Next Article in Journal
Challenges in the (Re-)Connection of Peripheral Areas to the Rail Network from a Rolling Stock Perspective: The Case of Germany
Next Article in Special Issue
Experimental Study to Increase the Autonomy of a UAV by Incorporating Solar Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Modelling and Simulation of Aerodynamic Cylindrical Bearings Using ANSYS Hydrodynamic Bearing Element Types
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Development Trends in Vehicle Propulsion Sources—A Short Review

1
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, 45C Wiejska Str., 15-351 Bialystok, Poland
2
Department of Automotive Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
3
Mechanical Engineering Department, Istanbul Medeniyet University, North Campus Uskudar, Istanbul 34700, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vehicles 2023, 5(3), 1133-1137; https://doi.org/10.3390/vehicles5030062
Submission received: 8 August 2023 / Accepted: 6 September 2023 / Published: 8 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Alternative Fuels and Power Sources in Vehicles)
Today’s vehicle powertrains, especially in cars and vans, have to meet increasingly stringent type approval standards. Global measures presented as GHGs [1] or CARB-CAR [2] ultimately aim to reduce CO2 emissions despite the differing opinions in this regard [3]. Recent legislation adopted by the European Commission aims to limit CO2 emissions to 0 g/km in a driving test by 2035 [4]. In contrast, the ‘Fit for 55’ plan requires a 55% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2030 for newly manufactured passenger cars [5]. These measures force manufacturers to supplement classic powertrains with an additional (green) source of propulsion or to use only non-emitting sources of propulsion. The NEDC type approval test [6] approached emission testing in a laboratory/simplified manner. The type approval transition to WLTC [7] and RDE [8] tests brought the test conditions more in line with normal operating conditions. In the case of passenger cars, for which emission requirements are the most stringent, a supplementation of at least 50% of the ICE with an additional propulsion source is required today. Another obstacle to the exclusive use of ICE in vehicle propulsion is the Euro 7 legislation that is scheduled to be introduced in Europe in the near future [9].
When looking at the global development and contemporary requirements for the propulsion sources of various vehicles, the following trends are evident: a change in the organisation of the combustion process to systems such as ATAC [10], CAI/HCCI [11,12], HPDI or RCCI [13]; the use of dual fuel [14,15]; the use of exhaust gas cleaning components, such as EC, DOC, FAP, DPF, GPF and SCR [16,17,18,19]; the use of lower carbon fuels [20]; the use of alternative fuels, such as LPG [21,22,23,24], CNG [25,26,27], LNG [21,28,29], HVO [30,31], PVO [32] and FAME [33]; the use of refuse-derived fuels, such as biogas [34], syngas [35], a biomass gasifier [36], POMDME [37], TPO [38] and NH3 [39]; the use of carbon-free fuels, such as H2 [35,40,41]; and eco-driving [42].
Currently, hybrid powertrains are being built with ICE configurations in MHEV, PHEV, FCV or BEV [43,44,45]. A number of research studies indicate that using an electric motor as a supplementary propulsion source in addition to the ICE is the most optimal solution before switching to battery-only propulsion [46]. However, as shown in [47], long-range BEVs and fuel cell plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (FCPHEVs) have similar life cycle emissions as PHEV-CNG. Charging and energy storage systems are important [48]. The target fuel of future vehicles is hydrogen, which would either be used as the sole fuel [49,50] or as an additive to other fuels [51,52]. Energy management now plays an important role in hybrid or battery systems in the same way as with ICE [53,54,55]. Determining the characteristic ratios of different propulsion sources and whether their shape/path matches with the approximating functions is important for computing and modelling the performance of different vehicle powertrains [56,57].
Besides cars, hybrid and battery drives are being tested in aviation [58,59,60] or marine ships [61]. Decarbonisation in densely populated areas like cities, where fuel cell buses with a supercapacitor are being used successfully [62], is very important. There is some hope behind the use of air motors as propulsion sources or as supplements in hybrid systems [63,64,65]. The important features of modern propulsion systems are that they are safe during operation and meet the demands of road infrastructure or road rescue equipment [66,67]. The market analyses presented in [68] show that in the future, younger potential buyers will prefer hydrogen and electric vehicles, which is currently taking place with the support of policy and strategic instruments and is extending to other age groups.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation and writing—original draft preparation, D.S.; writing—review and editing, B.A. and H.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

These analyses were financed through a subsidy of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland for the discipline of mechanical engineering at the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering at Bialystok University of Technology (WZ/WM-IIM/5/2023).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations and Acronyms

The following abbreviations and acronyms are used in this manuscript. Greenhouse Gases, GHGs; California Air Resources Board and validated by the Climate Action Reserve, CARB-CAR; Carbon Dioxide, CO2; New European Driving Cycle, NEDC; Worldwide Harmonized Light vehicles Test Cycle, WLTC; Real Driving Emissions, RDE; Internal Combustion Engine, ICE; European Vehicle Emissions Standards, Euro 7; Active Thermo-Atmosphere Combustion, ATAC; Controlled Auto-Ignition, CAI; Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition, HCCI; High-Pressure Direct Injection, HPDI; Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition, RCCI; Exhaust Catalyst, EC; Diesel Oxidation Catalyst, DOC; Filter a Particular, FAP; Diesel Particulate Filter, DPF; Gasoline Particulate Filter, GPF; Selective Catalytic Reduction, SCR; Liquefied Petroleum Gas, LPG; Compressed Natural Gas, CNG; Liquefied Natural Gas, LNG; Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil, HVO; Pure Vegetable Oil, PVO; Fatty Acid Methyl Ester, FAME; Polyoxymethylene Dimethyl Ether, POMDME; Tire Pyrolytic Oil, TPO; Ammonia, NH3; Hydrogen, H2; Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle, MHEV; Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle, PHEV; Fuel Cell Electric Hybrid Vehicle, FCV; Battery Electric Vehicle, BEV; Fuel Cell Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle, FCPHEV.

References

  1. Clairotte, M.; Suarez-Bertoa, R.; Zardini, A.A.; Giechaskiel, B.; Pavlovic, J.; Valverde, V.; Ciuffo, B.; Astorga, C. Exhaust emission factors of greenhouse gases (GHGs) from European road vehicles. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2020, 32, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Marino, B.D.V.; Mincheva, M.; Doucett, A. California air resources board forest carbon protocol invalidates offsets. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kumar, A.; Thanki, A.; Padhiyar, H.; Singh, N.K.; Pandey, S.; Yadav, M.; Yu, Z.G. Greenhouse gases emission control in WWTS via potential operational strategies: A critical review. Chemosphere 2021, 273, 129694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. European Commission. CO2 Emission Performance Standards for Cars and Vans; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2020; Volume L8/2, 6p. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ovaere, M.; Proost, S. Cost-effective reduction of fossil energy use in the European transport sector: An assessment of the Fit for 55 Package. Energy Policy 2022, 168, 113085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Czaban, J.; Szpica, D. Drive test system to be used on roller dynamometer. Mechanika 2013, 19, 600–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kamguia Simeu, S.; Kim, N. Standard Driving Cycles Comparison (IEA) & Impacts on the Ownership Cost. In Proceedings of the SAE Technical Papers 2018-01-0423, Detroit, MI, USA, 10–12 April 2018. [Google Scholar]
  8. Varella, R.A.; Duarte, G.; Baptista, P.; Sousa, L.; Mendoza Villafuerte, P. Comparison of Data Analysis Methods for European Real Driving Emissions Regulation. In SAE Technical Papers 2017-01-0997; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. García, A.; Monsalve-Serrano, J.; Villalta, D.; Guzmán-Mendoza, M. Methanol and OMEx as fuel candidates to fulfill the potential EURO VII emissions regulation under dual-mode dual-fuel combustion. Fuel 2020, 287, 119548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Onishi, S.; Jo, S.H.; Shoda, K.; Jo, P.D.; Kato, S. Active Thermo-Atmosphere Combustion (ATAC)—A New Combustion Process for Internal Combustion Engines; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 1979; p. 790501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Koszalka, G.; Hunicz, J. Comparative study of energy losses related to the ring pack operation in homogeneous charge compression ignition and spark ignition combustion. Energy 2021, 235, 121388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jeuland, N.; Montagne, X.; Duret, P. New HCCI/CAI combustion process development: Methodology for determination of relevant fuel parameters. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 2004, 59, 571–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mikulski, M.; Bekdemir, C. Understanding the role of low reactivity fuel stratification in a dual fuel RCCI engine—A simulation study. Appl. Energy 2017, 191, 689–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mikulski, M.; Wierzbicki, S. Validation of a zero-dimensional and two-phase combustion model for dual-fuel compression ignition engine simulation. Therm. Sci. 2017, 21, 387–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mikulski, M.; Balakrishnan, P.R.; Doosje, E.; Bekdemir, C. Variable Valve Actuation Strategies for Better Efficiency Load Range and Thermal Management in an RCCI Engine; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, J.; Roth, P.; Durbin, T.D.; Johnson, K.C.; Cocker, D.R.; Asa-Awuku, A.; Brezny, R.; Geller, M.; Karavalakis, G. Gasoline Particulate Filters as an Effective Tool to Reduce Particulate and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Emissions from Gasoline Direct Injection (GDI) Vehicles: A Case Study with Two GDI Vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 3275–3284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ballinger, T.; Cox, J.; Konduru, M.; De, D.; Manning, W.; Andersen, P. Evaluation of SCR catalyst technology on diesel particulate filters. In SAE Technical Papers; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2009; pp. 369–374. [Google Scholar]
  18. Senthil Kumar, J.; Ramesh Bapu, B.R.; Sivasaravanan, S.; Prabhu, M.; Muthu Kumar, S.; Abubacker, M.A. Experimental studies on emission reduction in a DI diesel engine by using a nano catalyst coated catalytic converter. Int. J. Ambient Energy 2019, 43, 1241–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Resitoglu, I.A.; Altinisik, K.; Keskin, A.; Ocakoglu, K. The effects of Fe2O3 based DOC and SCR catalyst on the exhaust emissions of diesel engines. Fuel 2020, 262, 116501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hunicz, J.; Kordos, P. An experimental study of fuel injection strategies in CAI gasoline engine. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2011, 35, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. MacLean, H.L.; Lave, L.B. Evaluating automobile fuel/propulsion system technologies. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2003, 29, 1–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Johnson, E. LPG: A secure, cleaner transport fuel? A policy recommendation for Europe. Energy Policy 2003, 31, 1573–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Masi, M. Experimental analysis on a spark ignition petrol engine fuelled with LPG (liquefied petroleum gas). Energy 2012, 41, 252–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Warguła, Ł.; Kukla, M.; Krawiec, P.; Wieczorek, B. Reduction in operating costs and environmental impact consisting in the modernization of the low-power cylindrical wood chipper power unit by using alternative fuel. Energies 2020, 13, 2995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Frick, M.; Axhausen, K.W.; Carle, G.; Wokaun, A. Optimization of the distribution of compressed natural gas (CNG) refueling stations: Swiss case studies. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2007, 12, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hekkert, M.P.; Hendriks, F.H.J.F.; Faaij, A.P.C.; Neelis, M.L. Natural gas as an alternative to crude oil in automotive fuel chains well-to-wheel analysis and transition strategy development. Energy Policy 2005, 33, 579–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Warguła, Ł.; Kukla, M.; Lijewski, P.; Dobrzyński, M.; Markiewicz, F. Impact of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) fuel systems in small engine wood chippers on exhaust emissions and fuel consumption. Energies 2020, 13, 6709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Arteconi, A.; Brandoni, C.; Evangelista, D.; Polonara, F. Life-cycle greenhouse gas analysis of LNG as a heavy vehicle fuel in Europe. Appl. Energy 2010, 87, 2005–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kumar, S.; Kwon, H.-T.; Choi, K.-H.; Lim, W.; Cho, J.H.; Tak, K.; Moon, I. LNG: An eco-friendly cryogenic fuel for sustainable development. Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 4264–4273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Oliva, F.; Fernández-Rodríguez, D. Autoignition study of LPG blends with diesel and HVO in a constant-volume combustion chamber. Fuel 2020, 267, 117173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Parravicini, M.; Barro, C.; Boulouchos, K. Experimental characterization of GTL, HVO, and OME based alternative fuels for diesel engines. Fuel 2021, 292, 120177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chiaramonti, D.; Prussi, M. Pure vegetable oil for energy and transport. Int. J. Oil Gas Coal Technol. 2009, 2, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Haryono, I.; Ma’ruf, M.; Setiapraja, H. Investigation on used oil and engine components of vehicles road test using twenty percent Fatty Acid Methyl Ester (B20). Int. J. Energy Environ. 2016, 7, 383. [Google Scholar]
  34. Singh, A.P.; Kumar, D.; Agarwal, A.K. Introduction to Alternative Fuels and Advanced Combustion Techniques as Sustainable Solutions for Internal Combustion Engines. In Energy, Environment, and Sustainability; Springer: Singapore, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  35. Fiore, M.; Magi, V.; Viggiano, A. Internal combustion engines powered by syngas: A review. Appl. Energy 2020, 276, 115415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Susastriawan, A.A.P.; Purwanto, Y. Purnomo Biomass gasifier–internal combustion engine system: Review of literature. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 2021, 14, 1090–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pélerin, D.; Gaukel, K.; Härtl, M.; Jacob, E.; Wachtmeister, G. Potentials to simplify the engine system using the alternative diesel fuels oxymethylene ether OME1 and OME3−6 on a heavy-duty engine. Fuel 2020, 259, 116231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mikulski, M.; Ambrosewicz-Walacik, M.; Hunicz, J.; Nitkiewicz, S. Combustion engine applications of waste tyre pyrolytic oil. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2021, 85, 100915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Boretti, A. Novel dual fuel diesel-ammonia combustion system in advanced TDI engines. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 7071–7076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jemni, M.A.; Kassem, S.H.; Driss, Z.; Abid, M.S. Effects of hydrogen enrichment and injection location on in-cylinder flow characteristics, performance and emissions of gaseous LPG engine. Energy 2018, 150, 92–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Popa, M.E.; Segers, A.J.; Denier van der Gon, H.A.C.; Krol, M.C.; Visschedijk, A.J.H.; Schaap, M.; Röckmann, T. Impact of a future H2 transportation on atmospheric pollution in Europe. Atmos. Environ. 2015, 113, 208–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Caban, J.; Vrábel, J.; Šarkan, B.; Ignaciuk, P. About eco-driving, genesis, challenges and benefits, application possibilities. Transp. Res. Procedia 2019, 40, 1281–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vidhya, H.; Allirani, S. A Literature Review on Electric Vehicles: Architecture, Electrical Machines for Power Train, Converter Topologies and Control Techniques. In 2021 International Conference on Computational Performance Evaluation, ComPE 2021; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 565–575. [Google Scholar]
  44. Basavaradder, A.B.; Dayananda Pai, K.; Chethan, K.N. Review on alternative propulsion in automotives-hybrid vehicles. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2018, 7, 1311–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Punov, P.; Gechev, T. Energy management of a fuel cell hybrid ultra-energy efficient vehicle. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 20291–20302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hannan, M.A.; Azidin, F.A.; Mohamed, A. Hybrid electric vehicles and their challenges: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 29, 135–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Blat Belmonte, B.; Esser, A.; Weyand, S.; Franke, G.; Schebek, L.; Rinderknecht, S. Identification of the Optimal Passenger Car Vehicle Fleet Transition for Mitigating the Cumulative Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions until 2050. Vehicles 2020, 2, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sangeetha, E.; Ramachandran, V. Different Topologies of Electrical Machines, Storage Systems, and Power Electronic Converters and Their Control for Battery Electric Vehicles—A Technical Review. Energies 2022, 15, 8959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Peksen, M. Hydrogen technology towards the solution of environment-friendly new energy vehicles. Energies 2021, 14, 4892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lu, J.; Bai, C.; Gao, Y.K.; Gao, H.Z.; Wang, J.G.; Li, C.; Sun, P.; Guo, Z.Y.; Zong, X. Progress on Underwater Fuel Cell Propulsion Technology. Tuijin Jishu/J. Propuls. Technol. 2020, 41, 2450–2464. [Google Scholar]
  51. Koten, H. Hydrogen effects on the diesel engine performance and emissions. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 10511–10519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Balcı, Ö.; Karagöz, Y.; Kale, S.; Damar, S.; Attar, A.; Köten, H.; Dalkılıç, A.S.; Wongwises, S. Fuel consumption and emission comparison of conventional and hydrogen feed vehicles. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 16250–16266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Harold, C.K.D.; Prakash, S.; Hofman, T. Powertrain Control for Hybrid-Electric Vehicles Using Supervised Machine Learning. Vehicles 2020, 2, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pardhi, S.; Chakraborty, S.; Tran, D.D.; El Baghdadi, M.; Wilkins, S.; Hegazy, O. A Review of Fuel Cell Powertrains for Long-Haul Heavy-Duty Vehicles: Technology, Hydrogen, Energy and Thermal Management Solutions. Energies 2022, 15, 9557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vignesh, R.; Ashok, B.; Senthil Kumar, M.; Szpica, D.; Harikrishnan, A.; Josh, H. Adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system-based energy management controller for optimal battery charge sustaining in biofuel powered non-plugin hybrid electric vehicle. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2023, 59, 103379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Szpica, D. New Leiderman–Khlystov Coefficients for Estimating Engine Full Load Characteristics and Performance. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2019, 32, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Szpica, D.; Piwnik, J.; Sidorowicz, M. The motion storage characteristics as the indicator of stability of internal combustion engine-receiver cooperation. Mechanika 2014, 20, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Murugaiah, M.; Theng, D.F.; Khan, T.; Sebaey, T.A.; Singh, B. Hybrid Electric Powered Multi-Lobed Airship for Sustainable Aviation. Aerospace 2022, 9, 769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Krznar, M.; Piljek, P.; Kotarski, D.; Pavković, D. Modeling, control system design and preliminary experimental verification of a hybrid power unit suitable for multirotor UAVs. Energies 2021, 14, 2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Valencia, E.; Oña, M.A.; Rodríguez, D.; Oña, A.; Hidalgo, V. Experimental performance assessment of an electric uav with an alternative distributed propulsion configuration implemented for wetland monitoring. In AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum and Exposition, 2019; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc., AIAA: Indianapolis, India, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  61. Koumentakos, A.G. Developments in electric and green marine ships. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2019, 2, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Partridge, J.S.; Wu, W.; Bucknall, R.W.G. Investigation on the Impact of Degree of Hybridisation for a Fuel Cell Supercapacitor Hybrid Bus with a Fuel Cell Variation Strategy. Vehicles 2020, 2, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wasbari, F.; Bakar, R.A.; Gan, L.M.; Tahir, M.M.; Yusof, A.A. A review of compressed-air hybrid technology in vehicle system. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 67, 935–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Korbut, M.; Szpica, D. A Review of Compressed Air Engine in the Vehicle Propulsion System. Acta Mech. Autom. 2021, 15, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Shan, M. Modeling and Control Strategy for Series Hydraulic Hybrid Vehicles. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Toledo, Toledo, UH, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  66. Zboina, J.; Kielin, J.; Bugaj, G.; Zalech, J.; Bąk, D. Rescue and Firefighting Operations During Incidents Involving Vehicles with Alternative Propulsion. Electric Vehicles. Saf. FIRE Technol. 2022, 60, 8–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Radziszewska-Wolińska, J.M. Alternative Fuels in Rail Transport and their Impact on Fire Hazard. In Materials Research Proceedings; Association of American Publishers: Millersville, PA, USA, 2022; Volume 24, pp. 212–220. [Google Scholar]
  68. Ziegler, A. Individual characteristics and stated preferences for alternative energy sources and propulsion technologies in vehicles: A discrete choice analysis for Germany. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2012, 46, 1372–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Szpica, D.; Ashok, B.; Köten, H. Development Trends in Vehicle Propulsion Sources—A Short Review. Vehicles 2023, 5, 1133-1137. https://doi.org/10.3390/vehicles5030062

AMA Style

Szpica D, Ashok B, Köten H. Development Trends in Vehicle Propulsion Sources—A Short Review. Vehicles. 2023; 5(3):1133-1137. https://doi.org/10.3390/vehicles5030062

Chicago/Turabian Style

Szpica, Dariusz, Bragadeshwaran Ashok, and Hasan Köten. 2023. "Development Trends in Vehicle Propulsion Sources—A Short Review" Vehicles 5, no. 3: 1133-1137. https://doi.org/10.3390/vehicles5030062

APA Style

Szpica, D., Ashok, B., & Köten, H. (2023). Development Trends in Vehicle Propulsion Sources—A Short Review. Vehicles, 5(3), 1133-1137. https://doi.org/10.3390/vehicles5030062

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop