Next Article in Journal
Relaxant Effect of the Ethanol Extract of Helichrysum plicatum (Asteraceae) on Isolated Rat Ileum Contractions
Previous Article in Journal
Probing the Dynamics of Solvation and Structure of the OH- Ion in Aqueous Solution from Picosecond Transient Absorption Measurements
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 15
Issue 5
10.3390/molecules15053378
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Vitro and in Vivo Effects of Laurus nobilis L. Leaf Extracts

by
Biljana Kaurinovic
*,
Mira Popovic
and
Sanja Vlaisavljevic
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2010, 15(5), 3378-3390; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules15053378
Submission received: 24 March 2010 / Revised: 28 April 2010 / Accepted: 5 May 2010 / Published: 7 May 2010
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The in vitro and in vivo antioxidant activities of different extracts of laurel leaves were studied. Free radical scavenging capacity (RSC) was evaluated measuring the scavenging activity on the DPPH, NO, O2•− and OH radicals. The effects on lipid peroxidation (LP) were also evaluated. Experimental results indicate that ethyl acetate extract of leaves has exhibited the largest RSC capacity in neutralization of DPPH, NO, O2•− and OH radicals. The same result was obtained in investigation of extracts impact on LP. The in vivo effects were evaluated on some antioxidant systems (activities of GSHPx, LPx, Px, CAT and XOD, and GSH content) in the mice liver and blood-hemolysate after treatment with the examined laurel extracts, or in combination with carbon tetrachloride (CCl4). On the basis of the results obtained it can be concluded that the examined extracts exhibited a certain protective effect, which is more pronounced on the liver than on blood-hemolysate parameters. The results obtained indicate toxicity of CCl4, probably due to the radicals involved in its metabolism. Combined treatments with CCl4 and the examined extracts showed both positive and negative synergism. Based on the experimental results, the strongest protective effect was shown by the EtOAc extract.

1. Introduction

The Lauraceae family comprises over 2,500 species which occur within the subtropics and tropics of Eastern Asia, South and North America. Most species possess aromatic roots, stems and fruits. One of the most well-known and most frequently used plants from this family is Laurus nobilis L., also called bay laurel. L. nobilis is a species held in high esteem since ancient times. It was dedicated to Apollo, the ancient Greek god of light, and a symbol of peace and victory used to make wreaths for emperors, generals, and poets [1].
The chemical composition of bay leaves has been extensively studied. From the essential oil, also called laurel leaf oil, various volatile components with antimicrobial activities against bacteria, yeasts, and some molds were identified [2,3,4]. 1,8-Cineole was the major component in all cases, with percentages ranging up to ca. 50% [5]. The presence of linalool, R-terpinyl acetate, and several monoterpene hydrocarbons such as α-pinene and sabinene was also determined. Benzene compounds (eugenol, methyl eugenol, and elemicin), present in percentages ranging between 1% and 12%, are responsible for the spicy aroma of bay leaves and are extremely important factors determining the sensory quality of bay leaves [6]. The berries (fruit) contain both fixed and volatile oils, the former, known as Oil of Bays, include laurostearine, the ether of lauric acid.
In previous phytochemical investigations on L. nobilis leaves and fruits, different groups of chemicals were isolated: flavones (apigenin and luteolin) [7], flavonols (kaempferol, myricetin, and quercitin) [8], sesquiterpene lactones [9], alkaloids [10], glycosylated flavonoids [11], and mono-terpene and germacrane alcohols [12].
Roots and leaves are a source of sesquiterpene lactones, and two distinct chemical types were found containing laurenobiolide and costunolide as major compounds, respectively [13,14]. Sesquiterpene lactones identified in bay leaf were found to have different pharmacological properties including inhibitory effects on NO production (anti-inflammatory) [15], inhibitory effects on alcohol absorption [16], and enhancement of liver glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity [17].
As a medicinal plant, Bay leaves and fruits have been employed against rheumatism, skin rashes, and earaches. In addition, it has been used as a stomachic, astringent, carminative, diaphoretic, stimulant, emetic, emmenagogue, abortifacient, and insect repellent. The essential oil is used by the cosmetic industry in creams, perfumes, and soaps.
The aim of this work was to study the antioxidant activity of different extracts of laurel leaves in vitro, to assess their potential capacity as scavengers of free radicals (DPPH, NO, O2•− and OH radicals) and as inhibitors of lipid peroxidation. Extracts of laurel leaves were used to study in vivo effects on some antioxidant systems in the mice liver and blood in combination with and without carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) as an inducer of oxidative stress.

2. Results and Discussion

Results of determination of total flavonoids in laurel extracts of leaves are given in Table 1.
Table
Table 1. Content of total flavonoids (mg/g) in extracts of leaves of L. nobilis.
Table 1. Content of total flavonoids (mg/g) in extracts of leaves of L. nobilis.
ExtractEt2O CHCl3EtOAc n-BuOH H2O
Leaf 0.761.021.561.070.68
The most abundant in flavonoids proved to be the ethyl acetate extract, while water extract contains the least flavonoids. Amount of flavonoids in extracts plays a significant role in their antioxidative capacity. Differences in flavonoid content between extracts and between plant organs can be explained by different number of secretory structures in various plant tissues [18].
Antiradical activity was observed in the study of laurel leaves extracts in different solvents on the content of DPPH, O2•− and NO radicals (Table 2.), whereby the EtOAc extract exhibited the strongest inhibitory effect, as the IC50 value was achieved with the lowest concentration.
Table
Table 2. IC50 values (μg/cm3) of the neutralization of DPPH, O2•− and NO radicals with laurel extracts.
Table 2. IC50 values (μg/cm3) of the neutralization of DPPH, O2•− and NO radicals with laurel extracts.
IC50 (μg/cm3)
ExtractEt2O CHCl3EtOAc n-BuOH H2O
DPPH radical127.38139.4283.24181.35161.83
O2• − radical327.60429.43163.57288.64486.32
NO radical168.77322.84158.63386.80618.42
The obtained results could point to strong quenching activities of flavonoids present in the leaves of laurel against DPPH radicals [19]. It can be supposed that such antiradical activity is also caused, besides flavonoids, by terpenoids, since nonpolar solvents also exhibited high antiradical potential. When investigating neutralization of O2•− and NO radicals, ethylacetate extract has also exhibited the greatest ability of their scavenging. These results can be attributed to the presence of sesquiterpenic lactones isolated from the plant that possess certain biological and pharmacological activity [20,21]. Matsuda et al. [15] have also established that the methanolic extract from the leaves of L. nobilis was found to inhibit nitric oxide (NO) production in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated mouse peritoneal macrophages. It was concluded that seven sesquiterpene lactones (costunolide, dehydrocostus lactone, eremanthine, zaluzanin C, magnolialide, santamarine and spirafolide) potently inhibited LPS-induced NO production.
Inhibition of NO radicals with laurel extracts is very significant, having in mind the ability to neutralize the superoxide anion radicals as well. The common reaction between superoxide anion radical and nitrogen-oxide radical yields a very reactive peroxynitrile anion (ONOO−) which is very active in reaction of nitrification of phenols - e.g. nitrification of thyrozine causes enzyme disfunctions, and increased amounts of 3-nitrothyrozine were found in various patological states, such as inflammation, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, and atherosclerosis [22]. If formation of nitro-derivatives of thyrozine is prevented, the occurrence of these diseases due to oxidative stress is reduced. Ethyl acetate extract of laurel leaves is especially suited in this process since it neutralizes both superoxide anion radical and NO radical. Obtained results can be related to the experiments in which the total amount of flavonoids was determined (Table 1.), which show that ethyl acetate extract of laurel leaf contains the largest amounts of total flavonoids.
The activity of the laurel extracts (1%, 5% and 10%) on the production of hydroxyl radicals is shown in Table 3. as mean with standard deviation. Laurel extracts have exhibited different behavior related to production of OH radicals. Ether, chloroform and ethyl acetate extracts expressed inhibition of OH radical at all investigated concentrations. A stronger inhibition of OH radical production was expressed by the ethyl acetate extracts, especially the 10% solution (26.5 ± 1.1 nmol/cm3) in comparison with the control (51.4 ± 1.2 nmol/cm3). n-Butanol and water extract have prooxidative effects, but not statistically significant. The antioxidant activities of all extracts of laurel leaves were dose dependent.
Table
Table 3. Effect of extracts of laurel leaves on production of hydroxyl radicals.
Table 3. Effect of extracts of laurel leaves on production of hydroxyl radicals.
ExtractControlEt2OCHCl3EtOAcn-BuOHH2O
1%51.4 ± 1.247.7 ± 1.1 (7.2)44.5 ± 1.2 (13.4)42.5 ± 0.9 (17.3)51.8 ± 1.252.7 ± 1.0
5%51.4 ± 1.241.7 ± 1.2 (18.9)38.3 ± 1.1 (25.5)34.7 ± 1.1 (32.5)53.2 ± 1.053.8 ± 1.1
10%51.4 ± 1.235.2 ± 1.4 (31.5)33.5 ± 1.3 (34.8)26.5 ± 1.1 (48.4)53.6 ± 1.254.7 ± 1.4
Results are expressed in nmol/cm3 of liposomes. Values in the parentheses represent % of inhibition of hydroxyl radical production.
Since lipid peroxidation causes oxidative damage to cell membranes and all other systems that contain lipids [23], in investigation of total antioxidative activity of extracts it is necessary to investigate their effects on lipid peroxidation (Table 4.). The first three extracts of laurel leaves (Et2O, CHCl3 and EtOAc) reduced the intensity of lipid peroxidation. The largest inhibitory activity, again, was exhibited by ethyl acetate extract. High inhibitory effect of this extract and its components towards Fe2+-dependent LP of liposomes can be related to the presence of flavonoids in the extracts. It was established that flavonoids act as mighty scavangers of free radicals [24]. It is also known that antiradical potential of flavonoids are the most pronounced towards OH, peroxy- and alkoxy radicals, which are formed in the process of lipid peroxidation [25]. Different flavonoids inhibit LP in vitro and the most pronounced effect is exhibited by quercetin [26]. Our previous investigation has also established similar results, since the ethyl acetate extract of marigold has also statistically significantly decreased production of OH radicals [27]. Since quercetin and its glycosides are the most abundant flavonoids in both marigold and laurel [8], efficiency of above mentioned ethyl acetate extracts can be explained in two ways: components of the ethyl acetate extract may inhibit production of OH radicals in the Fenton’s reaction system Fe2+-H2O2, by forming complexes with Fe2+ ions. It is well known that flavonoids containing free 5-OH groups form complexes with bi- and trivalent metal ions [28]. Also, components of the extract can act as scavengers of OH radicals, thus forming new radicals, wich can be stabilized through resonance [29].
Table
Table 4. Effect of extracts of laurel leaves on intensity of lipid peroxidation.
Table 4. Effect of extracts of laurel leaves on intensity of lipid peroxidation.
ExtractControlEt2O CHCl3EtOAc n-BuOH H2O
1%144.9 ± 3.6138.1 ± 1.9 (4.7)137.8 ± 1.4 (4.9)130.4 ± 2.6 (10.0)163.8 ± 3.1165.3 ± 2.8
5%144.9 ± 3.6130.3 ± 2.2 (10.1)128.8 ± 1.1 (11.1)116.9 ± 1.9 (19.3)166.3 ± 2.3172.3 ± 2.4
10%144.9 ± 3.6125.1 ± 3.1 (13.7)123.8 ± 2.4 (14.6)105.4 ± 1.6 (27.3)170.8 ± 2.4179.3 ± 2.1
Results are expressed in nmol/cm3 liposomes. Values in the parentheses representing % of inhibition of lipid peroxidation.
Two other extracts (n-BuOH and H2O extracts) have prooxidative effects. Investigations of the potential free radical scavenging activity of the examined extracts on different radicals showed that not the same substances are responsible for the antioxidant effects. This difference in antioxidant activity was recently also shown for some essential oils and isolated terpenoids [30,31].
In accordance with the results of the antioxidant effects of the extracts of laurel leaves obtained in in vitro assays, examinations of the in vivo activity of Et2O, CHCl3, EtOAc, n-BuOH and H2O extracts of laurel leaves (solutions made in 50% of ethanol) were conducted. The experimental animals were given 1 cm3/kg of 2% of Et2O, CHCl3, EtOAc, n-BuOH or H2O extract (i.p.) of laurel leaves for 5 days. After 5 days, the animals were killed. In the liver homogenate and blood hemolysate of killed animals the following biochemical parameters were determined: LPx intensity, content of GSH and activities of GSHPx, Px, XOD and CAT (Table 5 and Table 7). In Table 6 and Table 8 the results of the same parameters obtained after pretreatment of mice with the examined laurel extracts, followed by a single dose of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) as a well-known radical generator are presented.
As can be seen from Table 5 the Et2O extract and H2O extracts decreased the GSH content compared with control. The exceptionally high GSH values in the treatments with the EtOAc and especially n-BuOH extracts is probably due to the involvement of –SH groups from some other compounds apart from glutathione. Namely, the GSH content can not be significantly higher than for control, as about 95% of GSH in cytosol is found as free. The GSHPx activity decreased in the treatment with Et2O and CHCl3 extract, H2O extract caused its increase, while the other two extracts caused no essential changes of this parameter. With the exception of the Et2O extract, all other extracts decreased the extent of LPx, which indicates that they exhibit an antioxidant effect, i.e. they contain antioxidative compounds. The Px activity increased in the CHCl3 and H2O treatments and decreased in the treatment with the EtOAc extract. The CAT increased in the treatments with EtOAc and H2O extracts, the other extracts caused no essential changes of CAT with respect to control. An increased XOD value was observed only in the treatments with the Et2O extract.
Table
Table 5. Effect of extracts of laurel leaves on the biochemical parameters in the liver homogenate.
Table 5. Effect of extracts of laurel leaves on the biochemical parameters in the liver homogenate.
ParameterControlEt2O extractCHCl3 extractEtOAc extractn-BuOH extractH2O extract
GSH2.13 ± 0.162.02 ± 0.182.26 ± 0152.76 ± 0.26a3.04 ± 0.23a1.87 ± 0.16
GSHPx2.21 ± 0.171.74 ± 0.13a1.65 ± 0.18a2.13 ± 0.172.08 ± 0.242.72 ± 0.18a
LPx2.56 ± 0.223.18 ± 0.21a2.12 ± 0.231.87 ± 0.12a2.06 ± 0.21a2.03 ± 0.23a
Px5.89 ± 0.245.81 ± 0.236.48 ± 0.25a4.93 ± 0.23a5.58 ± 0.236.52 ± 0.25a
CAT3.36 ± 0.263.48 ± 0.213.28± 0.193.87 ± 0.17a3.11 ± 0.183.75 ± 0.19a
XOD4.20 ± 0.244.89 ± 0.25a3.78 ± 0.16a2.96 ± 0.18a4.21 ± 0.263.47 ± 0.25a
t-test a p ≤ 0.05 n = 6; x ± SD. Content of GSH is expressed in nmol GSH/mg of protein. Activities of GSHPx, Px, CAT and XOD are expressed in nmol/mg of protein x min-1. Intensity of LPx is expressed in nmol malondialdehyde/mg of protein.
As could be expected, treatment with CCl4 decreased the liver GSH content (Table 6), as this agent acts as a pro-oxidant, and GSH decrease is one of the ways of the organism′s antioxidative defense [32]. Obviously, by decreasing GSH content CCl4 impaired antioxidant status in hepatocytes. In previous studies, Mimica-Dukic et al. [33] found that flavonoids and phenolic acids from leaves of Mentha longifolia diminished the CCl4-mediated depletion of GSH. In the present study none of the examined extracts inhibited GSH depletion. Namely, with the exception of the Et2O one, all the extracts increased the GSH content compared to the control and yielded the same results as in Table 5, which indicates increased contents of secondary biomolecules exhibiting antioxidant effect.
Table
Table 6. Effect of laurel leaves extracts and CCl4 on the liver homogenate biochemical parameters.
Table 6. Effect of laurel leaves extracts and CCl4 on the liver homogenate biochemical parameters.
ParameterControlEt2O extractCHCl3 extractEtOAc extractn -BuOH extractH2O extract
+ CCl4 + CCl4+ CCl4+ CCl4 + CCl4
GSH1.94 ± 0.141.16 ± 0.11a2.80 ± 0.18a2.04 ± 0.272.08 ± 0.151.94 ± 0.22
GSHPx3.25 ± 0.153.88 ± 0.17a3.72 ± 0.18a2.47 ± 0.22a3.06 ± 0.243.17 ± 0.18
LPx2.85 ± 0.223.76 ± 0.11a3.79 ± 0.21a1.46 ± 0.12a2.91 ± 0.211.41 ± 0.17a
Px5.82 ± 0.246.78 ± 0.23a7.26 ± 0.25a5.91 ± 0.175.87 ± 0.207.31 ± 0.25a
CAT3.24 ± 0.263.88 ± 0.21a3.66 ± 0.193.74 ± 0.17a3.82 ± 0.18a3.88 ± 0.19a
XOD2.62 ± 0.142.96 ± 0.173.03 ± 0.21a2.19 ± 0.18a2.91 ± 0.262.27 ± 0.17a
t-test a p ≤ 0.05 n = 6; x ± SD. Content of GSH is expressed in nmol GSH/mg of protein. Activities of GSHPx, Px, CAT and XOD are expressed in nmol/mg of protein x min-1. Intensity of LPx is expressed in nmol malondialdehyde/mg of protein.
It has been proposed that one of the principal causes of CCl4-induced liver injury is lipid peroxidation induced by free radicals derivatives of CCl4 [34]. Increased LPx values were observed with the CCl4-treated animals compared to control. The EtOAc and H2O extracts in combination with CCl4 showed protective effect whereas the others showed a synergistic pro-oxidative effect.
Treatments with Et2O and CHCl3 extracts in combination with CCl4 resulted in increased GSHPx values, while EtOAc extract produced its decrease. At the same time, the Px activity did not essentially change compared with the control (5.82 ± 0.24 vs. 5.89 ± 0.24). Treatments with all extracts in combination with CCl4 yielded an increased CAT value compared with the control. At the same time, treatments with Et2O, CHCl3 and n-BuOH extracts combined with CCl4 resulted in increased XOD values, while EtOAc and H2O caused their decrease.
Decreased LPx values were observed in treatments with CHCl3, EtOAc and H2O extracts, the other extracts caused no essential changes (Table 7). All laurel extracts produced increases of Px and CAT, while XOD activity decreased in the treatments with Et­2O and EtOAc extracts and increased in the other treatments.
Table
Table 7. Effect of extracts of laurel leaves on the biochemical parameters in blood hemolysate.
Table 7. Effect of extracts of laurel leaves on the biochemical parameters in blood hemolysate.
ParameterControlEt2O extractCHCl3 extractEtOAc extractn-BuOH extractH2O extract
GSH7.26 ± 0.276.83 ± 0.217.18 ± 0.177.21± 0.247.56 ± 0.317.41 ± 0.22
GSHPx6.11 ± 0.234.13 ± 0.17a5.82 ± 0.183.84 ± 0.17a5.95 ± 0.256.71 ± 0.27a
LPx7.61 ± 0.227.82 ± 0.216.11 ± 0.31a4.83 ± 0.22a7.35 ± 0.235.14 ± 0.19a
Px4.97 ± 0.145.48 ± 0.17a5.31 ± 0.15a5.57 ± 0.17a5.33 ± 0.305.59 ± 0.25a
CAT4.18 ± 0.265.51 ± 0.21a4.75 ± 0.19a4.26 ± 0.244.58 ± 0.184.79 ± 0.17a
XOD4.78 ± 0.143.89 ± 0.17a5.96 ± 0.26a3.77 ± 0.18a5.18 ± 0.26a5.26 ± 0.25a
t-test a p ≤ 0.05 n = 6; x ± SD. Content of GSH is expressed in μmol GSH/dm3 erythrocytes Activities of GSHPx, Px, CAT and XOD are expressed in nmol/dm3 erythrocytes x min-1. Intensity of LPx is expressed in nmol malondialdehyde/dm3 erythrocytes.
A comparasion of GSH values in Table 7 and Table 8 shows that the GSH value is significantly lower in the animals treated with CCl4 (7.26 ± 0.27 vs. 5.06 ± 0.27). This indicates that GSH acts as one of the essential antioxidant systems. On the other hand, the extracts showed no protective effect; moreover, all of them produced a further decrease of the GSH value. No statistically significant effect on GSHPx activity was observed in the combined treatment with laurel extracts and CCl4, only the EtOAc extract decreased this activity (p < 0.001).
Table
Table 8. Effect of extracts of laurel leaves and CCl4 on the biochemical parameters in blood hemolysate.
Table 8. Effect of extracts of laurel leaves and CCl4 on the biochemical parameters in blood hemolysate.
ParameterControlEt2O extractCHCl3 extractEtOAc extractn -BuOH extractH2O extract
+ CCl4+ CCl4+ CCl4+ CCl4+ CCl4
GSH5.06 ± 0.274.28 ± 0.21a4.86 ± 0.164.80 ± 0.174.72 ± 0.314.11 ± 0.22a
GSHPx8.19 ± 0.238.26 ± 0.178.14 ± 0.196.92 ± 0.27a8.12 ± 0.248.34 ± 0.28
LPx9.42 ± 0.228.06 ± 0.21a7.97 ± 0.24a6.17 ± 0.22a6.28 ± 0.25a5.96 ± 0.31a
Px4.35 ± 0.142.79 ± 0.23a3.19 ± 0.15a2.79 ± 0.26a2.96 ± 0.30a1.89 ± 0.27a
CAT4.24 ± 0.162.61 ± 0.21a3.28 ± 0.19a2.91 ± 0.17a3.14 ± 0.18a2.26 ± 0.23a
XOD3.61 ± 0.142.08 ± 0.19a3.56 ± 0.163.33 ± 0.183.79 ± 0.263.72 ± 0.25
t-test a p ≤ 0.05 n = 6; x ± SD. Content of GSH is expressed in μmol GSH/dm3 erythrocytes Activities of GSHPx, Px, CAT and XOD are expressed in nmol/dm3 erythrocytes x min-1. Intensity of LPx is expressed in nmol malondialdehyde/dm3 erythrocytes.
The LPx value showed a statistically significant increase with CCl4-treated animals compared with the untreated ones, whereas the presence of laurel extract yielded a decrease of LPx. These results suggest that the extracts had a protective effect. According to the literature data [35], the reduction of the serum LPx might be the result of antioxidant activity of several classes of plant phenolic constituents, such as cinnamic acids (ferulic, caffeic, and chlorogenic), flavonoids and biflavonoids, 1,3,6,7-tetrahydroxyxanthones, and acylphoroglucinols such as hyperforin and adhyperforin. Cock and Samman [28] showed that quercetin and rutin and their glycosides show a strong inhibitory effect in respect of LPx. Very indicative are the results obtained for the Px and CAT, which are significantly decreased in combination of all extracts with CCl4. A statistically significant decrease of XOD activity was observed only in the case of treatment with the Et2O and EtOAc extracts, the other extracts exhibited no influence on it.

3. Experimental

3.1. General

Leaves of cultivated Laurus nobilis L., Lauraceae, were collected in June 2008 in the city of Ulcinj, Montenegro. The voucher specimen of the collected leaves (Laurus nobilis L. 1753, No 2-1811, Montenegro, Ulcinj (UTM 34T CM 4 54), 05.06.2008., det.: Dr Goran Anačkov) was confirmed and deposited at the Herbarium of the Department of Biology and Ecology (BUNS Herbarium), Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Novi Sad.
The plant leaves were dried in air and ground in a mixer. Finely powdered material (200 g) was macerated three times in 70% methanol (MeOH) with 4dm3 during a 24-h period. The macerates were collected, filtered, and evaporated to dryness under vacuum. The residues were dissolved in water and successively extracted with four solvents of increasing polarity: ether (Et2O), chloroform (CHCl3), ethyl acetate (EtOAc), and n-butanol (n-BuOH). The extraction was carried out until a colorless extract was obtained. The residue was the aqueous extract. All of five extracts (Et2O, CHCl3, EtOAc, n-BuOH, and H2O) were evaporated to dryness and then dissolved in 50% ethanol to make 10% (w=v) solutions. Both, these and the diluted solutions, were further used for examination.
RSC was evaluated measuring the scavenging activity of the examined extracts on the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), superoxide anion (O2•−), nitrite-oxide (NO) and OH radicals using a Beckman DU 65 spectrophotometer. Also, intensity of LPx in liposomes and biochemical parameters were evaluated using the same unit.

3.2. In vitro experiments

Determination of total flavonoids was conducted by colorimetric method based on the property of flavonoids and flavone glycosides to build metal complexes with aluminum ions [36]. Absorbance of analyzed solutions is measured at λ = 430 nm.
The DPPH assay was performed as described before [37], following the transformation of the DPPH radical to its reduced, neutral form (DPPH-H). The samples of all extracts of laurel leaves were investigated in concentrations of 50–500 μg/cm3. The disappearance of DPPH was measured spectrophotometrically at 515 nm.
Superoxide anion radicals were generated in the system xantine/xantine-oxidase, and the quantity of O2•− was determined by nitrite method [38] with modifications. This system was used also in determination of the level of inhibition of xantine-oxidase. The samples of all extracts of laurel leaves were investigated in concentrations of 50–500 μg/cm3. The intensity of color was measured spectrophotometrically (λ = 550 nm).
Production of NO radicals was determined spectrophotometrically. NO radical generated from sodium-nitropruside (SNP) reacts with oxygen in water solution at a physiological pH to give nitrite ions. Concentration of nitrite anions was determined using Griess reagent [39,40]. At room temperature nitrite ions react with Griess reagent and form purple complex. The samples of all extracts of laurel leaves were investigated in concentrations of 50–1,000 μg/cm3. The intensity of color, which is the function of the nitrite concentrations, was measured spectrophotometrically (λ = 546 nm). The absorbance of the resulting solutions and the blank (with the same chemicals, except for the sample) were recorded. For each sample, five replicates were recorded.
The IC50 value, which represents the concentrations of the examined extracts that caused 50% of inhibition, was determined by linear regression analysis from the obtained RSC values.
The effect of laurel leaves extracts on the production of OH radicals was determined by monitoring the chemical degradation of deoxyribose [41]. The reaction was initiated by hydroxyl radicals obtained in Fenton’s reaction [42], which yields products that react with thiobarbituric acid (TBA test). The obtained products, among which malondialdehyde (MDA) is the most important, are determined by a spectrophotometric method at 532 nm. The absorbance of the resulting solutions and the blank (with same chemicals, except sample) was recorded. For the experiment, three concentrations of extracts of laurel leaves were prepared (10%, 5% and 1% solution). Five replicates were performed for each sample. The absorbance at the end of the experiment was used to calculate the inhibition rate of deoxyribose degradation by the examined extracts.
The extent of LP was determined by measuring the color of the adduct produced in the reaction between 2-thiobarbituric acid (TBA) and malondialdehyde (MDA), as an oxidation product in the peroxidation of membrane lipids, by the TBA assay [34,43,44]. The commercial preparation of liposomes ‘PROLIPOS’ (Lucas-Meyer) pH 5–7 was used as a model system of biological membranes. The liposomes, 225–250 nm in diameter, were obtained by dissolving the commercial preparation in demineralized water (1:10), in an ultrasonic bath. For the experiment, three concentrations of extracts of laurel leaves were prepared (10%, 5% and 1% solution). Five replicates were performed for each sample.

3.3. In vivo antioxidant activity

This investigation was conducted on sexually mature White laboratory mice (both sexes), type BALB/C, with an average body weight of 20–28 grams. Animal care and all experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animal Resources, edited by Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council, Male and female Hanover National Medical Institute (Hann NMRI). Mices were bred in the vivarium at the Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical Faculty, University of Novi Sad, Serbia. Animals were kept in standard plexiglass cages (room temperature 21 ± 1 °C; humidity 55 ± 1.5%, with 12 h light period). They were fed standard laboratory mice feed, produced by the Veterinary Institute in Zemun. Animals were given free access to food and fluid (water). Animals were randomly assigned into six groups, consisting of 10 animals each. The animals of control group were given intraperitoneally (i.p.) physiological solution, the animals of five experimental groups received at the same time (i.p., 1.0 cm3/kg) one of five laurel leaf extracts. After 7 days five animals from each group were sacrificed to determine the biochemical liver and blood parameters. The rest six animals of each group were treated (i.p.) with CCl4 in olive oil (1:1, 2.0 cm3/kg) and sacrificed 24 h later, to determine the same biochemical parameters.
We have measured examined biochemical parameters in blood hemolysate and liver homogenate. Liver was homogenized in a Potter homogenizer with TRIS-HCl/sucrose in a ratio of 1:3 at 4 °C. Obtained homogenate was filtered. The following biochemical parameters were analyzed in blood hemolysate and liver homogenate: extent of lipid peroxidation (LPx) was determined after Buege and Aust [44], peroxidase (Px) activity was measured after Simon et al. [45], catalase activity (CAT) after Beers and Sizer [46]. Glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity was evaluated as described by Chin et al. [47], xanthine oxidase (XOD) after Bergmayer [48], content of reduced glutathione (GSH) after Kapetanović and Mieyal [49]. The total protein content in liver was determined after Gornall et al. [50].

3.4. Chemicals

Thiobarbituric acid (TBA), xanthine, xanthine-oxidase, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) were obtained from Sigma Chemicals. 2-deoxy-D-ribose was purchased from Aldrich. DTNB and reduced glutathione was obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). The commercial preparation of liposomes “PRO-LIPO S” was purchased from Lucas-Meyer (Hamburg, Germany). All chemicals used were of analytical grade.

3.5. Statistical analysis

Results of biochemical analyses are presented as mean value ± standard deviation (S.D.). The differences between control and test groups were analyzed using the Student t-test (significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 confidence level).

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the results of in vitro assays of examined laurel extracts expressed significant RSC and protective effects on LP, which was found to be correlated to different compounds, depending on the system of examination. Also, it can be concluded that ethyl acetate proved to be the best solvent for extraction of plant material when in vitro antioxidative activity is to be determined. Furthermore, laurel leaf extracts exhibited different activities in relation to the investigated biochemical parameters. On the basis of the results obtained for the values of investigated systems (GSH, GSHPx, LPx, Px, CAT and XOD) after treatment with laurel leaf extracts, as well in combination with CCl4, it can be concluded that the investigated extracts showed a certain protective effect, which is more pronounced on the liver than on serum parameters. A possible explanation may be the liver richness in enzymatic systems which can be involved in the pathways of the antioxidant mechanism. The differences observed in the action of particular extracts are probably due to the different contents of flavonoids and some other antioxidant compounds in them.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Environmental Protection of the Republic of Serbia (Project No. 142036). Also we like to send our gratitude to Goran Anackov, Herbarium of the Department of Biology and Ecology (BUNS Herbarium), Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Novi Sad.
  • Sample Availability: Not available.

References and Notes

  1. Rohwer, J. Lauraceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants; Kubitzki, K., Rohwer, J.G., Bittrich, V., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1993; pp. 366–391. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fiorini, C.; Fouraste, I.; David, B.; Bessiere, J. Composition of the flower, leaf and stem essential oils from L. nobilis L. FlaVour Fragr. J. 1997, 12, 91–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Caredda, A.; Marongiu, B.; Porcedda, S.; Soro, C. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction and characterization of L. nobilis essential oil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 1492–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Akgul, A.; Kivanc, M.; Bayrak, A. chemical composition and antimicrobial effect of Turkish laurel leaf oil. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1989, 1, 277–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Diäaz-Maroto, M.; Rez-Coello, M.; Cabezudo, M. Effect of drying method on the volatiles in bay leaf (Laurus nobilis L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 4520–4524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Biondi, D.; Cianci, P.; Geraci, C.; Ruberto, G.; Piattelli, M. Antimicrobial activity and chemical composition of essential oils from Sicilian aromatic plants. FlaVour Fragr. J. 1993, 8, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. kerget, M.; Kotnik, P.; Hadolin, M.; Hraš, A.; Simonič, M. Phenols, proanthocyanidins, flavones and flavonols in some plant materials and their antioxidant activities. Food Chem. 2005, 89, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vidal-Ollivier, E.; Elias, R.; Faure, F.; Babadjamian, A.; Crespin, F.; Balansard, G.; Boudon, G. Flavonal glycosides from Calendula officinalis flowers. Planta Med. 1989, 55, 73–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fischer, H.; Oliver, J.; Fischer, D. Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products, 4th; Herz, B., Grisebach, H., Kirby, G.W., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA, 1979; pp. 47–390, Chapter 2. [Google Scholar]
  10. Pech, B.; Bruneton, J. Alkaloids of Laurus nobilis. J. Nat. Prod. 1982, 45, 560–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fiorini, C.; David, B.; Fouraste, I.; Vercavteren, J. Acylated kaempferol glycosides from Laurus nobilis leaves. Phytochemistry 1998, 47, 821–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Appendino, G.; Taglipietra, S.; Nano, M.; Cisero, M. A sesquiterpene alcohol from the fruits of Laurus nobilis. Phytochemistry 1992, 31, 2537–2538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tada, M.; Takeda, K. Sesquiterpenes of Lauraceae plants. IV. Germacranolides from Laurus nobilis L. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1976, 24, 667–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. El-Feraly, S.; Benigni, D. Sesquiterpene lactones of Laurus nobilis leaves. J. Nat. Prod. 1980, 43, 527–531. [Google Scholar]
  15. Matsuda, H.; Kagerura, T.; Toguchida, I.; Ueda, H.; Morikawa, T.; Yoshikawa, M. Inhibitory Effects of sesquiterpene from Bay leaf on nitric oxide production in lipopolysaccharide-activated macrophages: structure requirement and role of heat shock protein induction. Life Sci. 2000, 66, 2151–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yoshikawa, M.; Shimoda, H.; Uemura, T.; Morikawa, T.; Kawahara, Y.; Matsuda, H. Alcohol absorption inhibitors from Bay leaf (Laurus Nobilis): Structure-requirements of sesquiterpenes for the activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2000, 8, 2071–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fang, F.; Sang, S.; Chen, K.; Gosslau, A.; Ho, C.; Robert, T. Rosen isolation and identification of cytotoxic compounds from Bay leaf (Laurus nobilis). Food Chem. 2005, 93, 497–501. [Google Scholar]
  18. Tucakov, J. Healing With Herbs (Phytotherapy); Rad: Beograd, Serbia, 1997; pp. 34–38. (in Serbian) [Google Scholar]
  19. Fejes, S.; Blazovics, A.; Lemberkovics, E.; Petri, G.; Szoke, E.; Kery, A. Free radical scavenging and membrane protective effects of methanol extracts from Anthriscus cerefolium L. (Hoffm.) and Petroselinum crispum (Mill.) Nym. ex A. W. Hill. Phytother. Res. 2000, 14, 362–365. [Google Scholar]
  20. Fraga, B. Natural sesquiterpenoids. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2003, 20, 392–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fischer, H.; Lu, T.; Cantrell, L.; Castaneda-Acosta, J.; Quijano, L.; Franzblau, G. Antimycobacterial evaluation of germacranolides. Phytochemistry 1988, 49, 559–564. [Google Scholar]
  22. Groves, J.T. Peroxynitrite: Reactive, invasive, enigmatic. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1999, 3, 226–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chatterjee, N.; Agarwal, S. Liposomes as membrane model for study of lipid peroxidation. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 1988, 4, 51–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Robak, J.; Gryglewski, J. Flavonoids are scavengers of superoxide anion. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1988, 37, 837–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sichel, G.; Corsaro, C.; Scalia, M.; Dibilio, J.; Bonomo, R. In vitro scavenger activity of some flavonoids and melanins against O2. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 1991, 11, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Husain, R.; Cilliard, J.; Cilliard, P. Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of flavonoids. Phytochemistry 1987, 26, 2489–2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kaurinović, B.; Popović, M.; Ćebović, T.; Mimica-Dukić, N. Effects of Calendula officinalis and Taraxacum officinale Weber (Asteraceae) extracts on the production of OH• radicals. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2003, 12, 250–253. [Google Scholar]
  28. Cock, C.; Samman, S. Flavonoids chemistry metabolism, cardioprotectioeffects and dietary sources. Nutrit. Biochem. 1996, 7, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rice-Evans, A.; Miller, J.; Paganga, G. Structure-antioxidant activity relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1996, 20, 933–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ruberto, G.; Baratta, T. Antioxidant activity of selected essential oil components in two lipid model systems. Food Chem. 2000, 69, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mimica-Dukic, N.; Bozin, B.; Sokovic, M.; Simin, N. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Melissa officinalis L. (Lamiaceae) essential oil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 2485–2489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Valenziela, A.; Aspillaga, M.; Soledad, V.; Guerra, R. Selectivity of sylimarin on the increase of the glutathione content in different tissue of the rat. Planta Med. 1989, 55, 420–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mimica-Dukic, N.; Jakovljevic, V.; Popovic, M.; Szabo, A.; Gasic, O. Effect of phenolic extracts of Mentha Longofolia on some liver biochemical parameters. Yugoslav. Physiol. Pharmacol. Acta 1996, 31, 531–535. [Google Scholar]
  34. Afanas′ev, A.; Dorozhko, I.; Brodski, V.; Kostyk, A.; Potapovich, I. Chelating and free radical scavenging mechanism of inhibitory action of rutin and quercetin in lipid peroxidation. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1989, 38, 1763–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Larson, R.A. The antioxidant of higher plants. Phytochemistry 1988, 27, 969–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gruenwald, J.; Brendler, T.; Jaenicke, C. PDRc for Herbal Medicines; Jaenicke, C., Ed.; Medical Economics Co.: Montvale, NJ, USA, 2000; pp. 271-275, 719-725. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sanchez-Moreno, C.; Larrauri, A.; Saura-Calixto, F. A procedure to measure their anti-radical efficiency of polyphenols. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1998, 76, 2760–2768. [Google Scholar]
  38. Cos, P.; Ying, L.; Callome, M.; Hu, P.; Cimanga, K.; Van Poel, B.; Pieters, L.; Vlietinick, J.; Van den Berghe, D. Structure-activity relationship and classification of flavonoids as inhibitors of Xanthine oxidase and superoxide scavengers. J. Nat. Prod. 1998, 61, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Green, C.; Wagner, A.; Glogowski, J.; Skipper, I.; Wishnok, S.; Tannenbaum, R. Analysis of nitrat, nitrit and [15N]nitrit in biological fluids. Anal. Biochem. 1982, 126, 131–138. [Google Scholar]
  40. Babu, H.; Shylesh, S.; Padikkala, J. Antioxidant and hepatoprotective effect of Acanthu silicifolius. Fitoterapia 2001, 72, 272–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cheesman, H.; Beavis, A.; Eserbauer, H. Hydroxyl-radical-induced-iron-catalysed degration of 2-deoxyribose. Biochem. J. 1988, 252, 649–653. [Google Scholar]
  42. Halliwell, B.; Gutteridge, J.M.C. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1986; pp. 183–189. [Google Scholar]
  43. Fukuzawa, K.; Seko, T.; Minami, K.; Terao, J. Dynamics of iron-ascorbate-induced lipid peroxidation in charged and uncharged phospholipid vesicles. Lipids 1993, 28, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Buege, A.J.; Aust, D.S. Methods in Enzymology; Fleischer, S., Parker, L., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1988; pp. 302–310. [Google Scholar]
  45. Simon, L.M.; Fatrai, Z.; Jonas, D.E.; Matkovics, B. Study of metabolism enzymes during the development of Phaseolus vulgaris. Biochem. Physiol. Plant 1974, 166, 389–393. [Google Scholar]
  46. Beers, R.F.J.; Sizer, J.W. Spectrophotometric method for measuring of breakdown of hydrogen peroxide by Catalase. J. Biol. Chem. 1950, 195, 133–140. [Google Scholar]
  47. Chin, P.T.Y.; Stults, F.H.; Tappel, A.L. Purification of rat lung soluble Glutathione Peroxidase. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1976, 445, 558–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bergmayer, U.H. Methoden Der Enzymatischen Analyse; Verlag Chemie: Weinheim, Germany, 1970; pp. 483–484. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kapetanović, I.M.; Mieyal, I.I. Inhibition of acetaminophen induced hepatotoxicity by phenacetin and its alkoxy analogs. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1979, 209, 25–30. [Google Scholar]
  50. Gornall, H.G.; Nardwall, C.L. Estimation of total protein in tissue homogenate. J. Biol. Chem. 1949, 177, 751–756. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kaurinovic, B.; Popovic, M.; Vlaisavljevic, S. In Vitro and in Vivo Effects of Laurus nobilis L. Leaf Extracts. Molecules 2010, 15, 3378-3390. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules15053378

AMA Style

Kaurinovic B, Popovic M, Vlaisavljevic S. In Vitro and in Vivo Effects of Laurus nobilis L. Leaf Extracts. Molecules. 2010; 15(5):3378-3390. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules15053378

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kaurinovic, Biljana, Mira Popovic, and Sanja Vlaisavljevic. 2010. "In Vitro and in Vivo Effects of Laurus nobilis L. Leaf Extracts" Molecules 15, no. 5: 3378-3390. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules15053378

APA Style

Kaurinovic, B., Popovic, M., & Vlaisavljevic, S. (2010). In Vitro and in Vivo Effects of Laurus nobilis L. Leaf Extracts. Molecules, 15(5), 3378-3390. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules15053378

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop