Comparative Effect of Fish Feeds on the Initial Growth and Survival Rate of Juvenile Redbreast Tilapia (Coptodon rendalli) under Early Hatchery Conditions
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Site
2.2. Experimental Design and Layout
2.3. Stocking of Fish
2.4. Feeding Trial Experiment
Description of the Feeds Used in the Study
2.5. Determination of Fish Growth Performance
2.6. Data Analysis and Presentation
3. Results
3.1. Growth Performance of C. rendalli by Feed Type
3.2. Growth Performance of C. rendalli by Sampling Week and Feed Type
3.3. Water Quality Parameters
4. Discussion
4.1. Water Parameters
4.2. Growth Performance of C. rendalli
4.3. Feed Conversion Ratios (FCRs)
4.4. Survival Rates
4.5. Implications for Aquaculture
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Mitra, A. Thought of Alternate Aquafeed: Conundrum in Aquaculture Sustainability? Proc. Zool. Soc. 2021, 74, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gatlin, D.M., III; Barrows, F.T.; Brown, P.; Dabrowski, K.; Gaylord, T.G.; Hardy, R.W.; Herman, E.; Hu, G.; Krogdahl, Å.; Nelson, R. Expanding the Utilization of Sustainable Plant Products in Aquafeeds: A Review. Aquac. Res. 2007, 38, 551–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jannathulla, R.; Rajaram, V.; Kalanjiam, R.; Ambasankar, K.; Muralidhar, M.; Dayal, J.S. Fishmeal Availability in the Scenarios of Climate Change: Inevitability of Fishmeal Replacement in Aquafeeds and Approaches for the Utilization of Plant Protein Sources. Aquac. Res. 2019, 50, 3493–3506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hodar, A.R.; Vasava, R.; Joshi, N.H.; Mahavadiya, D.R. Fish Meal and Fish Oil Replacement for Alternative Sources: A Review. J. Exp. Zool. India 2020, 23, 13–21. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, Y. Replacement of Fish Meal with Poultry By-Product Meal and Hydrolyzed Feather Meal in Feeds for Finfish. In Alternative Protein Sources in Aquaculture Diets; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2023; pp. 51–93. [Google Scholar]
- Oteri, M.; Di Rosa, A.R.; Lo Presti, V.; Giarratana, F.; Toscano, G.; Chiofalo, B. Black Soldier Fly Larvae Meal as Alternative to Fish Meal for Aquaculture Feed. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hecht, T.; Moehl, J.F.; Halwart, M.; Subasinghe, R.P. Regional Review on Aquaculture Development: Sub-Saharan Africa-2005; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Munguti, J.M.; Musa, S.; Orina, P.S.; Kyule, D.N.; Opiyo, M.A.; Charo-Karisa, H.; Ogello, E.O. An Overview of Current Status of Kenyan Fish Feed Industry and Feed Management Practices, Challenges and Opportunities. IJFAS 2014, 1, 128–137. [Google Scholar]
- Dubey, S.K.; Trivedi, R.K.; Chand, B.K. Culture Possibilities of Certain Brackishwater Species at Freshwater: A Climate Change Adaptation Strategy for Salinity Intrusion Prone Areas of Indian Sundarban Delta. Aquac. Stud. 2021, 22, AQUAST657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geletu, T.T.; Tang, S.; Xing, Y.; Zhao, J. Ecological Niche and Life-History Traits of Redbelly Tilapia (Coptodon Zillii, Gervais 1848) in Its Native and Introduced Ranges. Aquat. Living Resour. 2024, 37, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jere, A. Diet Overlap and Feeding Preference of Oreochromis Niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758) versus Two Native Cichlids of the Upper Kabompo River, Northwest of Zambia. Authorea Prepr. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samaddar, A. Recent Trends on Tilapia Cultivation and Its Major Socioeconomic Impact among Some Developing Nations: A Review. Asian J. Fish. Aquat. Res. 2022, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banda, R.; Musuka, C.G. Factors Attributed to Low Aquaculture Production in the Copperbelt Province of Zambia: A Case Study of Kitwe and Chingola Districts. Int. J. Res. Agric. For. 2020, 7, 20–29. [Google Scholar]
- Huntington, T.C.; Hasan, M.R. Fish as Feed Inputs for Aquaculture–Practices, Sustainability and Implications: A Global Synthesis. FAO Fish. Aquac. Technol. Pap. 2009, 518, 1–61. [Google Scholar]
- Rahman, M.H.; Alam, M.A.; Moniruzzaman, M.; Sultana, S.; Das, B.C. Effects of Different Feeding Frequencies on Growth Performance and Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) of Tilapia, Oreochromis Niloticus. Asian J. Fish. Aquat. Res. 2023, 23, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simasiku, E.; Hay, C. The Significance of the Sikunga Fish Protected Area towards Fisheries Conservation in the Zambezi River, Namibia. Afr. J. Ecol. 2023, 61, 354–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Likuwa, K.M. Colonialism and the Development of the Contract Labour System in Kavango. In Re-viewing Resistance in Namibian History; University of Namibia Press: Windhoek, Namibia, 2015; pp. 105–126. [Google Scholar]
- Strohbach, B.J. Vegetation of the Okavango River Valley in Kavango West, Namibia. Biodivers. Ecol. 2013, 5, 321–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.M.; Hoa, N.; Sorgeloos, P. Handbook for Artemia Pond Culture in Bangladesh (Bangla Version); WorldFish: Penang, Malaysia, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Kikamba, E.; Kang’ombe, J. Growth Performance of Red Breasted Tilapia (Coptodon Rendalli) Fed Maize Bran and Amaranthus Hybridus Leaves under Pond Culture. Mediterr. Aquac. J. 2022, 9, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoseinifar, S.H.; Zou, H.K.; Van Doan, H.; Harikrishnan, R.; Yousefi, M.; Paknejad, H.; Ahmadifar, E. Dissolved Oxygen Level and Stocking Density Effects on Growth, Feed Utilization, Physiology, and Innate Immunity of Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis Niloticus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019, 94, 705–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gingerich, A.J.; Cooke, S.J.; Hanson, K.C.; Donaldson, M.R.; Hasler, C.T.; Suski, C.D.; Arlinghaus, R. Evaluation of the Interactive Effects of Air Exposure Duration and Water Temperature on the Condition and Survival of Angled and Released Fish. Fish. Res. 2007, 86, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Parameters | Egg Yolk | Artemia | Commercial Pellets |
---|---|---|---|
Energy (KJ) | 616 | 23.5 | 16 |
Protein (%) | 16 | 23 | 48 |
Carbohydrates (%) | 1 | 0.4 | 6 |
Total Fat (%) | 8 | 0.3 | 6 |
Sodium (%) | 3 | 21 | 11 |
Parameters | Egg Yolk | Artemia | Commercial Pellets | p-Values |
---|---|---|---|---|
Initial weight (g) | 0.037 ± 0.003 a | 0.037 ± 0.003 a | 0.037 ± 0.003 a | 0.991 |
Specific growth rate (%) | 0.941 ± 0.129 b | 0.327 ± 0.049 a | 1.394 ± 0.215 c | <0.001 |
Final weight (g) | 0.301 ± 0.037 b | 0.128 ± 0.014 a | 0.427 ± 0.059 c | <0.001 |
Total weight gain (g) | 0.264 ± 0.036 b | 0.092 ± 0.014 a | 0.390 ± 0.060 c | <0.001 |
Relative weight gain (g) | 0.072 ± 0.005 b | 0.045 ± 0.005 a | 0.086 ± 0.006 b | <0.001 |
Food conversion ratio (FCR) | 0.20 ± 0.05 a | 0.26 ± 0.07 a | 0.22 ± 0.04 a | 0.567 |
Survival (%) | 70.47 ± 40.69 a | 33 ± 19.05 b | 76.19 ± 43.099 a | 0.02 |
Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Source of Variation | DF | Average Length (mm) | Average Weight (g) | Average Length (mm) | Average Weight (g) | Average Length (mm) | Average Weight (g) | Average Length (mm) | Average Weight (g) |
Feeds | 2 | 18.72 ** | 0.004 ** | 40.880 ** | 0.021 ** | 47.567 *** | 0.043 *** | 0.136 ** | 120.596 ** |
Error | 6 | 7.65 | 0.001 | 16.080 | 0.008 | 28.613 | 0.015 | 0.064 | 38.267 |
Total | 8 | 26.38 | 0.005 | 56.960 | 0.0290 | 76.16 | 0.058 | 0.200 | 158.862 |
p-value | 0.024 | 0.011 | 0.023 | 0.24 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.014 | 0.033 |
Fish Feeds | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Artemia | 0.04 b | 0.06 b | 0.09 b | 0.13 b |
Powder 48% CP | 0.08 a | 0.17 a | 0.24 a | 0.43 a |
Egg yolk | 0.08 a | 0.12 ab | 0.14 b | 0.30 ab |
Parameter | Egg Yolk | Brine Shrimp | Powder 48% Crude Protein |
---|---|---|---|
Temperature (°C) | 28.14 ± 0.03 | 28.01 ± 0.01 | 28.11 ± 0.02 |
DO (mg/L) | 8.59 ± 0.05 | 8.29 ± 0.02 | 8.08 ± 0.03 |
pH | 7.45 ± 0.01 | 7.36 ± 0.01 | 7.38 ± 0.00 |
Ammonia (NH3,/mg/L) | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.01 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Simasiku, E.K.; Hove, K.; Kanyeme, M.N.; Awala, S.K.; Matengu, K.K.; Iita, T.I. Comparative Effect of Fish Feeds on the Initial Growth and Survival Rate of Juvenile Redbreast Tilapia (Coptodon rendalli) under Early Hatchery Conditions. Aquac. J. 2024, 4, 180-191. https://doi.org/10.3390/aquacj4030013
Simasiku EK, Hove K, Kanyeme MN, Awala SK, Matengu KK, Iita TI. Comparative Effect of Fish Feeds on the Initial Growth and Survival Rate of Juvenile Redbreast Tilapia (Coptodon rendalli) under Early Hatchery Conditions. Aquaculture Journal. 2024; 4(3):180-191. https://doi.org/10.3390/aquacj4030013
Chicago/Turabian StyleSimasiku, Evans Kamwi, Kudakwashe Hove, Margaret Ndatoolewe Kanyeme, Simon Kamwele Awala, Kenneth Kamwi Matengu, and Titus Iipinge Iita. 2024. "Comparative Effect of Fish Feeds on the Initial Growth and Survival Rate of Juvenile Redbreast Tilapia (Coptodon rendalli) under Early Hatchery Conditions" Aquaculture Journal 4, no. 3: 180-191. https://doi.org/10.3390/aquacj4030013
APA StyleSimasiku, E. K., Hove, K., Kanyeme, M. N., Awala, S. K., Matengu, K. K., & Iita, T. I. (2024). Comparative Effect of Fish Feeds on the Initial Growth and Survival Rate of Juvenile Redbreast Tilapia (Coptodon rendalli) under Early Hatchery Conditions. Aquaculture Journal, 4(3), 180-191. https://doi.org/10.3390/aquacj4030013