Next Article in Journal
Embracing Immersive Journalism: Adoption and Integration by News Media Producers
Previous Article in Journal
Disney Reloaded: Pixar’s Influence on the Evolution of Disney Animation Feature Films (1994–2018)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Face Attack Online: Unpacking Conflicts in Multimodal Group Chats
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Intercultural Attitudes Embedded in Microblogging: Sentiment and Content Analyses of Data from Sina Weibo

Faculty of Education, Taipa, Macau SAR 999078, China
Journal. Media 2024, 5(4), 1477-1493; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5040092
Submission received: 3 September 2024 / Revised: 22 September 2024 / Accepted: 23 September 2024 / Published: 27 September 2024

Abstract

:
This study analyzed 2421 microblogs posted between the year 2012 to March 2022 reflecting the microbloggers’ attitudes toward different cultures. Results indicated that (1) the number of microblog posts expressing the users’ intercultural attitudes increased distinctly from 2019 to March 2022, with females users in general posting more microblogs than males; (2) females posted more microblogs encompassing positive emotions to show their interest and motivation to learn about foreign cultures, and the tendency to value and appreciate cultural differences, whereas males created more sentimentally neutral posts that revealed their recognition of the existence of cultural differences, and females and males posted a similar number of microblogs containing negative emotions; and (3) more posts involved “small c” culture were posted than those containing themes belonging to the “Big C” culture. Gender gap was further observed regarding the cultural themes concerned by the microbloggers. Implications were discussed in the context of intercultural education.

1. Introduction

Why do we need to be attitudinally prepared to embrace multiculturalism? When people and things around are greatly different from those in one’s own native cultural milieu, insecure feelings may arise because one’s internal belief system is hard to be fully affirmed (Furnham 2019). It is thus natural for a person to react with defense mechanism to protect the self from emotional conflicts or stress when faced with cultural differences (Lebedko 2014). Typical defensive reactions include, but are not limited to, denying the existence of cultural differences (Bennett and Hammer 2017), a tendency to judge using one’s own culture as the benchmark (Tori and Bilmes 2002), and trying to make sense based on overgeneralized and secondhand beliefs (i.e., stereotypes) (Amoretti 2018). Unfortunately, these internal attitudes can be radiated via a person’s speech, body language, and even tone of voice, which can further lead to a cycle of negative reaction and result in communication breakdown or conflict (Zhu and Bresnahan 2018).
Over the past decade, research on cultivating positive attitudes toward other cultures has proliferated in various fields. In healthcare, studies like Karasu et al. (2022) demonstrated the importance of cultural sensitivity in improving patient outcomes and reducing health disparities. In business, Moradi and Ghabanchi (2019) highlighted how cross-cultural understanding boosts international collaboration and market success. In tourism, Kirillova et al. (2015) showed that cultural appreciation enhances travelers’ experiences and promotes sustainable tourism. In education, Tarchi and Surian (2022) emphasized the role of intercultural competence in fostering inclusive learning environments and improving student engagement. However, in the exploration of intercultural attitudes of individuals, quantitative approach relying on self-reported measures occupied a large portion of prior studies (e.g., Idris 2020; Liu et al. 2017). Beyond any doubt, self-reported measures are versatile and indispensable for capturing differentiated patterns of human attitudes (Hendrick et al. 2013), whereas they also bear drawbacks. Given the fact that self-report on survey items describing psychological processes is under respondents’ control, a common criticism against self-report measures has been their tendency to be susceptible to socially desirable responses (Holtgraves 2004). That is, the respondent might engage in faking behaviors intentionally and unintentionally to forge the ideal image of the self. This can be understood through Goffman’s (1967) theories of impression management and facework. Individuals regularly engage in impression management, consciously or unconsciously adjusting their behaviors to project a favorable image. This includes unintentional actions driven by ingrained social mechanisms that help maintain a positive identity. Thus, both intentional and unintentional faking are part of broader social practices aimed at managing self-presentation, including in intercultural contexts. As such, scholars have issued calls on researchers to use more diverse approaches when investigating intercultural dispositions, such as behavioral observations, text mining, and implicit association tests, to obtain a more nuanced and accurate understanding of intercultural attitudes (Deardorff 2017). Such methodologies can provide deeper insights by minimizing the influence of impression management and capturing more genuine intercultural behaviors and dispositions (Leung et al. 2014).
Microblogging has been a valuable data source for researchers to understand individual attitudes and beliefs about a particular topic. For example, based on tweets or posts collected from social media sites where users share information, feelings, and perspectives (e.g., X [formerly Twitter], Facebook), studies were conducted to understand individual’s attitudes toward MOOCs (massive open online courses) (Zhou 2022), vaccination (Tavoschi et al. 2020), global warming (Qiao and Jiang 2021), LGBTQ-related issues (Adamczyk and Liao 2019), among other topics. As Kumar (2021) pointed out, a strength of unstructured data such as microblogging is that it does not contain any predefined rules. Translated to the current context, unlike structured survey items assessing intercultural attitudes that preset intercultural situations (e.g., “I respect the ways people from different cultures behave.”, Intercultural Sensitivity Scale, Chen and Starosta 2000), the revealed attitudes via microblogging derived from what a person saw and heard that formed his/her unique intercultural experiences (e.g., “I asked the teachers if they wanted to try my cookies. The Chinese teachers were all like, ‘No, no thanks, I’m good’, but before I even finished my question, the foreign teacher’s hand was already reaching for a cookie. It was so cute!”, an analysis item of this study).
Hence, the microblogging data are deemed to be more authentic regarding intercultural situations due to their real-time, personal nature, which captures spontaneous expressions of cultural behaviors, customs, values, and beliefs (Tufekci 2014). For example, posts about local festivals offer insights into how individuals celebrate their traditions and share their experiences with a global audience. Microbloggers might also express admiration or curiosity about other cultures, as seen in posts from individuals in the U.S. sharing their excitement about attending a traditional Japanese tea ceremony, or in users from India posting their reflections on attending a Thanksgiving dinner in the U.S. Additionally, discussions on cultural values provide perspectives on how people perceive and interact with different cultural norms. To the author’s best knowledge, however, no study to date has employed microblogging data to investigate the attitudinal aspect of individuals’ intercultural dispositions. As Armitage and Christian (2003) maintained, attitudes, when shaped in positive way, can influence behaviors to achieve a favorable outcome. Indeed, positive attitudes toward foreign cultures are the preconditions of voluntary cognitive skills enhancement, and effective behavioral and emotional regulation that would ultimately lead to successful intercultural interactions (Griffith et al. 2016). The purpose of this study was thus to explore Chinese microblogging users’ attitudes toward foreign cultures/cultural differences and their utmost attention to certain themes of culture. The findings of this study will inform educators who aim to adopt purposeful and effective strategies to develop positive intercultural attitudes of learners.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Intercultural Attitudes

Individuals who wish to thrive in the multicultural but interconnected globe are expected to possess a decent level of intercultural competence (IC). Intercultural attitudes, as the attitudinal dimension of IC and the focus of this study, was defined as a collection of traits that drive individuals to evaluate intercultural situations as beneficial and remain engaged in or initiate intercultural interactions despite the innate uncertainty and ambiguity (Byram 2021; Deardorff 2006; Griffith et al. 2016). These IC experts further proposed a variety of elements of intercultural attitudes to operationalize the definition. Specifically, in possession of favorable intercultural attitudes, a person would respect and value cultural diversity; show open-mindedness to cultures of and people from other countries while withholding judgment; and show curiosity and discovery for intercultural learning and interactions. Opposite to these elements were ethnocentric beliefs, stereotypes and prejudices, low tolerance for ambiguity, and even dislike or rejection of foreign people and cultures, which constitute typical causes of intercultural tensions and breakdown (Spitzberg and Changnon 2009).

2.2. Types of Culture: ‘Big C’ and ‘Small c’ Culture

Culture is defined as “the learned and shared values, beliefs, and behaviors of a community of interacting people” (Bennett and Bennett 2004, p. 147). To further sort out different themes of culture, Paige et al. (2003) suggested two broad types of culture: “Big C” and “small c”. “Big C” culture refers to a set of facts that can be easily observed and remembered, such as a country’s history, economy, social system, education, festivals, and art. By contrast, “small c” consists of aspects that cannot be easily and immediately observed or understood, such as people’s behavioral patterns, thinking patterns, values and beliefs, customs, language, and everyday living. These two culture types have been used by researchers to extract cultural content in various text materials.
For example, Kang-Young (2009) analyzed the texts and pictures in eleven high-school EFL conversation textbooks and found that most of the textbooks showed a strong preference for the teaching of “Big C” culture (e.g., education, holidays, food), yet paid little attention to “small c” culture (e.g., individualist beliefs, interpersonal relationships). Similarly, Labtic and Teo (2019) investigated the cultural information contained in six English textbooks and reported that “Big C” culture (e.g., literature, geography, and races) is more frequently presented than “small c” culture (e.g., everyday living, ritual behavior). A review of literature showed that the framework relying on “Big C” and “small c” cultures were more frequently adopted in the analyses of educational materials (e.g., Yue et al. 2020; Zakiyah and Rukmini 2022). Nonetheless, this framework is also believed to be valid for analyzing microblogging texts because when users posted specifically on intercultural topics, the notion of culture would be more tangible for them as such different cultural themes would be more explicitly presented in their postings.

2.3. Sentiment and Content Analysis of Microblogging Data

Sentiment analysis identifies subjectivity (neutral vs. emotionally loaded) and the polarity (positive vs. negative semantic orientation) of a text (Pawar et al. 2016). Appraisal theory posited that emotions can be elicited by evaluations of concrete situations that produce specific reactions on various individuals (Scherer et al. 2001). For example, happiness felt when a romantic relationship starts could be elicited by the appraisals that something desired has been obtained (Berscheid and Walster 1978). The appraisal theory lays the foundation for structured sentiment extraction that is based on appraisal expression (Bloom 2011). As platforms for users to express themselves, the prevalence of microblogs has aroused the research in the field of sentiment analysis. According to Korenek and Šimko (2014), the appraisal theory also has its strength in supporting the analysis of microblogers’ attitudes toward any object/person/event (e.g., foreign cultures or people in this study), because attitudes express a person’s current mindset when writing a post that contains his/her affect, appreciation or judgment.
Qualitative content analysis is an analytical tool used to “systematically analyze texts by processing the material step by step with theory-based category systems developed on the material.” (Mayring 2002, p. 114). The deductive content analysis is often used to test existing categories and concepts. In other words, the structure of analysis is operationalized on the basis of previous knowledge (Elo and Kyngäs 2008). For example, some studies analyzed the microblog posts based on existing categories of health-related messages (Pei et al. 2016), learning and teaching content (Fischer et al. 2019), and attitudes toward sports for women (Esmundo 2021). Given that the analytic targets of this study (i.e., dimensions of intercultural attitudes and culture) have already been maturely conceptualized and validated by both theoretical and empirical studies, the deductive approach was chosen to perform the content analysis of microblogging data.

2.4. Gender Differences in Intercultural Attitudes and Microblogging

The American Psychological Association (2011) defined gender as “the attitudes, feelings, and behaviors that a given culture associates with a person’s biological sex” (p. 1), implying that men and women differ psychologically in the way they perceive and act. Some past studies reported that women were more likely to (a) respect cultural diversity and be open-minded about cultural differences (Vreckova et al. 2020), (b) be interculturally empathetic (Solhaug and Kristensen 2020), (c) possess stronger foreign language proficiency (Wightman 2020), and (d) hold ethnorelative perspectives (Goldstein and Kim 2006) than their male counterparts. In contrast, some studies documented that men experienced a lower level of anxiety and had better control of their interactions with culturally different others (Moradi and Ghabanchi 2019). Concerning the posting behaviors on social media, compared to men, women were found to express more emotions on social media (Tifferet and Vilnai-Yavetz 2014) that were either distinctly positive or negative (Jalonen 2014). Moreover, researchers observed that women tend to post more topics related to everyday living such as family fun, holidays, and festivals, whereas men post more about topics such as deep thought, politics, and religion (Liu et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2013). All the evidence indicated the need to attend to gender differences in the sentiment and content of microbloggers’ posts.

2.5. The Present Study

This study made the first attempt to generate a comprehensive picture of how Chinese people feel about foreign cultures and people, and more specifically, what themes of cultural content were concerned, and whether gender gap existed in these issues, by closely examining microblog posts on relevant topics from the launch year of the selected microblogging platform through 2022. The general objective of this study is to uncover how microbloggers’ attitudes and thematic focus on foreign cultures have evolved over time and to determine the role that gender differences play in shaping these perspectives. Five research questions were proposed to guide this study:
(1)
What was the overall microblog activity about users’ attitudes toward foreign cultures and people during 2009 and 2022?
(2)
What were the sentiment values of the eligible posts that reflected the microbloggers’ attitudes toward foreign cultures and people?
(3)
Were there any gender differences in microbloggers’ attitudes toward foreign cultures and people?
(4)
What themes of culture under the “Big C” and “small c” culture types were included in the eligible microblog posts?
(5)
Were there any gender differences in the culture themes concerned by the microbloggers?

3. Methods

3.1. Data Source and Data Collection

Sina Weibo, the Chinese equivalent of X (formerly Twitter), was launched by Sina Corporation in August 2009. As reported by Thomala (2022, June 21), up to the first quarter of 2022, monthly active users of Sina Weibo have surpassed 582 million (252 million daily active users). It has been the most popular microblogging platform in China for users to share and receive information. Microblogging data were extracted using Houyi Crawler Version 4.0.1.0 (https://www.houyicaiji.com/, accessed on 7 May 2022), a free software developed based on an artificial intelligence algorithm to identify and collect information from websites. The search terms used for data collection were “外国文化” (foreign culture), “外国人”/”老外” (foreigner), “其他国家”/”别的国家” (other countries), “西方国家” (Western countries), “西方人” (Westerners), “东西文化差异” (cultural differences between Eastern and Western cultures), “中外文化差异” (cultural differences between China and foreign cultures), “和我们的文化相比” (compared to our culture), “和中国文化相比” (compared to Chinese culture), “和中国人相比” (compared to our Chinese), and “过洋节” (celebrate foreign festivals).
The timeframe of searching was set between August 2009 and March 2022. A total of 9464 microblogging posts were initially identified. The data were exported to and processed in Microsoft Excel. In the phase of data pre-processing, the dataset was cleaned by removing repeated posts by the same author (n = 45), political comments on international wars (n = 2839) or the pandemic (n = 2055), news (n = 63), advertisements (n = 284), and irrelevant posts (n = 1757). The final dataset for subsequent analyses included 2421 microblog posts by 2295 Sina Weibo users. The gender information was obtained from user profiles, with 1410 microblogs posted by females and 1011 microblogs posted by males.

3.2. Sentiment Values Analysis and Content Analysis

After the data pre-processing phase, each microblog was coded regarding its sentiment value (i.e., positive, neutral, or negative). Previous studies suggested that sentiment analysis of microblogging data could have been automated through using natural language processing techniques such as Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count tool (e.g., Onan 2018) and machine learning algorithms (e.g., Gupta et al. 2017). Nevertheless, this study chose to use manual coding as the effort required was acceptable. More importantly, according to Van-Atteveldt et al. (2021) and Boukes et al. (2020), human coding tends to produce higher accuracy as compared to automated coding. The appraisal dictionary suggested by Bloom (2011) was used to assist the coding of emotional quotients associated with the microblog posts. Specifically, posts that expressed obvious positive emotions or contained words such as “glad” and “interesting” were coded as positive; posts that revealed ambiguous or mixed emotion or included words such as “different” and “differences” were coded as neutral, and posts that expressed obvious negative emotions or used words such as “frustrated” or “afraid” were coded as negative. Example microblogs that were coded as positive, neutral, or negative, respectively, are presented in Table 1. All the translation was conducted by following Brislin’s (1970) back-translation technique, which involves translating the text from the original language to the target language and then translating it back to the original language. This approach helps to identify and correct discrepancies in meaning, tone, or context, ensuring that the translated content retains its original intent and nuances. By using this method, the study aimed to minimize shifts in meaning that could affect the accuracy and fidelity of the emotional coding, thereby enhancing the reliability of the analysis of intercultural sentiments in microblogging data.
To further discover the dimensions of intercultural attitudes embedded in the microblog post and the associated themes of culture, deductive content analysis (Mayring 2015) was adopted to scrutinize the posts content. The codebook was composed of the theoretically and empirically differentiated categories of intercultural attitudes and culture (i.e., “Big C” and “small c”). To improve the reliability of coding, two PhD candidates in education were invited to perform the manual coding. The coders were paid 1.2 USD for each microblog post. Before commencing the formal coding, the two coders spent two days familiarizing themselves with the codebook and worked independently to code 200 randomly selected microblog posts to examine the relevance of each code, and to establish inter-coder reliability. The sequence of assigning codes for each post was the (a) sentiment value, (b) dimension of intercultural attitudes, and (c) theme of culture. Figure 1 delineates the data analysis procedures.
Inconsistencies were discussed after the coding, and the codebook was further refined. Then, the two coders applied the refined codebook (see Appendix A) to independently coded all microblog posts under analysis. The Krippendorff’s α for the coding of sentiment values (α = 0.90), dimensions of intercultural attitudes (α = 0.87), and themes of culture (α = 0.93) were calculated in SPSS 26.0 (De Swert 2012).

4. Results and Discussions

4.1. The Overall Microblog Activity about Users’ Intercultural Attitudes

As shown in Figure 2, during the period from 2012 to 2018, only a handful of microblogs were posted to express the users’ attitudes toward foreign people and cultures. From 2019 to 2021, the number of microblog posts increased steadily, but from the end of 2021 to March 2022, the number of microblog posts expressing the users’ intercultural attitudes dramatically increased. The turning points of growth in the number of relevant microblog posts were very likely related to the worldwide outbreak of the pandemic in 2019. Probably, during the lockdown period, many users spent increased time on active social media use to reduce boredom (Sun et al. 2022) such that through extensive viewing activities (e.g., news) on microblog platform, users were exposed to culturally different reactions to the epidemic (e.g., face masks issues), which stimulated their willingness to express their thoughts or opinions about people and cultures of other countries.
The gender-based comparison indicated that from 2019 to March 2022, females (64.4%, 55.8%, 57.4%, 59.5%, respectively) posted more microblogs than males (35.6%, 44.2%, 42.6%, 40.5%, respectively) that revealed their intercultural attitudes. This corroborated the findings of previous studies that females had a greater tendency to engage in active social media use (i.e., posting) and self-disclosure (i.e., the process of revealing intimate information about oneself to others such attitudes, feelings, desires, experiences, and thoughts) than their male counterparts (Towner et al. 2022).

4.2. Sentiment Values and Dimensions of Chinese Microbloggers’ Intercultural Attitudes: Gender-Based Comparison

The results of the sentiment analysis demonstrated that, in general, 53.9% (n = 1304) microblog posts contained obvious positive attitudes toward foreign people and cultures; 25.5% (n = 618) posts revealed ambiguous attitudes that were labeled as neutral; and 20.6% (n = 499) posts involved obvious negative attitudes toward foreign people and cultures. As shown in Figure 3, when the sentiment values of posts were compared across gender groups, females (73.8%, n = 962) were found to post high rate of sentimentally positive microblogs, nearly three times higher than that of males (26.2%, n = 342). In contrast, the rate of sentimentally neutral microblogs posted by males (69.9%, n = 432) was more than twice as that posted by females (30.1%, n = 186). Moreover, the rates of sentimentally negative microblogs posted by females (52.5%, n = 262) and males (47.5%, n = 237) were of minor differences, with females having slightly higher rate than males.
The finding that females in general exhibited more obvious emotion than males was congruent with Park et al.’s (2016) analytical results of 15.4 million posts created by 68,000 Facebook users. Their findings suggested that women use words more emotionally than men as reflected in women’s predominant use of words describing emotions (e.g., excited, happy) and intensive adverbs (e.g., sooooo, ridiculously); and their tendency to use warmer and more positive words. Similarly, Rao et al.’s (2010) examination of X (formerly Twitter) users’ language use reported that expressions such as “OMG” and “lol” were more frequently used by females, and the word “yeah” is predominantly used by men to affirm a fact.
A closer look was then taken to investigate the dimensions of intercultural attitudes as embedded in the sentimentally positive, neutral and negative microblog posts. As presented in Figure 4, sentimentally positive posts reflected the microbloggers’ curiosity and discovery about and respect for foreign people and cultures. The results indicated that among these posts, more microblogs were posted by females to show their interest and motivation to learn about foreign cultures (females: 69.9%, n = 589; males: 30.1%, n = 254), and also the tendency to value and appreciate cultural differences (females: 80.9%, n = 373; males: 19.1%, n = 88), as compared to their male counterparts. This finding was consistent with previous empirical studies that compared to males, females are more likely to initiate intercultural contact and are more motivated to understand, appreciate, and interact with different cultures (Tompkins et al. 2017; Vreckova et al. 2020). Scholars have attempted to understand this gender gap based on the assumptions of social role theory. That is, men are expected to be highly agentic because of their assertive and competitive behaviors; women, on the other hand, are seen as communal for being more friendly and caring (Eagly and Wood 2012). Thus, when approaching foreign people/cultures, women are more likely to exhibit friendly and empathetic attitudes and evaluate the intercultural situations as favorable.
Sentimentally neutral posts displayed the microbloggers’ openness toward cultural differences. That is, among these microblogs, compared to females, more males posted to express their recognition of the existence of cultural differences, without revealing obvious emotion (males: 69.9%, n = 432; females: 30.1%, n = 186). According to Epstein (2003), women and men relied on different systems (experiential versus rational) to interpret the world. The experiential system adopted by women is innate and adaptive; hence, women prefer to make sense of the world by learning from outcomes of affective experiences that stimulate positive emotions, for example, to recognize, understand, and appreciate cultural differences through engaging in authentic intercultural contacts. In comparison, men applied a rational system that operates based on evidence and is considered to be analytical. Therefore, men are apt to translate the reality into symbols or words that are transmitted culturally such as through education (Sladek et al. 2010), for instance, to indicate the acceptance of cultural differences by rationally summarizing the available evidence (e.g., history of cultural diversity).
However, mixed results were found regarding sentimentally negative microblogs. Comparison across gender groups suggested that more microblogs were posted by males that involved negative cultural orientation (males: 66.2%, n = 45; females: 33.8%, n = 23) whereas more posts were created by females that implied their low tolerance to differences (females: 55.5%, n = 239; males: 44.5%, n = 192). Specifically, more microblogs posted by males displayed the beliefs that their own culture is better than that of other countries (i.e., ethnocentric beliefs) and unwillingness to approach people/culture of other countries (i.e., inherent resistance). However, more posts created by females revealed their negative attitudes toward intercultural situations accompanied by feelings of confusion or anxiety (i.e., culture shock). Similar findings were documented in prior studies. For example, perhaps for generally being more assertive and less trusting, men were found to have higher level of ethnocentrism than women (Salisbury et al. 2010) and were less willing to communicate interculturally by viewing differences as a threat to one’s identity and view of the world (Göncz 2018). On the other hand, women are usually more socially anxious and less psychologically secure than men (Vervoort et al. 2010). Thus, intercultural situations that are inherently stressful were more likely to cause anxiety for women, which may further stimulate their intention to avoid uncertainty (Broeder 2022).

4.3. Themes of Culture Concerned by Chinese Microbloggers: Gender-Based Comparison

Of the relevant microblog posts, 27.5% (n = 666) posts were about “Big C” culture; 50.9% (n = 1233) posts were about “small c” culture; 9.1% (n = 221) posts did not specify the types of culture, culture was only mentioned literally as “culture’” in these posts; 12.4% (n = 301) posts did not include any cultural content. Instead, they expressed the microbloggers’ willingness to interact with culturally different people. Results of gender-based comparison of culture themes concerned by the microbloggers are shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6.
Regarding “Big C” culture, Figure 5 showed that more females are interested in different countries’ festivals (females: 66.4%, n = 241; males: 33.6%, n = 122), art such as movies, literature, and music (females: 57.5%, n = 111; males: 42.5%, n = 82), and food (females: 61.2%, n = 41; males: 38.8%, n = 26); whereas males posted more about history (males: 82.5%, n = 52; females: 17.5%, n = 11), the physical appearance of people (males: 60.9%, n = 14; females: 39.1%, n = 9), and the social or education systems (males: 52.0%, n = 13; females: 48.0%, n = 12) of different countries.
As for “small c” culture, females posted more about foreign language learning (females: 84.6%, n = 170; males: 15.4%, n = 31), and culturally different people’s behavioral patterns (females: 51.9%, n = 161; males: 48.1%, n = 149), everyday living (females: 75.4%, n = 52; males: 24.6%, n = 17), interpersonal or intimate relations (females: 62.5%, n = 35; males: 37.5%, n = 21), personal traits (females: 56.6%, n = 30; males: 43.4%, n = 23), and customs (females: 52.0%, n = 17; males: 48.0%, n = 12). On the other hand, males posted more about values and beliefs (males: 66.3%, n = 183; females: 33.7%, n = 93), and thinking patterns (males: 73.7%, n = 129; females: 26.3%, n = 46) of people from different cultures.
These results, to a varying extent, corroborated findings of previous studies that uncovered gender differences in posting behaviors on social media. For example, in Liu et al. (2018) and Wang et al. (2013)’s studies that investigated topic preferences of Facebook users, females were found to post more on topics related to detailed aspects of their everyday life such as family fun, intimate and interpersonal relationships, festivals, and daily routines, whereas males post more about abstract concepts such as deep thoughts, ideology- and system-related topics. Notably, as reported above, more women displayed negative attitudes toward intercultural experiences due to the culture shock they have suffered. A scrutinization of relevant posts suggested that women’ anxious feelings were mostly caused by their perceived difficulty in comprehending culturally different thinking patterns (e.g., logic of thinking) or values and beliefs (e.g., individualism, egoism, values of sex). A plausible explanation for these findings is that men and women possess different cognitive styles. Prior research (Smith et al. 2008) found that men are more disposed to abstract thinking to recognize patterns (e.g., thinking styles of Easterners and Westerners), analyze the essence of things (e.g., historical/religious roots of cultural differences), and synthesize the information to ultimately solve problems (e.g., make sense how certain values and beliefs shape the shared behavioral patterns in a cultural group). On the other hand, women tend to engage more in context-specific thinking, in aspects of concrete situations (e.g., festivals, food, and everyday living) and relationships (e.g., family relationships, friendships, and romantic relationships) in different cultures. Probably, women who were less skilled at higher-order thinking were more likely to experience culture shock related to abstract intercultural information processing.

5. Conclusions and Implications

This interdisciplinary study contributed to both fields of intercultural competence and microblogging. On the one hand, the current study made the first attempt to understand individuals’ attitudes toward foreign people and cultures through the analyses of a large number of microblogging data. In particular, the findings unsealed the percentages of microblogs with different sentiment values and the corresponding theoretically defined aspects of intercultural attitudes. The gender-based comparison further improved our understanding of the gender gap in the attitudinal dispositions needed to embrace multiculturalism. On the other hand, our findings regarding gender differences in emotional disclosure and posting topics on social media added to relevant research realm, especially from the angle of microbloggers’ demonstration of their intercultural attitudes and cultural themes of interests.
Practically, findings of this study were informative about the strengths and weaknesses, respectively, of females and males when responding to cultural differences. In general, the observed gender gaps in intercultural attitudes urge researchers and educational practitioners to take this issue into account when designing interventions to enhance individuals’ intercultural competence, so as to maximize the intervention effectiveness by attending to potential gender differences. Specifically, the inspection of microblog posts with negative sentiment values alerted that males were more likely to hold the beliefs that their own cultural group is superior to others and were less willing to approach culturally dissimilar people or situations. According to prior intervention studies, web-based exploratory activities (e.g., group discussion on academic essays, news reports, personal blogs, and videos) that involved learners’ own culture and a different culture (Stockwell 2016, 2018) and international online collaborations (i.e., students from two different cultures worked in teams to discuss and deliver PowerPoint presentation on similarities and differences on various aspects of their cultures) (Boehm et al. 2010) were effective in reducing individuals’ ethnocentric beliefs and fostering more favorable and flexible attitudes toward different cultures.
Moreover, attention also needs to be paid to the negative attitudes of a crowd of women toward intercultural experiences, as can be seen in their microblog posts (i.e., anxiety and confusion about cultural differences in thinking patterns, and values and beliefs). As suggested by Carroll and Harris (2020), repetitive instructional intervention can be applied to improve learners’ ability to establish connections between materials, thereby increasing learners’ accuracy and confidence in interpreting complex issues. Translated into the current context, instead of requiring learners to memorize materials describing typical characteristics of a certain culture, educators can guide learners to repeatedly build connections between the abstract aspects (e.g., values and beliefs) and the concrete aspects (e.g., behavioral patterns, customs) of people in a culture—that is, to decipher the impact of a group of people’s cultural values and beliefs on their shared cognitive, emotional, and behavioral responses when functioning in their community. This would help improve learners’ higher-order thinking skills to accurately dissect and understand different worldviews and minimize the risk of experiencing culture shock.
It is necessary to note that the findings of this study need to be interpreted with cautions. First, although microblogging content was less strictly structured than self-reported survey items, individual’s self-disclosure on social media can also be biased. The Self-Affirmation Theory (Steele 1988) held that individuals had fundamental needs for positive self-regard. As such, individuals can be more inclined to display their positive images more often than negative ones on social networking platforms (Li 2019), and consequently information published on the platforms can often be overly positive rather than negative (Verduyn et al. 2021) to maintain their self-worth. Therefore, it is possible that some microblog users have fabricated their posts to downplay their confusion about cultural differences. Second, one notable limitation of this study is the potential for inaccuracies in gender information provided by users, as they may deliberately misrepresent their gender or select categories that do not align with their true identity. This discrepancy can significantly impact the accuracy of the gender-based analysis, leading to potential biases in the results. Similarly, the absence of age information for both creators and users further limits the study’s comprehensiveness. Age can influence both the content created and the reception of that content, potentially interacting with gender in ways not captured by the current analysis. Future research should incorporate age demographics alongside gender to provide a more nuanced understanding of how these factors interact and affect content creation and user engagement. Third, the microblogging data used in this study only contained data from Sina Weibo (Chinese X [formerly Twitter]). The findings may be mitigated by involving data from other microblogging platforms. Last, the sample of this study only included Chinese microblog users, and the findings thus might not be able to be generalized to population of other cultures. It would be interesting for future studies to investigate this topic using a larger dataset that includes more culturally diverse samples.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. Access to social media data is restricted due to privacy concerns and data protection regulations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Example posts of corresponding codes in the codebook.
CategoriesCodesOriginal PostsEnglish Translation
Intercultural attitudesCuriosity and discovery“一早起床,开启了两天的中西文化差异课。听赵老师从中西方的历史发展过程入手,了解文化差异的构成和精神信仰的不同点。高考时选修的历史,完全都是为了考试,似乎也没有记住什么。现在抛开考场,反而可以更开阔的吸收和融汇。”“Got up super early for a two-day course on Chinese vs. Western cultures. Mr. Zhao’s lectures are seriously eye-opening, diving into how history shapes cultural differences and beliefs. College history was all about exams and I barely remember anything. Now, I’m learning for the love of it and soaking up so much more.”
Respect“#如何看待中外街舞编舞师的差异化# 文化差异决定吧,国外编舞师感觉更注重音乐本身,节奏,国内编舞师更注重故事性,让音乐和故事结合,各有各的优点” “#ChineseVsForeignHipHopChoreography# The differences are all about culture! Foreign choreographers focus more on the music and rhythm, while domestic ones emphasize storytelling and blending music with narrative. Both approaches have their own strengths.”
Openness“我不否认东西方文化差异挺大的”“I won’t deny that there are big cultural differences between East and West.”
Negative cultural orientation“我们五千年的文化底蕴,外国人懂个屁!我都替他们遗憾”“Five thousand years of cultural heritage, and foreigners don’t get it at all! I feel sorry for them.”
Low tolerance for differences“我真有点搞不懂,你在中国,你不说中国话,一直说你们国家的语言,你觉得我会搭理你吗?”“Seriously, you’re in China, don’t speak Chinese, and just keep talking in your own language. Do you really think I’m going to engage with you?”
Culture—‘Big C’History“好像逐渐明白为什么那么多人崇尚甚至有点倾慕外国的文化了,听了一点点关于古罗马的历史,觉得相较起我们的历史,那就像入门的小学课程和博士的课程一样,实在是太简单了,所以能看得懂,所以容易有共鸣”“Seems like I’m starting to get why so many people are into foreign cultures. After learning a bit about ancient Rome’s history, it feels like comparing elementary school to a PhD program. It’s so straightforward, and I can totally get into it and relate.”
Systems“和我们的中小学教育体系相比,很多国家都不行啊”“Honestly, a lot of education systems in other countries don’t even come close to matching ours. Ours is way better.”
Festivals“春节是中国最重要的传统节日,就好像我们看老外过圣诞节一样,现在很多外国朋友也会过这个节日,而且他们也会买点年糕糖果什么的,文化交流真的全球化了。”“Chinese New Year is like Christmas for us—super important and widely celebrated. Now, lots of my foreign friends are getting into it too! They’re picking up rice cakes and candy, and it’s awesome to see how global cultural exchange is these days.”
Art“就是说百年孤独看了快一半..人物关系复杂得堪比红楼梦,有一些小感悟,算是蛮喜欢这本书的”“Just finished half of One Hundred Years of Solitude—the character relationships are as tangled as A Dream of Red Mansions! Got a lot of thoughts brewing. Really into this book so far.”
Food“我看美剧里面只要碰到节日或者酒会,都会端出来一只硕大无比色泽诱人的火鸡,火鸡可食用的肉比我们餐桌上的各种鸡都多,而且看起来很好吃”“Noticed that in American TV shows, every time there’s a holiday or a party, there’s always a big, shiny roasted turkey! It’s packed with way more meat than any chicken we usually have, and it looks insanely delicious.”
Appearance“这些西方人为什么都长的这么壮啊 太吓人了 又高又壮 是吃的不一样吗?”“Why are Westerners so strong? It’s kinda intimidating. They’re tall and built! Do they eat differently or something?”
Culture—
‘small c’
Behavioral patterns“咖啡馆座位旁边各坐着一对金发西方人,其他都是日本人。两对西方人说话都好大声,二郎腿,身体几乎斜躺着在座位上,边说话边互相打着手势,不时发出哈哈哈哈的大笑声。完全目无旁人。旁边日本人声音都很小,坐姿小心。我想写东西,所以真希望金发们能说话小声点,但我知道他们正在享受他们的放松时刻”“Just had a café experience where the two pairs of blond Westerners next to me were super loud—chatting, laughing, and totally laid back. Meanwhile, the Japanese folks around were all sitting quietly and upright. I’m here trying to write and wish the blondes would tone it down a bit, but hey, I get that they’re just enjoying their time.”
Thinking patterns“中国人强调整体思维,西方人强调分析思维。用通俗的话说,就是中国人容易看到一片森林,西方人容易看到一棵棵的树。中国人更容易看到整体、看到全局,看到所有的关联性和变化性,西方人则更容易看到每棵树的独特个性、与众不同的特点,甚至可以看到它的排他性。实际上,它们都是人们为了适应自己的生存环境而创造出来的最有意义和价值的文化,所以它们没有对错之分,也没有高下之分。”“Chinese thinking tends to be more holistic—like seeing the whole forest—while Western thinking is more analytical, focusing on individual trees. So, Chinese folks might notice the big picture and how everything connects, while Westerners spot unique traits and details of each tree. Both perspectives are super valuable and shaped by their environments, so neither is better or worse, just different ways of understanding the world.”
Values and beliefs“#中西文化差异#问小爱 如何找到男朋友 小爱说 成为更好的自己就能遇到更好的他问 Being 如何找到男朋友 Bing 说 be yourself and flirt 和 AI 的聊天还是有点愉快”“#CultureClash Alert# I asked Mi AI (Xiaomi’s AI) how to find a boyfriend, and it said, ‘Be a better person, and you’ll attract a better match.’ But when I asked Bing (Microsoft’s AI) the same thing, it said, ‘Just be yourself and flirt!’ It was a fun chat with the AI!”
Customs“连续看到三个诗人叫 John 外国人到底为啥这么喜欢重名?” “Just noticed that I’ve come across three poets named John. Why do so many foreigners love that name?”
Language“今天雇主面试,感觉真的中外文化差异很大,以至于自己不敢说话,怕别人曲解自己的意思,又怕人家听不懂!所以学好一门语言也要了解更多别人的文化呀”“Today’s interview really highlighted the differences between Chinese and foreign cultures for me. I was hesitant to speak up because I was worried about being misunderstood! It’s clear that learning a language goes hand in hand with understanding different cultures.”
Everyday living“外国人怎么那么爱吃冰的,他们真的不喝热水吗”“Why are foreigners so obsessed with ice? Do they really never drink warm water?”
Relations“东西方 dating 文化差异: 东方,我们先确定关系,再做该做的事,不合就分 西方,我们先做该做的事,再看要不要确定关系,中间随时可以换人”“Dating differences between East and West: In the East, we usually define the relationship first, then see how it goes, and break up if it doesn’t work out. In the West, it’s more about dating first and figuring out the relationship status later—you can always change your mind before making it official.”
Personal traits“西方人有一个共同的特点:傲慢”“One thing I’ve noticed about Westerners is that they often come off as pretty arrogant.”
Culture—NS/NANot specified“我喜欢外国的文化”“I like foreign cultures.”
Not applicable“怎么那么多外国人啊我晕”“Why are there so many foreigners OMG.”

References

  1. Adamczyk, Amy, and Yen-Chiao Liao. 2019. Examining public opinion about LGBTQ-related issues in the United States and across multiple nations. Annual Review of Sociology 45: 401–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. American Psychological Association. 2011. Definition of Terms: Sex, Gender, Gender Identity, Sexual Orientation. Available online: http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbt/resources/sexuality-definitions.pdf (accessed on 17 July 2023).
  3. Amoretti, Guido. 2018. Psychological obstacles to multiculturalism: How stereotypes and mechanisms of defence may cause adverse behaviours to multiculturalism. Geopolitical, Social Security and Freedom Journal 1: 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Armitage, Christopher J., and Julie Christian. 2003. From attitudes to behaviour: Basic and applied research on the theory of planned behaviour. Current Psychology 22: 187–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bennett, Janet M., and Milton J. Bennett. 2004. Developing intercultural sensitivity: An integrative approach to global and domestic diversity. In Handbook of Intercultural Training. Edited by Dan Landis, Janet Marie Bennett and Milton J. Bennett. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, pp. 147–65. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bennett, Milton J., and Mitchell Hammer. 2017. A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication 1: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  7. Berscheid, Ellen, and Elaine Walster. 1978. Interpersonal Attraction. Reading: Addison-Wesley. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bloom, Kenneth. 2011. Sentiment Analysis Based on Appraisal Theory and Functional Local Grammars (Publication No. 3504518). Doctoral dissertation, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA. [Google Scholar]
  9. Boehm, Diane, Hermann Kurthen, and Lilianna Aniola-Jedrzejek. 2010. Do international online collaborative learning projects impact ethnocentrism? e-Learning and Digital Media 7: 133–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Boukes, Mark, Bob Van de Velde, Theo Araujo, and Rens Vliegenthart. 2020. What’s the tone? Easy doesn’t do it: Analyzing performance and agreement between off-the-shelf sentiment analysis tools. Communication Methods and Measures 14: 83–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Brislin, Richard W. 1970. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1: 185–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Broeder, Peter. 2022. The moderating effects of age and gender on the relationship between culture and uncertainty avoidance: Evidence from Europe and Asia. Journal of the Academy of Business and Emerging Markets 2: 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Byram, Michael. 2021. Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar]
  14. Carroll, Kathleen A., and Carolynn M. Harris. 2020. Using a repetitive instructional intervention to improve students’ higher-order thinking skills. College Teaching 69: 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, Guo-Ming, and William J. Starosta. 2000. The development and validation of the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale. Human Communication 3: 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  16. De Swert, Knut. 2012. Calculating Inter-Coder Reliability in Media Content Analysis Using Krippendorff’s Alpha. Center for Politics and Communication, pp. 1–15. Available online: https://www.polcomm.org/wp-content/uploads/ICR01022012.pdf (accessed on 17 July 2023).
  17. Deardorff, Darla K. 2006. Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education 10: 241–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Deardorff, Darla K. 2017. The big picture of intercultural competence assessment. In Intercultural Competence in Higher Education: International Approaches, Assessment, and Application. Edited by Darla Deardoff and Lily ArasaratnamSmith. London, UK: Routledge, pp. 124–33. [Google Scholar]
  19. Eagly, Alice H., and Wendy Wood. 2012. Social role theory. In Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Geographical Perspectives. Edited by Paul A. M. Van Lange, Arie W. Kruglanski and E. Tory Higgins. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd., pp. 458–76. [Google Scholar]
  20. Elo, Satu, and Helvi Kyngäs. 2008. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing 62: 107–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Epstein, Seymour. 2003. Cognitive-experiential self theory of personality. In Handbook of Psychology: Vol. 5. Personality and Social Psychology. Edited by Theodore Millon and Melvin J. Lerner. Hoboken: Wiley, pp. 159–84. [Google Scholar]
  22. Esmundo, Rachel A. 2021. A Content Analysis of Twitter Attitudes on women’s Australian and North American Sports. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia. [Google Scholar]
  23. Fischer, Christian, Barry Fishman, and Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck. 2019. New contexts for professional learning: Analyzing high school science teachers’ engagement on Twitter. AERA Open 5: 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Furnham, Adrian. 2019. Culture Shock: A review of the literature for practitioners. Psychology 10: 1832–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Pantheon Books. [Google Scholar]
  26. Goldstein, Susan B., and Randi I. Kim. 2006. Predictors of US college students’ participation in study abroad programs: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 30: 507–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Göncz, Lajos. 2018. Generalised ethnocentrism among high-school students in a multicultural setting: The role of the degree of multilingualism. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 39: 224–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Griffith, Richard L., Leah Wolfeld, Brigitte K. Armon, Joseph Rios, and Ou Lydia Liu. 2016. Assessing intercultural competence in higher education: Existing research and future directions. ETS Research Report Series 2016: 1–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gupta, Bhumika, Monika Negi, Kanika Vishwakarma, Goldi Rawat, and Priyanka Badhani. 2017. Study of Twitter sentiment analysis using machine learning algorithms on Python. International Journal of Computer Applications 165: 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hendrick, Tamara A., Arnout R. Fischer, Hilde Tobi, and Lynn J. Frewer. 2013. Self-reported attitude scales: Current practice in adequate assessment of reliability, validity, and dimensionality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 43: 1538–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Holtgraves, Thomas. 2004. Social desirability and self-reports: Testing models of socially desirable responding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30: 161–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Idris, Mas Muhammad. 2020. Assessing intercultural competence (IC) of state junior high school English teachers in Yogyakarta. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics 9: 628–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jalonen, Harri. 2014. Negative emotions in social media as a managerial challenge. In European Conference on Management, Leadership & Governance. Bristol: Academic Conferences International Limited, pp. 128–35. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kang-Young, Lee. 2009. Treating culture: What 11 high school EFL conversation textbooks in South Korea do. English Teaching: Practice and Critique 8: 76–96. [Google Scholar]
  35. Karasu, Fatma, Filiz Polat, and Canan B. Okuyan. 2022. The determination of intercultural sensitivity and ethnocentrism levels among nurses and nursing students: A border of city, Turkey. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care 58: 314–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kirillova, Ksenia, Xinran Lehto, and Liping Cai. 2015. Volunteer tourism and intercultural sensitivity: The role of interaction with host communities. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 32: 382–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Korenek, Peter, and Marián Šimko. 2014. Sentiment analysis on microblog utilizing appraisal theory. World Wide Web 17: 847–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kumar, Kailash. 2021. Integrated benchmarking standard and decision support system for structured, semi structured, unstructured retail data. Wireless Networks, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Labtic, Ian Glenn Carag, and Adisa Teo. 2019. Presentation of cultural information in a series of English textbooks. The New English Teacher 13: 36–36. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lebedko, Maria G. 2014. Interaction of ethnic stereotypes and shared identity in intercultural communication. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 154: 179–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Leung, Kwok, Soon Ang, and Mei Ling Tan. 2014. Intercultural competence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 1: 489–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, Yongzhan. 2019. Upward social comparison and depression in social network settings. Internet Research 29: 46–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, Ning, Yan Bing Zhang, and Weston T. Wiebe. 2017. Initial communication with and attitudes toward international students: Testing the mediating effects of friendship formation variables. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 46: 330–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, Yezheng, Jiajia Wang, Yuanchun Jiang, Jianshan Sun, and Jennifer Shang. 2018. Identifying impact of intrinsic factors on topic preferences in online social media: A nonparametric hierarchical Bayesian approach. Information Sciences 423: 219–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mayring, Philipp. 2002. Einführung in Die Qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken. 5. überarb. Aufl. [Introduction to Qualitative Social Research, 5th rev. ed.]. Weinheim: Beltz. [Google Scholar]
  46. Mayring, Philipp. 2015. Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical background and procedures. In Advances in Mathematics Education: Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education. Edited by Angelika Bikner-Ahsbahs, Christine Knipping and Norma Presmeg. Cham: Springer, pp. 365–80. [Google Scholar]
  47. Moradi, Elahe, and Zargham Ghabanchi. 2019. Intercultural sensitivity: A comparative study among business English undergraduate learners in two Countries of Iran and China. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies 6: 134–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Onan, Aytuğ. 2018. Sentiment analysis on Twitter based on ensemble of psychological and linguistic feature sets. Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 6: 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Paige, R. Michael, Helen L. Jorstad, Laura Siaya, Francine Klein, Jeanette Colby, and Dale Lange. 2003. Culture learning in language education. In Culture as the Core: Integrating Culture into the Language Curriculum. Edited by David Connell and John Connell. Minneapolis: The Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition, University of Minnesota, pp. 47–114. [Google Scholar]
  50. Park, Gregory, David Bryce Yaden, H. Andrew Schwartz, Margaret L. Kern, Johannes C. Eichstaedt, Michael Kosinski, David Stillwell, Lyle H. Ungar, and Martin E. P. Seligman. 2016. Women are warmer but no less assertive than men: Gender and language on Facebook. PLoS ONE 11: e0155885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Pawar, Anil Bhausaheb, Mahesh A. Jawale, and Dattatraya N. Kyatanavar. 2016. Fundamentals of sentiment analysis: Concepts and methodology. In Sentiment Analysis and Ontology Engineering. Edited by Witold Pedrycz and Shyi-Ming Chen. Cham: Springer, pp. 25–48. [Google Scholar]
  52. Pei, Jiayin, Guang Yu, and Peng Shan. 2016. Social media coverage of public health issues in China: A content analysis of Weibo news posts. Information Technology: New Generations 448: 111–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Qiao, Fang, and Kexin Jiang. 2021. Attitudes towards global warming on Twitter: A hedonometer-appraisal analysis. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM) 30: 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rao, Delip, David Yarowsky, Abhishek Shreevats, and Manaswi Gupta. 2010. Classifying latent user attributes in Twitter. In Proceedings of SMUC2010: The 2nd International Workshop on Search and Mining User-Generated Contents. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 37–44. [Google Scholar]
  55. Salisbury, Mark H., Michael B. Paulsen, and Ernest T. Pascarella. 2010. To see the world or stay at home: Applying an integrated student choice model to explore the gender gap in the intent to study abroad. Research in Higher Education 51: 615–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Scherer, Klaus R., Angela Schorr, and Tom Johnstone. 2001. Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theories, Methods, Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  57. Sladek, Ruth M., Malcolm J. Bond, and Paddy A. Phillips. 2010. Age and gender differences in preferences for rational and experiential thinking. Personality and Individual Differences 49: 907–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Smith, Pamela K., Daniël H. J. Wigboldus, and A. P. Dijksterhuis. 2008. Abstract thinking increases one’s sense of power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44: 378–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Solhaug, Trond, and Niels Nørgaard Kristensen. 2020. Gender and intercultural competence: Analysis of intercultural competence among upper secondary school students in Denmark and Norway. Educational Psychology 40: 120–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Spitzberg, Brian H., and Gabrielle Changnon. 2009. Conceptualizing intercultural competence. In Handbook of Intercultural Competence. Edited by Darla K. Deardorff. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, pp. 2–51. [Google Scholar]
  61. Steele, Claude M. 1988. The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Edited by Leonard Berkowitz. New York: Academic Press, vol. 21, pp. 261–302. [Google Scholar]
  62. Stockwell, Esther. 2016. Using web-based exploratory tasks to develop intercultural competence in a homogeneous cultural environment. Innovations in Education & Teaching International 53: 649–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Stockwell, Esther. 2018. Revisiting WebQuests to develop intercultural communication competence. International Journal of Technology and Inclusive Education 7: 1196–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sun, Rui, Carlotta Rieble, Yang Liu, and Disa Sauter. 2022. Connected despite lockdown: The role of social interactions and social media use in wellbeing. Collabra: Psychology 8: 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tarchi, Christian, and Alessio Surian. 2022. Promoting intercultural competence in study abroad students. European Journal of Psychology of Education 37: 123–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tavoschi, Lara, Filippo Quattrone, Eleonora D’Andrea, Pietro Ducange, Marco Vabanesi, Francesco Marcelloni, and Pier Luigi Lopalco. 2020. Twitter as a sentinel tool to monitor public opinion on vaccination: An opinion mining analysis from September 2016 to August 2017 in Italy. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics 16: 1062–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Thomala, Lai Lin. 2022. Average Number of Daily Active Users of Weibo Corporation from 1st Quarter 2018 to 1st Quarter 2022. Statista. June 2. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1058070/china-sina-weibo-dau/#:~:text=As%20of%20the%20first%20quarter,582%20million%20monthly%20active%20users (accessed on 17 July 2023).
  68. Tifferet, Sigal, and Iris Vilnai-Yavetz. 2014. Gender differences in Facebook self-presentation: An international randomized study. Computers in Human Behavior 35: 388–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tompkins, Amanda, Trevor Cook, Emily Miller, and Lucy A. LePeau. 2017. Gender influences on students’ study abroad participation and intercultural competence. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice 54: 204–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tori, Christopher D., and Murray Bilmes. 2002. Multiculturalism and psychoanalytic psychology: The validation of a defense mechanisms measure in an Asian population. Psychoanalytic Psychology 19: 701–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Towner, Emily, Jennifer Grint, Tally Levy, Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, and Livia Tomova. 2022. Revealing the self in a digital world: A systematic review of adolescent online and offline self-disclosure. Current Opinion in Psychology 45: 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Tufekci, Zeynep. 2014. Big questions for social media Big Data: Representativeness, validity and other methodological pitfalls. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 8: 505–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Van-Atteveldt, Wouter, Mariken A. Van der Velden, and Mark Boukes. 2021. The validity of sentiment analysis: Comparing manual annotation, crowd-coding, dictionary approaches, and machine learning algorithms. Communication Methods and Measures 15: 121–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Verduyn, Philippe, Nino Gugushvili, and Ethan Kross. 2021. The impact of social network sites on mental health: Distinguishing active from passive use. World Psychiatry 20: 133–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Vervoort, Leentje, Lidewij H. Wolters, Sanne M. Hogendoorn, Pier J. M. Prins, Else de Haan, Maaike H. Nauta, and Frits Boer. 2010. Automatic evaluations in clinically anxious and nonanxious children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology 39: 481–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Vreckova, Alzbeta, Cody Paris, and Heather Jeffrey. 2020. A gender analysis of intercultural sensitivity among flight attendants. e-Review of Tourism Research 18: 363–74. [Google Scholar]
  77. Wang, Yi-Chia, Moira Burke, and Robert E. Kraut. 2013. Gender, topic, and audience response: An analysis of usergenerated content on Facebook. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, pp. 31–34. [Google Scholar]
  78. Wightman, Merideth. 2020. Gender Differences in Second Language Learning: Why They Exist and What We Can Do about It. Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. Available online: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/2371 (accessed on 17 July 2023).
  79. Yue, Lin Wen, Ang Lay Hoon, Chan Mei Yuit, and Paramasivam Shamala. 2020. Analysing cultural elements in L2 mandarin textbooks for Malaysian learners. Journal of Language and Education 6: 121–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zakiyah, Yuliana, and Dwi Rukmini. 2022. Cultural contents on New Step-Up: Reading and writing for university students. English Education Journal 12: 112–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhou, Mingming. 2022. Public opinion on MOOCs: Sentiment and content analyses of Chinese microblogging data. Behaviour & Information Technology 41: 365–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhu, Yi, and Mary Bresnahan. 2018. They make no contribution!” versus “We should make friends with them!”—American domestic students’ perception of Chinese international students’ reticence and face. Journal of International Students 8: 1614–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flowchart of the data analysis procedures.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the data analysis procedures.
Journalmedia 05 00092 g001
Figure 2. Total number of microblogs reflecting users’ intercultural attitudes from 2012 to 2022.
Figure 2. Total number of microblogs reflecting users’ intercultural attitudes from 2012 to 2022.
Journalmedia 05 00092 g002
Figure 3. Comparison across gender in the sentiment values of microblog posts.
Figure 3. Comparison across gender in the sentiment values of microblog posts.
Journalmedia 05 00092 g003
Figure 4. Dimensions of intercultural attitudes embedded in the microblog posts.
Figure 4. Dimensions of intercultural attitudes embedded in the microblog posts.
Journalmedia 05 00092 g004
Figure 5. Gender gap in ‘Big C’ culture themes contained in the microblog posts.
Figure 5. Gender gap in ‘Big C’ culture themes contained in the microblog posts.
Journalmedia 05 00092 g005
Figure 6. Gender gap in ‘small c’ culture themes contained in the microblog posts.
Figure 6. Gender gap in ‘small c’ culture themes contained in the microblog posts.
Journalmedia 05 00092 g006
Table 1. Example microblog posts with different sentiment values.
Table 1. Example microblog posts with different sentiment values.
Original PostsEnglish TranslationSentiment Values
“今年的我在冬奥遇到了很多朋友,不论是一起工作的大家,还是许许多多来自不同文化背景的外国朋友。我时常感到足够温暖与幸运。”“This year, I made many friends at the Winter Olympics, including colleagues and people from various cultural backgrounds. I often feel warm and fortunate because of these experiences.”Positive
“看了一晚上视频,外国人在中国生活,中国人在外国生活,文化差异很有趣。”“Spent the whole evening watching videos about foreigners living in China and Chinese people living abroad. The cultural differences are really fascinating.”
“环境的差别竟最终导致了如此巨大的东西方文化差异,以至于到了现在人们都还生活在不同的文化环境和政治制度中,这便使人有了差别。”“The environmental differences have created significant cultural differences between the East and West. Even now, people live in different cultural contexts and political systems, which shapes their behaviors and perspectives.”Neutral
“美国人和我们国家的人相比,他们吃的食物多数是高热量的,也就是肉食比较多,在宴会上,也会使用一次性手套来吃食物。” “Compared to people in my country, Americans eat a lot more high-calorie foods, like meat, and they use disposable gloves at banquets.”
“开始半个月的实习了被分到了一个全是外国人的组本社恐+语障已经快死了。”“Started my internship for half a month and assigned to a group full of foreigners. I am dying as a sociophobic nerd with language barrier.”Negative
“看一圈美食纪录片就知道,国外很多食材和做法根本没法和中国相比。”“Watch some food documentaries then you will know that many foreign food ingredients and recipes are simply not comparable to those in China.”
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X. Intercultural Attitudes Embedded in Microblogging: Sentiment and Content Analyses of Data from Sina Weibo. Journal. Media 2024, 5, 1477-1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5040092

AMA Style

Zhang X. Intercultural Attitudes Embedded in Microblogging: Sentiment and Content Analyses of Data from Sina Weibo. Journalism and Media. 2024; 5(4):1477-1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5040092

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xiaotian. 2024. "Intercultural Attitudes Embedded in Microblogging: Sentiment and Content Analyses of Data from Sina Weibo" Journalism and Media 5, no. 4: 1477-1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5040092

APA Style

Zhang, X. (2024). Intercultural Attitudes Embedded in Microblogging: Sentiment and Content Analyses of Data from Sina Weibo. Journalism and Media, 5(4), 1477-1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5040092

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop