Next Article in Journal
Mechanical and Electrical Properties and Electromagnetic-Wave-Shielding Effectiveness of Graphene-Nanoplatelet-Reinforced Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Nanocomposites
Previous Article in Journal
Statistical Analysis and Optimization of the Experimental Results on Performance of Green Aluminum-7075 Hybrid Composites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chitosan-Biopolymer-Entrapped Activated Charcoal for Adsorption of Reactive Orange Dye from Aqueous Phase and CO2 from Gaseous Phase
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Closed-Loop Composite Welding and Bonding System Using Radio-Frequency Heating and Pressure

1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
2
Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7(3), 116; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7030116
Submission received: 22 January 2023 / Revised: 9 February 2023 / Accepted: 28 February 2023 / Published: 13 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress in Polymer Composites, Volume II)

Abstract

:
Polymer parts often replace traditional metallic parts in load-bearing applications due to their high strength-to-weight ratio, with thermoplastics at the forefront. Conventional manufacturing processes rely on using fasteners or adhesives to hold composite assemblies together, but thermoplastics can be welded together. Ultrasonic welding is widely used but becomes challenging for complex geometries, and new parameters need to be developed for different polymers and specimen geometries. In this work, we developed a closed-loop welding machine that employs the recent discovery of radio-frequency (RF) heating of carbonaceous materials. The machine is successfully able to weld polylactic acid (PLA) coupons with graphitic RF susceptors at the bondline in less than 2 min and using less than 50 W of input RF power. We found that a higher areal density of the graphitic paint lowers the mechanical properties of the weld because the carbonaceous materials hinder polymer chain diffusion. A significant change was not observed in weld properties for welding pressure ranges between 0 and 0.3 MPa. However, increasing out-of-plane welding displacement increased the modulus and strength of the weld. This work provides an interesting new automated system for welding polymer composites using RF fields, with potential applications in various manufacturing industries.

1. Introduction

Polymers are essential in our day-to-day life, and they find applications in various fields such as commodities and daily usage for packaging [1], automotive [2] and aerospace applications [3], additive manufacturing, and medical and dental transplants [4], etc. Thermoplastics are gaining significant traction in these industries since they can be molded and processed at elevated temperatures and are able to be recycled and reused [5,6,7]. Thermoplastic polymers and composites have found applications in load-bearing structures, making it essential to create robust, clean, and scalable joints enabling more complex geometries which take advantage of the weight savings and ecological benefits of thermoplastic polymers.
For assembling complex geometries, welding and joining are essential since it is easier to make smaller parts and join/assemble them at a later stage. Various methods have been developed to achieve this, including adhesive bonding [8], mechanical fastening [9], and fusion welding [10]. Adhesive bonding requires an additional polymer layer at the bondline to hold the substrates. While mechanical fastening incorporates additional components such as screws and rivets to avoid fusing the joining surfaces, it increases the weight of the assembly [10]. For polymers and their composites, it is desirable to fuse or weld components since fasteners require drilling holes and could lead to high-stress concentrations in the composite [11]. Researchers have found 61% labor savings in using fusion bondings as compared to mechanical fastening for assembling composite wing structures [10].
A method that fuses the bondline for thermoplastic composites is more desirable since the polymer chains diffuse between the two surfaces and result in a robust mechanical handshake in a single step [7,12]. Various methods have been developed under the umbrella of fusion bonding [13,14] and are classified according to the method used to heat up the workpiece for welding. These include bonding resulting from frictional heating, bulk heating, two-stage techniques, and electromagnetic heating [15]. Thermoplastic welding carried out by frictional heating includes spin, vibration, and ultrasonic welding. Bulk heating involves heating the entire workpiece in an oven or autoclave. Moreover, thermal techniques like gas, radiant, infrared, and laser welding are also methods to weld polymers. Electromagnetic (EM) excitation techniques like induction, microwaves, and resistance welding have gained significant traction lately since they are energy efficient because EM fields do not require a medium for energy transfer [16]. Of all these methods, the most commonly used methods include ultrasonic welding and induction welding. Ultrasonic welding is an established method but upscaling issues such as misalignment due to vibration are a problem; moreover, shape and size of the weld are dictated by the ultrasonic horn geometry [17,18]. On the other hand, inductive welding is a good option for larger areas, but implementation is a challenge for complex geometries since the bondline needs to be arranged relative to a pancake-type coil along the bond area [19].
Recently, researchers found that RF fields between 1 and 200 MHz can be used to heat carbonaceous materials, including CNTs [20], carbon black [21], graphene [22], and carbon fibers [23]. Using lower frequencies rather than microwaves for heating materials offers benefits such as greater penetration depths than microwaves, which allows for better heating in thicker materials. RF waves are capable of better selectivity; dielectric loss tangents of materials tend to be higher in the frequency range of microwaves, whereas at radio frequencies, more materials have comparatively low dielectric loss tangents, making them less susceptible to RF heating. This exciting discovery of RF heating has shown the potential to reduce fabrication time and energy consumption for applications ranging from additive manufacturing to thermal reduction, relative to the status quo [24]. Some applications of RF heating include improving interlayer adhesion in 3D-printed thermoplastics [25], additive manufacturing of thermoset nanocomposites [26,27], curing composites [28], and reduction of graphene oxide [22], among others.
Recent work [28] has focused on the interaction between materials and RF fields, but human intervention is required to modulate specimen parameters like temperature, displacement, and pressure. No study has been performed on the effects of RF processing parameters on weld quality. In this work, we propose a closed-loop system with thermal and force sensors as feedback systems to mitigate the effect of extrinsic factors on the weld quality and produce a consistent weld with a high degree of automation.

2. Methods

In this investigation, we have designed a closed-loop system with an RF welding setup that can be used to weld polymer composites continuously. The machine developed in this study utilizes a thermal camera, signal generator, linear actuator, and load cell weld polymers in a controlled manner and gets consistent weld joints.

2.1. Controls and Setup for RF Welding Machine

We have developed a closed-loop feedback control system and deployed it for the RF welding machine. The machine consisted of the RF heating system, sensors, loading actuator, and control unit connected to a computer. A target temperature was provided to the MATLAB script that actuates the linear displacement actuator, power, and frequency from the RF signal generator, depending on the sensor data obtained from FLIR thermal camera and the load cell during welding. The control diagram for the system is shown in Figure 1. FLIR A700 thermal camera and HX711 load cell were used to monitor the thermal profile and load on the actuator. As shown in Figure 1, the MATLAB control script first collected the data from the sensors and compared these values with the target values for the test. If these target values were not achieved, the MATLAB script went into a loop to achieve these values. For target thermal profiles, the control script increases the RF power level until desired temperatures are reached; the actuator is translated until desired load or displacement is achieved. In this study, we focused on welding 3D-printed coupons made with polylactic acid (PLA). PLA filaments used for 3D printing were purchased from Protopasta (Vancouver, WA). The PLA filament used in printing has a melting temperature range of 195–225 °C, a decomposition temperature of 250 °C, and a relative density of 1.2 g/cc. No special treatment was administered to change the surface finish of the 3D-printed PLA coupons.
Since the bondline is not visible during the welding process and the temperature is measured from the side, a temperature of 105 °C was found through iterative testing to give the best welding results without polymer degradation. A maximum limit of 50 W of RF input power was set for all experiments, and RF frequency was kept constant at 140 MHz.
The machine was programmed to achieve three welding control configurations: hold, displacement, and pressure control. For hold controls, the actuator translates to touch the coupons, and during RF welding, the actuator does not move while ensuring contact and negligible pressure. In displacement control, the actuator starts by holding minimal pressure until the PLA piece reaches 70 °C; this initial temperature is chosen to be close to the glass transition temperature (Tg) of PLA. At Tg, the material transitions from a glassy to a rubbery phase, and the actuator moves to the desired displacement. Displacing in this manner minimizes the pressures early in the process. Finally, pressure control applies pressure prior to any heating; this means that the actuator continues to move until the desired pressure is achieved. The actuator holds this position while the coupons heat up and the substrates get welded.
For all methods, the coupons would heat to the desired maximum temperature of 105 °C. Once the temperature is reached, the signal generator pulses RF power to keep the coupons in the melt temperature range for 60 s. After this time, the piece cools to 70 °C before the actuator retracts, and the weld is considered complete. For this investigation, we examined the effect of three different pressures and displacements applied to the composite bondline.

2.2. RF Heating Elements

A coplanar RF applicator was used to generate a fringing electric field that extended outwards from the two parallel electrodes, as shown in Figure 2. The RF applicator was fabricated by laser-etching copper traces on an FR4 substrate. The gap between the applicator electrodes is 4 mm. The RF waves were generated using a RIGOL DSG815 signal generator, amplified using a PRANA GN 500 amplifier, and supplied to the RF applicator using coaxial cables. Temperature changes were monitored using a FLIR A700 thermal camera.

2.3. Graphite-Coated Specimens

The specimens to be welded were two identical rectangular 3D-printed PLA coupons. A commercially available conductive graphitic ink (SKU-0216) purchased from Bare Conductive was used to pattern the coupons; the ink was diluted to 300 mg/mL in an aqueous medium to optimize the spray process. First, 1 mm-wide single traces with a varying number of layers (1, 3, 5, and 7) were sprayed on the PLA coupon to investigate the RF heating process through the radio-frequency sweep method. 3D-printed PLA coupons were sprayed on using a CZ Robotics CNC Singular Airbrush. Next, an overlap area of 25 × 25 mm2 was chosen for the welding process; the CNC was set to spray single-layer traces in this area with varying coverage percentages (25%, 50%, and 75%) as shown in Figure 3. The coverage percentage was modified by changing the width of the sprayed trace within the pre-determined overlap area.
Radio-Frequency Sweep: A radio-frequency sweep was performed to determine the number of layers of sprayed ink that showed maximum RF response, maintaining a single trace across all samples. Due to the system’s frequency-dependent impedance, RF heating rate changes with frequency. The resonant frequency with the largest resistive losses, and thus the maximum heating rate, are identified using a frequency sweep [28,29]. When the impedances of the source (RF generator), sample, capacitor, and connecting cables are closely matched at the resonant frequency, power is effectively transferred from the source to the sample. The RF field was applied using a stationary fringing-field applicator, as shown in Figure 2. The frequency was incrementally changed from 120 to 150 MHz, and the maximum heating rate was noted for each sample.

2.4. Welding Machine Fabrication

The RF welding machine, seen in Figure 4, was designed to apply an RF field to a set of coupons while either the pressure or displacement of the coupons was controlled. This novel welding machine emulates the basic principles of plastic welding [30,31] using RF energy as the heating source. To achieve this, the machine consists of a low dielectric Teflon base plate attached to fiberglass support rods and acrylic plates. Parts facing the RF applicator can also be lined with aluminum foil to reflect the RF waves if high powers are to be used. A linear actuator is mounted on the acrylic plates, positioned above the RF applicator that rests on the Teflon base plate. The fiberglass supports are attached to the base plate and acrylic mounting plates with epoxy. The linear actuator itself utilizes an attachment head that was 3D-printed from polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG). This head has a slot for an HX 711 load cell to read forces applied by the actuator. The force applied by the linear actuator can be set to a specific value applied upon the bond line in the case of pressure control, or it can vary in such a manner that the total displacement at the lap joint is constant in case of displacement control. The load cell was calibrated to describe a relationship between load and output voltage.

2.5. Mechanical Testing

The shear strength in tension of the specimens was measured using an Instron 558H servohydraulic universal testing machine. The lap shear specimens were prepared as per ASTM D 3163-01. The specimens were mounted on a wedge-shaped self-aligning gripper, and a 20 kN load cell was used. The force until fracture was recorded and was divided by the lap area to calculate the shear stress. A representative image of a tested coupon is shown in Figure S1.

3. Results and Discussion

We have created a polymer welding system along with the hardware and software necessary to create a closed-loop welding process. The machine can operate in three modes: pressure control, displacement control, and holding pressure, depending upon the required weld parameters. The polymer coupons to be welded were sprayed with graphite paint to use RF energy to heat the interface effectively. The machine applies a fringing RF field for targeted heating of the bondline to achieve polymer welding. Note that all these studies were carried out for an optimized graphite coating with desired in-plane conductivity. Anas et al. generalized RF heating patterns for various conductive materials, including carbon nanocomposites and conductive carbonaceous films [30]. They found that by tailoring the conductivity of nanocomposites, heating rates can be manipulated for fixed power and frequency.
Using the fabricated RF welding machine, we conducted experiments to see the effect of pressure, displacement, and graphite coverage on the bondline on the weld properties. Figure 5 shows representative graphs for various parameters that were examined. Specimens were described as Sx/Py/Dz using a nomenclature, where Sx denotes x% of surface area coverage, Py represents y MPa of pressure applied, and Dz is an out-of-plane displacement of z mm. Therefore, S50/P0.3/D0 is the nomenclature for a coupon with 50% graphite coverage on the bondline, applied pressure of 0.3 MPa, and 0 displacement.
We observed (as shown in Figure 5) that specimens with 75% graphite coverage take longer to heat than those with 50% coverage. This is because RF energy has to be distributed over a larger volume. As described earlier, the MATLAB controls code switches the RF off once the target melt temperature of 105 °C is achieved, but switches it on when the temperature drops below 100 °C; this results in a triangular oscillating temperature profile (as shown in all sub-plots in Figure 5—black lines) to maintain the bondline within a specific range without causing sparks or bubbling. Figure 5a,d shows specimens bonded with hold controls; no change in displacement and minimal fluctuations in the force sensor were observed for these specimens. The fluctuations in the force sensors were within the operating range of error. Figure 5b,e is a specimen welded in pressure control with a target of 0.3 MPa pressure. The specimen is placed under the actuator, and 0.3 MPa load is applied; then, as RF is switched on, the force drops as the polymer transitions from a solid to a rubbery phase. Finally, Figure 5c,f is displacement-controlled welding; the displacement increases (by 0.5 mm) as the polymer starts to heat from RF energy, which results in larger forces recorded by the sensor. The displacement is held constant, and the forces drop off once the specimen cools off. After RF welding, displacement of the bondline and the top surface was measured for all the different specimens and compiled in Figure S2.
Once welded coupons were retrieved from the machine, these specimens were tested for shear strength. Representative stress–strain curves are shown in Figure 6. A more detailed analysis of the mechanical testing is discussed in this section.
To investigate the effect of graphitic coverage, we examine coupons with 25%, 50%, and 75% coverage. These experiments were carried out in the hold control setting, which maintains a small amount of pressure in order to hold the workpiece without any displacement to mitigate the effects of pressure and displacement on the weld. The resulting shear modulus and shear strengths are shown in Figure 7. Interestingly, the strength of the welded joint decreases with increases in the graphite area. The average displacement of the bondline and the top surface was similar for all graphite coverages examined in this study, as shown in Figure S3. This decrease in modulus and strength is driven by two phenomena. Carbon diffusion in the bulk polymer hinders the polymer chain fusion, and graphite acts as a lubricant between the coupons when applying pressure.
Molecular simulations have shown that a graphite film on a polymeric substrate can affect the substrate’s viscoelastic characteristics [32]. The carbon atoms close to the substrate influence both the melt pool’s long-term (diffusive) motion and the short-term (local mobility) dynamics. Although the local mobility is not significantly affected in-plane with respect to the graphitic material, the graphite atoms affect the out-of-plane mobility of polymers (perpendicular to the bondline). Moreover, the diffusion coefficient of the polymer chains may decrease as the thickness of the carbonaceous (graphite) layer increases. Additionally, we hypothesize that the graphite layer acts as a lubricant since the graphite particles are not functionalized and only have non-bonded interactions with the polymer chains. This behavior also translates to the shear modulus values measured in this study. This self-lubricating property of graphite is used in polymer component applications such as bearings, gears, and water meters [33].
For specimens welded in pressure and displacement control, we focused on 50% coverage area. As seen in Figure 8, we did not see any significant change in modulus and shear strength for coupons with varying pressures between 0 and 0.3 MPa. For specimens welded in displacement control, we did not see a significant change in modulus, but the shear strength of the specimens increased slightly (Figure 9). This could be due to better chain diffusion at the bondline, as higher displacement would allow polymer chains from one substrate to intermingle with the chains on the other substrate. The center and top surface displacement of the specimens for pressure and displacement control are shown in Figures S4 and S5. As expected, the bondline displaces more for specimens tested in displacement control.
We see a slight increase in the shear strength for displacement-controlled specimens as compared to pressure-controlled specimens; this can be explained by examining the force and temperature evolution over time for these experiments. For pressure-controlled specimens, a fixed pressure is attained, and then the actuators are kept at a constant distance during the welding process; for displacement control, the actuator achieves the desired displacement while the bondline heats up. The latter results in better polymer chain diffusion as the polymer interface experiences temperature and pressure (due to displacement) during the process. The latter point can be inferred by examining Figure 9 and Figure S5, showing a direct correlation between bondline displacement and lap shear strength of specimens.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we developed an automated closed-loop composite welding machine that uses radio-frequency heating. We focused on welding polylactic acid (PLA) thermoplastic 3D-printed coupons with graphitic susceptors on the bondline to absorb RF energy and dissipate it locally for welding. The setup comprises two sensors—thermal camera and load cell—to measure the temperature and pressure, a linear actuator for controlled displacement, RF heating system, and a controls logic driven by a MATLAB code. These components constitute the closed-looped system that does not require human intervention. The machine can be used in three control settings: hold, displacement, and pressure control. For the polylactic acid (PLA) coupons welded in this work using this machine, we found a good heating response of graphite coatings at the bondline with less than 50 W of RF input powers. Coupons take 50–100 s to heat up to desired temperatures of 105 °C; RF power is then modulated by the controls program to keep the temperature within the 100–105 °C range.
Using the three controls in this closed-loop system, we successfully welded PLA coupons within 2 min. The weld properties of the coupons were evaluated for pressure and displacement control with fixed graphite coverage; the effect of percentage area of the bondline covered by carbonaceous filler was also examined. We found that a higher concentration of graphitic area coverage results in poor polymer diffusion at the bonding interface and lowers the shear modulus and strength. Interestingly, we found that specimens welded using different pressures did not significantly change in mechanical properties, but specimens welded using displacement control saw an increase in shear strength of 31% on increasing the displacement from 0 to 0.5 mm.
The closed-loop RF welding machine employs an out-of-oven, energy-efficient heating method and does not create surface indents, as seen in ultrasonic welding. The closed-loop framework developed in this work has potential applications for automated RF welding, fabrication, and manufacturing for future factories. RF welding machines can be used for welding various thermoplastics, joining thermosets with conductive adhesives, and repairing carbon fiber composites. The processing parameters (input RF power) can be tuned to reach desired heating rates and processing temperatures. We envision that the thermal data generated by the RF welding machine can be stored and used with machine learning algorithms [34,35] for more efficient manufacturing in the future.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcs7030116/s1, Figure S1: Laps hear testing of welded specimens using servo-hydraulic testing machine. Figure S2: Average displacement of (a) center bondline and (b) top surface measured after RF welding for defined welding parameters. Figure S3: Center and surface displacement for specific displacement values varying with the graphite density. Figure S4: Center and surface displacement for different values of applied pressure. Figure S5: Center and surface displacement for different values of applied displacement.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.E., C.N, K.T. and A.V.; methodology, I.E., C.N, K.T, A.S. and B.F.; formal analysis, I.E., S.G., A.N. and A.V.; investigation, I.E., C.N., A.S., A.N. and S.G.; writing—original draft preparation, I.E., S.G. and A.V.; writing—review and editing, S.G., A.S., M.J.G. and A.V.; supervision and project administration, M.J.G. and A.V.; funding acquisition, M.J.G. and A.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to acknowledge the University of Washington for the financial support.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data can be made available on request to corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the University of Washington for financial support. We would also like to thank Santosh Devasia from the University of Washington and Sam Pedigo from Boeing for their thoughtful conversations about the idea.

Conflicts of Interest

The work on fabrication of closed loop machine in this paper is the subject of patents pending held by University of Washington, Seattle with Ian Enriquez, Colin Noronha, Katrina Teo, and Aniruddh Vashisth listed as co-inventors.

References

  1. López-Rubio, A.; Almenar, E.; Hernandez-Muñoz, P.; Lagarón, J.M.; Catalá, R.; Gavara, R. Overview of Active Polymer-Based Packaging Technologies for Food Applications. Food Rev. Int. 2004, 20, 357–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Patil, A.; Patel, A.; Purohit, R. An overview of Polymeric Materials for Automotive Applications. Mater. Today Proc. 2017, 4, 3807–3815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wright, W.W. Polymers in aerospace applications. Mater. Des. 1991, 12, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ozdil, D.; Aydin, H.M. Polymers for medical and tissue engineering applications. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2014, 89, 1793–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Recycling of Carbon Fibers from Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Using Electrochemical Method—ScienceDirect. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359835X1500247X (accessed on 3 August 2022).
  6. Stewart, R. Thermoplastic composites—Recyclable and fast to process. Reinf. Plast. 2011, 55, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kline, D.B.; Wool, R.P. Polymer welding relations investigated by a lap shear joint method. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1988, 28, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kinloch, A.J.; Taig, C.M. The Adhesive Bonding of Thermoplastic Cornposites. J. Adhes. 1987, 21, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mechanical Behaviour of Thermoplastic Composites Spot-Welded and Mechanically Fastened Joints: A Preliminary Comparison. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359836816321126 (accessed on 3 August 2022).
  10. Yousefpour, A.; Hojjati, M.; Immarigeon, J.-P. Fusion Bonding/Welding of Thermoplastic Composites. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2004, 17, 303–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Godwin, E.W.; Matthews, F.L. A review of the strength of joints in fibre-reinforced plastics: Part 1. Mechanically fastened joints. Composites 1980, 11, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Deng, S.; Djukic, L.; Paton, R.; Ye, L. Thermoplastic–epoxy interactions and their potential applications in joining composite structures—A review. Compos. Part Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2015, 68, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ageorges, C.; Ye, L.; Hou, M. Advances in fusion bonding techniques for joining thermoplastic matrix composites: A review. Compos. Part Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2001, 32, 839–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rudolf, R.; Mitschag, P.; Manfred, N. Welding of high-performance thermoplastic composites. Polym. Polym. Compos. 1999, 7, 309–315. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sudhin, A.; Remanan, M.; Ajeesh, G.; Jayanarayanan, K. Comparison of Properties of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic and Thermosetting Composites for Aerospace Applications. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 24, 453–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bayerl, T.; Duhovic, M.; Mitschang, P.; Bhattacharyya, D. The heating of polymer composites by electromagnetic induction—A review. Compos. Part Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2014, 57, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Global Plastic Welding Equipment Market Size & Forecasting Report to 2030: Case Studies of Dukane Ultrasonic Welding, Heely-Brown and Emerson-Bosch Packaging Technology-ResearchAndMarkets.com. Available online: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220503005717/en/Global-Plastic-Welding-Equipment-Market-Size-Forecasting-Report-to-2030-Case-Studies-of-Dukane-Ultrasonic-Welding-Heely-Brown-and-Emerson---Bosch-Packaging-Technology---ResearchAndMarkets.com (accessed on 14 August 2022).
  18. De Leon, M.; Shin, H.-S. Prediction of Optimum Welding Parameters for Weld-Quality Characterization in Dissimilar Ultrasonic-Welded Al-to-Cu Tabs for Li-ion Batteries. Met. Mater. Int. 2022, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ahmed, T.J.; Stavrov, D.; Bersee, H.E.N.; Beukers, A. Induction welding of thermoplastic composites—An overview. Compos. Part Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2006, 37, 1638–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sweeney, C.B.; Moran, A.G.; Gruener, J.T.; Strasser, A.M.; Pospisil, M.J.; Saed, M.A.; Green, M.J. Radio Frequency Heating of Carbon Nanotube Composite Materials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 27252–27259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Gruener, J.T.; Vashisth, A.; Pospisil, M.J.; Camacho, A.C.; Oh, J.-H.; Sophiea, D.; Mastroianni, S.E.; Auvil, T.J.; Green, M.J. Local heating and curing of carbon nanocomposite adhesives using radio frequencies. J. Manuf. Process. 2020, 58, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Debnath, D.; Zhao, X.; Anas, M.; Kulhanek, D.L.; Oh, J.H.; Green, M.J. Radio frequency heating and reduction of Graphene Oxide and Graphene Oxide-Polyvinyl Alcohol Composites. Carbon 2020, 169, 475–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vashisth, A.; Healey, R.E.; Pospisil, M.J.; Oh, J.H.; Green, M.J. Continuous Processing of Pre-pregs using Radio Frequency Heating. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2020, 195, 108211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vashisth, A.; Upama, S.T.; Anas, M.; Oh, J.-H.; Patil, N.; Green, M.J. Radio frequency heating and material processing using carbon susceptors. Nanoscale Adv. 2021, 3, 5255–5264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sweeney, C.B.; Lackey, B.A.; Pospisil, M.J.; Achee, T.C.; Hicks, V.K.; Moran, A.G.; Teipel, B.R.; Saed, M.A.; Green, M.J. Welding of 3D-printed carbon nanotube–polymer composites by locally induced microwave heating. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1700262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Sarmah, A.; Desai, S.K.; Tezel, G.B.; Vashisth, A.; Mustafa, M.M.; Arole, K.; Crowley, A.G.; Green, M.J. Rapid Manufacturing via Selective Radio-Frequency Heating and Curing of Thermosetting Resins. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2022, 24, 2101351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sarmah, A.; Desai, S.K.; Crowley, A.G.; Zolton, G.C.; Tezel, G.B.; Harkin, E.M.; Tran, T.Q.; Arole, K.; Green, M.J. Additive manufacturing of nanotube-loaded thermosets via direct ink writing and radio-frequency heating and curing. Carbon 2022, 200, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sarmah, A.; Morales, M.A.; Srivastava, A.; Upama, S.; Nandi, A.; Henry, T.C.; Green, M.J.; Vashisth, A. Interfacial carbon fiber–matrix interactions in thermosetting composites volumetrically cured by electromagnetic fields. Compos. Part Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2023, 164, 107276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Anas, M.; Mustafa, M.M.; Vashisth, A.; Barnes, E.; Saed, M.A.; Moores, L.C.; Green, M.J. Universal patterns of radio-frequency heating in nanomaterial-loaded structures. Appl. Mater. Today 2021, 23, 101044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Grewell, D.; Benatar, A. Welding of Plastics: Fundamentals and New Developments. Int. Polym. Process. 2007, 22, 43–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Yeh, H.J. 11-Ultrasonic welding of medical plastics. In Joining and Assembly of Medical Materials and Devices; Zhou, Y., Breyen, M.D., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomaterials; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2013; pp. 296–323e. ISBN 978-1-84569-577-4. [Google Scholar]
  32. Harmandaris, V.A.; Daoulas, K.C.; Mavrantzas, V.G. Molecular Dynamics Simulation of a Polymer Melt/Solid Interface: Local Dynamics and Chain Mobility in a Thin Film of Polyethylene Melt Adsorbed on Graphite. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 5796–5809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gilardi, R. Tribology of Graphite-Filled Polystyrene. Lubricants 2016, 4, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Thiem, J.; Cole, D.P.; Dubey, U.; Srivastava, A.; Ashraf, C.; Henry, T.C.; Bakis, C.E.; Vashisth, A. Using data science to locate nanoparticles in a polymer matrix composite. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2022, 218, 109205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Brunton, S.L.; Nathan Kutz, J.; Manohar, K.; Aravkin, A.Y.; Morgansen, K.; Klemisch, J.; Goebel, N.; Buttrick, J.; Poskin, J.; Blom-Schieber, A.W.; et al. Data-Driven Aerospace Engineering: Reframing the Industry with Machine Learning. AIAA J. 2021, 58, 2820–2847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic flow chart of the closed-loop control system for the radio-frequency welding machine.
Figure 1. Schematic flow chart of the closed-loop control system for the radio-frequency welding machine.
Jcs 07 00116 g001
Figure 2. (a) RF heating setup with a coplanar RF applicator made from FR4 sheets. The specimens are placed at the end of the applicator as a pressure actuator presses on the two coupons. (b) Schematic shows conductive graphitic material heated by RF fields, leading to targeted heating and welding of two thermoplastic substrates. The black interlayer denotes the graphitic coating, red double-sided arrows show the fringing RF fields, and the blue arrows show the applied pressure (or displacement). Note that t1, t2, and t3 are three time instances as the RF welding progresses.
Figure 2. (a) RF heating setup with a coplanar RF applicator made from FR4 sheets. The specimens are placed at the end of the applicator as a pressure actuator presses on the two coupons. (b) Schematic shows conductive graphitic material heated by RF fields, leading to targeted heating and welding of two thermoplastic substrates. The black interlayer denotes the graphitic coating, red double-sided arrows show the fringing RF fields, and the blue arrows show the applied pressure (or displacement). Note that t1, t2, and t3 are three time instances as the RF welding progresses.
Jcs 07 00116 g002
Figure 3. The RF coupons with varying surface coverages of the graphite. The coupons’ dimensions are 50.8 mm × 12.7 mm (2″ × 0.5″).
Figure 3. The RF coupons with varying surface coverages of the graphite. The coupons’ dimensions are 50.8 mm × 12.7 mm (2″ × 0.5″).
Jcs 07 00116 g003
Figure 4. (a) CAD model of the design and (b) fabricated RF welding machine.
Figure 4. (a) CAD model of the design and (b) fabricated RF welding machine.
Jcs 07 00116 g004
Figure 5. Change in force and temperature over the course of the experiments for (a) 75% graphite coverage with no pressure or displacement; for (b) 50% coverage, 0.3 MPa, and 0 displacement; and for (c) 50% coverage, 0.5 mm displacement, and no pressure. Change in displacement and temperature throughout the experiments for (d) 75% graphite coverage with no pressure or displacement; for (e) 50% coverage, 0.3 MPa, and 0 displacement; and for (f) 50% coverage, 0.5 mm displacement, and no pressure.
Figure 5. Change in force and temperature over the course of the experiments for (a) 75% graphite coverage with no pressure or displacement; for (b) 50% coverage, 0.3 MPa, and 0 displacement; and for (c) 50% coverage, 0.5 mm displacement, and no pressure. Change in displacement and temperature throughout the experiments for (d) 75% graphite coverage with no pressure or displacement; for (e) 50% coverage, 0.3 MPa, and 0 displacement; and for (f) 50% coverage, 0.5 mm displacement, and no pressure.
Jcs 07 00116 g005
Figure 6. The stress–strain curves for 75% graphite coverage with no pressure or displacement (orange dotted line); for 50% coverage, 0.3 MPa, and 0 displacement (grey solid line); and for 50% coverage, 0.5 mm displacement, and no pressure (blue dashed line).
Figure 6. The stress–strain curves for 75% graphite coverage with no pressure or displacement (orange dotted line); for 50% coverage, 0.3 MPa, and 0 displacement (grey solid line); and for 50% coverage, 0.5 mm displacement, and no pressure (blue dashed line).
Jcs 07 00116 g006
Figure 7. Specimens welded using “hold” controls with varying graphite coverage and resulting (a) average shear modulus and (b) shear strength.
Figure 7. Specimens welded using “hold” controls with varying graphite coverage and resulting (a) average shear modulus and (b) shear strength.
Jcs 07 00116 g007
Figure 8. Specimens welded in pressure control with varying graphite coverage and resulting (a) average shear modulus and (b) shear strength.
Figure 8. Specimens welded in pressure control with varying graphite coverage and resulting (a) average shear modulus and (b) shear strength.
Jcs 07 00116 g008
Figure 9. Specimens welded in displacement control with varying graphite coverage and resulting (a) average shear modulus and (b) shear strength.
Figure 9. Specimens welded in displacement control with varying graphite coverage and resulting (a) average shear modulus and (b) shear strength.
Jcs 07 00116 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Enriquez, I.; Noronha, C.; Teo, K.; Sarmah, A.; Gupta, S.; Nandi, A.; Fishbeck, B.; Green, M.J.; Vashisth, A. Closed-Loop Composite Welding and Bonding System Using Radio-Frequency Heating and Pressure. J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7, 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7030116

AMA Style

Enriquez I, Noronha C, Teo K, Sarmah A, Gupta S, Nandi A, Fishbeck B, Green MJ, Vashisth A. Closed-Loop Composite Welding and Bonding System Using Radio-Frequency Heating and Pressure. Journal of Composites Science. 2023; 7(3):116. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7030116

Chicago/Turabian Style

Enriquez, Ian, Colin Noronha, Katrina Teo, Anubhav Sarmah, Surabhit Gupta, Ankush Nandi, Blake Fishbeck, Micah J. Green, and Aniruddh Vashisth. 2023. "Closed-Loop Composite Welding and Bonding System Using Radio-Frequency Heating and Pressure" Journal of Composites Science 7, no. 3: 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7030116

APA Style

Enriquez, I., Noronha, C., Teo, K., Sarmah, A., Gupta, S., Nandi, A., Fishbeck, B., Green, M. J., & Vashisth, A. (2023). Closed-Loop Composite Welding and Bonding System Using Radio-Frequency Heating and Pressure. Journal of Composites Science, 7(3), 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7030116

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop