Measuring the Reliability Analysis of Heutagogy Learning, Student Motivation and Digital Literacy among Indonesian Students †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Problem Statement
3. Literature Review
4. Methodology
5. Pre-Testing Validity and Reliability of Research Instrument
6. Reliability Test Results
7. Discussion & Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Shoikova, E. Models of technology and change in higher education. Proc. Int. Spring Semin. Electron. Technol. 2004, 3, 500–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halsall, J.P.; Powell, J.L.; Snowden, M. Determined learning approach: Implications of heutagogy society based learning. Cogent Soc. Sci. 2016, 2, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shuhidan, S.M. Information-Seeking Processes among Primary School Children in Australia and Malaysia. Ph.D. Thesis, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Hase, S.; Kenyon, C. (Eds.) Self-Determined Learning: Heutagogy in Action; A&C Black: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Chan, B.S.K.; Churchill, D.; Chiu, T.K.F. Digital literacy learning in higher education through digital storytelling approach. J. Int. Educ. Res. 2017, 13, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kane, S. Literacy And Learning In The Content Areas; Routledge: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Niemi, H.; Multisilta, J. Digital storytelling promoting twenty-first century skills and student engagement. Technol. Pedagog. Educ. 2016, 25, 451–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reeve, J. In Building autonomous learners. In Autonomy-Supportive Teaching: What It Is, How to Do It; Springer: Singapore, 2016; pp. 129–152. [Google Scholar]
- Bilal, D. Web search engines for children: A comparative study and performance evaluation of “Yahooligans!,” “Ask Jeeves for kids,” and “super snooper”. In Proceedings of the 62nd ASIS Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA, 31 October–4 November 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Hase, S.; Kenyon, C. From Andragogy To Heutagogy; Ulti-BASE In-Site: Melbourne, Australia, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Blaschke, L.M. Strategies for Implementing Self-Determined Learning (Heutagogy) within Education: A Comparison of Three Institutions (Australia, South Africa, and Israel). Master’s Thesis, Oldenburg, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Hewi, L.; Shaleh, M. Refleksi Hasil PISA (The Programme For International Student Assesment): Upaya Perbaikan Bertumpu Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. J. Golden Age. 2020, 4, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gündüzalp, S. 21 st century skills for sustainable education: Prediction level of teachers’ information literacy skills on their digital literacy skills. Discourse Commun. Sustain. Educ. 2021, 12, 85–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dianimdri, S.D.; Yuliani, W.D. Digital age literacy for Indonesian elementary school student. Soc. Humanit. Educ. Stud. 2018, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eshet-Alkalai, Y. Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. J. Educ. Multimed. Hypermedia 2004, 13, 93–106. [Google Scholar]
- Hargittai, E. Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the “net Generation”. Sociol. Inq. 2010, 80, 92–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rhema, A.; Miliszewska, I. Analysis of student attitudes towards e-learning: The Case of engineering students in Libya. Issues Inf. Sci. Inf. Technol. 2014, 11, 169–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdullah, Z.D. Students’ attitudes towards information technology and the relationship with their academic achievement. Contemp. Educ. Technol. 2015, 6, 338–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bulger, M.E.; Mayer, R.E.; Metzger, M.J. Knowledge and processes that predict proficiency in digital literacy. Read. Writ. 2014, 27, 1567–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ng, W. Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Comput. Educ. 2012, 59, 1065–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fraillon, J.; Ainley, J.; Schulz, W.; Friedman, T.; Gebhardt, E. Preparing for Life in a Digital Age: The IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study; International Report; Springer Nature: Berlin, Germany, 2014; p. 308. [Google Scholar]
- Janssen, J.; Stoyanov, S.; Ferrari, A.; Punie, Y.; Pannekeet, K.; Sloep, P. Experts’ views on digital competence: Commonalities and differences. Comput. Educ. 2013, 68, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, S.; Angural, V. Use of Cronbach’s alpha in dental research. Jain S Angural V Med. Res. Chron. 2017, 4, 285–291. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F.; Sarstedt, M.; Matthews, L.M.; Ringle, C.M. Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: Part I—Method. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2016, 28, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Hypothesis | |
---|---|
H1 | Learner agency has relationship with digital literacy. |
H2 | Capability has relationship with digital literacy |
H3 | Self-reflection has relationship with digital literacy |
H4 | Non-linear learning design has relationship with digital literacy |
H5 | Digital Literacy has relationship with student motivation |
H6 | Digital literacy has mediated the relationship between heutagogy learning and student motivation |
Variables | Number of Items | Cronbach’s Alpha | |
---|---|---|---|
Learner Agency | Self-determined | 5 | 0.896 |
Responsive | 4 | 0.787 | |
Attitude | 5 | 0.917 | |
Capability | Self-efficacy | 4 | 0.720 |
Creativity | 4 | 0.814 | |
Communicate | 5 | 0.835 | |
Reflection | Know-in-action | 4 | 0.747 |
Reflect-in-action | 4 | 0.783 | |
Reflect-in-practice | 4 | 0.834 | |
Non-linear Design | Ability to Handle ambiguity | 4 | 0.799 |
Nurture engagement | 5 | 0.813 | |
Apply open system thinking | 4 | 0.775 | |
Student Motivation | Attention | 5 | 0.856 |
Relevance | 6 | 0.787 | |
Confident | 4 | 0.803 | |
Satisfaction | 5 | 0.793 | |
Digital Literacy | Technology | 4 | 0.829 |
Ethics | 6 | 0.813 | |
Cognitive | 5 | 0.839 | |
Overall | 87 | 0.813 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mannan, E.F.; Shuhidan, S.M.; Masrek, M.N. Measuring the Reliability Analysis of Heutagogy Learning, Student Motivation and Digital Literacy among Indonesian Students. Proceedings 2022, 82, 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022082033
Mannan EF, Shuhidan SM, Masrek MN. Measuring the Reliability Analysis of Heutagogy Learning, Student Motivation and Digital Literacy among Indonesian Students. Proceedings. 2022; 82(1):33. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022082033
Chicago/Turabian StyleMannan, Endang Fitriyah, Shamila Mohamed Shuhidan, and Mohamad Noorman Masrek. 2022. "Measuring the Reliability Analysis of Heutagogy Learning, Student Motivation and Digital Literacy among Indonesian Students" Proceedings 82, no. 1: 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022082033
APA StyleMannan, E. F., Shuhidan, S. M., & Masrek, M. N. (2022). Measuring the Reliability Analysis of Heutagogy Learning, Student Motivation and Digital Literacy among Indonesian Students. Proceedings, 82(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022082033