Next Article in Journal
A Novel Method to Determine the Optimal Location for a Cellular Tower by Using LiDAR Data
Previous Article in Journal
Taiwan Stock Tape Reading Periodically Using Web Scraping Technology with GUI
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
ASI
Volume 5
Issue 2
10.3390/asi5020029
asi-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The 3D Product Model Research Evolution and Future Trends: A Systematic Literature Review

by
Carl Kirpes
1,
Guiping Hu
2,* and
Dave Sly
1
1
Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering (IMSE), Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
2
Department of Sustainability, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Syst. Innov. 2022, 5(2), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5020029
Submission received: 22 December 2021 / Revised: 9 February 2022 / Accepted: 11 February 2022 / Published: 22 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The 3D product model has long been a tool used by engineers to design and plan for the physical creation of a 3D object. The way in which the 3D product model has been applied to production and assembly processes has evolved over time, yet the current body of knowledge does not document that evolution. The purpose of this article is to collect and structure the evolution of 3D product model research, categorizing the ways in which the body of knowledge has evolved over time, while also providing a look into projected applications and research focuses of the 3D product model. The result of this article is the development of sixteen 3D product model research themes and the categorization of the body of knowledge within those themes, establishing a basis for 3D product model research ontology. Then, the paper explores where the evolution of the 3D product model is trending based on discussions with industry experts. The authors aim to provide a foundation for a comprehensive and interdisciplinary discussion amongst academia and industry about the current state and future trends of research on the 3D product model and its application in production and assembly processes.

1. Introduction

Three-dimensional (3D) product models generate value to manufacturing companies in multiple stages of the engineering, assembly, and production processes [1]. Initially used primarily as a design tool, the 3D product model focused on helping engineers create visual models of the product they intended to create. The 3D product model later moved into the production and assembly processes, helping create value in a variety of ways, from allowing operators to see how a product is configured to ensuring the right parts, tools, work instructions, and other critical components are assigned to the right stations [1,2]. With the development of new software and technologies, the stage is now set for the 3D product model to be utilized in emerging applications and frontiers of industrial and systems engineering [3,4]. The authors note that the 3D product model can have a large array of meanings from the virtual computer-aided design (CAD) model, to a digital mock-up, to a digital twin, or even a physical 3D model. The 3D product model application focused on in this paper is the value of bringing the virtual CAD model and digital 3D assembly mock-up to the assembly process beyond the engineering design. The authors have recognized that the 3D product models usability has increased as computer graphics have improved, mathematical models have emerged to simplify the 3D product model representations, and technology such as virtual reality glasses provide new 3D product model applications. As concepts such as artificial intelligence, robotics, and the digital twin emerge in both academia and industry, the authors aimed to understand the 3D product models role in these evolving applications. Doing so led the authors down a path of reviewing how the 3D product model research has developed to date, which was followed by interviewing industry experts on anticipated future trends.
The authors recognized a significant amount of research in the body of knowledge on 3D product models with similar focus topics but did not come across any research that established themes around these topics and categorized the research accordingly. This generated the question “How has the 3D product model research evolved over time?” and, once these themes were determined, “Where is the research and industry applications of the 3D product model projected to head in the future?” The authors’ intent is to answer those questions and close the current gap in the research, providing the foundation for future comprehensive 3D product model research ontology. This work collects a comprehensive list of approximately 300 articles and conference proceedings that discuss the 3D product model and its applications to assembly and production processes, develops themes across the research, categorizes the research by those themes, and projects future applications and research trends.

2. Materials and Methods

The schematic of the research methodology used in this research is show in Figure 1.
The research team searched the Compendex database for articles that contained any variation of the term “3D” and “assembly” while excluding “printing.” The objective of this search was to identify the body of literature in the engineering field that focused on 3D product models and their application in assembly operations. This search generated over 40,000 relevant database entries and, when limited to English, resulted in 38,934 records. When limited further to journal articles, the search results in approximately 24,690 records. To view how the magnitude of research on the 3D product model has evolved over time, the authors sorted the research entries by year, as show in Figure 2. While there were articles written on the 3D product model prior to 1970, the number recorded in the database was minimal, and the authors have excluded them from the figure to make the remainder of the figure large enough to be legible. That said, the articles that predate 1970 have been considered in our analysis.
Then, the authors reviewed the title and abstracts of the journal articles returned in the search. Given the intent of this research was to review how the 3D product model research has evolved over time, the authors started with the oldest research articles and began to comb through them to identify research trends. As the authors progressed, the team was able to determine additional search terms that could be excluded to reduce the quantity of articles to review without eliminating large swaths of the body of knowledge that would be applicable to the research. The term “printing” was excluded to remove the research surrounding 3D printing, as the authors were primarily focused on the application of 3D product models in manufacturing facilities requiring production and assembly operations.
The authors do note that the 3D product model has a direct tie to the 3D printing application, as the 3D product model is the foundation of 3D printing and even computer numerical control (CNC) milling and machining techniques. While 3D printing and enhanced machining capabilities are a key component of the 4th industrial revolution and do tie back to the 3D product model, the authors’ aim in this research was to focus on the assembly process. While in some cases, enhanced 3D printing and machine techniques can be used to replace the need for assembly altogether (given that complex shapes and geometries can now be produced as a single component, which was not previously feasible), there are still a large number of applications where assembly is critical. Such applications include assemblies of complex equipment in industries such as motor vehicles, industrial machinery, aerospace, medical products, construction and farm machinery, and electronics. These industries are the primary focus of this research, which is why the authors have chosen to exclude “printing” as a search term, to target the research to those industries that involve complex assembly operations. For readers who are interested in learning more about 3D printing and its role in industry 4.0, the authors included some supplemental references [5,6,7].
To remove research surrounding 3D fluid flows that are not applicable to the application of 3D product models in assembly operations, the terms “convection, laminar, petroleum, thermal, and thermo” were added to the list of excluded terms. Likewise, the words “carbon, chemical, chemistry, nuclear, and nano” were excluded as the research with those terms tended to focus on 3D molecular structures. The final excluded terms added were “structural and semiconductor”, as the authors were primarily interested in the application of 3D product models to products that would be produced in a manufacturing facility with size and scale requiring production and assembly processes, versus application to building structures or electrical components. These excluded terms were developed based on the authors’ initial review of the data to determine segments of research that the database query was returning that were not applicable.
The exclusion of the terms shown in above reduced the records to closer to 4000. These were broken down by decade, as shown in Table 1.
Then, the authors reviewed the remaining articles and summarized the key findings in those that are relevant. Not all records that remained after the search terms noted above were relevant, so the authors spent a great deal of time reviewing the remaining records to capture the research work applicable to the evolution of 3D product model research over time. The results are presented in the next section.

3. Results

In reviewing the body of literature of the 3D product model research, the authors developed the following themes that the research focused on around the 3D product model. These themes and the corresponding number of applicable research papers that reference them are noted in Table 2.
To provide additional visibility into how these research themes were developed, the authors have listed the research articles and conference proceedings that were used to determine these research themes. Given all these articles and conference proceedings are being referenced simultaneously in Table 3, the authors chose to list the references in alphabetical order by last name in the References section It is of note that the authors chose to assign one research theme per publication and thus selected the most prominent theme.
While Table 3 provides the research corresponding to each 3D product model theme, it does not show a clear visual of the research evolution over time. The authors also developed how the 3D product model research evolved by decade, as shown in Figure 3.
The themes over time and the amount of research in each decade can be combined to then find what the major themes were for each decade of research. Table 4 demonstrates the research in quantity of research articles by research them by decade over time.
As the data show, the 3D product model started as a tool mainly used for product design all the way through the 1990s. In the 1990s, virtual reality and virtual assembly began to be discussed, along with the idea of using the 3D model beyond just product design for applications in assembly line and assembly station layout planning.
In the 2000s, the research focused shifted from just designing the product to also designing for assembly. The importance of how 3D product models could assist in geometric dimensioning and tolerancing increased, and the use of 3D product models in virtual environments gained further traction. The 2000s also showed the start of research on how the 3D product model could be used in web-based applications, and early discussions on moving beyond virtual reality to augmented reality began.
In the 2010s, the importance of structuring the 3D product models so that the data within them could be more easily processed by computers began to take off. While virtual reality and virtual assembly applications of the 3D product model remained strong, augmented reality and combining the virtual and physical environments gained traction. In addition, with the further development of more 3D product models, the need arose to reduce redundancy in creating 3D product models, and research grew on how to query databases of 3D product models to find already designed parts and assemblies. Deploying the 3D product model to the shop floor via virtual training and virtual work instructions also was a research topic that garnered support.
In the 2020s, the concept of the 3D product model applications has seen another shift. While augmented reality remains a relevant topic, much of the research has moved to the application of the 3D product model in artificial intelligence and digital twins.
The authors’ development of the sixteen 3D product model research themes and the categorization, by decade, of the body of knowledge into those themes answers the question of how the 3D product model research has evolved overtime. Then, the 3D product model research themes developed in this work provide the foundation for a future comprehensive 3D product model research ontology.

4. Discussion

4.1. The 3D Product Model Research Evolution

As seen in the Results section, the authors were able to develop 3D product model research themes and identify trends in those research themes over time. These trends will be discussed in greater detail, with specific examples throughout the Discussion section of this paper.

4.1.1. 1940s to 1960s

In the 1940s to the 1960s personal computers were not yet in existence, and so while companies and individuals were developing engineering drawings, they were doing so by hand. Many of the engineering drawings were done in two dimensions but, even before the existence of a personal computer to aid in 3D product model development, companies were still finding applications for the development and use of 3D models. In 1941, Douglas Aircraft was using hand-drawn three-dimensional drawings to speed up the planning and operation of their mass production assembly lines, and by 1942, Boeing had begun doing the same [76,253]. In some instances, a miniature physical 3D model of the plant and the product were being developed, such as at Ford Motor Company in 1947 followed by other organizations in the 1950s [16,196].

4.1.2. 1970s

In the 1970s, the research remained largely focused on using the 3D product model for product design. That research included a range of applications from how 3D product models could be used in the design of a diesel engine to the design of buildings [114,215,216]. In addition, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers published research that was the first of its kind to account for tolerances and dimensioning of 3D models [77]. Research also began on how databases can be used to capture the information that a 3D product model contains [113].

4.1.3. 1980s

In the 1980s, again, the focus of the 3D product model research remained on product design, with many large organizations concentrating research efforts in this area, including research sponsored by organizations such as IBM, Austin Rover, McDonnel Douglas, and Northrop Aircraft [27,139,221,274]. However, the research also built on the trends started in the 1970s of 3D product model geometric dimensioning and tolerancing as well as data processing of the 3D product model. Organizations that were focused on the data processing of the 3D product models and reviewing the ways in which users wanted to access the 3D product model data included IBM, Princeton, and Combustion Engineering [111,235,280]. In the same decade, both John Deere and Eastman-Kodak focused research on geometric dimensioning and tolerancing of 3D product models to statistically analyze tolerance stack-up and develop probability information on how assembly dimensions are distributed when parts are assembled [74,208,227]. The 1980s also saw the first development of research focused on moving beyond the product design focus to include the impact the 3D product model has on the assembly sequence [140].

4.1.4. 1990s

While product design continued to be the focus of the 3D product model research in the 1990s, the emergence of new technologies enabled research to begin on virtual assembly and using the 3D product model in virtual environments. The research on the virtual assembly of 3D products included the implementation of force feedback systems from the virtual environment to the physical environment at the Institute of Technology in Japan, combining human movement in the assembly of 3D products in the virtual environment with ergonomics research at Caterpillar and using the virtual environment for virtual assembly training at Motorola [75,110,279]. The virtual environment and 3D product model were also used at Iowa State University’s Virtual Reality Applications Center to identify the impact that part shapes have on the stresses on that part and make modifications in real time [222]. Technology and research also emerged in the 1990s to not only apply the virtual environment to the physical world but also reverse engineer the physical world into the 3D virtual environment. Scanning technologies and coordinate measuring machines (CMM) were used to capture key data points of physical objects and translate them into 3D models [66,118].

4.1.5. 2000s

In the 2000s, the research shifted from the 3D product model design to 3D product model design for assembly. Research emerged on computer-aided assembly planning systems, with applications ranging from electromechanical components to pumps, torque converters, golfcarts, and aircraft [30,82,163,183,192]. As research on design for assembly grew, so did the use of the 3D product models for virtual assembly training and the development of virtual work instructions [187,226]. On the research front of geometric dimensioning and tolerancing of 3D product models, the literature moved beyond applying probabilities to tolerance stack-up to determining the optimal configuration of variant part assemblies, in addition to the tradeoffs between improved tolerances and associated costs that were reviewed in the 3D product model development stage [124,156]. The functionality of the internet and world wide web also improved greatly in the 2000s, and with that came research on how to deploy 3D product models over the web, with the development of the virtual reality modeling language (VRML) aimed at meeting that objective. With the advent of VRML, researchers looked to increase its functionality via proposing solutions such as concurrent design environments, drag-and-drop applications, and manufacturing task planning over the web [64,205,269]. This technology enabled different individuals located in different locations around the world to simultaneously work on and edit the same 3D product model. In the 2000s, the first research on augmented reality using the 3D product model also emerged, with early applications including the evaluation of assembly sequencing and prototyping using both physical and virtual models simultaneously [179,193].

4.1.6. 2010s

From the 2000s to the 2010s, the research on 3D product models continued to accelerate. Key focus areas of that research included enhancing the ability of the 3D product model data to be processed by computers, the need to catalogue 3D product model parts in a library for reference-and-reuse versus recreation, and a larger focus on augmented reality applications. To enhance 3D product model data processing, compression algorithms were developed, mesh segmentation of the 3D model was utilized, and programs were developed to convert 3D product model file formats to standardized formats [62,207,285]. Model-based definition structures and lightweight 3D models were also developed to enhance data processing [94,95,233,234]. As more 3D models are developed, the need began to arise for a library of 3D product models that could be referenced and reused rather than recreated. Research on ways to achieve the reuse of existing 3D product models from 3D product model libraries included assembly-based modeling, 3D CAD assembly model matching, and a significant subassemblies approach [54,137,138,290]. In the 2010s, the application of augmented reality also spread across and intertwined with other research categories of the 3D product model, including design for assembly, assembly planning, and disassembly [55,186,268].

4.1.7. 2020s

While, at the time of this writing, we are still early in the decade of the 2020s, the 3D product model research has evolved to focusing on the application of the 3D product model in artificial intelligence, robotics, and the digital twin. The 3D product model is at the confluence of these areas, being applied to robotic assembly via digital twin technology and serving as a digital representation of the physical space on a real-time basis [103,159]. The 3D product model also continues to be applied in augmented reality applications, with recent research focused on user cognitive load and user satisfaction when utilizing these Industry 4.0 augmented reality applications [170].

4.2. The 3D Product Model Research Current State and Future Trends

In discussions with industry experts, as we move through the 2020s into the 2030s and beyond, a number of trends are anticipated to play out in 3D product model research and industry applications. As organizations evolve and enterprise architecture interdisciplinary teams develop, the application of the 3D product model and the information they contain will become more broadly available beyond segregated departments such as information technology or operations. This will enable a federated approach in which having the 3D product model data will better enable teams to autonomously make decisions needed to reach the organization’s key objectives. The standardization of data methods across industries will be a key enabler of this autonomy and accelerate the adoption of the 3D product model in areas such as analytics, machine learning, and the internet of things (IOT). The 3D product model will move from an analytic tool to becoming an integral part of the product lifecycle, where the evolution of the geometry and key characteristics of the product will also be able to be modeled in real time as the product moves through the production process.
Knowing the evolution of the part geometry through the production process will enable marring the product digital twin with the process digital twin and create opportunities such as knowing what products are best to be ordered based on machine set-up, calibration, and dimensions for less changeover time via the sequencing of similar parts. The marrying of the product digital twin and process digital twin will also help mine out manufacturing patterns to generatively create designs and help determine the best manufacturing processes for a given 3D product model geometry. In addition, marring the product digital twin with the process digital twin can be coupled with the use of neural nets to reduce individual stock-keeping units (SKUs) through providing recommendations on 3D product model parts to combine based on both geometry and the manufacturing processes used to create them. As new parts are designed, the computer will also be able to provide design recommendations based on previously developed 3D product model parts clusters. This evolution combines product design with design for assembly and design for manufacturability.
Over time, machine learning will be able to be used to associate manufacturing operations to the engineering 3D product model design. Any two parts that come together are joined somehow, and the computer will learn to determine how those geometries should be manufactured and assembled, including what tooling to use to do so. Machine learning of the 3D product model will also enable the development of numerical control (NC) program generation, and inspections plans will be automatically generated that are needed to manufacture, assemble, and inspect a part/assembly. Such developments will require parallel computation and quantum computing to account for the correlation and make such solutions possible.
Eventually, the sustainability and repurposing of material will also become a cognizant component of the 3D product model design. The design, manufacturing processes, and operations will be done in such a way to allow that product to be easily upgraded and/or reused in different ways for subtle tasks.

5. Conclusions

The 3D product model opens a vast array of possibilities, from how the product is designed to how it is manufactured assembled, transported, serviced, and re-used. This article identified research themes in the 3D product model research evolution, categorized the research by those themes, and provides a look into the future on 3D product model research that is currently under development and yet to come. Overall, 16 research themes were identified, including applications of research on how the 3D product model fits into emerging frontiers such as artificial intelligence, robotics, and the digital twin.
The major research themes were identified in a one-to-one relationship between the research themes and the literature. Future research could evaluate a one-to-many relationship in which the literature is assigned multiple research themes, to add additional context around the 3D product model research evolution. In addition, this research used Compendex as the database of record, so other sources (such as Scopus) could be used to further evaluate and expand the body of knowledge and research themes collected in this work. Many of the research themes were listed in the literature, but definitions on these research themes were not always explicitly provided. Thus, the research themes in this work are based on the knowledge, expertise, and perspectives of the authors. The authors aimed to increase the transparency of the research theme development by sharing the previously published research that applied to these themes. The authors encourage others to provide feedback and challenge the selection of the research themes and projected future trends.
This article can be thought of as a first step in defining the 3D product model research evolution and future trends. As research on the 3D product model and its application to production and assembly processes continues to develop, the authors anticipate these research themes will continue to be broadened and enhanced further.

Author Contributions

C.K. and G.H. conceived the idea. C.K. formulated the problem, developed the research themes, and worked with industry participants to determine probable future research trends. G.H. and D.S. provided guidance throughout the research and proofread the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to this version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in Section 2 and Section 3 of the manuscript. Specific references in the Discussion section have been generalized to protect the right of the industry experts (who collaborated in this research) to remain anonymous while still retaining the relevance of the data.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the industrial and systems engineers who are experts in their field and provided their perspective on the future trends of 3D product model research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kirpes, C.; Sly, D.; Hu, G. Quantitative Model for the Value of the 3D Product Model Use in Production Processes. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2021, 4, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kirpes, C.; Sly, D.; Hu, G. Value of the 3D product model use in assembly processes: Process planning, design, and shop floor execution. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2021, 4, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sly, D. Integrating 3D product models with assembly line balancing via process consumption. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 17, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sly, D.; Kirpes, C. Emerging frontiers in industrial and systems engineering: Success through collaboration. In Building and Managing the Bill of Process to Streamline the Enterprise—An Emerging Technology-Enabled Systems Approach; Nembhard, H.B., Cudney, E.A., Coperich, K.M., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; pp. 149–165. [Google Scholar]
  5. Casini, M. Chapter 3—Building digital revolution. In Construction 4.0; Casini, M., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2022; pp. 151–186. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kantaros, A.; Diegel, O.; Piromalis, D.; Tsaramirsis, G.; Khadidos, A.O.; Khadidos, A.O.; Khan, F.Q.; Sadeeq, J. 3D printing: Making an innovative technology widely accessible through makerspaces and outsourced services. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 49, 2712–2723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mahamood, R.M.; Jen, T.-C.; Akinlabi, S.A.; Hassan, S.; Abdulrahman, K.; Akinlabi, E. Chapter 6—Role of additive manufacturing in the era of Industry 4.0. In Additive Manufacturing; Manjaiah, M., Raghavendra, K., Balashanmugam, N., Paulo Davim, J., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2021; pp. 107–126. [Google Scholar]
  8. Anonymous. 3D CAD strips 20% off engineer-to-order machining time. Manuf. Comput. Solut. 2005, 11, 57. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=article&issn=1358-1066&date=2005&volume=11&issue=1&spage=57&epage=57&title=Manufacturing%20Computer%20Solutions&atitle=3D%20CAD%20strips%2020%25%20off%20engineer-to-order%20machining%20time&aulast=&aufirst=&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=2005088847019&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  9. Anonymous. Surface modelling cuts design by 50%. Manuf. Comput. Solut. 2005, 11, 40. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=article&issn=1358-1066&date=2005&volume=11&issue=2&spage=40&epage=40&title=Manufacturing%20Computer%20Solutions&atitle=Surface%20modelling%20cuts%20design%20by%2050%25&aulast=&aufirst=&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=2005139010103&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  10. Anonymous. Simulation helps GM cut the tests. Environ. Eng. 2006, 19, 45–46. Available online: https://web.s.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=263ff1cb-d16a-41cb-b70b-ddb193270055%40redis (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  11. Abdel-Malek, K.; Zou, H.L.; Wang, J.Y.; Othman, S. Automated design and parametrization of mechanical part geometry. Res. Eng. Des. Theory Appl. Concurr. Eng. 1999, 11, 206–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Aish, R. 3D Icons and Architectural CAD. Comput. Graph. Forum 1985, 4, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Alfadhlani; Ari Samadhi, T.M.A.; Ma’Ruf, A.; Toha, I.S. Automatic collision detection for assembly sequence planning using a three-dimensional solid model. J. Adv. Manuf. Syst. 2011, 10, 277–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Anderson, R.O. Detecting and Eliminating Collisions in NC Machining. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 1978, 10, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Anonymous. Perspective drawings speed plane assembly. Agric. Aviat. 1942, 41, 118–120. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=article&issn=&date=1942&volume=41&issue=6&spage=118&epage=120&title=Aviation&atitle=Perspective%20drawings%20speed%20plane%20assembly&aulast=Anon&aufirst=&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=19420000906&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  16. Anonymous. Miniature auto plant aids engineers in analyzing production layouts. Steel 1947, 120, 89126. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=article&issn=&date=1947&volume=120&issue=7&spage=89&epage=89&title=Steel&atitle=Miniature%20auto%20plant%20aids%20engineers%20in%20analyzing%20production%20layouts&aulast=Anon&aufirst=&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=19470001851&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  17. Anselmetti, B. Generation of functional tolerancing based on positioning features. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 2006, 38, 902–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Antonya, C.; Talaba, D. Design evaluation and modification of mechanical systems in virtual environments. Virtual Real. 2007, 11, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Arai, E.; Iwata, K. CAD system with product assembly/disassembly planning function. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 1993, 10, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Barr, R.E.; Schmidt, P.S.; Krueger, T.J.; Twu, C.-Y. An introduction to engineering through an integrated reverse engineering and design graphics project. J. Eng. Educ. 2000, 89, 413–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Barton, J.C.; Finley, C.R.; Faulkner, J.R. CAD System Used for Major Offshore Project. Oil Gas J. 1986, 84, 96–102. [Google Scholar]
  22. Baydar, C.M.; Saitou, K. Automated generation of robust error recovery logic in assembly systems using genetic programming. J. Manuf. Syst. 2001, 20, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Berg, L.P.; Behdad, S.; Vance, J.M.; Thurston, D. Disassembly Sequence Evaluation: A User Study Leveraging Immersive Computing Technologies. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 2015, 15, 011002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Bergsten, F.C. Computer-Aided Design, Manufacturing, Assembly and Test (CADMAT). Proc. Des. Autom. Conf. 1981, 18, 873–880. [Google Scholar]
  25. Besbes, M.; Zolghadri, M.; Costa Affonso, R.; Masmoudi, F.; Haddar, M. 3D facility layout problem. J. Intell. Manuf. 2021, 32, 1065–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bhattacharya, B.; Winer, E.H. Augmented reality via expert demonstration authoring (AREDA). Comput. Ind. 2019, 105, 61–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bhaumik, P.K. Building aircraft assembly tools from A 3-D database. In Proceedings of the Aerospace Technology Conference and Exposition, Anaheim, CA, USA, 3–6 October 1988; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Blatcher, R. Productive processes. Engineering 2010, 251, 32–33. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=article&issn=&date=1947&volume=120&issue=7&spage=89&epage=89&title=Steel&atitle=Miniature%20auto%20plant%20aids%20engineers%20in%20analyzing%20production%20layouts&aulast=Anon&aufirst=&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=19470001851&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  29. Bo, C.; Yang, Z.; Wang, L.; Chen, H. A comparison of tolerance analysis models for assembly. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2013, 68, 739–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Boer, C.R.; Pedrazzoli, P.; Sacco, M.; Rinaldi, R.; De Pascale, G.; Avai, A. Integrated computer aided design for assembly systems. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 2001, 50, 17–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bonino, B.; Giannini, F.; Monti, M.; Raffaeli, R. Review on the leveraging of design information in 3D CAD models for subassemblies identification. Comput. Aided Des. Appl. 2021, 18, 1247–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Boysen, N.; Bock, S. Scheduling just-in-time part supply for mixed-model assembly lines. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2011, 211, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Boysen, N.; Fliedner, M.; Scholl, A. A classification of assembly line balancing problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2007, 183, 674–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Boysen, N.; Fliedner, M.; Scholl, A. Level scheduling of mixed-model assembly lines under storage constraints. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2009, 47, 2669–2684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Boysen, N.; Fliedner, M.; Scholl, A. Production planning of mixed-model assembly lines: Overview and extensions. Prod. Plan. Control 2009, 20, 455–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Boysen, N.; Fliedner, M.; Scholl, A. Sequencing mixed-model assembly lines: Survey, classification and model critique. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2009, 192, 349–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Boysen, N.; Fliedner, M.; Scholl, A. The product rate variation problem and its relevance in real world mixed-model assembly lines. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2009, 197, 818–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Boysen, N.; Kiel, M.; Scholl, A. Sequencing mixed-model assembly lines to minimise the number of work overload situations. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2011, 49, 4735–4760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Boysen, N.; Scholl, A.; Wopperer, N. Resequencing of mixed-model assembly lines: Survey and research agenda. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2012, 216, 594–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Braun, R.C.; Marx, W.G. Virtual manufacturing tools in the product design environment. In Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition; American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Material Handling Division, MHD: Bethpage, NY, USA, 1999; Volume 5, pp. 171–177. [Google Scholar]
  41. Brody, H. CAD meets CAM. High Technol. 1987, 7, 12–15. [Google Scholar]
  42. Brost, R.C.; Peters, R.R. Automatic design of 3-D fixtures and assembly pallets. Int. J. Robot. Res. 1998, 17, 1243–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Brough, J.E.; Schwartz, M.; Gupta, S.K.; Anand, D.K.; Kavetsky, R.; Pettersen, R. Towards the development of a virtual environment-based training system for mechanical assembly operations. Virtual Real. 2007, 11, 189–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Brown, R.G.; Brost, R.C. 3-D modular gripper design tool. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 1999, 15, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bullinger, H.J.; Richter, M.; Seidel, K.A. Virtual assembly planning. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. 2000, 10, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Butt, S.W.; Miller, H.P.; Hoke, D.N.; Piazza, F. Comprehensive Application of a CAD/CAM System to Mechanical Design. RCA Engineer 1986, 31, 18–24. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=article&issn=0048-6574&date=1986&volume=31&issue=2&spage=18&epage=24&title=RCA%20engineer&atitle=COMPREHENSIVE%20APPLICATION%20OF%20A%20CAD%2FCAM%20SYSTEM%20TO%20MECHANICAL%20DESIGN.&aulast=Butt&aufirst=S.W.&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=1986070091852&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  47. Camillo, J. 3D Modeling and simulation software helps ford manage global assembly. Assembly 2014, 57. [Google Scholar]
  48. Camillo, J. Fast prototyping sweetens baker’s success. Assembly 2014, 57. [Google Scholar]
  49. Camillo, J. 3D modeling brings concurrent benefits to machinery builder. Assembly 2016, 59. [Google Scholar]
  50. Cao, Y.; Liu, T.; Yang, J.; Yan, H. A novel tolerance analysis method for three-dimensional assembly. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 2019, 233, 1818–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Carlson, P.; Peters, A.; Gilbert, S.B.; Vance, J.M.; Luse, A. Virtual training: Learning transfer of assembly tasks. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2015, 21, 770–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chan, S.C.F.; Soo, S.M.K.; Yu, K.M. Customer-driven collaborative product assembler for Internet-based commerce. Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl. 2006, 14, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chang, Y.; Aziz, E.-S.; Esche, S.K.; Chassapis, C. A framework for developing collaborative training environments for assembling. Comput. Educ. J. 2013, 4, 44–59. [Google Scholar]
  54. Chaudhuri, S.; Kalogerakis, E.; Guibas, L.; Koltun, V. Probabilistic reasoning for assembly-based 3D modeling. ACM Trans. Graph. 2011, 30, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chen, C.J.; Hong, J.; Wang, S.F. Automated positioning of 3D virtual scene in AR-based assembly and disassembly guiding system. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2015, 76, 753–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chen, C.; Tian, Z.; Li, D.; Pang, L.; Wang, T.; Hong, J. Projection-based augmented reality system for assembly guidance and monitoring. Assem. Autom. 2021, 41, 10–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chen, J.; Jia, X. A multimedia case-based reasoning framework for assembly sequence planning. Assem. Autom. 2019, 39, 673–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chen, K.-Z.; Feng, X.-A.; Ding, L. Intelligent approaches for generating assembly drawings from 3-D computer models of mechanical products. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 2002, 34, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chen, R.-S.; Lu, K.-Y.; Tai, P.-H. Optimizing assembly planning through a three-stage integrated approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2004, 88, 243–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Chen, W.-C.; Hsu, Y.-Y.; Hsieh, L.-F.; Tai, P.-H. A systematic optimization approach for assembly sequence planning using Taguchi method, DOE, and BPNN. Expert Syst. Appl. 2010, 37, 716–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chen, W.-C.; Tai, P.-H.; Deng, W.-J.; Hsieh, L.-F. A three-stage integrated approach for assembly sequence planning using neural networks. Expert Syst. Appl. 2008, 34, 1777–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Cheng, S.-C.; Kuo, C.-T.; Wu, D.-C. A novel 3D mesh compression using mesh segmentation with multiple principal plane analysis. Pattern Recognit. 2010, 43, 267–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chu, C.-H.; Cheng, C.-Y.; Wu, C.-W. Applications of the Web-based collaborative visualization in distributed product development. Comput. Ind. 2006, 5, 272–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chung, C.; Peng, Q. Enabled dynamic tasks planning in Web-based virtual manufacturing environments. Comput. Ind. 2008, 5, 82–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chung, J.C.H.; Hwang, T.-S.; Wu, C.-T.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, J.-Y.; Bai, Y.; Zou, H. Framework for integrated mechanical design automation. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 2000, 32, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Clark, J. 3D scanning systems for rapid prototyping. Assem. Autom. 1997, 17, 206–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cormier, D.; Unnanon, K. Virtual interference detection with case goods assemblies. For. Prod. J. 2000, 50, 75–78. [Google Scholar]
  68. Corney, J.R.; Torres-Sanchez, C.; Jagadeesan, A.P.; Yan, X.T.; Regli, W.C.; Medellin, H. Putting the crowd to work in a knowledge-based factory. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2010, 24, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Corrado, A.; Polini, W.; Moroni, G. Manufacturing signature and operating conditions in a variational model for tolerance analysis of rigid assemblies. Res. Eng. Des. 2017, 28, 529–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Corrado, A.; Polini, W. A comprehensive study of tolerance analysis methods for rigid parts with manufacturing signature and operating conditions. J. Adv. Mech. Des. Syst. Manuf. 2017, 11, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Corrado, A.; Polini, W.; Moroni, G.; Petro, S. A variational model for 3d tolerance analysis with manufacturing signature and operating conditions. Assem. Autom. 2018, 38, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Craig, M. Limits of tolerance. Manuf. Eng. 1996, 75, 139–143. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=article&issn=0956-9944&date=1996&volume=75&issue=3&spage=139&epage=143&title=Manufacturing%20Engineer&atitle=Limits%20of%20tolerance&aulast=Craig&aufirst=Mark&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=1996413291764&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  73. Davies, P.; Sivich, L. Augmented Reality and Other Visualization Technologies for Manufacturing in Boeing. SAE Int. J. Aerosp. 2011, 4, 1133–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Dedoncker, D.; Spencer, A. Assembly tolerance analysis with simulation and optimization techniques. In Proceedings of the International Congress and Exposition, Detroit, MI, USA, 23–27 February 1987; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Deitz, D. Human-integrated design. Mech. Eng. 1995, 117, 92–96. [Google Scholar]
  76. Easton, C.W. Shortcut to production: Three-dimensional drawings. Tool Eng. 1942, 11, 99–101. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=article&issn=&date=1942&volume=11&issue=11&spage=99&epage=101&title=Tool%20Engineer&atitle=Shortcut%20to%20production:%20Three-dimensional%20drawings&aulast=Easton&aufirst=C.W.&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=19420000920&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  77. Eaton, F. Computer Modelling of a Three-Dimensional Assembly; American Society of Mechanical Engineers: New York, NY, USA, 1975; Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=conference&issn=0402-1215&date=1975&volume=&issue=75&spage=&epage=&title=American%20Society%20of%20Mechanical%20Engineers%20(Paper)&atitle=COMPUTER%20MODELING%20OF%20A%20THREE-DIMENSIONAL%20ASSEMBLY.&aulast=Eaton&aufirst=Fletcher&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=1975050006653&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  78. Emde, S.; Boysen, N. Optimally locating in-house logistics areas to facilitate JIT-supply of mixed-model assembly lines. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2012, 135, 393–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Emde, S.; Boysen, N.; Scholl, A. Balancing mixed-model assembly lines: A computational evaluation of objectives to smoothen workload. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2010, 48, 3173–3191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Fan, Q.; Liu, H. Digitalized assembly process design and processing simulation of modem aircraft. J. Appl. Sci. 2013, 13, 1927–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Fang, Y.; Liou, F.W. Virtual Prototyping of Mechanical Assemblies with Deformable Components. J. Manuf. Syst. 1997, 16, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Farish, M. Sweet dreams. Engineering 2007, 248, 37–38. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=article&issn=0013-7782&date=2007&volume=248&issue=5&spage=37&epage=38&title=Engineering&atitle=Sweet%20dreams&aulast=Farish&aufirst=Mike&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=20073110734309&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  83. Favi, C.; Campi, F. CAD-based design for welding (DFW) method. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 2021, 15, 95–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Fearis, P.; McMillan, A. 3D CAD puts product designers in the driving seat. Br. Plast. Rubber 1996, 4–6. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=article&issn=0307-6164&date=1996&volume=&issue=&spage=4&epage=6&title=British%20Plastics%20and%20Rubber&atitle=3D%20CAD%20puts%20product%20designers%20in%20the%20driving%20seat&aulast=Fearis&aufirst=Paul&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=1996413291785&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  85. Fenster, A.; Lee, D.; Sherebrin, S.; Rankin, R.; Downey, D. Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the vasculature. Ultrasonics 1998, 36, 629–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Feyen, R.; Liu, Y.; Chaffin, D.; Jimmerson, G.; Joseph, B. New software tools improve workplace design. Ergon. Des. 1999, 7, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Feyen, R.; Liu, Y.; Chaffin, D.; Jimmerson, G.; Joseph, B. Computer-aided ergonomics: A case study of incorporating ergonomics analyses into workplace design. Appl. Ergon. 2000, 31, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Fiorentino, M.; Radkowski, R.; Stritzke, C.; Uva, A.E.; Monno, G. Design review of CAD assemblies using bimanual natural interface. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 2013, 7, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Fiorentino, M.; Uva, A.E.; Gattullo, M.; Debernardis, S.; Monno, G. Augmented reality on large screen for interactive maintenance instructions. Comput. Ind. 2014, 65, 270–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Fliedner, M.; Boysen, N.; Scholl, A. Solving symmetric mixed-model multi-level just-in-time scheduling problems. Discret. Appl. Math. 2010, 158, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Franciosa, P.; Patalano, S.; Riviere, A. 3D tolerance specification: An approach for the analysis of the global consistency based on graphs. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 2010, 4, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Gangal, M.; Thakur, A.; Roy, D.; Kumar, P.; Kelso, B.; Marks, S. Integrated, virtual plant design and commissioning methodology using digital manufacturing and lean principles. SAE Int. J. Mater. Manuf. 2009, 2, 368–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Garbaya, S.; Zaldivar-Colado, U. The affect of contact force sensations on user performance in virtual assembly tasks. Virtual Real. 2007, 11, 287–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Geng, J.; Tian, X.; Bai, M.; Jia, X.; Liu, X. A design method for three-dimensional maintenance, repair and overhaul job card of complex products. Comput. Ind. 2014, 65, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Geng, J.; Zhang, S.; Yang, B. A publishing method of lightweight three-dimensional assembly instruction for complex products. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 2015, 15, 031004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Gilbert, S.B. Perceived realism of virtual environments depends on authenticity. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 2016, 25, 322–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Gimeno, J.; Morillo, P.; Orduna, J.M.; Fernandez, M. A new AR authoring tool using depth maps for industrial procedures. Comput. Ind. 2013, 64, 1263–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Golle, U.; Boysen, N.; Rothlauf, F. Analysis and design of sequencing rules for car sequencing. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2010, 206, 579–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Golle, U.; Rothlauf, F.; Boysen, N. Car sequencing versus mixed-model sequencing: A computational study. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2014, 237, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Gordon, D.; Reynolds, R.A. Image Space Shading of 3-Dimensional Objects. Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Processing 1985, 29, 361–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Gorjup, G.; Gao, G.; Dwivedi, A.; Liarokapis, M. A Flexible Robotic Assembly System Combining CAD Based Localization, Compliance Control, and a Multi-Modal Gripper. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2021, 6, 8639–8646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Grimsdale, R.L.; Chang, C.W. Layout design language: A technique for generating layout plans. Comput. Graph. Forum 1996, 15, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Guo, D.; Zhong, R.Y.; Lin, P.; Lyu, Z.; Rong, Y.; Huang, G.Q. Digital twin-enabled Graduation Intelligent Manufacturing System for fixed-position assembly islands. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2020, 63, 101917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Guo, J.; Yan, D.-M.; Li, E.; Dong, W.; Wonka, P.; Zhang, X. Illustrating the disassembly of 3D models. Comput. Graph. 2013, 37, 574–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Guo, J.; Li, B.; Liu, Z.; Hong, J.; Wu, X. Integration of geometric variation and part deformation into variation propagation of 3-D assemblies. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2016, 54, 5708–5721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ha, J.-S.; Choi, S.-H.; Shin, S.-Y.; Chwa, K.-Y.; Chang, S.-Y.; Woo, T.C. On deciding 3D part disassemblability and surface machinability. IIE Trans. Inst. Ind. Eng. 1996, 28, 847–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Han, Z.; Li, Y.; Yang, M.; Yuan, Q.; Ba, L.; Xu, E. Digital twin-driven 3D visualization monitoring and traceability system for general parts in continuous casting machine. J. Adv. Mech. Des. Syst. Manuf. 2020, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Hanh, L.D.; Hieu, K.T.G. 3D matching by combining CAD model and computer vision for autonomous bin picking. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 2021, 15, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. He, H.; Wu, Y.; Pan, H.; Zheng, D. Visualized interactive manipulation in virtual assembly. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2007, 3, 387–392. [Google Scholar]
  110. Hirata, Y.; Mizuguchi, T.; Sato, M.; Kawarada, H. Virtual work space for assembly. Syst. Comput. Jpn. 1994, 25, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Hoole, S.R.H. Memory Economic 3-D Finite Element Mesh Generator for Small Computers. In Proceedings of the COMPCON 84 Fall: The Small Computer (R)Evolution, Arlington, VA, USA, 16–20 September 1984; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 1984; pp. 111–115. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=conference&issn=&date=1984&volume=&issue=&spage=111&epage=115&title=Proceedings%20-%20IEEE%20Computer%20Society%20International%20Conference&atitle=MEMORY%20ECONOMIC%203-D%20FINITE%20ELEMENT%20MESH%20GENERATOR%20FOR%20SMALL%20COMPUTERS.&aulast=Hoole&aufirst=S.R.H.&isbn=9780818605468&id=DOI:&ABBR=1985010012307&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  112. Hoover, M.; Miller, J.; Gilbert, S.; Winer, E. Measuring the performance impact of using the microsoft HoloLens 1 to provide guided assembly work instructions. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 2020, 20, 061001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Hoskins, E.M. Descriptive Databases in Some Design Manufacturing Environments. Comput. Aided Des. 1979, 11, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Hoskins, E.M. Design Development and Description Using 3D Box Geometries. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 1979, 11, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Hou, L.; Wang, X. A study on the benefits of augmented reality in retaining working memory in assembly tasks: A focus on differences in gender. Autom. Constr. 2013, 32, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Hou, W.; Yan, Y.; Duan, W.; Sun, H. Research on three dimensional computer assistance assembly process design system. Wuhan Ligong Daxue Xuebao J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. 2006, 28, 1088–1092. [Google Scholar]
  117. Hsu, Y.-Y.; Tai, P.-H.; Wang, M.-W.; Chen, W.-C. A knowledge-based engineering system for assembly sequence planning. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2011, 55, 763–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Huang, S.-J.; Lin, Y.-W. Prototype system of three-dimensional non-contact measurement. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 1996, 11, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Huang, W.; Chen, Q.; Wang, M.; Ye, H. Virtual training system for hydraulic pump cart based on virtual reality. Telkomnika Indones. J. Electr. Eng. 2013, 11, 4282–4290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Hudspeth, M. Modeling smart assemblies. Mach. Des. 2005, 77, 82–84. Available online: https://www.engineeringvillage.com/search/doc/detailed.url?SEARCHID=91cf80b291b647ff804a17733fc5ed90&DOCINDEX=1&database=1&pageType=quickSearch&searchtype=Quick&dedupResultCount=null&format=quickSearchDetailedFormat&usageOrigin=recordpage&usageZone=abstracttab&toolsinScopus=Noload (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  121. Hudspeth, M. Software keeps focus on design, not CAD. Mach. Des. 2006, 78, 120–123. Available online: https://web.s.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=56473b0c-4af5-472d-82a1-66883272f526%40redis (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  122. Jaiswal, P.; Huang, J.; Rai, R. Assembly-based conceptual 3D modeling with unlabeled components using probabilistic factor graph. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 2016, 74, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Jayaram, S.; Connacher, H.I.; Lyons, K.W. Virtual assembly using virtual reality techniques. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 1997, 29, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Jeang, A. Computer-aided tolerance synthesis with statistical method and optimization techniques. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 2001, 17, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Jezernik, A.; Hren, G. A solution to integrate computer-aided design (CAD) and virtual reality (VR) databases in design and manufacturing processes. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2003, 22, 768–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Ji, W.; Yin, S.; Wang, L. A Virtual Training Based Programming-Free Automatic Assembly Approach for Future Industry. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 43865–43873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Jia, D.; Bhatti, A.; Nahavandi, S. The impact of self-efficacy and perceived system efficacy on effectiveness of virtual training systems. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2014, 33, 16–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Jin, S.; Cai, W.; Lai, X.; Lin, Z. Design automation and optimization of assembly sequences for complex mechanical systems. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2010, 48, 1045–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Jolly, S.D. Design of large systems for packaging and launch on multiple, heterogeneous vehicles. J. Aerosp. Eng. 1996, 9, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Jones, R.E.; Calton, T.L.; Peters, R.R. Automated assembly and fixture planning at Sandia National Laboratories. Assem. Autom. 1997, 17, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Kang, X.; Peng, Q. Data integration from product design to assembly planning in a collaborative environment. Int. J. Manuf. Res. 2010, 5, 120–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Kang, X.; Peng, Q. Integration of CAD models with product assembly planning in a Web-based 3D visualized environment. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 2014, 8, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Kanou, Y. Virtual reality training system. Rev. Automot. Eng. 2004, 25, 265–270. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=article&issn=1349-4724&date=2004&volume=25&issue=3&spage=265&epage=270&title=Review%20of%20Automotive%20Engineering&atitle=Virtual%20reality%20training%20system&aulast=Kanou&aufirst=Yutaka&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=2005469482992&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  134. Kaplan, G. Auto manufacture digitizes in depth. IEEE Spectr. 1997, 34, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Kasik, D.J.; Dill, J.C.; Johnson, C.; Kasik, D.; Whitton, M.C. Interactive Graphics in Industry: The Early Days. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 2020, 40, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Katayama, K.; Hirashima, T. A retrieval method for 3D CAD assembly models using 3D radon transform and spherical harmonic transform. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. 2020, E103D, 992–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Katayama, K.; Sato, T. Matching 3D CAD assembly models with different layouts of components using projections. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. 2015, E98D, 1247–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Katayama, K.; Sato, W. Subassembly retrieval of 3D CAD assembly models with different layout of components based on sinogram. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. 2019, E102D, 777–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Kehoe, G.M. Benefits of Integrated Manufacturing Systems for Vehicle Operations. In Proceedings of the PEMEC: The Factory Efficiency Show and Conference, Birmingham, UK, 27–30 September 1986; pp. 1.1.1–1.1.8. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=conference&issn=&date=1986&volume=&issue=&spage=1&epage=1&title=PEMEC:%20The%20Factory%20Efficiency%20Show%20and%20Conference.&atitle=BENEFITS%20OF%20INTEGRATED%20MANUFACTURING%20SYSTEMS%20FOR%20VEHICLE%20OPERATIONS.&aulast=Kehoe&aufirst=Gerard%20Michael&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=1987060097933&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  140. Khosla, P.K.; Mattikali, R. Determining the assembly sequence from a 3-D model. J. Mech. Work. Technol. 1989, 20, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Kieu, D.; Luecke, G.R.; Gilbert, S.; Hunt, T.; Gilmore, B.; Meusel, C.; Kelly, N. Listening to the voice of the customer using an immersive combine simulator: Innovative techniques for product development. Int. J. Heavy Veh. Syst. 2020, 27, 303–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Kim, H.; Cha, M.; Mun, D. Shape distribution-based approach to comparing 3D CAD assembly models. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2017, 31, 5627–5638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Kim, J.; Kim, K.S.; Choi, K.; Lee, J.Y. Solving 3D geometric constraints for assembly modelling. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2000, 16, 843–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Kim, J.J.; Rossignac, J.R. Screw motions for the animation and analysis of mechanical assemblies. JSME Int. J. Ser. C Mech. Syst. Mach. Elem. Manuf. 2001, 44, 156–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Kim, M.; Lee, J.Y. Touch and hand gesture-based interactions for directly manipulating 3D virtual objects in mobile augmented reality. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2016, 75, 16529–16550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Klindworth, H.; Otto, C.; Scholl, A. On a learning precedence graph concept for the automotive industry. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2012, 217, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Kojima, S.; Hashimoto, H. 3-D CAD data oriented self-planning of assembly robot cell systems. IEEE ASME Int. Conf. Adv. Intell. Mechatron. AIM 1999, 484–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Kostic, Z.; Radakovic, D.; Cvetkovic, D.; Jevremovic, A.; Markovic, D.; Ranisavljev, M.K. Web-based laboratory for collaborative and concurrent CAD designing, assembling, and practical exercising on distance. Teh. Vjesn. 2015, 22, 591–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Kwon, S.; Kim, B.C.; Mun, D.; Han, S. Simplification of feature-based 3D CAD assembly data of ship and offshore equipment using quantitative evaluation metrics. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 2015, 59, 140–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Kwon, S.; Kim, B.C.; Mun, D.; Han, S. User-assisted integrated method for controlling level of detail of large-scale B-rep assembly models. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2018, 31, 881–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Kwon, S.; Mun, D.; Kim, B.C.; Han, S. Feature shape complexity: A new criterion for the simplification of feature-based 3D CAD models. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 88, 1831–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Ladeveze, N.; Fourquet, J.-Y.; Puel, B. Interactive path planning for haptic assistance in assembly tasks. Comput. Graph. 2010, 34, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Lambiase, F.; Lambiase, A. An integrated approach to the analysis of automotive assembly activities using digital manufacturing tools. Int. J. Internet Manuf. Serv. 2008, 1, 160–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Latombe, J.-C.; Wilson, R.H.; Cazals, F. Assembly sequencing with toleranced parts. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 1997, 29, 159–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Leicht, R.; Messner, J. Moving toward an ‘intelligent’ shop modeling process. Electron. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2008, 13, 286–302. [Google Scholar]
  156. Li, B.; Roy, U. Relative positioning of toleranced polyhedral parts in an assembly. IIE Trans. Inst. Ind. Eng. 2001, 33, 323–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Li, C.; Hou, W. Analysis of Assembly Tolerance Based on Assembly Constraint Information Model. Math. Probl. Eng. 2021, 2021, 7438966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Li, H.; Zhu, H.; Zhou, X.; Li, P.; Yu, Z. A new computer-aided tolerance analysis and optimization framework for assembling processes using DP-SDT theory. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2016, 86, 1299–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Li, X.; He, B.; Zhou, Y.; Li, G. Multisource Model-Driven Digital Twin System of Robotic Assembly. IEEE Syst. J. 2021, 15, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Liang, J.S. A web-based 3D virtual technologies for developing product information framework. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2007, 34, 617–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Liang, J.S.; Wei, P.W. Conceptual design system in a Web-based virtual interactive environment for product development. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2006, 30, 1010–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Liang, J.; He, H.; Wu, Y. Bare-Hand Depth Perception Used in Augmented Reality Assembly Supporting. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 1534–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Lin, Y.J.; Uhler, A. Shortening the design for assembly process time for torque converter development. Assem. Autom. 2002, 22, 248–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Liu, J.; Jin, J.; Shi, J. State space modeling for 3-D variation propagation in rigid-body multistage assembly processes. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 2010, 7, 274–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Liu, Q.; Wang, C. Pipe-assembly approach for aero-engines by modified particle swarm optimization. Assem. Autom. 2010, 30, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Lupinetti, K.; Giannini, F.; Monti, M.; Pernot, J.-P. Content-based multi-criteria similarity assessment of CAD assembly models. Comput. Ind. 2019, 112, 103111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Lynch, K. 3D tolerance analysis in PC manufacture. Assem. Autom. 2001, 21, 213–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Mall, J.; Staudacher, S. Evaluation of assemblability during aero engine preliminary design. CEAS Aeronaut. J. 2018, 9, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Marconi, M.; Germani, M.; Favi, C.; Raffaeli, R. CAD feature recognition as a means to prevent ergonomics issues during manual assembly tasks. Comput. Aided Des. Appl. 2018, 15, 734–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Marino, E.; Barbieri, L.; Colacino, B.; Fleri, A.K.; Bruno, F. An Augmented Reality inspection tool to support workers in Industry 4.0 environments. Comput. Ind. 2021, 127, 103412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Masehian, E.; Ghandi, S. ASPPR: A New Assembly Sequence and Path Planner/Replanner for Monotone and Nonmonotone Assembly Planning. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 2020, 123, 102828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. McClelland, M.J. Engine Design and Analysis by Computer Techniques. In Proceedings of the Autotech ‘85—International Automotive Technology Exhibition and Congress. Alternator Technology; Analysis of Data for Automotive Development; Automated Assembly and Fastening Methods; Automatic Inspection and Condition Monitoring, Automotive Brake, Birmingham, UK, 1985; Institute of Mechanical Engineers, Automobile Division: London, UK, 1985. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=conference&issn=&date=1985&volume=&issue=&spage=&epage=&title=Autotech%20%2785%20-%20International%20Automotive%20Technology%20Exhibition%20and%20Congress.%20Alternator%20Technology;%20Analysis%20of%20Data%20for%20Automotive%20Development;%20Automated%20Assembly%20and%20Fastening%20Methods;%20Automatic%20Inspection%20and%20Condition%20Monitoring;%20Automotive%20Brake&atitle=ENGINE%20DESIGN%20AND%20ANALYSIS%20BY%20COMPUTER%20TECHNIQUES.&aulast=McClelland&aufirst=M.J.&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=1988120174167&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  173. McEwan, S.; Sims, P. Computer Graphics in Practice. BKSTS J. 1984, 66, 330–331. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=article&issn=0305-6996&date=1984&volume=66&issue=8&spage=330&epage=331&title=BKSTS%20journal&atitle=COMPUTER%20GRAPHICS%20IN%20PRACTICE.&aulast=McEwan&aufirst=Stewart&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=1985080107276&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  174. Meusel, C.; Grimm, C.; Starkey, J.; Gilbert, S.B.; Gilmore, B.; Luecke, G.; Kieu, D.; Hunt, T. The importance of operator knowledge in evaluating virtual reality cue fidelity. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019, 160, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Mills, R. Mechanical CAD on a roll. Comput. Aided Eng. 1996, 15, 5. [Google Scholar]
  176. Mills, R. The advancing state of solid modeling. Comput. Aided Eng. 1998, 17, 6. [Google Scholar]
  177. Mitra, N.J.; Yang, Y.-L.; Yan, D.-M.; Li, W.; Agrawala, M. Illustrating how mechanical assemblies work. ACM Trans. Graph. 2010, 29, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Mitra, N.J.; Yang, Y.-L.; Yan, D.-M.; Li, W.; Agrawala, M. Illustrating how mechanical assemblies work. Commun. ACM 2013, 56, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Molineros, J.; Sharma, R. Real-time tracking of multiple objects using fiducials for augmented reality. Real Time Imaging 2001, 7, 495–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Murali, G.B.; Deepak, B.B.V.L.; Raju, M.V.A.; Biswal, B.B. Optimal robotic assembly sequence planning using stability graph through stable assembly subset identification. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2019, 233, 5410–5430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Nassar, K.; Thabet, W.; Beliveau, Y. Building assembly detailing using constraint-based modeling. Autom. Constr. 2003, 12, 365–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Nayar, N. Workplace ergonomics and simulation. Assem. Autom. 1996, 16, 25–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Neely, M.J. Digital prototyping for golf car development. SAE Int. J. Mater. Manuf. 2009, 1, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Neumann, F.; Atten, M. Novel approach for shape-based similarity search enabled by 3D PDF. Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol. 2018, 58, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Newton, M. Real-Time 3-D Graphics for Microcomputers. Byte 1984, 9, 251–286. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=article&issn=0360-5280&date=1984&volume=9&issue=10&spage=17&epage=17&title=Byte&atitle=REAL-TIME%203-D%20GRAPHICS%20FOR%20MICROCOMPUTERS.&aulast=Newton&aufirst=Marcus&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=1984120218487&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  186. Ng, L.X.; Wang, Z.B.; Ong, S.K.; Nee, A.Y.C. Integrated product design and assembly planning in an augmented reality environment. Assem. Autom. 2013, 33, 345–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Nilsson, D. Taking flight in 3D [aerospace design]. Manufacturing 2007, 86, 24–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Ong, S.K.; Wang, Z.B. Augmented assembly technologies based on 3D bare-hand interaction. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 2011, 60, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Oren, M.; Carlson, P.; Gilbert, S.; Vance, J.M. Puzzle assembly training: Real world vs. virtual environment. In Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, VR 2012, Costa Mesa, CA, USA, 4–8 March 2012; IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2012; pp. 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  190. Otto, A.; Otto, C. How to design effective priority rules: Example of simple assembly line balancing. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2014, 69, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Ouverson, K.M.; Gilbert, S.B. A Composite Framework of Co-located Asymmetric Virtual Reality. Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. 2021, 5, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Palmer, D. Pump maker cuts lead times to production and assembly. Manuf. Comput. Solut. 2002, 8, 48–49. [Google Scholar]
  193. Pang, Y.; Nee, A.Y.C.; Ong, S.K.; Yuan, M.; Youcef-Toumi, K. Assembly feature design in an augmented reality environment. Assem. Autom. 2006, 26, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Park, H.G. Framework of design interface module in ERP. In Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning (ISATP’99) (Cat. No.99TH8470), Porto, Portugal , 24 July 1999; pp. 112–116. [Google Scholar]
  195. Park, J.C.; Lee, K. Computer aided design of a mold cavity with proper rigging system for casting processes. Part 2. J. Eng. Ind. 1991, 113, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Patton, W.G. Plastic prototypes, perspective drawings speed new product production. Iron Age 1952, 170, 155–158. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=article&issn=&date=1952&volume=170&issue=12&spage=155&epage=158&title=Iron%20Age&atitle=Plastic%20prototypes,%20perspective%20drawings%20speed%20new%20product%20production&aulast=Patton&aufirst=W.G.&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=19520012977&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  197. Peng, G.; Wang, G.; Liu, W.; Yu, H. A desktop virtual reality-based interactive modular fixture configuration design system. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 2010, 42, 432–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Peng, H.; Wang, B. A statistical approach for three-dimensional tolerance redesign of mechanical assemblies. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2018, 232, 2132–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Pichler, G. 3D Laser scanning—Application in plant engineering and construction. Aufbereit. Tech. Miner. Processing 2015, 56, 82–87. [Google Scholar]
  200. Polini, W. Concurrent tolerance design. Res. Eng. Des. 2016, 27, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Polini, W.; Corrado, A. Geometric tolerance analysis through Jacobian model for rigid assemblies with translational deviations. Assem. Autom. 2016, 36, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Pontonnier, C.; Dumont, G.; Samani, A.; Madeleine, P.; Badawi, M. Designing and evaluating a workstation in real and virtual environment: Toward virtual reality based ergonomic design sessions. J. Multimodal User Interfaces 2014, 8, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  203. Qiao, H.; Wu, Q.; Yu, S.; Du, J.; Xiang, Y. A 3D assembly model retrieval method based on assembly information. Assem. Autom. 2019, 39, 556–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Qin, S.F.; Harrison, R.; West, A.A.; Wright, D.K. Development of a novel 3D simulation modelling system for distributed manufacturing. Comput. Ind. 2004, 54, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Qin, S.; Wright, D.K.; Harrison, R.; West, A.A. Drag-and-drop simulation assembly modelling over the Internet. Int. J. Agil. Manuf. 2005, 8, 43–56. [Google Scholar]
  206. Qin, Y.; Bloomquist, E.; Bulbul, T.; Gabbard, J.; Tanous, K. Impact of information display on worker performance for wood frame wall assembly using AR HMD under different task conditions. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2021, 50, 101423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Quadros, W.R.; Vyas, V.; Brewer, M.; Owen, S.J.; Shimada, K. A computational framework for automating generation of sizing function in assembly meshing via disconnected skeletons. Eng. Comput. 2010, 26, 231–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Ragon, D.; Spencer, A. John deere assembly variation of crawler track chain/shoe assembly. In Proceedings of the International Off-Highway and Powerplant Congress and Exposition, Milwaukee, WI, USA, 12–15 September 1988; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Raju Bahubalendruni, M.; Biswal, B. Liaison concatenation A method to obtain feasible assembly sequences from 3D-CAD product. Sadhana Acad. Proc. Eng. Sci. 2016, 41, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  210. Ramos Barbero, B.; Perez Azcona, J.; Gonzalez Perez, J. A tolerance analysis and optimization methodology. The combined use of 3D CAT, a dimensional hierarchization matrix and an optimization algorithm. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2015, 81, 371–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  211. Reffat, R.M.; Khaeruzzaman, Y.; El-Sebakhy, E.; Raharja, I.P. Augmentation of real-time 3D virtual environments for architectural design at the conceptual stage. Electron. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2008, 13, 553–563. [Google Scholar]
  212. Riitahuhta, A.; Rautakorpi, E.; Viitanen, Y. Three-dimensional measurement method (CADMM) for the realization of process plants. Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed. 1994, 13, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Rivers, A.; Durand, F.; Igarashi, T. 3D modeling with silhouettes. ACM Trans. Graph. 2010, 29, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Riviere, G.; Couture, N.; Reuter, P. The activation of modality in virtual objects assembly. J. Multimodal User Interfaces 2010, 3, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Roberts, D.I. Detailing a New Diesel Engine Design Using a Three-Dimensional Interactive Graphic System; American Society of Mechanical Engineers: USA, 1976; Volume 76, Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=conference&issn=0402-1215&date=1976&volume=&issue=76&spage=&epage=&title=American%20Society%20of%20Mechanical%20Engineers%20(Paper)&atitle=DETAILING%20A%20NEW%20DIESEL%20ENGINE%20DESIGN%20USING%20A%20THREE-DIMENSIONAL%20INTERACTIVE%20GRAPHIC%20SYSTEM.&aulast=Roberts&aufirst=D.I.&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=1977040007246&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  216. Roberts, D.I. 3-D Interactive Graphics—Assist Diesel Engine Design. Mech. Eng. 1978, 10, 40–45. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=article&issn=0025-6501&date=1978&volume=10&issue=3&spage=40&epage=45&title=Mechanical%20Engineering&atitle=3-D%20INTERACTIVE%20GRAPHICS%20-%20ASSIST%20DIESEL%20ENGINE%20DESIGN.&aulast=Roberts&aufirst=D.I.&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=1978060003288&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  217. Robinson, P. Making CAD files usable to down stream teams. Mach. Des. 2005, 77, 164. [Google Scholar]
  218. Rossignac, J.R.; Kim, J.J. Computing and visualizing pose-interpolating 3D motions. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 2001, 33, 279–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Rowe, J. SolidWorks 2004—Strong CAD program offers features that help you switch to 3D. Cadalyst 2004, 21, 24–27. [Google Scholar]
  220. Rowe, J. Solidworks 2006: Analyzing and validating mechanical designs on the fly. Cadalyst 2005, 22, 24–28. [Google Scholar]
  221. Ruffle, S. Does your architectural CAD system understand you? In Knowledge Engineering and Computer Modelling in CAD, Proceedings of CAD86: Seventh International Conference on the Computer as a Design Tool, London, UK, 2–5 September 1986; Butterworth & Co Ltd.: Cambridge, UK, 1986; p. 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Ryken, M.J.; Vance, J.M. Applying virtual reality techniques to the interactive stress analysis of a tractor lift arm. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 1999, 35, 141–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  223. Samper, S.; Adragna, P.-A.; Favreliere, H.; Pillet, M. Modeling of 2D and 3D assemblies taking into account form errors of plane surfaces. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 2009, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Schmitz, B. Great expectations: The future of virtual design. Comput. Aided Eng. 1995, 14, 4. Available online: https://www.engineeringvillage.com/search/doc/detailed.url?SEARCHID=6ea5bcf4983d42008dcf20f086951bb2&DOCINDEX=1&database=1&pageType=quickSearch&searchtype=Quick&dedupResultCount=null&format=quickSearchDetailedFormat&usageOrigin=recordpage&usageZone=abstracttab&toolsinScopus=Noload (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  225. Scholl, A.; Fliedner, M.; Boysen, N. Absalom: Balancing assembly lines with assignment restrictions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2010, 200, 688–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  226. Schwartz, M.; Gupta, S.K.; Brough, J.E.; Anand, D.K.; Kavetsky, R. Using virtual demonstrations for creating multi-media training instructions. Comput. Aided Des. Appl. 2007, 4, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Scott, R.T.; Gabriele, G.A. Computer aided tolerance analysis of parts and assemblies. In Proceedings of the ASME 1989 Design Technical Conferences, DETC 1989, Montreal, QC, Canada, 17–21 September 1989; American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME): New York, NY, USA, 1989; Volume 1, pp. 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Senderska, K.; Mare, A.; Zajac, J. Hardware of manual assembly workstation online analysis. UPB Sci. Bull. Ser. D Mech. Eng. 2012, 74, 103–110. [Google Scholar]
  229. Shao, T.; Li, D.; Rong, Y.; Zheng, C.; Zhou, K. Dynamic furniture modeling through assembly instructions. ACM Trans. Graph. 2016, 35, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  230. Sharif, M.M.; Haas, C.; Walbridge, S. Using termination points and 3D visualization for dimensional control in prefabrication. Autom. Constr. 2022, 133, 103998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Shelley, T. 3D CAD integrates with manufacturing. Eureka 2006, 26, 21. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=article&issn=0261-2097&date=2006&volume=26&issue=3&spage=21&epage=21&title=Eureka&atitle=3D%20CAD%20integrates%20with%20manufacturing&aulast=Shelley&aufirst=Tom&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=2006139784901&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  232. Shelley, T. Learning for the future. Eureka 2006, 26, 35. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=article&issn=0261-2097&date=2006&volume=26&issue=12&spage=35&epage=35&title=Eureka&atitle=Learning%20for%20the%20future&aulast=Shelley&aufirst=Tom&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=20070410385776&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  233. Sheng, B.; Yin, X.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, F.; Fang, Z.; Xiao, Z. A rapid virtual assembly approach for 3D models of production line equipment based on the smart recognition of assembly features. J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2019, 10, 1257–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Sheng, B.; Zhao, F.; Zhang, C.; Yin, X.; Shu, Y. Parameterized representation and solution method of the lightweight 3D model virtual assembly constraint. J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2019, 10, 1167–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Shesler, A.T.; Wagner, S.G. Three-Dimensional Core Model for Personal Computers. In Simulators IV, Proceedings of the SCS Simulators Conference, 1987, Orlando, FL, USA, 6–9 April 1987; Society for Computer Simulation: Vista, CA, USA; Volume 18, pp. 115–122. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=conference&issn=0735-9276&date=1987&volume=18&issue=4&spage=115&epage=122&title=Simulation%20Series&atitle=THREE-DIMENSIONAL%20CORE%20MODEL%20FOR%20PERSONAL%20COMPUTERS.&aulast=Shesler&aufirst=Albert%20T.&isbn=9780911801156&id=DOI:&ABBR=1988060091130&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  236. Shidpour, H.; Shahrokhi, M.; Bernard, A. A multi-objective programming approach, integrated into the TOPSIS method, in order to optimize product design, in three-dimensional concurrent engineering. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2013, 64, 875–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Sierla, S.; Kyrki, V.; Aarnio, P.; Vyatkin, V. Automatic assembly planning based on digital product descriptions. Comput. Ind. 2018, 97, 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Sinha, S.; Franciosa, P.; Ceglarek, D. Object Shape Error Response Using Bayesian 3-D Convolutional Neural Networks for Assembly Systems with Compliant Parts. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2021, 17, 6676–6686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Sitharam, M.; Oung, J.-J.; Zhou, Y.; Arbree, A. Geometric constraints within feature hierarchies. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 2006, 38, 22–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  240. Sittas, E. 3D design reference framework. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 1991, 23, 380–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Smith, G.E. Let web pages show assembly instructions and more. Mach. Des. 2001, 73, 124–128. [Google Scholar]
  242. Srikanth, K.; Liou, F.W.; Balakrishnan, S.N. Integrated approach for assembly tolerance analysis. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2001, 39, 1517–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Stefanides, E.J. Molded, 3-D interconnect generates 50% cost reduction. Des. News 1990, 46, 226–227. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=article&issn=0011-9407&date=1990&volume=46&issue=3&spage=226&epage=227&title=Design%20News%20(Boston)&atitle=Molded,%203-D%20interconnect%20generates%2050%25%20cost%20reduction&aulast=Stefanides&aufirst=E.J.&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=1990120187389&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  244. Studt, T. CAD systems get even smarter, speed up product development. Res. Dev. 1995, 37, 25–26. Available online: https://web.s.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=a6242309-ba9d-40ef-84b3-b9a7f9a05c2e%40redis (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  245. Su, Q.; Lai, S.-J. 3D geometric constraint analysis and its application on the spatial assembly sequence planning. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2010, 48, 1395–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Su, Q.; Lai, S.-j.; Liu, J. Geometric computation based assembly sequencing and evaluating in terms of assembly angle, direction, reorientation, and stability. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 2009, 41, 479–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Sun, W.; Mu, X.; Sun, Q.; Sun, Z.; Wang, X. Analysis and optimization of assembly precision-cost model based on 3D tolerance expression. Assem. Autom. 2018, 38, 497–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Tanaka, M.; Anthony, L.; Kaneeda, T.; Hirooka, J. A single solution method for converting 2D assembly drawings to 3D part drawings. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 2004, 36, 723–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Tariki, K.; Kiyokawa, T.; Nagatani, T.; Takamatsu, J.; Ogasawara, T. Generating complex assembly sequences from 3D CAD models considering insertion relations. Adv. Robot. 2021, 35, 337–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Tching, L.; Dumont, G.; Perret, J. Interactive simulation of CAD models assemblies using virtual constraint guidance: A new method to assist haptic assembly tasks. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 2010, 4, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Teck, T.B.; Senthil Kumar, A.; Subramanian, V. A CAD integrated analysis of flatness in a form tolerance zone. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 2001, 33, 853–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Templeman, M. All in the mind. Manuf. Eng. 1996, 75, 133–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Tharratt, G. Production breakdown illustration. Automot. Ind. 1941, 85, 24–28. [Google Scholar]
  254. Toma, M.I.; Girbacia, F.; Antonya, C. A comparative evaluation of human interaction for design and assembly of 3D CAD models in desktop and immersive environments. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 2012, 6, 179–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Tong, S.; Downey, D.B.; Cardinal, H.N.; Fenster, A. A three-dimensional ultrasound prostate imaging system. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1996, 22, 735–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Tsai, C.-Y.; Liu, T.-Y.; Lu, Y.-H.; Nisar, H. A novel interactive assembly teaching aid using multi-template augmented reality. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2020, 79, 31981–32009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Vaclav, T.; Mare, A.; Legutko, S.; Koal, P.; Delgado Sobrino, D.R. Proposal of a system for estimating the assembly time in small and medium-sized enterprises. Teh. Vjesn. 2020, 27, 2089–2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Velaz, Y.; Arce, J.R.; Gutierrez, T.; Lozano-Rodero, A.; Suescun, A. The influence of interaction technology on the learning of assembly tasks using virtual reality. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 2014, 14, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  259. Vigano, R.; Gomez, G.O. Assembly planning with automated retrieval of assembly sequences from CAD model information. Assem. Autom. 2012, 32, 347–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Walters, W.E. Drawing three-dimensional assemblies. Mach. Des. 1947, 19, 82–87. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=article&issn=&date=1947&volume=19&issue=10&spage=82&epage=87&title=Machine%20Design&atitle=Drawing%20three-dimensional%20assemblies&aulast=Walters&aufirst=W.E.&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=19480005378&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  261. Wang, H.; Ning, R.; Yan, Y. Simulated toleranced CAD geometrical model and automatic generation of 3D dimension chains. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2006, 29, 1019–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Wang, J.; Gu, D.; Yu, Z.; Tan, C.; Zhou, L. A framework for 3D model reconstruction in reverse engineering. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2012, 63, 1189–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Wang, K.; Liu, D.; Liu, Z.; Duan, G.; Hu, L.; Tan, J. A fast object registration method for augmented reality assembly with simultaneous determination of multiple 2D-3D correspondences. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2020, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Wang, L.; Givehchi, M.; Adamson, G.; Holm, M. A sensor-driven 3D model-based approach to remote real-time monitoring. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 2011, 60, 493–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Wang, P.; Bai, X.; Billinghurst, M.; Zhang, S.; Wei, S.; Xu, G.; He, W.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J. 3DGAM: Using 3D gesture and CAD models for training on mixed reality remote collaboration. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2021, 80, 31059–31084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Wang, Q.Y.; Tian, L. A systematic approach for 3D VRML model-based assembly in Web-based product design. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2007, 33, 819–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Wang, Y. Application of three-dimensional solid modeling of virtual reality technology in ship assembling. Int. J. Mechatron. Appl. Mech. 2017, 2017, 33–38. [Google Scholar]
  268. Wang, Z.B.; Ng, L.X.; Ong, S.K.; Nee, A.Y.C. Assembly planning and evaluation in an augmented reality environment. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2013, 51, 7388–7404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Wang, Z.Y.; Guan, C.X.; Sun, Y.M.; Ying, D.W.; Li, M.; Zhang, T. VRML-based remote concurrent design tool approach. Huanan Ligong Daxue Xuebao J. South China Univ. Technol. Nat. Sci. 2001, 29, 52–55. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=article&issn=1000-565X&date=2001&volume=29&issue=10&spage=52&epage=55&title=Huanan%20Ligong%20Daxue%20Xuebao%2FJournal%20of%20South%20China%20University%20of%20Technology%20(Natural%20Science)&atitle=VRML-based%20remote%20concurrent%20design%20tool%20approach&aulast=Wang&aufirst=Z.-Y.&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=2001536787792&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  270. Watabe, H.; Miyoshi, N.; Kakazu, Y.; Okino, N. Interference recognition among 3D solid models for assembly planning. In Advances in Design Automation—1989, Montreal, QC, Canada, 17–21 September 1989; ASME: New York, NY, USA, 1989; Volume 20, pp. 79–84. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=conference&issn=&date=1989&volume=20&issue=&spage=79&epage=84&title=American%20Society%20of%20Mechanical%20Engineers,%20Design%20Engineering%20Division%20(Publication)%20DE&atitle=Interference%20recognition%20among%203D%20solid%20models%20for%20assembly%20planning&aulast=Watabe&aufirst=H.&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=1990040423825&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  271. Waurzyniak, P. Enter the virtual world. Manuf. Eng. 2007, 139, 67–82. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/docview/219718396/fulltextPDF/B300FF9807704131PQ/1?accountid=10906 (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  272. Waurzyniak, P. Connecting the digital world with the factory floor: New collaborative 3D plant process planning and visualization tools are helping manufacturers prove out PLM’s promise. Manuf. Eng. 2014, 152, 53–64. [Google Scholar]
  273. Weber, N.O. Product development teams and tools applied to the aircraft industry. World Cl. Des. Manuf. 1994, 1, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Wesley, M.A.; Lozano-Perez, T.; Lieberman, L.I.; Lavin, M.A.; Grossman, D.D. Geometric Modeling System for Automated Mechanical Assembly. IBM J. Res. Dev. 1980, 24, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Whitward, L. 3D visualisation—Time to suspend our disbelief? Des. Eng. Lond. 1995, 28–30. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=article&issn=0308-8448&date=1995&volume=&issue=&spage=28&epage=30&title=Design%20engineering%20London&atitle=3D%20visualisation%20-%20time%20to%20suspend%20our%20disbelief%3F&aulast=Whitward&aufirst=Lane&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=1995422832785&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  276. Wiegand, B.A. Three-Dimensional Interactive Computer-Aided Design and Manufacture of Mechanical Structures. RCA Eng. 1981, 26, 51–57. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=article&issn=0048-6574&date=1981&volume=26&issue=6&spage=51&epage=57&title=RCA%20engineer&atitle=THREE-DIMENSIONAL%20INTERACTIVE%20COMPUTER-AIDED%20DESIGN%20AND%20MANUFACTURE%20OF%20MECHANICAL%20STRUCTURES.&aulast=Wiegand&aufirst=Bernie%20A.&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=1982080003707&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  277. Wigotsky, V. 3-D CAD. Plast. Eng. 1990, 46, 12–16. Available online: https://bi.gale.com/global/article/GALE%7CA9131418/e971004cf632d5fb92e6e15d6350c300?u=iastu_main (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  278. Williams, A. Transition from 2D to 3D. Cadalyst 2004, 21, 10–12. [Google Scholar]
  279. Wittenberg, G. Training with virtual reality. Assem. Autom. 1995, 15, 12–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Wolfe, R.N. 3D geometric databases for mechanical engineering. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Base Techniques for Pictorial Applications, Florence, Italy, 20–22 June 1979; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1980; Volume 81, pp. 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Xiao, H.; Duan, Y.; Zhang, Z. Mobile 3D assembly process information construction and transfer to the assembly station of complex products. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2018, 31, 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Xiao, H.; Li, Y.; Yu, J.; Zhang, J. CAD mesh model simplification with assembly features preservation. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2014, 57, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Xiao, H.; Li, Y.; Yu, J.; Zhang, J.; Tang, W. Dynamic assembly simplification for virtual assembly process of complex product in cloud computing environment. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 2014, 228, 1198–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Xie, X.; Xu, K.; Mitra, N.J.; Cohen-Or, D.; Gong, W.; Su, Q.; Chen, B. Sketch-to-design: Context-based part assembly. Comput. Graph. Forum 2013, 32, 233–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Yap, H.-J.; Taha, Z.; Dawal, S.Z.M. A generic approach of integrating 3D models into virtual manufacturing. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. C 2012, 13, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Yesin, K.B.; Nelson, B.J. A CAD model based tracking system for visually guided microassembly. Robotica 2005, 23, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Yi, C.; Besant, C.B.; Jebb, A. Three-Dimensional Digitizing Techniques for Computer-Aided Animation. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computers in Engineering and Building Design (CAD ‘76), London, UK, 23–25 March 1976; IPC Science and Technology Press, Ltd.: London, UK, 1976; pp. 292–295. Available online: https://iowa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=Compendex&genre=conference&issn=&date=1976&volume=&issue=&spage=292&epage=295&title=Int%20Conf%20on%20Comput%20in%20Eng%20and%20Build%20Des%20(CAD%20%2776),%202nd,%20Proc&atitle=THREE-DIMENSIONAL%20DIGITIZING%20TECHNIQUES%20FOR%20COMPUTER-AIDED%20ANIMATION.&aulast=Yi&aufirst=C.&isbn=&id=DOI:&ABBR=1976100001275&vid=01IASU&institution=01IASU&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  288. Yoshimura, M.; Yoshida, S.; Konishi, Y.; Izui, K.; Nishiwaki, S.; Inamori, Y.; Nomura, A.; Mitsuyuki, K.; Kawaguchi, Y.; Inagaki, T. A rapid analysis method for production line design. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2006, 44, 1171–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Yuan, X. An interactive approach of assembly planning. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Hum. 2002, 32, 522–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Zhang, C.; Zhou, G.; Lu, Q.; Chang, F. Generating significant subassemblies from 3D assembly models for design reuse. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 4744–4761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Zhang, K.; Li, Y.; Tang, S. An integrated modeling method of unified tolerance representation for mechanical product. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2010, 46, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Zhang, P.; Bao, J.; Yang, Z.; Huang, F. The site visualization and closed-loop control for 3D assembly process. Key Eng. Mater. 2014, 621, 617–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Zhang, X.; Yin, G.; Qi, N. Research on high-resolution improved projection 3D localization algorithm and precision assembly of parts based on virtual reality. Neural Comput. Appl. 2019, 31, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, A.; Ke, Y. A multi-object posture coordination method with tolerance constraints for aircraft components assembly. Assem. Autom. 2020, 40, 345–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Zhang, Y.; Travis, A.R.L. Creation and evaluation of a multi-sensory virtual assembly environment. Int. J. Autom. Comput. 2008, 5, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Zhang, Y.; Travis, A.R.L.; Collings, N. Evaluation of multi-sensory feedback on the usability of a virtual assembly environment. J. Multimed. 2007, 2, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Zhao, S.; Li, Z. A new assembly sequences generation of three dimensional product based on polychromatic sets. Inf. Technol. J. 2008, 7, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  298. Zhao, Z.; Bezdecny, M.; Lee, B.; Wu, Y.; Robinson, D.; Bauer, L.; Slagle, M.; Coleman, D.; Barnes, J.; Walls, S. Prediction of assembly variation during early design. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 2009, 9, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Zhu, W.; Vader, A.M.; Chadda, A.; Leu, M.C.; Liu, X.F.; Vance, J.B. Wii remote-based low-cost motion capture for automated assembly simulation. Virtual Real. 2013, 17, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Asi 05 00029 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic of research methodology.
Figure 1. Schematic of research methodology.
Asi 05 00029 g001
Asi 05 00029 g002 550
Figure 2. Compendex research records on the 3D product model with an assembly reference over time.
Figure 2. Compendex research records on the 3D product model with an assembly reference over time.
Asi 05 00029 g002
Asi 05 00029 g003 550
Figure 3. Three-dimensional (3D) product model research themes evolution over time.
Figure 3. Three-dimensional (3D) product model research themes evolution over time.
Asi 05 00029 g003
Table
Table 1. Three-dimensional (3D) product model journal articles in English from Compendex records by decade.
Table 1. Three-dimensional (3D) product model journal articles in English from Compendex records by decade.
Decade(s)Compendex Journal Article RecordsCompendex Records (Limited by Search Terms)
1940s–1960s2420
1970s51
1980s18899
1990s957354
2000s4662943
2010s14,4281824
2020s4416501
Total24,6883742
Table
Table 2. Three-dimensional (3D) product model research themes and associated number of references.
Table 2. Three-dimensional (3D) product model research themes and associated number of references.
S. No3D Product Model Research Themes# of Reference (s)
1Product Design37
2Design for Assembly21
3Data Processing22
4Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T)34
5Assembly Sequence Planning34
6Virtual Assembly/Virtual Reality (VR)27
7Assembly line/Station layout planning24
8Interpolation between 2D and 3D Models10
9Reverse Engineering/Scanning Technology7
10Assembly Feasibility4
11Web-Based Applications14
12Virtual Training/Work Instructions (WI)13
13Augmented Reality (AR)21
143D Model Library13
15Disassembly3
16Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Digital Twin8
Total 292
Table 3. Three-dimensional (3D) product model research themes and associated references [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299].
S. No3D Product Model Research ThemesReference(s)
1Product Design[11,12,14,15,21,24,27,41,42,46,65,67,72,76,81,84,100,102,106,114,134,139,172,176,195,196,212,215,216,221,232,243,244,253,270,274,275,277]
2Design for Assembly[16,19,22,30,58,82,98,116,120,155,163,181,183,192,204,211,220,260,267,273,289]
3Data Processing[9,62,95,111,113,149,150,151,173,175,185,207,217,233,234,235,276,280,282,283,285,287]
4Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing[17,29,50,69,70,71,74,77,91,105,122,143,154,156,157,158,164,167,198,200,201,208,210,223,227,238,239,242,247,251,261,291,294,298]
5Assembly Sequence Planning[32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,57,59,60,61,79,90,98,99,117,126,128,130,140,146,165,171,190,209,225,229,237,240,245,246,259,297]
6Virtual Assembly/Virtual Reality[18,43,45,53,75,93,96,109,110,119,123,125,133,152,197,214,222,224,231,250,254,258,279,286,295,296,299]
7Assembly line/station layout planning[10,25,40,44,47,78,80,83,86,87,92,135,147,153,169,182,194,202,228,236,252,256,257,271,272,288]
8Interpolation between 2D and 3D Models[8,28,85,168,213,219,248,255,263,278]
9Reverse Engineering/Scanning Technology[20,48,66,118,199,230,262]
10Assembly Feasibility[13,129,144,218]
11Web-Based Applications[52,63,64,68,131,132,148,160,161,191,205,241,266,269]
12Virtual Training/Work Instructions[26,49,51,112,127,141,174,177,178,187,189,226,281]
13Augmented Reality[55,56,73,88,89,97,115,145,162,170,179,186,188,193,206,258,264,265,268,292]
143D Model Library[54,121,122,136,137,138,142,166,180,184,203,284,290]
15Disassembly[23,94,104]
16Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twin[31,101,103,107,108,159,249,293]
Table
Table 4. Three-dimensional (3D) product model research themes evolution with journal article count.
Table 4. Three-dimensional (3D) product model research themes evolution with journal article count.
S. No3D Product Model Research Themes1940s–1960s1970s1980s1990s2000s2010s2020s
1Product Design3412153
2Design for Assembly3 2151
3Data Processing 261211
4Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing 13111153
5Assembly Sequence Planning 129211
6Virtual Assembly/Virtual Reality 61110
7Assembly line/station layout planning 7683
8Interpolation between 2D and 3D Models 2431
9Reverse Engineering/Scanning Technology 2131
10Assembly Feasibility 121
11Web-Based Applications 941
12Virtual Training/Work Instructions 292
13Augmented Reality 2127
143D Model Library 1111
15Disassembly 3
16Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twin 17
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kirpes, C.; Hu, G.; Sly, D. The 3D Product Model Research Evolution and Future Trends: A Systematic Literature Review. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2022, 5, 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5020029

AMA Style

Kirpes C, Hu G, Sly D. The 3D Product Model Research Evolution and Future Trends: A Systematic Literature Review. Applied System Innovation. 2022; 5(2):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5020029

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kirpes, Carl, Guiping Hu, and Dave Sly. 2022. "The 3D Product Model Research Evolution and Future Trends: A Systematic Literature Review" Applied System Innovation 5, no. 2: 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5020029

APA Style

Kirpes, C., Hu, G., & Sly, D. (2022). The 3D Product Model Research Evolution and Future Trends: A Systematic Literature Review. Applied System Innovation, 5(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5020029

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop