Next Article in Journal
Modification of Biomass-Derived Nanoporous Carbon with Nickel Oxide Nanoparticles for Supercapacitor Application
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Cutting Speed during the Turning of Inconel 718 on Oxidation Wear Pattern on the Zr-ZrN-(Zr,Mo,Al)N Composite Nanostructured Coating
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Adsorptive Removal of As(III) by Cellulose-Sn(IV) Biocomposite

by
Anita Shekhawat
1,
Ravin Jugade
1,*,
Vaishnavi Gomase
1,
Shashikant Kahu
1,
Saravanan Dhandayutham
2 and
Sadanand Pandey
3,*
1
Department of Chemistry, Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Nagpur 440033, Maharashtra, India
2
Department of Chemistry, National College (Autonomous), Tiruchirapalli 620001, Tamilnadu, India
3
Department of Chemistry, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7(1), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7010019
Submission received: 25 November 2022 / Revised: 20 December 2022 / Accepted: 3 January 2023 / Published: 6 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Biocomposites)

Abstract

:
Cellulose-Sn(IV) (CSn) biocomposite was synthesized by cellulose and stannic chloride in ethanol medium using microwave irradiation for 2 min with 30 s of intermittent time intervals. The incorporation of Sn(IV) into the cellulose matrix was confirmed through FT-IR, XRD, TGA, SEM- EDS, and BET. The prepared composite CSn has been used for the adsorptive removal of As(III) from water. Parameters, such as initial concentration, adsorbent dose, initial As(III) concentration, and time required for the adsorption process, were optimized through the batch-adsorption process. The adsorption capacity of the CSn for As(III) adsorption was found to be 16.64 mg/g at pH 7.0. Freundlich isotherm was found to be more suitable for the adsorption process based on regression coefficient values. Pseudo-second-order kinetic model was found to be more suitable for understanding the kinetics of the adsorption of As(III). Weber–Morris model with non-zero intercept revealed that the mechanism of adsorption was not limited to the diffusion process only. The adsorption process was spontaneous and exothermic and showed a decrease in randomness. Chloride ions decreased the percentage removal of As(III) when the concentration of chloride ions was ten times that of As(III) concentration according to the results obtained through the effect of co-anions study. In this study, 5% (w/v) NaCl solution has been used for the regeneration of the material, and during up to five adsorption–desorption cycles, there was a gradual decrease in percentage removal of As(III) from 95% to 78% only, which proves the greener aspect of the CSn. The breakthrough volume of 1.25 L of 10 mg/L of As(III) in column studies revealed that the CSn could be applicable for larger sample volumes also.

1. Introduction

Cellulose is the most abundant biopolymer available in nature [1]. The presence of hydroxyl functional groups in its structure provides reactive sites for the introduction of various organic and inorganic moieties in its matrix [2]. The structural modification changes the chemical and physical properties of the native cellulose [3]. Modified biopolymeric materials have wide applications in various industries as well as for environmental remediation [4]. In the literature, it was reported that biopolymers could be used as host matrixes for the immobilization of multivalent metal ions and as potent adsorbents [5,6]. Tin exists in (+2) and (+4) oxidation states and has a tendency to react with organic functionalities easily. Tin-based composites have been reported in the literature for the adsorption of dyes and hazardous ions effectively [7]. The combination of tin with biopolymers is a greener opinion to treat toxic waste in a synergistic manner, as tin provides stability and reactive property to the biocomposites, and a dense network of biopolymers avoids the leaching of tin into the water. In other words, this is the way to take advantage of tin properties in an eco-friendly manner [8].
Arsenic (As) is generally found in surface water around geothermal-active areas. In contamination of groundwater, the main sources of arsenic are base metal sulfides, arsenopyrite, and realgar. As(III) and As(V) exist in water in the form of oxyanions. However, As(III) is more mobile and toxic than As(V) [9]. Consumption of arsenic-contaminated water leads to arsenicosis and cancer in the skin, lungs, or kidneys. Sometimes, consumption of arsenic-contaminated water gives rise to diabetes, hypertension, and reproductive disorders [10]. The permissible limit of Arsenic in drinking water is 10 µg/L, according to World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. In India, groundwater of some regions of Bihar, West Bengal, Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand, Manipur, Assam, and Chhattisgarh states have an arsenic concentration of more than the permissible limit [11]. So, there is a need for an effective methodology for the removal of arsenic from water bodies. The adsorption process has been reported as the most effective method reported for the reduction of arsenic levels in water [12,13].
By considering the above perspective, cellulose- and tin-based biocomposite has been synthesized within a short period of time by using microwave irradiation. The prepared material was used for the adsorption of As(III) from water with optimized conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

All the chemicals used for synthesis and adsorption studies were of analytical grade (AR) and procured from SRL Chemie Ltd., India. A stock solution of As(III) of 1000 mg/L was prepared by dissolving 1.32 g of As2O3 in 1.0 M NaOH(25 mL) and diluting it to 100 mL. The solution obtained was neutralized with 1.0 M HCl by using 0.2% phenolphthalein (2 drops), and further volume made up to 1 L. Working standard solutions of various concentrations of As(III) were prepared from the stock solution for adsorption studies.
A homogeneous mixture of 2 mL anhydrous Sn(IV) chloride and 4 g of microcrystalline cellulose dispersed in 30 mL methanol was obtained by stirring. The mixture was exposed to microwave irradiation for 2 min with 30 s of the time interval. The resultant precipitate was centrifuged and washed with distilled water. The washing was continued till the negative test for chloride ions was obtained and then dried in a hot-air oven for 24 h. For the leaching of Sn(IV), 0.5 g of dried material was stirred for an hour with 100 mL distilled water by magnetic stirrer and filtered. The concentration of Sn(IV) ions was detected in the filtrate by ICP-AES, and it was found below the detection limit. The prepared CSn biocomposite has been used for further adsorption studies.
The batch-absorption method was carried out for the adsorption studies [14]. For this, the optimized dose of 400 mg of CSn was stirred with 50 mL of 5–100 mg/L As(III) solutions on magnetic stirrers for 45 min for equilibration. The amount of As(III) was adsorbed (qe) in mg/g on CSn, and percentage removal capacity was calculated, as given in equation 1 and equation 2, respectively.
q e = C 0 C e W × V
% R e m o v a l = C 0 C e C 0 × V ,
where C0 and Ce indicate the concentrations (mg/L) of As(III) at initial and equilibrium conditions in the solution phase, respectively. V is the volume (L) of As(III) solution in liters. W is the weight(g) of CSn. To obtain reliable results, all the experiments were performed in triplicate. After the adsorption process, ICP-AES analysis for tin was performed to check whether it would leach out in the solution. The result obtained was found to be negative.
FT-IR spectra of native cellulose and CSn were recorded in the wavelength range of 500–4000 cm−1 using Bruker Alpha spectrometer with ZnSe ATR crystal. Rigaku Miniflex 300 X-ray diffractometer gives the XRD spectra in 2ϴ range 3.0–90.00 using copper Kα radiation. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) model TESCAN VEGA 3 SBH was utilized for observing the change in the structure of the adsorbent. Elemental composition was confirmed by X-ray analyzer Oxford INCA Energy 250 EDS System. TGA and DTA were recorded by Shimadzu DTG 60 with a scan rate of 20 °C/min in a nitrogen medium. The Brunauer–Emmet–Teller (BET) surface-area measurement was carried out by Quantachrome Nova 2200e. Microwave oven LG, India, with model number MS2049, was used for irradiation during the synthesis of CSn. The concentration of the arsenic in the solution after adsorption was measured using ICP-AES (Thermo IRIS Intrepid II XDL).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of SnC

Figure 1a shows the FTIR spectrum of cellulose having a broad peak of OH stretching at 3370 cm−1. The vibrations of C–O–C bonds were assigned to peak at 1028 cm−1. C–O stretching and bending vibrations were allotted to peaks at 1510 and 1266 cm−1, respectively [15,16]. The peak at 1387 was assigned to C–O–H vibration [17]. Figure 1b shows the spectrum of CSn adsorbent showing characteristic peaks of O–H, C–H, and C–O stretching vibrations at 3370, 1690, and 1028 cm−1, respectively. A new peak at 757 cm–1 owing to the stretching vibrations of Sn–O confirmed that the Sn(IV) atoms were present in the network of cellulose chains [8,18]. After the adsorption of arsenic, a new peak was observed at 834 cm−1 and a change in the region at 1300–1400 cm−1, which confirms the interaction of Arsenic with the CSn [19].
The observed X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of cellulose and CSn are shown in Figure 2. Cellulose biopolymer shows diffraction peaks at 2ϴ = 14.88° and 22.26° [11]. In CSn, three new peaks at 2ϴ = 27.1°, 34.5°, and 51.44° have been observed, which matched with the reported peaks of Sn(IV) and confirmed the incorporation of Sn(IV) into the cellulose matrix [20]. Low intensity and broadened peaks are characteristics of amorphous behavior. The decrease in crystallinity of adsorbent can be attributed to the typical amorphous regions of cellulose which are introduced through intramolecular and intermolecular H-bonding interactions and rearrangement [21].
The TGA studies (Figure 3a) of cellulose showed that a weight loss of 3% was observed at 120 ℃ due to loss of moisture. Further decrease in weight percent was observed with the successive increase in temperature. The overall decomposition of cellulose was observed in two stages. The first degradation curve was observed between 250–390 °C with 85% weight loss from the initial weight of cellulose. The second curve was obtained in the range of 390–650 °C with 95% of weight loss from the initial weight [22]. The same two-stage process was reflected in two exothermic peaks of DTA thermograms presented in Figure 3b. In the case of CSn, it starts degrading below 200 °C because of its amorphous behavior [23]. Such type of degradation behavior was reported in the literature for the cellulose iron-oxide nanocomposites [24]. It was clearly observed that the biocomposite is thermally stable with a total weight loss of 75% at 800 °C compared to cellulose which attributes to the existence of tin (IV) in the biopolymer matrix [25].
SEM and EDS (Figure 4) of cellulose, CSn, and CSn with adsorbed As(III) were observed to predict the change in structural specifics. The cellulose shows an intense network of fibrous morphology. In CSn, the surface becomes denser with patches. The change in the surface morphology confirms the formation of the biocomposite. The elemental peaks of Sn with peaks of C and O in the EDS Spectrum of CSn confirmed the incorporation of Sn(IV) in the cellulose structure. The adsorption of As(III) on CSn was clearly observed in the EDX spectrum, which showed the arsenic peak with other elemental peaks of CSn.
The BET surface area of cellulose and CSn were obtained by adsorption–desorption of nitrogen at 77 K. The increase in the surface area from 0.092 to 3.205 m2/g was ascribed to the collaboration of Sn and cellulose in biocomposite.

3.2. Parameter Optimization

3.2.1. Effect of Time

Contact time was varied from 5–60 min to study the effect of contact time simultaneously on the % removal of As(III) and on the adsorption capacity of CSn. For that purpose, 50 mL of 5 mg/L of As(III) initial concentration equilibrated with 200 mg CSn at 298 K. It was observed that with the increase in time, there was a sudden increase in % removal of As(III) and the adsorption capacity of CSn. At the initial time of 5 min, there were more available adsorption sites on the CSn surface, and in 45 min, it reached equilibrium (Figure 5a) since, at this stage, most of the adsorption sites were loaded with As(III) [26].

3.2.2. Effect of Adsorbent Dose

The amount of CSn was varied from 50–600 mg and equilibrated for 45 min with 5 mg/L As(III) at pH 7.0 to study the effect of the adsorbent dose. It was observed that the % removal of As(III) increases with the successive amount of adsorbent (Figure 5b). When the dose of CSn reached 400 mg, there was no observable change in % removal due to the unavailability of As(III) in the solution for incoming rising-adsorption sites on the surface of the CSn [27]. The same results were obtained for the adsorption capacity of CSn towards As(III). Thus, the 400 mg adsorption dose was fixed for further adsorption studies.

3.2.3. Effect of As(III) Concentration

The initial concentration of As(III) was varied in the range of 2–50 mg/L and equilibrated with 400 mg of CSn for 45 min at pH 7.0. At 5 mg/L of As(III), percentage removal was found to be more than 95% and then went on decreasing due to the saturation of adsorption sites on the CSn [28] (Figure 5c). Thus, an initial concentration of 5 mg/L As(III) solution was selected for the adsorption studies. The adsorption capacity of the material went on increasing as the availability of adsorbate increased for the adsorption sites.

3.2.4. Effect of pH

pH and redox potential are the two main factors for arsenic speciation. Speciation of arsenic was sensitive to a pH range of 6.5– 8.5 due to oxidizing and reducing conditions of groundwater. The functionalities present on the surface of adsorbent and adsorbate surfaces are pH-dependent. Therefore, the pH of the media used for the adsorption should be optimized. For this, the pH of 5 mg/L of As(III) solutions was varied from 2.0–9.0 and equilibrated with 400 mg of CSn for 45 min. It was found that maximum percentage removal was observed in the pH range of 6.0–7.0. The pH point of zero charge of CSn was found to be 7.2 (Figure 5e). At a lower pH range, neutral arsenic species (H3AsO3) were dominant, whereas the adsorbent CSn surface was highly protonated, which did not favor the As(III) adsorption results in less % removal and low adsorption capacity. The H2AsO3 species of As(III) exists in an alkaline medium. At pH higher than 7.2, the repulsive forces come into action which reduces the % removal of As(III) and CSn has a lower adsorption capacity [29]. Therefore, pH 7.0 is selected for the adsorption of As(III).

3.3. Adsorption Isotherms

Maximum adsorption capacity and monolayer adsorption phenomenon of As(III) on CSn was given by the Langmuir adsorption isotherm [30]. The graph of Ce/qe vs. Ce (Figure 6a) gives the value for maximum adsorption capacity (qmax), and constant b is related to the adsorption energy. Effective interaction between the CSn and As(III) was confirmed by the RL value, which was found to be lower than the unity. Freundlich [31] adsorption isotherm was studied to understand the heterogeneous adsorption phenomenon of As(III) by CSn. Log qe vs. Log Ce gives the values for constants kF and n (Figure 6b). Based on the values of regression, coefficient and comparison graph of experimental qe along with calculated qe values for both isotherms against Ce (Figure 6c), point towards the Freundlich isotherm model, which was found to be the best-fitted model for the adsorption process of As(III) on CSn. The equations and results obtained for both isotherms have been depicted in Table 1.

3.4. Kinetic Models for Adsorption

Pseudo-first-order kinetic and pseudo-second-order kinetic models (Table 1) were employed to understand the adsorption kinetics of adsorption of As(III) onto the CSn [32]. For this, 50 mL of 5 mg/L As(III) solution was equilibrated with 400 mg of CSn at pH 7.0 for a varied time range of 5–45 min. The pseudo-first-order rate constant (k1) was obtained through the plot of log (qe − qt) against t (Figure 6d), while the pseudo-second-order rate constant value was obtained through the plot of t/qt against t (Figure 6e). Pseudo-second-order kinetic was the best-fit model for the adsorption process of As(III) on CSn, as the value of the correlation coefficient was found to be 0.999 (Table 1).
The adsorption process may proceed through transport in solution bulk, film diffusion, particle diffusion, or with adsorption and desorption within the particles and solid surface. Generally, the diffusion process is considered a rate-limiting step. For this Weber–Morris model was studied to understand whether the diffusion process is a rate-limiting step of the adsorption process. The non-zero intercept of the linear plot of qt versus t1/2 (Figure 6f) indicates that particle diffusion is not only responsible for the adsorption of As(III) on CSn [33].

3.5. Thermodynamic Study

The effect of temperature on the adsorption process of As(III) on CSn was explained by the thermodynamic parameters studied at temperatures 298 K, 303 K, 308 K, 318 K, and 328 K. The values for ∆H and ∆S (Table 2) were calculated from the slope and intercept of the plot of ln K vs. 1/T (Figure 7), respectively [34]. The spontaneity of the adsorption process was confirmed through the negative value of change in free energyΔG. The value of ΔG was moved towards the positive value with an increase in temperature, indicating that higher temperature does not favor the adsorption process. Negative enthalpy changes ΔH shows the exothermic behavior of the adsorption process. A negative ΔS entropy change value indicates a decrease in the randomness of As(III) as it passes from the solution phase to the CSn surface.

3.6. Column Studies

For column studies, 1 g of CSn was packed in a glass column of 30.0 cm in length, with an inner diameter of 1.0 cm and a height of 6.0 cm. The flow rate of the column was adjusted to 5 mL/min, and 10 mg/L of As(III) solution was passed through it. The concentration of As(III) in the eluate was analyzed to determine the column efficiency (Figure 7b). Various column parameter values were calculated (Table 3). It was found that compared to batch extraction, the column method is more effective for the treatment of larger sample volumes containing As(III).

3.7. Effect of Co-Ions

In water samples, various anions were present along with As(III), which may compete for the adsorption sites on CSn during adsorption. To study the effect of co-anions on As(III) removal, solutions of 10 mg/L As(III) with 100 mg/L of each co-anion, such as SO42−, Cl, PO43−, and NO3, were stirred with CSn at optimized conditions for adsorption. Figure 8 shows that the chloride ions have a higher tendency to interfere in the adsorption of As(III) by CSn; as a result, % removal decreases. However, this decrease in the removal tendency of CSn was observed only when chloride ions were present in a ten times higher concentration than As(III).

3.8. Regeneration and Reusability of Adsorbent

For desorption studies, 5% (w/v) of various reagents, such as sodium chloride, sodium nitrate, sodium sulfate, and sodium carbonate, were examined. The best results were obtained with sodium chloride solution (Figure 9). The chloride ions in NaCl exchange with As(III) ions at this higher concentration on the surface of CSn, leading to the desorption of As(III). The regenerated CSn was utilized for ten adsorption–desorption cycles, and it was found that there was a decrease in the percentage removal of As(III) (Figure 9) as compared to the initial CSn. The percentage removal of As(III) was found to be more than 90% for up to three cycles and decreased in successive cycles.

4. Conclusions

Cellulose biopolymer has a very low adsorption capacity towards As(III). When modified with tin (IV) chloride, it forms a potent biocomposite for As(III). The adsorption capacity of CSn increased to 16.64 mg/g. The probable mechanism for adsorption includes diffusion and ion exchange of As(III) with chloride ions present on the surface of CSn. Cellulose–tin biocomposite prepared by microwave irradiation, which is different from than conventional method, suggests that the study has a greener aspect. More than 95% adsorption was observed in just 45 min at neutral pH, suggesting that the CSn biocomposite is a very remarkable adsorbent. The isotherm and kinetic data fitted well with the Freundlich isotherm model and pseudo-second-order kinetics, respectively. The thermodynamic studies disclose that the adsorption process is spontaneous and enthalpy-driven. The fixed-bed-column studies suggest that the adsorbent is applicable to a large volume of samples and can be regenerated and reused multiple times.

Author Contributions

A.S.—Conceptualization and writing original draft, R.J.—supervision and visualization. V.G. and S.P.—writing, review, and editing, S.K.—methodology, and S.D.—resources. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data should be provided on request.

Acknowledgments

Authors are thankful to CSIR-HRDG, New Delhi, for providing research associateship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Baghaei, B.; Skrifvars, M. All-Cellulose Composites: A Review of Recent Studies on Structure, Properties and Applications. Molecules 2020, 25, 2836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Xie, Y.; Gao, S.; Ling, Z.; Lai, C.; Huang, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, C.; Chu, F.; Xu, F.; Dumont, M.-J.; et al. A Multiscale Biomimetic Strategy to Design Strong, Tough Hydrogels by Tuning the Self-Assembly Behavior of Cellulose. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 13685–13696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fernandes, S.C.; Freire, C.S.; Silvestre, A.J.; Pascoal Neto, C.; Gandini, A. Novel Materials Based on Chitosan and Cellulose: Novel Materials Based on Chitosan and Cellulose. Polym. Int. 2011, 60, 875–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Egor, M.; Kumar, A.A.; Ahuja, T.; Mukherjee, S.; Chakraborty, A.; Sudhakar, C.; Srikrishnarka, P.; Bose, S.; Ravindran, S.J.; Pradeep, T. Cellulosic Ternary Nanocomposite for Affordable and Sustainable Fluoride Removal. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 12788–12799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pinto, R.J.B.; Neves, M.C.; Neto, C.P.; Trindade, T.; Pinto, R.J.B.; Neves, M.C.; Neto, C.P.; Trindade, T. Composites of Cellulose and Metal Nanoparticles; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2012; ISBN 978-953-51-0762-0. [Google Scholar]
  6. Pandey, S. A comprehensive review on recent developments in bentonite based materials used as adsorbents for wastewater treatment. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 241, 1091–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shekhawat, A.; Kahu, S.S.; Saravanan, D.; Jugade, R.M. Assimilation of Chitin with Tin for Defluoridation of Water. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 18936–18945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shekhawat, A.; Kahu, S.; Saravanan, D.; Jugade, R. Tin(IV) Cross-Linked Chitosan for the Removal of As(III). Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 172, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yamani, J.S.; Miller, S.M.; Spaulding, M.L.; Zimmerman, J.B. Enhanced Arsenic Removal Using Mixed Metal Oxide Impregnated Chitosan Beads. Water Res. 2012, 46, 4427–4434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Borah, G.; Mudoi, P.P.; Borah, P. Chapter 13—Arsenic Contamination in Water Resources and Its Health Risk Assessment. In Contamination of Water; Ahamad, A., Siddiqui, S.I., Singh, P., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 187–198. ISBN 978-0-12-824058-8. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ghosh, N.C. Groundwater Arsenic Contamination in India: Vulnerability and Scope for Remedy; National Institute of Hydrology: Roorke, India, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu, B.; Kim, K.-H.; Kumar, V.; Kim, S. A Review of Functional Sorbents for Adsorptive Removal of Arsenic Ions in Aqueous Systems. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 388, 121815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Weerasundara, L.; Ok, Y.-S.; Bundschuh, J. Selective Removal of Arsenic in Water: A Critical Review. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 268, 115668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Khapre, M.A.; Jugade, R.M. Hierarchical Approach towards Adsorptive Removal of Alizarin Red S Dye Using Native Chitosan and Its Successively Modified Versions. Water Sci. Technol. 2020, 82, 715–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Khapre, M.; Shekhawat, A.; Saravanan, D.; Pandey, S.; Jugade, R. Mesoporous Fe–Al-Doped Cellulose for the Efficient Removal of Reactive Dyes. Mater. Adv. 2022, 3, 3278–3285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Araga, R.; Sharma, C.S. Amine Functionalized Electrospun Cellulose Nanofibers for Fluoride Adsorption from Drinking Water. J Polym. Environ. 2019, 27, 816–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Eltaweil, A.S.; Abd El-Monaem, E.M.; El-Subruiti, G.M.; Ali, B.M.; Abd El-Latif, M.M.; Omer, A.M. Graphene Oxide Incorporated Cellulose Acetate Beads for Efficient Removal of Methylene Blue Dye; Isotherms, Kinetic, Mechanism and Co-Existing Ions Studies. J Porous. Mater. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kahu, S.; Shekhawat, A.; Saravanan, D.; Jugade, R. Stannic Chloride Impregnated Chitosan for Defluoridation of Water. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 104, 1528–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bullen, J.C.; Lapinee, C.; Miller, L.A.; Bullough, F.; Berry, A.J.; Najorka, J.; Cibin, G.; Vilar, R.; Weiss, D.J. Spectroscopic (XAS, FTIR) Investigations into Arsenic Adsorption onto TiO2/Fe2O3 Composites: Evaluation of the Surface Complexes, Speciation and Precipitation Predicted by Modelling. Results Surf. Interfaces 2022, 9, 100084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Srivastava, N.; Mukhopadhyay, M. Biosynthesis of SnO 2 Nanoparticles Using Bacterium Erwinia Herbicola and Their Photocatalytic Activity for Degradation of Dyes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 13971–13979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Segal, L.; Creely, J.J.; Martin, A.E.; Conrad, C.M. An Empirical Method for Estimating the Degree of Crystallinity of Native Cellulose Using the X-Ray Diffractometer. Text. Res. J. 1959, 29, 786–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Leal, G.F.; Ramos, L.A.; Barrett, D.H.; Curvelo, A.A.S.; Rodella, C.B. A Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) Method to Determine the Catalytic Conversion of Cellulose from Carbon-Supported Hydrogenolysis Process. Thermochim. Acta 2015, 616, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jabareen, L.; Maruthapandi, M.; Saravanan, A.; Gedanken, A. Effective Degradation of Cellulose by Microwave Irradiation in Alkaline Solution. Cellulose 2021, 28, 11275–11285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yadav, M. Study on Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Cellulose/Iron Oxide Bionanocomposites Film. Compos. Commun. 2018, 10, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sankararamakrishnan, N.; Srivastava, I.; Mishra, S. Studies on Novel Nano-Bimetal Doped Cellulose Nanofibers Derived from Agrowaste towards Deflouridation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 128, 556–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kahu, S.; Shekhawat, A.; Saravanan, D.; Jugade, R. Ionic Solid-Impregnated Sulphate-Crosslinked Chitosan for Effective Adsorption of Hexavalent Chromium from Effluents. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 13, 2269–2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Gomase, V.; Jugade, R.; Doondani, P.; Deshmukh, S.; Saravanan, D.; Pandey, S. Dual Modifications of Chitosan with PLK for Amputation of Cyanide Ions: Equilibrium Studies and Optimization Using RSM. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 223, 636–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shekhawat, A.; Kahu, S.; Saravanan, D.; Pandey, S.; Jugade, R. Rational Modification of Chitosan Biopolymer for Remediation of Cr(VI) from Water. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2022, 7, 100123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Singh, D.B.; Prasad, G.; Rupainwar, D.C.; Singh, V.N. As(III) Removal from Aqueous Solution by Adsorption. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1988, 42, 373–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Langmuir, I. The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1918, 40, 1361–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Freundlich, H. Über Die Adsorption in Lösungen. Z. Für Phys. Chem. 1907, 57U, 385–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Azizian, S.; Eris, S. Adsorption Isotherms and Kinetics. In Interface Science and Technology, Volume 3; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 445–509. ISBN 978-0-12-818805-7. [Google Scholar]
  33. Campos, N.F.; Barbosa, C.M.; Rodríguez-Díaz, J.M.; Duarte, M.M. Removal of Naphthenic Acids Using Activated Charcoal: Kinetic and Equilibrium Studies. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2018, 36, 1405–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Korde, S.; Tandekar, S.; Jugade, R.M. Novel Mesoporous Chitosan-Zirconia-Ferrosoferric Oxide as Magnetic Composite for Defluoridation of Water. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. FT-IR of (a) Cellulose, (b) CSn, and (c) CSn with adsorbed As(III).
Figure 1. FT-IR of (a) Cellulose, (b) CSn, and (c) CSn with adsorbed As(III).
Jcs 07 00019 g001
Figure 2. XRD pattern of (a) cellulose and (b) CSn.
Figure 2. XRD pattern of (a) cellulose and (b) CSn.
Jcs 07 00019 g002
Figure 3. (a) TGA curve and (b) DTA Curve.
Figure 3. (a) TGA curve and (b) DTA Curve.
Jcs 07 00019 g003
Figure 4. SEM micrograph EDX spectra of (a) cellulose, (b) CSn, and (c) CSn after adsorption of As(III).
Figure 4. SEM micrograph EDX spectra of (a) cellulose, (b) CSn, and (c) CSn after adsorption of As(III).
Jcs 07 00019 g004
Figure 5. Optimized parameters: (a) contact time, (b) CSn dose, (c) Initial concentration, (d) pH, and (e) pH point of zero charge.
Figure 5. Optimized parameters: (a) contact time, (b) CSn dose, (c) Initial concentration, (d) pH, and (e) pH point of zero charge.
Jcs 07 00019 g005
Figure 6. (a) Langmuir-adsorption isotherm, (b) Freundlich-adsorption isotherm, (c) Comparison of isotherms qe vs. Ce, (d) Pseudo-first-order kinetic model, (e) Pseudo-second-order kinetic model and (f) Weber–Morris model.
Figure 6. (a) Langmuir-adsorption isotherm, (b) Freundlich-adsorption isotherm, (c) Comparison of isotherms qe vs. Ce, (d) Pseudo-first-order kinetic model, (e) Pseudo-second-order kinetic model and (f) Weber–Morris model.
Jcs 07 00019 g006
Figure 7. (a) Van’t Hoff Plot and (b) Column study-breakthrough curve.
Figure 7. (a) Van’t Hoff Plot and (b) Column study-breakthrough curve.
Jcs 07 00019 g007
Figure 8. Effect of diverse ions.
Figure 8. Effect of diverse ions.
Jcs 07 00019 g008
Figure 9. (a) Desorption Studies and (b) adsorption–desorption cycle.
Figure 9. (a) Desorption Studies and (b) adsorption–desorption cycle.
Jcs 07 00019 g009
Table 1. Adsorption isotherms and Kinetic model—equations and parameters.
Table 1. Adsorption isotherms and Kinetic model—equations and parameters.
Adsorption Isotherms
Sr. No.Models ParametersValue
1.Langmuir
C e q e = 1 q m a x b + C e q m a x
R L = 1 1 + b C 0
qmax (mg g−1)16.64
b (L mg−1)0.193
RL0.509
r20.955
2.Freundlich
l o g q e = log K F + 1 n   l o g C e
KF (mg1−1/n/g/L)3.25
n2.23
r20.994
Kinetic models
1.Pseudo-first-order kinetics
log q e q t = log q e + k 1 t 2.303  
k1 (min−1)0.098
r20.978
2.Pseudo-second-order kinetics
  t q t = 1 k 2 q 2 +   t q e
k2 (g/mg/min)0.253
r20.999
3.Intraparticle diffusion
q t = k i n t . t 1 2 + C
Kint (mg/g/min1/2)0.528
r20.523
Table 2. Thermodynamic parameters.
Table 2. Thermodynamic parameters.
TemperatureΔG
(kJ/mol)
ΔH
(kJ/mol)
ΔS
(kJ/mol/K)
298 K−15.16−74.946−0.202
303 K−13.96
308 K−12.41
318 K−10.44
328 K−9.228
Table 3. Column Studies.
Table 3. Column Studies.
ParameterResult
Inlet concentration of As(III)10 mg/L
Breakthrough volume1250 mL
Exhaustion volume1800 mL
Breakthrough Capacity12.5 mg/g
Exhaustion Capacity18 mg/g
Degree of column utilization69.44
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shekhawat, A.; Jugade, R.; Gomase, V.; Kahu, S.; Dhandayutham, S.; Pandey, S. Adsorptive Removal of As(III) by Cellulose-Sn(IV) Biocomposite. J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7010019

AMA Style

Shekhawat A, Jugade R, Gomase V, Kahu S, Dhandayutham S, Pandey S. Adsorptive Removal of As(III) by Cellulose-Sn(IV) Biocomposite. Journal of Composites Science. 2023; 7(1):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7010019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shekhawat, Anita, Ravin Jugade, Vaishnavi Gomase, Shashikant Kahu, Saravanan Dhandayutham, and Sadanand Pandey. 2023. "Adsorptive Removal of As(III) by Cellulose-Sn(IV) Biocomposite" Journal of Composites Science 7, no. 1: 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7010019

APA Style

Shekhawat, A., Jugade, R., Gomase, V., Kahu, S., Dhandayutham, S., & Pandey, S. (2023). Adsorptive Removal of As(III) by Cellulose-Sn(IV) Biocomposite. Journal of Composites Science, 7(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7010019

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop