Next Article in Journal
Clinical and Histopathological Evolution of Acute Intraperitoneal Infection by Streptococcus agalactiae Serotypes Ib and III in Nile Tilapia
Previous Article in Journal
Feeding Habits and Prey Composition of Six Mesopelagic Fish Species from an Isolated Central Mediterranean Basin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Knowledge Mapping of the Development Trend of Smart Fisheries in China: A Bibliometric Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Unraveling Greek Inland Competitive Fishing: Historical Insights, Angler Profiles, and Motivations through Limited Data Integration in Recreational Fishing Research

Laboratory of Ichthyology, Department of Zoology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Box 134, GR54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fishes 2024, 9(7), 278; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9070278
Submission received: 26 June 2024 / Revised: 9 July 2024 / Accepted: 11 July 2024 / Published: 13 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management and Monitoring of Recreational Fisheries)

Abstract

:
This study delves into the realm of competitive sport fishing in Greece’s inland waters, where recent years have witnessed a notable surge in such activities. Despite the absence of official records, insights into the sport’s trend and the motivations and socio-demographic characteristics of anglers participating in fishing competitions were gleaned from digital data sourced from online platforms and interviews with anglers. Our findings illuminate the growing popularity of sport fishing in Greece, evident in the increasing number of fishing competitions and the burgeoning angling community. Predominantly male, anglers exhibit a strong dedication to catch-and-release practices, citing relaxation and socialization as primary motivations, with competitive aspirations also shaping their involvement. Moreover, the study highlights legislative gaps in inland water fisheries regulations, underscoring the need for updates to ensure sustainable management and to mitigate illegal activities. Additionally, there exists an opportunity to bolster anglers’ ecological awareness through targeted education initiatives. Ultimately, addressing these conclusions holds the potential to foster responsible fishing practices and contribute to the long-term sustainability of inland water fisheries.
Key Contribution: The study demonstrates the valuable contributions of digital data and interviews to fisheries research, providing insights into the historical trends, profiles, and motivations of anglers in competitive inland fishing in Greece. It also highlights the need for updated regulations and educational initiatives to promote sustainable practices and long-term conservation.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Recreational fishing, defined as catching fish for pleasure or competition rather than for commercial purposes, is a popular leisure activity enjoyed by millions worldwide. Recreational fishing can take place in inland waters, such as lakes, ponds, and rivers, as well as in saltwater environments like oceans, seas, and coastal areas. Anglers target a wide range of fish species depending on their location and preferences, such as trout and bass or carp in freshwater [1,2] or marlin and tuna in the sea [3,4]. The rich diversity of fishing environments and target species highlights the versatility and widespread appeal of recreational fishing.
While recreational fishing is primarily pursued for recreational enjoyment, it also has cultural, social, and economic significance. Globally, the number of active anglers ranges from 220 to 700 million. These estimates vary considerably due to limited data, particularly in less-developed countries [5,6], and the absence of requirements for recreational fishing licenses and records of catches in some regions, including certain European countries. Several communities rely on fishing tourism as a source of revenue, attracting visitors who come to fish in local waters and participate in related activities and events [7,8]. Recreational anglers’ annual expenditures are estimated at $190 billion, making recreational fisheries in some countries more profitable than commercial ones [9]. The cost of transport, equipment, accessories and clothing, accommodation and excursions, education, and license fees [7,10] makes recreational fishing a multi-billion-euro industry [11,12]. This economic impact underscores the importance of recreational fishing to local and national economies, driving infrastructure development and job creation in related sectors.
In addition, angling has evolved into a popular sport, with thousands of fishing competitions where anglers compete to catch the largest fish or the most fish within a specified time frame, taking place worldwide annually [13] (details about fishing competitions in Appendix A). The modern era of freshwater fishing tournaments began to take shape in the late 20th century (in the 1970s and 1980s), particularly in regions with abundant freshwater resources like North America and Europe [13,14]. Nowadays, a vast number of inland water fishing competitions are held worldwide [8,14]. For example, [14] estimated that over 32,000 competitive freshwater fishing events occurred in 2005 in North America alone, though the lack of a record system has resulted in misreporting and underestimation globally [13]. Competitive fishing events evolved alongside advancements in fishing gear, techniques, and transportation, enabling anglers to travel to distant water bodies for tournaments [8,13]. These historical developments reflect the growing sophistication and organization of competitive fishing, demonstrating its increasing popularity and the community’s passion for the sport.
In Greece, sport fishing, as a recreational fisheries activity, is characterized by the absence of a national registration process [15]. Specifically, in Greek inland waters, competitive sport fishing has been officially documented only since 2008. However, relevant data are limited or unavailable. There exists a gap in understanding the motivations of these specialized anglers, occasionally perceived as “elitists”, who partake in these events. Limited knowledge exists regarding their behaviors, expertise, perspectives, and environmental awareness levels. Addressing these aspects could greatly benefit conservation initiatives and environmental education programs tailored to their values and interests. The absence of comprehensive data in Greece presents a unique challenge and opportunity to explore this relatively under-researched area, potentially unveiling unique insights into the motivations and behaviors of Greek anglers.
The motivation behind this study was to fill the knowledge gap concerning competitive sport fishing in Greek inland waters. Understanding the profiles, motivations, and socio-demographic characteristics of anglers can inform better management practices and policy making. We gathered and analyzed digital fisheries data concerning competitive sport fishing competitions in Greek inland waters from online sources due to the lack of official data. Additionally, we conducted a questionnaire survey of participants in fishing competitions to evaluate their profiles. Our specific objectives were to analyze trends in the popularity of competitive sport fishing in Greece’s inland waters, identify the primary target species, elucidate the profiles of participating anglers, explore their motivations, and examine the socio-demographic factors influencing them and their perceptions of the sport and of fisheries management. By addressing the knowledge gap in this aspect of Greek fisheries, our research aims to provide insights that can inform future managerial actions. The outcomes of our research could guide the design of conservation initiatives and educational programs aligned with sport-fishing priorities. Understanding these dynamics is essential for developing policies that support sustainable fishing practices and enhance the recreational fishing experience, ensuring the long-term viability of this culturally and economically important activity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Collection

Initially, we contacted the active fishing clubs in Greece to acquire data concerning the number of registered members and the competitions they organize annually. However, in many cases, there was a lack of comprehensive records regarding their activities through the years; therefore, we conducted an internet survey to collect and analyze digital data on competitive sport fishing in the inland waters of Greece. Specifically, data were sourced from various online platforms including YouTube, Facebook, news websites, and more, using relevant keywords, primarily in Greek. These keywords included “recreational fishing”, “athletic fishing”, “sport fishing”, “fishing match”, “fishing tournament”, “festivals”, carp fishing”, “pike fishing”, “trout fishing”, “catfish fishing”, “bait”, and “anglers”. Searches were performed using search engines like Google and Microsoft Edge. Since our primary objectives were to analyze trends in the popularity of competitive sport fishing in Greece’s inland waters, identify the primary target species, elucidate the profiles of participating anglers, explore their motivations, and examine the socio-demographic factors influencing them and their perceptions of the sport and fisheries management, we further conducted a questionnaire research during the spring of 2023 among carp anglers who participated in two carp catch-and-release fishing competitions. These competitions took place in two lentic ecosystems located in Northern Greece, the Kerkini (on 17 March 2023) and Polyphytou (on 31 March 2023) reservoirs, each spanning two days. The interviewed participants were thoroughly prepared and equipped with suitable gear, bait, and tackle to endure overnight stays on the shores.
The questionnaire consisted of both closed-ended and open-ended questions covering a broad spectrum of topics (see Supplementary Material). Respondents were also encouraged to provide detailed information and anecdotes to enhance the richness of the data. The questionnaire’s structure encompassed four sections, beginning with inquiries regarding the estimation of the cost of the specific fishing trip they had undertaken and their investment in the activity. Following this, questions delved into their fishing practices, gear, exploration techniques, preferences, and the frequency of their angling activities. The third segment delved into their perspectives and environmental knowledge, probing their attitudes toward conservation and sustainable practices and their awareness of local ecosystems. Finally, demographic data were gathered, including information such as age, gender, location, and socio-economic status.
The questionnaire’s structure was finalized after a trial concerning its fulfillment and clarity that was conducted with a smaller sample before this research. The questionnaires were distributed to participants for completion, while a researcher (the same person on all occasions) was present nearby to address any possible queries that arose. We ensured that no participants replied twice. We explicitly requested this during the second competition, verifying that none of the participants had already completed the survey during the first competition. This precaution was taken to maintain the integrity and uniqueness of the data.
Each questionnaire was completed anonymously. Specifically, no identifying information was recorded, to ensure the sincerity of responses. Each respondent was informed at the beginning about the identity and role of the researcher, the assurance of their anonymity, and the objectives of the research. A total of 62 questionnaires were completed.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

A chi-squared test was conducted to evaluate whether there was a statistically significant association between the number of anglers and the categorical variables, such as age class, living area, annual income, educational level, and marital status. Furthermore, ANOVA was conducted to detect differences in the anglers’ fishing activity, particularly the fishing days per season and the fishing hours per season. Subsequently, a Spearman correlation matrix was computed to explore correlations between the anglers’ socio-demographic characteristics, fishing activities, motivations, and perspectives. This analysis was conducted using R (packages reshape2 [16], ggplot2 [17]). Additionally, generalized linear regression models (GLMs) were employed to examine whether the socio-demographic parameters influenced the anglers’ motivations. This analysis was further conducted in subgroups based on specific demographic characteristics to provide further insights into these relationships (R packages stats, base).

3. Results

3.1. Anglers’ Associations

Seven angler associations exclusively targeting freshwater species, predominantly carp, and participating in competitive events were identified. These associations were all situated in Northern and Central Greece, having names referencing either the name of a specific water body, like Lake Kerkini (the newest anglers’ fishing club, created in 2023), Lake Kastorias, or Lake Pamvotida, or cities proximal to their preferred fishing areas such as Ptolemaida or Kozani (see Appendix A for details). The most populated associations, namely those of Kozani, Kerkini, and Ptolepaida, have between 70 and 124 active members. However, only a subset of these members possesses athlete forms to participate in competitions, and even fewer participate. Furthermore, five additional angler associations, targeting mainly marine species, may also have members that participate in inland fishing competitions, particularly in those involving surface fishing with floats. Specifically, based on a rough estimation, fewer than 150 people currently participate in official fishing competitions conducted in Greek inland waters.

3.2. Fishing Competitions

Fishing competitions in Greek inland waters have a history dating back to 1984 and are primarily organized by local fishing angler associations. However, the lack of official record keeping has made it challenging to trace their history, a difficulty that persists for many contemporary events. Information about these competitions, including those conducted to this day, is primarily sourced from the internet. The first “official” fishing competition acknowledged by the Hellenic Federation of Underwater Activities and Sport Fishing (H.F.U.A.S.F.) in Greece’s inland waters commenced in 2008 with the inaugural national event (Figure 1a). Despite interruptions during the period of the COVID-19 pandemic, when competitions were suspended, the trend has been consistently upward (the number of 2024 competitions refers to the first four months of the year). Since 2008, nearly 90 fishing events have been tracked down through internet footprints. However, it is worth noting that the actual number of competitions and events is likely higher due to instances of misreporting.
The primary focus of fishing competitions has been on Cyprinus carpio (carp), although there have been instances of competitions targeting the species Esox lucius (pike) in Lake Cheimaditida (Figure 1b). Furthermore, a few surface fishing competitions have been recorded where all caught fish species were accounted for. Most of these competitions occurred in Northern Greece, where there is a higher concentration of both natural and artificial lakes (Figure 2).

3.3. Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Anglers

Competitive fishing appears to be a predominantly male-dominated activity, with only 1 woman among the 62 individuals interviewed fishing alongside her partner (Figure 3). The anglers were mainly middle-aged and lived in small provincial villages. Their income and educational level were moderate, while the vast majority were married (Figure 3).
Analysis revealed no significant differences in the distribution of anglers across income groups (χ2 = 5.52, df = 3, p-value = 0.1374). However, statistically significant differences were observed between anglers based on their age classes (χ2 = 35.541, df = 2, p-value < 0.001), living area type (χ2 = 8.9661, df = 1, p-value < 0.001), education level (χ2 = 37.186, df = 4, p-value < 0.001), and marital status (χ2 = 37.396, df = 2, p-value < 0.001).

3.4. Anglers’ Fishing Experience, Knowledge Resources, and Activity

Most anglers began their recreational fishing in the 1990s, with an approximate 10-year time lag before they started participating in fishing competitions (Figure 4). They engage in online fishing forums and social media pages and browse the internet for tips, techniques, and stories shared by fellow anglers (87.5%). Moreover, they receive information on fishing-related issues primarily from anglers’ associations (37.5%) and, to a lesser extent, from fisheries offices (23.2%), mass media (17.9), and publications (19.6%) (note that when asked about their information sources, they could choose more than one option).
Their average fishing activity peaks during the summer (29 days) and autumn (22 days) (Figure 5). Conversely, the average fishing activity per trip or expenditure (in hours) remains relatively consistent throughout spring, summer, and autumn, but notably decreases in winter. ANOVA revealed significant differences among the seasons concerning the fishing days (Fcrit = 2.65, p-value < 0.05) but not the fishing hours per expenditure (p-value = 0.06).
Participants expressed a willingness to travel considerable distances for fishing, with some (5.3%) even venturing abroad (Figure 6).

3.5. The Activity’s Cost

Competitive fishing is indeed a costly sport, as evidenced by the expenses incurred for competition trips, gear ownership, and annual fishing-related expenditures (Figure 7). The mean estimated cost of a fishing trip was around EUR 200, with a maximum reported value of EUR 500. Additionally, the mean estimated gear cost was approximately EUR 5000, with the maximum reported gear cost reaching EUR 30,000. Furthermore, anglers faced a mean annual expense of around EUR 1750, with the maximum annual reported cost being EUR 6000, related to their fishing pursuits.

3.6. Target Species and Fish Handling

The primary target species (apart from the competitions) was carp, with lesser emphasis on pike, wels catfish, perch, and trout (Figure 8). However, some anglers reported targeting all commercial fishes within a water body, while others mentioned fishing also in marine environments (Figure 8).
The vast majority of the 61 respondents who answered the question about the fate of the caught fish stated that they catch-and-release almost 78% of the caught specimens, with catch-and-release being practiced exclusively by 68.8% of the interviewed anglers. Only one individual mentioned releasing solely 50% of the catch and gifting the remaining 50% to others (Figure 9).

3.7. Anglers’ Motivations

Relaxation was the most popular (96.7%) motivation for the interviewed anglers (Figure 10), followed by socialization (63.3%) and the fishing challenge (45%). However, all the provided motivation choices were selected by some anglers, revealing variability in the individual needs of the anglers.

3.8. Angler’s Perspectives

When asked about their concerns regarding fishing, the majority (71.9%) highlighted the non-compliance of the fishing community (including both professional fishermen and recreational anglers) with fishing regulations. Additionally, they noted the lack of infrastructure (54.4%) that could support their activity. Others mentioned the high number of both types of fishers (38.6%), which imposes significant fishing pressure on fish stocks (Figure 11).
When respondents were asked to freely share their perspectives on fisheries management and needs, they highlighted the importance of addressing the following issues:
  • Implementing effective control measures during fishing prohibition periods.
  • Addressing concerns regarding overfishing by professional fishermen.
  • Addressing instances of abuses and lawlessness within the professional fishing community. Toward this, they specifically mentioned enforcement legislation concerning the use of professional gillnets (nylon nets, even though forbidden, are almost exclusively used by professional fishers in inland waters of Greece).
  • Utilizing lakes and dams for tourist purposes.
  • Implementing oversight measures for both professionals and amateurs.
  • Implementing measures to monitor foreign fishermen.
  • Making necessary changes to legislation governing inland waters.
  • Establishing legislation to regulate recreational and sports fishing.
  • Establishing protection and control bodies to oversee fisheries management.
  • Recognizing the need for fisheries biologists within the fisheries department to support the development of recreational fishing.

3.9. Anglers’ Ecological Knowledge

The anglers were familiar with the term “overfishing”, mentioning that many fish species’ stocks are overexploited (Figure 12).
When queried about their awareness of other fish species present in the lake they were fishing in on the survey day, anglers predominantly cited commercially valuable species (Figure 13). Specifically, only 28 anglers responded to this question, with 4 of them indicating that they were unaware of any other species besides carp.

3.10. Seeking the Determinants of Anglers’ Motivations

The Spearman correlation between anglers’ socio-economic characteristics, fishing activities, motivations, and perceptions revealed relatively strong correlations between (a) the year anglers started competing and the year they started fishing, (b) the motivation of pursuing fishing because “its_free” and fishing for “food”, and (c) the motivation of pursuing fishing because “its_free” and the perception of “easy_access” (Figure A1, Appendix A). However, it was found that the “relaxation” variable did not show any specific correlation with other parameters (thus, it is not presented in Figure A1) due to the uniformity of the values recorded for “relaxation” across the dataset.
In addition, no significant relationships were found in the generalized linear model (GLM) analysis between the fishers’ motivations and their socio-demographic characteristics.

4. Discussion

4.1. Popularity and Community Engagement

The current study underscores the rising popularity of sport fishing in Greece’s inland waters, as evidenced by the increasing frequency of fishing competitions held in the country. This trend is accompanied by a growing angling community engaging in fishing clubs and online forums, where they exchange knowledge, experiences, and tips with fellow enthusiasts, and is in alignment with the trend regarding the activity worldwide [18].

4.2. Sample Size and Representativeness

The sample size of 62 respondents utilized in our study should be considered in the context of the population we are examining. Competitive angling, particularly in Greece, represents a niche community. According to our background research and available data, the total population of anglers participating in such competitions in Greece is relatively small. While precise numbers are challenging to ascertain, estimates suggest that the population is limited to around 100 to 150 individuals. Consequently, a sample size of 62 respondents constitutes a significant proportion (62% and 41.3%, respectively) of this population.

4.3. Demographic Insights

Our study revealed a male dominance in recreational fishing, consistent with global trends, where women constitute an average of 2–5% of anglers in most countries [19,20,21]. The fact that the only woman who participated in our study was fishing alongside her spouse suggests a potential pattern of women being less involved independently in the activity. The fact that among the responders were inhabitants of both small villages and big cities incorporates the belief that recreational angling is an important leisure activity for all [21,22].

4.4. Commitment to Fishing

Most respondents demonstrated a high level of angling experience, having started fishing in the 1990s. This, combined with the relatively high number of days they fish annually and their willingness to travel considerable distances for fishing, indicates a strong commitment to the activity.
The relatively high estimated mean cost of the fishing trips during which the interviews were conducted reflects the significant financial investment competitive anglers are willing to undertake. In contrast, the high mean cost of buying gear highlights the substantial expenditure associated with acquiring and maintaining fishing equipment. Lastly, the mean annual expense of around EUR 1750 related to their fishing pursuits underscores the ongoing financial commitment required to engage in this recreational activity.
The above are indicative of the activity’s contribution to the local economy. The spending on travel, accommodation, and other local services during fishing trips supports local businesses and stimulates economic growth in the regions frequented by anglers. The investment in gear and equipment, often purchased from local retailers, further boosts economic activity and supports local employment.

4.5. Conservation Practices

The notable prevalence of catch-and-release practices among the competitive anglers interviewed in our study mirrors the widespread acceptance of this approach within the Greek angling community. Their primary motivation for embracing catch-and-release stems from a shared commitment to conserving fish stocks, particularly those heavily targeted for harvest. This conservation ethic is consistent with practices promoted by fishing clubs, aiming to enhance the potential for trophy catches and often mandated during fishing competitions as a conservation measure [21,23,24,25].

4.6. Anglers’ Motivations

The main anglers’ motivation was relaxation, indicating the human need to escape to nature. This finding is in accordance with numerous studies concerning recreational fishing motivations worldwide [21,26]. The absence of a significant relationship between this motivation and socio-demographic and economic factors is also indicative of the catholic character of this human need [25]. In addition, socialization and the desire to be with friends emerged as another significant motivation, which was expected, as being with friends has been numerously proved as a major component of recreational fishing [27]. Interestingly, research on the motivations of competitive anglers (i.e., [28]) revealed that the need for public perception and reputation emerged as a major factor influencing their behavior. Such motivations may be indirectly reflected in the motivation for “competition” observed in our study. Anglers seeking recognition and status within the fishing community may be driven by a desire to excel in competitive environments, contributing to the overall motivation for engaging in fishing tournaments.

4.7. Legislative Gaps and Recommendations

The gap in Greek legislation concerning fisheries and fishing activity in inland waters has been brought to light by the anglers’ perspectives, shedding light on deficiencies in various aspects. Updating legislation is imperative. Currently, shortcomings in fishing regulations exacerbate the situation, especially due to the absence of proper controls, which in turn creates opportunities for illegal activities. To address these issues, several urgent measures are needed. Initially, establishing maximum catch limits for professional fishing is essential to ensure sustainable management of fish stocks and prevent overexploitation. Additionally, mandating licenses for recreational fishing is crucial to regulate and monitor angling activities effectively [21]. These measures not only promote responsible fishing practices, but also help prevent revenue loss for the Greek state and contribute to the long-term sustainability of inland water fisheries.

4.8. Ecological Awareness

The surveyed anglers exhibited a commendable familiarity with the most commercially significant fish species and fishing regulations. However, their knowledge appeared to be somewhat limited concerning smaller-bodied species and missing the broader ecosystem dynamics. Introducing targeted programs aimed at enhancing ecological awareness could prove instrumental in providing anglers with a more comprehensive understanding of the ecosystem structure and function. Environmental education initiatives play a crucial role in empowering individuals and communities to make informed decisions and take responsible actions. By promoting environmental literacy and fostering a deeper connection with nature, such programs have the potential to inspire positive change and collective efforts toward environmental conservation and stewardship. It is worth noting that recreation specialization can significantly influence anglers’ environmental behavior, particularly in terms of their commitment to environmental protection. Specifically, anglers who specialize in specific recreational pursuits tend to exhibit a heightened concern for environmental conservation and sustainability [29,30]. This highlights the importance of tailoring environmental education efforts to the needs and interests of different angler groups, ultimately fostering a greater sense of environmental responsibility within the angling community.

4.9. Future Research

In Greece, recreational fishing operates without the requirement of a license, granting anglers the freedom to pursue their hobby without formal authorization. However, this lack of regulation extends to the monitoring of both commercial and recreational fisheries, resulting in a dearth of essential data on catches, fishermen, anglers, and the pressure exerted on local fish stocks. This information gap exacerbates tensions between recreational anglers and professional fishermen and complicates fisheries management efforts. Moreover, the limited availability of data on recreational fishing is a widespread issue in many countries [25]. To address these challenges, researchers have employed innovative data-gathering approaches such as web scraping [31] and conducting interviews. Leveraging digital data, including information from online forums, social media platforms, and specialized angling websites, has emerged as a promising tool. By analyzing digital footprints such as posts, comments, photos, and geotagged information, valuable insights can be gleaned into anglers’ preferences, behaviors, and favored fishing locations. This approach offers researchers and authorities a more comprehensive understanding of target species, popular fishing spots, angling techniques, and their potential impact on local ecosystems. Furthermore, digital data analysis enables the identification of trends and patterns over time, facilitating the development of targeted management strategies and conservation efforts. For example, monitoring changes in angler activity levels or the adoption of specific fishing techniques can inform adaptive management practices aimed at sustaining healthy fish populations and preserving natural habitats. In addition to digital data analysis, research studies involving interviews have proven to be particularly valuable, especially in cases where scientific research on ecosystems is lacking [32,33,34]. These interviews not only provide essential fishing data but also contribute to a deeper understanding of ecosystems, thereby informing the establishment of effective management plans. Overall, the integration of innovative data-gathering approaches holds promise for addressing knowledge gaps and enhancing fisheries management in Greece and beyond.

4.10. Policy and Sustainability Recommendations

Given the insights gained from this study, it is evident that there is a need for targeted policy and sustainability measures to support the competitive angling community and ensure the long-term health of Greek inland water fisheries. Establishing a comprehensive national registration process for competitive and recreational anglers would provide accurate data on participation and help monitor the impact on fish stocks [21]. Strengthening regulations and enforcement mechanisms is essential to prevent illegal fishing activities and ensure compliance with sustainable fishing practices. Developing educational programs to increase anglers’ awareness of ecosystem dynamics and the importance of conservation, tailored to different angler groups, would promote environmental literacy. Encouraging the formation and growth of fishing clubs and online forums can facilitate knowledge exchange and foster a conservation-oriented community. Additionally, continuously gathering data through innovative methods like digital footprint analysis and interviews will enable adaptive and refined management strategies. By implementing these measures, Greece can enhance the sustainability of its inland water fisheries, support the angling community, and ensure the long-term viability of this important recreational activity.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study underscores the value of incorporating digital data from the internet and interviews in fisheries research, particularly in the absence of robust monitoring procedures. By leveraging such data, we were able to provide valuable insights into Greek inland competitive fishing, including historical perspectives, angler profiles, and motivations. Our findings reveal a growing popularity of sport fishing in Greece, as evidenced by the increasing number of fishing competitions and a burgeoning angling community. However, the sport remains largely male-dominated, with women comprising a minority of participants. Despite this, there is a strong conservation ethic among anglers, demonstrated by the widespread adoption of catch-and-release practices to preserve fish stocks. The surveyed anglers were primarily motivated by relaxation and socialization, with competitive aspirations also influencing their engagement. The study also highlights legislative gaps in inland water fisheries regulations, emphasizing the need for updates to ensure sustainable management and curb illegal activities. Furthermore, there is an opportunity to enhance anglers’ ecological awareness through targeted education initiatives. Incorporating the above can promote responsible fishing practices and contribute to the long-term sustainability of inland water fisheries, supporting their sustainable management.

Supplementary Materials

The questionnaire content can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/fishes9070278/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: O.P. and D.C.B.; Developing methods: O.P. and D.C.B.; Conducting the research: O.P.; Data analysis: O.P.; Data interpretation and preparation of figures and tables: O.P.; Writing: O.P and D.C.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

No external funding was receiving for the research.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper. For additional information, please contact the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to the anonymous anglers for their participation in this research, as well as to the fishing clubs of Lake Kerkini and Kozani for permitting and facilitating this study during their fishing competitions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Appendix A.1. Fishing Competitions

Fishing competitions or matches are defined as “organized events in which a group of anglers fishes for inducements, awards, prizes, or public recognition in addition to the catch or the satisfaction of catching fish”. Competitions or fishing matches can take various formats, including individual or team-based events. They typically last for a set duration, ranging from several hours to multiple days, with anglers aiming to catch the most carp by weight or size. Each competition typically has its own set of rules and regulations governing aspects such as permitted bait types, fishing methods, equipment restrictions, fish-handling procedures, and scoring criteria to ensure fair play and sportsmanship among participants.
Organizers often select venues known for their healthy fish populations and varied fishing challenges. Scoring systems vary depending on the competition format but commonly involve weighing or measuring each caught fish. Points are awarded based on the size or weight of the fish, with bonus points sometimes given for achieving certain milestones or catching rare specimens.
The participants range from casual hobbyists to dedicated enthusiasts. These anglers use a variety of techniques and equipment to catch fish, including rods, reels, lines, hooks, and bait. Their goal is typically to experience the thrill of the catch, whether it is reeling in a prized trophy fish or simply enjoying the tranquility of being outdoors.
Competitive fishing fosters a sense of camaraderie among participants, with anglers often sharing tips, tactics, and experiences both on and off the water. Local clubs and organizations play a key role in organizing competitions and fostering a supportive angling community.
Competitions may offer prizes, trophies, or cash awards to top-performing anglers or teams. Winning or placing well in prestigious events can provide recognition within the angling community and serve as a mark of accomplishment for participants.
Overall, competitive fishing combines elements of skill, strategy, and sportsmanship, attracting anglers of all levels who are passionate about the pursuit of fish and the thrill of competition.
During these competitions, catch-and-release practices are commonplace, reflecting a broader trend in angling toward conservation.

Appendix A.2. Greek Fishing Clubs Active in Inland Fisheries

  • Recreational Anglers and Lake Orestiada Friends
  • Athletic Association of Recreational Anglers of Karditsa
  • Athletic Association of Recreational Anglers of Lake Kerkini
  • Athletic Association of Recreational Anglers of Florina
  • Athletic Association of Recreational Anglers of Kozani “ALIAKMON”
  • Athletic Association of Recreational Anglers of Ptolemaida A.S.E.A.P. “Sakis Tzouras”
  • Athletic Association of Recreational Anglers of Ioannina “Pamvotis”
  • Nautical Club of Karlovasi
  • ANO Karystos
  • NOT Kallithea
  • Delphinia Peristeri
  • Tritonas FC
Figure A1. The correlation between anglers’ socio-economic characteristics, their fishing activities, motivations, and perceptions.
Figure A1. The correlation between anglers’ socio-economic characteristics, their fishing activities, motivations, and perceptions.
Fishes 09 00278 g0a1

References

  1. Arlinghaus, R.; Mehner, T. Socio-economic characterisation of specialised common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) anglers in Germany, and implications for inland fisheries management and eutrophication control. Fish. Res. 2003, 61, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cooke, S.J.; Arlinghaus, R.; Johnson, B.M.; Cowx, I.G. Recreational fisheries in inland waters. In Freshwater Fisheries Ecology; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; pp. 449–465. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ihde, T.F.; Wilberg, M.J.; Loewensteiner, D.A.; Secor, D.H.; Miller, T.J. The increasing importance of marine recreational fishing in the US: Challenges for management. Fish. Res. 2011, 108, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Townhill, B.L.; Radford, Z.; Pecl, G.; van Putten, I.; Pinnegar, J.K.; Hyder, K. Marine recreational fishing and the implications of climate change. Fish Fish. 2019, 20, 977–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Arlinghaus, R.; Tillner, R.; Bork, M. Explaining participation rates in recreational fishing across industrialised countries. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 2015, 22, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vehanen, T.; Piria, M.; Kubečka, J.; Skov, C.; Kelly, F.; Pokki, H.; Eskelinen, P.; Rahikainen, M.; Keskinen, T.; Artell, J.; et al. Data Collection Systems and Methodologies for the Inland Fisheries of Europe; FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 649; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kohl, H. Social and Economic Value of Northern and Central Europe. European Anglers’ Alliance. 2002. Available online: https://www.eaa-europe.org/files/eaa1_7935.pdf (accessed on 21 January 2020).
  8. Hargrove, J.S.; Weyl, O.L.; Allen, M.S.; Deacon, N.R. Using tournament angler data to rapidly assess the invasion status of alien sport fishes (Micropterus spp.) in Southern Africa. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0130056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. World Bank. Hidden Harvest: The Global Contribution of Capture Fisheries; Report 66469-GLB; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  10. Toivonen, A.-L. Recreational fishing in Finland. In Global Challenges in Recreational Fisheries; Aas, Ø., Ed.; Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2008; pp. 21–25. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lovell, S.J.; Steinback, S.R.; Hilger, J.R. The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States, 2011; NOAA: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2013.
  12. Maar, K.; Riisager-Simonsen, C.; MacKenzie, B.R.; Skov, C.; Aarestrup, K.; Svendsen, J.C. Economic expenditures by recreational anglers in a recovering atlantic bluefin tuna fishery. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0271823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Schramm, H.L., Jr.; Armstrong, M.L.; Funicelli, N.A.; Green, D.M.; Lee, D.P.; Manns, R.E., Jr.; Taubert, B.D.; Waters, S.J. The status of competitive sport fishing in North America. Fisheries 1991, 16, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Schramm, H.L., Jr.; Hunt, K.M. Issues, benefits, and problems associated with fishing tournaments in inland waters of the United States: A survey of fishery agency administrators. Fisheries 2007, 32, 234–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Papadopoulos, A.; Touloumis, K.; Tziolas, E.; Boulamatsis, D.; Koutrakis, E. Evaluation of marine recreational fisheries and their relation to sustainability of fisheries resources in Greece. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wickham, H. Reshaping Data with the reshape Package. J. Stat. Softw. 2007, 21, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wickham, H. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, 2nd ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  18. Organa, A. The role of recreational fisheries in the sustainable management of marine resources. In Globefish Highlights a Quarterly Update on World Seafood Markets; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2017; Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i7332e.pdf (accessed on 21 January 2020).
  19. Floyd, M.F.; Nicholas, L.; Lee, I.; Lee, J.H.; Scott, D. Social stratification in recreational fishing participation: Research and policy implications. Leis. Sci. 2006, 28, 351–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Reid, D.D. Overview of recreational fishing in Australia. In Global Challenge in Recreational Fisheries; Aas, O., Arlinghaus, R., Ditton, R.B., Policansky, D.H.L.S., Jr., Eds.; Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2008; pp. 13–18. [Google Scholar]
  21. Czarkowski, T.K.; Wołos, A.; Kapusta, A. Socio-economic portrait of Polish anglers: Implications for recreational fisheries management in freshwater bodies. Aquat. Living Resour. 2021, 34, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Arlinghaus, R.; Bork, M.; Fladung, E. Understanding the heterogeneity of recreational anglers across an urban–rural gradient in a metropolitan area (Berlin, Germany), with implications for fisheries management. Fish. Res. 2008, 92, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Policansky, D. Catch-and-release recreational fishing: A historical perspective. In Recreational Fisheries: Ecological, Economic and Social Evaluation; Pitcher, T.J., Hollingworth, C.E., Eds.; Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK, 2002; pp. 74–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sass, G.G.; Shaw, S.L. Catch-and-release influences on inland recreational fisheries. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac. 2020, 28, 211–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Skrzypczak, A.R.; Karpiński, E.A. New insight into the motivations of anglers and fish release practices in view of the invasiveness of angling. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 271, 111055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Dillard, J.E.; Bates, D.L. Leisure motivation revisited: Why people recreate. Manag. Leis. 2011, 16, 253–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Arlinghaus, R.; Cooke, S.J.; Lyman, J.; Policansky, D.; Schwab, A.; Suski, C.; Sutton, S.G.; Thorstad, E.B. Understanding the complexity of catch-and-release in recreational fishing: An integrative synthesis of global knowledge from historical, ethical, social, and biological perspectives. Rev. Fish. Sci. 2007, 15, 75–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Oh, C.O.; Ditton, R.B.; Riechers, R. Understanding anglers’ preferences for fishing tournament characteristics and policies. Environ. Manag. 2007, 40, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Oh, C.O.; Ditton, R.B. Using recreation specialization to understand conservation support. J. Leis. Res. 2008, 40, 556–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hawkins, C.; Loomis, D.K.; Salz, R.J. A replication of the internal validity and reliability of a multivariable index to measure recreation specialization. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 2009, 14, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lennox, R.J.; Sbragaglia, V.; Vollset, K.W.; Sortland, L.K.; McClenachan, L.; Jarić, I.; Guckian, M.L.; Ferter, K.; Danylchuk, A.J.; Cooke, S.J.; et al. Digital fisheries data in the Internet age: Emerging tools for research and monitoring using online data in recreational fisheries. Fish Fish. 2022, 23, 926–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Neis, B.; Schneider, D.C.; Felt, L.; Haedrich, R.L.; Fischer, J.; Hutchings, J.A. Fisheries assessment: What can be learned from interviewing resource users? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1999, 56, 1949–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tesfamichael, D.; Pitcher, T.J.; Pauly, D. Assessing changes in fisheries using fishers’ knowledge to generate long time series of catch rates: A case study from the Red Sea. Ecol. Soc. 2014, 19, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lewis, S.A.; Setiasih, N.; Fahmi; Dharmadi, D.; O’Malley, M.P.; Campbell, S.J.; Yusuf, M.; Sianipar, A.B. Assessing Indonesian manta and devil ray populations through historical landings and fishing community interviews. PeerJ PrePrints 2015, 6, e1334v1. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Number of fishing competitions tracked down through internet footprints for the period 2008 to 2024, and (b) targeting species of fishing competitions.
Figure 1. (a) Number of fishing competitions tracked down through internet footprints for the period 2008 to 2024, and (b) targeting species of fishing competitions.
Fishes 09 00278 g001
Figure 2. The Greek inland water bodies where fishing competitions were organized. The size of each circle on the map corresponds to the number of events held.
Figure 2. The Greek inland water bodies where fishing competitions were organized. The size of each circle on the map corresponds to the number of events held.
Fishes 09 00278 g002
Figure 3. The interviewed anglers provided data on their sex, age class, living area, income, education level, and marital status, and ‘n’ indicates the number of anglers who provided such data.
Figure 3. The interviewed anglers provided data on their sex, age class, living area, income, education level, and marital status, and ‘n’ indicates the number of anglers who provided such data.
Fishes 09 00278 g003
Figure 4. Decade when reviewed anglers started (a) recreational angling and (b) participating in fishing competitions. The relationship between the year they started angling and the year they began competing is also provided (c); ‘n’ indicates the number of anglers who provided such data.
Figure 4. Decade when reviewed anglers started (a) recreational angling and (b) participating in fishing competitions. The relationship between the year they started angling and the year they began competing is also provided (c); ‘n’ indicates the number of anglers who provided such data.
Fishes 09 00278 g004
Figure 5. The fishing activity of interviewed anglers in days and hours per season. The mean and the median values are indicated by the x and the horizontal line, respectively.
Figure 5. The fishing activity of interviewed anglers in days and hours per season. The mean and the median values are indicated by the x and the horizontal line, respectively.
Fishes 09 00278 g005
Figure 6. The distance anglers are willing to travel for fishing; ‘n’ indicates the number of anglers who provided such data.
Figure 6. The distance anglers are willing to travel for fishing; ‘n’ indicates the number of anglers who provided such data.
Fishes 09 00278 g006
Figure 7. The estimated cost of the fishing trip, the gear cost (including rods, reels, tackle, and other equipment), and the total annual fishing expenses (incurred for fishing activities, including trip costs, gear expenses, bait, transportation, and maintenance) of the anglers interviewed. The central box represents the interquartile range (IQR), while the horizontal line inside the box indicates the median value and the dark gray dot the mean value; standard deviation is shown as vertical error bars. The minimum and maximum values are represented by light gray dots. The ‘n’ indicates the number of anglers who provided such data.
Figure 7. The estimated cost of the fishing trip, the gear cost (including rods, reels, tackle, and other equipment), and the total annual fishing expenses (incurred for fishing activities, including trip costs, gear expenses, bait, transportation, and maintenance) of the anglers interviewed. The central box represents the interquartile range (IQR), while the horizontal line inside the box indicates the median value and the dark gray dot the mean value; standard deviation is shown as vertical error bars. The minimum and maximum values are represented by light gray dots. The ‘n’ indicates the number of anglers who provided such data.
Fishes 09 00278 g007
Figure 8. The fish species targeted by the interviewed anglers; ‘n’ indicates the number of anglers who provided such data.
Figure 8. The fish species targeted by the interviewed anglers; ‘n’ indicates the number of anglers who provided such data.
Fishes 09 00278 g008
Figure 9. The catch-and-release rate practiced by the interviewed anglers; ‘n’ indicates the number of anglers who provided such data.
Figure 9. The catch-and-release rate practiced by the interviewed anglers; ‘n’ indicates the number of anglers who provided such data.
Fishes 09 00278 g009
Figure 10. The anglers’ motivations for recreational fishing pursuits; ‘n’ indicates the number of anglers who provided such data.
Figure 10. The anglers’ motivations for recreational fishing pursuits; ‘n’ indicates the number of anglers who provided such data.
Fishes 09 00278 g010
Figure 11. Anglers’ concerns regarding fishing; ‘n’ indicates the number of anglers who provided such data.
Figure 11. Anglers’ concerns regarding fishing; ‘n’ indicates the number of anglers who provided such data.
Fishes 09 00278 g011
Figure 12. Anglers’ view on (a) the existence of overfishing and (b) the overfished fish stocks.
Figure 12. Anglers’ view on (a) the existence of overfishing and (b) the overfished fish stocks.
Fishes 09 00278 g012
Figure 13. Fish species mentioned by anglers as present in the water body they fished on the date of the conducted interview; ‘n’ indicates the number of anglers who provided such data.
Figure 13. Fish species mentioned by anglers as present in the water body they fished on the date of the conducted interview; ‘n’ indicates the number of anglers who provided such data.
Fishes 09 00278 g013
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Petriki, O.; Bobori, D.C. Unraveling Greek Inland Competitive Fishing: Historical Insights, Angler Profiles, and Motivations through Limited Data Integration in Recreational Fishing Research. Fishes 2024, 9, 278. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9070278

AMA Style

Petriki O, Bobori DC. Unraveling Greek Inland Competitive Fishing: Historical Insights, Angler Profiles, and Motivations through Limited Data Integration in Recreational Fishing Research. Fishes. 2024; 9(7):278. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9070278

Chicago/Turabian Style

Petriki, Olga, and Dimitra C. Bobori. 2024. "Unraveling Greek Inland Competitive Fishing: Historical Insights, Angler Profiles, and Motivations through Limited Data Integration in Recreational Fishing Research" Fishes 9, no. 7: 278. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9070278

APA Style

Petriki, O., & Bobori, D. C. (2024). Unraveling Greek Inland Competitive Fishing: Historical Insights, Angler Profiles, and Motivations through Limited Data Integration in Recreational Fishing Research. Fishes, 9(7), 278. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9070278

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop