Next Article in Journal
Effects of Organic Selenium and Probiotic Supplementation on the Performance of Indigenous and Crossbred Dairy Cows during Summer in the Tropics
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Short-Term Glycerin Supplementation on Follicle Dynamics and Pregnancy Rate in Goats
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Vegetable Oils or Glycerol on the In Vitro Ruminal Production of Greenhouse Gases
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Annual Sexual Behavior in Boer Bucks Located in the Guerrero Tropics in Mexico

by
José Luis Ponce-Covarrubias
1,*,†,
Ethel Caterina García y González
1,†,
Blanca Celia Pineda-Burgos
1,
Aurora Matilde Guevara-Arroyo
1,
Pedro Enrique Hernández-Ruiz
1,
Fernando Torres-Agatón
1,
Maricela Ruiz-Ortega
2,
Marisol Paredes-Alvarado
3,
José Manuel Robles-Robles
4,
José del Carmen Rodríguez-Castillo
4,
Oscar Ángel-García
5,† and
Edgar Valencia-Franco
6,*
1
Escuela Superior de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia No. 3, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero (UAGro), Técpan de Galeana 40900, Guerrero, Mexico
2
Instituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Tulancingo de Bravo 43600, Hidalgo, Mexico
3
Facultad de Estudios Superiores Cuautitlán, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuautitlán Izcalli 54714, Estado de México, Mexico
4
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, El Salado, Tecamachalco 75492, Puebla, Mexico
5
Departamento de Ciencias Médico Veterinarias, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro-Unidad Laguna, Torreón 27059, Coahuila, Mexico
6
Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Tlatlauquitepec 73905, Puebla, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Ruminants 2023, 3(2), 149-157; https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants3020014
Submission received: 4 May 2023 / Revised: 4 June 2023 / Accepted: 9 June 2023 / Published: 13 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reproductive Management of Ruminants)

Abstract

:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the intensity of the annual sexual behavior (SB) of Boer bucks under tropical conditions in southern Mexico. For one year, 16 extensively grazing males were evaluated for SB individually with estrogenized goats. From the beginning of the experiment and every 30 days, body weight (BW), body condition (BC), testicular circumference (TC), odor intensity (OI), and SB (nudging, ano-genital sniffing, flehmen, mounting attempts, mounts with intromission, and self-urination) were recorded. The bucks showed more intense SB during the months of November to May than during the months of June to October (p < 0.05). Greater frequencies were found for nudging, ano-genital sniffing, mounting attempts, and self-urination in the months of November to May (p < 0.001). BW was lower during the months of January to August than in the months of September to December (p < 0.05). On the other hand, TC increased from October to December (p < 0.05). Similarly, the OI in males varied over time (time effect; p < 0.001). In fact, an increased odor was found from October to December. The conclusions are that breed male goats from the tropics of Guerrero have a more intense SB during the months of November to May, but TC, OI, BW, and BC correspond to the time of the year when forage availability is the greatest.

1. Introduction

Bucks originating or adapted from temperate and subtropical regions show a reproductive seasonality that decreases sexual behavior (SB) [1,2]. In the Mexican subtropics of northern Mexico, bucks have sexual rest during the months of January to May (winter–spring), while their period of reproductive activity occurs from May to December (spring–autumn) [3]. During the period of reproductive seasonality, there is a decrease in sexual behavior (SB), testicular circumference (TC), odor intensity (OI), vocalizations, testosterone secretion, and sperm quality [4,5]; these variables increase during the reproductive season, in tandem with more intense SB [5].
On the other hand, some goat breeds from subtropical and tropical regions show variations in their SB [6]. Indeed, male goats from tropical regions show sexual activity throughout the year. However, some factors, such as forage availability, environmental temperatures, and socio-sexual relations, among other factors, modify this behavior [6,7,8].
In bucks, testosterone secretion is important to heighten their high sexual libido and improve their sperm quality [9,10]. Testosterone stimulates the preoptic area and medial region of the hypothalamic amygdala, which are important for endocrine activity and essential for the deployment of SB in male goats [11]. A determining factor to evaluate SB in males is exposure to a female in estrus, a moment at which some factors such as pheromones and sexual attractiveness intervene [12,13,14].
It has been proven that females showing signs of estrus improve their response when exposed to the male effect [15]. However, the behavior of females with signs of estrus can induce both appetite and consumption behaviors in male sheep and goats [14,16]. In fact, proprioceptive behavior can initiate and maintain sexual interactions between two females, thus increasing sexual motivation in males to mate with them [16,17,18,19].
Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the intensity of SB in Boer males throughout the year under tropical conditions in southern Mexico.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General

The study was carried out during a period from 1 January to 31 December 2019, in the municipality of Cuajinicuilapa, Guerrero, Mexico. The region belongs to the Costa Chica region of this state, and it is located in the Mexican tropical region between parallels 16°18′58″ and 16°35′46″ north latitude and meridians 98°21′04″ and 98°43′44″ west longitude. The climate is warm and dry, with an annual average temperature of 34 °C, and rains occur during the summer months, producing precipitations of 1300 mm (Figure 1) [20]. All experimental procedures in the experimental units that were used in the present study adhered strictly to the standards for the ethical use, care, and well-being of research animals [21].

2.2. Animals and Treatments

Sexual behavior (SB) was evaluated in 16 adult Boer bucks with an average age of 3.5 years, a body weight (BW) of 96.38 ± 3.43 kg, and a body condition (BC) of 3.5 ± 0.45 points (on scale from 1 to 4 points).

2.3. Management and Measuring of Males

Goat production in this region is for subsistence purposes. Extensive grazing takes place in the morning (08:00 h) and in the afternoon (19:00 h). The goats are locked in open goat sheds that have drinking fountains. The animals do not receive any supplemental nutrition nor zootechnical management except for internal deworming once per year (Ivermectin; Baymec®, 200 µg kg−1 PV; Bayer-Animal Health, Mexico City, Mexico).
Before beginning the experiment, all males from both groups were measured for their body weight (BW), body condition (BC), testicular circumference (TC), neck odor, and SB. Then, on 1 January 2019, these same measurements were obtained from all males. Since the beginning of the experiment and every 30 days, BW, BC, TC, SB, and odor intensity (OI) from 10–15 cm at the base of the horns were recorded. These measurements were always performed by previously trained people and with the same evaluation criteria. The animals were weighed with an electronic hanging scale (Rhino-Model: BAC-300) with a capacity of 300 kg and an accuracy of 100 g. BC was evaluated via the palpation of the spinous and lateral processes of the lumbar vertebrae to detect fat and musculature in this region of the spinal column. A score of 1 (thin) to 4 (fat) was assigned, with increments between units of 0.5. OI was evaluated by smelling the dorsal part of the neck, 10–15 cm posterior to the base of the horns. The 0-to-3-point scale described by Walkden-Brown et al. [22] was used, with the following values: 0 (neutral or equal odor to females), 1 (light sexual odor), 2 (moderate sexual odor), and 3 (intense sexual odor). Finally, TC was measured using a centimeter-graded tape measure.

2.4. Observation of Sexual Behavior

The SB of the male goats was evaluated over one year. These activities were performed every 30 days for thirty minutes per male (0:700 to 11:00 h). The males were exposed to females with signs of estrus. SB was evaluated in males using two females, with one female from a different herd for every four males. SB evaluations were carried out with one person per male who recorded the following variables: nudging, ano-genital sniffing, flehmen, mounting attempts, mounts with intromission, and self-urination [23] (Table 1). For the estrogenization of the female goats that were used to evaluate the male SB, a short synchronization protocol described by García y González et al. [24] was used.

2.5. Food and Accommodation

Male goats were only fed the usual grass and plants that they consumed during the grazing period, in addition to products derived from agricultural activities and seasonal fruits: corn, sorghum, mango, orange, and watermelon, among others. The animals did not receive any nutritional supplementation and were housed in open pens enclosed using cyclonic mesh, wooden posts, and galvanized sheet roofs (width of 6 m, length of 14 m, and ceiling height of 3.5 m). The pens had drinking fountains supplied with clean and fresh water that were commonly washed every 3 days. Additionally, more than 100 m away from the management pens, there was a wooden pen used to expose females in estrus to males. This is where SB was evaluated.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed in a completely randomized design with a 95% confidence interval. The total number of nudging and ano-genital sniffing incidences was compared with a one-way of variance analysis (ANOVA) with repeated measurements over time (the time of the year), followed by post-hoc Bonferroni tests to compare two by two. Sexual behavior, mounting attempts, flehmen, and self-urination were compared with the Friedman test for non-parametric statistics. Subsequently, the Wilcoxon test was used to compare two by two. The data obtained from the BW and TC readings were analyzed with an ANOVA considering two factors (group × time). BC, as well as OI, were compared using a non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test. All statistical analyses were conducted using the statistical program for Windows, SYSTAT 13 [25].

3. Results

3.1. Sexual Behavior

The SB displayed by the bucks was more intense during the period from November to May (p < 0.001) when compared to the months of June to October (p > 0.180). This shows a significant difference between seasons (summer–fall vs. spring–winter) for nudging, ano-genital sniffing, mounting attempts, and self-urination (p < 0.001). The frequencies of mounts without intromission, mounts with intromission, flehmen, and vocalizations were similar in all seasons of the year (p > 0.05) (Figure 2).

3.2. Body Weight and Condition

The males’ BWs were different between seasons (summer–fall vs. spring–winter) throughout the assessed time (p < 0.001). On the other hand, body weight (BW) was lower during the months of January to August than in the months of September to December (p < 0.05). BCs were similar among the group of males throughout the year (p > 0.05). However, there was no effect recorded of the group or of the time-by-group interaction (p > 0.05) (Figure 3).

3.3. Testicular Circumference and Odor Intensity

The TCs of the males varied throughout the study, with a significant difference due to the seasonal effect (p < 0.001). In fact, a time x group interaction was found (p < 0.001). In the males, TC increased from October to December (p < 0.05). Similarly, the OI of the males varied over time (time effect; p < 0.001). In fact, an increased odor was found from October to December (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

4.1. Sexual Behavior

Previous studies indicate that male sheep and goats from temperate and subtropical regions express a marked period of sexual rest, modulated by the photoperiod, in which the following SBs decrease: nudging, ano-genital sniffing, mounting attempts, self-urination, mounting with and without intromission, flehmen, and vocalizations [3,9]. This phenomenon is observed in goats of the Mexican subtropics that show sexual rest during the months of January to May (photoperiod effect) [4]. In contrast, in the Australian subtropics, sexual rest is attributed to other modulators such as nutrition, temperature, and environmental humidity [26,27].
In the present study, the intense SB shown by the male goats from the tropic of Guerrero during the months of November to May is likely due to nutrition, since during those months, the males recovered after the rainy season when the forage availability was higher. In this regard, some authors point out that the nutritional level influences testicular mass, testosterone production, and body weight; as a consequence, SB deploys [22,27].
Consistent with these results, González-Reyna et al. [28] found a decrease in SB in male Pelibuey sheep in the Mexican tropics during the months of January to May. Contrary to this finding, some of the literature mentions that male sheep and goats from tropical regions display SB throughout the entire year [8,29]. This phenomenon is explained in male sheep and goats from tropical regions of the world where the decrease in SB is not due to the photoperiod but is rather modulated by other factors, such as nutrition, high environmental temperatures, relative humidity, and rainfall [8,14,29,30].
This is understandable since reproductive seasonality is a natural selection strategy for the survival of offspring that is justified by inclement weather in temperate regions. However, in subtropical and particularly tropical regions, the conditions are different, and this effect can be observed when some environmental factors change and directly affect the reproduction of the species. During the dry season, there is little availability of forage, high temperatures and environmental humidity, and socio-sexual relations, among other factors that modulate reproduction.

4.2. Body Weight and Condition

Some research work carried out in temperate and subtropical regions in goats shows that their BWs increase when they experience intense SB [3,31]. The present study was conducted with Boer bucks under tropical conditions, and it was found that the animals experienced increases in weight and BC during the months of the year when the availability of forage increased. This has been proven in some studies carried out in sheep and goats under similar study conditions [6,8,32].
The aforementioned result is a logical result since the increase in the weight and BC of these males was due to the fact that they were beginning the reproductive season and required body reserves that would be used during the mating season.

4.3. Testicular Circumference and Odor Intensity

In the present study, decreases in TC and OI were found in the months of October to December, indicative of low forage availability and low SB. Some studies carried out in male goats from temperate and subtropical regions show that during the period of sexual rest, SB, TC, OI, vocalizations, testosterone secretion, and sperm quality decrease [3,5]. However, in the tropics, goats decrease these variables but without considering a period of sexual rest. Instead, their intensity and quality simply decrease [22,28,33].
In the present study, TC and OI, which are directly related to sperm quality and testosterone secretion, were evaluated. Testosterone is the hormone responsible for the males having high sexual libidos and intense SB. In fact, male goats from the Mexican subtropics that were photo-stimulated during the period of sexual rest increased their TC, OI, vocalizations, sperm quality, and testosterone secretion [3,4,34,35]. In this regard, Rivas-Muñoz et al. [34] reported that the photo-stimulated goats demonstrated increased scrotal circumference and OI; this same behavior occurs in male goats treated with exogenous testosterone during sexual rest [36]. The increase in TC is due to an increase in the secretion of prolactin, which during this period, is secreted in greater quantities. In addition, OI is indicative of the secretion of testosterone and consequently the deployment of intense SB.

5. Conclusions

The present study describes for the first time the seasonal variations in the SB of bucks of the Boer breed under the tropical conditions of Guerrero. Males have a higher SB during the months of November to May, which corresponds to the summer and autumn seasons. On the other hand, TC, OI, BW and BC presented higher values during the months of September to December. These findings show that the time of year influenced these events since the TC, OI, BW and BC were higher during the months in which there is a greater availability of forage as a consequence of the rainy season. However, it does not mean that this can occur in all herds, as mentioned by Chemineau and Xandé [7], based on the SB displayed by Creole goats from the tropics of Guadalupe Island.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L.P.-C. and E.V.-F.; methodology, E.C.G.y.G.; B.C.P.-B. and M.R.-O.; software, A.M.G.-A.; validation, P.E.H.-R., F.T.-A. and O.Á.-G.; formal analysis, M.R.-O. and A.M.G.-A.; investigation, J.L.P.-C., E.C.G.y.G. and M.R.-O.; resources, J.M.R.-R.; data curation, J.d.C.R.-C. and E.V.-F.; writing—original draft preparation, J.L.P.-C., E.C.G.y.G. and E.V.-F.; writing—review and editing, J.L.P.-C., O.Á.-G. and P.E.H.-R.; visualization, F.T.-A.; supervision, B.C.P.-B. and M.P.-A.; project administration, J.L.P.-C. and E.C.G.y.G.; funding acquisition, J.L.P.-C. and E.V.-F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financed by the research group “Animal Production Systems”, UAGro.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The experimental protocol was approved by the Use and Care of the Animals in Experimentation Committee of the Universidad Autonoma de Guerrero (protocol #108).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

We have no data to publish.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to all the goat farmers in the municipality of Cuajinicuilapa, especially to the “Petaca and the Miguel Aleman Valdes neighborhood”. Likewise, thanks to all the research group “Animal Production Systems” members of the ESMVZ-3, UAGro. Finally, thank you for the collaboration between the universities UAGro, BUAP, UAAAN-UL, and UAEH and the research group.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported in this manuscript.

References

  1. Karsch, F.J.; Robinson, J.E.; Woodfill, C.J.I.; Brown, M.B. Circannual Cycles of Luteinizing Hormone and Prolactin Secretion in Ewes during Prolonged Exposure to a Fixed Photoperiod: Evidence for an Endogenous Reproductive Rhythm1. Biol. Reprod. 1989, 41, 1034–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Vidal, A.; Médigue, C.; Malpaux, B.; Clément, F. Endogenous circannual rhythm in luteinizing hormone secretion: Insight from signal analysis coupled with mathematical modelling. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 2009, 367, 4759–4777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Delgadillo, J.; Canedo, G.; Chemineau, P.; Guillaume, D.; Malpaux, B. Evidence for an annual reproductive rhythm independent of food availability in male creole goats in subtropical northern mexico. Theriogenology 1999, 52, 727–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Delgadillo, J.A.; Carrillo, E.; Morán, J.; Duarte, G.; Chemineau, P.; Malpaux, B. Induction of sexual activity of male creole goats in subtropical northern Mexico using long days and melatonin. J. Anim. Sci. 2001, 79, 2245–2252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zarazaga, L.; Gatica, M.; Celi, I.; Guzmán, J.; Malpaux, B. Artificial long days and daily contact with bucks induce ovarian but not oestrous activity during the non-breeding season in Mediterranean goat females. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2011, 125, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hart, B.L.; Jones, T. Effects of castration on sexual behavior of tropical male goats. Horm. Behav. 1975, 6, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chemineau, P.; Xandé, A. Reproductive efficiency of creole meat goats permanetly kept with males relationship to a tropical environment. Trop. Anim. Prod. 1982, 7, 98–104. Available online: https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US201302550380 (accessed on 21 November 2022).
  8. Aké-Villanueva, J.R.; Aké-López, J.R.; Magaña-Monforte, J.G.; Segura-Correa, J.C. Reproductive behavior in hair sheep rams under tropical conditions. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2019, 51, 1627–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ponce, J.; Velázquez, H.; Duarte, G.; Bedos, M.; Hernández, H.; Keller, M.; Chemineau, P.; Delgadillo, J. Reducing exposure to long days from 75 to 30 days of extra-light treatment does not decrease the capacity of male goats to stimulate ovulatory activity in seasonally anovulatory females. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2014, 48, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zarazaga, L.A.; Gatica, M.C.; Delgado-Pertíñez, M.; Hernández, H.; Guzmán, J.L.; Delgadillo, J.A. Photoperiod-Treatment in Mediterranean Bucks Can Improve the Reproductive Performance of the Male Effect Depending on the Extent of Their Seasonality. Animals 2021, 11, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gorski, R.; Gordon, J.; Shryne, J.; Southam, A. Evidence for a morphological sex difference within the medial preoptic area of the rat brain. Brain Res. 1978, 148, 333–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Iwata, E.; Wakabayashi, Y.; Kakuma, Y.; Kikusui, T.; Takeuchi, Y.; Mori, Y. Testosterone-Dependent Primer Pheromone Production in the Sebaceous Gland of Male Goat. Biol. Reprod. 2000, 62, 806–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Giriboni, J.; Lacuesta, L.; Ungerfeld, R. Continuous contact with females in estrus throughout the year enhances testicular activity and improves seminal traits of male goats. Theriogenology 2017, 8, 284–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ponce-Covarrubias, J.L.; González, E.C.G.Y.; Ramírez-Bribiesca, J.E.; Pineda-Burgos, B.C. Reproductive response of synchronized and extensively grazed Blackbelly ewes during the summer in the tropics. J. Anim. Behav. Biometeorol. 2023, 11, e2023001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rodríguez-Martínez, R.; Angel, O.; Guillén-Muñoz, J.M.; Robles-Trillo, P.A.; Santiago-Miramontes, M.D.L.A.D.; Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Mellado, M.; Véliz, F.G. Estrus induction in anestrous mixed-breed goats using the “female-to-female effect”. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2013, 45, 911–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Carrillo, E.; Meza-Herrera, C.; Olán-Sánchez, A.; Robles-Trillo, P.; Leyva, C.; Luna-Orozco, J.; Rodríguez-Martínez, R.; Véliz-Deras, F. The “female effect” positively affects the appetitive and consummatory sexual behaviour and testosterone concentrations of Alpine male goats under subtropical conditions. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 59, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Ponce, J.L.; Hernández, H.; Flores, J.A.; Keller, M.; Chemineau, P.; Delgadillo, J.A. One day of contact with photostimulated bucks is sufficient to induce ovulation in seasonally anestrous goats. Theriogenology 2015, 84, 880–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Guillén-Muñoz, J.M.; Meza-Herrera, C.; Santos-Jimenez, Z.; Rivas-Muñoz, R.; Luna-Orozco, J.R.; Mellado, M.; Véliz-Deras, F. Exposure of sexually inactive males to estrogenized females increased the investigative and consummatory sexual behavior. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2016, 173, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Delgadillo, J.A.; Espinoza-Flores, L.A.; Abecia, J.A.; Hernández, H.; Keller, M.; Chemineau, P. Sexually active male goats stimulate the endocrine and sexual activities of other males in seasonal sexual rest through the “buck-to-buck effect”. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2022, 81, 106746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. INEGI. Anuario Estadístico y Geográfico de Guerrero. 2016. Available online: http://www.diputados.gob.mx/sedia/biblio/usieg/mapas2016/gro_mapas.pdf (accessed on 2 February 2022).
  21. FASS. Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching, 3rd ed.; Federation Animal Science Society: Champaing, IL, USA, 2010; p. 177. [Google Scholar]
  22. Walkden-Brown, S.W.; Restall, B.J.; Norton, B.W.; Scaramuzzi, R.; Martin, G.B. Effect of nutrition on seasonal patterns of LH, FSH and testosterone concentration, testicular mass, sebaceous gland volume and odour in Australian cashmere goats. Reproduction 1994, 102, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Bedos, M.; Muñoz, A.L.; Orihuela, A.; Delgadillo, J.A. The sexual behavior of male goats exposed to long days is as intense as during their breeding season. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2016, 184, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ponce, J.L.; González, E.C.G.Y.; Cruz, U.M.; Reyes, L.A.; Morales, J.V.V.; Pérez, R.V.; Zúñiga, S. Parity of the Dorper sheep does not influence the reproductive and productive response when they are synchronized with an “ultra-short” protocol. Open Access J. Sci. 2018, 2, 193–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. SYSTAT 13. Product of Cranes Software International Ltd. San José, CA, USA. Available online: https://systatsoftware.com/systat/ (accessed on 20 January 2021).
  26. Pérez, R.; Forsberg, M.; Rodriguez-Martinez, H. Seasonal Variation in Live Weight, Testes Size, Testosterone, LH Secretion, Melatonin and Thyroxine in Merino and Corriedale Rams in a Subtropical Climate. Acta Vet. Scand. 1998, 39, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Delgadillo, J.; Sifuentes, P.; Flores, M.; Espinoza-Flores, L.; Andrade-Esparza, J.; Hernández, H.; Keller, M.; Chemineau, P. Nutritional supplementation improves the sexual response of bucks exposed to long days in semi-extensive management and their ability to stimulate reproduction in goats. Animal 2021, 15, 100114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gonzalez, A.; Murphy, B.; Foote, W.; Ortega, E. Circannual estrous variations and ovulation rate in Pelibuey ewes. Small Rumin. Res. 1992, 8, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Godfrey, R.W.; Collins, J.R.; Gray, M.L. Evaluation of sexual behavior of hair sheep rams in a tropical environment. J. Anim. Sci. 1998, 76, 714–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. de-Combellas, J. Comportamiento reproductivo en ovinos tropicales. Rev. Cient. Fac. 1993, 3, 135–141. Available online: https://www.produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/cientifica/article/view/14103/14083 (accessed on 21 November 2022).
  31. Delgadillo, J.; Leboeuf, B.; Chemineau, P. Decrease in the seasonality of sexual behavior and sperm production in bucks by exposure to short photoperiodic cycles. Theriogenology 1991, 36, 755–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hernández-Ruiz, P.E.; González, E.C.G.Y.; Pineda-Burgos, B.C.; Flores-López, E.; Valencia-Franco, E.; Carmona-Victoria, M.; Velázquez-Morales, J.V.; Covarrubias, J.L.P. Reproductive evaluation of bucks (Capra hircus L.) with usual management in herds from Benito Juarez, Guerrero, Mexico. Agro Prod. 2021, 14, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cárdenas-Gallegos, M.; Aké-López, J.; Centurión-Castro, F.; Magaña-Monforte, J. The Breed and Season Effects on Scrotal Circumference and Semen Characteristics of Hair Sheep Rams Under Tropical Conditions. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2012, 47, e92–e94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rivas-Muñoz, R.; Fitz-Rodríguez, G.; Poindron, P.; Malpaux, B.; Delgadillo, J.A. Stimulation of estrous behavior in grazing female goats by continuous or discontinuous exposure to males. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 85, 1257–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. González, F.; Sifuentes, L.; Ulloa-Arvizu, R.; Peiró, M.P.; Duarte, G.; Fernández, I. Group or individual housing does not reduce socio-sexual and reproductive responses in anestrous goats during the first contact with the photo-stimulated buck. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2023, 82, 106772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ángel-García, O.; Meza-Herrera, C.; Contreras-Villarreal, V.; Guillen-Muñoz, J.; Leyva, C.; Robles-Trillo, P.; Rivas-Muñoz, R.; Rodríguez-Martínez, R.; Mellado, M.; Véliz, F. Effect of different male-to-female ratios and testosterone administration upon the male sexual behavior and the out-of-season reproductive response of anestrous goats. Small Rumin. Res. 2015, 133, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The figure represents two graphs, one at the top and the other at the bottom. The “X” axis represents the months of the year in which the experiment was carried out, and the “Y” axis represents the percentages of all the variables. Graph (A) is at the top and represents rainfall (black line) and photoperiod (dotted black line). For its part, graph (B) represents the THI (black line), relative humidity (grey line), and ambient temperature (dotted gray line).
Figure 1. The figure represents two graphs, one at the top and the other at the bottom. The “X” axis represents the months of the year in which the experiment was carried out, and the “Y” axis represents the percentages of all the variables. Graph (A) is at the top and represents rainfall (black line) and photoperiod (dotted black line). For its part, graph (B) represents the THI (black line), relative humidity (grey line), and ambient temperature (dotted gray line).
Ruminants 03 00014 g001
Figure 2. Sexual behavior (SB) of male goats displayed throughout the year. The unfilled geometric figures indicate the variables with the highest SB (November to May; spring–winter) (nudging, Ruminants 03 00014 i001 ano-genital sniffing □, flehmen ◊, mounting attempts ○, mounting with intromission Ruminants 03 00014 i002, and self-urination Ruminants 03 00014 i003). On the other hand, the figures with filling indicate the variables with lower SB (June to October; summer–autumn) (nudging ▲, ano-genital sniffing ■, mounting attempts ●, and self-urination ▄). Literals a,b in the geometric figures describe a significant difference (p < 0.001).
Figure 2. Sexual behavior (SB) of male goats displayed throughout the year. The unfilled geometric figures indicate the variables with the highest SB (November to May; spring–winter) (nudging, Ruminants 03 00014 i001 ano-genital sniffing □, flehmen ◊, mounting attempts ○, mounting with intromission Ruminants 03 00014 i002, and self-urination Ruminants 03 00014 i003). On the other hand, the figures with filling indicate the variables with lower SB (June to October; summer–autumn) (nudging ▲, ano-genital sniffing ■, mounting attempts ●, and self-urination ▄). Literals a,b in the geometric figures describe a significant difference (p < 0.001).
Ruminants 03 00014 g002
Figure 3. In the upper part of the figure indicate the body weight (black circle) and in the lower part the body condition (white circle) (scale: 1–4) (months from January to August); a,b for the circle indicates a significant difference (p < 0.001). The results are presented in means ± SEM.
Figure 3. In the upper part of the figure indicate the body weight (black circle) and in the lower part the body condition (white circle) (scale: 1–4) (months from January to August); a,b for the circle indicates a significant difference (p < 0.001). The results are presented in means ± SEM.
Ruminants 03 00014 g003
Figure 4. In the upper part of the figure, testicular circumference (cm) is indicated (black boxes) and in the lower part the intensity of the odor (white boxes) (scale: 0–3) (months from October to December); a,b for the square indicates a significant difference (p < 0.001). The results are presented in mean ± SEM.
Figure 4. In the upper part of the figure, testicular circumference (cm) is indicated (black boxes) and in the lower part the intensity of the odor (white boxes) (scale: 0–3) (months from October to December); a,b for the square indicates a significant difference (p < 0.001). The results are presented in mean ± SEM.
Ruminants 03 00014 g004
Table 1. Etogram of the sexual behavior of bucks exposed to female goats artificially induced to estrus.
Table 1. Etogram of the sexual behavior of bucks exposed to female goats artificially induced to estrus.
BehaviorDescription
NudgingLateral approach of the male flexing his front leg against the female with short, staccato kicks; these may be accompanied by licks and low vocalizations.
Ano-genital sniffingSmells focalized in the perineal area of the female (>3 s).
Mounting attemptsThe male tries to jump with his front legs and upper back onto another goat. There may or may not be pelvic movements, usually interrupted by female flight.
Mounting without intromissionThe male places his front legs and upper back on another goat. Associated with pelvic movements and erection but without penetration; usually interrupted by female flight.
Mounting with intromissionThe male attaches his front legs and the upper part of the back to another goat. Known as true mounting or with service, characterized by pelvic movements and the movement known as kidney blow: when the tip of the glands makes contact with the vulvar mucosa, a strong push is accompanied by penetration and ejaculation.
FlehmenRearward tilt of the upper lip that exposes the dental ridge, usually with the head raised and the neck extended. This occurs after smelling the perineal area, his urine, or that of the female to facilitate the arrival of olfactory signals to the vomeronasal organ.
Vocalizationsthe emission of low sounds characteristic of the male during contact with the female.
Self-urinationThe male urinates on his own face, mouth, and beard as the erect penis protrudes.
The definitions were modified from those reported by Hart and Jones (1975) [6] and Bedos et al. (2016) [23].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ponce-Covarrubias, J.L.; García y González, E.C.; Pineda-Burgos, B.C.; Guevara-Arroyo, A.M.; Hernández-Ruiz, P.E.; Torres-Agatón, F.; Ruiz-Ortega, M.; Paredes-Alvarado, M.; Robles-Robles, J.M.; Rodríguez-Castillo, J.d.C.; et al. Annual Sexual Behavior in Boer Bucks Located in the Guerrero Tropics in Mexico. Ruminants 2023, 3, 149-157. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants3020014

AMA Style

Ponce-Covarrubias JL, García y González EC, Pineda-Burgos BC, Guevara-Arroyo AM, Hernández-Ruiz PE, Torres-Agatón F, Ruiz-Ortega M, Paredes-Alvarado M, Robles-Robles JM, Rodríguez-Castillo JdC, et al. Annual Sexual Behavior in Boer Bucks Located in the Guerrero Tropics in Mexico. Ruminants. 2023; 3(2):149-157. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants3020014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ponce-Covarrubias, José Luis, Ethel Caterina García y González, Blanca Celia Pineda-Burgos, Aurora Matilde Guevara-Arroyo, Pedro Enrique Hernández-Ruiz, Fernando Torres-Agatón, Maricela Ruiz-Ortega, Marisol Paredes-Alvarado, José Manuel Robles-Robles, José del Carmen Rodríguez-Castillo, and et al. 2023. "Annual Sexual Behavior in Boer Bucks Located in the Guerrero Tropics in Mexico" Ruminants 3, no. 2: 149-157. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants3020014

APA Style

Ponce-Covarrubias, J. L., García y González, E. C., Pineda-Burgos, B. C., Guevara-Arroyo, A. M., Hernández-Ruiz, P. E., Torres-Agatón, F., Ruiz-Ortega, M., Paredes-Alvarado, M., Robles-Robles, J. M., Rodríguez-Castillo, J. d. C., Ángel-García, O., & Valencia-Franco, E. (2023). Annual Sexual Behavior in Boer Bucks Located in the Guerrero Tropics in Mexico. Ruminants, 3(2), 149-157. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants3020014

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop