Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Fibre Oxidation on the Preparation of Cellulose Nanocrystals (CNC)
Previous Article in Journal
Alternative Energy Potential and Conversion Efficiency of Biomass into Target Biofuels: A Case Study in Ethiopian Sugar Industry- Wonji-Shoa
Previous Article in Special Issue
Production of Bio-Ethanol from the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste and Refuse-Derived Fuel
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biomass and β-Glucosidase Production by the Cyanobacterium Pseudanabaena sp. under Heterotrophic Conditions

1
Laboratory of Biotechnology, Department of Biological Applications and Technology, University of Ioannina, 45100 Ioannina, Greece
2
Interscience Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Cancer Biobank Center, University of Ioannina, 45100 Ioannina, Greece
3
Department of Biological Applications and Technology, University of Ioannina, 45100 Ioannina, Greece
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomass 2022, 2(4), 299-315; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass2040020
Submission received: 8 September 2022 / Revised: 17 October 2022 / Accepted: 21 October 2022 / Published: 27 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomass to Biobased Chemicals & Materials)

Abstract

:
A cyanobacterium producing β-glucosidase was isolated from Lake Pamvotis located in Ioannina in Greece. This microorganism, named Pamv7, was identified as Pseudanabaena sp. using phylogenetic characterization. The high-throughput BiologMicroPlate™ method, used for the rapid assessment of heterotrophic potential, indicates that Pseudanabaena sp. metabolizes a wide range of organic substrates such as amino acids, carbohydrates, and carboxylic acids. When the strain grows in a culture medium containing cellobiose as a carbon source, it produces a significant amount of intracellular β-glucosidase. The effect of cellobiose concentration, nitrogen source, and nitrogen concentration of the growth medium, as well as the temperature of the culture, on biomass and β-glucosidase by Pseudanabaena sp., was studied. Biomass and β-glucosidase production by the strain in a lab-scale bioreactor at optimal conditions (10 g/L cellobiose, 1.5 g/L yeast, and 23 ± 1 °C) reached 2.8 g dry weight/L and 44 U/L, respectively. The protein and lipid content of the produced cyanobacterium biomass were 23% and 43 w/w, respectively. This study is the first report of β-glucosidase production by a cyanobacterial strain and concomitant high production of microalgae biomass, making Pseudanabaena sp. a promising microorganism in the field of enzyme biotechnology.

1. Introduction

Beta-glucosidase (β-D-glucoside glucohydrolase) hydrolyzes the β-glucosidic linkages of cellobiose, short-oligosaccharides, as well as alkyl- and aryl-glucosides into glucose units [1,2,3,4], in cooperation with endoglucase (1,4-β-D-glucan hydrolase) and exoglucanase (1,4-β-D-glucan glucohydrolase), which degrade cellulose into glucose units.
Cellulolytic enzymes and especially β-glucosidase have potential for many biotechnological applications based on both hydrolytic and synthetic activity [1,5]. Some of the applications of β-glucosidases are in ethanol and biofuel production; the decomposition of organic matter; and food, wine, juice, textile, and paper industry [3,5,6,7]. In most cases, β-glucosidase constitutes a bottleneck in the degradation of cellulose by commercial cellulolytic enzymatic products. This imbalance in cellulolytic enzymatic cocktails could be improved by adding appropriate β-glucosidase quantities [8]. Through reverse hydrolysis or transglycosylation, β-glucosidase catalyzes the synthesis of glucosidic bonds of oligosaccharides and alkyl glucosides [1,3]. Therefore, β-glucosidases find application as tools with diagnostic, therapeutic, or bactericidal purposes in medical, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries [9].
Cellulolytic enzymes have been found in many organisms such as plants, animals, fungi, and bacteria [10]. Bacteria and fungi are among the favorable microorganisms for the production of these enzymes as they grow faster with much lower cost [5]. Moreover, some of them are able to produce enzymes with special characteristics, such as stability in harsh temperature and pH conditions, which constitute high-quality features for some applications [10,11]. One strategy for finding enzymes with desirable catalytic properties is to discover new strains of microorganisms as a small percentage of the existent biodiversity has been isolated and cultured in the laboratory. The potential of algal and cyanobacterium species to be among the candidates for enzyme production has been reported [12].
Cyanobacteria (formerly blue-green algae) are a ubiquitous and abundant component of phytoplankton. They first appeared approximately 3.5 billion years ago, triggering major ecological change through the photochemical release of molecular oxygen from water into the atmosphere. They occasionally form blooms and constitute a wide range of morphological groups. These microorganisms are able to grow under different conditions, and they possess the ability to grow under autotrophic, mixotrophic, and heterotrophic conditions [13,14]. Different cyanobacterial species and strains are thought to be promising as sources of proteins, exopolysaccharides, carbohydrates, and lipids, suitable for the production of highly valuable products [15,16], whereas they are also able to produce nutrients, hormones, and metabolites that are appropriate to enhance plant growth and their energy yield [17]. Microbial biomass, agricultural wastes, and forest residues are the most promising sustainable energy sources for biofuel production [18,19]. Some cyanobacteria can be used for hydrogen production, as they are able to accumulate a great amount of starch on their biomass [20]. The main energy storage components of cyanobacterial biomass, carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins form a potential feedstock that can be converted to bioenergy. The lipid fraction can be converted to biodiesel by transesterification, the carbohydrates to bioethanol by fermentation under dark, anoxic conditions, whereas, alternatively, using anaerobic digestion, all three fractions can be converted to biogas [21]. Moreover, filamentous cyanobacteria are able to use agro-industrial wastes and wastewaters as substrates to help them grow, while, at the same time, they lead to a reduction of the organic load of the wastes [22]. Recent techno-economic analyses and life cycle assessments of cyanobacterial biomass suggest a biorefinery approach as a promising zero-waste technology. In the biorefinery, the cyanobacterial biomass should be fully utilized using various enzymatic, chemical, and physical treatments, including heat and water flows [23].
More specifically, cyanobacteria of the Pseudanabaena family are known as important sources of metabolites with great biotechnological and pharmaceutical applications. For instance, Pseudanabaena cells are used for the production of AgNPs with great bactericidal properties [24] or for biodiesel production when cultivated at forest biomass hydrolysates [25]. Pseudanabaena galeata extracts show cytotoxic and antiviral properties [26]. Phycobiliproteins from Pseudanabaena tenuis show antioxidant properties against mercury chloride oxidation stress [27].
Lake Pamvotis is an ancient suburban Mediterranean lake, having been in continual existence throughout the Plio-Pleistocene period. It is characterized by rich biodiversity, and for this reason, it has been placed under European Community legislation [28]. Lake Pamvotis has suffered from eutrophication for the last three decades, with periodic blooms of cyanobacteria. Moreover, this lake is a habitat for a variety of filamentous cyanobacteria, which are divergent from other populations [29].
In the present study, we presented a cyanobacterium strain (Pseudanabaena sp.) as a novel β-glucosidase producer. Pseudanabaena sp. strain Pamv7, which belongs to filamentous cyanobacteria, has been isolated from a local lake (Lake Pamvotis) in Greece. The ability of the strain to grow in heterotrophic conditions, under a variety of different organic sources, was studied, whereasβ-glucosidase production was studied when the strain was grown using cellobiose as an organic source. Moreover, the cyanobacterium cells were cultivated at different substrate concentrations, different nitrogen sources, different concentrations of the optimal one, and different temperatures toward the optimization of culture conditions for β-glucosidase and biomass production. At the end of the above process, cyanobacterium cells were cultivated under the optimal conditions for the enzyme production in a bioreactor system of 2 L. The results of this work suggest the Pseudanabaena sp. as a new innovative candidate for the simultaneous cyanobacterial biomass and industrial enzyme production.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Field Sampling

Lake Pamvotis is an ancient shallow lake located in NW Greece (Ioannina, Greece (39°39′45″ N 20°53′06″ E)). In our analysis, we used surface water samples from a sample station (SS). Water samples were collected immediately below the surface in sterile bottles. Samples were kept cool until they were processed within 1 h from the collection.

2.2. Isolation

A volume of 100 μL water sample from Lake Pamvotis was interspersed on BG11 medium agar plates. A variety of cyanobacterial colonies considering the morphological features were picked from the plates and purified further on BG11 agar plates. To isolate and cultivate cyanobacteria, we used a BG11 medium (Fluka Analytical, Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA) under aerobic conditions, 23 ± 1 °C temperature, and 12:12 h light and dark periods with white fluorescent irradiation. The intensity of light during the light period was 80 μmol of photons m−2 s−1.The purity of the strains was assessed by a microscopic examination and by plating onto LB/agar plates for 48 h to exclude the possibility of the presence of heterotrophic bacteria.

2.3. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, Cloning, and Sequencing

We performed DNA extraction using an Ultra Clean soil DNA isolation kit from MoBio Laboratories (Power Soil DNA Isolation kit, Carlsbad, CA 92010, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.
PCR amplification was performed in a BioradiCycler in a 50μL reaction volume. For 16S rDNA amplification, we used the forward primer 8F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) [30] and the reverse primer 518R (5′-ATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG-3′) [31]. PCR conditions were as described earlier [31].
For internal transcribed spacer sequence (ITS) amplification, we used the forward CSIF (5′-GYCACGCCCGAAGTCRTTAC-3′) primer and the reverse ULR (5′-CCTCTGTGTGCCTAGGTATC-3′) primerearlier [32]. PCR conditions were as described earlier [32]. PCR products were purified using a Macherey-Nagel DNA cleanup kit (NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up, Duren, Germany). Afterward, they were cloned using a TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Inserts were fully determined by sequencing, which was performed by Eurofins Genomics/VBC Biotech (Vienna, Austria).

2.4. Nucleotide Sequences and Accession Numbers

The sequences were deposited at GenBank and were assigned accession numbers MN047231 (16S rRNA partial-ITS full length-23S rRNA partial) and MN047223 (16S rRNA partial).

2.5. Phylogenetic Characterization

All sequences were compared against each other for similarity using NCBI-BLAST, and the results were analyzed for obtaining their phylogenetic affiliation. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using MEGA 6.1 software (https://mega.software.informer.com/6.1/, accessed on 7 September 2022). Trees were constructed using the neighbor-joining method with Jukes–Cantor distance correction [33].

2.6. Screening of Substrates for Heterotrophic Growth of Pseudanabaena sp. Cyanobacterium (BIOLOG)

To achieve a first determination of the possible carbon sources that can be used as substrates for the heterotrophic growth of the cyanobacterium, we used a rapid method, the Biolog-ECO plate technique. The Biolog-ECO plate consists of 96 wells, which means 31 sole carbon sources and one water blank, while each one has three replicates. The inoculum for each well was prepared from a culture that was in exponential phase. The cyanobacterium solution was diluted in sterile water to Abs 0.100 at 600 nm; then 150 μL was inoculated into each well of the Biolog-ECO plate, and it was incubated in the dark in 23 ± 1 °C. The growth of the cyanobacterium was determined by periodically taking readings at 600 nm.
The carbon sources of the Biolog-ECO plate can be classified into six different biochemical categories (carbohydrates, carboxylic acids, amino acids, amines, phenolic compounds, and polymers) based on their compounds [34]. To determine which organic source is preferred by the cyanobacteria, the average absorbance at the endpoint in each category was calculated, as described by Choi K.H. et al. [35] and Tian-Yuan et al. [34], and compared among these categories.

2.7. Culture Growth Conditions of Pseudanabaena sp. Cells and β-Glucosidase Production

The culture conditions for Pseudanabaena sp. cells were as follows: 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask with a medium containing BG-11, D-cellobiose as carbon source, and a source of nitrogen, at 23 °C ± 1 °C, in the dark, and with continuous shaking at 100 rpm.
More specifically, for the optimization of carbon source concentration, cells were cultured at a range of 0 to 25 g/L cellobiose. After that, six different organic and inorganic nitrogen sources were tested, whereas the concentration of the optimum at the range of 0.5 to 2.5 g/L was also checked. Finally, the effect of temperature on growth and enzyme production was determined by testing 9 different temperatures, ranging from 15 to 35 °C.
For all the experiments, the inoculum constitutes 10% of the culture and was taken from heterotrophic cultures after the determination of their density. Every 24 h, we were taking samples to monitor the growth, biomass, enzyme production, and sugar consumption.
Using the optimum conditions for biomass and enzyme production, a time-course experiment in a 2-L bioreactor was taken place. Prior to heat sterilization (121 °C, 20 min), the pH was adjusted to 6.5 and not regulated during the cultivation. The inoculum constituted of precultures of 48 hold under the optimum culture conditions. Cells were harvested every 24 h.
The determination of cyanobacteria biomass was achieved by collecting samples and measuring the dry biomass. More specifically, a preweighed filter WHATMAN membrane of 0.45 micron diameter was used to filter the samples under vacuum (the volume of the samples was known). The filtrated samples were incubated at 60 °C overnight, and then the dried biomass was weighed. The concentration (mg/L) of the algal in the cultivation was calculated based on the difference in the weight of the membrane before and after the filtration. The growth was determined measuring the absorbance at 600 nm every 24 h. The specific growth rate (μ) was calculated from consecutive OD600 measurements at the exponential phase following the formula
μ = Δ l n O D 600 Δ t
where t is time.
The amount of residual sugar during the time course of the experiment was color imetrically determined using a dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) reagent as described by Miller (1959). Samples of Pamv7 were made up to 0.25 mL with milli-Q water, and 0.5 mL of the DNS reagent was added. The color obtained after boiling the mixture for 5 min and diluting it with 2 mL of milli-Q water was measured at 540 nm. The concentration (mg/mL) of the residual cellobiose was based on the standard equation
y = 2.246   O D 540
where y is the concentration of cellobiose (g/L).
For β-glucosidase determination, cells were harvested every 24 h via centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 5 min and washed twice with milli-Q water. Then, they were suspended in milli-Q water and disrupted via ultrasonication. The debris and intact cells were removed via centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 5 min to obtain the crude cell extract while the β-glucosidase assay was described.

2.8. β-Glucosidase Assay

β-Glucosidase activity was determined by measuring the hydrolysis of p-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside (pNPG). The content of pNPG in the reaction mixture (1 mL) was 2 mM in a 100 mM citrate-phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) with an appropriately diluted enzyme extract. The mixture was incubated for 15 min at 40 °C. The reaction was stopped by adding 0.2 mL of 10% Na2CO3, and the released p-nitrophenol was measured at 410 nm. All enzyme assays were performed at least triplicate. One unit (U) of β-glucosidase activity is defined as the amount of enzyme that liberates 1 μmol of p-nitrophenol per minute in the reaction mixture under the above assay conditions.

2.9. FT-IR Spectrum

An FTIR-8400 infrared spectrometer (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a deuterated triglycine sulfate (DTGS) detector was used for the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis. The spectra were recorded in the range of 400 to 4000 cm−1 with an average of 32 scans. The samples were in the form of KBr pellets (60 mg) containing 1 wt% of the cyanobacterium cells.

2.10. Protein and Lipid Determination

For protein determination, the bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA) was used as described first by Smith et al. [36].
For lipid determination, a modified version of Folch’s method was used [37]. The cell dry biomass was powdered and incubated with a mixture of methanol–chloroform (1:2 v/v) overnight. The next day, the mixture was centrifuged, after the addition of water, creating two phases with the cell pellet in the middle. The lower chloroform phase containing the extracted lipids was transferred to preweighted glass vials, which were subsequently dried. Lipid weight was determined based on the weight difference after drying, and the lipid concentration (g/L) was calculated based on the initial sample.
The lipid content (% w/w) was calculated using the following equation:
lipid   content = lipid   concentration biomass   concentration   × 100

2.11. Statistical Analysis

In the current study, all experiments were conducted in triplicate. The data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance(ANOVA) with Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT), with p values < 0.05 being regarded as significant.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Isolation and Phylogenetic Characterization

Several cyanobacterial strains were isolated from water samples of Lake Pamvotis. The results of the phylogenetic analysis revealed that the strain named “Pamv7” is a new cyanobacterial strain. With the sequencing of 16S rDNA and the ITS region of Pamv7 strain, the results of the BLAST analysis revealed sequence identities in comparison with others that are available in GenBank. More specifically, the 16S rDNA sequence displayed 99.3% identity to Pseudanabaena sp. 0830-3 in the GenBank database. Furthermore, the ITS sequence displayed 91.9% identity to Pseudanabaena sp. RK_4_6 and 88% identity to Limnothrixredekei CCAP 1443/1 in the GenBank database as presented in Table 1.
The results of the phylogenetic analysis revealed that the “Pamv7” cyanobacterium is related to Pseudanabaena sp. The distance trees, which are presented in Figure 1, are based on the 16S rDNA (Figure 1A) sequence and ITS sequence (Figure 1B) of Pamv7 and several sequences with the highest similarities retrieved from GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ databases. Based on these two constructed phylogenetic trees, the Pamv7 sequence, which is presented with a red symbol, revealed that the filamentous strain isolated from Lake Pamvotis belongs to cyanobacteria and is affiliated to Pseudanabaena sp. and Limnothrix sp. All in all, the strain of Pamv7 belongs to the Pseudanabaenaceae family, a small family of cyanobacteria, which contains the ecologically important and polyphyletic genera of Limnothrix and Pseudanabaena [38]. A microscopic picture of the strain is also presented in Figure 1A.

3.2. Heterotrophic Characterization by Biolog-ECO Plate

Biolog-ECO plates, containing 31 carbon sources, can determine the metabolic fingerprint of each microorganism. It is achieved through the microorganism’s reaction on the different carbon sources, whichindicates the cell’s metabolic situation. The result of the Biolog-ECO test showed that Pseudanabaena sp. could accumulate a wide range of organic substrates. Cyanobacterium Pseudanabaena sp. could metabolize 29 kinds of organic substrates among all 31 carbon sources in the Biolog-ECO plate, indicating cells’ ability to achieve higher biomass under heterotrophic than autotrophic conditions [39]. In this research, according to their biochemical properties, the 31 substrates in the Biolog-ECO plate were classified into six categories: carbohydrates, carboxylic acids, amino acids, amines, phenolic compounds, and polymers, as described in Table 2. The absorbance of each biochemical category at the endpoint (120 h) is presented in Figure 2 as a whisker plot graph. The strain showed diverse performances on different categories of substrates. The assailable substrates of Pseudanabaena sp. covered all five categories, which indicates that the strain could utilize a broad range of organic substrates. The metabolic properties of Pseudanabaena sp. mainly utilized amino acids, carbohydrates, carboxylic acids, polymers, phenolic compounds, and amines, as presented in Table 2. These results come in accordance with previous studies of heterotrophic cultivations of cyanobacteria, which were using different carbohydrates, i.e., monosaccharides, disaccharides, and polysaccharides, as carbon sources [40,41].
The metabolic patterns of Pseudanabaena sp. for each carbon substrate in Biolog-ECO plates are presented in Table 2, where the specific growth rates of Pseudanabaena sp. in the presence of each substrate are presented. More specifically, according to μ (d−1), Pseudanabaena sp. metabolizes better the substrates that belong to amino acids and especially L-asparagine, followed by glycyl-L-glutamic acid, L-serine, and L-arginine. Among the carbohydrates, the microorganism prefers D-cellobiose, D-mannitol, D-xylose, and N-acetyl-D-glycosamine, whereas among the carboxylic acids, pyruvic acid methyl ester acid obviously metabolized better, followed by a-ketobutyric acid, D-galacturonic acid, and D-glucosaminic acid.

3.3. Optimization of Cellobiose Concentration on Biomass and β-Glucosidase Production in Pseudanabaena sp. Cells

Among the various organic substrates that were tested with Biolog, cellobiose is the preferred carbohydrate source, as it shows a specific growth rate of 0.6 d−1. Moreover, it is observed that Pseudanabaena sp. cells can produce β-glucosidase, when heterotrophically cultivated, using cellobiose. We should highlight that, until now, the basic β-glucosidase producers were bacteria and fungi, whereas it is the first time that a cyanobacterial strain produces enzyme. Therefore, it is of crucial importance to find out the optimum conditions for both biomass and enzyme production.
First, we checked the effect of cellobiose concentration, as it constitutes the carbon source, which is necessary for heterotrophic cell growth. Therefore, in this part, we examined the effect of cellobiose concentration on biomass and enzyme production by testing six different concentrations, starting from cellobiose absence until the presence of 25 g/L cellobiose. As shown in Figure 3, the cell dry weight increased when the cellobiose concentration changed from 0 to 20 g/L, whereas over this rate, a decrease in the biomass formation was observed. More specifically, when the carbon source concentration was 20 g/L, biomass had its highest value reaching 2.63 ± 0.03 g/L. This value appears to be the minimum difference from the biomass at the 10 and 15 g/L substrate, which were 2.24 ± 0.02 and 2.59 ± 0.03 g/L, respectively. At the same time, the enzyme activity significantly increased when the cellobiose concentration increased from 5 to 10 g/L, remaining approximately constant on bigger rates. As shown in Figure 3, it increased from 11.73 ± 0.78 (5 g/L) to 26.45 ± 0.78U/L (10 g/L). These results come in accordance with other studies about the heterotrophic growth of microalgae, where low carbon concentrations are not enough for a satisfactory growth of the cells, whereas greater carbon concentrations were causing an inhibitory effect on the biomass or its production [42]. Moreover, the concentration of 10 g/L of carbon source—usually glucose on most of the cases—for the heterotrophic growth of different microalgal strains, seems to be the most appropriate, something that comes in accordance with our study [43,44]. We should mention that cell growth is highly related with both the strain and carbon source. For instance, the cyanobacterium Phormidium sp. was able to produce 5.54 g/L biomass when cultivated using fructose as the carbon source compared with1.18 g/L when cultivated using sucrose [22,40]. Cyanobacterium Nostocflagelliforme reached a biomass of 0.41 g/L after 7 days of cultivation with fructose, whereas Anabaena variabilis reached 10 g/L with the same carbon source [22].
Therefore, regarding the fact that cell growth is highly dependent on the strain, carbon source, and its concentrations, 10 g/L cellobiose constitutes the greater option as Pseudanabaena sp. cells can produce a little lower biomass, but with great enzyme activity, and is presented as the most effective carbon concentration.

3.4. Optimization of Nitrogen Source on Biomass and β-Glucosidase Production in Pseudanabaena sp. Cells

After the carbon source, which is the cellobiose in the current work, the quality and quantity of the nitrogen source play a crucial role in microalgae growth and production of bioactive molecules [45]. As it is reported that microalgae have the ability to assimilate many nitrogen sources [46], keeping the cellobiose concentration at 10 g/L, we checked the effect of different nitrogen sources, some organic and some inorganic forms.
As shown in Figure 4, Pseudanabaena sp. cells did not even manage to grow under the presence of inorganic nitrogen sources. Both ammonium chloride and ammonium sulfate dramatically change the pH of cultures, as they are rapidly assimilated by the cells, having cell death as a result. Additionally, urea is related with urease presence, so the cyanobacterial cells are not able to assimilate the nitrogen source, overcome the adaptive phase, and continue in the exponential phase [47]. On the other hand, both yeast and peptone constitute organic nitrogen sources that are absolutely used by the cells. Therefore, they lead to normal growth and enzyme production. Moreover, complex nitrogen sources contain both growth factors, vitamins and amino acids, which may affect the growth process in a positive way [46]. The use of yeast led to 2.22 ± 0.04 g/L cell dry weight and 26.10 ± 0.75 U/L enzyme activity, whereas the use of peptone to 2.28 ± 0.75 g/L and 24.57 ± 0.64 U/L, respectively. Moreover, the peak of biomass and enzyme production happened earlier in the culture when yeast was the nitrogen source, while they were keeping these values, even when the substrate was exhausted about something that was not presented in the case of peptone. The above results come in accordance with other studies, showing that ammonium sources cause the inhibition of cell growth, whereas yeast extract shows the greatest growth and protein production [46]. Moreover, Spirulina platensis and Anabaena 7120 cells displayed the same tendency, where ammonium chloride, sulfate, and urea were causing dramatic growth inhibition, with sodium nitrate being the most suitable among them [48,49].
We should mention that the preferred nitrogen source is also highly dependent on the desirable product. For instance, Dunaliellasalina prefers ammonium than nitrate sources for protein production, whereas Chlorella sorokiniana prefers urea or nitrate instead of ammonium for lipid production [50,51].

3.5. Optimization of Nitrogen Concentration on Biomass and β-Glucosidase Production in Pseudanabaena sp. Cells

It has already been reported that the nutrients of the medium, such as carbon and nitrogen and their concentrations, influence the cell growth [52]. Moreover, nutrient and especially nitrogen limitations can lead to enhancement of production of specific bioactive compounds [42]. The optimal concentrations of carbon and nitrogen sources are both strain- and product-dependent. Therefore, selecting yeast as the most appropriate nitrogen source, we continued with the examination of the effect of yeast concentration on both biomass and enzyme production. For this purpose, we checked four different yeast concentrations, ranging from 0.5 to 2.5 g/L. As presented in Figure 5, the increase in yeast concentration from 0.5 to 1.5resulted in a biomass and enzyme production increase, reaching their peak values of 2.73 ± 0.15 g/L and 42.44 ± 0.09 U/L, respectively. On a yeast concentration of 2 g/L, both biomass and enzyme productions were about the same, whereas on higher yeast concentrations, both biomass and enzyme production were half. Therefore, the optimal yeast concentration and most cost-effective is 1.5 g/L.

3.6. Optimization of Temperature on Biomass and β-Glucosidase Production in Pseudanabaena sp. Cells

After the purification of nutrient environment with carbon and nitrogen sources, the abiotic factor of temperature plays also a crucial role on growth and enzyme activity. It is reported that most of the microalgal species appear to have an optimum temperature range of 20–30 °C [53]. In most cases, temperatures lower than 16 °C slow the growth, whereas temperatures over 35 °C lead to cell death. For temperatures out of the above ranges, there are specific strains of microalgal species that can survive, grow, and produce biomolecules. For instance, the thermostable Cyanobacterium aponinum appears to have its optimal growth at 40 °C [54]. Testing temperatures from 15 to 35 °C, as it is obvious from Table 3, biomass production shows a sharp increase when culture temperature was increased from 15 to 23 °C.
For the temperature range of 23–28 °C, biomass production was about the same, displaying a max of 2.80 ± 0.19 g/L (at 23 °C) and a min of 2.46 ± 0.11 g/L (at 28 °C). At growth temperatures over 30 °C, Pseudanabaena sp. cells showeda decrease in their growth, with a harsh reduction at 35 °C, which resulted in less than half biomass production. These results come in accordance with the optimal temperature ranges for most of microalgal species. Moreover, Pseudanabaena sp. is isolated from Lake Pamvotis, whose temperature ranges from about 5 to 26 °C depending on the season, with most of the months being over 12 °C [55], something that comes in accordance with the preferred temperatures from the cells.
The highest enzyme activity was 44.69 ± 0.75 at 23 °C, having a slight difference with this at 25 and 28 °C, being 43.05 ± 0.54 U/L and 42.01 ± 0.88 U/L, respectively. Therefore, these temperature values seem to be the optimal values, with temperature values excluded from them resulting in decreasing rates of both the biomass and enzyme.

3.7. Growth of Pseudanabaena sp. under Optimum Conditions

Taking all the above into consideration and knowing that the aim of the purification process is the highest enzyme production in parallel with the cost minimizing, for the optimal production, we selected and used the following parameters: 10 g/L cellobiose, 1.5 g/L yeast and 23 ± 1 °C. Figure 6 presents the growth, enzyme production, and cellobiose consumption curves, resulting from cell culture in a bioreactor of 2 L volume, using the optimum conditions referred above. As shown in Figure 6, Pseudanabaena sp. cells enter the exponential phase even from the first hours of inoculation, whereas at 96 h, they reach close to the peak. Moreover, as it is observed, enzyme production is drastically increased from the first hours of cultivation, when the cells are at its exponential phase. As it is observed, the enzyme activity is about 18 U/L at the first 48 h of cultivation, whereas it extremely rapidly reaches close to its peak value of 42.2 U/L at 72 h and the peak at 160 h with 44.7 U/L enzyme production; at the same time, cellobiose concentration is less than 1/10 of the initial. Therefore, Pseudanabaena sp. cells were producing β-glucosidase during their station phase, while the cellobiose was already consumed. The maximum activity of produced β-glucosidase remained stable until the end of culture.
It is known that heterotrophic culture conditions cause a great enhancement of biomass production, which also happened in our study. We should mention that the production of cell dry biomass is highly related with many conditions such as the carbon source, a possible nutrient starvation, the pH, or the temperature of the culture [18]. Moreover, the above results are in accordance with previous studies indicating the instant insertion of cells in the exponential phase even from the first hours of culture, with enzyme production in parallel [40,56,57].
In addition, FTIR spectra (Figure 7) characterized the specific macromolecules that can be detected and derived from Pseudanabaena sp. lyophilized cells, cultivated under the above optimum conditions [58]. Proteins, lipids, and polysaccharides correspond in characteristics bands of FTIR spectra of cells in the range of 4000–400 cm−1 [59,60]. O–H and N–H vibration stretching can be observed at 3280 cm−1, resulting in the carbohydrate and protein content. At the wavelength range 3000–2800 cm−1, C–H stretching vibration can be observed that represents the acyl chains. These bands are characteristic of lipid compounds. The CH3 and CH2 absorption bands are observed at 2998–2829 cm−a and represent the lipid and carbohydrate content.
The band at 1650 cm−h represents the protein C–O stretching vibrations of peptide bonds (amide I). The band at 1550 cm−r represents the N–H bending vibrations and C–N stretching vibrations that are considered for use in the estimation (amide II). At 1186–1350 cm−1, C–H and O–H deformations are present. At the wavelength 1245 cm−r, amide III band is present, resulting from several coordinate displacements. Polysaccharides have characteristic absorption bands around 1200–950 cm−o representing the C–O–C stretching band. The presence of the detected lipids, polysaccharides, amides, proteins, and carbohydrates constitutes characteristic molecules of cyanobacteria species as also previously reported [61,62].
Continuing with a first determination of the protein and lipid content, Pseudanabaena sp. cells were capable of producing about 22.5 ± 0.8% w/w and 43.3 ± 0.9% w/w, respectively. The above results constitute one more evidence about the importance of the novel cyanobacterial cells, as they constitute the raw material to produce highly valuable products, displaying a plethora of applications. It is known that proteins derived from microalgae are used in the food industry, nutraceuticals, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics [63,64,65]. On the other hand, lipids also constitute a great part of cell content, something that come in accordance with previous studies, an indication that heterotrophic culture conditions enhance lipid production [66]. Depending on the type of produced lipids, the appropriate applications differ. For instance, PUFAs are more appropriate as nutraceuticals, whereas MUFAs and SFAs find application on energy industry and more usual in biodiesel production [67].

4. Conclusions

In this study, an isolated cyanobacterium from the eutrophic lake Pamvotida was identified as Pseudanabaena sp. The strain heterotrophically grows with a variety of organic sources. The best assimilable classes of organic molecules are carbohydrates, carboxylic acids, and amino acids, as determined by Biolog microplate experiments. Pseudanabaena sp. rapidly heterotrophically grows using cellobiose as a carbon source, reaching high biomass production. At the same time, the strain quantitatively produced an intracellular β-glucosidase reaching high productivity, with characteristics that make it appropriate for many applications. The optimal culture conditions for the greatest and at the same time more affordable enzyme conditions were determined, whereas the enzyme was produced at a bioreactor system of 2 L through a time course experiment, showing that the enzyme was produced early during the culture. This is the first report of β-glucosidase production by a cyanobacterium strain. Work is already in progress toward the purification and characterization of the enzyme.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.K. and A.T.; methodology, D.K. and A.T.; writing original draft preparation, D.K., A.T., K.V. and P.K.; supervision, I.S. and P.K.; reviewing, I.S., K.V., H.S. and P.K.; investigation, H.S. and P.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Dimitra Karageorgou was supported for this work by the Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (HFRI) and the General Secretariat for Research and Technology (GSRT), under the HFRI PhD Fellowship grant (GA. no. 1137).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ahmed, A.; Batool, K.; Bibi, A. Microbial β-Glucosidase: Sources, Production and Applications. J. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 5, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Chen, Z.; Meng, T.; Li, Z.; Liu, P.; Wang, Y. Characterization of a beta-glucosidase from Bacillus licheniformis and its effect on bioflocculant degradation. AMB Express. 2017, 7, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Singhania, R.R.; Sukumaran, R.K.; Larroche, C.; Pandey, A. Role and significance of beta-glucosidases in the hydrolysis of cellulose for bioethanol production. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 127, 500–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tiwari, P.; Misra, B.N.; Sangwan, N.S. Β-Glucosidases from the fungus Trichoderma: An efficient cellulase machinery in biotechnological applications. BioMed. Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 203735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Ahmed, A.; Aslam, M.; Ashraf, M.; ul-Hassan Nasim, F.; Batool, K.; Bibi, A. Microbial β-Glucosidases: Screening, Characterization, Cloning and Applications. J. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 5, 57–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Chang, J.; Lee, Y.-S.; Fang, S.-J.; Park, D.-J.; Choi, Y.-L. Hydrolysis of isoflavone glycoside by immobilization of β-glucosidase on a chitosan-carbon in two-phase system. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 61, 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. GV Sharada, R.; Venkateswar, S.; AnandRao, M. Applications of cellulases-review. Int. J. Pharm. Chem. Biol. Sci. 2014, 4, 424–437. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sørensen, A.; Lübeck, M.; Lübeck, P.S.; Ahring, B.K. Fungal Beta-Glucosidases: A Bottleneck in Industrial Use of Lignocellulosic Materials. Biomolecules 2013, 3, 612–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Seeberger, P.H.; Werz, D.B. Synthesis and medical applications of oligosaccharides. Nature 2007, 446, 1046–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lambertz, C.; Garvey, M.; Klinger, J.; Heesel, D.; Klose, H. Challenges and advances in the heterologous expression of cellulolytic enzymes: A review. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2014, 7, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Nigam, P.S. Microbial enzymes with special characteristics for biotechnological applications. Biomolecules 2013, 3, 597–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mogharabia, M. Are Algae the Future Source of Enzymes? Trends Pept. Protein Sci. 2016, 1, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  13. Economou, C.N.; Moustaka-Gouni, M.; Kehayias, G.; Aggelis, G.; Vayenas, G.V. Lipid production by the filamentous cyanobacterium Limnothrix sp. growing in synthetic wastewater in suspended- and attached-growth photobioreactor systems. Ann. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 1941–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Meireles dos Santos, A.; Vieira, K.R.; Basso Sartori, R.; Meireles dos Santos, A.; Queiroz, M.I.; Queiroz Zepka, L.; Jacob-Lopes, E. Heterotrophic Cultivation of Cyanobacteria: Study of Effect of Exogenous Sources of Organic Carbon, Absolute Amount of Nutrients, and Stirring Speed on Biomass and Lipid Productivity. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2017, 5, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kumar, J.; Singh, D.; Tyagi, M.B.; Kumar, A. Chapter 16—Cyanobacteria: Applications in Biotechnology. In Cyanobacteria from Basic Science to Applications; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 327–346. [Google Scholar]
  16. Khalifa, S.; Shedid, E.S.; Saied, E.M.; Jassbi, A.R.; Jamebozorgi, F.H.; Rateb, M.E.; Du, M.; Abdel-Daim, M.M.; Kai, G.Y.; Al-Hammady, M.; et al. Cyanobacteria-From the Oceans to the Potential Biotechnological and Biomedical Applications. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Romanowska-Duda, Z.; Szufa, S.; Grzesik, M.; Piotrowski, K.; Janas, R. The Promotive Effect of Cyanobacteria and Chlorella sp. Foliar Biofertilization on Growth and Metabolic Activities of Willow (Salix viminalis L.) Plants as Feedstock Production, Solid Biofuel and Biochar as C Carrier for Fertilizers via Torrefaction Process. Energies 2021, 14, 5262. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jacob-Lopes, E.; Santos, A.B.; Severo, I.A.; Manoreze, M.M.; Zepka, L.Q. Dual production of bioenergy in heterotrophic cultures of cyanobacteria: Process performance, carbon balance, biofuel quality and sustainability metrics. Biomass Bioenergy 2020, 142, 105756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Roman, K.; Barwicki, J.; Rzodkiewicz, W.; Dawidowski, M. Evaluation of Mechanical and Energetic Properties of the Forest Residues Shredded Chips during Briquetting Process. Energies 2021, 14, 3270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rodjaroen, S.N.; Mahakhant, A.; Miyamoto, K. High biomass production and starch accumulation in native green algal strains and cyanobacterial strains of Thailand. Kasetsart J. (Nat. Sci.) 2007, 41, 570–575. [Google Scholar]
  21. Singh, G. Cyanobacteria as a novel source of reneable energy. Plant Arch. 2017, 17, 1790–1794. [Google Scholar]
  22. Markou, G.; Georgakakis, D. Cultivation of filamentous cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) in agro-industrial wastes and wastewaters: A review. Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 3389–3401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kroumov, A.D.; Scheufele, F.B.; Zaharieva, M.M.; Zheleva-Dimitrova, D.; Najdenski, H. Optimal Biomass Production by Cyanobacteria, Mathematical Evaluation, and Improvements in the Light of Biorefinery Concept. In Ecophysiology and Biochemistry of Cyanobacteria; Rastogi, R.P., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 401–429. [Google Scholar]
  24. Karageorgou, D.; Zygouri, P.; Tsakiridis, T.; Hammami, M.A.; Chalmpes, N.; Subrati, M.; Sainis, I.; Spyrou, K.; Katapodis, P.; Gournis, D.; et al. Green Synthesis and Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles with High Antibacterial Activity Using Cell Extracts of Cyanobacterium Pseudanabaena/Limnothrix sp. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Karageorgou, D.; Patel, A.; Rova, U.; Christakopoulos, P.; Katapodis, P.; Matsakas, L. Heterotrophic Cultivation of the CynobacteriumPseudanabaena sp. on Forest Biomass Hydrolysates towards Sustainable Biodiesel Production. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Cegłowska, M.; Szubert, K.; Grygier, B.; Lenart, M.; Plewka, J.; Milewska, A.; Lis, K.; Szczepański, A.; Chykunova, Y.; Barreto-Duran, E.; et al. Pseudanabaenagaleata CCNP1313-Biological Activity and Peptides Production. Toxins 2022, 14, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cano-Europa, E.; Ortiz-Butrón, R.; Gallardo-Casas, C.A.; Blas-Valdivia, V.; Pineda-Reynoso, M.; Olvera-Ramírez, R.; Franco-Colin, M. Phycobiliproteins from Pseudanabaena tenuis rich in c-phycoerythrin protect against HgCl2-caused oxidative stress and cellular damage in the kidney. J. Appl. Phycol. 2010, 22, 495–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vareli, K.; Pilidis, G.; Mavrogiorgou, M.C.; Briasoulis, E.; Sainis, I. Molecular characterization of cyanobacterial diversity and yearly fluctuations of Microcystin loads in a suburban Mediterranean Lake (Lake Pamvotis, Greece). J. Environ. Monit. 2009, 11, 1506–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Touka, A.; Vareli, K.; Igglezou, M.; Monokrousos, N.; Alivertis, D.; Halley, J.M.; Hadjikakou, S.; Frillingos, S.; Sainis, I. Ancient European Lakes: Reservoirs of Hidden Microbial Diversity? The Case of Lake Pamvotis (NW Greece). Open J. Ecol. 2018, 8, 537–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Edem, P.A.; Schmidt, T.M.; Blakemore, T.R.; Pace, N.R. Phylogenetic Analysis of Aquaspirillummagnetotacticum Using Polymerase Chain Reaction-Amplified 16s rRNA-Specific DNA. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1991, 41, 324–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Muyzer, G.; De Waal, E.C.; Uitterlinden, A. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1993, 59, 695–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Janse, I.; Meima, M.; Kardinaal, W.E.A.; Zwart, G. High-resolution differentiation of Cyanobacteria by using rRNA-internal transcribed spacer denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 6634–6643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Tamura, K.; Peterson, D.; Peterson, N.; Stecher, G.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. Mega5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28, 2731–2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Tian-Yuan, Z.; Yin-Hu, W.; Lin-Lan, Z.; Xiao-Xiong, W.; Hong-Ying, H. Screening heterotrophic microalgal strains by using the Biolog method for biofuel production from organic wastewater. Algal Res. 2014, 6, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Choi, K.-H.; Dobbs, F.C. Comparison of two kinds of Biolog microplates (GN and ECO) in their ability to distinguish among aquatic microbial communities. J. Microbiol. Methods 1999, 36, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Smith, P.K.; Krohn, R.I.; Hermanson, G.T.; Mallia, A.K.; Gartner, F.H.; Provenzano, M.D.; Fujimoto, E.K.; Goeke, N.M.; Olson, B.J.; Klenk, D.C. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal. Biochem. 1985, 150, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Folch, J.; Lees, M.; Sloane Stanley, G.H. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 1957, 226, 497–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Komárek, J.; Kaštovský, J.; Mareš, J.; Johansen, J.R. Taxonomic classification of cyanoprokaryotes (cyanobacterial genera), using a polyphasic approach. Preslia 2014, 86, 295–335. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sutherland, D.L.; Burke, J.; Ralph, P.J. High-throughput screening for heterotrophic growth in microalgae using the Biolog Plate assay. New Biotechnol. 2021, 65, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Francisco, E.C.; Franco, T.T.; Wagner, R.; Jacob-Lopes, E. Assessment of different carbohydrates as exogenous carbon source in cultivation of cyanobacteria. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2014, 37, 1497–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lee, T.-C.; Xiong, W.; Paddock, T.; Carrieri, D.; Chang, I.-F.; Chiu, H.-F.; Ungerer, J.; Juo, S.-H.H.; Maness, P.-C.; Yu, J. Engineered xylose utilization enhances bio-products productivity in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Metab. Eng. 2015, 30, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Patel, A.; Matsakas, L.; Rova, U.; Christakopoulos, P. Heterotrophic cultivation of Auxenochlorellaprotothecoides using forest biomass as a feedstock for sustainable biodiesel production. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2018, 11, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Miao, X.; Li, P.; Li, R.; Zhong, J. In situ biodiesel production from fast-growing and high oil content Chlorella pyrenoidosa in rice straw hydrolysate. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2011, 2011, 141207. [Google Scholar]
  44. Gao, C.; Zhai, Y.; Ding, Y.; Wu, Q. Application of sweet sorghum for biodiesel 
production by heterotrophic microalga Chlorella protothecoides. Appl. Energy 2010, 87, 756–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gilpin, L.C.; Davidson, K.; Roberts, E. The influence of changes in nitrogen: Silicon ratios on diatom growth dynamics. J. Sea Res. 2004, 51, 21–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kim, G.; Mujtaba, G.; Lee, K. Effects of nitrogen sources on cell growth and biochemical composition of marine chlorophyte Tetraselmis sp. for lipid production. Algae 2016, 31, 257–266. [Google Scholar]
  47. Converti, A.; Scapazzoni, S.; Lodi, A.; Carvalho, J.C.M. Ammonium and urea removal by Spiru;ina platensis. J. Ind. Microbiol. 2006, 33, 8–16. [Google Scholar]
  48. Vieira Costa, J.A.; Cozza, K.L.; Oliviera, L.; Magagnin, G. Different nitrogen sources and growth responses of Spirulina platensis in microenvironments. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 17, 439–442. [Google Scholar]
  49. Johnson, T.J.; Jahandideh, A.; Isaac, I.C.; Baldwin, E.L.; Muthukumarappan, K.; Zjou, R.; Gibbons, W.R. Determining the optimal nitrogen source for large-scale cultivation of filamentous cyanobacteria. J. Appl. Phycol. 2016, 29, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Norici, A.; Dalsass, A.; Giordano, M. Role of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase in anaplerosis in the green microalga Dunaliellasalina cultured under different nitrogen regimes. Physiol Plant. 2002, 116, 186–191. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wan, M.X.; Wang, R.M.; Xia, J.L.; Rosenberg, J.N.; Nie, Z.Y.; Kobayashi, N.; Oyler, G.A.; Betenbaugh, M.J. Physiological evaluation of a new Chlorella sorokiniana isolate for its biomass production and lipid accumulation in photoautotrophic and heterotrophic cultures. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012, 109, 1958–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Patel, A.; Pruthi, V.; Pruthi, P.A. Synchronized nutrient stress conditions trigger the diversion of CDP-DG pathway of phospholipids synthesis towards de novo TAG synthesis in oleaginous yeast escalating biodiesel production. Energy 2017, 139, 962–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Singh, S.P.; Singh, P. Effect of temperature and light on the growth of algae species: A review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2015, 50, 431–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gris, B.; Sforza, E.; Morosinotto, T.; Bertucco, A.; La Rocca, N. Influence of light and temperature on growth and high-value molecules productivity from Cyanobacterium aponinum. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 1781–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kagalou, I.; Economidis, G.; Leonardos, I.; Papaloukas, C. Assessment of a Mediterranean shallow lentic ecosystem (Lake Pamvotis, Greece) using benthic community diversity: Response to environmental parameters. Limnologica 2006, 36, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Garcia, N.F.L.; da Silva Santos, F.R.; Goncalves, F.A.; de Paz, M.F.; Fonseca, G.G.; Leite, R.S.R. Production of β-glucosidase on solid-state fermentation by Lichtheimiaramosa in agroindustrial residues: Characterization and catalytic properties of the enzymatic extract. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 18, 314–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Olajuyigbe, F.M.; Nlekerem, C.M.; Ogunyewo, O.A. Production and Characterization of Highly Thermostable β-Glucosidase during the Biodegradation of Methyl Cellulose by Fusarium oxysporum. Biochem. Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 3978124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Özer, T.; Yalçın, D.; Erkaya, I.A.; Udoh, A.U. Identification and Characterization of Some Species of Cyanobacteria, Chlorophyta and BacillariophytaUsing Fourier- Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy. Int. J. Pharm. Biol. Sci. 2016, 11, 20–27. [Google Scholar]
  59. Bataller, B.G.; Capareda, S.C. A rapid and non-destructive method for quantifying biomolecules in Spirulina platensis via Fourier transform infrared—Attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy. Algal Res. 2018, 32, 341–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Meng, Y.; Yao, C.; Xue, S.; Yang, H. Application of Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy in determination of microalgal compositions. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 151, 347–354. [Google Scholar]
  61. Oufdou, K.; Mezrioui, N.; Oudra, B.; Loudiki, M.; Barakate, M.; Sbiyyaa, B. Bioactive compounds from Pseudanabaena species (Cyanobacteria). Microbios 2001, 106, 21–29. [Google Scholar]
  62. Rajeshwari, K.R.; Rajashekhar, M. Biochemical Composition of Seven Species of Cyanobacteria Isolated from Different Aquatic Habitats of Western Ghats, Southern India. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2011, 54, 849–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Christaki, E.; Florou-Paneri, P.; Bonos, E. Microalgae: A novel ingredient in nutrition. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011, 62, 794–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kim, S.-K.; Kang, K.-H. Medicinal Effects of Peptides from Marine Microalgae. Adv. Food Nutr. 2011, 64, 313–323. [Google Scholar]
  65. Siqueira, S.F.; Queiroz, M.I.; Zepka, L.Q.; Jacob-Lopes, E. Introductory Chapter: Microalgae Biotechnology—A Brief Introduction. In Microalgal Biotechnology; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  66. Mohamed, M.; Wei, L.Z.; Ariff, A.B. Heterotrophic cultivation of microalgae for production of biodiesel. Recent Pat. Biotechnol. 2011, 5, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Patel, A.; Mikes, F.; Matsakas, L. An Overview of Current Pretreatment Methods Used to Improve Lipid Extraction from Oleaginous Micro-Organisms. Molecules 2018, 23, 1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of Pseudanabaena sp. (A) Distance tree based on alignment of Pseudanabaena sp. 16S rDNA sequence (), and sequences with highest similarities retrieved from GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ databases (branches with bootstrap values below 50% have been deleted in this presentation). Microscopic picture is also presented. (B) Distance tree based on alignment of Pseudanabaena sp. ITS sequence (), and sequences with highest similarities retrieved from GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ databases (branches with bootstrap values below 50% have been deleted in this presentation).
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of Pseudanabaena sp. (A) Distance tree based on alignment of Pseudanabaena sp. 16S rDNA sequence (), and sequences with highest similarities retrieved from GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ databases (branches with bootstrap values below 50% have been deleted in this presentation). Microscopic picture is also presented. (B) Distance tree based on alignment of Pseudanabaena sp. ITS sequence (), and sequences with highest similarities retrieved from GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ databases (branches with bootstrap values below 50% have been deleted in this presentation).
Biomass 02 00020 g001
Figure 2. Absorbances of assimilable substrates for cyanobacterial strain Pseudanabaena sp. in Biolog-ECO plate. Substrates in Biolog-ECO plates are assigned into six categories according to their biochemical properties, where columns from left to right represent amino acids, carbohydrates, carboxyl acids, polymers, phenolic acids, and amines, respectively.
Figure 2. Absorbances of assimilable substrates for cyanobacterial strain Pseudanabaena sp. in Biolog-ECO plate. Substrates in Biolog-ECO plates are assigned into six categories according to their biochemical properties, where columns from left to right represent amino acids, carbohydrates, carboxyl acids, polymers, phenolic acids, and amines, respectively.
Biomass 02 00020 g002
Figure 3. Biomass and β-glucosidase production by Pseudanabaena sp. under heterotrophic conditions in different cellobiose concentration; white column represents biomass production, and gray column the enzyme production. All measurements were performed in triplicate, whereas SD is represented. Different letters over bars with same color indicate differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test DMRT with p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Biomass and β-glucosidase production by Pseudanabaena sp. under heterotrophic conditions in different cellobiose concentration; white column represents biomass production, and gray column the enzyme production. All measurements were performed in triplicate, whereas SD is represented. Different letters over bars with same color indicate differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test DMRT with p < 0.05.
Biomass 02 00020 g003
Figure 4. Cell dry production (g/L) and β-glucosidase activity (U/L) of Pseudanabaena sp. under heterotrophic conditions in different nitrogen sources (ammonium chloride (AC), ammonium sulfate (AS), sodium nitrate (SN.), yeast extract (YE), peptone (PE), and urea (UR)).In all cases, dark gray column represents biomass production, whereas gray column the enzyme production. Activity (U/L) was measured against 2 mM pNPG in citrate-phosphate buffer, pH 6.0, at 40 °C. In all cases, samples were collected daily, and all reactions and measurements were performed in triplicate, while SD is represented. Different letters over bars with same color indicate differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test DMRT with p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Cell dry production (g/L) and β-glucosidase activity (U/L) of Pseudanabaena sp. under heterotrophic conditions in different nitrogen sources (ammonium chloride (AC), ammonium sulfate (AS), sodium nitrate (SN.), yeast extract (YE), peptone (PE), and urea (UR)).In all cases, dark gray column represents biomass production, whereas gray column the enzyme production. Activity (U/L) was measured against 2 mM pNPG in citrate-phosphate buffer, pH 6.0, at 40 °C. In all cases, samples were collected daily, and all reactions and measurements were performed in triplicate, while SD is represented. Different letters over bars with same color indicate differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test DMRT with p < 0.05.
Biomass 02 00020 g004
Figure 5. Cell dry production (g/L) and β-glucosidase activity (U/L) of Pseudanabaena sp. under heterotrophic conditions in different nitrogen concentrations (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 g/L—from left to right, respectively). In all cases, dark gray column represents biomass production, whereas gray column the enzyme production. Activity (U/L) was measured against 2 mM pNPG in citrate-phosphate buffer, pH 6.0, at 40 °C. In all cases, samples were collected daily, and all reactions and measurements were performed in triplicate, while the SD is represented. Data associated with the same letter over bars with same color indicates no significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Cell dry production (g/L) and β-glucosidase activity (U/L) of Pseudanabaena sp. under heterotrophic conditions in different nitrogen concentrations (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 g/L—from left to right, respectively). In all cases, dark gray column represents biomass production, whereas gray column the enzyme production. Activity (U/L) was measured against 2 mM pNPG in citrate-phosphate buffer, pH 6.0, at 40 °C. In all cases, samples were collected daily, and all reactions and measurements were performed in triplicate, while the SD is represented. Data associated with the same letter over bars with same color indicates no significant difference at p < 0.05.
Biomass 02 00020 g005
Figure 6. Time course showing cultivation of Pseudanabaena sp. under optimum heterotrophic conditions in cellobiose (10 g/L) and yeast (1.5 g/L) and 23 °C. Cell dry weight (g/L) (black circles), β-glucosidase production (U/L) (white squares), and concentration of residual sugars (white circles) during cultivation time are presented with black, dark gray, and light gray lines, respectively. Activity (U/L) was measured against 2 mM pNPG in citrate-phosphate buffer, pH 6.0, at 40 °C. In all cases, samples were collected daily, and all reactions and measurements were performed in triplicate, while the SD is represented.
Figure 6. Time course showing cultivation of Pseudanabaena sp. under optimum heterotrophic conditions in cellobiose (10 g/L) and yeast (1.5 g/L) and 23 °C. Cell dry weight (g/L) (black circles), β-glucosidase production (U/L) (white squares), and concentration of residual sugars (white circles) during cultivation time are presented with black, dark gray, and light gray lines, respectively. Activity (U/L) was measured against 2 mM pNPG in citrate-phosphate buffer, pH 6.0, at 40 °C. In all cases, samples were collected daily, and all reactions and measurements were performed in triplicate, while the SD is represented.
Biomass 02 00020 g006
Figure 7. FTIR spectra of Pseudanabaena sp. cells. Each peak represents a specific molecular movement. Functional groups are represented.
Figure 7. FTIR spectra of Pseudanabaena sp. cells. Each peak represents a specific molecular movement. Functional groups are represented.
Biomass 02 00020 g007
Table 1. Comparison of Pseudanabaena sp. 16S rDNA and “Pamv7” ITS sequences to already deposited sequences using BLAST software in NCBI website (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (accessed on 15 June 2019).
Table 1. Comparison of Pseudanabaena sp. 16S rDNA and “Pamv7” ITS sequences to already deposited sequences using BLAST software in NCBI website (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (accessed on 15 June 2019).
Pamv7Species GenBank% OverlappingIdentityAccession
(15 June 2019)
16S rDNA partial (471 bp)Pseudanabaena sp. 0830-310099.3%AB936777
ITS full length (703 bp)Pseudanabaena sp. RK_4_6 9991.9%KY379894
ITS full length (703 bp)LimnothrixredekeiCCAP 1443/19988%AJ580007
Table 2. Specific growth rates μ (d−1) of Pseudanabaena sp. in Biolog-ECO plate. Organic substrates are assigned into diverse biochemical categories, according to description of Keun-Hyung Choi and Fred C. Dobbs [16].
Table 2. Specific growth rates μ (d−1) of Pseudanabaena sp. in Biolog-ECO plate. Organic substrates are assigned into diverse biochemical categories, according to description of Keun-Hyung Choi and Fred C. Dobbs [16].
SubstrateSpecific Growth RateSubstrateSpecific Growth Rate
Carbohydratesμ (d−1)Carboxylicacidsμ (d−1)
β-Methyl-D-glucoside0.17 ± 0.01Pyruvicacidmethylester0.50 ± 0.01
D-Galactonicacid γ-lactone0.29 ± 0.01D-Galacturonicacid0.42 ± 0.01
D-Xylose0.42 ± 0.01γ-Hydroxybutyricacid0.15 ± 0.01
i-Erythritol0.15 ± 0.01D-Glucosaminic acid0.39 ± 0.01
D-Mannitol0.52 ± 0.01Itaconic acid0.26 ± 0.01
N-Acetyl-D-glycosamine0.40 ± 0.01α-KetobutyricAcid0.42 ± 0.01
D-Cellobiose0.60 ± 0.01D-Malic acid0.28 ± 0.01
Glucose-1-phosphate0.16 ± 0.01
α-D-lactose0.19 ± 0.01AminoAcidsμ (d−1)
d.l-A-Glycerol phosphate0.32 ± 0.01L-Arginine
0.43 ± 0.01
L-Asparagine0.70 ± 0.01
Aminesμ (d−1)L-Phenylalanine0.28 ± 0.01
Phenylethylamine0.08 ± 0.01L-Serine
0.48 ± 0.01
Putrescine0.18 ± 0.01L-Threonine0.28 ± 0.01
Polymersμ (d−1)Phenoliccompoundsμ (d−1)
Tween 400.38 ± 0.012-Hydroxy benzoic acid0.00 ± 0.01
Tween 800.37 ± 0.014-Hydroxy benzoicacid0.37 ± 0.01
α-Cyclodextrin0.16 ± 0.01
Glycogen0.14 ± 0.01
Table 3. Cell dry production (g/L) and β-glucosidase activity (U/L) of Pseudanabaena sp. under heterotrophic conditions in different temperatures (15, 18, 20, 23, 25, 28, 30,32, and 35 °Cfrom left to right, respectively). In all cases, dark gray column represents biomass production, whereas gray column the enzyme production. Activity (U/L) was measured against 2 mM pNPG in citrate-phosphate buffer, pH 6.0, at 40 °C. In all cases, samples were collected daily, and all reactions and measurements were performed in triplicate, while the SD is represented. Data associated with the same letter at the same column are not significantly different; p < 0.05. All means are significantly different from control.
Table 3. Cell dry production (g/L) and β-glucosidase activity (U/L) of Pseudanabaena sp. under heterotrophic conditions in different temperatures (15, 18, 20, 23, 25, 28, 30,32, and 35 °Cfrom left to right, respectively). In all cases, dark gray column represents biomass production, whereas gray column the enzyme production. Activity (U/L) was measured against 2 mM pNPG in citrate-phosphate buffer, pH 6.0, at 40 °C. In all cases, samples were collected daily, and all reactions and measurements were performed in triplicate, while the SD is represented. Data associated with the same letter at the same column are not significantly different; p < 0.05. All means are significantly different from control.
Cultivation Temperature (°C)Production by Pseudanabaena sp.
Biomass (g/L)β-Xylosidase (U/L)
151.64 ± 0.12 a30.27 ± 0.05 a
181.63 ± 0.15 a30.01 ± 0.46 a
202.00 ± 0.02 b37.66 ± 0.41 b
232.80 ± 0.19 c44.69 ± 0.75 c
252.76 ± 0.09 c43.05 ± 0.55 cd
282.46 ± 0.11 d42.01 ± 0.89 d
302.10 ± 0.10 b34.10 ± 0.72 e
322.02 ± 0.16 b30.27 ± 0.34 a
351.01 ± 0.06 e 12.64 ± 0.42 f
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Karageorgou, D.; Sainis, I.; Touka, A.; Vareli, K.; Stamatis, H.; Katapodis, P. Biomass and β-Glucosidase Production by the Cyanobacterium Pseudanabaena sp. under Heterotrophic Conditions. Biomass 2022, 2, 299-315. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass2040020

AMA Style

Karageorgou D, Sainis I, Touka A, Vareli K, Stamatis H, Katapodis P. Biomass and β-Glucosidase Production by the Cyanobacterium Pseudanabaena sp. under Heterotrophic Conditions. Biomass. 2022; 2(4):299-315. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass2040020

Chicago/Turabian Style

Karageorgou, Dimitra, Ioannis Sainis, Anastasia Touka, Katerina Vareli, Haralambos Stamatis, and Petros Katapodis. 2022. "Biomass and β-Glucosidase Production by the Cyanobacterium Pseudanabaena sp. under Heterotrophic Conditions" Biomass 2, no. 4: 299-315. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass2040020

APA Style

Karageorgou, D., Sainis, I., Touka, A., Vareli, K., Stamatis, H., & Katapodis, P. (2022). Biomass and β-Glucosidase Production by the Cyanobacterium Pseudanabaena sp. under Heterotrophic Conditions. Biomass, 2(4), 299-315. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass2040020

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop