Next Article in Journal
Game Transfer Phenomena in a Clinical Case with Psychosis and Gaming Disorder
Previous Article in Journal
Cocaine Effects without Cocaine: Increasing Happiness with Self-Regulation Therapy in a Single Session
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Internet Addiction and Depression among Syrian College Students: A Cross-Sectional Study

1
Faculty of Medicine, Aleppo University, Aleppo 15310, Syria
2
Faculty of Medicine of Algiers, University of Algiers, Algiers 16000, Algeria
3
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy III, University of Ulm, Leimgrubenweg 12-14, 89075 Ulm, Germany
4
Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26121 Oldenburg, Germany
5
Nursing Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha 3050, Qatar
6
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Life Science, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Tangail 1980, Bangladesh
7
Department of Internal Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha 3050, Qatar
8
Faculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus 30621, Syria
9
Department of Health Services, Srinagar 190001, India
10
Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Sharda University, Greater Noida 201306, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Psychiatry Int. 2023, 4(3), 275-285; https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint4030027
Submission received: 15 June 2023 / Revised: 25 August 2023 / Accepted: 30 August 2023 / Published: 1 September 2023

Abstract

:
Background: Problematic internet use (PIU) or internet addiction has become increasingly prevalent, and concerns about its impact on mental health and social functioning have grown. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of PIU among Syrian university students and its relationship with their demographics, internet user behavior, and mental health. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among undergraduate medical students in Syrian government universities between 12 April and 29 May 2022. The survey included the Beck Depression Inventory and the Internet Addiction Scale. Results: Out of 2891 participants, 75.2% were female, with an average age of 21.87. The average Internet Addiction Test (IAT) score was 49.4, and the overall prevalence of PIU was 89%. Furthermore, 93.0% of participants displayed possible signs and symptoms of depression. PIU was significantly linked with physical abuse (p = 0.001) and mental stress (p = 0.0001). Internet addiction is (AOR:1.723, COR:2.289) fold more likely to occur in those with more than 8 h of sleep per night than in those who sleep for less than 6 h (p-value < 0.05). Unadjusted regression analysis showed that 13 predictors of the independent variables were statistically significant in predicting the presence of internet addiction, such as participants who suffered from a breakup (COR:2.039), domestic violence (COR:2.136), physical abuse (COR:2.190), or mental stress (COR:2.621) were more likely to be affected by internet addiction than those who did not (p-value < 0.05). Conclusions: The study found a high rate of internet addiction among Syrian medical students, with those experiencing mental health problems and depression symptoms more likely to be internet addicts. To prevent PIU, students should be encouraged to participate in extracurricular activities, such as sports, and awareness programs should be enhanced to highlight the negative effects of internet addiction.

1. Introduction

Internet addiction (IA) or problematic internet use (PIU) is defined as uncontrollable use of the Internet or significantly using the Internet as one of the necessities of life, causing stress and impairment when not using it [1]. However, as problematic internet use increased in prevalence, there were more worries about its effect on people’s mental health and social function [2]. A European cross-sectional study showed that 14% to 55% of European internet users have PIU [3]. Another cross-sectional study revealed that IA among university students in Jordan was 40% [4]. Previous studies revealed a correlation between PIU and mental health illnesses such as insomnia, headache, and problems with sleep quality leading to learning, concentration, and memory problems, as well among students with internet addiction (17.2%); 51.7% were also identified as insomniacs [5,6]. Many observational studies have documented the relationship between PIU and depression among adults, especially students, which revealed a higher rate of inadequate sleep, irregular dietary habits, less physical activity, and suicidal thoughts. In addition, the overall prevalence of PIU was 17.6% and nearly 44% (95% CI: 39.9–48.8) of the participants exhibited PIU [7,8,9]. Although Facebook is one of the most popular social media applications, created in 2004, it allows people to connect more easily and upload their features, pictures, videos, and feelings and provides easier ways to get to know others. The most interactive category with the application is university students. According to statistics, there were 2.45 billion monthly active users worldwide by the end of 2019. Around 68% of American adults used Facebook in 2018, compared to 56% in Germany, 75% in Italy and Spain, 76% in France, 89% in Belgium, 79% in the Netherlands, and 85% in the United Kingdom [10,11,12]. A Pew Research Center survey of US adults mentions that some 88% of 18- to 29-year-olds indicate that they use any form of social media [11]. High rates of emotional discomfort have been reported among Damascus University medical students. Depression was ranked as the most frequent distress, with a frequency of 60.6%, while almost one in two medical students felt stressed (52.6%), and one in three medical students experienced anxiety symptoms (35.1%) [13]. Significant numbers of Syrian students have stigmatizing views toward depressed individuals. However, vast numbers of Syrian students are eager to interact with these individuals [14]. Previous research has indicated that the proportion of people with PIU is greater in low-income countries, and PIU has shown more prevalence among university students. However, the number of these studies is still small [15,16,17]. Even though recent studies have discussed this phenomenon, the number of these studies is still small, especially for the categories of university students, where we can see a significant rise in depression rates every year; therefore, this topic must be studied more with a concentration on university students to minimize the occurrence of this issue. This study aims to measure the correlation between depression and internet addiction, especially among Syrian college students on social media platforms like Facebook.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Strategy and Questionnaire Design

An online cross-sectional survey was carried out between 12 April and 29 May 2022 to evaluate people’s knowledge of the connection between internet addiction and depression among students in Syrian universities. Students from government universities in Syria who were enrolled in undergraduate and graduate programs conducted this research (Damascus University, Tishreen University, Al-Baath University, Aleppo University, and Tartus University). The data was gathered using an online questionnaire distributed on social media platforms such as Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, and Telegram. The survey was developed using data from another study [8] and then translated and modified for Syrian locals. We employed convenience and snowball sampling methods to get the required data from the respondents. On the Google Forms website, a sample of 2904 Syrian students was asked to take the survey; however, 13 declined, bringing the total down to 2891.

2.2. Measures

The questionnaire is composed of 56 questions, divided into four sections, and on the first page, there was a question asking about agreeing to participate in this study.

2.2.1. Sociodemographic Variables

Age, gender, present address (city, rural region, or village), relationship status (single or in a relationship), experiences of breakup (yes, no, or not applicable), experiences of domestic abuse (binary variable), college (medical or non-medical) and separated parents are among the eight questions included in this assessment (binary variable).

2.2.2. Health, Behavioral, and Internet Activity Variables

This survey included seven questions that probed respondents’ behaviors and lifestyles, collecting data on their average daily physical activity (defined as any activity that raised their heart rate for at least 30 min), average sleep duration (normally six to eight hours), and average weight [18]. Depressive symptoms, past drug use history, and smoking history (binary variables) [19]. Questions on educational internet use, online gaming, YouTube, chat rooms, online shopping, social media like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, and how often people use Facebook daily were among the internet-use variables.

2.2.3. Depression Prediction Scale

This survey has 21 questions to measure depressed symptoms, all confirmed in Bangladesh [20]. The depression prediction scale is based on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scale [19]. The overall score, which ranged from 0 to 63, was calculated by adding the individual answer scores, which were categorized as normal from 0 to 4; borderline for depression from 5 to 13; moderate, representing likely moderate depression from 14 to 20; and probable severe depression from 21 to 63. The rating was comparable to that of research in Chinese [21] and Bangladesh [20]. The depression prediction scale based on the (BDI scale) has a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.83 and a score of 14 [21] for the depression criterion. The BDI was created to predict the likelihood of depression based on reported symptoms rather than to provide an official diagnosis of a depressive illness since it is not a clinical diagnostic tool.

2.2.4. Internet Addiction Assessment Tool

The internet addiction assessment tool is based on the Internet Addiction Test (IAT), a self-reported tool designed to assess problematic internet use [22]. There are 20 Likert-type questions on the scale, ranging from 0 (never) to 5 (always). Individual answer scores were added to create total scores ranging from 0 to 100. Participants were divided into two “internet-usage” groups based on their IAT scores, classifying them as (PIU), with those scoring more than 50 and “non-PIU” for less than 50. This limit was established using the approach described in prior studies [7,23,24]. Previous research shows this scale has high reliability and validity [7,23,25,26].

2.3. Pilot Study

This questionnaire was conducted on 30 randomly selected members of the public to establish its applicability and comprehension. Then, improvements were made in response to participant comments. Furthermore, using 30 participants, we ran a pilot test to evaluate the reliability of the inquired scales in this study (internet addiction assessment scale and depression prediction scale). For both scales, Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.712 to 0.861, indicating that the involved scales maintained a high internal consistency; the questionnaire was distributed once the pilot research was completed.

2.4. Sample Size

The minimum sample size was calculated using a single percentage of the population formula [n = [(Z/2)2. p (1 − p)/d2]. A 50% population percentage (P), 5% error margin, 95% confidence interval (Z/2 = 1.96), and an extra 5% non-response rate were employed. The minimum sample size was found to be 385.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The individuals’ demographic characteristics were determined using descriptive statistics. The associations between PIU and other participant characteristics were investigated using chi-square analysis, Fisher’s Exact Test, and a binary logistic regression model. The variance inflation factor was used to test for multicollinearity (VIF). The Hosmer–Lemeshow test was used to make the final model selection, and the Wald test was used to determine the significance of the variables. The odds ratios (OR) and associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Statistical significance was determined at the 0.05 level or below (2-tailed). Utilizing SPSS Windows version 28.0, results were examined.

3. Results

A total of 2904 individuals were invited to answer the survey, 13 of whom were refused participation, so the final number was 2891. The overall average score of the IAT scale was 49.40, with a standard deviation of 15.79 (Min = 0-Max = 100). The percentage of females was 75.2%, and the mean age of participants was 21.87 (SD = 3.211) years (Table 1). A total of 60.5% of participants were medical college students, and 39.5% were not. After omitting missing data regarding internet addiction (338), the sample size was set to 2553. The prevalence of PIU was 2281(89%) among all participants, and the cutoff score on the IAT was ≥50. Only 8.9% were suffering from domestic violence. Approximately one-third (33.3%) of the participants have experienced a breakup. Also, 13.0% suffered from physical abuse. More than half of individuals (58.7%) reported sleeping 6 to 8 h each night. Most individuals (93.0%) showed signs and symptoms of possible depression; 21.3% of respondents said they did not use the Internet for education. There is a significant correlation between suffering from domestic violence and the existence of PIU (p = 0.008). Experiencing a breakup was also related to greater rates of PIU (p = 0.0001). PIU was strongly associated with physical abuse (p = 0.001) and feelings of mental stress (p = 0.0001). Those who used the Internet for non-educational purposes were substantially related to PIU (p = 0.002). Participation in online chat rooms was also significantly associated with the existence of PIU (p = 0.0001). The following behaviors were also shown to be substantially linked with the existence of PIU: online gaming (p = 0.005), watching YouTube videos (p = 0.0001), accessing social media (p = 0.0001), and downloading movie TV series p = 0.0001) (Table 1).
Adjusted and not adjusted binary logistic regression were performed to investigate the prediction association between the existence of PIU among the participants and other demographic variables (Table 2). In the regression-adjusted model for all covariates, out of twenty-four predictive factors of internet addiction, just seven variables (feeling mental stress, average sleep, depressive symptoms, internet use for educational purposes, using chat rooms, watching YouTube videos and movie and TV series downloading) were significant predictors of PIU in participants. Individuals who have mental stress are 1.952 times more likely to experience internet addiction than those who do not have mental stress (95%CI:1.404–2.715) (p = 0.0001). The probability of having an internet addiction is 2.721 times higher in individuals with depressive symptoms than in those without depressive symptoms (95%CI: 1.758–4.214) (p = 0.0001). People who use the Internet for educational purposes have a 0.544-fold increased risk of developing an internet addiction compared to those who do not (95%CI: 0.350–0.846) (p = 0.007). Internet addiction is 1.723 fold more likely to occur in those with more than 8 h of sleep per night than in those who sleep for fewer than 6 h (95% CI:1.179–2.519, p-value: 0.005) (Table 2).
However, for the regression curve or unadjusted model, we found that thirteen predictors of the independent variables were statistically significant in the prediction of the presence of internet addiction, such as the participants who suffered from a breakup (COR: 2.039), domestic violence (COR: 2.136), physical abuse (COR: 2.190), or feel mental stress (COR: 2.621) had a higher probability to be affected of internet addiction conduction rather than those who had none (p-value < 0.05) (Table 3).

4. Discussion

Problematic and obsessive use of the Internet, sometimes known as “cyber addiction”, causes significant damage to a person’s ability to operate in numerous areas of their lives over an extended period; it is a relatively new phenomenon and is a recent field of research in mental health, particularly among the youth population. It seems to interact with several individual and environmental factors [27]. Study participants’ correlation between depression and internet addiction was the focus of this research. Our study had a population of 2891 young Syrian college students. Our findings show that 1414 out of 1845, that would be nearly 76% of city area residents have PIU. Its prevalence among single participants seems to be very high, at 75.2%. Also, findings report that 84.2% of participants with PIU use chat rooms, and 83.6% use social media applications; this could be a clear justification for its abuse and increased use among the young population. Furthermore, 84.8% of participants with PIU present probable depression symptoms. The findings did not report a clear correlation between internet addiction and suicide.
Overall, results show a relatively high prevalence of internet addiction among Syrian college students, with a significant correlation between depression symptoms and cyber addiction. This recognized disorder made psychologists argue that excessive internet use should be treated the same as other types of addiction [28]. Several factors can play a role in the development of PIU; one of the best known is underlying mental health conditions, including anxiety and depression. Environmental factors significantly affect PIU among young people [29]. Internet addiction is severe and can lead to restlessness, irritability, agitation, and anger. Furthermore, it will cause lower productivity, which may negatively affect the addicted person, the surrounding population, and society [30]. In Syria, despite the very high prevalence of internet addiction, there has been no formal government response to this issue. PIU and the inability to control the amount of time spent interfacing with digital technology must be considered an impulse mental illness and, therefore, require efficient management to help restore a balanced use of the Internet and everyday life [31]. Despite the lack of evidence-based therapies for internet addiction, cognitive-behavioral methods may be useful [32]. As suggested recommendations to prevent, detect, and manage internet addiction, targeted actions on modifiable factors, especially those affecting family interactions and environmental activities, would be beneficial. First, using external stoppers such as sports practice and hobby learning can be significantly effective in internet addiction management [33]. Also, marital and family therapy may be useful to reduce internet time as a family support system is critical in maintaining the intervention effect and fostering positive parent–adolescent relationship promotion [34]. In addition, internet addiction treatment dedicated to psychiatric centers seems to be mandatory in a few cases; this can provide complete, efficient management [35]. Depression or anxiety may be the fundamental cause of internet addiction. In this situation, medication to address the underlying disease may considerably enhance the treatment of the condition [36].
Finally, to summarize, during the last decade, the wide availability of the Internet and the adoption of new digital technologies such as smartphones have changed people’s lifestyles and introduced new social dynamics, which resulted in internet addiction; this condition is considered a disorder and needs to be appropriately managed in order to avoid its consequences. Internet addiction seems to be widely shared among Syrian college students and therefore requires urgent intervention. Syrian authorities must organize prevention and treatment programs for this condition in order to reduce its high prevalence and raise awareness about its dangerousness and adverse outcomes [29,30,31].

5. Limitations

The cross-sectional study design utilized in this research was valuable and affordable, but it cannot establish causation. Moreover, due to the study’s focus on Syrian medical students, it is possible that those students who required extended absences were not included, potentially leading to an underreporting of the prevalence of student internet addiction. However, the anonymous nature of the surveys also introduced the possibility of memory bias, as there was no way to contact participants after completing their questionnaires to verify their responses. Also, there is missing data on some questions as we did not include a choice within our online survey to force participants to answer all questions. Despite these limitations, several measures were taken to strengthen the research’s internal validity. This included using validated instruments, accounting for possible confounders in the final model, sampling from multiple study sites using universal techniques, and calculating the sample size a priori to ensure adequate statistical power. To mitigate potential biases in the online survey, investigators were involved in the data-gathering process, fabricated data were removed, and multi-auto responses were restricted.

6. Conclusions

The findings of our study suggest that internet addiction (IA) or problematic internet use (PIU) is a significant concern, especially among students studying medicine in medical schools. The study also revealed that most IA participants exhibit signs of depression, indicating a potential correlation between the two. In addition, 80.4% with PIU watch YouTube videos, 66.7% with PIU feel mental stress, and 64.5% with PIU download movie TV series. While there is currently no known link between IA and suicide, several variables may contribute to the development of IA. Further research is necessary to identify the underlying factors that cause IA and develop effective prevention and intervention strategies.

Author Contributions

S.S. (Sarya Swed): Conceptualization, Data Curation, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Writing—Original draft and Writing—Review and Editing. H.B., H.A., M.A.R., M.E., A.J.N., M.M.H., M.N.N., B.S., M.K.A., E.B., R.A.K., S.S. (Shiekh Shoib): Writing—Review and Final Editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study has been approved by Aleppo and Damascus Universities’ institutional review boards and ethical licensing committees (IRB: RK/22-017). Informed consent was obtained from all participants. All methods were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The authors have made accessible and saved all the information needed to draw the conclusions in this research. Any legitimate request will result in access to all data from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Data collection group: Sham Alholiby (Faculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria); Raghad Daoud (Faculty of Medicine, Tishreen University, Latakia, Syria); Sally Edlby (Faculty of Medicine, Aleppo University, Aleppo, Syria); Salwa Bormo (Faculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria); Ibrahim Mosab Kerawan Ibrahim Mosab (Faculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria); Maram Dery (Faculty of Medicine, Aleppo University, Aleppo, Syria); Joudy Karh Damour (Faculty of Medicine, Aleppo University, Aleppo, Syria); and Mouhammed Sleiay (Faculty of Medicine, Hama University, Hama, Syria).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

This study has been approved by Aleppo and Damascus Universities’ institutional review boards and ethical licensing committees (IRB: RK/22-017). Informed consent was obtained from all participants. All methods were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

References

  1. Hasan, A.A.H.; Jaber, A.A. Prevalence of Internet Addiction, Its Association with Psychological Distress, Coping Strategies among Undergraduate Students. Nurse Educ. Today 2019, 81, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kuss, D.J.; Shorter, G.W.; Van Rooij, A.J.; Van De Mheen, D.; Griffiths, M.D. The Internet Addiction Components Model and Personality: Establishing Construct Validity via a Nomological Network. Comput. Human Behav. 2014, 39, 312–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Laconi, S.; Kaliszewska-Czeremska, K.; Gnisci, A.; Sergi, I.; Barke, A.; Jeromin, F.; Groth, J.; Gamez-Guadix, M.; Ozcan, N.K.; Demetrovics, Z.; et al. Cross-Cultural Study of Problematic Internet Use in Nine European Countries. Comput. Human Behav. 2018, 84, 430–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Al-Gamal, E.; Alzayyat, A.; Ahmad, M.M. Prevalence of Internet Addiction and Its Association with Psychological Distress and Coping Strategies among University Students in Jordan. Perspect. Psychiatr. Care 2016, 52, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Çelebioğlu, A.; Aytekin Özdemir, A.; Küçükoğlu, S.; Ayran, G. The Effect of Internet Addiction on Sleep Quality in Adolescents. J. Child Adolesc. Psychiatr. Nurs. 2020, 33, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cheung, L.M.; Wong, W.S. The Effects of Insomnia and Internet Addiction on Depression in Hong Kong Chinese Adolescents: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Analysis. J. Sleep Res. 2011, 20, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bener, A.; Bhugra, D. Lifestyle and Depressive Risk Factors Associated with Problematic Internet Use in Adolescents in an Arabian Gulf Culture. J. Addict. Med. 2013, 7, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sayeed, A.; Rahman, M.H.; Hassan, M.N.; Christopher, E.; Kundu, S.; Al Banna, M.H.; Hasan, A.R.; Mallick, T.; Meem, A.E.; Hasan, M.T. Problematic Internet Use Associated with Depression, Health, and Internet-Use Behaviors among University Students of Bangladesh: A Cross-Sectional Study. Child Youth Serv. Rev. 2021, 120, 105771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Morrison, C.M.; Gore, H. The Relationship between Excessive Internet Use and Depression: A Questionnaire-Based Study of 1,319 Young People and Adults. Psychopathology 2010, 43, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Grow, A.; Perrotta, D.; Del Fava, E.; Cimentada, J.; Rampazzo, F.; Gil-Clavel, S.; Zagheni, E. Addressing Public Health Emergencies via Facebook Surveys: Advantages, Challenges, and Practical Considerations. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e20653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Day: March 1, 2018. Available online: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/03/01/ (accessed on 9 August 2023).
  12. Gendronneau, C.; Wisniowski, A.; Yildiz, D.; Zagheni, E.; Florio, L.; Hsiao, Y.; Stepanek, M.; Weber, I.; Abel, G.; Hoorens, S. Measuring Labour Mobility and Migration Using Big Data: Exploring the Potential of Social-Media Data for Measuring EU Mobility Flows and Stocks of EU Movers; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Al Saadi, T.; Zaher Addeen, S.; Turk, T.; Abbas, F.; Alkhatib, M. Psychological Distress among Medical Students in Conflicts: A Cross-Sectional Study from Syria. BMC Med. Educ. 2017, 17, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Swed, S.; Sohib, S.; Hassan, N.A.I.F.; Almoshantaf, M.B.; Alkadi, S.M.S.; AbdelQadir, Y.H.; Ibrahim, N.; Khair, L.T.; Bakkour, A.; Muwaili, A.H.H.; et al. Stigmatizing Attitudes towards Depression among University Students in Syria. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0273483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mengistu, N.; Tarekegn, D.; Bayisa, Y.; Yimer, S.; Madoro, D.; Assefa, D.G.; Zeleke, E.D.; Molla, W.; Wudneh, A.; Shumye, S.; et al. Prevalence and Factors Associated with Problematic Internet Use among Ethiopian Undergraduate University Students in 2019. J. Addict. 2021, 2021, 6041607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Stubbs, M.; Bateman, C.J.; Hull, D.M. Problematic Internet Use among University Students in Jamaica. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 2022, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Romero-López, M.; Pichardo, C.; De Hoces, I.; García-Berbén, T. Problematic Internet Use among University Students and Its Relationship with Social Skills. Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mamun, M.A.; Hossain, M.S.; Griffiths, M.D. Mental Health Problems and Associated Predictors among Bangladeshi Students. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 2022, 20, 657–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Beck, A.T.; Beamesderfer, A. Assessment of Depression: The Depression Inventory. Mod. Probl. Pharmacopsychiatry 1974, 7, 151–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mostafa Alim, S.M.A.H.; Ahmed, M.N.; Mullick, M.S.I.; Chowdhury, N.F.; Akhter, F.; Alam, M.S. Validation of the Bangla Version of Beck Depression Inventory-II. Brain Behav. 2020, 10, e01563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, L.; Wang, L.; Qiu, X.H.; Yang, X.X.; Qiao, Z.X.; Yang, Y.J.; Liang, Y. Depression among Chinese University Students: Prevalence and Socio-Demographic Correlates. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e58379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Young, K.S. Caught in the Net: How to Recognize the Signs of Internet Addiction--and a Winning Strategy for Recovery; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1998; p. 248. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mamun, M.A.; Hossain, M.S.; Siddique, A.B.; Sikder, M.T.; Kuss, D.J.; Griffiths, M.D. Problematic Internet Use in Bangladeshi Students: The Role of Socio-Demographic Factors, Depression, Anxiety, and Stress. Asian J. Psychiatr. 2019, 44, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Younes, F.; Halawi, G.; Jabbour, H.; El Osta, N.; Karam, L.; Hajj, A.; Khabbaz, L.R. Internet Addiction and Relationships with Insomnia, Anxiety, Depression, Stress and Self-Esteem in University Students: A Cross-Sectional Designed Study. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0161126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Anand, N.; Thomas, C.; Jain, P.A.; Bhat, A.; Thomas, C.; Prathyusha, P.V.; Aiyappa, S.; Bhat, S.; Young, K.; Cherian, A.V. Internet Use Behaviors, Internet Addiction and Psychological Distress among Medical College Students: A Multi Centre Study from South India. Asian J. Psychiatr. 2018, 37, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Widyanto, L.; McMurran, M. The Psychometric Properties of the Internet Addiction Test. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 2004, 7, 443–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kuss, D.; Griffiths, M.; Karila, L.; Billieux, J. Internet Addiction: A Systematic Review of Epidemiological Research for the Last Decade. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2014, 20, 4026–4052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kuss, D.J.; Lopez-Fernandez, O. Internet Addiction and Problematic Internet Use: A Systematic Review of Clinical Research. World J. Psychiatry 2016, 6, 143–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Weinstein, A.; Lejoyeux, M. Internet Addiction or Excessive Internet Use. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 2010, 36, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Noroozi, F.; Hassanipour, S.; Eftekharian, F.; Eisapareh, K.; Kaveh, M.H. Internet Addiction Effect on Quality of Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sci. World J. 2021, 2021, 2556679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hahn, C.; Kim, D.J. Is There a Shared Neurobiology between Aggression and Internet Addiction Disorder? J. Behav. Addict. 2014, 3, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zajac, K.; Ginley, M.K.; Chang, R.; Petry, N.M. Treatments for Internet Gaming Disorder and Internet Addiction: A Systematic Review. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 2017, 31, 979–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Huang, X.Q.; Li, M.C.; Tao, R. Treatment of Internet Addiction. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2010, 12, 462–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, Q.X.; Fang, X.Y.; Yan, N.; Zhou, Z.K.; Yuan, X.J.; Lan, J.; Liu, C.Y. Multi-Family Group Therapy for Adolescent Internet Addiction: Exploring the Underlying Mechanisms. Addict. Behav. 2015, 42, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. King, D.L.; Delfabbro, P.H.; Griffiths, M.D.; Gradisar, M. Assessing Clinical Trials of Internet Addiction Treatment: A Systematic Review and CONSORT Evaluation. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2011, 31, 1110–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Łukawski, K.; Rusek, M.; Czuczwar, S.J. Can Pharmacotherapy Play a Role in Treating Internet Addiction Disorder? Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2019, 20, 1299–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Distribution of sociodemographic, health, and behavioral characteristics and internet use behaviors of respondents.
Table 1. Distribution of sociodemographic, health, and behavioral characteristics and internet use behaviors of respondents.
FrequencyPercentage %Internet Addiction Scorep-Value
Non-PIUPIU
Frequency
272
Percentage %
11%
Frequency
2281
Percentage %
89%
GenderFemale217375.2%2018.1%164165.9%0.975
Male71824.8%712.9%57723.2%
Place of residenceCity area184563.8%1747.0%141456.8%0.943
Village area104636.2%983.9%80432.3%
Relationship statusSingle242884.2%2208.8%187175.2%0.127
In a relationship45715.8%522.1%34413.8%
AgeMean + SD21.87 ± 3.21122.58 ± 4.11721.81 ± 3.0040.258
≤20 years 103335.7%863.5%77831.2%
>20 years185864.3%1867.5%144057.8%
Domestic violenceNo262591.1%25910.4%199680.4%0.008
Yes2568.9%130.5%2148.6%
Breakup (experienced a breakup)No61321.3%783.1%44818.0%0.0001
Yes95933.3%662.7%77331.1%
Not applicable130945.4%1285.2%99239.9%
Separated parentsNo265893.0%24710.0%204783.0%0.412
Yes2007.0%220.9%1506.1%
Smoking historyNo197968.6%1877.5%150660.6%0.680
Yes90531.4%833.3%70828.5%
Physical abuseNo250587.0%25210.2%189676.5%0.001
Yes37313.0%190.8%31312.6%
Sexual abuseNo270694.0%26010.5%206583.3%0.114
Yes1736.0%110.4%1445.8%
Drug useNo286799.4%27010.9%219988.6%0.609
Yes160.6%20.1%110.4%
Feeling mental stressNo79827.7%1275.1%55822.4%0.0001
Yes208772.3%1445.8%165866.7%
Suicidal attemptNo271093.9%26110.5%206583.1%0.088
Yes1756.1%110.4%1496.0%
Internet use for educational purposesNo61321.3%381.5%49119.8%0.002
Yes226378.7%2329.4%171769.3%
Using chat roomsNo1746.0%311.2%1194.8%0.0001
Yes270794.0%2419.7%209184.2%
Online gamingNo214974.6%2228.9%163065.6%0.005
Yes73325.4%502.0%58123.4%
Watching YouTube videosNo30810.7%502.0%2168.7%0.0001
Yes257289.3%2228.9%199680.4%
Online shoppingNo204470.8%1937.8%156963.1%0.976
Yes84329.2%793.2%64525.9%
Using social media like Facebook, Twitter, and InstagramNo1926.7%321.3%1365.5%0.0001
Yes268793.3%2389.6%207783.6%
Movie and TV series downloadingNo84929.5%1104.4%60924.5%0.0001
Yes203170.5%1616.5%160264.5%
Are you a student in medical college?No113439.5%1124.5%84734.1%0.335
Yes174060.5%1596.4%136455.0%
Average sleep<6 h35712.4%341.4%28011.2%0.0001
6–8 h169658.7%1947.8%127551.2%
>8 h83729.0%441.8%66226.6%
Depressive symptomsNo probable depression1747.0%492.2%1064.7%0.0001
Probable depression232893.0%1858.3%189484.8%
Table 2. Regression analysis of factors associated with PIU.
Table 2. Regression analysis of factors associated with PIU.
VariablesCategoriesp-ValueAdjusted Odds Ratio
LowerUpper
Age(Ref.: ≤20 years)1
>20 years0.2930.8360.5991.167
Gender(Ref.: Female)1
Male0.6581.0850.7561.558
Residence(Ref.: City)1
Rural0.6851.0680.7781.464
Relationship status(Ref.: Single)1
In a relationship0.9270.9790.6171.552
Breakup (experienced a breakup)(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.1241.4200.9082.221
Not applicable0.3751.2060.7971.823
Domestic violence(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.3261.4470.6923.025
Separated parents(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.3540.7560.4181.367
Smoking history(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.2630.8200.5791.161
Physical abuse(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.1771.5010.8332.705
Sexual abuse(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.5711.2380.5912.594
Suicidal attempt(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.8871.0610.4712.389
Feeling mental stress(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.00011.9521.4042.715
Drug addiction(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.4390.4020.0404.041
Sleep<6 h 0.963 0.989 0.616 1.587
(Ref: 6–8 h)1
>8 h 0.005 1.723 1.179 2.519
Are you a student in medical college?(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.6851.0720.7651.502
Depressive symptoms(Ref.: No probable depression)1
Probable depression0.00012.7211.7584.214
Internet use for educational purposes(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.0070.5440.3500.846
Using chat rooms(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.0042.1811.2913.685
Online gaming(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.0851.4090.9542.083
Watching YouTube videos(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.00012.0771.3813.124
Online shopping(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.3040.8310.5841.183
Using social media like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.1591.4510.8652.437
Movie and TV series downloading(Ref.: No)
Yes0.0451.3991.0071.945
Table 3. Unadjusted regression analysis of factors associated with PIU.
Table 3. Unadjusted regression analysis of factors associated with PIU.
VariablesCategoriesp-ValueCurve Odds Ratio95% C.I. for COR
LowerUpper
Age(Ref.: ≤20 years)1
>20 years0.258 0.856 0.653 1.121
Gender(Ref.: Female)1
Male0.975 0.995 0.747 1.326
Residence(Ref.: City)1
Rural0.943 1.010 0.777 1.312
Relationship status(Ref.: Single)1
In a relationship0.128 0.778 0.563 1.075
Breakup (experienced a breakup)(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.0001 2.039 1.440 2.887
Not applicable0.052 1.349 0.997 1.827
Domestic violence(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.010 2.136 1.202 3.795
Separated parents(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.412 0.823 0.516 1.312
Smoking history(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.680 1.059 0.806 1.392
Physical abuse(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.001 2.190 1.353 3.543
Sexual abuse(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.118 1.648 0.881 3.084
Suicidal attempt(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.092 1.712 0.916 3.201
Feeling mental stress(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.0001 2.621 2.026 3.389
Drug addiction(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.611 0.675 0.149 3.063
Sleep<6 h 0.253 1.253 0.851 1.845
(Ref: 6–8 h)1
>8 h 0.0001 2.289 1.629 3.218
Are you a student in medical college?(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.335 1.134 0.878 1.466
Depressive symptoms(Ref.: No probable depression)1
Probable depression0.0001 4.733 3.267 6.856
Internet use for educational purposes(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.002 0.573 0.401 0.819
Using chat rooms(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.0001 2.260 1.489 3.430
Online gaming(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.005 1.583 1.148 2.182
Watching YouTube videos(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.0001 2.081 1.485 2.916
Online shopping(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.976 1.004 0.761 1.325
Using social media like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram(Ref.: No)1
Yes0.001 2.053 1.366 3.087
Movie and TV series downloading(Ref.: No)
Yes0.0001 1.797 1.386 2.330
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Swed, S.; Bohsas, H.; Alibrahim, H.; Rais, M.A.; Elsayed, M.; Nashwan, A.J.; Hasan, M.M.; Nour Nasif, M.; Sawaf, B.; Albuni, M.K.; et al. Internet Addiction and Depression among Syrian College Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. Psychiatry Int. 2023, 4, 275-285. https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint4030027

AMA Style

Swed S, Bohsas H, Alibrahim H, Rais MA, Elsayed M, Nashwan AJ, Hasan MM, Nour Nasif M, Sawaf B, Albuni MK, et al. Internet Addiction and Depression among Syrian College Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. Psychiatry International. 2023; 4(3):275-285. https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint4030027

Chicago/Turabian Style

Swed, Sarya, Haidara Bohsas, Hidar Alibrahim, Mohammed Amir Rais, Mohamed Elsayed, Abdulqadir J. Nashwan, Mohammad Mehedi Hasan, Mohamad Nour Nasif, Bisher Sawaf, Mhd Kutaiba Albuni, and et al. 2023. "Internet Addiction and Depression among Syrian College Students: A Cross-Sectional Study" Psychiatry International 4, no. 3: 275-285. https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint4030027

APA Style

Swed, S., Bohsas, H., Alibrahim, H., Rais, M. A., Elsayed, M., Nashwan, A. J., Hasan, M. M., Nour Nasif, M., Sawaf, B., Albuni, M. K., Battikh, E., Abo Kash, R., & Shoib, S. (2023). Internet Addiction and Depression among Syrian College Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. Psychiatry International, 4(3), 275-285. https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint4030027

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop