1. Introduction
Mental health is not merely health issue, but it can affect the well-being of living. This is incongruent with the definition by another piece of literature [
1], which defines mental health as a state of well-being of individuals who are aware of the capabilities of themselves to withstand the pressures of life and, in turn, contribute to society and country. In fact, the global burden of diseases and disabilities is influenced by mental health, which can affect productivity and, in turn, hinder the economic development of a country [
2].
Malaysia has carried out movement control orders to stop the COVID-19 virus from spreading. The impacts were substantial, as most of the people lost a source of income, causing social distancing and limiting social activities, which are among the major and apparent factors for the occurrence of mental health disorders and affect the well-being of life [
3,
4]. There is a scarcity of research in Malaysia on health and psychological health throughout the COVID-19 epidemic. Theoretically, the pandemic was projected to have both positive and negative effects on Malaysia’s mental health [
5]; therefore, it is substantial to be studied, as there is not yet a quantitative study on health and mental wellbeing in Malaysia’s community [
6].
Among the positive effects during the period of movement control expected by the author is that people at home are thus encouraged to spend time with family, which can increase the family’s state of harmony and encourage a balanced life, which ultimately has a favorable effect on Malaysians’ overall mental health. However, theoretically, the pandemic is expected to provide positive and negative effects on mental health in Malaysia [
5]. Since there has not been a quantitative study that looks at the mental health of the Malaysian community during the COVID-19 pandemic, research on mental health in Malaysia is crucial [
6]. This study obtained quantitative evidence of mental health problems using a Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21) analysis and further examined the relationship between mental problems and sociodemographic factors such as race, age, and gender. DASS-21, in both the Malay and English version, was used to assess mental health. The DASS has been used widely as an instrument that is recognized for determining symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress [
7]. In addition, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21) was employed in many cultures and other nations during COVID-19 as a screening tool to identify a person’s level of depression, anxiety, and stress [
8,
9,
10].
As a result, this study aimed to investigate the physical and mental health of the Malaysian society during the period of Movement Control Orders in order to combat the COVID-19 pandemic.
2. Literature Review
A pandemic known as the Novel Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) has had a tremendous impact on our societies, economies, health, and human behaviour [
11]. The COVID-19 pandemic caused many countries to carry out sanctions and the closure of socio-economic activities [
12]. This includes Malaysia, which implemented movement control directives to stop the COVID-19 virus from spreading. The impacts were substantial, as most of the people lost a source of income, causing social distancing and limiting social activities, which are among the major and apparent factors for the occurrence of mental health disorders and affecting the well-being of life [
3,
4].
Disease outbreaks are able to affect the state of mental health of the people, culture and environment. It is because this pandemic has been spreading quickly to the whole world that it has led to great fear, concern, and anxiety, especially to certain groups, e.g., the elderly people and people with comorbid disorders [
13]. It has the potential to affect existing diseases and can lead to psychiatry-related symptoms, which may be related to impaired mental and interaction immunity [
14].
3. Research Design
This study was quantitative in nature. This quantitative research only displays descriptive data. Using an internet questionnaire, the information was gathered through a survey. Before distributing questionnaires, it was required to establish the population to ensure that sampling could be undertaken. For this study, the population consisted of B40 and M40 household members earning less than RM9620 per year. This study used a purposive sampling strategy. A purposeful sample, also known as a judging or expert sample, is a nonprobability sample type. The fundamental objective of a purposive sample is to produce a statistically representative sample of the population. A purposive sample is one whose characteristics are specified for a study-relevant goal. Participants in the final sample represented 14 states in Malaysia (
Table 1).
From April 1 to May 30 of 2020, 762 replies in total were gathered throughout the data collection period. During the movement control order period, online surveys were used to perform the research for two months. The Google forms containing the study’s questions were sent publicly via email and platforms for social media, like Facebook and WhatsApp. Those who took the initiative to fill out the responses were therefore categorized as survey participants. Thus, the final sample included respondents from 14 Malaysian states.
The online survey was distributed using Google Forms to contacts and contacts of contacts, in accordance with the snowball and simple sampling methods. Contacts were urged to widely distribute the survey to their networks. Studies were analyzed using a descriptive analysis and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS). The Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS) is a screening test for identifying a person’s level of depression, anxiety, and stress. With this screening test, you can find out your mental health status and whether you are stressed, worried, or depressed. The DASS is an instrument that is often used to assess the level of an individual for the analysis of depression and anxiety. DASS has no implications for patients or individuals in the classification system, such as the discrete diagnostic manual and Mental Disorder Statistics (DSM) and any disease classification. The DASS only evaluates the symptoms that are associated with depression, anxiety, and stress [
15]. In the early stages of using DASS, it contained 42 items but was modified to 21 items. The DASS was much used in psychology-related studies, in which its reliability and validity have been recognized in various fields of study. Thus, the DASS is an instrument that is recognized for determining symptoms of stress, anxiety, and depression [
7]. During COVID-19, the DASS-21 was utilized in several cultures and countries as a screening tool to identify a person’s level of depression, anxiety, and stress [
8,
9,
10].
It is also worth noting that this study was employed in the scope of social science and not into psychology studies, by technical means. This research does not involve any patients of known mental health; instead, it was conducted generally on community basis. The data collected originated from the society; therefore, they were not adhered with ethical or confidentiality issues. The respondents’ responses were only used for academic purposes alone.
4. Analysis and Discussion
4.1. Respondent’s Profile
The profile of the study’s respondents is shown in
Table 1. The majority of respondents were males of Malay ethnicity who represented respondents from all states in Malaysia. Most respondents were working in the of private sector and represented all levels of education, from no formal education to having a doctorate degree. Furthermore, the majority of respondents were located in the city. In the aspects of age and salary, respondents represented the age of engaging in work actively and coming from a B40 and M40 category in Malaysia.
4.2. DASS-21 Score Analysis
The DASS-2 Score Analysis in
Table 2 reveals that nearly a quarter of Malaysian respondents during the era of the mobility control order suffered from mental health issues. As many as 23.1% of Malaysians have at least a mild mental health problem to a very bad problem. If the components of the mental health problems of the Malaysian community are detailed, almost 10% of the respondents experienced severe and very severe symptoms for both mental problem components of depression and anxiety during the movement control period in Malaysia to combat the COVID-19 pandemic.
4.3. Cross-Tabulation Analysis
Table 3 shows the rate and the percentage-level of depression and whether respondents showed symptoms of depression or not within the different socio-demographic variables. The results of the study found that respondents living in urban areas showed more symptoms of depression (30%) than those living in rural areas (26.6%). In addition to that, the findings of the study found that respondents that were aged 18–25 years showed symptoms of depression that were much higher, namely 45%, and this is consistent with the conclusions of [
16] in Spain. The study’s findings also revealed that, in Northern Spain, during the COVID-19 pandemic’s emergency period, one-quarter of respondents involved in the study had mental health problems. Respondents experienced depression (27.5%), had symptoms of anxiety (26.9%), and experienced stress (26.5%), respectively. This group which is the most active in socializing may have been experiencing a higher probability of depression symptoms due to the closure of social engaging places, such as central shopping malls and entertainment centers, where the percentage is nearly twice as much compared to the other age groups.
Table 3 also illustrates the level of anxiety related to the demographic variables. In terms of gender disparities, severe symptoms of depression were more prevalent in women, with statistics showing that 30.5% of women in Malaysia suffered from at least a few anxiety symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic, compared to only 27% of male respondents. The study’s findings are consistent with the results of the study by [
17] in Taiwan and [
18] in Italy, who found that the occurrence of the symptoms of anxiety is higher for women than men. Despite the fact that mental issues do not favor race or skin color and can happen to anyone, this study found that the respondents from a Chinese ethnicity suffer from anxiety symptoms the most (50%) compared to other ethnicities during the movement control order.
Table 3 also shows the rate and the percentage of the impact of if respondents experienced stress symptoms or not on different sociodemographic variables. Relatively, women who lived in the city and were aged 18–25 years were the demographic that were most prone to stress symptoms, compared to other demographic factors. From the aspect of the employment sector, available respondents who worked in the private sector who suffered from the risk of stress symptoms was high, contributing 27% compared to respondents who worked in the government or even worked alone. In addition, of respondents who received wages based on job (piece rated)/freelancer/working online, food delivery employees working through the phone applications and e-hailing drivers were those who demonstrated stress symptoms, contributing to 26.2% of the respondents at least experiencing symptoms of stress either mildly or severely affected compared to respondents who received monthly or even a weekly salary while the pandemic struck.
5. Conclusions
This study did not consider medical cases and therefore did not require ethical consent. This study is in line with studies conducted by many researchers in the same field [
12,
19,
20,
21]. Therefore, this study does not require any ethical concern. This was a cross-sectional study that relied mostly on self-reported questionnaires to quantify psychiatric symptoms; no clinical diagnosis was made. The gold standard for mental diagnosis consists of a structured clinical interview and functional neuroimaging [
21,
22].
The study’s findings demonstrate that communities in Malaysia experience impaired mental health as a result of the COVID-19 epidemic, as evidenced by signs of stress, anxiety, and sadness. The results of this study found that almost a quarter of respondents need to be given attention, as there is a probability that this figure may increase while the world is making the best efforts to reduce the number of deaths brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic and COVID-19 positive cases.
With the deteriorating economic situation, of course, many companies went bankrupt, and many individuals will lose their source of income. Individuals should manage their personal financial situation and, at the same time, their mental health in a stable state. Economic uncertainty and loss of employment may not only cause a person to lose sanity but also cause indirect costs to immediate family members. This is because family members must bear the patient’s cost financially and have to sacrifice their rest time to pay attention and care for the patient. Therefore, the crucial moral support from individuals to family and friends is much needed.
In addition to the disabled and the elderly who need to be given attention, women also need support during this pandemic. The findings of the study found that female respondents living in the city is a demographic group that shows the highest mental health problems, at least to a small extent to very severe, either through depression, anxiety, or stress. This is probably because the women who are married and living in the city are working women. With the state of closing economic activities and the need to work from home, these women need to be juggling to do their work activities and “work” at the home at the same time. This is exacerbated by children’s online school activities, which need to be given attention for as long as they are indoors due to the closure of the school during the movement control order period in Malaysia.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.K.I. and C.S.; methodology, M.Z.M. and S.S.; software, M.K.I.; validation, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, M.K.I., S.S., M.Z.M. and C.S.; project administration, funding acquisition, M.K.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the Research Collaboration Fund 2021 (600-UiTMCTKD) (PJI/RMU 5/2/1) and SIGni-Finomics (600-UiTMCTKD (PJI/RMU 5/1) SIG 1/2022 (20)).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and analyzed for the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Terengganu for funding this study under the Research Collaboration Fund 2021 (600-UiTMCTKD) (PJI/RMU 5/2/1) and SIGni-Finomics (600-UiTMCTKD (PJI/RMU 5/1) SIG 1/2022 (20)).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- World Health Organization. Promoting Mental Health: Concepts, Emerging Evidence, Practice: A Report of the World Health Organization, Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse in Collaboration with the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation and the University of Melbourne; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005; ISBN 9791157467679.
- World Health Organization. Depression and Other Common Mental Disorders: Global Health Estimates; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 1–24.
- Leigh-Hunt, N.; Bagguley, D.; Bash, K.; Turner, V.; Turnbull, S.; Valtorta, N.; Caan, W. An overview of systematic reviews on the public health consequences of social isolation and loneliness. Public Health 2017, 152, 157–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Verme, P. Happiness, freedom and control. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2009, 71, 146–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shanmugam, H.; Juhari, J.A.; Nair, P.; Chow, S.K.; Ng, C.G. Impacts of COVID-19 Pandemic on mental health in Malaysia: A Single Thread of Hope. Malays. J. Psychiatry 2020, 29, 78–84. [Google Scholar]
- Rathakrishnan, B.; Kamaluddin, M.R.; Singh, S.S.B. Mental health issues during COVID-19 pandemic: Treatment and how to overcome. Malays. J. Psychiatry 2020, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antony, M.M.; Cox, B.J.; Enns, M.W.; Bieling, P.J.; Swinson, R.P. Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the depression anxiety stress scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychol. Assess. 1998, 10, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Chudzicka-Czupała, A.; Grabowski, D.; Pan, R.; Adamus, K.; Wan, X.; Hetnał, M.; Tan, Y.; Olszewska-Guizzo, A.; Xu, L.; et al. The Association between physical and mental health and face mask use during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparison of two countries with different views and practices. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 11, 569981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Le, H.T.; Lai, A.J.X.; Sun, J.; Hoang, M.T.; Vu, L.G.; Pham, H.Q.; Nguyen, T.H.; Tran, B.X.; Latkin, C.A.; Le, X.T.T.; et al. Anxiety and depression among people under the nationwide partial lockdown in Vietnam. Front. Public Health 2020, 8, 589359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tee, M.L.; Tee, C.A.; Anlacan, J.P.; Aligam, K.J.G.; Reyes, P.W.C.; Kuruchittham, V.; Ho, R.C. Psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines. J. Affect. Disord. 2020, 277, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tran, B.X.; Nguyen, H.T.; Le, H.T.; Latkin, C.A.; Pham, H.Q.; Vu, L.G.; Le, X.T.T.; Nguyen, T.T.; Pham, Q.T.; Ta, N.T.K.; et al. Impact of COVID-19 on economic well-being and quality of life of the Vietnamese during the national social distancing. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 565153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiong, J.; Lipsitz, O.; Nasri, F.; Lui, L.M.W.; Gill, H.; Phan, L.; Chen-Li, D.; Iacobucci, M.; Ho, R.; Majeed, A.; et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A Systematic review. J. Affect. Disord. 2020, 277, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dong, L.; Bouey, J.; Bouey, J. Public mental health crisis during covid-19 pandemic, China. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020. [CrossRef]
- COVID-19 Disrupting Mental Health Services in Most Countries, WHO Survey. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/05-10-2020-covid-19-disrupting-mental-health-services-in-most-countries-who-survey (accessed on 9 November 2020).
- Lovibond, S.H.; Lovibond, P.F. Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales; Behaviour Research and Therapy; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1995; ISBN 7334-1423-0. [Google Scholar]
- Ozamiz-Etxebarria, N.; Dosil-Santamaria, M.; Picaza-Gorrochategui, M.; Idoiaga-Mondragon, N. Stress, anxiety, and depression levels in the initial stage of the COVID-19 outbreak in a population sample in the Northern Spain. Cad. Saude Publica 2020, 36, e00054020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wong, L.P.; Hung, C.C.; Alias, H.; Lee, T.S.H. Anxiety symptoms and preventive measures during the COVID-19 outbreak in Taiwan. BMC Psychiatry 2020, 20, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gualano, M.R.; Lo Moro, G.; Voglino, G.; Bert, F.; Siliquini, R. Effects of COVID-19 lockdown on mental health and sleep disturbances in Italy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, M.W.B.; Ho, R.C.M. Moodle: The cost effective solution for internet cognitive behavioral therapy (i-cbt) interventions. Technol. Health Care 2017, 25, 163–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Soh, H.L.; Ho, R.C.; Ho, C.S.; Tam, W.W. Efficacy of digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Sleep Med. 2020, 75, 315–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ho, C.S.; Chee, C.Y.; Ho, R.C. Mental health strategies to combat the psychological impact of COVID-19 beyond paranoia and panic. Ann. Acad. Med. Singap. 2020, 49, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Husain, S.F.; Yu, R.; Tang, T.B.; Tam, W.W.; Tran, B.; Quek, T.T.; Hwang, S.H.; Chang, C.W.; Ho, C.S.; Ho, R.C. Validating a Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Diagnostic Paradigm for Major Depressive Disorder. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1.
Respondents’ Profile.
Table 1.
Respondents’ Profile.
Gender | % | Race | % |
---|
Male | 53.9 | Malay | 68.2 |
Female | 46.1 | Chinese | 14.7 |
State | | Indian | 12.3 |
Perlis | 1.4 | Others | 4.7 |
Kedah | 7.7 | Education level | |
Pulau Pinang | 14.2 | Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) | 6.4 |
Perak | 8.1 | Master | 13.8 |
Selangor | 27.8 | Bachelor’s degree | 29.7 |
Johor | 9.2 | Diploma | 22.2 |
Negeri Sembilan | 2.8 | STPM/Certificate | 4.9 |
Melaka | 2.1 | SPM/MCE | 18.1 |
Pahang | 3.1 | PMR/SRP | 3.0 |
Terengganu | 3.1 | UPSR/Completed Primary 6 | 0.8 |
Kelantan | 5.5 | No formal education | 1.2 |
Sabah | 3.7 | Employment sector | |
Sarawak | 2.4 | Government sector | 32.0 |
W.P. Labuan | 0.3 | Private sector | 46.3 |
W.P. Putrajaya | 1.2 | Self employed | 21.7 |
W.P. Kuala Lumpur | 7.3 | Category of income | |
Area | | Based on hourly/daily/weekly | 13.3 |
Urban | 66.9 | Based on monthly | 69.7 |
Rural | 33.1 | Based on piece rate | 17.1 |
Age | | Monthly salary | |
18–25 years old | 15.7 | RM580 and below | 5.0 |
26–30 years old | 14.2 | RM580–RM980 | 6.3 |
31-40 years old | 39.5 | RM981–RM2614 | 27.6 |
41-60 years old | 28.7 | RM2615–RM4360 | 27.3 |
61 years old and above | 1.8 | RM4361–RM9619 | 33.9 |
Table 2.
DASS-21 score and Mental Health Problem Components.
Table 2.
DASS-21 score and Mental Health Problem Components.
DASS-21 Scoring | Percentage (%) |
---|
Normal | 76.9 |
Mild | 10.9 |
Moderate | 8.7 |
Severe | 2.9 |
Very severe | 0.7 |
Depression Level | |
Normal | 71.1 |
Mild | 8.9 |
Moderate | 10.8 |
Severe | 5.0 |
Very severe | 4.2 |
Anxiety Level | |
Normal | 71.4 |
Mild | 5.5 |
Moderate | 13.3 |
Severe | 4.5 |
Very severe | 5.4 |
Stress Level | |
Normal | 75.9 |
Mild | 8.1 |
Moderate | 8.9 |
Severe | 6.3 |
Very severe | 0.8 |
Table 3.
Rate and Percentage of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Levels for demographic factors 1.
Table 3.
Rate and Percentage of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Levels for demographic factors 1.
Variables | Category | Depression | Anxiety | Stress |
---|
Normal | Not Normal * | Normal | Not Normal * | Normal | Not Normal * |
---|
Gender | Male | 292 | 119 | 300 | 111 | 319 | 92 |
| | 71.0% | 29.0% | 73.00% | 27.00% | 77.60% | 22.40% |
| Female | 250 | 101 | 244 | 107 | 259 | 92 |
| | 71.2% | 28.8% | 69.50% | 30.50% | 73.80% | 26.20% |
| Total | 542 | 220 | 544 | 218 | 578 | 184 |
| | 71.1% | 28.9% | 71.40% | 28.60% | 75.90% | 24.10% |
Area of Living | Urban | 357 | 153 | 365 | 145 | 386 | 124 |
| | 70.0% | 30.0% | 71.60% | 28.40% | 75.70% | 24.30% |
| Rural | 185 | 67 | 179 | 73 | 192 | 60 |
| | 73.4% | 26.6% | 71.00% | 29.00% | 76.20% | 23.80% |
| Total | 542 | 220 | 544 | 218 | 578 | 184 |
| | 71.1% | 28.9% | 71.40% | 28.60% | 75.90% | 24.10% |
Age | 18–25 years old | 66 | 54 | 63 | 57 | 84 | 36 |
| | 55.0% | 45.0% | 52.50% | 47.50% | 70.00% | 30.00% |
| 26–30 years old | 83 | 25 | 78 | 30 | 82 | 26 |
| | 76.9% | 23.1% | 72.20% | 27.80% | 75.90% | 24.10% |
| 31–40 years old | 216 | 85 | 225 | 76 | 228 | 73 |
| | 71.8% | 28.2% | 74.80% | 25.20% | 75.70% | 24.30% |
| 41–60 years old | 165 | 54 | 167 | 52 | 173 | 46 |
| | 75.3% | 24.7% | 76.30% | 23.70% | 79.00% | 21.00% |
| 61 years old and above | 12 | 2 | 11 | 3 | 11 | 3 |
| | 85.7% | 14.3% | 78.60% | 21.40% | 78.60% | 21.40% |
| Total | 542 | 220 | 544 | 218 | 578 | 184 |
| | 71.1% | 28.9% | 71.40% | 28.60% | 75.90% | 24.10% |
Race | Malay | 389 | 131 | 396 | 124 | 404 | 116 |
| | 74.8% | 25.2% | 76.20% | 23.80% | 77.70% | 22.30% |
| Chinese | 61 | 51 | 56 | 56 | 75 | 37 |
| | 54.5% | 45.5% | 50.00% | 50.00% | 67.00% | 33.00% |
| Indian | 69 | 25 | 66 | 28 | 69 | 25 |
| | 73.4% | 26.6% | 70.20% | 29.80% | 73.40% | 26.60% |
| Others | 23 | 13 | 26 | 10 | 30 | 6 |
| | 63.9% | 36.1% | 72.20% | 27.80% | 83.30% | 16.70% |
| Total | 542 | 220 | 544 | 218 | 578 | 184 |
| | 71.1% | 28.9% | 71.40% | 28.60% | 75.90% | 24.10% |
Employment Sector | Government | 196 | 48 | 188 | 56 | 192 | 52 |
| | 80.3% | 19.7% | 77.00% | 23.00% | 78.70% | 21.30% |
| Private | 235 | 118 | 232 | 121 | 257 | 96 |
| | 66.6% | 33.4% | 65.70% | 34.30% | 72.80% | 27.20% |
| Self-employed | 111 | 54 | 124 | 41 | 129 | 36 |
| | 67.3% | 32.7% | 75.20% | 24.80% | 78.20% | 21.80% |
| Total | 542 | 220 | 544 | 218 | 578 | 184 |
| | 71.1% | 28.9% | 71.40% | 28.60% | 75.90% | 24.10% |
Category of income | Hourly/daily/weekly basis | 62 | 39 | 61 | 40 | 78 | 23 |
| | 61.4% | 38.6% | 60.40% | 39.60% | 77.20% | 22.80% |
| Monthly basis | 401 | 130 | 394 | 137 | 404 | 127 |
| | 75.5% | 24.5% | 74.20% | 25.80% | 76.10% | 23.90% |
| Piece rated basis | 79 | 51 | 89 | 41 | 96 | 34 |
| | 60.8% | 39.2% | 68.50% | 31.50% | 73.80% | 26.20% |
| Total | 542 | 220 | 544 | 218 | 578 | 184 |
| | 71.1% | 28.9% | 71.40% | 28.60% | 75.90% | 24.10% |
Monthly income | RM580 and below | 30 | 8 | 30 | 8 | 32 | 6 |
| | 78.9% | 21.1% | 78.90% | 21.10% | 84.20% | 15.80% |
| RM580 to RM980 | 32 | 16 | 34 | 14 | 35 | 13 |
| | 66.7% | 33.3% | 70.80% | 29.20% | 72.90% | 27.10% |
| RM981 to RM2614 | 148 | 62 | 155 | 55 | 161 | 49 |
| | 70.5% | 29.5% | 73.80% | 26.20% | 76.70% | 23.30% |
| RM2615 to RM4360 | 147 | 61 | 145 | 63 | 158 | 50 |
| | 70.7% | 29.3% | 69.70% | 30.30% | 76.00% | 24.00% |
| RM4361 to RM9619 | 185 | 73 | 180 | 78 | 192 | 66 |
| | 71.7% | 28.3% | 69.80% | 30.20% | 74.40% | 25.60% |
| Total | 542 | 220 | 544 | 218 | 578 | 184 |
| | 71.1% | 28.9% | 71.40% | 28.60% | 75.90% | 24.10% |
| Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).