Next Article in Journal
Multidisciplinary Approach of Proactive Preservation of the Religions Complex in Old Cairo—Part 1: Geoscience Aspects
Previous Article in Journal
An Integrated Method for the Reconstruction of Private Renaissance Exhibition Rooms (camerini) Starting from Ippolito II d’Este’s Cabinet of Paintings at His Tiburtine Villa
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Recording of Historic Buildings and Monuments for FEA: Current Practices and Future Directions

by
Francesca Turchetti
1,*,
Branka Cuca
1,
Daniela Oreni
1 and
Athos Agapiou
2
1
Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via Ponzio 31, 20133 Milan, Italy
2
Department of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Cyprus University of Technology, Saripolou 2-8, Limassol 3036, Cyprus
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Heritage 2025, 8(2), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8020055
Submission received: 11 December 2024 / Revised: 15 January 2025 / Accepted: 24 January 2025 / Published: 28 January 2025

Abstract

Cultural heritage (CH) sites and monuments share significant historical and cultural value, but at the same time, these are highly vulnerable to deterioration due to age, construction methods, and materials used. Therefore, stability studies for CH structures through numerical analyses allow researchers and stakeholders to safeguard them against time and exposure to hazards. To obtain reliable results for stability studies, detailed and accurate geometric documentation is needed prior to any modeling or simulation. In this context, geomatics technologies like LiDAR and photogrammetry can offer great support in documenting their structural integrity, providing efficient, non-invasive data collection methods that generate 3D point clouds. Nevertheless, despite the benefits, geomatic methods remain underutilized in structural engineering due to limitations in converting 3D point clouds directly for use in finite element modeling (FEM) analysis. The paper aims to review current approaches for the generation of FE models for structural analysis employing data obtained from 3D digital surveys. Each approach is described in detail, providing examples from literature and highlighting its advantages and disadvantages. Studies show that analysis accuracy depends strongly on point cloud level of detail, underlining the importance of precise geomatic surveys. Emerging workflows and semi-automated methods enable point clouds to be integrated with BIM (building information modeling) and FEM, thereby enhancing the contribution that laser scanning techniques and 3D modeling provide for the analysis of the stability of structures belonging to cultural heritage.
Keywords: point cloud; cultural heritage; FEM; 3D modeling; BIM point cloud; cultural heritage; FEM; 3D modeling; BIM

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Turchetti, F.; Cuca, B.; Oreni, D.; Agapiou, A. Recording of Historic Buildings and Monuments for FEA: Current Practices and Future Directions. Heritage 2025, 8, 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8020055

AMA Style

Turchetti F, Cuca B, Oreni D, Agapiou A. Recording of Historic Buildings and Monuments for FEA: Current Practices and Future Directions. Heritage. 2025; 8(2):55. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8020055

Chicago/Turabian Style

Turchetti, Francesca, Branka Cuca, Daniela Oreni, and Athos Agapiou. 2025. "Recording of Historic Buildings and Monuments for FEA: Current Practices and Future Directions" Heritage 8, no. 2: 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8020055

APA Style

Turchetti, F., Cuca, B., Oreni, D., & Agapiou, A. (2025). Recording of Historic Buildings and Monuments for FEA: Current Practices and Future Directions. Heritage, 8(2), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8020055

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop