Next Article in Journal
First Record of the Red-Footed Falcon’s Nocturnal Flight Activity during the Nestling Period Using GPS Data
Previous Article in Journal
Plant Diversity Is More Important than Climate Factors in Driving Insect Richness Pattern along a Latitudinal Gradient
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Commiphora Jacq (Burseraceae) in Saudi Arabia, Botanical, Phytochemical and Ethnobotanical Notes

by
Lamiaa F. Shalabi
1,* and
Fedah S. Otaif
2
1
Biological and Geological Department, Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt
2
Biology Department, Faculty of Science, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Ecologies 2022, 3(2), 38-57; https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies3020005
Submission received: 27 January 2022 / Revised: 8 March 2022 / Accepted: 15 March 2022 / Published: 29 March 2022

Abstract

:
Commiphora species are of high medicinal importance. They are distributed in Saudi Arabia, mainly in rocky habitats and regions under mountains, including the east of Tihama, forming a distinct element of Saudi flora. The present study focuses on the botanical characterization of five species of Commiphora, i.e., C. erythraea, C. gileadensis, C. kataf, C. myrrha, and C. quadricincta. The morphological characters for each species were recorded comparatively, and their taxonomic relationships were examined using gross morphology by generating a UPGMA dendrogram, which separated the Commiphora species into two distinct groups. A dichotomous key was generated to facilitate the identification process of the plant, even by naked eye, by obvious characteristics. Because of the similarities in anatomical structure of the stem and petiole of most studied species, only the quantitative variations are illustrated comparatively. Seed macro- and micro-morphological characteristics were recorded comparatively to be used in the identification of a species in the case of leaf absence. The phytochemical study included measurements of total phenolic and flavonoid contents. The phytochemical results were correlated with the ethno-botanic survey. The traditional uses for all species were recorded using the questionnaire and open interviews method for data collecting. The results revealed that the most common Commiphora species that are traditionally used are C. myrrha and C. gileadensis. The study recommends more research on Commiphora species using more advanced techniques and tries to increase public awareness on the importance of these plants.

1. Introduction

Commiphora Jacq (Burseraceae( is a genus of 150–185 species distributed in tropical and subtropical regions, occupying an ecological range between 1 and 2100 m above sea level [1,2]. The species are small trees or shrubs with short, thorny branches. Commiphora is distributed on the Red Sea coast in the west and southwest of Saudi Arabia. It is also found in Somalia, with the high concentration in the Horn of Africa. [3,4,5]. In Saudi Arabia, the genus Commiphora is represented by six species, i.e., C. erythraea, C. gileadensis, C. habessinica, C. kataf, C. myrrha, and C. quadricincta [6,7]. According to [8], there are five Commiphora species, i.e., C. quadricincta, C. gileadensis, C. kataf, C. habessinica, and C. myrrha, in the flora of Jazan, and an additional species, i.e. C. erythraea, was reported in Farasan Island, Jazan by [7].
The distribution of Commiphora species only in the western region of Saudi Arabia can be explained and confirmed by the account of the subdivision of African phytochoria of [9], that the genus is found distributed in the majority of the regional centers of endemism, and two regional mosaic and transitional zones, with the highest genetic diversity in the Somalia–Masai regional center of endemism.
However, some species such as C. myrrha are transcontinental and extend their distribution to Arabia and India [5], C. gileadensis, C. quadricincta, C. kataf, and C. myrrha exist beyond the continent and occur in Saudi Arabia, having a disjunctive distribution to their center of endemism [10].
Traditional medicine occupies a significant part of Saudi Arabia’s heritage, and it is widely practiced today [11]; some reports concern the study of medicinal plants in the flora of Saudi Arabia [12,13]. Several species of the genus Commiphora produce fragrant resins used for incense and perfume and are used medicinally in the liver diseases, gastrointestinal disorder, urinary tract infections, rheumatism, scurvy and jaundice [14,15,16,17,18,19], cancer [20], respiratory, muscular, and kidney complaints [21]. Besides its traditional usage for the treatment of sore stomach, colds, fever, and malaria, wound healing, as an antiseptic, and against skin infections, the resinous exudates produced by the different species of Commiphora have high commercial value [6].
In Arab countries, Commiphora myrrha tree is commonly known as myrrh. It has been used as a traditional remedy for a long time [22]. Myrrh is also used in traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of trauma, arthritis, fractures, and diseases caused by blood stagnation [23].
Commiphora species have been the subject of many taxonomic and ethnobotanic studies [24,25,26,27]; the only previous taxonomic study on the species of genus Commiphora growing in Saudi Arabia was achieved by Majrashi [28] as an MSc thesis in the Arabic language. The ethnobotanical importance of plants including the Commiphora species has been reported in many works [22,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. Some studies focused on the ethnobotanical significance of Commiphora species individually [23,37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. The aim of this study is to record the biological (morphological, anatomical, and phytochemical) valuable notes concerning the Commiphora species of Saudi Arabia, as well as to study the obvious features of the Commiphora species to make their identification easier, providing a simple identification key that can be used simply in any plant growing stage, in addition to reporting the ethnic importance and human use of the Commiphora species in Saudi Arabia for conserving and saving these unrecorded data from being lost.

2. Materials and Methods

Twenty-three field trips were organized to different localities in the western area of Saudi Arabia. There were no significant variations in the Commiphora specimens according to the different localities, so most specimens were collected and recorded from the Jazan area. The Jazan region has variable land forms, including Red Sea coastal plain to the west, the stony transitional region of Tihama Hills in the middle, and high mountains to the east [44]. The climate is influenced by the tropical maritime air mass [45,46]. High summer temperatures in this region are also associated with spells of strong sand storms that add to the harshness of the environment. The Tihama area in Jazan is generally hot throughout the year, except for a brief mild winter. Rainfall in the entire Tihama region is too scarce to support any significant vegetation [47,48]. This is based on five species of Commiphora (Burseraceae) collected from eight hilly/mountainous regions in the Jazan area, SW Saudi Arabia from June 2018 to June 2019. (Figure 1, Table 1).
For morphological study, at least ten specimens for each species at their fully adult stage were collected during different seasons (Table 1). Stems, leaves, flowers, fruits, and seeds were collected during flowering and fruiting stages. A total of 12 characters of micro- and macro-morphological types (7 binary and 4 multistate) were recorded comparatively, either directly from fresh specimens in their natural habitats or at the lab prior to preservation as voucher material. These characters were coded by 0 and 1 according to the character states absence and presence, and then used in the data matrix creation, which was subjected to the software program “NTSys v. 2.02” for examining the similarities and dissimilarities among the studied species and producing the relationship “UPGMA” dendrogram. Some photos were taken of the plants in the field.
The anatomical investigation was carried out on hand-prepared transvers sections (T.S.) of petioles and stems of the five Commiphora species using light microscope (LM.) Seeds were examined directly to record macro-morphological features by LM, and micromorphological features and sculpture pattern were recorded using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For SEM observations, approximately 7 seeds from each taxon were analyzed; the seeds were mounted on SEM stubs using double sided cellotape, coated with gold and palladium in a vacuum evaporator, and examined and photographed in a JEOL JSM-6380LA scanning electron microscope, which operated at an accelerated voltage of 30 KV, at the electron microscopy unit, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Phytochemical screening of plant methanolic extracts was carried out using standard procedures. The Folin–Ciocalteu method was adopted to determine the total phenolic contents of the different extracts [49]. All tests were carried out in triplicate, and the results were expressed as gallic acid equivalents (eq.GA mg/g dry weight of the different extracts). Flavonoid contents were determined based on the formation of flavonoid–aluminum complex [50]. The amounts of flavonoids were expressed as rutin equivalents (mg RE/g dry weight).
The ethno-botanical field trips were carried out in different localities of the Kingdom. Ethnobotanical data were obtained using a semi-structured questionnaire method. The target groups for this study were people from different ages and cultures, traditional midwives, housewives, farmers, and other people who had practiced and used medicinal plants.
A descriptive statistical method using frequencies and percentages was used to analyze the socio-demographic data of the respondents, and the results of the ethnobotanical survey were analyzed using the relative frequency of citation (RFC). This measure was calculated to determine the relative importance of a particular species. This value was determined using the relation RFC = Fc/N [51], where Fc is the number of respondents who cited a particular species, and N is the total number of respondents.

3. Results

3.1. Morphological Study

Table 2 shows the recorded morphological characters of the Commiphora species under investigation, from which five were quantitative and seven were qualitative. By recording the characters, it is clear that: only two species, i.e.,: C. myrrha and C. quadricincta (Figure 2 and Figure 3), were armed (with conspicuous spines), whereas the remaining three species were spineless. C. quadricincta was characterized by simple leaf with single blade, whereas C. erythraea, C. kataf, and C. myrrha appeared with trifoliate leaf; on the other hand, C. gileadensis is characterized by heteromorphic leaves. Leaf margin is recorded dentate in C. myrrha and C. kataf, whereas the remaining species had an entire leaf margin. Leaf was characterized by an acute apex in C. myrrha, but the apex was aristate in C. quadricincta.
Leaf texture character was represented by three states: (1) leathery in C. kataf; (2) papery in C. gileadensis, C. quadricincta, and C. myrrha; and (3) hairy in C. erythraea. Leaf blades were in equal size in only one species, i.e., C. quadricincta, whereas the remaining species were characterized by unequal blades. Red flowers were recorded in C. myrrha and C. quadricincta, whereas yellowish green flowers were recorded in C. kataf and C. erythraea, but C. gileadensis was characterized by creamy- pinkish flowers (Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6). The measurements of some plant parts had been taken, recorded as mean values, and represented as quantitative characters such as: plant height, petiole length, and blade length. (Table 2). From the recorded data, C. kataf appeared with large measurements of plant height, petiole length, and blade length in comparison with other species.
Blade width was recorded at 4.5 ± (4–5) mm in C. myrrha and 7.5 ± (6–9) mm in C. erythraea and C. gileadensis, whereas it was 12 ± (10–14) mm in C. kataf and C. quadricincta. L/W ratio was calculated as less than 2 in C. erythraea, C. gileadensis, and C. kataf, but more than 2 in C. myrrha and C. quadricincta.
Figure 7 illustrates the relationships among the Commiphora species under investigation in terms of UPGMA (Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic mean) dendrogram. This dendrogram resulted from the data matrix, generated by coding the macro-morphological characters as “1, 0” for present and absent. C. myrrha is separated from the group of species in which that the plant is armed with unequal trifoliate leaves, the terminal leaflet is much longer than the lateral leaflets, and the resin is transparent with glossy appearance. C. quadricincta clustered close to C. myrrha because they shared some characteristics such as the spiny habit of the plant and red flowers, while having simple leaves and an opaque (not transparent) resin. This result is supported by the resulting identification key (Figure 8).
Although C. quadricincta appeared at the same assemblage as the remaining four species, relatively, it clustered separately from the remaining three species. The three species C. erythraea, C. gileadensis, and C. kataf are clustered together at the same group at the similarity level 0.49; this is due to the spineless nature of the plant and unequal size of leaflets’ blade per leaf. C. erythraea and C. gileadensis are the only species that are found and collected from Farasan Island; both are characterized by a short and spineless nature, in addition to a glossy, black resin, so both appeared nearly related to each other in the dendrogram (Figure 7).
This result is confirmed by the identification key (Figure 8) that both appeared as a couplet; they varied only by the trifoliate leaves and yellow flowers in C. erythraea, compared to the heteromorphic leaves (3–5 leaflets/leaf) and red flowers in C. gileadensis. The clearest difference between them is the strong aromatic nature of C. gileadensis, whereas C. erythraea is recorded as non-aromatic plant.
C. kataf is arranged with C. erythraea and C. gileadensis at the same group in the dendrogram (Figure 7) due to sharing the characteristic spineless nature of the plant, whereas it is distinguished from them by the maximum height of the plant (may reach more than 5 m) and trifoliate leaflets with longer petioles, as well as the leathery texture of the blade. This result is supported and confirmed in the identification key (Figure 8).

3.2. Anatomical Variations in Commiphora sp. Stem

The anatomical characters of the stem in Commiphora species are structurally similar (Figure 9). The transverse sections of the stem of most species show the epidermis covered by the periderm, differentiated into cork layer with relatively large barrel cells followed by a conspicuous layer of cork cambium with different thickness. Epidermal trichomes extend from the epidermis densely in the form of a multi-cellular hairs in C. qudricincta, whereas they appear as uni-cellular hairs in C. kataf and C. erythraea, and are absent in both C. myrrha and C. gileadensis. Sometimes, the epidermal layer was covered by a lignified layer of cuticle; lenticels are formed clearly in old stems of some species such as C. myrrha. The cortex is found next to the periderm and appeared narrow in the majority of species (Table 3) because of the presence of periderm, which occupies a large proportion of the stem diameter, including the bundles of fibers. In many stems of Commiphora species, the cortex appeared differentiated into outer and inner cortex, with collenchyma and parenchyma, respectively. Endodermis is found as a layer/multiple layers of schelerenchymatous cells surrounding the vascular cylinder.
The vascular cylinder appeared with phloem, xylem, and vascular cambium in between; together, they form a continuous ring in most species. The width of xylem and phloem varied according to the studied species (Table 3). Phloem is located outside, including scattered resin canals through it, which take a ring appearance; the majority of canals are of circle shape in cross section, and the average number of them reaches 14–50 (Table 3). Xylem layer is found inside the cambium; it appeared, in most species, with the structure of metaxylem, protoxylem, and xylem vessels, in addition to the medullary rays, which cut this layer longitudinally. Pith is the innermost layer; it consists of parenchymatous tissue, and it extends to different diameters. Due to the structural similarity in the stem anatomy of most studied species of Commiphora, only the quantitative variations in the measurements of anatomical layers are illustrated comparatively in Table 3.

3.3. Anatomical Variations in the Petiole of Commiphora Species

From the investigation of the internal structure of Commiphora petioles through the transverse sections (Figure 10), it was clear that the outermost layer is the epidermis, sometimes covered by a waxy, thick cuticle. The epidermal trichomes arise from the epidermis of all studied species except C. quadricincta. These trichomes are of many types: uni-, multicellular or glandular (Table 4).
The cortex is of variable sizes, and it consists of collenchymatous layers outside and parencymatous layers inside in the majority of species. Vascular cylinders formed from separate bundles are separated by the medullary rays, which extend from the pith, and every bundle is covered by a thick layer of sclerenchymatous cells called the bundle cap. Phloem is found directly inside to the bundle cap, including 4–11 resin canals with different diameters (Table 4).
Vascular cambium is arranged in a single layer between phloem and xylem. Xylem is formed internally, including the xylem vessels with varied diameters. Pith is located centrally; it consists of parenchyma with crystals deposits in many medullary cells in some species.
The anatomical structure of the petiole had shown a large degree of similarity between the studied species. The qualitative variations appeared only in the trichomes presence/type, whereas the quantitative variations were recorded as average measurements and illustrated in Table 4.

3.4. Seed Macro- and Microstructure

The recorded macro- and micro-morphological features of seeds that were seen under light microscope and scanning electron microscope are illustrated in Table 5 and Table 6, described with details as shown later and supported by figures.
Figure 11 and Table 6 show that the seed outline is circular in C. erythrya but is ovate in C. gileadensis and C. kataf, whereas it was elongated ovate in both C. myrrha and C. quadricincta. The color of mature seed was black with a conspicuous brown base in C. erythrya, C. gileadensis, and C. kataf, whereas it was black and brown in both C. myrrha and C. quadricincta, respectively. The recorded seed length and width for all species’ seeds ranged between 11 and 26 mm and 8 and 16 mm, respectively, and the L/W ratio ranged between 1.2 and 1.7. The maximum weight of 10 seeds reached 1.9 g in C. quadricincta, whereas the lighter one was recorded in C. gileadensis (0.25 g).
In seed microstructure, which is investigated using SEM (Table 5 and Figure 11), it was clear that, the overall pattern of ornamentation was irregular only in C. erythrya, whereas it was reticulate in the other species. The anticlinal walls shape appeared irregular in C. erythrya, C. myrrha, and C. quadricincta, whereas it had an angled shape in both C. gileadensis and C. kataf. Anticlinal walls were recorded with the same thickness of 1.66 μm in C. gileadensis, C. myrrha, and C. quadricincta, whereas it was measured as 5 μm in C. erythrya and 3.33 μm C. kataf. Periclinal area had a raised level in only C. erythrya but appeared sunken in the other species. No testa remains or cuticular deposits appeared in C. erythrya, C. myrrha, and C. quadricincta. Hilum was sunken in both C. kataf and C. myrrha, whereas it was raised in the remaining three species. The hilum area recorded the greatest width (3.19 mm) in C. erythrya, and the smallest one (0.006 mm) in C. gileadensis.

4. Phytochemical Results

4.1. Determination of Total Phenolic Contents

A chemotaxonomic study of the five species of Commiphora was achieved by preparing the aqueous solutions of the different extracts from each species. From Table 7, it is clear that the measured gallic acid (as phenolic contents) in the specimens ranged from 3.95 to 44.25 µg per 1 mg of dry plant. The highest concentration was recorded in C. kataf (44.25 µg/mg dry plant), followed by C. quadricincta (43.37 µg/mg dry plant). The concentration was approximately at the same range in C. gileadensis, and C. myrrha showed very close concentrations of gallic acid (23.54 and 23.99 µg /mg dry plant), whereas the lowest concentration was measured in C. erythraea (3.95 µg/mg dry plant) (see Table 7).

4.2. Determination of Total Flavonoid Contents

Table 7 also shows the flavonoid contents (as Rutin) recorded in the studied species. C. quadricincta showed the highest concentration of flavonoids (2.04 µg Rutin/mg of dry plant), whereas flavonoid contents were recorded at approximately the same concentrations in C. erythraea and C. gileadensis. The remaining two species, i.e., C. kataf and C. myrrha, showed the lowest concentrations (1.21 and 1.10 µg Rutin/mg of dry plant, respectively).

5. Ethno-Botanical Data

5.1. The Informants’ Data Analysis

Demographic characteristics of informants (Table 8) were documented and assessed during face-to-face meetings and discussions. In total, 167 informants were interviewed; 79 were females and 88 males, with percentages of 47% and 53%, respectively.

5.2. Ethno-Botanical Aspects Analysis

Ethno-botanical aspects of five Commiphora species are recorded through the ethno-botanical survey. Results of the field documentation concerning the second part of the questionnaire (plant information) are summarized in Table 9. Regarding the parts used of the plant, stem and resin are used in all species, except in C. erythraea and C. myrrha, in which only the resin is the most important part used; resin and stem were used traditionally in C. gileadensis, C. quadricincta, and C. kataf; whereas leaves were used only in C. gileadensis. The results revealed that C. erythraea and C. myrrha are used for curing skin; C. gileadensis and C. myrrha are used for chest diseases; all species were recorded to be used in abdominal diseases except C. erythraea and C. quadricincta; and all species were used for treating other organs except C. erythraea (Table 9). Ethno-medicinally, the process of preparation of plants was varied, as reported by the questionnaires.
All species were prepared for use by drenching, except C. quadricincta, whereas C. gileadensis was the only species whose twigs were used as a tooth-brush; at the same time, C. myrrha, C. quadricincta, and C. kataf were reported to be prepared for use as a powder (Table 9). Traditionally, most species are used for cosmetic purposes, except C. erythraea and C. quadricincta, whereas the therapeutic uses were recorded in all species except C. quadricincta and C. kataf, but all species were recorded to be used for household purposes except C. erythraea (Table 9). The survey shows many ways of using the Commiphora species for traditional uses, C. erythraea is reported to be used only as dressing, and all species were used as syrup, except C. erythraea and C. quadricincta; the other forms of uses were recorded in all species except C. erythraea (Table 9).

5.3. Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC)

The results of the ethno-botanical survey were analyzed using the Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC). This measure was calculated to determine the relative importance of a particular species (Table 10 and Figure 12). This value was determined using the relation [51]:
RFC = Fc/N
where Fc is the number of respondents who cited a particular species, and N is the total number of the respondents (167).

6. Discussions

Morphologically, the resulting UPGMA dendrogram and the identification key revealed that the Commiphora species were separated into two distinct groups: the first one includes only two species, i.e., C. myrrha and C. quadricincta were armed (with conspicuous spines). C. erythraea and C. gileadensis are the only species that are found and collected from Farasan Island; both are characterized by a short and spineless nature, in addition to a glossy, black resin, so both appeared nearly related to each other in the dendrogram. This result matches that of [28].
The anatomical results of stem and petiole through cross sections were recorded comparatively in Commiphora species. These results have a degree of agreement with those recorded by [28,52]. Due to the structural similarity in the stem and petiole anatomy of most studied species of Commiphora, only the quantitative variations in the measurements of anatomical layers are illustrated comparatively in this study.
The recorded characters of seed micro- and macro-morphology were very valuable in distinguishing between the studied species of Commiphora, and these results match those of [28,52] with a good degree. The present study is an attempt to compile the current available knowledge of Commiphora species to be broadly representative of many parts of western Saudi Arabia. Investigations underline the significance of local sites for Commiphora. It is proposed that the explanation and classification of different species of Commiphora in Jazan region will facilitate understanding of the Commiphora life in Saudi Arabia as a whole. Our study can be usefully applied in the conservation and management of the area, as well as to focus on the ethnobotanic importance of these species
The phytochemical results recorded high levels of phenolic and flavonoid contents in all species, especially in C. myrrha, C. kataf, and C. gileadensis; this result is confirmed later by an ethno-botanical survey of the these species, in which the percentages of traditional uses by respondents were recorded. At the same time, Majrashi [28] reported high levels of total of phenolic and antimicrobial activities, which reflects the importance of these species in the use of traditional medicine.
Ethno-botanical data were collected by means of a preset data capture questionnaire and open interviews. The questionnaire was designed to focus on the local names of plants, their various applications, the parts of the plant used, and the methods of preparation and administering. Everyone in the target population who agreed to participate was interviewed. Some people informed the researchers that they were reluctant to reveal information about certain medicinal plants, the properties of which they considered to be very powerful. They clearly wished to keep this knowledge to themselves as something belonging to their own private domain. The ability to use plants of such purported potency apparently serves as these healers’ specialty trade marks in their communities, conferring upon them the status of being the best among their peers.
From the ethno-botanic survey, the majority of informants were male, as in tribal areas of Saudi Arabia, there are restrictions on conversations and interactions of females with strangers and outside community members. This resulted in a lower contribution of females in the present study. Regarding age, about half of respondents were between 30–60 years. Kayanna [53] reported that elderly people have more skills and awareness regarding ethno-botanical uses of plants. Additionally, this experience and knowledge also declines with an upsurge in education because people with higher education experience are not attentive to the folk use of medicinal plants. This opinion has been confirmed by the result of the present study, that nearly 38% of respondents were illiterate, and they stated that vertical transfer of traditional knowledge on medicinal plants is not taking place efficiently due to a lack of interest in younger generations to learn and practice it.
Many Commiphora species were found to be of significant biological value for their cytotoxic, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antimalarial, hypolipidemic, hepatoprotective, and antioxidant effects [17]. Besides its traditional usage for the treatment of sore stomach, colds, fever, and malaria, wound healing, as an antiseptic, and against skin infections, the resinous exudates of many Commiphora species may be used in incense and perfume manufacture [16,54]. In Arab countries, the Commiphora myrrha tree is commonly known as myrrh. It has been used as a traditional remedy for a long time [22].

7. Conclusions

By the end of this study, the importance of Commiphora sp. becomes clear, due to the morphological, anatomical and phytochemical unique treats. Because of the deciduous habit of the Commiphora members, the identification of species was problematic. Plants without leaves resembles each other. The identification key produced by this study based on the obvious morphological characters as well as the plant nature to provide an easy tool for the plant recognition even during its naked stage. The anatomical features of Commiphore sp., specially the quantitative ones, in addition to the micro-morphology of seeds can be used for plants determination in the case of the absence of vegetative and reproductive parts, it can be used also in the fossils recognition and paleobotanical studies. The ethno-botanical study revealed that, the most common species that are traditionally used by Saudians are C. myrrha and C. gileadensis, this surveyed result supported the phytochemical analysis of the total phenolic and flavonoid contents in these two species. The study recommends more research on Commiphora species using more advanced techniques and tries to increase public awareness on the importance of these plants. Although the current study is the first taxonomic study of Commiphora in combination with the ethnobotanic survey among the species in Saudi Arabia, it is still a preliminary one, and more work is still needed on different taxa and their relationships between other taxa of the family worldwide.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.F.S. and F.S.O.; methodology, L.F.S. and F.S.O.; software, L.F.S.; validation, L.F.S.; formal analysis, F.S.O.; investigation, F.S.O.; resources, L.F.S. and F.S.O.; writing original draft, review and editing, L.F.S. and F.S.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding concerning the practical or theoretical work, the publication only is funded by MDPI.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Authors are much grateful to Yahya S. Masrahi and Saeida Ncibi, Jazan University for their help during the field and practical work.

Conflicts of Interest

Both authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Vollesen, K. Commiphora, some thoughts on the classification of an “impossible” genus. In Research on the Ethiopian Flora: Proceedings of the Wrst Ethiopian Flora Symposium, Uppsala, Sweden, 22–26 May 1984; Hedberg, I., Ed.; Almqvist & Wikdell International: Uppsala, Sweden, 1986; pp. 204–212. [Google Scholar]
  2. Byng, J.W. The Flowering Plants Handbook: A practical Guide to Families and Genera of the World; Plant Gateway Ltd.: Hertford, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mugahid, A.M. Flora of Saudi Arabia; King Saud University Press: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  4. Vollensen, K. Studies in Burseraceae of North Eastern Africa. Kew Bull. 1985, 40, 39–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Soromessa, T. Ecological phytogeography: A case study of Commiphora species. Sci. Technol. Arts Res. J. 2013, 2, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chaudhary, S.A. Flora of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; Ministry of Agriculture and Water, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 2001.
  7. Alfarhan, A.H.; Al-Turki, T.A.; Basahy, A.Y. Flora of Jizan Region; King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST): Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  8. Masrahi, Y.S. The Illustrated Guide for Wild Plants in Jazan, (Arabic version); Published by Author: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  9. White, F. The vegetation of Africa. Nat. Resour. Res. UNESCO 1983, 20, 356. [Google Scholar]
  10. Van Der Walt, J.J.A. The South African species of Commiphora. Bothalia 1973, 11, 53–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Al-Essa, M.A.; Al-Mehaidib, A.; Al-Gain, S. Parental awareness of Liver disease among children in Saudi Arabia. Ann. Saudi Med. 1998, 18, 79–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shawky, R.A.; Alzamel, N.M. Survey on medicinal plants in the flora of Al Riyadh Region, Saudi Arabia. Eurasian J. Biosci. 2020, 14, 3795–3800. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ullaha, A.R.; Alqahtani, A.S.; Noman, O.M.; Algahtani, A.M.; Ibenmoussa, S.; Bourhia, M. A review on ethno-medicinal plants used in traditional medicine in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 2706–2718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abdul-Ghani, A.S.R. Amin effect of aqueous extract of Commiphora opobalsamum on blood pressure and heart rate in rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1997, 57, 219–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Al-Howiriny, T.A.; Al-Sohaibani, M.O.; Al-Said, M.S.; Al-Yahya, M.E.; El-Tahir, K.H.S. Rafatullah hepato protective properties of Commiphora opobalsamum (Balessan), a traditional medicinal plant of Saudi Arabia. Drugs Exptl. Clin. Res. 2004, 5–6, 213–220. [Google Scholar]
  16. Al-Howiriny, T.A.; Al-Sohaibani, M.O.; Al-Said, M.; Al-Yahya, M.K.; El-Tahir, S. Rafatullah effect of Commiphora opobalsamum (L.) Engl. (Balessan) on experimental gastric ulcers and secretion in rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 98, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Francis, J.A.; Srinivasa, N.R.; Muraleedharan, G.N. Bioactive terpenoids and guggulusteroids from Commiphora mukul gum resin of potential anti-inflammatory interest. Chem. Biodivers. 2004, 11, 1842–1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Shen, T.; Wen, W.Z.; Wang, X.N.; Sun, L.m.; Yuan, H.O.; Wang, X.L. Hon Xiang lousesqui terpenoids from the Resinous Exudates of Commiphora opobalsamum (Burseraceae). Helv. Chim. 2008, 91, 881–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Iluz, D.; Hoffman, M.; Gilboa-Garber, N.; Amar, Z. Medicinal properties of Commiphora gileadensis. Afr. J. Pharm. Pharma 2010, 4, 516–520. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hartwell, J.L. Plants Used against Cancer: A Survey; Quarterman Publications Inc.: Boston, MA, USA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tejero, M.R.G.; Casares-Porcel, C.P.; Sanchez-Rojas, M.; Ramiro-Gutíerrez, J.M.; Molero-Mesa, J.; Pieroni, A.; Giusti, M.E.; Censorii, E.C.; De Pasquale, D.A.; Hadjichambis, D.A.; et al. Eljohrig medicinal plants in the Mediterranean area: Synthesis of the results of the project. Rubia J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 116, 341–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hanus, L.O.; Rezanka, T.; Dembitsky, V.M.; Moussaieff, A. Myrrh--Commiphora chemistry. Biomed. Pap. 2005, 149, 3–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Shen, T.; Guo-Hui, L.; Wang, X.N.; Lou, X.H. The genus Commiphora, A review of its traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 142, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Van der Walt, J.J.A.; Van der Schijff, H.P. The anatomy of the petiole as an aid to the identification of South African Commiphora species. Kirkia 1973, 9, 95–107. [Google Scholar]
  25. Duperon, J. [Anatomical study of the stem of Commiphora africana (A. Rich) Engl. (Burseraceae) [gum-resin, Bdellium]]. [French]. Bull. Mus. Natl. D’hist. Nat. Sect. B Adansonia Bot. Phytochim. 1984, 6, 325–333. [Google Scholar]
  26. Weeks, A.; Simpson, B.B. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Commiphora (Burseraceae) yields insight on the evolution and historical biogeography of an “impossible” genus. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 42, 62–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mahr, D. Commiphora: An introduction to the genus. Cact. Succ. J. 2012, 84, 140–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Majrashi, D.M. Taxonomic Studies on Some Species of Genus Commiphora (Burseraceae) Growing in Al-Baha Region. Master’s Thesis, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ochieng, R.A. An Ethnobotanical and Phytochemical Study of Medicinal Plants Used to Treat Gastrointestinal Disorders in Children in Siaya District, Kenya. Master’s Thesis, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kumar, S.; Shankar, V. Medicinal plants of the Indian desert: Commiphora wightii (Arnott) Bhand. J. Arid Environ. 1982, 5, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fasola, T.R.; Ogunshe, A.A.O.; Onyeachuchim, H.D. Ethnobotanical importance of endangered species in the arid zones of Nigeria. Zonas Áridas 2004, 8, ág-57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mati, E. Ethnobotany and trade of medicinal plants in the Qaysari market, Erbil, Kurdish autonomous region, Iraq. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 133, 253–944. [Google Scholar]
  33. Amiri, A.; Joharchi, D. Ethnobotanical investigation of traditional medicinal plants commercialized in the markets of Mashhad, Iran. Avicenna J. Phytomed. 2013, 3, 254–271. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Noman, A.; Hussain, I.; Ali, Q.; Muhammad, A.; Ashraf, M.; Haider, M.Z. Ethnobotanical studies of potential wild medicinal plants of Ormara, Gawadar, Pakistan. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2013, 25, 751–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Anvar, K.; Haneef, J. Ethnobotanical plants used for postnatal care by traditional practitioners from kozhikode district, kerala, india. IJRPC 2015, 5, 570–581. [Google Scholar]
  36. El-shabasy, A. Survey on medicinal plants in the flora of Jizan Region, Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Bot. Stud. 2016, 2, 38–59. [Google Scholar]
  37. Adebayo, H.A.; Aliyu, R.; Gatsing, D.; Garba, H.I. The effects of ethanolic leaf extract of Commiphora africana (Burseraceae) on lipid profile in rats. Int. J. Pharma. 2006, 2, 618–622. [Google Scholar]
  38. Abbas, F.A.; Al-massarany, S.M.; Tawfeq, S.K.; Al-howiriny, T.A.; Mossa, J.S.; Abourashed, S.A. Phytochemical and biological studies on Saudi Commiphora opobalsamum L. J. Nat. Prod. Res. 2007, 21, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wineman, E.; Douglas, L.; Wineman, V.; Sharova, K.; Jaspars, M.; Meshner, S.; Bentwich, Z.; Cohen, G.; Shtevi, A. Commiphora gileadensis sap extract induces cell cycle-dependent death in immortalized keratinocytes and human dermoid carcinoma cells. J. Herb. Med. 2015, 5, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Okwute, S.K.; Ochi, I.O. Phytochemical analysis and cytotoxic activity of the Root extract of Commiphora africana (Caesalpiniaceae). J. Pharm. Phytochem. 2017, 6, 451–454. [Google Scholar]
  41. Bouslama, L.; Kouidhi, B.; Alqurashi, Y.M.; Chaieb, K.; Papetti, A. Virucidal Effect of guggulsterone isolated from Commiphora gileadensis. Planta Med. 2019, 85, 1225–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Alqahtani, S.A.; Nasr, F.A.; Noman, O.M.; Farooq, M.; Alhawassi, T.; Qamar, W.; El-Gamal, A. Cytotoxic evaluation and anti-angiogenic effects of two furano-sesquiterpenoids from Commiphora myrrh resin. Molecules 2020, 25, 1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Alehaideb, Z.; Alatar, G.; Nehdi, A.; Albaz, A.; Al-Eidi, H.; Almutairi, M.; Matou-Nasri, S. Commiphora myrrha (Nees) Engl. resin extracts induce phase-I cytochrome P450 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, and 3A4 isoenzyme expressions in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cells. Saudi Pharm. J. 2021, 29, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Muller, E. South Tihama and Farasan Islands. In Quaternary Period. in Saudi Arabia; Jado, A., Zötl, J.G., Eds.; Springer: Wien, Germany, 1984; pp. 141–150. [Google Scholar]
  45. Brown, G.F.; Jackson, R.O. Geologic Map of the Asir Quadrangle; Ministry of Petroleum and Mineral Resources, Directorate General of Mineral Resouces: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 1979; p. 232.
  46. Fisher, M.; Membery, D.A. Climate. In Vegetation of the Arabian Peninsula; Ghazanfar, S.A., Fisher, M., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1998; pp. 5–38. [Google Scholar]
  47. Middleton, N.J. Dust storms in the Middle East. J. Arid Environ. 1986, 10, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Abulfatih, H.A. Vegetation zonation along an altitudinal gradient between sea level and 3000 meters in southwestern Saudi Arabia. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 1992, 4, 57–97. [Google Scholar]
  49. Singleton, V.L.; Rudolf, O.; Rosa, M.L.R. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. In Methods in Enzymology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1999; Volume 299, pp. 152–178. [Google Scholar]
  50. Djeridane, A.; Yousfi, M.; Nadjemi, B.; Boutassouna, D.; Stocker, P.; Vidal, N. Antioxidant activity of some Algerian medicinal plants extracts containing phenolic compounds. Food Chem. 2006, 97, 654–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tardío, J.; Pardo-de-Santayana, M. Cultural importance indices: A comparative analysis based on the useful wild plants of Southern Cantabria (Northern Spain). Econ. Bot. 2008, 62, 24–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gostel, M.R. Systematics and Evolution of Commiphora Jacq. (Burseraceae) in Madagascar. Ph.D. Thesis, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kayanna, L.C. Marriage and Family Therapy. A Psychoeducational Workshop for Young Women on the Effects of Paternal Alcoholism. Master’s Thesis, California State University, Long Beach, CA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  54. Lemenih, M.; Abebe, T.; Olsson, M. Gum and resin resources from some Acacia, Boswellia and Commiphora species and their economic contributions in Liban, south-east Ethiopia. J. Arid Environ. 2003, 55, 465–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Study area map; numbers refer to the species (see Table 1).
Figure 1. Study area map; numbers refer to the species (see Table 1).
Ecologies 03 00005 g001
Figure 2. Commiphora myrrha; (A): whole plant in leafy stage; (B): leaves; (C): floral buds and one flower is magnified at 1.2×; (D): fruits and leaves.
Figure 2. Commiphora myrrha; (A): whole plant in leafy stage; (B): leaves; (C): floral buds and one flower is magnified at 1.2×; (D): fruits and leaves.
Ecologies 03 00005 g002
Figure 3. Commiphora quadricincta; (A): whole plant in naked stage; (B): whole plant in leafy stage; (C): fruits and leaves; (D): flowers at normal view; (E): A magnified flower at 1.2×.
Figure 3. Commiphora quadricincta; (A): whole plant in naked stage; (B): whole plant in leafy stage; (C): fruits and leaves; (D): flowers at normal view; (E): A magnified flower at 1.2×.
Ecologies 03 00005 g003
Figure 4. Commiphora erythraea; (A): whole plant at naked stage, leaves at upper corner; (B): flowers upper view, and one flower is magnified at 1.2×; (C): fruits with dried twigs.
Figure 4. Commiphora erythraea; (A): whole plant at naked stage, leaves at upper corner; (B): flowers upper view, and one flower is magnified at 1.2×; (C): fruits with dried twigs.
Ecologies 03 00005 g004
Figure 5. Commiphora gileadensis; (A): leaves; (B): whole plant; (C): one flower is magnified at 2×; (E): flowers at original size; (D): fruits and leaves.
Figure 5. Commiphora gileadensis; (A): leaves; (B): whole plant; (C): one flower is magnified at 2×; (E): flowers at original size; (D): fruits and leaves.
Ecologies 03 00005 g005
Figure 6. Commiphora kataf; (A): whole plant in leafy stage; (B): whole plant in naked stage; (C): A magnified flower at 2×, (D): flowers at normal view; (E): fruits and leaves.
Figure 6. Commiphora kataf; (A): whole plant in leafy stage; (B): whole plant in naked stage; (C): A magnified flower at 2×, (D): flowers at normal view; (E): fruits and leaves.
Ecologies 03 00005 g006
Figure 7. UPGMA dendrogam shows the relationships between the Commiphora species using the gross morphological characters.
Figure 7. UPGMA dendrogam shows the relationships between the Commiphora species using the gross morphological characters.
Ecologies 03 00005 g007
Figure 8. Identification key of Commiphora species based on gross morphology.
Figure 8. Identification key of Commiphora species based on gross morphology.
Ecologies 03 00005 g008
Figure 9. Transverse sections in stems of: (A) C. erythraea, (B) C. gileadensis, (C) C. kataf, (D) C. myrrha, and (E) C. quadricincta; ep: epidermis, pe: periderm (cork + cork cambium), co: cortex (collenchyma), ph: phloem, ri: risen canal, xy: xylem va: vascular cambium, pi: pith.
Figure 9. Transverse sections in stems of: (A) C. erythraea, (B) C. gileadensis, (C) C. kataf, (D) C. myrrha, and (E) C. quadricincta; ep: epidermis, pe: periderm (cork + cork cambium), co: cortex (collenchyma), ph: phloem, ri: risen canal, xy: xylem va: vascular cambium, pi: pith.
Ecologies 03 00005 g009aEcologies 03 00005 g009b
Figure 10. Transverse sections in leaf petioles of: (A) C. erythraea, (B) C. gileadensis, (C) C. kataf, (D) C. myrrha, and (E) C. quadricincta; gh: glandular hair, ep: epidermis, co: cortex, ph: phloem, ri: risen canal, xy: xylem, pi: pith, bc: bundle cap.
Figure 10. Transverse sections in leaf petioles of: (A) C. erythraea, (B) C. gileadensis, (C) C. kataf, (D) C. myrrha, and (E) C. quadricincta; gh: glandular hair, ep: epidermis, co: cortex, ph: phloem, ri: risen canal, xy: xylem, pi: pith, bc: bundle cap.
Ecologies 03 00005 g010aEcologies 03 00005 g010b
Figure 11. Seeds of Commiphora sp.: (A) C. erythraea, (B) C. gileadensis, (C) C. kataf, (D) C. myrrha, and (E) C. quadricincta; I: LM figure magnified at X1.7, II: SEM figure shows the whole seed, III: hilum area, as seen by SEM, IV: overall pattern of ornamentation, as seen by SEM.
Figure 11. Seeds of Commiphora sp.: (A) C. erythraea, (B) C. gileadensis, (C) C. kataf, (D) C. myrrha, and (E) C. quadricincta; I: LM figure magnified at X1.7, II: SEM figure shows the whole seed, III: hilum area, as seen by SEM, IV: overall pattern of ornamentation, as seen by SEM.
Ecologies 03 00005 g011aEcologies 03 00005 g011b
Figure 12. The relative importance of each species (RFC).
Figure 12. The relative importance of each species (RFC).
Ecologies 03 00005 g012
Table 1. The plant sample of Commiphora species collected from Jazan area with scientific and local names.
Table 1. The plant sample of Commiphora species collected from Jazan area with scientific and local names.
No.Scientific Name and Author CitationCollection LocalitiesDates of CollectionCoordinates (Latitude and Longitude) of Localities
1Commiphora erythrya (Ehrenb.) Engler. In DC Monog. Phan. 1 V.: 20 (1883).Hebar Island10 October 2018
5 April 2019
03.64′16°53–52.17′42°24
2Commiphora gileadensis (L.) C. Chr. in Dansk Bot. Arkiv, 4 (3): 18 (1922).Frasan Island
South of Fayfa
East of Sabya
25 August 2018
14 September 2018
18 June 2019
54.12′16°48–7.84′41°51
0.38′17°11–57.42′543
20.93′17°13–52.32′42°48
3Commiphora kataf (Forssk.) Engl. in DC., mono. Phan. 4:19 (1883).North of Al-Ardah
Al-Rayth Mountains (Black Mountain)
25 August 2018
13 September 2018
25 March 2019
19.97′817–14.09′443°
20.93′17°13–52.32′42°48
02.02′17°35–38.29′42°53
4Commiphora myrrha (Nees) Engl. in DC., mono. Phan. 4:19 (1883).East of Ahd-Almsarha
East of Abu-arish
East of Sabya
North of Al-Ardah
Al-Rayth Mountains
2 June 2018
11 August 2018
25 August 2018
18 June 2019
25 March 2019
56.72′16°46–38.76′343
4.07′117–2.48′42°53
35.30′317–4.99′42°55
19.97′817–14.09′443°
02.02′17°35–38.29′42°53
5Commiphora quadricincta Schweinf. in Bull. Herb. Boiss. 7, App. 2: 283 (1899).East of Sabya (east of Akwa Mountain)
East of Abu-arish
23 September 2018
20 January 2019
18 June 2019
20.93′17°13–52.32′42°48
36.74′317°–12.03′42°55
35.30′317–4.99′42°55
Table 2. The character list used for the description of Commiphora species morphologically.
Table 2. The character list used for the description of Commiphora species morphologically.
CharactersNo.Character States
Plant height (m)1>5
2<5
Spine3present
4absent
Leaf blade5simple
6trifoliate
7heteromorphic (3–5)
Leaf margin8entire
9dentate
Leaf apex10acute
11aristate
Leaf texture12leathery
13papery
14hairy
Petiole length (mm)15>15
16<15
Blade length (mm) L17>15
18<15
Blade width (mm) W194.5 ± (4–5)
207.5 ± (6–9)
2112 ± (10–14)
L/W ratio22>2
23<2
Blade size/leaf24equal
25unequal
Flower color26yellowish green
27creamy-pinkish
28red
Table 3. Quantitative anatomical characters of stem in Commiphora sp.
Table 3. Quantitative anatomical characters of stem in Commiphora sp.
Commiphora SpeciesAnatomical Parts in the Stem
Cortex Width (mm)Phloem Width (mm)Xylem Width (mm)Pith Diameter (mm)Resin Channels
C. erythrya0.030.020.040.0828
C. gileadensis0.0040.020.040.0614
C. kataf0.040.050.020.0843
C. myrrha0.010.020.040.0930
C. quadricincta0.010.030.060.0850
Table 4. Quantitative anatomical characters of petiole in Commiphora sp.
Table 4. Quantitative anatomical characters of petiole in Commiphora sp.
Commiphora SpeciesAnatomical Parts of the Petiole
TrichomesCortex Width (mm)Pith Diameter (mm)Average Number of Resin CanalsDiameter of Resin Canal (mm)
C. erythryaUnicellular and glandular0.040.0110 ± (9–11)0.002
C. gileadensisUnicellular0.020.034 ± (3–5)0.008
C. katafUnicellular and glandular0.020.0911 ± (10–12)0.002
C. myrrhaMulticellular0.020.077 ± (5–9)0.005
C. quadricinctaAbsent0.030.0810 ± (9–11)0.005
Table 5. Seed micro-morphological variations of Commiphora species using SEM.
Table 5. Seed micro-morphological variations of Commiphora species using SEM.
Seed MicrostructureC. erythryaC. gileadensisC. katafC. myrrhaC. quadricincta
Overall pattern of ornamentationirregularreticulatereticulatereticulatereticulate
Anticlinal wall shapeirregularangledangledirregularirregular
Anticlinal wall thickness (μm)51.663.331.661.66
Preclinal levelraisedsunkensunkensunkensunken
Cuticular deposits absentpresentpresentabsentabsent
Hilum level raisedraisedsunkensunkenraised
Hilum area width (mm)3.190.0062.211.971.65
Table 6. Seed macro-morphological variations of Commiphora species using L.M.
Table 6. Seed macro-morphological variations of Commiphora species using L.M.
CharactersC. erythryaC. gileadensisC. katafC. myrrhaC. quadricincta
Weight of 10 seeds (g)0.730.251.170.651.9
Outline Seed shapecircleovateovateelongated ovateelongated ovate
Color of mature seedBlack with brown baseBrown with black baseBlack with brown baseBlackBrown
Length (mm) L1611261516
Width (mm) W12.58168.510
L/W ratio1.281.41.621.71.6
Table 7. Total of phenols and flavonoid contents of Commiphora species.
Table 7. Total of phenols and flavonoid contents of Commiphora species.
No.Speciesµg G A/mg Dry Plant *µg R/mg Dry Plant **
1C. erythraea3.951.63
2C. gileadensis23.541.67
3C. kataf44.251.21
4C. myrrha23.991.10
5C. quadricincta43.372.04
* Microgram of gallic acid (as total phenolic contents)/milligram of dry plant. ** Microgram of flavonoid contents (as Rutin)/milligram of dry plant.
Table 8. Demographic characteristics of informants according to the ethnobotanical survey.
Table 8. Demographic characteristics of informants according to the ethnobotanical survey.
GenderAgeProfessionEducation LevelPlace of Residence
FemaleMaleMore than 60From 30–60Less than 30No WorkEmployeeIlliterateMiddleHighCityIslandSmall CityVillage
Respondents79884376489473645746101530112
47%53%25.5%45.5%29%56%44%38.5%34%27.5%6%9%18%67%
Table 9. Analysis of ethno-botanical aspects, percentage values according to the FC, where Fc is the number of respondents who cited a particular species.
Table 9. Analysis of ethno-botanical aspects, percentage values according to the FC, where Fc is the number of respondents who cited a particular species.
No.Commiphora sp.The Used Plant PartThe Target Body OrganPreparation ProcessTypes of UsesHow to Use
ResinLeavesStemOthersAbdomenChestSkinPowderedTooth-brushDrenchedHouseholdCosmeticTherapeuticOthersDressingSyrup
1C. erythraea5000005005005050
%10000000100001000010001000
2C. gileadensis5104045550050554074517
%9.619.27786.59.69.600969.667713.686.51.9213.4
3C. kataf5045455004505154504505
%8.9080808.9008008.9268008008.9
4C. myrrha500025151620030554020030
%98003.99.829.431390589.89.87839058
5C. quadricincta3033000300300300
%1000100100000100001000010000
Table 10. The relative importance of each species (RFC).
Table 10. The relative importance of each species (RFC).
SpeciesAll UsesFCRFC
C. erythrea
  • Resin is traditionally used on livestock against ticks
  • Resin is traditionally used for humans against snake venom poisoning
50.03
C. gileadensis
  • Treatment of the abdomen pains by boiling leaves
  • Tooth brushing
  • Leaves used for dyeing fabrics preparations
  • Crushed leaves used to treat the eye tumor
520.31
C. kataf
  • Laxative material (with resin drenched)
  • Bark is used as incense, grinded and used as a hair ornament
  • Construction of old houses using wood
  • Firewood because the plank continues burning for a long time
  • Its smoke is insect repellent
  • Bee houses are made of wood
560.34
C. myrrha
  • Wound healing
  • Antibiotic for tonsillitis
  • Cleaning uterus after birth
  • Stomachache and coughing
  • Cure cancer by soaking and drinking it with honey
  • Colds and chest pains
  • Tonic for body
  • Intensive hair
  • Treatment for abscesses and fever in children
  • Strengthens the head bones in children
  • Incense for houses
510.31
C. quadricincta
  • Resin is used as glue for ancient pots in which milk is placed
  • Wood is used as firewood and in preparing fences for animals
30.018
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shalabi, L.F.; Otaif, F.S. Commiphora Jacq (Burseraceae) in Saudi Arabia, Botanical, Phytochemical and Ethnobotanical Notes. Ecologies 2022, 3, 38-57. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies3020005

AMA Style

Shalabi LF, Otaif FS. Commiphora Jacq (Burseraceae) in Saudi Arabia, Botanical, Phytochemical and Ethnobotanical Notes. Ecologies. 2022; 3(2):38-57. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies3020005

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shalabi, Lamiaa F., and Fedah S. Otaif. 2022. "Commiphora Jacq (Burseraceae) in Saudi Arabia, Botanical, Phytochemical and Ethnobotanical Notes" Ecologies 3, no. 2: 38-57. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies3020005

APA Style

Shalabi, L. F., & Otaif, F. S. (2022). Commiphora Jacq (Burseraceae) in Saudi Arabia, Botanical, Phytochemical and Ethnobotanical Notes. Ecologies, 3(2), 38-57. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies3020005

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop