Next Article in Journal
The Distribution, Population Size, and Habitat Preferences of a Newly Established Population of the Oriental Magpie Pica serica in Tomakomai City, Hokkaido, Northern Japan
Previous Article in Journal
Ocular Lesions in Birds of Prey in Portugal: A Retrospective Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Bird Interspecific Brood Parasitism Record in the Third Century

MOE Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Birds 2024, 5(4), 648-655; https://doi.org/10.3390/birds5040044
Submission received: 31 July 2024 / Revised: 20 September 2024 / Accepted: 23 September 2024 / Published: 9 October 2024

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Interspecific brood parasitism is practiced by certain birds, in a phenomenon by which eggs are laid in the nests of other host birds, causing them to be hatched and the young reared by the hosts at the cost of the hosts’ own fitness. Parasitic birds and their hosts provide the clearest examples of coevolution in ornithology. The Common Cuckoo Cuculus canorus, widely distributed across the Eurasian continent, and its several hundred hosts are among the best studied of all brood parasite systems. Through consulting ancient Chinese books, we found a record of the occurrence of interspecific brood parasitism in the Three Kingdoms period (220–280 AD). Based on the ecological habits and morphological characteristics described in these ancient Chinese books, we confirmed this occurrence to be the brood parasitism of Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica by the Common Cuckoo, which implies that there is a long history of coevolution between these two species. This is likely to be the first accurate record of brood parasitism by Common Cuckoos in China.

Abstract

The phenomenon of interspecies brood parasitism, characterized by parasitic birds depositing their eggs within the nests of unrelated host species for subsequent hatching and rearing, represents a pivotal aspect of ornithological research, owing to its profound implications for the coevolutionary dynamics between host and parasite species. Among the myriad of avian brood parasites, the Common Cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) stands out due to its expansive geographical range and diverse array of host species, thereby underscoring its significance in the context of parasitism studies. Drawing upon historical records dating back to the Three Kingdoms period (220–280 AD) in China, this study delves into the annals of avian brood parasitism, uncovering instances of parasitic behavior attributed to the Common Cuckoo. Through a meticulous analysis of these ancient narratives, coupled with an examination of the ecological and morphological attributes of the birds involved, we confirm the parasitization of Barn Swallows (Hirundo rustica) by Common Cuckoos. This finding underscores the existence of a long-standing coevolutionary relationship between these two species, extending over nearly two millennia. Remarkably, the record under scrutiny, with its precise temporal, geographical, and taxonomic specifications, emerges as a potential candidate for the earliest documented instance of Common Cuckoo brood parasitism in Chinese historical records. As such, it provides invaluable insights into the historical ecology of avian parasitism and underscores the need for further interdisciplinary research to unravel the complexities of host–parasite interactions across time and space.

1. Introduction

Avian interspecies brood parasitism constitutes a distinctive reproductive tactic employed by a subset of birds within the Cuculidae family, where parasitic individuals deposit their eggs within the nests of unrelated host species [1]. Notably, approximately 45% of the 150 species within this avian family engage in such parasitic behavior [2,3], highlighting its prevalence within this taxonomic group. Among these, the Common Cuckoo (Cuculus canorus), with its extensive Eurasian distribution and an impressive array of nearly 300 host species [4], has garnered considerable attention from researchers. The nest parasitism exhibited by cuckoos poses profound detrimental effects on their host species, not only resulting in the mortality of host offspring, but also depriving them of the vital time and resources necessary for their own reproductive endeavors [1,2,3]. Consequently, hosts that have evolved antiparasitic strategies are favored by the forces of natural selection. These antiparasitic mechanisms employed by hosts encompass a range of behaviors, including nest guarding [5] and egg discrimination [6], which aim to mitigate the adverse impacts of cuckoo parasitism. In response to these antiparasitic defenses, cuckoos have evolved a suite of sophisticated parasitic tactics to circumvent host defenses. For instance, they mimic the appearance and vocalizations of raptors to intimidate and deceive hosts [7,8] and lay eggs that closely resemble those of their hosts in terms of markings and coloration, thereby reducing the likelihood of detection and rejection [9]. The arms race between cuckoos’ parasitic strategies and hosts’ antiparasitic defenses constitutes a dynamic and fascinating area of study in avian ethology and evolutionary biology.
The duration of the interaction between cuckoos and their hosts is a crucial factor influencing their coevolutionary trajectory [10]. For example, hosts that have recently become subject to cuckoo parasitism, due to their lack of evolutionary history with this parasite, often exhibit weaker antiparasitic defenses, particularly in terms of egg discrimination [11]. However, quantifying the duration of cuckoo–host interactions is challenging, particularly in regions with limited scientific records and prior to the establishment of systematic natural history studies. Nonetheless, ancient literary works and historical documents can provide valuable insights into the historical context and evolutionary dynamics of avian nest parasitism, offering a unique window into the past. Historical narratives, spanning centuries and continents, have long documented the parasitic proclivities of the Common Cuckoo. For instance, Aristotle’s seminal work Historia Animalium (circa 384–322 BC), as interpreted by modern scholars [12], and the comprehensive Compendium of Materia Medica by Li Shizhen (1518–1593 AD) [13] both contain allusions to this unique reproductive strategy. Furthermore, the literary works of the renowned Tang dynasty poet Du Fu (712–770 AD), specifically his poem “Cuckoo Song” [14], provide additional testament to the cultural awareness and poetic rendition of cuckoo brood parasitism.
In our endeavors to delve deeper into the historical ecology of avian parasitism, we have uncovered hitherto unreported records of brood parasitism from the Three Kingdoms period (220–280 AD) in China. These newly identified records, hitherto unacknowledged in the scientific literature, offer a unique opportunity to augment our understanding of the evolutionary history and ecological dynamics of avian parasitism. The present study is, therefore, aimed at validating the parasitic nature of these historical accounts, elucidating the specific species involved, and elucidating their implications for contemporary ornithological research and the broader field of evolutionary biology.

2. Materials and Methods

The ancient textual sources utilized in this study primarily stem from the author’s extensive reading and are further supplemented by systematic searches within databases (Table S1), notably the ERUDITION China Basic Ancient Books Database (http://dh.ersjk.com/, accessed on 1 June 2024) [15], the world’s premier digital repository of Chinese ancient texts. Given the antiquity of these sources, the potential for transmission errors, such as miscopying, is inherent. Consequently, meticulous verification was conducted for every record sourced from these ancient texts. This verification process involved utilizing keywords from the textual materials to conduct database searches, aiming to locate additional records of the same material across different ancient texts. By cross-referencing and mutually corroborating data from disparate sources, we endeavored to ensure the utmost accuracy in our records.
A pivotal challenge encountered in this research pertains to the phenomenon of synonymy, where multiple names may refer to the same species. For instance, the cuckoo, in ancient China, was not solely designated as “DUJUAN” (Chinese equivalent 杜鹃), but also bore names such as “BUGU” (布谷), “ZIGUI” (子规), “TIJUE” (鹈鴂), “DUYU” (杜宇), and “WANGDI” (望帝) [15]. To mitigate the risk of data omission, we adopted a comprehensive approach in our database searches, incorporating all equivalent expressions of species names. Additionally, we confronted the issue of homonymy, where distinct species may share the same name. The morphological similarities between cuckoos and raptors have, at times, led to ambiguity in ancient textual sources, making it difficult to discern between the two. To address this challenge, we conducted a rigorous textual analysis of bird species names found in ancient texts, employing two primary strategies. Firstly, we examined concurrent records and descriptions of these species from other sources to gain insights into the contemporary understanding of these species. Secondly, we integrated the ecological, morphological, and behavioral descriptions provided in the ancient texts with modern taxonomic and ecological knowledge, enabling us to infer the species referenced in the textual materials with greater precision.
From the ERUDITION China Basic Ancient Books Database (1 June 2024) [15], we gathered 54,914 records related to cuckoos. Among these records, we delved specifically into those related to the parasitic habits of cuckoos during the 1st to 5th centuries AD (roughly corresponding to the Han dynasty, the Three Kingdoms period, and the Jin dynasty in ancient China). Additionally, we browsed 821 and 170 records concerning swallows and eagles, respectively, during the same period.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Historical Accounts of Brood Parasitism

The ancient textual sources from the Huangchu period (220–226 AD) of the Wei dynasty provide intriguing insights into instances of avian brood parasitism. These records, extracted from various historical texts, offer a glimpse into the occurrence of a unique avian phenomenon during this era. Chen Shou’s Records of the Three Kingdoms narrates, “During the Huangchu period, a portentous event was witnessed within the palace, where an aberrant species of bird was reared within a swallow’s nest, distinguished by its red beak, claws, and chest. This was deemed a significant anomaly for the Wei dynasty” [16]. Similarly, Shen Yue’s Book of Song recounts that “Towards the end of the Huangchu era, an eagle was born amidst the confines of a swallow’s nest, marked by its crimson beak and claws” [17]. Further corroboration is found in Fang Xuanling’s Book of Jin, which states that “In the inaugural year of the Huangchu period, an eagle once again emerged from a swallow’s nest within the Weiyang Palace, characterized by its red beak and claws” [18]. Additionally, the Comprehensive Mirror to Aid in Government echoes this account, reiterating the anomaly of “a dissimilar bird being raised in a swallow’s nest during the Huangchu period, with emphasis on its striking red beak, claws, and chest, which was considered a momentous occurrence for the Wei dynasty” [19].
These consistent narratives, despite minor temporal discrepancies, converge on a central theme: the emergence of an “eagle” within a “swallow” nest, adorned with distinctive red beak and claws, in the Weiyang Palace during the reign of Emperor Wen of Wei (220–226 AD). The palace, situated in Chang’an (currently Xi’an, Weiyang District), served as the imperial abode and administrative hub during the Han dynasty (202 BC–220 AD), underscoring the historical significance of these observations.

3.2. Species Identification

In the realm of ancient Chinese literature, the “swallow” holds a prominent place as a recurring motif. Numerous classical texts, including, but not limited to, the Book of Songs, specifically Guofeng, Beifeng, and Yanyan, attest to its cultural significance [16]. This passage, for instance, poetically depicts the graceful flight of swallows with their unevenly arranged tail feathers, symbolizing natural beauty and the cyclical nature of life. Furthermore, the poetic works of Qu Yuan (340–278 BC), a renowned poet of the Chu State during the Warring States period, also feature the swallow. In his Nine Chapters: Crossing the River, Qu Yuan alludes to the nesting habits of various birds, including sparrows, swallows, crows, and magpies, within human habitats, highlighting the bird’s intimate connection with human society and the natural world [20].
As we embark on a more profound exploration of the literary landscape during the Han dynasty and the subsequent Three Kingdoms period, the prevalence of the swallow as a poetic motif emerges with even greater prominence. Cao Pi’s (187–226 AD) Widow’s Poem contains the evocative line “The returning swallows soar and hover” [21], while his Yan Ge Xing depicts the migration of swallows with the verse “The flocks of swallows bid farewell and the swans soar southward” [22]. Similarly, Cao Zhi’s (192–232 AD) Poem on Prawns and Eels portrays the playful antics of sparrows and swallows with the line “Swallows and sparrows play among the thorns” [22]. Furthermore, Guan Qiujian’s (birth year unknown, died 255 AD) Poem in Response to Du Zhi incorporates the swallow as a metaphor for societal scorn, as evident in the verse “To be ridiculed by swallows and sparrows” [23]. Lastly, Ruan Ji’s (210–263 AD) Eighty-Two Poems of Meditation, Poem Eight expresses a desire for humility and camaraderie with nature, as manifested in the line “I would rather soar with swallows and sparrows” [24].
The above examples underscore the enduring significance of the swallow as a literary device in ancient Chinese poetry, serving as a versatile symbol that encapsulates various themes such as migration, resilience, playfulness, societal commentary, and the harmonious coexistence between humans and nature. Moreover, the swallow’s significance extends beyond mere literary allusions; it also serves as a biological marker in the study of avian ecology and migration patterns. In ancient texts, the “swallow” consistently refers to the Barn Swallow (Hirundo rustica), a member of the Hirundinidae family that is ubiquitous as a summer migrant bird across most regions of China [25,26]. Its breeding habits, which typically span from April to August, and its preference for nesting on human structures further underscore its unique relationship with human society and the built environment [27].
In the context of ancient literature and historical records, the “eagle” has also been a familiar avian species to numerous cultures [28,29]. Notably, archeological excavations have uncovered depictions of eagles in the tomb of Queen Fu Hao, consort of King Wuding of the Shang dynasty (1324–1266 BC), further emphasizing their cultural significance [30]. Ancient texts such as the Book of Songs: Da Ya: Wen Wang Zhi Shi: Da Ming, employ metaphorical references to eagles to convey the might and prowess of individuals, as exemplified in the phrase “The grand-master Shang-fu, was like an eagle on the wing” [16]. Furthermore, historical records in the History of the Dong Han indicate the existence of institutions dedicated to the breeding of eagles for imperial purposes during the Han dynasty [31].
In delving into the biological implications of the phrase “eagle growing in a swallow’s nest”, it is crucial to refute the misconception of direct parasitism by eagles (Accipitriformes) or other avian predators, as their ecological niches and behaviors are inherently distinct. Eagles, alongside their ecologically analogous counterparts falcons (Falconiformes) and owls (Strigiformes), are known to exhibit the behavior of nest usurpation for breeding purposes, preferentially targeting the nests of corvids [32,33,34]. Corvids, with their typical weight exceeding 100 g [35], possess nests that are sufficiently large and robust to accommodate the needs of raptors such as eagles, falcons, and owls. Conversely, the Barn Swallow, with its diminutive weight of merely 16 g [35], constructs fragile mud nests that are prone to disintegration, thereby rendering them impractical for use by raptors.
Upon dismissing the notion of raptor involvement, a plausible interpretation of the phrase “eagle growing in a swallow’s nest” emerges, centering on the phenomenon of cuckoo brood parasitism. In this behavior, cuckoos deposit their eggs within the nests of host birds, entrusting the hosts with the incubation and rearing of their offspring [1]. The disparity in size, plumage, and the exhibition of Batesian mimicry towards raptors [36,37] often leads to folklore misconceptions, wherein cuckoo chicks are erroneously identified as “eagles” or “monsters”.
In the context of northern China, specifically north of the Qinling Mountains–Huaihe River region, several cuckoo species are known to breed, including [38] the Chestnut-winged Cuckoo (Clamator coromandus), the Common Koel (Eudynamys scolopacea), the Large Hawk Cuckoo (Hierococcyx sparverioide), the Indian Cuckoo (Cuculus micropterus), the Lesser Cuckoo (Cuculus poliocephalus), the Himalayan Cuckoo (Cuculus saturates), the Oriental Cuckoo (Cuculus optatus), and the Common Cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Among these species, the Chestnut-winged, Common Koel, and Large Hawk Cuckoo primarily target host birds weighing over 30 g, particularly those belonging to the Corvidae and Dicruridae families. The Lesser Cuckoo, Himalayan Cuckoo, and Oriental Cuckoo prefer mountainous forest habitats. Notably, the distinctive white head of Indian Cuckoo chicks serves as a salient identifier [3,39]. Given the specific location of Weiyang Palace, the nesting habits of Barn Swallows, and the morphological characteristics described for the “strange bird”, we can logically deduce that all cuckoo species, with the exception of the Common Cuckoo, can be eliminated from consideration.
The extensive host range of the Common Cuckoo encompasses nearly 300 documented species globally [4]. Within the context of China, approximately 60 host species have been recorded, including instances where the Common Cuckoo exhibits brood parasitism in the nests of Barn Swallows [27,38,39]. Notably, the Common Cuckoo chick exhibits distinct morphological features, with its beak interior, tarsi, and claws being colored orange or dark red, and the featherless area of its chest revealing bright red skin when exposed [2,3]. These characteristics, along with its ecological habits, align closely with the historical description of “a hawk born from a swallow’s nest” and the depiction of a “red beak, claws, and chest”. Consequently, it is reasonable to infer that the phenomenon witnessed in Weiyang Palace during the Huangchu era was indeed the parasitism of the Common Cuckoo within the nests of Barn Swallows.
Subsequent to the previously mentioned records in the Book of Song and the Book of Jin, an additional instance of Barn Swallow parasitism is documented. Specifically, the Book of Song, Volume 32, Chapter 22, narrates that “During the first year of the Jingchu era, an anomalous occurrence took place wherein a swallow deposited an unusually large chick within the nest of Li Gai’s household in Juantaoli, Wei Kingdom. This chick’s form was reminiscent of an eagle, while its beak exhibited similarities to that of a swallow” [18]. In corroboration, the Book of Jin, Volume 28, Chapter 18, attests to this event, stating that “In the inaugural year of the Jingchu era, a swallow was recorded to have hatched a colossal chick within the nest of Li Gai’s family in Wei Kingdom. This chick’s physique mirrored that of an eagle, and its beak mirrored the beak of a swallow, leading to interpretations as a portentous event involving feathered creatures and signifying a disaster” [19]. Jingchu was the reigning title of Emperor Ming of Wei, spanning from 237 to 239 AD. The bird described, characterized by its immense size (“colossal chick”), eagle-like appearance (“physique mirrored that of an eagle”), and swallow-like beak (“beak mirrored the beak of a swallow”), is presumed to be another case of the Common Cuckoo parasitizing the nest of a Barn Swallow.

3.3. Scientific Significance

The Barn Swallow serves as a viable host for the Common Cuckoo, exhibiting a moderate level of egg ejection behavior [40,41], and is capable of successfully fostering the development of cuckoo chicks [42]. A comprehensive analysis of Barn Swallow nests across various geographical regions reveals notable differences in parasitism rates by the Common Cuckoo. For instance, in Italy, 1.2% of 416 nests were parasitized [43], whereas in Poland, the parasitism rate was considerably lower, affecting only 0.2% of 1530 nests [44]. In Jilin City, China, a parasitism rate of 2.4% was observed, with 1 out of 42 nests being parasitized, while, in contrast, no parasitism was recorded in 1719 nests on Hainan Island [27]. These findings underscore the relatively low parasitism rate of the Common Cuckoo on Barn Swallows compared to other host species [45].
Furthermore, the preference of Barn Swallows to nest on human structures has been identified as a factor that may reduce their vulnerability to parasitism by the Common Cuckoo [44,46]. This observation aligns with the broader understanding of the coevolutionary dynamics between host birds and parasites, wherein the duration and intensity of interactions play a pivotal role in shaping parasitism rates and behavioral strategies [11,47]. The present study’s discovery of nest parasitism records dating back to the Third Century provides a unique perspective on the long-standing coevolutionary history between Barn Swallows and the Common Cuckoo, spanning nearly two millennia. This historical context offers invaluable insights into the evolutionary trajectories of these two species and their ongoing parasitic and antiparasitic strategies. Consequently, the findings of this study contribute to a deeper understanding of avian coevolutionary dynamics and have significant implications for the conservation and management of these species.

4. Conclusions

The “cuckoo” embodies a rich historical and cultural heritage within the context of Chinese society [48], with its iconography often intertwined with agricultural timing practices, such as those documented in Xia Xiaozheng: March [49], and the mythical narrative surrounding Du Yu [50,51]. While accounts of nest parasitism are scarce in the pre-Qin and Han dynasties, scattered references do exist, exemplified by the Book of Songs: Zhaonan: Quechao, which alludes to “the dove occupying the magpie’s nest” [16]. However, scholarly debate persists regarding whether this phrase signifies cuckoo nest parasitism or the behavior of predators usurping nests for reproductive purposes [52]. If “magpie”, in this context, refers to the magpie (Pica serica) or its closely related species, the possibility of Common Cuckoo parasitism is negated due to the unsuitability of these species as hosts [53,54].
Intriguingly, the Comprehensive Mirror to Aid in Government documented an event in 286 BC that mentioned a peculiar occurrence where there were hawk eggs found in a sparrow’s nest on a small hill in the city of Song, which was interpreted as a propitious omen [55]. This could be a case of nest parasitism, in which the cuckoo laid its eggs in the sparrow’s nest. Although this account is likely to be related to nest parasitism, the limited information provided hinders definitive conclusions regarding the specific species involved in the parasitic interaction.
Our study sheds light on a unique record from the Huangchu era, which describes an instance of “swallow giving birth to an eagle” within the Weiyang Palace. This narrative, rich in temporal, spatial, and ecological details, presents a compelling case for the occurrence of Common Cuckoo nest parasitism against Barn Swallows. Through the rigorous examination of ancient texts, we posit that this record represents the earliest documented evidence of Common Cuckoo nest parasitism in China, contributing to the academic discourse on avian coevolutionary dynamics and parasitism strategies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/birds5040044/s1: Table S1: The original text (in Chinese), author, source of the materials involved in the main text, and the corresponding English translation of this information. These materials are presented in the order they appear in the main text.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.X.; methodology, Y.Z. and C.X.; validation, D.L., Y.Z. and C.X.; data curation, Y.Z. and C.X.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z. and C.X.; writing—review and editing, D.L.; and funding acquisition, C.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32170491) and the Scientific Research Team Project of the College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, in 2024.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created.

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Miao Tian and Qianyi Zhang for their constructive suggestions and helpful comments on the revision of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Johnsgard, P.A. The Avian Brood Parasites: Deception at the Nest; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 3–20. [Google Scholar]
  2. Payne, R.B. The Cuckoos; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2005; pp. 3–8, 510–517. [Google Scholar]
  3. Erritzøe, J.; Mann, C.F.; Brammer, F.P.; Fuller, R.A. Cuckoos of the World; Christopher Helm: London, UK, 2012; pp. 10–28, 1017–1035. [Google Scholar]
  4. Morelli, F.; Benedetti, Y.; Møller, A.P.; Liang, W.; Carrascal, L.M. Cuckoos host range is associated positively with distribution range and negatively with evolutionary uniqueness. J. Anim. Ecol. 2018, 87, 765–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, J.; Santema, P.; Li, J.; Deng, W.; Kempenaers, B. Brood parasitism risk drives birds to breed near humans. Curr. Biol. 2023, 33, 1125–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rutila, J.; Jokimäki, J.; Avilés, J.M.; Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, M.L. Responses of Parasitized and Unparasitized Common Redstart (Phoenicurus phoenicurus) Populations against Artificial Cuckoo Parasitism. Auk 2006, 123, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ma, L.; Yang, C.C.; Liang, W. Hawk Mimicry Does Not Reduce Attacks of Cuckoos by Highly Aggressive Hosts. Avian Res. 2018, 9, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. York, J.E.; Davies, N.B. Female Cuckoo Calls Misdirect Host Defences towards the Wrong Enemy. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 1, 1520–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Honza, M.; Šulc, M.; Jelínek, V.; Požgayová, M.; Procházka, P. Brood Parasites Lay Eggs Matching the Appearance of Host Clutches. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2014, 281, 20132665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Moksnes, A.; Fossøy, F.; Røskaft, E.; Stokke, B.G. Reviewing 30 Years of Studies on the Common Cuckoo: Accumulated Knowledge and Future Perspectives. Chin. Birds 2013, 4, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Soler, M. Long-Term Coevolution between Avian Brood Parasites and Their Hosts. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2014, 89, 688–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Røskaft, E.; Liang, W.; Stokke, B.G. Avian brood parasitism—A growing research area in behavioral ecology. Chin. Birds 2012, 3, 243–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, S.Z. Compendium of Materia Medica; A New Annotated Edition; Huaxia Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2011; p. 1756. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zou, D.J. Famous Writers Commented on Complete Poetry Works of Tang Dynasty; Tianjin Ancient Books Publishing House: Tianjin, China, 2010; p. 427. [Google Scholar]
  15. ERUDITION China Basic Ancient Books Database. Available online: http://dh.ersjk.com/ (accessed on 1 June 2024).
  16. Ge, P.L. Book of Songs; Zhongzhou Ancient Books Publishing House: Zhengzhou, China, 2020; pp. 18–19, 38–39, 424–427. [Google Scholar]
  17. (Jin Dynasty); Chen, S. Records of the Three Kingdoms; Tianjin People’s Publishing House: Tianjin, China, 2019; p. 728. [Google Scholar]
  18. Shen, Y. Book of Song; Zhonghua Shuju: Beijing, China, 2019; pp. 1025–1026. [Google Scholar]
  19. (Tang Dynasty); Fang, X.L. Book of Jin; Zhonghua Shuju: Beijing, China, 1974; p. 861. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gong, Z.P. Chu Ci; Sichuan Literature and Art Publishing House: Chengdu, China, 2021; p. 117. [Google Scholar]
  21. Su, M.L.; Zhang, K.L. The Collected Works of Cao Zhi, Cao Pi, Cao Cao; Jiangsu Phoenix Publishing House: Nanjing, China, 2014; pp. 71–72. [Google Scholar]
  22. Guo, M.Q. The Collection of Poems of Yuefu; Zhonghua Shuju: Beijing, China, 2019; pp. 454, 478, 592. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lu, Q.L. Complete Edition of Poetries in Pre-Qin, Han, Wei, Jin, Northern and Southern Dynasties; Zhonghua Shuju: Beijing, China, 2017; p. 474. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ji, F. Proofreading, Annotating and Commenting on Ruan Ji’s Poems Singing of Emotions and Ambitions by Allegoric and Allusive Methods; Wuhan University Press: Wuhan, China, 2018; p. 261. [Google Scholar]
  25. Gao, M.Q.; Wang, F.C.; Tang, N.; Liu, K.; Cheng, B.G. Textual Research on Birds in the Book of Songs of Ancient Books of China. J. Hunan Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2006, 34, 142–146. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yang, B. Birds and Poetics: A Thematic Study of the Bird Image Series in Ancient Chinese Poetry; People’s Daily Press: Beijing, China, 2018; pp. 124–136. [Google Scholar]
  27. Su, T.P.; Huo, J.; Yang, C.Z.; Liang, W. Brood Parasitism on Barn Swallow (Hirundo rustica) Populations in China by Common Cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Chin. J. Zool. 2017, 52, 338–341. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lu, T.C.; He, P. An Overview of the Ecological Habits of Ancient Chinese Birds. In The Study of Ancient Chinese Zoology; Wang, Z.W., Feng, Z.J., Eds.; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2019; Volume 2, pp. 117–123. [Google Scholar]
  29. Tong, Y.C. Research on Ornithological Achievements in Ancient China. In. The Study of Ancient Chinese Zoology; Wang, Z.W., Feng, Z.J., Eds.; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2019; Volume 4, pp. 329–339. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhai, S.D. Discovery and Research on the Jades from the Fu Hao Tomb. Museum 2018, 5, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Z. The History of the Dong Han; An Annotated Edition; Zhonghua Shuju: Beijing, China, 2008; p. 205. [Google Scholar]
  32. Barlow, C. Appropriation of the yellow-billed magpie’s nest by the desert sparrow hawk. Wilson Bull. 1898, 10, 40–41. [Google Scholar]
  33. Deng, W.H.; Gao, W.; Yu, Y.M. Occupation of Magpie’s Nest Sites by Long-eared Owls in Secondary Forest. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2002, 22, 62–67. [Google Scholar]
  34. Yi, G.D.; Yin, W.C. The Preliminary Investigation of the Kestrel Using the Magpies Old Nest on the Pylons. Jilin Norm. Univ. J. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2016, 37, 116–120. [Google Scholar]
  35. Dunning, J.B. CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: NY, USA, 2008; Volume 327, pp. 483–489. [Google Scholar]
  36. Welbergen, J.A.; Davies, N.B. A parasite in wolf’s clothing: Hawk mimicry reduces mobbing of cuckoos by hosts. Behav. Ecol. 2011, 22, 574–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gluckman, T.L.; Mundy, N.I. Cuckoos in raptors’ clothing: Barred plumage illuminates a fundamental principle of Batesian mimicry. Anim. Behav. 2013, 86, 1165–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, C.; Liang, W.; Antonov, A.; Cai, Y.; Stokke, B.G.; Fossøy, F.; Moksnes, A.; Røskaft, E. Diversity of parasitic cuckoos and their hosts in China. Chin. Birds 2012, 3, 9–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liang, W.; Yang, C.; Møller, A.P. High Diversity of Brood Parasites in China and Coevolution between Cuckoos and Their Hosts. In Avian Brood Parasitism Behaviour, Ecology, Evolution and Coevolution; Soler, M., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 251–267. [Google Scholar]
  40. Yang, C.; Wang, L.; Liang, W.; Møller, A.P. Nest sanitation behavior in hirundines as a pre-adaptation to egg rejection to counter brood parasitism. Anim. Cogn. 2015, 18, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, D.; Bai, Y.; Li, X.; Guan, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z. Lack of fine-tuned egg rejection adjustment in Barn Swallows with variable local abundance of Common Cuckoos. Behav. Process. 2020, 174, 104087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, S.S.; Chen, M.; Wang, L.W.; Liang, W. Parasitic Brood Nestlings Exchange Experiment in Four Species of Passeriformes. J. Hainan Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 2013, 26, 417–420. [Google Scholar]
  43. Campobello, D.; Sealy, S.G. Avian brood parasitism in a Mediterranean region: Hosts and habitat preferences of Common Cuckoos Cuculus canorus. Bird Study 2009, 56, 389–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liang, W.; Yang, C.; Wang, L.; Møller, A.P. Avoiding parasitism by breeding indoors: Cuckoo parasitism of hirundines and rejection of eggs. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2013, 67, 913–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Møller, A.P.; Saino, N.; Adamík, P.; Ambrosini, R.; Antonov, A.; Campobello, D.; Stokke, B.G.; Fossøy, F.; Lehikoinen, E.; Martin-Vivaldi, M.; et al. Rapid change in host use of the Common Cuckoo Cuculus canorus linked to climate change. Proc. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 2011, 278, 733–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Martín-Vivaldi, M.; Soler, J.J.; Møller, A.P.; Pérez-Contreras, T.; Soler, M. The importance of nest-site and habitat in egg recognition ability of potential hosts of the Common Cuckoo Cuculus canorus. IBIS 2013, 155, 140–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rothstein, S.I. Relic behaviours, coevolution and the retention versus loss of host defences after episodes of avian brood parasitism. Anim. Behav. 2001, 61, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Luo, G.H. Cognitive History About Cuckoo and Azalea in China. J. Beijing For. Univ. (Soc. Sci.) 2020, 19, 45–51. [Google Scholar]
  49. He, X. The New Research of Xai Xiaozheng; Volumes Publishing House: Shenyang, China, 2014; p. 29. [Google Scholar]
  50. Qi, R.Y.; Qi, Y.T.; Guo, W.D.; Zhu, B.W.; Wang, Q.L. Response of the Cuckoo’s Start and Halt Dates to Climate Change in East Qinghai. Clim. Chang. Res. 2008, 4, 225–229. [Google Scholar]
  51. Ma, Q.J. A Textual Research on the Alias of Cuckoo in China. J. Anhui Univ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 21, 52–58. [Google Scholar]
  52. Yang, N. What Does the Dove in “The Dove over the Magpie’s Nest” Refer to? J. Chongqing Three Gorges Univ. 2013, 29, 97–98. [Google Scholar]
  53. Aviles, J.M. Egg rejection by Iberian azure-winged magpies Cyanopica cyanus in the absence of brood parasitism. J. Avian Biol. 2004, 35, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Soler, M.; de Neve, L. Great spotted cuckoo nestlings but not magpie nestlings starve in experimental age-matched broods. Ethology 2012, 118, 1036–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, H.R.; Shen, Z.H. Translation of Comprehensive Mirror to Aid in Government in Classical Chinese and in Vernacular; Reform Press: Beijing, China, 1991; Volume 60, p. 1100. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, D.; Zhang, Y.; Xia, C. Bird Interspecific Brood Parasitism Record in the Third Century. Birds 2024, 5, 648-655. https://doi.org/10.3390/birds5040044

AMA Style

Li D, Zhang Y, Xia C. Bird Interspecific Brood Parasitism Record in the Third Century. Birds. 2024; 5(4):648-655. https://doi.org/10.3390/birds5040044

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Dongyang, Yimei Zhang, and Canwei Xia. 2024. "Bird Interspecific Brood Parasitism Record in the Third Century" Birds 5, no. 4: 648-655. https://doi.org/10.3390/birds5040044

APA Style

Li, D., Zhang, Y., & Xia, C. (2024). Bird Interspecific Brood Parasitism Record in the Third Century. Birds, 5(4), 648-655. https://doi.org/10.3390/birds5040044

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop