Next Article in Journal
Pembrolizumab Induced Recall Dermatitis Occurring 5 Years After Radiotherapy
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of Regional Anesthesia on the Systemic Stress Response
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

First Case of Chryseobacterium gleum Post-COVID-19 in a Child with Recurrent Fever

by
Manuela Colosimo
1,
Filippo Luciani
2,
Maria Novella Pullano
3,
Diana Marisol Abrego-Guandique
4 and
Luca Gallelli
4,5,6,*
1
Department of Microbiology and Virology, AO Dulbecco: Pugliese Hospital, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
2
Infectious Disease Ambulatory, Department of Prevention, ASP, 87100 Cosenza, Italy
3
Department of Pediatry, AO Dulbecco: Pugliese Hospital, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
4
Department of Health Science, School of Medicine, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
5
Department of Health Science, School of Medicine, Research Center FAS@UNICZ, University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
6
Operative Unit of Clinical Pharmacology, Dulbecco University Hospital, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Reports 2024, 7(4), 90; https://doi.org/10.3390/reports7040090
Submission received: 29 September 2024 / Revised: 30 October 2024 / Accepted: 31 October 2024 / Published: 2 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Diseases)

Abstract

:
Background and Clinical Significance: Chryseobacterium gleum is a Gram-negative opportunistic and emerging pathogen able to induce systemic manifestations (e.g., peritonitis, pneumonia, urinary tract infections, meningitis) in immunocompromised patients. No data on children have been published. Case Presentation: A 2-year-old child presented in the pediatric ambulatory room with recurrent fever, submandibular lymphadenopathy, and skin rash. Laboratory findings revealed the presence of microcytic anemia with an increase in c-reactive protein. Chest X-ray reported mild accentuation of the bronchial structure, especially on the right side and middle–lower zone. In the peripheral blood smear, anisopoikilocytosis and elliptical red cells were evident. Clinical evaluation revealed the presence of conjunctivitis and polymorphic erythema, hyperemic pharynx and tonsils, SPO2 99%, auscultation of the chest, harsh vesicular murmur all over the area, and some wheezing. Microbiological analysis of sputum and throat swabs revealed the presence of numerous colonies of Chryseobacterium gleum confirmed using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS score > 2.2). Conclusions: This is the first case of Chryseobacterium gleum post-COVID in a child. We suggest that a quick identification and an appropriate treatment represent the critical factors able to prevent the adverse outcomes related to C. gleum infection.

1. Introduction and Clinical Significance

Chryseobacterium gleum (C. gleum) is an aerobic, Gram-negative, rod-shaped, non-motile bacterium, catalase-positive, oxidase-positive, and indole-positive pathogen that is able to hydrolyze starch and reduce nitrates and nitrites. It is found in the environments (e.g., soils, plant roots, flowers, freshwater) [1,2,3] and nosocomially in submandibular support devices (e.g., ventilators, central lines) [2]. C. gleum represents a potential opportunistic and emerging pathogen. Even if it does not cause serious infections in humans, it could induce systemic manifestations (e.g., peritonitis, pneumonia, urinary tract infections, meningitis) in immunocompromised patients or indwelling catheters [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. This report details the case of a young, immunocompetent child who presented with recurrent fever infected by C. gleum.

2. Case Description

A 2-year-old child with a history of COVID-19 infection six months ago presented to the pediatric outpatient clinic with recurrent fever, submandibular lymphadenopathy, and a skin rash. Laboratory findings revealed the presence of microcytic anemia with an increase in c-reactive protein. At pediatric admission, a throat swab was performed, and blood agar, MacConkey agar (MCK), Sabouraud and Columbia Nalidixic Acid (CNA) plates were used. It is left to incubate for 24–48 h at 37 °C except for CNA, which is preserved in CO2. In the first 24 h, numerous yellow colonies were highlighted on the blood agar and MCK plates, which were identified with the MALDI-TOF MS system as C. gleum. A further throat swab and sputum examination were requested. The bacterium grew on both samples in the first 24 h and was again identified with the mass spectrometry identification system. An ultrasound of the neck and abdomen, in conjunction with a hematological evaluation, led to the diagnosis of submandibular lymphadenomegaly and anisopoikilocytosis. Additionally, the dermatologist diagnosed atopic dermatitis and prescribed topical treatment comprising a glucocorticoid (hydrocortisone 17-butyrate) and acetaminophen. At the follow-up, one month later, due to the persistence of symptoms, he was hospitalized in the pediatric division. A dermatological evaluation follow-up confirmed the presence of atopic skin disease, while an otorhinolaryngology consultation diagnosed tonsillar hypertrophy without ongoing inflammation. During the hospitalization, laboratory tests, bone marrow fine needle aspiration, and a new neck and abdomen ultrasound failed to reveal a systemic disease. In detail, chest X-ray reported mild accentuation of the bronchial structure, especially on the right side and in the middle–lower zone. Free costophrenic sinuses, cardiac shadow within the limits of a regular aorta, several oval lymph nodes with thick and hypoechoic and thin cortex, and hyperechoic central hilum in place, as shown in Figure 1.
In the lymph node echo on the right, in the submandibular area, oval and hypoechoic lymph nodes with vascular spots were visible. The peripheral blood smear exhibited anisopoikilocytosis and elliptical red cells, as well as several activated lymph nodes and some atypical lymphocytes with nucleoli and nuclear notches. Additionally, there were some naked nuclei and monocytes with different cytoplasmic tingabilities. The fine needle aspiration of the marrow demonstrated high cellularity (C3, M1, MGK present), with infiltrations that were compatible with the subject’s age. The myeloid series was present, as were notes of erythropoiesis in the erythroid series. In the microcytic anemia testing, also known as complete blood count, the carrier of beta thalassemia trait, as well as molecular analysis for triplication of the negative alpha gene, was present. The patient was negative for thrombophilia (see summary in Table 1).
Moreover, an increase in erythrocyte sedimentation rate was documented in Table 2.
Clinical evaluation revealed the presence of conjunctivitis and polymorphic erythema. An infectious disease was postulated, and clarithromycin was prescribed. Two weeks later (14 March 2024), due to the persistence of symptoms, he was transferred to another operative unit of child diseases, where he developed a fever (39.5 °C). Clinical evaluation revealed the presence of conjunctivitis and polymorphic erythema. The clinical evaluation reported hyperemic pharynx and tonsils, SPO2 99%, auscultation of the chest, harsh vesicular murmur all over the area, and some wheezing. Microbiological analysis of sputum and throat swabs revealed the presence of numerous colonies of C. gleum. According to the Bartlett scheme, the confirmed swab and the sputum examination were positive after the suitability assessment. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS score > 2.2) was used for the pathogen’s confirmation test, as is shown in Figure 2.
The Sensitive system by Sensititre Thermo scientific™ Gram-negative MIC plate was used to evaluate the antibiotic sensitivity (Table 3). The system follows the EUCAST interpretation.

3. Discussion

Chryseobacterium was identified for the first time as a medically significant bacterial genus, making up 0.27% of non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli collected from samples across 16 countries [14]. C. gleum was the least common (two isolates—4%). C. gleum infection in humans affects immunosuppressed individuals and device carriers, hence it is a pathological opportunist in the hospital. The highest prevalence was found among the elderly [15]. Six cases of C. gleum infection were reported during 2012–2015 and one in 2018 [16,17]. For instance, a case report highlighted C. gleum as the agent of pneumonia in an adult male with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, illustrating its potential to cause severe respiratory infections in vulnerable populations [15]. Additionally, C. gleum has been implicated in urinary tract infections and bloodstream infections, further emphasizing its clinical significance [12,18]. This pathogen does not frequently infect the pediatric population; however, a case published in 2016 from Saudi Arabia reported C. gleum pneumonia in a 6-month-old baby with nephrotic syndrome [9].
Post-COVID-19, there has been an increase in reports in the literature of infections with C. gleum [19]. Prolonged hospitalizations due to COVID-19, especially those requiring mechanical ventilation, are associated with an increased risk of healthcare-associated infections caused by rare and opportunistic organisms, such as C. gleum. Angrup et al. described 18 C. gleum isolates that were identified from 10 patients, with 17 of these isolates found in 9 COVID-19-positive patients, suggesting a possible association between COVID-19 and C. gleum respiratory tract infections [20].
Therefore, to the best of our knowledge and according to literature review, this is the first case of C. gleum reported in a post-COVID-19 pediatric patient. This pathogen is especially concerning due to its intrinsic resistance spectrum to carbapenems, aminoglycosides, and combinations of beta-inhibitors lactams/beta-lactamases and cephalosporins, commonly used to treat sepsis [15]. However, some studies have reported susceptibility to fluoroquinolones and tetracyclines, indicating that treatment options may be limited but not entirely absent [19,21]. The resistance mechanisms, including the production of beta-lactamases, further complicate the management of infections caused by C. gleum [15]. In this case report, antibiotic resistance was found in the following antibiotics: amikacin, amoxyclav aztreonam, cefotaxime, ertapenem, gentamicin, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, and tobramycin (Table 3). Due to extremely limited sensitivity, there is a risk that C. gleum could become a severe infectious threat. Despite its scarcity, it is imperative that medical professionals recognize potential risk factors and maintain clinical suspicion of C. gleum, when appropriate. Respect for hand hygiene, aseptic procedures, and timely identification and treatment are all critical factors in preventing adverse outcomes related to C. gleum infection. The patient fully recovered after pharmacological therapy with ceftazidime antibiotics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.C.; methodology, M.C. and M.N.P.; software, M.C. and M.N.P.; validation, F.L. and L.G.; investigation, M.C., M.N.P. and D.M.A.-G.; data curation, M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.C. and D.M.A.-G.; writing—review and editing, F.L. and L.G.; supervision, L.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by Comitato Etico Territoriale Calabria (n. 250/2024 of 22 August 2024).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient’s guardian to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The original data presented in this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Holmes, B.; Owen, R.J.; Steigerwalt, A.G.; Brenner, D.J. Flavobacterium gleum, a new species found in human clinical specimens. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1984, 34, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lo, H.H.; Chang, S.M. Identification, characterization, and biofilm formation of clinical Chryseobacterium gleum isolates. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2014, 79, 298–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chiu, C.W.; Li, M.C.; Ko, W.C.; Li, C.W.; Chen, P.L.; Chang, C.M.; Lee, N.Y.; Lee, C.C. Clinical impact of Gram-negative nonfermenters on adults with community-onset bacteremia in the emergency department. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2015, 48, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ali, M.; Alsoub, H. Chryseobacterium gleum bacteraemia: First reported cases from Qatar. New Microbes New Infect. 2021, 41, 100869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Virok, D.P.; Abrok, M.; Szel, B.; Tajti, Z.; Mader, K.; Urban, E. Chryseobacterium gleum—A novel bacterium species detected in neonatal respiratory tract infections. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014, 27, 1926–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Abdul Wahab, A.; Taj-Aldeen, S.J.; Ibrahim, E.B.; Talaq, E.; Abu-Madi, M.; Fotedar, R. Discrepancy in MALDI-TOF MS identification of uncommon Gram-negative bacteria from lower respiratory secretions in patients with cystic fibrosis. Infect. Drug Resist. 2015, 8, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brkic, D.V.; Zlopasa, O.; Bedenic, B.; Plecko, V. Chryseobacterium gleum infection in patient with extreme malnutrition and hepatic lesion—Case report. Signa Vitae 2015, 10, 50–52. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ramya, T.G.; Baby, S.; Das, P.; Geetha, R.K. Chryseobacterium gleum urinary tract infection. Genes. Rev. 2015, 1, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  9. Abdalhamid, B.; Elhadi, N.; Alsamman, K.; Aljindan, R. Chryseobacterium gleum pneumonia in an infant with nephrotic syndrome. IDCases 2016, 5, 34–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lambiase, A.; Del Pezzo, M.; Raia, V.; Sepe, A.; Ferri, P.; Rossano, F. Chryseobacterium respiratory tract infections in patients with cystic fibrosis. J. Infect. 2007, 55, 518–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jain, V.; Hussain, N.A.; Siddiqui, T.; Sahu, C.; Ghar, M.; Prasad, K.N. Simultaneous isolation of Chryseobacterium gleum from bloodstream and respiratory tract: First case report from India. JMM Case Rep. 2017, 4, e005122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Arouna, O.; Deluca, F.I.; Camara, M.; Fall, B.; Fall, B.; Ba Diallo, A.; Docquier, J.D.; Mboup, S. Chryseobacterium gleum in a man with prostatectomy in Senegal: A case report and review of the literature. J. Med. Case Rep. 2017, 11, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Singhal, L.; Gupta, V.; Mehta, V.; Singla, N.; Janmeja, A.K.; Chander, J. Sepsis due to Chryseobacterium gleum in a diabetic patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A case report and mini review. JPN J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 70, 687–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Stone, P.W. Economic burden of healthcare-associated infections: An American perspective. Expert. Rev. Pharmacoecon. Outcomes Res. 2009, 9, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Amisha, F.; Fugere, T.; Caceres, J.; Rico Crescencio, J.C.; Falls, N. Chryseobacterium gleum Causing Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia in an Adult Male with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma. Cureus 2021, 13, e19297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Aykac, K.; Ozsurekci, Y.; Tuncer, O.; Sancak, B.; Cengiz, A.B.; Kara, A.; Ceyhan, M. Six cases during 2012–2015 and literature review of Chryseobacterium indologenes infections in pediatric patients. Can J Microbiol. 2016, 62, 812–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mirza, H.C.; Tuncer, Ö.; Ölmez, S.; Şener, B.; Tuğcu, G.D.; Özçelik, U.; Gürsoy, N.C.; Otlu, B.; Büyükçam, A.; Kara, A.; et al. Clinical Strains of Chryseobacterium and Elizabethkingia spp. Isolated from Pediatric Patients in a University Hospital: Performance of MALDI-TOF MS-Based Identification, Antimicrobial Susceptibilities, and Baseline Patient Characteristics. Microb. Drug Resist. 2018, 24, 816–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tsouvalas, C.; Mousa, G.; Lee, A.H.; Philip, J.A.; Levine, D. Chryseobacterium gleum isolation from respiratory culture following community-acquired pneumonia. Am. J. Case Rep. 2020, 21, e921172-1–e921172-5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Anson, D.; Chaucer, B.; Norton, J.; Bansal, S. Multiple drug-resistant clabsi from an extremely rare bacterium, chryseobacterium gleum. Case Rep. Infect. Dis. 2020, 2020, 2097813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Angrup, A.; Sharma, B.; Sehgal, I.S.; Biswal, M.; Ray, P. Emerging Bacterial Pathogens in the COVID-19 Era: Chryseobacterium gleum—A Case in Point. J. Lab. Physicians 2022, 15, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  21. Lin, J.; Lai, C.; Yang, C.; Huang, Y. Differences in clinical manifestations, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, and mutations of fluoroquinolone target genes between chryseobacterium gleum and chryseobacterium indologenes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e02256-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Chest X-ray.
Figure 1. Chest X-ray.
Reports 07 00090 g001
Figure 2. C. gleum. identification using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Red line represents the sample of the child; blue line represents a reference sample (negative control). Each peak in the spectra represents proteins of a specific charge and size. The white arrow indicates the C. gleum.
Figure 2. C. gleum. identification using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Red line represents the sample of the child; blue line represents a reference sample (negative control). Each peak in the spectra represents proteins of a specific charge and size. The white arrow indicates the C. gleum.
Reports 07 00090 g002
Table 1. Clinical laboratory and radiological evaluation during the admission.
Table 1. Clinical laboratory and radiological evaluation during the admission.
ExaminationResults
Chest X-raymild accentuation of the bronchial structure
Lymph node echooval lymph nodes with thick, hypoechoic and thin cortex and hyperechoic central hilum
Peripheral blood smearanisopoikilocytosis and elliptical red cells
Fine needle aspiration of the marrowrich cellularity (C3, M1, MGK present) infiltrate
Microcytic Anemia Testing §carrier of beta thalassemia trait, molecular analysis for triplication of the negative alpha gene
C3: atypical cells in shape; M1: macrophages; MGK: megakaryocytes; § molecular biology.
Table 2. Blood laboratory tests.
Table 2. Blood laboratory tests.
Admission
(8 March)
Follow-Up
(19 March)
Normal Range
White Blood Cells9.9919.684.60–10.20 × 103/mm3
Red Cells5.475.474.20–6.10 × 106/µL
Hemoglobin8.58.812–18 g/dL
Hematocrit Test29.629.637–52% of red blood cells
Mean Corpuscular Volume54.154.180–99 µm3
Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin161627–32 pg/cell
Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration29.629.632–37 g/dL
Platelets424325130–400
Mean Platelet Volume777.2–11
Neutrophils12.12 (61.6%)12.12 (61.6%)10.63–6.96 (39.3–73.7%)
Lymphocytes6.11 (31.1%)6.11 (31.1%) 1.09–2.99 (18–48%)
Monocytes1.22 (6.19%)1.22 (6.19%)0.24–0.79 (4.4–12.7% of white blood cells)
Eosinophils--0.03–0.44 (0.6–7.3% of white blood cells)
Basophils0.23 (1.2%)0.23 (1.2%)0.0–0.08 (0.0–1.7% of white blood cells)
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate107107<20 mm/h
C-reactive Protein4.881880.3–5 mg/L
Procalcitonin0.021.11once 0.05 ng/ml
EBV
VCA IgM19U/mL > 40
VCA IgG>750U/mL > 40
Bartonella henselae
IgM0.156Index > 1.1
IgG0.785Index > 1.1
Table 3. Antibiogram evaluation of sputum culture.
Table 3. Antibiogram evaluation of sputum culture.
AntibioticsMICSensitivity Pattern
Amikacin32Resistant
Amoxyclav64Resistant
Aztreonam32Resistant
Cefotaxime8Resistant
Ceftazidime2Susceptible
Ceftazidime/avibactam<0.5Susceptible
Ceftalozane/tazobactam<0.5Susceptible
Ciprofloxacin0.25Susceptible
Ertapenem2Resistant
Gentamicin8Resistant
Imipenem4Intermediate
Meropenem16Resistant
Piperacillin/tazobactam32Resistant
Tigecycline0.5Susceptible
Tobramycin8Resistant
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Colosimo, M.; Luciani, F.; Pullano, M.N.; Abrego-Guandique, D.M.; Gallelli, L. First Case of Chryseobacterium gleum Post-COVID-19 in a Child with Recurrent Fever. Reports 2024, 7, 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/reports7040090

AMA Style

Colosimo M, Luciani F, Pullano MN, Abrego-Guandique DM, Gallelli L. First Case of Chryseobacterium gleum Post-COVID-19 in a Child with Recurrent Fever. Reports. 2024; 7(4):90. https://doi.org/10.3390/reports7040090

Chicago/Turabian Style

Colosimo, Manuela, Filippo Luciani, Maria Novella Pullano, Diana Marisol Abrego-Guandique, and Luca Gallelli. 2024. "First Case of Chryseobacterium gleum Post-COVID-19 in a Child with Recurrent Fever" Reports 7, no. 4: 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/reports7040090

APA Style

Colosimo, M., Luciani, F., Pullano, M. N., Abrego-Guandique, D. M., & Gallelli, L. (2024). First Case of Chryseobacterium gleum Post-COVID-19 in a Child with Recurrent Fever. Reports, 7(4), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/reports7040090

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop