Next Article in Journal
Protein Delivery to Insect Epithelial Cells In Vivo: Potential Application to Functional Molecular Analysis of Proteins in Butterfly Wing Development
Previous Article in Journal
Biomolecular Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation for Biotechnology
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
BioTech
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/biotech12020027
biotech-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Characterization of Dehydrin in Azraq Saltbush among Related Atriplex Species

by
Anas Musallam
1,
Saeid Abu-Romman
2 and
Monther T. Sadder
3,*
1
Biotechnology Research Directorate, National Agricultural Research Center, Baq’a 19381, Jordan
2
Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Al-Balqa Applied University, Al-Salt 19117, Jordan
3
Plant Biotechnology Lab, Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, School of Agriculture, University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
BioTech 2023, 12(2), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/biotech12020027
Submission received: 20 March 2023 / Revised: 2 April 2023 / Accepted: 5 April 2023 / Published: 7 April 2023
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Atriplex spp. (saltbush) is known to survive extremely harsh environmental stresses such as salinity and drought. It mitigates such conditions based on specialized physiological and biochemical characteristics. Dehydrin genes (DHNs) are considered major players in this adaptation. In this study, a novel DHN gene from Azrak (Jordan) saltbush was characterized along with other Atriplex species from diverse habitats. Intronless DHN-expressed sequence tags (495–761 bp) were successfully cloned and sequenced. Saltbush dehydrins contain one S-segment followed by three K-segments: an arrangement called SK3-type. Two substantial insertions were detected including three copies of the K2-segemnet in A. canescens. New motif variants other than the six-serine standard were evident in the S-segment. AhaDHN1 (A. halimus) has a cysteine residue (SSCSSS), while AgaDHN1 (A. gardneri var. utahensis) has an isoleucine residue (SISSSS). In contrast to the conserved K1-segment, both the K2- and K3-segment showed several substitutions, particularly in AnuDHN1 (A. nummularia). In addition, a parsimony phylogenetic tree based on homologs from related genera was constructed. The phylogenetic tree resolved DHNs for all of the investigated Atriplex species in a superclade with an 85% bootstrap value. Nonetheless, the DHN isolated from Azraq saltbush was uniquely subclustred with a related genera Halimione portulacoides. The characterized DHNs revealed tremendous diversification among the Atriplex species, which opens a new venue for their functional analysis.
Keywords:
Atriplex; dehydrin; LEA II; K–segment; S–segment
Key Contribution: AhDHN from Azraq clustered with DHN from a related genera Halimione portulacoides. In addition, novel S-segment motifes were resolved for different Atriplex species.

1. Introduction

Salinity is a major global stress factor affecting modern agriculture, especially in arid and semi-arid regions [1,2,3]. Enormous agricultural losses are caused by salinity and are expected to increase in the coming years. Saltbush (Atriplex spp.) belongs to the Chenopodiaceae family, which also encompasses major crops, e.g., spinach, sugar beet, and quinoa. It has several ploidy levels, e.g., 2n = 18, 36, 54, 72, or 90 [4]. Different Atriplex spp. are native to different regions, e.g., Eurasian red orache (A. prostrate) [5], American Gardner’s saltbush (A. gardneri) [6], Australian oldman saltbush (A. nummularia) [7], and Mediterranean saltbush (A. halimus) [2]. The latter spreads in a major desert region in Jordan called Azraq, which has aridisols with prevailing dry hot summers and dry cold winters (Figure 1) (personal communications).
Saltbush is a halophyte which possesses unique salt tolerance mechanisms that guarantee normal growth and development, e.g., A. halimus can grow in extreme sodic soils (25–30 dS m−1) (Le Houérou 1992). Moreover, moderate salinity inhibitory to major crops [1,8,9,10] would stimulate growth in A. nummularia and A. halimus [2,11].
Many efforts have been directed toward the characterization of relevant salt-responsive genes underlying the unique physiology of halophyte plants [12,13]. In this regard, saltbush would sense salinity stress or even drought stress through a specialized protein, which was previously called early responsive to dehydration (ERD). The new name for ERD is the osmosensitive calcium-permeable cation channel (OSCA). The OSCA was first reported in Arabidopsis by two separate research groups [14,15]. In saltbush, AhOSCA expression was found to be upregulated ca. 6-folds in A. halimus under 150 mM NaCl level (ca. 13 dS m−1), which mimics the salinity levels in the Azraq region [2].
Dehydrins (DHNs) are widely spread across the plant kingdom and are considered crucial stress-responsive genes, e.g., FcDHN in common fig under salinity stress [9] and tomato TAS14 dehydrin under drought stress [16]. DHNs contain hydrophilic residues that have functional changes in response to solutes and dehydration [13,17]. DHNs are members of the Late Embryogenesis Abundant II (LEA II) protein family, which are considered stress-responsive factors and are predominant during seed maturation and dissection phases [17]; in addition, they are considered to be major salinity tolerance biomarkers [13]. Nonetheless, there are other important salinity biomarkers, and some overlap even with drought stress but others do not [16].
DHN has three conserved segments in its structure (Y, S, and K segments), where K segments can be available once, twice, or trice forming amphipathic α-helices, which aid in stabilizing cellular components and membranes [18]. Both α-amylase and lactate dehydrogenase are examples of cold-sensitive enzymes protected by DHNs [19]. Additionally, DHNs can protect against oxidative stress [20]. Different Atriplex species are widely distributed around the world with diverse prevailing environmental conditions. Therefore, a colinearity is expected between the protein structure and function for each species, which would be vital for adaptation. Therefore, this study aimed to characterize DHN from Azrak (Jordan) saltbush among a group of diverse Atriplex species at the molecular level.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

The saltbush seeds were collected from Azrak (Jordan). In addition, seeds from different Atriplex spp. were kindly provided from two seed banks: the National Agricultural Research Center (NARC, Jordan) and the National Arid Land Plant Genetic Resource Unit (USDA, USA). The seeds were surface-sterilized and germinated in vitro over MS medium. The plantlets were subcultured using nodal cutting [13]. A total of fourteen accessions covering nine different species were included in the study (Table 1): thirteen Atriplex spp. accessions and Halimione portulacoides (sea purslane), a sister species that was formerly classified as A. portulacoides.

2.2. Cloning DHNs

Total RNA was extracted from fresh leaves based on the guanidinium thiocyanate phenol—chloroform method [20] using TRIZOL (Invitrogen Inc, USA). All used plastic-wares were RNase free, and RNA was resuspended in DEPC-treated water (Qiagen, Germany) supplemented with an RNase inhibitor (Qiagen, Germany). Reverse transcription reactions were performed for isolated RNA templates following the recommended procedure using a GoScript™ Reverse Transcriptase kit (Promega, USA). Several primers were designed to amplify ESTs covering the majority of DHN genes using the polymerase chain reaction (online Supplementary Table S1). The fragments were cloned as described earlier [13] and sequenced with the Sanger method using an ABI 3730 sequencer (ABI, USA). The sequences were deposited in GenBank [21] with nucleotide accession numbers (MH591427-MH591440) and corresponding protein accession numbers (AYH52682-AYH52695) (Table 1).

2.3. Analysis of Atriplex DHNs

Protein secondary structure was predicted using Phyre2 software [22]. Protein features and predicted 3-dimensional structure were analyzed through the PSIPRED server hosted by University College London [23]. The three-dimensional structure with ligand prediction was predicted using I-TASSER software [24]. DHN proteins from related Chenopodiaceae were retrieved from Genbank [21]. They included proteins from two Atriplex species, Chenopodium quinoa, Beta vulgaris, Spinacea oleracea, and two Suaeda species (salsa and glauca) in addition to Tamarix hispidata as an outgroup. Protein sequences were subjected to multiple sequence alignment, along with saltbush dehydrin protein sequences generated in this study using BioEdit [25]. Aligned sequences were bootstrapped 1000 times by using the SEQBOOT function available in PHYLIP software [26] followed by the construction of a phylogenetic tree based on the parsimony method. A consensus tree was illustrated using TreeView [27].

3. Results

Seedlings were successfully grown for all Atriplex species. Thereafter, nodal cuttings were used to multiply and maintain the cultures in 250 glass bottles to obtain enough tissue materials for RNA isolation. The sequenced DHN ESTs were found to be in the range of 495-761 bp. Nonetheless, they cover all important segments (S and K).
When the DHN amino acid sequences were multiple-aligned, two major insertions were detected. The first insertion was short (KHETLGQ) and was detected in DHN protein from A. canescens (AFC98463), which was located 14 amino acids upstream of the S-segment. The second insertion detected 9 amino acids upstream of the K2-segment. Two different segments in the second insertion were evident; the first segment (Fifty amino acids long) has an additional K2-segment and was detected in A. halimus (AGZ86543), A. dimorphostegia (AYH52684), A. leucoclada (AYH52687), A. hortensisi (AYH52688), and A. gardneri var. utahensis (AYH52691). Interestingly, A. numimularia (AYH52689) showed a similar fifty amino acid insertion but without an additional K2-segment as above. The second segment (one hundred amino acids long) has two extra K2-segments, and it was detected only in A. canescens (AFC98463).
A membrane pore-lining stretch (14-6 amino acids) was predicted for all of the investigated DHNs (online Supplementary Table S2), where the N- and C-termini were cytosolic and extracellular, respectively, except for A. nummularia, which had two DHNs; AYH52689 had an extracellular N-terminus and a pore-lining stretch of EDAVISGVEKAHVFS (Figure 2A), while AYH52690 had a cytosolic N-terminus and a pore-lining stretch of HEAVT HVATAEPSVEG (Figure 2B). The secondary structure prediction for the investigated Atriplex DHNs was carried out for polypeptides spanning [N-terminus—S-segment—K1-segment] (online Supplementary Figure S1). Accordingly, Atriplex DHNs showed unique helices with diverse numbers and lengths.
Concerning the conserved segments in DHN proteins, most species showed six residues of the conserved S-segment (SSSSSS) (Figure 3). However, A. gardneri var. utahensis (AYH52691) has the isoleucine (I) residue at the second position, and A. nummularia (AYH52690) has the threonine (T) residue at the second position. Moreover, A. nummularia (AYH52689) showed three cysteine (CCC) residues, and A. halimus (AYH52686) showed one cysteine residue (C) at the third position (Figure 3). Analysis of aligned DNA sequences showed several SNPs in the S-segment (S1S2S3S4S5S6) for the investigated Atriplex species. In S1, a silent mutation (TCC to TCT) was found in three A. halimus accessions (KF578414, MH591427, and MH591431). A S2I missense mutation was found in A. gardneri var. utahensis (AYH52691) as a result of a codon change from the consensus AGC to ATC. In addition, the A. nummularia (AYH52690) showed a S2T variant due to a codon change from the consensus AGC to ACC. Moreover, sequential serine to cysteine substitutions (S2C, S3C, and S4C) were detected in A. nummularia (AYH52689) due to three SNPs in the consensus (AGC TCT AGC to TGC TGT TGT). In addition, the A. halimus (AYH52686) DHN showed a S3C variant due to a codon change from the consensus TCT to TGT.
The highly conserved K1-segment (KKKRKKEKKEKK) was evident for different Atriplex species and accessions (Figure 3). Three amino acid substitutions were found in A. canescens (AFC98463); K3R was due to a codon change from AAG > AGG; K5R and K8R, the last two substitutions, resulted from a codon change from AAG to AGG.
The DHNs for both A. nummularia (MH591434) and A. dimorphostegia (MH591429) showed silent SNPs in R4 in the K1-segment (AGA to AGG). Moreover, a silent mutation in E7 (GAA>GAG) was evident in the DHNs of three A. halimus accessions (KF578414, MH591427, and MH591431) and A. nummularia (MH591434). In addition, A. nummularia (MH591434) has a silent mutation in K9 resulting from AAA>AAG.
The K2-segment is the third major motif present in DHN proteins with a consensus of KKGGFLDK(V/I)KDK (Figure 3). However, it was KKGGFVEKIKDK in A. canscence (AFC98463), while it was KKVGFLDKVKDK in several species; A. halimus (AYH52685), A. dimorphostegia (AYH52684), A. leucoclada (AYH52687), A. hortensis (AYH52688), A. gardneri var. utahensis (AYH52691), and Atriplex lindleyi subsp. conduplicata (AYH52692). The KKGGFLDKIKDK variant was present in A. halimus (AYH52682) and A. halimus (AYH52686), while it was KKGGFVDKIKDK in the A. halimus (AYH52683) accession and KKGGFLGKIKDK in the previously published A. halimus (AGZ86543)as KKGGFVDKIKDK in the A. halimus (AYH52683) accession and KKGGFLGKIKDK in the previously published A. halimus (AGZ86543) accession. On the other hand, the DHN K2-segments of A. nummularia (AYH52689) and (AYH52690) were KVGGLDDVVEDL and KKGGFLDKVKDK, respectively.
When investigating the colinear nucleotide sequences covering the K2-segment, fourteen SNPs were detected in different positions. A. nummularia (AYH52689) had a K2V resulting from AAG > GTT and a silent SNP in G3 with GGT > GGA as compared with A. canscence (AFC98463), A. halimus (AGZ86543, AYH52682, AYH52686, and AYH52683), and A. nummularia (AYH52690). In addition, it had an F5L substitution with TTC > CTC and another one with L6D resulting from CTT > GAT as compared to all other species and accessions except for A. canscence (AFC98463) and A. halimus (AYH52683). On the contrary, an L6V (CTT > GTT) substitution was evident in A. canscence (JN974246) and A. halimus (AYH52683). Additional K2-segment substitutions in A. nummularia (AYH52689) compared to the consensus include: K8V (AAG > GTC), K10E (AAG > GAG), and K12L (AAA > CTC). Furthermore, the DHNs of A. halimus (AYH52685); A. dimorphosegia (AYH52684); A. leucoclada (AYH52687); A. hortensis (AYH52688); and A. gardneri var. utahensis (AYH52691) had G3V substitutions resulting from GGT > GTT, while V9I (GTC > ATC) was evident in A. canscence (AFC98463) and different A. halimus accessions (AGZ86543, AYH52682, AYH52686, and AYH52683).
The third K-rich segment in DHN Atriplex species is K3-segment. This segment is highly conserved and has consensus (KDKKGFLDKIKDKIPG) in all of the investigated species except A. nummularia (AYH52689) which has a special K3-segment (EEKEVFVEMIEDFSRQ) resulting from several SNPs; K1E (AAG > GAG), D2E (GAT > GAG), K4E (AAG > GAG), G5V (GGG > GTC), L7V (TTG > GTG); D8E (GAC > GAG), K9M (AAG > ATG), K11E (AAG > GAG), K13F (AAA > TTC), I14S (ATC > TCC), P15R (CCT > CGG), and G16Q (GGC > CAG). On the other hand, A. halimus (AYH52682) has two silent mutations in the K3-segment sequence at I14 and (ATC > ATT) P15 (CCT > CCC).
The three-dimensional structure was predicated for the DHN protein from A. halimus (AYH52683) grown in the Azraq region (Jordan). The structure contains eight long and three short helices (Figure 4). Three ligands were predicted to bind the protein, namely, Mg, Ca, and Fe.
A parsimonious phylogenetic tree was constructed for all available DHN proteins from the Atriplex species and the homologs from other species in the Chenopodiaceae (Figure 5). The Tamarix hispidata (out-group) DHN was nicely separated from all of the other DHNs. The tree showed two major clusters. The first one was resolved with a 98% bootstrap value. It comprises two DHNs from Chenopodium quinoa.
The second cluster was subdivided into seven major clades. Clade (I) has one, two, and three DHNs from Spinacia oleracea, C. quinoa, and Beta vulgaris, respectively while clade (II) has two DHNs each from S. oleracea (XP_021848510 and KNA16389), C. quinoa (XP_021774793 and XP_021752990), and Beta vulgaris (KMT01303 and XP_010690283). Clade (III) was resolved with a 93% bootstrap value and has three DHNs from C. quinoua: ERD 14-like (XP_021732246), DHN1 (AGM15308), and ERD 14-like (XP_021756500). The biggest clade (IV) was resolved with a 85% bootstrap value and has 15 Atriplex species and accession DHNs: A. halimus (AGZ86543), A. halimus (AYH52686), A. halimus (AYH52682), A. gardneri (AYH52694), A. gardneri (AYH52695), A. nummularia L (AYH52690), A. nummularia U (AYH52689), A. hortensis (AYH52688), A. canescens (AFC98463), A. leucoclada (AYH52687), A. dimorphostegia (AYH52684), A. lindleyi (AYH52692), A. halimus (AYH52685), A. gardneri var. utahensis (AYH52691), and A. halimus (AYH52683), in addition to one DHN from the related species Halimione portulacoides (AYH52693). On the other hand, the smallest clade (V) was resolved with a 98% bootstrap value and has two DHNs from S. oleracea (KMS95553 and XP_021846321), while clade (VI) was resolved with a 64% bootstrap value and has two DHNs for each of the S. oleracea and Suaeda spp. Finally, clade (VII) has two proteins from Beta vulgaris.

4. Discussion

We were able to amplify DHN genes from several Atriplex species both indirectly using cDNA and directly using genomic DNA as they were found to be intronless. Likewise, several DHNs from different plant species were found to be intronless, e.g., Eucalyptus globulus [28] and Vigna radiate [29]. Many plants’ stress-responsive genes are void of introns or interspaced with just a few ones, e.g., MYB transcription factor [30] and salinity-responsive genes [31]. Furthermore, stress-responsive genes with rapid change in expression levels were also found to be interspaced with limited introns, e.g., Arabidopsis thaliana [32]. Moreover, recent studies have shown that such intronless and limited intron-interrupted genes were putatively acquired by horizontal gene transfer from prokaryotes to Phragmoplastophyta long before the appearance of terrestrial plants [33,34].
We were interested in investigating DHN genes from saltbush from Azraq (Jordan) and different Atriplex species as they were directly involved in salinity tolerance [16,35]. This was achieved by utilizing available sequences for DHN genes: A. halimus and A. canscence both with complete ORF. A recombinant yeast-expressing AcDHN gene was found to tolerate salinity stress [35]. Likewise, the expression of the AhDHN gene was found to be upregulated by more than seven folds in A. halimus roots under salinity stress [13]. However, they code for proteins that vary in structure and size. While the AhDHN gene (KF578414) from Saudi Arabia isolate encodes a 26.8 kDa protein [13], the AcDHN gene (JN974246) encodes a 38.3 kDa protein [35]. When compared with orthologs from the related genus Chenopodium quinoa, a wider range in protein sizes is evident, i.e., 30, 34, 50, and 55 kDa [36].
DHNs vary in their cellular location (membrane or cytoplasmic). They can have multiple locations in the cell, e.g., wheat DHNs [37]. Nonetheless, all of the investigated Atriplex DHNs in this study showed a single predicted pore-lining (online Supplementary Table S2) in comparison to comparable stress-responsive proteins with two pore-linings, e.g., OePMP3 [10]. Most Atriplex DHNs showed an extracellular C-terminus and a cytoplasmic N-terminus, similar to the previously published AhDHN [16]. However, Atriplex nummularia has two DHNs; one has an extracellular C-terminus and a cytoplasmic N-terminus similar to the other investigated DHNs, while the other has an extracellular N-terminus and a cytoplasmic C-terminus. The putative pore-lining of Atriplex DHNs indicates that they have major hydrophobic domains and consequently facilitate the folding of this integral protein along the phospholipid bilayer membrane. Likewise, plant DHN homologs were found to be associated with cell membranes. Arabidopsis DHNs were found to bind aquaporin (AtPIP2B) indicating a potential role in maintaining the lipid association of the aquaporin hydrophobic transmembrane portion [38]. Moreover, some plant DHNs were found to bind abiotic stress-responsive proteins for protection and to enhance their activity, e.g., ERD14 which can bind to Phi9 GLUTATHIONE-S-TRANSFERASE9 and CATALASE under oxidative stress in Arabidopsis [39], GsPM30 interacting with receptors such as cytoplasmic kinase GsCBRLK under salinity in wild soybean [40], and MtCAS31 protecting leghemoglobin under drought stress in barrel medic [41].
The detected amino acid substitutions in the major segments in the A. halimus DHN (Azraq region, Jordan) would interfere with its interaction with other macromolecules. For example, it was found that the S-segment is a major phosphorylation domain in Arabidopsis DHN [42]. Moreover, K-segments are positively charged as they are rich in K residues; therefore, they can bind DNA as the phosphate backbone is negatively charged [43]. Moreover, the expression of saltbush DHN (Azraq region, Jordan) was assessed using qRT-PCR (data not shown). The results were almost comparable with earlier findings for DHN expression under salinity stress (Al-Jouf region, Saudi Arabia) [13]. The saltbush DHN (Azraq region, Jordan) showed around ten-fold upregulation in the root tissues rather than the shoots compared with the seven-fold upregulation in DHN (Al-Jouf region, Saudi Arabia) [13].
Two GO terms related to molecular function were revealed for A. halimus DHN (Azraq region, Jordan), namely “substrate-specific transporter activity” and “protein binding”, while it showed four GO terms related to biological processes, “protein localization to nucleus”, “nuclear import”, protein import”, and “protein targeting”. Likewise, the maize DHN was found localized to the nucleus [44]. In addition, “nuclear envelope” and “pore complex” were predicted as GO terms related to cellular localization. In fact, both H residues and K-segments are indispensable for binding phospholipids, a major component of the cellular membrane [45,46].
On the other hand, three metal–ligand binding sites were predicted in the DHN from A. halimus (Azraq region, Jordan) (Figure 4). The first was a Mg ligand binding site with residues D148 and D152. The second was a Ca ligand binding site with residues D148 and D152. Similarly, the Arabidopsis DHN was found to bind calcium, which was found to be directly proportional to phosphorylation [42]. Finally, there was a Fe ligand binding site, which was associated with residues D162 and K191. A similar affinity to Fe was recorded in Vitis riparia DHN1 [47]. Furthermore, DHNs binding metal ligands can act as reactive oxygen species scavengers, which would aid in plant mitigation under various stresses [43,45,46].
The investigated species have a common genus (Atriplex), which belongs to the Chenapodaiceae family and subfamily of Chenapodioideae, which contains both Atriplex and Chenapodium genera [21]. After constructing the phylogenetic tree, all of the investigated Atriplex species in this study: (A. halimus (AYH52683), A. gardneri var. utahensis (AYH52691), A. halimus (AYH52685), A. leucoclada (AYH52687), A. dimorphostegia (AYH52684), A. hortensis (AYH52688) A. nummularia U (AYH52689), A. halimus (AYH52682), A. nummularia L (AYH52690), and A. halimus (AYH52686)) and the previously published data (A. canescen (AFC98463) and (NCBI 2022) and A. halimus (AGZ86543) [16]), were resolved in two subclades consolidated into one major clade (IV) with an 85% bootstrap value. They were separated from all other homologs from related genera, e.g., Chenopodium, Spinacia, Beta, and Suaeda. However, Halimione portulacoides also appeared in Atriplex clade IV. H. portulacoides (previously classified as A. portulacoides) was recently recognized as a distinct genus based on extensive phylogenetic analysis [48].
On the contrary, in a previous study, A. halimus was clustered away from A. dimorphostegia based on the atpB-rbcL spacer sequence, while A. nummularia and A. hortensis were clustered together and away from A. halimus and A. leucoclada based on ITS sequences [48]. This could mean that the DHN protein sequence is more conserved among Atriplex spp than DNA-based sequences (e.g., the atpB-rbcL spacer and ITS sequences). Atriplex and Chenapodium were clustered together but away from Beta vulgaris (Subfamily Betoidieae) based on trnL-F and rpl16 sequences [49], the ITS sequence [50], and the matK/trnK sequence [51]. Likewise, our data showed two groups of Chenapodium DHNs, one that was clustered with Atriplex in a superclade resolved with an 80% bootstrap value and another group clustered into two major clades with Beta and Spinacia.
Based on an extensive phylogenetic analysis using maximum likelihood and utilizing 59 protein-coding genes [52], a tight clustering was reported for both Spinacia and Chenapodium followed by Beta among 11 genera from the Chenopodiaceae family. Likewise, Spinacia and Chenapodium were found to cluster together based on the atpB-rbcL spacer sequence [48]. In addition, and based on the flowering locus (FT), orthologs were clustered together between Beta and Chenopodium [53]. These clusters agree with our phylogenetic analysis of DHNs.
The cloned DHN from A. halimus (MH591431) showed several SNPs compared with the published DHN genes from A. halimus (KF578414) and A. canescens (JN974246). In addition, the highly conserved S-segment available in DHN genes from A. halimus and A. canescens consists of six residues of the amino acid serine (SSSSSS) [16,17], while the S-segment in the DHN gene from A. halimus (AYH52686) was found to have C instead of S at the third position (SSCSSS). Moreover, the PCR amplified DHN gene from A. nummularia showed two bands using gel electrophoresis, which could be an indication of the presence of two paralogous dehydrins in this species. Multiple dehydrins have already been recorded for several plant species. This can start from two copies as in Vitis vinifera and can go up to fifteen copies as in Malus domestica [54].
The sequencing of both fragments from A. nummularia revealed novel forms in the S-segment. The first upper band in A. nummularia (AYH52689) with a size of 761 bp gave an S-segment with three cysteines and three serines (SCCCSS), while the second lower band in the same species A. nummularia (AYH52690) with a size of 495 bp gave an S-segment rich in serein residues with threonine residues at the second position (STSSSS). On the contrary, A. gardneri var. utahensis (AYH52691) showed another variant in the S-segment with isoleucine replacing a serine residue at the second position (SISSSS). Although the S-segment in the DHN is highly conserved, however our data revealed novel variants reported for the first time, which is consistent with earlier works showing other variants such as the glycine-containing S-segment (S2G) in EjDHN2 from Eriobotrya japonica [55], the S2N available in A. thaliana (CAA62449) or the S2G form present in DHN3 from Coffea canephora [56].
The SK-segment showed more variability between species because it extends for a longer stretch (40–42 residues) and due to the presence of a gap in the gene structure [48]. This can lead to changes in the position of the S-segment between 1-18, while the K-segment runs between 27–42 positions. The most frequent SKn-segment present in the available DHNs is the YnSKn form (85%), while the SKn form is less frequent. Nonetheless, additional very rare forms were also recorded for plant dehydrins, e.g., the SKKS form present in Stellaria longipes [57] and the SKKYKY form present in Cerastium arcticum [58]. It is worth mentioning that the K-segment was found to have a protective role against both biotic and abiotic stresses, e.g., in grapes [59].

5. Conclusions

In this study, we found that most DHNs from the Azraq desert have a unique protein structure and presumably function. This could enable saltbush plants to survive the prevailing harsh conditions in the desert. On the other hand, the related DHNs from other species also showed unique and novel motifs (e.g., the S-segment) that would make the original plant be adapted to the specific conditions they live in. Therefore, the obtained data could guide future work to resolve holistic DHN interactomes with membranes, DNA, and other proteins to identify the uniqueness of each protein which would aid in mitigating different Atriplex spp. to different environmental stresses.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biotech12020027/s1. Table S1: Primer information used in the present study. Table S2: Pore-lining sequence for DHN protein species. Figure S1: Atriplex DHN secondary structure prediction spanning N-terminus - S- and K1-segments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.T.S.; methodology, A.M.; software, S.A.-R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T.S., A.M. and S.A.-R.; writing—review and editing, M.T.S., A.M. and S.A.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (Project number 2397), University of Jordan, Jordan.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Alsadon, A.A.; Sadder, M.T.; Wahb-Allah, M.A. Responsive gene screening and exploration of genotypes responses to salinity tolerance in tomato. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2013, 7, 1383–1395. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sadder, M.T.; Anwar, F.; Al-Doss, A.A. Gene expression and physiological analysis of Atriplex halimus (L.) under salt stress. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2013, 7, 112–118. [Google Scholar]
  3. Brake, M.; Al-Qadumii, L.; Hamasha, H.; Migdadi, H.; Awad, A.; Haddad, N.; Sadder, M.T. Development of SSR Markers linked to stress responsive genes along tomato chromosome 3 (Solanum lycopersicum L.). BioTech 2022, 11, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ruas, C.F.; Ruas, P.M.; Stutz, H.C.; Fairbanks, D.J. Cytogenetic studies in the genus Atriplex (Chenopodiaceae). Caryologia 2001, 54, 129–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Frankton, C.; Bassett, I.J. The genus Atriplex (Chenopodiaceae) in Canada. I. Three introduced species: A. heterosperma, A. oblongifolia, and A. hortensis. Canad. J. Bot. 1968, 46, 1309–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nord, E.C.; Christensen, D.R.; Plummer, A.P. Atriplex species [or Taxa] that spread by root spouts, stem layers, and by seed. Ecology 1969, 50, 324–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wilson, P.G. Chenopodiaceae. In Flora of Australia; Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra, Australia, 1984; Volume 4, pp. 81–330. [Google Scholar]
  8. Le Houérou, H.N. The role of saltbushes (Atriplex spp.) in arid land rehabilitation in the Mediterranean Basin: A review. Agrofor. Syst. 1992, 18, 107–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sadder, M.T.; Alshomali, I.; Ateyyeh, A.; Musallam, A. Physiological and molecular responses for long term salinity stress in common fig (Ficus carica L.). Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2021, 27, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sadder, M.T.; Ateyyeh, A.F.; Alswalmah, H.; Zakri, A.M.; Alsadon, A.A.; Al-Doss, A.A. Characterization of putative salinity-responsive biomarkers in olive (Olea europaea L.). Plant Genet. Resour. 2021, 19, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dunn, G.M.; Neales, T.F. Are the effects of salinity on growth and leaf gas exchange related? Photosynthetica 1993, 29, 33–42. [Google Scholar]
  12. Xu, C.; Tang, X.; Shao, H.; Wang, H. Salinity tolerance mechanism of economic halophytes from physiological to molecular hierarchy for improving food quality. Curr. Genom. 2016, 17, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Sadder, M.T.; Al-Doss, A.A. Characterization of dehydrin AhDHN from Mediterranean saltbush (Atriplex halimus). Turk. J. Biol. 2014, 38, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hou, C.; Tian, W.; Kleist, T.; He, K.; Garcia, V.; Bai, F.; Hao, Y.; Luan, S.; Li, L. DUF221 proteins are a family of osmosensitive calcium-permeable cation channels conserved across eukaryotes. Cell Res. 2014, 24, 632–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Yuan, F.; Yang, H.; Xue, Y.; Kong, D.; Ye, R.; Li, C.; Zhang, J.; Theprungsirikul, L.; Shrift, T.; Krichilsky, B.; et al. OSCA1 mediates osmotic-stress-evoked Ca 2+ increases vital for osmosensing in Arabidopsis. Nature 2014, 514, 367–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sadder, M.T.; Alsadon, A.A.; Wahb-Allah, M.A. Transcriptomic analysis of tomato lines reveals putative stress-specific biomarkers. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2014, 38, 700–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hanin, M.; Brini, F.; Ebel, C.; Toda, Y.; Takeda, S.; Masmoudi, K. Plant dehydrins and stress tolerance: Versatile proteins for complex mechanisms. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 1503–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Koag, M.C.; Wilkens, S.; Fenton, R.D.; Resnik, J.; Vo, E.; Close, T.J. The K-segment of maize DHN1 mediates binding to anionic phospholipid vesicles and concomitant structural changes. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 1503–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Rinne, P.L.; Kaikuranta, P.L.; van der Plas, L.H.; van der Schoot, C. Dehydrins in cold-acclimated apices of birch (Betula pubescens Ehrh.): Production, localization and potential role in rescuing enzyme function during dehydration. Planta 1999, 209, 377–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hara, M.; Fujinaga, M.; Kuboi, T. Radical scavenging activity and oxidative modification of citrus dehydrin. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2004, 42, 657–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. NCBI, The National Center for Biotechnology Information. 2023. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed on 1 January 2023).
  22. Kelley, L.A.; Sternberg, M.J. Protein structure prediction on the Web: A case study using the Phyre server. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Buchan, D.W.; Ward, S.M.; Lobley, A.E.; Nugent, T.C.; Bryson, K.; Jones, D.T. Protein annotation and modelling servers at University College London. Nucl. Acids Res. 2010, 38 (Suppl. S2), W563–W568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Yang, J.; Yan, R.; Roy, A.; Xu, D.; Poisson, J.; Zhang, Y. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 7–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  26. Felsenstein, J. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package), version 3.5 c; Department of Genetics, University of Washington: Seattle, WA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  27. Page, R.D.M. TREEVIEW: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1996, 12, 357–358. [Google Scholar]
  28. Fernandez, M.; Águila, S.V.; Arora, R.; Chen, K. Isolation and characterization of three cold acclimation-responsive dehydrin genes from Eucalyptus globulus. Tree Genet. Genomes 2012, 8, 149–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lin, C.H.; Peng, P.H.; Ko, C.Y.; Markhart, A.H.; Lin, T.Y. Characterization of a novel Y2K-type dehydrin VrDhn1 from Vigna radiata. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012, 53, 930–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. He, Q.; Jones, D.C.; Li, W.; Xie, F.; Ma, J.; Sun, R.; Wang, Q.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, B. Genome-wide identification of R2R3-MYB genes and expression analyses during abiotic stress in Gossypium raimondii. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Speth, C.; Szabo, E.X.; Martinho, C.; Collani, S.; zur Oven-Krockhaus, S.; Richter, S.; Droste-Borel, I.; Macek, B.; Stierhof, Y.D.; Schmid, M.; et al. Arabidopsis RNA processing factor SERRATE regulates the transcription of intronless genes. Elife 2018, 7, e37078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jeffares, D.C.; Penkett, C.J.; Bähler, J. Rapidly regulated genes are intron poor. Trends Genet. 2008, 24, 375–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fang, H.; Huangfu, L.; Chen, R.; Li, P.; Xu, S.; Zhang, E.; Cao, W.; Liu, L.; Yao, Y.; Liang, G.; et al. Ancestor of land plants acquired the DNA-3-methyladenine glycosylase (MAG) gene from bacteria through horizontal gene transfer. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Morozov, S.Y.; Solovyev, A.G. Emergence of intronless evolutionary forms of stress response genes: Possible relation to terrestrial adaptation of green plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Li, J.; Yu, G.; Chen, X.; Fan, Z.; Liu, J.; Pan, H. Cloning and stress resistance functional characterization of an AcDHN gene from Atriplex canescens. Plant Physiol. Commun. 2012, 48, 676–682. [Google Scholar]
  36. Burrieza, H.P.; Koyro, H.W.; Tosar, L.M.; Kobayashi, K.; Maldonado, S. High salinity induces dehydrin accumulation in Chenopodium quinoa Willd. cv. Hualhuas embryos. Plant Soil 2012, 354, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bhattacharya, S.; Dhar, S.; Banerjee, A.; Ray, S. Structural, functional, and evolutionary analysis of late embryogenesis abundant proteins (LEA) in Triticum aestivum: A detailed molecular level biochemistry using in silico approach. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2019, 82, 9–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hernández-Sánchez, I.E.; Maruri-López, I.; Molphe-Balch, E.P.; Becerra-Flora, A.; Jaimes-Miranda, F.; Jiménez-Bremont, J.F. Evidence for in vivo interactions between dehydrins and the aquaporin AtPIP2B. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 510, 545–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nguyen, P.N.; Tossounian, M.A.; Kovacs, D.S.; Thu, T.T.; Stijlemans, B.; Vertommen, D.; Pauwels, J.; Gevaert, K.; Angenon, G.; Messens, J.; et al. Dehydrin ERD14 activates glutathione transferase Phi9 in Arabidopsis thaliana under osmotic stress. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Gen. Subj. 2020, 1864, 129506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sun, M.; Shen, Y.; Yin, K.; Guo, Y.; Cai, X.; Yang, J.; Zhu, Y.; Jia, B.; Sun, X. A late embryogenesis abundant protein GsPM30 interacts with a receptor like cytoplasmic kinase GsCBRLK and regulates environmental stress responses. Plant Sci. 2019, 283, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Li, X.; Feng, H.; Wen, J.; Dong, J.; Wang, T. MtCAS31 aids symbiotic nitrogen fixation by protecting the leghemoglobin MtLb120-1 under drought stress in Medicago truncatula. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Alsheikh, M.K.; Heyen, B.J.; Randall, S.K. Ion binding properties of the dehydrin ERD14 are dependent upon phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 40882–40889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Sun, Z.; Li, S.; Chen, W.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, L.; Sun, W.; Wang, Z. Plant dehydrins: Expression, regulatory networks, and protective roles in plants challenged by abiotic stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, T.; Yang, X.; Li, D. Functional characterization of KS-type dehydrin ZmDHN13 and its related conserved domains under oxidative stress. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 7361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Yu, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L. Structural and functional dynamics of dehydrins: A plant protector protein under abiotic stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Tiwari, P.; Chakrabarty, D. Dehydrin in the past four decades: From chaperones to transcription co-regulators in regulating abiotic stress response. Curr. Res. Biotechnol. 2021, 3, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Boddington, K.F.; Graether, S.P. Binding of a Vitis riparia dehydrin to DNA. Plant Sci. 2019, 287, 110172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kadereit, G.; Mavrodiev, E.V.; Zacharias, E.H.; Sukhorukov, A.P. Molecular phylogeny of Atripliceae (Chenopodioideae, Chenopodiaceae): Implications for systematics, biogeography, flower and fruit evolution, and the origin of C4 photosynthesis. Am. J. Bot. 2010, 97, 1664–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. del-Pino, I.S.; Borsch, T.; Motley, T.J. trnL-F and rpl16 sequence data and dense taxon sampling reveal monophyly of unilocular anthered Gomphrenoideae (Amaranthaceae) and an improved picture of their internal relationships. Syst. Bot. 2009, 34, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kadereit, G.; Hohmann, S.; Kadereit, J.W. A synopsis of Chenopodiaceae subfam. Betoideae and notes on the taxonomy of Beta. Willdenowia 2006, 36, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Müller, K.; Borsch, T. Phylogenetics of Amaranthaceae based on matK/trnK sequence data: Evidence from parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian analyses. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 2005, 92, 66–102. [Google Scholar]
  52. Hong, S.Y.; Cheon, K.S.; Yoo, K.O.; Lee, H.O.; Cho, K.S.; Suh, J.T.; Kim, S.J.; Nam, J.H.; Sohn, H.B.; Kim, Y.H. Complete chloroplast genome sequences and comparative analysis of Chenopodium quinoa and C. album. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jarvis, D.E.; Ho, Y.S.; Lightfoot, D.J.; Schmöckel, S.M.; Li, B.; Borm, T.J.; Ohyanagi, H.; Mineta, K.; Michell, C.T.; Saber, N.; et al. The genome of Chenopodium quinoa. Nature 2017, 542, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Malik, A.A.; Veltri, M.; Boddington, K.F.; Singh, K.K.; Graether, S.P. Genome analysis of conserved dehydrin motifs in vascular plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 108, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Xu, H.; Yang, Y.; Xie, L.; Li, X.; Feng, C.; Chen, J.; Xu, C. Involvement of multiple types of dehydrins in the freezing response in loquat (Eriobotrya japonica). PLoS ONE 2019, 9, e87575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Hinniger, C.; Caillet, V.; Michoux, F.; Ben Amor, M.; Tanksley, S.; Lin, C.; McCarthy, J. Isolation and characterization of cDNA encoding three dehydrins expressed during Coffea canephora (Robusta) grain development. Ann. Bot. 2006, 97, 755–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Zhang, X.H.; Moloney, M.; Chinnappa, C.C. Nucleotide sequence of a cDNA clone encoding a dehydrin-like protein from Stellaria longipes. Plant Physiol. 1993, 103, 1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Kim, I.S.; Kim, H.Y.; Kim, Y.S.; Choi, H.G.; Kang, S.H.; Yoon, H.S. Expression of dehydrin gene from Arctic Cerastium arcticum increases abiotic stress tolerance and enhance the fermentation capacity of a genetically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae laboratory strain. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 8997–9009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rosales, R.; Romero, I.; Escribano, M.I.; Merodio, C.; Sanchez-Ballesta, M.T. The crucial role of Φ-and K-segments in the in vitro functionality of Vitis vinifera dehydrin DHN1a. Phytochem 2014, 108, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biotech 12 00027 g001 550
Figure 1. Saltbush native to Azraq. (A) A map of Jordan showing the Azraq region. (B) Saltbush growing in nature (Azraq) under dry and saline conditions; picture taken in mid-June 2022.
Figure 1. Saltbush native to Azraq. (A) A map of Jordan showing the Azraq region. (B) Saltbush growing in nature (Azraq) under dry and saline conditions; picture taken in mid-June 2022.
Biotech 12 00027 g001
Biotech 12 00027 g002 550
Figure 2. Predicted transmembrane topology for AnuDHN showing pore-lining amino acids: (A) for Atriplex nummularia (AYH52689); (B) for Atriplex nummularia (AYH52690).
Figure 2. Predicted transmembrane topology for AnuDHN showing pore-lining amino acids: (A) for Atriplex nummularia (AYH52689); (B) for Atriplex nummularia (AYH52690).
Biotech 12 00027 g002
Biotech 12 00027 g003 550
Figure 3. Multiple sequence alignment for DHN protein segments. AFC98463. (A. canescens), AGZ86543 (A. halimus), AYH52682 (A. halimus), AYH52683 (A. halimus), AYH52684 (A. dimorphostegia), AYH52685 (A. halimus), AYH52686 (A. halimus), AYH52687 (A. leucoclada), AYH52688 (A. hortensis), AYH52689 (A. nummularia U), AYH52690 (A. nummularia L), AYH52691 (A. gardenri var. utahensis), AYH52692 (A. lindleyi subsp. conduplicata), AYH52693 (Halimione portulacoides), AYH52694 (Atriplex gardneri U), and AYH52695 (Atriplex gardneri L).
Figure 3. Multiple sequence alignment for DHN protein segments. AFC98463. (A. canescens), AGZ86543 (A. halimus), AYH52682 (A. halimus), AYH52683 (A. halimus), AYH52684 (A. dimorphostegia), AYH52685 (A. halimus), AYH52686 (A. halimus), AYH52687 (A. leucoclada), AYH52688 (A. hortensis), AYH52689 (A. nummularia U), AYH52690 (A. nummularia L), AYH52691 (A. gardenri var. utahensis), AYH52692 (A. lindleyi subsp. conduplicata), AYH52693 (Halimione portulacoides), AYH52694 (Atriplex gardneri U), and AYH52695 (Atriplex gardneri L).
Biotech 12 00027 g003
Biotech 12 00027 g004 550
Figure 4. Predicted three-dimensional structure of the DHN protein (AYH52683) from A. halimus. along with the predicted ligand biding sites: (A) Mg, (B) Ca, and (C) Fe.
Figure 4. Predicted three-dimensional structure of the DHN protein (AYH52683) from A. halimus. along with the predicted ligand biding sites: (A) Mg, (B) Ca, and (C) Fe.
Biotech 12 00027 g004
Biotech 12 00027 g005 550
Figure 5. Phylogeny of the Atriplex DHN and homologs from related plant species based on the parsimony method. The accession numbers are indicated to the left of the scientific names. The branching points show the bootstrap values (percentage of 1000 runs). Clade I contains DHNs with SK2-type while the remaining clades contain DHNs with SK3-type.
Figure 5. Phylogeny of the Atriplex DHN and homologs from related plant species based on the parsimony method. The accession numbers are indicated to the left of the scientific names. The branching points show the bootstrap values (percentage of 1000 runs). Clade I contains DHNs with SK2-type while the remaining clades contain DHNs with SK3-type.
Biotech 12 00027 g005
Table
Table 1. Atriplex species used in this study along with their source, lab code, DHN gene, and accession numbers.
Table 1. Atriplex species used in this study along with their source, lab code, DHN gene, and accession numbers.
#SpeciesSourceLab CodeGeneEST
Accession		Protein
Accession
1Atriplex canescensNCBI-AcaDHN1JN974246AFC98463
2Atriplex halimusNCBI-AhaDHN1KF578414AGZ86543
3Atriplex halimusAmman, JordanJO372AhaDHN1MH591427AYH52682
4Atriplex halimusAzraq, JordanJO2991AhaDHN1MH591428AYH52683
5Atriplex dimorphostegiaAqaba, JordanJO3111AdiDHN1MH591429AYH52684
6Atriplex halimusAl Jouf, Saudi ArabiaKSAAhaDHN2MH591430AYH52685
7Atriplex halimusBir Seb’a, PalestineI4AhaDHN1MH591431AYH52686
8Atriplex leucocladaAl-Naqab, PalestineI5AleDHN1MH591432AYH52687
9Atriplex hortensisFormer Serbia and MontenegroI15AhoDHN1MH591433AYH52688
10Atriplex numimulariaSouth AfricaI18UAnuDHN1MH591434AYH52689
I18LAnuDHN2MH591435AYH52690
11Atriplex gardneri var. utahensisUSAI19AgaDHN1MH591436AYH52691
12Atriplex lindleyi subsp. conduplicataSouth AfricaI6AliDHN1MH591437AYH52692
13Halimione portulacoidesEgyptE2HpoDHN1MH591438AYH52693
14Atriplex gardneriUSAI11UAgaDHN1MH591439AYH52694
I11LAgaDHN2MH591440AYH52695
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Musallam, A.; Abu-Romman, S.; Sadder, M.T. Molecular Characterization of Dehydrin in Azraq Saltbush among Related Atriplex Species. BioTech 2023, 12, 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/biotech12020027

AMA Style

Musallam A, Abu-Romman S, Sadder MT. Molecular Characterization of Dehydrin in Azraq Saltbush among Related Atriplex Species. BioTech. 2023; 12(2):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/biotech12020027

Chicago/Turabian Style

Musallam, Anas, Saeid Abu-Romman, and Monther T. Sadder. 2023. "Molecular Characterization of Dehydrin in Azraq Saltbush among Related Atriplex Species" BioTech 12, no. 2: 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/biotech12020027

APA Style

Musallam, A., Abu-Romman, S., & Sadder, M. T. (2023). Molecular Characterization of Dehydrin in Azraq Saltbush among Related Atriplex Species. BioTech, 12(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/biotech12020027

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop