Next Article in Journal
Prediction of Slip Velocity at the Interface of Open-Cell Metal Foam Using 3D Printed Foams
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Enzymatic Hydrolysis on Solubility and Emulsifying Properties of Lupin Proteins (Lupinus luteus)
Previous Article in Journal
Polysaccharides-Based Injectable Hydrogels: Preparation, Characteristics, and Biomedical Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Addition of Trans-Resveratrol-Loaded, Highly Concentrated Double Emulsion to Moisturizing Cream: Effect on Physicochemical Properties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Review on the Antioxidant Activity of Phenolics in o/w Emulsions along with the Impact of a Few Important Factors on Their Interfacial Behaviour

by
Sotirios Kiokias
1,* and
Vassiliki Oreopoulou
2
1
European Research Executive Agency (REA), Place Charles Rogier 16, 1210 Bruxelles, Belgium
2
Laboratory of Food Chemistry and Technology, School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Iron Politechniou, 9, 15780 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Colloids Interfaces 2022, 6(4), 79; https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids6040079
Submission received: 13 October 2022 / Revised: 19 November 2022 / Accepted: 23 November 2022 / Published: 12 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Emulsions and Applications)

Abstract

:
This review paper focuses on the antioxidant properties of phenolic compounds in oil in water (o/w) emulsion systems. The authors first provide an overview of the most recent studies on the activity of common, naturally occurring phenolic compounds against the oxidative deterioration of o/w emulsions. A screening of the latest literature was subsequently performed with the aim to elucidate how specific parameters (polarity, pH, emulsifiers, and synergistic action) affect the phenolic interfacial distribution, which in turn determines their antioxidant potential in food emulsion systems. An understanding of the interfacial activity of phenolic antioxidants could be of interest to food scientists working on the development of novel food products enriched with functional ingredients. It would also provide further insight to health scientists exploring the potentially beneficial properties of phenolic antioxidants against the oxidative damage of amphiphilic biological membranes (which link to serious pathologic conditions).

1. Introduction

Lipid oxidation is a serious problem for scientists since it adversely affects the product quality in the food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical sectors [1]. Many common food products exist as oil-in-water (o/w) emulsions including beverages, dressings, sauces, soups, and desserts [2]. One of the main causes of the quality deterioration of these products is the oxidation of lipids [3]. The degradation of unsaturated lipids can lead to off-flavors, decreases the nutritional profile of foods, and may eventually generate toxic products [4]. In emulsified foods, lipid oxidation can occur rapidly due to their large surface area, with mechanisms that are more complex and not fully understood compared to bulk oils [5,6]. As a consequence, the food industry faces a serious problem due to the low oxidative stability of emulsified systems, which adversely impacts consumer safety and the economic viability of the products [7]. A better understanding of the endogenous and exogenous factors that monitor the microstructural and oxidative stability of food emulsions would help to maintain their desirable functional and sensory properties during the formulation, processing, and storage of relevant products [8]. In addition, emulsion systems generally mimic the amphiphilic nature of important biological membranes (such as lipoproteins) that are prone to oxidative degradation when attacked by singlet oxygen and free radicals [9]. This biochemical process eventually links to the development of serious human health conditions, such as aging, carcinogenesis, and cardiovascular diseases [10].
Over the last few years, there is a steady food market trend for the use of natural antioxidants, as a common strategy to slow down lipid oxidation in emulsified foods, increase their shelf life, and minimize bad odors [11,12]. A body of recent research [13,14] focuses on nano-emulsions that are increasingly used in various products in order to incorporate easily degradable bioactive compounds, protect them against oxidation, and enhance their bioavailability. In manufactured products (quite often heterogeneous systems containing lipids as emulsions or bulk phase) the efficiency of an antioxidant is determined not only by its chemical reactivity, but also by its physical properties and its interaction with other compounds present in the products [15].
With the term phenolics, we refer to a wide class of natural compounds (e.g., tocopherols, flavonoids, phenolic acids) with varying structures and antioxidant properties [16]. The application of phenolic compounds in various commercial products has attracted an increasing level of interest over the last few years from researchers in the food, pharmaceutical, and nutraceutical industries [17]. It is true, though, that certain structural characteristics (including the hydrophobic character of many phenolics) may affect their integration into real products as well as their general biological activities and their bio-absorption in human organisms [18]. Their potential to act as functional ingredients upon their addition in bulk or emulsified oils has been an area of emerging scientific interest in the last decade [19,20,21]. A few researchers in this field have focused on phenolic acids, their activity, health effects, and extraction from natural plant sources [21,22,23]. Phenolic acids are classified as hydroxybenzoic and hydroxycinnamic acids, and, depending on their structure, may present solubility in water or lipids, thus enabling their use in many products [7,14,24].
In this review paper, the authors focus on the antioxidant properties of phenolic antioxidants against the oxidative deterioration of food-relevant o/w model emulsions. The novelty of this paper mainly concerns the literature review of the most important interfacial factors that determine the antioxidant potential of phenolic compounds in food emulsion systems. The phenolic distribution is determined by solubility and partitioning behaviour in the different regions of the emulsion (oil core, aqueous phase, interface) and together with the mode of incorporation can significantly determine the antioxidant efficiency [25,26]. The interfacial synergistic activity of various phenolic antioxidants is also discussed as an additional important factor. Further to the technological importance of phenolics and the protection against oxidative deterioration as a result of their incorporation in real lipid-based products, there is also an additional aspect. The research findings from phenolic activity in interfacial systems could be of interest to clinical nutrition researchers who explore the potential effects of natural antioxidants against the oxidative damage of amphiphilic biological membranes.
In addition, the analysis of such research outcomes can feed the development of novel food emulsions and thereby trigger innovation and new market applications in the associated industrial sectors.

2. Overview of Studies Reporting on the Effect of Phenolics against the Oxidation of o/w Emulsions

Although most of the studies on phenolic antioxidants so far have focused on bulk oils, a body of recent research has examined the activity of various phenolic compounds in food-related o/w emulsions. In emulsified systems, the initial step of lipid oxidation takes place at the interface between the oil and water phases. Over the last few years, an increasing number of researchers have reported well-documented antioxidant activities of naturally occurring phenolics in o/w model systems [19,27].
Tocopherols are a class of natural compounds with a high nutritional value in the human diet because of their vitamin E activity. In addition, various authors have reported their well-established antioxidants activity in vitro (oil model systems) and in vivo (human clinical trials) [28,29]. Wang et al. [30], following oxidation experiments of flaxseed o/w emulsions, have noted a higher antioxidant efficiency of δ-tocopherol compared to α-tocopherol. The authors linked the superior activity of δ-tocopherol to its enhanced distribution in the interfacial area of the emulsion system. Another similar study—based on the autoxidation of shrimp o/w emulsions under storage at room temperature did not report any protective effect of α-tocopherol against oxidative destabilisation [31]. On the contrary, α-tocopherol when combined with chitooligosaccharides (at both 0.2 and 0.4 g/L concentrations) significantly delayed the oxidation process, in terms of both primary (conjugated dienes) and secondary (TBARs) oxidation products indicators [31]. Barouh et al. [15] further explored the activity of tocopherols in bulk oils and emulsion systems as a function of various physicochemical parameters (including their interaction with specific emulsifiers such as Tween 65, Tween 80, whey proteins, etc.).
Flavonoids comprise another class of widespread phenolic compounds with well-established antioxidant properties strongly related to their structure [32,33]. Common plant flavonoids such as quercetin, rutin, and hesperitin prolong the shelf life of o/w emulsions by retarding the oxidative deterioration and improving physical stability. However, only quercetin retained its antioxidant activity in the presence of ferric ions due to its structural configuration (3′4′ dihyrdoxy substitution of B ring and the presence o 3-OH) [34]. In fact, quercetin seems to be one of the most potent contributors to the antioxidant activity of plant extracts in emulsions [35]. However, quercetin has been reported to exert a pro-oxidant character in pure lipids and antioxidant activity in emulsions due to its hydroxyl group in position-3 [36]. Catechin acted as a better antioxidant than quercetin in the copper-induced oxidation of diluted, Tween-based, linoleic acid emulsion (0.02 M), while morin presented the best protective action [37]. Different metal ions may affect the activity of flavonoids in emulsions, where the pro-oxidant or antioxidant character may dependon the flavonoid structure and the metal type [38] Flavonoids have also been examined for the preparation of physically stable pickering emulsions, while also offering oxidative stability [39,40].
Plant extracts are rich in flavonoids and phenolic acids and exert a strong antioxidant activity in o/w emulsions that may be attributed to synergism among its components and also to partitioning in the aqueous phase (e.g., polar phenolic acids or flavonoid glycosides), oil-water interface (e.g., medium polarity phenolic acids and flavonoids), or the oil phase (e.g., flavonoid aglycons) of the emulsion [41,42]. Additionally, the presence of endogenous antioxidants such as α-tocopherol may affect the flavonoid activity in lipid systems; e.g., it showed a strong synergistic effect with quercetin in emulsions, and a clear antagonistic effect in bulk oil [43]. More information on the phenolic synergistic effects is given in Section 3.4.
The current paper has focused on various phenolic acids available in many natural sources (e.g., in olive oil, herbs, fruits) that have been widely explored in food systems [44]. Caffeic acid (CA) is perhaps the most well-known phenolic acid widely spread in the plant kingdom [45]. CA exerted a clear antioxidant effect when added in o/w emulsion systems stabilised by Tween and prepared with various vegetable oils [46,47]. Ferulic acid (FA) is another phenolic acid -commonly present in many plant seeds [48] that was reported to act as a strong antioxidant following its addition in a range of oil-based emulsions [49,50,51].
For gallic acid (GA), which is found in high amounts in tea and berries [52] there is some contradictory evidence in the literature about its protective action against oxidation of food emulsions. GA and its alkyl esters were found to exert a clear antioxidant effect against the oxidation of rapeseed o/w nano-emulsions stabilised by SDS [53] or even double emulsions by the use of encapsulation [54]. Additionally, Zhu et al. [55] concluded a strong inhibitory effect of GA and its alkyl esters against the formation of both primary (Peroxide Values) and secondary oxidation products (hexanal content). Propyl gallate exerted a superior activity compared to gallic acid and the other gallate esters. Other studies, however, did not report any protective effect of GA in o/w emulsions [56,57].
A large variety of plants and vegetables are abundant in p-coumaric acid (p-CA) [58]. Park et al. [59] reported that roasted rice hull extracts, with a high concentration of p-CA enhanced the oxidative stability of bulk oil and o/w emulsions at 60 °C. Rosmarinic acid (RA) is the main phenolic component in various edible and aromatic herbs of the Lamiaceae family (including Rosmarinus officinalis, Origanum spp., etc.) [60]. Choulitoudi et al. [19] observed that ethanol and ethyl acetate extracts of Satureja thymbra—articularly rich in RA—reduced by 75–80% the oxidation rate of sunflower o/w emulsions at chilling temperature (5 °C). Other researchers reported the antioxidant activity of RA in corn oil- and soyabean oil-based emulsions [61,62] as well as in a model emulsion system based on linoleic acid [46].
Bakota et al. [63] incorporated either pure RA or RA-rich extract (from Salvia officinalis leaves), at a concentration of ~30 mg/g, into o/w emulsions and observed that both treatments were effective in suppressing lipid oxidation.
Vanillic acid (VA) is a phenolic acid found in several fruits, olives, and cereal grains. Keller et al. [64] observed a strong antioxidant character of VA during the autoxidation of Tween 40-based o/w systems, at pH 3.5. In addition, a few authors [30,65] reported that the addition of tannic acid (TA) enhanced the resistance of plant-based emulsions against both droplet aggregation and lipid oxidation as a result of its strong ferrous ion-binding properties.
Ascorbic acid is another phenolic compound widely present in nature and with a high nutritional value (also known as vitamin C). A number of scientists highlighted the important role of ascorbic acid in antioxidant synergies examined in both food and clinically relevant studies [66,67].
As will be discussed under Section 3.4, a shift from the prooxidant to an antioxidant potential of ascorbic acid in interfacial systems is vastly dependent on the presence of other phenolic compounds in the system (and in particular of tocopherols).

3. Interfacial Factors That Affect the Antioxidant Activity of Phenolic Compounds

Various authors examined a number of factors that can potentially influence the physical and oxidative stability of emulsions including type and concentration of oil phase and of emulsifiers, pH and ionic composition, emulsion droplet size, and interfacial properties [68,69]. Raikos et al. [70] noted that the physical location of antioxidants in o/w emulsions can have a significant influence on their free radical scavenging activity and ability to inhibit lipid oxidation. The partitioning of antioxidant molecules in emulsions has been reported to affect their activity [71]. According to Shahidi and Zhong [6], the efficacy of antioxidants in emulsified systems is determined by their polarity but also by their molecular size, mechanism of action, and the presence and type of emulsifiers. Kiokias and Oreopoulou [72] explored the antioxidant effect of carotenoids with varying polarities in sunflower oil-in-water emulsions. The authors attributed the superior antioxidant effect of polar carotenoids to their enhanced distribution in the interface of the emulsion system and claimed that less potent β-carotene is likely to be homogeneously dispersed in the oil droplets. On the contrary, the polar xanthophylls (lutein, and annatto carotenoids) may be located near the oil-water interface where their hydrophilic groups (-OH, COOH, etc.) are better orientated, and thereby more efficiently trap the AAPH-derived radicals attacking from the water phase of the emulsion.
The authors note that a similar mode of action is also expected to occur during the action of phenolic antioxidants in an emulsion system. Figure 1 provides a general picture of the expected distribution of an amphiphilic phenolic antioxidant in the emulsion phases. The alkyl chain (hydrophobic part) is mainly oriented towards the lipid core of the oil droplet, whereas the hydrophilic part (with OH/COOH groups) is preferentially located towards the interfacial region of the emulsion phase. The most important interfacial factors that determine the antioxidant potential of phenolic compounds in food emulsion systems are examined in the following sections.

3.1. Effect of pH of the Aqueous Phase on the Interfacial Activity of Phenolic Compounds

There is a general agreement about the important role of pH in monitoring the microstructural stability of food-relevant emulsion products [73]. However, how pH affects the oxidative destabilisation of emulsions is pending some further clarification due to contradictory evidence in the relevant literature [4].
Interestingly, Branco et al. [74] observed that a pH change from 3.0 to 7.0 increased the peroxide value (PV) and reduced the thiobaribituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) in o/w emulsions. The authors noted, though, that the presence of ascorbic acid (1 mmol/L) not only had no significant inhibitory effect on PV and TBARS (p < 0.05), but even triggered a prooxidant character. Costa et al. [75] noted that a modification of the pH in the aqueous phase could largely affect the interfacial distribution, and consequently the antioxidant activity, of phenolic acids.
Zhou and Elias [76] reported that the pH is capable of influencing the antioxidant activity of phenolics, along with transition metal properties, and is overall a factor to take into careful consideration in the production of food-relevant emulsion systems. The results of Sorensen et al. [77] indicated that the pH, especially in the presence of iron, had a greater impact on lipid oxidation than the size of the lipid droplets. CA promoted oxidation at pH 3 in the presence of iron, a fact attributed to its ability to reduce Fe3+ to Fe2+, thereby propagating lipid oxidation and catalysing peroxide decomposition to the formation of secondary products. At pH 6, CA interacted and formed complexes with iron, as also observed for other phenolics, thus depressing PV formation, either with or without iron ions in the emulsion.
A similar study [78] concluded that in the presence of 25 μM Fe3+, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), at a concentration of 400 μM, accelerated the oxidation of a Tween 80-stabilised flaxseed o/w emulsion at pH 3, but exhibited an antioxidant character at pH 7. Other researchers [79] observed that EGCG and epicatechin gallate (ECG)—even at lower concentrations (100 μM)—protected Tween-20 stabilised sunflower o/w emulsions from their oxidative degradation at pH 5.5, in the absence of Fe3+. According to Kim and Choe [80], the oxidative degradation of soybean o/w emulsions proceeded faster at pH 4 in the absence of iron. Interestingly, the emulsions were more stable at the same pH compared to higher or lower acidity values when iron was present in the system. Upon addition of peppermint extract at pH 4, iron reduced and significantly delayed the degradation of total polyphenols (including RA and CA).
Tian et al. [81] reported that tea polyphenols, when added at a relatively low level, are located at the oil droplet surfaces in the whey protein-stabilised emulsions, because of their tendency to bind to the adsorbed protein molecules. Moreover, pH affects the potent synergistic actions of the phenolic acids with endogenous antioxidants as tocopherols. Kittipongpittaya et al. [82] observed that RA more effectively regenerated a-tocopherol at pH 7, due to its higher electron donation ability to the a-tocopheroxyl radicals at the oil-water interface, compared to pH 3. Losada-Barreiro et al. [83] investigated deeper the effects of pH on the partition constants and the distribution of GA and CA between the aqueous and interfacial regions of 10% corn oil/acidic water emulsions stabilised by Tween 20. The authors reported that a decrease in pH from 4 to 3 leads to an increase of GA distribution in the interface (from 20% to 60%), and of CA (from 50% to 75%) and concluded that acidity can exert a great impact on the partition of antioxidants between the emulsion phases. Similarly, a decrease in pH from 3.6 to 3 caused an increase in CA fraction in the interface from 90 to 95% [84]. These results may be attributed to the higher solubility of the phenolic ions (present at higher pH values) in the aqueous phase. A recent study [45] examined the antioxidant activity of GA and its alkyl esters in SDS-stabilised rapeseed o/w emulsions. GA, at pH 7, exerted a lower antioxidant effect than its ester derivatives. This was explained by the fact that GA at this pH is negatively charged and thereby repelled by the anionic SDS-coated interface, contrary to the electrostatically neutral ester derivatives. Furthermore, Zoric et al. [85] reported a lower stability of RA at pH 7.5 than at pH 2.5.
Overall, the pH of the aqueous phase plays an important role in determining the antioxidant effect of phenolic acids against the oxidative deterioration of o/w emulsion systems. In the absence of metals, a lower pH links to higher phenolic distribution in the interface leading to stronger antioxidant efficiencies. The situation, though, is more complex in the presence of transition metals in the emulsion system that seems to highly affect the role of pH on phenolic antioxidant activity. For instance, higher pH values overall induce metal-catalyzed oxidation by increasing the number of dissociated species. Another factor that can be crucial here is the formation of metal complexes with phenolic antioxidants and the change in oxidation potentials. Therefore, further investigation is needed to more precisely elucidate the mechanisms and actual effect of pH on the phenolic antioxidant activity in the presence of metals.

3.2. Effect of the Emulsifier and of the Interfacial Concentration of Phenolics on Their Antioxidant Activity

A few researchers have examined how certain features of the emulsifier may affect the lipid oxidation in food emulsions [86,87]. More specifically, the size and conformation of the emulsifier define the thickness of the emulsion droplet interface through the formation of biopolymer layers. In principle, the thicker the interfacial emulsifier layer, the more difficult for the free radicals to penetrate, thereby the better the antioxidant protection. This theory also explains why according to certain studies, low molecular weight emulsifiers (e.g., Tween, SDS) result in emulsions that are easier and faster oxidized compared to systems prepared under exactly the same experimental conditions but with larger molecular weight emulsifiers such as Brij 700 or certain proteins [88,89].
Among the possible environmental factors influencing the efficiency of phenolic antioxidants, the nature and concentration of surfactants was noted as the most important by McClements and Decker [90]. A few studies examined how emulsifiers may affect the partitioning of antioxidants in emulsions and thereby moderate their interfacial activities. Kiralan et al. [91] have suggested that surfactant micelles could increase the antioxidant activity of phenolics by changing their physical location. Other researchers in this field concluded that the location and concentration of phenolic antioxidants in the interface of an o/w model system are highly dependent on their molecular interaction with the present emulsifiers [26,62].
Da Silveira et al. [53] investigated the effect of the presence of surfactant micelles on the antioxidant efficiency of a homologous series of gallate phenolipids (with 0–16 carbon atoms alkyl chains: G0, G3, G8, G12, or G16) in o/w nano-emulsions. According to the results, the surfactant micelles hinder the antioxidant action of hydrophobic phenolipids, but not that of hydrophilic ones. Losada-Barreiro et al. [83] reported that a tenfold increase of the surfactant (Tween 20) volume enhanced the interfacial distribution of both GA (from 20% to 60%) and CA (from to 50% and 90%), thereby concluding that the emulsifier concentration largely determines the partition of phenolic acids in emulsified systems.
Keller et al. [64] examined the partitioning behaviour of VA following its addition in 30% ο/w model systems stabilised by Tween 40 under low pH conditions (pH of aqueous phase: 3.5). The authors reported that when oil, water, and emulsifier were just mixed, the major proportion of VA (~90) retained in the aqueous phase was mostly associated with Tween micelles. In the homogenised emulsified system, though, VA migrated to the o/w interface of the oil droplet. Another study [49] focused on FA and iFA (isoferulic acid) trying to determine the parameters that affect their partitioning behaviour in the emulsion phases. According to the research findings, an increase in the concentration of the emulsifiers resulted in enhanced solubilisation and migration of both FA and iFA at the interface, which subsequently resulted in clear antioxidant activities of both tested phenolic acids. Furthermore, Mitrus et al. [14] concluded that a higher surfactant volume fraction increased the percentage of antioxidants distributed in the interface. Other researchers attempted to elucidate the protective action of a few proteins commonly used in food applications (e.g., whey proteins, soy proteins, etc.) against the oxidative destabilisation of emulsion systems. Such an antioxidant effect is highly dependent not only on the type, structure, and concentration of the protein but also on their synergistic action with other antioxidants (e.g., enhanced antioxidant activity of proteins mixtures with tocopherols and other phenolics) [4,92]. An overall conclusion of the relevant studies is that proteins may, indeed, affect the interfacial partitioning of phenolic antioxidants by modifying the interfacial charge [93]. In doing so, the proteins can alter the location of transition metal ions and their subsequent interaction with polyphenols thereby determining their antioxidant activity in the interfacial systems [94]. A picture of the microstructure for a protein stabilised emulsion (produced in NTUA/Laboratory of Food Chemistry and Technology) is given in Figure 2 (Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy-CSLM image of a 10% cottonseed o/w emulsion stabilized by 1% sodium caseinate).
The effect of emulsifiers on phenolic antioxidant activities could be also seen from the “angle” of their reported impact on the oil droplet seize. According to Vilasaua et al. [95], the particle size decreases with increasing ionic/nonionic surfactant ratio, up to a certain ratio above which emulsions aggregate. Kiokias et al. [69] reported that in contrast to emulsions stabilized by low molecular weight emulsifiers (Tween 20, SDS), smaller oil droplets, obtained in protein-stabilized emulsions through the increase of protein concentration, were associated with enhanced protection from oxidative changes. Overall, we can claim that the stability of phenolic compounds that are located at the oil-water interface or inside the oil droplets of an o/w emulsion may be affected by droplet size [96]. A decrease in droplet size results in an increase of the oil and interfacial area, where the phenolic compounds can contact free radicals found in the water phase and thus oxidize faster. Additionally, the lipophilic phenolic compounds diffuse faster from the interior of an oil droplet to the exterior as the droplet size decreases [97].
Over the last few years, a number of studies have explored the distribution of phenolics in o/w emulsions by developing pseudophase kinetic models [74,84,98]. The advantage of this approach is that it works on intact emulsions, unlike other methods that require phase separation and cannot provide estimates of the amounts of antioxidants in the interfacial area. Via the use of partition constant values, such models determine the percentages of phenolic acids in the oil, aqueous and interfacial regions of the emulsions. The results of a few studies offer “libraries” of partition constant values for the distribution of various phenolic antioxidants (e.g., CA, 4-hydroxycinnamic acid, di-hydrocaffeic acid, and hydroxytyrosol derivatives) [53,75,99]. Lossada Βarreiro et al. [98] investigated the phenolic distributions in intact emulsions by using the pseudo-phase kinetic model and estimated changes in the antioxidant concentration, by using a chemical probe and employing the Schaal oven test. They reported that at any given volume fraction of emulsifier, the concentrations of antioxidants in the interfacial region of stripped corn oil emulsions and their efficiency follow the order: propyl gallates > gallic acid > octylgallates > lauryl gallates. The authors highlighted that these results provide clear evidence that the antioxidant efficiency correlates with its concentration in the interfacial region. Furthermore, Meireles et al. [100] have employed the kinetic method to determine the distribution of a homologous series of chlorogenic acid in olive o/w emulsions. The authors concluded that the activity of chlorogenates in emulsions is greatly dependent on their interfacial concentrations.
The research evidence in o/w emulsions presented in this section (i) notes a clear effect of the type of emulsifier in the interfacial distribution of phenolics, which may vary depending on the mode of their binding interaction; (ii) highlights that the findings of recent kinetic studies (mainly by use of pseudo-phase models) tend to agree how important is the concentration of phenolic compounds in the interfacial region of o/w model emulsion systems in order to interpret their overall antioxidant potential.

3.3. Effect of Polarity on the Antioxidant Activity of Phenolic Compounds

A body of recent research evidence noted that the efficacy of antioxidants in emulsions is highly affected by their polarity [6]. A well-known theory in the field concerns the so-called “polar paradox” which illustrates the paradoxical behavior of antioxidants in different media and rationalizes the fact that polar antioxidants are more effective in less polar media, such as bulk oils, while nonpolar antioxidants are more effective in relatively more polar media, such as o/w emulsions or liposomes [8].
In line with the general concept of this theory, the more polar antioxidants (containing hydrophylic groups) are better distributed in the water phase or the oil-water interface where they may be easily oxidised (in particular under thermally accelerated oxidation conditions). On the other side, the less polar antioxidants (and normally hydrophobic in nature) are preferably located in the lipid core of the emulsion droplets, which is thereby better protected from oxidation [101]. Kanakidi et al. [87] arrived at similar results by highlighting that the more polar RA and carnosic acid, compared to the other phenolic diterpenes, are distributed in the aqueous phase and the oil-water interface where they are faster and promptly oxidized by trace metals or free radicals possibly present there. In the same mode of action, the antioxidant potential of phenolic compounds was reported to decrease with increasing hydrophobicity (e.g., gallic esters less protective than GA) during the oxidative deterioration of bulk oil systems [102]. Noon et al. [103] investigated the efficacy of four natural phenolic antioxidants with varying structures and polarities (quercetin, curcumin, rutin hydrate, and ascorbic acid) against the oxidative deterioration of different o/w emulsion environments. The authors concluded that the most non-polar compounds (curcumin and quercetin) yielded higher peroxide values (PV) reductions (of 65% and 74%, respectively) in 5% oil phase volume emulsions compared to 40% oil phase volume emulsions (just 28% and 43% PV reductions). Another study [74] further demonstrated the applicability of the polar paradox theory in the oxidative stability for n-3 high unsaturated fatty acid-rich water emulsions. While the hydrophilic ascorbic acid acted as a pro-oxidant, natural plant extracts rich in non-polar polyphenols and a-tocopherol presented a strong antioxidant character. Other research studies, though, came out with evidence that is not fully in line with the polar paradox concept. Poyato et al. [5] reported that a Melissa officinalis water extract rich in RA was more effective in o/w emulsions and inhibited lipid oxidation more effectively than the lipophilic antioxidant (BHA).
Di Mattia et al. [104] also came out with certain findings that are not in good agreement with the polar paradox theory. The authors reported that GA, although a phenolic compound with a high polarity, exerted a strong antioxidant effect upon its addition to olive o/w emulsions. GA was estimated to be present in the aqueous phase at a much higher (almost double) concentration than the more hydrophobic quercetin under the same experimental interfacial conditions.
Similarly, Bravo-Diaz et al. [105] used gallate and caffeate esters of variable alkyl chain length and hydrophobicity in o/w, Tween 20-based emulsions. The authors reported a decreasing activity with increasing hydrophobicity, which may be attributed to a distributional shifting of the phenolic antioxidants from the interfacial to oil region of the emulsion, based on their increasing oil solubility.
Moreover, Mitrus et al. [14] concluded that GA and its esters tend to accumulate in the interfacial region, and the percentage distributed in the interface increased with hydrophobicity up to a certain length of alkyl chain (called a cut-off effect), due to lack of water solubility of esters with a longer alkyl chain. Costa et al. [7], however, while evaluating the antioxidant efficiency of n-alkyl esters of phenolic compounds in olive o/w emulsions, concluded that the antioxidant distribution in the interface does not correlate directly with the length of the alkyl chain, thereby with the hydrophobicity.
Overall, we should note that various studies in the field do not fully align with polar paradox concepts concerning the antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds in emulsion systems. As a general conclusion, though, the polarity can be a critical factor in moderating the interfacial antioxidant activity as evidenced by recent studies that compare different types of phenolic acids (and other phenolic antioxidants) with varying structure and hydrophobicity in o/w emulsions. For this reason, we also included the next section (Section 3.4) which focuses on the interaction effects of phenolic antioxidants with varying polarities in o/w emulsion systems.

3.4. Synergistic Interfacial Activity of Phenolic Compounds against the Lipid Oxidation of o/w Emulsions

In Section 3.3, polarity was found to determine the phenolic antioxidant activity in various lipid-based systems. As a next step, the potential interaction effect of mixtures of phenolic antioxidants with different degrees of hydrophobicity against the lipid oxidation of o/w emulsions is further discussed. A number of research studies in this scientific field have widely reported over the last decade that more protection against oxidative deterioration of food products is offered through the synergistic action of antioxidants with varying structures, physical properties, and modes of action [106,107]. Filip et al. [108] highlighted an enhanced antioxidant activity through the interaction of tocopherols and ascorbic acid in various oil model systems. They claimed that the synergistic effect occurs because of the reduction of tocopherol radicals by ascorbic acid. Zhou and Elias [76] observed a clear protective effect of CA, following its addition in o/w emulsions (stabilised by Tween 20 or Citrem emulsifiers), with tocopherols endogenously present in the oil phase. However, GA acted as a prooxidant accelerating lipid oxidation at the absence of any tocopherols in the emulsion. Wu et al. [108] reported a clear antioxidant character of GA and its alkyl esters when combined with α-tocopherol in o/w emulsions systems. The authors attributed this antioxidant synergy to the initial quick oxidation of α-tocopherol into α-tocopherol quinine, causing its transfer to the interfacial membrane and exposure to oxidation. The tocopherol radicals are reduced back by gallate esters regenerating α-tocopherol in the interfacial layer and enabling antioxidant activity in the emulsion system. Panya et al. [62] noted that the high polarity of RA, and consequently its distribution in the aqueous phase, was responsible for the observed low efficiency in emulsions. The authors reported, however, an enhanced antioxidant effect when RA was combined with α-tocopherol. This could be explained via an increased distribution of RA in the water phase allowing its interaction with the more hydrophobic α-tocopherol on the oil droplet’s surface.
Noon et al. [103] found that combinations of ascorbic acid with quercetin or curcumin resulted in antioxidant synergism against the oxidation of o/w emulsions. This research builds on the understanding of the fundamental behaviour of natural antioxidants, such as plant extracts, within different emulsion formulations.
Similarly, Farooq et al. [11] reviewed how polarity and interactions of phenolic antioxidants may determine their antioxidant activity at the oil-water interface of food emulsions. The authors highlighted that synergistic interactions of polar with non-polar phenolics at the oil-water interface may be considered a promising strategy for improving the oxidative stability of emulsions. Further to synergistic activities, we cannot exclude the possibility of some “antagonistic effects between phenolic antioxidants. Liu et al. [109] also referred to the regeneration of α-tocopherol radicals, but this time to clarify antagonistic, rather than synergistic effects, in o/w systems. Following the addition of α-tocopherol at varying concentrations, the authors observed an increased partition of α-tocopherol in an aqueous phase when mixed with γ-oryzanol. They also proposed an inhibitory effect of γ-oryzanol against the regeneration of α-tocopherol. Such antagonism reduced the antioxidant potential of tocopherols in the emulsion system.
The Table 1 below presents an overview of several studies, the results of which have demonstrated a clear protective effect of phenolic compounds (either alone or in combinations) against the oxidative deterioration of o/w emulsions.

4. Conclusions

The analysis of literature evidence undertaken in this work has concluded that the well-established antioxidant activity of several phenolic compounds in various o/w emulsion systems is highly dependent on their interfacial distribution. The partition of phenolics within the emulsion phases is a factor that could determine their antioxidant efficiencies in interfacial systems and is influenced by various parameters including pH, emulsifier, and their structure (hydrophilic/hydrophobic character). The highest activity is shown by the phenolic compounds located at the emulsion interface and correlates with their interfacial concentration. In addition, synergistic actions between phenolics have been reported to enhance interfacial antioxidant activity. By monitoring the interfacial distributions of phenolics in o/w emulsions, researchers could further promote their use as functional ingredients in novel food emulsion relevant products (such as various dressings, fresh cheese types, protein-stabilized drinks, etc.). Further work in this field may involve the design of new kinetic studies with the aim to validate and complete the current databases on the distribution constants of various phenolic compounds.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.K.; resources, S.K. and V.O.; writing—original draft preparation, S.K.; review and editing, supervision, V.O. The authors have contributed substantially to the work reported. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The views expressed in this publication are purely those of the writers and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission.

References

  1. Schroder, A.; Sprakel, J.; Boerkamp, W.; Schroen, K.; Berton-Carabin, C.C. Can we prevent lipid oxidation in emulsions by using fat-based pickering particles? Food Res. Int. 2019, 120, 352–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dimakou, C.; Oreopoulou, V. Antioxidant activity of carotenoids against the oxidative destabilization of sunflower oil-in-water emulsions. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 393–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Claire, C.; Berton-Carabin, C.-C.; Ropers, M.-H.; Genot, C. Lipid oxidation in Oil-in-Water Emulsions: Involvement of the Interfacial Layer. Compreh. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019, 13, 945–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kiokias, S.; Gordon, M.; Oreopoulou, V. Compositional and processing factors that monitor oxidative deterioration of food relevant protein stabilized emulsions. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 549–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Poyato, C.; Navarro-Blasco, I.-E.; Calvo, M.-I.; Cavero, R.-Y.; Astiasarán, I.; Ansorena, D. Oxidative stability of O/W and W/O/W emulsions: Effect of lipid composition and antioxidant polarity. Food Res. Int. 2013, 51, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Shahidi, F.; Zhong, Y. Revisiting the polar paradox theory: A critical overview. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 3499–3504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Costa, M.; Barreiro, S.-L.; Magalhães, J.; Monteiro, L.-S.; Bravo-Díaz, C.; Paiva-Martins, F. Effects of the Reactive Moiety of Phenolipids on Their Antioxidant Efficiency in Model Emulsified Systems. Foods 2021, 10, 1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kiokias, S.; Varzakas, T. Innovative applications of food related emulsions. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 3165–3172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Axmann, M.; Strobl, W.-M.; Plochberger, B.; Stangl, H. Cholesterol transfer at the plasma membrane. Atherosclerosis 2019, 290, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kiokias, S. Antioxidant effects of vitamins C, E and provitamin A compounds as monitored by use of biochemical oxidative indicators linked to atherosclerosis and carcinogenesis. Int. J. Nutr. Res. 2019, 1, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  11. Farooq, S.; Hui, A.; Zhang, H.; Weiss, J. A comprehensive review on polarity, partitioning, and interactions of phenolic antioxidants at oil–water interface of food emulsions. Compreh. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 4250–4277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Phonsatta, N.; Deetae, P.; Luangpituksa, P.; Grajeda-Iglesias, C.; Figueroa-Espinoza, M.C.; Le Comte, J.; Villeneuve, P.; Decker, E.A.; Visessanguan, W.; Panya, A. Comparison of antioxidant evaluation assays for investigating antioxidative activity of gallic acid and its alkyl esters in different food matrices. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 7509–7518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Katsouli, M.; Polychniatou, V.; Tzia, C. Optimization of water in olive oil nano-emulsions composition with bioactive compounds by response surface methodology. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 89, 740–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mitrus, O.; Zuraw, M.; Losada-Barreiro, S.; Bravo-Díaz, C.; Paiva-Martins, F. Targeting Antioxidants to Interfaces: Control of the oxidative stability of lipid-based emulsions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 3266–3274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Barouh, N.; Bourlieu-Lacanal, C.; Figueroa-Espinoza, M.C.; Durand, E.; Villeneuve, P. Tocopherols as antioxidants in lipid-based systems: The combination of chemical and physicochemical interactions determines their efficiency. Compr. Rev. Food. Sci. Food Saf. 2022, 21, 642–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Arancibia, M.; Giménez, B.; López-Caballero, M.-E.; Gómez-Guillén, M.-C.; Montero, P. Release of cinnamon essential oil from polysaccharide bilayer films and its use for microbial growth inhibition in chilled shrimps. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 59, 989–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liudvinaviciute, D.; Rutkaite, R.; Bendoraitiene, J.; Klimaviciute, R. Thermogravimetric analysis of caffeic and rosmarinic acid containing chitosan complexes. Carb. Polym. 2019, 222, 115003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Garavand, F.; Jalai-Jivan, M.; Assadpour, E.; Jafari, S.M. Encapsulation of phenolic compounds within nano/microemulsion systems: A review. Food Chem. 2021, 3641, 130376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Choulitoudi, E.; Xristou, M.; Tsimogiannis, D.; Oreopoulou, V. The effect of temperature on the phenolic content and oxidative stability of o/w emulsions enriched with natural extracts from Satureja thymbra. Food Chem. 2021, 349, 129206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lisete-Torres, P.; Losada-Barreiro, S.; Albuquerque, H.; Sanchez-Paz, V.; Paiva-Martins, F.; Bravo-Diaz, C. Distribution of hydroxytyrosol and hydroxytyrosol acetate in olive oil emulsions and their antioxidant efficiency. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 7318–7325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, Y.; Carver, J.-A.; Calabrese, A.-N.; Pukala, T.-L. Gallic acid interacts with α-synuclein to prevent the structural collapse necessary for its aggregation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Prot. Proteo. 2014, 1844, 1481–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kiokias, S.; Oreopoulou, V. A review on the health protective effects of phenolic acids against a range of severe pathologic conditions (incl Coronovrus based infections). Molecules 2021, 26, 5405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Oreopoulou, A.; Papavassilopoulou, E.; Bardouki, H.; Vamvakias, M.; Bimpilas, A.; Oreopoulou, V. Antioxidant recovery from hydrodistillation residues of selected Lamiaceae species by alkaline extraction. J. Appl. Res. Medic. Aromat. Plants 2018, 8, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tsimogiannis, D.; Oreopoulou, V. Classification of phenolic compounds in plants. In Polyphenols in Plants Isolation Purification and Extract Preparation, 2nd ed.; Watson, R.R., Ed.; Elsevier Inc.: London, UK, 2019; pp. 263–284. [Google Scholar]
  25. Durand, E.; Zhao, Y.; Ruesgas-Ramón, M.; Figueroa-Espinoza, M.-C.; Lamy, S.; Coupland, J.N.; Elias, R.-J.; Villeneuve, P. Evaluation of antioxidant activity and interaction with radical species using the vesicle conjugated autoxidizable triene (VesiCAT) assay. Europ. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2019, 121, 1800419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Laguerre, M.; Bily, A.; Roller, M.; Birtić, S. Mass transport phenomena in lipidoxidation and antioxidation. Ann. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 8, 391–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kiokias, S.; Proestos, C.; Oreopoulou, V. Phenolic acids of plant origin—A review on their antioxidant activity in vitro (o/w emulsion systems) along with their in vivo health biochemical properties. Foods 2020, 9, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Traber, G.-M.; Jeffrey, A. Vitamin E, antioxidant and nothing more. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2007, 43, 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kim, S.-K.; Im, G.-J.; An, Y.-S.; Lee, S.-H.; Jung, H.-H.; Park, S.-Y. The effects of the antioxidant α-tocopherol succinate on cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in HEI-OC1 auditory cells. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhin. 2016, 86, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, L.; Yu, X.; Geng, F.; Cheng, C.; Yang, J.; Deng, Q. Effects of tocopherols on the stability of flaxseed oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by different emulsifiers: Interfacial partitioning and interaction. Food Chem. 2022, 374, 131691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rajasekaran, B.; Singh, A.; Nagarajan, M.; Benjakul, S. Effect of chitooligosaccharide and α-tocopherol on physical properties and oxidative stability of shrimp oil-in water emulsion stabilized by bovine serum albumin-chitosan complex. Food Contr. 2022, 137, 108899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tsimogiannis, D.; Oreopoulou, V. Defining the role of flavonoid structure on cottonseed oil stabilization: Study of A- and C-ring substitution. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2007, 84, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Oh, W.Y.; Ambigaipalan, P.; Shahidi, F. Quercetin and its ester derivatives inhibit oxidation of food, LDL and DNA. Food Chem. 2021, 364, 130394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yang, D.; Wang, X.Y.; Lee, J.H. Effects of flavonoids on physical and oxidative stability of soybean oil O/W emulsions. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2015, 24, 851–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Valerga, J.; Reta, M.; Lanari, M.C. Polyphenol input to the antioxidant activity of yerba mate (Ilex paraguariensis) extracts. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 45, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Skerget, M.; Kotnik, P.; Hadolin, M.; Hras, A.; Simonic, M.; Knez, Z. Phenols, pronahtocyaninds, flavones, and flavonols in some plant materials and their antioxidant activities. Food Chem. 2005, 89, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Beker, B.-Y.; Bakir, T.; Filiz, I.; Apak, R. Antioxidant protective effect of flavonoids on linoleic acid peroxidation induced by copper (II)/ascorbic acid. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2011, 164, 732–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Roedig-Penman, A.; Gordon, M.H. Antioxidant properties of myricetin and quercetin in oil and emulsions. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1998, 75, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Duffus, L.J.; Norton, J.E.; Smith, P.; Norton, I.T.; Spyropoulos, F. A comparative study on the capacity of a range of food-grade particles to form stable O/W and W/O Pickering emulsions. J. Coll. Interfac. Sci. 2016, 473, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Tong, Q.; Yi, Z.; Ran, Y.; Chen, X.; Chen, G.; Li, X. Green tea polyphenol-stabilized gel-like high internal phase pickering emulsions. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 4076–4090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Skowyra, M.; Gallego, M.G.; Segovia, F.; Almajano, M.P. Antioxidant properties of Artemisia annua extracts in model food emulsions. Antioxidants 2014, 3, 116–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. García-Iñiguez de Ciriano, M.; Rehecho, S.; Calvo, M.I.; Cavero, R.Y.; Navarro, I.; Astiasarán, I.; Ansorena, D. Effect of lyophilized water extracts of Melissa officinalis on the stability of algae and linseed oil-in-water emulsion to be used as a functional ingredient in meat products. Meat Sci. 2010, 85, 373–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Becker, E.M.; Ntouma, G.; Skibsted, L.H. Synergism and antagonism between quercetin and other chain-breaking antioxidants in lipid systems of increasing structural organisation. Food Chem. 2007, 103, 1288–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kiokias, S.; Proestos, C.; Oreopoulou, V. Effect of natural Food Antioxidants against LDL and DNA Oxidative damages. Antioxidants 2018, 7, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Sugahara, S.; Chiyo, A.; Fukuoka, K.; Ueda, Y.; Tokunaga, Y.; Nishida, Y.; Kinoshita, H.; Matsuda, Y.; Igoshi, K.; Ono, M.; et al. Unique antioxidant effects of herbal leaf tea and stem tea from Moringa oleifera L. especially on superoxide anion radical generation systems. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2018, 82, 1973–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Terpinc, P.; Polak, T.; Šegatin, N.; Hanzlowsky, A. Antioxidant properties of 4-vinyl derivatives of hydroxycinnamic acid. Food Chem. 2011, 128, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Conde, E.; Gordon, M.-H.; Moure, A.; Dominguez, H. Effects of caffeic acid and bovine serum albumin in reducing the rate of development of rancidity in oil-in-water and water-in-oil emulsions. Food Chem. 2011, 129, 1652–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Mojica, L.; Meyer, A.; Berhow, M.; González, E. Bean cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) have similar high antioxidant capacity, in vitro inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase while diverse phenolic composition and concentration. Food Res. Int. 2015, 69, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Oehlke, K.; Heins, A.; Stöckmann, H.; Schwarz, K. Impact of emulsifier microenvironments on acid–base equilibrium and activity of antioxidants. Food Chem. 2010, 118, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Maqsood, S.; Benjakul, S. Comparative studies of four different phenolic compounds on in vitro antioxidative activity and the preventive effect on lipid oxidation of fish oil emulsion and fish mince. Food Chem. 2010, 119, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shin, J.-A.; Jeong, S.-H.; Jia, C.-H.; Hong, S.-T.; Lee, K.-T. Comparison of antioxidant capacity of 4-vinylguaiacol with catechin and ferulic acid in oil-in-water emulsion. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 28, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pandurangan, A.-K.; Mohebali, N.; Norhaizan, M.-E.; Looi, C.-Y. Gallic acid attenuates dextran sulfate sodium-induced experimental colitis in BALB/c mice. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2015, 9, 3923–3934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Da Silveira, T.F.; Laguerre, M.; Bourlieu-Lacanal, C.; Lecomte, J.; Durand, E.; Figueroa-Espinoza, M.C.; Barea, B.; Barouh, N.; Castro, I.A.; Villeneuve, P. Impact of surfactant concentration and antioxidant mode of incorporation on the oxidative stability of oil-in-water nanoemulsions. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 141, 110982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Evangeliou, V.; Panagopoulou, E.; Mandala, I. Encapsulation of EGCG and esterified EGCG derivatives in double emulsions containing Whey Protein Isolate, Bacterial Cellulose and salt. Food Chem. 2019, 281, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zhu, M.; Wu, C.; Chen, Y.; Xie, M. Antioxidant effects of different polar gallic acid and its alkyl esters in oil-in-water emulsions. J. Chin. Instit. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 19, 13–22. [Google Scholar]
  56. Bou, R.; Boo, C.; Kwek, A.; Hidalgo, D.; Decke, E.A. Research ArticleEffect of different antioxidants on lycopene degradation inoil-in-water emulsions. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2011, 113, 724–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Alavi Rafiee, S.; Farhoosh, R.; Sharif, A. Antioxidant activity of gallic acid as affected by an extra carboxyl group than pyrogallol in various oxidative environments. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2018, 120, 1800319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Trisha, S. Role of hesperdin, luteolin and coumaric acid in arthritis management: A Review. Inter. J. Phys. Nutr. Phys. Educ. 2018, 3, 1183–1186. [Google Scholar]
  59. Park, J.; Gim, S.-Y.; Jeon, J.-Y.; Kim, M.-J.; Choi, H.-K.; Lee, J. Chemical profiles and antioxidant properties of roasted rice hull extracts in bulk oil and oil-in-water emulsion. Food Chem. 2019, 272, 242–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yashin, A.; Yashin, Y.; Xia, X.; Nemzer, B. Antioxidant activity of spices and their impact on human health: A review. Antioxidants 2017, 6, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Alamed, J.; Chaiyasit, W.; McClements, D.-J.; Decker, E.-A. Relationships between free radical scavenging and antioxidant activity in foods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 257, 2969–2976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Panya, A.; Kittipongpittaya, K.; Laguerre, M.; Bayrasy, C.; Lecomte, J.; Villeneuve, P.; Decker, E.-A. Interactions between α-tocopherol and rosmarinic acid and its alkyl esters in emulsions: Synergistic, additive, or antagonistic effect? J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 10320–10330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Bakota, E.-L.; Winkler-Moser, J.-K.; Berhow, M.-A.; Eller, F.-J.; Vaughn, S.-F. Antioxidant activity and sensory evaluation of a rosmarinic acid-enriched extract of Salvia officinalis. J. Food Sci. 2015, 80, 711–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Keller, S.; Locquet, N.; Cuvelier, M.E. Partitioning of vanillic acid in oil-in-water emulsions: Impact of the Tween®40 emulsifier. Food Res. Int. 2016, 88, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Li, R.; Dai, T.; Zhou, W.; Fu, G.; Wan, Y.; McClements, D.J.; Li, J. Impact of pH, ferrous ions, and tannic acid on lipid oxidation in plant-based emulsions containing saponin-coated flaxseed oil droplets. Food Res. Int. 2020, 136, 109618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Jayasinghe, C.; Gotoh, N.; Wada, S. Pro-oxidant/antioxidant behaviours of ascorbic acid, tocopherol, and plant extracts in n-3 highly unsaturated fatty acid rich oil-in-water emulsions. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 3077–3084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Narra, M.-R.; Rajendar, K.; Rudra, R.; Rao, J.-V.; Begum, G. The role of vitamin C as antioxidant in protection of biochemical and haematological stress induced by chlorpyrifos in freshwater fish Clarias batrachus. Chemosphere 2015, 132, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Dimakou, C.; Kiokias, S.; Tsaprouni, I.; Oreopoulou, V. Effect of processing and storage parameters on oxidative deterioration of oil-in-water emulsions. Food Biophys. 2007, 2, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kiokias, S.; Dimakou, C.; Tsaprouni, I.; Oreopoulou, V. Effect of compositional factors against the thermal oxidation of novel food emulsions. Food Biophys. 2006, 1, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Raikos, V.; Neacsu, M.; Morrice, P.; Duthie, G. Physicochemical stability of egg protein-stabilized oil-in-water emulsions supplemented with vegetable powders. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 49, 2433–2440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cheng, C.; Yu, X.; McClements, D.-J.; Huang, Q.-D.; Tang, H.; Yu, K.; Xiang, X.; Chen, P.; Wang, X.-T.; Deng, Q.-C. Effect of flaxseed polyphenols on physical stability and oxidative stability of flaxseed oil-in-water nanoemulsions. Food Chem. 2019, 301, 125207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kiokias, S.; Oreopoulou, V. Antioxidant properties of natural carotenoid preparations against the AAPH-oxidation of food emulsions. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Tech. 2006, 7, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Seo, S.-R.; Lee, H.-Y.; Kim, J.-C. Thermo- and pH-responsiveness of emulsions stabilized with acidic thermosensitive polymers. J. Food Eng. 2016, 111, 449–457. [Google Scholar]
  74. Branco, G.F.; Rodrigues, M.I.; Gioielli, L.A.; Castro, I.A. Effect of the simultaneous interaction among ascorbic acid, iron and ph on the oxidative stability of oil-in-water emulsions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 12183–12192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Costa, M.; Losada-Barreiro, S.; Paiva-Martins, F.; Bravo-Dıaz, C.; Romsted, L.S. A direct correlation between the antioxidant efficiencies of caffeic acid and its alkyl esters and their concentrations in the interfacial region of olive oil emulsions. The pseudophase model interpretation of the “cut-off” effect. Food Chem. 2015, 175, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhou, L.; Elias, R.-J. Antioxidant and pro-oxidant activity of (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate in food emulsions: Influence of pH and phenolic concentration. Food Chem. 2013, 138, 1503–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Sørensen, A.-D.; Villeneuve, P.; Jacobsen, C. Alkyl caffeates as antioxidants in O/W emulsions: Impact of emulsifier type and endogenous tocopherols. Europ. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2017, 119, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Zhou, L.; Elias, R.-J. Factors influencing the antioxidant and pro-oxidant activity of polyphenols in oil-in-water emulsions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 2906–2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Roedig-Penman, A.; Gordon, M.-H. Antioxidant properties of catechins and green tea extracts in model food emulsions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997, 45, 4267–4270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kim, J.; Choe, E. Effect of the pH on the lipid oxidation and polyphenols of soybean oil-in-water emulsion with added peppermint (Mentha piperita) extract in the presence and absence of iron. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 27, 1285–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Tian, L.; Zhang, S.; Yi, Z.; Cui, L.; Decker, E.-A.; McClements, D.-E. Antioxidant and prooxidant activities of tea polyphenols in oil-in-water emulsions depend on the level used and the location of proteins. Food Chem. 2022, 1, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kittipongpittaya, K.; Panya, A.; Phonsatta, N.; Decker, E.A. Effects of Environmental pH on Antioxidant Interactions between Rosmarinic Acid and α-Tocopherol in Oil-in-Water (O/W) Emulsions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 6575–6583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Losada-Barreiro, S.; Dıaz, C.-B.; Romsted, L.-S. Distributions of phenolic acid antioxidants between the interfacial and aqueous regions of corn oil emulsions: Effects of pH and emulsifier concentration. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2015, 117, 1801–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Costa, M.; Losada-Barreiro, S.; Paiva-Martins, F.; Bravo-Dıaz, C.; Romsted, L.S. Physical evidence that the variations in the efficiency of homologous series of antioxidants in emulsions are due to differences in their distribution. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 564–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Zorić, Z.; Markić, J.; Pedisić, S.; Bučević-Popović, V.; Generalić-Mekinić, I.; Grebenar, K.; Kulišić-Bilušić, T. Stability of rosmarinic acid in aqueous extracts from different Lamiaceae species after in vitro digestion with human gastrointestinal enzymes. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2016, 54, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Villeneuve, P.; Bourlieu-Lacanal, C.; Durand, E.; Lecomte, J.; McClements, D.-J.; Decker, E.-A. Lipid oxidation in emulsions and bulk oils: A review of the importance of micelles. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 29, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kanikidi, L.-D.; Tsimogiannis, D.; Kiokias, S.; Oreopoulou, V. Formulation of Rosemary Extracts through Spray-Drying Encapsulation or Emulsification). Neutraceuticals 2022, 2, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Chaiyasit, W.; Elias, R.; McClements, D.-E.; Decker, E.-A. Role of physical structures in bulk oils on lipid oxidation. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2007, 47, 299–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Waraho, T.; McClements, D.-J.; Decker, E.-A. Mechanisms of lipid oxidation in food dispersions. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 22, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. McClements, D.J.; Decker, E. Interfacial antioxidants: A review of natural and synthetic emulsifiers and co-emulsifiers that can inhibit lipid oxidation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 20–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kiralan, S.-S.; Doğu-Baykut, E.; Kittipongpittaya, K.; McClements, D.-J.; Decker, E.-A. Increased antioxidant efficacy of tocopherols by surfactant solubilization in oil-in water emulsions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 10561–10566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Almajano, M.-P.; Delgado, E.; Gordon, M.-H. Albumin causes a synergistic increase in the antioxidant activity of green tea catechins in oil-in-water emulsions. Food Chem. 2007, 102, 1375–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sabouri, S.; Geng, J.-H.; Corredig, M. Tea polyphenols association to caseinate-stabilized oil-water interfaces. Food Hydrocol. 2015, 51, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Tian, B.; Wang, Y.-X.; Wang, T.-J.; Mao, L.-J.; Lu, Y.-N.; Wang, H.-T.; Feng, Z.-B. Structure and functional properties of antioxidant nano-emulsions prepared with tea polyphenols and soybean protein isolate. J. Oleo Sci. 2019, 68, 689–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Vilasaua, J.; Solansa, C.; Gomezb, M.J.; Dabriob, J.; Mujika-Garaib, R.; Esquenaa, J. Influence of a mixed ionic/nonionic surfactant system and the emulsification process on the properties of paraffin emulsions. Coll. Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 2011, 392, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Fu, Y.; McClements, D.J.; Luo, S.; Ye, J.; Chengmei, L. Degradation kinetic of rutin encapsulated in oil-in-water emulsions: Impact of particle size. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 103, 770–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Kharat, M.; Aberg, J.; Dai, T.; McClements, D.J. Comparison of Emulsion and Nanoemulsion Delivery Systems: The Chemical Stability of Curcumin Decreases as Oil Droplet Size Decreases. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 9205–9212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Losada-Barreiro, S.; Dıaz, C.-B.; Martins, F.-P.; Romsted, L.-S. Maxima in antioxidant distributions and efficiencies with increasing hydrophobicity of gallic acid and its alkyl esters. The pseudophase model interpretation of the “Cut off Effect”. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 6533–6543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Almeida, J.; Losada-Barreiro, S.; Costa, M.; Paiva-Martins, F.; Bravo-Díaz, C.; Romsted, L.S. Interfacial Concentrations of Hydroxytyrosol and Its Lipophilic Esters in Intact Olive Oil-in-Water Emulsions: Effects of Antioxidant Hydrophobicity, Surfactant Concentration, and the Oil-to-Water Ratio on the Oxidative Stability of the Emulsions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 5274–5283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Meireles, M.; Losada-Barreiro, S.; Costa, M.; Paiva-Martins, F.; Bravo-Díaz, C.; Monteiro, L.-S. Control of antioxidant efficiency of chlorogenates in emulsions: Modulation of antioxidant interfacial concentrations. J. Sci. Food. Agric. 2019, 99, 3917–3925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Huang, S.W.; Frankel, E.N.; Schwarz, K.; Aeschbach, R.; German, J.B. Antioxidant activity of carnosic acid and methyl carnosate in bulk oils and oil-in-water emulsions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996, 44, 2951–2956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Li, A.; Zhao, M.T.; Yin, F.W.; Zhang, M.; Liu, H.L.; Zhou, D.Y.; Shahidi, F. Antioxidant effects of gallic acid alkyl esters of various chain lengths in oyster during frying process. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 56, 2938–2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Noon, J.; Mills, T.B.; Norton, I.T. The use of natural antioxidants to combat lipid oxidation in O/W emulsions. J. Food Eng. 2020, 281, 110006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Di Mattia, C.D.; Sacchetti, G.; Mastrocola, D.; Sarker, D.K.; Pittia, P. Surface properties of phenolic compounds and their influence on the dispersion and oxidative stability of olive oil O/W emulsions. Food Hydrocol. 2010, 24, 652–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Bravo-Dıaz, C.; Romsted, L.-S.; Liu, S.; Losada-Barreiro, S.; Gallego, M.-J.; Xiang, G. To model chemical reactivity in heterogeneous emulsions, think homogeneous microemulsions. Langmuir 2015, 31, 8961–8979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Kiokias, S.; Varzakas, T.; Oreopoulou, V. In vitro activity of vitamins, flavonoids, and natural phenolic antioxidants against the oxidative deterioration of oil-based systems. Critic. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2008, 48, 78–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Bast, A.; Haanen, G.-R.; den Berg, V. Antioxidant effects of carotenoids. Int. J. Vit. Nutr. Res. 2007, 68, 399–403. [Google Scholar]
  108. Filip, V.; Hradkova, I.; Smidrkal, J. Antioxidants in margarine emulsions. Czech J. Food Sci. 2009, 27, 9–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Liu, R.; Chang, M.; Liu, R.; Xu, Y.; Wang, X. Interactions between α-tocopherol and γ-oryzanol in oil-in-water emulsions. Food Chem. 2021, 356, 129648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Wu, C.; Zhou, X.Y.; Zhang, M.R.; Chen, Y.; Nie, S.P.; Xie, M.Y. Combined application of gallate ester and α-tocopherol in oil-in-water emulsion: Their distribution and antioxidant efficiency. J. Disp. Sci. Technol. 2019, 41, 909–917. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Expected partitioning of phenolic antioxidants between the different regions of an o/w emulsion system (alkyl chain towards the lipid core, hydrophilic part towards the interface).
Figure 1. Expected partitioning of phenolic antioxidants between the different regions of an o/w emulsion system (alkyl chain towards the lipid core, hydrophilic part towards the interface).
Colloids 06 00079 g001
Figure 2. CSLM image of a 10% cottonseed o/w emulsion stabilized by 1% sodium caseinate. (Spherical oil droplets stabilized in the protein network, image size:131 × 131 μm) (produced in NTUA/Laboratory of Food Chemistry and Technology).
Figure 2. CSLM image of a 10% cottonseed o/w emulsion stabilized by 1% sodium caseinate. (Spherical oil droplets stabilized in the protein network, image size:131 × 131 μm) (produced in NTUA/Laboratory of Food Chemistry and Technology).
Colloids 06 00079 g002
Table 1. Overview of literature reporting a clear antioxidant activity of certain phenolic compounds (alone or in combinations) against oxidative deterioration of various model oil-in-water emulsion systems.
Table 1. Overview of literature reporting a clear antioxidant activity of certain phenolic compounds (alone or in combinations) against oxidative deterioration of various model oil-in-water emulsion systems.
StructureEmulsion Systems/Reported Antioxidant ActivitiesLiterature
α,δ Tocopherols
Colloids 06 00079 i001
Flaxseed o/w emulsions/
Clear effect of tocopherols (δToc > α-Toc)
[30]
Flavonoids (general structure)
Colloids 06 00079 i002
Clear effect of flavonoids in various o/w emulsions (with quercetin being the stronger antitoxidant)/[34,35,37]
Caffeic acid (CA)
Colloids 06 00079 i003
Tween-based linoleic acid o/w emulsions/clear CA effect[46]
Citrem- and Tween-based o/w emulsions/clear CA effect in the presence of endogenous tocopherols[77]
Ferulic acid (FA)
Colloids 06 00079 i004
Corn oil-based o/w emulsions
/clear FA effect
[49]
Tween-linoleic acid-based emulsions/clear FA effect[50]
Gallic acid (GA)
Colloids 06 00079 i005
SDS stabilised rapeseed o/w nano-emulsions/clear GA effect[53]
Clear effect of GA or its alkyl esters added in combination with α-toc in o/w emulsions[110]
Rosmarinic acid (RA)
Colloids 06 00079 i006
Tween-based o/w emulsions prepared with linoleic acid or soybean emulsions/clear RA effect[62]
Clear effect of RA-rich plant extracts in sunflower o/w emulsions[19]
Vanillic acid (VA)
Colloids 06 00079 i007
Tween 40-based o/w systems, at pH 3.5/clear effect of VA in the emulsified system[64]
Ascorbic acid
Colloids 06 00079 i008
Mixtures of ascorbic acid with α-tocopherol in o/w emulsions/strong synergistic antioxidant effect[108]
Mixtures of ascorbic acid with quercetin in o/w emulsions/observed synergistic activity[102]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kiokias, S.; Oreopoulou, V. Review on the Antioxidant Activity of Phenolics in o/w Emulsions along with the Impact of a Few Important Factors on Their Interfacial Behaviour. Colloids Interfaces 2022, 6, 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids6040079

AMA Style

Kiokias S, Oreopoulou V. Review on the Antioxidant Activity of Phenolics in o/w Emulsions along with the Impact of a Few Important Factors on Their Interfacial Behaviour. Colloids and Interfaces. 2022; 6(4):79. https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids6040079

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kiokias, Sotirios, and Vassiliki Oreopoulou. 2022. "Review on the Antioxidant Activity of Phenolics in o/w Emulsions along with the Impact of a Few Important Factors on Their Interfacial Behaviour" Colloids and Interfaces 6, no. 4: 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids6040079

APA Style

Kiokias, S., & Oreopoulou, V. (2022). Review on the Antioxidant Activity of Phenolics in o/w Emulsions along with the Impact of a Few Important Factors on Their Interfacial Behaviour. Colloids and Interfaces, 6(4), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids6040079

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop