Next Article in Journal
The Typology of Dubrovnik Summer Residences as a Spatial Planning Tool for Developing the Coexistence of Privacy and Sociality: A Case Study of the Gruž Area
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Exposure Condition on the Composition of the Corrosion Layers of the San Carlone of Arona
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Heritage
Volume 6
Issue 12
10.3390/heritage6120396
heritage-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles in Leather Conservation: Exploring the Potential of Hydroxypropyl Cellulose/Zinc Oxide Nanocomposite as a Leather Consolidation Agent

by
Alireza Koochakzaei
1,*,
Zahra Ghane
1 and
Mohsen Mohammadi Achachluei
2
1
Department of Conservation and Archaeometry, Faculty of Cultural Materials Conservation, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz P.O. Box 15385-4567, Iran
2
Department of Objects Conservation and Archaeometry, Art University of Isfahan, Hakim-Nezami St., Isfahan P.O. Box 1744, Iran
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Heritage 2023, 6(12), 7547-7558; https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6120396
Submission received: 27 October 2023 / Revised: 29 November 2023 / Accepted: 29 November 2023 / Published: 1 December 2023
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This research presents a comprehensive study on the application of hydroxypropyl cellulose/zinc oxide nanocomposite (HPC/ZnO NC) as an effective consolidant in leather conservation. The critical focus is to prevent photooxidative degradation, a significant challenge in preserving historical leather artifacts. The nanocomposite was evaluated for its protective capabilities against environmental stressors like UV radiation and moisture, mechanical robustness, and potential to stabilize acid-damaged leather. The uniform dispersion of ZnO NPs in the HPC matrix was revealed as crucial for improving leather properties, which was confirmed through SEM imaging. The HPC/ZnO NC coating effectively prevented UV-induced microcracks, surface degradation and collagen denaturation. It also demonstrated enhanced mechanical resistance, inhibiting the reduction in leather’s maximum tolerable force and increasing the elongation index, even after aging. Additionally, it exhibited improved water-repellent properties and increased the pH of the leather, offering potential benefits for the treatment of acid-degraded leathers. Overall, the findings affirm that the application of HPC/ZnO NC significantly augments the physical and mechanical properties of leather, providing enhanced resistance to environmental degradation.

1. Introduction

Leather has been used for various purposes for thousands of years [1,2], but it is a perishable material that can deteriorate due to biological attacks, chemical attacks, physical factors such as temperature, humidity, and light, and improper storage and handling. Mold, mildew, insect infestation, pollutants in the air, and chemicals used in the tanning process can cause discoloration, stiffness, cracking, and a loss of strength and flexibility. Exposure to high temperatures and humidity can cause the leather to shrink and become brittle, while exposure to light can cause fading and discoloration. Storing leather in a damp or humid environment can promote mold growth, while folding or creasing leather can cause it to crack and weaken over time [3,4].
During the 19th century, the industrial revolution and rising demand brought about significant changes in the process of making vegetable leather. This included the increased use of condensed tannins, sulfur-containing compounds, and strong mineral acids like sulfuric acid, resulting in the production of unstable leathers [5]. Additionally, an increase in industrial air pollutants, which caused complex chemical processes and especially oxidation, became a major contributor to the destruction of historical objects, particularly leather [6]. These factors led to rapid chemical degradation and decay of leather products, primarily due to acid hydrolysis or acid degradation, also known as red rot. This damage is caused by the hydrolysis of condensed tannins and leads to irreversible destruction, reducing the strength and thermal stability of the leather while increasing its acidity and creating a red color [7,8]. Unfortunately, conventional leather dressings are usually unable to improve this damage [9,10].
For a long time, various methods have been suggested and studied to address the acid degradation of vegetable-tanned leather [11,12,13,14,15]. These methods date back over a century. The majority of treatments and historical cases used in leather protection can be categorized based on their effectiveness into three groups: stabilizing agents, consolidation agents, and surface coatings [16]. Consolidants are commonly utilized in this field, not just for acid-damaged leather. Klucel G is the most notable, extensively used, and favored consolidating agent for leather conservation, serving a broad range of purposes [16,17,18].
Klucel G, known as hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC), has been used as a conservational adhesive in leather and historical fabric conservation since the early 1980s [19,20]. It was first introduced by Cains in 1981 [21,22] for leather consolidation and has since been widely used in America and parts of Europe, especially in bookbinding conservation [16,23,24]. Klucel G is typically prepared as a solution in industrial methylated spirits (IMS), ethanol, or isopropanol, or in cellugel form [16,25]. It is commonly used for the treatment of acid degradation in protein-based materials, but there are concerns about its lack of proper efficiency and stability in acidic conditions [16]. While it causes minimal changes in the appearance of leather, it can decompose and harden over time, leading to further damage [26].
In prior research, it was found that HPC is susceptible to photooxidation, which can be addressed by optimizing its properties and rectifying its flaws [27,28,29]. One possible approach is to utilize it as a nanocomposite, and nano zinc oxide has demonstrated promising results in the conservation of artworks [30,31,32].
Nano zinc oxide (ZnO) and its composites with cellulose ethers are effective solutions for art conservation due to their unique physical, chemical, and antimicrobial properties [33,34,35]. ZnO nanoparticles protect artworks from UV-induced degradation and prevent biological deterioration caused by microorganisms [36,37,38,39]. However, direct application of ZnO nanoparticles can cause alterations in the original appearance. To address this issue, ZnO composites with cellulose ethers have been developed, which maintain the beneficial properties of ZnO while retaining the original aesthetics of the artwork [40,41]. These composites have shown promising results in preventing color fading and inhibiting the growth of fungi on artworks. Overall, nano zinc oxide and its composites with cellulose ethers are innovative and promising materials for art conservation.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of zinc nanoparticles in enhancing the properties of Klusel G, which was tested as a consolidating agent for historical leather to prevent photooxidative degradation. The investigation included analyzing various characteristics of the nanocomposite, such as its impact on tensile strength, pH level, water droplet contact angle, and changes in microstructure using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and SEM. This research can significantly contribute to broadening the application of nanocomposites and enhancing their effectiveness in preserving historical leather artifacts.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Leathers

In this research, sheepskin-tanned leather with mimosa extract from Behtar Leather Co., Tabriz, Iran was utilized. Samples were obtained from the flank region of the animal and cut into 25 × 5 cm dimensions, parallel to the collagen fibers direction. To ensure consistency in sample thickness, measurements were taken at three points and compared to the mean. Any samples that deviated from the mean + standard deviation range were considered outliers and excluded from the study. Each treatment had five replicates.

2.2. Treatment Materials

In order to preserve leather, a popular consolidant called hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC) or Klucel G was utilized. HPC was dissolved in isopropanol (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) at a concentration of 1% and stirred for three hours. ZnO nanoparticles (purchased from US-Nano) were also dispersed in isopropanol for three hours before being added to the HPC container at a ratio of 2% (w/w). The mixture was stirred for an additional 3 h to create a nanocomposite solution (HPC/ZnO NC). The treatment involved applying two layers of the solution onto the grain layer of the leather using a brush, allowing each layer to dry before applying the next.

2.3. Accelerated Aging

To assess the effectiveness of treatments over time, an accelerated aging process was carried out using a 60 cm long black UV lamp with a UV-A range. The lamp was placed in a box and the samples were positioned 20 cm away from it. The irradiation lasted for 72 h with the temperature inside the box being maintained at around 35–40 °C. Once the process was complete, the samples were taken out of the UV box and analyzed.

2.4. Contact Angle Measurement

Contact angle measurements were performed using a Jikan CAG-10 goniometer (Jikan Co., Tehran, Iran) that was connected to JikanAssistant software Ver. 7.3.2. Five droplets of deionized water with a volume of 10 μL and an injection rate of 1 μL/s were deposited onto the surface of each sample via a syringe pump. Images of the droplets were captured after a 2 s interval. The mean value of the measured contact angles for each sample was calculated and utilized for subsequent data analysis.

2.5. Uniaxial Tensile Test

The leather samples underwent a uniaxial test following the ISO 3376 standard [42], using bone-shaped samples with standardized “large” dimensions. The SANTAM STM5 testing machine (SANTAM Co., Tehran, Iran) was used, with a jaw separation speed of 100 mm/min. To ensure statistical significance, five samples were tested, all cut perpendicular to the backbone and stretched until ultimate damage.

2.6. Colorimetery

This study examined the color changes caused by various treatments and the effects of accelerated aging conditions on the samples using an NH300 colorimeter (Shenzhen Threenh Technology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China) in the CIE L*a*b* space. For each sample, 5 analysis points were examined, and the average data obtained was used for further analysis.

2.7. Scanning Electron Microscopy

The scanning electron microscope (SEM) was utilized to examine the leathers and determine the thickness and microstructure of the treatment film. Samples measuring 2 mm in side length were coated with gold and inspected using the MIRA3 field emission scanning electron microscope from TESCAN in the Czech Republic.

2.8. ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy

The Nicolet 470 FTIR spectrometer and OMNIC 6.1a software (Nicolet Instrument Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) were utilized for conducting ATR-FTIR analysis. The system was equipped with a PIKE MIRacle attenuated total reflectance (ATR) accessory featuring a diamond crystal plate. The analysis was performed on the surface of leathers, with 64 scans taken at a resolution of 4 cm−1 in the range of 1800–600 cm−1.

3. Results and Discussion

The dispersion of nanoparticles in the HPC matrix is crucial in determining the properties of the nanocomposite. In this study, the SEM image shows that the dispersion of zinc oxide nanoparticles on the HPC matrix is uniform and well-distributed (Figure 1). This uniform dispersion can be attributed to the appropriate synthesis of the nanocomposite, which is essential for improving the properties of leather and creating a transparent film. This film can act as a protective layer, shielding the leather from environmental factors such as moisture and UV radiation, while also enhancing its mechanical and physical properties. The transparency of the film is also beneficial for leather products, as it allows the natural texture and color of the leather to be visible. The cross-sectional view provides additional insights into the thickness of the coating layer on the leather. The thickness of the coating layer is crucial in determining the durability and strength of the leather. In this study, the coating layer thickness was found to be approximately 9 μm, which is relatively high. This can be attributed to the brush treatment, which was repeated to enhance the strength of the leather. The high thickness of the coating layer can contribute to the improved mechanical and physical properties of the leather, making it more durable and long-lasting.
Figure 2 illustrates the effect of accelerated aging on the surface of neat (untreated) and treated leather. The SEM image of neat leather shows dispersed microcracks, which are clear indicators of surface layer degradation caused by UV radiation. In contrast, the HPC-coated samples exhibit partial prevention of microcrack formation. However, the impact of UV radiation on these samples results in the deformation of the HPC film.
Conversely, the leather coated with the HPC/zinc oxide NC displays significantly minimized morphological changes on the surface of the leather. A smooth layer is still visible on the leather, indicating the effectiveness of the nanocomposite in protecting the leather from UV radiation-induced degradation. These findings indicate that the zinc oxide/HPC NC coating can effectively prevent the formation of microcracks and surface layer degradation caused by UV radiation.
When zinc oxide is added to a solution of HPC, it can protect leather from degradation by effectively absorbing and dispersing UV radiation due to its exceptional UV absorption properties [43,44,45]. Additionally, ZnO nanoparticles possess photocatalytic characteristics [44,46,47] that enable them to counteract free radicals responsible for leather damage [48]. Therefore, when combined with HPC matrix, ZnO nanoparticles create a film that protects leather from photooxidation.
The chemical structure of leather was analyzed through ATR-FTIR spectroscopy (Figure 3). The spectra of leather typically show vibrations of amide I, II, and III at around 1650, 1550, and 1240 cm−1, respectively [3,12,49]. The ratio of amide I to II peak intensities can indicate collagen hydrolysis [50,51], while the distance between their positions can indicate collagen denaturation/gelatinization [52,53]. The ratio of amide III intensity to the peak at approximately 1450 cm−1 can indicate the collagen triple helix’s integrity [52,53,54,55]. The use of HPC increases the absorbance band intensities within the range of 900 to 1200 cm−1, indicating various C-O vibrations in the HPC structure [27]. However, aging causes a decrease in these peak intensities, indicating HPC degradation. Additionally, an increase in carbonyl vibrations around 1730 cm−1 can indicate HPC oxidation in these samples [27,56]. Due to overlapping peaks of collagen, HPC, and the finishing layer of leather, only the denaturation index based on the amide bands I and II positions can be verified. The difference in the position of these two peaks in the collagen FTIR spectrum is approximately 100 cm−1. The difference between these two peaks, known as Δν, is an indicator of collagen denaturation that increases with degradation [12,50,53,57,58,59,60]. The second derivative was used to determine the precise positions of these peaks, and the Δν values for the samples before and after accelerated aging are presented in Figure 4. As illustrated in the figure, accelerated aging of both neat and HPC-treated leather resulted in increased denaturation, while HPC/ZnO NC treatment effectively prevented this change to a significant extent. The rise in Δν in the spectra of untreated leather and leather treated with HPC after accelerated aging can be noted, however, using other methods such as DSC, which can offer a better understanding of the denaturation of leathers.
Figure 5 displays the colorimetric results and pH measurements of the samples. After accelerated aging, there is not a significant difference in color changes between neat and treated leathers. The quantity of color changes resulting from accelerated aging in the samples studied is actually very similar, and there are no noticeable differences in their ΔE* values. The primary reason for color changes is the oxidation of condensed mimosa tannins, resulting in red leather. This is evident in the notable rise of parameter a* following accelerated aging. Furthermore, the leather has become darker as a result of accelerated aging, which is evident in the decrease in the L* parameter. Similarly, pH measurements do not show significant differences between the samples. However, the leather treated with HPC/ZnO NC displays an increase in pH after aging, indicating that this treatment may be useful in consolidating acid-damaged leathers.
The results presented in Figure 6 show the average water drop contact angle. The application of HPC has led to a significant increase in the contact angle of leather, from approximately 58° to 73°, indicating an improvement in its water-repellent properties. In addition, the performance of HPC has been further improved by incorporating zinc oxide nanoparticles. These nanoparticles have a hydrophobic nature, meaning they repel water. When they are added to an HPC film, they create a rough surface, which increases the contact angle of the film. This roughness prevents liquid from spreading and reduces its contact with the film. As a result, the contact angle increases, indicating greater hydrophobicity. The nanoparticles also form micro- and nanostructures that trap air and create small pockets of space between the liquid droplet and the film, further reducing the contact area and increasing the contact angle [61,62,63].
When treated with HPC/ZnO NC, the contact angle increased to around 78°, highlighting the impact of zinc oxide nanoparticles on increasing the hydrophobicity of HPC. Notably, the HPC/ZnO NC treatment exhibited a lower reduction upon aging compared to the HPC treatment, indicating that HPC/ZnO NC is more stable than neat HPC. However, accelerated aging resulted in an increase in the contact angle in neat leather, which may be attributed to the oxidation of the leather finishing layer and the augmentation of cross-links on the leather surface.
Figure 7 illustrates the results of the uniaxial tensile tests conducted on the leathers. This figure presents the maximum force at the point of failure in Newton and the amount of extension until failure in millimeter. Accelerated aging resulted in a decrease in the maximum bearable force before tearing for both neat leathers and leathers treated with HPC. However, the reduction in the tolerance threshold of the leather was less pronounced in HPC-treated samples than in neat leather. Notably, the use of HPC/ZnO NC prevented this decrease in the tolerance threshold of the leather, as no reduction in the tolerable force of the leather was observed after aging, indicating the greater stability of this leather. In terms of extension, aging caused a decrease in this index in neat leather, and HPC treatment prevented this decrease, providing relative stability to this index. However, in leathers treated with HPC/ZnO NC, not only was there no decrease in the elongation index after aging, but also a significant increase was observed. This suggests that, in addition to improving some HPC characteristics, HPC/ZnO NC treatment has also improved the mechanical resistance of leather, confirming its performance as an improved consolidant.

4. Conclusions

This study aimed to investigate the potential of using a zinc oxide/hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC) nanocomposite as a consolidating agent for leather. The findings indicate that zinc oxide nanoparticles are uniformly distributed throughout the HPC matrix. The HPC/ZnO NC treatment applied to the leather creates a coating layer that effectively shields it from UV radiation, thus preventing the development of microcracks and surface layer deterioration. Moreover, the HPC/ZnO NC treatment exhibited superior mechanical properties, preventing the decrease in the tolerable force of the leather after aging and increasing the elongation index, confirming its performance as an improved consolidant. Additionally, the HPC/ZnO NC treatment improves the waterproofing properties of HPC and leather and prevents collagen denaturation under UV radiation. Furthermore, the treatment increases the pH of the leather, which can help control the destruction caused by acid. These findings demonstrate that the use of HPC/ZnO nanocomposites as a consolidating agent for leather significantly enhances its mechanical and physical properties and improves its resistance to environmental factors such as UV radiation and humidity. These results can contribute to the development of new and effective methods for the restoration and conservation of leather artifacts. Furthermore, future research can explore the application of these techniques on leathers that have undergone other tanning procedures.

Author Contributions

The work process was devised by A.K., who also conducted data analysis and interpretation. Z.G. and M.M.A. were involved in the experimental aspect. The results were discussed by all authors and they contributed to the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Acknowledgments

This article is a segment of the outcomes obtained from the thesis of Z.G., who was supervised by A.K. and M.M.A. at Tabriz Islamic Art University. Hence, we are grateful to the university for providing us with the chance to carry out this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Koochakzaei, A.; Mallakpour, S. Identification of surface dyeing agents of two bookbinding leathers from 19th-century Qajar, Iran, using LC–MS, μXRF and FTIR spectroscopy. Archaeometry 2023, 65, 603–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Koochakzaei, A.; Sabaghian, M. Tannin characterization and sourcing in historical leathers through FTIR spectroscopy and PCA analysis. Collagen Leather 2023, 5, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Koochakzaei, A.; Achachluei, M.M. Red Stains on Archaeological Leather: Degradation Characteristics of A Shoe From The 11th–13th Centuries (Seljuk Period, Iran). J. Am. Inst. Conserv. 2015, 54, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Florian, M.-L.E. The mechanisms of deterioration in leather. In Conservation of Leather and Related Materials; Kite, M., Thomson, R., Eds.; Butterworth-Heinemann: London, UK, 2006; pp. 36–57. [Google Scholar]
  5. Thomson, R. The Manufacture of Leather. In Conservation of Leather and Related Materials; Kite, M., Thomson, R., Eds.; Butterworth-Heinemann: London, UK, 2006; pp. 66–81. [Google Scholar]
  6. Puica, N.M.; Ardelean, E. The industrial pollution impact on religious heritage in Romania. Eur. J. Sci. Theol. 2008, 4, 51–59. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mahony, C.C.; Pearlstein, E. Evaluation of consolidants for the Treatment of Red Rot on Vegetable Tanned Leather. In Proceedings of the AIC 42nd Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA, 28–31 May 2014. [Google Scholar]
  8. Florian, M.-L.E. Protein Facts: Fibrous Proteins in Cultural and Natural History Artifacts; Archetype: London, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kozjak, I.; Igrec, I. Environmental influence on the leather used for book restoration, practical aspects of UV and hydrothermal degradation. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference: Protection of Cultural Heritage from Natural and Man-made Disasters, National and University Library in Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia, 8–10 May 2014. [Google Scholar]
  10. Overell, R. The ‘Red-Rot’ Problem. La Trobe J. 2004, 73, 101–107. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lama, A.; Antunes, A.P.M.; Covington, A.D.; Guthrie-Strachan, J.; Fletcher, Y. Use of aluminium alkoxide and oxazolidine II to treat acid-deteriorated historic leather. J. Inst. Conserv. 2015, 38, 172–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Koochakzaei, A.; Mallakpour, S.; Ahmadi, H. Performance Evaluation of Hybrid Formulations Consisting of Antioxidant and Crosslinking Agents for the Treatment of Acid Degradation in Historic Vegetable-Tanned Leathers. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc. 2022, 117, 330–337. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lama, A.; Antunes, A.P.M.; Fletcher, Y.; Guthrie-Strachan, J.; Vidler, K. Investigation of acid-deterioration in leather leading towards finding a suitable product for treatment. In Proceedings of the 114th Society of Leather Technologists and Chemists (SLTC) Conference, University of Northampton, Northampton, UK, 7 May 2011. [Google Scholar]
  14. Vyskočilová, G.; Ebersbach, M.; Kopecká, R.; Prokeš, L.; Příhoda, J. Model study of the leather degradation by oxidation and hydrolysis. Herit. Sci. 2019, 7, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sebestyén, Z.; Czégény, Z.; Badea, E.; Carsote, C.; Şendrea, C.; Barta-Rajnai, E.; Bozi, J.; Miu, L.; Jakab, E. Thermal characterization of new, artificially aged and historical leather and parchment. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2015, 115, 419–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Johnson, A. Evaluation of the use of SC6000 in conjunction with Klucel G as a conservation treatment for bookbinding leather: Notes on a preliminary study. J. Inst. Conserv. 2013, 36, 125–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bainbridge, A. Material-Based Treatments. In Conservation of Books; Routledge: London, UK, 2023; pp. 554–640. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kite, M.; Thomson, R.; Angus, A. Materials and techniques: Past and present. In Conservation of Leather and Related Materials; Routledge: London, UK, 2006; pp. 121–129. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gill, K.; Boersma, F. Solvent reactivation of hydroxypropyl cellulose (Klucel G) in textile conservation: Recent developments. Conservator 1997, 21, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Caruso, M.R.; D’agostino, G.; Milioto, S.; Cavallaro, G.; Lazzara, G. A review on biopolymer-based treatments for consolidation and surface protection of cultural heritage materials. J. Mater. Sci. 2023, 58, 12954–12975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cains, A. Preparation of the Book for Conservation and Repair. New Bookbind. 1981, 1, 11–25. [Google Scholar]
  22. Quandt, A.B. Recollections of Tony Cains and his Approach to the Treatment of Parchment Manuscripts. J. Pap. Conserv. 2021, 22, 156–179. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lafrance, J. Efficiency and Quality in a Batch Treatment: The Conservation of over A Hundred Leather Shoes And Fragments. In Proceedings of the 11th ICOM-CC Group on Wet Organic Archaeological Materials Conference, Greenville, NC, USA, 24–29 May 2010. [Google Scholar]
  24. Phillips, M.W. Notes on a Method for Consolidating Leather. J. Am. Inst. Conserv. 1984, 24, 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Steere, P. What is Cellugel? Shedding Light on an Elusive Product. J. Pap. Conserv. 2017, 18, 67–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ruzicka, G.; Reidell, S.; Primanis, O. Leather Conservation-bookbinding leather consolidants. In Conservation of Leather and Related Materials; Kite, M., Thomson, R., Eds.; Butterworth-Heinemann: London, UK, 2006; pp. 230–232. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ahmadi, H.; Mallakpour, S.; Koochakzaei, A. Evaluating the Role of antioxidants in the stabilization of hydroxypropyl cellulose by ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy. Prog. Color Color. Coat. 2018, 11, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Majeed, Z.N.; Mohammed, H.H.; Farhan, S.A. Study the Photodegradation of Hydroxypropyl Cellulose in Presence and Absence of Benzophenone and Eosine Dye. Chem. Mater. Res. 2014, 6, 18–25. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhang, J.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, X. UV-0/HPC laminated coatings for protection of cellulosed-based cultural heritage against UV rays. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2020, 177, 109169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cinteză, L.O.; Tănase, M.A. Multifunctional ZnO nanoparticle: Based coatings for cultural heritage preventive conservation. In Thin Films; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  31. David, M.E.; Ion, R.-M.; Grigorescu, R.M.; Iancu, L.; Andrei, E.R. Nanomaterials used in conservation and restoration of cultural heritage: An up-to-date overview. Materials 2020, 13, 2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kanth, A.P.; Soni, A.K. Application of nanocomposites for conservation of materials of cultural heritage. J. Cult. Herit. 2023, 59, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Afsharpour, M.; Imani, S. Preventive protection of paper works by using nanocomposite coating of zinc oxide. J. Cult. Herit. 2017, 25, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhao, S.-W.; Guo, C.-R.; Hu, Y.-Z.; Guo, Y.-R.; Pan, Q.-J. The preparation and antibacterial activity of cellulose/ZnO composite: A review. Open Chem. 2018, 16, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gu, W. Application and enhancement effect of nano-ZnO film preparation technology in the protection of paper artwork. Ferroelectrics 2023, 607, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Weththimuni, M.L.; Milanese, C.; Licchelli, M.; Malagodi, M. Improving the protective properties of shellac-based varnishes by functionalized nanoparticles. Coatings 2021, 11, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Luo, Z.; Dong, K.; Guo, M.; Lian, Z.; Zhang, B.; Wei, W. Preparation of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles-Based Starch Paste and its Antifungal Performance as a Paper Adhesive. Starch-Stärke 2018, 70, 1700211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. El-Feky, O.M.; Dong, K.; Guo, M.; Lian, Z.; Zhang, B.; Wei, W. Use of ZnO nanoparticles for protecting oil paintings on paper support against dirt, fungal attack, and UV aging. J. Cult. Herit. 2014, 15, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jia, M.; Zhang, X.G.; Weng, J.J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, M.F. Protective coating of paper works: ZnO/cellulose nanocrystal composites and analytical characterization. J. Cult. Herit. 2019, 38, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mostafa, A.M.; Hamed, S.A.E.-K.M.; Afifi, H.; Mohamady, S. A comparative study on the color change of pigments due to the consolidation of conventional spectroscopic techniques and laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. A 2019, 125, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Abu Krorra, A.; Noshy, W.; Oun, A.; Abu Elleif, M. Evaluation of Hydroxypropyl Cellulose, Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles and Nanocellulose for Tracing Papers Consolidation. Adv. Res. Conserv. Sci. 2021, 2, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. ISO 3376:2020; Leather—Physical and Mechanical Tests—Determination of Tensile Strength and Percentage Elongation. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020.
  43. Song, Z.; Kelf, T.A.; Sanchez, W.H.; Roberts, M.S.; Rička, J.; Frenz, M.; Zvyagin, A.V. Characterization of optical properties of ZnO nanoparticles for quantitative imaging of transdermal transport. Biomed. Opt. Express 2011, 2, 3321–3333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Joseph, M.; Nampoori, V.P.N.; Kailasnath, M. Biofunctionalized zinc oxide nanoflowers coated textiles for UV protection. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 68, 363–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Grüneberger, F.; Künniger, T.; Huch, A.; Zimmermann, T.; Arnold, M. Nanofibrillated cellulose in wood coatings: Dispersion and stabilization of ZnO as UV absorber. Prog. Org. Coat. 2015, 87, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Guo, M.Y.; Ng, A.M.C.; Liu, F.; Djurišić, A.B.; Chan, W.K.; Su, H.; Wong, K.S. Effect of Native Defects on Photocatalytic Properties of ZnO. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 11095–11101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dash, D.; Panda, N.R.; Sahu, D. Photoluminescence and photocatalytic properties of europium doped ZnO nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 494, 666–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sharma, V.; Sharma, J.; Kansay, V.; Sharma, V.D.; Sharma, A.; Kumar, S.; Bera, M. The effect of calcination temperatures on the structural and optical properties of zinc oxide nanoparticles and their influence on the photocatalytic degradation of leather dye. Chem. Phys. Impact 2023, 6, 100196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Carsote, C.; Şendrea, C.; Micu, M.-C.; Adams, A.; Badea, E. Micro-DSC, FTIR-ATR and NMR MOUSE study of the dose-dependent effects of gamma irradiation on vegetable-tanned leather: The influence of leather thermal stability. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2021, 189, 109712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Badea, E.; Miu, L.; Budrugeac, P.; Giurginca, M.; Mašić, A.; Badea, N.; Della Gatta, G. Study of deterioration of historical parchments by various thermal analysis techniques complemented by SEM, FTIR, UV-Vis-NIR and unilateral NMR investigations. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2008, 91, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Koochakzaei, A.; Ahmadi, H.; Achachlouei, M.M. Performance Evaluation of Dimethyl Silicone Oil as Archaeological Dry Leather Lubricant. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc. 2020, 115, 140–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Petroviciu, I.; Ahmadi, H.; Achachlouei, M.M. Artificially aged parchment investigated by FTIR. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress "Chemistry for Cultural Heritage" (ChemCH 2014), Academy of Fine Arts, Vienna, Austria, 1–5 July 2014. [Google Scholar]
  53. Koochakzaei, A.; Ahmadi, H.; Mallakpour, S. An experimental comparative study of the effect of skin type on the stability of vegetable leather under acidic condition. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc. 2018, 113(11), 345–351. [Google Scholar]
  54. Júnior, Z.S.S.; Botta, S.B.; Ana, P.A.; Franca, C.M.; Fernandes, K.P.S.; Mesquita-Ferrari, R.A.; Deana, A.; Bussadori, S.K. Effect of papain-based gel on type I collagen-spectroscopy applied for microstructural analysis. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pielesz, A. Temperature-dependent FTIR spectra of collagen and protective effect of partially hydrolysed fucoidan. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2014, 118, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zaltariov, M.-F.; Filip, D.; Macocinschi, D.; Spiridon, I. Hydrohypropyl cellulose/polyurethane blends. The behavior after accelerated ageing. A FTIR study. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2020, 54, 903–914. [Google Scholar]
  57. Yang, Z.; Gong, D. Studies of structure changes of archeological leather by FTIR spectroscopy. J. Soc. Leather Technol. Chem. 2018, 102, 262–267. [Google Scholar]
  58. Derrick, M. Evaluation of the State of Degradation of Dead Sea Scroll Samples Using FTIR Spectroscopy. Book Pap. Annu. 1991, 10, 49–65. [Google Scholar]
  59. Vetter, W.; Pöllnitz, G.; Schreiner, M. Examination of Historic Parchment Manuscripts by Non invasive Reflection-FTIR—Possibilities and Limitations. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress “Chemistry for Cultural Heritage” (ChemCH 2014), Academy of Fine Arts, Vienna, Austria, 1–5 July 2014. [Google Scholar]
  60. Plavan, V.; Giurginca, M.; Budrugeac, P.; Vilsan, M.; Miu, L. Evaluation of the Physico—chemical Characteristics of Leather Samples of Some Historical Objects from Kiev. Rev. Chim. 2010, 61, 627–631. [Google Scholar]
  61. Chatzigrigoriou, A.; Karapanagiotis, I.; Poulios, I. Superhydrophobic Coatings Based on Siloxane Resin and Calcium Hydroxide Nanoparticles for Marble Protection. Coatings 2020, 10, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Karapanagiotis, I.; Manoudis, P.N. Superhydrophobic and superamphiphobic materials for the conservation of natural stone: An overview. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 320, 126175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Manoudis, P.N.; Chughtai, Z.; Tsiridis, V.; Evgenidis, S.P.; Spathis, P.K.; Karapantsios, T.D.; Karapanagiotis, I. Tuning the Wettability of a Commercial Silane Product to Induce Superamphiphobicity for Stone Protection. Coatings 2023, 13, 700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Heritage 06 00396 g001
Figure 1. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images; (a): cross-sectional view of leather treated with HPC/ZnO NC, revealing the presence of a 9-micrometer film on the surface of the leather; (b): corresponding surface image of the same leather depicting a homogeneous distribution of ZnO NPs in the HPC matrix. The HPC film on the leather surface is indicated by the arrows.
Figure 1. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images; (a): cross-sectional view of leather treated with HPC/ZnO NC, revealing the presence of a 9-micrometer film on the surface of the leather; (b): corresponding surface image of the same leather depicting a homogeneous distribution of ZnO NPs in the HPC matrix. The HPC film on the leather surface is indicated by the arrows.
Heritage 06 00396 g001
Heritage 06 00396 g002
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the surface of the investigated leather samples; (a): neat leather surface prior to accelerated aging; (b): neat leather surface after accelerated aging, demonstrating an increase in surface microcracks; (c): leather treated with HPC after accelerated aging exhibiting a reduction in microcracks; (d): leather treated with HPC/ZnO NC after accelerated aging, demonstrating prevention of microcracks and preservation of a smooth and uniform surface on the leather.
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the surface of the investigated leather samples; (a): neat leather surface prior to accelerated aging; (b): neat leather surface after accelerated aging, demonstrating an increase in surface microcracks; (c): leather treated with HPC after accelerated aging exhibiting a reduction in microcracks; (d): leather treated with HPC/ZnO NC after accelerated aging, demonstrating prevention of microcracks and preservation of a smooth and uniform surface on the leather.
Heritage 06 00396 g002
Heritage 06 00396 g003
Figure 3. ATR-FTIR spectra of the surface of neat and treated leathers, before and after accelerated aging (A-), following baseline correction and normalization within the range of 700–1850 cm−1.
Figure 3. ATR-FTIR spectra of the surface of neat and treated leathers, before and after accelerated aging (A-), following baseline correction and normalization within the range of 700–1850 cm−1.
Heritage 06 00396 g003
Heritage 06 00396 g004
Figure 4. The difference in wavenumber between amide I and II peaks can be used as an indicator of collagen denaturation. Results indicate that the use of HPC/ZnO NC prevents this change caused by accelerated aging, unlike HPC and neat leather.
Figure 4. The difference in wavenumber between amide I and II peaks can be used as an indicator of collagen denaturation. Results indicate that the use of HPC/ZnO NC prevents this change caused by accelerated aging, unlike HPC and neat leather.
Heritage 06 00396 g004
Heritage 06 00396 g005
Figure 5. Color index (top) and pH (bottom) changes resulting from treatment and accelerated aging.
Figure 5. Color index (top) and pH (bottom) changes resulting from treatment and accelerated aging.
Heritage 06 00396 g005
Heritage 06 00396 g006
Figure 6. Changes in water droplet contact angle due to treatment and accelerated aging demonstrate improved water repellency from the use of HPC. Additionally, the addition of zinc oxide nanoparticles to HPC enhances this property.
Figure 6. Changes in water droplet contact angle due to treatment and accelerated aging demonstrate improved water repellency from the use of HPC. Additionally, the addition of zinc oxide nanoparticles to HPC enhances this property.
Heritage 06 00396 g006
Heritage 06 00396 g007
Figure 7. The maximum force applied to leather samples before tearing (top) and the extension until the moment of tearing (bottom) are shown.
Figure 7. The maximum force applied to leather samples before tearing (top) and the extension until the moment of tearing (bottom) are shown.
Heritage 06 00396 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Koochakzaei, A.; Ghane, Z.; Mohammadi Achachluei, M. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles in Leather Conservation: Exploring the Potential of Hydroxypropyl Cellulose/Zinc Oxide Nanocomposite as a Leather Consolidation Agent. Heritage 2023, 6, 7547-7558. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6120396

AMA Style

Koochakzaei A, Ghane Z, Mohammadi Achachluei M. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles in Leather Conservation: Exploring the Potential of Hydroxypropyl Cellulose/Zinc Oxide Nanocomposite as a Leather Consolidation Agent. Heritage. 2023; 6(12):7547-7558. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6120396

Chicago/Turabian Style

Koochakzaei, Alireza, Zahra Ghane, and Mohsen Mohammadi Achachluei. 2023. "Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles in Leather Conservation: Exploring the Potential of Hydroxypropyl Cellulose/Zinc Oxide Nanocomposite as a Leather Consolidation Agent" Heritage 6, no. 12: 7547-7558. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6120396

APA Style

Koochakzaei, A., Ghane, Z., & Mohammadi Achachluei, M. (2023). Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles in Leather Conservation: Exploring the Potential of Hydroxypropyl Cellulose/Zinc Oxide Nanocomposite as a Leather Consolidation Agent. Heritage, 6(12), 7547-7558. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6120396

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop