Conventional Machining of Metal Matrix Composites towards Sustainable Manufacturing—Present Scenario and Future Prospects
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Metal Matrix Composites (MMCs) are made of a metallic matrix (usually aluminum, magnesium, titanium, or copper) reinforced with dispersed particles, fibers, or whiskers of a second phase. These reinforcing phases can be ceramic (e.g., SiC, Al2O3), carbides (e.g., TiC, WC), or other metals [7].
- Polymer Matrix Composites (PMCs) combine a polymer with reinforcing carbon fiber and glass fiber fabrics. Examples include epoxies and polyester resins [8].
- Ceramic Matrix Composite (CMCs) are a ceramic matrix with incorporated ceramic fibers. Examples include the use of SiO2, Al2O3, or carbon fibers.
- Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymers (GFRPs) are matrix composites reinforced with epoxy and polyester-bound glass fibers.
- Hybrid Composites (HCs) combine at least two types of matrices or reinforcement to accomplish specific design requirements [12].
- Natural Fiber Composites (NFCs) include jute, flax, cotton, and wood to enhance strength and provide a wood-like appearance.
- Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers (CFRPs) are a form of polymer matrix composite. The sticky polymer is often a thermoplastic or thermoset resin like epoxy, but it can also be a thermoset or thermoplastic polymer like polyester, vinyl ester, or nylon.
- Aramid Fiber Reinforced Polymers (AFRPs) are polymer matrix composites that employ aramid as a reinforcing material.
- Functionally Graded Composites (FGCs) are subsets of composites that allow for the adjustment of parts based on the application or form.
2. Machining of Metal Matrix Composites
2.1. Aluminum Metal Matrix Composites (AlMMCs)
2.1.1. Aluminum Reinforced with Alumina (Al/Al2O3)
2.1.2. Aluminum Reinforced with Silicon (Al/Si)
- Al reinforced with silicon (Si);
- Al reinforced with silicon carbide (SiC);
- Al reinforced with silicon carbide and graphite (SiC-Gr);
- Al reinforced with silicon and magnesium (Al-Si10Mg);
- Al reinforced with silicon and aluminum oxide (Si-Al2O3);
- Al reinforced with silicon nitride and graphene (Si3N4 and C);
- Al reinforced with silicon and multi-wall carbon nanotubes (SI-MWCNT);
- Al reinforced with silicon nitride and molybdenum disulfide (SiN–MoS2);
- Al reinforced with Silicon with magnesium (AlSi9Mg).
2.1.3. Aluminum Reinforced with Boron (Al-B)
- Al reinforced with boron carbide (B4C);
- Al reinforced with magnesium diboride (MgB2);
- Al reinforced with titanium diboride (TiB2);
- Al reinforced with hafnium diboride (HfB2);
- Al reinforced with zirconium diboride (ZrB2).
2.1.4. Aluminum Reinforced with Titanium (Al–Ti)
2.1.5. Other Aluminum Metal Matrix Composites
2.2. Copper Metal Matrix Composites
2.3. Magnesium Metal Matrix Composites
2.4. Titanium Alloy Metal Matrix Composites
2.5. Molybdenum (Mo) MMCs
3. Discussion on Future Trends of Conventional Machining on MMCs
3.1. Comparison of Base Materials
3.2. Reinforcement Materials
3.3. Machining Input and Output Responses
3.4. Sustainable Manufacturing Practices of MMCs
4. Metal Matrix Composites Computing Techniques
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Author | Particulate Reinforced Metal Matrices | Conventional Machining Process | Input/Output Parameters | Optimization Method | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Karabulut (2015) [15] | AA7039/Al2O3 MMC and AA7039 | Milling | Input: Vc, Fz, and Dc Output: Ra and Fc | ANOVA, Taguchi, and ANN | Ra (Ra) was improved between 196% and 312% during the milling of the AA7039/Al2O3 alloy |
Kannan et al. (2015) [16] | LM6 aluminum alloy/Al2O3 | Turning | Input: Vc, Fz, and Dc Output: Fc and surface finish | Comparison of tool | The NCD tool performs well compared to TiN-coated and uncoated tools |
Ghandehariun et al. (2016) [17] | Al6061/Al2O3 | Turning | Input: Rake angle, clearance angle, Vc, Dc, and width of cut Output: Fc | Finite element analysis (FEA) | Increase in plastic deformation around particle results in debonding and fracture during the cutting process |
Kannan et al. (2018) [18] | Al 7075/hexagonal BN/Al2O3 | Turning | Input: Tool geometry, tool material, coating type, Vc, feed, Dc, and approach angle Output: Fc, tool wear, and Ra | Dry, MQL, and SEM | MQL machining of the hybrid nanocomposite produces better results over dry machining in terms of surface finish, forces, and tool wear |
Prakash and Iqbal (2018) [19] | AA2014/Al2O3 | Turning | Input: Vc, Fzs, Dc Output: Fc, surface finish, and temperature | Linear regression analysis and Taguchi method | Ra and Fc decrease with increasing Vc and increase with increasing Fz and Dc |
Thankachan (2019) [20] | LM25 Al alloy/nano Al2O3 | Turning | Input: Vc, Fz, and Dc Output: Fc and surface finish | RSM and ANOVA | At a low Vc, an unstable built-up-edge (BUE) is formed, which leads to a poor surface finish |
Srivastava et al. (2021) [21] | A359/B4C/Al2O3 hybrid MMCs | Turning | Input: Rotational speed, Fz, and Dc Output: MRR, Ra, and tool flank wear | RSM | SR is influenced by both feed and rotational speed. At a higher rotational speed, the machining time decreases. Flank wear also increases when increasing the rotational speed, Dc, and Fz |
Szymański et al. (2022) [22] | EN AC-44000 AC-AlSi11/Al2O3 | Turning | Input: Dc, Fz, and Vc Output: Fc, tool wear, and Ra | SEM | Fz influences the geometrical structure of the MMC |
Ravikumar and Suresh (2023) [23] | Al7075/SiC/Al2O3 | Turning | Input: Weight percentages of SiC, Al2O3, and heat treatment Output: Machining force and Ra | Taguchi | The weight percentage of nano-sized reinforcements and ageing temperature increased, and the machining force and Ra changed linearly |
Sunar et al. (2023) [24] | A356/Al2O3 | Milling | Input: % of reinforcement, feed, and radial and axial Dc Output: Fc and Ra | ANOVA | Surface quality can be improved by higher reinforcement ratios |
Arun Premnath et al. (2015) [25] | Al 6061/Al2O3/graphite (Gr) | Milling | Input: Fz, Vc, Dc, and weight fraction Output: Tool wear | ANOVA and SEM | The feed and weight fraction are found to be greater contributing factors and increase the tool wear |
Author | Particulate Reinforced Metal Matrices | Conventional Machining Process | Input/Output Parameters | Optimization Method | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Palanikumar et al. (2014) [39] | SiC-reinforced A356 aluminum metal matrix | Turning | Input: Vc, feed, and Dc Output: Ra | RSM, ANOVA, and DFA | An increase in Vc reduces Ra |
Venkatesan et al. (2014) [40] | SiC and B4C-reinforced aluminum 356 hybrid MMC | Turning | Input: Weight fraction, speed, Fz, and cutting depth Output: Ra | RSM | Roughness decreases at a higher Vc during machining |
Dabade et al. (2014) [41] | Al/SiCp composites | Turning | Input: Tool nose radius, insert geometry speed, Fz, and cutting depth Output: Ra | Taguchi method | Ra is higher at denser reinforcement composites |
Vivek et al. (2015) [42], Vijayraj et al. [43] | Al with Si, Mg, and Fe reinforced with SiC | Turning | Input: Spindle speed, Fz, and Dc Output: Tool wear, Ra, and MRR | ANOVA, Taguchi, and RSM | Spindle speed and feed are the more important influencing parameters for the tool wear |
El-Kady et al. (2015) [44] | Aluminum–silicon cast alloy | Turning | Input: Vc and the weight fraction percent Output: Fc, tool wear, and Ra | Different weight fractions of SiC nanoparticulate | Improvements in Ra were found by increasing the Vc and the weight fraction percent of the SiC nano-particulates |
Karabulut et al. (2016) [45] | Al7075 and the open-cell SiC foam MMC | Milling | Input: Milling speed, Fz, and Dc Output: Milling force and tool wear | ANOVA and RSM | The cutting depth affected the milling force, the cutting tool wear was affected by the cutting depth, and the Fz was the most important factor for the tool wear |
Bushlya et al. (2017) [49] | AlSi9Mg0.3 reinforced with SiC | Turning | Input: Vc Output: Tool wear | SEM and TEM | The dimensions and stability of this tool protective layer were found to decrease at a higher Vc |
Elsadek et al. (2017) [50] | Al/SiC | Turning | Output: Ra and tool flank wear Output: Fz, Vc, Dc, and % volume of SiC | Fuzzy logic | The surface finish can be increased by increasing the Vc Flank tool wear increases upon increasing the SiC |
Ghoreishi et al. (2018) [51] | Al A356-T6 alloy reinforcement with SiC | Milling | Input: Vc, Fz, Dc, and coolant Output: Ra and Fc | CCD | Vc is more than 1800 m/min, Fz is less than the particle size per tooth, and Dc is between 1 and 1.1 mm |
Ghoreishi et al. (2019) [52] | Al A356-T6 alloy reinforcement with SiC | Milling | Input: Vc, Fz, Dc, and coolant Output: Ra and tool wear | CCD | Increasing the Vc does not lead to a higher tool wear value Increasing the Dc and Fz results wear in tool. |
Xiong et al. (2018) [53] | Situ TiB2/7050Al composites | Milling | Input: Vc, Fz, and axial depth Output: Ra and Fc | ANOVA | Fc are influenced by the axial Dc. Increasing the milling speed reduces Ra |
Deng et al. (2018) [54] | SiCp/Al | Milling | Input: Feed, spindle speed, axial depth, and slope angle Output: Tool wear and surface quality | FEA, SEM, and EDS | During MQL operation, the process improves the tool wear and tool life and reduces Ra |
Pramanik et al. (2018) [55] | Al 6061/SiC | Milling | Input: Vc and Fz Output: Ra | Chip morphology technique | Fz is the crucial factor that reduces Ra |
Wang et al. (2018) [56] | SiCp/Al 2024 | Milling | Input: Cutting depth, Vc, and laser power Output: Fc, surface integrity, chip formation, and tool wear | Taguchi and ANOVA | Laser power and cutting depth have a great effect on roughness |
Kumar and Sood (2019) [58] | Al7075/SiC/B4C | Turning | Input: Vc, Fz, Dc, and percentage reinforcement Output: Ra and Fc | RSM, ANOVA, and DFA | Increases were found in the hardness, tensile strength, and grain size, as well as more fine-grained structures |
Niu (2018) [59] | SiCp/Al and B4Cp/Al | Turning | Input: Spindle speed, Vc, and Fz Output: Chip formation, Fc, temperature, and tool wear | FEM and RSM | The cutting spindle speed and Fz are considered as the main factors |
Kumar et al. (2019) [60] | Al6061/SiC/B4C/talc | Drilling | Input: Vc, feed, Dc, and percentage of reinforcement Output: Thrust force, circularity, and Ra | ANOVA, Taguchi technique, and GRA | Ra and Fc is mainly influenced by Fz |
Nandakumar et al. (2019) [61] | Aluminum and nano SiC | Grinding | Input: Wheel speed, Dc, and workpiece speed Output: Grinding forces and temperature | RSM | High Dc causes increases in grinding forces and temperature |
Mirshamsi et al. (2019) [62] | Aluminum/SiC | Turning | Input: Vc, Dc, Fz, laser power, laser frequency, laser light angle, and percentage of particles Output: Flank wear and Ra | Placket–Burman method, Taguchi, and ANOVA | An increase in the reinforcement ratio leads to an increase in the flank wear of the cutting tool and an increase in Fz resulted in increasing Ra and tool wear |
Tripathy and Maity (2019) [63] | Al6063/SiC/ZrO2 | Milling | Input: Feed, Vc, and Dc Output: Tool wear | Taguchi | A cryo-treated end mill cutter improves the tool wear rate |
Ajithkumar and Xavior (2019) [64,65] | (i) Al7075/SiC/B4C, (ii) Al7075/SiC/graphene, (iii) Al7075/SiC/CNT | Turning | Input: Tool, Vc, Fz, and Dc Output: Flank wear, crater wear, and chip morphology | Taguchi method | The reinforcement particles of SiC, B4C, graphene, and CNT had a higher influence on chip morphology and shape |
Arulraj et al. (2019) [66] | LM24-SiCp-coconut shell ash | Turning | Input: Vc, Fz, Dc, and tool-nose radius Output: Surface roughness | Taguchi method and genetic algorithm | Vc is an important factor to reduce Ra |
Wang et al. (2019) [67] | SiCp/Al | Turning | Output: Tool wear and Ra | Taguchi method | The tool is damaged seriously due to the large Fc |
Ramasubramanian et al. (2019) [68] | AA2124-SiC MMC | Turning | Input: Different diamond-coated tool Output: Tool failure, temperature, chip morphology, and Ra | Raman spectroscopy | BMTN-coated tools outperformed MCD, NCD, BDD, and PCD tools |
Thirukkumaran et al. (2020) [69] | Al–SiC | Drilling | Input: Speed, Fz, and point angle in degrees Output: Temperature, Fz, and Ra | Taguchi method and ANOVA | The tool and workpiece temperatures increase with an increase in spindle speed at different point angles |
Abbas et al. (2020) [70] | Al/SiC | Drilling | Input: Spindle speed and Fz Output: Thrust force, hole diameter, delamination factor, Ra, tool wear, and chip analysis | SEM and EDS | The result reveal that the thrust force varies directly with the Fz, but inversely with the spindle speed |
Wiciak-Pikula et al. (2020) [71,72] | Al/SiC | Milling | Input: Vc, feed, spindle speed, axial and radial infeed, and depth Output: Tool wear | Multilayer perceptron (MLP) and ANN | The effectiveness of predicting wear is based on the forces and vibrations |
Zhao et al. (2020) [73,74] | SiCp/Al | Milling | Input: Laser power, scanning speed, and track displacement Output: Fc, | DOE | The reduction in Fc is attributed to the thermal failure of the interface layer |
Zhou et al. (2020) [75] | Al/SiC | Milling | Input: Vc, Fz, Dc, and volume fraction of SiC Output: Roughness | ANN and ANOVA | Roughness decreases with cutting speed and increases with an increase in the volume fraction of SiC and Fz |
Liu et al. (2020) [76] | SiCp/Al composites | Turning | Input: Fz Output: Tool wear and thermal–mechanical stress | The analytical modeling approach model | The mechanical stress and thermal stress are induced by the mechanical load and thermal load |
Repeto et al. (2020) [77] | 5083 Al/SiC | Shaper | Input: Vc and Dc Output: Tool wear | SOM and SEM | Machining time is an influential factor and an increase in the wear causes an increase in the forces |
Swain et al. (2020) [78] | Al/SiCp | Turning | Input: Vc and feed Output: Flank wear and Ra | Principal component analysis (PCA) and Taguchi | Vc and Dc are the influencing parameters of flank wear, and Dc and feed influence the responses for Ra |
Swain et al. (2020) [79] | Al/SiCp | Turning | Input: Vc, feed, and Dc Output: Fc | Taguchi and quadratic regression model | The feed force, Fc, and radial force decrease by increasing the Vc at constant Fz |
Das et al. (2020) [80] | Al 7075/SiCp | Turning | Input: Vc, feed, and Dc Output: Temperature, Ra, and tool flank wear | ANOVA, Taguchi, and PSO | At higher machining speeds, the surface quality is improved |
Bhushan (2022) [81], Bhushan (2021) [82] | 7075 Al alloy/SiC | Turning | Input: Vc, feed, and Dc Output: Crater wear, tangential force, feed force, and radial force | ANOVA and RSM | Dc is the influencing parameter of the tangential force, whereas Fz is the influencing parameter of the feed force [82]; increasing Vc and feed enhances the flank and crater wear [83] |
Chakravarthy et al. (2021) [83] | Nano SiC/Al | Drilling | Input: Spindle speed, Fz, point angle, Wt% of SiC, and type of cooling Output: Ra and burr height | FESEM, EDAX, AFM, Vickers micro hardness test, and NSGA-II | The minimal SR and BH are 0.29 μm and 0.23 mm, respectively, under 500 rpm, 50 mm/min feed, and a 900 point angle |
Çevik et al. (2021) [84] | A2024-B4C-SiC | Milling | Input: % of SiC and B4C reinforcements Output: Surface morphology, hardness, MRR, and Ra | EDX analysis | Ra values increased with the addition of nanoparticles within the AA2024 alloy matrix |
Shihab et al. (2021) [85] | Hybrid Al7075/SiC/Gr | Milling | Input: Spindle speed, feed, Dc, and % of SiC/Gr Output: Ra, micro hardness, and MRR | RSM, ANOVA, and DFA | The weight percentage of the reinforced materials significantly affects the surface integrity |
Saini and Singh (2021) [86], (2022) [87], (2022) [88] | Al-4032/SiC | Milling | Input: Spindle speed, Fz, and power supply Output: MRR and Ra | TGRA and ANOVA [87], Taguchi, ANN [88], and RSM [89] | The result established that the inclusion of SiC in the base matrix demonstrates improved mechanical properties and a better machined surface with optimized machining parameters |
Patil and Lila (2021) [89] | 7071Al/SiC | Turning | Input: Fz and Dc Output: Ra, Fc and tool wear | Metallurgical microscope | PCD tools showed a smaller machined surface than at other Fc levels |
Kumar et al. (2021) [90], Kumar et al. (2021) [91] | Al/SiC/Cr [91] Al/SiC/Mo [92] | Turning | Input: Vc, Fz, Dc, and Wt.% of Mo Output: Ra, MRR, and TWR | Taguchi, GRA, and ANOVA | The Vc and feed are the most influential parameter for Ra Dc is the most significant parameter for the highest MRR |
Abedinzadeh et al. (2021) [92] | SiC/Al2O3 and aluminum powder | Turning | Input: Vc and Dc Output: Ra and Fc | Taguchi | Vc and Dc exhibited a major influence on Ra and Fc |
Zhou et al. (2021) [93] | SiCp/Al | Turning | Input: Volume fraction of SiC (%), Vc, Fz, and Dc Output: Fc and surface topography | Finite element (FE) model | Fc increases with the increase in cutting depth; the larger the Fz or the smaller the cutting depth, the better the hydrophobicity of the machined surface |
Devaraj et al. (2021) [94] | Al 6061/SiC | Turning | Input: Hole diameter, hole depth, and pitch between the hole Output: Ra, power consumption, and tool flank wear | Taguchi | The hole depth and pitch between the holes significantly affect the machining performance |
Liu et al. (2022) [95] | SiCp/Al | Drilling | Input: Fz and spindle speed Output: Tool wear mechanisms and the tool’s geometrical structure | Tool wear models | Tool wear modeling in the drilling of SiCp/Al should consider the effect of the tool wear mechanisms |
Babu et al. (2022) [96] | Al7075/SiC/WC | Drilling | Input: Point angle, feed, and speed Output: Thrust force, Ra, and roundness error | RSM, MLR, ANN, and DFA | Fz and point angle are found to have a significant influence during the drilling process |
Nagarajan and Kamalakannan (2022) [97] | AA7075/SiC | Turning | Input: Vc, feed, and Dc Output: Tool tip temperature, Ra, and tool wear | RSM technique | Vc plays the most imperative role affecting Ra |
Behera et al. (2022) [98] | Al/Si/Mg/Cu/SiC | Turning | Input: Dc, feed rate, and Vc Output: Ra | Taguchi, ANOVA, and RSM | Feed and Vc are important controllable and dominant factors |
Kim et al. (2022) [99] | 217 XG, 225XE aluminum/SiC | Turning and UAT | Input: Vc, feed, Dc, and tool radius Output: Fc and Ra | FE and comparison work | Ra was improved in ultrasonically-assisted turning (UAT) |
Laghari et al. (2023) [100,101] | SiCp/Al | Milling | Input: Vc, feed, and axial and radial Dc Output: Tool wear and Ra | EDS | At an Fz of 0.06 mm/rev, 160 m/min, and MQL, there is an Ra improvement |
Priyadarshi and Sharma (2016) [102,103] | Al-6061-SiC-Gr | Turning | Input: Nanoparticle type, quantity %, and feed Output: Tool wear and Ra | ANOVA and RSM | An increase in the weight percent also significantly affected the magnitude of Fc |
Shihab et al. (2021) [85] | Al7075/SiC/ Gr | Milling | Input: Spindle speed, Fz, Dc, and the weight percentage of the reinforced materials Output: MRR, Ra, and micro hardness | ANOVA and RSM | Spindle speed, Fz, and the weight percentage of reinforced materials significantly affect the surface integrity |
Kannan and Kannan (2018) [104] | Al-Si10Mg | Turning | Input: Vc and Dc Output: Fc and Ra | RSM and DFA | An increase in force is obtained for all samples at a higher speed and cutting depth |
Guolong et al. (2023) [105] | Si/Al | Milling | Input: Vc, radial Dc, axial Dc, feed Output: Cutting-edge radius on the Fc | Damage formation mechanism | Cracks and scratches are the most common damage of the machined surface, and the cutting-edge radius has a great influence on machining damage |
Şap (2023) [106] | Al–12Si based reinforced (TiB2–Al2O3) | Milling | Input: MMC type, cooling conditions, Vc, and Fz Output: Ra, tool wear, cutting temperature, and energy consumption | Taguchi method and ANOVA | The most effective parameters on the Ra, flank wear, cutting temperature, and energy consumption were determined as cooling/lubrication (54.41%) |
Al-Kandary et al. (2019) [107] | Al-Si/MWCNT | Turning | Input: Vc, Fz, and the rake angle of the cutting tool Output: MRR, Ra, and roundness error | Taguchi method and ANOVA | Vc has the most significant effect on the roundness error and MRR of the nanocomposites |
Raj et al. (2023) [108] | Al/Si3N4/graphene | Turning | Input: Feed, machining speed, depth, and nose radius Output: Tool wear, Ra, and Fc | LSOA, MOORA, and TLBO | The resultant Fc rises with a higher nose radius due to the increase in flow stress, as a higher radius at the nose produces more wear |
Puttaswamy and Venkatagiriyappa (2021) [109] | Al 6065-Si-MWCT | Turning | Input: Cutting velocity, feed, and Dc Output: MRR and Ra | DOE, ANOVA, and RSM | Ra was mainly affected by the feed and Vc |
Kannan et al. (2019) [110] | Al2219/SiN/MoS2 | Turning | Input: Vc, feed, and Dc Output: Fc and Ra | CCD and DFA | Ra and Fc are found to better for HMMC than in the other two reinforced base metals |
Siddeshkumar et al. (2022) [111] | Aluminum/nano (n-B4C)/Nano HMMC (n-B4C/MoS2) | Turning | Input: Vc and feed Output: Fc and Ra | CCD, ANOVA, and RSM | Fz is the major influencing factor on the Vc. The addition of (n-B4C and n-B4C/MoS2) particles increases the Ra and Fc in nanocomposites |
Ghalme and Karolczak (2023) [112] | EN AC-43330 (AlSi9Mg) | Drilling | Input: Drill speed and feed Output: Ra and roundness error | EWTOPSIS | Drill speed has a significant effect on Ra and roundness error |
Wiciak-Pikuła et al. (2021) [113] | Duralcan (Al/SiC/10p) | Milling | Input: Vc, spindle speed, feed, and axial and radial depth Output: Ra | CART and ANN | The prediction of Ra based on Fc is conceivable |
Author | Conventional Machining Process | Particulate Reinforced Metal Matrices | Input/Output Parameters | Optimization Method | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hiremath et al. (2022) [117] | Turning | Al6061/B4C | Input: Feed and Dc Output: Ra, Fc, and microstructural studies | Electron microscopy | The quality of the machined surface is significantly impacted by the weight percentage of reinforced boron carbide particles |
Sekhar et al. (2022) [118] | Turning | AA6063-Mg/B4C/MWCNT | Input: Vc, feed, and Dc Output: Ra | Machine learning | The minimum settling times of the controller responses for consistent surface quality and machining productivity were determined |
Sathish et al. (2022) [119] | Turning | AA8050/B4C/TiB2 | Input: % nanoparticle reinforcement, spindle speed, machining speed, and Dc Output: MRR and Ra | Taguchi design | A moderate level of spindle speed results in a higher MRR The minimum Dc results in a low Ra |
Pul and Yağmur (2022) [120] | Turning | Aluminum 6061/B4C/GNP/ | Input: Vc and Fz Output: Fc, Ra, and tool wear | SEM | The Fc increased with the increase in the Fz The highest tool wear was observed in tools where 10% B4C reinforced composites without GNP reinforcement were machined |
Ekici et al. (2017) [121] | Drilling | Al/B4C/Graphite | Input: Vc and three different Fz values Output: Fc, Ra, thrust force, dimensional accuracy, and burr height | ANOVA | With an increase in Vc, thrust forces decreased. In the drilling of the Al/B4C/Gr hybrid composite, Gr reinforcement was observed |
Author | Conventional Machining Process | Particulate Reinforced Metal Matrices | Input/Output Parameters | Optimization Method | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pugazhenthi et al. (2018) [122] | Turning | AA7075/TiB2 | Input: Fz, Vc, and Dc Output: Fc and Ra | FESEM | The increase in Vc enhanced Ra due to a reduction in transferred material |
Yu et al. (2021) [123] | Milling | Al 2024, Al 7075, Al 2024/TiB2, Al 7075/TiB2 | Input: Spindle speed, Fz, and width of cut Output: Fc and Ra | Frequency spectrum | Cutting parameters at a lower cutting specific energy can be selected to obtain a good surface quality in the milling of TiB2/Al composites |
Chen et al. (2021) [124] | Milling | TiB2/Al7075 | Input: Cutting fluid—pressure Output: Tool life | CMQL | Through a combination of excellent cooling and lubrication performance, the tool life was extended by 198.08% compared with dry conditions |
Parasuraman et al. (2021) [125] | Drilling | AA7075/TiB2 | Input: Vc, Fz, and weight percentage Output: Fc and Ra | FESEM, EDAX, and EBSD Statistical regression | Fc was observed to be reduced as Vc increased |
Kishore et al. (2014) [126] Kishore et al. (2014) [127] | Turning | Al6061/TiC | Input: Vc, Fz, and Dc Output: Fc and Ra [135], surface integrity, and flank wear [136] | EDX, SEM, and Taguchi | Fc was decreased with the increase in Vc. Ra was decreasing by the increase in Vc |
Thangavel et al. (2019) [129] | Milling | Al/n-TiC/MoS2 sintered nanocomposite | Input: Spindle speed, Fz, and weight percentage Output: Fc and Ra | FESEM, CCD, RSM, and GA | The relationship between the machining parameters and responses shows a quadratic and linear relationship |
Sozhamannan et al. (2018) [130] | Turning | Al/TiCp/Gr hybrid composite | Input: Dc and Fz Output: Flank tool wear and Ra | SCM | A sudden increase in flank wear was observed during the increase in Fz and Ra |
Maganti and Potturi (2023) [132] | Turning | Al 6061/graphite/TiO2 | Input: Vc, Dc, and Fz Output: Hardness, tension test, and Fc | EDAX | Using Al 6061 in the machining of 3% Gr and 5% TiO2, an increase in Fc of about 50% was observed |
Aluminum Reinforced with Zirconium (Al–Zr) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Author | Conventional Machining Process | Particulate Reinforced Metal Matrices | Input/Output Parameters | Optimization Method | Result |
Ruban et al. (2020) [134], Ruban et al. (2023) [135] | Turning | AA6061/ZrB2-ZrC | Input: Vc, Dc, and Fz Output: Microstructural analysis | Taguchi, ANOVA [143] XRD, and FESEM analysis [144] | Ra and Fc had a major impact on Vc |
Yerigeri and Biradar (2022) [136] | Turning | Al/ZrB2 | Input: Vc, Dc, and Fz Output: Tool wear | Comparison | The wear rate of an uncoated tool significantly impacted the tool wear |
Mahesha et al. (2023) [137] | Turning | ZrB2/AA7475 | Input: Vc, Dc, and Fz Output: Ra | Box–Behnken design and ANOVA | Ra decreased as Vc was increased |
Aluminum reinforced with boron nidride (Al7075/BN) | |||||
Raja (2020) [139] | Drilling | AA7075/BN | Input: % of reinforcement, spindle speed, feed, and point of angle Output: Thrust force and Ra | RSM and ANOVA | Hardness was increased with the increase in the wt% of the reinforcement materials |
Aluminum reinforced with chromium (Al/Cr) | |||||
Kumar et al. (2021) [91] | Turning | Al/SiC/Cr | Input: Vc, feed, Dc, coating thickness, and chromium Output: Ra, tool wear rate, and MRR | Taguchi, ANOVA, and GRA | The results reveal that the optimal value obtained for the material removal rate is 15,674.32 mm3/min, having Ra and tool wear rate values of 0.39 μm and 0.917 mg/min |
Aluminum reinforced with copper (Al/Cu) | |||||
Arulkirubakaran et al. (2019) [140] | Turning | Al/Cu/TiB2 | Input: Vc and feed Output: Fc, tool wear rate, Ra, and chip morphology | OM and SEM | The specific cutting energy was reduced by an amount of 25% in dry and 30% in lubricating conditions during machining of an Al-Cu/TiB2composite |
Aluminum reinforced with magnesium (Al/Mg) | |||||
Prasad et al. (2022) [142] | Milling | Al 8081-Mg/Zr/nano TiO2 | Input: Vc and feed Output: surface morphology and tool failure | SEM | The evolution of displacement in the PCBN tool was 24.7 μm, which is better compared to 34.3 μm in the PCD tool at 3000 r/min |
Jaswanth and Anbuchezhiyan (2022) [143] | Drilling | Al-Mg-Cr alloys | Input: Tool diameter, spindle speed, and load capacity Output: Ra | Statistical analysis using SPSS | WC-reinforced Al-Mg-Cr composites had a higher Ra than Al-Mg-Cr alloys |
Pul (2018) [145] | Turning | Al-MgO | Input: Fz, Vc, and Dc Output: Ra | SEM | Ra values were reduced with the increased Vc |
Aluminum reinforced with graphene | |||||
Joel and Anthony Xavior (2017) [145,146] | Turning | Al 2024, 6061, 7075/reinforced with graphene | Input: Vc, Dc, and Fz Output: Ra | HRSEM, XRD, Taguchi, and ANOVA | The detachment of reinforcement materials from the composite and their impact on surface quality were examined |
Aluminum reinforced with graphite | |||||
Lagisetti and Sukjamsri (2022) [147] | Turning | AA6061/SiC/graphite | Input: Vc, Dc, and Fz Output: Fc and Ra | ANOVA | High Vc values accompanied by low feed and Dc resulted in a reduced Fc and better surface finish |
Author | Conventional Machining Process | Particulate Reinforced Metal Matrices | Input/Output Parameters | Optimization Method | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sathish et al. (2021) [148] | Turning | Si3N4-reinforced copper alloy composite | Input: Vc, Dc, Fz, and wt. % of Si3N4 reinforcement Output: Fc, tool wear, and Ra | P/M route | The Vc and wt. % of reinforcement were directly influenced to maximize the Ra value from the analysis |
Usca et al. (2021) [149] | Turning | Cu-B-CrC composites | Input: Reinforcement ratio, Vc, Fz, and Dc Output: Tool wear, Ra, cutting temperature, and chip formation | Taguchi method | Vc and Fz have a contributing impact on cutting temperatures and Ra |
Usca et al. (2022) [150] | Milling | Cu-B-CrC composites | Input: Reinforcement ratio, Vc, and Fz Output: Ra, tool wear, chip morphology, and cutting temperatures | Full factorial design | Vc alterations play an important role in the machinability characteristics |
Usca et al. (2022) [151] | Milling | Cu-B-CrC composites | Input: Reinforcement ratio, Vc, and Fz Output: Minimum energy consumption | Fuzzy inference system | An increasing reinforcement ratio, Fz, and Vc increases the energy consumption |
Şap et al. (2021) [152] | Turning | Cu/Mo-SiCp hybrid composites | Input: Reinforcement ratio, Vc, Fz, and Dc Output: Ra, tool wear, and cutting temperature | Taguchi, ANOVA, SEM, and EDX | Reinforcement ratio is the dominant factor on all response parameters |
Şap et al. (2021) [153] | Turning | Cu-based, B-Ti-SiCP hybrid composite | Input: Vc and Fz Output: Tool wear, temperature, energy, Ra, surface texture, and chip morphology | MQL-assisted and cryogenic LN2-assisted machining | Cryogenic cooling was found to be the most efficient method |
Şap et al. (2021) [152,153,154] | Turning | Cu reinforced with Ti-B-SiC powder particles | Input: Reinforcement ratio, Vc, Fz, and Dc Output: Ra, flank wear, and cutting temperature | Full factorial design, SEM, and EDS | Through Fz and Vc, it was determined that the Ra values decreased with the increase in the reinforcement rate |
Author | Conventional Machining Process | Particulate Reinforced Metal Matrices | Input/Output Parameters | Optimization Method | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Teng et al. (2015) [158], Teng et al. (2016) [159] | Milling | Mg/TiB2 and Mg/Ti MMC | Input: Spindle speed, Fz, Dc, and feed per tooth Output: Fc and surface morphology | FFD, SEM [160], and ANOVA [161] | Dc and spindle speed have a significant effect on Ra |
Teng et al. (2017) [160] | Milling | Mg/BN and Mg/ZnO | Input: Spindle speed, Fz, and Dc Output: Fc, Ra, and chip morphology | SEM | Fc increased with the Dc and feed per tooth in all specimens |
Teng (2018) [161] | Milling | Magnesium-based Ti, TiB2, BN, ZnO | Input: Spindle speed, Fz, and Dc Output: Fc, Ra, and chip morphology | FE model and ANOVA | Smaller tool wear and the highest Ra were observed at a medium Vc |
Teng et al. (2018) [162]. | Milling | Mg/Ti MMC | Input: Vc and Fz Output: Fc and Ra | FE model and SEM | The largest tool wear was generated at the lowest feed per tooth |
Gao and Jia (2017) [163] | Milling | Mg/GR MMC | Input: Size of GNPs, weight fraction of GNPs, Vc, Dc, rake angle of tool, and edge radius Output: Fc and chip morphology | FE model and factor analysis | The severe fluctuation of Fc in each case was revealed with relation to the serrated or even fragmentized chip formation |
Sun et al. (2020) [164] | Drilling | Mg/SiO2 | Input: Rotation speed and Fz Output: Chip formation, surface morphology, and Fc | FFD and SEM | The increase in the rotation speed causes an increase in the fluidity of the material, which in turn causes a decrease in Ra |
Babu et al. (2020) [165] | Drilling | Mg/SiC/CNTs, | Input: Spindle speed, Fz, drill diameter, and point angle Output: Burr formation and Ra | Taguchi and ANOVA | Spindle speed and Fz were the influencing factors for Ra |
Asgari and Sedighi (2023) [166] | Turning | AZ91/SiC | Input: Vc, Fz, and Dc Output: Ra, tool life, and Fc | DOE and RSM | Increasing the Fz leads to tool life reduction |
Gobivel and Vijay Sekar (2022) [167] | Turning | Mg/SiCp | Input: Spindle speed, Vc, Fz, and Dc Output: Machining forces, machined surface quality, chip microstructure, and tool morphology | SEM analysis | Vc had a significant influence on all Fc |
Meher et al. (2022) [168] | Turning | RZ5/TiB2 MMC | Input: Vc, Fz, and Dc Output: Fc and surface quality | Taguchi and ANOVA | Ra also increased with an increase in Fz and Dc, whereas it decreased with an increase in Vc |
Meher and Mahapatra (2023) [169] | Turning | RZ5/TiB2 in situ magnesium | Input: Vc, Fz, and Dc Output: Fc, Ra, chip morphology, and tool wear | FESEM | Fc increased with increases in Vc, Fz, and Dc |
Radhakrishnan (2023) [170], Radhakrishnan et al. (2023) [171] | Milling | Mg/TiO2 nanocomposite | Input: Vc, Fz, and Dc Output: Fc, Ra, chip morphology, and tool wear | ANOVA and regression equation | Dc directly influenced the performance of the machinability of the composite |
Author | Conventional Machining Process | Particulate Reinforced Metal Matrices | Input/Output Parameters | Optimization Method | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kishore et al. (2015) [175] | Turning | Al6061-TiC in situ MMC | Input: Vc, Fz, and Dc Output: Fc and Ra | Taguchi, ANOVA, EDX, and SEM | Fc and Ra are low at higher Vc values and lower feed and lower Dc values. |
Duong et al. (2016) [176] | Turning | Ti-6Al-4V/TiC | Input: Vc, Fz, and Dc Output: Tool wear | SEM and EDX | TiC reinforcement in the workpiece material is still found in the form, but these particles were not affected strongly |
Niknam et al. (2018) [177] | Turning | Ti-6Al-4V/TiC | Input: Vc, Fz, and Dc Output: Ra, flank wear, Fc, feed force, and thrust force | DOE and orthogonal array L9 | Fz and Vc are considered as the major machining factors affecting flank wear and Ra |
Ramkumar et al. (2019) [179] | Drilling | Ti/TiB | Input: Spindle speed, Fz, and processing technique Output: Trust force and Ra | Taguchi and ANOVA | The influencing parameter on thrust force and Ra is Fz |
Kamalizadeh et al. (2019) [180] | Milling | Ti-6Al-4V/TiC MMC | Input: Spindle speed, Fz, and processing technique Output: Tool wear and Ra | Orthogonal array L9 DOE and ANOVA | Vc and Dc are the main cutting parameters affecting tool wear and Ra |
Li et al. (2020) [181] | Milling | Ti/MWCNTs | Input: Spindle speed, Fz, and processing technique Output: Fc, tool wear, and facial morphology (Ra, hardness, flaws, and element distribution) | FFT analysis | Hard TiC particles were blown away by the explosion force |
Nasr et al. (2020) [182] | Milling | Graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs)-reinforced Ti6Al4V | Input: GNP percentage, Fz, and Vc Output: Fc components, Ra, surface morphology, micro hardness, and chip morphology | SEM | Ra and Fc are considerably affected by the GNPs content |
Das et al. (2022) [183] | Milling | Ti6Al4V MMCs | Input: Fz, Vc, and Dc Output: Longitudinal force, radial force, tangential force, Ra, and material removal rate | Taguchi, GRA, and ANOVA | Tool feed has the highest rate contribution |
References
- Chawla, K.K.; Chawla, K.K. Ceramic matrix composites. In Composite Materials: Science and Engineering; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 251–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saravanan, C.; Subramanian, K.; Krishnan, V.A.; Narayanan, R.S. Effect of particulate reinforced aluminium metal matrix composite—A review. Mech. Mech. Eng. 2015, 19, 23–30. [Google Scholar]
- Ashebir, D.A.; Mengesha, G.A.; Sinha, D.K. An insight into mechanical and metallurgical behavior of hybrid reinforced aluminum metal matrix composite. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 2022, 7843981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashem, E.G. Study of the mechanical properties of the metal matrix composites developed with alumina particles. In Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luna Ramírez, A.; Porcayo-Calderon, J.; Mazur, Z.; Salinas-Bravo, V.M.; Martinez-Gomez, L. Microstructural changes during high temperature service of a cobalt-based superalloy first stage nozzle. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 2016, 745839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dandekar, C.R.; Shin, Y.C. Modeling of machining of composite materials: A review. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2012, 57, 102–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beaumont, P.W.; Zweben, C.H.; Gdutos, E.; Talreja, R.; Poursartip, A.; Clyne, T.W.; Ruggles-wrenn, M.B.; Peis, T.; Thostenson, E.T.; Crane, R.; et al. (Eds.) Comprehensive Composite Materials II; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; Volume 6. [Google Scholar]
- Shalin, R.E. (Ed.) Polymer Matrix Composites; Springer Science Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 4. [Google Scholar]
- Chawla, K.K.; Chawla, K.K. Ceramic Matrix Composites; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1987; pp. 134–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- An, Q.; Chen, J.; Ming, W.; Chen, M. Machining of SiC ceramic matrix composites: A review. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 2021, 34, 540–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramanathan, A.; Krishnan, P.K.; Muraliraja, R. A review on the production of metal matrix composites through stir casting–Furnace design, properties, challenges, and research opportunities. J. Manuf. Process. 2019, 42, 213–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Menezes, E.A.; Eggers, F.; Marczak, R.J.; Iturrioz, I.; Amico, S.C. Hybrid composites: Experimental, numerical and analytical assessment aided by online software. Mech. Mater. 2020, 148, 103533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhoi, N.K.; Singh, H.; Pratap, S. Developments in the aluminum metal matrix composites reinforced by micro/nano particles—A review. J. Compos. Mater. 2020, 54, 813–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadeghi, B.; Cavaliere, P.; Perrone, A. Effect of Al2O3, SiO2 and carbon nanotubes on the microstructural and mechanical behavior of spark plasma sintered aluminum based nanocomposites. Part. Sci. Technol. 2018, 38, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karabulut, Ş. Optimization of Ra and Fc during AA7039/Al2O3 metal matrix composites milling using neural networks and Taguchi method. Measurement 2015, 66, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kannan, R.; Narayanaperumal, A.; Rao, M.S.R. Nanocrystalline Diamond Coated Tool Performance in Machining of LM6 Aluminium Alloy/Alumina MMC. In Proceedings of the International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, Guangzhou, China, 28–29 November 2015; Volume 56833, p. V002T01A008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghandehariun, A.; Kishawy, H.A.; Umer, U.; Hussein, H.M. Analysis of tool-particle interactions during cutting process of metal matrix composites. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2016, 82, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kannan, C.; Ramanujam, R.; Balan, A.S.S. Machinability studies on Al 7075/BN/Al2O3 squeeze cast hybrid nanocomposite under different machining environments. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2018, 33, 587–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prakash, M.; Iqbal, U.M. Parametric optimization in turning of AA2014/Al2O3 nano composite for machinability assessment using sensors. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 402, 012013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thankachan, T.P. Production and Machining Performance Study of Nano Al2O3 Particle Reinforced LM25 Aluminum Alloy Composites. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 2019, 60, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srivastava, A.K.; Maurya, M.; Saxena, A.; Kumar, N.; Dwivedi, S.P. Statistical Optimization by Response Surface Methodology of Process Parameters during the CNC Turning Operation of Hybrid Metal Matrix Composite. Master’s Thesis, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szymański, M.; Przestacki, D.; Szymański, P. Tool Wear and Ra in Turning of Metal Matrix Composite Built of Al2O3 Sinter Saturated by Aluminum Alloy in Vacuum Condition. Materials 2022, 15, 8375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ravikumar, M.; Suresh, R. Study on mechanical and machinability characteristics of n-Al2O3/SiC-reinforced Al7075 composite by design of experiment technique. Multiscale Multidiscip. Model. Exp. Des. 2023, 6, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sunar, T.; Parenti, P.; Tunçay, T.; Özyürek, D.; Annoni, M. The Effects of Nanoparticle Reinforcement on the Micromilling Process of A356/Al2O3 Nanocomposites. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2023, 7, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arun Premnath, A.; Suryatheja, P.; Srinath, A.; Karthikeyan, S. Analyses of tool wear while milling hybrid metal matrix composites. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2015, 813, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alam, M.A.; Ya, H.B.; Azeem, M.; Mustapha, M.; Yusuf, M.; Masood, F.; Marode, R.V.; Sapuan, S.M.; Ansari, A.H. Advancements in aluminum matrix composites reinforced with carbides and graphene: A comprehensive review. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2023, 12, 20230111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kremer, A.; Devillez, A.; Dominiak, S.; Dudzinski, D.; El Mansori, M. Machinability of AI/SiC particulate metal-matrix composites under dry conditions with CVD diamond-coated carbide tools. Mach. Sci. Technol. 2008, 12, 214–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, Y.F.; Xu, J.H.; Yang, H.; Luo, S.B.; Fu, Y.C. Machining induced defects and the influence factors when diamond turning of SiCp/Al composites. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2008, 10, 626–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, Y.F.; Xu, J.H.; Yang, H.; Luo, S.B.; Fu, Y.C. Workpiece surface quality when ultra-precision turning of SiCp/Al composites. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2008, 203, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishnaraj, V.; Raghavendran, N.; Sudhan, R.; Vignesh, R. An investigation on end milling of aluminium based metal matrix composites for optimising machining parameters. J. Mach. Form. Technol. 2012, 4, 265. [Google Scholar]
- Krishnaraj, V. Optimisation of End Milling Parameters on Aluminium/SiC Composites Using Response Surface and Artificial Neural Network Methodologies. Mater. Sci. Forum 2013, 766, 59–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Álvarez-Alcón, M.; López de Lacalle, L.N.; Fernández-Zacarías, F. Multiple Sensor Monitoring of CFRP Drilling to Define Cutting Parameters Sensitivity on Surface Roughness, Cylindricity and Diameter. Materials 2020, 13, 2796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajmohan, T.; Palanikumar, K. Optimization of machining parameters for multi-performance characteristics in drilling hybrid metal matrix composites. J. Compos. Mater. 2012, 46, 869–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajmohan, T.; Palanikumar, K. Application of the central composite design in optimization of machining parameters in drilling hybrid metal matrix composites. Measurement 2013, 46, 1470–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jayakumar, K.; Mathew, J.; Joseph, M.A.; Kumar, R.S.; Chakravarthy, P. Processing and end milling behavioural study of A356-SiCp Composite. Mater. Sci. Forum 2012, 710, 338–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeyakumar, S.; Marimuthu, K.; Ramachandran, T. Prediction of Fc, tool wear and Ra of Al6061/SiC composite for end milling operations using RSM. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2013, 27, 2813–2822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muthukrishnan, N.; Babu, T.M.; Ramanujam, R. Fabrication and turning of Al/SiC/B4C hybrid metal matrix composites optimization using desirability analysis. J. Chin. Inst. Ind. Eng. 2012, 29, 515–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, S.; Xie, L.J.; Wang, X.B.; Fu, N.X.; Shi, X.K. Investigation on the Fc of high-speed milling of high volume fraction of SiCp/Al composites with PCD tools. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 873, 350–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palanikumar, K.; Muthukrishnan, N.; Hariprasad, K.S. Ra parameters optimization in machining A356/SiC/20p metal matrix composites by PCD tool using response surface methodology and desirability function. Mach. Sci. Technol. 2014, 12, 529–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesan, K.; Ramanujam, R.; Joel, J.; Jeyapandiarajan, P.; Vignesh, M.; Tolia, D.J.; Krishna, R.V. Study of Fc and Ra in machining of Al alloy hybrid composite and optimized using response surface methodology. Procedia Eng. 2014, 97, 677–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dabade, U.A.; Sonawane, H.A.; Joshi, S.S. Fcs and Ra in machining Al/SiCp composites of varying composition. Mach. Sci. Technol. 2014, 14, 258–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vivek, S.; Vijayraj, S.; Prabhu, G.; Singh, J.V.M. Experimental Investigation for the Machining of Al-Sic Nano Composites using Response Surface Method. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 2015, 10, 13738–13746. [Google Scholar]
- Vijayraj, S.; Arivazhagan, A.; Prakash, G.; Prabhu, G. Optimization of machining parameters of Al-SiC nano composites using DOE. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res 2015, 10, 5863–5869. [Google Scholar]
- El-Kady, E.Y.; Gaafer, A.M.; Ghaith, M.H.G.; Khalil, T.; Mostafa, A.A. The effect of machining parameters on the Fcs, tool wear, and machined Ra of metal matrix nano composite material. Adv. Mater. 2015, 4, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karabulut, Ş.; Çinici, H.; Karakoç, H. Experimental investigation and optimization of Fc and tool wear in milling Al7075 and open-cell SiC foam composite. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2016, 41, 1797–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thamizharasan, M.M.; Nithiya Sandhiya, Y.J.; Sekar, K.V.; Bhanu Prasad, V.V. Finite element analysis of the effect of Vc on the orthogonal turning of A359/SiCp MMC. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2016, 852, 304–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jadhav, M.R.; Dabade, U.A. Modelling and simulation of Al/SiCp MMCs during hot machining. In Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 11–17 November 2016; Volume 50527, p. V002T02A023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Q.; Xu, W.; Zhang, L. A micromechanics analysis of the material removal mechanisms in the cutting of ceramic particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Mach. Sci. Technol. 2018, 22, 638–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bushlya, V.; Lenrick, F.; Gutnichenko, O.; Petrusha, I.; Osipov, O.; Kristiansson, S.; Stahl, J.E. Performance and wear mechanisms of novel superhard diamond and boron nitride based tools in machining Al-SiCp metal matrix composite. Wear 2017, 376, 152–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elsadek, A.A.; Gaafer, A.; Lashin, A.M.A. Prediction of Roughness and Tool Wear in Turning of Metal Matrix Nanocomposites. J. Eng. App. Sci 2017, 64, 387–408. [Google Scholar]
- Ghoreishi, R.; Roohi, A.H.; Ghadikolaei, A.D. Analysis of the influence of cutting parameters on Ra and Fcs in high speed face milling of Al/SiC MMC. Mater. Res. Express 2018, 5, 086521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghoreishi, R.; Roohi, A.H.; Ghadikolaei, A.D. Evaluation of tool wear in high-speed face milling of Al/SiC metal matrix composites. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2019, 41, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, B.; Wang, H.; Peng, F.; Yan, R.; Zhou, L. Experimental and theoretical investigations on tool wear and surface quality in micro milling of SiCp/Al composites under dry and MQL conditions. In Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 9–15 November 2018; Volume 52019, p. V002T02A001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, J.; Pang, S.; Xie, L.; Hu, X.; Peng, S.; Wang, T. Investigation of Fcs, surface integrity, and tool wear when high-speed milling of high-volume fraction SiC p/Al6063 composites in PCD tooling. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 98, 1237–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pramanik, A.; Basak, A.K.; Dong, Y.; Shankar, S.; Littlefair, G. Milling of nanoparticles reinforced Al-based metal matrix composites. J. Compos. Sci. 2018, 2, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Xu, J.; Yu, H.; Yu, Z.; Li, Y.; Du, Q. Process characteristics of laser-assisted micro machining of SiC p/2024Al composites. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 94, 3679–3690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teng, X.; Chen, W.; Huo, D.; Shyha, I.; Lin, C. Comparison of cutting mechanism when machining micro and nano-particles reinforced SiC/Al metal matrix composites. Compos. Struct. 2018, 203, 636–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Sood, P.K. Leverage of machining parameters and non-oxide nano ceramic fillers loading on machinability of aluminium matrix based nano-composites. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 056516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niu, Z. Investigation on the Multiscale Multiphysics Based Approach to Modelling and Analysis of Precision Machining of Metal Matrix Composites (MMCs) and Its Application Perspectives. Doctoral Dissertation, Brunel University, London, UK, 2018. Available online: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/17549 (accessed on 30 June 2024).
- Ramesh Kumar, C.; JaiGanesh, V.; Malarvannan, R.R.R. Optimization of drilling parameters in hybrid (Al6061/SiC/B 4 C/talc) composites by grey relational analysis. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2019, 41, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nandakumar, A.; Rajmohan, T.; Vijayabhaskar, S. Experimental evaluation of the lubrication performance in MQL grinding of nano SiC reinforced Al matrix composites. Silicon 2019, 11, 2987–2999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mirshamsi, S.M.A.; Movahhedy, M.R.; Khodaygan, S. Experimental modeling and optimizing process parameters in the laser assisted machining of silicon carbide particle-reinforced aluminum matrix composites. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 086591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tripathy, P.; Maity, K.P. Experimental Investigation during Micro-Milling of Hybrid Al6063 MMC Reinforced with SiC and ZrO2. Adv. Eng. Forum 2019, 33, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajithkumar, J.P.; Xavior, M.A. Fc and Ra analysis during turning of Al 7075 based hybrid composites. Procedia Manuf. 2019, 30, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajithkumar, J.P.; Xavior, M.A. Flank and crater wear analysis during turning of Al 7075 based hybrid composites. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 086560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arulraj, M.; Palani, P.K.; Venkatesh, L. Optimization of Machining Parameters In Turning of Hybrid Aluminium-Matrix (LM24–SiCp–Coconut Shell Ash) Composite. Mater. Tehnol. Mater. Technol. 2019, 53, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Xu, J.; Yu, Z.; Liu, Q.; Pei, Q.; Zhai, C. Study on Laser-assisted Machining of Aluminum-based Silicon Carbide. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Manipulation, Manufacturing and Measurement on the Nanoscale (3M-NANO), Zhenjiang, China, 4–8 August 2019; pp. 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramasubramanian, K.; Arunachalam, N.; Rao, M.R. Wear performance of nano-engineered boron doped graded layer CVD diamond coated cutting tool for machining of Al-SiC MMC. Wear 2019, 426, 1536–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thirukkumaran, K.; Menaka, M.; Mukhopadhyay, C.K.; Venkatraman, B. A study on temperature rise, tool wear, and Ra during drilling of Al–5% SiC composite. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2020, 45, 5407–5419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbas, C.A.; Huang, C.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Liu, H.; Zhu, H. Machinability investigations on high-speed drilling of aluminum reinforced with silicon carbide metal matrix composites. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 108, 1601–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiciak-Pikula, M.; Felusiak, A.; Twardowski, P. Artificial Neural Network models for tool wear prediction during Aluminium Matrix Composite milling. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace (MetroAeroSpace), Pisa, Italy, 22–24 June 2020; pp. 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiciak-Pikuła, M.; Felusiak-Czyryca, A.; Twardowski, P. Tool wear prediction based on artificial neural network during aluminum matrix composite milling. Sensors 2020, 20, 5798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, G.; Mao, P.; Li, L.; Iqbal, A.; He, N. Micro-milling of 65 vol% SiCp/Al composites with a novel laser-assisted hybrid process. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 26121–26128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, G.; Hu, M.; Li, L.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X. Enhanced machinability of SiCp/Al composites with laser-induced oxidation assisted milling. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 18592–18600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, G.; Xu, C.; Ma, Y.; Wang, X.H.; Feng, P.F.; Zhang, M. Prediction and control of Ra for the milling of Al/SiC metal matrix composites based on neural networks. Adv. Manuf. 2020, 8, 486–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Gao, L.; Jiang, X.; Xu, W.; Liu, S.; Yang, T. Analytical modeling of subsurface damage depth in machining of SiCp/Al composites. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2020, 185, 105874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Repeto, D.; Fernández-Vidal, S.R.; Mayuet, P.F.; Salguero, J.; Batista, M. On the machinability of an Al-63% SiC metal matrix composite. Materials 2020, 13, 1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swain, P.K.; Mohapatra, K.D.; Das, R.; Sahoo, A.K.; Panda, A. Experimental investigation into characterization and machining of Al+ SiCp nano-composites using coated carbide tool. Mech. Ind. 2020, 21, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swain, P.K.; Mohapatra, K.D.; Swain, P.K. Optimization, error analysis and mathematical modelling of Al-SiCp metal matrix nano composites using coated carbide insert. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 26, 620–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, D.; Chakraborty, V.; Nayak, B.B.; Satpathy, M.P.; Samal, C. Machining of aluminium-based metal matrix composite-a particle swarm optimisation approach. Int. J. Mach. Mach. Mater. 2020, 22, 79–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhushan, R.K. Optimization of machining parameters for minimizing Fcs during machining of Al alloy SiC particle composites. Aust. J. Mech. Eng. 2022, 20, 372–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhushan, R.K. Minimizing tool wear by optimization (ANOVA) of cutting parameters in machining of 7075Al Alloy SiC particle composite. Aust. J. Mech. Eng. 2021, 21, 499–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakravarthy, V.K.; Rajmohan, T.; Vijayan, D.; Palanikumar, K. Sustainable drilling of nano SiC reinforced Al matrix composites using MQL and cryogenic cooling for achieving the better surface integrity. Silicon 2022, 14, 1787–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Çevik, Z.A.; Karabacak, A.H.; Kök, M.; Canakçı, A.; Kumar, S.S.; Varol, T. The effect of machining processes on the physical and surface characteristics of AA2024-B4C-SiC hybrid nanocomposites fabricated by hot pressing method. J. Compos. Mater. 2021, 55, 2657–2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shihab, S.K.; Gattmah, J.; Kadhim, H.M. Experimental investigation of surface integrity and multi-objective optimization of end milling for hybrid Al7075 matrix composites. Silicon 2021, 13, 1403–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saini, P.; Singh, P.K. Optimization of end milling parameters for rough and finish machining of Al-4032/3% SiC metal matrix composite. Eng. Res. Express 2021, 3, 045009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saini, P.; Singh, P.K.; Kumar, D. Effect of machining parameters for surface finish and material removal rate of Al-4032/SiC composite during end milling using TGRA and ANN. J. Adv. Manuf. Syst. 2022, 21, 85–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saini, P.; Singh, P.K. Effect of machining parameters on Ra and energy consumption during end milling of stir cast Al-4032/6% SiC composite. Surf. Topogr. Metrol. Prop. 2022, 10, 035029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patil, P.P.; Lila, M.K. Impact of Machining Variables on Tool wear and Ra of 7071 Al with SiC Hybrid Materials. Webology 2021, 18, 2910–2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, J.; Singh, D.; Kalsi, N.S.; Sharma, S. Influence of Reinforcement Contents and Turning Parameters on the Machining Behaviour of Al/SiC/Cr Hybrid Aluminium Matrix Composites. In Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing of Composites; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 33–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, J.; Singh, D.; Kalsi, N.S.; Sharma, S.; Mia, M.; Singh, J.; Rahman, M.A.; Khan, A.M.; Rao, K.V. Investigation on the mechanical, tribological, morphological and machinability behavior of stir-casted Al/SiC/Mo reinforced MMCs. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 12, 930–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abedinzadeh, R.; Norouzi, E.; Toghraie, D. Experimental investigation of machinability in laser-assisted machining of aluminum-based nanocomposites. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 15, 3481–3491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, J.; Lu, M.; Lin, J.; Du, Y. Elliptic vibration assisted cutting of metal matrix composite reinforced by silicon carbide: An investigation of machining mechanisms and surface integrity. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 15, 1115–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devaraj, S.; Malkapuram, R.; Singaravel, B. Performance analysis of micro textured cutting insert design parameters on machining of Al-MMC in turning process. Int. J. Lightweight Mater. Manuf. 2021, 4, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Wang, Z.; Gao, L.; Zhang, X.; Wang, G.; Yang, T.; Du, Y. A novel tool wear modeling method in drilling of particle reinforced metal matrix composite. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2022, 119, 7089–7107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babu, S.S.; Dhanasekaran, C.; Anbuchezhiyan, G.; Palani, K. Parametric analysis on drilling of aluminium alloy hybrid composites reinforced with SIC/WC. Eng. Res. Express 2022, 4, 025036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagarajan, N.; Kamalakannan, R. Analyze the effect of crater cutting tool wear modeling in the machining of aluminium composite. Mater. Res. 2022, 25, e220239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Behera, R.K.; Samal, B.P.; Panigrahi, S.C.; Das, S.R.; Mohamed, A.; Muduli, K.; Samal, A.; Parida, P.K.; Das, R. Experimental analysis on machinability aspects of sintered aluminium metal matrix (Al+ Si+ Mg+ Cu+ SiC) composite-a novel product produced by powder metallurgy method. Int. J. Mater. Eng. Innov. 2022, 13, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Zani, L.; Abdul-Kadir, A.; Ribeiro, M.L.; Roy, A.; Baxevanakis, K.P.; Jones, L.C.R.; Silberschmidt, V.V. Ultrasonically assisted turning of micro-SiCp/Al 2124 composite. Procedia Struct. Integr. 2022, 37, 282–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laghari, R.A.; He, N.; Jamil, M.; Gupta, M.K. Tribological and machining characteristics of milling SiCp/Al MMC composites under sustainable cooling conditions. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2023, 128, 2613–2630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laghari, R.A.; Mekid, S.; Akhtar, S.S.; Laghari, A.A.; Jamil, M. Investigating the Tribological Aspects of Tool Wear Mechanism and Tool Life in Sustainable Lubri-Cooling Face Milling Process of Particle Reinforced SiCp/Al Metal Matrix Composites. In Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Columbus, OH, USA, 30 October–3 November 2022; Volume 86649, p. V02BT02A062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Priyadarshi, D.; Sharma, R.K. Optimization for turning of Al-6061-SiC-Gr hybrid nanocomposites using response surface methodologies. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2016, 31, 1342–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Priyadarshi, D.; Sharma, R.K. Effect of type and percentage of reinforcement for optimization of the Fc in turning of Aluminium matrix nanocomposites using response surface methodologies. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2016, 30, 1095–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kannan, V.; Kannan, V.V. A Study on the Turning Characteristics and Optimization of MOS 2 p and SiCp-Reinforced Al-Si10Mg Metal Matrix Composites (No. 2018-28-0043). In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Design, Materials, Manufacturing and Surface Engineering for Mobility (ADMMS’18), Chennai, India, 20–21 July 2018; SAE Technical Paper. SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guolong, Z.H.A.O.; Lianjia, X.I.N.; Liang, L.I.; Zhang, Y.; Ning, H.E.; Hansen, H.N. Fc model and damage formation mechanism in milling of 70wt% Si/Al composite. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 2023, 36, 114–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Şap, S. Machining and energy aspect assessment with sustainable cutting fluid strategies of Al–12Si based hybrid composites. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Green Technol. 2023, 11, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Kandary, M.; Habib, S.; EH Mansour, S.; S Mahmoud, T. On The Optimization Of The Machinability Characteristics Of Al-Si/Al2O3 AND Al-Si/MWCNTs Metal Matrix Nanocomposites. Eng. Res. J. Fac. Eng. 2019, 42, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raj, P.; Biju, P.L.; Deepanraj, B.; Senthilkumar, N. Optimizing the machining conditions in turning hybrid aluminium nanocomposites adopting teaching–learning based optimization and MOORA technique. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. IJIDeM 2023, 18, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puttaswamy, S.J.; Venkatagiriyappa, R.B. Effect of Machining Parameters on Ra, Power Consumption, and Material Removal Rate of Aluminium 6065-Si-MWCT Metal Matrix Composite in Turning Operations. IIUM Eng. J. 2021, 22, 283–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kannan, V.V.; Kannan, V.; Sundararajan, D.; Seth, A.; Sood, N.; Babu, A. Fabrication and Machinability Study of Al2219 Metal Matrix Composites Reinforced with SiN/MoS 2 Nanoparticles (No. 2019-28-0170). In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Design, Materials, Manufacturing and Surface Engineering for Mobility, Chennai, India, 19–21 July 2019; SAE Technical Paper. SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siddeshkumar, N.G.; Suresh, R.; Shivaramu, L.; Shankar, G.S. Analysis of Fcs and Ra in Machining Al2219, Unhybrid and Hybrid Metal Matrix Nano Composites using CCD Design of Experiment. Trends Sci. 2022, 19, 4499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghalme, S.G.; Karolczak, P. Optimization of Drilling Parameters for Aluminum Metal Matrix Composite Using Entropy-Weighted TOPSIS under MQL Conditions. Eng. Trans. 2023, 71, 595–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiciak-Pikuła, M.; Twardowski, P.; Bartkowska, A.; Felusiak-Czyryca, A. Experimental investigation of Ra in milling of duralcanTM composite. Materials 2021, 14, 6010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuliiev, R. Mechanical Properties of Boron Carbide (B4C). Master’s Thesis, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA, 2020. Available online: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd2020/81/ (accessed on 30 June 2024).
- Smart, D.R.; Varghese, P.; George, L.J. Experimental investigation of effect of gear milling parameters of Al-B4C composite gears on Ra. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013, 690, 2523–2528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taşkesen, A.; Kütükde, K. Experimental investigation and multi-objective analysis on drilling of boron carbide reinforced metal matrix composites using grey relational analysis. Measurement 2014, 47, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hiremath, V.; Bharath, V.; Auradi, V.; Dundur, S.T.; Nagaral, M. Machining of hard-to-cut materials: Impact of varying weight proportion of boron carbide particle addition on Fc and Ra of Al6061. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2022, 12, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sekhar, R.; Singh, T.P.; Shah, P. Machine learning based predictive modeling and control of Ra generation while machining micro boron carbide and carbon nanotube particle reinforced Al-Mg matrix composites. Part. Sci. Technol. 2022, 40, 355–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sathish, T.; Vinayagam, M.; Raja, T.; Seikh, A.H.; Siddique, M.H.; Subbiah, R.; Hailu, B. Synthesis of AA8050/B4C/TiB2 Hybrid Nanocomposites and Evaluation of Computer-Aided Machining Parameters. J. Nanomater. 2022, 2022, 9745418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pul, M.; Yağmur, S. Examination of the effect of B4C and GNP reinforcements on machinability in the machining of Al 6061 matrix B4C/GNP reinforced hybrid composites. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2022, 44, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ekici, E.; Motorcu, A.R.; Uzun, G. An investigation of the effects of cutting parameters and graphite reinforcement on quality characteristics during the drilling of Al/10B4C composites. Measurement 2017, 95, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pugazhenthi, A.; Kanagaraj, G.; Dinaharan, I.; Selvam, J.D.R. Turning characteristics of in situ formed TiB2 ceramic particulate reinforced AA7075 aluminum matrix composites using polycrystalline diamond cutting tool. Measurement 2018, 121, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, W.; Chen, J.; Li, Y.; Zuo, Z.; Chen, D.; An, Q.; Chen, M.; Wang, H. Comprehensive study on the cutting specific energy and Ra of milled in situ TiB2/Al composites and Al alloys. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2021, 112, 2717–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodríguez, A.; Calleja, A.; de Lacalle, L.N.L.; Pereira, O.; Rubio-Mateos, A.; Rodríguez, G. Drilling of CFRP-Ti6Al4V stacks using CO2-cryogenic cooling. J. Manuf. Process. 2021, 64, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parasuraman, S.; Elamvazuthi, I.; Kanagaraj, G.; Natarajan, E.; Pugazhenthi, A. Assessments of process parameters on Fc and Ra during drilling of AA7075/TiB2 in situ composite. Materials 2021, 14, 1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kishore, D.S.C.; Rao, K.P.; Mahamani, A. Investigation of Fc, Ra and flank wear in turning of In-situ Al6061-TiC metal matrix composite. Procedia Mater. Sci. 2014, 6, 1040–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kishore, D.S.C.; Rao, K.P.; Mahamani, A. Effects of PCD and uncoated tungsten carbide inserts in turning of in-situ Al6061-TiC metal matrix composite. Procedia Mater. Sci. 2014, 5, 1574–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sujith, S.V.; Mulik, R.S. Surface integrity and flank wear response under pure coconut oil-Al2O3 nano minimum quantity lubrication turning of Al-7079/7 wt%-TiC in situ metal matrix composites. J. Tribol. 2022, 144, 051701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thangavel, S.; Murugan, M.; Zeelanbasha, N. Investigation of Fc in end milling of Al/n-Tic/MoS 2 sintered nano composite. Metalurgija 2019, 58, 251–254. [Google Scholar]
- Sozhamannan, C.G.; Naveenkumar, K.; Mathiarasu, A.; Velmurugan, K.; Venkatachalapathy, V.S.K. Machining characteristics of Al/Ticp/Gr hybrid composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 5940–5946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raveendran, P.; Alagarsamy, S.V.; Ravichandran, M.; Meignanamoorthy, M. Effect of machining parameters on Ra for aluminium matrix composite by using Taguchi method with decision tree algorithm. Surf. Rev. Lett. 2021, 28, 2150021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maganti, N.V.R.; Potturi, R.R. Investigation on Mechanical and Machinability Properties of Aluminium Metal Matrix Composite Reinforced with Titanium Oxide (TiO2) and Graphite (Gr) Particles. Trends Sci. 2023, 20, 5682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sivasankaran, S.; Saminathan, E.; Sidharth, S.; Harisagar, P.T.; Sasikumar, P. Effect of Graphite addition on Ra during turning of AA 7075-ZrB2 in-situ metal matrix composites. Procedia Mater. Sci. 2014, 5, 2122–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruban, S.R.; Selvam, J.D.R.; Wins, K.L.D.; Kandavalli, S.R. Optimization of cutting parameters of hybrid metal matrix composite AA6061/ZrB2 and ZrC during dry turning. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 993, 012135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruban, S.R.; Dev Wins, K.L.; Raja Selvam, J.D.; S Rai, R. Influence of turning parameters on the machinability of Al6061/ZrB2 ZrC hybrid in-situ Aluminium Matrix Composite. Aust. J. Mech. Eng. 2023, 21, 1218–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yerigeri, S.V.; Biradar, S.K. Effect of ZrB2 Nano-Ingredient on Uncoated Tool Wear for Aluminum Alloys-Based Metal Matrix Composite. In Innovations in Mechanical Engineering: Select Proceedings of ICIME 2021; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2021; pp. 515–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahesha, C.R.; Suprabha, R.; Suresh Kumar, R.; Chowdary, C.M.; Upadhyay, V.V.; Soumya, M.; Al-Ammar, E.A.; Palaniappan, S.; Diriba, A. Effect of ZrB 2 Particles on Machining Parameters of AA7475 Alloy-Based Composites by Optimization Technique. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2023, 2023, 8573440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razavykia, A. Effects of Machining Parameters and Bismuth Addition on Al-20% Mg2Si Machinability during Dry Turning. Doctoral Dissertation, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia, 2014. Available online: https://eprints.utm.my/53458/25/AbbasRazavykiaMFKM2014.pdf (accessed on 30 June 2024).
- Raja, K.; Chandra Sekar, V.S.; Vignesh Kumar, V.; Ramkumar, T.; Ganeshan, P. Microstructure characterization and performance evaluation on AA7075 metal matrix composites using RSM technique. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2020, 45, 9481–9495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arulkirubakaran, D.; Senthilkumar, V.; Chilamwar, V.L.; Senthil, P. Performance of surface textured tools during machining of Al-Cu/TiB2 composite. Measurement 2019, 137, 636–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dandekar, C.R.; Shin, Y.C. Laser-assisted machining of a fiber reinforced metal matrix composite. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2010, 132, 061004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasad, B.S.; KarakaVVNR, C.M.; Annavarapu, V.S. Surface morphology and microstructural analysis of al 8081-mg/zr/TiO2 nano metal matrix composite–A base for performance evaluation of polycrystalline diamond and poly cubic boron nitride tools. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2022, 236, 5678–5686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaswanth, A.; Anbuchezhiyan, G. Analyzing the Ra of WC particulate hardened MMCs with Al-Mg-Cr alloys. J. Pharm. Negat. Results 2022, 13, 310–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pul, M. Investigation of effects of MgO ratio on the surface quality and tool wear in turning Al–MgO composites. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 2018, 232, 2122–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joel, J.; Anthony Xavior, M. Machinability analysis of aluminum alloy-graphene metal matrix composites using uncoated and dlc-coated carbide insert. In Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Tampa, FL, USA, 3–9 November 2017; Volume 58356, p. V002T02A002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joel, J.; Xavior, A. Optimization on machining parameters of aluminium alloy hybrid composite using carbide insert. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 116532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lagisetti, V.K.; Sukjamsri, C. Machinability Study on AA6061/2 SiC/Graphite Hybrid Nanocomposites Fabricated through Ultrasonic Assisted Stir Casting. Int. J. Automot. Mech. Eng. 2022, 19, 9950–9963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sathish, T.; Mohanavel, V.; Karthick, A.; Arunkumar, M.; Ravichandran, M.; Rajkumar, S. Study on Compaction and machinability of silicon nitride (Si3N4) reinforced copper alloy composite through P/M route. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2021, 2021, 7491679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Usca, Ü.A.; Uzun, M.; Kuntoğlu, M.; Sap, E.; Gupta, M.K. Investigations on tool wear, Ra, cutting temperature, and chip formation in machining of Cu-B-CrC composites. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2021, 116, 3011–3025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Usca, Ü.A.; Uzun, M.; Şap, S.; Kuntoğlu, M.; Giasin, K.; Pimenov, D.Y.; Wojciechowski, S. Tool wear, Ra, cutting temperature and chips morphology evaluation of Al/TiN coated carbide cutting tools in milling of Cu–B–CrC based ceramic matrix composites. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 16, 1243–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Usca, Ü.A.; Şap, S.; Uzun, M.; Kuntoğlu, M.; Salur, E.; Karabiber, A.; Pimenov, D.Y.; Giasin, K.; Wojciechowski, S. Estimation, optimization and analysis based investigation of the energy consumption in machinability of ceramic-based metal matrix composite materials. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 17, 2987–2998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Şap, E.; Usca, U.A.; Gupta, M.K.; Kuntoğlu, M. Tool wear and machinability investigations in dry turning of Cu/Mo-SiCp hybrid composites. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2021, 114, 379–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Şap, E.; Usca, Ü.A.; Gupta, M.K.; Kuntoğlu, M.; Sarıkaya, M.; Pimenov, D.Y.; Mia, M. Parametric optimization for improving the machining process of cu/mo-sicp composites produced by powder metallurgy. Materials 2021, 14, 1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Şap, S.; Usca, Ü.A.; Uzun, M.; Kuntoğlu, M.; Salur, E.; Pimenov, D.Y. Investigation of the effects of cooling and lubricating strategies on tribological characteristics in machining of hybrid composites. Lubricants 2022, 10, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Şap, S.; Uzun, M.; Usca, Ü.A.; Pimenov, D.Y.; Giasin, K.; Wojciechowski, S. Investigation of machinability of TieB-SiCp reinforced Cu hybrid composites in dry turning. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 18, e1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Liu, J.; Xu, C. Machinability study of SiC nano-particles reinforced magnesium nanocomposites during micro-milling processes. In Proceedings of the International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference 2010, Erie, PA, USA, 1–5 October 2010; Volume 49477, pp. 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Liu, J.; Liu, J.; Ji, Y.; Xu, C. Experimental investigation on the machinability of SiC nano-particles reinforced magnesium nanocomposites during micro-milling processes. Int. J. Manuf. Res. 2013, 8, 64–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teng, X.; Huo, D.; Wong, W.L.E.; Gupta, M. Experiment based investigation into micro machinability of Mg based metal matrix composites (MMCs) with nano-sized reinforcements. In Proceedings of the 2015 21st International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC), Glasgow, UK, 11–12 September 2015; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teng, X.; Huo, D.; Wong, E.; Meenashisundaram, G.; Gupta, M. Micro-machinability of nanoparticle-reinforced Mg-based MMCs: An experimental investigation. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2016, 87, 2165–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teng, X.; Huo, D.; Wong, W.L.E.; Sankaranarayanan, S.; Gupta, M. Machinability Investigation in Micro-milling of Mg Based MMCs with Nano-Sized Particles. In Magnesium Technology; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teng, X. Investigation into Micro Machinability of Mg Based Metal Matrix Compostites (MMCs) Reinforced with Nanoparticles. Doctoral Dissertation, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2018. Available online: https://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/4361 (accessed on 30 June 2024).
- Teng, X.; Huo, D.; Shyha, I.; Chen, W.; Wong, E. An experimental study on tool wear behaviour in micro milling of nano Mg/Ti metal matrix composites. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 96, 2127–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, C.; Jia, J. Factor analysis of key parameters on Fc in micromachining of graphene-reinforced magnesium matrix nanocomposites based on FE simulation. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 92, 3123–3136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, F.; Huo, D.; Fu, G.; Teng, X.; Kannan, S.; Zhang, H. Micro-drilling of Mg-based MMCs reinforced with SiO2 nanoparticles: An experimental approach. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 2020, 234, 1473–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babu, J.S.; Heo, M.; Kang, C.G. Study of Machining Parameter Optimization in Drilling of Magnesium Based Hybrid Composites Reinforced with Sic/CNT. Key Eng. Mater. 2020, 846, 42–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asgari, A.; Sedighi, M. Investigation on the optimal machining of Mg-based composites considering Ra, tool life, Fcs, and productivity. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2023, 237, 1139–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gobivel, K.; Vijay Sekar, K.S. Machinability studies on the turning of magnesium metal matrix composites. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2022, 67, 939–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meher, A.; Mahapatra, M.M.; Samal, P.; Vundavilli, P.R.; Shankar, K.V. Statistical Modeling of the Machinability of an In-Situ Synthesized RZ5/TiB2 Magnesium Matrix Composite in Dry Turning Condition. Crystals 2022, 12, 1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meher, A.; Mahapatra, M.M. Investigation on the Effect of Machining Parameters on Machinability of RZ5/TiB2 In-Situ Magnesium Matrix Composite. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2023, 32, 7706–7720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radhakrishnan, G. Experimental investigation on the effect of process parameters on machinability and surface integrity during end milling of Mg-TiO2 nanocomposite. Int. J. Mater. Prod. Technol. 2023, 66, 312–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radhakrishnan, G.; Mathialagan, S.; Shankaranarayanan, S.; Pushparaj, J.P. Investigation on the machinability of TiN nano particulate reinforced magnesium matrix composite. Mater. Today Proc. 2023, 72, 2281–2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aramesh, M.; Shi, B.; Nassef, A.O.; Attia, H.; Balazinski, M.; Kishawy, H.A. Meta-modeling optimization of the cutting process during turning titanium metal matrix composites (Ti-MMCs). Procedia CIRP 2013, 8, 576–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aramesh, M.; Attia, M.H.; Kishawy, H.A.; Balazinski, M. Estimating the remaining useful tool life of worn tools under different cutting parameters: A survival life analysis during turning of titanium metal matrix composites (Ti-MMCs). CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2016, 12, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aramesh, M.; Shaban, Y.; Yacout, S.; Attia, M.H.; Kishawy, H.A.; Balazinski, M. Survival life analysis applied to tool life estimation with variable cutting conditions when machining titanium metal matrix composites (Ti-MMCs). Mach. Sci. Technol. 2016, 20, 132–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kishore, D.S.C.; Rao, K.P.; Ramesh, A. Optimization of machining parameters for improving Fc and Ra in turning of Al6061-TiC in-situ metal matrix composites by using Taguchi method. Mater. Today Proc. 2015, 2, 3075–3083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duong, X.; Mayer, J.R.R.; Balazinski, M. Initial tool wear behavior during machining of titanium metal matrix composite (TiMMCs). Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2016, 60, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niknam, S.A.; Kamalizadeh, S.; Asgari, A.; Balazinski, M. Turning titanium metal matrix composites (Ti-MMCs) with carbide and CBN inserts. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 97, 253–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, Y.; Wang, W.; Jiang, R.; Lin, K. Machinability of in situ TiB2 particle reinforced 7050Al matrix composites with TiAlN coating tool. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 97, 3813–3825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramkumar, T.; Selvakumar, M.; Mohanraj, M.; Chandrasekar, P. Experimental investigation and analysis of drilling parameters of metal matrix (Ti/TiB) composites. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2019, 41, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamalizadeh, S.; Niknam, S.A.; Asgari, A.; Balazinski, M. Tool wear characterization in high-speed milling of titanium metal matrix composites. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 100, 2901–2913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, G.; Munir, K.; Wen, C.; Li, Y.; Ding, S. Machinablility of titanium matrix composites (TMC) reinforced with multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Manuf. Process. 2020, 56, 131–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasr, M.M.; Anwar, S.; Al-Samhan, A.M.; Abdo, H.S.; Dabwan, A. On the machining analysis of graphene nanoplatelets reinforced Ti6Al4V matrix nanocomposites. J. Manuf. Process. 2020, 61, 574–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, L.; Nayak, R.; Saxena, K.K.; Nanda, J.; Jena, S.P.; Behera, A.; Sehgal, S.; Prakash, C.; Dixit, S.; Abdul-Zahra, D.S. Determination of optimum machining parameters for face milling process of Ti6A14V metal matrix composite. Materials 2022, 15, 4765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gutema, E.M.; Lemu, H.G. Conventional Machining of Metal Matrix Composites towards Sustainable Manufacturing—Present Scenario and Future Prospects. J. Compos. Sci. 2024, 8, 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8090356
Gutema EM, Lemu HG. Conventional Machining of Metal Matrix Composites towards Sustainable Manufacturing—Present Scenario and Future Prospects. Journal of Composites Science. 2024; 8(9):356. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8090356
Chicago/Turabian StyleGutema, Endalkachew Mosisa, and Hirpa G. Lemu. 2024. "Conventional Machining of Metal Matrix Composites towards Sustainable Manufacturing—Present Scenario and Future Prospects" Journal of Composites Science 8, no. 9: 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8090356
APA StyleGutema, E. M., & Lemu, H. G. (2024). Conventional Machining of Metal Matrix Composites towards Sustainable Manufacturing—Present Scenario and Future Prospects. Journal of Composites Science, 8(9), 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8090356