Previous Article in Journal
Awareness and Perception of Hepatitis C Self-Testing in Nigeria: A National Survey of Stakeholders and the Public
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Arg753Gln Polymorphisms in Toll-like Receptor 2 in a Syphilis-Infected and Control Population in The Netherlands: Can Differences in the Number of Self-Reported Sexual Contacts Indicate Protection against Syphilis?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Unravelling the Biological Interplay Between Genital HPV Infection and Cervicovaginal Microbiota in Sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for Cervical (Pre)cancer Prevention

by
Harris Onywera
1,2,3,4,*,
Zizipho Z. A. Mbulawa
5,6,7,
Adrian Brink
1,2,
Anna-Lise Williamson
1,8 and
Lamech M. Mwapagha
9,*
1
Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7925, South Africa
2
Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7925, South Africa
3
Research, Innovations, and Academics Unit, Tunacare Services Health Providers Limited, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
4
Centre for Research in Infectious Diseases, College of Graduate Studies and Research, Mount Kenya University, P.O. Box 342, Thika 01000, Kenya
5
SAMRC/UCT Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7925, South Africa
6
National Health Laboratory Service, Nelson Mandela Academic Hospital, Mthatha 5100, South Africa
7
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha 5100, South Africa
8
Division of Medical Virology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7925, South Africa
9
Department of Biology, Chemistry and Physics, Faculty of Health, Natural Resources and Applied Sciences, Namibia University of Science and Technology, 13 Jackson Kaujeua Street, Windhoek Private Bag 13388, Namibia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Venereology 2024, 3(4), 211-231; https://doi.org/10.3390/venereology3040017
Submission received: 25 June 2024 / Revised: 29 October 2024 / Accepted: 1 November 2024 / Published: 14 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exclusive Papers of the Editorial Board Members of Venereology)

Abstract

:
Cervical cancer is more common in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) compared to developed countries, with persistent genital high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) infection identified as the cause. However, other factors contributing to this gap remain unclear. This review explores the potential role of cervicovaginal microbiota (CVM) in genital HPV infection and cervical cancer development among women in SSA. Many women of African descent, including those from SSA, lack lactobacilli dominance in their CVM, which is considered a biomarker of cervicovaginal health. Published literature has associated Lactobacillus-dominated CVM with a lower risk of HPV infection and cervical cancer. The converse is true for women with high diversity non-Lactobacillus-dominated CVM and bacterial vaginosis, the most common form of vaginal disorder. However, findings on the relationship between specific bacterial abundance and cervical disease severity are inconsistent and inconclusive due to differences in study design, study population, sampling, and potential confounders. Thus, there is a need to form consensus to advance research on CVM and HPV-associated cervical disease. Despite the exact mechanisms by which CVM influence HR-HPV persistence and cervical carcinogenesis being unknown, the backbone of the mechanisms appears to be mediated in part by the following: cervicovaginal dysbiosis, elevated vaginal pH, high ratio of L-to-D-lactic acid, cohesive biofilm formation, chronic inflammation, and immune dysregulation. Consequently, these promote cellular proliferation, genetic instability, and evasion of immune surveillance. This review calls for larger, prospective studies to unravel causal links, identify protective features, and integrate CVM interventions into HPV and cervical cancer prevention strategies in SSA.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Genital HPV infection and cervical cancer cases are more widespread in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) than in developed countries [1] (Supplementary Table S1—list of geographic regions and in SSA). The estimated age-standardized incidence and mortality rates of cervical cancer in SSA are 33.4 and 22.6 per 100,000 women annually, respectively, two-to-three times higher than the global averages of 14.1 and 7.1 per 100,000 women [2]. Globally, HPV infection peaks in adolescents and young adults (<25 years), then declines. In Africa, a second peak occurs in older women (≥45 years) [1] for reasons not fully understood, including immunosenescence of aging (i.e., waning immunity) [3] that may lead to the reactivation of latent HPV infections acquired earlier in life [4]. As observed worldwide, HPV 16 and 18 are the most prevalent genotypes in cancer. However, HPV-35, a high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) genotype, is common among Sub-Saharan women [5,6] and has been detected in approximately 2% of invasive cervical cancers globally, and up to 10% in SSA [7]. Although numerous studies attribute the high HPV and cervical cancer burden to poor cervical screening programs [8], low HPV vaccine coverage [9,10], demographic, sociobehavioural, clinical, and host genetic factors [11,12,13,14,15], they do not sufficiently explain why women in SSA are more predisposed to genital HPV infection and cervical cancer compared to those in developed countries. Persistent infection with genital HR-HPV is necessary, albeit not sufficient, for the progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) to cervical cancer. Other poorly understood factors, including but not limited to cervicovaginal microbiota (CVM), may at least partly account for the underlying disparities in HPV infection and cervical cancer burden in women in SSA and developed countries [14,16,17].
A large cross-sectional CVM study conducted among 396 asymptomatic reproductive-age North American women from white, black (synonymous with African ancestry), Hispanic, and Asian ethnicities observed that CVM clustered into five groups, known as community state types (CSTs): CST I to V. Of these, four were dominated by Lactobacillus species (CST I: L. crispatus, CST II: L. gasseri, CST III: L. iners, and CST V: L. jensenii) [18], which are considered the sine qua non of a healthy CVM [19], although not always [20]. The women had different prevalence of Lactobacillus-dominated CVM: white (89.7%), Asian (80.2%), Hispanic (61.9%), and black women (59.6%). The other CST (CST IV) lacked appreciable numbers of lactobacilli and had higher proportions of strictly anaerobic bacteria that have been associated with bacterial vaginosis (BV) [18], a polymicrobial vaginal disorder that is globally high—ranging from 23% to 29% across continents [21]. The study on North American women also found that CST IV was significantly associated with BV and was more common in black women than in white and Asian women [18]. It is important to note that, while the CVM is generally described as a distinct ecosystem, it exists along a continuum of microbial states. Studies on healthy women have observed that many CVM fall between the established CSTs [22] and can transition between different CSTs [23], indicating that the CVM operates along a continuum [22,24].
L. iners-dominated CVM, non-Lactobacillus-dominated CVM, and a wide range of BV-associated bacteria are often the most prevalent in women of African ancestry [18,25,26,27], including in SSA [25,26,28], with 38% to 83% of women in SSA found to have CVM dominated by L. iners [29,30,31,32], which is assumed to be the least protective among the key Lactobacillus spp. [19,28]. This contrasts with the observation in healthy white women (<45%), where L. crispatus is often the most predominant Lactobacillus spp. [18,25,33,34]. Non-Lactobacillus-dominated CVM is common among women of African ancestry, with studies on cohorts from SSA reporting a prevalence of between 23% and 64% [17,27,29,31,35]. Relatively recent published data suggest that non-Lactobacillus-dominated CVM (CST IV) may not be the norm in women of African ancestry since a high proportion of African American women were found to have Lactobacillus-dominated CVM [24]. Among women of non-African descent, particularly white women, this prevalence rarely reaches 40% [18]. While CVM varies with ethnicity [18,24,33,34], geographical location [36], and other factors [37], the CVM is not exclusive to any particular ethnic group [24]. The presence of non-Lactobacillus-dominated CVM may indicate abnormal, transitioning, or variant states of health. These CVM compositions could reflect shifts in the cervicovaginal environment, potentially associated with changes in microbial diversity or imbalances that may affect health outcomes. It is believed that the high prevalence of CVM dominated by non-Lactobacillus spp. and L. iners among women of African ancestry may partly account for the high burden of BV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in this population [27,28,35,38].
Current knowledge suggests a potential causal role of CVM and BV in HPV-associated infections, including cervical (pre)cancer. The present discussion examines studies on genital BV, CVM, and HPV-associated cervical diseases in SSA women, comparing findings with those from other regions. It builds on our previous work [17]. In cases where SSA women are not directly studied, insights are drawn from literature involving women from other regions to speculate the scenario in SSA. The underscored knowledge may guide leveraging the translational potential of CVM in preventing HPV infection and associated diseases among women in SSA.

1.1. Antagonistic Mechanisms Used by Lactobacilli to Interfere with Pathogens

Lactobacilli, as part of the commensal CVM, employ several direct and indirect physiological mechanisms to interfere with pathogens [19,39]. Although some of these mechanisms are still poorly defined, they rely on metabolites produced by lactobacilli or lactobacilli interactions. In brief, the mechanisms relying on metabolites produced by lactobacilli include the following:
  • Production of L- and D-lactic acid, which maintains an acidic environment (pH ≤ 4) that inhibits the growth of uropathogens, including Escherichia coli, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Chlamydia trachomatis [19,39]. Lactic acid production in the cervicovaginal milieu is species-dependent, with most Lactobacillus spp. able to produce both isoforms. However, L. iners exclusively produces the L-isomer [39]. The biocidal action of lactic acid depends on its ability, or that of its released hydrogen ions [19,39], to modify surface proteins and penetrate membranes, leading to cytosol acidification or disruption of microbial metabolism. Lactic acid can regulate host immune responses and trigger autophagy. The D-lactate isoform plays a role in maintaining tissue integrity [39].
  • Peroxidase system: Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), produced by lactobacilli and released in the cervicovaginal environment, exerts biocidal effects by crossing microbial membranes and acting as an oxidant in the cytosol. In vivo, H2O2 reacts with ferrous ions to generate hydroxyl radicals, which oxidize nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids, causing mutagenic and cytotoxic effects in microorganisms lacking H2O2-degrading enzymes like peroxidase or catalase (e.g., Prevotella, Gardnerella) [39].
  • Bacteriocins (e.g., class II bacteriocins) and bacteriocin-like molecules produced by cervicovaginal lactobacilli can inhibit growth can inhibit the growth or biofilm formation of pathogens such as Gardnerella vaginalis and Enterococcus faecalis [19,39].
  • Bacteriophages in Lactobacillus contribute to genome plasticity, modulate microbial interactions, and influence cervicovaginal microbiome homeostasis through lysogenic and lytic cycles, prophage integration, and mobile genetic elements [39].
  • Production of biosurfactants, exopolysaccharides, and extracellular vesicles, which protect against pathogens by inhibiting biofilm formation, altering cell membrane permeability, and causing cell death. Biosurfactants modulate surface chemistry to prevent pathogen attachment [39].
Mechanisms relying on lactobacilli interactions include the following:
  • Lactobacilli interfere with microbial adhesion by displaying surface structures (adhesins), which mediate interactions with the host and other microorganisms. These multifunctional proteins enable co-aggregation with pathogens, masking their surface molecules and preventing receptor recognition on host epithelium [19,39].
  • Many lactobacilli are thought to have a higher affinity for epithelial surface receptors compared to pathogenic microorganisms and can competitively exclude pathogens through steric hindrance. As a result, they prevent the attachment of pathogens to host epithelium, as well as colonization and invasion [39].
  • Another competitive mechanism between lactobacilli and pathogens involves niche filtering and/or competition for growth nutrients. High glucose consumption and depletion by L. crispatus strains reduce C. trachomatis cellular infection. Glucose fermentation produces antimicrobial organic acids like lactic acid [39].
  • Host-defense mechanisms are stimulated through species-specific modulation (immunomodulatory activity): Lactobacilli modulate immune homeostasis. They induce the production of chemokines and cytokines, which can clear and prevent infections [19,39].

1.2. Link Between BV and Genital HPV Infections and CIN

Limited research has focused on the understanding of the link between BV and HPV infections and cervical (pre)cancer. Information on the association between BV and HPV infections among women in SSA is scarce. A meta-analysis of 12 published articles involving 6372 women aged 13–69 years found that prevalent BV was linked to uterine cervical HPV infection (overall estimated odds ratio (OR), 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11–1.84), though none of the studies were from SSA [40]. In two separate large cohort longitudinal studies, BV was associated with persistent cervical HPV among Finnish women (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.13–4.08) [41] and delayed clearance of HPV and HR-HPV infection among Chinese women [42]. In the HIV Epidemiology Research Study of U.S. women aged 15–56 years, preceding or current BV was associated with prevalent HPV (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04–1.26), incident HPV (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.04–1.47), and delayed clearance of HPV infection (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72–0.97) [43]. However, a case-crossover analysis examining an alternate model for the outcome of incident BV showed that incident BV was associated with incident (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.12–1.90) but not preceding HPV infection (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.80–1.37) [43]. A time-lag analysis of the detectability of HPV DNA and clinical diagnosis of BV suggests that HPV infection may precede or occur simultaneously with BV [44]. BV has been associated with increased and specific HPV genotypes [6,45], such as HPV-58 (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.0–5.2), according to a study on 616 female sex workers (FSWs) aged 18–61 years in Western Kenya [45]. Nevertheless, some investigations found no significant association of BV with HPV [45,46,47] and HR-HPV [6].
The association between BV and CIN remains contentious. A study involving 280 Dutch women aged 20–66 years with uterine cervix cytological abnormalities found that BV did not affect CIN severity [47]. Similarly, a South Korean cohort study found a significant correlation of BV with CIN, albeit not significant in multivariate analyses [46]. A systematic review and meta-analysis of over 20,000 women aged 13–78 years from different countries (including South Africa), representing different races/ethnicities, showed that women with BV were significantly more likely to have CIN/SIL (squamous intraepithelial lesion) than women without BV (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.24–1.83) [48]. Interestingly, the South Korean cohort study noted that BV, with or without HPV infection, did not influence the incidence of CIN, irrespective of the severity [46]. Further research is needed to clarify the relationship between BV and HPV infections, particularly among SSA women, and its implications for cervical disease-prevention strategies.
Due to the high burden of BV, HPV, and cervical cancer in SSA, investigating their potential relationship with the incidence and severity of CIN among SSA women is essential. While BV may influence HPV persistence, its role in the progression of cervical disease remains unclear and warrants further research. Conducting such a study on the SSA population is essential because of the observation that being black, although not a deterministic factor [49], is strongly associated with high vaginal pH (>4.5) [50], which has been strongly correlated with BV [18] and the detectability of HPV infection (including multiple types) at times [44,51]. Contrastingly, a previous study found no relationship between vaginal HPV detectability and vaginal pH [44]. Increased vaginal pH has been correlated with CIN severity [52].
A hallmark of BV is believed to be the presence of vaginal biofilm, an assemblage of microbial cells adhered to a surface and encapsulated in a self-produced matrix of extracellular polymeric substances [53]. There are two forms of biofilm, dispersed (planktonic) and cohesive, with the former being highly prevalent and sexually transmitted [54]. Biofilm formation has been associated with HPV and HR-HPV infections [55]. Bacterial biofilms provide a persistent and resilient milieu for opportunistic and pathogenic bacteria, thereby adeptly evading detection by the immune system and contributing to the development of chronic inflammatory diseases [56]. Thus, specific bacterial taxa in the biofilms might explain why BV is associated with increased inflammation [6]. BV may promote HPV infection by resulting in the loss of both the protective cervicovaginal lactobacilli and mucosa barrier integrity. This may, in turn, facilitate adherence, invasion, and integration of HPV oncogenes into the genome of epithelial cells of the cervical transformation zone [40]. Both BV and HR-HPV may impact the metagenome functional content of CVM [57]. It has been suggested that BV may facilitate HPV acquisition or reactivation by altering immunological balance within the cervical tissue [40]. Specific metabolic signatures such as elevated levels of the signalling eicosanoid 12-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (12-HETE), a biomarker for inflammation, have been documented in women with BV [58]. Thus, understanding these interactions could elucidate mechanisms underlying HPV infection and CIN progression in SSA women.

1.3. Association of Cervicovaginal Bacteria and CSTs with Genital HPV Infections

Limited progress has been made in understanding the relationship of cervicovaginal bacteria and CSTs with genital HPV infections among women in SSA. Studies in Rwanda and Nigeria revealed associations between CSTs and HPV detection [35,59]. In Rwanda, FSWs with CST I had the lowest HPV prevalence (9.1%), including HR-HPV types (0.0%) [35], while in Nigeria, CST IV-B (characterized by the absence of Lactobacillus dominance and colonization with Fannyhessea vaginae (previously known as Atopobium vaginae [60]), Prevotella spp., and G. vaginalis) was linked to high HPV prevalence [35]. In cohorts from non-SSA, CST I, CST II, and, sometimes, CST III have been associated with reduced prevalent HPV and HR-HPV infection compared to CST IV [61,62,63]. A longitudinal study in the U.S. that comprised 50% African American women observed that women with CST IV and CST III had higher frequencies of HPV infection (71% and 72%, respectively) compared with CST I (45%) and CST II (12%) [61]. Further, there was a trend towards HPV positivity in samples from women in CST IV-B and CST III relative to CST II [61]. The study showed that there was a trend of an increased risk of transitioning to HPV positivity in women with CST IV-A (low Lactobacillus CVM with several anaerobes, including Prevotella spp., Fannyhessea spp., Anaerococcus spp., and Streptococcus spp.) compared to CST I [61]. In terms of rates of HPV remission (HPV positive to no detection), CST II, in particular, was associated with more rapid remission of HPV compared to CST III and CST IV-B [61]. The studies presented here suggest that CST IV and, to a lesser extent, CST III may not be protective against HPV infection. L. iners, assumed to have clonal variants [64], is considered the least protective of the common Lactobacillus spp. [19]. Other organisms, including Candida albicans, C. trachomatis, and Ureaplasma urealyticum, have been shown to influence the transformation of HPV lesions. Diversity increases of CVM also amplify inflammatory response and immune dysregulation through cytokine production, creating the local premises for tumour development [65].
Studies assessing the impact of HPV on microbial diversity, and vice versa, have yielded conflicting findings. A study conducted on a Nigerian cohort used weighted UniFrac distances to assess beta diversity and found that the CVM diversity differed between women with and without HR-HPV infection, but this distinction was observed only in women not infected with HIV infection [59]. HIV infection may impact CVM. While some studies have found no significant impact of HIV on alpha and beta diversity [66], others have reported contradictory results [67]. The latter observation could, therefore, be one of the reasons why the effect of HPV infection on CVM is lost when only HIV-infected women are considered. Additionally, conflicting findings exist regarding the effect of HPV on alpha [29,30,35,67,68] and beta diversity of CVM among women in SSA [29,30,59,67,68]. These discrepancies may stem from differences in study design, study population (e.g., Ethiopian South African, Tanzanian, and Rwandan, and whether they are healthy or diseased), sampling (cervical, vaginal, and cervicovaginal lavage), 16S rRNA hypervariable region (e.g., V4, V3-V4), methods/techniques used to study CVM (Ion Torrent PGM, Illumina MiSeq, and Microarray), bioinformatic-analysis tools (e.g., QIIME, QIIME2/DADA2), and potential confounders, such as menopausal status and host genetic background. It has been shown that CVM profiles can be influenced by several technical factors, including the choice of primers and the targeted 16S rRNA gene region, the sequencing platform, sequencing quality, and bioinformatic tools used [69,70,71]. Controversies exist regarding whether the microbial diversity and composition across various cervicovaginal sites (vaginal introitus, mid-vagina, lateral vaginal wall, posterior fornix, ectocervix, and endocervix) are homogeneous (highly concordant) [72,73] or heterogeneous [32,74]. Despite the debate, some investigators still sample the vagina when studying infections and diseases in the cervical or cervicovaginal milieu, or the cervix when focusing on infections and diseases vaginal or cervicovaginal milieu. Together, these factors highlight the importance of methodological consistency and careful consideration of technical variables when interpreting CVM data from microbiome studies.
Studies on women from SSA with and without HPV infection reveal heterogeneity in differentially abundant bacteria. Among Nigerian women with and without HIV infection, a higher relative abundance of L. iners and lower relative abundances of several BV-associated bacteria, including Prevotella spp., Sneathia spp., and Dialister spp., were strongly associated with HPV infection [59]. BV-associated bacteria have been correlated with prevalent HPV among Ethiopian adults [68] and asymptomatic South African adolescents [6]. Among Tanzanian women with and without HIV infection, higher relative abundances (at least 10-fold increase) of Bacteriodetes and Fusobacteria and lower relative abundance of Actinobacteria were associated with HPV infection [67]. The latter finding is in disagreement with a study on a South African cohort study [30]. However, the association of Fusobacteria with HPV infection aligns with previous reports [30,63]. In the South African study, the CVM of women with HR-HPV infection was enriched with G. vaginalis, Sneathia sp., F. vaginae, Aerococcus, and Pseudomonas veronii [30]. Notably, the observation of Sneathia sp. is consistent with findings on Italian [75], South Korean [63], Nigerian [59], and Chinese cohorts [76]. It is worth pointing out that higher relative abundances of genus Fannyhessea were strongly linked with HPV persistence [75]. These findings underscore the complexity of CVM composition in the natural history of HPV infection and highlight potential biomarkers for HPV infection.
Several studies involving women from non-SAA have linked higher abundances of specific or all common cervicovaginal lactobacilli with lower prevalent HPV infection [62,63,77,78], including HPV-16 [79]. A study on a North American cohort prospectively assessing the relationship between CVM and HPV infection, while controlling for immune status, found that among the Lactobacillus spp. (L. crispatus, L. gasseri, L. iners, and L. jensenii), only the relative abundance of L. crispatus was significantly associated with decreased HPV or oncogenic HPV detection after adjustment for multiple covariates, including vaginal pH [62]. Furthermore, this study on the North American cohort found no association of relative abundance of Lactobacillus spp. as a group with prevalent HPV [62], as opposed to a South Korean twin cohort cross-sectional study [63]. Interestingly, a prospective study on 59 African/Caribbean women in Canada associated both low bacterial load and abundances of L. gasseri with prevalent HPV [77]. Additionally, an abundance of L. iners has been associated with the clearance of HR-HPV infection among Costa Rican women [80].
The role of CVM in the natural history of HPV infection, including among women from SSA, remains unclear. However, several mechanisms have been speculated [81]. Cervicovaginal lactobacilli may play a protective role against HPV infection via antagonistic mechanisms, primarily by maintaining a low acidic milieu attributed to lactic acid production [82]. Relative abundances of Lactobacillus spp., including L. crispatus, have been inversely correlated with vaginal pH [62], which may also be important in HPV pathogenesis. Reduced risk of HPV detection has been associated with a vaginal pH of <5.0 [51], due to the susceptibility of the HPVE5 oncoprotein to acidic pH [83] as proposed in a previous review [81]. This reduces and/or obliterates the viral propagation in the host epithelia. Among the individual Lactobacillus spp., the relative abundance of L. crispatus has been found to exhibit the highest correlation with acidic pH, followed by L. jensenii, L. gasseri, and L. iners [62]. Also, Lactobacillus spp. vary in their ability to produce H2O2, with L. iners and L. gasseri typically being very low H2O2 producers compared to L. crispatus and L. jensenii [84,85,86]. Lactobacilli-derived H2O2 may be protective against BV [84,85,87]. While H2O2-producing lactobacilli may exhibit antibacterial, antiviral, and antitumoral properties [88,89,90], their presence may not consistently affect cervical neoplasia or HR-HPV positivity [91]. Differences in Lactobacillus spp. may, therefore, explain the differing effects on the natural history of HPV infections among women with Lactobacillus-dominated CVM [61]. Nonetheless, the lack of CVMs with Lactobacillus dominance among women in SSA may partly clarify why these women have an increased risk for HPV infection.
In addition to low vaginal pH, lactobacilli such as L. crispatus may use other biological mechanisms, such as the isoform of lactic acid to foil the detection of HPV infection [62]. D- and L-isoforms of lactic acid possess antiviral activity [92,93]. However, high ratios of L-to-D-lactic acid, as evident in L. iners-dominated CVM [92,94], may predispose women to BV and cause loss of cervical integrity [94], which can allow HPV particles to enter and infect the basal cells [95]. Differences in prevalence, persistence, and remission of HPV may further be pointed to the immunological responses [77], temporal changes of the cervicovaginal milieus, stability of the CSTs [61], and altered metabolic pathways of the CVM [79]. Specific inflammatory mediators (chemokines, cytokines, and growth factors) have been correlated with HPV and HR-HPV infection [96], although this association may be lost after adjusting for BV status [6]. Elevated levels of interferon gamma-induced protein 10 (IP-10) and monokine induced by gamma interferon (MIG) have been associated with prevalent HPV, while increased cervical Langerhans cells, involved in HIV acquisition, have been linked to HPV clearance [77]. Women with HPV-16 have shown depleted metabolic pathways, such as replication and repair [79].

1.4. Association of Cervicovaginal Bacteria and CSTs with HPV-Associated Cervical (Pre)cancer

There is a scarcity of studies on the relationship between CVM composition and diversity and HPV-associated cervical (pre)cancer in women in SSA. A small cohort prospective study performed by Sims et al. [66] that included 21 and 10 Batswana women with cervical dysplasia (CIN2+) and cervical cancer, correspondingly, with and without HIV infection, noted that the prevalence of Lactobacillus-dominated CVM was significantly lower in women with cervical cancer (10%) compared to those with CIN2+ (29%). Similarly, a study by Klein et al. [67] involving 144 Tanzanian women (with an average age of 37 years) with precancerous lesions found that high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) samples considerably lacked Lactobacillus dominance observed in samples negative for intraepithelial lesions or malignancy (NILM). Moreover, a lower relative abundance of Lactobacillus spp. was recently noted among 120 adult Ethiopian women with adenocarcinoma (cervical cancer) compared to women with and without premalignant dysplasia (atypical squamous cells with undetermined significance [ASCUS]/NILM, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [LSIL]/CIN1/2+, and HSIL/CIN3) [68].
The aforementioned findings indicate an inverse relationship between lactobacilli dominance and HPV pathogenesis. Moreover, this may be true since the findings of a cross-sectional study on 169 UK women (aged 18–45 years) observed a decreasing prevalence of CST I with increasing disease severity (CST I prevalence: 50% in normal, 42% in LSIL, 40% in HSIL, and 20% in invasive cervical cancer), while CST IV prevalence increased significantly in women with LSIL (21%), HSIL (27%), and invasive cervical cancer (40%) compared to disease-free healthy controls [97]. Although a study on 151 Nigerian women (median age: 52 years) found a null association between CST and cervical pathology, it associated HR-HPV infection in CST III and CST IV with HSIL and cervical cancer [16]. Likewise, a large study of HR-HPV-positive North American women aged 19–50 years associated CVM dominated by L. iners and an unclassified Lactobacillus with CIN2+ [98]. However, caution should be taken when interpreting this result since there was no association between CIN2+ and L. iners sequence reads when examined independently [98]. A small cohort study on Ethiopian women found that L. iners was enriched in women with dysplasia (CIN1/2/3) [68]. Despite this, it may be acknowledged that accumulating literature suggests that loss of abundances of lactobacilli or shift of Lactobacillus-dominated CVM (particularly CST I) to non-Lactobacillus-dominated CVM (such as CST VI) could, therefore, be a cofactor in the development of cervical disease.
Sims et al. [66] further noted significant compositional and diversity disparities among Batswana women with cervical dysplasia and cancer, with higher alpha diversity (measured using the Shannon diversity index) in women with cancer relative to those with CIN2+. This observation augments a UK study that associated increasing CVM diversity with CIN severity, irrespective of HPV status [97]. Klein et al. [67] observed a higher alpha diversity in the CVM of HIV-positive women with HSIL versus those without cervical lesions (NILM). Similarly, increased diversity has been associated with progression to CIN2+ among Costa Rican women [80]. A pilot study on a Mexican cohort found higher microbial diversity among HPV-positive women with SIL and cervical cancer compared to HPV-negative women without lesions [99]. Sims et al. [66] further noted that the beta diversity of Batswana women with cervical dysplasia was significantly different from that of women with cervical cancer. Similar findings of alpha and beta diversities have been reported in other African cohorts with and without cervical cancer [68]. Nevertheless, Klein et al. [67] reported CVM differences based on cervical cytology among HIV-positive Tanzanian women. There are still conflicting reports on the association between CVM and CIN severity, with null association being observed by other investigators [98]. In as much as inconsistencies and conflicting results could be attributed to differences in study methodologies and a lack of adjusting for some confounding factors, such results could be an indication that other factors are involved in the aetiology of cervical disease.
Machine-learning algorithms have been instrumental in identifying differentially abundant bacteria in Sub-Saharan women with cervical (pre)cancer. Serving as examples, genus Lachnospira (in class Clostridia) and several taxa in phylum Proteobacteria (Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and Burkholderiaceae) have been found to be enriched in Batswana women with cervical dysplasia and cervical cancer, respectively [66]. High relative abundances of Porphyromonas somerae, Porphyromonas asaccharolytica, Prevotella timonensis, and an uncultured bacterium have been associated with cervical cancer among Ethiopian women [68]. In the study by Klein et al. [67] on the Tanzanian cohort, the average relative abundance of Firmicutes was found to be lower in HIV-positive women compared to HIV-negative women (4.2% versus 44.4%) and varied by cervical cytology, though with no obvious pattern [67]. However, in HIV-positive women, the average relative abundance of Firmicutes decreased in women with cervical lesions (from 55.8% to between 35.2% and 43.8%) [67]. Tenericutes, including order Mycoplasmatales (genera Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma), exhibited a clear increase in the relative abundance with increasing severity of lesions in both HIV-negative and positive women [67]. Mycoplasmatales, Mollicutes, and Tenericutes were found to be more abundant in HSIL versus NILM cervices, including in age-matched HIV-positive women [67]. Since abundances Mycoplasma displayed the strongest positive linear relationship with the severity of lesions in both HIV-negative and positive women, Klein et al. [67] posited that Mycoplasma could result in a CVM type that promotes HPV-associated cervical lesions.
Studies on women from various regions globally, akin to those on SSA women, have yielded varied results on the association between the abundance of bacteria and different stages of HPV-associated cervical (pre)cancer. In a South Korean case-control study, women with a predominance of G. vaginalis and F. vaginae, in tandem with a high L. iners/L. crispatus ratio, were more likely to have CIN [78]. Higher relative abundances G. vaginalis have been strongly correlated with progression to CIN2+ [80]. A synergistic effect between BV-associated bacteria, particularly F. vaginae, and HR-HPV has been associated with an increased risk of CIN [78]. In agreement with this, high abundances of G. vaginalis and F. vaginae have been linked to SIL outcomes among Dutch women [100]. Among women from the UK with HSIL, lower relative abundances of L. jensenii and L. coleohominis and higher relative abundances of Sneathia sanguinegens, Anaerococcus tetradius, and Peptostreptococcus anaerobius have been observed relative to women with LSIL [97]. Conversely, Mexican women with normal cervical cytology have been found to have higher relative abundances of L. crispatus and L. iners than women with SIL and cervical cancer, respectively [99]. Further, Fusobacterium sp. was significantly more abundant in late-stage cervical cancer compared to early stages (HPV-negative or non-cervical lesions), whereas Fusobacterium necrophorum was exclusive to women with cervical cancer [99]. The rarity of lactobacilli dominance in the CVM of women of African ancestry might explain their less distinct presence in the CVM of African women with HPV-associated cervical (pre)cancer compared to their non-African counterparts.

1.5. Potential Mechanisms Protecting Against and Promoting HPV-Induced Cervical Carcinogenesis

Cervicovaginal lactobacilli may exert influence over inflammation and immunity [101], potentially impacting cancer development through complex mechanisms. The observation of diminished abundance of Lactobacillus in women with cervical (pre)cancer is becoming a common finding in CVM studies. This suggests a consensus that lactobacilli may confer protection against HPV infection, thus reducing the risk of HPV-induced cervical disease. Evidence supporting the protective role of Lactobacillus against HPV-induced precancerous lesions was demonstrated in a small-scale 6-month longitudinal controlled pilot study investigating the impact of oral probiotic Lactobacillus casei on the clearance of HPV-induced lesions [102]. Although the difference was not statistically significant, probiotic users had a higher chance of clearing HPV infections compared to the control group [102]. Lactic acid from lactobacilli exhibits antiviral properties [103]. It can inhibit a virus by direct virus–probiotic interactions aided by adsorption or a trapping mechanism. Alternatively, lactic acid bacteria can evoke the host’s immune antiviral responses and/or produce nonproteinaceous metabolites with inhibitory capabilities [103]. Lactic acid also acidifies the cervicovaginal environment, hence resulting in low pH [62,82], which is a key mechanism for controlling the composition of CVM and preventing colonization of the microenvironment with pathogens [82,104]. Lactic acid can suppress HPVE6 and E7 oncogene expression [105]. Elevated vaginal pH has been associated with the detection of HR-HPV [51] and the severity of intraepithelial lesions [51,52]. HR-HPV types are known to be common in women, including those from SSA, with cervical neoplasia [5,15,16]. Lactobacilli appear to have other mechanisms used to curtail viral infections. Motevaseli and colleagues (2013) [106] showed using culture and bioassay experiments that L. crispatus and L. gasseri have cytotoxic activity on tumours independent of pH and lactic acid. It has been suggested that CVM homeostasis is necessary to maintain a certain level of inflammatory surveillance that is required for clearing HPV and preventing re-infections (maintaining an HPV-negative state). This thought is supported by a recent study that investigated the CVM and its associated inflammatory milieu during HPV 16 pre-acquisition, persistence, and clearance states. The study found that 9 of 13 inflammatory cytokines levels—interleukin (IL-4, -5, -10, -12, and -13), interferon (IFN-γ and IFN-α2), macrophage inflammatory protein-1-alpha (MIP-1α), and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)—were significantly increased in the immediate post-clearance visit compared to the pre-acquisition or infection visits [107]. Anti-inflammatory nucleotides, adenosine, and cytosine have been positively correlated with Lactobacillus abundance and negatively correlated with genital inflammation, suggesting that such nucleotides could be molecules associated with maintaining cervicovaginal health [108].
Several mechanisms have been propagated to elucidate how CVM promotes the development of cervical (pre)cancer, notwithstanding the ethnic variations in CVM. One such mechanism assumes that HR-HPV infection causes the CVM to shift from L. crispatus to L. iners predominance [99]. As the HPV-infected cells continue to transform to SIL, CVM diversity increases alongside pathobionts, mainly Sneathia and Fusobacterium spp. Fusobacterium necrophorum is present when cervical cancer finally ensues. This shift is mediated by the immunosuppressive microenvironment evoked by HPV infection, maintaining cytokine–CVM cross-talk [99]. L. iners in tumours has been found to cause lactate-induced metabolic, conferring chemotherapy and radiation resistance in cervical cancer cells and leading to poor patient survival [109]. Another model, termed the “diversity model for HPV progression”, assumes that G. vaginalis drives expansion in CVM diversity, serving as a risk factor for the progression of HR-HPV infection to CIN2+ [80]. Prolonged Lactobacillus depletion, high microbial diversity, and increased abundance of bacteria associated with CST IV (G. vaginalis and F. vaginae) are associated with the development of SIL 6 months post-HR-HPV diagnosis [100]. G. vaginalis is linked to the stability of Lactobacillus-depleted communities in women with HR-HPV infections [110]. This may result in delayed HPV clearance, hence persistence, which can lead to the emergence of transitional communities, e.g., Megasphaera genomosp type 1-dominated CVM [110]. Thus, bacterial species such as G. vaginalis, and F. vaginae could serve as biomarkers for cervical carcinogenesis. Apart from the presence of specific BV-associated bacteria, HPV persistence and cervical carcinogenesis are mediated by dysbiosis-induced mucus breakdown by bacterial sialidases (leading to loss of the epithelial integrity) and subsequent production of biogenic amines (putrescines and nitrosamines) associated with oxidative stress-induced DNA damage, which is a crucial step in carcinogenesis [81]. Links between HPV-induced cervical carcinogenesis and CVM, cellular, cervicovaginal metabolomes, and cytokine markers of inflammation have been underscored [108,111].
Accumulating published research suggests that the backbone of HPV carcinogenesis encompasses cervicovaginal dysbiosis (increased CVM diversity), elevated vaginal pH, high ratio of L-to-D-lactic acid (due to BV), biofilm formation, chronic inflammation, and immune dysregulation, including waning immunity (Figure 1). Certain Lactobacillus spp., like L. iners, with low production of D-lactic acid and H2O2, may not effectively maintain a healthy CVM, potentially predisposing women to STIs. Inflammation induced by CVM and BV is a key driver of genital HPV infection and cervical precancerous and cancer changes. Significant alterations, including aberrant metagenome functions, cohesive biofilm formation, and chronic inflammation, promote an environment conducive to HR-HPV persistence, contraction of the diversity of HR-HPV, and progression to cervical cancer. HR-HPV diversity reduces during cervical carcinogenesis [15], possibly due to other factors such as microbial (metabolic) interactions, selection pressure, and viral competition. Also, proliferating cancerous cells may not actively support HPV replication as effectively as the precancerous or normal cells [112]. HPV has been detected in bacterial biofilms [113]. Biofilms can cause mucous depletion and chronic mucosal inflammation, facilitating cellular transformation and cancer progression. Bacteria in biofilms can also promote cancer via other mechanisms, such as altering host metabolisms, producing toxins functioning as carcinogens, and oncogene activation [114]. CVM dominated by G. vaginalis, which is thought to drive biofilm formation, has been linked to elevated immune activation, disruption of epithelial integrity, and impaired wound healing [115].
Microabrasions in the cervicovaginal tract enable HPV access to basal epithelial cells of the cervical transformation zone [95]. E6 oncogene may trigger cellular transformation through cellular reduction of p21 and p53 gene expression and deregulation of signalling pathways (e.g., PI3K/AKT) involved in DNA damage repair, cell survival, and cell proliferation [116]. E5 oncoprotein results in decreased cytotoxic activity of natural killer cells and a lack of cytotoxic T lymphocyte response against HPV, while E6 and E7 oncoproteins help HPV to evade host immune responses by inhibiting the recruitment of macrophages and other immune cells into the site of infection [111]. E7 oncoprotein can mechanistically interact with several core proteins (NEMO, CK1, and β-TrCP) involved in both NF-kB- and Wnt/β-catenin-signaling pathways, leading to significant down-regulation of host-defense (mucosal innate) peptides used by the predominant Lactobacillus spp. (L. crispatus, L. jensenii, and L. iners) as amino acid sources for growth and survival. This impairment leads to reduced Lactobacillus abundance and creates a cervicovaginal milieu conducive to dysbiosis. The resulting microbial imbalance may contribute to the persistence and subsequent immune evasion of HPV infections, further promoting the development of pre-neoplastic or neoplastic lesions within the cervicovaginal milieu [117]. Certain epigenetic changes (e.g., methylation of the L1 and L2 late viral genes) during productive HPV infection in both virus and host cell genomes play an essential role in hosting specific microbial communities (e.g., tumour microbiota), viral persistence, and cervical carcinogenesis [118,119,120].

2. Issues and Challenges in the Current Literature and Way Forward

In this subsection, we outline key issues, challenges, and supporting data in the current literature regarding CVM and HPV-associated cervical disease in women in SSA, alongside proposed future directions for research and interventions to improve cervicovaginal health outcomes (Table 1).

3. Conclusions

Next-generation sequencing technologies have revealed insights into the interplay between genital HPV infection and CVM. The available evidence, albeit scarce, on women from SSA indicates that CVM with lactobacilli dominance, which has been negatively associated with HPV infection and severity of CIN, is uncommon among women of African descent. Associations of CVM and specific bacterial taxa with HPV and cervical disease are hypothesis-generating, warranting further investigations. Current research suggests that disruptions in the CVM, marked by reduced key Lactobacillus spp. and overgrowth of BV-associated bacteria, may heighten HPV persistence and cervical abnormalities. More evidence is needed to link specific bacteria in CVM with HPV and cervical disease, underscoring the importance of understanding the interplay between genital HPV and CVM for the prevention and control of cervical disease in SSA. The relationship between CVM, HPV, and HPV-induced carcinogenesis highlights the need to integrate CVM manipulation with prevention programs for STI and cervical cancer.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/venereology3040017/s1, Table S1: List of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) geographic regions in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.O.; Writing—original draft preparation, H.O.; Writing—review and editing, H.O., Z.Z.A.M., A.B., A.-L.W. and L.M.M.; Visualization—Figures and captions, H.O.; Supervision, H.O.; Project administration, H.O.; Funding acquisition, none. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Tracy L. Meiring for partly providing intellectual guidance on the initial draft, partly captured in Harris Onywera’s doctoral thesis (http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36399, accessed on 21 May 2021). Harris Onywera acknowledges the late Bethwel Kiplagat Tanui, whose intellectual advice hitherto is nostalgic and profound.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Harris Onywera was employed by the company Tunacare Services Health Providers Limited. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bruni, L.; Albero, G.; Serrano, B.; Mena, M.; Collado, J.; Gómez, D.; Muñoz, J.; Bosch, F.X.; de Sanjosé, S. Human Papillomavirus and Related Diseases in the World. Summary Report 10 March 2023. Available online: https://hpvcentre.net/statistics/reports/XWX.pdf (accessed on 1 June 2023).
  2. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Global Cancer Observatory; International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Lyon, France, 2022; Volume 2022. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ryser, M.D.; Rositch, A.; Gravitt, P.E. Modeling of US human papillomavirus (HPV) seroprevalence by age and sexual behavior indicates an increasing trend of HPV infection following the sexual revolution. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 216, 604–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Trottier, H.; Ferreira, S.; Thomann, P.; Costa, M.C.; Sobrinho, J.S.; Prado, J.C.; Rohan, T.E.; Villa, L.L.; Franco, E.L. Human papillomavirus infection and reinfection in adult women: The role of sexual activity and natural immunity. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 8569–8577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mbulawa, Z.Z.A.; Phohlo, K.; Garcia-Jardon, M.; Williamson, A.L.; Businge, C.B. High human papillomavirus (HPV)-35 prevalence among South African women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia warrants attention. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0264498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Happel, A.U.; Balle, C.; Havyarimana, E.; Brown, B.; Maust, B.S.; Feng, C.; Yi, B.H.; Gill, K.; Bekker, L.G.; Passmore, J.S.; et al. Cervicovaginal human papillomavirus genomes, microbiota composition and cytokine concentrations in South African adolescents. Viruses 2023, 15, 758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pinheiro, M.; Gage, J.C.; Clifford, G.M.; Demarco, M.; Cheung, L.C.; Chen, Z.; Yeager, M.; Cullen, M.; Boland, J.F.; Chen, X.; et al. Association of HPV35 with cervical carcinogenesis among women of African ancestry: Evidence of viral-host interaction with implications for disease intervention. Int. J. Cancer 2020, 147, 2677–2686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mantula, F.; Toefy, Y.; Sewram, V. Barriers to cervical cancer screening in Africa: A systematic review. BMC Public Health 2024, 24, 525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Asgedom, Y.S.; Kebede, T.M.; Seifu, B.L.; Mare, K.U.; Asmare, Z.A.; Asebe, H.A.; Kase, B.F.; Shibeshi, A.H.; Tebeje, T.M.; Sabo, K.G.; et al. Human papillomavirus vaccination uptake and determinant factors among adolescent schoolgirls in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2024, 20, 2326295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Asempah, E.; Ikpebe, E. Accelerating HPV vaccination in Africa for health equity. Glob. Health Res. Policy 2024, 9, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Onywera, H.; Mabunda, S.A.; Williamson, A.-L.; Mbulawa, Z.Z.A. Microbiological and behavioral determinants of genital HPV infections among adolescent girls and young women warrant the need for targeted policy interventions to reduce HPV risk. Front. Reprod. Health 2022, 4, 887736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mbulawa, Z.Z.; Johnson, L.F.; Marais, D.J.; Coetzee, D.; Williamson, A.L. The impact of human immunodeficiency virus on human papillomavirus transmission in heterosexually active couples. J. Infect. 2013, 67, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Olajide, N.; Robb, K.; Niedzwiedz, C.; Jani, B. Cervical cancer risk factors in eight west African countries: Cross-sectional analysis of the demographic and health survey 2017–2020. Lancet 2022, 400, S68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kamiza, A.B. Incidence and risk factors associated with cervical cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. ARCH Women Health Care 2020, 3, 7. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mcharo, R.; Lennemann, T.; France, J.; Torres, L.; Garí, M.; Mbuya, W.; Mwalongo, W.; Mahenge, A.; Bauer, A.; Mnkai, J.; et al. HPV type distribution in HIV positive and negative women with or without cervical dysplasia or cancer in East Africa. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 763717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Musa, J.; Maiga, M.; Green, S.J.; Magaji, F.A.; Maryam, A.J.; Okolo, M.; Nyam, C.J.; Cosmas, N.T.; Silas, O.A.; Imade, G.E.; et al. Vaginal microbiome community state types and high-risk human papillomaviruses in cervical precancer and cancer in North-central Nigeria. BMC Cancer 2023, 23, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Onywera, D.H. A Study of the Genital Microbiotas of Black South African Women and Men: Associations with Human Papillomavirus and HIV Infections. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa, 2018. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36399 (accessed on 21 May 2021).
  18. Ravel, J.; Gajer, P.; Abdo, Z.; Schneider, G.M.; Koenig, S.S.K.; McCulle, S.L.; Ault, K.; Peralta, L.; Forney, L.J. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 4680–4687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Petrova, M.I.; Lievens, E.; Malik, S.; Imholz, N.; Lebeer, S. Lactobacillus species as biomarkers and agents that can promote various aspects of vaginal health. Front. Physiol. 2015, 6, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Forney, L.J.; Foster, J.A.; Ledger, W. The vaginal flora of healthy women is not always dominated by Lactobacillus species. J. Infect. Dis. 2006, 194, 1468–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Peebles, K.; Velloza, J.; Balkus, J.E.; McClelland, R.S.; Barnabas, R.V. High global burden and costs of bacterial vaginosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2019, 46, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lebeer, S.; Ahannach, S.; Gehrmann, T.; Wittouck, S.; Eilers, T.; Oerlemans, E.; Condori, S.; Dillen, J.; Spacova, I.; Vander Donck, L.; et al. A citizen-science-enabled catalogue of the vaginal microbiome and associated factors. Nat. Microbiol. 2023, 8, 2183–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gajer, P.; Brotman, R.M.; Guoyun, B.; Sakamoto, J.; Schütte, U.M.E.; Zhong, X.; Koenig, S.S.K.; Fu, F.; Ma, Z.; Zhou, X.; et al. Temporal dynamics of the human vaginal microbiota. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 132ra52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Roachford, O.S.E.; Alleyne, A.T.; Nelson, K.E. Insights into the vaginal microbiome in a diverse group of women of African, Asian and European ancestries. PeerJ 2022, 10, e14449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dong, W.; Wang, S.; Wang, X.; Xu, G.; Liu, Q.; Li, Z.; Lv, N.; Pan, Y.; Xiong, Q.; Liu, D.; et al. Characteristics of vaginal microbiota of women of reproductive age with infections. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Juliana, N.C.A.; Peters, R.P.H.; Al-Nasiry, S.; Budding, A.E.; Morré, S.A.; Ambrosino, E. Composition of the vaginal microbiota during pregnancy in women living in sub-Saharan Africa: A PRISMA-compliant review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021, 21, 596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Roachford, O.S.E.; Alleyne, A.T.; Kuelbs, C.; Torralba, M.G.; Nelson, K.E. The cervicovaginal microbiome and its resistome in a random selection of Afro-Caribbean women. Hum. Microbiome J. 2021, 20, 100079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Taku, O.; Onywera, H.; Mbulawa, Z.Z.A.; Businge, C.B.; Meiring, T.L.; Williamson, A.-L. Molecular identification of cervical microbes in HIV-negative and HIV-positive women in an African setting using a customized bacterial vaginosis microbial DNA quantitative PCR (qPCR) array. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0222921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Onywera, H.; Williamson, A.-L.; Mbulawa, Z.; Coetzee, D.; Meiring, T. Factors associated with the composition and diversity of the cervical microbiota of reproductive-age Black South African women: A retrospective cross-sectional study. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Onywera, H.; Williamson, A.L.; Mbulawa, Z.Z.A.; Coetzee, D.; Meiring, T.L. The cervical microbiota in reproductive-age South African women with and without human papillomavirus infection. Papillomavirus Res. 2019, 7, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Anahtar, M.N.; Byrne, E.H.; Doherty, K.E.; Bowman, B.A.; Yamamoto, H.S.; Soumillon, M.; Padavattan, N.; Ismail, N.; Moodley, A.; Sabatini, M.E.; et al. Cervicovaginal bacteria are a major modulator of host inflammatory responses in the female genital tract. Immunity 2015, 42, 965–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Balle, C.; Lennard, K.; Dabee, S.; Barnabas, S.L.; Jaumdally, S.Z.; Gasper, M.A.; Maseko, V.; Mbulawa, Z.Z.A.; Williamson, A.L.; Bekker, L.G.; et al. Endocervical and vaginal microbiota in South African adolescents with asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fettweis, J.M.; Brooks, J.P.; Serrano, M.G.; Sheth, N.U.; Girerd, P.H.; Edwards, D.J.; Strauss, J.F.; Jefferson, K.K.; Buck, G.A. Differences in vaginal microbiome in African American women versus women of European ancestry. Microbiology 2014, 160, 2272–2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhou, X.; Brown, C.J.; Abdo, Z.; Davis, C.C.; Hansmann, M.A.; Joyce, P.; Foster, J.A.; Forney, L.J. Differences in the composition of vaginal microbial communities found in healthy Caucasian and Black women. ISME J. 2007, 1, 121–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Borgdorff, H.; Tsivtsivadze, E.; Verhelst, R.; Marzorati, M.; Jurriaans, S.; Ndayisaba, G.F.; Schuren, F.H.; van de Wijgert, J.H. Lactobacillus-dominated cervicovaginal microbiota associated with reduced HIV/STI prevalence and genital HIV viral load in African women. ISME J. 2014, 8, 1781–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lennard, K.; Smritee, D.; Havyarimana, E.; Blakney, A.; Barnabas, S.L.; Jaumdally, S.Z.; Botha, G.; Mkhize, N.N.; Bekker, L.-G.; Lewis, D.A.; et al. Vaginal microbiota varies by geographical location in South African women. S. Afr. J. Sci. Technol. 2019, 38, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lehtoranta, L.; Ala-Jaakkola, R.; Laitila, A.; Maukonen, J. Healthy vaginal microbiota and influence of probiotics across the female life span. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 819958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Bayigga, L.; Kateete, D.P.; Anderson, D.J.; Sekikubo, M.; Nakanjako, D. Diversity of vaginal microbiota in sub-Saharan Africa and its effects on HIV transmission and prevention. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 220, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Avitabile, E.; Menotti, L.; Croatti, V.; Giordani, B.; Parolin, C.; Vitali, B. Protective mechanisms of vaginal lactobacilli against sexually transmitted viral infections. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gillet, E.; Meys, J.F.A.; Verstraelen, H.; Bosire, C.; De Sutter, P.; Temmerman, M.; Broeck, D.V. Bacterial vaginosis is associated with uterine cervical human papillomavirus infection: A meta-analysis. BMC Infect. Dis. 2011, 11, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kero, K.; Rautava, J.; Syrjanen, K.; Grenman, S.; Syrjanen, S. Association of asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis with persistence of female genital human papillomavirus infection. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017, 36, 2215–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Guo, Y.L.; You, K.; Qiao, J.; Zhao, Y.M.; Geng, L. Bacterial vaginosis is conducive to the persistence of HPV infection. Int. J. STD AIDS 2012, 23, 581–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. King, C.C.; Jamieson, D.J.; Wiener, J.; Cu-Uvin, S.; Klein, R.S.; Rompalo, A.M.; Shah, K.V.; Sobel, J.D. Bacterial vaginosis and the natural history of human papillomavirus. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011, 2011, 319460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mao, C.; Hughes, J.P.; Kiviat, N.; Kuypers, J.; Lee, S.-K.; Adam, D.E.; Koutsky, L.a. Clinical findings among young women with genital human papillomavirus infection. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003, 188, 677–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Menon, S.; Broeck, D.V.; Rossi, R.; Ogbe, E.; Harmon, S.; Mabeya, H. Associations between vaginal infections and potential high-risk and high-risk human papillomavirus genotypes in female sex workers in western Kenya. Clin. Ther. 2016, 38, 2567–2577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Nam, K.H.; Kim, Y.T.; Kim, S.R.; Kim, S.W.; Kim, J.W.; Lee, M.K.; Nam, E.J.; Jung, Y.W. Association between bacterial vaginosis and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 2009, 20, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Peters, N.; Van Leeuwen, A.M.; Pieters, W.J.; Hollema, H.; Quint, W.G.; Burger, M.P. Bacterial vaginosis is not important in the etiology of cervical neoplasia. Sex. Transm. Dis. 1995, 22, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Gillet, E.; Meys, J.F.A.; Verstraelen, H.; Verhelst, R.; De Sutter, P.; Temmerman, M.; Vanden Broeck, D. Association between bacterial vaginosis and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e45201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fiscella, K.; Klebanoff, M.A. Are racial differences in vaginal pH explained by vaginal flora? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004, 191, 747–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Stevens-Simon, C.; Jamison, J.; McGregor, J.A.; Douglas, J.M. Racial variation in vaginal pH among healthy sexually active adolescents. Sex. Transm. Dis. 1994, 21, 168–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Clarke, M.A.; Rodriguez, A.C.; Gage, J.C.; Herrero, R.; Hildesheim, A.; Wacholder, S.; Burk, R.; Schiffman, M. A large, population-based study of age-related associations between vaginal pH and human papillomavirus infection. BMC Infect. Dis. 2012, 12, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Łaniewski, P.; Barnes, D.; Goulder, A.; Cui, H.; Roe, D.J.; Chase, D.M.; Herbst-Kralovetz, M.M. Linking cervicovaginal immune signatures, HPV and microbiota composition in cervical carcinogenesis in non-Hispanic and Hispanic women. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 7593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sousa, L.G.V.; Pereira, S.A.; Cerca, N. Fighting polymicrobial biofilms in bacterial vaginosis. Microb. Biotechnol. 2023, 16, 1423–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Verstraelen, H.; Swidsinski, A. The biofilm in bacterial vaginosis: Implications for epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 26, 86–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Donmez, H.G.; Sahal, G.; Akgor, U.; Cagan, M.; Ozgul, N.; Beksac, M.S. The relationship between the presence of HPV infection and biofilm formation in cervicovaginal smears. Infection 2020, 48, 735–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Mendhe, S.; Badge, A.; Ugemuge, S.; Chandi, D. Impact of biofilms on chronic infections and medical challenges. Cureus 2023, 15, e48204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Onywera, H.; Anejo-Okopi, J.; Mwapagha, L.M.; Okendo, J.; Williamson, A.-L. Predictive functional analysis reveals inferred features unique to cervicovaginal microbiota of African women with bacterial vaginosis and high-risk human papillomavirus infection. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0253218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Srinivasan, S.; Morgan, M.T.; Fiedler, T.L.; Djukovic, D.; Hoffman, N.G.; Raftery, D.; Marrazzo, J.M.; Fredricks, D.N. Metabolic signatures of bacterial vaginosis. mBio 2015, 6, e00204-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dareng, E.O.; Ma, B.; Famooto, A.O.; Akarolo-Anthony, S.N.; Offiong, R.A.; Olaniyan, O.; Dakum, P.S.; Wheeler, C.M.; Fadrosh, D.; Yang, H.; et al. Prevalent high-risk HPV infection and vaginal microbiota in Nigerian women. Epidemiol. Infect. 2016, 144, 123–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Konschuh, S.; Jayaprakash, T.; Dolatabadi, A.; Dayo, E.; Ramay, H.; Sycuro, L. O02.3 Reclassification of Atopobium vaginae as three novel Fannyhessea species: Implications for understanding their role in bacterial vaginosis. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2021, 97, A18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Brotman, R.M.; Shardell, M.D.; Gajer, P.; Tracy, J.K.; Zenilman, J.M.; Ravel, J.; Gravitt, P.E. Interplay between the temporal dynamics of the vaginal microbiota and human papillomavirus detection. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 210, 1723–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Reimers, L.L.; Mehta, S.D.; Massad, L.S.; Burk, R.D.; Xie, X.; Ravel, J.; Cohen, M.H.; Palefsky, J.M.; Weber, K.M.; Xue, X.; et al. The cervicovaginal microbiota and its associations with human papillomavirus detection in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 214, 1361–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lee, J.E.; Lee, S.; Lee, H.; Song, Y.-M.; Lee, K.; Han, M.J.; Sung, J.; Ko, G. Association of the vaginal microbiota with human papillomavirus infection in a Korean twin cohort. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e63514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Petrova, M.I.; Reid, G.; Vaneechoutte, M.; Lebeer, S. Lactobacillus iners: Friend or foe? Trends Microbiol. 2017, 25, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Trifanescu, O.G.; Trifanescu, R.A.; Mitrica, R.I.; Bran, D.M.; Serbanescu, G.L.; Valcauan, L.; Marinescu, S.A.; Gales, L.N.; Tanase, B.C.; Anghel, R.M. The female reproductive tract microbiome and cancerogenesis: A review story of bacteria, hormones, and disease. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Sims, T.T.; Biegert, G.W.G.; Ramogola-Masire, D.; Ngoni, K.; Solley, T.; Ning, M.S.; El Alam, M.B.; Mezzari, M.; Petrosino, J.; Zetola, N.M.; et al. Tumor microbial diversity and compositional differences among women in Botswana with high-grade cervical dysplasia and cervical cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. 2020, 30, 1151–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Klein, C.; Gonzalez, D.; Samwel, K.; Kahesa, C.; Mwaiselage, J.; Aluthge, N.; Fernando, S.; West, J.T.; Wood, C.; Angeletti, P.C. Relationship between the cervical microbiome, HIV status, and precancerous lesions. mBio 2019, 10, e02785-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Teka, B.; Yoshida-Court, K.; Firdawoke, E.; Chanyalew, Z.; Gizaw, M.; Addissie, A.; Mihret, A.; Colbert, L.E.; Napravnik, T.C.; El Alam, M.B.; et al. Cervicovaginal microbiota profiles in precancerous lesions and cervical cancer among Ethiopian women. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Claesson, M.J.; Wang, Q.; O’Sullivan, O.; Greene-Diniz, R.; Cole, J.R.; Ross, R.P.; O’Toole, P.W. Comparison of two next-generation sequencing technologies for resolving highly complex microbiota composition using tandem variable 16S rRNA gene regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, e200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Fouhy, F.; Clooney, A.G.; Stanton, C.; Claesson, M.J.; Cotter, P.D. 16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform. BMC Microbiol. 2016, 16, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Onywera, H.; Meiring, T.L. Comparative analyses of Ion Torrent V4 and Illumina V3-V4 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding methods for characterization of cervical microbiota: Taxonomic and functional profiling. Sci. Afr. 2020, 7, e00278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Smith, W.L.; Hedges, S.R.; Mordechai, E.; Adelson, M.E.; Trama, J.P.; Gygax, S.E.; Kaunitz, A.M.; Hilbert, D.W. Cervical and vaginal flora specimens are highly concordant with respect to bacterial vaginosis-associated organisms and commensal Lactobacillus species in women of reproductive age. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 3078–3081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Huang, Y.E.; Wang, Y.; He, Y.; Ji, Y.; Wang, L.P.; Sheng, H.F.; Zhang, M.; Huang, Q.T.; Zhang, D.J.; Wu, J.J.; et al. Homogeneity of the vaginal microbiome at the cervix, posterior fornix, and vaginal canal in pregnant Chinese women. Microb. Ecol. 2015, 69, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kim, T.K.; Thomas, S.M.; Ho, M.; Sharma, S.; Reich, C.I.; Frank, J.A.; Yeater, K.M.; Biggs, D.R.; Nakamura, N.; Stumpf, R.; et al. Heterogeneity of vaginal microbial communities within individuals. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009, 47, 1181–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Di Paola, M.; Sani, C.; Clemente, A.M.; Iossa, A.; Perissi, E.; Castronovo, G.; Tanturli, M.; Rivero, D.; Cozzolino, F.; Cavalieri, D.; et al. Characterization of cervico-vaginal microbiota in women developing persistent high-risk human papillomavirus infection. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Chao, X.-P.; Sun, T.-T.; Wang, S.; Fan, Q.-B.; Shi, H.-H.; Zhu, L.; Lang, J.-H. Correlation between the diversity of vaginal microbiota and the risk of high-risk human papillomavirus infection. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2019, 29, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Shannon, B.; Yi, T.J.; Perusini, S.; Gajer, P.; Ma, B.; Humphrys, M.S.; Thomas-Pavanel, J.; Chieza, L.; Janakiram, P.; Saunders, M.; et al. Association of HPV infection and clearance with cervicovaginal immunology and the vaginal microbiota. Mucosal Immunol. 2017, 10, 1310–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Oh, H.Y.; Kim, B.S.; Seo, S.S.; Kong, J.S.; Lee, J.K.; Park, S.Y.; Hong, K.M.; Kim, H.K.; Kim, M.K. The association of uterine cervical microbiota with an increased risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Korea. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2015, 21, 674.e1–674.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Wei, X.; Zhu, J.; Wang, X.; Xie, X.; Lu, W. The alterations of vaginal microbiome in HPV16 infection as identified by shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Usyk, M.; Zolnik, C.P.; Castle, P.E.; Porras, C.; Herrero, R.; Gradissimo, A.; Gonzalez, P.; Safaeian, M.; Schiffman, M.; Burk, R.D.; et al. Cervicovaginal microbiome and natural history of HPV in a longitudinal study. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1008376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mitra, A.; MacIntyre, D.A.; Marchesi, J.R.; Lee, Y.S.; Bennett, P.R.; Kyrgiou, M. The vaginal microbiota, human papillomavirus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: What do we know and where are we going next? Microbiome 2016, 4, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Boskey, E.R.; Telsch, K.M.; Whaley, K.J.; Moench, T.R.; Cone, R.A. Acid production by vaginal flora in vitro is consistent with the rate and extent of vaginal acidification. Infect. Immun. 1999, 67, 5170–5175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Straight, S.W.; Herman, B.; McCance, D.J. The E5 oncoprotein of human papillomavirus type 16 inhibits the acidification of endosomes in human keratinocytes. J. Virol. 1995, 69, 3185–3192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Antonio, M.A.; Rabe, L.K.; Hillier, S.L. Colonization of the rectum by Lactobacillus species and decreased risk of bacterial vaginosis. J. Infect. Dis. 2005, 192, 394–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Pendharkar, S.; Magopane, T.; Larsson, P.-G.; de Bruyn, G.; Gray, G.E.; Hammarström, L.; Marcotte, H. Identification and characterisation of vaginal lactobacilli from South African women. BMC Infect. Dis. 2013, 13, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Song, Y.-L.; Kato, N.; Matsumiya, Y.; Liu, C.-X.; Kato, H.; Watanabe, k. Identification of and hydrogen peroxide production by fecal and vaginal lactobacilli isolated from Japanese women and newborn infants. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999, 37, 3062–3064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Eschenbach, D.A.; Davick, P.R.; Williams, B.L.; Klebanoff, S.J.; Young-Smith, K.; Critchlow, C.M.; Holmes, K.K. Prevalence of hydrogen peroxide-producing Lactobacillus species in normal women and women with bacterial vaginosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1989, 27, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Klebanoff, S.J.; Coombs, R.W. Viricidal effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus on human immunodeficiency virus type 1: Possible role in heterosexual transmission. J. Exp. Med. 1991, 174, 289–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Clark, R.A.; Klebanoff, S.J. Role of the myeloperoxidase-H2O2-halide system in concanavalin A-induced tumor cell killing by human neutrophils. J. Immunol. 1979, 122, 2605–2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Miko, E.; Barakonyi, A. The role of hydrogen-peroxide (H2O2) produced by vaginal microbiota in female reproductive health. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Choi, H.S.; Kim, K.M.; Kim, C.H.; Kim, S.M.; Oh, J.S. Hydrogen peroxide producing lactobacilli in women with cervical neoplasia. Cancer Res. Treat. 2006, 38, 108–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Nunn, K.L.; Wang, Y.Y.; Harit, D.; Humphrys, M.S.; Ma, B.; Cone, R.; Ravel, J.; Lai, S.K. Enhanced trapping of HIV-1 by human cervicovaginal mucus is associated with Lactobacillus crispatus-dominant microbiota. mBio 2015, 6, e01084-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Nahui Palomino, R.A.; Zicari, S.; Vanpouille, C.; Vitali, B.; Margolis, L. Vaginal Lactobacillus inhibits HIV-1 replication in human tissues ex vivo. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Witkin, S.S.; Mendes-Soares, H.; Linhares, I.M.; Jayaram, A.; Ledger, W.J.; Forney, L.J. Influence of vaginal bacteria and D- and L-lactic acid isomers on vaginal extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer: Implications for protection against upper genital tract infections. mBio 2013, 4, e00460-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Doorbar, J.; Quint, W.; Banks, L.; Bravo, I.G.; Stoler, M.; Broker, T.R.; Stanley, M.A. The biology and life-cycle of human papillomaviruses. Vaccine 2012, 30 (Suppl. S5), F55–F70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Olukomogbon, T.; Akpobome, B.; Omole, A.; Adebamowo, C.A.; Adebamowo, S.N. Association between cervical inflammatory mediators and prevalent cervical human papillomavirus infection. JCO Glob. Oncol. 2024, 10, e2300380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Mitra, A.; MacIntyre, D.A.; Lee, Y.S.; Smith, A.; Marchesi, J.R.; Lehne, B.; Bhatia, R.; Lyons, D.; Paraskevaidis, E.; Li, J.V.; et al. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia disease progression is associated with increased vaginal microbiome diversity. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Piyathilake, C.J.; Ollberding, N.J.; Kumar, R.; Macaluso, M.; Alvarez, R.D.; Morrow, C.D. Cervical microbiota associated with higher grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women infected with high-risk human papillomaviruses. Cancer Prev. Res. 2016, 9, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Audirac-Chalifour, A.; Torres-Poveda, K.; Bahena-Roman, M.; Tellez-Sosa, J.; Martinez-Barnetche, J.; Cortina-Ceballos, B.; Lopez-Estrada, G.; Delgado-Romero, K.; Burguete-Garcia, A.I.; Cantu, D.; et al. Cervical microbiome and cytokine profile at various stages of cervical cancer: A pilot study. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Molina, M.A.; Leenders, W.P.J.; Huynen, M.A.; Melchers, W.J.G.; Andralojc, K.M. Temporal composition of the cervicovaginal microbiome associates with hrHPV infection outcomes in a longitudinal study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2024, 24, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Chee, W.J.Y.; Chew, S.Y.; Than, L.T.L. Vaginal microbiota and the potential of Lactobacillus derivatives in maintaining vaginal health. Microb. Cell Fact. 2020, 19, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Verhoeven, V.; Renard, N.; Makar, A.; Van Royen, P.; Bogers, J.P.; Lardon, F.; Peeters, M.; Baay, M. Probiotics enhance the clearance of human papillomavirus-related cervical lesions: A prospective controlled pilot study. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 2013, 22, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Al Kassaa, I.; Hober, D.; Hamze, M.; Chihib, N.E.; Drider, D. Antiviral potential of lactic acid bacteria and their bacteriocins. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2014, 6, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Boris, S.; Barbés, C. Role played by lactobacilli in controlling the population of vaginal pathogens. Microbes Infect. 2000, 2, 543–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Cha, M.K.; Lee, D.K.; An, H.M.; Lee, S.W.; Shin, S.H.; Kwon, J.H.; Kim, K.J.; Ha, N.J. Antiviral activity of Bifidobacterium adolescentis SPM1005-A on human papillomavirus type 16. BMC Med. 2012, 10, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Motevaseli, E.; Shirzad, M.; Akrami, S.M.; Mousavi, A.S.; Mirsalehian, A.; Modarressi, M.H. Normal and tumour cervical cells respond differently to vaginal lactobacilli, independent of pH and lactate. J. Med. Microbiol. 2013, 62, 1065–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Moscicki, A.B.; Shi, B.; Huang, H.; Barnard, E.; Li, H. Cervical-vaginal microbiome and associated cytokine profiles in a prospective study of HPV 16 acquisition, persistence, and clearance. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 569022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Ilhan, Z.E.; Łaniewski, P.; Thomas, N.; Roe, D.J.; Chase, D.M.; Herbst-Kralovetz, M.M. Deciphering the complex interplay between microbiota, HPV, inflammation and cancer through cervicovaginal metabolic profiling. EBioMedicine 2019, 44, 675–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Colbert, L.E.; El Alam, M.B.; Wang, R.; Karpinets, T.; Lo, D.; Lynn, E.J.; Harris, T.A.; Elnaggar, J.H.; Yoshida-Court, K.; Tomasic, K.; et al. Tumor-resident Lactobacillus iners confer chemoradiation resistance through lactate-induced metabolic rewiring. Cancer Cell 2023, 41, 1945–1962.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Molina, M.A.; Melchers, W.J.G.; Andralojc, K.M.; Leenders, W.P.J.; Huynen, M.A. Longitudinal analysis on the ecological dynamics of the cervicovaginal microbiome in hrHPV infection. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2023, 21, 4424–4431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ntuli, L.; Mtshali, A.; Mzobe, G.; Liebenberg, L.J.; Ngcapu, S. Role of immunity and vaginal microbiome in clearance and persistence of human papillomavirus infection. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 927131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Graham, S.V. The human papillomavirus replication cycle, and its links to cancer progression: A comprehensive review. Clin. Sci. 2017, 131, 2201–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Cavalcanti, E.F.; Silva, C.R.; Ferreira, D.C.; Ferreira, M.V.; Vanderborght, P.R.; Torres, M.C.; Torres, S.R. Detection of human papillomavirus in dental biofilm and the uterine cervix of a pregnant adolescent. Sao Paulo Med. J. 2016, 134, 88–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Choi, E.; Murray, B.; Choi, S. Biofilm and cancer: Interactions and future directions for cancer therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Zevin, A.S.; Xie, I.Y.; Birse, K.; Arnold, K.; Romas, L.; Westmacott, G.; Novak, R.M.; McCorrister, S.; McKinnon, L.R.; Cohen, C.R.; et al. Microbiome composition and function drives wound-healing impairment in the female genital tract. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, e1005889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Mwapagha, L.M.; Tiffin, N.; Parker, I. Delineation of the HPV11E6 and HPV18E6 pathways in initiating cellular transformation. Front. Oncol. 2017, 7, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Lebeau, A.; Bruyere, D.; Roncarati, P.; Peixoto, P.; Hervouet, E.; Cobraiville, G.; Taminiau, B.; Masson, M.; Gallego, C.; Mazzucchelli, G.; et al. HPV infection alters vaginal microbiome through down-regulating host mucosal innate peptides used by Lactobacilli as amino acid sources. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Holubekova, V.; Kolkova, Z.; Kasubova, I.; Samec, M.; Mazurakova, A.; Koklesova, L.; Kubatka, P.; Rokos, T.; Kozubik, E.; Biringer, K.; et al. Interaction of cervical microbiome with epigenome of epithelial cells: Significance of inflammation to primary healthcare. Biomol. Concepts 2022, 13, 61–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Da Silva, M.L.R.; De Albuquerque, B.; Allyrio, T.; De Almeida, V.D.; Cobucci, R.N.O.; Bezerra, F.L.; Andrade, V.S.; Lanza, D.C.F.; De Azevedo, J.C.V.; De Araújo, J.M.G.; et al. The role of HPV-induced epigenetic changes in cervical carcinogenesis (Review). Biomed. Rep. 2021, 15, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Nené, N.R.; Barrett, J.; Jones, A.; Evans, I.; Reisel, D.; Timms, J.F.; Paprotka, T.; Leimbach, A.; Franchi, D.; Colombo, N.; et al. DNA methylation signatures to predict the cervicovaginal microbiome status. Clin. Epigenetics 2020, 12, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Dareng, E.O.; Ma, B.; Adebamowo, S.N.; Famooto, A.; Ravel, J.; Pharoah, P.P.; Adebamowo, C.A. Vaginal microbiota diversity and paucity of Lactobacillus species are associated with persistent hrHPV infection in HIV negative but not in HIV positive women. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 19095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Ravilla, R.; Coleman, H.N.; Chow, C.E.; Chan, L.; Fuhrman, B.J.; Greenfield, W.W.; Robeson, M.S.; Iverson, K.; Spencer, H., 3rd; Nakagawa, M. Cervical microbiome and response to a human papillomavirus therapeutic vaccine for treating high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2019, 18, 1534735419893063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Africa. Cervical Cancer Common Amongst African Women 2015. Available online: https://www.afro.who.int/news/cervical-cancer-common-amongst-african-women (accessed on 20 October 2024).
  124. Pinheiro, S.P.; Holmes, M.D.; Pollak, M.N.; Barbieri, R.L.; Hankinson, S.E. Racial differences in premenopausal endogenous hormones. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2005, 14, 2147–2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Marsh, E.E.; Shaw, N.D.; Klingman, K.M.; Tiamfook-Morgan, T.O.; Yialamas, M.A.; Sluss, P.M.; Hall, J.E. Estrogen levels are higher across the menstrual cycle in African-American women compared with Caucasian women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, 3199–3206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Zahid, M.; Mondal, B.; LeVan, T.D.; Rogan, E.G. Estrogen metabolism in African-American women with and without breast cancer: A pilot study. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2019, 32, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Cornejo, O.E.; Hickey, R.J.; Suzuki, H.; Forney, L.J. Focusing the diversity of Gardnerella vaginalis through the lens of ecotypes. Evol. Appl. 2018, 11, 312–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Schellenberg, J.J.; Patterson, M.H.; Hill, J.E. Gardnerella vaginalis diversity and ecology in relation to vaginal symptoms. Res. Microbiol. 2017, 168, 837–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Onywera, H.; Chambuso, R.; Benjamin, D.; Hilt, E.; Thomas-White, K. Editorial: An outlook on urobiome: Advances in understanding the role of urobiome in urological health and disease and its potential in biotherapeutics. Front. Urol. 2024, 4, 1380340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Possible immunobiological mechanism that CVM contributes to HPV-induced cervical carcinogenesis. Depletion of protective commensal bacteria (notably Lactobacillus spp.) in the CVM can lead to proliferation of opportunistic bacteria and classical pathogens, thereby altering the CVM structure, function, and diversity. CVM dysbiosis increases the risk of HPV infection and persistence. HPV can exploit biofilms and its oncogenes (e.g., E6 and E7) to dampen or evade host immune and adaptive responses. BV- or biofilm-induced inflammatory responses, cervicovaginal metabolic changes, and molecular and cellular changes induced by HPV infection collectively contribute to architectural damage in the cervical cells, leading to precancerous lesions, which can then develop into cervical cancer. The interaction of HPV with opportunistic and pathogenic cervicovaginal bacteria may result in oncogene activation, contraction of HR-HPV diversity (favouring aggression of specific HPV types), and emergence of a tumour microbiota. The contraction of HR-HPV diversity could also be due to selection pressure, immune responses, and viral competition. Tumour microenvironment can facilitate oncogene expression and cancer progression through barrier dysfunction, bacterial translocation, and persistent inflammation in the cervicovaginal milieu. HPV- and CVM-induced epigenetic changes are crucial events in cervical carcinogenesis. Protective commensal bacteria may facilitate HPV clearance and induce regression of cervical dysplasia or slow cervical tumorigenesis.
Figure 1. Possible immunobiological mechanism that CVM contributes to HPV-induced cervical carcinogenesis. Depletion of protective commensal bacteria (notably Lactobacillus spp.) in the CVM can lead to proliferation of opportunistic bacteria and classical pathogens, thereby altering the CVM structure, function, and diversity. CVM dysbiosis increases the risk of HPV infection and persistence. HPV can exploit biofilms and its oncogenes (e.g., E6 and E7) to dampen or evade host immune and adaptive responses. BV- or biofilm-induced inflammatory responses, cervicovaginal metabolic changes, and molecular and cellular changes induced by HPV infection collectively contribute to architectural damage in the cervical cells, leading to precancerous lesions, which can then develop into cervical cancer. The interaction of HPV with opportunistic and pathogenic cervicovaginal bacteria may result in oncogene activation, contraction of HR-HPV diversity (favouring aggression of specific HPV types), and emergence of a tumour microbiota. The contraction of HR-HPV diversity could also be due to selection pressure, immune responses, and viral competition. Tumour microenvironment can facilitate oncogene expression and cancer progression through barrier dysfunction, bacterial translocation, and persistent inflammation in the cervicovaginal milieu. HPV- and CVM-induced epigenetic changes are crucial events in cervical carcinogenesis. Protective commensal bacteria may facilitate HPV clearance and induce regression of cervical dysplasia or slow cervical tumorigenesis.
Venereology 03 00017 g001
Table 1. Current issues, challenges, and future directions for interventions on CVM and HPV-associated cervical disease in women in SSA.
Table 1. Current issues, challenges, and future directions for interventions on CVM and HPV-associated cervical disease in women in SSA.
Issue/ChallengeDescription and/or Existing DataFuture Direction
Question of whether CVM is distinct or exists as a continuum and how this impacts cervicovaginal health
  • The proposition that CSTs are not entirely distinct but exist along a continuum [22] challenges the one-size-fits-all approaches for diagnostic and treatment
  • Researchers to standardize nomenclature and considerations for CVM research
  • CST framework needs to be continuously updated; CST classification needs to be expanded to understand their dynamics and improve diagnostic and treatment strategies for infections and diseases
Limited data on the relationship of CVM and HPV-associated cervical disease in SSA, which limit cross-study comparisons and generalizability
  • Existing studies are predominantly cross-sectional with inconsistent results due to differences in design, population characteristics (sometimes underpowered), methodologies (sampling strategy, hypervariable regions, sequencing technologies, and bioinformatics tools), and bacterial clonal variants
  • Lack of adjustment for potential confounders that might impact the relationship of HPV-associated cervical disease
  • Second peak of HPV infection in older women may be partly due to immune waning with age [3,4]
  • Conduct region-specific, longitudinal studies with larger cohorts, appropriate controls, and standardized culture-independent approaches to investigate the relationship between CVM and HPV-associated cervical disease
  • Investigate how waning immunity in older women impacts CVM and HPV; study the impact of aging on CVM and reactivation of a latent HPV infection
Understudied role of non-Lactobacillus spp. and non-Lactobacillus-dominated CVM in HPV progression to CIN
  • Whether certain non-Lactobacillus spp. (e.g., Veillonella spp.) and non-Lactobacillus-dominated CVM are pathogenic or have protective attributes against HPV infection and persistence, as well as CIN severity [30,59,121]
  • Uncertain role of pathogenic roles of certain non-Lactobacillus spp.
  • Investigate whether cervicovaginal milieus with non-Lactobacillus spp. or dominance may offer protection against CIN severity in women in SSA women
Unexplored impact of antimicrobial properties of lactobacilli on HR-HPV and cervical neoplasia
  • Limited understanding of the role of antagonistic mechanisms of lactobacilli (e.g., H2O2 production) in the natural history of HR-HPV infection and cervical neoplasia [91]
  • Study the antimicrobial properties of lactobacilli in the context of HR-HPV and cervical neoplasia
Need to underscore if association means causation during CVM alterations
  • Need to evaluate whether the alterations in the CVM could be a consequence of HPV infection and/or precancerous cervical lesions rather than a factor influencing the course of HPV infection (persistence/clearance)
  • Conduct prospective studies to establish causal links between CVM alterations and HPV persistence or carcinogenesis
Need for deeper insight into the mechanistic role of CVM and host changes in HPV persistence and carcinogenesis
  • Need to chart the biological interplay between different HPV genotypes and CVM and an association between CVM and epigenome (of the virus and host), plus the functional capacity of CVM in healthy and diseased women
  • Conflicting data on HPV and cytokine profiles [111]
  • Examine the biological and epigenetic interactions/interplay between HPV genotypes, CVM, and the host immune system
Limited understanding of the role of bacterial biofilms in the natural history of HPV infection and HPV-induced cancer
  • HPV has been observed in biofilms [113]
  • Biofilms have been associated with HR-HPV and HPV infections, and their formation may serve as an indirect marker for atypical cytological changes [55]
  • Establish the role of biofilm as a reservoir for HPV
  • Research to establish a definitive link between biofilms and HPV carcinogenesis and CVM alterations in tumour-containing tissues
  • Explore biofilm-targeted interventions
Unexplored impact of HPV vaccines on CVM diversity and composition
  • Certain bacteria (e.g., Prevotella, phyla Caldithrix, and Nitrospirae) may dampen the immunological effect of therapeutic vaccines (e.g., PepCan) [122]
  • Current evidence indicates a null effect of HPV vaccines on the composition and diversity [122], yet CVM is impacted by race/ethnicity [18]
  • Repeat research with a larger sample size to obtain additional data for confirmatory purposes
  • Conduct further research to understand the relationship between HPV vaccination and CVM
  • Explore the possibility of harnessing protective cervicovaginal features (including immunomodulatory properties of specific bacteria) that may be used alongside HPV vaccines for cervical dysplasia and cancer prevention
Low uptake and coverage of HPV vaccines and late diagnosis of cervical cancer
  • High HPV and cervical cancer burden in SSA is due to inequalities in the distribution of the HPV vaccine [10], as well as both low uptake (some as low as 4%) and coverage of HPV vaccines [9]
  • In many parts of Africa, cervical cancer is often not diagnosed early, but rather at advanced stages, which are associated with poor outcomes [123]
  • Accelerate efforts to expand HPV vaccination coverage
  • Intensify campaigns to improve uptake of HPV vaccines in SSA
  • Develop more comprehensive, accurate, and accessible screening methods
  • Enhance early detection of cervical cancer
Underexplored role of oestrogen in CVM and cancer risk
  • Variations in oestrogen levels and DNA adducts linked to cancer risk have been noted across different racial and ethnic groups [124,125], thereby suggesting varied oestrogen metabolism and cancer risks across populations [126]
  • Investigate the impact of oestrogen metabolism on CVM and cervical carcinogenesis in SSA populations
Debate on CVM homogeneity versus heterogeneity and definition of a healthy versus diseased CVM in asymptomatic women of African descent
  • Ongoing debates highlight the complexities of CVM composition [32,72,73,74],
    which is not fully understood if certain non-Lactobacillus-dominated CVM represent abnormal, intermediate, or variant states of health
  • Ensure methodological consistency and careful consideration of technical variables when interpreting data from microbiome studies
  • Clarify definitions of healthy versus diseased CVM in women of African descent to inform HPV prevention and cancer progression
Existence of genomic diversity and reclassification of certain bacterial species
  • Certain bacteria such as G. vaginalis and L. iners exhibit genomic heterogeneity [127,128] and clonal variants [64]
  • Some bacteria (e.g., A. vaginae to F. vaginae [60]) have recently undergone reclassification. However, some investigators are still using the former taxonomic names
  • Conduct genomic and functional investigations using more accurate approaches that have detailed resolution, which will improve understanding of the role of these bacteria in HPV infection and cervical cancer
  • Investigators should adopt the updated taxonomic classifications of bacteria to ensure consistency and accuracy in scientific communication
Limited translatable research in CVM
  • There is limited CVM research that is effectively translated into practical applications
  • Ensure constant communication between microbiota research and translational science to improve genital health [129]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Onywera, H.; Mbulawa, Z.Z.A.; Brink, A.; Williamson, A.-L.; Mwapagha, L.M. Unravelling the Biological Interplay Between Genital HPV Infection and Cervicovaginal Microbiota in Sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for Cervical (Pre)cancer Prevention. Venereology 2024, 3, 211-231. https://doi.org/10.3390/venereology3040017

AMA Style

Onywera H, Mbulawa ZZA, Brink A, Williamson A-L, Mwapagha LM. Unravelling the Biological Interplay Between Genital HPV Infection and Cervicovaginal Microbiota in Sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for Cervical (Pre)cancer Prevention. Venereology. 2024; 3(4):211-231. https://doi.org/10.3390/venereology3040017

Chicago/Turabian Style

Onywera, Harris, Zizipho Z. A. Mbulawa, Adrian Brink, Anna-Lise Williamson, and Lamech M. Mwapagha. 2024. "Unravelling the Biological Interplay Between Genital HPV Infection and Cervicovaginal Microbiota in Sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for Cervical (Pre)cancer Prevention" Venereology 3, no. 4: 211-231. https://doi.org/10.3390/venereology3040017

APA Style

Onywera, H., Mbulawa, Z. Z. A., Brink, A., Williamson, A. -L., & Mwapagha, L. M. (2024). Unravelling the Biological Interplay Between Genital HPV Infection and Cervicovaginal Microbiota in Sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for Cervical (Pre)cancer Prevention. Venereology, 3(4), 211-231. https://doi.org/10.3390/venereology3040017

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop