Special Interest Tourism (SIT) in Murmansk (Arctic NE Scandinavia): Touristic Route around the City to Explore the Oldest Rocks in Europe
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Environmental Conditions
3.2. Flora and Fauna
3.3. Historical View
3.4. Geodiversity
- Gneisses are grey–silver rocks with a red–pink accent (Figure 6A). They are mainly made of quartz and plagioclases, which are accompanied by biotite, phlogopite, muscovite, and numerous accessory minerals, including garnets. These rocks have grano-nematoblastic, fine-blasted, slate, gneiss, and grain textures. They form a complex containing lamellae built of dark and light minerals of varying proportions and thicknesses in one place, resembling slate in other gneisses. In the microscopic image, quartz is usually visible, together with plagioclases (of different compositions) and orthoclase from light laminates in the rock. In the discussed rocks, quartz most often has suture boundaries. Garnet usually occurs in the vicinity of these minerals, although there are also varieties almost free of these minerals, with much darker colors and a greater proportion of biotite (Figure 6C). In addition to these minerals, the rock has dark laminates composed of feminine minerals, such as biotite, sometimes accompanied by phlogopite and muscovite. Present pyroxene and apatite sporadically appear. In some rocks, sillimanite and staurolite are abundant, which accompanies the microdislocation zones in the rock co-occurring with biotite and deformed garnet crystals. Ore minerals are represented by polymetallic sulfides, such as pyrite, chalcopyrite, galena, and pentlandite, which are accompanied by ilmenite, chromite, iron oxides, and hydroxides. These rocks are the backbone of the Kola series, revealing themselves in many parts of the city. It is from these rocks that the hills, outskirts, and numerous rocky slopes are built. Their importance for the city’s geomorphology is paramount.
- Granitogneisses are rocks, usually grey–pink. They accompany the gneisses discussed above in their migmatisation zones. Their importance is secondary, limited to the zones of gneiss ultrametamorphism. The best exposures of these rocks are visible in the area of the Monument to the Unknown Soldier (object No. 6, Figure 3). Resembling granitoid and often bearing clear traces of migmatisation, they are crossed by numerous veins and other rock formations. Together with gneisses and schists, they form a rock found in the Murmansk region. These rocks are mainly made of quartz, orthoclase, and plagioclase, with numerous accessory minerals (Figure 6D). They have grano-lepido-nematoblastic, coarse crystalline, porphyry structures, and compact, random, streaky, gneiss, nebulite, pseudocellular, pseudofluidic textures. In the microscopic image, the rock background is represented by quartz, orthoclase, and plagioclase (labradore, bytownite), which form aggregates of various crystal sizes, often crushed or deformed, sometimes also containing sericite and iron oxides and hydroxides. The occurrence of these rocks in the geological structure of Murmansk is limited by the area of their occurrence. These rocks are exposed only in a few places, but due to the discussion of the processes of the Kola series sediments in question, their significance is high.
- Amphibolites are rocks that constitute a complex of structurally diverse formations. They usually occur as paleosomes in migmatized granite. They are composed of plagioclase and amphibole from the hornblende group. They most often have grano-nematoblastic structures. The microscopic image shows common hornblende, sometimes arranged along the longest axes, forming flat-parallel structures in the rock. It often forms symplectic and idioblastic adhesions, having titanite, magnetite, and zirconium infixes. The amphibolites in the complex in question are a small admixture of rocks formed in the ultrametamorphism processes of older deposits. Their exposure in Murmansk is less frequent, giving them secondary importance.
- Enderbites and granodiorites occurring in the discussed rock region are gray–green rocks with visible crystals of pyroxenes, amphiboles, biotite, quartz, and plagioclases. These rocks most often have a grano-lepido-nematoblastic structure, and the texture is dense, random, less often directional, and underlined by mafic xenoliths and grinds. In the microscopic image, there is quartz, which is accompanied by plagioclase (oligoclase and labradore). Biotite lamellae, sometimes also common hornblende, are seen in are seen between of plagioclases, which form aggregates in the rock along with the ore minerals and hypersthene crystals present in them (Figure 6E). Additionally, apatite and ore minerals represented by ilmenite and magnetite appear in the rock. These rocks are exposed in tectonically limited zones, usually east of Murmansk. Their occurrence can be correlated with old intrusions, which, similarly to the Kola series granulite gneisses, have undergone metamorphism. However, the exact position of these rocks concerning the tracks of the Kola series is unknown.
- Pegmatites (Figure 6B,F) are rocks that usually have a crystal size not exceeding a few cm. In the Murmansk region, there are pegmatites with muscovite, epidote, quartz, and tourmalines (shoerl). They are often found in the field. Their thickness is up to 1 m or more. However, in the vicinity of this unit, there are LCT pegmatites that also contain spodumene and columbite. Detailed studies of these rocks may permit us to find similar analogies in the Murmansk region. In the rocks in question, quartz and orthoclase are usually visible, forming the background of the rock. In addition to these minerals, there are the above-mentioned phases as well as sulfides (pyrite, chalcopyrite) and sometimes also carbonates.
- Lamprophyre is a veined rock in which the main ingredient is orthoclase. Next to it, there are augite and olivine. Olyvines are often cracked in the rock. They also show serpentinization (Figure 4G). Next to them, there are also numerous tiny magnetite crystals. Rutile is present in pyroxenes, often in the direction of pyroxene cleavage.
- Dolerites are rocks with an ophthalmic structure, usually emphasized by plagioclase crystals Figure 4H). Apart from these minerals, there are also augite and biotite. They are accompanied by numerous magnetite and ilmenite as well as individual sulfide crystals.
- Meta-Picrites are black scales with a fine-crystalline structure and have a dense, random texture. The microscopic image shows mainly orthopyroxene crystals, accompanied by fine crystals of clinopyroxene and talc. Apart from these minerals, olivines are also visible, usually single, strongly chlorinated crystals. In addition to these minerals, garnets are also visible, usually with numerous rutile in rims. This rock also has hornblende and epidotes.
3.5. Study City
3.6. Proposed Trails and Objects
- City center, Five Corners Square, and train station.
- 2.
- Museum of National History.
- 3.
- Monument to fallen sailors located on the rock ledge.
- 4.
- Exposure of granulites in some city blocks.
- 5.
- Educational paths area and Semyonovskoe Lake recreation center.
- 6.
- The vicinity of the Monument to the Unknown Soldier.
- 7.
- Uncovering rocks in the area of the ski slope near the ring road.
- 8.
- Rock ridges of the bypass area.
- 9.
- Cultural and historical reconstructions.
- 10.
- Interesting rock exposures in the area of the sports and recreation complex.
- 11.
- Rocks with dikes of the bypass.
- 12.
- Area of entry to the city.
- 13.
- Historical and geomorphological complex in the vicinity of the city of Kola.
- 14.
- Kola Bay and Murmansk panorama from one of the longest bridges in the Arctic.
- 15.
- Recreation area in a closed quarry.
- 16.
- Historical and cultural complex in the vicinity of the passenger port.
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Oevermann, H.; Degenkolb, J.; Dießler, A.; Karge, S.; Peltz, U. Participation in the reuse of industrial heritage sites: The case of Oberschöneweide, Berlin. Int. J. Heritage Stud. 2016, 22, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berlin Tourist Infos. Available online: https://www.visitberlin.de/de/berlin-tourist-infos (accessed on 20 November 2022).
- Tracz, M.; Bajgier-Kowalska, M.; Wójtowicz, B. Transformation in the Tourist Services and their Impact on the Perception of Tourism by the Residents of Krakow (Poland). Stud. Ind. Geogr. Comm. Pol. Geogr. Soc. 2019, 33, 164–177. [Google Scholar]
- Cracow Tourist Information Point. Available online: https://www.seekrakow.com/pl/ (accessed on 20 November 2022).
- Pica, A.; Vergari, F.; Fredi, P.; Del Monte, M. The Aeterna Urbs Geomorphological Heritage (Rome, Italy). Geoheritage 2015, 8, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rome Tourist Office. Available online: https://www.romeinformation.it/en/ (accessed on 20 November 2022).
- Lamparska, M. Post-industrial Cultural Heritage Sites in the Katowice conurbation, Poland. Environ. Socio-Econ. Stud. 2013, 1, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Regional Tourist Information Centre in Katowice. Available online: https://www.facebook.com/RCITKatowice (accessed on 16 November 2022).
- Swietokrzyskie Travel. Available online: https://swietokrzyskie.travel/ (accessed on 20 November 2022).
- Chylińska, D.; Kołodziejczyk, K. Geotourism in an urban space? Open Geosci. 2018, 10, 297–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kryukova, E.M.; Khetagurova, V.S.; Mosalev, A.I.; Mukhomorova, I.V.; Egorova, E.N. Organisation of the use of Moscow cultural and historical heritage in tourist activities. J. Environ. Manag. Tour. 2019, 10, 763–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moscow Tourist Information Offices. Available online: https://russiau.com/moscow-tourist-information-offices/ (accessed on 16 November 2022).
- Ushakov, I.F. Kola Land. Murmansk, History Book; Murmansk Publishing House of the Commercial Sea Port: Murmansk, Russia, 1972. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Bayanova, T.B.; Kunakkuzin, E.L.; Serov, P.A.; Fedotov, D.A.; Borisenko, E.S.; Elizarov, D.V.; Larionov, A.V. Precise U-Pb, Id-Tims, and SHRIMP-II ages on single zircon and Nd-Sr signatures from Achaean TTG and high aluminum gneiss on the Fennoscandian Shield. In Proceedings of the 32nd Nordic Geological Winter Meeting, Helsinki, Finland, 13–15 January 2018; Volume 13–15.I, p. 172. [Google Scholar]
- Bayanova, T.B. Age of the Geological Complexes of the Kola Region and Magmatism Processes; Russian Academy of Sciences: Moscow, Russia, 2002. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Balashov, J.A.; Bayanova, T.B.; Mitrofanov, F.P. Isotope data on the age and genesis of layered basic –ultrabasic intrusions in the Kola Peninsula and northern Karelia, northern Baltic Shield. Precambrian Res. 1993, 64, 97–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bibikova, E.V.; Bogdanova, S.; Postnikov, A.V.; Popova, L.P.; Kirnozova, T.I.; Fugzan, M.M.; Glushchenko, V.V. Sarmatia-Volgo-Uralia junction zone: Isotopic-geochronologic characteristic of supracrustal rocks and granitoids. Strat. Geol. Correl. 2009, 17, 561–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glebovitsky, V.A. Early Precambrian of the Baltic Shield; Nauka: St Petersburg, Russia, 2005; p. 710. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Huber, M.; Bayanova, T.B.; Serov, P.A.; Skupiński, S. Archean Gneisses of the Murmansk, Oleniegorsk Region, NE Fennoscandia, in the Light of the Petrographic and Geochemical Analysis; Sciences Publisher: Lublin, Poland, 2018; p. 181. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Huber, M.; Hałas, S.; Serov, P.A.; Ekimova, N.A.; Bayanova, T.B. Stable isotope geochemistry and Sm-Nd, U-Pb dating of sulfides from layered intrusions in the northern part of Baltic Shield. Cent. Eur. Geol. 2013, 56, 134–135. [Google Scholar]
- Petrovskaya, L.S.; Mitrofanov, F.P.; Bayanova, T.B.; Petrov, V.P.; Petrovski, M.N. Neoarchean Enderbites-Granulite Complex of the Puloziero-Polnek-Tundra Region, Central Kola Block: Stages and the Thermodynamic Regime of Evolution; Kola Science Centre RAS Kola Peninsula, Russian Academy of Sciences: Apatity, Russia, 2010; p. 78. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Pozhilienko, V.I.; Gavrilenko, B.V.; Zhirov, C.V.; Zhabin, S.V. Geology of Mineral Areas of the Murmansk Region; Russian Academy of Sciences: Apatity, Russia, 2002; p. 360. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- James-Williamson; Aratram, M.; Green, P.E. Protecting Geoheritage in the Caribbean—Insights from Jamaica. Geoheritage 2017, 9, 195–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, F. Safeguarding Geoheritage in Ethiopia: Challenges Faced, and the Role of Geotourism. Geoheritage 2020, 12, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woo, K.S.; Chun, S.S.; Moon, K.O. Outstanding Geoheritage Values of the Island-Type Tidal Flats in Korea. Geoheritage 2020, 12, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aune, S.; Hofgaard, A.; Lars Söderström, L. Contrasting climate- and land-use-driven tree encroachment patterns of subarctic tundra in northern Norway and the Kola Peninsula. Can. J. For. Res. 2011, 41, 437–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Møer, J.J.; Yevzerov, V.Y.; Kolka, V.V.; Corner, G.D. Holocene raised-beach ridges and sea-ice-pushed boulders on the Kola Peninsula, northwest Russia: Indicators of climatic change. Holocene 2001, 12, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aamlid, D.; Venn, K. Methods of monitoring the effects of air pollution on forest and vegetation of eastern Finnmark, Norway, Norw. J. Agr. Sci. 1993, 7, 71–87. [Google Scholar]
- Brightman, F.H. Some factors influencing lichen growth in towns. Lichenologist 1959, 1, 104–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koptsik, G.N.; Niedbaiev, N.P.; Koptsik, S.V.; Pavluk, I.N. Heavy metal pollution of forest soils by atmospheric emissions of Pechenganikel smelter. Eurasian Soil Sci. 1999, 32, 896–903. [Google Scholar]
- Koptsik, S.V.; Koptsik, G. Soil pollution in terrestrial ecosystems of the Kola Peninsula, Russia. In Proceedings of the 10th International Soil Conservation Organization Meeting, West Lafayette, IN, USA, 24–29 May 1999; pp. 212–216. [Google Scholar]
- Pereverzev, V.N. Peat Soils of the Kola Peninsula. Eur. Soil Sci. 2005, 38, 457–464. [Google Scholar]
- Konstantinov, A.S.; Koryakin, O.A.; Makarova, V.V. Red Book of the Murmansk Region, 2nd ed.; Rev. and Add. Resp. ed. on the—Kemerovo; Asia-Print: Perm, Russia, 2014; p. 584. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Trutnev, Y.P.; Kamelin, R.V. Red Book of the Russian Federation, Plants and Mushrooms; Partnership of Scientific Publications KMK: Moscow, Russia, 2008; p. 855. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Grigoryev, A.A.; Gladkiy, Y.N.; Sevastyanov, D.V.; Shastina, G.N. Stone objects of Russian Fennoscandia: Potential for recreational use. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 302, 012148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popova, O.N.; Vicentiy, I.V. Migration situation in the Russian Arctic (on the example of the Murmansk region). IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 302, 012086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huber, M.; Iakovleva, O.; Zhigunova, G.; Menshakova, M.; Gainanova, R. Can the Arctic be saved for the next generations? Study of examples and internships in Murmansk District. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 678, 012031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- History of the Kola Peninsula. Available online: http://region.murman.ru/history/kola_land/ (accessed on 19 November 2022).
- Fedorov, P.V.; Obryadina, T.A. All-Union Population Census of 1939 and Political Repressions in Murman; Nauka Publisher: Moscow, Sovet Union, 1939; p. 262. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Baluev, A.S.; Morozov, J.A.; Terekhov, E.N.; Bayanova, T.B.; Tyupanov, S.N. Tectonics of the articulation region of the East European craton and the West Arctic platform. Geotectonics 2016, 5, 3–35. [Google Scholar]
- Bayanova, T.; Korchagin, A.; Mitrofanov, A.; Serov, P.; Ekimova, N.; Nitkina, E.; Kamensky, I.; Elizarov, D.; Huber, M. Long-Lived Mantle Plume and Polyphase Evolution of Palaeoproterozoic PGE Intrusions in the Fennoscandian Shield. Minerals 2019, 9, 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bayanova, T.B.; Pozhylienko, V.I.; Smolkin, V.F.; Kudryshov, N.M.; Kaulina, T.V.; Vetrin, V.R. Catalog of the Geochronology Data of N-E Part of the Baltic Shield; Russian Academy of Sciences Publisher: Apatity, Russia, 2002; p. 53. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Bayanova, T.B. Age of Benchmark Geological Complexes of the Kola Region and Magmatism Process Action; Sankt Petersburg, Nauka: St Petersburg, Russia, 2004; p. 174. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Britvin, S.N.; Ivanov, G.Y.; Yakuvenchuk, V.N. Mineralogical Accessory on the Kola Peninsula; World of Stones: New Delhi, India, 1995; pp. 1–6. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Dolivo-Dobrovol’skii, D.V.; Skublov, S.G.; Glebovitskii, V.A.; Astaf’ea, B.Y.; Voinova, O.A.; Shcheglova, T.P. Age, U–Pb, SHRIMP-II, Geochemistry of Zircon, and Conditions of the Formation of Sapphirine Bearing Rocks of the Central Kola Granulite–Gneiss Area. In Doklady Earth Sciences; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; Volume 453, pp. 1121–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitrofanov, A.F. Geological Characteristics of the Kola Peninsula; Russian Academy of Science Publisher: Apatity, Russian, 2000; p. 166. [Google Scholar]
- Arzamastsev, A.A.; Arzamastseva, L.V.; Bea, F.; Montero, P. Trace Elements in Minerals as Indicators of the Evolution of Alkaline Ultrabasic Dike Series: LA-ICP-MS Data for the Magmatic Provinces of Northeastern Fennoscandia and Germany. Petrology 2009, 17, 46–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aleksandrova, A.; Aigina, E. Ethno-Tourism Research in Lovozero, Murmansk Region, Russia. SHS Web Conf. 2014, 12, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- De Frantz, M. From Cultural Regeneration to Discursive Governance: Constructing the Flagship of the ‘Museumsquartier Vienna’ as a Plural Symbol of Change. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 2005, 29, 50–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arnberger, A.; Aikoh, T.; Eder, R.; Shoji, Y.; Mieno, T. How many people should be in the urban forest? A comparison of trail preferences of Vienna and Sapporo forest visitor segments. Urban For. Urban Green 2010, 9, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zgłobicki, W.; Baran-Zgłobicka, B. Geomorphological Heritage as a Tourist Attraction. A Case Study in Lubelskie Province, SE Poland. Geoheritage 2013, 5, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gambino, F.; Borghi, A.; d’Atri, A.; Gallo, L.M.; Ghiraldi, L.; Giardino, M.; Martire, L.; Palomba, M.; Perotti, L.; Macadam, J. TOURinSTONES: A Free Mobile Application for Promoting Geological Heritage in the City of Torino (NW Italy). Geoheritage 2019, 11, 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kryukova, E.M.; Khetagurova, V.S. Modern Methods and Approaches to the Management of The Hotel Services Promotion. Rev. Turismo Estudos & Prát. 2020, 3, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Cayla, N. An Overview of New Technologies Applied to the Management of Geoheritage. Geoheritage 2014, 6, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cela, A.; Lankford, L.; Knowles-Lankford, J. Visitor Spending and Economic Impacts of Heritage Tourism: A Case Study of the Silos and Smokestacks National Heritage Area. J. Herit. Tour. 2009, 4, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Druguet, E.; Rahimi, A.; Carreras, J.; Castaño, L.M.; Sánchez-Sorribes, I. The Geoheritage of Kerdous Inlier: Pages of Earth History in an Outstanding Landscape; Western Anti-Atlas, Morocco; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erfurt-Cooper, P. Geotourism in Volcanic and Geothermal Environments: Playing with Fire? Geoheritage 2011, 3, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, W.; Xiaolei, Z.; Zhaoping, Y.; Fuming, L.; Heigang, X.; Zhaoguo, W.; Hui, S. Analysis of spatial distribution characteristics and geographical factors of Chinese National Geoparks. Cent. Eur. J. Geosci. 2014, 6, 279–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gürer, A.; Gürer, Ö.F.; Sangu, E. Compound geotourism and mine tourism potentiality of Soma region, Turkey. Arab. J. Geosci. 2019, 12, 734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hose, T.A. 3G’s for Modern Geotourism. Geoheritage 2012, 4, 7–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang; Song. The geological heritages in Xinjiang, China: Its features and protection. J. Geogr. Sci. 2010, 20, 357–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamorska, I.; Sobiech, M.; Karasiewicz, T.; Tylmann, K. Geoheritage of Postglacial Areas in Northern Poland—Prospects for Geotourism. Geoheritahe 2020, 12, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Joano Carlos Nunes. The Azores Archipelago: Islands of Geodiversity. In Volcanic Tourist Destinations, Geoheritage, Geoparks and Geotourism; Erfurt-Cooper, P., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kershaw, S.; Chitnarin, A.; Noipow, N.; Forel, M.B.; Junrattanamanee, T.; Charoenmit, J. Microbialites and associated facies of the Late Ordovician system in Thailand: Paleoenvironments and paleogeographic implications. Facies 2019, 65, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mhend, A.S.; Maaté, A.; Amri, A.; Hlila, R.; Chakiri, S.; Maaté, S.; Martín-Martín, M. The Geological Heritage of the Talassemtane National Park and the Ghomara Coast Natural. Geoheritage 2019, 11, 1005–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moufti, M.R.; Németh, K.; El-Masry, N.; Qaddah, A. Volcanic Geotopes and Their Geosites Preserved in an Arid Climate Related to Landscape and Climate Changes Since the Neogene in Northern Saudi Arabia: Harrat Hutaymah, Hai’il Region. Geoheritage 2015, 7, 103–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murmansk Visitor Center. Available online: https://visitmurmansk.info/en/ (accessed on 20 November 2022).
- Nakada, S. Volcanic Archipelago: Volcanism as a Geoheritage Characteristic of Japan. In Natural Heritage of Japan, Geological, Geomorphological, and Ecological Aspects; Chakraborty, A., Mokudai, K., Cooper, M., Watanabe, M., Chakraborty, S., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 19–28. [Google Scholar]
- Németh, K.; Moufti, M.R. Geoheritage Values of a Mature Monogenetic Volcanic Field in Intra-continental Settings: Harrat Khaybar, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Geoheritage 2017, 9, 311–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pogodina, V.; Matveevskaya, A. Geography of Tourism of the European Part of Russia. In The Geography of Tourism of Central and Eastern European Countries; Widawski, K., Wyrzykowski, J., Eds.; Springer International Publishing AG: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 375–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popa, R.G.; Popa, D.A.; Andrășanu, A. The SEA and Big-S Models for Managing Geosites as Resources for Local Communities in the Context of Rural Geoparks. Geoheritage 2017, 9, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinnyovsky, D.; Sachkov, D.; Tsvetkova, I.; Atanasova, N. Geomorphosite Characterization Method for an Aspiring Geopark Application Dossier on the Example of Maritsa Cirque Complex in Geopark Rila, Rila Mountain, SW Bulgaria. Geoheritage 2020, 12, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vdovets, M.S.; Silantiev, V.V.; Mozzherin, V.V. A National Geopark in the Republic of Tatarstan, Russia, a Feasibility Study. Geoheritage 2010, 2, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zangmo, G.T.; Kagou, A.D.; Nkouathio, D.G.; Gountié, M.D.; Kamgang, P. The Volcanic Geoheritage of the Mount Bamenda Calderas, Cameroon Line, Assessment for Geotouristic and Geoeducational Purposes. Geoheritage 2017, 9, 255–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farsani, N.T.; Esfahani, M.A.G.; Shokrizadeh, M. Understanding Tourists’ Satisfaction and Motivation Regarding Mining Geotours, Case Study: Isfahan, Iran. Geoheritage 2019, 11, 681–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farsani, N.T.; Mortazavi, M.; Bahrami, A.; Kalantary, R.; Bizhaem, F.K. Traditional Crafts: A Tool for Geo-education in Geotourism. Geoheritage 2017, 9, 577–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kavčič, M.; Peljhan, M. Geological Heritage as an Integral Part of Natural Heritage Conservation Through Its Sustainable Use in the Idrija region, Slovenia. Geoheritage 2010, 2, 137–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pijet-Migoń, E.; Migoń, P. Promoting and Interpreting Geoheritage at the Local Level—Bottom-up Approach in the Land of Extinct Volcanoes, Sudetes, SW Poland. Geoheritage 2019, 11, 1227–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Koizumi, T.; Chakraborty, A. Geoecotourism and environmental conservation education: Insights from Japan. GeoJournal 2016, 81, 737–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piranha, J.M.; Del Lama, E.A.; La Corte Bacci, D. Geoparks in Brazil—Strategy of Geoconservation and Development. Geoheritage 2011, 3, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huber, M.; Iakovleva, O.; Zhigunova, G.; Menshakova, M.Y.; Gainanova, R.I.; Moroniak, M. Geoheritage of the Western Khibiny ingenious alkaline rocks intrusion (Kola Peninsula, Arctic Russia): Evaluation, and geotourism opportunities. Geoheritage 2021, 13, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuming, L.; Fang, W.; Heigang, X.; Zhaoguo, W.; Baofu, L. A Study on Classification and Zoning of Chinese Geoheritage Resources in National Geoparks. Geoheritage 2016, 8, 247–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gravis, I.; Németh, K.; Twemlow, C.; Németh, B. The Case for Community-Led Geoheritage and Geoconservation Ventures in Māngere, South Auckland, and Central Otago, New Zealand. Geoheritage 2020, 12, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huber, M.; Zhigunova, G.; Menshakova, M.; Iakovleva, O.; Karimova, M. Geoheritage of the Monchegorsk Igneous Layered Paleoproterozoic Intrusion (Kola Peninsula, Arctic Russia): Evaluation and Geotourism Opportunities. Heritage 2021, 4, 3583–3610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jończy, I.; Huber, M.; Lata, L. Vitrified metallurgical wastes after zinc and lead production from the dump in Ruda Śląska in the aspect of mineralogical and chemical studies. Miner. Resour. Manag. 2014, 30, 161–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gajek, G.; Zgłobicki, Z.; Kołodyńska-Gawrysiak, R. Geoeducational Value of Quarries Located Within the Małopolska Vistula River Gap, E Poland. Geoheritage 2019, 11, 1335–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Huber, M.; Zhigunova, G.; Menshakova, M.; Gainanova, R.; Iakovleva, O. Geoheritage of the Kandalaksha region (Kola Peninsula, White Sea, Arctic Russia), Evaluation, and Geotourism Opportunities. Geoheritage 2022, 14, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huber, M.; Iakovleva, O. Tourism, Scientific, and Didactic Potential of the Ultrabasic-Alkaline Intrusion in Afrikanda with Perovskite Mineral (Kola Peninsula, N Russia) and of the Related Built Heritage. Heritage 2021, 4, 3892–3907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grosbois, M.; Weg, F.B.; Eder, E. International viewpoint and news. Environ. Geol. 2008, 55, 465–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
No | Latitude | Longitude | No | Latitude | Longitude |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 68°58′13.9″ N | 33°04′28.4″ E | 9 | 68°56′43.3″ N | 33°10′04.2″ E |
2 | 68°58′26.1″ N | 33°05′13.0″ E | 10 | 68°55′51.5″ N | 33°08′50.1″ E |
3 | 68°59′10.1″ N | 33°05′38.0″ E | 11 | 68°54′30.6″ N | 33°08′11.0″ E |
4 | 68°57′42.3″ N | 33°06′18.6″ E | 12 | 68°53′32.6″ N | 33°06′52.7″ E |
5 | 68°59′30.4″ N | 33°05′51.8″ E | 13 | 68°52′36.7″ N | 33°01′35.1″ E |
6 | 68°59′37.7″ N | 33°03′49.9″ E | 14 | 68°54′38.3″ N | 33°01′22.5″ E |
7 | 68°59′24.9″ N | 33°09′57.1″ E | 15 | 68°55′44.7″ N | 33°05′19.9″ E |
8 | 68°57′41.8″ N | 33°09′34.3″ E | 16 | 68°58′29.1″ N | 33°03′36.8″ E |
Object No. | Values | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cultural | Historical | Environment | Geomorphology | Exposure | Availability | |
1 | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | ||
2 | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ |
3 | +++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ |
4 | + | +++ | ++ | +++ | ||
5 | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
6 | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
7 | ++ | +++ | ++ | + | ||
8 | +++ | +++ | ++ | + | ||
9 | +++ | + | ++ | +++ | +++ | ++ |
10 | ++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ||
11 | ++ | +++ | ++ | + | ||
12 | ++ | + | +++ | +++ | + | |
13 | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | +++ |
14 | + | + | + | +++ | +++ | |
15 | + | + | ++ | +++ | +++ | ++ |
16 | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ |
Site Distance | Walking Time | Travel Time by Car | Site Distance | Walking Time | Travel Time by Car |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
16-1 | (16-1) 16 | 8 | 8–9 | 60 | 13 |
1–2 | 8 | 2 | 9–10 | 13 | 4 |
2–3 | 24 | 4 | 10–11 | 59 | 11 |
3–4 | 41 | 7 | 11–12 | 29 | 2 |
3–5 | 20 | 3 | 12–13 | 71 | 7 |
5–6 | 15 | 9 | 13–14 | 47 | 4 |
6–7 | 39 | 5 | 14–15 | 120 | 12 |
7–8 | 39 | 3 | 15–16 | 66 | 9 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Huber, M.; Iakovleva, O.; Zhigunova, G.; Menshakova, M.Y. Special Interest Tourism (SIT) in Murmansk (Arctic NE Scandinavia): Touristic Route around the City to Explore the Oldest Rocks in Europe. Heritage 2023, 6, 2664-2687. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6030141
Huber M, Iakovleva O, Zhigunova G, Menshakova MY. Special Interest Tourism (SIT) in Murmansk (Arctic NE Scandinavia): Touristic Route around the City to Explore the Oldest Rocks in Europe. Heritage. 2023; 6(3):2664-2687. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6030141
Chicago/Turabian StyleHuber, Miłosz, Olga Iakovleva, Galina Zhigunova, and Marija Y. Menshakova. 2023. "Special Interest Tourism (SIT) in Murmansk (Arctic NE Scandinavia): Touristic Route around the City to Explore the Oldest Rocks in Europe" Heritage 6, no. 3: 2664-2687. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6030141
APA StyleHuber, M., Iakovleva, O., Zhigunova, G., & Menshakova, M. Y. (2023). Special Interest Tourism (SIT) in Murmansk (Arctic NE Scandinavia): Touristic Route around the City to Explore the Oldest Rocks in Europe. Heritage, 6(3), 2664-2687. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6030141