Next Article in Journal
Quasi-Static Measurement with Piezoelectric Sensors in Regard to Structural Health Monitoring of Wind Turbines
Previous Article in Journal
Tyrosinase Immobilization in Multi Walled Carbon Nanotube and Gold Nanowires Matrice for Catechol Detection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Computational Improvement in Human Dynamics Estimation †

Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 16145 Genoa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 5th International Symposium on Sensor Science (I3S 2017), Barcelona, Spain, 27–29 September 2017.
Proceedings 2017, 1(8), 827; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1080827
Published: 19 December 2017
In the context of human–robot interaction, control of robots could be improved by adding human dynamics as a feedback to robot controllers. A computational framework for the estimation of whole-body human dynamics is provided by Nori in 2015.
The estimation procedure starts from the Newton–Euler algorithm, in which boundary conditions are replaced with measurements coming from sensors. The proposed algorithm computes an estimation of human dynamic variables, assumed as stochastic variables with Gaussian distributions, providing as a Maximum-A-Posteriori (MAP) their mean and covariance conditioned on available measurements.
In this computation, inverses of high-dimensional sparse matrices are calculated. In order to reduce the related high computational cost, Cholesky factorization is used. Clolesky factorization is a decomposition of a positive-definite matrix into the product of a lower triangular matrix and its transpose. The solution of a MAP linear system is computed by decomposing the covariance matrix with Cholesky factorization and then with forward and backward substitutions. Moreover, since the covariance matrices maintain the same structure, a permutation matrix is computed only once and then employed to each computational temporal-step to further improve the Cholesky factorization/computational performance. The computational time of the MAP algorithm decreases by about 15%.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lazzaroni, M.; Lorenzini, M. Computational Improvement in Human Dynamics Estimation. Proceedings 2017, 1, 827. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1080827

AMA Style

Lazzaroni M, Lorenzini M. Computational Improvement in Human Dynamics Estimation. Proceedings. 2017; 1(8):827. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1080827

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lazzaroni, Maria, and Marta Lorenzini. 2017. "Computational Improvement in Human Dynamics Estimation" Proceedings 1, no. 8: 827. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1080827

APA Style

Lazzaroni, M., & Lorenzini, M. (2017). Computational Improvement in Human Dynamics Estimation. Proceedings, 1(8), 827. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1080827

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop