Next Article in Journal
Intraoral Sialadenoma Papilliferum: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature with Emphasis on Clinical and Histopathological Diagnostic Features
Next Article in Special Issue
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of Bifid and Trifid Mandibular Canals: A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis on Mandibular Biomechanics Simulation under Normal and Traumatic Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Foreword to the Special Issue on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging in Dentistry

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Dental Materials, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 32 Clinicilor Street, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Oral 2022, 2(3), 238-241; https://doi.org/10.3390/oral2030022
Submission received: 25 August 2022 / Revised: 5 September 2022 / Accepted: 6 September 2022 / Published: 9 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Imaging in Dentistry)
It is a great honor and privilege to present this Special Issue on “Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Imaging in Dentistry”. CBCT is one of the significant key components, which symbolizes the next phase of dentistry [1]. The use of CBCT images enhances both diagnosis and treatment planning; improved planning and greater confidence in diagnosing are just a few of the outcomes. CBCT is used in maxillofacial 3D imaging and has applications ranging from the diagnosis of dentomaxillofacial abnormalities [2], implantology [3], orthodontics [4], endodontics [5], cleft lip and palate [6], obstructive sleep apnea [7], maxillofacial traumatology [8], temporomandibular joint pathology [9], and orthognathic surgery [10] to forensic dentistry [11].
The CBCT radiation risk and doses vary but remain at the lower end of the medical exposure risk [12].
Artificial intelligence tools can use images from cone beam computed tomography and soft tissue scans for patient management and intervention prognosis [13,14,15].
Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a severe consequence connected to the administration of drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis, malignancy, or immunological disorders, such as antiangiogenic drugs or antiresorptive medication [16]. CBCT imaging, however, may be used to investigate MRONJ [17]. Because CBCT is required to identify the true amount of MRONJ, it is worthwhile to undergo a CBCT on a regular basis [18]. Semi-automatic cone-beam computed tomography imaging delineation may be exploited to assess the amount of MRONJ abnormalities on CBCT [19].
The introduction of CBCT has unquestionably enhanced diagnosing precision and therapeutic management.
In orthodontics, CBCT may be implemented to assess lateral incisor resorption caused by upper canine impaction [20]. CBCT may be additionally used to evaluate miniscrew-assisted fast palate enlargement and its impact on the respiratory system [21].
CBCT can also be employed for image-guided surgeries and image-guided radiotherapy treatment, since it allows for increased picture resolution by altering picture geometric features, and it also enables screen resolution enhancement, a field of vision enlargement, and metal distortion decrease [22].
In maxillofacial surgery, CBCT may be employed to monitor osseous modifications after the insertion of a sinus floor bony transplant [23], as well as for maxillary sinus features in cleft lip and palate patients [24], even in computer-assisted orthognathic surgery [25]. In implantology, CBCT is an essential tool, since it may be used to analyze bone characteristics around implants [26]. CBCT may be used to identify morphological changes or illnesses of the maxillary sinuses [27], the most frequent sinus abnormalities, as well as to give a strategy for deciding whether additional sinus assessment is required [28]. ENT specialists and maxillofacial surgeons may employ CBCT to investigate the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses [29].
CBCT may be useful to assess the efficiency of root canal fillings and the occurrence of periapical infections in endodontic therapy [30] and in determining the contact of the posterior maxillary roots and the sinus [31].
In periodontology, CBCT has a high resolution for identifying furcation involvement and the tissue architecture, as well as diagnosing osseous abnormalities [32].
CBCT might also be utilized as a part of a method for developing a computerized simulated patient [33].
Despite the rising popularity of CBCT in dentistry and its routine usage, it has a few drawbacks that must be considered to improve image resolution and provide an accurate diagnosis. Some the limitations are artifacts [34,35], which are defined as inconsistencies within the reconstruction of the graphic image and the real information of the patient that deteriorate the clarity of CBCT scans, and may develop as a result of patient mobility, as well as the picture acquisition and building [36]. The major drawback of CBCT is that it generates lower image contrast than fan-beam computed tomography, making it difficult to visualize soft tissue, although CBCT has higher spatial clarity [37]. Furthermore, the shortcomings of CBCT comprise greater doses than conventional radiographs, and a poor association to Hounsfield units for uniform osseous density estimation [38].
To reduce metal artifacts and enhance soft tissue imaging an incremental CBCT, a reconstructing technique was developed [39]. In addition, a deep learning approach has been developed for eliminating metal artifacts in CBCT images [40].
This Special Issue aims at compiling the most recent and advanced dental scientific studies into a coherent collection of evidence using prevailing CBCT images in treatment planning and diagnosis, as a guide for further research and innovation.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hou, X.; Xu, X.; Zhao, M.; Kong, J.; Wang, M.; Lee, E.-S.; Jia, Q.; Jiang, H.B. An overview of three-dimensional imaging devices in dentistry. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2022; Online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Aldhuwayhi, S.; Bhardwaj, A.; Deeban, Y.A.M.; Bhardwaj, S.S.; Alammari, R.B.; Alzunaydi, A. A Narrative Review on Current Diagnostic Imaging Tools for Dentomaxillofacial Abnormalities in Children. Children 2022, 9, 621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sawicki, P.; Zawadzki, P.J.; Regulski, P. The Impact of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Exposure Parameters on Peri-Implant Artifacts: A Literature Review. Cureus 2022, 14, e23035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tadinada, A.; Marczak, A.; Yadav, S.; Mukherjee, P.M. Applications of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics: A Review. Turk. J. Orthod. 2017, 29, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sharma, G.; Abraham, D.; Gupta, A.; Aggarwal, V.; Mehta, N.; Jala, S.; Chauhan, P.; Singh, A. Comparison of healing assessments of periapical endodontic surgery using conventional radiography and cone-beam computed tomography: A systematic review. Imaging Sci. Dent. 2021, 52, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jahanbin, A.; Kamyabnezhad, E.; Raisolsadat, M.A.; Farzanegan, F.; Bardideh, E. Long-Term Stability of Alveolar Bone Graft in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Craniofacial Surg. 2021, 33, e194–e200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gurgel, M.L.; Junior, C.C.; Cevidanes, L.H.S.; Silva, P.G.D.B.; Carvalho, F.S.R.; Kurita, L.M.; Cunha, T.C.A.; Fabbro, C.D.; Costa, F.W.G. Methodological parameters for upper airway assessment by cone-beam computed tomography in adults with obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Sleep Breath. 2022; Online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Raghoebar, I.I.; Rozema, F.R.; de Lange, J.; Dubois, L. Surgical treatment of fractures of the zygomaticomaxillary complex: Effect of fixation on repositioning and stability. A systematic review. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2021, 60, 397–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dygas, S.; Szarmach, I.; Radej, I. Assessment of the Morphology and Degenerative Changes in the Temporomandibular Joint Using CBCT according to the Orthodontic Approach: A Scoping Review. BioMed Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 6863014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alqahtani, K.A.; Shaheen, E.; Morgan, N.; Shujaat, S.; Politis, C.; Jacobs, R. Impact of orthognathic surgery on root resorption: A systematic review. J. Stomatol. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2022; Online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Issrani, R.; Prabhu, N.; Sghaireen, M.G.; Ganji, K.K.; Alqahtani, A.M.A.; Aljamaan, T.S.; Alanazi, A.M.; Alanazi, S.H.; Alam, M.K.; Munisekhar, M.S. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A New Tool on the Horizon for Forensic Dentistry. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hedesiu, M.; Marcu, M.; Salmon, B.; Pauwels, R.; Oenning, A.C.; Almasan, O.; Roman, R.; Baciut, M.; Jacobs, R. DIMITRA Research Group Irradiation provided by dental radiological procedures in a pediatric population. Eur. J. Radiol. 2018, 103, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hung, K.; Yeung, A.W.K.; Tanaka, R.; Bornstein, M.M. Current Applications, Opportunities, and Limitations of AI for 3D Imaging in Dental Research and Practice. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jeoun, B.-S.; Yang, S.; Lee, S.-J.; Kim, T.-I.; Kim, J.-M.; Kim, J.-E.; Huh, K.-H.; Lee, S.-S.; Heo, M.-S.; Yi, W.-J. Canal-Net for automatic and robust 3D segmentation of mandibular canals in CBCT images using a continuity-aware contextual network. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 13460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cui, Z.; Fang, Y.; Mei, L.; Zhang, B.; Yu, B.; Liu, J.; Jiang, C.; Sun, Y.; Ma, L.; Huang, J.; et al. A fully automatic AI system for tooth and alveolar bone segmentation from cone-beam CT images. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bansal, H. Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: An update. Natl. J. Maxillofac. Surg. 2022, 13, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ogura, I.; Minami, Y.; Ono, J.; Kanri, Y.; Okada, Y.; Igarashi, K.; Haga-Tsujimura, M.; Nakahara, K.; Kobayashi, E. CBCT imaging and histopathological characteristics of osteoradionecrosis and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. Imaging Sci. Dent. 2021, 51, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Assili, Z.; Dolivet, G.; Salleron, J.; Griffaton-Tallandier, C.; Egloff-Juras, C.; Phulpin, B. A Comparison of the Clinical and Radiological Extent of Denosumab (Xgeva®) Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Retrospective Study. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lentzen, M.-P.; Buller, J.; Riekert, M.; Grandoch, A.; Kreppel, M.; Zöller, J.E.; Zirk, M. Bisphosphonate application and volumetric effects on MRONJ lesions. J. Cranio-Maxillofac. Surg. 2021, 49, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mitsea, A.; Palikaraki, G.; Karamesinis, K.; Vastardis, H.; Gizani, S.; Sifakakis, I. Evaluation of Lateral Incisor Resorption Caused by Impacted Maxillary Canines Based on CBCT: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Children 2022, 9, 1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Prévé, S.; Alcázar, B.G. Interest of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion on the upper airway in growing patients: A systematic review. Int. Orthod. 2022, 20, 100657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hatamikia, S.; Biguri, A.; Herl, G.; Kronreif, G.; Reynolds, T.; Kettenbach, J.; Russ, T.; Tersol, A.; Maier, A.; Figl, M.L.; et al. Source-detector trajectory optimization in cone-beam computed tomography: A comprehensive review on today’s state-of-the-art. Phys. Med. Biol. 2022, 67, 16TR03. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Alhajj, W.A.; Al-Qadhi, G.; Christidis, N.; Al-Moraissi, E. Bone Graft Osseous Changes After Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: A Systematic Review. J. Oral Implant. 2022; Online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Srivastav, S.; Tewari, N.; Duggal, R.; Goel, S.; Rahul, M.; Mathur, V.P.; Yadav, R.; Upadhyaya, A.D. Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Assessment of Maxillary Sinus Characteristics in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 2022; Online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Apostolakis, D.; Michelinakis, G.; Kamposiora, P.; Papavasiliou, G. The current state of computer assisted orthognathic surgery: A narrative review. J. Dent. 2022, 119, 104052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dhondt, R.; Quirynen, M.; Tarce, M.; Teughels, W.; Temmerman, A.; Jacobs, R. The accuracy of probing, ultrasound and cone-beam CT scans for determining the buccal bone plate dimensions around oral implants—A systematic review. J. Periodontal Res. 2022, 57, 754–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vogiatzi, T.; Kloukos, D.; Scarfe, W.C.; Bornstein, M.M. Incidence of anatomical variations and disease of the maxillary sinuses as identified by cone beam computed tomography: A systematic review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2014, 29, 1301–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Friedland, B.; Metson, R. A guide to recognizing maxillary sinus pathology and for deciding on further preoperative assessment prior to maxillary sinus augmentation. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent. 2014, 34, 807–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Parks, E.T. Cone Beam Computed Tomography for the Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 2014, 58, 627–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. dos Santos, G.N.A.; Faria-E-Silva, A.L.; Ribeiro, V.L.; Pelozo, L.L.; Candemil, A.P.; Oliveira, M.L.; Lopes-Olhê, F.C.; Mazzi-Chaves, J.F.; Sousa-Neto, M.D. Is the quality of root canal filling obtained by cone-beam computed tomography associated with periapical lesions? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Oral Investig. 2022, 26, 5105–5116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kirkham-Ali, K.; La, M.; Sher, J.; Sholapurkar, A. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic imaging in assessing the relationship between posterior maxillary tooth roots and the maxillary sinus: A systematic review. J. Investig. Clin. Dent. 2019, 10, e12402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Walter, C.; Schmidt, J.C.; Dula, K.; Sculean, A. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for diagnosis and treatment planning in periodontology: A systematic review. Quintessence Int. 2016, 47, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Park, J.H.; Lee, G.-H.; Moon, D.-N.; Yun, K.-D.; Kim, J.-C.; Lee, K.C. Creation of Digital Virtual Patient by Integrating CBCT, Intraoral Scan, 3D Facial Scan: An Approach to Methodology for Integration Accuracy. J. Craniofacial Surg. 2021, 33, e396–e398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hase, T.; Nakao, M.; Imanishi, K.; Nakamura, M.; Matsuda, T. Improvement of Image Quality of Cone-beam CT Images by Three-dimensional Generative Adversarial Network. In Proceedings of the 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), Mexico, 1–5 November 2021; pp. 2843–2846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Schulze, R.; Heil, U.; Gross, D.; Bruellmann, D.D.; Dranischnikow, E.; Schwanecke, U.; Schoemer, E. Artefacts in CBCT: A review. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2011, 40, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Dwivedi, N.; Nagarajappa, A.K.; Tiwari, R. Artifacts: The downturn of CBCT image. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2015, 5, 440–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lechuga, L.; Weidlich, G.A. Cone Beam CT vs. Fan Beam CT: A Comparison of Image Quality and Dose Delivered Between Two Differing CT Imaging Modalities. Cureus 2016, 8, e778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kamburoğlu, K. Use of dentomaxillofacial cone beam computed tomography in dentistry. World J. Radiol. 2015, 7, 128–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Washio, H.; Ohira, S.; Funama, Y.; Morimoto, M.; Wada, K.; Yagi, M.; Shimamoto, H.; Koike, Y.; Ueda, Y.; Karino, T.; et al. Metal artifact reduction using iterative CBCT reconstruction algorithm for head and neck radiation therapy: A phantom and clinical study. Eur. J. Radiol. 2020, 132, 109293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hyun, C.M.; Bayaraa, T.; Yun, H.S.; Jang, T.J.; Park, H.S.; Seo, J.K. Deep learning method for reducing metal artifacts in dental cone-beam CT using supplementary information from intra-oral scan. Phys. Med. Biol. 2022, 67, 175007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Almășan, O. Foreword to the Special Issue on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging in Dentistry. Oral 2022, 2, 238-241. https://doi.org/10.3390/oral2030022

AMA Style

Almășan O. Foreword to the Special Issue on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging in Dentistry. Oral. 2022; 2(3):238-241. https://doi.org/10.3390/oral2030022

Chicago/Turabian Style

Almășan, Oana. 2022. "Foreword to the Special Issue on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging in Dentistry" Oral 2, no. 3: 238-241. https://doi.org/10.3390/oral2030022

APA Style

Almășan, O. (2022). Foreword to the Special Issue on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging in Dentistry. Oral, 2(3), 238-241. https://doi.org/10.3390/oral2030022

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop