Next Article in Journal
Screening of Different Carbon Nanotubes in Melt-Mixed Polymer Composites with Different Polymer Matrices for Their Thermoelectrical Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
A Dimensionless Characteristic Number for Process Selection and Mold Design in Composites Manufacturing: Part II—Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Free Vibration Analysis of Laminated Functionally Graded Carbon Nanotube-Reinforced Composite Doubly Curved Shallow Shell Panels Using a New Four-Variable Refined Theory
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Family of C0 Quadrilateral Plate Elements Based on the Refined Zigzag Theory for the Analysis of Thin and Thick Laminated Composite and Sandwich Plates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Micro Flowers of SrS/Bi2S3 Nanocomposite and Its Field Emission Properties

1
Centre for Materials for Electronics Technology (C-MET), Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), Government of India, Panchawati Off Pashan Road, Pune 411008, India
2
Department of Physics, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune 411007, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Compos. Sci. 2019, 3(4), 105; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs3040105
Submission received: 17 September 2019 / Revised: 14 November 2019 / Accepted: 26 November 2019 / Published: 3 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Journal of Composites Science in 2019)

Abstract

:
The three-dimensional hierarchical SrS/Bi2S3 heterostructures were synthesized by a template-free single-step hydrothermal method. The structural and morphological studies revealed the formation of a single crystalline orthorhombic heterostructure with rod-like morphologies possessing a high aspect ratio. The field emission properties of SrS/Bi2S3 nanorods were investigated. J–E and the Fowler–Nordheim (F–N) plot, as well as long-term field emission (FE) stability, were studied. SrS/Bi2S3 nanoflowers have enhanced the FE properties more than the virgin Bi2S3. The observed values of the re-producible turn-on field for SrS/Bi2S3 defined to draw an emission current density of ca. 1 µA/cm2 were found to be ca. 2.50 V/µm, and of the threshold field to draw a current density of ca. 10 µA/cm2 were found to be ca. 3.00 V/µm (without visible light illumination). A maximum emission current density of ca. 527 μA/cm2 was drawn without light and a current density of ca. 1078 μA/cm2 with light, which is higher than that of pristine Bi2S3.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Nanomaterials have been attracting great attention for catalytic, electronics, and electro-optical applications. Recently, architectural changes in the nanomaterial design and their orientation have attracted scientists because of their potential use as key materials in nanodevice fabrication [1]. The research focus has been shifted from simple structures to a complex nanocrystal to achieve multifunctionality [2]. For that reason, hierarchically nanostructured materials are of great interest for field emission (FE)-based applications. Also, structures with nanotip emitters offer more excellent advantages than the usual microtip emitters. The small radius of curvature at the tip with a high aspect ratio facilitates the use of these field nanoemitters under lower applied voltages with a higher base pressure. The hierarchically nanostructured nanomaterials are attractive candidates for potential applications in a various range of vacuum micro/nanoelectronic devices. Nevertheless, to develop a simple, economically feasible and scaled-up method for constructing hierarchically self-assembled architectures is a daunting task for various systems.
In this regard, a promising methodology would be a solvothermal or hydrothermal approach [3]. Since, nano-Bi2S3 has intrinsic photoconductivity and, hence, has been explored for photo-enhanced FE behavior. The nanostructured Bi2S3 has been studied for field emission properties [4]. As seen from the literature, there are only a few reports on the FE characteristics of Bi2S3 nanostructures [5]. To improve the turn-on and threshold potential in Bi2S3 nanomaterials, the heterostructure architecture has been used. More et al. [5] have reported the FE properties of the CdS-Bi2S3 heterostructure, which show the turn-on field is about 1.8 µv−1 for 10 µA/cm2.
In this paper, we report the synthesis of architectured SrS/Bi2S3 consisting of self-assembled nanorods within nanoflowers via template-free solvothermal routes. After the illumination of visible light, these synthesized SrS/Bi2S3 nanoflowers exhibit reproducible photosensitive FE behavior. We investigate the FE performance of a single isolated SrS/Bi2S3 nanoflower to explore its application in FE-based micro/nano-optoelectronic devices. To the best of our knowledge, this unique SrS/Bi2S3 composite for FE performance has been hitherto unattempted and, hence, studied in detail.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Material

Strontium nitrate (Sr(NO3)2), bismuth nitrate (Bi(NO3)3·5H2O), and thiourea (NH2CSNH2-TU) are of analytical grade (SD Fine-Chem Limited, Mumbai, India) and were used for the synthesis of the catalyst without any further purification.

2.2. Synthesis of SrS/Bi2S3

In typical synthesis procedure, SrS/Bi2S3 nanostructures were prepared by dissolving 1 mmole of Sr(NO3)2, 2 mmole of Bi(NO3)3·5H2O and 10 mmole of thiourea (NH2CSNH2) into 80 mL solvent (mixture of (3:1) water: ethylene glycol (EG)). After one hour of stirring, the solution was transferred to a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave (100 mL). Further, the system was sealed and kept at 180 °C in the oven, followed by natural cooling at room temperature. The finally obtained black precipitate was filtered, washed with water and ethanol 3–4 times, and dried at 80 °C. The samples were designated as S1, S2, and S3, which were synthesized in water: ethylene glycol (3:1) at 6 h, 12 h, and 18 h, respectively.
Sr(NO3)2 + 2 Bi(NO3)3·5H2O + 10 (NH2CSNH2) → Bi2S3 + SrS + 8NH4NO3 + 6H2S↑ + CO2↑ + NH4
During reaction, ethylene glycol (EG): water was used as the reaction medium. Strontium nitrate, bismuth nitrate, and thiourea were dissolved in mixed solvent (EG and water) under magnetic stirring, then a clear yellowish solution was formed. In the solvothermal process, because of temperature and pressure, Bi2S3 and SrS nuclei were formed by the reaction of the Bi3+ and Sr2+ ions present in the solution and H2S at solvothermal condition.

2.3. Sample Characterizations

The X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Model-D8, Advance, and Bruker AXS, Billerica, MA, USA) was used to investigate the structure. The FESEM (Hitachi S-4800, Tokyo, Japan) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2200FS, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) were used to confirm the morphology and crystal size. Samples for TEM analysis were prepared by drop casting solutions onto carbon-coated copper grids followed by drying. The UV-Visible spectrometer (PerkinElmer Model-lambda-950, Rodgau, Germany) was used for optical study. The photoluminescence of the synthesized material was recorded on a Horiba Fluorolog-3 spectrofluorometer with an excitation wavelength of 420 nm. The variation in current was measured by an electrometer workstation (Keithley Electrometer, 6517B, Cleveland, OH, USA) with illumination of light (1500 LUX). We carried out Raman analysis for further investigation of the structural phases of the composite using a model HR-800-Raman spectrometer (Horiba JobinYvon, Paris, France 632).

2.4. Field Emission

The planar ‘diode’ configuration was used to measure field emission current density versus applied electric field (J–E), and emission current versus time (I–t) characteristics were measured in a metal vacuum chamber having a pressure of 1 × 10−8 mbar. A semi-transparent cathodoluminescent phosphor screen (diameter ca. 50 mm) was kept parallel to the cathode in a typical ‘diode’ configuration. The cathode was obtained by sprinkling a very small quantity of the SrS/Bi2S3 powder onto a piece of conducting carbon tape (ca. 0.25 cm2), which was ultra-high vacuum (UHV) compatible. This carbon tape, along with the material, was further loaded on a copper rod connected to a linear motion drive, facilitating variation in the cathode-anode separation. During FE measurements, the cathode–anode separation was maintained at 2 mm constant distance. The emission current was acquired on a Keithley electrometer (6514) by varying the applied voltage between the cathode and anode with a step of 40 V (0–40 KV, Spellman, New York, NY, USA). The FE measurements and vacuum processing details were in accordance with the earlier reports [6]. For investigating the FE characteristics of a single isolated SrS/Bi2S3 nanoflower, a small quantity of the SrS/Bi2S3 powder was sonicated in acetone for 5 min and subsequently drop casted on a microscopic glass plate. Under a high-resolution optical microscope, a single SrS/Bi2S3 flower was skilfully picked up and carefully attached to a blunt tungsten tip using vacuum-compatible silver paste. The tungsten needle with a single flower was transferred to a stainless steel stub using UHV-compatible electrically conducting silver paint. A phosphor-coated tin-oxide concave glass plate (diameter ca. 50 mm) was used as an anode kept at a distance of ca. 3 cm, facing the sample (cathode).

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Structural Study

The X-ray diffraction pattern of the urchin-like SrS/Bi2S3 nanostructure synthesized by varying reaction times is shown in Figure 1. The strong peaks can be assigned to the orthorhombic Bi2S3 (JCPDF card: 00-043-1471). The weak peaks at 29.68 and 42.42 are due to the cubic phase of the SrS (JCPDF card: 00-008-0489). The (111) indexed plane of SrS is merged in the (130) diffraction plane of Bi2S3. The intense and sharp peaks indicate that the urchin-like SrS/Bi2S3 nanostructure is well crystalline. The XRD shows that the obtained product is a composite, i.e., SrS/Bi2S3.

3.2. FESEM Study

Figure 2 shows typical FESEM micrographs of SrS/Bi2S3 synthesized at 180 °C for different reaction durations for morphological investigation. Figure 2a,b show the FESEM of sample S1, which shows the formation of a hierarchical flower-like structure containing nanorods with diameters of about 40 ± 5 nm, as well as hierarchical urchin-like micro-nanostructures having sizes of 3 ± 0.5 µm. Figure 2c,d are the images of sample S2 prepared at 12 h, which show uniform urchin-like micro-nanostructures having nanorods with lengths of 3.5 ± 0.5 µm and diameters of 40 ± 5 nm. When the reaction was prolonged to 18 h, urchin-like nanostructure flowers, as in Figure 2e,f, of size 4 ± 0.5 μm were formed by the self-alignment of nanorods of diameter 75 ± 5 nm. Phase formation of SrS took place in sample S3 and the intensity of peaks for SrS was increased in sample S3 than S2, which was observed in XRD and further confirmed via TEM. The flowers obtained are well defined and the self-alignment of nanorods is well separated, as compared to the S1 and S2 obtained within 6 h and 12 h. It is quite obvious to have bigger flowers with a higher diameter of nanorods because the crystal growth is favoured due to prolonged reaction time via the Ostwald ripening phenomenon [1].

3.3. HR-TEM Study

Figure 3 shows the high-resolution TEM (HR-TEM) images of an individual hierarchical SrS/Bi2S3 nanostructure with urchin-like morphology (sample S3). Figure 3a shows a characteristic TEM image of a SrS/Bi2S3 nanoflower composed of self-assembled nanorods. The HR-TEM of the sample S3 nanorod is shown in Figure 3b, having a rod size in the range of 50–80 nm. From the TEM images, the diameter of rods was observed to be consistent with FESEM investigations. Figure 3c, which shows the clear lattice fringes with d-spacing, reveals that the crystalline Bi2S3 nanoflower with lattice spacing of 0.31 nm, corresponding to the (121) plane (JCPDF card: 00-043-1471) of orthorhombic Bi2S3, is directly connected with the (200) plane (JCPDF card: 00-008-0489) of cubic SrS nanorods with lattice spacing of 0.30 nm. The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (Figure 3d) further confirms the crystalline nature of the nanostructures and the calculated d-values are in good agreements with the XRD data. The uniform distribution of Sr and S Energy Dispersive X-Ray Analysis (EDAX) elemental mapping were performed, as shown in Figure 3e.

3.4. Optical and Electronic Studies

Figure 4 shows the ultra violet–visible (UV–VIS) absorption spectra of SrS/Bi2S3 samples. The absorption spectra were recorded over the wavelength range of 200–900 nm, implying that these samples may have good visible-light absorption. Interestingly, SrS content was not observed in sample S1 when the reaction was carried out for 6 h, which is also discussed in XRD. Samples S2 and S3 show identical absorption patterns with a steep absorption edge in the UV as well as visible region, corresponding to the band gap energy of the individual components. Amongst the various narrow band gap semiconductors, bismuth sulfide and strontium sulfide semiconductors have a direct band gap of ca. 1.3 eV and ca. 4.0 eV, respectively [7,8]. The band gap value was calculated using the Kubelka–Munk function Eg = 1240/λ (where λ is the wavelength in nm) based on absorbance and was found to be two absorption steeps at ca. 3.58 eV and ca. 1.64 eV corresponding to the SrS and Bi2S3, respectively, in sample S3. The absorption of this composite powder was shifted to shorter wavelengths monotonically as the SrS was added.

3.5. PL Study

Photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy has been broadly used to study the efficiency of charge carrier trapping, movement, and the rate of recombination in semiconductors [1,9,10]. The room temperature photoluminescence (PL) measurement of prepared composite powders SrS/Bi2S3 was performed at 420 nm (Figure 5). The peak at 613 nm in the spectrum can be attributed to a high-level transition in SrS/Bi2S3 nanocrystallites [11]. However, the peak intensity in the case of sample S3 is less than S2 and S1. This may be an indication of Bi2S3 modification by SrS, which is getting adhered to the surface or within Bi2S3 bulk. These defects can act as the recombination centres for photo-generated carriers. The less electron-hole recombination in Bi2S3 resulted in the increase of PL peaks intensity [12]. The PL peaks intensities of the powders decreased from samples S1 to S3 with the phase formation of SrS. It indicates that the electron hole recombination is inhibited with increases in SrS.

3.6. Raman Study

The room temperature Raman spectra of the SrS/Bi2S3 composite shown in Figure 6 and inset shows the Raman spectra of pure SrS. Raman spectroscopy is a vital tool for investigating the dopant concentration, identification of lattice defect, and orientation of crystals in the material [1]. Up to now, there was little work reported on the application of Raman spectroscopy on SrS nanostructures. The Raman spectrum exhibits four distinct vibrational peaks at about 78.78, 115.36, 245.55, and 964.47 cm−1, which are assigned to Bi2S3. The two absorption bands at 78.78 and 115.36 are attributed to the Ag mode, while 245.55 cm−1 is assigned to the B1g mode [13]. The peak at 965 cm−1 may be to the surface phonon modes of nanosized Bi2S3 [3]. However, peaks at 451.41 cm−1 and 615.12 cm−1 are ascribed to SrS, which is slightly shifted due to composite structure (inset of Figure 6). Sample S3 has a little shift and the intensity is stronger than S1 and S2. According to Campbell [14], Raman scattering is considered to be very sensitive to the microstructures of nanocrystalline materials, which may lead to a shift, showing complete agreement with our results. The higher intensity of SrS/Bi2S3 composite (S3) in Raman was due to the good crystallinity of the material.

4. Field Emission Study (FE)

The field emission current density J (µA/cm2) versus applied field E (V/µm), i.e., J–E, characteristics of the SrS/Bi2S3 nanoflowers experiment was carried out in an UHV (Ultra High Vacuum) condition, at the base pressure of ca. 1 × 10–8 mbar and in a planar diode configuration. This is depicted in Figure 7 and Figure S1a,c,e (Supporting information). The J–E plot gives information about the turn-on field (defined as an applied field required to draw an emission current density of ca. 1 µA/cm2), the threshold field (defined as an applied field required to draw an emission current density of ca. 10 µA/cm2), and the maximum current density drawn [3,15]. The turn-on and threshold fields were found to be reproducible. The observed values of the turn-on field for Bi2S3, S1, S2, and S3 defined to draw an emission current density of ca. 1 µA/cm2 were found to be ca. 6.90, 2.55, and 2.50 V/µm, and the threshold field to draw a current density of ca. 10 µA/cm2 was found to be ca. 7.40, 3.07, and 3.00 V/µm (without visible light illumination) (Table 1). The size and shape of the emitter strongly affects FE behavior. Due to the high aspect ratio within nanomaterials, the nanostructure exhibits lower values of turn-on and threshold fields.
Figure 7 shows an interesting enhancement in the field emission properties of SrS/Bi2S3 composites when photons of visible wavelength incident on the field emitter samples. It shows noticeable decrement in turn-on and threshold fields with visible light illumination [16]. With visible light illumination, the SrS/Bi2S3 emitter shows a turn-on field of ca. 2.50, 2.37, and 2.10 V/µm and a threshold field of ca. 3.20, 2.68, and 2.80 V/µm, respectively, for the anode–cathode separation of ca. 2 mm, which are very low values of the turn-on and threshold fields as compared to the values without visible light illumination. As the applied field increases gradually, the emission current density is observed to increase exponentially and a maximum emission current density of ca. 527, 264, and 254 μA/cm2 is drawn at an applied field of ca. 7.4 V/μm without light and a current density of ca. 1078, 284.8, and 173 μA/cm2 at an applied field of ca. 6.9 V/μm is observed as per the field emission theory. The observed J–E plots were analyzed using the Fowler–Nordheim (F–N) equation [17]. The result obtained is much superior to pristine Bi2S3 (Table 1). Figure 8 and Figure S1b,d,f in Supporting Information shows the corresponding F–N plot, i.e., plot of ln (J/E2) versus (1/E), (b, d, f) derived from the observed J–E characteristics. In both cases, the emitter has a semiconducting nature, which is confirmed over the entire range of the applied field in F–N plots with nonlinear behavior.
Interestingly, the F–N plot of the field emission current from the SrS/Bi2S3 displays a nonlinear relationship between ln (J/E2) versus 1/E for both, without light and with light illumination. This nonlinearity can be explained by the non-uniform geometries of the emitters. The F–N plot shows a gradual bend in the curve for the low electric field and then much more steeper change is observed in the high field region [18,19]. The nonlinearity of the F–N plot is dominated by geometrical variations of the protrusions in the SrS/Bi2S3. With increasing applied voltage, the number of emission sites increases, ultimately resulting in a rising slope as a function of the electric field. The linear behavior of the F–N curve was observed only at the highest electric field. Along with the emission characteristics, the emission current stability of the field emitters is an essential parameter in the context of their practical application. The emission current stability has been investigated at the base pressure of ca. 1 × 10−8 mbar.
The emission current versus time (I–t) measurement of sample S3 was performed at a preset current value of ca. 10 µA over the period of 3 h and long-term stability over the period of 10 h was found to be fairly stable with 13.2 ± 10 mA current (Figure 9a,b). The appearance of spikes in the emission current is endorsed for the adsorption, desorption, and migration of residual gas molecules on the emitter surface.
A field emission micrograph for sample S3 captured at the different applied fields shows a current density of ca. 400 μA/cm2 and displays a number of tiny bright spots (Figure 10), indicating that the emission is indeed from protruding emitting sites [20]. The temporal changes in the intensity of these spots are observed to be commensurate with the emission current fluctuation, depicted in the I–t plot (Figure 11).
Based on previous reports [21], we proposed a mechanism of field emission enhancement in 3D SrS/Bi2S3 nanoflowers due to hierarchical architectures. The heteroarchitectured SrS/Bi2S3 (S3) emitter exhibits superior emission behavior, which can be attributed to the combined effect. The unique morphological patterns of the SrS/Bi2S3 emitter are responsible for field emission enhancement. The epitaxial growth of SrS on the Bi2S3 nanorods (stem) is an important player in enhancing the ‘local’ field of the SrS/Bi2S3 emitter. In this ‘two-stage’ process, the ‘first’ enhancement in the local field was due to the ‘Bi2S3’ stem and further enhancement at the ‘branches’ (SrS) was owing to their high aspect ratio [22]. This is confirmed from PL results, which indicate that defects provided the recombination centers for photo-generated carriers, and less electron-hole recombination in SrS/Bi2S3. The PL peaks intensities of the powders decreased from samples S1 to S3 with the phase formation of SrS. It indicates that the electron hole recombination is inhibited with the increase in SrS. The defect vacancies further lead to a lowering of the surface barrier, which in turn is expected to increase the carrier mobility and conductivity [23]. Such surface passivation effects are observed in the SrS/Bi2S3 nanoflower, which is responsible for better FE.

5. Conclusions

In a nutshell, nanoflowers of strontium sulfide/bismuth sulfide were synthesized by the hydrothermal method. The effect on the morphologies and size of SrS/Bi2S3 were studied with respect to the reaction time. This structural study shows the orthorhombic and cubic phases of Bi2S3 and SrS, respectively. The flowers of micron size were comprised of nanorods with a size of 50–80 nm. Considering the tunable band gap of these nanostructures within the visible region, field emission investigation was demonstrated. The turn-on and threshold fields were found to be reproducible, with ca. 1 µA/cm2 found to be ca. 2.5 V/µm and ca. 10 µA/cm2 found to be ca. 3.00 V/µm (without visible light illumination), respectively. This composite (S3) shows an interesting enhancement in the field emission properties of SrS/Bi2S3 when photons of visible wavelength incident on the field emitter. With visible light illumination, the SrS/Bi2S3 emitter shows a turn-on field of ca. 2.50 V/µm and a threshold field of ca. 2.80 V/µm, respectively, for an anode–cathode separation of ca. 2 mm. These values of the turn-on and threshold fields are lower as compared to the values obtained without visible light illumination. The SrS/Bi2S3 is a promising candidate for microelectronics applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2504-477X/3/4/105/s1, Figure S1: J-E and Current versus time (I–t) plots for S1 (a,b) (6 hr), S2 (c,d) (12 hr) and (e,f) Pristine Bi2S3.

Author Contributions

A.R.G.: Methodology, Investigation, Writing-Original Draft Preparation. U.P.C. and Y.A.S.: Software, Writing-Review & Editing, Visualization. R.P.P. and J.D.A., M.A.M.: Formal Analysis. M.V.K. and B.B.K.: Conceptualization, Supervision.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to give thanks for the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) Government of India and Centre for Materials for Electronics Technology (C-MET), Pune for providing research facilities. The authors would like to thank Nanocrystalline materials group for their kind support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yu, X.; Cao, C. Photoresponse and Field-Emission Properties of Bismuth Sulfide Nanoflowers. Cryst. Growth Des. 2008, 8, 3951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhai, T.L.; Ma, L.Y.; Liao, M.; Wang, X.; Fang, X.; Yao, J.; Bando, Y.; Golberg, D. One-dimensional inorganic nanostructures: Synthesis, field-emission and photodetection. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 2986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Panmand, R.P.; Sethi, Y.A.; Deokar, R.S.; Late, D.J.; Gholap, H.M.; Baeg, J.; Kale, B.B. In situ fabrication of highly crystalline CdS decorated Bi2S3 nanowires (nano-heterostructure) for visible light photocatalyst application. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 23508–23517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yu, Y.; Jin, C.H.; Wang, R.H.; Chen, Q.; Peng, L.-M. High-Quality Ultralong Bi2S3 Nanowires:  Structure, Growth, and Properties. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 18772–18776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Warule, S.S.; Kashid, R.V.; Shinde, D.R.; Chaudhari, N.S.; Kale, B.B.; More, M.A. Architectured Bi2S3 nanoflowers: Photoenhanced field emission study. J. Nanopart Res. 2012, 14, 889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ibanez, M.; Guardia, P.; Shavel, A.; Cadavid, D.; Arbiol, J.; Morante, J.; Cabot, A. Growth Kinetics of Asymmetric Bi2S3 Nanocrystals: Size Distribution Focusing in Nanorods. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 7947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ramgir, N.S.; Late, D.J.; Bhise, A.B.; Mulla, I.S.; More, M.A.; Joag, D.S.; Pillai, V.K. Field emission studies of novel ZnO nanostructures in high and low field regions. Nanotechnology 2006, 17, 2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Khan, Z.; Barpuzary, D.; Baswant, O.; Sutradhar, S.; Qureshi, M. Directed growth of 1D cadmium sulfide by chemically anchored Al2O3 and ZnO (nanoparticles). Mater. Lett. 2011, 65, 1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, F.B.; Li, X.Z. The enhancement of photodegradation efficiency using Pt-TiO2 catalyst. Chemosphere 2002, 48, 1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zhang, J.; Hu, Y.; Matsuoka, M.; Yamashita, H.; Minagawa, M.; Hidaka, H. Relationship between the Local Structures of Titanium Oxide Photocatalysts and Their Reactivities in the Decomposition of NO. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 8395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cong, Y.; Zhang, J.; Chen, F.; Anpo, M.; He, D. Preparation, Photocatalytic Activity, and Mechanism of Nano-TiO2 Co-Doped with Nitrogen and Iron (III). J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 10618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Niasaria, M.S.; Ghanbaria, D.; Davara, F. Synthesis of different morphologies of bismuth sulfide nanostructures via hydrothermal process in the presence of thioglycolic acid. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 488, 442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Jiang, L.; Sun, K.; Liu, F.; Lai, Y. Photoelectrochemical properties of Bi2S3 thin films deposited by successive ionic layer adsorption and reaction (SILAR) method. J. Alloys Compd. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  14. Campbell, I.H.; Fauchet, P.M. The effects of microcrystal size and shape on the one phonon Raman spectra of crystalline semiconductors. Sol. State Commun. 1986, 58, 739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, Z.; Huang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Tong, Y. Facile hydrothermal synthesis of Bi2S3 spheres and CuS/Bi2S3 composites nanostructures with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic performances. CrystEngComm 2014, 12, 8261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kar, S.; Chaudhuri, S.C.J. Shape Selective Growth of CdS One-Dimensional Nanostructures by a Thermal Evaporation Process. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 4542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Warule, S.S.; Chaudhari, N.S.; Kale, B.B.; Pandiraj, S.; Khare, R.T.; More, M.A. Controlled synthesis of aligned Bi2S3 nanowires, sharp apex nanowires and nanobelts with its morphology dependent field emission investigations. CrystEngComm 2013, 15, 890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fowler, R.H.; Nordheim, L.W.; Proc, R. Electron emission in intense electric fields. London. Ser. A 1928, 119, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Palnitkar, U.A.; Kashid, R.V.; More, M.A.; Joag, D.S.; Panchakarla, L.S.; Rao, C.N.R. Remarkably low turn-on field emission in undoped, nitrogen-doped, and boron-doped graphene. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 063102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chavan, P.G.; Badadhe, S.S.; Mulla, I.S.; More, M.A.; Joag, D.S. Synthesis of single crystalline CdS nanocombs and their application in photo-sensitive field emission switches. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 1078–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bankar, P.K.; Pawar, M.S.; Pawbake, A.S.; Warule, S.S.; Late, D.J.; More, M.A. Spatially branched CdS–Bi2S3 heteroarchitecture: Single step hydrothermal synthesis approach with enhanced field emission performance and highly responsive broadband photodetection. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 95092–95100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhirnov, V.V.; Givargizov, E.I.; Plekhanov, P.S. Field emission from silicon spikes with diamond coatings. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 1995, 13, 418–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Warule, S.S.; Chaudhari, N.S.; Kale, B.B.; Patil, K.R.; Koinkar, P.M.; More, M.A.; Murakami, R.-I. Organization of cubic CeO2 nanoparticles on the edges of self assembled tapered ZnO nanorods via a template free one-pot synthesis: Significant cathodoluminescence and field emission properties. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 8887–8895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Pattern SrS/Bi2S3 nanoflowers synthesized by hydrothermal approach at 180 °C with different time durations: 6 h (S1), 12 h (S2), and 18 h (S3).
Figure 1. Pattern SrS/Bi2S3 nanoflowers synthesized by hydrothermal approach at 180 °C with different time durations: 6 h (S1), 12 h (S2), and 18 h (S3).
Jcs 03 00105 g001
Figure 2. Images of the SrS/Bi2S3 synthesized by varying reaction times: S1 (a,b) for 6 h, S2 (c,d) for 12 h, and S3 (e,f) for 18 h.
Figure 2. Images of the SrS/Bi2S3 synthesized by varying reaction times: S1 (a,b) for 6 h, S2 (c,d) for 12 h, and S3 (e,f) for 18 h.
Jcs 03 00105 g002
Figure 3. (a,b) TEM images of SrS/Bi2S3 nanoflower at different magnifications, (c) HR-TEM image of SrS/Bi2S3, (d) SAED pattern of corresponding SrS/Bi2S3 nanoflower, and (e) EDAX spectra of SrS/Bi2S3 nanoflower.
Figure 3. (a,b) TEM images of SrS/Bi2S3 nanoflower at different magnifications, (c) HR-TEM image of SrS/Bi2S3, (d) SAED pattern of corresponding SrS/Bi2S3 nanoflower, and (e) EDAX spectra of SrS/Bi2S3 nanoflower.
Jcs 03 00105 g003
Figure 4. UV-Visible spectra of SrS/Bi2S3 synthesized by hydrothermal approach at 180 °C: S1, S2, and S3.
Figure 4. UV-Visible spectra of SrS/Bi2S3 synthesized by hydrothermal approach at 180 °C: S1, S2, and S3.
Jcs 03 00105 g004
Figure 5. PL Spectra of the SrS/Bi2S3 samples S1, S2, and S3.
Figure 5. PL Spectra of the SrS/Bi2S3 samples S1, S2, and S3.
Jcs 03 00105 g005
Figure 6. Raman Spectra of SrS/Bi2S3 nanoflowers and Inset show Raman spectra of commercial SrS.
Figure 6. Raman Spectra of SrS/Bi2S3 nanoflowers and Inset show Raman spectra of commercial SrS.
Jcs 03 00105 g006
Figure 7. Emission current density–applied field (J–E) plot of the SrS/Bi2S3 (S3) nanoflowers.
Figure 7. Emission current density–applied field (J–E) plot of the SrS/Bi2S3 (S3) nanoflowers.
Jcs 03 00105 g007
Figure 8. Fowler–Nordheim (F–N) plot of the SrS/Bi2S3 (S3) nanoflowers.
Figure 8. Fowler–Nordheim (F–N) plot of the SrS/Bi2S3 (S3) nanoflowers.
Jcs 03 00105 g008
Figure 9. Emission current versus time (I–t) plots of the SrS/Bi2S3 (S3) nanoflowers (a,b).
Figure 9. Emission current versus time (I–t) plots of the SrS/Bi2S3 (S3) nanoflowers (a,b).
Jcs 03 00105 g009
Figure 10. Field Emission Micrograph (FEM) image of SrS/Bi2S3 (S3).
Figure 10. Field Emission Micrograph (FEM) image of SrS/Bi2S3 (S3).
Jcs 03 00105 g010
Figure 11. FE behavior of the SrS/Bi2S3 (S3) nanoflowers.
Figure 11. FE behavior of the SrS/Bi2S3 (S3) nanoflowers.
Jcs 03 00105 g011
Table 1. Emission study of SrS/Bi2S3 specimens.
Table 1. Emission study of SrS/Bi2S3 specimens.
SpecimenTurn-on Field
For 1 μA/cm²
V/μm
Light Off/On
Threshold Field
10 μA/cm²
V/μm
Light Off/On
Maximum Current Density
µA/cm2
Light Off/On
Bi2S3 pristine 3.103.8460.32
S1ca. 6.9/ca. 2.50ca. 7.4/ca. 3.20ca. 254/ca. 173
S2ca. 2.55/ca. 2.37ca. 3.07/ca. 2.68ca. 264/ca. 284.8
S3ca. 2.50/ca. 2.10ca. 3.00/ca. 2.80ca. 527/ca. 1078

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gunjal, A.R.; Chothe, U.P.; Sethi, Y.A.; Panmand, R.P.; Ambekar, J.D.; Kulkarni, M.V.; More, M.A.; Kale, B.B. Micro Flowers of SrS/Bi2S3 Nanocomposite and Its Field Emission Properties. J. Compos. Sci. 2019, 3, 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs3040105

AMA Style

Gunjal AR, Chothe UP, Sethi YA, Panmand RP, Ambekar JD, Kulkarni MV, More MA, Kale BB. Micro Flowers of SrS/Bi2S3 Nanocomposite and Its Field Emission Properties. Journal of Composites Science. 2019; 3(4):105. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs3040105

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gunjal, Aarti R., Ujjwala P. Chothe, Yogesh A. Sethi, Rajendra P. Panmand, Jalinder D. Ambekar, Milind V. Kulkarni, Mahendra A. More, and Bharat B. Kale. 2019. "Micro Flowers of SrS/Bi2S3 Nanocomposite and Its Field Emission Properties" Journal of Composites Science 3, no. 4: 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs3040105

APA Style

Gunjal, A. R., Chothe, U. P., Sethi, Y. A., Panmand, R. P., Ambekar, J. D., Kulkarni, M. V., More, M. A., & Kale, B. B. (2019). Micro Flowers of SrS/Bi2S3 Nanocomposite and Its Field Emission Properties. Journal of Composites Science, 3(4), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs3040105

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop