Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Mullite 3D Printed Humidity Sensors
Previous Article in Journal
CaCO3-Infused Carbon Fiber Aerogels: Synthesis and Characterization
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ultra-Broadband Plasmon Resonance in Gold Nanoparticles Precipitated in ZnO-Al2O3-SiO2 Glass
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Ceramics
Volume 7
Issue 2
10.3390/ceramics7020052
ceramics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fabrication of Dicarboxylic-Acid- and Silica-Substituted Octacalcium Phosphate Blocks with Stronger Mechanical Strength

by
Yuki Sugiura
1,2,*,
Yasuko Saito
3,
Etsuko Yamada
2 and
Masanori Horie
2
1
Health and Medical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 1-1-1, Higashi, Tsukuba 305-0045, Ibaraki, Japan
2
Health and Medical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 2217-14, Hayashi, Takamatsu 761-0395, Kagawa, Japan
3
Research Institute for Sustainable Chemistry, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 3-11-32 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-0046, Hiroshima, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Ceramics 2024, 7(2), 796-806; https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics7020052
Submission received: 28 April 2024 / Revised: 4 June 2024 / Accepted: 5 June 2024 / Published: 7 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Manufacturing Processes of Silicate Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Octacalcium phosphate (OCP) is an attractive base material to combine into components developed for medical purposes, especially those used in bone replacement procedures, not only because of its excellent biocompatibility but also because of its ability to intercalate with multiple types of molecular layers such as silica, dicarboxylic acid, and various cations. On the other hand, there are no examples of simultaneous substituting for several different compounds on OCPs. Therefore, in this study, the physical and mechanical strength (DTS: diametral tensile strength) of OCPs substituted with both silica and dicarboxylic acids (thiomalate: SH-malate) were evaluated. By optimizing the amount of SH-malate, we were able to prepare a block consisting of OCPs with both silica and SH-malate supported in the interlayer. The composition of the OCP-based compound comprising this block was Ca8Na1.07H6.33(PO4)4.44(SiO4)1.32(SH-malate)2.40·nH2O. Interestingly, the low mechanical strength, a drawback of silica-substituted OCP blocks, could be improved by dicarboxylic acid substituting. The dicarboxylic acid addition increased the mechanical strength of silica-substituted OCP blocks, and the acid successfully incorporated into the interlayer, even with the presence of silica. These results are expected to advance the creation of better silica-substituted OCPs and improved bone replacement materials.

1. Introduction

A prevalent health issue among the elderly is hard tissue syndrome [1,2]. This is because as individuals age, they develop hard tissues that have relatively low healing abilities. As typified by bone fracture and periodontal diseases, hard tissue syndrome leads to a greatly decreased quality of life. In particular, alveolar bone recovery as well as the creation of effective bone regeneration materials are required to restore oral functions. Therefore, medical infrastructures that help with the rapid healing from diseases related to hard tissue syndrome are essential for the maintenance of a vibrant society, especially among elderly populations.
Octacalcium phosphate [OCP: Ca8(PO4)4(HPO4)2·5H2O], the main inorganic component of immature bone, exhibits excellent biocompatibility and can be medically replaced in the bone of a patient through the bone remodeling process [3,4,5,6,7,8]. In addition, the OCP crystal structure can be incorporated within various ions and molecules such as transition metal ions and dicarboxylic acids [5,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Thus, OCP has been an attractive base material to combine with components for the development of medical products, especially those utilized in bone regeneration. Furthermore, OCP is a precursor of other calcium phosphates that aid in bone healing and regeneration such as hydroxyapatite [HAp: Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2] and carbonate apatite [CO3Ap: Ca10−a(PO4)6−b(CO3)c(OH)2−d] [15,16,17,18]. Depending on the molecule, the OCP unit lattice-substituted materials interlayer might be maintained or released through the phase conversion process [19,20,21,22].
Silica enhanced the viabilities of osteoblasts and increases their bone production [23,24,25]. In fact, there have been attempts to demonstrate high bone regeneration ability by combining silica with vaterite, a polymorph of calcium carbonate, in bone replacement materials [26,27,28,29]. In addition, bioceramics containing silica nanoparticles were also introduced for bone regeneration materials [30,31,32,33]. We have investigated the usefulness of this material as a bone replacement material by substituting silica onto OCP (OCP-silica) without using organic silica such as tetraethyl silicate (TEOS), which possess the harmful problem of residual organic matter material feasibility tests for application in bone regeneration because silica enhances osteoblastic activities [34,35,36]. It was found that OCP-silica exhibited several times higher bone regeneration ability compared to CO3Ap, which is presently used in commercial bone substitutes for dental implant [35]. On the other hand, the low formability and mechanical strength of OCP-silica blocks are serious drawbacks for bone substitute applications and further equipment. Since silica acts as an inhibitor of OCP crystal growth, the interlocking process results in low mechanical strength [34,35]. Moreover, when OCP blocks were converted into apatite blocks through a solution medicated phase conversion process, the mechanical strength of treated blocks further decreased [36].
In a previous related study, the results showed that dicarboxylic-acid-substituted OCP blocks fabricated by the OCP cementing process displayed a mechanical strength that tended to be higher than that of normal OCP blocks [37,38]. This knowledge can be applied in the preparation of OCP-silica blocks that exhibit high strength and serves as a precursor for other silica-substituted calcium phosphates. To further investigate the capabilities of molecular-substituted OCP blocks for practical application, this study prepared silica-dicarboxylic acid molecule-supported OCP blocks using thiomalate acid [SH-malate: C4H6O4S] as the dicarboxylic acid molecule.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of SH-Malate and Silica-Substituted Blocks through the Cement-Setting Reaction

The reagents used for this study were obtained as follows: all reagents (except SH-malate) were purchased as reagent grade from FUJI Film Wako Pure Chemical Inc., Co., Osaka, Japan; SH-malate was purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industrial Co., Tokyo, Japan; H3PO4 was diluted by distilled water and then prepared in 4.0 mol/L H3PO4. In addition, the SH-malate and silica-substituted blocks were prepared through the cement-setting reaction [35,37,38].
Next, the OCP component fabrication process is detailed. First, 0.0–0.6 g SH-malate was dissolved into 2.0 mL 4.0 mol/L H3PO4 at an agate motor. Then, 1.2 g of CaCO3 powder was gradually mixed into the solution with mixing by agate pestle. Afterwards, 1.08 mL, 38 percentage by weight (wt%) Na2SiO3 solution was subsequently added by stirring with a pestle for several ten-second intervals until the bubbling process was stabilized. Using a stainless spatula, the mixture was placed in a silicon rubber mold (φ6 × 3 mm) that was tightly sealed by a 0.3 mm thick polypropylene sheet to avoid evaporation and induce the interlocking of formed crystals during incubation. The packed molds with samples were placed at 60 °C for 1 d. Finally, the treated materials were removed from the mold; then, they were thoroughly washed with distilled water three times and finally placed in a 40 °C drying oven for 1 d.

2.2. Evaluation Process

To evaluate the experimental results, crystallographic information from the samples was obtained through X-ray diffraction (XRD; MiniFlex600, Rigaku Co., Tokyo, Japan) at an acceleration voltage and amplitude of 40 kV and 15 mA, respectively. For characterization, the diffraction angle was continuously scanned over 2θ values ranging from 3° to 70° at a scanning rate of 5°/min. Meanwhile, for the crystallographic parameter analysis, it was scanned from 2° to 12° at a rate of 1°/min.
Next, the chemical bonding of the samples was analyzed with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) (IRTracer-100, Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan) and a triglycine sulfate detector (30 scans, resolution of 2 cm−1) that has an attenuated total reflection diamond prism. Also, the atmosphere provided the measurement background.
After Os sputtering, the fine structures of the samples were examined by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM; JSM-6700F, JEOL Co., Tokyo, Japan) at 3 kV acceleration voltage.
The 31P chemical shifts of the samples were determined by using solid state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy (Varian FT-NMR, 400 MHz, Agilent Technologies Co., Santa Clara, CA, USA) at a 161.8 MHz resonance frequency. Next, cross-polarization magic angle spinning (CP-MAS) 31P NMR spectroscopy was performed at 10 kHz. In addition, an Agilent 4 mm T3 CP-MAS HXY solid probe and zirconia rotors were used. Each sample weighed ≈0.03 g. Meanwhile, the contact time for the 31P CP-MAS measurements was 3 ms, with an acquisition time of 50 ms and relaxation delay of 40 s for each measurement interval. Each measurement was repeated 400 times. The 31P chemical shift of (NH4)H2PO4 was used as the external reference (1.0 ppm).
The Si and S content of the samples were measured using energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (EDX-8100, Shimadzu Co., Japan) at 15 kV acceleration voltage under a vacuum. Next, the Si/Ca ratios of the samples were calibrated using inner standard samples, which consisted of a hydroxyapatite–SiO2 mixture in disk-shaped sintered blocks (Ca/Si = 100:0, 90:10, 75:25, 50:50, and 0:100) measured in the same manner as the experimental samples. The S/Ca ratio was also calibrated using a disk-shaped mixture of CaCO3–CaSO4·2H2O set blocks (Ca/S = 100:0, 90:10, 75:25 and 50:50).
Afterwards, the mechanical strengths of five cylindrical specimens were evaluated. Their respective diameter and thickness were measured using a micrometer (MDC-25MU, Mitsutoyo Co., Ltd., Kawasaki, Japan). These specimens were then submitted under compression testing by crushing at a constant crosshead speed of 1 mm/min using a universal testing machine (AGS-J, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Next, the mean DTS values of the specimens were estimated and reported as the mean standard deviation. The results were then assessed by t-test analysis (with a significance level of p < 0.05).

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows photographs of the set samples with various SH-malate amounts. Note that in the study of dicarboxylic acid molecule substituting, the amount of CaCO3 is increased compared to the conventional OCP-silica preparation. This is because dicarboxylic acid is acidic, and it is necessary to increase the amount of CaCO3 to neutralize it. The mud mixture foamed more strongly because of this. Through the cement-setting reaction, all the samples revealed block shapes. It should be noted that in low SH-malate amounts (SH-malate: 0.00–0.15 g), the bubbling process was continued during setting reactions.
Next, the XRD evaluation of the obtained blocks was performed. Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of the set blocks with different SH-malate amounts. As the SH-malate concentration increased, the block composition became from apatite to OCP, and monophasic OCP peaks were observed around 0.45 g and 0.60 g of SH-malate content. The peak corresponding to d100 of OCP shifted slightly to the low angle, indicating that SH-malate intercalated with the OCP interlayer. Therefore, the sample with 0.60 g of SH-malate was found to be OCP monophase and thereby can be referred to as an OCP-silica:SH-malate block.
The conditions for substituted silica and SH-malate in OCP were further evaluated. Figure 3 and Figure 4 show the OCP-silica:SH-malate block FT-IR and NMR spectra, respectively. In FT-IR spectra, the OCP-silica:SH-malate block clearly exhibited -COOH band ranging from 1400 to 1600 cm−1, which is the same as in OCP-SH-malate. In addition, a weak band ranging from 1100 to 1200 cm−1, which corresponds to the silanol band, was observed. Then, the OCP-silica:SH-malate block revealed both OCP-silica and OCP-SH-malate. In NMR spectra, the P2/P4 peaks were clearly attenuated, while P5/P6 corresponded to the hydrous layer and shifted slightly toward the higher wavenumber. Meanwhile, bands corresponding to PA/PB were observed at lower wavenumbers. These results were attributed to the inclusion of dicarboxylic acid molecules [35,36], as well as indicating that both silica and SH-malate are contained in the OCP crystals.
The OCP-silica:SH-malate block (SH-malate: 0.60 g) contains of Si (8.35 ± 0.68 at%) and S (15.20 ± 3.38 at%). However, the OCP-silica:SH-malate block Si content was significantly lower than that of OCP-silica powder and block. On the other hand, the OCP-silica:SH-malate block S content was significantly higher than that of OCP-SH-malate powder. Then, the possibly chemical composition of OCP-silica:SH-malate block was described as Ca8Na1.07H6.33(PO4)4.44(SiO4)1.32(SH-malate)2.40·nH2O.
Next, the mechanical strength of the samples was evaluated. Figure 5 shows the DTS values of the set samples. As SH-malate was increased, the block mechanical strength was attenuated, but increased again. For the OCP-silica:SH-malate block, the mechanical strength of samples was significantly higher than that of blocks without SH-malate and OCP-silica blocks.
Meanwhile, the fine structure of the samples indicated that they possessed higher mechanical strength. Figure 6 shows SEM micrographs of the OCP-silica:SH-malate block and two types of OCP-silica block (CaCO3-H3PO4-Na2SiO3 and DCPD-MCPM-Na2SiO3 systems) for facilitate comparison. In the OCP-silica:SH-malate block, much denser and well-developed crystals were observed compared to both OCP-silica blocks. This suggests that a high degree of entanglement results in higher strength. When dicarboxylic acid molecules and other molecules are substituted on OCP, developing in the a-axis direction is suppressed [40,41,42,43]. As a result, the aspect ratio of OCP crystals increases. This is assumed to increase the entanglement and form a denser and stronger structure. Furthermore, since the dicarboxylic acid molecules have carboxy groups, an adhesive effect of free dicarboxylic acid molecules binding to Ca ions on the OCP surface is also expected [44,45]. Since the same phenomenon is observed even when silica is not supported, it is considered that dicarboxylic acid contributes to both aspect ratio and adhesive strength [34,35].
The results clearly show that both silica and SH-malate can be simultaneously substituted in the OCP crystal structure. Furthermore, we think that the prepared OCP-silica:SH-malate block is a material in which both silica and SH-malate are substituted between the layers of OCP. This is shown by FT-IR and NMR spectral measurements. In addition, compared to conventional OCP–silica, the strength of the prepared blocks is improved. One of the possible reasons for this is the morphological change of OCP crystals due to the incorporation of SH-malate into the OCP interlayer: OCP crystals generally assume a ribbon-like crystal form, while dicarboxylic acid molecules, including SH-malate, are distributed along the a-axis direction, that is, the orientation in which the crystal is thinnest [46,47]. Therefore, the a-axis direction growth is inhibited, while growth in the b- and c-axis directions is relatively less inhibited, resulting in the formation of crystals with a large aspect ratio, i.e., crystals that are easily entangled.
For further investigation, it was also tested as to whether OCP is useful for dicarboxylic acid molecules other than SH-malate. As shown in Figure 7, succinic acid (C4H6O4) substituting was considered. It was found that any dicarboxylic acid molecule, such as succinic acid, can be incorporated into OCP crystals and blocked. Therefore, these would have the same effect as that observed in SH-malate. Note that the mechanical strength of succinic-acid-substituted OCP-silica blocks was found to be significantly higher than that of SH-malate. This is likely due to the higher acidity of succinic acid and how it might compare to SH-malate, as well as the stronger adhesion of the carboxy groups of the dicarboxylic acid molecules, resulting in a stronger block.

4. Conclusions

Because of OCP’s ability to intercalate with multiple types of molecular layers such as silica, dicarboxylic acid, and various cations, OCP is an attractive base material to combine into components developed for medical purposes. On the other hand, there are no examples of simultaneous substituting for several different compounds on OCPs. Of particular interest is whether low mechanical strength, a drawback of OCP-silica blocks, could be improved by dicarboxylic acid substituting. Therefore, the preparation of silica-substituted OCP blocks with the addition of SH-malate, a dicarboxylic acid molecule, was investigated. If the formulation ratio is appropriate, it is possible to prepare monophasic OCP blocks substituted with dicarboxylic acid molecules and silica. The mechanical strength of the resulting blocks tends to be higher than that of the system without dicarboxylic acid molecules substituted. Based on these results, the findings of this study have promising applications for the development of improved medical components used in bone replacement that aid in more efficient as well as effective bone recovery and regeneration.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.S. (Yuki Sugiura) and M.H.; methodology, Y.S. (Yuki Sugiura) and E.Y.; NMR measurement Y.S. (Yasuko Saito). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the AMED Seeds H program (Keio University; grant number H424TS), AMED Seeds A program (Keio University; grant number A424TR), Kazuchika Okura Memorial Foundation 2022FY Grant-in-Aid, and JST-CREST (grant number JPMJCR22L5).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We thank T. Nakanishi, RIST, Kagawa, Japan, for performing the FT-IR measurements.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Safiri, S.; Kolahi, A.-A.; Smith, E.; Hill, C.; Bettampadi, D.; Mansournia, M.A.; Hoy, D.; Ashrafi-Asgarabad, A.; Sepidarkish, M.; Almasi-Hashiani, A.; et al. Global, regional and national burden of osteoarthritis 1990–2017: A systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020, 79, 819–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. World Health Organization. WHO’s Annual World Health Statistics Reports, 2020. In WHO’s Division for Data, Analytics and Delivery; WHO Press: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. Simon, P.; Grüner, D.; Worch, H.; Pompe, W.; Lichte, H.; El-Khassawna, T.; Heiss, C.; Wenisch, S.; Kniep, R. First evidence of octacalcium phosphate@osteocalcin nanocomplex as skeletal bone component directing collagen triple–helix nanofibril mineral-ization. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 13696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Suzuki, O.; Kamakura, S.; Katagiri, T. Surface Chemistry and Biological Responses to Synthetic Octacalcium Phosphate. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2006, 77B, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shi, H.; He, F.; Ye, J. Synthesis and structure of iron- and strontium-substituted octacalcium phosphate: Effects of ionic charge and radius. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 1712–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sai, Y.; Shiwaku, Y.; Anada, T.; Tsuchiya, K.; Takahashi, T.; Suzuki, O. Capacity of octacalcium phosphate to promote osteoblastic differentiation toward osteocytes in vitro. Acta Biomater. 2018, 69, 362–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kamakura, S.; Sasano, Y.; Homma, H.; Suzuki, O.; Kagayama, M.; Motegi, K. Implantation of Octacalcium Phosphate (OCP) in Rat Skull Defects Enhances Bone Repair. J. Dent. Res. 1999, 78, 1682–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sugiura, Y.; Munar, M.L.; Ishikawa, K. Fabrication of octacalcium phosphate foam through phase conversion and its histological evaluation. Mater. Lett. 2018, 212, 28–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Markovic, M.; Fowler, B.O.; Brown, W.E. Octacalcium phosphate carboxylates. 1. Preparation and identification. Chem. Mater. 1993, 5, 1401–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Monma, H.; Goto, M. Thermal alteration of succinate-complexed octacalcium phosphate. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 1980, 4, 147–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yokoi, T.; Kamitakahara, M.; Ohtsuki, C. Continuous expansion of the interplanar spacing of octacalcium phosphate by incor-poration of dicarboxylate ions with a side chain. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 7943–7950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Davies, E.; Müller, K.H.; Wong, W.C.; Pickard, C.J.; Reid, D.G.; Skepper, J.N.; Duer, M.J. Citrate bridges between mineral platelets in bone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E1354–E1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Boanini, E.; Gazzano, M.; Rubini, K.; Bigi, A. Collapsed Octacalcium Phosphate Stabilized by Ionic Substitutions. Cryst. Growth Des. 2010, 10, 3612–3617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yamada, I.; Noda, D.; Shinozaki, K.; Galindo, T.G.P.; Tagaya, M. Synthesis of Luminescent Eu(III)-Doped Octacalcium Phosphate Particles Hybridized with Succinate Ions and Their Reactive Behavior in Simulated Body Fluid. Cryst. Growth Des. 2021, 21, 2005–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chickerur, N.S.; Tung, M.S.; Brown, W.E. A Mechanism for Incorporation of Carbonate into Apatite. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1980, 32, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sugiura, Y.; Ishikawa, K. Fabrication of carbonate apatite blocks from octacalcium phosphate blocks through different phase conversion mode depending on carbonate concentration. J. Solid State Chem. 2018, 267, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Horváthová, R.; Müller, L.; Helebrant, A.; Greil, P.; Müller, F.A. In vitro transformation of OCP into carbonated HA under physiological conditions. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2008, 28, 1414–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ito, N.; Kamitakahara, M.; Yoshimura, M.; Ioku, K. Importance of nucleation in transformation of octacalcium phosphate to hydroxyapatite. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2014, 40, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yokoi, T.; Goto, T.; Kitaoka, S. Formation of Hydroxyapatite Crystals from Octacalcium Phosphate with Incorporated Succinate Ion under Hydrothermal Conditions. Chem. Lett. 2019, 48, 855–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sugiura, Y.; Makita, Y. Intercalated molecule releasing process of thiomalate substituted octacalcium phosphate crystals during phase conversion. J. Cryst. Growth 2022, 583, 126545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yokoi, T.; Goto, T.; Kato, T.; Takahashi, S.; Nakamura, J.; Sekino, T.; Ohtsuki, C.; Kawashita, M. Hydroxyapatite Formation from Octacalcium Phosphate and Its Related Compounds: A Discussion of the Transformation Mechanism. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2020, 93, 701–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sugiura, Y.; Horie, M. Fabrication of silver-doped apatite powders from silver-substituted octacalcium phosphate powders via solid–solid phase-conversion process. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 25614–25621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Carlisle, E.M. Silicon: An Essential Element for the Chick. Science 1972, 178, 619–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Xynos, I.D.; Edgar, A.J.; Buttery, L.D.; Hench, L.L.; Polak, J.M. Ionic Products of Bioactive Glass Dissolution Increase Proliferation of Human Osteoblasts and Induce Insulin-like Growth Factor II mRNA Expression and Protein Synthesis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000, 276, 461–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Reffitt, D.M.; Ogston, N.; Jugdaohsingh, R.; Cheung, H.F.J.; Evans, B.A.J.; Thompson, R.P.H.; Powell, J.J.; Hampson, G.N. Orthosilicic acid stimulates collagen type 1 synthesis and osteoblastic differentiation in human osteoblast-like cells in vitro. Bone 2003, 32, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Obata, A.; Tokuda, S.; Kasuga, T. Enhanced in vitro cell activity on silicon-doped vaterite/poly(lactic acid) composites. Acta Biomater. 2009, 5, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kasuga, T.; Maeda, H.; Kato, K.; Nogami, M.; Hata, K.-I.; Ueda, M. Preparation of poly(lactic acid) composites containing calcium carbonate (vaterite). Biomaterials 2003, 24, 3247–3253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Nakamura, J.; Kasuga, T. Enhancement of crystalline plane orientation in silsesquioxane-containing vaterite particles towards tuning of calcium ion release. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 1250–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Obata, A.; Ozasa, H.; Kasuga, T.; Jones, J.R. Cotton wool-like poly(lactic acid)/vaterite composite scaffolds releasing soluble silica for bone tissue engineering. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2013, 24, 1649–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Manchón, A.; Alkhraisat, M.; Rueda-Rodriguez, C.; Torres, J.; Prados-Frutos, J.C.; Ewald, A.; Gbureck, U.; Cabrejos-Azama, J.; Rodriguez-González, A.; López-Cabarcos, E. Silicon calcium phosphate ceramic as novel biomaterial to simulate the bone regenerative properties of autologous bone. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2014, 103, 479–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dong, G.; He, L.; Wu, G.; Deng, C. The effect of silicon doping on the transformation of amorphous calcium phos-phate to silicon-substituted α-tricalcium phosphate by heat treatment. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 883–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Huang, S.-H.; Chen, Y.-J.; Kao, C.-T.; Lin, C.-C.; Huang, T.-H.; Shie, M.-Y. Physicochemical properties and biocompatibility of silica doped b-tricalcium phosphate for bone cement. J. Dent. Sci. 2015, 10, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ha, S.-W.; Viggeswarapu, M.; Habib, M.M.; Beck, G.R., Jr. Bioactive effects of silica nanoparticles on bone cells are size, surface, and composition dependent. Acta Biomater. 2018, 82, 184–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sugiura, Y.; Niitsu, K.; Saito, Y.; Endo, T.; Horie, M. Inorganic process for wet silica-doping of calcium phosphate. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 12330–12335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sugiura, Y.; Ono, F.; Nohara, M.; Takechi, A.; Kutara, K.; Kanda, T.; Saito, Y.; Yamada, E.; Oowada, K.; Endo, T.; et al. Inorganic silica hybrid octacalcium phosphate bone substitute: Harmonics to acceleration in biological metabolism and its curing process. Materialia 2023, 28, 101771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sugiura, Y.; Saito, Y.; Yamada, E.; Endo, T.; Horie, M.; Makita, Y. Fabrication of silica-substituted carbonate apatite blocks through phase transformation process from silica-substituted octacalcium phosphate blocks. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 2023, 131, 458–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sugiura, Y.; Yamada, E.; Horie, M. Fabrication of Octacalcium Phosphate Block through the Reaction between CaCO3 Powder and Phosphate Acid. Chem. Lett. 2022, 51, 851–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sugiura, Y.; Yamada, E.; Horie, M. Fabrication of dicarboxylic-acid-substituted octacalcium phosphate blocks via cementing. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 9719–9724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Berry, E.; Baddiel, C. Some assignments in the infra-red spectrum of octacalcium phosphate. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Spectrosc. 1967, 23, 1781–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tsai, T.W.T.; Chan, J.C.C. Recent Progress in the Solid-State NMR Studies of Biomineralization. Ann. Rep. NMR Spectros. 2011, 73, 1–61. [Google Scholar]
  41. Sugiura, Y.; Makita, Y. Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane Substitution into Octacalcium Phosphate. Chem. Lett. 2019, 48, 1304–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bigi, A.; Boanini, E.; Borghi, M.; Cojazzi, G.; Panzavolta, S.; Roveri, N. Synthesis and hydrolysis of octacalcium phosphate: Effect of sodium polyacrylate. J. Inorgn. Biochem. 1999, 75, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sugiura, Y.; Yamada, E.; Horie, M. Interlayer expansion of octacalcium phosphate via forced oxidation of the intercalated molecules within its interlayers. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2023, 25, 26640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ince, D.E.; Johnston, C.T.; Moudgil, B.M. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic study of adsorption of oleic acid/oleate on surfaces of apatite and dolomite. Langmuir 1991, 7, 1453–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dong, L.; Wei, Q.; Qin, W.; Jiao, F. Selective adsorption of sodium polyacrylate on calcite surface: Implications for flotation separation of apatite from calcite. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 241, 116415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tsai, T.W.T.; Chou, F.-C.; Tseng, Y.-H.; Chan, J.C.C. Solid-state P-31 NMR study of octacalcium phosphate incorporated with succinate. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 6692–6697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, Y.; Reid, D.G.; Duer, M.J.; Chan, J.C.C. Solid state NMR—An indispensable tool in organic-inorganic biocomposite character-ization; refining the structure of octacalcium phosphate composites with the linear metabolic di-acids succinate and adipate. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 2018, 95, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ceramics 07 00052 g001
Figure 1. Photographs of the set blocks with different SH-malate amounts. (a) OCP-silica block as reference. (b) SH-malate: 0.00 g. (c) SH-malate: 0.15 g. (d) SH-malate: 0.30 g. (e) SH-malate: 0.45 g. (f) SH-malate: 0.60 g.
Figure 1. Photographs of the set blocks with different SH-malate amounts. (a) OCP-silica block as reference. (b) SH-malate: 0.00 g. (c) SH-malate: 0.15 g. (d) SH-malate: 0.30 g. (e) SH-malate: 0.45 g. (f) SH-malate: 0.60 g.
Ceramics 07 00052 g001
Ceramics 07 00052 g002
Figure 2. XRD patterns of the set blocks. (a) Wide range. (b) Small angle. Green broken line: OCP-SH-malate d(100)’ peak. Red dotted line: OCP d(100) peak.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of the set blocks. (a) Wide range. (b) Small angle. Green broken line: OCP-SH-malate d(100)’ peak. Red dotted line: OCP d(100) peak.
Ceramics 07 00052 g002
Ceramics 07 00052 g003
Figure 3. FT-IR spectra of OCP-silica:SH-malate block with OCP–silica and OCP-SH-malate reference for facilitate comparison. (a) Wide range. (b) Hydrous. Blue band: silanol vibration. Red broken lines: -COOH vibration. Green dotted line: HPO4 vibration [39].
Figure 3. FT-IR spectra of OCP-silica:SH-malate block with OCP–silica and OCP-SH-malate reference for facilitate comparison. (a) Wide range. (b) Hydrous. Blue band: silanol vibration. Red broken lines: -COOH vibration. Green dotted line: HPO4 vibration [39].
Ceramics 07 00052 g003
Ceramics 07 00052 g004
Figure 4. 31P solid-state NMR spectra of OCP-silica:SH-malate block with conventional OCP, OCP-silica block, and OCP-silica powder for facilitate comparison. Broken lines corresponded each PO4 state. Dark blue broken line: PO4 of OCP-silica block state [35,40].
Figure 4. 31P solid-state NMR spectra of OCP-silica:SH-malate block with conventional OCP, OCP-silica block, and OCP-silica powder for facilitate comparison. Broken lines corresponded each PO4 state. Dark blue broken line: PO4 of OCP-silica block state [35,40].
Ceramics 07 00052 g004
Ceramics 07 00052 g005
Figure 5. DTS values of the set blocks with different SH-malate amounts. *: p < 0.05.
Figure 5. DTS values of the set blocks with different SH-malate amounts. *: p < 0.05.
Ceramics 07 00052 g005
Ceramics 07 00052 g006
Figure 6. SEM micrographs of OCP-silica:SH-malate block and reference materials in 0.5 mm and 10 μm, respectively. (a,b) OCP-silica fabricated from MCPM-DCPD-Na2SiO3 system. (c,d) OCP-silica fabricated from CaCO3-H3PO4-Na2SiO3. (e,f) OCP-silica:SH-malate block.
Figure 6. SEM micrographs of OCP-silica:SH-malate block and reference materials in 0.5 mm and 10 μm, respectively. (a,b) OCP-silica fabricated from MCPM-DCPD-Na2SiO3 system. (c,d) OCP-silica fabricated from CaCO3-H3PO4-Na2SiO3. (e,f) OCP-silica:SH-malate block.
Ceramics 07 00052 g006
Ceramics 07 00052 g007
Figure 7. Evaluation results of OCP-silica:succinate block fabrication. (a) Photographs of the set blocks with different succinate amounts. (b) Wide-range XRD patterns of the set blocks with different succinate amounts. (c) Small-angle XRD patterns of the set blocks with different succinate amounts. Green broken line: OCP-SH-malate d(100)’ peak. Red dotted line: OCP d(100) peak. (d) DTS values of the set blocks with different succinate amounts. *: p < 0.05.
Figure 7. Evaluation results of OCP-silica:succinate block fabrication. (a) Photographs of the set blocks with different succinate amounts. (b) Wide-range XRD patterns of the set blocks with different succinate amounts. (c) Small-angle XRD patterns of the set blocks with different succinate amounts. Green broken line: OCP-SH-malate d(100)’ peak. Red dotted line: OCP d(100) peak. (d) DTS values of the set blocks with different succinate amounts. *: p < 0.05.
Ceramics 07 00052 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sugiura, Y.; Saito, Y.; Yamada, E.; Horie, M. Fabrication of Dicarboxylic-Acid- and Silica-Substituted Octacalcium Phosphate Blocks with Stronger Mechanical Strength. Ceramics 2024, 7, 796-806. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics7020052

AMA Style

Sugiura Y, Saito Y, Yamada E, Horie M. Fabrication of Dicarboxylic-Acid- and Silica-Substituted Octacalcium Phosphate Blocks with Stronger Mechanical Strength. Ceramics. 2024; 7(2):796-806. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics7020052

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sugiura, Yuki, Yasuko Saito, Etsuko Yamada, and Masanori Horie. 2024. "Fabrication of Dicarboxylic-Acid- and Silica-Substituted Octacalcium Phosphate Blocks with Stronger Mechanical Strength" Ceramics 7, no. 2: 796-806. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics7020052

APA Style

Sugiura, Y., Saito, Y., Yamada, E., & Horie, M. (2024). Fabrication of Dicarboxylic-Acid- and Silica-Substituted Octacalcium Phosphate Blocks with Stronger Mechanical Strength. Ceramics, 7(2), 796-806. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics7020052

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop