2. Materials and Methods
To assess the feasibility of our approach, we conducted a simulation of the oxyfuel process integrated into the thermal decomposition of MgCO
3. This simulation, which is depicted in
Figure 1, was performed using HSC:Outotec version 9.8.1.2, incorporating established unit operations and equipment informed by decades of process development [
4,
5]. To simplify the simulation, we assumed the use of a rotary kiln (with 95% of the magnesium oxide being directly obtained from the furnace and the remaining product being collected in a cyclone). The potential for commercializing the high-purity CO
2 off-gas is the main drive of this process, which is described below.
In order to simulate this as closely as possible to a real case, the following parameters are assumed for this simulation: 1000 kg/h of MgCO3 are fed to a recuperator where a stream of hot gas crosses it to heat up the feed material before entering the furnace. A rotary kiln was considered to be a robust solution for the amount we are considering, but a multiple hearth furnace or a fluidized bed could also be considered. The simulation also takes into consideration the furnace temperature, ensuring it is adequate for the thermal decomposition reaction. For this, the amount of CO2-rich off-gas purged from the system was defined as 30% together with a defined oxygen–fuel ratio of 2.2 (λ = 1.1).
In the roasting section, MgCO3 is thermally decomposed. The temperature is kept as low as possible so as not to form a melt inside the rotary kiln, but it is kept above the 800 °C required for the thermal decomposition reaction. The temperature can be further decreased but at the cost of increasing the amount of O2 (and N2) entering the gas mixer section. Natural gas is used as the main fuel source. The connected cyclone allows for the recovery of the remaining material dragged with the off-gas, which is followed by a recuperator that allows for the use of the heat from the off-gas in increasing the MgCO3 temperature before entering the furnace, thereby decreasing the amount of fuel required to achieve the thermal decomposition temperature.
4. Discussion
The production of magnesium oxide (MgO) involves the extraction and processing of magnesium-containing minerals, primarily magnesite (magnesium carbonate) or dolomite (a magnesium–calcium carbonate). This process makes up nearly 90% of all magnesia manufactured worldwide, with two other technologies (brine precipitation and serpentine leaching) representing the remaining 10%. For this first technology, the calcination process is the crucial step in the production of magnesia. It involves heating the magnesite or dolomite at high temperatures depending on the type of magnesium oxide required (Equation (1)). Between 1500 °C and 2000 °C periclase (also known as dead-burned magnesium oxide (DBM)) is obtained. It has refractory applications, so it is extensively used in steel production, serving as protective and replaceable linings for furnace kilns and other equipment which have contact with molten steel [
6]. Hard-burned magnesium oxide has applications where chemical reactivity is required, and it is produced between 1000 °C and 1500 °C. A third grade of magnesium oxide is obtained at temperatures between 600 and 1000 °C (also known as caustic magnesia), which has several applications in the polymer and paper industry, acid neutralization, among others [
7]. Below 700 °C, however, it is reported that CO
2 reabsorption from the off-gas and from the air (when cooled down) can occur due to its increased activity, so the chosen temperature typically has to take into account the chance of increased impurities [
8].
Consequently, the sources of CO2 emissions in the magnesia production process are primarily attributed to the calcination step where direct emissions occur both from fuel combustion and MgCO3 decomposition to MgO.
Another technology is based on the precipitation of magnesium hydroxide from seawater and brines by using quicklime (see Equations (2)–(4)). The CO
2 source in this case is the formation of quicklime from limestone. Dolomitic limes may also be used, but the process is less common and slightly different.
MgO can also be obtained from serpentines, starting from the leaching of MgCl
2 and consequent calcination to MgO (see Equation (5)).
The last two methods, although not under the scope of this report, are important to mention as in both cases the emissions of CO2 are comparable to those in the calcination of magnesite case.
When a simple model is used to calculate the CO
2 emissions from the thermal decomposition of MgCO
3, one can immediately conclude that fuel combustion is the main driver for increased emissions (see
Figure 2).
The CO
2 emissions from the thermal decomposition of 1000 kg of MgCO
3 at 1000 °C with a flame temperature of 1846 °C using methane as fuel (CH
4, 100%) were calculated. Considering the ideal case with a fuel/air ratio of λ = 1.2 and no losses, as well as a second case with 15% energy losses, the estimated values show that a release of 521 kg of CO
2 occurs from MgCO
3 decomposition. At 0% losses, the combustion of methane releases 255 kg of CO
2, and at 15% energy loss, 482 kg of CO
2 are estimated to be obtained from methane combustion. Overall, 0.78 kg of CO
2 per kg of MgCO
3 are obtained in the first case, while 1.01 kg of CO
2/kg of MgCO
3 are obtained in the second case, thereby indicating an increase of 29% in CO
2 emissions per kg of thermally decomposed MgCO
3 (
Table 1). For simplicity, indirect emissions from electricity production are not considered in this report.
An and Xue (2017) reported several examples based on the standard calcination case. Considering typical fuel (heavy oil, coal, or a mixture of both) for 1000 kg of MgCO
3, the fuel consumptions range between 230 and 250 kg to obtain 90% pure light calcined magnesia (LCM) and between 280 and 300 kg for 94% pure LCM. This results in a direct emission of 1500 kg of CO
2 being emitted for 90% pure LCM and 1650 kg of CO
2 being emitted for 94% pure LCM [
9].
Another report, which was undertaken by Luong and coworkers, calculated the carbon footprints of magnesium oxide and magnesium hydroxide (higher than 99% purity) based on two other technologies (brine process and serpentine process) using simulation software, and it carefully compared the calculations with those of previous reports. The direct emissions are, respectively, 2000 and 3400 kg of CO
2,equiv per 1000 kg of MgCO
3 for a purity higher than 99%. When taking into consideration the direct emission of CO
2 from the thermal decomposition of MgCO
3 (which does not occur in both the brine and serpentine cases) and the different efficiencies associated with each process, we are left with all three cases having comparable direct emissions [
10]. It is clear that the choice of fuel, the energy losses in the entirety of the process, and the quality of magnesium oxide, when they are all combined, contribute to high emissions of CO
2 in the production of MgO.
At present, there are multiple avenues being explored for the purification of CO2-containing streams from the steel and cement industries with the aim of carbon capture, utilization, and storage. One of these examples was developed by CarbonOrO, which is a partner in the Carbon4Minerals project. CarbonOrO offers an innovative solution where a proprietary amine solvent is used to capture CO2 from flue gases with a concentration as low as 5%. This high-purity CO2 stream can then be used for CCUS (carbon capture, utilisation, and storage) and in the upgrade of biogas/landfill gas. Due to the solvent’s properties, desorption of CO2 is possible at temperatures starting at 70 °C, with low energy consumption.
VITO, the project coordinator of the Carbon4Minerals, is currently developing the next generation in carbon capture technology by utilizing the approach of porous structured sorbents where CO2 gas is selectively captured through a specific sorbent that ois packed in several sorption columns. The use of structured porous sorbents instead of classical pellets or granules enables us to lower the energy consumption of the capture process by lowering the pressure drop and improving mass and heat transfer. After adsorption, CO2 is released in a cyclic way from the sorbent due to the change in pressure and/or temperature to obtain a CO2-rich stream. Depending on the characteristics of the CO2 source, CO2 sorbent materials, such as zeolites, activated carbon, metal–organic frameworks, or amine-functionalised sorbents, can be selected.
Another example is that of the development of a new generation of carbonated materials. The understanding of the mechanisms that regulate the carbonation of natural versus synthetic materials [
11] was crucial to investigate carbonation kinetics. De Silva investigated how calcium carbonate microstructures with high strengths can be obtained within hours, in situ, from the lime carbonation process [
12]. VITO has perfected the method by developing efficient methods of mineral carbonation and construction materials [
13], and more recently the investigation into the accelerated carbonation of steel slags to produce high-strength construction materials is ongoing [
14].
In our discussion, it becomes evident that despite significant developments in emission reduction technologies across other industries, the magnesia sector has received limited attention. Despite the potential benefits of capture, purification, and utilization technologies, their application within this industry remains largely uncharted territory. One solution that tackles the CO
2 emissions in a magnesia case was proposed by KON Chemical Solutions together with Tenova in 2021. The report explores the possibility of substituting the fuel in the serpentine case with pure hydrogen as a method to reduce the direct emissions that arise from fuel combustion [
15]. This solution, however, is not focused in the case of magnesite calcination. Finding a solution in its place that recycles or enriches the CO
2-containing off-gas for storage and utilization is crucial since CO
2 is the main by-product of the chemical reaction. With traditional combustion, air is the source of oxygen for the combustion reaction. However, air mainly consists of nitrogen (about 78%) and only contains about 21% oxygen. When fuel is burned in the air, nitrogen dilutes the combustion gases, thereby resulting in a lower concentration of carbon dioxide (CO
2) and water vapour (H
2O). This higher nitrogen content in the flue gases makes capturing and separating CO
2 more challenging. As we have demonstrated, in oxyfuel combustion, the nitrogen content is significantly reduced by using pure oxygen instead of air. By eliminating nitrogen, the combustion process produces a flue gas stream that is mainly composed of CO
2 and H
2O. This stream is highly concentrated, thereby making it easier to capture CO
2 utilizing existent technologies, and the stream is ready to use in some cases.