Methodology for the Identification of Nucleation Sites in Aluminum Alloy by Use of Misorientatation Mapping †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Experimental Procedure
KAM Maps
3. Results and Discussion
- (a)
- the second neighbor and a maximum misorientation angle of 5° (as it is used widely in literature) and
- (b)
- the first neighbor and a maximum misorientation angle of 65°.
4. Conclusions
- The hot-rolled sheet in the as received condition had formed orientations (101) and (338), which were maintained during all the annealing processes and coexisted with the orientations in-between before finally being restored at its initial state after the completion of recrystallization.
- The SGBs were low after hot rolling any only increased significantly after cold rolling before decreasing again after the thermal treatments.
- The increase of SGBs from the cold rolled condition until annealing with a soaking time 120′, which occurs mainly in orientations (101), allowed for the accurate definition of the completion point of recovery on the rolled 3104 sheet sample.
- No significant orientation rotations were observed during the annealing process, whereas the mean KAM angle decreased during annealing.
- The mobility of LAGBs at soaking times between 90′ and 120′ indicate the evolution of the recovery process.
- The boundary mobility is found to decrease with a decreasing mean misorientation angle. The mobility of the LAGBs at the recrystallized state were found to be twelve times higher in comparison to the recrystallized state.
- The KAM approach was focused on the actual misorientation relationships within the grain as well as the detection of the possible nucleation points by use of a simpler way of evaluation, ideal for industrial applications. Multiple samples can be effectively examined in a timely manner; thus, various production stages could be effectively monitored, in terms of microstructure evolution.
References
- Das, S.; Yin, W. The worldwide aluminum economy: The current state of the industry. JOM J. Miner. Met. Mater. Soc. 2007, 59, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vargel, C. The Metallurgy of Aluminium. In Corrosion of Aluminium; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2004; Chapter A.3; pp. 23–57. [Google Scholar]
- Malin, A.; Chen, B. Aluminum Alloys for Packaging; TMS: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1993; pp. 251–260. [Google Scholar]
- Gloria, A.; Montanari, R.; Richetta, M.; Varone, A. Alloys for Aeronautic Applications: State of the Art and Perspectives. Metals 2019, 9, 662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansen, N.; Huang, X.; Winther, G. Effect of Grain Boundaries and Grain Orientation on Structure and Properties. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2011, 42, 613–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Morris, J. Texture evolution of polycrystalline AA 5182 aluminum alloy with an initial {0 0 1}<110> texture during rolling. Scr. Mater. 2002, 47, 487–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papadopoulou, S.; Kontopoulou, A.; Gavalas, E.; Papaefthymiou, S. The Effects of Reduction and Thermal Treatment on the Recrystallization and Crystallographic Texture Evolution of 5182 Aluminum Alloy. Metals 2020, 10, 1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Engler, O.; Knarbakk, K. Temper rolling to control texture and earing in aluminium alloy AA 5050A. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2020, 288, 116910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kobayashi, R.; Kudo, T.; Tanaka, H. Deformation-texture evolution in deep drawing of cold-rolled 3104 aluminum alloy sheet. J. Jpn. Inst. Light Met. 2019, 69, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hirsch, J. Textures in Industrial Processes and Products. Mater. Sci. Forum 2011, 702–703, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doherty, R.; Hughes, D.; Humphreys, F.; Jonas, J.; Jensen, D.J.; Kassner, M.; King, W.; McNelly, T. McQueen and A. Rollett, “Current issues in recrystallization: A review. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 1997, 238, 219–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Humphreys, H.M. Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phenomena; Elsevier: Kidlington, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Nolze, G.; Winkelmann, A. About the Reliability of EBSD Measurements: Data Enhancement; EMAS: Trondheim, Norway, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Wilkinson, A. New method for deter-mining small misorientations from electron back scatter diffraction patterns. Scr. Mater. 2001, 44, 2379–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brough, I.; Bate, P.; Humphreys, F. Optimizing the angular resolution of EBSD. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2006, 22, 1279–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, J.; Britton, T.; Wilkinson, A. Measurement of geometrically necessary dislocation density with high resolution electron backscatter diffraction: Effects of detector binning and step size. Ultramicroscopy 2013, 125, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kamaya, M. Assessment of local deformation using EBSD: Quantification of ac-curacy of measurement and definition of local gradient. Ultramicroscopy 2011, 111, 1189–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nolze, G.; Hielscher, R. Orientations –perfectly colored. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2016, 49, 1786–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Humphreys, F.; Hatherly, M. Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phenomena. Pergamon 1995, 397–398. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, C.; Wang, C.; Xu, J.; Zhang, P.; Shan, D.; Guo, B. Interactive effect of microstructure and cavity dimension on filling behavior in micro coining of pure nickel. Nature 2016, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, X.; Li, Y.; Xua, C.; Wang, B.; Peng, R.; Chen, J. Improved mechanical anisotropy and texture optimization of a 3xx aluminum alloy by differential temperature rolling. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2021, 799, 140278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takayama, Y.; Yoshimura, T.; Watanabe, H. Relationship between strain stored by compressive deformation and crystallographic orientation in a pure aluminum. ICOTOM IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2015, 82, 012029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferry, M.; Humphreys, F. Discontinuous subgrain growth in deformed and annealed {110}h001ialumi-num single crystals. Acta Metall. Mater. 1996, 44, 1293–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Humphreys, F. Subgrain growth and low angle boundary mobility in aluminum crystals of orientation {110}h001i. Acta Mater. 2000, 48, 2017–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Humphreys, F. The annealing behaviour of deformed cube-oriented aluminum single crystals. Acta Mater. 2000, 48, 2543–2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishin, O.; Godfrey, A.; Jensen, D.J.; Hansen, N. Recovery and recrystallization in commercial purity aluminum cold. Acta Mater. 2013, 61, 5354–5364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molotnikov, A.; Lapovok, R.; Gu, C.; Davies, C.; Estrin, Y. Size effects in micro cup drawing. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2012, 550, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tikhovskiy, D.F.I. Simulation of earing during deep drawing of an Al–3% Mg alloy (AA 5754) using a texture component crystal plasticity FEM. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2007, 183, 2–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Z.S.; Mao, W.M.; Roters, F.; Raabe, D. A texture optimization study for minimum earing in aluminium by use of a texture component crystal plasticity finite element method. Acta Mater. 2004, 52, 1003–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, H.; Gottstein, G. Crystallographic analysis of the influence of stress state on earing behavior in deep drawing of face-centered cubic metals. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 1997, 28, 785–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Misorientation Grain Boundaries | Hot Rolled | Cold Rolled | Soaking Time 90’ | Soaking Time 100’ | Soaking Time 120’ | Soaking Time 600’ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2–5° (%) | 48.5 | 86.6 | 83.8 | 89.8% | 72.4 | 4.9 |
5–15° (%) | 26.9 | 6.3 | 8.5 | 5.9 | 14.8 | 0.8 |
15–65° (%) | 24.6 | 7.1 | 7.7 | 4.3 | 12.8 | 94.3 |
KAM | ||||||
Mean KAM Angle (°) | 2.2 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.7 |
KAM (%) | 91 | 56.6 | 49.8 | 42.8 | 71.5 | 94.9 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Papadopoulou, S.; Gavalas, E.; Papaefthymiou, S. Methodology for the Identification of Nucleation Sites in Aluminum Alloy by Use of Misorientatation Mapping. Mater. Proc. 2021, 3, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/IEC2M-09251
Papadopoulou S, Gavalas E, Papaefthymiou S. Methodology for the Identification of Nucleation Sites in Aluminum Alloy by Use of Misorientatation Mapping. Materials Proceedings. 2021; 3(1):11. https://doi.org/10.3390/IEC2M-09251
Chicago/Turabian StylePapadopoulou, Sofia, Evangelos Gavalas, and Spyros Papaefthymiou. 2021. "Methodology for the Identification of Nucleation Sites in Aluminum Alloy by Use of Misorientatation Mapping" Materials Proceedings 3, no. 1: 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/IEC2M-09251
APA StylePapadopoulou, S., Gavalas, E., & Papaefthymiou, S. (2021). Methodology for the Identification of Nucleation Sites in Aluminum Alloy by Use of Misorientatation Mapping. Materials Proceedings, 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/IEC2M-09251