Next Article in Journal
Our Experience in Testing Potential Prebiotics
Previous Article in Journal
Associations between Eating Behavior and Dietary Intake in a Sample of Type 2 Diabetes Patients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Investigation of the Postprandial Glycaemic Response to White Bread and Wholemeal Bread Consumption among Healthy Young Adults †

1
Department of Health Sciences Research and Management, City, University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK
2
School of Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 2DS, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 14th European Nutrition Conference FENS 2023, Belgrade, Serbia, 14–17 November 2023.
Proceedings 2023, 91(1), 194; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091194
Published: 2 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 14th European Nutrition Conference FENS 2023)
Background and Objectives: Wholemeal bread is regarded as healthier than white bread due to its higher fibre contents and other nutrients, including phytochemicals and essential minerals, and is recommended to be included in the healthy diet over white bread [1]. This study aimed to investigate the difference in the postprandial glycemic response to commonly consumed white bread and wholemeal bread in the UK in normal weight and healthy young adults. Methods: Designed as an acute randomized cross-over trial, 20 participants (10 white Caucasians and 10 Chinese, 20–31 y, BMI 18.5–24.6 kg/m2) were given two slices of wholemeal (fibre 6.7 g) and white bread (fibre 2.7 g) alongside 150 mL of pure orange juice and 10 g of butter on separate visits randomly (minimum of a 48-h interval) after fasting for 12 h. The blood glucose concentration was measured at time 0 (fasting), 30 min, 60 min, 90 min and 120 min postprandially through multiple finger pricks using a Biosen blood glucose analyser. The difference in the area under the curve (AUC) and the peak value (PV) between different bread intakes were analysed through a paired t-test and between groups (genders, ethnicities) using two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Results: Characteristics of the participants were as follows: age: 23.15 ± 3.3 y; body mass index (BMI): 21.0 ± 2.2 kg/m2; body fat composition: 19.9 ± 6.3%. The AUCs were significantly reduced after wholemeal bread meal consumption compared with white bread meal consumption (631.9 ± 66.8 mmol·min/L vs. 655.8 ± 56.6 mmol·min/L, p = 0.027). The AUCs were significantly less in females compared with males after both instances of bread meal consumption (white bread: female 630.2 ± 54.7 mmol·min/L, male 676.7 ± 51.2 mmol·min/L; wholemeal bread: female 593.7 ± 49.7 mmol·min/L, male 663.0 ± 64.2 mmol·min/L, p = 0.024). There was no significant difference in the PVs between the genders. No difference in either the AUCs or PVs was observed between ethnic groups, though Chinese participants had significant lower fasting blood glucose levels than their counterparts. Discussion: The wholemeal bread did deliver a beneficial effect for the postprandial glycaemic response compared with white bread consumption. Female participants show significant lower postprandial glycaemic response than males regardless of white or whole meal bread consumption.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.D. and Y.X.; methodology, H.D. and Y.X.; investigation, D.G.P. and N.L.; data analysis, H.D. and Y.X.; writing—original draft preparation, H.D.; writing—review and editing, Y.X.; supervision, Y.X.; project administration, Y.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Coventry University Ethics Committee (Ref. P144960).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Reference

  1. Lockyer, S.; Spiro, A. The role of bread in the UK diet: An update. Nutr Bull. 2020, 45, 133–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dong, H.; Pineda, D.G.; Li, N.; Xu, Y. Investigation of the Postprandial Glycaemic Response to White Bread and Wholemeal Bread Consumption among Healthy Young Adults. Proceedings 2023, 91, 194. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091194

AMA Style

Dong H, Pineda DG, Li N, Xu Y. Investigation of the Postprandial Glycaemic Response to White Bread and Wholemeal Bread Consumption among Healthy Young Adults. Proceedings. 2023; 91(1):194. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091194

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dong, Honglin, Diana Galindo Pineda, Ni Li, and Yizhi Xu. 2023. "Investigation of the Postprandial Glycaemic Response to White Bread and Wholemeal Bread Consumption among Healthy Young Adults" Proceedings 91, no. 1: 194. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091194

APA Style

Dong, H., Pineda, D. G., Li, N., & Xu, Y. (2023). Investigation of the Postprandial Glycaemic Response to White Bread and Wholemeal Bread Consumption among Healthy Young Adults. Proceedings, 91(1), 194. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091194

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop