Next Article in Journal
Lassa Fever: Critical Review and Prospects for Control
Next Article in Special Issue
Untargeted Liquid Chromatography–High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Metabolomic Investigation Reveals Altered Lipid Content in Leishmania infantum Lacking Lipid Droplet Protein Kinase
Previous Article in Journal
An Overview of the Management of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Six French-Speaking African Countries from 2018 to 2022
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experimental Granulomatous Amebic Encephalitis Caused by Acanthamoeba castellanii
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Insights into the State of the Art of Urogenital Schistosomiasis with a Focus on Infertility

by
Rafaella P. Marques
1,
Waqas Ahmad
2,
Raquel Soares
3,4,
Katia C. Oliveira
1,† and
Monica C. Botelho
4,5,*,†
1
Disciplina de Parasitologia, Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia e Parasitologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo 04023-062, Brazil
2
Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (UVAS), KBCMA Campus, Narowal 51800, Pakistan
3
Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
4
i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
5
Department of Health Promotion and Chronic Diseases, INSA—National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, 4000-055 Porto, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2024, 9(8), 177; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed9080177
Submission received: 9 May 2024 / Revised: 1 August 2024 / Accepted: 5 August 2024 / Published: 10 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Parasitic Neglected Tropical Diseases)

Abstract

:
Schistosomiasis is a neglected tropical disease that affects developing countries worldwide and is caused by several species of parasites from the Schistosoma genus. Chronic infection is characterized by the formation of granulomas around the parasite eggs, the leading cause of pathology. The hepatosplenic clinical form is one of the most common, but urogenital schistosomiasis is another relevant clinical presentation responsible for infertility in men and women. Inflammatory response, anatomical deformations, and endocrine/biochemical changes are involved in the development of infertility. Schistosome parasites can synthesize catechol estrogen-like molecules and affect the sexual hormone balance in their host. Here, we review many aspects of the pathology of urogenital schistosomiasis, specifically infertility, and point to the biochemical and endocrinal elements that must be investigated in the future.

1. Introduction

As described by the German surgeon Theodor Bilharz in 1851, schistosomiasis (also known as bilharziasis) is an important parasitic disease worldwide. This helminthiasis is endemic in areas of developing countries. The highest risk of contamination resides in populations that live in areas with the absence of basic sanitation and depend on agriculture and fishing for their subsistence [1,2,3] The disability-adjusted life year of schistosomiasis in 2019 (1.6 million) shows a 24% reduction in comparison to 2.2 million in the year 2000, concomitant with the increase in worldwide coverage of the control program [4]. Human schistosomiasis is caused by trematode flukes belonging to the genus Schistosoma: S. mansoni, S. haematobium, S. japonicum, S. malayensis, S. intercalatum, and S. mekongi, and infects people in the endemic areas of Central and South America, the Caribbean, Middle and East Asia, and Africa [5,6,7].
The life cycle of schistosomes is established with the blood flukes (schistosomes) laying eggs in the veins of the mesenteric, bladder or reproductive organ plexuses. Their eggs are excreted from the human body through urine or feces into fresh water, and the larvae (miracidia) are liberated. The miracidia swim to their intermediate host, a snail (there is a specific species for each schistosome species), and penetrate them. After several weeks of asexual reproduction and growth, the infected snail releases (under environmental stimuli) another larval form known as cercariae. These cercariae swim until they locate a human host, at which point they penetrate the intact skin. Once inside the human host, these cercariae shed their tails and transform into schistosomula. These schistosomula then develop a resilient tegument that shields them from immune responses. They migrate into the circulation and, around 30 days later, they mature into adult worms within the portal vein. These adult worms proceed to migrate within the venous system (around 45 days), taking residence in the small vessels of the intestines (S. mansoni and S. japonicum), bladder or reproductive organs (S. haematobium), according to the species. Adult worms live in the blood vessels for years, excreting hundreds of eggs daily and successfully surviving in the immune system with sophisticated evasion mechanisms. The eggs must either exit the body through excretion (feces or urine) or become ensnared within adjacent tissues. When eggs become entrapped, they stimulate the development of periovular granulomas, the key event of the physiopathology of schistosomiasis, and lead to a range of consequences depending on parasite load, age, and immune/physiological status of the host. These effects encompass physical and intellectual development limitations and influence the endocrine and immunological systems (by producing hormone-like molecules) and their signaling molecules (such as receptors, kinases and transcription factors). Additionally, organ-specific outcomes emerge, including pronounced hepatosplenomegaly, portal fibrosis, and, as a result, portal hypertension [2,7,8].
To comprehensively understand the pathology of urogenital schistosomiasis and its impact on fertility, our group has been investigating the biochemical and endocrine elements of this disease. Our previous research in this area explained some of the mechanisms by which schistosome parasites influence hormonal balance and reproductive function in the host. Additionally, the elucidation of these mechanisms may pave the way for the development of targeted interventions to prevent or treat infertility associated with urogenital schistosomiasis. Urogenital schistosomiasis represents a significant public health concern, particularly due to its association with infertility. Continued research into the biochemical and endocrine aspects of the disease is crucial for improving our understanding of its pathogenesis, especially infertility, and developing effective strategies for prevention and treatment.
Here, we review these aspects based on the search of the literature deposited in the PubMed database. We included all publications that reported schistosomiasis associated with infertility. The criteria and search strategies used for the inclusion of the papers are elucidated in Supplementary Materials (Figure S1).

2. Urogenital Schistosomiasis

Eggs cause inflammation in the urinary and genital tracts, intestinal walls, and liver. The pathological effects in the genital tract lead to obstruction, fibrosis, the destruction of anatomical structures, and the production of antibodies against spermatozoa [9]. Although the development of genital tract pathologies can occur in both genders, women are more affected. S. haematobium eggs can be deposited in the urinary bladder, lower ureters, cervix, and vagina, where the main pathology occurs. The close location of the genital venous plexus favors the parasitic migration, leading to the development of female genital schistosomiasis (FGS). FGS outcomes derived from the deposition of schistosome eggs include the formation of granulomas, fibrosis, and angiogenesis as part of the inflammatory response. Consequently, women afflicted by this condition might undergo symptoms such as hematuria, dysuria, and an elevated susceptibility to the development of bladder cancer [8,10,11,12,13,14].
The classical lesions of female genital schistosomiasis are described as “sandy patches” because they comprise eggs and granulomas associated with increased inflammation and vascularization. Typically, areas of sandy patches tend to bleed upon contact and can additionally induce genital itching and discomfort. This condition can also cause stress incontinence, dyspareunia, and potentially even infertility [15]. Endometriosis can be linked to FGS, often contributing to female infertility and an elevated risk of the horizontal transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [2,13,16].
Current guidelines recommend preventive chemotherapy, using praziquantel to avoid the impact of schistosomiasis on life quality. A single dose of praziquantel in participants in a study in Nigeria significantly reduced eggs in their urine [17]. Urogenital schistosomiasis maintains a significant prevalence, mainly affecting female school aged children (SAC) and often goes undetected among individuals [18,19]. The infection with S. haematobium can be detected by testing aspects like proteinuria and hematuria, but the progression of the disease and complications need more sophisticated approaches (such as ultrasound), which impacts the capability to detect the disease in remote areas [20,21]. Prevention is the most effective way to decrease the disease’s occurrence [2,13,16].

3. Mechanisms Underlying Schistosomiasis-Associated Infertility

Infertility is characterized as the inability to achieve pregnancy following 12 months of frequent and unprotected sexual intercourse. This health condition impacts one in six couples (15–20%) globally and 12–30% of couples in the sub-Saharan Africa region [22,23,24]. Pelvic infections (such as Neisseria gonorrhea and Chlamydia trachomatis) are frequently associated as a potential cause of infertility. Schistosomiasis persists as a significant risk factor, since many cases of infertility in schistosomiasis-endemic areas have been connected to the clinical presentation on female genitalia (41%) and are involved in many cases of ectopic pregnancies (3.6%) [9,22,25].

3.1. Periovular Granuloma Is the Critical Event of Urogenital Pathogenesis

Infertility is thought to be associated with schistosome egg deposition, which triggers inflammation and granulomatous reactions through the release of proteolytic enzymes by the eggs. This process can lead to mechanical blockages, the formation of scar tissue, and the destruction of anatomical structures [9,26]. The granuloma formed around the eggs accounts for this, comprising eosinophils, mononuclear phagocytes, fibroblasts, lymphocytes, neutrophils, plasma cells, and mast cells. The presence of parasites in organisms triggers the systemic immune response. Antigens originating from cercariae, adult worms, and eggs are transported to lymphoid organs, which are taken up, processed, and presented to antigen-specific T cells. This sequence of events triggers T-cell activation and the secretion of lymphokines. Consequently, systemic immune responses are activated, which can lead to chronic fibrosis and tubal adhesions that significantly contribute to infertility [27]. The lesions caused by the presence of eggs in the lower genital tract, especially in the vagina or vulva, can become hypertrophic, growing for months or even years. Consequently, the weakening of epithelial barriers due to vaginal and cervical lesions can facilitate HIV transmission. Easy bleeding in these areas allows HIV in semen direct access to the bloodstream and, through ulcerative lesions, to the regional lymph nodes [27,28]. The diagnosis of lesions in the upper genital tract, which includes the uterus, fallopian tubes, and ovaries, is more difficult in routine clinical practice [27]. It is worth highlighting that infertility and reduced fertility can also be attributed to hormonal imbalances [27,28].
Male infertility can be caused by various conditions, like sexually transmitted infections, febrile diseases, and parasitic infections, such as filariasis and schistosomiasis. The association between male infertility and schistosomiasis is little reported, and this pathology can occur by a range of mechanisms: (i) hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis hormonal disruption; (ii) testicular tissue damaged by inflammation and granuloma formation and/or (iii) the obstruction of or an accessory sex organ affected by inflammation and granuloma formation leading to severe oligozoospermia, azoospermia, or subfertile semen [26]. Trapped Schistosoma eggs in men can block the spermatic venous plexus, leading to granuloma formation, testicular infarction, intense epididymitis, and the inhibition of spermatogenesis [3,29]. Seminal vesiculitis can result in hematospermia, painful ejaculation, burning during urination, and lower back pain; the granuloma stage causes irreversible damage [3,29].
Schistosomiasis primarily involves thromboembolic lesions leading to terminal vein occlusion and blood supply impairment [30]. The access routes for the worms in the venous systems of the spermatic cord, epididymis, and testicle include the following: the junctions of the superior mesenteric with the right spermatic veins and the inferior mesenteric with the left spermatic veins; the convergence of the deferential vein with pelvic veins; the linkage between the pampiniform plexus in the scrotum and pelvic veins intersecting near the external inguinal ring; and the possibility of direct spread from the epididymis to the testis (though rare) and the potential for systemic arterial spread, as observed in cases of ectopic bilharzial lesions (although also rare) [31]. Figure 1 illustrates the principal events associated with female and male infertility in urogenital schistosomiasis.

3.2. Estrogen Pathways and Catechol Estrogens: New Metabolites Involved in Urogenital Schistosomiasis-Induced Bladder Cancer

Estrogen signaling is mediated through estrogen receptors (ERs), including the classical receptors ERα and ERβ, as well as membrane receptors such as GPR30 [32,33]. Estrogen receptor α is predominantly expressed in gonadal organs, the liver, and adipose tissue, while ERβ is primarily found in the prostate, bladder, ovary, colon, adipose tissue, and immune system [34]. These classic receptors play essential physiological roles in ovarian development and function and mediate estrogen’s cardioprotective effects [32,35]. Previous studies have linked estrogen-like metabolites during female genital schistosomiasis (FGS) with self-reported infertility. Santos et al. reported that these metabolites down-regulate ERα and ERβ in estrogen-responsive cells in vitro [36]. Different estrogen signaling pathways are related to the regulation of biological processes. In the classical pathway, activating the ligand and direct binding to Estrogen Responsive Elements (EREs) in the promoter regions of target genes results in transcriptional alterations in estrogen-responsive genes. As for the non-genomic pathway, ligand-activated ERs do not directly bind to DNA. Instead, they are connected through the activation of a kinase cascade to the activation of a transcription factor complex, which subsequently interacts with the target gene promoter. Then, gene regulation is affected by indirect DNA binding [32,37,38,39].
Catechol estrogens are the result of the metabolism of estrogens E1 and E2. In this process, the formation of pregnenolone occurs after the catalysis of cholesterol by the CYP11A enzyme of the cytochrome P450 family. Subsequently, another P450 enzyme, CYP17A, leads to the formation of androstenedione, which can be catalyzed by HSD17B3 for the formation of testosterone or metabolized by aromatase (CYP19A), resulting in estrone (E1) production. Estradiol (E2) formation occurs through the aromatization of testosterone or the metabolization of estrone by HSD17B1. The hydroxylation of the steroid aromatic ring on C2, C4, and C16 positions by cytochrome P450 enzymes, such as CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP3A4, and CYP1B1, culminates in the production of catechol estrogens 4-hydroxyestrone and 4-hydroxyestradiol (or 2-hydroxyestrone and 2-hydroxyestradiol), which CYP450 oxidates in the semiquinones E1-3,4-SQ and E2-3,4-SQ (or E1-2,3-SQ and E2-2,3-SQ) and the posterior to quinones E1-3,4-Q and E2-3,4-Q (or E1-2,3-Q and E2-2,3-Q). Evidence has demonstrated that S. haematobium eggs secrete these novel catechol estrogens which are then metabolized into active quinones capable of modifying DNA, either by forming adducts or by producing reactive oxygen species, in addition to inducing mutations in the p53 gene, resulting in damage and carcinogenesis [36]. Consequently, it is assumed that parasite-derived catechol estrogens may impact infertility during Schistosoma infection by interfering with estrogen receptors [36,40,41,42].
Figure 2 postulates the catechol estrogens biosynthesis pathway in S. haematobium, S. mansoni, and S. japonicum based on a brief in silico search for homologs in the genome of these parasites. The result of this search is documented in Table 1. There, we point to the gene predictions that may be responsible for the catechol estrogen synthesis. The hypothesis is that the synthesis of these hormone-like molecules by parasites interferes with the fertility and/or pathological process of cancer development, for example.
The crosstalk between hosts and parasites, particularly in the context of hormonal changes induced by parasites, presents a fascinating area for further research. This may be the effect of the parasite’s metabolic interference in the substrates of the host, interfering in the endocrinal regulation of sexual hormones or producing hormone-like molecules that may act as endocrinal disruptors. Investigating the impact of parasites on host hormonal regulation, especially regarding fertility-related hormones, could provide valuable insights into the mechanisms of parasitic infections and their effects on reproductive health.
Examining the genital organs of infected animals could shed light on potential alterations induced by the parasite’s production of catechol estrogens in the reproductive system. Similarly, exploring the synthesis of estrogen-related metabolites by parasites, such as eggs, and their interaction with estrogen receptors (ER) in host cells, would be crucial for revealing hormonal interactions and/or hormonal alterations in infected hosts. Understanding whether the levels of sexual hormones in infected female hosts influence the expression of ER in their tissues is another important aspect to explore. This could elucidate how parasitic infections impact the hormonal balance and reproductive physiology of the host. Additionally, investigating whether parasites interfere with the physiological processes of fertility could provide insights into potential mechanisms underlying infertility associated with schistosomiasis.

4. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

The established molecular crosstalk between the host and parasite is complex and exciting. Further research is required to examine the impact of hormonal changes induced by the parasite in the host. It would be interesting, for example, if the genital organs of infected animals were inspected. This research would also include an investigation of the synthesis of estrogen-related metabolites by parasites (eggs) that can down- or up-regulate the expression of estrogen receptor (ER) alpha and beta in estrogen-responsive cells. Could the level of sexual hormones in infected host females induce changes in the ER expression in their tissues? Could the parasite interfere with the physiological process of fertility? All these points are relevant to understanding the impact of schistosomiasis on the fertility status of couples and the molecular mechanisms beyond it. Overall, unraveling the molecular mechanisms underlying the interaction between schistosomiasis and fertility could have significant implications for understanding the reproductive health implications of parasitic infections. This research could contribute to the development of targeted interventions to mitigate the impact of schistosomiasis on fertility status and improve reproductive health outcomes for affected individuals and couples.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/tropicalmed9080177/s1, Figure S1: Informative diagram of criteria and search strategies for inclusion of publications in review.

Funding

RPM and KCO received financial support from FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; 2023/04391-6) and CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; 88887.973643/2025-00).

Acknowledgments

Waqas Ahmad has received input for this work through ESCMID’s mentorship program by Monica C. Botelho.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Dzeing-Ella, A.; Mechaï, F.; Consigny, P.H.; Zerat, L.; Viard, J.P.; Lecuit, M.; Lortholary, O. Case Report: Cervical Schistosomiasis as a Risk Factor of Cervical Uterine Dysplasia in a Traveler. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2009, 81, 549–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nour, N.M. Schistosomiasis: Health Effects on Women. Rev. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010, 3, 28–32. [Google Scholar]
  3. Adisa, J.; Egbujo, E.M.; Yahaya, B.A.; Echejoh, G. Primary Infertility Associated with Schistosoma mansoni: A Case Report from the Jos Plateau, North Central Nigeria. Afr. Health Sci. 2012, 12, 563–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Montresor, A.; Mwinzi, P.; Mupfasoni, D.; Garba, A. Reduction in DALYs Lost Due to Soil-Transmitted Helminthiases and Schistosomiasis from 2000 to 2019 Is Parallel to the Increase in Coverage of the Global Control Programs. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2022, 16, e0010575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Botelho, M.C.; Machado, J.C.; Brindley, P.J.; da Costa, J.M.C. Targeting Molecular Signaling Pathways of Schistosoma haematobium Infection in Bladder Cancer. Virulence 2011, 2, 267–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chen, X.; Le, J.; Hu, Y. Predicting Schistosomiasis Intensity in Africa: A Machine Learning Approach to Evaluate the Progress of WHO Roadmap 2030. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2024, 111, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Figueiredo, J.C.; Richter, J.; Borja, N.; Balaca, A.; Costa, S.; Belo, S.; Grácio, M.A. Prostate Adenocarcinoma Associated with Prostatic Infection Due to Schistosoma haematobium. Case Report and Systematic Review. Parasitol. Res. 2015, 114, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Richardson, M.L.; Fu, C.L.; Pennington, L.F.; Honeycutt, J.D.; Odegaard, J.L.; Hsieh, Y.J.; Hammam, O.; Conti, S.L.; Hsieh, M.H. A New Mouse Model for Female Genital Schistosomiasis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014, 8, e2957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kjetland, E.F.; Kurewa, E.N.; Mduluza, T.; Midzi, N.; Gomo, E.; Friis, H.; Gundersen, S.G.; Ndhlovu, P.D. The First Community-Based Report on the Effect of Genital Schistosoma haematobium Infection on Female Fertility. Fertil. Steril. 2010, 94, 1551–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rollinson, D. A Wake up Call for Urinary Schistosomiasis: Reconciling Research Effort with Public Health Importance. Parasitology 2009, 136, 1593–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Talaat, M.; Watts, S.; Mekheimar, S.; Ali, H.F.; Hamed, H. The Social Context of Reproductive Health in an Egyptian Hamlet: A Pilot Study to Identify Female Genital Schistosomiasis. Soc. Sci. Med. 2004, 58, 515–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hotez, P.J.; Fenwick, A.; Kjetland, E.F. Africa’s 32 Cents Solution for HIV/AIDS. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2009, 3, e430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Schanz, A.; Richter, J.; Beyer, I.; Baldus, S.E.; Hess, A.P.; Kruessel, J.S. Genital Schistosomiasis as a Cause of Female Sterility and Acute Abdomen. Fertil. Steril. 2010, 93, 2075.e7–2075.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bailey, S.L.; Price, J.; Llewelyn, M. Fluke Infertility: The Late Cost of a Quick Swim. J. Travel Med. 2011, 18, 61–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hotez, P.; Whitham, M. Helminth Infections: A New Global Women’s Health Agenda. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014, 123, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mbabazi, P.S.; Andan, O.; Fitzgerald, D.W.; Chitsulo, L.; Engels, D.; Downs, J.A. Examining the Relationship between Urogenital Schistosomiasis and Hiv Infection. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2011, 5, e1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Odaibo, A.B.; Komolafe, A.K.; Olajumoke, T.O.; Diyan, K.D.; Aluko, D.A.; Alagbe, O.A.; Ajagbe, O.A.; Olarinloye, D.B. Endemic Status of Urogenital Schistosomiasis and the Efficacy of a Single-Dose Praziquantel Treatment in Unmapped Rural Farming Communities in Oyo East Local Government Area, Oyo State, Nigeria. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2024, 18, e0012101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lamberti, O.; Kayuni, S.; Kumwenda, D.; Ngwira, B.; Singh, V.; Moktali, V.; Dhanani, N.; Wessels, E.; Van Lieshout, L.; Fleming, F.M.; et al. Female Genital Schistosomiasis Burden and Risk Factors in Two Endemic Areas in Malawi Nested in the Morbidity Operational Research for Bilharziasis Implementation Decisions (MORBID) Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2024, 18, e0012102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Percheron, L.; Leblanc, C.; Ulinski, T.; Fila, M.; Malvy, D.; Bacchetta, J.; Guigonis, V.; Debuisson, C.; Launay, E.; Martinez, E.; et al. Pediatric Urogenital Schistosomiasis Diagnosed in France. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2024, 39, 1893–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vaillant, M.T.; Philippy, F.; Neven, A.; Barré, J.; Bulaev, D.; Olliaro, P.L.; Utzinger, J.; Keiser, J.; Garba, A.T. Diagnostic Tests for Human Schistosoma mansoni and Schistosoma haematobium Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Lancet Microbe 2024, 5, e366–e378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Manciulli, T.; Marangoni, D.; Salas-Coronas, J.; Bocanegra, C.; Richter, J.; Gobbi, F.; Motta, L.; Minervini, A.; Bartoloni, A.; Zammarchi, L. Diagnosis and Management of Complicated Urogenital Schistosomiasis: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Infection 2023, 51, 1185–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Owusu-Bempah, A.; Odoi, A.T.; Dassah, E.T. Genital Schistosomiasis Leading to Ectopic Pregnancy and Subfertility: A Case for Parasitic Evaluation of Gynecologic Patients in Schistosomiasis Endemic Areas. Case Rep. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013, 2013, 634264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Botelho, M.C.; Alves, H.; Barros, A.; Rinaldi, G.; Brindley, P.J.; Sousa, M. The Role of Estrogens and Estrogen Receptor Signaling Pathways in Cancer and Infertility: The Case of Schistosomes. Trends Parasitol. 2015, 31, 246–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lindsay, T.J.; Vitrikas, K.R. Evaluation and Treatment of Infertility. Am. Fam. Physician 2015, 91, 308–314. [Google Scholar]
  25. Balasch, J.; Martínez-román, S.; Creus, M.; Campo, E.; Fortuny, A.; Vanrell, J.A. Schistosomiasis: An Unusual Cause of Tubal Infertility. Hum. Reprod. 1995, 10, 1725–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Abdel-Naser, M.B.; Altenburg, A.; Zouboulis, C.C.; Wollina, U. Schistosomiasis (Bilharziasis) and Male Infertility. Andrologia 2019, 51, e13165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Helling-Giese, G.; Kjetland, E.F.; Gundersen, S.G.; Poggensee, G.; Richter, J.; Krantz, I.; Feldmeier, H. Schistosomiasis in Women: Manifestations in the Upper Reproductive Tract. Acta Trop. 1996, 62, 225–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Poggensee, G.; Feldmeier, H.; Krantz, I. Schistosomiasis of the Female Genital Tract: Public Health Aspects. Parasitol. Today 1999, 15, 378–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kini, S.; Dayoub, N.; Raja, A.; Pickering, S.; Thong, J. Schistosomiasis-Induced Male Infertility. BMJ Case Rep. 2009, 2009, bcr0120091481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. El-Mahgoub, S. Pelvic Schistosomiasis and Infertility. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 1982, 20, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Girgis, S.M.; Wassef, N.F. Bilharziasis and Azoospermia. Arch. Androl. 1980, 5, 369–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Cui, J.; Shen, Y.; Li, R. Estrogen Synthesis and Signaling Pathways during Aging: From Periphery to Brain. Trends Mol. Med. 2013, 19, 197–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Prossnitz, E.R.; Maggiolini, M. Mechanisms of Estrogen Signaling and Gene Expression via GPR30. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2009, 308, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kovats, S. Estrogen Receptors Regulate Innate Immune Cells and Signaling Pathways. Cell. Immunol. 2015, 294, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Paterni, I.; Granchi, C.; Katzenellenbogen, J.A.; Minutolo, F. Estrogen Receptors Alpha (ERα) and Beta (ERβ): Subtype-Selective Ligands and Clinical Potential. Steroids 2014, 90, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Santos, J.; Gouveia, M.J.; Vale, N.; De Lurdes Delgado, M.; Gonçalves, A.; Da Silva, J.M.T.; Oliveira, C.; Xavier, P.; Gomes, P.; Santos, L.L.; et al. Urinary Estrogen Metabolites and Self-Reported Infertility in Women Infected with Schistosoma haematobium. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e96774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Björnström, L.; Sjöberg, M. Mechanisms of Estrogen Receptor Signaling: Convergence of Genomic and Nongenomic Actions on Target Genes. Mol. Endocrinol. 2005, 19, 833–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Heldring, N.; Pike, A.; Andersson, S.; Matthews, J.; Cheng, G.; Hartman, J.; Tujague, M.; Ström, A.; Treuter, E.; Warner, M.; et al. Estrogen Receptors: How Do They Signal and What Are Their Targets. Physiol. Rev. 2007, 87, 905–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vrtačnik, P.; Ostanek, B.; Mencej-Bedrač, S.; Marc, J. The Many Faces of Estrogen Signaling. Biochem. Medica 2014, 24, 329–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Botelho, M.C.; Alves, H.; Richter, J.; Jorge, R.; Herculano, R.A. Estrogen Catechol Detection as Biomarkers in Schistosomiasis Induced Cancer and Infertility Graphical Abstract HHS Public Access. Lett. Drug Des. Discov. 2017, 14, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cardoso, R.; Lacerda, P.C.; Costa, P.P.; Machado, A.; Carvalho, A.; Bordalo, A.; Fernandes, R.; Soares, R.; Richter, J.; Alves, H.; et al. Estrogen Metabolism-Associated CYP2D6 and IL6-174g/c Polymorphisms in Schistosoma haematobium Infection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Oliveira, K.C.; Cardoso, R.; Dos Santos, A.C.; Fernandes, R.; Botelho, M.C. Imbalance of Steroid Hormones in Hamsters Infected with Schistosoma mansoni. Endocr. Metab. Immune Disord.-Drug Targets 2019, 19, 1122–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Events associated with the female and male infertility in urogenital schistosomiasis.
Figure 1. Events associated with the female and male infertility in urogenital schistosomiasis.
Tropicalmed 09 00177 g001
Figure 2. Catechol estrogens synthesis pathway in humans and the possible homologs identified in schistosome species. In green are highlighted the possible homologs and in yellow are highlighted the homologs with an e-value close to the cut-off (10−5).
Figure 2. Catechol estrogens synthesis pathway in humans and the possible homologs identified in schistosome species. In green are highlighted the possible homologs and in yellow are highlighted the homologs with an e-value close to the cut-off (10−5).
Tropicalmed 09 00177 g002
Table 1. S. haematobium, S. mansoni, and S. japonicum homologs of postulates catechol estrogens biosynthesis pathway.
Table 1. S. haematobium, S. mansoni, and S. japonicum homologs of postulates catechol estrogens biosynthesis pathway.
S. japonicumS. mansoniS. haematobiumHuman Ref. Seq. ID.NameSymbolEnzyme ID
% IdentityE-ValueGene ID% IdentityE-ValueGene ID% IdentityE-ValueGene ID
ALQ33469.1cholesterol monooxygenaseCYP11A1.14.15.6
ABY87534.1steroid 17alpha-monooxygenaseCYP17A1.14.14.19
531.1 × 1022Sjp_005830052.57.40 × 10−21Smp_009430.153.82.20 × 10−23SHAE2_97190.1EAW92645.1testosterone 17beta-dehydrogenaseHSD17B31.1.1.64
NP_000404.2hydroxysteroid 17-beta dehydrogenase 1HSD17B11.1.1.62
NP_059488.2cytochrome P450 family 3 subfamily A member 4CYP3A41.14.13.32
37.95.00 × 10−8EWB00_005315.230.21.30 × 10−6Smp_156400.130.23.50 × 10−7MS3_00006533.2_mrnaNP_001306146.1cytochrome P450 family 1 subfamily A member 1CYP1A11.14.14.1
34.51.00 × 10−6EWB00_005315.2272.50 × 10−5Smp_156400.1275.00 × 10−6SHAE1_52460.1NP_000752.2cytochrome P450 family 1 subfamily A2CYP1A21.14.14.1
36.45.00 × 10−5EWB00_005315.335.73.60 × 10−5Smp_156400.133.99.60 × 10−5SHAE2_54450.1NP_000095.2cytochrome P450 family 1 subfamily B1CYP1B11.14.14.1
43.91.20 × 10−64EWB00_00718542.61.60 × 10−64Smp_030760.143.44.20 × 10−64SHAE1_77650.8NP_000095.2NADPH--cytochrome P450 reductaseCPR1.6.2.4
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marques, R.P.; Ahmad, W.; Soares, R.; Oliveira, K.C.; Botelho, M.C. Insights into the State of the Art of Urogenital Schistosomiasis with a Focus on Infertility. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2024, 9, 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed9080177

AMA Style

Marques RP, Ahmad W, Soares R, Oliveira KC, Botelho MC. Insights into the State of the Art of Urogenital Schistosomiasis with a Focus on Infertility. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2024; 9(8):177. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed9080177

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marques, Rafaella P., Waqas Ahmad, Raquel Soares, Katia C. Oliveira, and Monica C. Botelho. 2024. "Insights into the State of the Art of Urogenital Schistosomiasis with a Focus on Infertility" Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 9, no. 8: 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed9080177

APA Style

Marques, R. P., Ahmad, W., Soares, R., Oliveira, K. C., & Botelho, M. C. (2024). Insights into the State of the Art of Urogenital Schistosomiasis with a Focus on Infertility. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, 9(8), 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed9080177

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop