Spin Frustrated Pyrazolato Triangular CuII Complex: Structure and Magnetic Properties, an Overview

Cañón-Mancisidor, Walter; Hermosilla-Ibáñez, Patricio; Spodine, Evgenia; Paredes-García, Verónica; Gómez-García, Carlos J.; Venegas-Yazigi, Diego

doi:10.3390/magnetochemistry9060155

Open AccessEditor’s ChoiceArticle

Spin Frustrated Pyrazolato Triangular Cu^II Complex: Structure and Magnetic Properties, an Overview

by

Walter Cañón-Mancisidor

^1,2,*

,

Patricio Hermosilla-Ibáñez

^3,4

,

Evgenia Spodine

^2,3,*,

Verónica Paredes-García

^3,5

,

Carlos J. Gómez-García

⁶

and

Diego Venegas-Yazigi

^3,4,*

¹

Departamento de Matemáticas y Ciencias de la Ingeniería (DMCI), Facultad de Ingeniería, Ciencia y Tecnología (FICyT), Universidad Bernardo O’Higgins (UBO), Av. Viel 1497, Santiago 8370993, Chile

²

Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad de Chile, Dr. Carlos Lorca Tobar 964, Santiago 8391063, Chile

³

Centro para el Desarrollo de la Nanociencia y Nanotecnología, (CEDENNA), USACH, Av. Lib. Bernardo O’Higgins 3363, Estacion Central 9170022, Chile

⁴

Departamento de Química de los Materiales, Facultad de Química y Biología, Universidad de Santiago de Chile (USACH), Av. Libertador Bernardo O´Higgins 3363, Estacion Central 9170022, Chile

⁵

Departamento de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Andrés Bello, Republica 275, Santiago 8370146, Chile

⁶

Departamento de Química Inorgánica, Universidad de Valencia, C/Dr. Moliner 50, Burjasot, CP-46100 Valencia, Spain

^*

Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Magnetochemistry 2023, 9(6), 155; https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry9060155

Submission received: 19 May 2023 / Revised: 6 June 2023 / Accepted: 9 June 2023 / Published: 11 June 2023

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symmetry and Geometry, Key Parameters in 3d and 4f Molecular Magnetism)

Download

Browse Figures

Versions Notes

Abstract

:

The synthesis and structural characterization of a new triangular Cu₃–μ₃OH pyrazolato complex of formula, [Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(pz)₃(Hpz)₃][BF₄]₂ (1−Cu₃), Hpz = pyrazole, is presented. The triangular unit forms a quasi-isosceles triangle with Cu–Cu distances of 3.3739(9), 3.3571(9), and 3.370(1) Å. This complex is isostructural to the hexanuclear complex [Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(pz)₃(Hpz)₃](ClO₄)₂]₂ (QOPJIP). A comparative structural analysis with other reported triangular Cu₃–μ₃OH pyrazolato complexes has been carried out, showing that, depending on the pyrazolato derivative, an auxiliary ligand or counter-anion can affect the nuclearity and/or the dimensionality of the system. The magnetic properties of 1−Cu₃ are analyzed using experimental data and DFT calculation. A detailed analysis was performed on the magnetic properties, comparing experimental and theoretical data of other molecular triangular Cu₃–μ₃OH complexes, showing that the displacement of the μ₃−OH⁻ from the Cu₃ plane, together with the type of organic ligands, influences the nature of the magnetic exchange interaction between the spin-carrier centers, since it affects the overlap of the magnetic orbitals involved in the exchange pathways. Finally, a detailed comparison of the magnetic properties of 1−Cu₃ and QOPJIP was carried out, which allowed us to understand the differences in their magnetic properties.

Keywords:

Cu₃–μ₃OH complex; pyrazolato ligands; trinuclear complex; spin frustration; magnetic susceptibility; antisymmetric exchange; DFT calculations

1. Introduction

Triangular Cu^II complexes have been largely studied in the literature, and among them, several systems present a μ₃−X⁻ (X = Cl⁻, Br⁻, OH⁻, O²⁻) bridging unit that, together with other organic auxiliary ligands enables obtaining very stable systems [1,2,3,4,5]. Due to their high stability, these triangular fragments can be used as secondary building units (SBU) in constructing several coordination polymers or MOF systems [6,7,8,9].

Moreover, triangular complexes are an interesting class of materials, since they have been suggested as possible qubits, as they can present spin–electron coupling due to the interplay between three main factors (spin exchange, spin–orbit interaction, and chirality) [10,11,12,13,14,15]. Spin frustration (SF) has been suggested as the origin of the abovementioned features. This phenomenon originates when an odd number of non-integer spin carriers that are antiferromagnetically coupled cannot be satisfied simultaneously, like in a triangular system [16]. Thus, the energy of the ground state is doubly degenerate, but distortions of the C₃ symmetry of the triangle or by the antisymmetric exchange, which is related to spin–orbit interactions, can break this degeneracy by lowering the symmetry of the system [17,18]. The antisymmetric exchange introduced by Dzyaloshinsky–Moriya explains the origin of spin-canting in magnetic systems. They were considering the isotropic exchange, which tends to align the spins of the system in a parallel or antiparallel way, depending on the nature of the magnetic interaction, and the antisymmetric exchange, which tends to be arranged perpendicularly to each of the spins of the system. Both interactions compete with each other, giving rise to a small canting angle [19,20].

These triangular Cu^II systems have been largely, studied since they formed the simplest spin triangle. This has allowed for the possibility of studying the magnetic properties of geometrically spin-frustrated systems in detail [21]. Among these systems, the ones with a hydroxy bridge (μ₃−OH⁻) are among the most reported in the literature [22,23]. Systems presenting pyrazolato, triazolato, and other types of auxiliary organic ligands, have been magnetically studied in the literature [24,25]. In general, the displacement of the μ₃−OH⁻ from the Cu₃ plane, together with the type of organic ligand, has been related to the nature of the magnetic exchange interaction between the spin-carrier centers, since they affect the overlap of the magnetic orbitals involved in the exchange pathways [26].

Among all the mentioned systems, Cu₃–μ₃OH pyrazolato complexes are among the most reported systems, and they present strong antiferromagnetic properties [27,28]. However, they have not been extensively analyzed in the search of magneto-structural features, as has been done for the triazolato complexes [19]. Depending on the pyrazolato derivative, auxiliary ligand, or counter-anion, these compounds may present different nuclearity and/or dimensionality [3,24].

In this work, we present the synthesis and structural characterization of a triangular Cu₃–μ₃OH pyrazolato complex of formula, [Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(pz)₃(Hpz)₃][BF₄]₂ (1−Cu₃), Hpz = pyrazole. Interestingly, this trinuclear complex is isostructural to the hexanuclear QOPJIP structure [Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(pz)₃(Hpz)₃(ClO₄)₂]₂, since the perchlorate anions connect the two triangular units [29]. An extensive structural analysis with other reported triangular Cu₃–μ₃OH pyrazolato complexes has been performed. The magnetic properties of 1−Cu₃ were analyzed using experimental data together with DFT calculation, showing that strong antiferromagnetic interactions exist between the Cu^II centers. We present a detailed analysis of the magnetic properties of 1−Cu₃_, and compare them with the experimental data of other molecular triangular Cu₃–μ₃OH pyrazolato complexes and the theoretical magnetic properties of a previously reported Cu₃–μ₃OH complex [26]. Finally, we perform a detailed study of the magnetic properties of 1−Cu₃ and QOPJIP to understand the differences in their magnetic properties.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. ESI Mass and FTIR Spectra

ESI–MS in a positive mode (acetonitrile) showed the existence of different fragments of the [Cu₃–μ₃OH]ⁿ⁺ unit, such as: ([Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(pz)₃(Hpz)₃][BF₄])⁺ (m/Z = 700); ([Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(pz)₃(Hpz)₃] + 1e⁻)⁺ (m/Z = 613); ([Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(pz)₃(Hpz)₂] + 1e⁻)⁺ (m/Z = 544); ([Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(pz)₃(Hpz)₁] + 1e⁻)⁺ (m/Z = 476); and ([Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(pz)₃)⁺ (m/Z = 408). See Figure S1. Complementary analyses (EA and FTIR spectroscopy) confirmed the purity of the crystalline material (see Supporting Information, Section S2, FTIR).

2.2. Structure Analysis

The triangular complex (1−Cu₃) crystallizes in the centrosymmetric monoclinic space group P2₁/c (for more information, see CIF file and Section S3). The molecular structure consists of a triangular [Cu₃–μ₃OH]ⁿ⁺ core, surrounded by three protonated Hpz and three deprotonated pz⁻ ligands, forming the cationic complex [Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(pz)₃(Hpz)₃]²⁺, which is counterbalanced by two tetrafluoroborate anions. The trinuclear unit is formed by two Cu^II (Cu1 and Cu3) centers with a square pyramid (SqP) geometry, and an octahedral Cu2 center (O_h) with a Jahn–Teller distortion. This triangular unit presents pseudo-three-fold symmetry, forming an isosceles triangle, with copper–copper distances of 3.3740(8), 3.3574(8), and 3.3702(8) Å for Cu1–Cu2, Cu2–Cu3, and Cu1–Cu3, respectively. As observed for similar systems, the μ₃−OH⁻ group is not coplanar with the plane formed by the three copper centers, displaced by 0.439 Å. Other displacements reported in the literature for the [Cu₃–μ₃OH]ⁿ⁺ are in the range of 0.363 and 0.759 Å [28,30]. The metal centers present three different types of Cu–O, Cu–N, and Cu–F bonds. The first is around 2.00 Å, the second is between 1.98 and 2.02 Å, and the third is between 2.48 and 2.58 Å (Figure 1).

An original aspect of 1−Cu₃ is the presence of two [BF₄]⁻ counter-anions (B1 and B2) coordinated to the copper centers of the trinuclear unit. In fact, 1−Cu₃ is the first example of a triangular pyrazolato complex with this type of counter-anion. One of the [BF₄]⁻ anions (B1) presents a μ₃ coordination mode, with three F atoms coordinated to the three Cu^II centers (with F–Cu distances of 2.483(3), 2.530(4), and 2.581(4) Å). The other [BF₄]⁻ anion (B2) is only coordinated by one F atom to a single Cu^II center (Cu2-F5 = 2.557(4) Å). The structure presents an inversion center (outside the complex) that generates a second triangular [Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(pz)₃(Hpz)₃][BF₄]₂ unit, where the fluorine atom (F7) of the [BF₄]⁻ anion (B2) is semi-coordinated to Cu1 with a long distance of 2.812(3) Å. Finally, it is worth mentioning that between the triangular units, there are some hydrogen bonds that stabilize the crystal lattice of the complex, with inter-cluster Cu–Cu distances ranging between 7.309(1) and 13.4522(9) Å (Figure 2).

According to the CCDC database, there are at least 96 structures based on pyrazolato (R-pz⁻) ligands, forming complexes with the general formula [Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(R-pz)₃(L)₃]^n+/−, where R = –H, –CH₃, –NO₂, among others, and L = pz^0/−, Cl⁻, H₂O, NO₃⁻, etc. [2,8,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. The nature of the axial ligand and the type of substitution of the pz⁻ ligand leads to the formation of either high dimensional systems (usually for R = –COO⁻) or discrete complexes. If the axial ligand is monodentate or acts as a chelate, or if the pz⁻ ligand substituent group cannot coordinate with other metal centers, discrete (0D) systems are formed (see Table 1). As a general trend, we observe that when larger ligands are present either as axial or auxiliar ligands, the distance between the Cu₃ plane and the μ₃−OH⁻ group increases. We also observe that when auxiliary ligands are present, the triangular units can form hexanuclear units by coordinating these auxiliar ligands to the metal centers of the closest triangular units (RUYGEX, RUYGIB, RUYHEY, RETQUD, QOPJIP, DIBXOC, EGIXUQ, EHOLIZ).

Among the compounds listed in Table 1, QOPJIP [Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(pz)₃(Hpz)₃][ClO₄]₂) [29] is isostructural to 1−Cu₃ ([Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(pz)₃(Hpz)₃][BF₄]₂), although there are some differences, mainly related to the nature of the counter-anion. The smaller size of the [BF₄]⁻ unit located between the two triangular units (compared to ClO₄⁻) leads to an important shortening of the distances between the Cu₃ planes for 1−Cu₃ (6.789 Å), as compared to QOPJIP (7.044 Å). This shortening allows for the formation of a hydrogen bond between F8 and the hydrogen atom of the μ₃−OH^- group (not observed in QOPJIP), enlarging the O–H bond in 1−Cu₃ (0.991 Å), compared to QOPJIP (0.979 Å). The lower coordination capacity of BF₄⁻ compared to ClO₄⁻ is clearly observed in 1−Cu₃, where the Cu₃(μ₃−OH) units are isolated (except for a very long semi-coordinated Cu1–F7 bond of 2.811(3) Å). In contrast, in QOPJIP, the ClO₄⁻ anion connects two triangular Cu₃ units through four short Cu–O bonds (in the range of 2.44–2.66 Å) to form a hexanuclear complex.

2.3. Magnetic Properties. dc Magnetic Analysis

The thermal variation of the product of the molar magnetic susceptibility per Cu₃ unit multiplied by the the temperature for 1−Cu₃, measured with a DC field of 100 mT, shows a value of around 0.5 cm³ K mol⁻¹ at 300 K (Figure 3). This value is below the expected one for three uncoupled paramagnetic Cu(II) ions (1.125 cm³ K mol⁻¹ with g = 2.0), indicating the existence of bulk antiferromagnetic interactions between the Cu^II atoms of the Cu₃(μ₃−OH) core. When the temperature is lowered, χ_mT steadily decreases, reaching a plateau between 130 and 100 K. Below 100 K, χ_mT further decreases and reaches a value of 0.26 cm³ K mol⁻¹ at 2 K. The χ_mT value in the plateau is 0.38–0.40 cm³ K mol⁻¹, which is the expected value for a trinuclear unit with an S = 1/2 ground state [19,29]. The field dependence of the magnetization at 2 K for 1−Cu₃ shows a value of around 0.7 μ_B at 5 T, corresponding to ca. 0.7 electrons, although saturation is not fully reached at 5 T (Figure 3). This behavior is typical of systems with a μ₃-hydroxido moiety with a ground state of S = ½ (M = 1 μ_B), that present magnetization values below the expected ones and do not reach saturation, even at high fields [22,39]. Comparing the experimental data with those calculated using the PHI program (see below) for 1−Cu₃ shows a good agreement between them. The lower values of the experimental data confirm the presence of an antisymmetric exchange.

The magnetic behavior observed for the χT data at low temperatures can be associated with the spin frustration phenomena, which allows for the existence of an antisymmetric exchange, as described by Ferrer et al. [19]. This work describes in detail the antisymmetric exchange interaction in a triangular Cu₃ system based on triazolato derivatives. Additionally, we cannot discard that geometry distortions of the local coordination environment may influence the overall magnetic properties. In this sense, several discussions have arisen from this point, and according to Niedner-Schatteburg et al., spin frustration leads to a geometric distortion [42,43,44].

The fit of the dc experimental data was achieved using the PHI program [45]. At first, only isotropic interactions assuming an isosceles arrangement, i.e., two equal copper distances and one different for the system, were considered, providing a good fit in the 50–300 K range. The best fit in the whole temperature range was obtained by adding the antisymmetric exchange interaction (ASE; G_ij) to the model. It has been extensively discussed in the literature that triangular systems can deviate from the isotropic behavior, presenting non-isotropic magnetic interactions, such as the antisymmetric exchange that tends to arrange the spins perpendicular to each other. The antisymmetric vector is considered equal for each pair (G₁₂ = G₂₃ = G₃₁ = G) and only the z-component is assumed to be non-zero (G_x = G_y = 0) [18,19]. It is important to remark that the antisymmetric exchange can be affected by the distortions of the triangular structure [46,47,48]. Thus, based on the structural arrangement of the Cu^II triangles, we have used a model with two isotropic exchange interactions (J₁ and J₂) for an isosceles triangle and an antisymmetric exchange, using the Hamiltonian equation shown below:

\hat{H} = - 2 J_{1} (S_{1} S_{2} + S_{2} S_{3}) - 2 J_{2} (S_{1} S_{3}) - 2 G ({\hat{S}}_{1} \times {\hat{S}}_{2} + {\hat{S}}_{2} \times {\hat{S}}_{3} + {\hat{S}}_{1} \times {\hat{S}}_{3}) + μ_{B} gH \sum_{i = 1}^{3} {\hat{S}}_{i}

(1)

The best-fit parameters obtained for the isotropic exchange interactions are J₁ = −193.5(6) cm⁻¹ and J₂ = −205.5(3) cm⁻¹, with an antisymmetric exchange parameter |G_Z| = 28 cm⁻¹ (solid line in Figure 3). These values are listed in Table 2, together with the magnetic parameters of selected molecular [Cu₃–μ₃OH]^n+/− pyrazolato complexes. The isotropic interaction values are strongly antiferromagnetic, being similar to those reported for other pyrazolato and triazolato triangular Cu₃–μ₃OH complexes. The antisymmetric exchange interactions for triangular Cu^II hydroxido pyrazolato complexes have only been reported for two systems: VAZCOR (|G_Z| = −18.2 cm⁻¹) and YIFGIG (|G_Z| = −31.2 cm⁻¹) [22,39]. However, for complexes based on the triazolato ligand, there are more examples in the literature, with |G_Z| values between 17.5 and 44 cm⁻¹ [19]. Thus, the isotropic and antisymmetric exchange interactions obtained for 1−Cu₃ are within the range observed for other triangular Cu^II hydroxy compounds (see Table 2).

Magneto-structural analysis on triangular systems was carried out using the experimental data shown in Table 2. According to the literature, two structural parameters have been selected to study their influence on the magnetic properties of these triangular systems. The first is the displacement of the μ₃−OH⁻ from the Cu₃ plane, where the magnetic interaction becomes more antiferromagnetic when the displacement is smaller [49]. The second corresponds to the Cu–(μ₃-X)–Cu angle, which seems to be sensitive to the magnetic coupling interaction. The magnetic coupling interaction is switched from ferromagnetic to antiferromagnetic when the angle varies from 76° to 120° [50]. The analysis of these structural parameters with the average magnetic exchange interactions shows that a general tendency is observed only with the displacement of the μ₃−OH⁻ from the Cu₃ plane (Figure 4).

As mentioned in the Structural Analysis section, 1−Cu₃ and QOPJIP are isostructural crystalline systems. According to the literature, the displacement of the μ₃−OH⁻ group from the Cu₃ plane influences the magnetic properties. This effect shows that a larger displacement causes a weaker antiferromagnetic interaction, which can be related to a weaker overlap of the magnetic orbitals of the Cu^II centers in the triangular system [51]. However, the smaller displacement observed for 1−Cu₃ (0.439 Å) compared to that of QOPJIP (0.466 Å), suggests that 1−Cu₃ should present a stronger antiferromagnetic interaction between the copper centers than QOPJIP. However, the opposite phenomenon is observed (Figure 5).

We have performed DFT calculations to rationalize the magnetic properties observed for 1−Cu3 (see Materials and Methods section) [23]. The results were compared to a previously reported theoretical study on the magnetic properties of several μ₃−OH⁻-bridged trinuclear Cu^II complexes [26]. The theoretical calculations for 1−Cu₃ were carried out at the same level of theory as for the study mentioned above. The geometrical array of the triangular unit for 1−Cu₃ permits defining three exchange pathways, with magnetic exchange interactions of J₁ = −94.9 cm⁻¹, J₂ = −87.7 cm⁻¹, and J₃ = −98.6 cm⁻¹. For QOPJIP, the previously reported DFT calculations also describe three exchange constants: J₁ = −118.3 cm⁻¹, J₂ = −106.0 cm⁻¹, and J₃ = −120.6 cm⁻¹. The difference observed in the magnitude of the magnetic exchange interaction between the calculated and the one obtained from the fitting experimental data for both systems may be related to the so-called strong interaction limit, in which the weak interaction limit treatment of Noodleman would result in J-values being generally twice as larger [23]. This difference could also be because the experimental J-values were obtained from bulk magnetic data that include other magnetic phenomena in the crystalline lattice. On the other hand, DFT calculations can isolate the magnetic phenomena for the molecular structure.

The DFT calculation of 1−Cu₃ was completely validated, since the overlapping parameters, together with their calculated magnetic exchange interactions, fit well on the plot of the J-values of the seven studied complexes as a function of the square of the overlap depicted in the previous work of reference [26]. A linear relationship can be observed, as expected from the Kahn–Briat overlap model (Figure 6). These results permit us to infer that the μ₃−OH⁻-bridged complex contributes to the exchange phenomenon, together with other bridges. Finally, Mulliken spin density values were determined for four spin configurations. The obtained values for the Cu^II atoms were in the 0.60–0.68 e⁻ range, similar to those obtained for other similar Cu^II systems [23,26]. These results reflect that most of the electron spin density is located on the metal centers, and the rest of the spin density appears over the atoms of the first coordination sphere through a delocalization mechanism of the spin density. Figure S3 presents the spin density surfaces for the ferromagnetic solution S_T = 3/2 and three broken-symmetry solutions S_T = 1/2 for 1−Cu₃. It is possible to observe that no polarization mechanism of the spin density is observed for the corresponding second coordination spheres.

Finally, from all the results discussed above, it is possible to conclude that both compounds, 1−Cu₃ and QOPJIP, have a similar trinuclear structure with μ₃−OH⁻ and μ₂−pz⁻ bridges, and both systems show a tetrahedral anion with a μ₃ coordination mode ([BF₄]⁻ and [ClO₄]⁻). The average DFT calculated J-values for 1−Cu3 and QOPJIP were −93.7 and −114.9 cm⁻¹, respectively. The displacement of the μ₃−OH⁻ group from the plane of the three copper atoms is smaller for 1−Cu₃ (0.439 Å) than for QOPJIP (0.466 Å); thus, the first system should have stronger antiferromagnetic interactions, contrasting the experimental values. These results suggest that the μ₃−ClO₄⁻ anion is not an innocent ligand, and favors an antiferromagnetic exchange between the Cu^II centers, resulting in a stronger antiferromagnetic coupling in QOPJIP.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. The Synthesis of [Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(pz)₃(Hpz)₃][BF₄]₂ (1−Cu₃)

Cu(BF₄)₂∙H₂O (765.5 mg, 3 mmol) was dissolved in 20 mL of methanol. Then, a solution of pyrazole (204.2 mg, 3 mmol) and dimethylamine (135.2 mg, 3 mmol) in 15 mL of methanol was added to the first solution. After adding the second solution, the color changed from light blue to greenish−blue in the final solution. The greenish-blue crystals of 1−Cu3, suitable for X-ray diffraction, were obtained within three days through the slow evaporation of the filtered solution at room temperature. Elemental analysis found the following: C, 27.9%; N, 19.5%; H, 3.2%. The calculation for Cu₃C₁₈H₂₂N₁₂OB₂F₈ was as follows: C, 27.5%; N, 21.4%; H, 2.8%. The elemental ratio estimated via electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) was as follows: (exp.) theo. Cu: F = (2.89)3: (8.03)8. ESI–MS in a positive mode (acetonitrile) showed the existence of only [Cu₃(μ₃−OH)]²⁺ unit, confirmed through mass spectrometry results. The experiments show the existence of the ([Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(pz)₃(Hpz)₃][BF₄])⁺ (m/Z = 700); ([Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(pz)₃(Hpz)₃] + 1e⁻)⁺ (m/Z = 613); ([Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(pz)₃(Hpz)₂] + 1e⁻)⁺ (m/Z = 544); ([Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(pz)₃(Hpz)₁] ] + 1e⁻)⁺ (m/Z = 476); ([Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(pz)₃)⁺ (m/Z = 408) (see Figure S1). IR data (KBr, ν_max/cm^-1) 3400m [ν(NH)], 3137w [ν(μ₃−OH⁻)], 1650w, and 1200w [ν_as(CN aromatic)]. See Figure S2.

3.2. Physical Characterization

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was performed using a NICOLET 5700 (Thermofisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in the range 4000–650 cm⁻¹. Elemental analysis (C, N, H) was performed employing microanalytical procedures, using an EA 1108 elemental analyzer (CE Instruments, Wigan, UK). Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI–MS) studies of 1−Cu3 were performed using a QTOF Premier instrument with an orthogonal Z-spray–electrospray interface (Waters, Manchester, UK). A capillary voltage of 3.5 kV was used in the positive scan mode, and the cone voltage was set to 10 V to control the extent of fragmentation.

3.3. X-ray Diffraction

A single crystal of the 1−Cu₃ compound was mounted on a glass fiber, using a hydrocarbon oil to coat the crystal, and then transferred directly to the cold nitrogen stream for data collection. X-ray data were collected at 120 K on a Supernova diffractometer (Rigaku, Austin, TX, USA) equipped with a graphite-monochromated Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source (λ = 0.71073 Å). The program CrysAlisPro, Oxford Diffraction Ltd. (Yarnton, UK), was used for unit cell determination and data reduction. Empirical absorption correction was performed using spherical harmonics, implemented in the SCALE3 ABSPACK scaling algorithm. The structure was solved with the ShelXT structure solution program [52], and refined with the SHELXL-2018 program [53] using Olex 2 [54]. Non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically, and the hydrogen atoms were placed in calculated positions that were refined using idealized geometries (riding model). A summary of the data collection and structure refinements is provided in Table S1. CCDC-2174487 (1−Cu3) contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif. (28 November 2022).

3.4. Magnetic Susceptibility Measurements

Variable temperature susceptibility measurements were carried out for 1−Cu3 in the temperature range of 2–300 K, with an applied magnetic field of 100 mT on a ground polycrystalline sample (with a mass of 37.64 mg), using a Quantum Design (San Diego, CA, USA) MPMS XL-5 SQUID magnetometer. The susceptibility data were corrected for the diamagnetic contributions of the sample using Pascal´s constants [55]. Isothermal magnetization measurements were made between 0 and 5 T at 2 K.

3.5. DFT Calculations of the Magnetic Properties

Spin-unrestricted calculations under the density functional theory approach were performed using the hybrid B3LYP functional [56,57] and a triple-ζ all-electron basis set for all atoms in all the calculations [58]. A guess function was generated using the Jaguar 5.5 code [59]. Total energy calculations were performed with the Gaussian09 code [60], using the quadratic convergence approach with a convergence criterion of 10⁻⁷ a.u. Mulliken spin densities were obtained from single-point calculations using Gaussian09.

The Heisenberg–Dirac-van Vleck spin Hamiltonian used to describe the exchange coupling in the trinuclear complex was

\hat{H} = - \sum_{i > j} J_{ij} S_{i} S_{j}

, where S_i and S_j are the spin operators of the paramagnetic centers of the compound. The J_i parameters are the magnetic coupling constants between neighboring centers with unpaired electrons. Four different spin distributions (three antiferromagnetic and one ferromagnetic) for the system were calculated, and the obtained energies permit evaluating the magnetic exchange constants of the system.

Utilizing the non-projected energy of the broken symmetry solution as the energy of the low-spin state within the DFT methodology produced good results because it avoided the cancellation of the non-dynamic correlation effects, as has been stated in studies carried out by Ruiz et al. Thus, the J-value was obtained using the non-projected method [61,62].

4. Conclusions

A new trinuclear cationic [Cu₃–μ₃OH]ⁿ⁺ complex based on the pyrazolato ligand has been obtained, i.e., [Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(pz)₃(Hpz)₃][BF₄]₂ (1−Cu₃). The triangular complex presents the [BF₄]⁻ as a counter-anion and is isostructural with the QOPJIP system. Nevertheless, the smaller size of the BF₄⁻ anion in 1−Cu₃, compared to the ClO₄⁻ anion in QOPJIP, prevents the connection of the triangular units in 1−Cu₃, in contrast to what is observed for the isostructural complex QOPJIP.

The magnetic data show that strong antiferromagnetic interactions, together with antisymmetric interactions, exist in the triangular unit. The analysis of the experimental data and theoretical DFT results lead to the conclusion that there is a correlation between the displacement of the μ₃−OH⁻ from the Cu₃ plane and the magnetic exchange interactions of the triangular Cu₃ pyrazolato systems. However, the presence of other bridging organic ligands also plays a role in the magnetic exchange. These features affect the overlap of the magnetic orbitals according to the Khan–Briat model, suggesting that a strong overlap of magnetic orbitals exists in these systems.

The differences in the magnetic properties between 1−Cu₃ and QOPJIP were analyzed and rationalized, showing that the different structural parameters, such as the displacement of the μ₃−OH⁻ from the Cu₃ plane, the nature of the bridging organic ligands, and also the size of the counter-anion, affect the overall magnetic properties of these systems.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/magnetochemistry9060155/s1, Figure S1. Electrospray–mass spectrometry 1−Cu₃ measurements in the positive mode with the different simulated fragment patterns Figure S2. FTIR Spectra of 1−Cu₃. Figure S3. Spin density surfaces for 1−Cu₃ of the antiferromagnetic configurations and the ferromagnetic one. Table S1. Crystal data and structure refinement for 1−Cu₃. Table S2. Fractional atomic coordinates and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters for 1−Cu₃. Table S3. Anisotropic displacement parameters for 1−Cu₃. Table S4. Bond lengths for 1−Cu₃. Table S5. Bond angles for 1−Cu₃. Table S6. Hydrogen atom coordinates and isotropic displacement parameters for 1−Cu₃.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.C.-M., D.V.-Y., E.S. and C.J.G.-G.; formal analysis, W.C.-M. and P.H.-I.; investigation, W.C.-M., P.H.-I. and C.J.G.-G.; writing—original draft preparation, W.C.-M., P.H.-I. and V.P.-G.; writing—review and editing, W.C.-M., D.V.-Y., E.S., V.P.-G. and C.J.G.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge Financiamiento Basal Program AFB220001 for partial financial support. Powered@NLHPC: This research was partially supported by the supercomputing infrastructure of the NLHPC (ECM-02), Center for Mathematical Modelling CMM, Universidad de Chile. The authors acknowledge CONICYT-FONDEQUIP/EQM130086-EQM140060. This work was carried out under the partial support of the Chilean–French International Research Program “IRP-CoopIC”. This study formed part of the Advanced Materials program and was supported by MCIN with funding from European Union Next Generation EU (PRTR-C17.I1) and the Generalitat Valenciana (project MFA-2022-057). The authors also thank the Generalidad Valenciana (Prometeo/2019/076) and project PID2021-125907NB-I00, financed by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/FEDER, UE, for financial support. D.V.-Y. acknowledges FONDECYT 1201249 for support.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Guillermo Mínguez Espallargas from Instituto de Ciencia Molecular (ICMol), Universitat de Valencia, for performing the single-crystal XRD and for the fruitful discussion on the crystallographic and structural data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Scatena, R.; Massignani, S.; Lanza, A.E.; Zorzi, F.; Monari, M.; Nestola, F.; Pettinari, C.; Pandolfo, L. Synthesis of Coordination Polymers and Discrete Complexes from the Reaction of Copper(II) Carboxylates with Pyrazole: Role of Carboxylates Basicity. Cryst. Growth Des. 2022, 22, 1032–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Di Nicola, C.; Karabach, Y.Y.; Kirillov, A.M.; Monari, M.; Pandolfo, L.; Pettinari, C.; Pombeiro, A.J.L. Supramolecular assemblies of trinuclear triangular copper(II) secondary building units through hydrogen bonds. Generation of different metal-organic frameworks, valuable catalysts for peroxidative oxidation of alkanes. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Angaridis, P.A.; Baran, P.; Boča, R.; Cervantes-Lee, F.; Haase, W.; Mezei, G.; Raptis, R.G.; Werner, R. Synthesis and Structural Characterization of Trinuclear Cu^II−Pyrazolato Complexes Containing μ₃-OH, μ₃-O, and μ₃-Cl Ligands. Magnetic Susceptibility Study of [PPN]₂[(μ₃-O)Cu₃(μ-pz)₃Cl₃]. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 2219–2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Schneider, J.D.; Smith, B.A.; Williams, G.A.; Powell, D.R.; Perez, F.; Rowe, G.T.; Yang, L. Synthesis and Characterization of Cu(II) and Mixed-Valence Cu(I)Cu(II) Clusters Supported by Pyridylamide Ligands. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 5433–5446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gusev, A.; Nemec, I.; Herchel, R.; Shul’gin, V.; Ryush, I.; Kiskin, M.; Efimov, N.; Ugolkova, E.; Minin, V.; Lyssenko, K.; et al. Copper(II) self-assembled clusters of bis((pyridin-2-yl)-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)alkanes. Unusual rearrangement of ligands under reaction conditions. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 3052–3060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Bala, S.; Bhattacharya, S.; Goswami, A.; Adhikary, A.; Konar, S.; Mondal, R. Designing functional metal-organic frameworks by imparting a hexanuclear copper-based secondary building unit specific properties: Structural correlation with magnetic and photocatalytic activity. Cryst. Growth Des. 2014, 14, 6391–6398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Condello, F.; Garau, F.; Lanza, A.; Monari, M.; Nestola, F.; Pandolfo, L.; Pettinari, C. Synthesis and structural characterizations of new coordination polymers generated by the interaction between the trinuclear triangular SBU [Cu₃(μ₃-OH)(μ-pz)₃]²⁺ and 4,4′-Bipyridine. Cryst. Growth Des. 2015, 15, 4854–4862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Rivera-Carrillo, M.; Chakraborty, I.; Raptis, R.G. Systematic synthesis of a metal organic framework based on triangular Cu₃(μ₃-OH) secondary building units: From a 0-D complex to a 1-D chain and a 3-D lattice. Cryst. Growth Des. 2010, 10, 2606–2612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Stefanczyk, O.; Kumar, K.; Pai, T.Y.; Li, G.; Ohkoshi, S.I. Integration of Trinuclear Triangle Copper(II) Secondary Building Units in Octacyanidometallates(IV)-Based Frameworks. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 61, 8930–8939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Trif, M.; Troiani, F.; Stepanenko, D.; Loss, D. Spin-electric coupling in molecular magnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101, 217201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Troiani, F.; Stepanenko, D.; Loss, D. Hyperfine-induced decoherence in triangular spin-cluster qubits. Phys. Rev. B—Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2012, 86, 161409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Belinsky, M.I. Spin Chirality of Cu₃ and V₃ Nanomagnets. 1. Rotation Behavior of Vector Chirality, Scalar Chirality, and Magnetization in the Rotating Magnetic Field, Magnetochiral Correlations. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 4078–4090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Belinsky, M.I. Spin Chirality of Cu₃ and V₃ Nanomagnets. 2. Frustration, Temperature, and Distortion Dependence of Spin Chiralities and Magnetization in the Rotating and Tilted Magnetic Fields. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 4091–4109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kintzel, B.; Böhme, M.; Liu, J.; Burkhardt, A.; Mrozek, J.; Buchholz, A.; Ardavan, A.; Plass, W. Molecular electronic spin qubits from a spin-frustrated trinuclear copper complex. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 12934–12937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Boudalis, A.K. Half-Integer Spin Triangles: Old Dogs, New Tricks. Chem. Eur. J. 2021, 27, 7022–7042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Spielberg, E.T.; Gilb, A.; Plaul, D.; Geibig, D.; Hornig, D.; Schuch, D.; Buchholz, A.; Ardavan, A.; Plass, W. A Spin-Frustrated Trinuclear Copper Complex Based on Triaminoguanidine with an Energetically Well-Separated Degenerate Ground State. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 3432–3438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sowrey, F.E.; Tilford, C.; Wocadlo, S.; Anson, C.E.; Powell, A.K.; Bennington, S.M.; Montfrooij, W.; Jayasooriya, U.A.; Cannon, R.D. Spin frustration and concealed asymmetry: Structure and magnetic spectrum of [Fe₃O(O₂CPh)₆(py)₃]ClO₄·py^†. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 2001, 6, 862–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Tsukerblat, B.S.; Belinskii, M.I.; Fainzil’berg, V.E. Magnetochemistry and Spectroscopy of Transition Metals Exchange Clusters. Sov. Sci. Rev. B Chem. 1987, 9, 337–481. [Google Scholar]
Ferrer, S.; Lloret, F.; Pardo, E.; Clemente-Juan, J.M.; Liu-González, M.; García-Granda, S. Antisymmetric Exchange in Triangular Tricopper(II) Complexes: Correlation among Structural, Magnetic, and Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Parameters. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 51, 985–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Winpenny, R.E.P. Molecular Cluster Magnets; World Scientific Publishing Co.: Singapore, 2012. [Google Scholar]
Toader, A.M.; Buta, M.C.; Cimpoesu, F.; Toma, A.I.; Zalaru, C.M.; Cinteza, L.O.; Ferbinteanu, M. New Syntheses, Analytic Spin Hamiltonians, Structural and Computational Characterization for a Series of Tri-, Hexa- and Hepta-Nuclear Copper (II) Complexes with Prototypic Patterns. Chemistry 2021, 3, 411–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mathivathanan, L.; Boudalis, A.K.; Turek, P.; Pissas, M.; Sanakis, Y.; Raptis, R.G. Interactions between H-bonded [Cu^II₃(μ₃-OH)] triangles; A combined magnetic susceptibility and EPR study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 17234–17244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Shi, K.; Mathivathanan, L.; Herchel, R.; Boudalis, A.K.; Raptis, R.G. Supramolecular Assemblies of Trinuclear Copper(II)-Pyrazolato Units: A Structural, Magnetic and EPR Study. Chemistry 2020, 2, 626–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mezei, G.; Raptis, R.G.; Telser, J. Trinuclear, antiferromagnetically coupled Cu^II complex with an EPR spectrum of mononuclear Cu^II: Effect of alcoholic solvents. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 8841–8843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mukherjee, P.; Drew, M.G.B.; Estrader, M.; Diaz, C.; Ghosh, A. Influence of counter anions on the structures and magnetic properties of trinuclear Cu(II) complexes containing a μ₃-OH core and Schiff base ligands. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2008, 361, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cañon-Mancisidor, W.; Spodine, E.; Paredes-Garcia, V.; Venegas-Yazigi, D. Theoretical description of the magnetic properties of μ₃-hydroxo bridged trinuclear copper(II) complexes. J. Mol. Model. 2013, 19, 2835–2844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Zhou, J.-H.; Liu, Z.; Li, Y.-Z.; Song, Y.; Chen, X.-T.; You, X.-Z. Synthesis, structures and magnetic properties of two copper(II) complexes with pyrazole and pivalate ligands. J. Coord. Chem. 2006, 59, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Davydenko, Y.M.; Demeshko, S.; Pavlenko, V.A.; Dechert, S.; Meyer, F.; Fritsky, I.O. Synthesis, Crystal Structure, Spectroscopic and Magnetically Study of Two Copper(II) Complexes with Pyrazole Ligand. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chemie 2013, 639, 1472–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Zhou, Q.-J.; Liu, Y.-Z.; Wang, R.-L.; Fu, J.-W.; Xu, J.-Y.; Lou, J.-S. Synthesis, crystal structure and magnetic properties of a trinuclear Cu(II)-pyrazolate complex containing μ₃-OH. J. Coord. Chem. 2009, 62, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Shi, K.; Mathivathanan, L.; Boudalis, A.K.; Turek, P.; Chakraborty, I.; Raptis, R.G. Nitrite Reduction by Trinuclear Copper Pyrazolate Complexes: An Example of a Catalytic, Synthetic Polynuclear NO Releasing System. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 7537–7544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Massignani, S.; Scatena, R.; Lanza, A.; Monari, M.; Condello, F.; Nestola, F.; Pettinari, C.; Zorzi, F.; Pandolfo, L. Coordination polymers from mild condition reactions of copper(II) carboxylates with pyrazole (Hpz). Influence of carboxylate basicity on the self-assembly of the [Cu₃(μ₃-OH)(μ-pz)₃]²⁺ secondary building unit. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2017, 455, 618–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ahmed, B.M.; Mezei, G. From ordinary to extraordinary: Insights into the formation mechanism and pH-dependent assembly/disassembly of nanojars. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 7717–7728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Alsalme, A.; Ghazzali, M.; Khan, R.A.; Al-Farhan, K.; Reedijk, J. A novel trinuclear μ₃-hydroxido-bridged Cu(II) compound; A molecular cluster, stabilized by hydrogen bonding, bridging pyrazolates, terminal pyrazoles, water and nitrate anions. Polyhedron 2014, 75, 64–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Di Nicola, C.; Garau, F.; Gazzano, M.; Monari, M.; Pandolfo, L.; Pettinari, C.; Pettinari, R. Reactions of a coordination polymer based on the triangular cluster [Cu₃(μ₃-OH)(μ-pz)₃]²⁺ with strong acids. Crystal structure and supramolecular assemblies of new mono-, tri-, and hexanuclear complexes and coordination polymers. Cryst. Growth Des. 2010, 10, 3120–3131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Casarin, M.; Cingolani, A.; Di Nicola, C.; Falcomer, D.; Monari, M.; Pandolfo, L.; Pettinari, C. The Different Supramolecular Arrangements of the Triangular [Cu₃(μ₃-OH)(μ-pz)₃]²⁺ (pz = Pyrazolate) Secondary Building Units. Synthesis of a Coordination Polymer with Permanent Hexagonal Channels. Cryst. Growth Des. 2007, 7, 676–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Vynohradov, O.S.; Pavlenko, V.A.; Fritsky, I.O.; Gural’skiy, I.A.; Shova, S. Synthesis and Crystal Structure of Copper(II) 9-Azametallacrowns-3 with 4-Iodopyrazole. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 65, 1481–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Angaroni, M.; Ardizzoia, G.A.; Beringhelli, T.; La Monica, G.; Gatteschi, D.; Masciocchi, N.; Moret, M. Oxidation reaction of [{Cu(Hpz)₂Cl}₂ ](Hpz = pyrazole): Synthesis of the trinuclear copper(II) hydroxo complexes [Cu₃(OH)(pz)₃(Hpz)₂Cl₂]·solv (solv = H₂O or tetrahydrofuran). Formation, magnetic properties, and X-ray crystal structure of [Cu₃(OH)(pz)₃(Hpz)₂Cl₂]·py (py = pyridine). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1990, 11, 3305–3309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Liu, X.; Nie, Y.; Tang, Q.; Tian, A.; Hu, Z.; Yan, J.; Zhang, S. Pyrazole-based trinuclear and mononuclear complexes: Synthesis, characterization, DNA interactions and cytotoxicity studies. Transit. Met. Chem. 2021, 46, 481–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Boudalis, A.K.; Rogez, G.; Heinrich, B.; Raptis, R.G.; Turek, P. Towards ionic liquids with tailored magnetic properties: Bmim+ salts of ferro- and antiferromagnetic Cu^II₃ triangles. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 12263–12273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Razali, M.R.; Urbatsch, A.; Deacon, G.B.; Batten, S.R. Transition metal complexes of the small cyano anion dicyanonitromethanide [C(CN)₂(NO₂)]⁻ Dedicated to George Christou on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Polyhedron 2013, 64, 352–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Rivera-Carrillo, M.; Chakraborty, I.; Mezei, G.; Webster, R.D.; Raptis, R.G. Tuning of the [Cu₃(μ-O)]^4+/5+ redox couple: Spectroscopic evidence of charge delocalization in the mixed-valent [Cu₃(μ-O)]⁵⁺ species. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 7644–7650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Lang, J.; Hewer, J.M.; Meyer, J.; Schuchmann, J.; van Wüllen, C.; Niedner-Schatteburg, G. Magnetostructural correlation in isolated trinuclear iron(III) oxo acetate complexes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 16673–16685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Antkowiak, M.; Kamieniarz, G.; Florek, W. Comment on “magnetostructural correlations in isolated trinuclear iron(III) oxo acetate complexes” by J. Lang, J.M. Hewer, J. Meyer, J. Schuchmann, C. van Wüllen and G. Niedner-Schatteburg, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2018, 20, 16673. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
van Wüllen, C.; Lang, J.; Niedner-Schatteburg, G. Reply to the ‘Comment on “Magnetostructural correlations in isolated trinuclear iron (iii) oxo acetate complexes“ by M. Antkowiak, G. Kamieniarz and W. Florek, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2018, 20. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 505–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Chilton, N.F.; Anderson, R.P.; Turner, L.D.; Soncini, A.; Murray, K.S. PHI: A powerful new program for the analysis of anisotropic monomeric and exchange-coupled polynuclear d- and f-block complexes. J. Comput. Chem. 2013, 34, 1164–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bouammali, M.A.; Suaud, N.; Guihéry, N.; Maurice, R. Antisymmetric Exchange in a Real Copper Triangular Complex. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 61, 12138–12148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Tsukerblat, B. Group-theoretical approaches in molecular magnetism: Metal clusters. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2008, 361, 3746–3760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Tsukerblat, B.; Palii, A.; Clemente-Juan, J.M.; Coronado, E. Modelling the properties of magnetic clusters with complex structures: How symmetry can help us. Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2020, 39, 217–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Afrati, T.; Dendrinou-Samara, C.; Raptopoulou, C.; Terzis, A.; Tangoulis, V.; Tsipis, A.; Kessissoglou, D.P. Experimental and theoretical study of the antisymmetric magnetic behavior of copper inverse-9-metallacrown-3 compounds. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 7545–7555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wang, L.-L.; Sun, Y.-M.; Yu, Z.-Y.; Qi, Z.-N.; Liu, C.-B. Theoretical Investigation on Triagonal Symmetry Copper Trimers: Magneto-Structural Correlation and Spin Frustration. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 10534–10539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Yoon, J.; Solomon, E.I. Ground-state electronic and magnetic properties of a μ₃-Oxo-bridged trinuclear Cu(II) complex: Correlation to the native intermediate of the multicopper oxidases. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 8076–8086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT—Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Adv. 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C Struct. Chem. 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Dolomanov, O.V.; Bourhis, L.J.; Gildea, R.J.; Howard, J.A.K.; Puschmann, H. OLEX2: A complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bain, G.A.; Berry, J.F. Diamagnetic Corrections and Pascal’s Constants. J. Chem. Educ. 2008, 85, 532–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Becke, A.D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Yanai, T.; Tew, D.P.; Handy, N.C. A new hybrid exchange-correlation functional using the Coulomb-attenuating method (CAM-B3LYP). Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 393, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Schafer, A.; Huber, C.; Ahlrichs, R. Fully optimized contracted quality for atoms Li to Kr Gaussian basis sets of triple zeta valence quality for atoms Li to Kr. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 5829–5835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jaguar. Jaguar 5.5; Version 5.5; Schrödinger, LLC.: Portland, OR, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Montgomery, J.A.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K.N.; Burant, J.C.; et al. G09. Gaussian 09; (Revision D.2); Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
Ruiz, E.; Alvarez, S.; Cano, J.; Polo, V. About the calculation of exchange coupling constants using density-functional theory: The role of the self-interaction error. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 164110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ruiz, E. Theoretical Study of the Exchange Coupling in Large Polynuclear Transition Metal Complexes Using DFT Methods. Struct. Bond. 2004, 113, 71–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Figure 1. Crystal structure of the triangular complex [Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(pz)₃(Hpz)₃][BF₄]₂ (1−Cu₃). Color code: Cu = green, O = red, N = blue, C = grey, H = white, B = light pink, and F = light yellow.

Figure 2. Crystal packing of the triangular complex [Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(pz)₃(Hpz)₃][BF₄]₂ (1−Cu₃). Color code: Cu = green, O = red, N = blue, C = grey, H = white, B = light pink, and F = light yellow.

Figure 3. (A) Thermal dependence of χ_mT for 1−Cu₃ at 100 mT. The solid line is the best fit obtained considering an isosceles triangle and the antisymmetric exchange; see equation 1 (PHI code). (B) Experimental M(H) plot at 2 K for 1−Cu₃, purple line. The calculated magnetization curve using the PHI code.

Figure 4. Relation between the displacement of the μ₃−OH⁻ from the Cu₃ plane and the average magnetic exchange interactions of triangular Cu₃ pyrazolato systems. Squares represent the structures depicted in the graph.

Figure 5. (A) The molecular structure of 1−Cu₃ and the magnetic exchange interaction obtained from experimental data. (B) Molecular structure of QOPJIP and the magnetic exchange interaction obtained from [25].

Figure 6. Dependence of the calculated J−values with the square of the overlap integral of the magnetic orbitals. Adapted from ref. [28], Copyright (2013), with permission from Springer.

Table 1. Structural parameters of triangular Cu₃ systems of the type [Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(R-pz)₃(L)₃]^n+/−.

CCDC Code	Cu^II–Cu^II (Å)	Cu₃ (plane)–OH (Å)	Cu_n–OH (Å)	Cu_n–N (pz) (Å)	Cu_n-1–Cu_n–Cu_n+1 (°)	Cu_n–OH–Cu_n+1 (°)	Ref.
1−Cu₃	3.3740(8) 3.3574(8) 3.3702(9)	0.439	2.005(3) 1.978(3) 1.995(3)	1.942(4) to 1.965(3)	59.71(2) 60.09(2) 60.20(2)	115.8(2) 115.3(2) 114.8(2)	This work
AMACIC	3.3020(6) 3.2561(5) 3.3927(6)	0.553	1.977(2) 2.001(2) 2.005(2)	1.932(3) to 1.947(2)	58.19(1) 62.30(1) 59.51(1)	112.20(9) 116.9(1) 108.73(9)	[31]
ASUNIN	3.3456(1) 3.3266(6) 3.3456(1)	0.510	2.011(1) 1.932(5) 2.042(5)	1.918(3) to 1.952(1)	59.62(1) 60.19(1) 60.19(1)	116.1(1) 113.6(2) 111.3(1)	[32]
BOFLEP	3.349(2) 3.239(2) 3.355(2)	0.580	2.005(4) 2.001(4) 1.995(3)	1.924(5) to 1.958(4)	57.78(2) 61.20(2) 61.02(2)	113.5(2) 108.3(2) 114.1(2)	[33]
DEFSEN	3.384(1) 3.2503(9) 3.2950(9)	0.567	1.975(3) 2.008(3) 2.000(2)	1.928(4) to 1.948(4)	58.22(2) 59.52(2) 62.26(2)	116.3(1) 108.4(1) 112.0(1)	[27]
DIBXOC	3.2972(5) 3.2972(5) 3.3843(4)	0.609	2.008(2) 2.030(2) 2.008(2)	1.946(2) to 1.1.957	59.12(1) 61.76(1) 59.12(1)	109.5(1) 109.5(1) 114.9(1)	[35]
EGIXOK	3.3540(5) 3.3874(6) 3.4036(6)	0.363	1.979(2) 1.993(2) 1.985(3)	1.921(3) to 1.941(2)	60.16(1) 60.64(1) 59.19(1)	115.2(2) 116.7(2) 118.3(2)	[30]
EGIXUQ	3.268(1) 3.379(1) 3.350(1)	0.148	1.936(5) 1.943(4) 1.913(5)	1.914(5) to 1.942(5)	61.39(2) 60.50(2) 58.11(2)	114.8(2) 121.0(2) 122.4(2)	[30]
EHOLIZ	3.389(5) 3.389(5) 3.389(5)	0.274	2.046(10) 1.941(10) 1.941(10)	1.92(1) to 1.97(2)	60.0(1) 60.0(1) 60.0(1)	116(1) 122(1) 116(1)	[36]
JEWWEO	3.3416(8) 3.3825(8) 3.3502(7)	0.461	1.988(3) 2.010(3) 1.982(3)	1.923(4) to 1.943(4)	60.73(2) 59.76(2) 59.51(2)	113.4(1) 115.9(2) 115.1(2)	[2]
JEWWIS	3.387(1) 3.309(1) 3.350(1)	0.486	1.976(6) 2.021(5) 1.985(6)	1.919(7) to 1.952(8)	58.84(3) 60.03(3) 61.13(3)	115.9(3) 111.4(3) 115.5(3)	[2]
MUZQUU	3.3696(5) 3.3461(5) 3.3788(5)	0.455	1.982(2) 2.003(2) 2.001(2)	1.947(3) to 1.960(2)	59.45(1) 60.41(1) 60.14(1)	115.45(9) 113.39(9) 116.05(9)	[8]
* QIMSIQ-a	3.2977(4) 3.1704(4) 3.3126(4)	0.688	2.016(2) 2.012(2) 1.987(2)	1.938(2) to 1.959(2)	57.32(1) 61.58(1) 61.10(1)	109.91(7) 104.90(7) 111.68(8)	[28]
* QIMSIQ-b	3.3911(4) 3.3023(4) 3.3214(4)	0.512	2.000(1) 1.994(2) 1.989(2)	1.944(2) to 1.959(2)	58.93(1) 59.48(1) 61.59(1)	116.20(8) 111.99(7) 112.72(7)	[28]
* QIMSOW-a	3.2559(7) 3.342(1) 3.2345(9)	0.713	1.992(3) 2.032(3) 2.044(3)	1.941(4) to 1.958(4)	61.98(2) 58.69(2) 59.32(2)	108.0(1) 110.2(1) 106.6)1)	[28]
* QIMSOW-b	3.2045(6) 3.1837(8) 3.2007(9)	0.759	1.985(3) 2.011(2) 1.990(3)	1.948(3) to 1.960(4)	59.61(2) 60.13(2) 60.25(2)	106.6(1) 105.4(1) 107.3(1)	[28]
QOPJIP	3.355(1) 3.386(1) 3.368(1)	0.466	1.994(5) 2.000(4) 2.007(5)	1.929(6) to 1.958(6)	59.94(3) 60.49(3) 59.57(3)	114.3(2) 114.4(2) 115.6(2)	[29]
QUSMEX	3.344(2) 3.286(2) 3.392(2)	0.475	1.955(8) 2.017(6) 1.992(9)	1.933(9) to 1.978(9)	58.39(4) 61.53(4) 60.07(4)	114.7(4) 110.1(4) 118.5(4)	[34]
QUSMIB	3.289(2) 3.289(2) 3.289(2)	0.489	1.961(1) 1.962(1) 1.960(1)	1.89(1) to 1.930(8)	60.00(4) 60.00(4) 60.00(4)	114.0(1) 114.0(1) 114.0(1)	[34]
QUSMUN	3.3550(5) 3.3615(5) 3.3439(6)	0.471	1.985(2) 2.005(2) 1.987(2)	1.937(2) to 1.951(2)	60.24(1) 59.72(1) 60.04(1)	114.42(9) 114.68(9) 114.65(9)	[34]
RETQUD	3.3833(6) 3.3629(6) 3.3769(5)	0.542	2.026(2) 2.028(3) 2.013(2)	1.942(3) to 1.961(2)	59.66(1) 60.07(1) 60.26(1)	113.1(1) 112.7(1) 113.5(1)	[24]
RETRAK	3.365(1) 3.3650(9) 3.3886(8)	0.565	2.023(3) 2.041(3) 2.019(2)	1.933(3) to 1.962(5)	59.77(2) 60.46(2) 59.77(2)	111.8(1) 111.9(1) 113.9(1)	[24]
RETREO	3.3442(6) 3.3975(6) 3.3022(7)	0.625	2.024(2) 2.033(2) 2.038(2)	1.936(3) to 1.957(3)	61.48(1) 58.65(1) 59.87(1)	111.0(1) 113.1(1) 108.7(1)	[24]
RUYGEX	3.4471(9) 3.206(1) 3.4227(9)	0.524	1.987(3) 2.024(3) 2.035(3)	1.940(4) to 1.953(4)	55.55(2) 62.01(2) 62.44(2)	118.5(1) 104.4(1) 117.3(1)	[3]
RUYGIB	3.2473(8) 3.4007(6) 3.4305(8)	0.507	2.014(3) 2.017(2) 1.989(2)	1.933(4) to 1.952(4)	61.16(1) 62.08(1) 56.76(1)	107.3(1) 116.2(1) 118.0(1)	[3]
RUYHEY	3.414(1) 3.253(1) 3.277(1)	0.613	2.012(5) 2.006(4) 2.016(3)	1.929(7) to 1.950(5)	58.15(3) 58.82(3) 63.03(3)	116.4(2) 108.0(2) 108.9(2)	[3]
SIJKOL	3.112(1) 3.321(1) 3.321(1)	0.658	2.000(1) 2.000(1) 1.977(1)	1.942(1) to 1.967(4)	62.06(1) 62.06(1) 55.88(1)	102.2(1) 113.3(1) 113.3(1)	[37]
UZIWEI	3.3695(6) 3.2840(5) 3.2953(5)	0.595	1.998(2) 2.004(2) 2.104(2)	1.937(2) to 1.952(2)	59.03(1) 59.36(1) 61.61(1)	114.68(8) 109.64(8) 110.42(8)	[38]
VAZCOR	3.1913(9) 3.391(1) 3.353(1)	0.599	2.032(4) 2.030(4) 1.959(3)	1.933(6) to 1.960(5)	62.36(2) 61.16(2) 56.49(2)	103.6(2) 116.4(2) 114.3(2)	[39]
VIMYEX	3.2639(7) 3.1851(8) 3.299(1)	0.712	2.027(2) 1.991(2) 2.003(2)	1.935(2) to 1.950(2)	58.06(1) 61.52(1) 60.41(1)	108.67(7) 105.79(7) 109.9387)	[40]
XOKXAX	3.347(1) 3.403(1) 3.320(1)	0.491	1.998(4) 2.000(4) 2.000(4)	1.939(5) to 1.963(6)	61.38(2) 58.92(2) 59.70(2)	113.6(2) 116.6(2) 112.3(2)	[41]
YIFGIG	3.3500(8) 3.2440(7) 3.3519(6)	0.521	1.978(2) 1.968(2) 2.008(2)	1.928(2) to 1.953(2)	57.90(1) 61.08(1) 61.02(1)	116.20(9) 109.37(9) 114.48(9)	[22]

* In QIMSIQ and QIMSOW, the letters a and b denote the structure that presents two different triangular Cu₃ units.

Table 2. Selected examples of the magnetic and structural parameters of triangular Cu₃ pyrazolato systems of the general formula, [Cu₃(μ₃−OH)(R-pz)₃(L)₃]^n+/−.

CCDC Code	d(Cu^II–Cu^II) (Å)	Cu₃ (plane)–OH (Å)	J(Cu^II–Cu^II) (cm⁻¹)	g	zJ´ (cm⁻¹)	\|G_Z\| (cm⁻¹)	Ref.
1−Cu₃	3.3740(8) 3.3574(8) 3.3702(9)	0.439	−193.5(6) −205.5(6)	2.09	-	28	This work
BOFLEP ^#	3.349(2) 3.239(2) 3.355(2)	0.580	-	-	-	-	[33]
DEFSEN	3.384(1) 3.2503(9) 3.2950(9)	0.567	−117.7 −90.3	2.047	−3.0	-	[27]
QISOW-a *	3.2559(7) 3.342(1) 3.2345(9)	0.713	−140	2.07	-	-	[28]
QISOW-b *	3.2045(6) 3.1837(8) 3.2007(9)	0.759	−109	2.07	-	-	[28]
QOPJIP	3.355(1) 3.386(1) 3.368(1)	0.466	−241.9	2.07	−23.0	-	[29]
SIJKOL	3.112(1) 3.321(1) 3.321(1)	0.658	−148 −23	2.17	-	-	[37]
VAZCOR	3.1913(9) 3.391(1) 3.353(1)	0.599	−298 −257	2.12	−0.37	18.2	[39]
YIFGIG	3.3500(8) 3.2440(7) 3.3519(6)	0.521	−392 −278	2.09	-	31.2	[22]

^# The magnetic properties are qualitatively described in this structure and no analytical interpretation was performed.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cañón-Mancisidor, W.; Hermosilla-Ibáñez, P.; Spodine, E.; Paredes-García, V.; Gómez-García, C.J.; Venegas-Yazigi, D. Spin Frustrated Pyrazolato Triangular Cu^II Complex: Structure and Magnetic Properties, an Overview. Magnetochemistry 2023, 9, 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry9060155

AMA Style

Cañón-Mancisidor W, Hermosilla-Ibáñez P, Spodine E, Paredes-García V, Gómez-García CJ, Venegas-Yazigi D. Spin Frustrated Pyrazolato Triangular Cu^II Complex: Structure and Magnetic Properties, an Overview. Magnetochemistry. 2023; 9(6):155. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry9060155

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cañón-Mancisidor, Walter, Patricio Hermosilla-Ibáñez, Evgenia Spodine, Verónica Paredes-García, Carlos J. Gómez-García, and Diego Venegas-Yazigi. 2023. "Spin Frustrated Pyrazolato Triangular Cu^II Complex: Structure and Magnetic Properties, an Overview" Magnetochemistry 9, no. 6: 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry9060155

APA Style

Cañón-Mancisidor, W., Hermosilla-Ibáñez, P., Spodine, E., Paredes-García, V., Gómez-García, C. J., & Venegas-Yazigi, D. (2023). Spin Frustrated Pyrazolato Triangular Cu^II Complex: Structure and Magnetic Properties, an Overview. Magnetochemistry, 9(6), 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry9060155

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Menu

Spin Frustrated Pyrazolato Triangular Cu^II Complex: Structure and Magnetic Properties, an Overview

Abstract

1. Introduction