Next Article in Journal
Treatment of Scrap Tire for Rubber and Carbon Black Recovery
Previous Article in Journal
Recycling of Pretreated Polyolefin-Based Ocean-Bound Plastic Waste by Incorporating Clay and Rubber
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Liberation and Separation of Valuable Components from LED Modules: Presentation of Two Innovative Approaches

1
Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Helmholtz Institute Freiberg for Resource Technology, Chemnitzer Straße 40, 09599 Freiberg, Germany
2
Institute of Nonferrous Metallurgy and Purest Materials, Freiberg University of Mining and Technology, Akademiestraße 6, 09599 Freiberg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Recycling 2022, 7(3), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling7030026
Submission received: 1 March 2022 / Revised: 13 April 2022 / Accepted: 17 April 2022 / Published: 19 April 2022

Abstract

:
The rapid development of light-emitting-diode (LED) technology is attributed to its superiority over light sources of earlier generations. Although LED lamps, compared to compact fluorescent lamps, are considered less harmful to the environment, there is still no efficient solution to deal with them at the end of their lifecycle. The first part of the study provides a detailed characterisation of LED lamps, focusing on their most interesting component: the LED module. LED packages attached to the module are highly enriched with Ga, In, Pd, Ag, Au, Sr, Y, Ce, Eu, Gd, and Lu, with the content of each element varying greatly depending on the LED technology. In the second part of this research, two new approaches for liberation and concentration of valuable components from LED modules are presented and compared: a chemical route and a thermal route. The chemical treatment leads to a highly selective separation of LED chips and encapsulation. Enrichment factors up to about 125 are achieved, and a concentrate is obtained containing approximately 14 wt% of the aforementioned valuable components. However, the process requires aromatic solvents, which are viewed as toxic. The thermal treatment results in separation of the aluminium heat sink from all other components of the LED module. Enrichment is approximately ten times lower, but the approach is technically feasible.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

LED lamps belong to the newest generation of light sources. Due to their long lifetime, low energy consumption, compactness, very low IR and UV emission and mercury-free design, they are rapidly replacing conventional lamps [1]. According to Nikulski et al. (2021) [2], by 2030, LED lamps will completely replace previous-generation light sources in the European Union, with over 1000 million units expected to be sold every year from 2026 onwards solely for general household use. Due to its high flexibility and efficiency, LED technology is also widely used in other areas (e.g., in the automotive industry or street lighting), meaning that the number of LED products coming onto the market will be even higher in a rapidly growing market [3].
Once damaged, LED products represent a new material flow that contains valuable components. Additionally, they can be hazardous for people and the environment if improperly disposed of [4]. Efficient and selective recycling of modern products, such as LED lamps, is a huge challenge due to their complex design, small scale and material composition (plastics, ceramics, metals, glass and semiconductors) [5]. Companies specializing in the recycling of previous-generation light sources have to respond to this rapidly advancing technological change. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of development for specific recycling methods [6] and research on this topic [7].
The most valuable part of an LED product is the LED module, which is comprised of gallium, indium, precious metals and rare earth elements [5]. However, compared to the mass of the whole product, or even to the mass of the LED module, their concentration is very low. According to Reuter and Schaik (2015) [8], common recycling processes cannot recover valuable components from ppm levels of complex waste products such as LED lamps. Efficient liberation and concentration steps are of crucial importance. Nevertheless, there are few studies dealing with both issues, as summarized in Table 1.
Liberation and particle-size reduction have been achieved by manual disassembly [11], milling [12], electrohydraulic fragmentation (EHF) [9,10], hydro-comminution and shredding [11]. Depending on process parameters, EHF allows coarse as well as fine fragmentation. Using only a few high-voltage pulses, LED lamps are fragmented into metal pieces, ceramic parts, circuit boards, LED modules and plastic parts, which can be treated again in order to yield finer fragmentation and to liberate LED packages [9]. The study proposed how to deal with the generated material mix in order to separate single components; however, separation was done manually, so no experimental results were presented. The breakage behaviour of different types of LED lamps by EHF was also studied by Kumar et al. (2018) [10]. The authors concluded that metallic components can be liberated at a coarser fraction. However, the method is unsuitable for LED lamps with metallic casings, as no breakage was observed. Mizanur Rahman et al. (2019) [11] performed fragmentation manually and automatically (hydro-comminution and shredding). Manual disassembly and hydro-comminution generated clean fractions of aluminium, plastics, LED modules and printed circuit boards. However, hydro-comminution damages single lamp components, such as the LED modules. Shredding generates a mixed, plastic-rich fraction, hindering the proper recycling of valuable components. Recently, Martins et al. (2020) [12] considered the whole process chain. The authors showed that it is possible to liberate and separate single components of LED lamps effectively by comminution in a hammer mill, sieving and electrostatic, magnetic and gravity separation.
In summary, following fragmentation of waste LED lamps and separation of their components, either LED packages or modules are produced as a process stream. Following the physical processing stage comes the extraction and/or further separation of valuable components from obtained fractions. Review of research articles identified that a wide variety of different kinds of materials and waste from the LED industry have been treated, such as semiconductor materials [13,14,15,16,17], semiconductor materials and wires [18,19], wires [20] or LED chips and phosphors [21]. However, so far no solution has been provided to deal with the whole LED modules.
Our study fills this gap and shows how to liberate and concentrate valuable components contained in LED modules. This can be achieved by soaking an LED module in an organic solvent and subsequent ultrasonication, or by thermal treatment. Both methods show advantages as well as disadvantages, which we discuss in detail. In the first part of this research, waste LED lamps are disassembled manually, and the mass balance of main components is determined. Then, a comprehensive analysis of the assembly of LED modules as well as of the content of valuable metals in the most important LED components are provided. Finally, the two approaches for liberation and separation of valuable components are presented, and benefits resulting from recycling of LED lamps are introduced.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Manual Disassembly and Sorting

The LED lamps used in this study were provided by LAREC GmbH, located in Saxony (Germany). One hundred LED lamps were randomly sorted from a collection container and disassembled manually, generating five different fractions: base assembly and heat sink, diffuser, driver, LED module and Edison screw.

2.2. Characterisation of LED Packages, Chips and Encapsulation

The structures of the LED packages from the three different LED modules depicted in Figure 1a were characterized using mineral liberation analysis (MLA).
Furthermore, the chemical composition of LED chips and encapsulation was determined (Figure 1b). For this purpose, five different LED modules were soaked in acetone for 24 h, and the LED chips and encapsulation were subsequently detached mechanically. Following this, total dissolution of the substrate was carried out in three steps. Initially, aqua regia digestion was carried out. The residue was then oxidized at 1200 °C in a muffle furnace for two hours, and finally, the calcine was fused with lithium metaborate (1050 °C; 30 min). The hot crucible with melt were immediately immersed in an aqueous solution of HNO 3 (5 wt%), and finally, 5 wt% of HCl was added in order to achieve total dissolution. The chemical composition of the obtained solution was determined by ICP-MS (Thermo Scientific XSERIES 2, internal standards: 10 μ g/L Rh and Re, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.3. Approaches for Liberation and Concentration of Valuable Components from LED Modules

Liberation and concentration of valuable components were investigated by two different approaches: thermal and chemical treatment. In the first part of this experimental study, the LED module pieces depicted in Figure 1c were mixed with 5 mL of the following soaking media for 24 h: an inorganic base (NaOH, 2 mol/L), an oxidizing agent (H 2 O 2 , 30 wt%), carboxylic acids (acetic and naphthenic acid), alcohols (isopropanol and ethylene glycol), a ketone (acetone), a glycol ether (1-methoxy-2-propanol acetate), kerosene and aromatic solvents (etlylbenzene and toluene). Samples soaked in 1-methoxy-2-propanol acetate, kerosene, etlylbenzene and toluene were subsequently ultrasonicated for eight hours (Bandelin Sonorex DT 103 H; ultrasonic frequency: 35 kHz). Additionally, three alternatives for aromatic solvents were tested: ethyl-isobutyrate, limonene and p-cymene. Soaking time was 24 h, and the samples were ultrasonicated for eight hours. In thermal treatment experiments, an LED module piece was heated in a muffle furnace at temperatures between 250 °C and 600 °C for two or four hours. Finally, in comparative experiments, the efficiencies of both approaches were compared using the LED module depicted in Figure 1d (chemical treatment: soaking medium—toluene, soaking time—24 h, ultrasonication time—eight hours; thermal treatment: heating temperature—600 °C, heating time—four hours).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Disassembly and Sorting Process

The five main fractions obtained by manual disassembly and sorting are depicted in Figure 2a.
The average mass of a single LED lamp amounts to approximately 53 g and consists of base assembly and heat sink (47 wt%), diffuser (21 wt%), driver (19 wt%), LED module (7 wt%) and Edison screw (6 wt%). The only component that is constructed solely from plastic is the diffuser. The simple composition of the metallic part of the base assembly and heat sink (over 95 wt% of aluminium [12]) significantly facilitates recycling. This is also the case for the Edison screw, which consists mainly of iron (approximately 82%) and nickel (approximately 17%) [12]. The driver and the LED module are the most complex and precious components. This study focuses on the LED modules depicted in Figure 2b, which have an average mass of 4 g and an average number of LED packages of 13.3. A total of 92% of LED modules could be easily detached from all other parts, 3% of LED modules remained connected to base assembly and heat sink and the last 5% to electronic components.

3.2. Characterisation of LED Packages, Chips and Encapsulation

Two of three of the LED packages analysed by mineral liberation have the same arrangement, which can be seen in Figure 3.
The LED package is comprised of a reflector cup, encapsulated phosphor particles and wires (Ga, Sr, Y, Al, Ag), electrode (Cu), solder (Sn), LED chips (Ga) and die-attachment material (Ag). The third LED package shows the following differences: wires consisting of gold and thick silver layer on Cu electrode. The most-valuable components of an LED module (Ga, Ag, Au, Sr, Y) are included primarily in the LED chips and encapsulation. To gain more specific information, the LED chips and encapsulations detached from five different LED module types were dissolved, as described in Section 2.2, and their chemical composition is provided in Table 2.
In addition to the elements detected by mineral liberation analysis, significant amounts of In, Pd, Ce, Eu, Gd and Lu were found. The average content of the following components does not exceed a value of 5 ppm: Sc, Co, Ni, La, Pr, Nd and Tb. The content of main components in the substrate varies strongly, indicating differences in the LED technology. The Ga content ranges from 0.25 wt% to 4 wt% and has two different applications: as a compound of semiconductor materials [22] as well as of garnet phosphors [23]. The high Ga content in samples S1 and S4 of about 4 wt% and 3 wt%, respectively, indicates the presence of garnet phosphors, for instance Y 3 (Al,Ga) 5 O 12 :Ce 3 + , which belongs to the phosphors emitting yellow-green light [23]. This suggestion confirms the detected high Y content of 8.0 wt% and 4.8 wt%, respectively. By contrast, the high concentration of Lu in samples S2 and S5 suggests the presence of a Lu-rich phosphor garnet such as Lu 3 Al 5 O 15 :Ce 3 + , which also emits yellow-green light [23]. In sample S3, neither significant amounts of Ga nor Lu were found, it did have over 1 wt% Sr. These LED packages most likely include nitride red-emitting, nitrogen oxide cyan-emitting or blue-cyan-emitting phosphors. Besides Lu and Y, other rare earth elements (Ce, Eu, Gd) were detected in lower concentrations, acting as a component of different kinds of LED phosphors and serving as doping agents [24]. The presence of Ag and Au can be explained by the application of both elements as die attachment material (e.g., Ag as silver paste) and as wire bonding [22].

3.3. Approaches for Liberation and Concentration of Valuable Components from LED Modules

3.3.1. Chemical Treatment

First, chemical treatment was investigated. Figure 4a provides the results of soaking LED module pieces in different media for 24 h. Sodium hydroxide solution (1), hydrogen peroxide solution (2) and acetic acid (3) are not suitable for the liberation of LED chips and encapsulation. In all three cases, the decomposition of the heat sink/upper layer occurs instead that of the LED package. After soaking in naphthenic acid (4), isopropanol (5), ethylene glycol (6) and kerosene (7), no visible changes to the LED module piece were observed. In contrast, soaking in acetone (8), 1-methoxy-2-propanol acetate (9), ethylbenzene (10) and toluene (11) resulted in partial detachment of the LED encapsulation. However, even after a week of soaking, there was not complete detachment. The best results were achieved using toluene.
In further experiments, LED module pieces treated in acetone, 1-methoxy-2-propanol acetate, ethylbenzene and toluene were ultrasonified for eight hours, leading to enhanced detachment (Figure 4b). In the case of ethylbenzene (14) and toluene (15), the LED substrate separated almost completely.
The use of aromatic solvents is viewed critically due to their toxicity. In recent years, attempts have been made to develop green alternatives. According to the literature, terpenes, their derivatives [25] and bio-based esters [26] have properties similar to petroleum-based chemicals and can be substituted for them in certain applications. However, as shown in Figure 4c, the tested bio-based compounds were less efficient than toluene or ethylbenzene even after eight hours of ultrasonication (16: ethyl isobutyrate, 17: limonene, 18: p-cymene).

3.3.2. Thermal Treatment

In other experiments, the LED module pieces were treated thermally. Depending on temperature and heating time, they decompose to different extents (Figure 4d). At 250 °C, only a slight decomposition of the upper layer occurs (19). At 350 °C, the reflector cup degrades and the LED piece splits into two parts: aluminium heat sink with insulating layer and other upper components (20). At 600 °C, conductive and insulating layers as well as LED packages split from the heat sink, forming a fragile and easy to pulverise substrate (21). Thus, for thermal treatment, only the separation of the metal base plate from all other LED components is possible.

3.3.3. Comparative Experiments

For the quantitative comparison of both approaches, two identical LED modules (depicted in Figure 1d) were treated chemically (soaking medium: toluene, ultrasonication time: 8 h) and thermally (heating temperature and time: 600 °C and 4 h). The elemental composition of both concentrates and the enrichment factor EF are provided in Table 3.
The concentrate resulting from chemical treatment consists of significant amounts of Ga, Y and Lu. It bears resemblance to substrate S4 characterized in Table 2, and the content of all valuable components amounts to approx. 14 wt%. The enrichment factor varies from 1.30 for Ag to 128 for Lu, respectively.
In comparison, the amount of valuable components in the concentrate obtained in the thermal treatment, at 1.37 wt%, is nearly ten times lower. The enrichment factor ranges from 3.34 for Au to 6.26 for Sr. Main components of the concentrate are Cu and Sn, with total mass fractions of over 55 wt%. In contrast, the main component of the concentrate obtained after chemical treatment is Al, with a content of approximately 11 wt%.

3.4. Estimates for Resource Recovery from LED Lamps in the European Union from 2022 and 2030

The described approaches are neither technically nor economically fully developed. However, there is no question that more attention should be paid to the recycling of end-of-life products. This section covers the benefit and importance of the recycling of LED lamps, estimating how much Ga, In, Pd, Ag, Au, Sr, Y, Ce, Eu, Gd and Lu can be recovered from LED lamps within the EU between 2022 and 2030, and how many primary resources can be saved by doing so. For the calculation, the following assumptions were considered:
  • The annual number of LED lamps sold in the EU is 968 million [2];
  • The average number of LED packages per LED lamp is 21.4, and the average mass of LED chips and encapsulation per LED package is 3.7 mg (see Table 2);
  • The average mass percent of a component X (X = Ga, In, Pd, Ag, Au, Sr, Y, Ce, Eu, Gd and Lu) in the concentrate is given in Table 2;
  • The construction and the chemical composition of LED lamps will not change during this time period;
  • The content of Lu in monazite is 30 ppm [27], and the content of monazite in the Bayan Obo deposit is 3.36 wt% [28];
  • The content of Y in tailings from alluvial tin mines in Malaysia is about 0.56 wt%, and the content of Y 2 O 3 in xenotome is 60 wt% [29];
  • The content of Ga in bauxite and zinc ores is about 100 ppm [30].
The annual average amount Prod X of each component X calculated by Equation (1) is given in Table 4.
P r o d X = 968 million × 21.4 × 3.7 mg × wt % X 100
With over 5000 kg/y of Lu and 5 × 10 6 tonnes of Bayan Obo ore required each year, these are the highest estimated values. According to Emsely (2011) [27], about 10 tonnes of Lu are produced from primary resources each year (data from 2011). This would imply that 50% is consumed in manufacturing processes, but we believe that, at present, the production capacity is higher. The second-most abundant element in the obtained LED concentrate is Y, with the estimated amount of approximately 2600 kg/year. For this quantity, nearly 1000 tonnes of tailings from alluvial tin mines in Malaysia are needed each year. Compared to the world production of Y as Y 2 O 3 , which in 2013 was between 8000 t and 12,000 t [31], the estimated value represents only a small percentage of the total. The calculated values for Ga are approximately 1300 kg and 13,100 t per year, respectively. When compared to the world production of Ga from primary resources (in 2020 about 300,000 kg), the estimated number is of little significance.

4. Conclusions

This study deals with the liberation and concentration of valuable components from LED modules by chemical and thermal treatment, and with characterization of the assembly and the chemical composition of LED packages. Moreover, the benefits and importance of recycling LED lamps are discussed. It has been found that the content of valuable components in LED chips and encapsulation is remarkably high and varies significantly depending on the LED technology. The most-abundant elements are Lu, Y, Ga and Sc, with average contents of 6.54, 5.41, 1.69 and 0.67 wt%, respectively. Additionally, significant amounts of In, Pd, Ag, Au, Ce, Eu and Gd were detected. The introduced approaches do not show industrial maturity, and further improvements are required. The main drawback of chemical detachment is the application of toxic aromatic solvents. Green alternatives considered in this study did not provide satisfactory results. Another conceivable option is the optimization of the frequency and power of the ultrasonic waves to improve detachment in non-aromatic solvents, e.g., acetone. By contrast, the content of valuable components in the concentrate produced by thermal treatment is ten times lower. The main elements are Cu and Sn, with mass fractions of over 55 wt%. Although thermal treatment is technically feasible, separation of valuable elements from the low-grade concentrate entails much higher efforts. Due to the high importance of the covered topic (recycling of all LED lamps in the European Union could save over 5 × 10 6 tof primary resources each year) more research should be carried out in this field.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B. and M.S. (Michael Stelter); methodology, A.B.; validation, M.S. (Michael Stelter) and V.R.; investigation, A.B.; resources, A.B. and M.S. (Michael Stoll); writing—original draft preparation, A.B.; writing—review and editing, C.C. and M.S. (Michael Stelter); visualization, A.B.; supervision, M.S. (Michael Stelter). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank Ute Bracklow from LAREC GmbH for providing LED lamps, Oliver Wiche for chemical analysis of liquid phases and Norman Kelly for his discussion and comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
EFenrichment factor
EHFelectrohydraulic fragmentation
EoLend-of-life
EUEuropean Union
ICP-MSinductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
LEDlight emitting diode
MLAmineral liberation analysis

References

  1. Bessho, M.; Shimizu, K. Latest trends in LED lighting. Electron. Commun. Jpn. 2012, 95, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nikulski, J.S.; Ritthoff, M.; von Gries, N. The potential and limitations of critical raw material recycling: The case of LED lamps. Resources 2021, 10, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Held, G. Introduction to Light Emitting Diode Technology and Applications; Auerbach Publications: Boca Ration, FL, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kumar, A.; Kuppusamy, V.K.; Holuszko, M.; Song, S.; Loschiavo, A. LED lamps waste in Canada: Generation and characterization. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 146, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cenci, M.P.; Dal Berto, F.C.; Schneider, E.L.; Veit, H.M. Assessment of LED lamps components and materials for a recycling perspective. Waste Manag. 2020, 107, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Buchert, M.; Manhart, A.; Bleher, D.; Pingel, D. Recycling Critical Raw Materials from Waste Electronic Equipment; Oeko-Institut e.V.: Darmstadt, Germany, 2012; pp. 1–80. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mizanur Rahman, S.M.; Kim, J.; Lerondel, G.; Bouzidi, Y.; Nomenyo, K.; Clerget, L. Missing research focus in end-of-life management of light-emitting diode (LED) lamps. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 127, 256–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Reuter, M.A.; van Schaik, A. Product-centric simulation-based design for recycling: Case of LED lamp recycling. J. Sustain. Metall. 2015, 1, 4–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. LED Professional. LED Lamps Recycling for a Circular Economy. 2016. Available online: https://www.led-professional.com/resources-1/articles/led-lamps-recycling-technology-for-a-circular-economy (accessed on 14 September 2021).
  10. Kumar, A.; Kuppusamy, V.K.; Holuszko, M. Selective metal liberation in waste LED lamps using high voltage pulse fragmentation. In Proceedings of the International Mineral Processing Conference (IMPC 2018), Moscow, Russia, 17–21 September 2018; pp. 3231–3240. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mizanur Rahman, S.M.; Kim, J.; Lerondel, G.; Bouzidi, Y.; Clerget, L. Value retention options in circular economy: Issues and challenges of LED lamp preprocessing. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Martins, T.R.; Tanabe, E.H.; Bertuol, D.A. Innovative method for the recycling of end-of-life LED bulbs by mechanical processing. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 161, 104875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, W.-S.; Hsu, L.-L.; Wang, L.-P. Recycling the GaN waste from LED industry by pressurized leaching method. Metals 2018, 8, 861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Maarefvand, M.; Sheibani, S.; Rashchi, F. Recovery of gallium from waste LEDs by oxidation and subsequent leaching. Hydrometallurgy 2020, 191, 105230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nagy, S.; Bokányi, L.; Gombkötő, I.; Magyar, T. Recycling of gallium from end-of-life light emitting diodes. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2017, 62, 1161–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Swain, B.; Mishra, C.; Kang, L.; Park, K.-S.; Lee, C.G.; Hong, H.S. Recycling process for recovery of gallium from GaN an e-waste of LED industry through ball milling, annealing and leaching. Environ. Res. 2015, 138, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Swain, B.; Mishra, C.; Kang, L.; Park, K.-S.; Lee, C.G.; Hong, H.S.; Park, J.-J. Recycling of metal-organic chemical vapor deposition waste of GaN based power device and LED industry by acidic leaching: Process optimization and kinetics study. J. Power Sources 2015, 281, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhan, L.; Xia, F.; Ye, Q.; Xiang, X.; Xie, B. Novel recycle technology for recovering rare metals (Ga, In) from waste light-emitting diodes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 299, 388–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhan, L.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Z. Recycling of metals (Ga, In, As and Ag) from waste light-emitting diodes in sub/supercritical ethanol. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 155, 104695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Murakami, H.; Nishihama, S.; Yoshizuka, K. Separation and recovery of gold from waste LED using ion exchange method. Hydrometallurgy 2015, 157, 194–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ruiz-Mercado, G.J.; Gonzalez, M.A.; Smith, R.L.; Meyer, D.E. A conceptual chemical process for the recycling of Ce, Eu, and Y from LED flat panel displays. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 126, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alim, M.A.; Abdullah, M.Z.; Aziz, M.S.A.; Kamarudin, R. Die attachment, wire bonding, and encapsulation process in LED packaging: A review. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2021, 329, 112817. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gao, T.; Tian, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, R.; Zhuang, W. Garnet phosphors for white-light-emitting diodes: Modification and calculation. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 3769–3781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, Y.; Zhu, G.; Xin, S.; Wang, Q.; Li, Y.; Wu, Q.; Wang, C.; Wang, X.; Ding, X.; Geng, W. Recent development in rare earth doped phosphors for white light emitting diodes. J. Rare Earths 2015, 33, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pellis, A.; Byrne, F.P.; Sherwood, J.; Vastano, M.; Comerford, J.W.; Farmer, T.J. Safer bio-based solvents to replace toluene and tetrahydrofuran for the biocatalyzed synthesis of polyesters. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 1686–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Byrne, F.P.; Forier, B.; Bossaert, G.; Hoebers, C.; Farmer, T.J.; Hunt, A.J. A methodical selection process for the development of ketones and esters as bio-based replacements for traditional hydrocarbon solvents. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 4003–4011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Emsley. Nature’s Building Blocks: An A-Z Guide to the Elements; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 32–58. [Google Scholar]
  28. Xu, C.; Chi, R.A.; Zhang, Y.; Zhong, C.; Ruan, Y.; Lyu, R.; Zhou, F. Process mineralogy of Bayan Obo rare earth ore by MLA. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 2020, 56, 737–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sulaiman, M.Y. An overview of the rare-earth mineral processing industry in Malaysia. Mater. Sci. Forum 2020, 70–72, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Foley, N.K.; Jaskula, B.W.; Kimball, B.E.; Schulte, R.F. Chapter H: Gallium. In Critical Mineral Resources of the United States—Economic and Environmental Geology and Prospects for Future Supply; Schulz, K.J., DeYoung, J.J.H., Seal Ii, R.R., Bradley, D.C., Eds.; U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1802; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  31. U.S. Geological Survey. Mineral Commodity Summaries 2021; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2021.
Figure 1. (a) LED modules used for the characterization of the construction of LED packages by MLA: (b) detachment of LED chips and encapsulation for chemical analysis; (c) LED module pieces used in tests; (d) LED module used in comparative experiments.
Figure 1. (a) LED modules used for the characterization of the construction of LED packages by MLA: (b) detachment of LED chips and encapsulation for chemical analysis; (c) LED module pieces used in tests; (d) LED module used in comparative experiments.
Recycling 07 00026 g001
Figure 2. (a) Fractions and their mass percentage generated by manual disassembly of LED lamps; (b) all separated LED modules.
Figure 2. (a) Fractions and their mass percentage generated by manual disassembly of LED lamps; (b) all separated LED modules.
Recycling 07 00026 g002
Figure 3. The profile of the LED package as determined by mineral liberation analysis (MLA).
Figure 3. The profile of the LED package as determined by mineral liberation analysis (MLA).
Recycling 07 00026 g003
Figure 4. Liberation experiments.
Figure 4. Liberation experiments.
Recycling 07 00026 g004
Table 1. Studies on liberation and concentration of valuable components from LED bulbs/lamps.
Table 1. Studies on liberation and concentration of valuable components from LED bulbs/lamps.
ReferenceComminution, Liberation or Particle-Size ReductionSizing and Separation of Particles by Screening or ClassificationObtained Fractions
LED professional (2016) [9]Electrohydraulic fragmentationManual sortingLED packages, mixed fraction (glass, metals, plastics, ceramics, residual, electronic comp.)
Kumar et al. (2018) [10]Electrohydraulic fragmentationSieving, manual sorting of fractions +6.3 mm−0.30 mm; 0.30–1.18 mm; 1.18–6.3 mm; +6.3 mm fractions
Mizanur Rahman et al. (2019) [11]Manual and automatic disassembly (hydro-comminution and shredding)Manual sorting, sievingAluminum, plastic, LED modules, printed circuit boards
Martins et al. (2020) [12]Comminution in a hammer millSieving, electrostatic separation, magnetic separation, gravity separation (non-magnetic fraction)Capacitors, coils, wires, polymeric housing, polymeric cover, metallic housing, Edison screw, printed circuit boards, heat sink with LEDs
Table 2. Characterized LED modules and elemental composition of LED chips and encapsulation.
Table 2. Characterized LED modules and elemental composition of LED chips and encapsulation.
LED ModuleS1S2S3S4S5Average Value
LED module before treatment Recycling 07 00026 i001 Recycling 07 00026 i002 Recycling 07 00026 i003 Recycling 07 00026 i004 Recycling 07 00026 i005
LED module after treatment Recycling 07 00026 i006 Recycling 07 00026 i007 Recycling 07 00026 i008 Recycling 07 00026 i009 Recycling 07 00026 i010
Detached LED chips and encapsulation Recycling 07 00026 i011 Recycling 07 00026 i012 Recycling 07 00026 i013 Recycling 07 00026 i014 Recycling 07 00026 i015
Mass of LED module in g5.444.955.491.956.024.77
Mass of LED chips and encapsulation in mg615563666362
Number of LED packages204010251221.4
Mass of LED chips and encapsulation per LED package in mg3.11.46.32.65.33.7
Main components [wt%]
Ga4.030.610.252.950.621.69
Sr1.020.351.090.650.250.67
Y7.960.014.204.810.063.41
Lu<0.0115.470.01<0.0117.196.54
Other relevant components [ppm]
In666047393850
Pd1623484294213685
Ag1589189776211377916
Au1262425
Eu320251197233308262
Gd1361591010
Table 3. Elemental composition of concentrates obtained after chemical and thermal treatment, and enrichment factor (EF) as percentage of the mass of the LED module.
Table 3. Elemental composition of concentrates obtained after chemical and thermal treatment, and enrichment factor (EF) as percentage of the mass of the LED module.
Chemical TreatmentThermal Treatment
Main high value components
[wt%]EF[wt%]EF
Ga2.6778.00.133.60
Y4.561190.346.20
Lu5.671280.366.25
Other valuable components
[ppm]EF[ppm]EF
Sr6719102266.26
In670.388726.24
Pd889117676.18
Ag32381.3042165.96
Au45.1033.34
Eu29469.91146.14
Gd1534.935.68
Base metals
[wt%]EF[wt%]EF
Al10.80.147.40.10
Fe0.080.280.571.48
Cu0.190.0331.56.20
Zn0.3814.20.123.20
Sn0.540.1024.66.25
Table 4. Annual amounts of Ga, In, Pd, Ag, Au, Sr, Y, Ce, Eu, Gd and Lu required for the production of LED packages sold in the European Union between 2022 and 2030 in kg (Prod X ) and the corresponding amount of primary resources needed for the production of Ga, Y and Lu in t (Res X ).
Table 4. Annual amounts of Ga, In, Pd, Ag, Au, Sr, Y, Ce, Eu, Gd and Lu required for the production of LED packages sold in the European Union between 2022 and 2030 in kg (Prod X ) and the corresponding amount of primary resources needed for the production of Ga, Y and Lu in t (Res X ).
GaInPdAgAuSrYCeEuGdLu
Prod X  in kg13073.8453710.40519263411320.2113.695049
Res X  in t13,074-----995--- 5 × 10 6
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Balinski, A.; Recksiek, V.; Stoll, M.; Christesen, C.; Stelter, M. Liberation and Separation of Valuable Components from LED Modules: Presentation of Two Innovative Approaches. Recycling 2022, 7, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling7030026

AMA Style

Balinski A, Recksiek V, Stoll M, Christesen C, Stelter M. Liberation and Separation of Valuable Components from LED Modules: Presentation of Two Innovative Approaches. Recycling. 2022; 7(3):26. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling7030026

Chicago/Turabian Style

Balinski, Adam, Volker Recksiek, Michael Stoll, Christian Christesen, and Michael Stelter. 2022. "Liberation and Separation of Valuable Components from LED Modules: Presentation of Two Innovative Approaches" Recycling 7, no. 3: 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling7030026

APA Style

Balinski, A., Recksiek, V., Stoll, M., Christesen, C., & Stelter, M. (2022). Liberation and Separation of Valuable Components from LED Modules: Presentation of Two Innovative Approaches. Recycling, 7(3), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling7030026

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop