Next Article in Journal
The Psychosocial Impact of Congenital Cytomegalovirus on Caregivers and Families: Lived Experiences and Review of the Literature
Previous Article in Journal
Implementation of Newborn Hearing Screening in Albania
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pilot Program of Newborn Screening for 5q Spinal Muscular Atrophy in the Russian Federation

1
Research Centre for Medical Genetics, Moskvorechye St., 1, 115522 Moscow, Russia
2
Russian Children Neuromuscular Center, Veltischev Clinical Pediatric Research Institute, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Taldomskaya Str. 2, 125412 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2023, 9(2), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns9020029
Submission received: 1 December 2022 / Revised: 2 May 2023 / Accepted: 11 May 2023 / Published: 16 May 2023

Abstract

:
5q spinal muscular atrophy (5q SMA) is one of the most common autosomal recessive disorders in the Russian Federation. The first medication to treat 5q SMA was registered in the Russian Federation for treatment of all 5q SMA types in 2019, and the last of the three currently available in December 2021. We launched the pilot newborn screening (NBS) program for 5q SMA in Moscow, the Russian Federation, starting in 2019. During the pilot program, 23,405 neonates were tested for the deletion of exon 7 of the SMN1 gene, the most common cause of 5q SMA. We used the SALSA® MC002 SMA Newborn Screen Kit (MRC Holland) to specifically detect homozygous deletions of SMN1 exon 7. We used the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) approach to validate detected homozygous deletions and the SALSA MLPA Probemix P060 SMA Carrier Kit (MRC Holland) to determine the SMN2 exon 7 copy number to prescribe gene therapy for 5q SMA. Three newborns with a homozygous deletion of the SMN1 gene were detected. The calculated birth prevalence of 1:7801 appears to be similar to the results in other European countries. The children did not show any signs of respiratory involvement or bulbar weakness immediately after birth. Until now, no 5q SMA case missed by NBS has been detected.

1. Introduction

Hereditary spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a large, genetically heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by progressive degeneration and death of motor neurons in the anterior horns of the spinal cord and, in some cases, in the nuclei of the brain stem [1]. 5q SMA is one of the most common autosomal recessive disorders in the world and the most frequent cause of genetically related infant mortality [2]. In Russia, the carrier frequency is 1/36, and the estimated disease frequency is 1:5184 newborns [3,4,5].
The cause of 5q SMA is mutations in the SMN1 gene in a homozygous or compound heterozygous state. The SMN1 gene is located in an inverted repeat region on the 5q chromosome; the repeat also includes the SMN2 gene, which has minimal differences from SMN1—the coding sequence of SMN2 differs from the sequence of SMN1 by one nucleotide (c.840C>T) and leads to alternative splicing of exon 7. As a result, only 10% of normal SMN protein is produced [6,7,8,9]. In 95–97% of patients with 5q SMA, the cause of the disease is the deletion of exon 7 of the SMN1 gene in a homozygous state.
Currently, three medications to treat 5q SMA are registered in Russia. The first medication, an antisense oligonucleotide, Nusinersen (Spinraza), was registered in the Russian Federation for treatment of all 5q SMA types in 2019. The second medication, Risdiplam (Evrysdi), a small molecule modifying splicing, was registered in Russia in December 2020. A novel gene therapy for the treatment of 5q SMA (the third medication), Onasemnogene abeparvovec (Zolgensma), received a registration certificate in December 2021. Thus, all three of the currently available medications for 5q SMA treatment are registered in the Russian Federation. This fact creates conditions for successful treatment and screening implementation in the country. Presymptomatic treatment is proven to decrease lethality and disability rates most effectively [10]. Considering the age of disease manifestation, it is reasonable to detect newborns with homozygous deletions during neonatal screening. There is no biochemical marker for 5q SMA; therefore, the only possible screening approach is molecular genetic diagnostics aimed at detecting the deletion of exon 7 of the SMN1 gene in a homozygous state.
Since 2006, neonatal screening for the following five hereditary disorders—phenylketonuria, cystic fibrosis, galactosemia, congenital adrenal hyperplasia, and congenital hypothyroidism—has been carried out in Russia. A pilot project of newborn screening for 5q SMA has been started in Moscow to estimate the incidence of the disease and identify newborns with 5q SMA who can be given therapy at the presymptomatic stage of the disease.
The aim of this pilot project was: (1) to refine methodological approaches for neonatal screening for 5q SMA at the pre-mass neonatal screening stage in the Russian Federation; (2) to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and feasibility of the SALSA® MC002 SMA Newborn Screen Kit (MRC Holland) without DNA isolation; and (3) to directly measure the frequency of 5q SMA due to homozygous exon 7 deletion of the SMN1 gene in a multinational mixed population sample from three maternity wards in Moscow.

2. Materials and Methods

The following maternity wards participated in the program: the maternity wards of S. S. Yudin City Clinical Hospital and E. O. Mukhin City Clinical Hospital, and clinical hospital No. 2 of the I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University. All mothers of 23,405 newborns signed informed consent to collect samples for the pilot 5q SMA screening project, and nobody declined participation in the study. All parents were informed that at the time of the start of screening, only 2 drugs for the treatment of 5q SMA were registered in the Russian Federation. Samples were taken from all newborns during the pilot project from August 2019 to January 2022.
Newborn screening for the 5 diseases in the Russian Federation was performed on the fourth day of the newborn’s life and then sent to reference laboratories for screening. Dried blood spots on Whatman® 903 cards for neonatal screening for 5q SMA were taken together with samples for screening for the 5 diseases and sent immediately to the Research Center for Medical Genetics for further diagnosis. Samples of newborns were collected and examined separately from samples of patients with suspected 5q SMA admitted for routine diagnosis. The DBS were transferred every day to the Research Center for Medical Genetics on days 4–6 of life. The 5q SMA screening results were available on days 6–8 of life.
The algorithm for screening and follow-up is shown in Figure 1. The pilot project was carried out via the melt assay using the SALSA® MC002 SMA Newborn Screen Kit (MRC Holland) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The assay can be performed on a crude DNA extract prepared from a 1.5 mm or 3.2 mm punch of a DBS card. After screening directly from DBS cards, DNA extraction from positive and ambiguous DBS samples was carried out for PCR-RFLP to confirm the presence of the homozygous deletion of exons 7 and 8 of the SMN1 gene and to make a diagnosis of 5q SMA; the analysis took up to 3 days, according to the laboratory’s timing. The positive samples were validated using the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) (exon 7—5′AAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCG*AT, 3′TCACTTTCATAATGCTGGCAGAC; exon 8—5′GTAATAACCAAATGCAATGTGAA, 3′CTACAACACCCTTCTCACAGG; * nucleotide, implemented into the primary sequence to create a restriction site for BseJ1 endonuclease (Thermo Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania). Details on the performance of the PCR-RFLP analysis during the pilot project are provided in Appendix A. Immediately after receiving the screening result, the parents were contacted to summon them to the Research Center for Medical Genetics for blood sampling of the whole family (referring to parents and siblings). Confirmatory molecular tests were performed on a fresh blood sample with signed informed consent; this strategy was chosen also to rule out sampling mismatch at the maternity ward since we did not expect false positive results. DNA extraction from peripheral blood leukocytes of positive samples was performed for direct automated Sanger sequencing and MLPA. DNA extraction from peripheral blood leukocytes and DBS to conduct the following tests was performed using the Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. MLPA was a reference method to confirm the presence of homozygous deletion of exons 7 and 8 of the SMN1 gene as well as establish the SMN2 copy number for subsequent gene therapy for the newborn and establish 5q SMA carrier status in the parents. Parents of newborns with a homozygous deletion of exon 7 of the SMN1 gene were examined to determine the number of copies of SMN1 and SMN2 with quantitative MLPA using the SALSA MLPA Probemix P060 SMA Carrier Kit (MRC Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The result of the SMN2 gene copy number was given on days 7–12 of the newborns’ lives. The coding sequences and adjacent intronic regions of exons 7 and 8 of the SMN1 gene (NM_00344.3) (exon 7—5′GTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCC, 3′CCATAAAGTTTTACAAAAGTAAGATTCAC, exon 8—5′GGTTTAACTGGAATTCGTCAAGC, 3′CAAATTTTCTCAACTGCCTCACC) were analyzed via direct automated Sanger sequencing for the identification of exon 7 of SMN2 splicing-modifier variants.
Upon completion of the diagnostic testing, parents were immediately summoned to the Russian Children Neuromuscular Center of the Veltischev Clinical Pediatric Research Institute of Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University for an appointment with a specialist for consultation. In the case of a 5q SMA diagnosis confirmation, the doctor could prescribe treatment with medications already registered or available in the Russian Federation within early access programs or recommend inclusion into clinical studies approved by the Russian Healthcare Ministry if they met the inclusion criteria.

3. Results

The samples were brought by courier every day to the Research Center for Medical Genetics, where each sample was also recorded. Newborn screening at the Research Center for Medical Genetics was performed twice weekly by melting curve analysis using the SALSA® MC002 SMA Newborn Screen Kit (MRC Holland). Each sample was analyzed by the melt assay within 3 working days according to the screening protocol. Cases with clear positive or ambiguous results were immediately referred for confirmatory testing by PCR-RFLP analysis, which was completed within 3 days according to the laboratory protocol. In fact, all three true positives in this study were confirmed within five days after receipt of the original DBS sample.
In this pilot project, of the 23,405 neonates that were screened, three were confirmed to have homozygous deletions of exon 7 of the SMN1 gene. The prevalence of 5q SMA was 1:7801. The following quantitative MLPA analysis detected zero copies of SMN1 and two copies of SMN2 in one patient and zero copies of SMN1 and three copies of SMN2 in two other patients.
Family analysis was carried out for all newborns with homozygous deletions of exon 7 of the SMN1 gene. Both parents were confirmed to carry the heterozygous deletion of exon 7 of the SMN1 gene in all three families. The parents of the first newborn with a positive result and his sibling had one copy of SMN1 and one copy of SMN2 each. The mother of the second newborn had one copy of SMN1 and one copy of SMN2, and the father had one copy of SMN1 and three copies of SMN2. The parents of the third newborn had one copy of SMN1 and two copies of SMN2 each; the older sibling had zero copies of SMN1 and three copies of SMN2; and the second sibling had two copies of SMN1 and two copies of SMN2. It is worth noting that in one of the families, the older sibling also has 5q SMA, which was unknown at the time of obtaining the screening results. The neonate’s mother was accidentally hospitalized in a maternity ward where newborn screening for 5q SMA was taking place. In Moscow, pregnant women are admitted to maternity wards by ambulance, depending on the number of maternity beds and available delivery rooms, the distance to the pregnant woman’s place of residence, and her labor activity. Additionally, information about the pilot project has not been advertised anywhere. The mother of an older child affected by 5q SMA was admitted by ambulance to the maternity ward, where she participated in the pilot project. The proband’s sibling has type II 5q SMA and receives Nusinersen treatment.
Aside from the deletion of exon 7 of the SMN1 gene, the SALSA® MC002 SMA Newborn Screen Kit (MRC Holland) allows for the detection of homozygous deletion of exon 7 of the SMN2 gene. This deletion was detected in 1338 newborns. The frequency of this deletion in a homozygous state, according to the results of the pilot screening, was 1:18, or 0.056.
During the organization of the pilot screening project, we were faced with the following problems in the preanalytical stage of diagnostics: (1) an inconsistency between the number of samples of newborns in the database and the number of forms delivered to the laboratory; and (2) a problem with summoning families for validation of positive results related to the depersonalization of the newborns’ samples. The first problem was solved by constantly checking the numbers of test forms from maternity wards and registering them at the Research Center for Medical Genetics, as well as checking the numbers inside the laboratory and registry of the Research Center for Medical Genetics. For full population screening, a barcode system should be introduced to minimize human error. The second problem was more difficult; the maternity ward was not always quick to respond when providing information about a positive screening result. The rapid recall of parents and their newborn babies was achieved thanks to the high quality of both the specialists at the Research Center for Medical Genetics registry office and the co-authors of the article. The acquired experience was taken into account when preparing the mass newborn 5q SMA screening program in the Russian Federation.
During the pilot, we interpreted 219 of 23,405 (0.9%) results as “ambiguous”, for the following reason. Despite the fact that there was a clear signal in the temperature range corresponding to exon 7 of the SMN1 gene, its intensity was significantly (5–9 times) lower than the intensity of the signal of exon 7 of the SMN2 gene, while during the analysis of other samples the intensity ratio did not exceed 1:2–1:3 (Figure 2). Because the SALSA® MC002 SMA Newborn Screen Kit (MRC Holland) includes a control sample with an intensity ratio of 1:5, we selected all the samples with lower ratios for the PCR-RFLP assay using DNA extracted from the DBS. All such samples were analyzed with PCR-RFLP using DNA extracted from dried blood spots. All these 219 ambiguous cases were analyzed with PCR-RFLP using DNA extracted from the DBS. We were able to obtain the blood samples of five newborns from the group of 219 ambiguous cases and perform MLPA analysis on them from their blood samples. Five available samples of the newborns were analyzed with quantitative MLPA using DNA extracted from blood. In these cases, one copy of the SMN1 gene and three or four copies of the SMN2 gene were detected. These additional tests were carried out on samples with ambiguous results, which were not part of the screening program. Thus, we confirmed that the abnormal peak ratios in these “ambiguous” cases were caused by the multifold prevalence of SMN2 copies over SMN1 in the examined samples. These results should therefore not be regarded as false positives.
In the SALSA MC002 SMA Newborn Screen, PCR amplification of exon 7 of the SMN1 gene and the closely related SMN2 gene is performed, followed by fluorescent probe binding to the amplicons and generation of a melt curve. Fluorescence is only measured during melt curve generation. Examples of the screening assay results from controls and ambiguous cases are shown in Figure 2. Red indicates the sample that we analyzed. In the sample in which the signal from exon 7 of the SMN2 gene was registered, the signal from exon 7 of the SMN1 gene was not registered—the control of deletion of exon 7 of the SMN1 gene (from SALSA® MC002) (Figure 2A). The sample in which the signal from exon 7 of the SMN1 gene and the signal from exon 7 of the SMN2 gene were registered in the intensity ratio 1:5 (the normal control from SALSA® MC002) (Figure 2B). The sample that showed a signal from exon 7 of SMN1 and SMN2, a control of normal genotype that was then validated by MLPA (Figure 2C). Samples that showed an intensity ratio of approximately 1:9 higher than the control in the SALSA® MC002 (Figure 2D–F). However, a signal from exon 7 of SMN1 and SMN2 is detected. These samples were validated by PCR-RFLP. These samples were also analyzed with quantitative MLPA. According to the MLPA results for these samples, the following genotypes are shown: one copy of SMN1 and three copies of SMN2 per genome (Figure 2D); one copy of SMN1 and four copies of SMN2 per genome (Figure 2E); and one copy of SMN1 and three copies of SMN2 per genome (Figure 2F).
As of November 2022, there have been no reported cases of 5q SMA in newborns that screened negative in the pilot study, indicating that the sensitivity of the NBS test was 100% in this small population. When the NBS test is extended to larger populations, the sensitivity would be expected to fall to 95–98% owing to the method’s inability to detect pathogenic mutations other than homozygous exon 7 deletions.

4. Discussion

5q SMA is one of the most severe neuromuscular disorders and the most common genetic cause of child mortality and disability. The disease is characterized by progressive symptoms of wasting palsy due to the degeneration of alpha-motor neurons in the anterior horns of the spinal cord. Newborn screening for 5q SMA allows the identification of presymptomatic patients and the prescription of gene therapy. Newborn screening for 5q SMA has been carried out in different countries by different methods (Table 1).
The pilot newborn screening project was conducted for the first time in the Russian Federation from August 2019 to January 2022. On 1 June 2021, the Premier Minister announced the expansion of the national newborn screening program from the current five to thirty-six diseases, including 5q SMA, which is expected to start in 2023 in all regions of the Russian Federation. In 2022, pilot projects have been implemented in six regions of the Russian Federation, with up to 200,000 newborns screened during the year. Screening for 5q SMA is implemented by the qPCR method. In St. Petersburg, the active pilot program started in October 2021. NBS 5q SMA is currently being carried out in five hospitals across St. Petersburg, and so far, no cases of 5q SMA have been identified. This pilot has also enabled researchers to identify carriers (five carriers have been identified to date). Preparations for the all-country national program are now ongoing, with structure/pathways established and protocols reviewed for approval [29].
According to the results of the pilot newborn screening project for 5q SMA in Moscow, the prevalence of the disease was 1 in 7801 neonates. The estimated prevalence of 5q SMA in the Moscow region is 1 in 5184 [3,4,5].
The observed 5q SMA prevalence in Moscow is lower than expected, although there is no significant difference between these figures (χ2 = 0.774, p = 0.771). The same situation can be observed in Germany, the USA, Taiwan, Australia, and Canada [13,14,17,20,23]. In all these countries, the observed 5q SMA prevalence is lower than the estimated prevalence, calculated from the carrier frequency for the deletion of exon 7 of the SMN1 gene, although it stays within the confidence interval for the estimated prevalence. For some countries, the difference can be caused by the small cohort sizes (approximately 100 people in Taiwan, Australia, and Canada) used to calculate the 5q SMA carrier frequency. Aside from that, some authors mention other causes for the difference between estimated and expected disease prevalence: (1) a lethal genotype—0 copies of the SMN1 gene and 0 copies of the SMN2 pseudogene (in this case, the embryo development stops at early terms of pregnancy), and (2) awareness of future parents about their carrier status with the conduct of prenatal and pre-implantation diagnostics. The data on the expected 5q SMA prevalence in Latvia was obtained according to the 10 year analysis of 5q SMA incidence, calculated per number of births during this period. This data cannot be compared with the data from other countries because some neonates with 0-I 5q SMA could die before receiving a diagnosis, and patients with type IV could have no symptoms at the moment of analysis. On the other hand, in Italy, the estimated and expected prevalence of 5q SMA correspond almost exactly.
In China, during the newborn screening, more cases of homozygous deletion of exon 7 of the SMN1 gene were detected than were estimated according to the calculations, although the observed prevalence is, similar to the results in other countries, within the confidence interval of the expected prevalence. This can possibly be connected to the bias in the population cohort in which the carrier frequency was calculated: it consisted of pregnant women from various regions of the People’s Republic of China [27].
In Japan, during the examination of more than 22,000 newborns, no homozygous carriers of the deletion of exon 7 of the SMN1 gene were detected. No published data on 5q SMA carrier frequency in this country was available; however, considering the incidence rate of 5q SMA (3.09 per 100,000 live births), which is by an order of magnitude lower than in other countries [5,14,16,17,21,29], this result is not unexpected.

5. Conclusions

At the moment, there are three kinds of medication registered in the Russian Federation for 5q SMA treatment. The goal of the newborn screening is the early detection of patients with 5q SMA for presymptomatic treatment. The rapid diagnosis in the presymptomatic stage of 5q SMA and the early referral to gene therapy for the treatment of newborns with a positive result during the pilot newborn screening project in Moscow were possible mostly due to the fact that the project was based and carried out within one city.
The prevalence of detected 5q SMA cases does not have significant differences from the estimated prevalence; however, similar to the results in other countries, there is a noticeable tendency towards a decrease in the observed prevalence compared to the expected prevalence. Our data is within the confidence interval, although the incidence rate is lower. The previously estimated incidence rate was based on an indirect method, through the incidence rate in the Russian population. We present the incidence rate estimated by the direct method.
The pilot 5q SMA screening was the first mass screening in the Russian Federation to use DNA diagnostic methods. The experience acquired during its implementation became the basis for planning a 5q SMA screening covering the entirety of the Russian Federation. The aim of the pilot project for newborn screening for SMA was not to study its economic efficiency. We studied the need for screening newborns for SMA in the Russian Federation since three drugs have been registered in the country at the moment. We have studied the advantages of the method, faced with ambiguous samples and various issues in the organization, and how the screening was conducted. The data will be taken into account when implementing expanded screening for 32 diseases in the Russian Federation in 2023. Our experience allowed us to organize another pilot project in 2022, which will include newborns from six regions of the Russian Federation.
In summary, this project has demonstrated the possibility, reality, and necessity of newborn screening for 5q SMA in the Russian Federation. The newborn screening showed data similar to the results in Europe. The pilot newborn 5q SMA screening project formed the basis for the implementation of 5q SMA newborn screening for the entire country. However, mass newborn screening for the entire country of Russia will be implemented using a different method for screening for SCID/5q SMA.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.M.; data curation, D.V., S.I.K. and A.P.; formal analysis, K.M.; investigation, K.M., A.C., V.Z. and N.R.; methodology, A.C., V.Z., P.C. and N.R.; project administration, O.S., S.I.K. and A.P.; validation, V.Z. and P.C.; visualization, K.M.; writing—original draft, K.M.; writing—review and editing, O.S. and A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the international innovation healthcare company “F. Hoffman—La Roche”. The research was carried out within the state assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation for RCMG.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The pilot newborn screening program was approved by the ethical committee of the Research Center for Medical Genetics, Moscow (approval number 11/1 and date 23 November 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The pilot project was carried out from August of 2019 to January of 2022 in the Research Center for Medical Genetics based on leading perinatal centers with the support of the international innovation healthcare company “F. Hoffman—La Roche”. “F. Hoffman—La Roche” possesses exclusive rights to the data and reports obtained in the course of the pilot project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

The PCR-RFLP method allows sequences of the SMN1 gene and its homologue, SMN2, to be separated by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and to determine whether a deletion in exons 7 and/or 8 is the cause of 5q SMA (Table A1).
Table A1. Composition of PCR Mix SMA-7-8.
Table A1. Composition of PCR Mix SMA-7-8.
Number of TubesPCR Buffer, µLdNTP, µLPrimer (7 or 8) Mix Volume, µLThe Volume of Taq Polymerase,
µL
Volume of H2O, µL
162.50.70.213.6
PCR program for exon 7: hot start 95°—3 min
32   cycles   94 ° 45   sec 55 ° 45   sec 72 ° 45   sec
final elongation: 72°—7 min
PCR program for exon 7: hot start 95°—3 min
28   cycles   94 ° 45   sec 57 ° 45   sec 72 ° 45   sec
final elongation: 72°—7 min
Perform the restriction assay:
(1)
Prepare 0.5 mL restriction tubes by numbering and arranging them appropriately in a rack. Add 10 µL of amplificant from the corresponding tube to each tube after PCR;
(2)
Prepare a restriction mixture consisting of buffer, enzyme, and water according to Table A2.
Table A2. The restriction mixture for exon 7 restriction (enzyme Bse 8I (Thermo Scientific)) and for exon 8 restriction (enzyme Bse 1I (Thermo Scientific)).
Table A2. The restriction mixture for exon 7 restriction (enzyme Bse 8I (Thermo Scientific)) and for exon 8 restriction (enzyme Bse 1I (Thermo Scientific)).
Number of TubesVolume of 10X Restriction Buffer, µLVolume of H2O, µLEnzyme Volume, µL
1.52.90.6
Mix the mixture thoroughly and add 5 µL to each tube with the post-PCR sample. Close the lid, centrifuge for 2–3 s and then incubate at 65 °C for 3 h (exon 8, enzyme Bse 1I) or 4 h at 60 °C (exon 7, enzyme Bse 8I).

Appendix A.1. Analysis of Results

The fragments are analyzed in a 7% acrylamide gel (29:1 AA/BA stock solution). Electrophoretic separation of the fragments is carried out at a field strength of 16 V/cm for 0.5–1.0 h (by the end of fragment separation, the leading dye bromophenol blue should have passed a distance of two thirds of the gel length).
The length of the amplified fragment of exon 7 is 152 bp, and exon 8 is 188 bp. After the restriction is carried out, the following size bands are registered on the gel (Figure A1 and Figure A2):
  • exon 7 of the SMN1 gene—152 b.p. exon 8 of the SMN2 gene—151 b.p.
  • exon 7 of the SMN2 gene—126 b.p. exon 8 of the SMN1 gene—119 b.p.
Figure A1. Analysis of the exon 7 deletion of the SMN1 gene. A deletion is registered in the absence of a band of the appropriate length (track No. 4). Figure A1 illustrates fragments of electropherograms with analyses of DNA samples from a patient with 5q SMA (lane 4), his parents (lanes 2 and 3), and a healthy control (lane 1).
Figure A1. Analysis of the exon 7 deletion of the SMN1 gene. A deletion is registered in the absence of a band of the appropriate length (track No. 4). Figure A1 illustrates fragments of electropherograms with analyses of DNA samples from a patient with 5q SMA (lane 4), his parents (lanes 2 and 3), and a healthy control (lane 1).
Ijns 09 00029 g0a1
Figure A2. Analysis of the deletion of exon 8 of the SMN1 gene. A deletion is registered in the absence of a band of the appropriate length (track No. 4). Figure A2 illustrates fragments of electropherograms with analyses of DNA samples from a patient with 5q SMA (lane 4), his parents (lanes 2 and 3), and a healthy control (lane 1).
Figure A2. Analysis of the deletion of exon 8 of the SMN1 gene. A deletion is registered in the absence of a band of the appropriate length (track No. 4). Figure A2 illustrates fragments of electropherograms with analyses of DNA samples from a patient with 5q SMA (lane 4), his parents (lanes 2 and 3), and a healthy control (lane 1).
Ijns 09 00029 g0a2

References

  1. Russman, B.S. Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Clinical Classification and Disease Heterogeneity. J. Child Neurol. 2007, 22, 946–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Crawford, T.O. Textbook of Neuromuscular Disorders of Infancy, Childhood, and Adolescence: A Clinician’s Approach, Butterworth-Heinemann; Darras, B., Jones, H.R., Jr., Ryan, M., De Vivo, D., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003; Chapter 8; pp. 145–166. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zabnenkova, V.V.; Dadali, E.L.; Spiridonova, M.G.; Zinchenko, R.A.; Poliakov, A.V. Heterozygous carrier rate for type I–IV proximal spinal muscular atrophy in Chuvashes, Udmurts, and residents of the Moscow region. Russ. J. Genet. 2012, 48, 838–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zabnenkova, V.V.; Shchagina, O.A.; Polyakov, A.V. Carrier screen of spinal muscular atrophy using a new medical technology «Quantitative detection methods of copy number analysis of SMA locus genes». Med. Genet. 2016, 15, 18–23. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  5. Zabnenkova, V.V.; Dadali, E.L.; Swarovskaya, M.; Zinchenko, R.; Polyakov, A.V. Spinal muscular atrophy carrier frequency in Russian Federation. In Proceedings of the Conference on American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG 2016), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 18–22 October 2016; p. 2476W. [Google Scholar]
  6. McLean, M.D.; Roy, N.; MacKenzie, A.E.; Salih, M.; Burghes, A.H.; Simard, L.; Korneluk, R.G.; Ikeda, J.E.; Surh, L. Two 5q13 simple tandem repeat loci are in linkage disequilibrium with type 1 spinal muscular atrophy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1994, 3, 1951–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bürglen, L.; Lefebvre, S.; Clermont, O.; Burlet, P.; Viollet, L.; Cruaud, C.; Munnich, A.; Melki, J. Structure and organization of the human survival motor neurone (SMN) gene. Genomics 1996, 32, 479–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lorson, C.L.; Hahnen, E.; Androphy, E.J.; Wirth, B. A single nucleotide in the SMN gene regulates splicing and is responsible for spinal muscular atrophy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 6307–6311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rochette, C.F.; Gilbert, N.; Simard, L.R. SMN gene duplication and the emergence of the SMN2 gene occurred in distinct hominids: SMN2 is unique to Homo sapiens. Hum. Genet. 2001, 108, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jędrzejowska, M. Advances in Newborn Screening and Presymptomatic Diagnosis of Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Degener. Neurol. Neuromuscul. Dis. 2020, 10, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Su, Y.N.; Hung, C.C.; Lin, S.Y.; Chen, F.Y.; Chern, J.P.; Tsai, C.; Chang, T.S.; Yang, C.C.; Li, H.; Ho, H.N.; et al. Carrier Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) in 107,611 Pregnant Women during the Period 2005–2009: A Prospective Population-Based Cohort Study. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kucera, K.S.; Taylor, J.L.; Robles, V.R.; Clinard, K.; Migliore, B.; Boyea, B.L.; Okoniewski, K.C.; Duparc, M.; Rehder, C.W.; Shone, S.; et al. Presymptomatic Diagnosis of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Through Newborn Screening. J. Pediatr. 2021, 190, 124–129.e121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dangouloff, T.; Vrščaj, E.; Servais, L.; Osredkar, D.; SMA NBS World Study Group. Newborn screening programs for spinal muscular atrophy worldwide: Where we stand and where to go. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2021, 31, 574–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ogino, S.; Wilson, R.; Gold, B. New insights on the evolution of the SMN1 and SMN2 region: Simulation and meta-analysis for allele and haplotype frequency calculations. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2004, 12, 1015–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hale, K.; Ojodu, J.; Singh, S. Landscape of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Newborn Screening in the United States: 2018–2021. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2021, 7, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wirth, B.; Herz, M.; Wetter, A.; Moskau, S.; Hahnen, E.; Rudnik-Schöneborn, S.; Wienker, T.; Zerres, K. Quantitative Analysis of Survival Motor Neuron Copies: Identification of Subtle SMN1 Mutations in Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy, Genotype-Phenotype Correlation, and Implications for Genetic Counseling. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1999, 64, 1340–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Feldkötter, M.; Schwarzer, V.; Wirth, R.; Wienker, T.F.; Wirth, B. Quantitative Analyses of SMN1 and SMN2 Based on Real-Time LightCycler PCR: Fast and Highly Reliable Carrier Testing and Prediction of Severity of Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2002, 70, 358–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Vill, K.; Schwartz, O.; Blaschek, A.; Gläser, D.; Nennstiel, U.; Wirth, B.; Burggraf, S.; Röschinger, W.; Becker, M.; Czibere, L.; et al. Newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy in Germany: Clinical results after 2 years. Orphanet. J. Rare Dis. 2021, 16, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Boemer, F.; Caberg, J.H.; Beckers, P.; Dideberg, V.; di Fiore, S.; Bours, V.; Marie, S.; Dewulf, J.; Marcelis, L.; Deconinck, N.; et al. Three years pilot of spinal muscular atrophy newborn screening turned into official program in Southern Belgium. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 19922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Smith, M.; Calabro, V.; Chong, B.; Gardiner, N.; Cowie, S.; du Sart, D. Population screening and cascade testing for carriers of SMA. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2007, 15, 759–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Calì, F.; Ruggeri, G.; Chiavetta, V.; Scuderi, C.; Bianca, S.; Barone, C.; Ragalmuto, A.; Schinocca, P.; Vitello, G.A.; Romano, V.; et al. Carrier screening for spinal muscular atrophy in Italian population. J. Genet. 2014, 93, 179–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Abiusi, E.; Vaisfeld, A.; Fiori, S.; Novelli, A.; Spartano, S.; Faggiano, M.V.; Giovanniello, T.; Angeloni, A.; Vento, G.; Santoloci, R.; et al. Experience of a 2-year spinal muscular atrophy NBS pilot study in Italy: Towards specific guidelines and standard operating procedures for the molecular diagnosis. J. Med. Genet. 2022, 2022, 108873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. McAndrew, P.E.; Parsons, D.W.; Simard, L.R.; Rochette, C.; Ray, P.N.; Mendell, J.R.; Prior, T.W.; Burghes, A.H. Identification of proximal spinal muscular atrophy carriers and patients by analysis of SMNT and SMNC gene copy number. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1997, 60, 1411–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. McMillan, H.J.; Kernohan, K.D.; Yeh, E.; Amburgey, K.; Boyd, J.; Campbell, C.; Dowling, J.J.; Gonorazky, H.; Marcadier, J.; Tarnopolsky, M.A.; et al. Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Ontario Testing and Follow-up Recommendations. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 2021, 48, 504–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Diep Tran, T.; Kroepfl, T.; Saito, M.; Nagura, M.; Ichiseki, H.; Kubota, M.; Toda, T.; Sakakihara, Y. The gene copy ratios of SMN1/SMN2 in Japanese carriers with type I spinal muscular atrophy. Brain Dev. 2001, 23, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kimizu, T.; Ida, S.; Okamoto, K.; Awano, H.; Niba, E.T.E.; Wijaya, Y.O.S.; Okazaki, S.; Shimomura, H.; Lee, T.; Tominaga, K.; et al. Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Diagnosis, Incidence, and Newborn Screening in Japan. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2021, 7, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chan, V.; Yip, B.; Yam, I.; Au, P.; Lin, C.K.; Wong, V.; Chan, T.K. Carrier incidence for spinal muscular atrophy in southern Chinese. J. Neurol. 2004, 251, 1089–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lin, Y.; Lin, C.H.; Yin, X.; Zhu, L.; Yang, J.; Shen, Y.; Yang, C.; Chen, X.; Hu, H.; Ma, Q.; et al. Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy in China Using DNA Mass Spectrometry. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. The European Alliance for Newborn Screening in Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Available online: https://www.sma-screening-alliance.org/map/ (accessed on 22 December 2022).
  30. Gailite, L.; Sterna, O.; Konika, M.; Isakovs, A.; Isakova, J.; Micule, I.; Setlere, S.; Diriks, M.; Auzenbaha, M. New-Born Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Results of a Latvian Pilot Study. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2022, 8, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Algorithm used in the pilot program of newborn screening for 5q SMA in Moscow. * “Ambiguous result” means the intensity of the signal of exon 7 of the SMN1 gene in such samples was significantly (5–9 times) lower than the intensity of the signal of exon 7 of the SMN2 gene, while during the analysis of other samples the intensity ratio did not exceed 1:2–1:3.
Figure 1. Algorithm used in the pilot program of newborn screening for 5q SMA in Moscow. * “Ambiguous result” means the intensity of the signal of exon 7 of the SMN1 gene in such samples was significantly (5–9 times) lower than the intensity of the signal of exon 7 of the SMN2 gene, while during the analysis of other samples the intensity ratio did not exceed 1:2–1:3.
Ijns 09 00029 g001
Figure 2. Cases with complicated interpretation detected during the newborn screening. Melt curves from the SALSA NBS assay are shown. Please see the text for a detailed explanation of the results shown in panels (AF).
Figure 2. Cases with complicated interpretation detected during the newborn screening. Melt curves from the SALSA NBS assay are shown. Please see the text for a detailed explanation of the results shown in panels (AF).
Ijns 09 00029 g002
Table 1. Data on newborn screening in an array of countries, including the new 5q SMA pilot screening in Russia. qPCR: quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction; ddPCR: droplet digital Polymerase Chain Reaction; MLPA: multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification; var methods: various methods.
Table 1. Data on newborn screening in an array of countries, including the new 5q SMA pilot screening in Russia. qPCR: quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction; ddPCR: droplet digital Polymerase Chain Reaction; MLPA: multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification; var methods: various methods.
Country/RegionProject Start MonthCarrier Frequency/Estimated 5q SMA PrevalenceMethodology Tier 1/Tier 2Detected Cases per Number of Newborns5q SMA Prevalence According to the Screening ResultsEstimated 5q SMA Prevalence
Taiwan11/141:48 [11]qPCR/
MLPA/
7:120,267 [12]1:17,181 [13]1:8968
USA01/161:53 [14]var methods
ddPCR-qPCR
180:2,395,718 [13,15]1:13,310 [1]1:11,236
Germany01/181:30
[16,17]
qPCR/
MLPA
43:297,163 [18]1:6911 [13]1:3600
Belgium03/18No dataqPCR/
MLPA
9:136,339 [13,19]1:15,149No data
Australia08/181:49
[20]
qPCR/
ddPCR
18:202,388
[13]
1:11,2441:6724
Italy09/191:35
[21]
qPCR/
qPCR
15:90,885 [22]1:60591:4900
Canada01/201:54
[23]
Mass/
MLPA
5:139,810
[13,24]
1:27,9621:11,664
Japan05/201:32,362 (according to the retrospective analysis data 2007–2016)
[25]
qPCR/
MLPA
0:22,209
[13]
Not detected1:32,362
Japan (Osaka)02/211:32,362qPCR/
MLPA
0:10,000 [26]Not detected1:32,362
China03/181:53
[27]
The Agena iPLEX assay (Mass)/
MLPA
3:29,364
[28]
1:97881:11,236
Latvia02/211:9091 (according to the retrospective analysis data 2007–2017)
[29]
qPCR/
qPCR and MLPA
2:10,411
[30]
1:52061:9069
Russia (Moscow)08/191:36
1:5184 [3]
The Melt Assay/
MLPA
3:23,4051:78011:5184
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mikhalchuk, K.; Shchagina, O.; Chukhrova, A.; Zabnenkova, V.; Chausova, P.; Ryadninskaya, N.; Vlodavets, D.; Kutsev, S.I.; Polyakov, A. Pilot Program of Newborn Screening for 5q Spinal Muscular Atrophy in the Russian Federation. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2023, 9, 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns9020029

AMA Style

Mikhalchuk K, Shchagina O, Chukhrova A, Zabnenkova V, Chausova P, Ryadninskaya N, Vlodavets D, Kutsev SI, Polyakov A. Pilot Program of Newborn Screening for 5q Spinal Muscular Atrophy in the Russian Federation. International Journal of Neonatal Screening. 2023; 9(2):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns9020029

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mikhalchuk, Kristina, Olga Shchagina, Alena Chukhrova, Viktoria Zabnenkova, Polina Chausova, Nina Ryadninskaya, Dmitry Vlodavets, Sergei I. Kutsev, and Alexander Polyakov. 2023. "Pilot Program of Newborn Screening for 5q Spinal Muscular Atrophy in the Russian Federation" International Journal of Neonatal Screening 9, no. 2: 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns9020029

APA Style

Mikhalchuk, K., Shchagina, O., Chukhrova, A., Zabnenkova, V., Chausova, P., Ryadninskaya, N., Vlodavets, D., Kutsev, S. I., & Polyakov, A. (2023). Pilot Program of Newborn Screening for 5q Spinal Muscular Atrophy in the Russian Federation. International Journal of Neonatal Screening, 9(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns9020029

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop