Next Article in Journal
Predicting Differences in Model Parameters with Individual Parameter Contribution Regression Using the R Package ipcr
Previous Article in Journal
Using the Effective Sample Size as the Stopping Criterion in Markov Chain Monte Carlo with the Bayes Module in Mplus
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Psych
Volume 3
Issue 3
10.3390/psych3030026
Review Report
psych-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Sociotype of Dermatological Patients: Assessing the Social Burden of Skin Disease

Psych 2021, 3(3), 348-359; https://doi.org/10.3390/psych3030026
by Servando E. Marron 1, Lucia Tomas-Aragones 2,*, Pedro C. Marijuan 3, Pablo Y. Mendivil-Nasarre 4 and Jorge Navarro 3
Reviewer 2:
Andrea Carugno
Psych 2021, 3(3), 348-359; https://doi.org/10.3390/psych3030026
Submission received: 23 May 2021 / Revised: 24 July 2021 / Accepted: 1 August 2021 / Published: 3 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Topic Psychodermatology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is a very interesting study. The psychological burden caused by dermatological disorders is enormous and hopefully gains more and more attention in order to improve interdisciplinary care of "skin patients".

Presented sociotype questionnaire (SOCQ) seems to be a very innovative and extremely helpful in evaluation of social burden of skin diseases. Functioning in the society seems to be crucial for the contemporary human being. Pandemia demonstrated this importance to the highest degree. 

The Authors very modestly underline the their "small sample" and other questionnaires available. I do agree with that but information gathered by the SOCQ at this stage is very promising and inevitably deserves to be delivered to the greater audience.   

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you very much for your time in reviewing our manuscript and for your valuable feedback which will no doubt encourage us to continue with our research on the Sociotype in Dermatology.

Best regards,

The Authors

Reviewer 2 Report

The article is interesting and well researched, however it partly provides the same data, albeit expanded, as in a previously published article written by the same authors (https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.14696). This particular article is not mentioned in the bibliography, I think it should be cited, if compatible with the journal's rules.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you very much for your time and valuable feedback on our manuscript.

We completely agree with you about our previous letter to the editor which was published in the JEADV being included as a reference. We have done this and submitted the corrected manuscript to the editorial office.

It now appears as reference 14 at the end of the second paragraph of the Introduction.

Thank you and kind regards,

The Authors

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

I would like to thank the authors for this interesting work and the changes they have made. 

Back to TopTop