Next Article in Journal
The Analysis of Red Lead Endsheets in Rare Books from the Fung Ping Shan Library at the University of Hong Kong
Previous Article in Journal
Burkina Faso through Its Traditional Architecture: A Century of Research on Built Vernacular Heritage
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Influence of Water Content on the Fresh and Hardened State Properties of Lime–Pozzolan Grouts

Laboratory of Building Materials, School of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
Heritage 2022, 5(3), 2394-2407; https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5030124
Submission received: 29 June 2022 / Revised: 17 August 2022 / Accepted: 19 August 2022 / Published: 26 August 2022

Abstract

:
Lime–pozzolan grouts concern a specific type often applied in the restoration of historic structures. Their water content, a crucial factor of their applicability, has a significant impact on their fresh and hardened state properties. In this study, four grout compositions were manufactured and tested, consisting of hydrated lime and natural pozzolan in a mass proportion 1:1. Their fresh properties were recorded, including fluidity, penetrability, volume stability, viscosity and shear stress, as well as the hardened ones (shrinkage deformations, physical and mechanical characteristics). Results show that water content reduction led to an increase in flow and penetration time, as well as a significant decrease of volume changes. Mechanical properties were significantly enhanced. Generally, the water content played a fundamental role in the behavior of the mixtures, also defining the type and range of their application.

1. Introduction

Lime-based grouts have been extensively used for the restoration of heritage structures, both concerning the strengthening of historic masonries and the consolidation of architectural surfaces [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Their type, constituents and properties are usually defined by the characteristics of each case, as well as the restoration requirements. They usually consist of one or more binding agents, whereas additives and admixtures have been applied in order to enhance specific properties [1,2,3,4,5]. Regarding the lime type, hydrated lime [1,2,3,9,11,12,13] or natural hydraulic lime may be used [4,5,6,7,8], either solely (especially in the latter case), or mixed with natural and artificial pozzolans.
The water content of grouts is of fundamental importance, since it presupposes the fluidity of the mixtures, directly linked with their applicability and efficacy. On the contrary, it negatively influences their volume stability, both at the fresh (segregation and bleeding) and hardened state (shrinkage deformations) [10]. Additionally, it inversely affects their mechanical properties, which whatsoever remain at a low level according to their composition [14]. To this extent, various studies have been performed, introducing admixtures and techniques for decreasing the water demand of the mixtures (superplasticizers, partial substitution of water with other suspensions, etc.) [1,10,13].
Regarding the fresh state properties of grouts, fluidity, injectability and volume stability are usually measured, according to relevant standards and specifications that define their performability during application [1,2,3,5,6,7,8,11,12,13,15]. Further testing procedures could be applied, focusing on determining rheological properties, such as plastic viscosity, shear and yield shear stress [5,7,9,13]. These may characterize the types of mixtures, classifying them as Newtonian (constant viscosity, independent of the stress imposed) and non-Newtonians (alterations of viscosity according to the stress applied) [16]. In the latter case, shear thinning (viscosity decrease) or shear thickening (viscosity increase) may be displayed according to the shear rate and stress imposed, as well as the consistency and composition of the mixtures [13,16]. When the finite stress required in order to deform, known as yield stress, is exceeded, the material flows in a non-linear stress–strain modulus (shear-thickening or shear-thinning behavior) due to the separation of the particles [17,18]. Generally, low level values of yield stress and plastic viscosity correspond to a low energy demand for a grout to be flowable and easily injected [13]. This is related with the minimum stress needed for a suspension to start flowing.
According to the models applied for determining the rheological properties of grouts and slurries, the Newton model mainly concerns Newtonian fluids, while Bingham and Casson models non-Newtonians [17,18,19,20]. The equations describing these models are as following:
τ = μ˙γ            (Newton model)
τ = τ0 + μ˙γ       (Bingham model)
τ = τ 0 + μ ˙ γ         ( Casson   model )
where τ is shear stress (Pa); μ is the plastic viscosity (Pa.s); ˙γ is shear rate (s−1); and τ0 is yield stress (Pa).
Another classification of fluids is their characterization as viscoplastic or viscoelastic. From a rheological perspective, a viscoplastic material has a yield stress under which it will not deform, whereas a viscoelastic one will deform at any stress application. Natural hydraulic lime grouts could be characterized as viscoplastic, presenting a plastic response up to the yield stress and a viscous performance at higher stress levels [13]. In the case of air lime grouts, there is limited research on the determination of their rheological properties regarding viscosity, shear and yield stress, which are closely related with their binding system, as well as their water content [9].
Regarding the hardened state properties of lime-based grouts, they are significantly influenced by their water content, both regarding their physical and mechanical properties. According to former research work and literature [1,2,3,4,5], lime-based grouts, such as lime–pozzolan ones, present a very slow strength development rate, attributed to their usually high water content, as well as the characteristics of their binding agents. Generally, the water content increase significantly influences their properties, both regarding shrinkage deformations, absorption and strength [1,2,3,4,5,8,9,10].
In the present study, the fresh and hardened state properties of four grout compositions, based on hydrated lime and natural pozzolan, were tested. The studied parameter was the Water/Binder (W/B) ratio, which was gradually decreased from 1 to 0.75. According to the results, the examined properties were significantly influenced by the water content, which was finally the fundamental factor influencing their behavior.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design of the Grout Compositions

During the experimental part of this study, four grout mixtures were manufactured, based on hydrated lime and natural pozzolan, in a mass proportion of 1:1. The selection of the binders followed former research work and literature [1,2,3,9,10,11,12]. In order to reduce the water demand, a polycarboxilate superplasticizer (Master Glenium 11) was added in all mixtures (1% w/w of binders). Superplasticizers may contribute to the water content reduction in lime-based grouts, enhancing their rheological properties and strength [1,2,11,12,13].
Regarding binders, hydrated lime (CL90) was provided by the company CaO Hellas Natural Chemicals and natural pozzolan by Dalkafouki Oikos. Their characteristics are presented in Table 1, where chemical analysis was determined by Atomic Absorption.
Since the scope of the study was to envisage the influence of the water content on lime–pozzolan grouts, four different W/B ratios were adopted according to the fluidity of the mixtures (measured with the ASTM C939-02 flow cone [21]). As explained later, the relevant flow time was taken into account for preparing the mixtures. In Table 2, the composition of the grout mixtures is presented, as well as their W/B ratio.

2.2. Mixing and Testing Procedure

The mixing procedure firstly concerned hand mixing of the constituents (2 min), with an adequate quantity of water to prevent aggregation [1,2,12,15]. Afterwards, a high-speed mixer was used (<6000 rps) for 4 min, and the fresh properties of the grouts were recorded. They regarded fluidity (flow time), penetrability and volume stability (Figure 1), while the mean values of 3 tests were taken into account.
Fluidity was measured following ASTM C939_02 [21] and EN 445: 2007 [22] (Figure 1a,b). Four flow time limits were predefined, including 10 ± 1 s, 12 ± 1 s, 14 ± 1 s and 16 ± 1 s. Measurements were repeated 1 h after mixing, for evaluating the applicability of the grouts throughout time, which concerns an important parameter defining their efficacy [1,2,15].
Injectability was tested according to EN 1771:2004 [23], following the sand-column test (Figure 1c). A transparent plexiglas cylinder was used (dimensions 390 mm × 22.2 mm), filled with natural, siliceous sand (2–4 mm). According to the literature [1,2,19], this sand type may simulate cracks of a range around 0.3–0.6 mm. The grout was injected to the cylinder under a pressure of 0.8 atm, and the penetration time (s) was recorded.
Volume stability followed ASTM C 940-98A [24], while both volume change and bleeding were recorded (Figure 1d). A reduced quantity was used, concerning 500 mL (instead of 1000 mL), following previous research [1,2]. The volume change and bleeding limit of 5% was taken into account during the study in order to prevent segregation [1,2,15].
The rheological properties of the mixtures (apparent viscosity, shear stress and yield shear stress) were recorded in a viscometer (RM100 PLUS, LAMY RHEOLOGY, Champagne au Mont d’Or, France). Tests were performed 10 min after the manufacture of the mixtures in laboratory conditions (20 ± 1 °C, 65% RH). The increasing shear rate, ranging from 100 to 300 s−1 (100, 150, 200, 250 and 300 s−1), was imposed for 10 s.
The mixtures were placed in metallic, prismatic molds (4 cm × 4 cm × 16 cm) up to hardening (Figure 2). They were further cured in a chamber with 90 ± 2% RH and 20 ± 1 °C temperature until the testing ages (28, 90 and 180 days). Totally, 18 specimens for each grout composition were manufactured.
For estimating shrinkage deformations, volume and mass changes were recorded in 2 specimens of each composition, cured at 60 ± 2% RH and 20 ± 1 °C. Measurements started to be recorded after the demolding of the specimens (approximately 7 days after manufacture). Former research work [1,2] showed that shrinkage deformations can be determined by regular measurements of the dimensions and weight of the grout specimens for a period around 40–50 days after their manufacture.
At the age of 28, 90 and 180 days, the physico-mechanical properties of the grouts were determined. Mechanical properties were assessed in 3 specimens/composition (mean values were taken), while for the physical properties one specimen per test was assessed at each testing age. The latter are indicative, helping in better understanding the performance of the grouts without, however, playing a crucial role in their applicability. According to former research [1,11,15], their rheological and mechanical properties are the fundamental factors determining their efficacy.
Their physical properties concerned porosity, absorption and apparent specific gravity (RILEM CPC 11.3 [25]), as well as water absorption coefficient due to capillary action (EN 1015-18:2002 [26]) and the mechanical dynamic modulus of elasticity (BS 1881-209:1990 [27]), flexural and compressive strength (BS EN1015-11:1999 [28]).
Results were comparatively assessed to envisage the impact of the water content on the overall performance of grouts.

3. Results

3.1. Fresh State Properties

As has been previously stated, the grout mixtures were manufactured with a different W/B ratio, including 1.0 (Comp. 1), 0.9 (Comp. 2), 0.8 (Comp. 3) and 0.75 (Comp. 4) (Table 2). In Table 3, the fresh state properties of the compositions are synoptically presented.
Regarding fluidity (Table 3), recorded by ASTM and EN flow cones at two intervals (immediately after manufacture and 1 h later), the following remarks could be attained. By reducing the W/B ratio from 1 to 0.75, flow time was, as expected, increased in both cases. Immediately after manufacture, ASTM flow time ranged from 9.8 to 16.9 s and 1 h later from 10.23 to 22.47 s, while EN time was 8.1–15 to 8.5–19.3 s, respectively.
At the ASTM cone, the flow time increase varied from 25 to 73% (a 10% decrease in the water content corresponded to a 25% flow time increase). One hour later, the increase rate was higher, ranging from 25 to 120% and being more intense in the lower W/B ratio (0.75). In the case of the EN cone, the time increase ranged from 19 to 85% and 18 to 127% 1 h after manufacture. Generally, compositions 1 and 2 showed the lower flow time increase 1 h after manufacture (~4%), while the highest was given by Comp. 4 (32%).
Figure 3 depicts the influence of the W/B ratio on the flow time of the mixtures. The application of the curve-fitting process on the research data resulted in a high correlation coefficient (R2 > 0.98) for all cases. Flow time measured immediately after the grouts’ manufacture was increased with the W/B decrease, following a linear function (1st degree polynomial). One hour after manufacture, values were also increased due to the W/B reduction, presenting, however, a quadratic function (2nd degree polynomial). It maybe therefore implied that the water content has a linear impact on the initial flow time of the grouts (both measured at ASTM and EN cones) and a quadratic one on the 1 h values. The latter may be directly linked with the applicability of the grouts throughout time, showing that the lower the water content the more difficult or even insufficient would be the grout application at least 1 h after the mixture preparation.
Penetrability (Table 3, Figure 4) also had a direct correlation with the W/B ratio, showing a gradual increase from 3 to 7.2 s. The relationship of the values also presented a polynomial function (2nd degree), showing a high correlation coefficient (R2 = 0.96). The final increase in the penetration time due to the decrease in W/B ratio from 0.75 to 1 was 130%. Volume reduction and bleeding, on the other hand, were significantly decreased due to the W/B ratio reduction and minimized in the lower W/B ratio (0.75). Volume reduction ranged from 2.2 to 0% and bleeding from 1.0 to 0%.

3.2. Rheological Properties

Figure 5 and Figure 6 present the rheological properties of the grout mixtures, determined by the Viscometer 10 min after manufacture. According to the results and in line with relevant studies [5,9,13], shear stress (Figure 5) was almost linearly increased with the shear rate rise, while it varied inversely with the W/B ratio (the lower the W/B ratio the higher the values). Compositions 1 and 2, presenting higher water content (W/B ratio 1 and 0.9, respectively), showed almost similar values and trends, ranging from 14 to 37 Pa. Composition 3 (0.8) and 4 (0.75), on the other hand, showed significantly higher values, intensively increased above 200 s−1 (25–62 Pa and 46–70 Pa, respectively).
Apparent viscosity (Figure 6) maintained almost at the same (low) level for Compositions 1 and 2 (W/B > 0.9), showing a slight decrease above 250 s−1. Values ranged from 0.124 to 0.117 Pa·s for Comp. 1 and 0.138 to 0.125 Pa·s for Comp. 2. In compositions 3 and 4 (W/B: 0.8–0.75), viscosity was decreased with the shear rate rise, with the more intense alterations to be recorded in Comp. 4 (0.462–0.217 Pa·s). According to Jorne et al. [13], in hydraulic lime grouts, presenting a similar rheological behavior with other cementitious materials, viscosity decreases with the rise of shear rate due to the particles’ dispersion.

3.3. Physical Properties

The shrinkage deformations of the grouts, according to their mass and volume changes, are depicted in Figure 7. Results show that a decrease in mass and volume was recorded in all cases. Changes were more extreme up to the age of 20 days and were further stabilized (especially mass changes). Generally, the reduction of water led to a reduction both in the weight and volume changes up to 30% and 95%, respectively. Regarding mass changes, a 10% decrease of water in each composition resulted in a proportional reduction in the values (~10%), while volume changes were significantly lower, ranging from 0.12% (Comp. 1) to 0.02% (Comp. 4). The lowest values were recorded for the lower W/B ratio (0.75).
The physical properties of the grouts, concerning porosity, absorption, apparent specific gravity and capillary absorption index, are presented in Table 4, while in Figure 8 the correlation of porosity and apparent specific gravity is given. It was observed that porosity and absorption values were slightly increased at 90 d and were further reduced. Apparent specific gravity presented an opposite performance. The decrease in the water quantity greatly influenced these properties, especially in compositions 1, 2 and 3, with a gradual decrease in porosity, absorption and capillary absorption index at all ages, ranging from 4 to 27%. On the other hand, apparent specific gravity increased from 4 to 12%.
Composition 4 showed a slight increase in porosity, absorption and apparent specific gravity (related to Comp. 3), while the capillary absorption index was significantly decreased. However, the 90 d values of porosity and absorption, which are considered to be the more representative in the case of lime-based grouts [1,2], followed the trend shown in all compositions.

3.4. Mechanical Properties

The mechanical properties of the grout compositions (dynamic modulus of elasticity, flexural and compressive strength), tested at different ages (28, 90, 180 d), are presented in Figure 9. From the correlation of the results, it may be firstly concluded that all values significantly increased throughout time, with the highest ones to be recorded at 180 days. Generally, the increase from 28 to 180 d varied from 200 tο 600%, with the highest rise to be seen in the lower W/B ratio and especially in compressive strength. To this extent and according to former research work [1,2], it was testified that lime–pozzolan grouts present a very slow strength development rate that should be thoroughly taken into consideration during the design of repair grouts for historic structures.
Dynamic modulus of elasticity ranged from 1 to 4 GPa in Comp. 1, 1.3 to 5.2 GPa in Comp. 2, 1.3 to 5.7 GPa in Comp. 3 and 1.2 to 6.2 GPa in Comp. 4. The water content decrease resulted in a low increase in the 28 d values (~5%) and a significant one further, especially at 180 days (55%).
Flexural strength was mostly influenced by the age of the specimens, especially concerning the 180 days, since the 28 d ones were <0.5 MPa, 90 d 0.7–1 MPa and 180 d 1.5–2.5 MPa. The W/B ratio decrease resulted in strength enhancement, mostly depicted in Comp. 4.
Compressive strength showed the same trend of dynamic modulus of elasticity, with values ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 MPa in Comp. 1, 0.6 to 1.9 MPa in Comp. 2, 0.7 to 2.4 MPa in Comp. 3 and 0.9 to 3 MPa in Comp. 4. The water quantity decrease also resulted in an increase in compressive strength, with a rise of 200% at 180 days.

4. Discussion

Regarding the rheological properties of the grouts, as discussed in Section 3.1, the applied function fitting method led to identifying the quantitative relationship among flow, penetration time and the W/B ratio of the mixtures (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Relevant efforts of quantifying the correlation among properties have been made by other researchers [6,18].
As has been already pointed out, the correlation coefficient was high in all cases (R2 > 0.96), showing a linear correlation of the flow time values and the W/B ratio immediately after the grout preparation and a quadratic one 1 h later (Table 5). Penetrability presented a quadratic function (2nd degree polynomial) with the water demand.
According to Larson [29], in a non-Newtonian fluid, viscosity may be increased or reduced with the shear rate rise, leading to shear thinning or thickening phenomena. On the other hand, in Newtonian fluids, viscosity is constant and independent to the stress imposed [17]. From the evaluation of the results of this study, it could be asserted that the higher water content of lime–pozzolan grouts (W/B ratio: 0.9–1.0) led to the creation of Newtonian fluids, maintaining their viscosity independently of the stress imposed. At lower W/B ratios (≤0.8), mixtures could be characterized as non-Newtonian, showing a shear thinning behavior, since their viscosity was decreased (Figure 6). To this direction, it seems than when all other parameters are stable, the water content of lime–pozzolan grouts defines their rheological behavior, as well as their characterization.
The correlation of the apparent viscosity with the shear stress, determines the plastic viscosity of the mixtures, as well as their yield stress [5,9,13,18]. The Bingham and Casson models (according to Equations (2) and (3)) have been generally applied, while in the case of NHL grouts the Bingham model usually prevails [5,9,13].
In the present study, both equations have been applied, as presented in Table 6. A wide range of results derived in the case of the Bingham model, varying from −0.0548 to 2.5180 Pa, with a negative value to be detected in Comp. 1 (−0.0548 Pa). In the Casson model, having a more gradual transition between the yield and Newtonian regions, values were near to zero, except for Comp. 4 that exhibited a value of 0.0488 Pa. As expected, Casson values were significantly lower than the Bingham ones, showing an increasing trend with the decrease of the water content.
According to Kelessidis et al. [30], when applying rheological models (mainly the two-parameter ones), negative values may arise, which is rather controversial, since the condition τ0 > 0 should always be valid. To this extent, other formulas have been proposed, considering more complex equations (i.e., the Golden Section search method) [30,31].
From all the above, it may be concluded that yield stress calculations are difficult to be applied in fluid lime–pozzolan grouts, mixed with a high-speed mixer and exhibiting a flow time below 12 s (measured at ASTM C939_02 flow cone) (W/B ratio: 0.9–1). Considering that yield stress is associated with the minimum stress needed to be applied for a fluid to start flowing, the low values of yield stress and plastic viscosity correspond to a more feasible application (easier injection) [5,13,16]. To this extent, there is an inverse relationship between the flow time and yield stress of the mixtures, mainly defined by their water content. Other parameters related to the type, properties, particle size and geometry of the raw materials, presence of admixtures, mixing procedure (mixing type and time), as well as the accuracy and repeatability of measurements, may play an important role in the research findings. Additionally, the testing and resting time of the grouts are fundamental.
Physical properties, such as porosity, absorption, capillary absorption index and apparent specific gravity were influenced at all ages by the water content decrease. The trend shown at the age of 90 days seems to be more representative, leading to a linear decrease in porosity and increase in ap. specific gravity with water content reduction. In Figure 10, this correlation is depicted in a linear function, with a relevant high correlation coefficient (R2 = 0.92–0.94). According to Papayianni and Stefanidou [32], in lime–pozzolan mortars, the increase in water content results in an increase in open porosity, favoring the development of larger pores. Therefore, the pore size distribution is a crucial parameter influenced by the W/B ratio that should also be further explored in lime-based grouts.
Regarding the mechanical properties of the grouts, Figure 10 depicts the correlation of the compressive strength with the W/B ratio. As it can be observed, there is an inverse relation of the values, presenting a quadratic function (2nd degree polynomial). In concrete technology, Abram’s law [33] depicted the relationship of strength to the Water/Cement (W/C) ratio (Equation (4)).
σ c =   K 1 K 2 W C
where σc is compressive strength, K1 and K2 are constants for specific materials and W/C the water/cement ratio. Relevant research has verified the formula in the case of cement-based mortars [34,35], whereas there are no relevant findings for lime-based grouts. According to ElNemr [35], Abram’s law was valid in cement mortars with a W/B ratio above 0.4 and was related to the type and proportion of aggregates, as well as other parameters. In the present study, compressive strength seems to follow a power function related to the W/B ratio, mainly attributed at the age of 180 days (Figure 11). This may be closely related with the slow strength development rate of lime-based grouts, showing the validation of Abram’s law at 180 d age. Focused experimental research may verify the research findings, identifying the relationship between the strength and water content of lime–pozzolan grouts.

5. Conclusions

Water content seems to be a crucial aspect in the case of lime–pozzolan grouts, determining both their fresh and hardened state properties. Since their role is to easily penetrate in a masonry structure, with limited pressure in order to avoid secondary problems, their rheological properties are fundamental in determining their efficacy. Although the water content defines their flowability, it has a negative impact on other fundamental characteristics, such as volume stability, shrinkage deformations and mechanical properties. These aspects should be taken into account in each application and be further assessed according to the restoration strategy followed.
In the present study, the influence of the W/B ratio in lime–pozzolan grouts was assessed, resulting in the following conclusions:
  • By reducing the W/B ratio from 1 to 0.75, flow time was increased from 25 to 73% in the ASTM cone and 25 to 120% in the EN one. One hour after manufacture, the increase rate was higher, being more intense in the lower W/B ratio (0.75).
  • Penetration time also had a direct correlation with the decrease in the water content, showing a gradual increase from 3 to 7.2 s. Volume reduction and bleeding were significantly decreased and minimized in the lower W/B ratio (0.75).
  • The higher water content (0.9–1.0) led to the creation of Newtonian fluids, maintaining their viscosity independently of the stress imposed. At lower W/B ratios (≤0.8), mixtures could be characterized as non-Newtonian, showing a shear thinning behavior since their viscosity was decreased.
  • Shrinkage deformations, especially volume reduction, were significantly improved by the W/B ratio reduction (up to 95%). On the other hand, 90 d porosity, absorption and capillary absorption index were decreased (around 4–27%), while apparent specific gravity slightly increased (4–12%).
  • Mechanical properties were significantly improved throughout the testing ages of the grout specimens (28, 90, 180 d) in a proportion ranging from 200 tο 600%. The highest rise was recorded in compressive strength. The water content reduction positively influenced all values, especially at 180 days. At this age, the dynamic modulus of elasticity was enhanced by up to 55%, while flexural strength maintained at the same level for a W/B ratio ranging from 0.9 to 0.75 (70% higher values than the ones achieved for a ratio equal to 1). Compressive strength, on the other hand, was gradually increased up to 200% at the lower water rate.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pachta, V.; Goulas, D. Fresh and hardened state properties of fiber reinforced lime-based grouts. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 261, 119818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pachta, V. The role of glass additives on the properties of lime-based grouts. Heritage 2021, 3, 906–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Padovnik, A.; Bokan-Bosiljkov, V. Effect of ultralight filler on the properties of hydrated lime injection grout for the consolidation of detached historic decorative plasters. Materials 2020, 13, 3360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vavricuk, A.; Bokan-Bosiljkov, V.; Kramar, S. The influence of metakaolin on the properties of natural hydraulic lime-based grouts for historic masonry repair. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 172, 706–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dinç-Sengönül, B.; Oktay, D.; Yüzer, N. Effect of temperature, resting time and brick dust (Horasan) on the rheological properties of hydraulic lime-based grouts. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 265, 120644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Miltiadou-Fezans, A.; Tassios, T.P. Penetrability of hydraulic grouts. Mater. Struct. 2013, 46, 1653–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Miltiadou-Fezans, A.; Tassios, T.P. Fluidity of hydraulic grouts for masonry strengthening. Mater. Struct. 2012, 45, 1817–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Biçer-Simşir, B.; Griffin, I.; Palazzo-Bertholon, B.; Rainer, L. Lime-based injection grouts for the conservation of architectural surfaces. Stud. Conserv. 2010, 55, 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Azeiteiro, L.C.; Velosa, A.; Paiva, H.; Mantas, P.Q.; Ferreira, V.M.; Veiga, R. Development of grouts for consolidation of old renders. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 50, 352–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pasian, C.; Secco, M.; Piqué, F.; Artioli, G.; Rickerby, S.; Cather, S. Lime-based injection grouts with reduced water content: An assessment of the effects of the water-reducing agents ovalbumin and ethanol on the mineralogical evolution and properties of grouts. J. Cult. Herit. 2018, 30, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Papayianni, I.; Pachta, V. Experimental study on the performance of lime-based grouts used in consolidating Historic Masonries. Mater. Struct. 2015, 48, 2111–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pachta, V.; Papadopoulos, F.; Stefanidou, M. Development and testing of grouts based on perlite by-products and lime. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 207, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jorne, F.; Henriques, F.M.A.; Baltazar, L.G. Influence of superplasticizer, temperature, resting time and injection pressure on hydraulic lime grout injectability. Correlation analysis between fresh grout parameters and grout injectability. J. Build. Eng. 2015, 4, 140–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Alvarez, J.I.; Veiga, R.; Martınez-Ramırez, S.; Secco, M.; Faria, P.; Maravelaki, P.N.; Ramesh, M.; Papayianni, I.; Valek, J. RILEM TC 277-LHS report: A review on the mechanisms of setting and hardening of lime-based binding systems. Mater. Struct. 2021, 54, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pachta, V.; Papayianni, I.; Spyriliotis, T. Assessment of laboratory and field testing methods in lime-based grouts for the consolidation of architectural surfaces. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 2020, 14, 1098–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Roussel, N.; Lemaître, A.; Flatt, R.J.; Coussot, P. Steady state flow of cement suspensions: A micromechanical state of the art. Cem. Concr. Res. 2010, 40, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alexandrou, A.N.; McGilvreay, T.M.; Burgos, G. Steady Herschel–Bulkley fluid flow in three-dimensional expansions. J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 2001, 100, 77–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Niu, J.; Wang, B.; Feng, C.; Chen, K. Experimental Research on Viscosity Characteristics of Grouting Slurry in a High Ground Temperature Environment. Materials 2020, 13, 3221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Magnon, E.; Cayeux, E. Precise Method to Estimate the Herschel-Bulkley Parameters from Pipe Rheometer Measurements. Fluids 2021, 6, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Herschel, W.H.; Bulkley, R. Konsistenzmessungen von Gummi-Benzollösungen. Kolloid 1926, 39, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. ASTM C939-02; Standard Test Method for Flow of Grout for Preplaced-Aggregate Concrete (Flow Cone Method). ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2009.
  22. EN 445:2007; Grout for Prestressing Tendons—Test Methods. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2007.
  23. EN 1771:2004; Products and Systems for the Protection and Repair of Concrete Structures. Test Methods—Determination of Injectability and Splitting Test. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
  24. ASTM C940-98a; Standard Test Method for Expansion and Bleeding of Freshly Mixed Grouts for Preplaced-Aggregate Concrete in the Laboratory. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2003.
  25. Rilem, C.P.C. 11.3 Absorption of water with immersion under vacuum. Mater. Constr. 1984, 17, 391–394. [Google Scholar]
  26. BS EN1015-18:2002; Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry, Part 18: Determination of Water Absorption Coefficient due to Capillary Action of Hardened Mortar. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2002.
  27. BS 1881-203:1986; Testing Concrete. Part 203: Recommendations for Measurement of Velocity of Ultrasonic Pulses in Concrete. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 1986.
  28. BS EN1015-11:1999; Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry, Part 11: Determination of Flexural and Compressive Strength of Hardened Mortar. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 1999.
  29. Larson, R.G. The Structure and Rheology of Complex Fluids. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kelessidis, V.C.; Maglione, R.; Tsamantaki, C.; Aspirtakis, Y. Optimal determination of rheological parameters for Herschel–Bulkley drilling fluids and impact on pressure drop, velocity profiles and penetration rates during drilling. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2006, 53, 203–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ohen, H.A.; Blick, E.F. Golden search method for determination of parameters in Robertson–Stiff non-Newtonian fluid model. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 1990, 4, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Papayianni, I.; Stefanidou, M. Strength–porosity relationships in lime–pozzolan mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2006, 20, 700–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Abrams, D.A. Design of Concrete Mixtures. Structural Materials Research Laboratory, Lewis Institute: Chicago, IL, USA, 1919; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  34. Rao, G.A. Generalization of Abrams’ law for cement mortars. Cem. Concr. Res. 2001, 31, 495–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. ElNemr, A. Generating water/binder ratio–to–strength curves for cement mortar used in Masonry walls. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 233, 117249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Fresh state properties testing (a). Flow cone (ASTM C939−02), (b). Flow cone (EN 445: 2007), (c). Sand-column test (EN 1771:2004), (d). Volume stability (ASTM C 940-98A).
Figure 1. Fresh state properties testing (a). Flow cone (ASTM C939−02), (b). Flow cone (EN 445: 2007), (c). Sand-column test (EN 1771:2004), (d). Volume stability (ASTM C 940-98A).
Heritage 05 00124 g001
Figure 2. Grout specimens during molding (left) and before entering the chamber (right).
Figure 2. Grout specimens during molding (left) and before entering the chamber (right).
Heritage 05 00124 g002
Figure 3. Correlation of the flow time and W/B ratio of the grout mixtures.
Figure 3. Correlation of the flow time and W/B ratio of the grout mixtures.
Heritage 05 00124 g003
Figure 4. Volume change, bleeding and penetration time of the grout mixtures according to their W/B ratio.
Figure 4. Volume change, bleeding and penetration time of the grout mixtures according to their W/B ratio.
Heritage 05 00124 g004
Figure 5. Shear stress of the grout mixtures correlated with the shear rate.
Figure 5. Shear stress of the grout mixtures correlated with the shear rate.
Heritage 05 00124 g005
Figure 6. Apparent viscosity of the grout mixtures correlated with the shear rate.
Figure 6. Apparent viscosity of the grout mixtures correlated with the shear rate.
Heritage 05 00124 g006
Figure 7. Weight and volume changes of the grout mixtures.
Figure 7. Weight and volume changes of the grout mixtures.
Heritage 05 00124 g007
Figure 8. Porosity and apparent specific gravity correlation of the grout compositions.
Figure 8. Porosity and apparent specific gravity correlation of the grout compositions.
Heritage 05 00124 g008
Figure 9. Mechanical properties of the grout compositions.
Figure 9. Mechanical properties of the grout compositions.
Heritage 05 00124 g009aHeritage 05 00124 g009b
Figure 10. Correlation of the porosity and ap. specific gravity with the W/B ratio of the grouts.
Figure 10. Correlation of the porosity and ap. specific gravity with the W/B ratio of the grouts.
Heritage 05 00124 g010
Figure 11. Correlation of the compressive strength with the W/B ratio of the grout mixtures.
Figure 11. Correlation of the compressive strength with the W/B ratio of the grout mixtures.
Heritage 05 00124 g011
Table 1. Characteristics of the binders.
Table 1. Characteristics of the binders.
BindersRelative Density (g/cm3)Pozzolanicity Index ASTM C311:77 (MPa)Grain Diameter (μm) of Volume Fractions (%)Chemical Composition (% w/w)
d50d90
Hydrated lime (powder, CL90)2.471-3.0910.80CaO: 72.44, SiO2: 0.06, Al2O3: 0.05 Fe2O3: 0.02, MgO: 2.72, Na2O: 0.2 K2O: 0.04 LOI: 23.97
Natural pozzolan (Milos island)2.40310.504.3011.60CaO: 1.32, SiO2: 77.6, Al2O3: 7.42 Fe2O3: 0.85, MgO: 0.64, Na2O: 2.73 K2O: 2.85, LOI: 6.02
Table 2. Constituents of the grout mixtures.
Table 2. Constituents of the grout mixtures.
Grout CompositionBinders (Parts of Weight)Superplasticizer (1% w/w of Binders)W/B Ratio
LimePozzolan
1111.00
2110.90
3110.80
4110.75
Table 3. Fresh state properties of the grout mixtures (mean values and standard deviation).
Table 3. Fresh state properties of the grout mixtures (mean values and standard deviation).
CompositionFlow Time (s)Penetrability (s)Volume Change (%)Bleeding (%)
ASTM (0 h)ASTM (1 h)EN (0 h)EN (1 h)
19.810.28.18.53.072.201.00
STDEV0.030.040.030.040.050.060.04
212.212.89.710.13.890.800.40
STDEV0.020.030.030.030.020.030.03
314.517.212.114.14.331.000.00
STDEV0.030.040.030.040.040.040.02
416.922.515.019.37.160.400.00
STDEV0.030.030.030.040.030.030.02
Table 4. Physical properties of the grout mixtures at various ages.
Table 4. Physical properties of the grout mixtures at various ages.
CompositionPorosity (%)Absorption (%)Cap. Abs. Index (g/cm2 min1/2)Ap. Specific Gravity
28 d90 d180 d28 d90 d180 d28 d90 d28 d90 d180 d
143.347.445.048.555.540.74.653.680.860.850.91
241.445.437.748.450.636.94.583.300.890.900.98
336.439.536.139.044.936.94.442.300.930.921.02
437.738.737.739.741.338.33.391.480.950.941.02
Table 5. The rheological equations of lime–pozzolan grouts according to their water content.
Table 5. The rheological equations of lime–pozzolan grouts according to their water content.
Rheological PropertiesEquationsR2
Flow timeASTM (0 h)F ASTM-o = 2.376 (W/B) + 7.440.9998
ASTM (1 h)F ASTM-1 = 0.6675 (W/B)2 + 0.7775 (W/B) + 8.73250.9994
EN (0 h)F EN-o = 2.296 (W/B) + 5.480.9822
EN (1 h)F EN-1 = 0.905 (W/B)2 – 0.877 (W/B) + 8.40.9985
PenetrabilityP = 0.5025 (W/B)2 – 1.2415 (W/B) + 3.94250.9595
F ASTM-0: flow time of a grout measured at ASTM C 940-98A cone immediately after manufacture; F ASTM-1: flow time of a grout measured at ASTM C 940-98A cone 1 h after manufacture; F EN-0 flow time of a grout measured at EN 445 cone immediately after manufacture; F EN-1: flow time of a grout measured at EN 445 cone 1 h after manufacture; P: penetration time of a grout measured according to EN 1771 (natural, siliceous sand, 2–4 mm); W/B: water/binder ratio of the grout mixtures.
Table 6. Estimated yield stress of the grout mixtures according to the Bingham and Casson model.
Table 6. Estimated yield stress of the grout mixtures according to the Bingham and Casson model.
CompositionYield Shear Stress (Pa)
Bingham ModelCasson Model
1−0.05480.0000
20.01550.0000
30.10950.0001
42.51800.0488
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pachta, V. The Influence of Water Content on the Fresh and Hardened State Properties of Lime–Pozzolan Grouts. Heritage 2022, 5, 2394-2407. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5030124

AMA Style

Pachta V. The Influence of Water Content on the Fresh and Hardened State Properties of Lime–Pozzolan Grouts. Heritage. 2022; 5(3):2394-2407. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5030124

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pachta, Vasiliki. 2022. "The Influence of Water Content on the Fresh and Hardened State Properties of Lime–Pozzolan Grouts" Heritage 5, no. 3: 2394-2407. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5030124

APA Style

Pachta, V. (2022). The Influence of Water Content on the Fresh and Hardened State Properties of Lime–Pozzolan Grouts. Heritage, 5(3), 2394-2407. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5030124

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop