Schema Incongruity: A Framework for Distributing Service Forms of FMCG Brands via a Digital Channel
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Development of a Digital Channel
3. Omni-Channel Distribution
4. Challenges FMCG Organisations Are Facing
5. Pathway Forward for FMCG Organisations
6. Schema Incongruity Theory
7. Extending Schema Incongruity Theory to Service Forms of FMCG Brands
8. Service Forms of FMCG Offerings
9. Methodology
9.1. Treatment 1: Supermarket (SM)
9.2. Treatment 2 Online Subscription Plan (OSP)
9.3. Treatment 3: Online Store (OS)
What do you think of the offering?
How much would you pay for it?
Would you purchase it?
10. Thematic Analysis Using Unsupervised Machine Learning
11. Results
11.1. Data Summary
11.2. Engagement with the Posts
11.3. Sentiment Analysis
“Awesome offering. The range is huge and yummo.”[R114]
“Really like it! Such a great, convenient idea. I also love that you can choose different options and also recipe ideas. Perfect to get the kids in the kitchen helping.”[R347]
“This could be an awesome idea for people that would like to try different flavours and experiment a bit instead of going for their “usual” at the supermarket. Maybe if you could align yourselves with another brand that ties in with oats to pop in the box, too, something breakfasty that could work as a topper for oats or even as an ingredient for smoothies. I like the idea of it being delivered also.”[R313]
“It’s an interesting concept, but I am not sure it works as a subscription service…What if you were to align yourselves with 2–3 other compatible brands and expand the offering? I would subscribe to an oat-predominant box if I could expect sample or full-size products from other breakfast or baking brands.”[R316]
“It’s a cool idea, especially for rural people who want good food.”[R236]
“As a parent, I do the groceries every week, so I would not buy online unless it were something that the supermarket does not offer as it would not be worth paying for the postage.”[R214]
11.4. Thematic Analysis
12. Discussion
12.1. Insights into the Engagement
12.2. Thematic Analysis
12.2.1. Minimal or No Stimulation
12.2.2. Moderately Incongruent
12.2.3. Extreme Incongruence
13. Limitations of the Study
14. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chevalier, S. Retail E-Commerce Sales Worldwide from 2014 to 2024. Statista. 2021. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/379046/worldwide-retail-e-commerce-sales/ (accessed on 12 November 2021).
- Duff, E. Online FMCG Sales Growing Four Times Faster than Offline. 2018. Available online: https://www.fmcgceo.co.uk/online-fmcg-sales-growing-four-times-faster-than-offline/ (accessed on 21 April 2022).
- Abbu, H.R.; Fleischmann, D.; Gopalakrishna, P. The Digital Transformation of the Grocery Business-Driven by Consumers Powered by Technology and Accelerated by the COVID-19 Pandemic. In Proceedings of the World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, Terceira Island, Portugal, 30 March–2 April 2021; Volume 3, pp. 329–339. [Google Scholar]
- CSNEWS. Nielsen: Convenience, Continuous Innovation Key to Retail Success. 2014. Available online: https://csnews.com/nielsen-convenience-continuous-innovation-key-retail-success (accessed on 21 April 2022).
- Roberts, M.; Xu, X.M.; Mettos, N. Internet shopping: The Supermarket Model and Customer Perceptions. J. Electron. Commer. Organ. 2003, 1, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Morganosky, M.A.; Cude, B.J. Consumer Response to Online Grocery Shopping. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2000, 28, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vijayasarathy, L.R. Predicting Consumer Intentions to Use Online Shopping: The Case for an Augmented Technology Acceptance Model. Inf. Manag. 2004, 41, 747–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ailawadi, K.L.; Farris, P.W. Managing Multi-and Omni-Channel Distribution: Metrics and Research Directions. J. Retail. 2017, 93, 120–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verhoef, P.C.; Kannan, P.K.; Inman, J.J. From Multi-Channel Retailing to Omni-Channel Retailing: Introduction to the Special Issue on Multi-Channel Retailing to Omni-Channel Retailing. J. Retail. 2015, 91, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, J.; Arce-Urriza, M.; Cebollada-Calvo, J.; Chintagunta, P.K. An Empirical Analysis of Shopping Behaviour Across Online and Offline Channels for Grocery Products: The Moderating Effects of Household and Product Characteristics. J. Interact. Mark. 2010, 24, 251–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melis, K.; Campo, K.; Breugelmans, E.; Lamey, L. The Impact of the Multi-Channel Retail Mix on Online Store Choice: Does Online Experience Matter? J. Retail. 2015, 91, 272–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maxwell, J.G.; Hudson, M. Customers Take Control: How the Multi-Channel Shopper Is Changing the Global Retail Landscape. Price Water Cooper. 2011. Available online: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/retail-consumer/retail-consumer-publications/global-multi-channel-consumer-survey/assets/2011-multi-channel-survey.pdf (accessed on 1 November 2021).
- Chen, L.; Nan, G.; Li, M.; Feng, B.; Liu, Q. Manufacturer’s Online Selling Strategies Under Spillovers from Online to Offline Sales. J Oper. Res. Soci. 2022, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, L.; Li, L. The Impact of Cross-Channel Integration on Retailers’ Sales Growth. J. Retail. 2015, 91, 198–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shriver, S.; Bollinger, B. Structural Analysis of Multi-Channel Demand. Columbia Bus. Sch. Res. Pap. 2015, 1, 15–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, K.; Goldfarb, A. Can Offline Stores Drive Online Sales? J. Mark. Res. 2017, 54, 706–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beck, N.; Rygl, D. Categorisation of Multiple Channel Retailing in Multi-, Cross-, and Omni-Channel Retailing for Retailers and Retailing. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2015, 27, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, L.; Li, L. Determinants of Retailers’ Cross-Channel Integration: An Innovation Diffusion Perspective on Omni-Channel Retailing. J. Interact. Mark. 2018, 44, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neslin, S.A.; Grewal, D.; Leghorn, R.; Shankar, V.; Teerling, M.L.; Thomas, J.S.; Verhoef, P.C. Challenges and Opportunities in Multi-Channel Customer Management. J. Serv. Res. 2006, 9, 95–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rigby, D. The Future of Shopping. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2011, 89, 65–76. [Google Scholar]
- Lusch, R.F.; Vargo, S.L.; O’Brien, M. Competing Through Service: Insights from Service-Dominant Logic. J. Retail. 2007, 83, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pauwels, K.; Leeflang, P.S.H.; Teerling, M.L.; Huizingh, K.R.E. Does Online Information Drive Offline Revenues? Only for Specific Products and Consumer Segments! J. Retail. 2011, 71, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Verhoef, P.C.; Neslin, S.A.B.; Vroomen, B. Multi-Channel Customer Management: Understanding the Research Shopper Phenomenon. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2007, 24, 129–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bell, D.R.; Gallino, S.; Moreno, A. Offline Showrooms in Omnichannel Retail: Demand and Operational Benefits. Manag. Sci. 2018, 64, 1629–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cook, G. Customer Experience in the Omni-Channel World and the Challenges and Opportunities this Presents. J. Direct Data Digit. Mark. Pract. 2014, 15, 262–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pauwels, K.; Neslin, S.A. Building with Bricks and Mortar: The Revenue Impact of Opening Physical Stores in a Multi-Channel Environment. J. Retail. 2015, 91, 182–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, R.; Lange, T.; Silen, P. Building Omnichannel Excellence. McKinsey 2016, 1–10. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/building-omnichannel-excellence (accessed on 1 December 2021).
- Jindal, R.P.; Gauri, D.K.; Li, W.; Ma, Y. Omnichannel Battle Between Amazon and Walmart: Is the Focus on Delivery the Best Strategy? J. Bus. Res. 2021, 122, 270–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stojanov, M.; Zhelyazkova, D.; Gramatikova, E. Development of Courier Services in the Context of Omnichannel Strategy. In Proceedings of the 5th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences & Arts (SGEM 2018), Albena, Bulgaria, 26 August–1 September 2018; pp. 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DHL. Omni-Channel Retail: Fulfilling Demand Profitably DHL Supply Chain—Excellence. Simply Delivered. 2019. Available online: https://dhl.lookbookhq.com/ao_thought-leadership_omni-channel?utm_source=Eloqua&utm_medium=Eloqua-LP&utm_campaign=OmniChannel2018&utm_content=Always-On&sfid=701440000012aBhAAI (accessed on 12 November 2021).
- FedEx Blogpost. E-Commerce Playbook: Reaching Your Next E-Commerce Goal. Available online: https://www.fedex.com/content/dam/fedex/eu-europe/downloads/ecommerce-playbook-GB.pdf (accessed on 1 December 2021).
- Reblin, G. Marketing Technology Powers Direct Mail and Omni Channel Marketing. USPS Blog, 12 February 2019. Available online: https://uspsblog.com/direct-mail/ (accessed on 21 December 2021).
- Mirzabeiki, V.; Saghiri, S.S. From Ambition to Action: How to Achieve Integration in Omni-Channel? J. Bus. Res. 2020, 110, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grewal, D.; Roggeveen, A.L.; Nordfält, J. The Future of Retailing. J. Retail. 2017, 93, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carnein, M.; Heuchert, M.; Homann, L.; Trautmann, H.; Vossen, G.; Becker, J.; Kraume, K. Towards Efficient and Informative Omni-Channel Customer Relationship Management. In Advances in Conceptual Modeling. ER 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science; De Cesare, S., Frank, U., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; Volume 10651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campo, K.; Breugelmans, E. Buying Groceries in Brick and Click Stores: Category Allocation Decisions and the Moderating Effect of Online Buying Experience. J. Interact. Mark. 2015, 31, 63–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, Y.; Lai, K.K.; Liang, L. Bricks or clicks: The Impact of Manufacturers’ Encroachment on Both Manufacturer-Owned and Traditional Retail Channels. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2013, 25, 695–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marimon, F.; Vidgen, R.; Barnes, S.; Cristóbal, E. Purchasing Behaviour in an Online Supermarket: The Applicability of ES-QUAL. Int. J. Mark. Res. 2010, 52, 111–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rafiq, M.; Fulford, H. Loyalty Transfer From Offline to Online Stores in the UK Grocery Industry. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2005, 33, 444–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mercier, P.; Welch, D.; Crétenot, G. In Omnichannel Retail, It’s Still About Detail. BCG Perspect. 2014, 5, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Lapoule, P. The French Grocery Retail Company Intermarché Develops the ‘Click and Drive’ Model. South Asian J. Bus. Manag. Cases 2014, 3, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durden, T. Visualising Walmart’s Domination of the US Grocery Market. Zero Hedge, 11 August 2019. Available online: https://archive.ph/ER7HI#selection-401.0-449.23 (accessed on 12 November 2021).
- Gain. Canada—Retail Foods Retail Sector Overview—2019. Global Agricultural Information Network, Gain Report Number CA19022. 2019. Available online: https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/report/downloadreportbyfilename?filename=Retail%20Foods_Ottawa_Canada_7-10-2019.pdf (accessed on 1 December 2021).
- Gain. New Zealand—Retail Food Sector. Global Agricultural Information Network. Gain Report Number NZ9020. 2009. Available online: https://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/RETAIL%20FOOD%20SECTOR_Wellington_New%20Zealand_11-16-2009.pdf (accessed on 1 December 2021).
- Berges-Sennou, F.; Bontems, P.; Réquillart, V. Economics of Private Labels: A Survey of Literature. J. Agric. Food Ind. Organ. 2004, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobson, P.W. Exploiting Buyer Power: Lessons From the British Grocery Trade. Antitrust Law J. 2005, 72, 529–562. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Gerchak, Y. Supply Chain Coordination when Demand is Shelf-Space Dependent. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2001, 3, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gómez, M.; Rubio, N. Shelf Management of Store Brands: Analysis of Manufacturers’ Perceptions. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2008, 36, 50–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nogales, A.F.; Suarez, M.G. Shelf Space Management of Private Labels: A Case Study in Spanish Retailing. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2005, 12, 205–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matos, P.V.; do Vale, R.C. The Market Power of Private Labels-Retailer’s Brand and Industry Effect. In Marketing Dynamism and Sustainability: Things Change, Things Stay the Same; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; p. 136. [Google Scholar]
- Davcik, N.S.; Sharma, P. Impact of Product Differentiation, Marketing Investments and Brand Equity on Pricing Strategies: A Brand Level Investigation. Eur. Mark. 2015, 49, 760–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobson, P.W.; Zhou, L. The Competition Effects of Look-Alike Private Label Products. In The National Brands and Private Labels in Retailing; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 17–26. [Google Scholar]
- Dobson, P.W.; Chakraborty, R. Private Labels and Branded Goods: Consumers’ Horrors and Heroes. In Private Labels, Brands and Competition Policy: The Changing Landscape of Retail Competition; Ezrachi, A., Bernitz, U., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2005; pp. 99–124. [Google Scholar]
- Aghion, P.; Bloom, N.; Blundell, R.; Griffith, R.; Howitt, P. Competition and Innovation: An inverted-U Relationship. Q. J. Econ. 2005, 120, 701–728. [Google Scholar]
- Gierszewska, G.; Seretny, M. Sustainable Behaviour–the Need of Change in Consumer and Business Attitudes and Behaviour. Found. Manag. 2019, 11, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lubowiecki-Vikuk, A.; Dąbrowska, A.; Machnik, A. Responsible Consumer and Lifestyle: Sustainability Insights. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2020, 25, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mommens, K.; Rai, H.B.; Van Lier, T.; Macharis, C. Delivery to Homes or Collection Points? A Sustainability Analysis for Urban, Urbanised and Rural Areas in Belgium. J. Transp. Geogr. 2021, 94, 103095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Louis, D.; Lombart, C.; Durif, F. Packaging-Free Products: A Lever of Proximity and Loyalty Between Consumers and Grocery Stores. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 60, 102499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giesler, M.; Veresiu, E. Creating the Responsible Consumer: Moralistic Governance Regimes and Consumer Subjectivity. J. Consum. Res. 2014, 41, 840–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kautish, P.; Soni, S. The Determinants of Consumer Willingness to Search for Environmental-Friendly Products: A survey. Int. J. Manag. 2012, 29, 696. [Google Scholar]
- Bemporad, R.; Baranowski, M. Conscious Consumers Are Changing the Rules of Marketing. Are You Ready? Highlights from the BBMG Conscious Consumer Report. 2007. Available online: https://www.fmi.org/docs/sustainability/BBMG_Conscious_Consumer_White_Paper.pdf (accessed on 1 November 2021).
- Sarkar, A.N. Promoting Eco-Innovations to Leverage Sustainable Development of Eco-Industry and Green Growth. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. 2013, 2, 171. [Google Scholar]
- Rubio-Tapia, A.; Ludvigsson, J.F.; Brantner, T.L.; Murray, J.A.; Everhart, J.E. The Prevalence of Celiac Disease in the United States. Off. J. Am. Coll. Gastroenterol. ACG 2012, 107, 1538–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Celiac Disease Foundation. What Is Celiac Disease? 2021. Available online: https://celiac.org/about-celiac-disease/what-is-celiac-disease/ (accessed on 1 November 2021).
- Mandler, G. The Structure of Value: Accounting for Taste. In Affect and Cognition: The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium; Clark, M.S., Fiske, S.T., Eds.; Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1982; pp. 3–36. [Google Scholar]
- Beals, D.E. Reappropriating Schema: Conceptions of Development from Bartlett and Bakhtin. Mind Cult. Act. 1998, 5, 3–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geenty, M. Aussies Ban NZ’s Favourite Car Ad. New Zealand Herald, 23 February 2007. Available online: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/aussies-ban-nzs-favourite-car-ad/HX2NQRDASAY5HQI3RUUHOVZZ2M/ (accessed on 21 April 2022).
- Lee, E.J.; Schumann, D.W. Explaining the Special Case of Incongruity in Advertising: Combining Classic Theoretical Approaches. Mark. Theory 2004, 4, 59–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petty, R.E.; Cacioppo, J.T. The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology; Berkowitz, L., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1986; Volume 19, pp. 123–205. [Google Scholar]
- Zuckerman, M. Behavioral Expressions and Biosocial Bases of Sensation Seeking; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Yoon, H.J. Understanding Schema Incongruity as a Process in Advertising: Review and Future Recommendations. J. Mark. Commun. 2013, 19, 360–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, X.; De Hooge, I.E.; Fischer, A.R. Something Underneath? Using a Within-Subjects Design to Examine Schema Congruity Theory at an Individual Level. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2022, 68, 102994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halkias, G.; Kokkinaki, F. Increasing Advertising Effectiveness Through Incongruity-Based Tactics: The Moderating Role of Consumer Involvement. J. Mark. Commun. 2013, 19, 182–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halkias, G.; Kokkinaki, F. The Degree of Ad– Brand Incongruity and the Distinction Between Schema Driven and Stimulus-Driven Attitudes. J. Advert. 2014, 43, 397–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jhang, J.H.; Grant, S.J.; Campbell, M.C. Get It? Got It. Good! Enhancing New Product Acceptance by Facilitating Resolution of Extreme Incongruity. J. Mark. Res. 2012, 49, 247–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srivastava, K.; Sharma, N.K. Consumer Attitude Towards Brand-Extension Incongruity: The Moderating Role of Need for Cognition and Need for Change. J. Mark. Manag. 2012, 28, 652–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heckler, S.E.; Childers, T.L. The Role of Expectancy and Relevancy in Memory for Verbal and Visual Information: What is Incongruency? J. Consum. Res. 1992, 18, 475–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alden, D.L.; Mukherjee, A.; Hoyer, W.D. The Effects of Incongruity, Surprise and Positive Moderators on Perceived Humour in Television Advertising. J. Advert. 2000, 29, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hirschberg, C.; Rajko, A.; Schumacher, T.; Wrulich, M. The Changing Market for Food Delivery. 2016. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/technology-media-and-telecommunications/our-insights/the-changing-market-for-food-delivery (accessed on 1 December 2021).
- Microsoft NZ News Centre. Digital Transformation the Recipe for Success at My Food Bag. 2018. Available online: https://news.microsoft.com/en-nz/2018/09/05/digital-transformation-the-recipe-for-success-at-my-food-bag/ (accessed on 1 November 2021).
- Ryan, H. My Food Bag’s Phenomenal Rise: From Zero to $100m Revenue in Three Years. NZ Herald, Business, 10 December 2015. Available online: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11558913 (accessed on 21 December 2021).
- My Food Bag. My Family Bag. 2021. Available online: https://www.myfoodbag.co.nz/products?feeds=three (accessed on 21 April 2022).
- Wang, S.; Wang, S.; Wang, M.T. Shopping Online or Not? Cognition and Personality Matters. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2006, 1, 68–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, S.S.; Chang, C.C.; Chien, Y.L.; Chang, J.H. Having Champagne Without Celebration? The Impact of Self-Regulatory Focus on Moderate Incongruity Effect. Eur. J. Mark. 2014, 48, 1939–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Otago Daily Times. Harraways Celebrates 150 Years with Going for Grain Book. Otago Daily Times, 9 May 2019. Available online: https://www.odt.co.nz/features/sponsored-content/story/harraways-celebrates-150-years-going-grain-book (accessed on 1 November 2021).
- Chakraborty, G.; Pagolu, M.; Garla, S. Text Mining and Analysis. Practical Methods, Examples, and Case Studies Using SAS; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2013; Available online: http://csyue.nccu.edu.tw/ch/Text%20Mining%20and%20Analysis,%20Practical%20Methods,%20Examples%20and%20Case%20Studies%20(2013%20Book).pdf (accessed on 16 June 2021).
- Robertson, S. Understanding Inverse Document Frequency: On Theoretical Arguments for IDF. J. Doc. 2004, 60, 503–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Abidin, T.F.; Yusuf, B.; Umran, M. Singular Value Decomposition for Dimensionality Reduction in Unsupervised Text Learning Problems. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Education Technology and Computer, Shanghai, China, 22–24 June 2010; Volume 4, p. V4-422. [Google Scholar]
- Bowden, J.L.H. The Process of Customer Engagement: A Conceptual Framework. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2009, 17, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Doorn, J.; Lemon, K.N.; Mittal, V.; Nass, S.; Pick, D.; Pirner, P.; Verhoef, P.C. Customer Engagement Behaviour: Theoretical Foundations and Research Directions. J. Serv. Res. 2010, 13, 253–266. [Google Scholar]
- Parackal, M.; Parackal, S.; Mather, D.; Eusebius, S. Dynamic Transactional Model: A Framework for Communicating Public Health Messages via Social Media. Perspect. Public Health 2021, 141, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- FMCG Business. Harraways Rebrands in Style. FMCG Business, 29 March 2019. Available online: https://www.fmcgbusiness.co.nz/harraways-rebrands-in-style/ (accessed on 1 December 2021).
- Thorsen, C.A.; DeVore, S. Analyzing Reflection On/For Action: A New Approach. Reflective Pract. 2013, 14, 88–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crozier, R.; Ranyard, R. Cognitive Process Models and Explanations of Decision Making. In Decision Making; Routledge: London, UK, 2002; pp. 19–34. [Google Scholar]
Channels | Facebook Ad Cost | Impression | Reach | Participation |
---|---|---|---|---|
Supermarket (SM) | $190 | 17,382 | 6456 | 32 |
Online subscription plan (OSP) | $175 | 17,389 | 6653 | 35 |
Online Store (OS) | $175 | 21,248 | 6698 | 16 |
Channels | Comments | Likes | Shares | Total Engagement |
---|---|---|---|---|
Supermarket (SM) | 32 | 92 | 0 | 124 |
Online subscription plan (OSP) | 35 | 73 | 0 | 108 |
Online store (OS) | 16 | 32 | 0 | 49 |
Channels | Positive | Negative | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Supermarket (SM) | 32 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 32 |
Online subscription plan (OSP) | 30 (85%) | 5 (15%) | 35 |
Online store (OS) | 13 (81%) | 3 (19%) | 16 |
Supermarket (SM) | Online Subscription Plan (OSP) | Online Store (OS) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Term | Weight | Term | Weight | Term | Weight |
Sugar | 0.616 | Box | 0.625 | Great | 0.520 |
Serve | 0.616 | Brand | 0.625 | Love | 0.500 |
Special | 0.616 | Roll | 0.610 | Retail price | 0.500 |
Definitely | 0.600 | Cool | 0.610 | Shop | 0.500 |
Single | 0.600 | Buy | 0.547 | Postage | 0.468 |
Flavour | 0.600 | Kid | 0.547 | Oat | 0.420 |
Syrup | 0.600 | Yes | 0.547 | Idea | 0.420 |
Honey | 0.600 | Recipe | 0.547 | Offer | 0.420 |
Sound | 0.600 | Different | 0.512 | Delivery | 0.370 |
Cut | 0.600 | Interest | 0.496 | Online | 0.370 |
Golden | 0.600 | Product | 0.469 | Purchase | 0.354 |
Size | 0.600 | Breakfast | 0.464 | Buy | 0.334 |
Good | 0.600 | Eat | 0.415 | Normal | 0.319 |
Great | 0.536 | Love | 0.391 | Pay | 0.312 |
Price | 0.536 | Great | 0.391 | Yes | 0.250 |
Idea | 0.387 | Retail | 0.187 |
Treatment | Label | Keywords | Archetype Responses |
---|---|---|---|
Supermarket (SM) | Big packs | oat price pay love | I love the big packs of rolled oats. It’s a good price usually, and my son loves it. I can mix it up by using different fruits, and I can soak some in soy milk for my breakfast smoothies. [R111] |
Honey & Golden Syrup | syrup honey sound golden | Your product range sounds delicious! Especially the honey and golden syrup oats. I’m not sure on the box size but between $5–$10? And absolutely! Can’t think of a better breakfast. [R121] | |
Health-conscious | sugar serve special single | We get the single serve packages as they’re convenient and quick to serve our toddler when he asks for porridge. We tend to only get the plain ones now, as we found the other flavours had a really high sugar ratio—probably why they tasted so good! Not ideal for toddler breakfast,though. [R131] | |
Generational users | product great pay flavour cut | I always buy Harraways, mum did too when I was a kid. I even cut the recipe off and stuck it to the pantry (door) for my kids. [R141] | |
Online Subscription Plan (OSP) | Convenient | oat buy product roll | “Great idea! Convenient, and if it came with different products sometimes, it would give you a reason to try different things.” [R311] |
Supply frequency | interest eat porridge month purchase | Would also like if you could choose frequency—e.g., a box is $20 a day but you can get bi-weekly, monthly, or every 2 months—we use a lot, so more frequent than monthly would be handy! [R321] | |
Heavy users | great idea different recipe | We use a lot of oats for different things, so it would be great to get other different ideas on how to use them. [R331] We use oats for cooking, not just for breakfast, so a few selected pick n mix packs might be a cool idea also. [R336] | |
Oats lovers | love yes kid cool porridge | I love porridge and so do my kids. I think it’s a good offering of products, good selection. [R341] | |
Online store (OS) | Sceptics | postage online offer shop | You would need a selling point to get people to buy direct. It would need to beat countdowns price including delivery. [R211] |
Costly | delivery buy oat normal price | Would need to consider the cost to have it delivered vs. going to the supermarket. [R221] | |
Variety | love great purchase retail price | Awesome as! Can enjoy a different flavour every day… Would be cool to get wee bonuses when buying the lot at once. [R231] |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Parackal, M.; Mather, D.; Redman, R. Schema Incongruity: A Framework for Distributing Service Forms of FMCG Brands via a Digital Channel. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2022, 17, 1124-1142. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer17030057
Parackal M, Mather D, Redman R. Schema Incongruity: A Framework for Distributing Service Forms of FMCG Brands via a Digital Channel. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2022; 17(3):1124-1142. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer17030057
Chicago/Turabian StyleParackal, Mathew, Damien Mather, and Rory Redman. 2022. "Schema Incongruity: A Framework for Distributing Service Forms of FMCG Brands via a Digital Channel" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 17, no. 3: 1124-1142. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer17030057
APA StyleParackal, M., Mather, D., & Redman, R. (2022). Schema Incongruity: A Framework for Distributing Service Forms of FMCG Brands via a Digital Channel. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 17(3), 1124-1142. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer17030057