Next Article in Journal
Exploration of Feature Representations for Predicting Learning and Retention Outcomes in a VR Training Scenario
Previous Article in Journal
Which Way to Cope with COVID-19 Challenges? Contributions of the IoT for Smart City Projects
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Big Data and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs) at a Glance

1
Research Institute of Energy Management and Planning, University of Tehran, Tehran 1417466191, Iran
2
Department of Business and Management, Webster Vienna Private University, 1020 Vienna, Austria
3
Faculty of Business and Law, De Montfort University, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK
4
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
5
School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, Tehran 1417935840, Iran
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2021, 5(3), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc5030028
Submission received: 8 May 2021 / Revised: 19 May 2021 / Accepted: 3 June 2021 / Published: 28 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Big Data and UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs))

Abstract

:
The launch of the United Nations (UN) 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2015 was a historic event, uniting countries around the world around the shared agenda of sustainable development with a more balanced relationship between human beings and the planet. The SDGs affect or impact almost all aspects of life, as indeed does the technological revolution, empowered by Big Data and their related technologies. It is inevitable that these two significant domains and their integration will play central roles in achieving the 2030 Agenda. This research aims to provide a comprehensive overview of how these domains are currently interacting, by illustrating the impact of Big Data on sustainable development in the context of each of the 17 UN SDGs.

1. Introduction

In 2015, the eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), which began in 2000 and culminated in 2015, were replaced by the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The final 2015 MDG Report stated that for the next 15 years, a new and more ambitious plan was required to transform the world if the globally desired future was to be achieved, where human needs and the requirements of economic transformation could be balanced with the protection of the environment and realizing peace and human rights for all [1]. This new universal agenda comprised 17 goals and 169 targets and aimed to complete the unfinished elements of the MDG era, but also ensure peace and prosperity for the people of the planet.
The concept of sustainable development emerged in the late 1980s as one of the development catchphrases of the era [2]. Arising from the debates on the contradictions between economic growth and environmental sustainability, to an emerging consensus on the three significant dimensions of sustainable development (economic growth, social inclusion, and environmental protection), to the 5Ps (people, prosperity, planet, partnership, and peace) that form the core of the 2030 Agenda [3], numerous scholars, practitioners, and policy makers have contributed to the advancement of sustainable development. Figure 1, summarizes the growth in searches for a few sustainable development-related phrases (and an index of their monthly Google trend) since 2014. In addition to the term “sustainable development”, for which searches show stable growth, the year 2015 (the year the 17 SDGs were adopted) shows a significant increase in worldwide searches for sustainable development; the index for the term “sustainable development” increased from approximately 40 to 70. This rapidly growing trend continued, even after 2015, and all relevant phrases have now merged close to the maximum value of 100, indicating the highest search pattern interest worldwide.
In addition to the greater ambition of the SDGs and the broadening definition of development [4], one of the biggest differences between sustainable development today compared with development in its early iterations is undoubtedly that it is accompanied by rapidly evolving technology and data science. Big Data, as a concept, emerged in the early 1990s about the same time as sustainable development. The importance of Big Data and the technological revolution that spawned it has arguably touched every aspect of human life, as evidenced by the stable and high level of the Google trend index (see Figure 1). Although numerous studies have contributed to our understanding of Big Data and its contribution to sustainable development, to the best of our knowledge, and although there is a UN Working Group dedicated to this issue, there is no research exclusively devoted to investigating the most up-to-date connections between the SDGs and Big Data. Nor is there any research dedicated to the related fields of Data Mining techniques and analytics platforms/services—both influential domains where, despite impressive progress, challenges are faced continuously. This paper seeks to summarize the impact of Big Data on sustainable development, in the context of the UN’s 17 SDGs, to present the readers with a good overview of where things stand at the moment, vis à vis the potential of Big Data in realizing the 2030 Agenda, as well as the challenges faced. In doing so, this should open up new avenues for future studies and research and further promote the integration of technology and sustainable development towards their shared goal.
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 introduces Big Data in the context of the current rapid technological revolution; Section 3 investigates the impact, potential values, and challenges of Big Data for each of the 17 SDGs; the paper is concluded in Section 4, where potential directions for future research are also outlined.

2. Big Data under the Technological Revolution

In recent years, rapid and continuous technological advancement has produced almost limitless volumes of information. It is estimated that every person on Earth will create 1.7 MB of data every second by 2020, generating over 2.5 quintillion bytes of data daily [5]. This data deluge or information overload has resulted in Big Data. The resultant analytics form a crucial key to every aspect of the digital economy and the potential and increasing significance of data-driven decision making is widely acknowledged. Numerous investigations have been conducted to reveal and illustrate the good use to which these data can be applied.
Like the concept of sustainable development, after decades of rapid development, Big Data are no longer a new term or concept. Although no longer new, Big Data have not stopped developing, expanding and integrating with other emerging and trending digital era products. In fact, this data-digitalization revolution promises to continually keep moving forward as technology evolves [6]. Nowadays, when referring to Big Data, instead of thinking about an independent solution or the size of the dataset being created, Big Data are now considered as a phenomenon closely linked to the broader digital revolution [7]. Few existing studies attempting to link sustainable development with Big Data have reflected adequately the most up to date nature of the Big Data phenomenon. The impact of accessing bigger size data on sustainable development [8] or the specific types of Big Data have not been addressed (i.e., urban Big Data in [9], household Big Data in [10], big Earth data in [11,12]). As Hassani et al. (2019) summarize in [13], the digitalization journey started from data management and warehousing before spreading to web-based intelligence and analytics, which in turn led to third generation mobile and sensor-based systems, followed by a fourth generation promoted by the evolving Internet of Things (IoT), machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, and more recently 5G. Thus, it has been a long journey to the current modern digital world [13,14]. Advances and benefits are unfolding in parallel with these rapidly developing digital technologies and intelligent data analytics, including a greatly enhanced capability to gather, obtain and process data. There is no doubt that the Big Data phenomenon and relevant technologies have penetrated almost every aspect of our life. The expansion of Big Data is contributing to productive growth across industries, enabling new business in Big Data infrastructure, analytic platforms, and services to develop [13]. In doing so, Big Data can make an important contribution to sustainable development. For example, Big Data can contribute to the better measurement of the progress of the SDGs [15]. Big Data and related Data Mining techniques and analytics platforms/services also hold immeasurable potential for the better integration and implementation of sustainable development.

3. Values of Big Data to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals

The integration of sustainable development will play an increasingly significant part in economic growth and social progress given the existing unbalanced relationship between humans and the planet, especially in urbanized cities [9]. In 2015, all United Nations member states adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development with 17 SDGs at its core. Following the MDGs, the UN issued an urgent call for action by all countries in a global partnership [16]. The UN understood the importance of leveraging Big Data and its analytics from the very beginning, establishing the UN Global Pulse in 2009 to serve as an innovation hub for developing, scaling and promoting Big Data research for sustainable development and humanitarian action [17]. Furthermore, there is the UN Big Data Programme [18], which includes a Task Team dedicated to Big Data and the SDGs [19]. UN ESCAP has also shown strong interest in this area and recently published a blog and working paper dealing with Big Data and the SDGs [20,21]. Moreover, there is a remarkable working project where a metadata repository of all SDG indicators is being assembled by the UN system and other international organizations. This metadata repository can be accessed via the UN Statistics Division website website [22].
The following subsections investigate the potential benefits of Big Data and their relevant technologies for each of the SDGs. In doing so, the improvements to measurement of the SDG indicators using Big Data are illustrated. The contributions of the broader Big Data phenomenon, empowered by today’s technologies, are also exemplified.

3.1. Big Data and No Poverty

SDG 1, “no poverty”, sets out to “end poverty in all its forms everywhere” [16]. This goal is a continuation from the MDG era, during which the global numbers experiencing extreme poverty was reduced by almost half, from 1,751 million (about 16% of the world) in 1999 to 836 million (about 10% of the world) in 2015. The 2030 Agenda aims to further reduce that percentage to less than 3% by 2030 [1,16]. This achievement was greatly assisted by a rapidly developing China, which dramatically improved global aggregates [23]. This brisk development could not continue indefinitely, leading to a slowdown of the decline of global extreme poverty. This slowdown has been exacerbated by outbreaks of violent conflict, natural disasters and more recently a global pandemic, which is predicted to lead to an increase in extreme poverty for the first time in over a decade (2021 [24]). The need for action is clear from the Google Trend “no poverty” index (see Figure 2), where a structural change in 2015 is followed by a stable growth trend approaching the maximum.
According to the World Bank Group survey of SDG-related Big Data projects in 2015 [25], SDG 1 “no poverty” attracted the most attention of Big Data projects among all SDGs, with mobile phone data and satellite imagery data and geodata identified as the top two data sources. UN Global Pulse identified that spending patterns extracted from mobile phone data can provide proxy indicators for income levels [17], which has also been confirmed in [26,27], where the authors used historical mobile phone use data or call detail records to map the socioeconomic status of individuals and provide an accurate prediction of poverty, even within micro-regions. Satellite imagery data and geodata have also been playing a significant role in predicting and identifying poverty. Jean et al. (2016) [28] applied ML techniques to daytime satellite images and night-time maps to locate areas experiencing poverty. Similarly, in [29], using ML techniques, high spatial resolution satellite images were adopted to identify features such as building density, car counts, road density, pavement, road width, roof materials, which can all be used to estimate poverty within small areas. The authors of [30] promote the integration of poverty geography with digitalization trends, where modern Big Data empowered technologies (i.e., data platform, cloud computing, remote sensing, AI), can be used to help fight poverty. As noted above, developments in China made a significant contribution to reducing global poverty; over 70% of the poverty reduction globally, over the past 40 years, can be attributed to China [31,32]. According to [33], the successful implementation of Big Data empowered technologies, which made a significant contribution to poverty reduction in Guizhou Province of China, serves as a good illustration. For example, the “Poverty Alleviation Cloud”, launched in 2015, facilitated the integration of data from different government departments, helping to identify people experiencing extreme poverty, and making available relevant policies and welfare programmes via the same platform. Moreover, it also enabled customized poverty alleviation, such as matching skilled labor with suitable employment or local products with buyers worldwide. By promoting e-commerce and helping people to find employment, this program helps people to get back on their feet by widening their sources of income and, in doing so, preventing poverty.

3.2. Big Data and Zero Hunger

SDG 2, “zero hunger”, aims to “end hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture” [16]. As can be seen in Figure 3, although “zero hunger” does not track or show the same level as the “no poverty” Google Trend index, worldwide attention and interest still indicates a significant boost since the inception of the SDGs in 2015. The growing trend in recent years is especially evident.
As the negative impacts of climate change have become clear in recent decades, agriculture is a sector that is increasingly under scrutiny. It faces significant challenges owing to its dependency on natural resources. It is a central to SDG 2 as it is critical to the supply of food but it is also one of the main sources of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions [34]. Researchers have been integrating Big Data technologies and sustainable agriculture using a diverse range of approaches [35,36,37], e.g., smart farming [38] and precision agriculture [39], both of which aim to assist data-driven decision making in agricultural management in order to improve the volume and quality of production. Big Data empowered technologies, such as smart sensor, IoT, cloud computing, big Earth data, and data mining techniques, are just some of the techniques being employed.
Apart from the mainstream focus on agriculture, it is noteworthy that Big Data analytics have also been used to investigate possible applications in the food supply chain [40,41], ensuring food security [42,43], food safety [44], personalized nutrition [45], as well as the reduction in food waste [46]. All of this work can help to achieve the goal of zero hunger.

3.3. Big Data and Good Health and Well-Being

SDG 3, “good health and well-being”, aims to achieve “healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages” [16]. As evident in Figure 4, the importance of health and well-being can be assessed thanks to the wide adoption of big health data platforms and health monitoring smart devices devices [47],. There have been a large number of studies cited in the literature which have studied the close integration of Big Data-related technologies and health and well-being [48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55]. In the early stages of Big Data development, Ginsberg et al. (2009) [56] discovered that early detection of seasonal influenza epidemics could be improved by monitoring the volume of relevant queries on search engines, although subsequent reports asserted that such predictions can be very inaccurate. Pioneering research such as this further extended the applications of Big Data-related technologies to the prediction and monitoring of infectious diseases [57]. Moreover, the availability of social media Big Data and rapidly advancing Big Data analytics has further improved care regarding mental health [58,59].
The big clinical data available nowadays have facilitated the development of precision medicine [60], where the information extracted from the data collected on each individual patient can help to improve patient profiling and achieve more accurate diagnoses. It can even be used to enable personalized medicine [61,62] or genomic medicine [63]. Although the availability of big medicine and healthcare data has empowered the advancement of Big Data analytics, implementations in health and medicine, challenges for data integration and synchronization remain, not least, ethical, privacy and security considerations [49,64].

3.4. Big Data and Quality Education

SDG 4, “quality education”, sets out to “ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all” [16]. The significance of quality education has always been a crucial pillar in the development of society worldwide as is evident from the, on average, 80+ Google Trend index in Figure 5. The era of digitalization has made available diverse and accessible learning resources to the majority of people via different and still rapidly evolving smart devices [65]. Big Data and its analytics have also made significant contributions to the transformation of education [66,67,68], with a particular focus on exploiting its rich and complex data [69,70].
The education sector has direct access to big education data, including information regarding student admissions, learning resources, teaching and learning performance, research progress and impacts, etc. These big education data provide a information full of potential for educational research. In recent years, research has mostly addressed the strategic development of intelligent tools/platforms in the implementations of learning analytics systems [71,72]. Real-time analytics empowered by Big Data, ML and AI technologies have enabled the possibility of a personalized education experience, where individualized learning [73] and evaluating [74,75,76,77] can help to eliminate unconscious biases and offer students a more encouraging learning environment. Data-driven learning analytics platforms offer the promise to advance the efficiency of learning and teaching by providing informed bespoke recommendations tailored to both the teachers and students based on their strengths and weaknesses [78,79]. It may also facilitate the monitoring of student behavior on campus to aid student safety [80], expand accessible learning resources [81] and help in satisfying the ever-changing demand of new courses/skills and curriculum development in a timely fashion. Moreover, Big Data empowered technologies have also been developed to predict the risks of school dropout to make available early warning systems [82,83,84].

3.5. Big Data and Gender Equality

SDG 5, “gender equality”, sets out to “achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls” [16]. According to UN Women [85], general gender inequalities exist in each of the 17 SDGs; as women play a crucial role in food production, ensuring better nutrition and education for children, there are substantial inequalities in term of educational opportunities, employment and welfare, access to healthcare, etc. SDG 5 is central to the achievement of all 17 SDGs, and key to delivering the transformative vision of the 2030 agenda [86]. As can been seen in Figure 6, there has been growing attention given to gender equality since 2014—the Google Trend index, in general, nearly doubled before and after the launch of SDGs in 2015.
The debate often tends to focus on the negative impacts of AI on employment, especially regarding the unbalanced vulnerabilities affecting gender as well as the fact that nearly 80% of AI professionals worldwide are male [87]. Integrating Big Data with traditional data sources in the meantime still offers tremendous opportunities to reduce gender inequality and social bias regardless of its form [88]. It will be crucial to collect more evidence on the impact of the technological revolution to better understand the evolving nature of gender inequality [89,90]. The Data2x organization, which aims to promote the visibility of gender sensitive data and advocates for the extraction of valuable insights from Big Data empowered technologies to support gender quality, published a report in 2019 summarizing a selection of case studies. For example, [91], Big Data such as mobile phone data, geospatial data and social media data have been used to identify gender gaps in education, employment, safety, social and financial status and credibility, etc. Ongoing projects in recent years have addressed the significance of obtaining equal access to/control of/capability with Big Data for women and girls to design more precise policies, particularly in regions or areas that are experiencing severe gender inequality [92]. Moreover, the expanding scale of social media data and mobile data along with the rising Big Data analytics today enables real-time monitoring of gender discrimination or gender inequality concerns worldwide [93].

3.6. Big Data and Clean Water and Sanitation

SDG 6, “clean water and sanitation”, aims to to “ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all” [16]. Access to clean and safe drinking water is a basic human right and is of paramount socio-economic importance. According to 2019 WHO/UNICEF statistics, despite ongoing worldwide efforts, there are still 2.2 billion people around the world who do not have access to safe drinking water and 4.2 billion people lack access to safe sanitation [94]. Despite the growing attention on SDG 6 (as evident by Figure 7) and the significant improvements that have been achieved since 2015 (see [94]), it remains a huge challenge to achieve the ambitions of this goal for many countries in Africa [95]. Big Data techniques will most likely have a more important role to play in this area in the future.
WASH is referred by WHO/UNICEF as a collective term for Water, Sanitation and Hygiene. To improve access to and the sustainability of WASH, the WHO/UNICEF has set out eight practical steps to tackle the problem [94]. In summary, these guidelines address policy domains, such as resources, infrastructure, workforce, monitoring and management. The means and applications of Big Data are investigated below to assess whether the aforementioned domains can be assisted by Big Data to improve WASH access and achieve sustainable development.
Before any specific measures can be implemented, a first, fundamental step is to undertake an accurate evaluation of the current status and problems, followed by designing a standardized approach to monitor and evaluate progress. This was an essential step at the beginning of the WHO and UNICEF Big Data project, starting with the Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for WASH in 1990. Over these years, with partnerships at country, regional and global levels, this programme has established about 5,000 national datasets covering more than 200 countries/regions worldwide. Considering the close relations of WASH to climate, agriculture as well as healthcare, the UN also brought together other integrated data collection and monitoring schemes. Based on the official list by UN Water website, these include: the Global Environment Monitoring System for Water (GEMS/Water); FAO’s Global Information System on Water and Agriculture (AQUASTAT); and UN-Water GLobal Analysis and Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water (GLAAS). Together, these form the comprehensive and high quality Big Data of WASH. This continuously monitored database reflects the progression of SDG 6, bringing insights for regional and global level policy making and enables substantial parallel data analyses and research as is evident by their regular progression reports and publications, which are made available via the UN-Water official website.
In addition to conducting households surveys, smart sensors/meters, IoT and cloud computing technologies have been playing increasingly important roles in the real-time data collection, visualization and analytics [96,97,98,99,100] for WASH, and also for the climate and agriculture sectors.
Some remarkable developments include the remote monitoring of reservoirs and water supply using satellite data—e.g., the Sentinel-1 Program [101], which predicts flood risk and water balance using Earth observation and hydrological data (i.e., rainfall, temperature, etc.) [102], using chemical sensors for real-time water quality monitoring and pollution tracing [103,104], applying advanced machine learning techniques for improving water quality forecasting and urban water management [105,106], etc. The water quality sector was examined by [107] and the water treatment industry by [108]. Both papers reviewed the functionalities and challenges of implementing Big Data technologies in their respective sectors, and therefore will not be reproduced here. In addition to direct technical applications of Big Data to the water sector outlined above, researchers in China have also investigated water sustainability from the perspective of the public’s attitude in order to collect more accurate information on recycled water use [109].

3.7. Big Data and Affordable and Clean Energy

SDG 7, “affordable and clean energy”, aims to “ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all” [16]. It is a challenging goal with increasing relevance (as can be seen in Figure 8) to ensure widely accessible and sustainable energy worldwide. The UN reports that about 13% of global population still lacks access to modern electricity.
A recent paper by Hassani et al. (2019) [110] investigated the impact of Big Data on energy poverty, in which the authors discuss the issues of data collection, data standardization, Big Data merging, processing and advanced data analytics. They also review the practical implementations of Big Data-related technologies to fight energy poverty. One of the key domains where Big Data techniques were applied to achieve SDG 7 was in the identification and prediction of energy poverty using satellite imagery, especially for regions/countries where accessing energy is limited. According to [110], where a comprehensive review of relevant research can be found, research projects that investigate satellite image and energy poverty have been used worldwide. Researchers have also been advancing techniques by combining most recent machine learning and AI technologies.
Apart from identifying regions/countries suffering the most from energy poverty, Big Data technologies also play an important role in grid planning and energy management [111,112,113,114], improving energy efficiency and preparedness for peak demand. Smart grids with smart meter sensors [115,116] allow real-time observations of energy demand and supply capacity, better understanding of energy consumption pattern, timely prediction of peak demand and reductions in potential energy wastes. Smart networking aims to optimize energy efficiency and sustainability [117] and will play an important role in the construction of smart cities [118,119,120,121]. It is noteworthy that a few SDGs are directly relevant to the establishment of smart cities, not least SDG 9 and SDG 11. The improvement of energy sustainability is of great importance for climate change as well. Although the importance of Big Data for each SDG is addressed separately in this paper, there are many interconnections. It is important to recognize these and cross-cutting synergies, applications and functionalities across the SDGs as a whole when promoting a sustainable environment at the global scale.

3.8. Big Data and Decent Work and Economic Growth

SDG 8, “decent work and economic growth”, aims to “promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all” [16]. Economic well-being has always been of enormous interest and has been closely monitored, but the focus on production (as measured by GDP) has raised considerable debate and interest in the risks of a “growth trap”, perhaps best encapsulated by Richard Layard’s (2011) [122] quip “anyone who believes in indefinite growth on a physically finite planet is either mad, or an economist”. Equally, with mounting fears regarding the impact of AI on employment, there is also growing interest in the future of work (see https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/future-of-work/lang–en/index.htm) (accessed on 20 June 2021); hence, the evident upward trend in Figure 9 is not surprising.
Economic growth is a broad subject covering various economic activities and sectors. the contribution of Big Data in assisting with the achievement of this SDG is mainly through data analytics, as well as compilation and monitoring of indicators. As previously mentioned, the UN network has been putting together a metadata repository [22] of all SDG indicators. The author of a recent work [123] has summarized the existing and potential contribution or significance of Big Data for the compilation of SDG indicators. He notes that Big Data could offer more efficient ways of compiling indicators, enabling more segmented and bespoke analyses, generating more granular or even completely new statistics and allowing dynamic analyses by using linkable data, etc.
To discover efficient and novel indicators, researchers explore social media or other relevant news data to reveal economic performance information that is not typically discoverable from traditional data sources or existing indicators [124,125]. Considering the close correlation between access to energy and economic status, there are obvious links to SDG 7, where researchers try to better understand regional energy poverty status using satellite imagery datasets. Complex and enormous economic activity or networks also contain valuable information on economic growth. For instance, the level of logistical network development and trade activity traffic may reflect the economic development of a certain region. Recent research [126] investigated transportation network Big Data and found valuable indicators of regional economic development status.
Moreover, Big Data can benefit economic modeling as they may facilitate the use of more advanced econometric tools [127]. Researchers can apply advanced data mining and machine learning techniques to improve their analyses of existing data. The are some examples where Big Data have contributed to improve macroeconomic forecasts and indicators—for example, Google data [128,129], economic news [125], web data [130,131] and individual bank card transaction data [132]. Others have exploited innovative methodologies or techniques Big Data has to improve practical functionality of economic modeling—for instance, early warnings of economic crisis using artificial neural networks [133] or trade nowcasting [134]. Other examples include [135], where the authors outline the methodological details of the New York Fed Staff Nowcast, or [136] where a digital AI decision tree is used to improve predictions of Russian GDP. Considering the data rich environment of the financial markets, it is also one of the sectors that first embraced Big Data technologies. A recent review of machine learning techniques, which were adopted for financial market forecasting, can be found in [137].

3.9. Big Data and Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure

SDG 9, “industry, innovation and infrastructure”, aims to “build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation” [16]. Thanks to the supportive policies and beneficial packages offered across different countries and regions to achieve sustainable transformation, industries have adopted better supply chain management to enable sustainable infrastructure and operations [138,139,140]. Big Data and predictive analytics have been used to significantly improve social and environmental performance [141]. Moreover, as evident in Figure 10, there has been growing attention given to SDG 9 since 2016. Note that a recent review [142] has evaluated relevant studies on Big Data in sustainability and supply chain management for the past decade. Moreover, a recent paper [143] has summarized a detailed list of drivers for industries to enable and implement sustainable supply chain management.
In regard to the sustainability of industrial infrastructure, popular practices and developments include sustainable building, efficient energy consumption and green energy, sustainable logistics and pollution management. SDG 9 is closely connected to SDG 11 in the context of sustainable cities, SDG 12 in regard to sustainable production and SDG 13 in terms of managing pollution. These will be separately addressed later in their respective sections. Of course, data can also be considered infrastructure—arguably a centrally important infrastructure in the era of data-driven decisions and also of relevance to SDG 17 [144,145]. The focus here is to list some specific Big Data implementations that closely reflect efforts to achieve SDG 9. The authors of [146] investigated industrial IoT and its benefits for promoting industrial sustainability in China. Other researchers have addressed the functionalities and advancements of Big Data in certain aspects of the supply chain, i.e., disaster resilience [147], risk predication and mitigation [148,149], maintenance optimization [150], cyber security [151], green product innovation [152], efficient logistics [153,154,155], etc.. There is also considerable literature investigating the interactions between Big Data and specific industries to achieve industrial sustainability such as the service industry in [156], agri-food industry in [157], and manufacturing industry [158] to name a few. Similarly, authors across the world have attempted to present the status of the fourth industrial revolution by country and region, for instance, Korea in [159], Germany [160], China [161] and India [162], etc.

3.10. Big Data and Reduced Inequality

SDG 10, “reduced inequality”, aims to “reduce inequality within and among countries” [16]. Within and across country inequality has been a persistent concern, and although huge progress has been achieved worldwide, it remains one of the most problematic challenges facing countries. Interest in this area is evident from the relatively consistent, high and growing interest in reducing inequality in Figure 11.
Inequality not only exists in terms of gender and race but exists across all domains. Thus, SDG 10 refers to all types of discrimination and lack of access/opportunity in the broadest sense. The increasing digital inequality (the “digital divide”) and the “data divide” arising from Big Data and relevant technologies have been well flagged—see [163], (UNCTAD, 2019) [164], where researchers have highlighted the negative effects usually caused by the lack of knowledge or skill sets due to education inequality or limited access to information and advanced technologies. Meanwhile, Big Data and and Big Data technologies have also been contributing in many domains to reduce inequality.
As outlined in SDG 1, satellite imagery data and geodata have been assisting researchers and governments to identify the most economically deprived regions. The practice of identifying poverty and lack of access to energy could also be adapted to reflect levels of inequality and promote corresponding policy adjustments. Similarly, the potential of social media data has been explored for better mapping socioeconomic status [165], helping to reveal insights to support policy response. Advanced data mining techniques and analytics have also been applied to social media data to monitor and extract hidden discrimination and inequalites [166]. Despite concerns regarding the negative effects of social media surveillance or “dataveillance”, there is a noticeable rise in the use of Big Data policing, which is shaping the future of law enforcement [167]. Apart from social media platforms, mobile phone data, internet data, and other transactional data have also been exploited by researchers for better mapping and economic forecasting status [26,168,169].
Although data science can be a challenging subject to master, it is becoming more accessible via online training, videos, e-book, Apps and distance learning, etc. Most of these resources are free and open to the public. The deluge of data availability corresponds with a growing awareness of accessing and sharing information. In today’s Big Data era, accessing educational resources and knowledge sharing is easier than ever. Advanced machine learning techniques have been applied to education Big Data to detect early warning signs of school dropout, contributing to a reduction in educational inequality [82,170]. Equality of opportunity and chances of success have been investigated by [171] with the assistance of modern Big Data, where researchers developed a better understanding of inequalities in upward mobility to inform policies regarding tax, housing and education, etc., and policies designed to provide support to those with disadvantaged backgrounds.

3.11. Big Data and Sustainable Cities and Communities

SDG 11, “sustainable cities and communities”, aims to “make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable” [16]. As the concept of smart/green cities emerges [172,173,174,175], this SDG is attracting great interest worldwide, as can be seen in Figure 12. A very recent paper [34] has presented research investigating the use of Big Data in sustainable urban planning and infrastructure. In summary, it shows that recent research mainly addresses aspects of urban informatics [176], Big Data architectures [177], smart/green cities, smart transportation, as well as smart grids and smart buildings, which are closely linked to sustainable energy and SDG 7. The purpose of this paper is not to provide a complete or comprehensive literature review of this extensive field, but rather to address some of the more iconic applications in order to illustrate how Big Data can be helpful in achieving SDG 11.
Data-driven technologies have penetrated almost every aspect of human life. Thus, establishing smart cities will require the sustainable transformation to almost everything we encounter in our daily activities. Real-time transportation network data can be used to improve transport efficiency, report traffic congestion and conditions, monitor risks and optimize maintenance and operation [178,179,180]. In recent years, a bike sharing smart network has sprung up across the world thanks to the advancements of IoT, GPS sensors and awareness of sustainable transportation [181]. The logistics service sector (i.e., parcel and food delivery services) also relies heavily on the efficiency of transportation networks. Big Data analytics have been widely used for sustainable route planning and the optimization of daily operations [182,183,184]. Along with the development of real-time Big Data monitoring and processing techniques, urban Big Data have also contributed to crime prevention, consolidating the safety aspects of smart cities. Specifically, Big Data can assist the police to identify and predict potential crime heated areas, understand crime associated issues, and optimize policy force resources [185,186,187]. Moreover, the interactions of Big Data and smart cities can also be extended to energy management [188], water supply and monitoring [189], waste management [190,191], etc.

3.12. Big Data and Responsible Consumption and Production

SDG 12, “responsible consumption and production”, aims to “ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns” [16]. Growing income disparities and a growing general awareness regarding sustainability has put this SDG under public scrutiny worldwide—see Figure 13. Food waste is an example of this, where almost 9% of the world’s population suffers from hunger while simultaneously the UN Food and Agriculture Organization estimates that approximately a third of all food produced (an estimated 1.3 billion tonnes) is wasted. There is growing debate and concern regarding the increasing volumes of electronic waste due to the rapid pace of technological development. These global issues are ringing an alarm bell, signaling future food and other resource shortages. On the other hand, promising novel solutions and improvements that Big Data and associated technologies have to offer to combat irresponsible consumption and production worldwide are being proposed.
As highlighted in SDG 9, sustainable supply chain management has been the priority for many industries. Such improvements will also have a positive impact on SDG 12 [192,193]. For example, Big Data empower supply chain management [157], helping to reduce agriculture waste or machine learning [194] to detect defective horticultural products. The authors of [195] applied machine learning to make production planning more sustainable in a food company in Spain. Other researchers focused on product life-cycle management and studied the advancements and influences of Big Data and relevant technologies on each stage, from supply and production to maintenance, recycling and waste disposal [196]. Big Data analytics, in general, also benefit the sustainable consumption of energy [197], which directly links to SDG 7, SDG 9 and the green city aspect of SDG 11. Energy, transportation, consumption and waste recovery are also identified in [198] as the new fields for sustainable consumption research. To date, however, the existing literature dealing with retail, marketing or e-commerce Big Data investigations has focused on the search for a better understanding of consumption behavior, and this has mainly been used to bring insights to further promote consumption. There are concerns that the search for economic prosperity has paid insufficient attention to irresponsible and unsustainable production and consumption. For instance, there is a substantial collection of literature regarding sustainable consumption [199], which mainly deals with the problem from a consumer behavior perspective but seems to lack any research that incorporates Big Data analytics and relevant advanced technologies.

3.13. Big Data and Climate Action

SDG 13, “climate action”, aims to “take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts” [16]. As the world has been experiencing more and more extreme environmental crises over the past decade, climate change has become a priority global scale policy issue, but general public awareness on such a crucial issue, while improving, has remained relatively low until recently (see Figure 14). That said, searching for the term “climate change” rather than “climate action”, the growing public interest is clear—especially since 2019. A recent paper [34] has reviewed and summarized the current status of Big Data applications in climate change-related studies; therefore, it is not necessary to reproduce this work. Nevertheless, some of the most important applications and functionalities of Big Data and relevant technologies in the field of climate change are presented below.
Hassani et al. [34] summarize the main functions of Big Data enabled techniques in climate change studies, such as: observing, monitoring, understanding, predicting, and optimizing. Almost all relevant use cases have employed Big Data for one or a combination of these functions. Moreover, the authors of [34] also identify the most established applications to be energy efficiency and intelligence (can also link to SDG 7 and SDG 11), smart farming and agriculture (this also relates to SDG 2) and forestry, sustainable urban planning and infrastructure (see also SDG 11), natural disaster and disease assessment, and other advanced supports, i.e., supply chain management and product life-cycle management (with connections to SDG 9). Some of these applications have already been addressed in other SDGs. The focus here, therefore, will concentrate on those applications that have not yet been mentioned, also noting recent novel applications that have been introduced since [34].
Similar to applications noted in SDGs 1 and 7, satellite imagery data have also been explored for sustainable forest management [200,201,202,203,204], i.e., identifying forest fire risk, monitoring deforestation, regional forest development planning and assisting forest management policy decision making, etc. Of relevance, the authors of [203] specifically focus on China, investigating the uses of Big Data in sustainable forest management, where they identify the relevant applications. The field of smart forestry is also addressed in [204], where the practical realization of Big Data analytics is examined.
There has also been a branch of research that studies meteorological Big Data, examining air pollution monitoring and prediction. These studies usually develop along similar lines to research on smart cities or urban Big Data [205,206,207]. Examples include the high impact factor of air pollution identified using advanced Big Data mining techniques in [208]. Honarvar et al. [209] used digitalized urban Big Data to predict particulate matter without having recourse to expensive air pollution sensor networks. Some researchers attempt to combat climate change by identifying and dealing with the source, namely, greenhouse gas emissions. Machine learning techniques were applied in [210] to promote greenhouse gas reduction technologies, and to better forecast greenhouse gas emissions [211].

3.14. Big Data and Life below Water

SDG 14, “life below water”, aims to “conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development” [16], meaning the sustainable development of marine and coastal ecosystems, reducing excessive usage of ocean resources and pollution and protecting marine species and coastal biodiversity.
Concerns regarding climate change, ocean acidification and marine pollution have raised awareness of life below water and the crucial role that our oceans play in the Earth’s ecosystem. Google search trends in Figure 15 indicate a growing interest in these topics. Moreover, more and more countries have mapped out “Blue Economy” strategies to combat environmental problems (i.e., resource scarcity, water crises, ocean acidification, etc.) while promoting maritime or blue growth [212,213]. The authors of [212] note the close interconnections between the Blue Economy and SDGs 14, 17, 16, 15 and 12.
A review of the literature highlights that the application of Big Data empowered technologies towards this goal mainly focuses on ocean/marine Big Data observation and monitoring [214,215], ocean and freshwater ecosystem diagnostics [216], sustainable fishery management [217], as well as marine life tracking and research. Remote sensing technologies enable real-time observation of ocean Big Data [218], i.e., sea temperature, sea level pressure, swells, salinity, humidity, surface winds, wind waves, etc. Satellite imagery data and monitoring of meteorological observations also contribute to better mapping the status of ocean ecosystems. Big Data analytics were applied to improve essential fish habitat designation in [219], discover marine habitats in [220], and track global fishing activities in [221]. Probst (2020) [222] illustrates the benefits of using advanced data technologies to improve the transparency of fishing activities.
A project funded by the European Union Horizon 2020 programme, datAcron, addressed how to monitor fishing activities. The findings were reported in [223]. The authors in [224] presented insights on how marine animal tracking data could inform the design and formulation of conservation policy. Similarly, to improve the protection of our ocean ecosystems, other researchers have investigated the role of marine predators [225]. These studies focused on the Southern oceans [226] and Antarctic Ocean [227].

3.15. Big Data and Life on Land

SDG 15, “life on land”, aims to “protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss” [16]. It is focused on global public good issues and attracts relatively high public interest, as is evident from Figure 16. Considering the broad scope of “life on land”, this SDG also shares common goals with some of the other SDGs. For instance, there is a close interconnection between forest management and SDG 13 climate action, where various applications for Big Data empowered technologies to achieve sustainable forestry were identified; SDG 6 included sustainable water ecosystems; and sustainable farming and agriculture is crucial to ending hunger (SDG 2). These arguments will not be presented again here. Rather, this section will address applications benefiting “life on land” that have not yet been addressed.
As with sustainable forest management, Big Data empowered technologies have also been applied to assess and classify desertification levels [228], monitoring desertification via satellite imagery [229], and assessing the effectiveness of sustainable land management policies [230]. Another related study [231] proposed Big Data empowered water resource management, agricultural planning and desert geoengineering as a future solution to combat desertification. Similar research, investigating land degradation has also embraced Big Data empowered technologies [232], i.e., sensor monitoring and assessing soil [233], monitoring via satellite data [234], land classification [235], etc. It is of note that some smart farming and smart agriculture research projects have also attempted to address the sustainability of land management by combating desertification and land degradation [236].
In addition to Earth observation, satellite imagery, and remote sensor IoT Big Data, an emerging trend is the exploitation of social media Big Data to monitor natural disasters in real time [237], as well as post-disaster management [238,239]. The review paper [240] in 2018 presents a summary of Big Data applications being used to assist natural disaster management along with other Big Data sources that could be explored. Thanks to the wide availability of mobile devices and their associated “tailpipe” data, many research projects have incorporated geographic information systems and global positioning systems to obtain real-time location information, which can support more efficient disaster responses and victim rescue, as well as provide more accurate damage assessment [241].
Biodiversity of life on land is also important for maintaining sustainable ecosystems. Overexploitation and climate change pose significant risks of biodiversity loss. Big Data empowered ecology studies can provide richer information, quickly providing lessons for the evolution and dynamics of biodiversity [242]. Researchers in [243] explored using Big Data for ecology and species distribution modeling, to better understand the effects of climate change on biodiversity. Given the explosion in the availability of biodiversity data and more developed techniques in processing data in scale, König et. al. [244] address the importance of biodiversity data integration and present some effective solutions.

3.16. Big Data and Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

SDG 16, “peace, justice and strong institutions”, aims to “promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels” [16]. This SDG has attracted relatively limited public attention with noticeable changes only becoming evident quite recently (see Figure 17). This is reflected by the relative scarcity of reliable academic research available for a literature review.
Big Data and its relevant technologies have been used to combat crime, as reviewed in [245]; however, the use of such technologies in the justice system are still limited. Simmons (2018) [246] examines the use of predictive algorithms in justice systems to improve accuracy, efficiency and fairness. Similar research, investigating the uses of Big Data and its relevant technologies in criminal justice settings, can be found in [247]. A field receiving relatively more attention, and supporting SDG 16, is smart governance [248]. The concept of a “responsive city” is examined in in [249], which summarizes the advantages of data-smart governance for promoting inclusive and engaging communities. Researchers in [250] evaluated the merits as well as challenges of information and algorithm empowered governance in the Big Data era. Some research has focused on infrastructure and platforms for smart governance [251,252,253], whereas Lin (2018) [254] presents a comparison of smart governance applications in selected Western countries and China. There are close connections between smart governance and smart city research (covered in Section SDG 11) [255,256], many of which have addressed data intelligent governance decision making in the context of smart cities. For instance, a citizen-centered Big Data governance framework for smart cities was discussed in [257] and validated using a blood donation governance case in China.
Widely available social media Big Data have also been explored for potential use in governance and politics—for instance, event detection using sentiment analysis [258,259,260,261]. These techniques can also reveal valuable information on public opinion regarding governance, providing real-time predictions of political elections [262,263,264,265]. This is, of course, predicated on the assumption that social media Big Data truly reflect public opinion. Considering the prevalence of fake news, mendacity, and other attempts to manipulate or even redirect Big Data, this is a very strong assumption. Analysts must treat data cautiously and be aware that conclusions emerging from Big Data analytics may be misleading.

3.17. Big Data and Partnerships for the Goals

SDG 17, “partnerships for the goals”, aims to “strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development” [16]. Since the MDGs, global partnerships have been the common approach to reaching a consensus and a shared understanding of issues in order to achieve complex MDGs and SDGs. It is no surprise that institutions and governments worldwide increasingly appreciate the need to join forces to combat the complex and interconnected challenges posed by economic, social and environmental progress (see Figure 18).
Cloud computing and greater data storage have enabled the merging and sharing of Big Data from various resources. Several challenges arising from the data deluge are explored in [13], including the different channels of data collection, differences in regulated data specification and standards, asymmetric access to information, knowledge based data pollution, and barriers to data sharing driven by hidden profit/interest/business secrets. The potential of Big Data, in the context of sustainable development, could be realized by close global partnerships dealing with the same SDGs, advanced cloud computing and the use of Big Data processing platforms [266]. These partnerships could be built upon mutually consenting policies or agreements and could address concerns regarding the fair exchange of data and data ownership. Blockchain technology may offer some advantages here, as it was fundamentally invented to assist and record transactions of value without the authorization of a central authority. Only later was it used to enable the digital world of cryptocurrency [13]. Using blockchain technology would facilitate Big Data sharing and processing in a secure manner, which would assist the process of building global partnerships. The fusion of Big Data and blockchain technologies is comprehensively discussed in [13]. Examples of innovative applications empowered by blockchain technology in the context of SDGs can be found in [267,268].

4. Conclusions and Future Research

This paper contributes to the existing literature by comprehensively investigating the interactions of two rather broad yet emerging subjects—Big Data and sustainable development. This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first academic paper that seeks to summarize the value of Big Data and Big Data technologies to the UN SDGs. The intention is not to present all existing studies, but rather to share the most up to date knowledge and bring insights for future research. Since the adoption of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in 2015, one-third of the time has passed and many remarkable achievements have already been achieved. While it is encouraging to witness the growing attention being given to the SDGs around the world, it is more important than ever to promote and encourage knowledge sharing via all reliable academical channels. With this in mind, this paper has explored the fruitful applications of Big Data and associated technologies that can assist with the realization of sustainable development, as defined by the UN 2030 Agenda and the 17 SDGs. As noted above, several of the applications in fact cross-cut, cover or are applicable to several SDGs simultaneously. This is appropriate as the SDGs themselves are all closely interconnected, and only be addressing all of them can we create a sustainable, safe, prosperous and equitable environment where humanity and nature can live together.
While many practical applications and technological advancements have emerged in recent decades, challenges remain. Some SDGs (i.e., SDGs 12, 14, 16, 17) receive relatively less attention than others. This is reflected by the relative scarcity of reliable information evident during our searches for relevant use cases and technological advancements. Despite the rapid advancements in affordable Big Data technologies, they remain prohibitively expensive for some. Perhaps this explains why we observed that more applications tend to focus on profit or value generating aspects of development. Specifically, more use cases address the potential for economic and industrial growth by promoting greater consumption, rather than highlighting solutions to curb the negative consequences of overexploitation, pollution and irresponsible or unsustainable consumption.
Although some regions or countries have realized the importance of long-term sustainable development and are willing to make short-term sacrifices to embrace advanced technologies, this remains challenging for regions or countries in the digitally disadvantaged position. Such unbalanced and asymmetric development is closely related to the digital divide debate. Specifically, access to information and knowledge may be much easier for certain cohorts than for others, placing some at an advantage and others in a relatively disadvantaged position. Reducing digital inequality will require a global collective effort—for instance, the sharing of information, knowledge, technologies and essential infrastructure. Moreover, there should be greater focus globally to address dimensions of sustainable development and applications of Big Data that are not necessarily profit or value generating but tackle the consequences of unsustainable activities. For instance, how do we find a sustainable balance between the technological revolution and the benefits we received from it whilst managing the rapid growth of electronic waste? Ignoring these questions will almost certainly lead to greater problems in long term and may eliminate the benefits that these technological advancements brought us in the first place.
As more and more people understand the value of Big Data and its associated technologies and begin to use it, the overexploitation of Big Data, or overlooking of Big Data ethics, could have serious consequences. Those who have more advanced Big Data skills may use data analytics for their own advantage, perhaps violating the human rights of others in the process. As noted above, fake news on social media may distort analytics, but could also be intentionally disseminated to alter public opinion. Individual data could be collected and sold for non-consensual marketing or for worse reasons, such as identity theft or blackmail. It will only be possible to achieve sustainable development if the use of Big Data empowered technologies is accompanied by consideration of privacy, ethics, human rights, and legislation, to find a balance between the common good and individual preferences.
Finally, our investigations suggest that Big Data on their own are no longer viewed as a solution but rather as a contributing element. Thus, data integration (integrating Big Data with traditional sources) is seen as the key issue. We also observe a move away from the purest view of Big Data towards a broader view, described broadly as “non-traditional sources”, which include, for example, citizen science, where everyone shares and contributes to data collection, integration, monitoring and analyses.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the paper equally. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

No applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

No applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://trends.google.com/trends/?geo=AT (accessed on 10 May 2021).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. UN. The MDGs Report 2015. 2015. Available online: https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals (accessed on 24 December 2019).
  2. Lele, S.M. Sustainable development: A critical review. World Dev. 1991, 19, 607–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. UNSSC. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2017. Available online: https://www.unssc.org/news-and-insights/news/watch-explainer-video-understanding-dimensions-sustainable-development/ (accessed on 27 December 2019).
  4. MacFeely, S. Measuring the Sustainable Development Goal Indicators: An Unprecedented Statistical Challenge. J. Off. Stat. 2020, 36, 36–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. DOMO. The Data Never Sleeps 6.0 Report by DOMO. 2018. Available online: https://www.domo.com/learn/data-never-sleeps-6 (accessed on 28 December 2019).
  6. Hassani, H.; Silva, E.S. Forecasting with Big Data: A Review. Ann. Data Sci. 2015, 2, 5–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Boyd, D.; Crawford, K. Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Inf. Commun. Soc. 2012, 15, 662–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. MacFeely, S. The Big (Data) Bang: What will It Mean for Compiling SDG Indicators? UNCTAD Research Paper, No. 23. 2018. Available online: https://unctad.org/webflyer/big-data-bang-what-will-it-mean-compiling-sdg-indicators (accessed on 10 May 2021).
  9. Kharrazi, A.; Qin, H.; Zhang, Y. Urban big data and sustainable development goals: Challenges and opportunities. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Alkire, S.; Samman, E. Mobilising the Household Data Required to Progress toward the SDGs; OPHI Working Paper: 72; Oxford University: Oxford, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  11. Guo, H.; Qiu, Y.; Massimo, M.; Chen, F.; Zhang, L.; Ishwaran, N.; Liang, D. DBAR: International Science Program for sustainable development of the belt and road region using Big Earth Data. Bull. Chin. Acad. Sci. 2017, 32, 2–9. [Google Scholar]
  12. Metternicht, G.; Mueller, N.; Lucas, R. Digital Earth for Sustainable Development Goals. In Manual of Digital Earth; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 443–471. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hassani, H.; Huang, X.; Silva, E.S. Fusing Big Data, Blockchain, and Cryptocurrency: Their Individual and Combined Importance in the Digital Economy; Palgrave Pivot: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen, H.; Chiang, R.H.; Storey, V.C. Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Q. 2012, 36, 1165–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. UN Global Issues. Big Data for Sustainable Development. Available online: https://www.un.org/en/sections/issues-depth/big-data-sustainable-development/index.html (accessed on 29 December 2019).
  16. SDGs Knowledge Platform. Sustainable Development Goals. Available online: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?menu=1300 (accessed on 30 December 2019).
  17. United Nations Global Pulse. Harnessing Big Data for Development and Humanitarian Action. Available online: https://www.unglobalpulse.org/about-new (accessed on 31 December 2019).
  18. UNBigData. United Nations Big Data Programme. Available online: https://unstats.un.org/bigdata/ (accessed on 10 May 2021).
  19. UNBigData. Task Teams. Available online: https://unstats.un.org/bigdata/task-teams/index.cshtml (accessed on 10 May 2021).
  20. UN ESCAP. Why Big Data are All the Buzz for Statisticians. Available online: https://www.unescap.org/blog/why-big-data-all-buzz-statisticians (accessed on 10 May 2021).
  21. UN ESCAP. Big Data for the SDGs—Country Examples in Compiling SDG Indicators Using Non-Traditional Data Sources. Working Paper Series. 2021. Available online: https://www.unescap.org/kp/2021/working-paperseries-sdwp12january-2021-big-data-sdgs-country-examples-compiling-sdg (accessed on 10 May 2021).
  22. UN Statistics Division. SDG Indicators Metadata Repository. Available online: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/ (accessed on 30 December 2019).
  23. Macfeely, S. Measuring the Sustainable Development Goals: What does it mean for Ireland? Administration 2017, 65, 41–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. CCSA. How COVID-19 is Changing the World: A Statistical Perspective. Committee for the Coordination of Statistical Activities. 2021. Available online: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/ccsa/documents/covid19-report-ccsa.pdf (accessed on 19 May 2021).
  25. Ballivian, A.; Jansen, R.; Sutton, M.T. Big Data and the Sustainable Development Goals. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Big Data for Official Statistics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 20–22 October 2015. [Google Scholar]
  26. Blumenstock, J.; Cadamuro, G.; On, R. Predicting poverty and wealth from mobile phone metadata. Science 2015, 350, 1073–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Njuguna, C.; McSharry, P. Constructing spatiotemporal poverty indices from big data. J. Bus. Res. 2017, 70, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jean, N.; Burke, M.; Xie, M.; Davis, W.M.; Lobell, D.B.; Ermon, S. Combining satellite imagery and machine learning to predict poverty. Science 2016, 353, 790–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Engstrom, R.; Hersh, J.; Newhouse, D. Poverty in HD: What Does High Resolution Satellite Imagery Reveal about Economic Welfare. Working Paper. 2016. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Poverty-in-HD-%3A-What-Does-High-Resolution-Satellite-Engstrom-Hersh/3939c042caa8412fe273fee63232535c8d894791 (accessed on 10 May 2021).
  30. Zhou, Y.; Liu, Y. The geography of poverty: Review and research prospects. J. Rural. Stud. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tan, W.P. China’s Approach to Reduce Poverty: Taking Targeted Measures to Lift People out of Poverty. International Poverty Reduction Center in China. Addis Ababa, April 18, 2018. Available online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/29075 (accessed on 10 May 2021).
  32. Ang, Y.Y. How China Escaped the Poverty Trap; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  33. Xinhua Net. China Focus: Smart Technologies Hone Poverty Alleviation Targeting. Xinhua Net. 2019. Available online: http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2019-07/23/c_138250700.htm (accessed on 10 May 2021).
  34. Hassani, H.; Huang, X.; Silva, E. Big Data and Climate Change. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2019, 3, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Kamilaris, A.; Kartakoullis, A.; Prenafeta-Boldú, F.X. A review on the practice of big data analysis in agriculture. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2017, 143, 23–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lokers, R.; Knapen, R.; Janssen, S.; van Randen, Y.; Jansen, J. Analysis of Big Data technologies for use in agro-environmental science. Environ. Model. Softw. 2016, 84, 494–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Coble, K.H.; Mishra, A.K.; Ferrell, S.; Griffin, T. Big data in agriculture: A challenge for the future. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 2018, 40, 79–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Wolfert, S.; Ge, L.; Verdouw, C.; Bogaardt, M.J. Big data in smart farming—A review. Agric. Syst. 2017, 153, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Popović, T.; Latinović, N.; Pešić, A.; Zečević, Ž.; Krstajić, B.; Djukanović, S. Architecting an IoT-enabled platform for precision agriculture and ecological monitoring: A case study. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2017, 140, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Magnin, C. How Big Data will Revolutionize the Global Food Chain. Digital McKinsey. 2016. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/how-big-data-will-revolutionize-the-global-food-chain (accessed on 10 May 2021).
  41. Akhtar, P.; Tse, Y.K.; Khan, Z.; Rao-Nicholson, R. Data-driven and adaptive leadership contributing to sustainability: Global agri-food supply chains connected with emerging markets. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2016, 181, 392–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Evans, B. Using Big Data to Achieve Food Security. In Big Data Challenges; Palgrave: London, UK, 2016; pp. 127–135. [Google Scholar]
  43. Mock, N.; Morrow, N.; Papendieck, A. From complexity to food security decision-support: Novel methods of assessment and their role in enhancing the timeliness and relevance of food and nutrition security information. Glob. Food Secur. 2013, 2, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Marvin, H.J.; Janssen, E.M.; Bouzembrak, Y.; Hendriksen, P.J.; Staats, M. Big data in food safety: An overview. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 2286–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. McDonald, D.; Glusman, G.; Price, N.D. Personalized nutrition through big data. Nat. Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Irani, Z.; Sharif, A.M.; Lee, H.; Aktas, E.; Topaloğlu, Z.; va not Wout, T.; Huda, S. Managing food security through food waste and loss: Small data to big data. Comput. Oper. Res. 2018, 98, 367–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jin, X.; Wah, B.W.; Cheng, X.; Wang, Y. Significance and challenges of big data research. Big Data Res. 2015, 2, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Khoury, M.J.; Ioannidis, J.P. Big data meets public health. Science 2014, 346, 1054–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Mooney, S.J.; Pejaver, V. Big data in public health: Terminology, machine learning, and privacy. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2018, 39, 95–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Chawla, N.V.; Davis, D.A. Bringing big data to personalized healthcare: A patient-centered framework. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2013, 28, 660–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Murdoch, T.B.; Detsky, A.S. The inevitable application of big data to health care. JAMA 2013, 309, 1351–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sun, J.; Reddy, C.K. Big data analytics for healthcare. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Chicago, IL, USA, 11–14 August 2013; p. 1525. [Google Scholar]
  53. Raghupathi, W.; Raghupathi, V. Big data analytics in healthcare: Promise and potential. Health Inf. Sci. Syst. 2014, 2, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bates, D.W.; Saria, S.; Ohno–Machado, L.; Shah, A.; Escobar, G. Big data in health care: Using analytics to identify and manage high-risk and high-cost patients. Health Aff. 2014, 33, 1123–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Luo, J.; Wu, M.; Gopukumar, D.; Zhao, Y. Big data application in biomedical research and health care: A literature review. Biomed. Inform. Insights 2016, 8, BII-S31559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Ginsberg, J.; Mohebbi, M.H.; Patel, R.S.; Brammer, L.; Smolinski, M.S.; Brilliant, L. Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature 2009, 457, 1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hay, S.I.; George, D.B.; Moyes, C.L.; Brownstein, J.S. Big data opportunities for global infectious disease surveillance. PLoS Med. 2013, 10, e1001413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Conway, M.; O’Connor, D. Social media, big data, and mental health: Current advances and ethical implications. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 2016, 9, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Shatte, A.B.; Hutchinson, D.M.; Teague, S.J. Machine learning in mental health: A scoping review of methods and applications. Psychol. Med. 2019, 49, 1426–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Khoury, M.J.; Iademarco, M.F.; Riley, W.T. Precision public health for the era of precision medicine. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2016, 50, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Alyass, A.; Turcotte, M.; Meyre, D. From big data analysis to personalized medicine for all: Challenges and opportunities. BMC Med Genom. 2015, 8, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Obermeyer, Z.; Emanuel, E.J. Predicting the future—Big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. He, K.; Ge, D.; He, M. Big data analytics for genomic medicine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Patil, H.K.; Seshadri, R. Big data security and privacy issues in healthcare. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Congress on Big Data, Washington, DC, USA, 27–30 October 2014; pp. 762–765. [Google Scholar]
  65. Huda, M.; Maseleno, A.; Atmotiyoso, P.; Siregar, M.; Ahmad, R.; Jasmi, K.; Muhamad, N. Big data emerging technology: Insights into innovative environment for online learning resources. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 2018, 13, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Baker, R.S. Big Data and Education; Teachers College, Columbia University: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  67. Daniel, B. Big Data and analytics in higher education: Opportunities and challenges. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2015, 46, 904–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Daniel, B.K. Big Data and data science: A critical review of issues for educational research. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2019, 50, 101–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Ellaway, R.H.; Pusic, M.V.; Galbraith, R.M.; Cameron, T. Developing the role of big data and analytics in health professional education. Med. Teach. 2014, 36, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Olayinka, O.; Kekeh, M.; Sheth-Chandra, M.; Akpinar-Elci, M. Big Data knowledge in global health education. Ann. Glob. Health 2017, 83, 676–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Vaitsis, C.; Hervatis, V.; Zary, N. Introduction to Big Data in education and its contribution to the quality improvement processes. Big Data Real-World Appl. 2016, 113, 58. [Google Scholar]
  72. Williamson, B. Big Data in Education: The Digital Future of Learning, Policy and Practice. Sage. 2017. Available online: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/big-data-in-education/book249086 (accessed on 10 May 2021).
  73. Dishon, G. New data, old tensions: Big data, personalized learning, and the challenges of progressive education. Theory Res. Educ. 2017, 15, 272–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Thompson, G. Computer adaptive testing, big data and algorithmic approaches to education. Br. J. Sociol. Educ. 2017, 38, 827–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Huda, M.; Anshari, M.; Almunawar, M.N.; Shahrill, M.; Tan, A.; Jaidin, J.H.; Masri, M. Innovative Teaching in Higher Education: The Big Data Approach. TOJET. 2016. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315665897_Innovative_Teaching_In_Higher_Education_The_Big_Data_Approach (accessed on 10 May 2021).
  76. Ciolacu, M.; Tehrani, A.F.; Beer, R.; Popp, H. Education 4.0—Fostering student’s performance with machine learning methods. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 23rd International Symposium for Design and Technology in Electronic Packaging (SIITME), Constanta, Romania, 26–29 October 2017; pp. 438–443. [Google Scholar]
  77. Oztekin, A.; Delen, D.; Turkyilmaz, A.; Zaim, S. A machine learning-based usability evaluation method for eLearning systems. Decis. Support Syst. 2013, 56, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Xu, X.; Wang, Y.; Yu, S. Teaching Performance Evaluation in Smart Campus. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 77754–77766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mohammed, A.; Kumar, S.; Singh, S.P.; Sharma, R.P. Enhancing Teaching and Learning in Educational Institutes Using the Concept of Big Data Technology. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Computing, Power and Communication Technologies (GUCON), Greater Noida, India, 28–29 September 2018; pp. 1038–1041. [Google Scholar]
  80. Liu, H.; Jiao, N. Research on Students’ Campus Behavior Analysis and Warning System Based on Big Data. In The International Conference on Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 392–400. [Google Scholar]
  81. Anshari, M.; Alas, Y.; Guan, L.S. Developing online learning resources: Big data, social networks, and cloud computing to support pervasive knowledge. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2016, 21, 1663–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Liang, J.; Yang, J.; Wu, Y.; Li, C.; Zheng, L. Big data application in education: Dropout prediction in edx MOOCs. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Second International Conference on Multimedia Big Data (BigMM), Taipei, Taiwan, 20–22 April 2016; pp. 440–443. [Google Scholar]
  83. Márquez-Vera, C.; Cano, A.; Romero, C.; Noaman, A.Y.M.; Mousa Fardoun, H.; Ventura, S. Early dropout prediction using data mining: A case study with high school students. Expert Syst. 2016, 33, 107–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Chung, J.Y.; Lee, S. Dropout early warning systems for high school students using machine learning. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2019, 96, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. UN Women. Infographic: Why Gender Equality Matters to Achieving All 17 SDGs. 2018. Available online: https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/multimedia/2018/7/infographic-why-gender-equality-matters-to-achieving-all-17-sdgs (accessed on 1 January 2020).
  86. UN Women. Turing Promises into Action: Gender Equality in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2018. Available online: https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2018/2/gender-equality-in-the-2030-agenda-for-sustainable-development-2018 (accessed on 1 January 2020).
  87. Hamaguchi, N.; Kondo, K. What does AI Mean for Gender Equality? World Economic Forum. 2019. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/04/ai-technology-and-gender-inequality (accessed on 2 January 2020).
  88. UN Women; Global Pulse. Gender Equality and Big Data: Making Gender Data Visible. 2018. Available online: https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2018/1/gender-equality-and-big-data (accessed on 2 January 2020).
  89. Teigland, J. Why We Need to Solve the Issue of Gender Bias before AI Makes It Worse. EY. 2019. Available online: https://www.ey.com/en_gl/diversity-inclusiveness/which-is-the-bigger-issue-for-women-leaders-the-glass-ceiling-or-the-glass-cliff (accessed on 3 January 2020).
  90. Dillon, S.; Collett, C. AI and Gender: Four Proposals for Future Research. Cambridge: The Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence. 2019. Available online: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.41459 (accessed on 3 January 2020).
  91. Data2x. Big Data, Big Impact? Towards Gender-Sensitive Data Systems. 2019. Available online: https://data2x.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/BigDataBigImpact-Report-WR.pdf (accessed on 3 January 2020).
  92. Brandtzaeg, P.B. Facebook is no “Great equalizer” A big data approach to gender differences in civic engagement across countries. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 2017, 35, 103–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Garcia, D.; Kassa, Y.M.; Cuevas, A.; Cebrian, M.; Moro, E.; Rahwan, I.; Cuevas, R. Analyzing gender inequality through large-scale Facebook advertising data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 6958–6963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. WHO/UNICEF JMP. Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene in Health Care Facilities: Practical Steps to Achieve Universal Access for Quality Care. 2019. Available online: https://www.unwater.org/publications/ (accessed on 18 August 2020).
  95. Nhamo, G.; Nhemachena, C.; Nhamo, S. Is 2030 too soon for Africa to achieve the water and sanitation sustainable development goal? Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 669, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Geetha, S.; Gouthami, S. Internet of things enabled real time water quality monitoring system. Smart Water 2016, 2, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Arridha, R.; Sukaridhoto, S.; Pramadihanto, D.; Funabiki, N. Classification extension based on IoT-big data analytic for smart environment monitoring and analytic in real-time system. Int. J. Space-Based Situated Comput. 2017, 7, 82–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Andres, L.; Boateng, K.; Borja-Vega, C.; Thomas, E. A review of in situ and remote sensing technologies to monitor water and sanitation interventions. Water 2018, 10, 756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Bai, Y.; Xu, L.; He, C.; Zhu, L.; Yang, X.; Jiang, T.; Nie, J.H.; Zhong, W.; Wang, Z.L. High-performance triboelectric nanogenerators for self-powered, in situ and real-time water quality mapping. Nano Energy 2019, 66, 104117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Chowdury, M.S.U.; Emran, T.B.; Ghosh, S.; Pathak, A.; Alam, M.M.; Absar, N.; Andersson, K.; Hossain, M.S. IoT based real-time river water quality monitoring system. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019, 155, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Amitrano, D.; Martino, G.D.; Iodice, A.; Mitidieri, F.; Papa, M.N.; Riccio, D.; Ruello, G. Sentinel-1 for monitoring reservoirs: A performance analysis. Remote. Sens. 2014, 6, 10676–10693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. García, L.; Rodríguez, D.; Wijnen, M.; Pakulski, I. (Eds.) Earth Observation for Water Resources Management: Current Use and Future Opportunities for the Water Sector; The World Bank: Washinton, DC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  103. Yaroshenko, I.; Kirsanov, D.; Marjanovic, M.; Lieberzeit, P.A.; Korostynska, O.; Mason, A.; Frau, I.; Legin, A. Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring with Chemical Sensors. Sensors 2020, 20, 3432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Meyer, A.M.; Klein, C.; Fünfrocken, E.; Kautenburger, R.; Beck, H.P. Real-time monitoring of water quality to identify pollution pathways in small and middle scale rivers. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 651, 2323–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Liu, P.; Wang, J.; Sangaiah, A.K.; Xie, Y.; Yin, X. Analysis and prediction of water quality using LSTM deep neural networks in IoT environment. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Rahim, M.S.; Nguyen, K.A.; Stewart, R.A.; Giurco, D.; Blumenstein, M. Machine Learning and Data Analytic Techniques in Digital Water Metering: A Review. Water 2020, 12, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Ponce Romero, J.M.; Hallett, S.H.; Jude, S. Leveraging big data tools and technologies: Addressing the challenges of the water quality sector. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Ghernaout, D.; Aichouni, M.; Alghamdi, A. Applying big data in water treatment industry: A new era of advance. Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci. 2018, 5, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Fu, H.; Li, Z.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Z. Research on big data digging of hot topics about recycled water use on micro-blog based on particle swarm optimization. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Hassani, H.; Yeganegi, M.R.; Beneki, C.; Unger, S.; Moradghaffari, M. Big Data and Energy Poverty Alleviation. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2019, 3, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Zhou, K.; Fu, C.; Yang, S. Big data driven smart energy management: From big data to big insights. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 56, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Tu, C.; He, X.; Shuai, Z.; Jiang, F. Big data issues in smart grid—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 79, 1099–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Hossain, E.; Khan, I.; Un-Noor, F.; Sikander, S.S.; Sunny, M.S.H. Application of big data and machine learning in smart grid, and associated security concerns: A review. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 13960–13988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Munshi, A.A.; Yasser, A.R.M. Big data framework for analytics in smart grids. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2017, 151, 369–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Zhou, K.; Yang, S. Understanding household energy consumption behavior: The contribution of energy big data analytics. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 56, 810–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Wen, L.; Zhou, K.; Yang, S.; Li, L. Compression of smart meter big data: A survey. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 91, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Asad, Z.; Chaudhry, M.A.R. A two-way street: Green big data processing for a greener smart grid. IEEE Syst. J. 2016, 11, 784–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Bibri, S.E. The IoT for smart sustainable cities of the future: An analytical framework for sensor-based big data applications for environmental sustainability. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 38, 230–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Chui, K.T.; Lytras, M.D.; Visvizi, A. Energy sustainability in smart cities: Artificial intelligence, smart monitoring, and optimization of energy consumption. Energies 2018, 11, 2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Allam, Z.; Tegally, H.; Thondoo, M. Redefining the use of big data in urban health for increased liveability in smart cities. Smart Cities 2019, 2, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Bertini, F.; Bergami, G.; Montesi, D.; Veronese, G.; Marchesini, G.; Pandolfi, P. Predicting frailty condition in elderly using multidimensional socioclinical databases. Proc. IEEE 2018, 106, 723–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Layard, R. ‘Happiness: New Lessons’ in Interview with Andrew Marr. 2011. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VkQsL73SgE (accessed on 5 February 2021).
  123. MacFeely, S. The Big (data) Bang: Opportunities and challenges for compiling SDG indicators. Glob. Policy 2019, 10, 121–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Yamada, K.; Takayasu, H.; Takayasu, M. Estimation of economic indicator announced by government from social big data. Entropy 2018, 20, 852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Elshendy, M.; Fronzetti Colladon, A. Big data analysis of economic news: Hints to forecast macroeconomic indicators. Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manag. 2017, 9, 1847979017720040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Li, B.; Gao, S.; Liang, Y.; Kang, Y.; Prestby, T.; Gao, Y.; Xiao, R. Estimation of regional economic development indicator from transportation network analytics. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Varian, H.R. Big data: New tricks for econometrics. J. Econ. Perspect. 2014, 28, 3–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Götz, T.B.; Knetsch, T.A. Google data in bridge equation models for German GDP. Int. J. Forecast. 2019, 35, 45–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Ferrara, L.; Simoni, A. When are Google Data Useful to Nowcast GDP? An Approach via Pre-Selection and Shrinkage. 2019. Available online: https://ideas.repec.org/p/crs/wpaper/2019-04.html (accessed on 10 May 2021).
  130. Blazquez, D.; Domenech, J. Web data mining for monitoring business export orientation. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2018, 24, 406–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Sheehan, E.; Meng, C.; Tan, M.; Uzkent, B.; Jean, N.; Burke, M.; Ermon, S. Predicting economic development using geolocated wikipedia articles. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery Data Mining, Anchorage, AK, USA, 4–8 August 2019; pp. 2698–2706. [Google Scholar]
  132. Sobolevsky, S.; Massaro, E.; Bojic, I.; Arias, J.M.; Ratti, C. Predicting regional economic indices using big data of individual bank card transactions. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Boston, MA, USA, 11–14 December 2017. [Google Scholar]
  133. Kim, T.Y.; Oh, K.J.; Sohn, I.; Hwang, C. Usefulness of artificial neural networks for early warning system of economic crisis. Expert Syst. Appl. 2004, 26, 583–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Hopp, D. Economic Nowcasting with Long Short-term Memory Artificial Neural Networks (LSTM) - UNCTAD Research Paper No. 62, UNCTAD/SER.RP/2021/5. Available online: https://unctad.org/webflyer/economic-nowcasting-long-short-term-memory-artificial-neural-networks-lstm (accessed on 17 June 2021).
  135. Bok, B.; Caratelli, D.; Giannone, D.; Sbordone, A.M.; Tambalotti, A. Macroeconomic nowcasting and forecasting with big data. Annu. Rev. Econ. 2018, 10, 615–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Lomakin, N.; Shokhnekh, A.; Sazonov, S.; Maramygin, M.; Tkachenko, D.; Angel, O. Digital Ai “Decision Tree” for Predicting Russian GDP Value Based on Big Data Mining to Ensure Balanced and Sustainable Economic Growth. In Proceedings of the 2019 International SPBPU Scientific Conference on Innovations in Digital Economy, New York, NY, USA, 24–25 October 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  137. Henrique, B.M.; Sobreiro, V.A.; Kimura, H. Literature review: Machine learning techniques applied to financial market prediction. Expert Syst. Appl. 2019, 124, 226–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Hazen, B.T.; Skipper, J.B.; Ezell, J.D.; Boone, C.A. Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain sustainability: A theory-driven research agenda. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2016, 101, 592–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Chen, L.; Zhao, X.; Tang, O.; Price, L.; Zhang, S.; Zhu, W. Supply chain collaboration for sustainability: A literature review and future research agenda. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2017, 194, 73–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Tiwari, S.; Wee, H.M.; Daryanto, Y. Big data analytics in supply chain management between 2010 and 2016: Insights to industries. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2018, 115, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Dubey, R.; Gunasekaran, A.; Childe, S.J.; Papadopoulos, T.; Luo, Z.; Wamba, S.F.; Roubaud, D. Can big data and predictive analytics improve social and environmental sustainability? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2019, 144, 534–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Chalmeta, R.; Santos-deLeon, N.J. Sustainable Supply Chain in the Era of Industry 4.0 and Big Data: A Systematic Analysis of Literature and Research. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Zimon, D.; Tyan, J.; Sroufe, R. Implementing Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Reactive, Cooperative, and Dynamic Models. Sustainability 2019, 11, 7227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Macfeely, S.; Duune, J. Joining up public service information: The rationale for a national data infrastructure. Administration 2014, 61, 93–107. [Google Scholar]
  145. UNCTAD. Development and Globalization: Facts and Figures 2016. Available online: https://stats.unctad.org/Dgff2016/ (accessed on 17 June 2021).
  146. Beier, G.; Niehoff, S.; Xue, B. More sustainability in industry through industrial internet of things? Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Papadopoulos, T.; Gunasekaran, A.; Dubey, R.; Altay, N.; Childe, S.J.; Fosso-Wamba, S. The role of Big Data in explaining disaster resilience in supply chains for sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 1108–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Mani, V.; Delgado, C.; Hazen, B.T.; Patel, P. Mitigating supply chain risk via sustainability using big data analytics: Evidence from the manufacturing supply chain. Sustainability 2017, 9, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Wu, K.J.; Liao, C.J.; Tseng, M.L.; Lim, M.K.; Hu, J.; Tan, K. Toward sustainability: Using big data to explore the decisive attributes of supply chain risks and uncertainties. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 663–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Kumar, A.; Shankar, R.; Thakur, L.S. A big data driven sustainable manufacturing framework for condition-based maintenance prediction. J. Comput. Sci. 2018, 27, 428–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Xu, L.D.; Duan, L. Big data for cyber physical systems in industry 4.0: A survey. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 2019, 13, 148–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Bag, S.; Wood, L.C.; Xu, L.; Dhamija, P.; Kayikci, Y. Big data analytics as an operational excellence approach to enhance sustainable supply chain performance. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 153, 104559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Kayikci, Y. Sustainability impact of digitization in logistics. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 21, 782–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Jin, D.H.; Kim, H.J. Integrated understanding of big data, big data analysis, and business intelligence: A case study of logistics. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Wamba, S.F.; Gunasekaran, A.; Papadopoulos, T.; Ngai, E. Big data analytics in logistics and supply chain management. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2018, 29, 478–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Hussain, M.; Khan, M.; Al-Aomar, R. A framework for supply chain sustainability in service industry with Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 55, 1301–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Belaud, J.P.; Prioux, N.; Vialle, C.; Sablayrolles, C. Big data for agri-food 4.0: Application to sustainability management for by-products supply chain. Comput. Ind. 2019, 111, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Ren, S.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sakao, T.; Huisingh, D.; Almeida, C.M. A comprehensive review of big data analytics throughout product lifecycle to support sustainable smart manufacturing: A framework, challenges and future research directions. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 210, 1343–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Sung, T.K. Industry 4.0: A Korea perspective. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2018, 132, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Bauer, W.; Schlund, S.; Hornung, T.; Schuler, S. Digitalization of industrial value chains-a review and evaluation of existing use cases of Industry 4.0 in Germany. LogForum 2018, 14, 331–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Li, L. China’s manufacturing locus in 2025: With a comparison of “Made-in-China 2025” and “Industry 4.0”. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2018, 135, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Iyer, A. Moving from Industry 2.0 to Industry 4.0: A case study from India on leapfrogging in smart manufacturing. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 21, 663–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Lutz, C. Digital inequalities in the age of artificial intelligence and big data. Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol. 2019, 1, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. UNCTAD. Inequality in Focus. SDG Pulse 2019. Available online: https://sdgpulse.unctad.org/in-focus-inequality/ (accessed on 17 June 2021).
  165. Shelton, T.; Poorthuis, A.; Zook, M. Social media and the city: Rethinking urban socio-spatial inequality using user-generated geographic information. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2015, 142, 198–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Burnap, P.; Williams, M.L. Cyber hate speech on twitter: An application of machine classification and statistical modeling for policy and decision making. Policy Internet 2015, 7, 223–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Ferguson, A.G. The Rise of Big Data Policing: Surveillance, Race, and the Future of Law Enforcement; NYU Press: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  168. Steele, J.E.; Sundsoy, P.R.; Pezzulo, C.; Alegana, V.A.; Bird, T.J.; Blumenstock, J.; Hadiuzzaman, K.N. Mapping poverty using mobile phone and satellite data. J. R. Soc. Interface 2017, 14, 20160690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Asongu, S.A.; Odhiambo, N.M. Mobile banking usage, quality of growth, inequality and poverty in developing countries. Inf. Dev. 2019, 35, 303–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Sorensen, L.C. “Big Data” in Educational Administration: An Application for Predicting School Dropout Risk. Educ. Adm. Q. 2019, 55, 404–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Chetty, R. Improving Equality of Opportunity: New Insights from Big Data. Contemporary Economic Policy. 2020. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/coep.12478 (accessed on 10 May 2021).
  172. Hashem, I.A.T.; Chang, V.; Anuar, N.B.; Adewole, K.; Yaqoob, I.; Gani, A.; Chiroma, H. The role of big data in smart city. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2016, 36, 748–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. Al Nuaimi, E.; Al Neyadi, H.; Mohamed, N.; Al-Jaroodi, J. Applications of big data to smart cities. J. Internet Serv. Appl. 2015, 6, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  174. Bibri, S.E.; Krogstie, J. Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2017, 31, 183–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Kong, L.; Liu, Z.; Wu, J. A systematic review of big data-based urban sustainability research: State-of-the-science and future directions. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 273, 123142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Thakuriah, P.V.; Tilahun, N.Y.; Zellner, M. Big data and urban informatics: Innovations and challenges to urban planning and knowledge discovery. In Seeing Cities through Big Data; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 11–45. [Google Scholar]
  177. Rathore, M.M.; Ahmad, A.; Paul, A.; Rho, S. Urban planning and building smart cities based on the internet of things using big data analytics. Comput. Netw. 2016, 101, 63–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Ghofrani, F.; He, Q.; Goverde, R.M.; Liu, X. Recent applications of big data analytics in railway transportation systems: A survey. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2018, 90, 226–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Mehmood, R.; Meriton, R.; Graham, G.; Hennelly, P.; Kumar, M. Exploring the influence of big data on city transport operations: A Markovian approach. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2017, 37, 75–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Lakshmanaprabu, S.K.; Shankar, K.; Rani, S.S.; Abdulhay, E.; Arunkumar, N.; Ramirez, G.; Uthayakumar, J. An effect of big data technology with ant colony optimization based routing in vehicular ad hoc networks: Towards smart cities. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 217, 584–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Zhang, Y.; Mi, Z. Environmental benefits of bike sharing: A big data-based analysis. Appl. Energy 2018, 220, 296–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Wang, G.; Gunasekaran, A.; Ngai, E.W.; Papadopoulos, T. Big data analytics in logistics and supply chain management: Certain investigations for research and applications. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2016, 176, 98–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Ji, S.; Sun, Q. Low-carbon planning and design in B&R logistics service: A case study of an e-commerce big data platform in China. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2052. [Google Scholar]
  184. Kaur, H.; Singh, S.P. Heuristic modeling for sustainable procurement and logistics in a supply chain using big data. Comput. Oper. Res. 2018, 98, 301–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Williams, M.L.; Burnap, P.; Sloan, L. Crime sensing with big data: The affordances and limitations of using open-source communications to estimate crime patterns. Br. J. Criminol. 2017, 57, 320–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  186. Feng, M.; Zheng, J.; Ren, J.; Hussain, A.; Li, X.; Xi, Y.; Liu, Q. Big data analytics and mining for effective visualization and trends forecasting of crime data. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 106111–106123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Brayne, S. Big data surveillance: The case of policing. Am. Sociol. Rev. 2017, 82, 977–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  188. Silva, B.N.; Khan, M.; Han, K. Integration of Big Data analytics embedded smart city architecture with RESTful web of things for efficient service provision and energy management. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2020, 107, 975–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Chen, Y.; Han, D. Water quality monitoring in smart city: A pilot project. Autom. Constr. 2018, 89, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  190. Gutierrez, J.M.; Jensen, M.; Henius, M.; Riaz, T. Smart waste collection system based on location intelligence. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2015, 61, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Gu, F.; Ma, B.; Guo, J.; Summers, P.A.; Hall, P. Internet of things and Big Data as potential solutions to the problems in waste electrical and electronic equipment management: An exploratory study. Waste Manag. 2017, 68, 434–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Dubey, R.; Gunasekaran, A.; Childe, S.J.; Luo, Z.; Wamba, S.F.; Roubaud, D.; Foropon, C. Examining the role of big data and predictive analytics on collaborative performance in context to sustainable consumption and production behaviour. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 196, 1508–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Tseng, M.L.; Tan, R.R.; Chiu, A.S.; Chien, C.F.; Kuo, T.C. Circular economy meets industry 4.0: Can big data drive industrial symbiosis? Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 131, 146–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Nturambirwe, J.F.I.; Opara, U.L. Machine learning applications to non-destructive defect detection in horticultural products. Biosyst. Eng. 2020, 189, 60–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Garre, A.; Ruiz, M.C.; Hontoria, E. Application of Machine Learning to support production planning of a food industry in the context of waste generation under uncertainty. Oper. Res. Perspect. 2020, 7, 100147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Li, J.; Tao, F.; Cheng, Y.; Zhao, L. Big data in product lifecycle management. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2015, 81, 667–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Herman, J.; Herman, H.; Mathews, M.J.; Vosloo, J.C. Using big data for insights into sustainable energy consumption in industrial and mining sectors. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 197, 1352–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Wang, Z.; Xue, M.; Wang, Y.; Song, M.; Li, S.; Daziano, R.A.; Zhang, B. Big data: New tend to sustainable consumption research. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 236, 117499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Young, W.; Hwang, K.; McDonald, S.; Oates, C.J. Sustainable consumption: Green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustain. Dev. 2010, 18, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Menaka, E.; Kumar, S.S.; Bharathi, M. Change detection in deforestation using high resolution satellite image with Haar wavelet transforms. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Green High Performance Computing (ICGHPC), Nagercoil, India, 14–15 March 2013; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  201. Lu, M.; Hamunyela, E.; Verbesselt, J.; Pebesma, E. Dimension reduction of multi-spectral satellite image time series to improve deforestation monitoring. Remote. Sens. 2017, 9, 1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  202. Ganesan, P.; Sathish, B.S.; Sajiv, G. A comparative approach of identification and segmentation of forest fire region in high resolution satellite images. In Proceedings of the 2016 World Conference on Futuristic Trends in Research and Innovation for Social Welfare (Startup Conclave), Coimbatore, India, 29 February–1 March 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  203. Hasan, S.S.; Zhang, Y.; Chu, X.; Teng, Y. The role of big data in China’s sustainable forest management. For. Econ. Rev. 2019, 1, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Zou, W.; Jing, W.; Chen, G.; Lu, Y.; Song, H. A survey of big data analytics for smart forestry. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 46621–46636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Kang, G.K.; Gao, J.Z.; Chiao, S.; Lu, S.; Xie, G. Air quality prediction: Big data and machine learning approaches. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev. 2018, 9, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  206. Zhu, J.Y.; Sun, C.; Li, V.O. An extended spatio-temporal granger causality model for air quality estimation with heterogeneous urban big data. IEEE Trans. Big Data 2017, 3, 307–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Xiaojun, C.; Xianpeng, L.; Peng, X. IOT-based air pollution monitoring and forecasting system. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Computer and Computational Sciences (ICCCS), Reykjavík, Iceland, 1–3 June 2015; pp. 257–260. [Google Scholar]
  208. Ma, J.; Ding, Y.; Cheng, J.C.; Jiang, F.; Tan, Y.; Gan, V.J.; Wan, Z. Identification of high impact factors of air quality on a national scale using big data and machine learning techniques. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 244, 118955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Honarvar, A.R.; Sami, A. Towards sustainable smart city by particulate matter prediction using urban big data, excluding expensive air pollution infrastructures. Big Data Res. 2019, 17, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Lee, S.; Tae, S. Development of a Decision Support Model Based on Machine Learning for Applying Greenhouse Gas Reduction Technology. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Hamrani, A.; Akbarzadeh, A.; Madramootoo, C.A. Machine learning for predicting greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural soils. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 741, 140338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Lee, K.H.; Noh, J.; Khim, J.S. The Blue Economy and the United Nations’ sustainable development goals: Challenges and opportunities. Environ. Int. 2020, 137, 105528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Eikeset, A.M.; Mazzarella, A.B.; Davíosdóttir, B.; Klinger, D.H.; Levin, S.A.; Rovenskaya, E.; Stenseth, N.C. What is blue growth? The semantics of “Sustainable Development” of marine environments. Mar. Policy 2018, 87, 177–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Liu, Y.; Qiu, M.; Liu, C.; Guo, Z. Big data challenges in ocean observation: A survey. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 2017, 21, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Huang, D.; Song, W.; Zou, G. Marine Big Data; World Scientific: Singapore, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  216. Baird, D.J.; Van den Brink, P.J.; Chariton, A.A.; Dafforn, K.A.; Johnston, E.L. New diagnostics for multiply stressed marine and freshwater ecosystems: Integrating models, ecoinformatics and big data. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2016, 67, 391–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  217. Thayer, J.A.; Hazen, E.L.; Garcia-Reyes, M.; Szoboszlai, A.; Sydeman, W.J. Implementing ecosystem considerations in forage fisheries: San Francisco Bay herring case study. Mar. Policy 2020, 118, 103884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. National Centers for Environmental Information: Marine/Ocean Data. Available online: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/marineocean-data (accessed on 15 September 2020).
  219. Moore, C.; Drazen, J.C.; Radford, B.T.; Kelley, C.; Newman, S.J. Improving essential fish habitat designation to support sustainable ecosystem-based fisheries management. Mar. Policy 2016, 69, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Sabeur, Z.; Correndo, G.; Veres, G.; Arbab-Zavar, B.; Neumann, G.; Ivall, T.D.; Lorenzo, J. EO big data analytics for the discovery of new trends of marine species habitats in a changing global climate. In Publications Office of the European Union; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2017; pp. 445–448. [Google Scholar]
  221. Kroodsma, D.A.; Mayorga, J.; Hochberg, T.; Miller, N.A.; Boerder, K.; Ferretti, F.; Woods, P. Tracking the global footprint of fisheries. Science 2018, 359, 904–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  222. Probst, W.N. How emerging data technologies can increase trust and transparency in fisheries. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2020, 77, 1286–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Ray, C.; Camossi, E.; Dréo, R.; Jousselme, A.L.; Iphar, C.; Zocholl, M.; Hadzagic, M. Use case design and big data analytics evaluation for fishing monitoring. In Proceedings of the OCEANS 2019-Marseille, Marseille, France, 17–20 June 2019; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  224. Hays, G.C.; Bailey, H.; Bograd, S.J.; Bowen, W.D.; Campagna, C.; Carmichael, R.H.; de Bruyn, P.N. Translating marine animal tracking data into conservation policy and management. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2019, 34, 459–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  225. Hazen, E.L.; Abrahms, B.; Brodie, S.; Carroll, G.; Jacox, M.G.; Savoca, M.S.; Bograd, S.J. Marine top predators as climate and ecosystem sentinels. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2019, 17, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  226. Hindell, M.A.; Reisinger, R.R.; Ropert-Coudert, Y.; Huckstädt, L.A.; Trathan, P.N.; Bornemann, H.; Lea, M.A. Tracking of marine predators to protect Southern Ocean ecosystems. Nature 2020, 580, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  227. Sequeira, A.M. Predators on track for ocean protection around Antarctica. Nature 2020, 580, 34–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  228. Yaojie, Y.; Min, L.; Lin, W.; A-Xing, Z. A data-mining-based approach for aeolian desertification susceptibility assessment: A case-study from Northern China. Land Degrad. Dev. 2019, 30, 1968–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Christian, B.A.; Dhinwa, P.S. Long term monitoring and assessment of desertification processes using medium high resolution satellite data. Appl. Geogr. 2018, 97, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Salvati, L.; Kosmas, C.; Kairis, O.; Karavitis, C.; Acikalin, S.; Belgacem, A.; Gungor, H. Unveiling soil degradation and desertification risk in the Mediterranean basin: A data mining analysis of the relationships between biophysical and socioeconomic factors in agro-forest landscapes. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2015, 58, 1789–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Zhang, Z.; Huisingh, D. Combating desertification in China: Monitoring, control, management and revegetation. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 182, 765–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Giuliani, G.; Mazzetti, P.; Santoro, M.; Nativi, S.; Van Bemmelen, J.; Colangeli, G.; Lehmann, A. Knowledge generation using satellite earth observations to support sustainable development goals (SDG): A use case on Land degradation. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2020, 88, 102068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Tóth, G.; Hermann, T.; da Silva, M.R.; Montanarella, L. Monitoring soil for sustainable development and land degradation neutrality. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2018, 190, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  234. Giuliani, G.; Chatenoux, B.; Benvenuti, A.; Lacroix, P.; Santoro, M.; Mazzetti, P. Monitoring land degradation at national level using satellite Earth Observation time-series data to support SDG15—Exploring the potential of data cube. Big Earth Data 2020, 4, 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  235. Camara, G. On the semantics of big Earth observation data for land classification. J. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2020, 2020, 21–34. [Google Scholar]
  236. Ayaz, M.; Ammad-Uddin, M.; Sharif, Z.; Mansour, A.; Aggoune, E.H.M. Internet-of-Things (IoT)-based smart agriculture: Toward making the fields talk. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 129551–129583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Choi, S.; Bae, B. The real-time monitoring system of social big data for disaster management. In Computer Science and Its Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 809–815. [Google Scholar]
  238. Ragini, J.R.; Anand, P.R.; Bhaskar, V. Big data analytics for disaster response and recovery through sentiment analysis. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2018, 42, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Akter, S.; Wamba, S.F. Big data and disaster management: A systematic review and agenda for future research. Ann. Oper. Res. 2019, 283, 939–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  240. Yu, M.; Yang, C.; Li, Y. Big data in natural disaster management: A review. Geosciences 2018, 8, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  241. Shan, S.; Zhao, F.; Wei, Y.; Liu, M. Disaster management 2.0: A real-time disaster damage assessment model based on mobile social media data—A case study of Weibo (Chinese Twitter). Saf. Sci. 2019, 115, 393–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. La Salle, J.; Williams, K.J.; Moritz, C. Biodiversity analysis in the digital era. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2016, 371, 20150337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  243. Hallgren, W.; Beaumont, L.; Bowness, A.; Chambers, L.; Graham, E.; Holewa, H.; Vanderwal, J. The biodiversity and climate change virtual laboratory: Where ecology meets big data. Environ. Model. Softw. 2016, 76, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  244. König, C.; Weigelt, P.; Schrader, J.; Taylor, A.; Kattge, J.; Kreft, H. Biodiversity data integration—The significance of data resolution and domain. PLoS Biol. 2019, 17, e3000183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Hassani, H.; Huang, X.; Silva, E.S.; Ghodsi, M. A review of data mining applications in crime. Stat. Anal. Data Min. ASA Data Sci. J. 2016, 9, 139–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Simmons, R. Big Data, Machine Judges, and the Legitimacy of the Criminal Justice System. UCDL Rev. 2018, 52, 1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Završnik, A. Algorithmic justice: Algorithms and big data in criminal justice settings. Eur. J. Criminol. 2019, 1477370819876762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  248. Sarker, M.N.I.; Wu, M.; Hossin, M.A. Smart governance through big data: Digital transformation of public agencies. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (ICAIBD), Chengdu, China, 26–28 May 2018; pp. 62–70. [Google Scholar]
  249. Goldsmith, S.; Crawford, S. The Responsive City: Engaging Communities through Data-Smart Governance; John Wiley Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  250. Janssen, M.; Kuk, G. The challenges and limits of big data algorithms in technocratic governance. Gov. Inf. Q. 2016, 3, 371–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Johnston, E.W.; Hansen, D.L. Design lessons for smart governance infrastructures. In Transforming American Governance: Rebooting the Public Square; Taylor and Francis: Oxfordshire, UK, 2011; pp. 197–212. [Google Scholar]
  252. Barns, S. Smart cities and urban data platforms: Designing interfaces for smart governance. City Cult. Soc. 2018, 12, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Al-Badi, A.; Tarhini, A.; Khan, A.I. Exploring big data governance frameworks. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2018, 141, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Lin, Y. A comparison of selected Western and Chinese smart governance: The application of ICT in governmental management, participation and collaboration. Telecommun. Policy 2018, 42, 800–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Pereira, G.V.; Parycek, P.; Falco, E.; Kleinhans, R. Smart governance in the context of smart cities: A literature review. Inf. Polity 2018, 23, 143–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  256. Meijer, A.; Bolívar, M.P.R. Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 2016, 82, 392–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Ju, J.; Liu, L.; Feng, Y. Citizen-centered big data analysis-driven governance intelligence framework for smart cities. Telecommun. Policy 2018, 42, 881–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Chen, F.; Neill, D.B. Human rights event detection from heterogeneous social media graphs. Big Data 2015, 3, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  259. Aldhaheri, A.; Lee, J. Event detection on large social media using temporal analysis. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 7th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 9–11 June 2017; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  260. Suma, S.; Mehmood, R.; Albeshri, A. Automatic event detection in smart cities using big data analytics. In International Conference on Smart Cities, Infrastructure, Technologies and Applications; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 111–122. [Google Scholar]
  261. Shi, L.; Wu, Y.; Liu, L.; Sun, X.; Jiang, L. Event detection and identification of influential spreaders in social media data streams. Big Data Min. Anal. 2018, 1, 34–46. [Google Scholar]
  262. Ceron, A.; Curini, L.; Iacus, S.M. Politics and Big Data: Nowcasting and Forecasting Elections with Social Media; Taylor Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  263. Bae, J.H.; Son, J.E.; Song, M. Analysis of twitter for 2012 South Korea presidential election by text mining techniques. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 2013, 19, 141–156. [Google Scholar]
  264. Sudhahar, S.; Veltri, G.A.; Cristianini, N. Automated analysis of the US presidential elections using Big Data and network analysis. Big Data Soc. 2015, 2, 2053951715572916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  265. Budiharto, W.; Meiliana, M. Prediction and analysis of Indonesia Presidential election from Twitter using sentiment analysis. J. Big Data 2018, 5, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  266. Naz, M.; Al-zahrani, F.A.; Khalid, R.; Javaid, N.; Qamar, A.M.; Afzal, M.K.; Shafiq, M. A secure data sharing platform using blockchain and interplanetary file system. Sustainability 2019, 11, 7054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  267. Kewell, B.; Adams, R.; Parry, G. Blockchain for good? Strateg. Chang. 2017, 26, 429–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  268. Adams, R.; Kewell, B.; Parry, G. Blockchain for good? Digital ledger technology and sustainable development goals. In Handbook of Sustainability and Social Science Research; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 127–140. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. UN SDGs and Big Data global Google trends since 2014.
Figure 1. UN SDGs and Big Data global Google trends since 2014.
Bdcc 05 00028 g001
Figure 2. Big Data and SDG 1 global Google trends since 2014.
Figure 2. Big Data and SDG 1 global Google trends since 2014.
Bdcc 05 00028 g002
Figure 3. Big Data and SDG 2 global Google trends since 2014.
Figure 3. Big Data and SDG 2 global Google trends since 2014.
Bdcc 05 00028 g003
Figure 4. Big Data and SDG 3 global Google trends since 2014.
Figure 4. Big Data and SDG 3 global Google trends since 2014.
Bdcc 05 00028 g004
Figure 5. Big Data and SDG 4 global Google trends since 2014.
Figure 5. Big Data and SDG 4 global Google trends since 2014.
Bdcc 05 00028 g005
Figure 6. Big Data and SDG 5 global Google trends since 2014.
Figure 6. Big Data and SDG 5 global Google trends since 2014.
Bdcc 05 00028 g006
Figure 7. Big Data and SDG 6 global Google trends since 2014.
Figure 7. Big Data and SDG 6 global Google trends since 2014.
Bdcc 05 00028 g007
Figure 8. Big Data and SDG 7 global Google trends since 2014.
Figure 8. Big Data and SDG 7 global Google trends since 2014.
Bdcc 05 00028 g008
Figure 9. Big Data and SDG 8 global Google trends since 2014.
Figure 9. Big Data and SDG 8 global Google trends since 2014.
Bdcc 05 00028 g009
Figure 10. Big Data and SDG 9 global Google trends since 2014.
Figure 10. Big Data and SDG 9 global Google trends since 2014.
Bdcc 05 00028 g010
Figure 11. Big Data and SDG 10 global Google trends since 2014.
Figure 11. Big Data and SDG 10 global Google trends since 2014.
Bdcc 05 00028 g011
Figure 12. Big Data and SDG 11 global Google trends since 2014.
Figure 12. Big Data and SDG 11 global Google trends since 2014.
Bdcc 05 00028 g012
Figure 13. Big Data and SDG 12 global Google trends since 2014.
Figure 13. Big Data and SDG 12 global Google trends since 2014.
Bdcc 05 00028 g013
Figure 14. Big Data and SDG 13 global Google trends since 2014.
Figure 14. Big Data and SDG 13 global Google trends since 2014.
Bdcc 05 00028 g014
Figure 15. Big Data and SDG 14 global Google trends since 2014.
Figure 15. Big Data and SDG 14 global Google trends since 2014.
Bdcc 05 00028 g015
Figure 16. Big Data and SDG 15 global Google trends since 2014.
Figure 16. Big Data and SDG 15 global Google trends since 2014.
Bdcc 05 00028 g016
Figure 17. Big Data and SDG 16 global Google trends since 2014.
Figure 17. Big Data and SDG 16 global Google trends since 2014.
Bdcc 05 00028 g017
Figure 18. Big Data and SDG 17 global Google trends since 2014.
Figure 18. Big Data and SDG 17 global Google trends since 2014.
Bdcc 05 00028 g018
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hassani, H.; Huang, X.; MacFeely, S.; Entezarian, M.R. Big Data and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs) at a Glance. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2021, 5, 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc5030028

AMA Style

Hassani H, Huang X, MacFeely S, Entezarian MR. Big Data and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs) at a Glance. Big Data and Cognitive Computing. 2021; 5(3):28. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc5030028

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hassani, Hossein, Xu Huang, Steve MacFeely, and Mohammad Reza Entezarian. 2021. "Big Data and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs) at a Glance" Big Data and Cognitive Computing 5, no. 3: 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc5030028

APA Style

Hassani, H., Huang, X., MacFeely, S., & Entezarian, M. R. (2021). Big Data and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs) at a Glance. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 5(3), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc5030028

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop