Bioremediation of Organic Pollutants in Soil–Water System: A Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. DNAPL in Soil–Water System
3. LNAPL in a Soil–Water System
4. Mobility of NAPL in the Experimental Domains
5. Fate of BTEX under Seasonal and Diurnal Fluctuations of Soil–Water Temperature
Reference | Contaminants | Techniques | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|
adapted from [25] | (1) 40 mL vials 10 g soil (2) 250 mL microcosm with 20 g soil | (1) Soil–water content was (i) 100%–50%, (ii) 20% (2) Arid volcanic indigenous population | (1) 0.03 mg (L h)−1 (2) 1–7 × 106 mg (gODsoil h)−1 |
adapted from [26] | 63 mL microcosm with no headspace | 31% soil–water content and indigenous microbial population | 0.12 h−1 |
adapted from [27] | 120 mL of mixed gas phase benzene in a microcosm slurry | 50–100% soil–water content and indigenous from contaminated site at different depths | 0.21 h−1 |
adapted from [28] | 14.8 L biofilm membrane reactor | Matric potential from 0 to −1.5 MPa and adapted culture of P. putida biofilms | 18–55 mg toluene (mg protein h)−1 |
adapted from [29] | Bioreactor D: 3.8 L: 30.48 | Soil–water content 14% to 20.5% and contaminated site | 0.11 mg (L h)−1 |
adapted from [30] | Unsaturated column D: 25 L: 20–30 | Soil–water content 15%–12%–8% and indigenous microbial population | 1.42 h−1 |
adapted from [31] | Unsaturated column infiltration D: 10 L:170 | Soil–water content 65% and indigenous microbial population | 0.33–1.46 mg (kg h)−1 |
adapted from [32] | Underground petroleum storage leaks | Surface flow | Benzene: 48% |
adapted from [33] | Refinery wastewater | VSSF VSSF CWs | BOD5: 68–70% COD: 63–65% NH4+-N: 49–68% NO3-N: 54–58% PO4 3 + P: 42–42% remove |
adapted from [34] | Refinery wastewater | Vertical-flow soil filter systems—rough filter (RF) | MTBE: 70% benzene: 98% remove |
6. Remediation of NAPL-Contaminated Groundwater Using Plant
7. Pot-Scale Wetland Treatment of BTEX
8. Case Study of Duplex-Constructed Wetlands for the Treatment of Diesel-Contaminated Wastewater
9. Integrated Column and Wetland Study
10. Engineered Bioremediation of NAPL-Polluted Sites
Reference | Contaminants | Techniques | Remarks | Removal |
---|---|---|---|---|
adapted from [45] | Sandy beach with light crude oil in it. | Bioaugmentation and biostimulation using microbial inoculation or inorganic mineral supplements. | Unsuccessful. | |
adapted from [46] | Simulation of an oil spill (light crude and fuel oil) at mature mangroves. | Forced aeration and food addition for biostimulation. | Successful. | No apparent reduction in mortality of trees with bioremediation. |
adapted from [47] | Degradation of crude oil in harsh sub-Antarctic conditions. | Slow-release fertiliser Inipol EAP-22 and three different fish composts for biostimulation. | Successful. | 95% removal. |
adapted from [48] | Oil deterioration on a salt marsh at the coast. | Fertilisation with N and P for biostimulation. | Successful. | GC/MS resolved alkanes and aromatics degraded substantially by >90% and >80% respectively. |
adapted from [49] | Degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in the polar desert. | Fertilisers (urea and diammonium phosphate) and surfactants are used in biostimulation together with temperature and moisture content modifications. | Successful. | In the laboratory, significant removal of compounds > nC16 occurred, whereas in the field, TPH reduction was mainly limited to removal of compounds < nC16. |
adapted from [50] | Soil contaminated with total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and PAHs from oily sludge. | Biostimulation using manure. | Successful. | After 1 year of bioremediation TPH in the treated plot had decreased by 58.2% compared with 15.6% in the control plot. |
adapted from [51] | Severe deterioration of crude oil. | Using commercial microbial culture for bioaugmentation. | Successful. | |
adapted from [52] | Benzene. | Vertical flow CW. | Successful. | Removal efficiencies between 88.71% and 89.77%, and 72.66% and 80.46% for indoor and outdoor CWs, respectively. |
adapted from [53] | BTEX. | Upward flow in the pilot system. Sand/gravel CW | Successful. | Cumulative mass removal approached 80% for benzene and 88% for total BTEX. |
adapted from [54] | BTEX. | Constructed wetland | Successful. | 90% of BTEX removed. |
adapted from [55] | 12 organics including BTEX. | Hydroponic system | Successful. | BTEX compounds were translocated, and uptake was greatest for benzene. |
adapted from [56] | BTEX | Bioremediation | Successful. | BTEX removal was high under WT dynamic conditions |
11. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Yadav, B.K.; Shrestha, S.R.; Hassanizadeh, S.M. Biodegradation of toluene under seasonal and diurnal fluctuations of soil-water temperature. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012, 223, 3579–3588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gupta, P.K.; Yadav, B.; Yadav, B.K. Assessment of LNAPL in subsurface under fluctuating groundwater table using 2D sand tank experiments. J. Environ. Eng. 2019, 145, 04019048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, P.K.; Yadav, B.K. Three-dimensional laboratory experiments on fate and transport of LNAPL under varying groundwater flow conditions. J. Environ. Eng. 2020, 146, 04020010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basu, S.; Yadav, B.K.; Mathur, S.; Gupta, P.K. In Situ Bioremediation of Toluene-Polluted Vadose Zone: Integrated Column and Wetland Study. CLEAN Soil Air Water 2020, 48, 2000118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, P.K.; Yadav, B.; Yadav, B.K.; Sushkova, S.; Basu, S. Engineered Bioremediation of NAPL Polluted Sites: Experimental and Simulation-Optimization Approach under Heterogeneous Moisture and Temperature Conditions. J. Environ. Eng. 2021, 147, 04021023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parker, J.C.; Park, E. Modeling field-scale dense nonaqueous phase liquid dissolution kinetics in heterogeneous aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 2004, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasa, E.; Chapman, S.W.; Bekins, B.A.; Fogg, G.E.; Scow, K.M.; Mackay, D.M. Role of back diffusion and biodegradation reactions in sustaining an MTBE/TBA plume in alluvial media. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2011, 126, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, L. Exploring the Influence of Sorption and Back Diffusion on Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid (DNAPL) Source Zone Plume Persistence in Heterogeneous Formations. Ph.D. Thesis, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Guleria, A.; Gupta, P.K.; Chakma, S.; Yadav, B.K. Unraveling the Fate and Transport of DNAPLs in the Heterogeneous Aquifer Systems—Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability. in review.
- Erning, K.; Grandel, S.; Dahmke, A.; Schäfer, D. Simulation of DNAPL infiltration and spreading behaviour in the saturated zone at varying flow velocities and alternating subsurface geometries. Environ. Earth Sci. 2012, 65, 1119–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Z.; Brusseau, M.L. The impact of well-field configuration and permeability heterogeneity on contaminant mass removal and plume persistence. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 333, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wanner, P.; Parker, B.L.; Chapman, S.W.; Aravena, R.; Hunkeler, D. Quantification of degradation of chlorinated hydrocarbons in saturated low permeability sediments using compound-specific isotope analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 5622–5630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Knorr, B.; Maloszewski, P.; Krämer, F.; Stumpp, C. Diffusive mass exchange of non-reactive substances in dual-porosity porous systems–column experiments under saturated conditions. Hydrol. Process. 2016, 30, 914–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ávila, C.; Bayona, J.M.; Martín, I.; Salas, J.J.; García, J. Emerging organic contaminant removal in a full-scale hybrid constructed wetland system for wastewater treatment and reuse. Ecol. Eng. 2015, 80, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brusseau, M.L.; Guo, Z. The integrated contaminant elution and tracer test toolkit, ICET3, for improved characterization of mass transfer, attenuation, and mass removal. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2018, 208, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Z.; Fogg, G.E.; Brusseau, M.L.; LaBolle, E.M.; Lopez, J. Modeling groundwater contaminant transport in the presence of large heterogeneity: A case study comparing MT3D and RWhet. Hydrogeol. J. 2019, 27, 1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chapman, S.W.; Parker, B.L.; Sale, T.C.; Doner, L.A. Testing high resolution numerical models for analysis of contaminant storage and release from low permeability zones. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2012, 136, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bianchi, M.; Zheng, C. A lithofacies approach for modeling non-F ickian solute transport in a heterogeneous alluvial aquifer. Water Resour. Res. 2016, 52, 552–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, J.W.; Madsen, S. Factors affecting the biodegradation of toluene in soil. Chemosphere 1996, 33, 107–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, S.A.; Ashcroft, G.L. Physical Edaphology. The Physics of Irrigated and Non-Irrigated Soils; Freeman and Co.: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
- Sommers, L.E.; Gilmour, C.M.; Wildung, R.E.; Beck, S.M. The effect of water potential on decomposition processes in soils. Water Potential Relat. Soil Microbiol. 1981, 9, 97–117. [Google Scholar]
- Sinke, A.J.C.; Dury, O.; Zobrist, J. Effects of a fluctuating water table: Column study on redox dynamics and fate of some organic pollutants. J. Contam. Hydrol. 1998, 33, 231–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sims, J.L.; Sims, R.C.; Dupont, R.R.; Matthews, J.E.; Russell, H.H. In Situ Bioremediation of Contaminated Unsaturated Subsurface Soils 1; Epa Environmental Engineering Sourcebook; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; pp. 165–182. [Google Scholar]
- Chambers, C.D.; Willis, J.; Gitipour, S.; Zieleniewski, J.L.; Rickabaugh, J.F.; Mecca, M.I.; Pasin, B.; Sims, R.C.; McLean, J.E.; Mahmood, R.; et al. In Situ Treatment of Hazardous Waste Contaminated Soils, 2nd ed.; Pollution Technology Review; Noyes Data Corporation: Park Ridge, IL, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Holden, P.A.; Hersman, L.E.; Firestone, M.K. Water content mediated microaerophilic Toluene biodegradation in arid vadose zone materials. Microb. Ecol. 2001, 42, 256–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Höhener, P.; Duwig, C.; Pasteris, G.; Kaufmann, K.; Dakhel, N.; Harms, H. Biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbon vapors: Laboratory studies on rates and kinetics in unsaturated alluvial sand. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2003, 66, 93–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kristensen, A.H.; Henriksen, K.; Mortensen, L.; Scow, K.M.; Moldrup, P. Soil physical constraints on intrinsic biodegradation of petroleum vapors in a layered subsurface. Vadose Zone J. 2010, 9, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holden, P.A.; Halverson, L.J.; Firestone, M.K. Water stress effects on toluene biodegradation by Pseudomonas putida. Biodegradation 1997, 8, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baker, R.J.; Baehr, A.L.; Lahvis, M.A. Estimation of hydrocarbon biodegradation rates in gasoline-contaminated sediment from measured respiration rates. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2000, 41, 175–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, Y.; Streck, T.; Jury, W.A. Transport and biodegradation of toluene in unsaturated soil. J. Contam. Hydrol. 1994, 17, 111–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen-King, R.M.; Barker, J.F.; Gillham, R.W.; Jensen, B.K. Substrate-and nutrient-limited toluene biotransformation in sandy soil. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. Int. J. 1994, 13, 693–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ballesteros, F., Jr.; Vuong, T.H.; Secondes, M.F.; Tuan, P.D. Removal efficiencies of constructed wetland and efficacy of plant on treating benzene. Sustain. Env. Res. 2016, 26, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mustapha, H.I.; van Bruggen, J.J.A.; Lens, P.N.L. Vertical subsurface flow constructed wetlands for polishing secondary Kaduna refinery wastewater in Nigeria. Ecol. Eng. 2015, 85, 588–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Afferden, M.; Rahman, K.Z.; Mosig, P.; De Biase, C.; Thullner, M.; Oswald, S.E.; Müller, R.A. Remediation of groundwater contaminated with MTBE and benzene: The potential of vertical-flow soil filter systems. Water Res. 2011, 45, 5063–5074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, B.K.; Ansari, F.A.; Basu, S.; Mathur, A. Remediation of LNAPL contaminated groundwater using plant-assisted biostimulation and bioaugmentation methods. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2014, 225, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narayanan, M.; Davis, L.C.; Erickson, L.E. Fate of volatile chlorinated organic compounds in a laboratory chamber with alfalfa plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995, 29, 2437–2444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- MacFarlane, R.B.; Benville, P.E. Primary and secondary stress responses of striped bass (Morone saxatilis) exposed to benzene. Mar. Biol. 1986, 92, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dzantor, E.K. Phytoremediation: The state of rhizosphere ‘engineering’ for accelerated rhizodegradation of xenobiotic contaminants. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. Int. Res. Process Environ. Clean Technol. 2007, 82, 228–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Powell, C.L.; Goltz, M.N.; Agrawal, A. Degradation kinetics of chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons by methane oxidizers naturally associated with wetland plant roots. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2014, 170, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mustapha, H.I.; Gupta, P.K.; Yadav, B.K.; van Bruggen, J.J.A.; Lens, P.N.L. Performance evaluation of duplex constructed wetlands for the treatment of diesel contaminated wastewater. Chemosphere 2018, 205, 166–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saeed, T.; Sun, G. A review on nitrogen and organics removal mechanisms in subsurface flow constructed wetlands: Dependency on environmental parameters, operating conditions and supporting media. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 112, 429–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dittmer, U.; Meyer, D.; Langergraber, G. Simulation of a subsurface vertical flow constructed wetland for CSO treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 2005, 51, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tindall, J.A.; Friedel, M.J.; Szmajter, R.J.; Cuffin, S.M. Part 1: Enhanced bioremediation of toluene in the unsaturated zone of a shallow unconfined aquifer. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2015, 168, 325–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ranieri, E.; Gikas, P.; Tchobanoglous, G. BTEX removal in pilot-scale horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Desalination Water Treat. 2013, 51, 3032–3039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venosa, A.D.; Suidan, M.T.; Wrenn, B.A.; Strohmeier, K.L.; Haines, J.R.; Eberhart, B.L.; King, D.; Holder, E. Bioremediation of an Experimental Oil Spill on the Shoreline of Delaware Bay. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30, 1764–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duke, N.; Burns, K.A.; Swannell, R.P.; Dalhaus, O.; Rupp, R.J. Dispersant use and a bioremediation strategy as alternate means of reducing impacts of large oil spills on mangroves: The Gladstone field trials. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2000, 41, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delille, D.; Delille, B.; Pelletier, E. Effectiveness of bioremediation of crude oil contaminated subantarctic intertidal sediment: The microbial response. Microb. Ecol. 2002, 44, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garcia-Blanco, S.; Venosa, A.D.; Suidan, M.T.; Lee, K.; Cobanli, S.; Haines, J.R. Biostimulation for the treatment of an oil-contaminated coastal salt marsh. Biodegradation 2007, 18, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, W.; Luo, Y.; Teng, Y.; Li, Z.; Ma, L.Q. Bioremediation of oily sludge-contaminated soil by stimulating indigenous microbes. Environ. Geochem. Health 2010, 32, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sanscartier, D.; Laing, T.; Reimer, K.; Zeeb, B. Bioremediation of weathered petroleum hydrocarbon soil contamination in the Canadian High Arctic: Laboratory and field studies. Chemosphere 2009, 77, 1121–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tsutsumi, H.; Kono, M.; Takai, K.; Manabe, T.; Haraguchi, M.; Yamamoto, I.; Oppenheimer, C. Bioremediation on the shore after an oil spill from the Nakhodka in the Sea of Japan. III. Field tests of a bioremediation agent with microbiological cultures for the treatment of an oil spill. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2000, 40, 320–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, X.; Eke, P.E.; Scholz, M.; Huang, S. Processes impacting on benzene removal in vertical-flow constructed wetlands. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bedessem, M.E.; Ferro, A.M.; Hiegel, T. Pilot-scale constructed wetlands for petroleum-contaminated groundwater. Water Environ. Res. 2007, 79, 581–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niell, W.L.O.; Nzengung, V.A. In-Situ Bioremediation and Phytoremediation of Contaminated Soils and Water: Three Case Studies. In Proceedings of the 2004 USA-Baltic Internation Symposium, Klaipeda, Lithuania, 15–17 June 2004; Volume 4, pp. 49–54. [Google Scholar]
- Burken, J.G.; Schnoor, J.L. Distribution and Volatilization of Organic Compounds Following Uptake by Hybrid Poplar Trees. Int. J. Phytoremediation 1999, 1, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guleria, A.; Gupta, P.K.; Chakma, S.; Yadav, B.K. Temporal moment-based approach to understand the dissolved-phase LNAPL recovery and associated characteristics in the porous system under dynamic groundwater table conditions. AQUA-Water Infrastruct. Ecosyst. Soc. 2023, 72, 479–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gupta, P.K.; Gandhi, M. Bioremediation of Organic Pollutants in Soil–Water System: A Review. BioTech 2023, 12, 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/biotech12020036
Gupta PK, Gandhi M. Bioremediation of Organic Pollutants in Soil–Water System: A Review. BioTech. 2023; 12(2):36. https://doi.org/10.3390/biotech12020036
Chicago/Turabian StyleGupta, Pankaj Kumar, and Manvi Gandhi. 2023. "Bioremediation of Organic Pollutants in Soil–Water System: A Review" BioTech 12, no. 2: 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/biotech12020036
APA StyleGupta, P. K., & Gandhi, M. (2023). Bioremediation of Organic Pollutants in Soil–Water System: A Review. BioTech, 12(2), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/biotech12020036