Next Article in Journal
Seasonal, Decadal, and El Niño-Southern Oscillation-Related Trends and Anomalies in Rainfall and Dry Spells during the Agricultural Season in Central Malawi
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing the Efficiency of Fully Two-Dimensional Hydraulic HEC-RAS Models in Rivers of Cyprus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Heritagescape of Kichwa People of Nizag Built upon Traditional Plant Usage along a Chimborazo Variant of the Andean Road System or Qhapaq Ñan

by
Carlos Renato Chávez Velásquez
1,
Alba Maritza Sinaluisa Pilco
2,
Luis Felipe Lema Palaquibay
3,
Paola Alexandra Velasteguí Arévalo
3,
Juan Enrique Ureña Moreno
1,
Alden Mauro Yépez Noboa
4,
James Brandon Latimer
5 and
Fausto O. Sarmiento
5,*
1
Faculty of Natural Resources, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo, Riobamba 060155, Ecuador
2
QHAPAQ ÑAN: Research Project, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo, Ecuador & Investigation Institute, Riobamba 060155, Ecuador
3
External Researchers, Riobamba 060155, Ecuador
4
Archaeology Program, Faculty of Human Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, Quito 170525, Ecuador
5
Neotropical Montology Collaboratory, Department of Geography, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Geographies 2024, 4(3), 537-562; https://doi.org/10.3390/geographies4030029
Submission received: 25 June 2024 / Revised: 20 July 2024 / Accepted: 6 August 2024 / Published: 13 August 2024

Abstract

:
To document the dynamics of biocultural heritage, we studied traditional uses of plants on a segment of the Andean Road System, or Qhapaq Ñan, within the central Andes of Ecuador, home of the Kichwa community of Nizag. Here, residents preserved a rich diversity of plants within their agricultural fields, or chakra, of the Andean landscapes, upholding a culture steeped in traditional knowledge. Wild and domesticated plants are a cornerstone for the community, prompting the development of ethnobotanical management strategies with a conservation approach. The diverse plant uses aim to revalue their culture, fortify their self-identification as an indigenous community, and ensure the transmission of ancestral knowledge. This research aims to ascertain the ethnobotanical applications of this venerable community. Employing participatory action research, semistructured interviews were conducted with 43 community informants to gather ethnobotanical data on the flora applied within their territory, spanning categories such as food, agriculture, crafts, living fences, construction, fuel, ornamental, environmental, technological, and medicinal services. The findings indicate that age, rather than educational level and gender, significantly influences the variation in plant usage knowledge. In total, 142 plant species were cataloged, comprising herbs (58%), shrubs (23%), trees (15%), and climbers (4%). The most represented families were Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Lamiaceae, and Poaceae. Notably, 96% of these species provide some type of environmental service or fulfill a niche within the socioecological system. Medicinal uses were reported for 89% of the plants, while 56% served agricultural purposes, primarily in fertilizer production and forage. Additionally, 44% of the plants are utilized as food, typically consumed fresh. Among the medicinal plants, leaves are the most used part (58%), prepared as infusions and poultices. The prevalent ailments addressed include respiratory and urinary system conditions, with Borago officinalis, Carica pentagona, Vasconcellea pubescens, and Origanum mejorana being the most frequently employed plants.

1. Introduction

From the beginning, humans have maintained close contact with plants, which has allowed them to acquire a rich collection of botanical knowledge [1]. Collecting wild plants is a deeply rooted custom in the original people’s communities [2,3], and it has been a staple activity and identity marker for knowledge holders and medicine persons in mountain communities. Trade networks and pilgrimages have been developed that are associated with collecting and distributing useful species through routes that became iconic in describing ethnoecological characteristics and ethnobotanical applications. Traditional ecological knowledge about the use of plants is thousands of years old and has transcended generations [4,5,6,7]. It is estimated that ancestral groups acquired their knowledge by distinguishing between plants that could be used as food and those that caused reactions in the organism [8,9]. Depending on the preparation method, they can act on the physical level in mental and emotional states [10]. Around 50,000 plant species with medicinal uses have been reported to date, corresponding to approximately 10% of those existing worldwide [11].
Plant species are considered high-value resources in health systems. According to estimates from the World Health Organization [12], more than 80% of the world’s population uses traditional medicine to meet primary healthcare needs, with traditional treatments involving the use of plant extracts or their active principles [7,13,14,15]. In the Andean world, plants played a substantial role due to their wide medicinal, nutritional, and ritual use, and the animist conception endowed plants with power, which could be benevolent or malevolent [16]. The Andes region is one of the largest centers of plant domestication in the world [17], it was the scene of civilizations that developed indigenous and traditional agriculture with many native plant species within the altitudinal range that oscillates between 2500 and 4300 m above sea level [18]. The cultivation of these species was the food base of large Andean populations; all their species and varieties currently cover approximately an area of 150,000 ha in the Andes, and it is estimated that about 500,000 indigenous native peasant families have plots of various sizes, with one or more varieties for self-consumption and the surplus for sale or barter [19].
Ecuador is a multiethnic and pluricultural country [20] that signed the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and is one of the most megadiverse countries in the world [21] due to its variety of ecosystems [22]. This megadiversity is due to a combination of astronomical, geological, biogeographical, ecological, and evolutionary factors [23], resulting in numerous useful floras. Approximately 80% of the Ecuadorian population uses plants for therapeutic purposes [24]. The use of wild vegetation is strongly associated with sociocultural factors of the existing ethnic groups in the country [25], especially indigenous peoples and rural cultures that preserve extensive knowledge of their mountainscape [26,27,28], constituting an important basis for the conservation of biocultural diversity and sustainable use [29,30,31].
The short distance that separates the ecological levels in the equatorial region, and particularly on the mountain slopes of its two mountain ranges, eastern and western, is an important geographical feature in the consolidation of the notion of territory among the original peoples of ancient Ecuador. The fundamental principles of Andean economic organization (reciprocity and redistribution) were subject to good management and control of the vertical distribution of the ecological floors. The origins of this agro-ecological tradition in the study region were detected, south of Nizag, as early as 240 AD–1438 AD in a very steep cultivation area distributed between 2835 and 3026 mt [32] and seem to have continuity in modern times.
Our aim is to fill the information gap regarding the traditional uses of plants by the Kichwa people of Nizag and their heritization along the variant of the Andean Road System, or Qhapac Ñan, in Chimborazo province, Central Ecuador. The road network is of great historical and cultural importance that traverses the Andes Mountains from Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, and Chile to Argentina. Some 780 km and 291 sites of the Qhapaq Ñan Andean Road System have been declared World Heritage Sites in the category of Cultural Itinerary by UNESCO in 2014 [33]. A great deal of the current Pan American Highway was built on what became the Royal Road or “Camino Real” in colonial times, following the Qhapac Ñan, which in turn followed pre-existing roads of local native federations, crisscrossing the inter-Andean valleys and allowing to connect them either to the Amazon basin on the eastern slopes or to the Pacific lowlands in the western Andean flanks [34]. The longitudinal route along the main cordilleras sometimes splits into variants to reach important areas. For instance, in northern Ecuador, there are variants that connect Caranqui, Reyloma, and Araque hill at San Pablo’s Lake (now known as Imbakucha) on one side, while those on the opposite site connect Aloburo, Yawarkucha (localities near Ibarra city), Cuchicaranki, Zuleta, and Imbakucha. In central Ecuador, the road connected the areas of Cuchaski with Cotocollao, Quito, Puengasí, Tambillo, Tiopullo, Mulaló, and Ambato [35]. In the Chimborazo province, the Inka Road had two variants from Liribamba until reaching Achupallas on its way to Ingapirka [36]. By exploring the ethnobotanical knowledge and ancestral practices of the rural lifescapes of the Kichwa communities in Nizag, we engage with the concept of a heritagescape, centered around the route of the Inka road variant in the Nizag territory. This route connects the lowland western flanks of the Andes with the central highland area of Alausí [32,36].
The Kichwa of Nizag have maintained a symbiotic relationship with their natural environment, where plants are not only vital resources for survival but also central elements in their worldview and spirituality. Thanks to their great organizational capacity, an adoption of agroecological models was derived, nourished by the heirloom of native agrobiodiversity and ancestral knowledge [37], which is a communal polyculture space with transitory sowing based on respect for the agri–luni–solar calendar, distinguishing sowing and fallow times of the land, with a durability of 2 to 4 years [38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. Furthermore, it is a scenario for the accumulation and transmission of traditional knowledge of plant management through a permanent exercise of domestication, reproduction, and selection of plant varieties, promoting sustainable use and conservation of agrobiodiversity. More importantly, it reflects the underlying strategy of trade control of lowland/highland dynamics, making it an important node along the Qhapac Ñan near the iconic Apu Chimborazo, between the iconic Apu Chimborazo and the region of Urbina to the northwest of the Riobamba Valley. Hence, the Nizag nexus is considered a good exemplar of territorial, economic, social, technological, and spiritual cocreation of the changing tropandean mountainscape of the western Andean flank [45]. The land use and management of the chakra go beyond being a set of agricultural practices mimicking the verticality of the slopped terrain in the Chanchan river basin; they are processes closely identified with the lifescape of indigenous communities and influence their epistemology and ontological worldview [46,47].
However, previous works report the loss of two-thirds of the species present in the chakra due to ecosystem degradation, the phenomenon of modernity, the proximity to cities of indigenous communities, and the absence of policies and proposals to revitalize the chakra [5,42,48,49,50,51,52,53]. These have negatively impacted the successful traditional agricultural system of indigenous communities, showing a progressive loss of genetic diversity with a tendency to maintain the so-called “commercial” species and, in addition, turning toward monocultures [45]. Because of this transformation, the chain of transmission of plants’ traditional knowledge is at risk [54,55,56,57], generating the inevitable loss of valuable knowledge and local identity [58].
In recent years, ethnobotanical studies have increasingly focused on finding ways to express the value of plant species to rural people [59]. So much so that, in various international forums, such as the Chiang Mai Declaration, the WHO, the CBD, and the FAO Action Plan, the urgent need to preserve biological resources and knowledge has been highlighted [60]. The Kichwa of Nizag maintain current, detailed knowledge of the local flora, acquired through generations of observation and experience [61]. This knowledge includes the identification of species, their life cycles, and their ecological interactions; however, such knowledge is decreasing, because it is a practice performed more by older adults than by young people. The use of traditional knowledge is due to ease of access, low economic costs, and beliefs. For this reason, research is of great importance to value and rescue knowledge about the traditional uses of wild plants in the rural Nizag community, maintaining the trade node associated with the legacy of exchanges between the lowland coastal plain and the highland territories transected by the Qhapac Ñan variant of the Inka road.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. The Study Area

This research was developed in the territory of Nizag (Alausí County, Chimborazo Province, Ecuador). Nizag is an indigenous community made up of 495 families and 2100 inhabitants ethnically self-identified with the Kichwa nationality [62]. It extends to the western foothills of the equatorial Andes Mountain range, between the coordinates UTM 17M 9753056 7409530, precisely on one of the sectors where remnants of the variant of the Inka road (Kapak Ñan or Qhapac Ñan) (Figure 1) connecting the highlands of Chimborazo province with the coastal lowlands of the Guayas gulf are found. The Nizag variant was strategic with exchanges of warm and cold agriproducts for both foodstuff and healthstuff. Famous explorers used this road (section Nizag—Patarata and Nizag—Guasuntos), such as the French Geodesic mission and Alexander von Humboldt’s explorations from Chimborazo towards Guayaquil [36]. Also. The Pilchis Hill near Achupallas was the symbol of indigenous resistance against Spaniards by community members of Guasuntos, Pomallacta, Lausay, and Suid during their rebellion in 1781 [63].
Sierra [64] proposed that the Nizag community is distributed along Dry Montane Thornland at 1035 m above sea level (masl) and along Dry Montane Shrubland from 1400 to 2500 masl. According to the Ministerio del Ambiente [65], Nizag is classified as an intervention, which is interpreted by the presence of agricultural mosaics in the area. Acosta Solis [66] referred to it as “Anthropofitia Humboldtiana” due to the acute farmscape transformation exerted in the area, as most of the Andean flanks have experienced since antiquity [67]. The climate is cold and dry; the temperature ranges between 8 and 10 °C, although in the foothills of Western Cordillera, toward the coastal plains, the climate warms significantly, reaching temperatures of up to 21 °C [68]. At the heights of the mountain range, ambient temperature is cold and humid, with permanent fog shrouding remnant forest patches and most of the hilly cultivated terrain. The rainy season runs from mid-September to mid-January, with precipitation of 153–655 mm/year in an altitudinal range that goes from 1840 to 3160 masl (Figure 2).

2.2. Data Gathering

Our main research objective was to identify and document ancestral knowledge about plants, with an emphasis on medicinal plants, which are being lost in different Andean communities that have used and continue to use the main axis of Qhapac Ñan and its trans-Andean variants. This research was conducted by collecting information from primary sources through field trips. The data were obtained in relation to the places that each knowledgeable member of the Nizag community identified as a source of useful plants within their property or in adjacent areas of use [69] and through the application of an open interview in which, in addition to the identification of different types of flora species existing in the Nizag community, a segmentation was carried out considering the useful plants for which information was recorded.
In the field data collection phase for the ethnobotanical study, a total of 3 exploratory trips were made to the study area, with the objective of investigating the plants that are most frequently used, preparing a list of these, and segmenting them into useful plants, that is, those that provide some benefit to the residents of Nizag. Data were collected through the application of the ethnobotanical method of [70] and semistructured interviews [71] with Prior Informed Consent as required by the IRB and the International Society of Ethnobiology’s Code of Ethics. Information was requested from people over 15 years of age but with a focus on adults over 30 years of ag who still exhibit continuous transmission of information among the population [72], with no identifiable information, following human subjects’ research protocols. According to Alemayehú et al. [73], ethnobotanical knowledge and practice vary within any culture according to age, sex, and educational level. Notwithstanding other demographic markers, much of the knowledge about plants in the study area was obtained from older informants, and to a lesser extent, from younger ones. The list of plants is included in Table A1 (Appendix A).
To fully understand the popular use of a certain genus or species, aspects such as the informant’s anonymous data (locality, information about health, diseases, common illnesses, access to health systems) and data on existing plants in the community were considered (i.e., common name, uses, preparation methods, part of the plant used, efficacy) (Figure 3). Additionally, as the interviews were carried out, small samples of plant material and photographic records were collected to taxonomically list, determine, and confirm scientific names.

2.3. Categories of Uses

The categories selected were identified because of the answers given by the community members of Nizag, as per their perceived relative importance, as follows (Figure 4):
  • Food: Plant species that are consumed as human food.
  • Agriculture: Plant species with agroindustrial functions that facilitate agricultural and livestock processes. In this category, two subcategories were considered.
    -
    Fertilizer: These are fertilizers that are given from the decomposition of a mixture of plant parts (leaves, stems, flowers) to improve the quality of the soil where the plants grow.
    -
    Forage: Plant species that are grown with the aim of feeding animals.
  • Artisanal: Plants from which fibers or dyes used to manufacture decorative utensils are obtained and which are generally sold.
    -
    Fibers: Plant fiber is any flexible, elongated, and narrow material that comes from plants.
    -
    Dyes refer to colorants that are derived from plant species.
  • Living fences: Plantations made in a linear manner with species, which are used as barriers, paths, or lot boundaries.
  • Construction: Plants that are used to produce supplies for homes.
    -
    Timber includes the plant species from which the wood for planks or beams used in the construction of homes, stables, and car bodies is extracted.
    -
    Fences: Plants whose wood is resistant to weathering are used to separate the plants from the exterior structure.
    -
    Roofing: Plant species that are used for home roofs.
  • Fuel: Plant species that are used as natural fuel (firewood) for cooking food.
  • Ornamental: Plants that are used as ornaments.
  • Environmental services are those functions of ecosystems that generate additional benefits and well-being for people and communities.
  • Technological: Species that are usually used to provide help; these are transformed to provide mechanical or chemical help in people’s daily tasks. It is divided into 2 subcategories:
    -
    Tools: Plants used to make utensils that provide mechanical help.
    -
    Cosmetics: Species used to improve people’s physical appearance.
  • Medicinal: Plants that have preventive and curative properties for diseases or, at the same time, relieve ailments in people. It is divided into fourteen subcategories established according to the systems of the human body, affected region, or disease, as proposed by Hurtado et al. [77], with some modifications that were adapted to the characteristics of the area:
    -
    Circulatory system: Purify the blood, high blood pressure, vasodilator, cholesterol reduction.
    -
    Digestive system: Stomachache, inflammation of the liver, stomach ulcers, gallbladder conditions, antiparasitic, hemorrhoids, diarrhea, intestinal infection, vomit, irritable colon syndrome, carminative, indigestion, gastritis, constipation.
    -
    Urinary system: Bladder pain, candidiasis, kidney disease, diuretic, urinary tract infection.
    -
    Female reproductive system: Menstrual cramps, facilitate labor, emmenagogue.
    -
    Male reproductive system: Prostate inflammation reliever.
    -
    Respiratory system: Pneumonia, throat conditions, expectorant, flu, asthma.
    -
    Nervous system: Headache, insomnia, heartache, sedatives, relaxing, depression, improve the nervous system.
    -
    Auditory system: Earache.
    -
    Skeletal system: Boneache, arthritis, strengthen bones.
    -
    Optical system: Eye infections.
    -
    Bacterial diseases: Syphilis, erysipelas.
    -
    Viral diseases: Measles, tonsillitis.
    -
    Skin conditions: Burns, rash, healing, removing calluses, skin irritation, festering wounds, moisturizing the skin, acne, flaccidity, sagging skin, reducing wrinkles.
    -
    Cultural diseases:
Evil eye: It is one of the most common evils; this condition can be caused by various reasons, envy toward a person, having sweet blood or very strong eyesight. It mainly affects children and plants [78].
Bad air: It can lodge in any part of the body; it generally occurs when passing near lonely places with stagnant water, ravines, holes, and cemeteries. It is considered one of the ailments caused by evil spirits [79].
Empacho: This is intestinal indigestion. The disease is due to stagnation and partial arrest of intestinal movement caused by something that adheres to the gastrointestinal wall. Contemporary healers express that, if they are not made to remove what is stuck to the intestinal wall, the child may die [80].
Scare: Among the indigenous people, there is a belief that the person’s soul was captured because they disturbed the guardian spirits of the land, rivers, or forests, and the soul will remain captive until the fault is atoned for. Also, in many cases, the illness is attributed to a scare caused by an accident or unexpected encounter [81].
Head loss: It is a characteristic condition of infants, who present the fontanelle or “headache” without hardening, in a tender and vulnerable state; the main cause is having subjected the child to sudden and rapid movements or falls [82].
Bewitching: It is an activity carried out of resentment, envy, ill will, or revenge, and it is considered that the affected person can die if it is not treated in advance [83].
  • Others: Fever, antibacterial, hemorrhages, rheumatism, anti-inflammatory, antitumor, anemia, hangover, reduce obesity.

3. Results

3.1. Sociodemography of the Informants

The application of the ethnobotanical method of Kvist et al. [70], which consists of obtaining as much information as possible from the population through their active participation, allows access to the reality of the subjects of study by living their daily lives. A total of 43 informants from the Nizag community were interviewed; the informants in the study area represented two age groups, the young (>15 <30 years) and the elderly (>30 years), 75% are women, more than 80% are adults or older, and 60% of the informants have a primary education level of study. They are mainly dedicated to agriculture, livestock, and tourism; the latter is in decline due to the ending of the state-run train company (“Ferrocarriles del Ecuador”), directly and indirectly related to tourism, which constituted the main source of jobs in the area.

3.2. Floristic Composition

One hundred and forty-two species of plants (tree, bush, herb, and climber) were identified in the Nizag community of the Alausí County, in Chimborazo Province of the central Andes of Ecuador; the identified specimens represent 34 genera and 61 families. Of the 142 species identified, 15% are herbs, 23% are shrubs, 15% are trees, and 6% are climber plants (Figure 5). Herbaceous plants occupied the largest floristic composition followed by shrubs and trees contributing to 96% of the floristic richness of plants used in the Nizag community. Likewise, of the total number of families, Asteraceae (18), Fabaceae (11), Lamiaceae (10), and Poaceae (8) were the families with the highest number of species, 52 families have four species each, 2 families have three species each, 12 families have two species each, 10 have three species each, and the remaining families contain a single species (Table A1).

3.3. Categories of Use

Of the total species identified, informants mention that 96% of them offer some type of environmental service or fulfill a function in the ecosystem; 89% of the plants have medicinal use and the most common means of preparation is through infusion, with the majority using leaves; 56% has agricultural use mainly for the generation of fertilizer and forage; 44% is used as food, generally consumed fresh, in salads, soups, and juices, in low percentages (Figure 6). The rest is used for construction, fuel, and mainly woody vegetation, which are generally used for the construction of house walls, as well as the construction of fences in patios, as well as corrals for livestock and the processing of charcoal; the technological use is mainly related to manufacturing utensils that provide mechanical help, as well as plants that have a cosmetic use, generally for easy cleaning, hair treatment, used to improve people’s physical appearance.

3.4. Plant Parts Used as Medicine

Although the use of plants was reported by categories, it is also necessary to identify which parts of them and which way they are used or have been consumed for generations to alleviate different conditions to the human body; from 58% of the plants identified as medicinal, only the leaves are used with the common method of preparation through infusions and as a poultice; 18% of the species use the entire plant, generally in infusions; 14% corresponds to the flower and the fruit, respectively, they are generally consumed fresh, cooked, extracted, or dried; and finally, the stem and root corresponding to 8% and 13%, respectively, are consumed either cooked, infused, or extracted.

3.5. Diseases Treated by Medicinal Plants

The most common diseases treated with medicinal plants include symptomatic conditions of the different anatomical systems: the respiratory system, such as throat conditions, flu, pneumonia, and expectorant; the urinary system, such as kidney conditions and diuretic and urinary tract infection; the digestive system, such as stomach pain, liver inflammation, and diarrhea; and skin conditions such as skin irritation, scarring, and acne. It is important to mention that many plants are used as anti-inflammatory. The plants that are used to treat the greatest number of conditions are Borago officinalis (23), Carica pentagona (17), Vasconcellea pubescens (17), Origanum mejorana (16), Citrus limonum (18), Rosa canina (16), Verbena officinalis (18), and Matricaria chamomilla (15) (Figure 7).

3.6. Threats and Management Practices for Conservation

Because the indigenous Kichwa people of Nizag have an intimate relationship with their natural environment, they are familiar with the threats that useful plants face. Therefore, during the key informant interviews, they were able to identify three main threats: (1) migration from the countryside to the city or to countries like the United States or Spain due to the economic crisis that Ecuador has gone through in recent decades [84], which causes family dismemberment and loss of traditions, knowledge, and customs, generating a very accelerated change in their cultural patterns [85,86]; (2) soil erosion due to wear and tear of the land parcel or chakra due to monoculture; and (3) the expansion of the agricultural frontier, which was identified as an important threat because of the many areas for cultivation and grazing sites, where a great diversity of species commonly used for health conditions were found degraded [87]. According to Alemayehu et al. [73], communities have various ethnobotanical management strategies with a conservation focus. Due to their diverse uses of plants, whether edible, medicinal, ornamental, introduced, or wild, they grow them widely on the chakra as weeds, or rather arvensis, growing indiscriminately in the fields and commonly being found in land fences under the shade of trees, and on some occasions, even prohibiting the felling of symbolic nurse trees for the rural population. In Nizag, conservation strategies are also being developed, the most representative being through community tourism that seeks to publicize the customs and traditions of the ancestral Kichwa nation. Currently, there is an association of women weavers based on derivatives of the Cabuya (Agave americana), which gives social agency to their fabrics. Their use of textiles and design appropriations helps re-evaluate their culture, within their self-identification as an indigenous community, and maintain and inherit ancestral knowledge, as well as the possibility of providing new values to their fabrics that are marketed to other destinations.

4. Discussion

In the Nizag community, there is a marked reduction in population due to the outmigration factor, which has converted it into a relatively aged community due to the current presence of a larger number of adults (over 30 years old). But, instead, the community has preserved a developed concept of living landscape or “ancestral territory”. From colonial times until the recent past, it was known that priests and mestizo merchants were only allowed to enter using the walled access roads, and only during the patron saint’s festivities [63]. Therefore, the sections of Qhapaq Ñan that have been documented in this region play an important role in the configuration of the spatial concept of territoriality of Nízag, both of which (road appropriations and conceptual ancestral territory) were probably conceived during the Inka period (XV century). The well-preserved walled roads of Nízag are a clear indication that the material culture of this region plays an important role in the cultural perception of territory, as reflected by some scholars [88] and in the agroecological practices with a long historical trajectory [32]. The mountainscape was transformed because the road network (or ‘caminerías’) of the ancient groups (i.e., Kañary, Puruwa, Panzaleo) used in the area started to lose hegemony when the Inka road (with two variants in the area) was built upon these mountain pathways and then with construction for the Royal road (or ‘camino real’) in colonial times and the republican decision to build the railroad linking the coastal plain with the highland valleys along the Chanchan watershed, centering Alausí as strategic node, and ending in recent times with the construction of the Pan American Highway—a paved road that allows transit towards southern (i.e., Azogues, Cuenca) or western cities (i.e., Vinces, Guayaquil). The depopulation of the Chanchan basin is linked to the stronger hegemony of the newer, faster, modern routes.
Traditional knowledge has been transmitted among indigenous peoples through generations for thousands of years [38]; in general, from parents to children, a situation we report as a deteriorating transmission of knowledge. It was evident that the elderly maintain knowledge about the management and use of plants [89], while traditional grandparents maintain knowledge about farmscape management and its medicinal plants.
Knowledge about useful plants is limited mainly to herbaceous, shrubby, and tree species, which is contrary to the study that identified that farmers from the tropical fringe in the Paramillo National Park in Colombia prioritized timber species as the most representative [74]. The use categories identified by the informants constitute cultural environmental services for medicinal and agricultural applications. The medicinal category confirms other ethnobotanical studies where the largest number of plant species are used for medicinal purposes [76,90,91].
In recent years, ethnobotany has shown relative importance in homeopathic medicine in the academic field [92], including therapeutic and mystical uses in popular medicine [93]; however, some of these vernacular health disciplines are still associated with empiricism, and there is a lack of chemical, clinical, and epidemiological studies confirming their active principles [94].
In the present study, four key families, Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Lamiaceae, and Poaceae, were identified, which represent 26% of the total number of plants that have medicinal use. this is related to the study conducted by Bussman and Douglas [95], in the province of Loja in the Andes of Ecuador, where they identified that the aforementioned families occupied 27% of the total number of plants registered in the study out of a total of 215 species, while Armijos et al. [96], in their study of little-known medicinal plants of Ecuador, registered that the families Asteraceae and Fabaceae occupied 15. 3% of the total 257 species, and were those with the highest number of species with medicinal uses. The fact that Asteraceae is the family with the highest number of medicinal taxa is not unexpected, since it is one of the most extensive families of large flowering plants, composed of more than 32,000 known species in more than 1900 genera distributed throughout the world [97,98]. Species belonging to Lamiaceae are known for their content of volatile aromatic compounds [99]. The use of these families is mainly related to respiratory, urinary, digestive, and anti-inflammatory conditions. These results are related to those presented by Armijos et al. [96], where they mention that the most used medicinal plants are those used as analgesics, antidiarrheal, anti-influenza, and anti-inflammatory. According to Tinitana et al. [100], the trade of these taxa was linked to the treatment of the most common diseases and ailments, related to the respiratory, genitourinary, digestive, and nervous systems.
In the community of Nizag, the presence of four extremely important taxa in the conception of the ancient world could be seen, namely Echinopsis pachanoi, Datura stramonium, Brugmansia sanguinea, and Brugmansia arborea, which are known as sacred plants, which usually accompany the rituals of healing [101], and the intense use of psychoactive plants is one of the characteristics of pre-Columbian Amerindian cultures [102].
Echinopsis pachanoi is the first sacred plant found by Andean archaeology, and archaeobotanical remains have been found dating back at least 10,000 years. It is undoubtedly one of the oldest magical plants in South America [103]. According to ancestral wisdom, this sacred plant is the connecting link with divinity and with the energetic side of each person when performing the ceremony ritual. The botanical remains found showed its use by humans and, consequently, showed its relevance in the historical development of the Andean civilization. It was used for recreational purposes but also as an entheogen to facilitate psychoexploration [104].
Datura stramonium, like many nightshades, contains tropane alkaloids that are toxic and dangerous. In different cultures, they were used for medical and healing purposes, as well as for initiation rituals, divination, and magical–religious rites, for their divinatory qualities and for the initiation rites of young people. Currently, this plant is used by Amazonian shamans during healing sessions to scare away the spirits of the sick body [105].
Brugmansia spp., or angels’ trumpet, is known as “borracheros”, a name related to the uses of the plant that, in general, are associated with its high alkaloid content [106]. Brugmansia spp. was used as medicine and hallucinogens, especially by the region’s native peoples, both Andean and Amazonian; they were used in religious ceremonies in the temple of the sun to generate a state of unconsciousness in the wives and slaves of the warriors who died, with the aim of burying them alive along with them [107]. In the Nizag community, these important plants have been losing their ancestral use to become purely ornamental plants.
The research obtained information on the medicinal use of plants, mainly for respiratory, urinary, digestive, and skin conditions, ailments that are treated mainly with medicinal plants before going to the health centers of each municipality and their drug stores. The difficulty of obtaining commercial medicine has allowed the search for traditional medicine through the management and use of curative plants found in rural plots [108]. Generally, this is evident in remote areas without access to health centers and pharmacies.
This behavior, in terms of the most used parts, corresponds to the predominant biological forms and the most important categories of use [74]. In the Nizag study area, herbaceous plants prevail, which is why this allowed us to identify that the leaves and entire plant are mainly used, which supports the study of preparations predominately by infusions, cooking, and extracts, mainly due to their herbaceous habits [109]. This also confirms several uses of plants from the rural community of Sogamoso, identified via preparation through decoction and infusion, followed by poultice [94].
In the field of research, it is essential to join forces with sustainable agriculture, which includes spaces for the conservation of various useful species, mainly traditional medicinal plants, which will contribute to protecting the Andean flora, and even more so when these territories are associated with construction. Ancestral systems such as the Qhapaq Ñan, through a synergy of key actors (civil society in general, governmental and nongovernmental organizations), seek to promote the knowledge, recovery, conservation, and enhancement of their cultural and archaeological heritage and environmental aspects associated with it as the articulating axis that promotes the responsible use of cultural and natural heritage from a perspective of sustainable development in the social, environmental, educational, and economic spheres for the improvement of the standard of living of local inhabitants through knowledge, strengthening, and searching for the revaluation of the Andean identity [110].

5. Conclusions

This research was carried out to identify and document ancestral knowledge about plants, with an emphasis on medicinal plants, which are being lost in different Andean communities that have used and continue to use Qhapac Ñan’s main axis and its trans-Andean variants. It was observed that in the Nizag community, access to conventional medical treatments was difficult due to low economic resources and its distance from health centers; so, the use of plants became one of the options to treat diseases, which is why socioecological and ethnographic surveys must be carried out to register and monitor the agrobiodiversity that guarantees plant use and safety to the consumer. A story map of Nizag using ArcGIS can be found in Appendix B.
One important research front is that of the “magic flora” often used by elder knowledge holders and yachak (or ‘curanderos’) that have maintained the repository of most medicinal plants’ usages. Like what is recognized as ‘natural medicine’ practiced by traditional healers in Andean towns, such as Iluman in Imbabura province, it is possible that some of the surviving practices of home gardens and medicinal products in Nizag could generate a revaluation of the Andean identitarian markers associated with the Qhapac Ñan and the community at large. It is essential to conserve the medicinal plant species that have been identified to date, as they are at risk of disappearing in some territories due to deforestation and the advancement of the agricultural frontier, which is why it is necessary to establish strategies that allow safeguarding their permanence over time as biocultural heritage. This mechanism is a good alternative that allows the conservation of ancestral knowledge, thus making the heritagization of Nizag and its Kichwa people an important alternative for sustainable and regenerative development in this tropandean landscape.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.R.C.V., A.M.S.P., F.O.S., A.M.Y.N., and L.F.L.P.; formal analysis, C.R.C.V., A.M.S.P., and F.O.S.; field explorations, C.R.C.V., A.M.S.P., and L.F.L.P.; resources, C.R.C.V. and A.M.S.P.; writing—original draft preparation, C.R.C.V., A.M.S.P., J.E.U.M., P.A.V.A. J.B.L., and F.O.S.; writing—review and editing, C.R.C.V., A.M.S.P., and L.F.L.P.; supervision, F.O.S.; funding acquisition, C.R.C.V. and A.M.S.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the IDIPI-320 project—“QHAPAQ ÑAN PARA LA VIDA: GESTIÓN DEL DESARROLLO SOSTENIBLE DE LAS POBLACIONES Y TERRITORIOS VINCULADOS AL SISTEMA VIAL ANDINO DEL QHAPAQ ÑAN (SECCIÓN NIZAG) MEDIANTE LA CONSERVACIÓN, SALVAGUARDA Y GESTIÓN DEL PATRIMONIO CULTURAL Y MEMORIA SOCIAL”, funded by the Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo through the Dean’s Office for Research (DDI-ESPOCH) and by the University of Georgia.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank our collaborators at ESPOCH, as well as the technical assistance of researchers at the University of Georgia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Species used by the inhabitants of the Nizag community.
Table A1. Species used by the inhabitants of the Nizag community.
FamilyScientific NameLocal NameHabitFoodAgriculturalArtisanalLiving fencesConstructionFuelOrnamentalsEnvironmental ServicesTechnologicalMedicinalUseUsed partPreparation Mode
AgavaceaeAgave americana (L. 1753)Cabuya negrab x xsu, lax, kc, bna, rhest, leex
AgavaceaeFurcraea andina (Trel. L.H.Bailey. 1915)Cabuya blancab x xsu, lax, kc, bna, rhest, leex
AmaranthaceaeChenopodium berlandieri (Moq. 1840)Mallah x x xaileex
AmaranthaceaeChenopodium ambrosioides (L. 1753)Paicotx x xst, ant, di, ii, men, anlein
AmaranthaceaeAerva sanguinolenta (L. 1826)Escancelh xx xtsi, oitl, kc, diu, uti, pne, tc, he, deps, tonslein
AmaranthaceaeAlternanthera porrigens (Kuntze. 1891)Moradillah x x xdiu, uti, menfloin
AmaryllidaceaeAllium sativum (L. 1753)Ajohxx x xpne, tc, flfrufe
AnacardiaceaeSchinus molle (L. 1753)Molleb x xxxxxxst, diu, h, rhe, aist, lere, in
AnnonaceaeAnnona cherimola (Mill. 1768)Chirimoyahx xx x xcons, anfrufe
ApiaceaeCoriandrum sativum (L. 1753)Cilantrohxx x xst, ant, vo, ca, conslein
ApiaceaeAnethum graveolens (L. 1753)Eneldohxx xx xst, hem, ca, in, diu, mc, fllein
ApiaceaeApium graveolens (L. 1753)Apiohx xxxns, art, mts, rhe, airo, leex, in
ApiaceaePetroselinum crispum (Mill. 1866)Perejilbxx xxxptb, hbp, chr, diu, mc, h, ai, anst, lefe, in
ApiaceaeArracacia xanthorrhiza (Bancr. 1826)Zanahoria Blancahxx x xtc, anro, leco, in
AraceaeColocasia esculenta (Schott. 1856)Papa chinahxx x utilein
AraliaceaeOreopanax ecuadorensis (Decne. & Planch. 1884)Pumamaquih xxxxxxxlax, rhelein
AsparagaceaeChlorophytum comosum (Jacques. 1862)Lazo de amorb xx
AsparagaceaeDracaena trifasciata (Mabb. 1948)lengua de suegrab xx xptb, kc, diu, tc, hleex
AsteraceaeTaraxacum officinale (F.H.Wigg. 1780)Taraxacoc x x xgc, cons, kc, diu, rw, reo, hgrcpin
AsteraceaeBaccharis linearis (Pers. 1807)Chilcab x xx x xailein
AsteraceaeBidens andicola (Kunth. 1818)Ñachagh x x xoitl, di, kc, diu, fal, he, re, fe, he, rhelein
AsteraceaeCalendula officinalis (L. 1753)Caléndulah x xx xga, mc, ei, e, b, h, si, anlein
AsteraceaeChromolaena odorata (R.M.King & H.Rob. 1970)Isoh x x xb, h, si, rfw, aileex
AsteraceaeAristeguietia glutinosa (R.M.King & H.Rob. 1975)Maticob xx xst, di, ga, kd, tc, exp, fl, syp, ra, si, rfw, fe, an, ailede
AsteraceaeTanacetum parthenium (Briq. 1916)Santa Maríah xx xst, la, vo, in, mc, he, sed, art, ra, fe, cd, an, aicpfe, in
AsteraceaeSchkuhria pinnata (Kuntze. 1898)Escobillah x xhbp, chrlein
AsteraceaeDahlia coccinea (Cav. 1795)Daliahxx xx xst, ca, diu, tc, her, fero, lein, tu
AsteraceaeAmbrosia arborescens (Mill. 1768)Marcob x xrh, ailein
AsteraceaeTanacetum balsamita (Sch.Bip. 1844)Santa Maríah x xcd, aicpin
AsteraceaeMatricaria chamomilla (L. 1753)Manzanillah x xxxxvas, st, ca, in, ga, cons, bp, tc, sed, ea, ei, si, a, fla, rwcp, floin
AsteraceaeSilybum marianum (Gaertn. 1791)Cardo marianoh x x xsu, gc, ga, mensein
AsteraceaeCichorium intybus (L. 1753)Achicoriahxx xxxgc, ant, ca, in, diu, uti, si, a, airo, ledr, in
AsteraceaeBidens pilosa (Griseb. 1753)Amor secoh x x xla, diu, re, h, aicpin
AsteraceaeXanthium spinosum (L. 1753)Cashamaruchah x xdiu, uti, pir, ei, fe, aicpin
AsteraceaeArtemisia absinthium (Mill. 1831)Ajenjoh x x xant, men, recpin
AsteraceaeCnicus benedictus (Sch.Bip. 1875)Cardo Santoh x
BasellaceaeUllucus tuberosus (Sperling. 1993)Mellocohxx x xst, fal, he, ai, antt, elein
BetulaceaeAlnus acuminata (Kunth. 1817)Alisot xxxxxxmen, tc, fl, tonsst, lein
BoraginaceaeBorago officinalis (L. 1753)Borrajab x x xhear, chr, ics, kc, diu, mc, tc, exp, fl, asth, ins, bna, art, tons, si, mts, a, ss, rw, fe, an, ai, anelein
BrassicaceaeBrassica oleracea (L. 1753)Colhxx x xsu, ga, an, aicp, st, lefe, dy, co
BrassicaceaeBrassica oleracea italica (Plenck. 1794)Brócolihxx x xcons, asth, ns, anfloco
BrassicaceaeLepidium chichicara (Desv. 1815)Chichicarah x x xfe, an, aicpcom
BrassicaceaeBrassica napus (L. 1753)Nabotxx x xchr, diu, tc, an, rheroco
BromeliaceaeTillandsia ionochroma (Mez. 1896)Bromeliah xx xptb, ant, ai, anttlein
CactaceaeOpuntia ficus—indica (L. 1768)Tunatxxxx x xchr, su, reofrufe
CactaceaeEchinopsis pachanoi
(H.Friedrich & G.D.Rowley. 1974)
Cactus San Pedrob x xx
CactaceaeOpuntia quitensis (F.A.C.Weber. 1898)Tunahxxxx x xchr, su, reofru, flofe
CannaceaeCanna indica (L. 1753)Achirabxx x xx xst, diu, tc, he, bna, b, h, fwro, lein
CaprifoliaceaeValeriana officinalis (L. 1753)Valerianah x x xhbp, ics, in, diu, mc, pne, tc, fl, asth, he, sed, a, rheroin
CaricaceaeCarica pentagona (Heilborn. 1921)Babacobxx xx x xhear, hbp, chr, in, tc, exp, fl, ns, re, ei, h, b, h, a, ss, rw, aiflo, fruin, ex
CaricaceaeVasconcellea pubescens
(A.DC. 1864)
Chamburohxx xx x xhear, hbp, chr, in, tc, exp, fl, ins, ns, re, ei, b, h, a, ss, rw, aifloin, ex
ChenopodiaceaeBeta vulgaris vulgaris (L. 1912)Acelgahxx x xptb, oitl, kcro, fruex, in
ChenopodiaceaeBeta vulgaris (L. 1753)Remolachatxxx xxxptb, art, mts, a, ss, rw, an, anttro, fruex, fe
CommelinaceaeZebrina pendula (Schnizl. 1849)Sinvergüenzah xx xdi, in, ga, bp, kc, diu, uti, ifiw, cd, aicp, lefe, in
ConvolvulaceaeIpomoea batatas (Griseb. 1859)Camotehxx xxxxhear, ptb, hbp, chr, oitl, cons, anro, leco
CucurbitaceaeCucumis sativus (L. 1753)Pepinocxx xxxbp, diu, pir, si, mts, a, rw, ss, an, reofruco
CucurbitaceaeCucurbita ficifolia (Wall. 1832)Sambocxx x xoitl, pne, tc, anst, frupo, fe
CyperaceaePlantago lanceolata (L. 1753)Llantén menorh x x xtsi, su, di, kc, uti, pne, tc, exp, asth, ea, h, si, ailein
EquisetaceaeEquisetum arvense (L. 1753)Cola de caballob x xgc, kc, diu, uti, stb, antcpin
EricaceaeVaccinium floribundum (H.B.K. 1819)Mortiñohx x xx xhear, chr, bp, ns, deps, si, a, rw, an, reolein
EuphorbiaceaeManihot esculenta (Crantz. 1766)Yucabxx
EuphorbiaceaeRicinus communis (L. 1753)Higuerillat x x x
FabaceaeInga ruiziana (G.Don 1832)Guabatx x xx xxxsu, hem, di, vo, ailein
FabaceaePhaseolus vulgaris (C.Baudet. 1977)Fréjolhxx xxxchr, si, aicp, lein, po
FabaceaeSophora cassioides (Sparre Benkt. 1963)Pilot xxxxx xoitl, vo, cand, pir, syp, ra, si, a, rhest, lein
FabaceaeDalea mutisii (Kunth. 1788–1850)Isob xx xptb, ant, ii, tc, exp, fl, fw, cd, rhecp, le, floba, in
FabaceaeTrifolium repens (L. 1753)Trébolh x x xst, dicpin
FabaceaeLupinus pubescens (Benth. 1861)Falso chochoh x xx xralepo
FabaceaeVicia sativa (L. 1753)Arverjillah x x xpir, tons, si, mts, ai, anttlein
FabaceaeDesmodium molliculum (Kunth. DC. 1825)Hierba infanteh x xpne, tc, explein
FabaceaeMedicago lupulina (L. 1753)Alfalfita amarillahxxx x
FabaceaeMedicago sativa (L. 1753)Alfalfahxx x xane, faleex
FabaceaePisum sativum (L. 1753)Arvejahxx x xchr, cons, meafloin
FabaceaeDesmodium tortuosum (Sw. DC. 1825)Pega pegab x xxxst, dilein
FabaceaeRetama sphaerocarpa (Boiss. 1840)Retamatxx xxxxxxpne, tc, exp, flfloin
FabaceaeLibidibia corymbosa (Britton & Killip. 1936)Cascoltx xxxxx
FabaceaeCaesalpinia spinosa (Kuntze. 1898)Guarangot xx xxxmen, flle, fruin
JuglandaceaeJuglans neotropica (Diels. 1906)Nogaltx x xx xxxbna, anlein
LamiaceaeRosmarinus officinalis (L. 1753)Romerohx x xx xsu, rhelein
LamiaceaeMelissa officinalis (L. 1753)Toronjilh x xhear, he, nscpin
LamiaceaeOriganum majorana (L. 1753)Mejoranahx xx xst, sitl, su, ii, vo, ca, in, ga, cand, uti, ins, ns, sed, re, bna, art, ecpfe
LamiaceaeMentha pulegium (L. 1753)Menta poleoh xx xst, men, pne, tc, re, eilein
LamiaceaeMinthostachys mollis (Kunth. Griseb. 1874)Tipob x x xst, gc, ant, di, vo, kc, uti, fl, asth, rhe, aicpin
LamiaceaeThymus vulgaris (L. 1753)Tomillobx x xhear, st, ca, ga, uti, cm, pne, tc, exp, fal, rhe, aicpin
LamiaceaeClinopodium nubigenum (Kuntze. 1891)Sunfob x x xst, ca, mc, fal, pne, tc, exp, fl, h, aicpin
LamiaceaeStachys byzantina (K.Koch. 1849)Oreja de conejoh x xx xoitl, uti, cdcp, lefe, in
LamiaceaeMentha spicata (L. 1753)Hierbabuenahxx xxxxst, vo, ca, in, pne, tc, he, ins, sed, re, silein
LamiaceaeMentha piperita (L. 1753)Mentahx x xst, ant, ca, asth, he, ei, silein
LauraceaeLaurus nobilis (Cav. 1801)Laurel de castillatx xxxxxxdi, ca, in, anlein
LauraceaePersea americana (Mill. 1768)Aguacatecxx x xxxchr, cons, mts, ss, rw, an, aile, flo, frupo, in, fe
LiliaceaeAllium cepa (L. 1753)Cebollatxx x xst, oitl, kc, tc, ancpfe, co, in
MalvaceaeTilia americana (L. 1753)Tiloh x x xvas, kc, diu, pne, tc, exp, ns, sed, re, bna, art, rhefloinfusión
MalvaceaeMalva silvestris (Pamp. 1920)Malvah x xx xsu, hem, cons, pne, tclein
MoraceaeFicus carica (Miq. 1864)Higohx xx x xlax, cm, ifiw, rcst, lere, in
MusaceaeMusa acuminata (Colla. 1966)Bananob x xxx xhbp, su, mc, ns, anelein
MyrtaceaeMyrtus communis (L. 1753)Arrayan o mirtot x xxxxxant, di, pne, exp, fl, aile, fruco, fe
MyrtaceaeEucalyptus melliodora (A.Cunn. ex Schauer. 1843)Eucaliptot xx xxxtc, fl, asth, relein
MyrtaceaeEucalyptus globulus (Labill. 1800)Eucalipto Aromáticoh xx xxxtc, fl, asth, relein
OrchidaceaeEpidendrum jamiesonis (Rchb.f. 1856)Maywah xx xhear, hbp, kc, diu, uti, ns, refloin
OxalidaceaeOxalis tuberosa (Molina. 1782)Ocahxx x xpir, ealeextrac, po, co
PassifloraceaePassiflora ligularis (Juss. 1805)Granadillacxx x xx xst, ii, ns, fero, lein
PassifloraceaePassiflora tarminiana (Coppens & V.E.Barney. 2001)Taxobx xx xx xst, su, ii, diu, he, nslepo
PinaceaePinus radiata (D.Don. 1836)Pinot xxxxxxxpne, tc, rhelein
PiperaceaePeperomia peltigera (C.DC. 1898)Pataku yuyob xx xvas, tsi, pne, exp, asth, ea, fe, ailein, ex
PoaceaeStipa ichu (Kunth. 1829)Pajah x xx
PoaceaeCenchrus clandestinus (Morrone, Ann. Bot. 2010)Kikuyoh x
PoaceaeZea mays (Gaertn. 1788)Maízhxxx x xst, kc, nsfloin
PoaceaeCortaderia nitida (Pilger Robert. 1906)Carrizo o sigseh x xxxxxx
PoaceaeCynodon dactylon (L. 1805)Gramah x x
PoaceaeCymbopogon citratus (Stapf Otto. 1906)Hierba luisahx xxxxhear, st, di, ii, in, uti, mts, alein
PoaceaePaspalum vaginatum (Sw. 1788)Gramilla blancah x xkc, diu, raro
PoaceaeLolium multiflorum (Lam. 1779)Raigrásb x x xst, di, ii, diucp, lein, ex
Poaceae Hordeum vulgare (L. 1753)Cebadah x x xptb, cons, diu, pir, he, reoro, lein
Poaceae Saccharum officinarum (L. 1753)Caña de azúcarhxx x x x xcons, pne, tc, fl, tons, fe, anroex
PolygonaceaeRumex crispus (L. 1753)Lengua de vacah x x xlax, di, diu, uti, exp, h, anero, leinfusión
PteridaceaeAdiantum capillus-veneris (L. 1753)Culantrillo de pozot x x xst, in, menlein
RosaceaePolylepis lanuginosa (Kunth. 1788-1850)Polilepisb x xxxxxkcstin
RosaceaeRosa canina (L. 1753)Rosahx x xx xst, lax, di, diu, tc, fl, ar, t, ei, ra, h, a, fe, cd, an, aiflo, frufe
RosaceaeMargyricarpus pinnatus (Kuntze. 1898)Piquiyuyobxx xx xst, ant, kc, diu, uti, pne, tc, fl, mea, tons, hercpin
RosaceaeRubus glaucus (Benth. 1845)Mora de castillabx x x xoitl, kc, exp, sedle, floin
RutaceaeCitrus reticulata (Blanco. 1837)Mandarinabx xxxx xhear, hbp, chr, st, in, cons, diu, uti, bp, tc, fl, ns, reole, fruin, ex
RutaceaeRuta graveolens (L. 1753)Rudat x xx xant, men, cdlein
RutaceaeCitrus sinensis (Pers. 1806)Naranjatx xxxx xst, ics, in, cons, pir, tc, fl, nsle, fruin, ex
RutaceaeCitrus limonum (Risso. 1813)Limónbx xxxx xhear, hbp, chr, st, oitl, ca, in, kc, pir, fl, he, art, syp, fe, he, rhe, ant, reost, le, floba, ex
SalicaceaeSalix bonplandiana (Kunth. 1817)Saucet xxxxxxfl, stb, aleba
SapindaceaeDodonaea viscosa (Jacq. 1760)Chamanab x x x xbna, antlein
Solanaceae Solanum muricatum (Dunal. 1852)Pepino dulcetxx x
SolanaceaeBrugmansia sanguinea (D.Don. 1820)Guantoh xxxx xtc, asth, he, cdlefe
SolanaceaeDatura stramonium (L. 1753)Chamicoh x xhem, fa, rheleba
Solanaceae Capsicum annuum (Fingerh. 1832)Ajíhx x xant, cdflo, frufe
Solanaceae Brugmansia arborea (Lagerh. 1895)Guantoh xxxx xtc, asth, he, cdlefe
SolanaceaeSolanum betaceum (Cav.1799)Tomate de árbolhx xx x xchr, oitl, tc, fl, tons, si, a, rw, anele, frupo, in, fe
SolanaceaeSolanum tuberosum (L. 1753)Papahxx x xst, chr, ga, he, si, mts, a, rw, aile, flo, frupo, fe
SolanaceaePhysalis peruviana (L. 1763)Uvillahx x xbp, kc, pne, tc, asth, re, tons, fw, anro, st, le, fruin, fe
TropaeolaceaeTropaeolum tuberosum (Ruiz & Pav. 1802)Mashuahxx x xoitl, ant, kc, diu, pir, h, an, airoin
UrticaceaeUrtica dioica (L. 1753)Ortigah x x xptb, cons, pir, he, reoro, lein
VerbenaceaeAloysia citriodora (Ortega ex Pers. 1806)Cedronbx x xx xst, tc, ins, relein
VerbenaceaeLantana camara (L. 1753)Supirrosah x xx
VerbenaceaeVerbena officinalis (L. 1753)Verbenah x xhear, oitl, su, di, vo, mc, pne, tc, asth, he, sed, ra, ha, fecpin
VerbenaceaePlantago major (L. 1753)Llanténc x x xst, diu, mts, aicpin
ViolaceaeViola wittrockiana (Kappert. 1932)Pensamientoh xx xoitl, lax, in, cons, diu, pne, tc, exp, ra, si, a, aile, floin
XanthorrhoeaceaeAloe vera (L. 1753)Sábilab x x xxxxoitl, su, hem, di, ga, h, si, mts, a, ailefe, po
Legend: Habit: tree = t, bush = b, herb = h, climb = c; use: ns = improve nervous system, fe = fever, he = hemorrhages, ga = gastritis, mc = menstrual cramps, ei = eye infections, e = erysipelas, b = burns, h = healing, si = skin irritation, a = acne, an = antibacterial, ai = anti-inflammatory, st = stomachache, di = diarrhea, kd = kidney disease, tc = throat conditions, fl = flu, ra = rash, vo = vomit, in = indigestion, he = headache, sed = sedative, art = arthritis, cd = cultural disease, hbp = high blood pressure, ca = carminative, diu = diuretic, vas = vasodilator, cons = constipated, bp = bladder pain, ea = earache, fla = flaccidity, su = stomach ulcers, men = emmenagogue, ant = antiparasitic, uti = urinary tract infection, an = antioxidants, re = relaxing, pir = prostate inflammation reliever, hem = hemorrhoids, rhe = rheumatism, iotl = inflammation of the liver, cand = candidiasis, syp =syphilis, ptb = purify the blood, ii = intestinal infection, pne = pneumonia, exp = expectorant, fw = festering wounds, tons = tonsillitis, mts = moisturize the skin, antt = antitumor, ane = anemia, mea = measles, hear = heartache, ins = insomnia, bna = bone-ache, gc = gallbladder conditions, kc =, fal = facilitate labor, asth = asthma, chr = cholesterol reduction, reo = reduces obesity, ics = irritable colon syndrome, rw = reduce wrinkles, ss = sagging skin, tsi = tonsillitis, stb = strengthen bones, hgr = hangover, vas = vasodilator, deps = depression, rc = remove calluses; used part: cp = complete plant, ro = root, st = tallo, le = leaf, flo = flower, fru = fruit, se = seet; preparation mode: in = infusion, ex = extract, de = decoction, fe = fresh, dr= dry, po = poultice, ba= bathroom with plants, dy= dehydrated, re = resin, tu = topical use, co = cooked, com = compresses.

Appendix B

Link B1: History maps “The Nizag Section of the Kapak Ñan”.

References

  1. Ramírez, M. Manual el Milagro de las Plantas, Aplicaciones Medicinales y Orofaríngeas; Fundación Hogares Juveniles Campesinos. Taller San Pablo: Bogotá, Colombia, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hawkes, K.; O’Connell, J.F.; Rogers, L. The behavioral ecology of modern hunter-gatherers, and human evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1997, 12, 29–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ladio, H.; Lozada, M. Edible wild plant use in a Mapuche community of northwestern Patagonia. Hum. Ecol. 2000, 28, 53–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sarmiento, F.O. Contesting Páramo: Critical Biogeography of the Northern Andean Highlands; Kona Publishing: Charlotte, NC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  5. Caniago, I.; Stephen, F.S. Medicinal plant ecology, knowledge and conservation in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Econ. Bot. 1998, 52, 229–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Benz, B.; Cevallos, J. Losing knowledge about plant use in the Sierra de Manantlan Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. Econ. Bot. 2000, 54, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Katewa, S.; Chaudhary, B.; Jain, A. Folk herbal medicines from tribal area of Rajastan, India. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 92, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Santillán, M. El uso Tradicional de las Plantas Medicinales, un Aporte para la Ciencia; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM): Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ávila, Y.; López, L.L. Impacto social de una estrategia de intervención sobre prescripción racional de medicina verde en Céspedes durante. Rev. Cuba Plantas Med. 2013, 18, 609–618. [Google Scholar]
  10. White, L. El Recetario Herbario: Las Mejores Alternativas Naturales a los Medicamentos; Rodale: Kutztown, PA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  11. Maldonado, C.; Paniagua-Zambrana, N.; Bussmann, R.; Zenteno-Ruiz, F.S.; Fuentes, A.F. The importance of medicinal plants, their taxonomy and the search for a cure for the disease caused by the coronavirus (COVID-19). Ecol. Boliv. 2020, 55, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  12. Organización Mundial de la Salud. WHO Establishes the Global Centre for Traditional Medicine in India. 2022. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/25-03-2022-who-establishes-the-global-centre-for-traditional-medicine-in-india (accessed on 15 January 2024).
  13. Akerele, O. Las plantas medicinales: Un tesoro que no debemos desperdiciar. Foro Mund. Salud. 1993, 14, 390–395. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sheldon, J.; Balick, M.; Laird, S. Medicinal plants: ¿can utilization and conservation coexist? Adv. Econ. Bot. 1997, 12, 104. [Google Scholar]
  15. Shrestha, P.; Dhillion, S. Medicinal plant diversity and use in the highlands of Dolakha district, Nepal. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2003, 86, 81–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Maranguello, C. Significar a Través de los Elementos Naturales: La Iconografía Vegetal en la Ornamentación Arquitectónica Colonial Andina. Rev. Esc. Hist. Salta 2020, 19. Available online: http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1669-90412020000100003&lng=es&nrm=iso (accessed on 20 January 2024).
  17. Vavilov, N.I. Estudio Sobre el Origen de las Plantas Cultivadas; ACME Agency. Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1951; p. 185.
  18. Santamaría, P.C.; Coronel, D.; Verdugo, K.; Paredes, M.F.; Yugsi, E.; Huachi, L. Estudio etnobotánico del mortiño (Vaccinium floribundum) como alimento ancestral y potencial alimento funcional. LA GRANJA. Rev. Cienc. Vida 2012, 16, 5–13. [Google Scholar]
  19. Delgado, M.; Delgado, F. El vivir y Comer bien en los Andes Bolivianos: Aportes de los Sistemas Agroalimentarios y las Estrategias de vida de las Naciones Indígena Originario Campesinas a las Políticas de Seguridad y Soberanía Alimentaria; AGRUCO Plural Editores: La Paz, Bolivia, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  20. Constitución del Ecuador. Constitución del Ecuador. Decreto Legislativo No. 000. RO/ 1 de 11 de Agosto de. 1998. Available online: https://www.acnur.org/fileadmin/Documentos/BDL/2002/0061.pdf (accessed on 20 January 2024).
  21. United Nations Environment Programme. Convenio Sobre la Diversidad Biológica. 2002. Available online: https://www.thegef.org/sites/default/files/documents/cop-06-09-es.pdf (accessed on 20 January 2024).
  22. Galeas, R.; Guevara, J. Sistema de Clasificación de Ecosistemas del Ecuador Continental, Proyecto Mapa de Vegetación del Ecuador. Quito. 2012. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Silvia-Salgado-3/publication/268268323_Propuesta_Metodologica_para_la_Representacion_Cartografica_de_los_Ecosistemas_del_Ecuador_Continental/links/546e270a0cf2b5fc17605746/Propuesta-Metodologica-para-la-Representacion-Cartografica-de-los-Ecosistemas-del-Ecuador-Continental.pdf (accessed on 25 January 2024).
  23. Burneo, S. Megadiversidad. Let. Verdes. Rev. Latinoam. Estud. Socioambientales 2009, 3, 6–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Orellana, A.; Achig, D.; Angulo, A.; Barrera, G.; Brito, L.; Mosquera, L. Sabiduría Ancestral Andina y Uso de Plantas Medicinales; Principios y Prácticas de la Medicina Tradicional en Ecuador; Universidad de Cuenca: Cuenca, Ecuador, 2020; ISBN 978-9978-14-442-8. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wetterstrom, W. Cognitive systems and food patterns, and paleoethnobotany. In The Nature and Status of Ethnobotany; Ford, R.I., Ed.; Anthropological Paper 69, Museum of Anthropology; University of Michigan: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1978; pp. 81–95. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pardo, M.; Gómez, E. Etnobotánica: Aprovechamiento tradicional de plantas y patrimonio cultural. An. Del Jardín Botánico Madr. 2002, 60, 171–182. [Google Scholar]
  27. Leonti, M.; Sticher, O.; Heinrich, M. Antiquity of medicinal plant usage in two Macro-Mayan ethnic groups (México). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2003, 88, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Caballero, J.; Cortés, L. Percepción, uso y manejo tradicional de los recursos vegetales en México. In Plantas Cultura y Sociedad; Rendón, B., Rebollar, S., Caballero y, J., Martínez, M.A., Eds.; Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales: México, D.F., Mexico, 2001; pp. 79–100. [Google Scholar]
  29. Prance, G.; Baleé, W.; Boom, B.; Carneiro, L. Quantitative ethnobotany and the case for conservation in Amazonia. Conserv. Biol. 1987, 1, 296–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Boom, B. Useful plants of the Panare Indians of the Venezuelan Guayana. Adv. Econ. Bot. 1990, 8, 57–76. [Google Scholar]
  31. Frei, B.; Sticher, O.; Heinrich, M. Zapotec and Mixe use of Tropical Habitats for securing medicinal plants in MéXico. Econ. Bot. 2000, 54, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Aguirre, C.; Piqué, R.; Parra, L.; Guamán, V.; Valdez, W. The Archeological Landscape of the Chanchán Basin and Its Agroecological Legacies for the Conservation of Montane Forests in the Western Foothills of the Ecuadorian Andes. Land 2023, 12, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. UNESCO. Qhapaq Ñan Sistema Vial Andino; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2021; ISBN 978-92-3-300166-4. [Google Scholar]
  34. Fresco, A. Ingañán: La Red Vial del Imperio inca en los Andes Ecuatoriales; Banco Central del Ecuador: Quito, Ecuador, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  35. Yépez, A.; Sevilla, A.; Anhalzer, J.; Vásquez, M.; Herzog, I.; Neumann, K. Ruta y camino: Memoria, historia y arqueología del Qhapaq Ñan (Capacñán) en el valle de Guayllabamba (Sierra Norte del Ecuador). INPC Rev. Patrim. Cult. Ecuad. 2023, 1, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Anhalzer, J. El hallazgo de un olvido. El Capacñán (Qhapaq ñan) en Ecuador; Imprenta Mariscal: Quito, Ecuador, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  37. Gortaire, R. Agroecología en el Ecuador. Proceso histórico, logros, y desafíos. Antropol. Cuad. Investig. 2016, 12–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Moncada, J.; Aranguren, J.; Lugo, C. Una Aproximación al Conocimiento, de la Diversidad y Multifuncionalidad de las Chakras Andinas. J. y. Aranguren, Sembrando vida y Cultura; Editorial UTN: Otavalo, Ecuador, 2018; pp. 12–35. [Google Scholar]
  39. Castro, S.; Galán, R. Conocimiento y manejo del bosque. Los Uitotos en la Amazonia colombiana. Biodiversidad 2003, 38, 14–16. [Google Scholar]
  40. Centro Interamericano de Artesanías y Artes Populares (CIDAP). Chakra Mundo Andin. 2017, 16, 356.
  41. Galán, S. Manejo y Enriquecimiento del Bosque a Través del Uso de los Frutales Cultivados en las Chagras y Rastrojos de un Núcleo Familiar Indígena de Araracuara, Medio Caquetá, Colombia; Tesis de licenciatura en Ecología, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana: Bogotá, Colombia, 2003; p. 137. [Google Scholar]
  42. Vélez, G.; Vélez, J. Sistema Agroforestal de las Chagras Indígenas del Medio Caquetá; Serie Estudios en la Amazonía Colombiana. Tomo XVII; Tropenbos Colombia: Bogotá, Colombia, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  43. Cabrera, E. El Agrosistema “Chagra” Entre los Indígenas de la Amazonía. Luna Azul. 2004. Available online: https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/lunazul/article/view/1039 (accessed on 20 February 2024).
  44. Triana, L.; Rodríguez, N.; García, J. (Dinámica del sistema agroforestal de chagras Como eje de la producción indígena en el Trapecio Amazónico (Colombia). Agron. Colomb. 2006, 24, 158–169. [Google Scholar]
  45. Sarmiento, F.O.; Chávez, R.; Aguirre Ch Abrahms, J. Desarrollo Sustentable y Regenerativo de los Paisajes Socioecológicos de Montaña: Montología del Chimborazo como Referente Insigne del Cambio Global. Rev. Antropol. Sur. 2022, 9, 121–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. CIFISAM. La Chagra: Un Espacio de Roles, Aprendizajes y Autoabastecimiento; San Vicente del Caguán: Caquetá, Colombia, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  47. Aguirre, C.P.; Caizaguano, A.R. Forthcoming. Mountain plowed and terraced: The alchemy of agriculture in the Andean Chanchán basin. In Mountain Lexicon: A Corpus of Montology and Innovation; Sarmiento, F., Gunya, A., Eds.; Springer-Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  48. Sarmiento, F.O. Andes mountains and human dimensions of global change: An overview. Pirineos 2008, 163, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Voeks Robert, A. Tropical Forest healers and habitat preference. Econ. Bot. 1996, 381–400. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4255881 (accessed on 5 August 2024).
  50. Joshi, A.; Joshi, K. Indigenous knowledge and uses of medicinal plants by local communities of the Kali Gandanki Watershed Area, Nepal. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2000, 73, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. FAO. La Biodiversidad para la Alimentación y la Agricultura—Preguntas Frecuentes; Versión Actualizada: Roma, Italy, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  52. Rengifo, D. Impacto de la Expansión Urbana Sobre Tierras Productivas y sus Repercusiones en la Producción Agrícola Caso Cantón Mejía-Ecuador, Período 2005–2015. Master’s Thesis, Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Sede Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  53. Pérez, A.; Milla, M.; Mesa, M. Impacto de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación en la agricultura. Cultiv. Trop. 2006, 27, 11–17. [Google Scholar]
  54. Toledo, V.; Barrera-Bassols, N. La Memoria Biocultural: La Importancia Ecológica de las Sabidurías Tradicionales; Icaria Editorial: Barcelona, Spain, 2008; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
  55. Cline, W. Global Warming and Agriculture: Impact Estimates by Country; Peterson Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  56. Raja, D.; Blanche, C.; Vallés, J. Contribution to the knowledge of the pharmaceutical ethnobotany of the La Segarra region (Catalonia, Iberian Peninsula). J. Ethnopharmacol. 1997, 57, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tabuti, J.; Lye, K.; Dhillion, S. Traditional herbal drugs of Bulamogi, Uganda. Plants, use and administration. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2003, 88, 19–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sarmiento, F.O. The Lapwing in Andean Ethnoecology: Proxy for Landscape Transformation. Geogr. Rev. 2010, 100, 229–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lawrence, A.; Phillips, O.; Ismodes, A.; López, M.; Rose, S.; Wood, D.; Farfán, A. Local values for harvested forest plants in Madre de Dios, Peru: Towards a more contextualised interpretation of quantitative ethnobotanical data. Biodiversity and Conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 2005, 14, 45–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Phillipson, J.; Wright, C.; Kirby, G.; Warhurst, D. Phytochemistry of Some Plants Used in Traditional Medicine for the Treatment of Protozoal Diseases; Universidad de Lausana: Lausanne, Switzerland, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  61. Ortíz, D.; Salazar, S.; Merino, C.; Pinos, L. El Patrimonio Cultural Inmaterial Para Generar Un Espacio De Reflexión Social. Estudio De Caso: Comunidad De Nizag, Provincia De Chimborazo, Ecuador. Eur. Sci. J. 2016, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Plan de Desarrollo y Ordenamiento Territorial del cantón Alausí. In Actualización del Plan de Ordenamiento Territorial del Cantón Alausí; GAD Cantón Alausí: Alausí, Ecuador, 2015.
  63. Moreno Yánez, S. Sublevaciones indígenas en la Audiencia de Quito; PUCE: Quito, Ecuador, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  64. Sierra Rodrigo. Propuesta Preliminar de un Sistema de Clasificación de Vegetación para el Ecuador Continental. 1999. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268390074 (accessed on 29 February 2024).
  65. Ministerio del Ambiente del Ecuador. Sistema de Clasificación de los Ecosistemas del Ecuador Continental; Subsecretaría de Patrimonio Natural: Quito, Ecuador, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  66. Acosta Solis, M. Ecología y Fitoecología; Editorial Casa de la Cultura Ecuatoriana: Quito, Ecuador, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  67. Sarmiento, F.O.; Sarmiento, V.E. Flancos Andinos: Paleoecología, Biogeografía Crítica y Ecología Política en los Climas Cambiantes de los Bosques Neotropicales de Montaña. Editorial INDES_CES/UNTRM; Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza, Amazonas: Chachapoyas, Peru, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Varela, L.A.; Ron, S.R. Geografía y Clima del Ecuador. BIOWEB. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador. 2018. Available online: https://bioweb.bio/fungiweb/GeografiaClima/ (accessed on 29 February 2024).
  69. Pérez, D.; Matiz, L. Uso de las plantas por comunidades campesinas en la ruralidad de Bogotá DC, Colombia. Caldasia 2017, 39, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kvist, P.; Gonzales, A.; Llapapasca, C. Estudio de plantas medicinales en la Amazonía peruana: Una evaluación de ocho métodos etnobotánicos. Folia Amaz. 2001, 12, 53–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Paulino de Albuquerque, U.; Lucena, R.; Alencar, N.L. Métodos e técnicas para colecta de dados etnobiológicos. In Métodos e Técnicas na Pesquisa Etnobiológica e Etnoecológica; Alburquerque, U.P., Lucena, R.F.P., Cunha, L.V.F.C., Eds.; Nupeea: Recife, Brazil, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  72. Berdonces, L. Gran Enciclopedia de las Plantas Medicinales: El Dioscórides del Tercer Milenio: Terapia Natural para el Tercer Milenio; Tikal Ediciones: Barcelona, Spain, 1998; ISBN 9788430584963. [Google Scholar]
  73. Alemayehu, G.; Asfaw, Z.; Kelbessa, E. Plant diversity and ethnobotany in Berehet District, North Shewa Zone of Amhara Region (Ethiopia) with emphasis on wild edible plants. J. Med. Plants Stud. 2015, 3, 93–105. [Google Scholar]
  74. Estupiñán, A.; Jiménez, N. Uso de las plantas por grupos campesinos en la franja tropical del Parque Nacional Natural Paramillo (Córdoba, Colombia). Caldasia 2010, 32, 21–38. [Google Scholar]
  75. Jiménez, N.; Estupiñán, A.; Sánchez, N.; Garzón, C. Etnobotánica de la media montaña de la Serranía del Perijá. In En: Colombia diversidad biótica, Media y baja Montaña de la Serranía del; Perijá, J.O., Rangel-Ch, Eds.; Universidad Nacional de Colombia-Instituto de Ciencias Naturales-CORPOCESAR-REVIVE: Bogotá, Colombia, 2009; pp. 393–416. [Google Scholar]
  76. Cruz, M.; Estupiñán; Jiménez, N.; Sánchez, N.; Galeano, G.; Linares, E. Etnobotánica de la región tropical del Cesar, Complejo Ciénaga de Zapatosa, Colombia diversidad Biótica VIII: Media y baja Montaña de la Serranía de Perijá; Universidad Nacional de Colombia: Bogotá, Colombia, 2009; pp. 417–447. [Google Scholar]
  77. Hurtado, N.; Rodríguez, C.; Aguilar, A. Estudio cualitativo y cuantitativo de la flora medicinal del municipio de Copándaro de Galeana, Michoacán, México. Polibotánica 2006, 22, 21–50. [Google Scholar]
  78. Bernal, H.; García Martínez, H.; Quevedo Sánchez, G. Pautas para el Conocimiento, Conservación y uso Sostenible de las Plantas Medicinales Nativas en Colombia: Estrategia Nacional para la Conservación de Plantas; Ministerio de Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt: Bogotá, Columbia, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  79. Pinto, J.; Cazares, D.; Bejarano, M.; Godoy, B.; Suárez, K.; Cisneros, I.; Ochoa, M. El mal de aire en el Ecuador. Práctica Fam. Rural. 2023, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Navarro, R.C. El empacho: Revisión de una enfermedad popular infantil chilena (1674–2014). Rev. Chil. Pediatr. 2016, 87, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rubel, A. El susto en Hispanoamérica. Rev. Cienc. Soc. 1969, 4, 457–476. [Google Scholar]
  82. Lorente Fernández, D. Medicina indígena y males infantiles entre los nahuas de Texcoco: Pérdida de la guía, caída de mollera, tiricia y mal de ojo. An. De Antropol. 2015, 49, 101–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Urióstegui-Flores, A. Síndromes de filiación cultural atendidos por médicos tradicionales. Rev. Salud Pública 2015, 17, 277–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Gratton, B. Ecuador en la historia de la migración internacional ¿Modelo o aberración? Migr. Ecuat. Transnacionalismo Redes Identidades 2005, 31–55. [Google Scholar]
  85. Márquez, A. Clima Social y Autoeficacia Percibida en Estudiantes Inmigrantes: Una Propuesta Intercultural; Universidad Complutense de Madrid Servicio de Publicaciones: Madrid, Spain, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  86. Donoso-Correa, M.; Sarmiento, F.O. Geospatial Memory and Joblessness Interpolated: International Migration Oxymora in the City of Biblián, Southern Ecuador. Am. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst. 2019, 8, 60–88. [Google Scholar]
  87. Orozco, R. Importancia Social de los Tejidos al Interior de la Corporación de Mujeres Artesanas de Nizag, COMANI-Ecuador. Master’s Thesis, Flacso Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  88. Fletcher, R. The Limits of Settlement Growth: A Theoretical Outline (New Studies in Archaeology); Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  89. Acosta, L.; Pérez, M.; Juragaro, L.; Nonokudo, H.; Sánchez, G.; Zafiama, Á.; Martínez, J.B.T.; Cobete, O.L.; Efaiteke, M.; Farekade, J.; et al. La Chagra en La Chorrera: Más que una Producción de Subsistencia es una Fuente de Comunicación y Alimento Físico y Espiritual, de los Hijos del Tabaco, la Coca y la Yuca Dulce: Los Retos de las Nuevas Generaciones Para las Prácticas Culturales y los; Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas “SINCHI”, Asociación Zonal Indígena de Cabildos y Autoridades Tradicionales de La Chorrera—AZICATCH: Bogotá, Colombia, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  90. Paulino de Albuquerque, U.; de Holanda Cavalcanti Andrade, L. Uso de recursos vegetais da caatinga: O caso do agreste do estado de Pernambuco (Nordeste do Brasil). Interciencia 2002, 27, 336–346. [Google Scholar]
  91. Aranguren, A. Plantas útiles empleadas por los campesinos de la región de Bailadores, Venezuela. Boletín Antropológico 2005, 23, 139–165. [Google Scholar]
  92. Cotton, C.M. Ethnobotany: Principies and Applications; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  93. Luz, D.; Pinheiro, A.; Silva, M.; Monteiro, M.; Prediger, R.; Maia, C.; Fontes-Junior, E. Ethnobotany, phytochemistry and neuropharmacological effects of Petiveria alliacea L. (Phytolaccaceae): A review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 185, 182–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Rueda, M.; Torres, M. Etnobotánica y usos de las plantas de la comunidad rural de Sogamoso, Boyacá, Colombia. RIAA 2017, 8, 187–206. [Google Scholar]
  95. Bussmann, R.W.; Sharon, D. Traditional medicinal plant use in Loja province, Southern Ecuador. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2006, 2, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Armijos, C.; Ramírez, J.; Vidari, G. Poorly Investigated Ecuadorian Medicinal Plants. Plants 2022, 11, 1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. World Flora Online. Available online: http://www.worldfloraonline.org (accessed on 5 May 2020).
  98. Tropicos.org. Jardín Botánico de Misuri. Available online: https://www.tropicos.org/home (accessed on 5 May 2020).
  99. Dewick, P.M. Medicinal Natural Products: A Biosynthetic Approach, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  100. Tinitana, F.; Rios, M.; Romero-Benavides, J.C.; Rot, M.d.l.C.; Pardo-De-Santayana, M. Medicinal plants sold at traditional markets in southern Ecuador. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomedicine 2016, 12, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Gualavisí, L. Creación e introducción del manejo de la historia clínica, el parte diario y el concentrado mensual de medicina tradicional Andina, en un servicio de salud del Ministerio de Salud Pública. Master’s Thesis, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  102. Watson, P. The Great Divide. In Nature and Human Nature in the Old World and the New; Weidenfeld & Nicolson: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  103. Schultes, R.; Hofmann, A. Plantas de los Dioses; Orígenes del Uso de Alucinógenos; Fondo de Cultura Economica: Santiago, Chile, 1979; ISBN 9681610237. [Google Scholar]
  104. Casa de la Cultura Ecuatoriana. La Obra Del Día: La Aguacolla O San Pedro; Casa de la Cultura Ecuatoriana: Quito, Ecuador, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  105. Lescure, J.; Balslev, H.; Gallegos, R. Plantas Útiles de la Amazonia Ecuatoriana: Un Inventario Crítico de los Datos Disponibles en Quito en la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador; ORSTOM: Paris, France, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  106. Pino, J.; Alvis, R. Efecto de Brugmansia arborea (L.) Lagerheim (Solanacea) en el sistema reproductor masculino de ratón. Rev. Peru. Biol. 2008, 15, 125–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Arteaga, L.; Perea, M.; Reguero, M. Brugmansia: Una especie promisoria para la producción de alcaloides del tropano. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Químico-Farm. 1993, 21, 36–40. [Google Scholar]
  108. Toscano, J. Uso tradicional de plantas medicinales en la vereda san Isidro, Municipio de San José de Paré Boyacá: Un estudio preliminar usando técnicas cuantitativas. Rev. Acta Biológica Colomb. 2017, 8, 187–206. [Google Scholar]
  109. Rodríguez, Y.; Carballo, L.; Cadme, M.; Fernandéz, P. Contribución al estudio etnobotánico de las especies forestales medicinales en comunidades del Parque Nacional Viñales. CIGET Pinar Río 2009, 10, 4. [Google Scholar]
  110. Tello, M. Coloquio Qhapaq Ñan, camino de integración andina. Graf. Hernández Cuenca, Ecuador. 2008. Available online: https://www.uazuay.edu.ec/sites/default/files/public/2020-08/coloquio37.pdf (accessed on 20 January 2024).
Figure 1. Andean road system or Qhapaq Ñan, Nizag section: (A) Photograph with a wide plan. (B) Photograph with a detailed plan.
Figure 1. Andean road system or Qhapaq Ñan, Nizag section: (A) Photograph with a wide plan. (B) Photograph with a detailed plan.
Geographies 04 00029 g001
Figure 2. Study area and distribution of Qhapaq Ñan sections in the Western Andean flanks of the Nizag region.
Figure 2. Study area and distribution of Qhapaq Ñan sections in the Western Andean flanks of the Nizag region.
Geographies 04 00029 g002
Figure 3. (A) Nizag indigenous woman providing ethnobotanical information on useful plants (Phaseolus vulgaris) present in the community. (B) Traditional accessories (bags, purses, and mats) made from cabuya (Agave americana).
Figure 3. (A) Nizag indigenous woman providing ethnobotanical information on useful plants (Phaseolus vulgaris) present in the community. (B) Traditional accessories (bags, purses, and mats) made from cabuya (Agave americana).
Geographies 04 00029 g003
Figure 4. Plant use categories, adapted from Pérez [69], Estupiñán et al. [74], Jiménez et al. [75], and Cruz et al. [76].
Figure 4. Plant use categories, adapted from Pérez [69], Estupiñán et al. [74], Jiménez et al. [75], and Cruz et al. [76].
Geographies 04 00029 g004
Figure 5. Habit typology of plants used in the Nizag community.
Figure 5. Habit typology of plants used in the Nizag community.
Geographies 04 00029 g005
Figure 6. Categories of use of plants found in the Nizag community.
Figure 6. Categories of use of plants found in the Nizag community.
Geographies 04 00029 g006
Figure 7. Grouping by color according to the number of diseases treated by species identified by informants in the Nizag community.
Figure 7. Grouping by color according to the number of diseases treated by species identified by informants in the Nizag community.
Geographies 04 00029 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chávez Velásquez, C.R.; Sinaluisa Pilco, A.M.; Lema Palaquibay, L.F.; Velasteguí Arévalo, P.A.; Ureña Moreno, J.E.; Yépez Noboa, A.M.; Latimer, J.B.; Sarmiento, F.O. The Heritagescape of Kichwa People of Nizag Built upon Traditional Plant Usage along a Chimborazo Variant of the Andean Road System or Qhapaq Ñan. Geographies 2024, 4, 537-562. https://doi.org/10.3390/geographies4030029

AMA Style

Chávez Velásquez CR, Sinaluisa Pilco AM, Lema Palaquibay LF, Velasteguí Arévalo PA, Ureña Moreno JE, Yépez Noboa AM, Latimer JB, Sarmiento FO. The Heritagescape of Kichwa People of Nizag Built upon Traditional Plant Usage along a Chimborazo Variant of the Andean Road System or Qhapaq Ñan. Geographies. 2024; 4(3):537-562. https://doi.org/10.3390/geographies4030029

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chávez Velásquez, Carlos Renato, Alba Maritza Sinaluisa Pilco, Luis Felipe Lema Palaquibay, Paola Alexandra Velasteguí Arévalo, Juan Enrique Ureña Moreno, Alden Mauro Yépez Noboa, James Brandon Latimer, and Fausto O. Sarmiento. 2024. "The Heritagescape of Kichwa People of Nizag Built upon Traditional Plant Usage along a Chimborazo Variant of the Andean Road System or Qhapaq Ñan" Geographies 4, no. 3: 537-562. https://doi.org/10.3390/geographies4030029

APA Style

Chávez Velásquez, C. R., Sinaluisa Pilco, A. M., Lema Palaquibay, L. F., Velasteguí Arévalo, P. A., Ureña Moreno, J. E., Yépez Noboa, A. M., Latimer, J. B., & Sarmiento, F. O. (2024). The Heritagescape of Kichwa People of Nizag Built upon Traditional Plant Usage along a Chimborazo Variant of the Andean Road System or Qhapaq Ñan. Geographies, 4(3), 537-562. https://doi.org/10.3390/geographies4030029

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop