-Wieczorek, J.; Arasimowicz-Jelonek, M. Contrasting regulation of NO and ROS in potato defense-associated metabolism in response to pathogens of different lifestyles. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Delledonne, M.; Murgia, I.; Ederle, D.; Sbicego, P.F.; Biondani, A.; Polverari, A.; Lamb, C. Reactive oxygen intermediates modulate nitric oxide signaling in the plant hypersensitive disease-resistance response. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2002, 40, 605–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Delledonne, M.; Zeier, J.; Marocco, A.; Lamb, C. Signal interactions between nitric oxide and reactive oxygen intermediates in the plant hypersensitive disease resistance response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 13454–13459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Blanco-Ulate, B.; Amrine, K.C.; Collins, T.S.; Rivero, R.M.; Vicente, A.R.; Morales-Cruz, A.; Doyle, C.L.; Ye, Z.; Allen, G.; Heymann, H.; et al. Developmental and metabolic plasticity of white-skinned grape berries in response to Botrytis cinerea during noble rot. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 2422–2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Camanes, G.; Scalschi, L.; Vicedo, B.; Gonzalez-Bosch, C.; Garcia-Agustin, P. An untargeted global metabolomic analysis reveals the biochemical changes underlying basal resistance and priming in Solanum lycopersicum, and identifies 1-methyltryptophan as a metabolite involved in plant responses to Botrytis cinerea and Pseudomonas syringae. Plant J. 2015, 84, 125–139. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gao, P.; Zhang, H.; Yan, H.; Wang, Q.; Yan, B.; Jian, H.; Tang, K.; Qiu, X. RcTGA1 and glucosinolate biosynthesis pathway involvement in the defence of rose against the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hu, Z.; Chang, X.; Dai, T.; Li, L.; Liu, P.; Wang, G.; Liu, P.; Huang, Z.; Liu, X. Metabolic profiling to identify the latent infection of strawberry by Botrytis cinerea. Evol. Bioinform. 2019, 15, 1176934319838518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, S.; Pang, Y.; Tao, Y.; Shi, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Ji, X.; Wang, B.; Herrera-Balandrano, D.D.; et al. Dipicolinic acid enhances kiwifruit resistance to Botrytis cinerea by promoting phenolics accumulation. Pest Manag. Sci. 2023, 79, 3177–3189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, L.; Yuan, L.; Staehelin, C.; Li, Y.; Ruan, J.; Liang, Z.; Xie, Z.; Wang, W.; Xie, J.; Huang, S. The LYSIN MOTIF-CONTAINING RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE 1 protein of banana is required for perception of pathogenic and symbiotic signals. New Phytol. 2019, 223, 1530–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ai, Y.; Li, Q.; Li, C.; Wang, R.; Sun, X.; Chen, S.; Cai, X.-Z.; Qi, X.; Liang, Y. Tomato LysM receptor kinase 4 mediates chitin-elicited fungal resistance in both leaves and fruit. Hortic. Res. 2023, 10, uhad082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hu, Z.; Fang, H.; Zhu, C.; Gu, S.; Ding, S.; Yu, J.; Shi, K. Ubiquitylation of PHYTOSULFOKINE RECEPTOR 1 modulates the defense response in tomato. Plant Physiol. 2023, 192, 2507–2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Liu, X.; Wang, Z.; Tian, Y.; Zhang, S.; Li, D.; Dong, W.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Z. Characterization of wall-associated kinase/wall-associated kinase-like (WAK/WAKL) family in rose (Rosa chinensis) reveals the role of RcWAK4 in Botrytis resistance. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wang, Z.; Ma, Y.; Chen, M.; Da, L.; Su, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, X. Comparative genomics analysis of WAK/WAKL family in Rosaceae identify candidate WAKs involved in the resistance to Botrytis cinerea. BMC Genom. 2023, 24, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Bleecker, A.B.; Estelle, M.A.; Somerville, C.; Kende, H. Insensitivity to ethylene conferred by a dominant mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 1988, 241, 1086–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Li, R.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Sheng, J.; Zhu, H.; Shen, L. Transcriptome analysis reveals that SlNPR1 mediates tomato fruit resistance against Botrytis cinerea by modulating phenylpropanoid metabolism and balancing ROS homeostasis. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2020, 172, 111382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, J.; Li, W.; Xiang, T.; Liu, Z.; Laluk, K.; Ding, X.; Zou, Y.; Gao, M.; Zhang, X.; Chen, S.; et al. Receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases integrate signaling from multiple plant immune receptors and are targeted by a Pseudomonas syringae effector. Cell Host Microbe 2010, 7, 290–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, D.; Wei, L.; Liu, T.; Ma, J.; Huang, K.; Guo, H.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, J.; Tsuda, K.; et al. Suppression of ETI by PTI priming to balance plant growth and defense through an MPK3/MPK6-WRKYs-PP2Cs module. Mol. Plant. 2023, 16, 903–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, L.; Ouyang, Z.; Hong, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, D.; Song, F. Tomato SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 contribute to disease resistance against Botrytis cinerea. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zheng, Y.; Yang, Y.; Liu, C.; Chen, L.; Sheng, J.; Shen, L. Inhibition of SlMPK1, SlMPK2, and SlMPK3 disrupts defense signaling pathways and enhances tomato fruit susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 5509–5517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhang, S.; Wang, L.; Zhao, R.; Yu, W.; Li, R.; Li, Y.; Sheng, J.; Shen, L. Knockout of SlMAPK3 Reduced Disease Resistance to Botrytis cinerea in Tomato Plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 8949–8956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zheng, Y.; Hong, H.; Chen, L.; Li, J.; Sheng, J.; Shen, L. LeMAPK1, LeMAPK2, and LeMAPK3 are associated with nitric oxide-induced defense response against Botrytis cinerea in the Lycopersicon esculentum fruit. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 1390–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chen, X.; Wang, W.; Cai, P.; Wang, Z.; Li, T.; Du, Y. The role of the MAP kinase−kinase protein StMKK1 in potato immunity to different pathogens. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zhang, Y.; Long, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yang, M.; Wang, L.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Q.; Li, M.; Lin, Y.; et al. MAPK5 and MAPK10 overexpression influences strawberry fruit ripening, antioxidant capacity and resistance to Botrytis cinerea. Planta 2021, 255, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, G.; Jia, S.; Yan, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, F.; Sun, Y. A strawberry mitogen-activated protein kinase gene, FaMAPK19, is involved in disease resistance against Botrytis cinerea. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 265, 109259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yang, J.H.; Lee, K.; Du, Q.; Yang, S.; Yuan, B.; Qi, L.; Wang, H. A membrane-associated NAC domain transcription factor XVP interacts with TDIF co-receptor and regulates vascular meristem activity. New Phytol. 2019, 226, 59–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liu, B.; Hong, Y.-B.; Zhang, Y.-F.; Li, X.-H.; Huang, L.; Zhang, H.-J.; Li, D.-Y.; Song, F.-M. Tomato WRKY transcriptional factor SlDRW1 is required for disease resistance against Botrytis cinerea and tolerance to oxidative stress. Plant Sci. 2014, 227, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, Y.; Zhao, F.; Zhang, G.; Jia, S.; Yan, Z. FaWRKY11 transcription factor positively regulates resistance to Botrytis cinerea in strawberry fruit. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 279, 109893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jia, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, G.; Yan, Z.; Cai, Q. Strawberry FaWRKY25 transcription factor negatively regulated the resistance of strawberry fruits to Botrytis cinerea. Genes 2020, 12, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ma, C.; Xiong, J.; Liang, M.; Liu, X.; Lai, X.; Bai, Y.; Cheng, Z. Strawberry WRKY transcription factor WRKY50 is required for resistance to necrotrophic fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Huang, H.; Zhao, W.; Li, C.; Qiao, H.; Song, S.; Yang, R.; Sun, L.; Ma, J.; Ma, X.; Wang, S. SlVQ15 interacts with jasmonate-ZIM domain proteins and SlWRKY31 to regulate defense response in tomato. Plant Physiol. 2022, 190, 828–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Shu, P.; Zhang, S.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Yao, L.; Sheng, J.; Shen, L. Over-expression of SlWRKY46 in tomato plants increases susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea by modulating ROS homeostasis and SA and JA signaling pathways. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 166, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Liu, X.; Li, D.; Zhang, S.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Z. Genome-wide characterization of the rose (Rosa chinensis) WRKY family and role of RcWRKY41 in gray mold resistance. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Fu, Y.; Li, J.; Wu, H.; Jiang, S.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, C.; Xu, W.; Li, Q.; Yang, L. Analyses of Botrytis cinerea-responsive LrWRKY genes from Lilium regale reveal distinct roles of two LrWRKY transcription factors in mediating responses to B. cinerea. Plant Cell Rep. 2022, 41, 995–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Liu, X.; Zhou, X.; Li, D.; Hong, B.; Gao, J.; Zhang, Z. Rose WRKY13 promotes disease protection to Botrytis by enhancing cytokinin content and reducing abscisic acid signaling. Plant Physiol. 2022, 191, 679–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dubos, C.; Stracke, R.; Grotewold, E.; Weisshaar, B.; Martin, C.; Lepiniec, L. MYB transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Millard, P.S.; Kragelund, B.B.; Burow, M. R2R3 MYB transcription factors–functions outside the DNA-Binding domain. Trends Plant Sci. 2019, 24, 934–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ren, H.; Bai, M.; Sun, J.; Liu, J.; Ren, M.; Dong, Y.; Wang, N.; Ning, G.; Wang, C. RcMYB84 and RcMYB123 mediate jasmonate-induced defense responses against Botrytis cinerea in rose (Rosa chinensis). Plant J. 2020, 103, 1839–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Liu, M.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, Z.; Wang, L.; Chen, C.; Ren, Z. Overexpression of SlMYB75 enhances resistance to Botrytis cinerea and prolongs fruit storage life in tomato. Plant Cell Rep. 2020, 40, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Yin, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhao, H.; Chu, X.; Liu, H.; Ding, X.; Lu, C.; Wang, X.; Zhao, X.; Li, Y.; et al. SlMYB1 regulates the accumulation of lycopene, fruit shape, and resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato. Hortic. Res. 2022, 10, uhac282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Qian, Y.C.; Zhang, T.Y.; Yu, Y.; Gou, L.P.; Yang, J.T.; Xu, J.; Pi, E.X. Regulatory mechanisms of bHLH transcription factors in plant adaptive responses to various abiotic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 677611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Pires, N.; Dolan, L. Origin and diversification of basic-helix-loop-helix proteins in plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27, 862–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Cao, Y.; Liu, L.; Ma, K.; Wang, W.; Lv, H.; Gao, M.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Ren, S.; Zhang, N.; et al. The jasmonate-induced bHLH gene SlJIG functions in terpene biosynthesis and resistance to insects and fungus. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2022, 64, 1102–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Ullah, I.; Yuan, W.; Uzair, M.; Li, S.; Rehman, O.U.; Nanda, S.; Wu, H. Molecular characterization of bHLH transcription factor family in Rose (Rosa chinensis Jacq.) under Botrytis cinerea Infection. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shu, P.; Li, Z.; Min, D.; Zhang, X.; Ai, W.; Li, J.; Zhou, J.; Li, Z.; Li, F.; Li, X. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated SlMYC2 mutagenesis adverse to tomato plant growth and MeJA-induced fruit resistance to Botrytis cinerea. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 5529–5538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Liu, B.; Ouyang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Hong, Y.; Huang, L.; Liu, S.; Zhang, H.; Li, D.; Song, F. Tomato NAC transcription factor SlSRN1 positively regulates defense response against biotic stress but negatively regulates abiotic stress response. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e102067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Le Hénanff, G.; Profizi, C.; Courteaux, B.; Rabenoelina, F.; Gérard, C.; Clément, C.; Baillieul, F.; Cordelier, S.; Dhondt-Cordelier, S. Grapevine NAC1 transcription factor as a convergent node in developmental processes, abiotic stresses, and necrotrophic/biotrophic pathogen tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 4877–4893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lu, C.K.; Liang, G. Fe deficiency-induced ethylene synthesis confers resistance to Botrytis cinerea. New Phytol. 2022, 237, 1843–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhu, Z.; Tian, S. Resistant responses of tomato fruit treated with exogenous methyl jasmonate to Botrytis cinerea infection. Sci. Hortic. 2012, 142, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Gupta, R.; Pizarro, L.; Leibman-Markus, M.; Marash, I.; Bar, M. Cytokinin response induces immunity and fungal pathogen resistance, and modulates trafficking of the PRR LeEIX2 in tomato. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2020, 21, 1287–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Ha, S.T.T.; Kim, Y.-T.; Jeon, Y.H.; Choi, H.W.; In, B.-C. Regulation of Botrytis cinerea infection and gene expression in cut roses by using nano silver and salicylic acid. Plants 2021, 10, 1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Denancé, N.; Sánchez-Vallet, A.; Goffner, D.; Molina, A. Disease resistance or growth: The role of plant hormones in balancing immune responses and fitness costs. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Ishiguro, S.; Kawai-Oda, A.; Ueda, J.; Nishida, I.; Okada, K. The DEFECTIVE IN ANTHER DEHISCENCE1 gene encodes a novel phospholipase A1 catalyzing the initial step of jasmonic acid biosynthesis, which synchronizes pollen maturation, anther dehiscence, and flower opening in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2001, 13, 2191–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Acosta, I.F.; Farmer, E.E. Jasmonates. Arab. Book 2010, 8, e0129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Yu, M.; Shen, L.; Fan, B.; Zhao, D.; Zheng, Y.; Sheng, J. The effect of MeJA on ethylene biosynthesis and induced disease resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2009, 54, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Li, Z.; Wei, Y.; Cao, Z.; Jiang, S.; Chen, Y.; Shao, X. The jasmonic acid signaling pathway is associated with terpinen-4-ol-induced disease resistance against Botrytis cinerea in strawberry fruit. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 10678–10687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Yeo, I.-C.; Manhaes, A.M.E.d.A.; Liu, J.; Avila, J.; He, P.; Devarenne, T.P. An unexpected role for tomato threonine deaminase 2 in host defense against bacterial infection. Plant Physiol. 2022, 192, 527–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Luo, D.; Sun, W.; Cai, J.; Hu, G.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, X.; Larkin, R.M.; Zhang, J.; Yang, C.; Ye, Z.; et al. SlBBX20 attenuates JA signalling and regulates resistance to Botrytis cinerea by inhibiting SlMED25 in tomato. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2023, 21, 792–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yan, J.; Zhang, C.; Gu, M.; Bai, Z.; Zhang, W.; Qi, T.; Cheng, Z.; Peng, W.; Luo, H.; Nan, F.; et al. The Arabidopsis coronatine insensitive1 protein is a jasmonate receptor. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 2220–2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Li, R.; Wang, L.; Li, Y.; Zhao, R.; Zhang, Y.; Sheng, J.; Ma, P.; Shen, L. Knockout of SlNPR1 enhances tomato plants resistance against Botrytis cinerea by modulating ROS homeostasis and JA/ET signaling pathways. Physiol. Plant. 2020, 170, 569–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Tang, Q.; Zheng, X.-D.; Guo, J.; Yu, T. Tomato SlPti5 plays a regulative role in the plant immune response against Botrytis cinerea through modulation of ROS system and hormone pathways. J. Integr. Agric. 2022, 21, 697–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Min, D.; Ai, W.; Zhou, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, X.; Li, Z.; Shi, Z.; Li, F.; Li, X.; Guo, Y. SlARG2 contributes to MeJA-induced defense responses to Botrytis cinerea in tomato fruit. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 3292–3301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Jia, H.; Zhang, C.; Pervaiz, T.; Zhao, P.; Liu, Z.; Wang, B.; Wang, C.; Zhang, L.; Fang, J.; Qian, J. Jasmonic acid involves in grape fruit ripening and resistant against Botrytis cinerea. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2016, 16, 79–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Zhang, L.; Song, Y.; Liu, K.; Gong, F. The tomato mediator subunit MED8 positively regulates plant response to Botrytis cinerea. J. Plant Physiol. 2021, 266, 153533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Chung, H.S.; Howe, G.A. A critical role for the TIFY motif in repression of jasmonate signaling by a stabilized splice variant of the JASMONATE ZIM-domain protein JAZ10 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2009, 21, 131–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Zhang, G.; Yan, X.; Zhang, S.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Qiao, H.; van Nocker, S.; Li, Z.; Wang, X. The jasmonate-ZIM domain gene VqJAZ4 from the Chinese wild grape Vitis quinquangularis improves resistance to powdery mildew in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 143, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Chen, Z.; Zheng, Z.; Huang, J.; Lai, Z.; Fan, B. Biosynthesis of salicylic acid in plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2009, 4, 493–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Métraux, J.-P. Recent breakthroughs in the study of salicylic acid biosynthesis. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 332–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ward, E.R.; Uknes, S.J.; Williams, S.C.; Dincher, S.S.; Wiederhold, D.L.; Alexander, D.C.; Ahl-Goy, P.; Metraux, J.-P.; Ryals, J.A. Coordinate gene activity in response to agents that induce systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell 1991, 3, 1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Wang, K.; Li, C.; Lei, C.; Jiang, Y.; Qiu, L.; Zou, X.; Zheng, Y. β-aminobutyric acid induces priming defence against Botrytis cinerea in grapefruit by reducing intercellular redox status that modifies posttranslation of VvNPR1 and its interaction with VvTGA1. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 156, 552–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. El Oirdi, M.; El Rahman, T.A.; Rigano, L.; El Hadrami, A.; Rodriguez, M.C.; Daayf, F.; Vojnov, A.; Bouarab, K. Botrytis cinerea manipulates the antagonistic effects between immune pathways to promote disease development in tomato. Plant Cell. 2011, 23, 2405–2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Luo, J.; Yu, W.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Peng, F. FaSnRK1α Mediates Salicylic Acid Pathways to Enhance Strawberry Resistance to Botrytis cinerea Manipulates the Antagonistic Effects between Immune Pathways to Promote Disease Development in Tomato. Hortic. Plant J. 2023; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Chae, H.S.; Kieber, J.J. Eto Brute. Role of ACS turnover in regulating ethylene biosynthesis. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Hua, J.; Chang, C.; Sun, Q.; Meyerowitz, E.M. Ethylene insensitivity conferred by Arabidopsis ERS gene. Science 1995, 269, 1712–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hua, J.; Sakai, H.; Nourizadeh, S.; Chen, Q.G.; Bleecker, A.B.; Ecker, J.R.; Meyerowitz, E.M. EIN4 and ERS2 are members of the putative ethylene receptor gene family in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 1321–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Chang, C.; Kwok, S.F.; Bleecker, A.B.; Meyerowitz, E.M. Arabidopsis ethylene-response gene ETR1: Similarity of product to two-component regulators. Science 1993, 262, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Kieber, J.J.; Rothenberg, M.; Roman, G.; Feldmann, K.A.; Ecker, J.R. CTR1, a negative regulator of the ethylene response pathway in arabidopsis, encodes a member of the Raf family of protein kinases. Cell 1993, 72, 427–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kendrick, M.D.; Chang, C. Ethylene signaling: New levels of complexity and regulation. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2008, 11, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ju, C.; Yoon, G.M.; Shemansky, J.M.; Lin, D.Y.; Ying, Z.I.; Chang, J.; Garrett, W.M.; Kessenbrock, M.; Groth, G.; Tucker, M.L.; et al. CTR1 phosphorylates the central regulator EIN2 to control ethylene hormone signaling from the ER membrane to the nucleus in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 19486–19491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Guo, H.; Ecker, J.R. Plant responses to ethylene gas are mediated by SCFEBF1/EBF2-dependent proteolysis of EIN3 transcription factor. Cell 2003, 115, 667–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Potuschak, T.; Lechner, E.; Parmentier, Y.; Yanagisawa, S.; Grava, S.; Koncz, C.; Genschik, P. EIN3-dependent regulation of plant ethylene hormone signaling by two Arabidopsis F box proteins: EBF1 and EBF2. Cell 2003, 115, 679–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Binder, B.M.; Walker, J.M.; Gagne, J.M.; Emborg, T.J.; Hemmann, G.; Bleecker, A.B.; Vierstra, R.D. The Arabidopsis EIN3 binding F-box proteins EBF1 and EBF2 have distinct but overlapping roles in ethylene signaling. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 509–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Ju, C.; Chang, C. Mechanistic Insights in ethylene perception and signal transduction. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Diaz, J.; Have, A.T.; van Kan, J.A. The role of ethylene and wound signaling in resistance of tomato to Botrytis cinerea. Plant Physiol. 2002, 129, 1341–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Nambeesan, S.; Abu Qamar, S.; Laluk, K.; Mattoo, A.K.; Mickelbart, M.V.; Ferruzzi, M.G.; Mengiste, T.; Handa, A.K. Polyamines attenuate ethylene-mediated defense responses to abrogate resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato. Plant Physiol. 2011, 158, 1034–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Yu, W.; Zhao, R.; Sheng, J.; Shen, L. SlERF2 is associated with methyl jasmonate-mediated defense response against Botrytis cinerea in tomato fruit. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 9923–9932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Alvarez-Gómez, T.B.; Ramírez-Trujillo, J.A.; Ramírez-Yáñez, M.; Suárez-Rodríguez, R. Overexpression of SlERF3b and SlERF5 in transgenic tomato alters fruit size, number of seeds and promotes early flowering, tolerance to abiotic stress and resistance to Botrytis cinerea infection. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2021, 179, 382–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ouyang, Z.; Liu, S.; Huang, L.; Hong, Y.; Li, X.; Huang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, D.; Song, F. Tomato SlERF.A1, SlERF.B4, SlERF.C3 and SlERF.A3, Members of B3 group of ERF family, are required for resistance to Botrytis cinerea. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Li, S.; Wu, P.; Yu, X.; Cao, J.; Chen, X.; Gao, L.; Chen, K.; Grierson, D. Contrasting roles of ethylene response factors in pathogen response and ripening in fleshy fruit. Cells 2022, 11, 2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Zheng, H.; Jin, R.; Liu, Z.; Sun, C.; Shi, Y.; Grierson, D.; Zhu, C.; Li, S.; Ferguson, I.; Chen, K. Role of the tomato fruit ripening regulator MADS-RIN in resistance to Botrytis cinerea infection. Food Qual. Saf. 2021, 5, fyab028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Sun, Y.; Liang, B.; Wang, J.; Kai, W.; Chen, P.; Jiang, L.; Du, Y.; Leng, P. SlPti4 affects regulation of fruit ripening, seed germination and stress responses by modulating ABA signaling in tomato. Plant Cell Physiol. 2018, 59, 1956–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Zhu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Chai, S.; Yin, W.; Gao, M.; Li, Z.; Wang, X. The transcription factors VaERF16 and VaMYB306 interact to enhance resistance of grapevine to Botrytis cinerea infection. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2022, 23, 1415–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Wan, R.; Guo, C.; Hou, X.; Zhu, Y.; Gao, M.; Hu, X.; Zhang, S.; Jiao, C.; Guo, R.; Li, Z.; et al. Comparative transcriptomic analysis highlights contrasting levels of resistance of Vitis vinifera and Vitis amurensis to Botrytis cinerea. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Zou, J.; Li, N.; Hu, N.; Tang, N.; Cao, H.; Liu, Y.; Chen, J.; Jian, W.; Gao, Y.; Yang, J.; et al. Co-silencing of ABA receptors (SlRCAR) reveals interactions between ABA and ethylene signaling during tomato fruit ripening. Hortic. Res. 2022, 9, uhac057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Li, Z.-X.; Lan, J.-B.; Liu, Y.-Q.; Qi, L.-W.; Tang, J.-M. Investigation of the role of AcTPR2 in kiwifruit and its response to Botrytis cinerea infection. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Wang, R.; Liu, K.; Tang, B.; Su, D.; He, X.; Deng, H.; Wu, M.; Bouzayen, M.; Grierson, D.; Liu, M. The MADS-box protein SlTAGL1 regulates a ripening-associated SlDQD/SDH2 involved in flavonoid biosynthesis and resistance against Botrytis cinerea in post-harvest tomato fruit. Plant J. 2023, 115, 1746–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Ma, L.; Haile, Z.M.; Sabbadini, S.; Mezzetti, B.; Negrini, F.; Baraldi, E. Functional characterization of MANNOSE-BINDING LECTIN 1, a G-type lectin gene family member, in response to fungal pathogens of strawberry. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 74, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Perk, E.A.; Di Palma, A.A.; Colman, S.; Mariani, O.; Cerrudo, I.; D’ambrosio, J.M.; Robuschi, L.; Pombo, M.A.; Rosli, H.G.; Villareal, F.; et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated phospholipase C 2 knock-out tomato plants are more resistant to Botrytis cinerea. Planta 2023, 257, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Gonorazky, G.; Guzzo, M.C.; Abd-El-Haliem, A.M.; Joosten, M.H.; Laxalt, A.M. Silencing of the tomato phosphatidylinositol-phospholipase C2 (SlPLC2) reduces plant susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2016, 17, 1354–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Zheng, X.; Yuan, Y.; Huang, B.; Hu, X.; Tang, Y.; Xu, X.; Wu, M.; Gong, Z.; Luo, Y.; Gong, M.; et al. Control of fruit softening and Ascorbic acid accumulation by manipulation of SlIMP3 in tomato. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2022, 20, 1213–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. López-Casado, G.; Sánchez-Raya, C.; Ric-Varas, P.D.; Paniagua, C.; Blanco-Portales, R.; Muñoz-Blanco, J.; Pose, S.; Matas, A.J.; Mercado, J.A. CRISPR/Cas9 editing of the polygalacturonase FaPG1 gene improves strawberry fruit firmness. Hortic. Res. 2023, 10, uhad011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Pei, Y.; Xue, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Shu, P.; Deng, H.; Bouzayen, M.; Hong, Y.; Liu, M. β-1,3-GLUCANASE10 regulates tomato development and disease resistance by modulating callose deposition. Plant Physiol. 2023, 192, 2785–2802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. González, M.; Brito, N.; González, C. The Botrytis cinerea elicitor protein BcIEB1 interacts with the tobacco PR5-family protein osmotin and protects the fungus against its antifungal activity. New Phytol. 2017, 215, 397–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Yu, X.; Feng, B.; He, P.; Shan, L. From Chaos to Harmony: Responses and Signaling upon Microbial Pattern Recognition. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2017, 55, 109–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Yuan, M.; Jiang, Z.; Bi, G.; Nomura, K.; Liu, M.; Wang, Y.; Cai, B.; Zhou, J.-M.; He, S.Y.; Xin, X.-F. Pattern-recognition receptors are required for NLR-mediated plant immunity. Nature 2021, 592, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Guo, J.; Cheng, Y. Advances in fungal elicitor-triggered plant immunity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Arenas, Y.C.; Kalkman, E.R.; Schouten, A.; Dieho, M.; Vredenbregt, P.; Uwumukiza, B.; Ruiz, M.O.; van Kan, J.A. Functional analysis and mode of action of phytotoxic Nep1-like proteins of Botrytis cinerea. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2010, 74, 376–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Frías, M.; González, M.; González, C.; Brito, N. A 25-residue peptide from Botrytis cinerea xylanase bcxyn11a elicits plant defensess. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Frías, M.; González, C.; Brito, N. BcSpl1, a cerato-platanin family protein, contributes to Botrytis cinerea virulence and elicits the hypersensitive response in the host. New Phytol. 2011, 192, 483–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Yang, C.; Liang, Y.; Qiu, D.; Zeng, H.; Yuan, J.; Yang, X. Lignin metabolism involves Botrytis cinerea BcGs1- induced defense response in tomato. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Zhang, L.; Kars, I.; Essenstam, B.; Liebrand, T.W.H.; Wagemakers, L.; Elberse, J.; Tagkalaki, P.; Tjoitang, D.; van den Ackerveken, G.; van Kan, J.A.L. Fungal endopolygalacturonases are recognized as microbe-associated molecular patterns by the Arabidopsis receptor-like protein RESPONSIVENESS TO BOTRYTIS POLYGALACTURONASES1. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 352–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Yang, Y.; Yang, X.; Dong, Y.; Qiu, D. The Botrytis cinerea xylanase BcXyl1 modulates plant immunity. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Bi, K.; Scalschi, L.; Jaiswal, N.; Mengiste, T.; Fried, R.; Sanz, A.B.; Arroyo, J.; Zhu, W.; Masrati, G.; Sharon, A. The Botrytis cinerea Crh1 transglycosylase is a cytoplasmic effector triggering plant cell death and defense response. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Zhu, W.; Yu, M.; Xu, R.; Bi, K.; Yu, S.; Xiong, C.; Liu, Z.; Sharon, A.; Jiang, D.; Wu, M.; et al. Botrytis cinerea BcSSP2 protein is a late infection phase, cytotoxic effector. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 24, 3420–3435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Latgé, J.-P. The cell wall: A carbohydrate armour for the fungal cell. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 66, 279–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Wan, J.; Zhang, S.; Stacey, G. Activation of a mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in Arabidopsis by chitin. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2004, 5, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Promyou, S.; Raruang, Y.; Chen, Z.-Y. Melatonin treatment of strawberry fruit during storage extends its post-harvest quality and reduces infection caused by Botrytis cinerea. Foods 2023, 12, 1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Li, S.; Cheng, Y.; Yan, R.; Liu, Y.; Huan, C.; Zheng, X. Preharvest spray with melatonin improves postharvest disease resistance in cherry tomato fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2022, 193, 112055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Ha, S.T.T.; Kim, Y.-T.; Yeam, I.; Choi, H.W.; In, B.-C. Molecular dissection of rose and Botrytis cinerea pathosystems affected by ethylene. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2022, 194, 112104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Kumar, V.; Hatan, E.; Bar, E.; Davidovich-Rikanati, R.; Doron-Faigenboim, A.; Spitzer-Rimon, B.; Elad, Y.; Alkan, N.; Lewinsohn, E.; Oren-Shamir, M. Phenylalanine increases chrysanthemum flower immunity against Botrytis cinerea attack. Plant J. 2020, 104, 226–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Desmedt, W.; Jonckheere, W.; Nguyen, V.H.; Ameye, M.; De Zutter, N.; De Kock, K.; Debode, J.; Van Leeuwen, T.; Audenaert, K.; Vanholme, B.; et al. The phenylpropanoid pathway inhibitor piperonylic acid induces broad-spectrum pest and disease resistance in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2021, 44, 3122–3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Zhang, Z.; Lu, S.; Yu, W.; Ehsan, S.; Zhang, Y.; Jia, H.; Fang, J. Jasmonate increases terpene synthase expression, leading to strawberry resistance to Botrytis cinerea infection. Plant Cell Rep. 2022, 41, 1243–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Naeemi, M.H.; Jari, S.K.; Zarinnia, V.; Fatehi, F. Changes in physio-biochemical status of cut of rose (Rosa hybrida L. cv. Samurai) flowers under methyl Jasmonate, brassinosteroid, and fungal elicitor to control gray mold. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 306, 111402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Hasanzadeh-Naemi, M.; Jari, S.K.; Zarrinnia, V.; Fatehi, F. The effect of exogenous methyl jasmonate and brassinosteroid on physicochemical traits, vase life, and gray mold disease of cut rose (Rosa hybrida L.) flowers. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2021, 20, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Li, Y.; Li, S.; Du, R.; Wang, J.; Li, H.; Xie, D.; Yan, J. Isoleucine enhances plant resistance against Botrytis cinerea via jasmonate signaling pathway. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 628328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Li, C.; Wang, K.; Tan, M.; Lei, C.; Cao, S. Involvement of a receptor-like kinase complex of FvFLS2 and FvBAK1 in brassinosteroids-induced immunity in postharvest strawberry fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2023, 198, 112266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Cao, X.; Yan, H.; Liu, X.; Li, D.; Sui, M.; Wu, J.; Yu, H.; Zhang, Z. A detached petal disc assay and virus-induced gene silencing facilitate the study of Botrytis cinerea resistance in rose flowers. Hortic. Res. 2019, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Sun, C.; Fu, D.; Jin, L.; Chen, M.; Zheng, X.; Yu, T. Chitin isolated from yeast cell wall induces the resistance of tomato fruit to Botrytis cinerea. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 199, 341–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Perato, S.M.; Furio, R.N.; Tomas-Grau, R.H.; Caro, M.d.P.; Hael-Conrad, V.; Díaz-Ricci, J.C.; Martinez-Zamora, M.G. The fungal elicitor AsES requires a functional ethylene pathway to activate the innate immunity in strawberry. Plant Biol. 2020, 22, 1030–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Ouyang, Z.; Li, X.; Huang, L.; Hong, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, D.; Song, F. Elicitin-like proteins Oli-D1 and Oli-D2 from Pythium oligandrum trigger hypersensitive response in Nicotiana benthamiana and induce resistance against Botrytis cinerea in tomato. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2015, 16, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Bi, K.; Liang, Y.; Mengiste, T.; Sharon, A. Killing softly: A roadmap of Botrytis cinerea pathogenicity. Trends Plant Sci. 2022, 28, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Horticulturae 09 01178 g001
Figure 1. Immune responses against B. cinerea in tomato. Chitin, other pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), and phytosulfokin (PSK) are recognized by receptor-like proteins and kinases that serve as PRRs. SlLYK4 interacts with SlCERK1, which recognizes chitin from B. cinerea. SlRIPK influences downstream ROS, while SlPSKR1 recognizes PSK, but how it works remains unclear. The activation of MAPK cascade is an important component of PTI signaling. Several major classes of transcription factors (TFs), mainly including WRKYs, ERFs, MYBs, bHLHs, and NACs, were implicated in immune responses to B. cinerea and may be targets of MAPK phosphorylation. These TFs influence the level of plant defense hormones by modulating gene expression. Mediator is an evolutionarily conserved multisubunit complex that regulates the function of RNA merase. Tomato mediator complex SlMED8 and SlMED25 contribute to immune responses to B. cinerea by modulating gene expression. Some other genes in the cytoplasm also affect the metabolites and phytohormones signaling.
Figure 1. Immune responses against B. cinerea in tomato. Chitin, other pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), and phytosulfokin (PSK) are recognized by receptor-like proteins and kinases that serve as PRRs. SlLYK4 interacts with SlCERK1, which recognizes chitin from B. cinerea. SlRIPK influences downstream ROS, while SlPSKR1 recognizes PSK, but how it works remains unclear. The activation of MAPK cascade is an important component of PTI signaling. Several major classes of transcription factors (TFs), mainly including WRKYs, ERFs, MYBs, bHLHs, and NACs, were implicated in immune responses to B. cinerea and may be targets of MAPK phosphorylation. These TFs influence the level of plant defense hormones by modulating gene expression. Mediator is an evolutionarily conserved multisubunit complex that regulates the function of RNA merase. Tomato mediator complex SlMED8 and SlMED25 contribute to immune responses to B. cinerea by modulating gene expression. Some other genes in the cytoplasm also affect the metabolites and phytohormones signaling.
Horticulturae 09 01178 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, R.; Cheng, Y. Recent Advances in Mechanisms Underlying Defense Responses of Horticultural Crops to Botrytis cinerea. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 1178. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9111178

AMA Style

Li R, Cheng Y. Recent Advances in Mechanisms Underlying Defense Responses of Horticultural Crops to Botrytis cinerea. Horticulturae. 2023; 9(11):1178. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9111178

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Rui, and Yulin Cheng. 2023. "Recent Advances in Mechanisms Underlying Defense Responses of Horticultural Crops to Botrytis cinerea" Horticulturae 9, no. 11: 1178. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9111178

APA Style

Li, R., & Cheng, Y. (2023). Recent Advances in Mechanisms Underlying Defense Responses of Horticultural Crops to Botrytis cinerea. Horticulturae, 9(11), 1178. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9111178

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop