Next Article in Journal
The Artemisia L. Genus: A Review of Bioactive Essential Oils
Next Article in Special Issue
4-N,N-Dimethylaminopyridine Promoted Selective Oxidation of Methyl Aromatics with Molecular Oxygen
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Different Extraction Methods and Conditions on the Phenolic Composition of Mate Tea Extracts
Previous Article in Special Issue
Contribution of Cation-π Interactions in Iminium Catalysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tandem Three-Component Reactions of Aldehyde, Alkyl Acrylate, and Dialkylmalonate Catalyzed by Ethyl Diphenylphosphine

Department of Chemistry, National Taiwan Normal University No. 88, Section 4, Tingchow Road, Taipei 11677, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2012, 17(3), 2529-2541; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17032529
Submission received: 19 December 2011 / Revised: 9 February 2012 / Accepted: 17 February 2012 / Published: 2 March 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Organocatalysis)

Abstract

:
A new highly efficient three-component reaction of alkyl acrylate, aldehyde and dialkyl malonate using ethyl diphenylphosphine as organocatalyst has been described. Various highly functional compounds bearing hydroxyl groups and the ester functions can be easily prepared in moderate to good yields according to our one-step procedure. The reactions are believed to proceed via Morita-Baylis-Hillman reactions of alkyl acrylate and aldehydes, followed by the Michael addition reactions of dialkyl malonates. Our reactions indicated that the intermediate species formed in the phosphine-catalyzed MBH reaction are an effective organic base to catalyze the Michael addition reactions of dialkyl malonates to the preformed MBH adducts.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Carbon-carbon bond formation is the most important organic reaction because it plays a fundamental role in making carbon-frameworks of organic compounds for numerous interesting studies concerning reactivity, chemoselectivity, and stereoselectivity [1,2]. Multicomponent reactions have long been recognized to play a key role in the development of synthetic methodologies because of their possible generation of an adduct in a single step from three or more reactants usually accompanied by bond-forming efficiency and atom economy [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Successful application of multicomponent reaction highly relies on the good chemoselectivity in the presence of all the reactants [10,11,12].
The Baylis-Hillman reaction adduct, resulting from alkyl acrylate and aldehyde is a good Michael acceptor because of the activated ester functionality by the neighboring hydroxy group [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Successful applications of the Baylis-Hillman adducts for further transformation by Michael additions of nucleophiles had been reported [21,22,23,24]. However, the Baylis-Hillman reactions are well known for their slow reaction rates and moderate to high yields, and therefore the whole processes often take several days to complete the following Michael reactions [4]. Further effort to simplify the whole process was undertaken by one-pot sequential Baylis-Hillman and Michael reactions with aldehyde, methyl acrylate, and nitroalkane in the presence of DBU (1.0 equiv.) with 26–62% yields [21], albeit the one-step three-component reaction failed due to the dominant Michael addition of DBU-deprotonated nitroalkane toward methyl acrylate. Therefore, a strong demand remains for an efficient approach.
In continuation of our efforts to simplify the whole process, we envisaged that instead of using a tertiary amine as an organocatalyst, it should be possible to carry out a phosphine-catalyzed three-component reaction starting from the Baylis-Hillman reaction of aldehyde 1 and alkyl acrylate 2, which is followed by the Michael addition of dialkylmalonate 3 to the resulting adduct [25,26,27,28]. Herein, dialkylmalonates 3 become activated by the action of the intermediate species formed in the phosphine-catalyzed MBH reaction, because phosphines were much poorer bases than amines though the former are stronger nucleophiles [29]. In particular, phosphines are known catalysts capable of promoting Michael reactions in the absence of added bases [30,31,32,33,34]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no report of a successful reaction or related study that utilizes 3 as the reacting partner. Therefore, we wish to report a highly efficient three-component reaction of 1, 2, and 3 catalyzed by ethyl diphenylphosphine (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1. A three-component reaction of aromatic aldehyde 1, alkyl acrylate 2, and functional alkane 3 catalysed by EtPPh2.
Scheme 1. A three-component reaction of aromatic aldehyde 1, alkyl acrylate 2, and functional alkane 3 catalysed by EtPPh2.
Molecules 17 02529 g001

2. Results and Discussion

4-Nitrobenzaldehyde (1a), methyl acrylate (2a, 2 equiv.) and diethyl malonate (3a, 1.2 equiv.) were initially chosen and reacted in t-BuOH in the presence of EtPPh2 at room temperature, providing the densely functionalized three component adduct 4a in moderate yield (47%) and good chemoselectivity (21:79 dr) within 0.5 h (Table 1, entry 1).
Table 1. Optimization of reaction conditions for a three-component reaction of 4-nitrobenzaldehyde(1a), methyl acrylate (2a) and diethyl malonate (3a) catalyzed by different organocatalysts a. Molecules 17 02529 i001
Table 1. Optimization of reaction conditions for a three-component reaction of 4-nitrobenzaldehyde(1a), methyl acrylate (2a) and diethyl malonate (3a) catalyzed by different organocatalysts a. Molecules 17 02529 i001
EntryCH2(CO2Et)2 (3a) (equiv.)CatalystSolventTime (h)dr of 4a bYield of 4a (%) c
11.2EtPPh2t-BuOH0.521:7947
21.2PPh3t-BuOH24-Trace
31.2PBu3t-BuOH4-Trace d
41.2DABCOt-BuOH2433:6725
51.2EtPPh2i-PrOH2.525:7538
61.2EtPPh2CH2Cl2312:8838
71.2EtPPh2Toluene415:8551
81.2EtPPh2THF418:8260
91.2EtPPh2eTHF212:8849
101.2EtPPh2fTHF2421:7962
111.5EtPPh2THF516:8454
12 g1.2EtPPh2THF/t-BuOH h1.519:8143
131.2DMAPTHF24-Trace
141.2DBUTHF24-Trace
a Unless stated otherwise, the reaction was performed using 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (1a) (0.5 mmol) and methyl acrylate (2a) (1.0 mmol) with 30 mol% catalyst in solvent (0.5 mL) at room temperature; b The diastereometric ratio of 4a was determined by crude 1H-NMR analysis; c Yield of analytically pure isolated product; d Only significant amount of 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (1a) and diethyl malonate (3a) were observed even after 8 h; e The reaction was performed with 50 mol% EtPPh2; f The reaction was performed with 20 mol% EtPPh2; g The reaction was performed at 10 °C; h THF/t-BuOH = 1/4.
Trace amounts of the product 4a were obtained when the less reactive PPh3 was used (entry 2). Significant amounts of 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (1a) and diethyl malonate (3a) were recovered, because the acrylate was prone to undergo polymerization when the extremely active PBu3 was used as the catalyst (entry 3). DABCO, which has weaker nucleophilicity than that of EtPPh2, catalyzed the three component reaction of 1a, 2a and 3a and afforded 4a in only 25% yield within 24 h (entry 4). Inferior results were obtained when the reactions were carried out in i-PrOH, CH2Cl2 and toluene (entries 5–7). Interestingly, when a polar aprotic solvent was used, such as THF, a significantly increased yield was observed (4a, 60% yield, entry 8). Increasing the amount of EtPPh2, prolonging the reaction time with 1.5 equiv. of 3a, or using a co-solvent system (THF/t-BuOH = 1/4) did not improve the final results either (entries 9, 11 and 12), and furthermore a worse diastereometric excess resulted from decreasing the amount of EtPPh2 (entry 10). DMAP and DBU were also examined, but only trace amounts of adduct 4a could be observed (entries 13 and 14).
The broad reaction scope of our protocol was demonstrated by further studies disclosed in Table 2. It showed that chemoselective three-component reactions of various aromatic aldehydes 1af, alkyl acrylate 2 (2 equiv.), and 3a (1.2 equiv.) in the presence of EtPPh2 (30 mol%) took place in 4–21 h, leading to the corresponding adducts 4aj in 36–63% yields.
Table 2. A three component reaction of aromatic aldehyde 1, alkyl acrylate 2, and dialkyl malonate 3 catalysed by EtPPh2 a. Molecules 17 02529 i002
Table 2. A three component reaction of aromatic aldehyde 1, alkyl acrylate 2, and dialkyl malonate 3 catalysed by EtPPh2 a. Molecules 17 02529 i002
EntryArR1R2Time (h)dr of 4 bYield of 4 (%) c
14-NO2C6H4 (1a)CH3 (2a)C2H5 (3a)418:824a (60)
23-NO2C6H4 (1b)2a3a413:874b (63)
32-NO2C6H4 (1c)2a3a437:634c (36)
44-CF3C6H4 (1d)2a3a1020:804d (57)
54-CNC6H4 (1e)2a3a417:834e (50)
63-Pyridyl (1f)2a3a2118:824f (55)
74-NO2C6H4 (1a)C2H5 (2b)3a49:914g (50)
83-NO2C6H4 (1b)2b3a415:854h (53)
94-CNC6H4 (1e)2b3a611:894i (51)
103-Pyridyl (1f)2b3a2014:864j (52)
114-NO2C6H4 (1a)CH3 (2a)CH3 (3b)513:874k (39)
a Unless stated otherwise, the reaction was performed using 1 (0.5 mmol), 2 (2.0 equiv.), and 3a (1.2 equiv.) in the presence of EtPPh2 (30 mol%) in THF (0.5 mL) at room temperature; b The diastereomeric ratio of 4 was determined by 1H-NMR analysis. The stereochemistry of 4ab, 4d, 4e, and 4gi was determined by 1H-NMR analysis in comparison to 5. For 4c, 4f, and 4j, their stereochemistry is not determined; c Yield of analytically pure isolated product.
A steric effect was found in case of reactions with an ortho-substituted aromatic aldehydes. For example, aromatic aldehydes bearing a nitro group in the para- or meta-position, like 1a or 1b, reacted with 2a and 3a within 4 h to provide the corresponding adducts 4a or 4b with good stereoselectivities (18:82 dr, 13:87 dr) in 60% or 63% yield, respectively (entries 1 and 2). However, in the case of 2-nitrobenzaldehyde (1c), poor results for the formation of 4c were obtained (36% yield and 37:63 dr, entry 3). Other substituted aromatic aldehydes, such as 4-trifluoromethylbenzaldehyde (1d) or 4-cyanobenzaldehyde (1e), reacted like 2a and 3a, generating 4d or 4e in 57% or 50% yield with 20:80 dr or 17:83 dr, resepectively (entries 4 and 5). Moderate yield and good stereoselectivity of 4f was also produced when heteroaromatic aldehyde 1f was employed in our protocol (entry 6). The reaction of 1a, 1b, 1e, or 1f and 3a also proceeded well when ethyl acrylate (2b) was used as the activated olefin, furnishing the corresponding adducts 4g, 4h, 4i, or 4j in moderate yield with high stereoselectivity (entries 7–10). In addition to diethyl malonate (3a), dimethyl malonate (3b) and bis(phenylsulfonyl)methane (3c) were also investigated as carbon nucleophiles for this protocol. Both of them worked smoothly with 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (1a) and methyl acrylate (2a, 2 equiv.) in the presence of EtPPh2 to give the corresponding adducts 4k (39% yield, 13:87 dr) and 5 (54% yield, 47:53 dr) (entry 11 and Scheme 2) [35].
Scheme 2. A three-component reaction of 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (1a), methyl acrylate (2a, 2 equiv.) and bis(phenylsulfonyl)methane (3c, 1.2 equiv.) catalyzed by EtPPh2.
Scheme 2. A three-component reaction of 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (1a), methyl acrylate (2a, 2 equiv.) and bis(phenylsulfonyl)methane (3c, 1.2 equiv.) catalyzed by EtPPh2.
Molecules 17 02529 g002
Remarkably, a tandem three-component reaction of 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (1a), methyl acrylate (2a, 1.2 equiv.) and a sterically bulky carbon nucleophile, diethyl methylmalonate (3d) (1.7 equiv.), ocurred successfully at room temperature within 9 h to provide the desired product 6n in 57% yield with good stereoselectivity (Scheme 3).
Scheme 3. A three-component reaction of 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (1a), methyl acrylate (2a, 1.2equiv.), and diethyl methylmalonate (3d, 1.7 equiv.) catalyzed by EtPPh2.
Scheme 3. A three-component reaction of 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (1a), methyl acrylate (2a, 1.2equiv.), and diethyl methylmalonate (3d, 1.7 equiv.) catalyzed by EtPPh2.
Molecules 17 02529 g003

3. Experimental

3.1. General

All reactions were carried out under a nitrogen atmosphere in dried glassware. All starting materials were purchased from commercial sources and used without further purification. THF was continuously refluxed and freshly distilled from sodium benzophenone ketyl under nitrogen. t-BuOH was dried and degassed before use. Yields refer to isolated yields of compounds estimated to be >95% pure as determined by 1H-NMR in a AV-400 or AV-500 Bruker using CDCl3 as solvent at 400 Hz, respectively. MS and HRMS were recorded in a Finnigan TSQ 700 and JEOL JMS-700 mass spectrometers. Analytical thin layer chromatography (TLC) was performed using Merck 60 F254 precoated silica gel plate (0.2 mm thickness). Flash chromatography was performed using Merck silica gel 60.

3.2. Typical Synthetic Procedure

3.2.1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions for an Organocatalytic Three-Component Reaction of 4-Nitrobenzaldehyde (1a), Methyl Acrylate (2a), and Diethyl Malonate (3a) (TP for Table 1)

A dry and nitrogen-flushed 10-mL Schlenk flask, equipped with a magnetic stirring bar and a septum, was charged with a solution of 1a (75.6 mg, 0.5 mmol) and 3a (91.0 μL, 1.2 equiv.) in solvent (dry degassed t-BuOH, i-PrOH or dry THF) (0.5 mL). Methyl acrylate (2a) (90.0 μL, 2.0 equiv.) and catalyst (EtPPh2, PPh3, PBu3, DABCO, DMAP or DBU) (30 mol%) were added, and the reaction mixture was stirred for indicated time at room temperature. Thereafter, the solvent was removed by evaporation in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography (n-hexanes/ethyl acetate 4:1) furnished the adduct 4a.

3.2.2. Typical Procedure for a Three-Component Reaction of Aromatic Aldehyde, Alkyl Acrylate, and Diethyl Malonate Catalyzed by EtPPh2 (TP for Table 2)

A dry and nitrogen-flushed 10-mL Schlenk flask, equipped with a magnetic stirring bar and a septum, was charged with a solution of 1 (0.5 mmol) and 3a or 3b (1.2 equiv.) in dry degassed THF (0.5 mL). Alkyl acrylate 2a or 2b (2.0 equiv.) and EtPPh2 (30.7 μL, 30 mol%) were added, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 4–21 h at room temperature. Thereafter, the solvent was removed by evaporation in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography furnished the adducts erythro-4 and threo-4.

3.2.3. Procedure for Preparation of 5 (TP for Scheme 2)

A dry and nitrogen-flushed 10-mL Schlenk flask, equipped with a magnetic stirring bar and a septum, was charged with a solution of 1a (151.1 mg, 1.0 mmol) and 3c (355.6 mg, 1.2 equiv.) in dry THF (1.0 mL). Methyl acrylate 2a (180.0 μL, 2.0 equiv.) and EtPPh2 (61.0 μL, 30 mol%) were added, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature. Thereafter, the solvent was removed by evaporation in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography furnished the adducts erythro-5 and threo-5 (dr = 47:53, 288.1 mg, 54%).

3.2.4. Procedure for Preparation of 6 (TP for Scheme 3)

A dry and nitrogen-flushed 10-mL Schlenk flask, equipped with a magnetic stirring bar and a septum, was charged with a solution of 1a (0.5 mmol) and 3d (102.3 μL, 1.2 equiv.) in dry t-BuOH (0.5 mL). Methyl acrylate 2a (90.0 μL, 2.0 equiv.) and EtPPh2 (30.7 μL, 30 mol%) were added, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 9 h at room temperature. Thereafter, the solvent was removed by evaporation in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography furnished the adducts 6 (dr = 79:21, 117.1 mg, 57%).
Erythro-1,1-diethyl 3-methyl 4-hydroxy-4-(4-nitrophenyl)butane-1,1,3-tricarboxylate (erythro-4a). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 8.18 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.52 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 5.13 (d, 1H, J = 3.7 Hz), 4.22–4.01 (m, 4H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 3.44 (s, 1H), 3.40–3.27 (m, 1H), 2.89–2.76 (m, 1H), 2.36–2.20 (m, 1H), 2.17–2.01 (m, 1H), 1.27–1.08 (m, 6H); 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 173.8, 168.8, 168.6, 148.3, 147.4, 127.0, 123.5, 72.9, 61.7, 61.5, 52.1, 49.8, 49.7, 25.3, 13.9; MS (70 eV, EI) m/z (%): 398 (2) [M+1]+, 380 (8), 319 (80), 302 (77), 274 (43), 245 (72), 160 (100), 133 (82), 127 (85), 113 (48), 105 (52), 55 (81); HRMS (MALDI) for C18H23NO9Na, [M+Na]+ (420.1270) found: 420.1275.
Threo-1,1-diethyl 3-methyl 4-hydroxy-4-(4-nitrophenyl)butane-1,1,3-tricarboxylate (threo-4a). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 8.22 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.50 (d, 2H, J = 8.6 Hz), 4.98 (d, 1H, J = 5.8 Hz), 4.23–4.14 (m, 4H), 3.64 (s, 3H), 3.38 (dd, 1H J = 5.7 Hz, 9.3 Hz), 2.97–2.90 (m, 1H), 2.30–2.21 (m, 1H), 2.18–2.09 (m, 1H), 1.29–1.21 (m, 6H); 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 173.8, 168.6, 168.5, 148.7, 147.6, 127.1, 123.7, 73.8, 61.8, 61.7, 52.1, 49.8, 49.6, 27.9, 14.0; MS (70 eV, EI) m/z (%): 398 (1) [M+1]+, 380 (5), 319 (85), 302 (79), 274 (40), 245 (77), 223 (86), 160 (100), 133 (93), 127 (85), 113 (51), 105 (49), 55 (81); HRMS (MALDI) for C18H23NO9Na, [M+Na]+ (420.1270) found: 420.1283.
Erythro-1,1-diethyl 3-methyl 4-hydroxy-4-(3-nitrophenyl)butane-1,1,3-tricarboxylate (erythro-4b). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 8.23 (s, 1H), 8.17–8.11 (m, 1H), 7.69 (d, 1H, J = 7.7 Hz), 7.52 (t, 1H J = 7.9 Hz), 5.14 (pseudo t, 1H, J = 4.1 Hz), 4.22–4.06 (m, 4H), 3.65 (s, 3H), 3.37 (dd, 1H J = 9.3 Hz, 5.3 Hz), 2.90–2.82 (m, 1H), 2.35–2.25 (m, 1H), 2.18–2.07 (m, 1H), 1.28–1.14 (m, 6H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 173.9, 168.9, 168.7, 148.3, 143.2, 132.2, 129.3, 122.8, 121.2, 72.7, 61.7, 61.6, 52.2, 49.9, 49.8, 25.4, 13.9. MS (20 eV, EI) m/z (%): 398 (5) [M+1]+, 380 (10), 348 (5), 246 (41), 214 (11), 187 (11), 173 (7), 160 (100), 134 (20). HRMS (ESI) for C18H23NO9Na, [M+Na]+ (420.1270) found: 420.1268.
Threo-1,1-diethyl 3-methyl 4-hydroxy-4-(3-nitrophenyl)butane-1,1,3-tricarboxylate (threo-4b). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 8.16 (s, 1H), 8.15–8.08 (m, 1H), 7.65 (d, 1H, J = 7.7 Hz), 7.51 (t, 1H J = 7.9 Hz), 4.95 (pseudo s, 1H), 4.18–4.07 (m, 4H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 3.60 (brs, 1H), 3.33 (dd, 1H J = 9.4 Hz, 5.6 Hz), 2.95–2.85 (m, 1H), 2.24–2.12 (m, 1H), 2.08–1.98 (m, 1H), 1.25–1.15 (m, 6H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 173.7, 168.6, 168.4, 148.2, 143.6, 132.3, 129.4, 122.9, 121.2, 73.7, 61.7, 61.6, 52.0, 50.0, 49.6, 27.7, 13.9, 13.7. MS (20 eV, EI) m/z (%):398 (1) [M+1]+, 380 (5), 348 (5), 301 (6), 246 (41), 214 (8), 187 (11), 173 (8), 160 (100), 134 (5). HRMS (ESI) for C18H23NO9Na, [M+Na]+ (420.1270) found: 420.1273.
Erythro-1,1-diethyl 3-methyl 4-hydroxy-4-(2-nitrophenyl)butane-1,1,3-tricarboxylat (erythro-4c). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 8.00 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.89 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.68 (t, 1H J = 7.6 Hz), 7.47 (t, 1H J = 7.8 Hz), 5.72 (pseudo s, 1H), 4.19–4.10 (m, 2H), 4.07 (quart, 2H J = 7.1 Hz), 3.69 (s, 3H), 3.43 (d, 1H, J = 3.0 Hz), 3.36 (dd, 1H, J = 9.8 Hz, J = 5.3 Hz), 2.98 (dt, 1H, J = 10.4 Hz, J = 3.8 Hz), 2.38–2.28 (m, 1H), 2.17–2.08 (m, 1H), 1.23 (t, 3H, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.15 (t, 3H, J = 7.1 Hz). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 174.6, 168.9, 168.6, 147.5, 136.1, 133.5, 129.3, 128.7, 124.9, 69.2, 61.6, 61.5, 52.2, 49.9, 47.6, 25.1, 13.9. MS (20 eV, EI) m/z (%): 398 (100) [M+1]+, 385 (62), 380 (61), 363 (75). HRMS (FAB) for C18H24NO9, [M+H]+ (398.1451) found: 398.1457.
Threo-1,1-diethyl 3-methyl 4-hydroxy-4-(2-nitrophenyl)butane-1,1,3-tricarboxylate (threo-4c). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 7.98 (dd, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, J = 0.6 Hz), 7.71–7.61 (m, 2H), 7.49–7.42 (m, 1H), 5.46 (dd, 1H, J = 6.7 Hz, J = 5.2 Hz), 4.25–4.14 (m, 4H), 3.84 (d, 1H J = 7.5 Hz), 3.58 (s, 3H), 3.43 (dd, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz, J = 6.2 Hz), 3.11–3.04 (m, 1H), 2.45–2.34 (m, 1H), 2.30–2.20 (m, 1H), 1.30–1.22 (m, 6H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 174.3, 168.9, 168.8, 148.1, 137.4, 133.7, 129.0, 128.6, 125.1, 70.2, 61.9, 52.1, 49.9, 48.9, 28.8, 14.1. MS (FAB) m/z (%): 398 (100) [M+1]+, 385 (60), 380 (65), 363 (72). HRMS (FAB) for C18H24NO9, [M+H]+ (398.1451) found: 398.1454.
Erythro-1,1-diethyl 3-methyl 4-hydroxy-4-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)butane-1,1,3-tricarboxylate (erythro-4d). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 7.60 (d, 2H, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.47 (d, 2H, J = 8.1 Hz), 5.10 (pseudo t, 1H, J = 3.9 Hz), 4.19–4.03 (m, 4H), 3.64 (s, 3H), 3.36 (dd, 1H, J = 5.4 Hz, 9.5 Hz), 3.17 (d, J = 3.4 Hz), 2.88–2.79 (m, 1H), 2.35–2.24 (m, 1H), 2.19–2.09 (m, 1H), 1.22 (t, 3H, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.17 (t, 3H, J = 7.2 Hz). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C). δ/ppm: 174.1, 168.9, 168.7, 144.9, 130.0 (quartet,J = 32 Hz), 126.7, 125.2 (quartet,J = 4 Hz), 123.9 (quartet,J = 270 Hz), 130.0 (quartet,J = 33 Hz), 126.4, 125.3 (quartet,J = 3 Hz), 123.8 (quartet,J = 269 Hz), 73.1, 61.6, 61.5, 52.1, 49.9, 49.8, 25.4, 14.0, 13.9. MS (FAB) m/z (%): 420 (1) [M]+, 403 (10), 360 (58), 245 (42), 173 (31), 160 (100), 126 (38), 55 (20). HRMS (ESI) for C19H23F3NaO7, [M+Na]+ (443.1294) found: 400.1290.
Threo-1,1-diethyl 3-methyl 4-hydroxy-4-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)butane-1,1,3-tricarboxylate (threo-4d). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 7.57 (d, 2H, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.40 (d, 2H, J = 8.1 Hz), 4.85 (d, 1H, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.15–4.07 (m, 4H), 3.61 (s, 4H), 3.30 (dd, 1H, J = 5.5 Hz, 9.6 Hz), 2.90–2.81 (m, 1H), 2.19–2.08 (m, 1H), 2.01–1.90 (m, 1H), 1.24–1.13 (m, 6H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 73.8, 168.5, 168.4, 145.3, 130.0 (quartet, J = 32 Hz), 126.7, 125.2 (quartet, J = 4 Hz), 123.9 (quartet, J = 270 Hz), 74.2, 61.5, 61.4, 52.7, 50.2, 49.6, 27.5, 13.6. MS (20 eV, EI) m/z (%): 420 (3) [M]+, 403 (14), 360 (69), 245 (34), 173 (27), 160 (100), 126 (42), 55 (20). HRMS (ESI) for C19H23F3NaO7, [M+Na]+ (443.1294) found: 400.1288.
Erythro-1,1-diethyl 3-methyl 4-(4-cyanophenyl)-4-hydroxybutane-1,1,3-tricarboxylate (erythro-4e). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 7.65 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.48 (d, 2H, J = 8.2 Hz), 5.10 (pseudo t, 1H, J = 3.9 Hz), 4.20–4.07 (m, 4H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 3.36 (dd, 1H, J = 5.4 Hz, 9.6 Hz), 3.20 (d, J = 3.4 Hz), 2.88–2.80 (m, 1H), 2.34–2.24 (m, 1H), 2.15–2.05 (m, 1H), 1.28–1.16 (m, 6H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 174.0, 168.9, 168.7, 146.2, 132.2, 126.7, 118.6, 111.7, 73.0, 61.7, 61.6, 52.2, 49.8, 49.7, 25.3, 14.0. HRMS (MALDI) for C19H23NNaO7, [M+Na]+ (400.1372) found: 400.1385.
Threo-1,1-diethyl 3-methyl 4-(4-cyanophenyl)-4-hydroxybutane-1,1,3-tricarboxylate (threo-4e). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 7.61 (d, 2H, J = 8.3 Hz), 7.41 (d, 2H, J = 8.2 Hz), 4.87 (d, 1H, J = 6.2 Hz), 4.18–4.07 (m, 4H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 3.55 (brs, 1H), 3.30 (dd, 1H, J = 5.6 Hz, 9.5 Hz), 2.89–2.80 (m, 1H), 2.20–2.10 (m, 1H), 2.03–1.91 (m, 1H), 1.25–1.16 (m, 6H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 173.7, 168.5, 168.4, 146.7, 132.2, 127.0, 118.5, 111.7, 74.0, 61.7, 61.6, 52.0, 49.9, 49.5, 27.7, 13.9. MS (20 eV, EI) m/z (%):78 (14) [M+1]+, 360 (13), 317 (39), 300 (29), 282 (16), 246 (21), 203 (31), 186 (29), 160 (100), 133 (15). HRMS (MALDI) for C19H23NNaO7, [M+Na]+ (400.1372) found: 400.1385.
1,1-Diethyl 3-methyl 4-hydroxy-4-(pyridin-3-yl)butane-1,1,3-tricarboxylate (4f). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 8.44 (s, 2H), 7.71–7.61 (m, 2H), 7.50–7.40 (m, 1H), 7.27–7.22 (m, 1H), 4.99 and 4.85 (d, 1H, J = 5.9&7.2 Hz), 4.42 (brs, 1H), 4.19–4.04 (m, 4H), 3.65 and 3.55 (s, 3H), 3.44–3.22 (m, 1H), 2.95–2.74 (m, 1H), 2.36–1.86 (m, 1H), 1.29–1.12 (m, 6H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 173.8, 173.5, 168.9, 168.7, 168.6, 168.4, 149.2, 148.1, 137.1, 134.2, 134.1, 131.6, 130.8, 130.7, 128.6, 128.5, 123.5, 72.7, 71.6, 61.6, 61.5, 61.4, 51.9, 51.8, 50.4, 50.2, 49.9, 49.7, 27.7, 26.0, 13.9.
Threo-triethyl 4-hydroxy-4-(4-nitrophenyl)butane-1,1,3-tricarboxylate (threo-4g). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 8.16 (d, 2H, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.48 (d, 2H, J = 8.7 Hz), 4.93 (t, 1H, J = 6.2 Hz), 4.20–4.09 (m, 4H), 4.09–4.01 (m, 2H), 3.68 (d, 1H, J = 6.7 Hz), 3.33 (dd, 1H, J = 5.5 Hz, 9.6 Hz), 2.90–2.81 (m, 1H), 2.24–2.13 (m, 1H), 2.09–2.00 (m, 1H), 1.21 (t, 3H, J = 7.2), 1.12 (t, 3H, J = 7.2). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 173.3, 168.6, 168.4, 148.8, 147.4, 127.1, 123.5, 73.6, 61.7, 61.6, 61.2, 49.8, 49.5, 27.9, 13.9, 13.8. MS (MALDI) m/z (%): 434 (100) [M+Na]+, 368 (55), 352 (63). HRMS (MALDI) for C19H25NNaO9, [M+Na]+ (434.1427) found: 434.1436.
Threo-triethyl 4-hydroxy-4-(3-nitrophenyl)butane-1,1,3-tricarboxylate (threo-4h). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 8.18, (s, 1H), 8.15–8.09 (m, 1H), 7.66 (d, 1H, J = 7.7 Hz), 7.52, (d, 1H, J = 7.9 Hz), 4.96 (t, 1H, J = 5.2 Hz), 4.21–4.12 (m, 4H), 4.09 (quartet, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 3.60 (d, 1H, J = 6.2 Hz), 3.37 (dd, 1H, J = 5.5 Hz, 9.5 Hz), 2.95–2.84 (m, 1H), 2.28–2.18 (m, 1H), 2.14–2.03 (m, 1H), 1.28–1.19 (m, 6H), 1.14 (t, 3H, J = 7.2 Hz). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 173.3, 168.6, 168.5, 148.3, 143.7, 132.3, 129.4, 122.9, 121.2, 73.7, 61.7, 61.6, 61.2, 49.8, 49.6, 27.9, 13.9. MS (70 eV, EI) m/z (%):412 (4) [M+1]+, 393 (5), 320 (14), 302 (15), 260 (25), 185 (39), 160 (100), 133 (15), 55 (16). HRMS (MALDI) for C19H25NNaO9, [M+Na]+ (434.1427) found: 434.1431.
Threo-triethyl 4-(4-cyanophenyl)-4-hydroxybutane-1,1,3-tricarboxylate (threo-4i). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 7.65 (d, 2H, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.45 (d, 2H, J = 8.2 Hz), 4.91 (t, 1H, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.25–4.14 (m, 4H), 4.09 (quartet, J = 7.0 Hz), 3.38 (dd, 1H, J = 5.7 Hz, 9.4 Hz), 3.34 (d, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz), 2.93–2.83 (m, 1H), 2.31–2.20 (m, 1H), 2.19–2.07 (m, 1H), 1.26 (t, 6H, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.15 (t, 3H, J = 7.1 Hz). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 173.1, 168.5, 168.3, 146.8, 132.0, 126.9, 118.4, 111.5, 73.9, 61.5, 61.4, 61.0, 49.8, 49.4, 27.7, 13.8. MS (20 eV, EI) m/z (%): 391 (4) [M]+, 218 (19), 160 (100), 132 (10), 102 (30). HRMS (MALDI) for C20H25NNaO7, [M+Na]+ (414.1529) found: 414.1535.
Threo-ethyl 3-(4-cyanophenyl)-2-((N,4-dimethylphenylsulfonamido)methyl)-3-hydroxypropanoate (threo-4j). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 8.35 (s, 2H), 7.65 (d, 1H, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.22 (dd, 1H, J = 4.8 Hz, J = 7.7 Hz), 4.81 (d, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz), 4.16–3.96 (m, 6H), 3.26 (dd, 1H J = 6.2 Hz, 10.1 Hz), 2.85–2.74 (m, 1H), 2.14–2.01 (m, 1H), 1.94–1.82 (m, 1H), 1.22–1.09 (m, 9H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 173.2, 168.5, 168.4, 148.7, 147.8, 137.3, 134.1, 123.5, 72.5, 61.5, 61.4, 60.9, 50.2, 49.6, 27.7, 13.9, 13.8, 13.7. MS (MALDI) m/z (%): 368 (100) [M+1]+, 350 (38), 305 (50), 289 (37). HRMS (MALDI) for C18H26NO7, [M+H]+ (368.1709) found: 368.1719.
Threo-trimethyl 4-hydroxy-4-(4-nitrophenyl)butane-1,1,3-tricarboxylate (threo-4k). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 8.20 (d, 2H, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.50 (d, 2H, J = 8.7 Hz), 4.96 (d, 1H, J = 6.0 Hz), 3.71 (s, 6H), 3.65 (s, 3H), 3.41 (dd, 1H, J = 5.7 Hz, 9.3 Hz), 2.92–2.88 (m, 1H), 2.24–2.19 (m, 1H), 2.13–2.08 (m, 1H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 173.6, 168.9, 168.6, 148.5, 147.6, 127.1, 123.7, 73.9, 52.8, 52.7, 52.1, 49.8, 49.2, 27.9. MS (20 eV, EI) m/z (%): 369 (8) [M]+, 317 (39), 300 (29), 282 (16), 246 (21), 152 (31), 145 (29), 131 (100), 86 (46). HRMS (MALDI) for C16H19NNaO9, [M+Na]+ (392.0957) found: 369.0968.
Erythro-methyl 2-(hydroxy(4-nitrophenyl)methyl)-4,4-bis(phenylsulfonyl)butanoate (erythro-5). mp.: 96.1–96.5 °C.1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 8.21 (d, 2H, J = 8.6 Hz), 7.88 (d, 2H, J = 7.4 Hz), 7.74–7.60 (m, 4H), 7.60–7.49 (m, 4H), 7.45 (t, 2H, J = 7.9), 5.26 (t, 1H, J = 4.2 Hz), 4.87 (dd, 1H, J = 3.2 Hz, 7.9 Hz), 3.60 (s, 3H), 3.41–3.31 (m, 1H), 3.12 (d, J = 3.8 Hz), 2.72–2.60 (m, 1H), 2.31–2.19 (m, 1H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 172.7, 147.9, 147.5, 137.4, 136.8, 134.7, 129.6, 129.4, 129.2, 129.0, 127.2, 123.6, 80.6, 72.5, 52.5, 49.7, 22.5. HRMS (ESI) for C24H23NNaO9S2, [M+Na]+ (556.0712) found: 556.0717. CCDC number: 837000.
Threo-methyl 2-(hydroxy(4-nitrophenyl)methyl)-4,4-bis(phenylsulfonyl)butanoate (threo-5). mp.: 140.2–140.7 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 8.18 (d, 2H, J = 8.6 Hz), 7.86 (d, 2H, J = 7.4 Hz), 7.81 (d, 2H, J = 7.7 Hz), 7.69 (t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.60–7.49 (m, 4H), 7.47(t, 2H, J = 8.6), 5.07 (t, 1H,J = 6.0 Hz), 4.73 (dd, 1H, J = 4.0 Hz, 7.6 Hz), 3.57 (s, 3H), 3.54–3.45 (m, 1H), 3.36 (d, J = 6.5 Hz), 2.54–2.42 (m, 1H), 2.38–2.26 (m, 1H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 172.4, 147.8, 147.6, 137.2, 137.1, 134.8, 134.7, 129.6, 129.5, 129.2, 129.1, 127.2, 123.7, 80.6, 73.4, 52.4, 49.9, 24.8. HRMS (ESI) for C24H23NNaO9S2, [M+Na]+ (556.0712) found: 556.0710.
2,2-Diethyl 4-methyl 5-hydroxy-5-(4-nitrophenyl)pentane-2,2,4-tricarboxylate (6). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 8.18 (d, 2H, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.47 (d, 2H, J = 8.7 Hz), 4.99 (pseudo t, 1H, J = 5.5 Hz), 4.17–4.11 (m, 4H), 3.56 (s, 4H), 2.98–2.97 (m, 1H), 2.31 (dd, 1H, J = 14.7, 9.2 Hz), 2.15 (dd, 1H, J = 14.7, 2.6 Hz), 1.36 (s, 3H), 1.24–1.17 (m, 6H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ/ppm: 174.0, 171.9, 171.5, 148.8, 147.5, 127.0, 123.5, 74.8, 61.7, 61.6, 52.9, 51.9, 48.6, 34.3, 20.2, 13.9, 13.8. MS (ESI) m/z (%): 434 (100) [M+Na]+, 305 (5). HRMS (MALDI) for C19H25NNaO9, [M+Na]+ (434.1427) found: 434.1438.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have developed a novel, simple approach toward the synthesis of highly functionalized molecules via three-component reactions of substituted aromatic aldehydes, alkyl acrylates and activated alkane catalyzed by ethyl diphenylphosphine. Furthermore, we presented the first organocatalytic addition of carbon-nucleophile to the in-situ generated MBH adducts. This multicomponent reaction has a broad reaction scope with all three components of acrylate, aldehyde and activated alkane. Further mechanistic details and development of their asymmetric three-component reactions, are now underway in our laboratory.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be accessed at: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/17/3/2529/s1.

Acknowledgements

We thank the National Science Council of the Republic of China (NSC Grant No. 99-2113-M-003-004-MY2) and National Taiwan Normal University (99T3030-6) for financial support.
  • Sample Availability: Samples of all compounds are available from the authors.

References and Notes

  1. Dalko, P.I.; Moisan, L. In the golden age of organocatalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5138–5175. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dalko, P.I.; Moisan, L. Enantioselective organocatalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3726–3748. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhu, J.; Bienaymé, H. (Eds.) Multicomponent Reactions; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2005.
  4. Dömling, A.; Ugi, I. Multicomponent reactions with isocyanides. Angew. Chem. 2000, 39, 3168–3210. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bienaymé, H.; Hulme, C.; Oddon, G.; Schmitt, P. Maximizing synthetic efficiency: Multi‐component transformations lead the way. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 3321–3329. [Google Scholar]
  6. Orru, R.V.A.; de Greef, M. Recent advances in solution-phase multicomponent methodology for the synthesis of heterocyclic compounds. Synthesis 2003, 10, 1471–1799. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hulme, C.; Gore, V. Multi-component Reactions: Emerging chemistry in drug discover ‘From Xylocain to Crixivan’. Curr. Med. Chem. 2003, 10, 51–80. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ramón, D.J.; Yus, M. Asymmetric multicomponent reactions (AMCRs): The new frontier. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1602–1634. [Google Scholar]
  9. Dömling, A. Recent developments in isocyanide based multicomponent reactions in applied chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 17–89. [Google Scholar]
  10. Tietze, L.F.; Brasche, G.; Gericke, K. (Eds.) Domino Reactions in Organic Synthesis; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2006.
  11. Posner, G.H. Multicomponent one-pot annulations forming 3 to 6 bonds. Chem. Rev. 1986, 86, 831–844. [Google Scholar]
  12. Nicolaou, K.C.; Edmonds, D.J.; Bulger, P.G. Cascade reactions in total synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7134–7186. [Google Scholar]
  13. Basavaiah, D.; Reddy, B.S.; Badsara, S.S. Recent contributions from the Baylis-Hillman reaction to organic chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 5447–5674. [Google Scholar]
  14. Basavaiah, D.; Rao, K.V.; Reddy, R. The Baylis-Hillman reaction: A novel source of attraction, opportunities, and challenges in synthetic chemistr. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 1581–1588. [Google Scholar]
  15. Davie, E.A.C.; Mennen, S.M.; Xu, Y.; Miller, S.J. Asymmetric catalysis mediated by synthetic peptides. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5759–5812. [Google Scholar]
  16. Masson, G.; Housseman, C.; Zhu, J. The enantioselective Morita-Baylis-Hillman reaction and its aza counterpart. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4614–4628. [Google Scholar]
  17. Basavaiah, D.; Rao, J.A.; Satyanarayana, T. Recent advances in the Baylis-Hillman reaction and applications. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 811–891. [Google Scholar]
  18. Langer, P. New strategies for the development of an asymmetric version of the Baylis-Hillman reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3049–3052. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ciganek, E. The catalyzed α-hydroxyalkylation and α-aminoalkylation of activated olefins(The Morita-Baylis-Hillman Reaction). In Organic Reactions; Paquette, L.A., Ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  20. Singh, V.; Batra, S. Advances in the Baylis-Hillman reaction-assisted synthesis of cyclic frameworks. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 4511–4574. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang, W.; Yu, M. One-pot sequential Baylis-Hillman and Michael reactions. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 7141–7143. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim, S.C.; Lee, K.Y.; Lee, H.S.; Kim, J.N. Synthesis of poly-substituted benzenes starting from Baylis-Hillman adducts: DBU-assisted unusual dehydrogenation. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 103–109. [Google Scholar]
  23. Roy, A.K.; Pathak, R.; Yadav, G.P.; Maulik, P.R.; Batra, S. Neighboring-group effect: DBU-promoted ring transformation of substituted isoxazoles to substituted pyrroles. Synthesis 2006, 1021–1027. [Google Scholar]
  24. Nag, S.; Yadav, G.P.; Maulik, P.R.; Batra, S. Sodium hydride mediated cascade reaction towards the synthesis of 1,5-disubstituted uracil from cyanamides derived from Baylis-Hillman adducts. Synthesis 2007, 911–917. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang, D.-W.; Syu, S.; Hung, Y.-T.; Chen, P.; Lee, C.-J.; Chen, K.-W.; Chen, Y.-J.; Lin, W. Organocatalytic tandem three-component reaction of aldehyde, alkyl vinyl ketone, and amide: One-pot syntheses of highly functional alkenes. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 363–366. [Google Scholar]
  26. Syu, S.; Wang, D.-W.; Chen, P.; Hung, Y.-T.; Jhang, Y.-W.; Kao, T.-T.; Lee, Y.-T.; Lin, W. Tandem three-component reaction of aldehyde, alkyl acrylate, and amide using ethyl diphenylphosphine as organocatalyst. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 5943–5946. [Google Scholar]
  27. Syu, S.; Lee, Y.-T.; Jang, Y.-J.; Lin, W. Organocatalytic tandem three-component reaction of imine, alkyl vinyl ketone, and imide via aza-Baylis-Hillman reaction. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 2888–2891. [Google Scholar]
  28. The proposed mechanism concerning the phosphine catalysis process was not mentioned in this report. For detailed information, please see the references [25],[26],[27].
  29. Methot, J.L.; Roush, W.R. Nucleophilic phosphine organocatalysis. Adv. Synth. Cat. 2004, 346, 1035–1050. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang, L.-C.; Luis, A.L.; Agapiou, K.; Jang, H.-Y.; Krische, M.J. Organocatalytic michael cycloisomerization of bis (enones): The intramolecular Rauhut-Currier reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2402–2403. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lu, C.; Lu, X. Tandem reactions to construct heterocycles via phosphine-catalyzed umpolung addition and intramolecular conjugate addition. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4677–4679. [Google Scholar]
  32. Xu, L.-W.; Xia, C.-G. Highly efficient phosphine-catalyzed aza-Michael reactions of α,β-unsaturated compounds with carbamates in the presence of TMSCl. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 4507–4510. [Google Scholar]
  33. Carolina, G.; Maria, L.; Caroline, M.; Marcial, M.-M.; Rosa, M.S.; Adelina, V. Michael additions catalyzed by phosphines. An overlooked synthetic method. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 8598–8605. [Google Scholar]
  34. Yuan, K.; Song, H.-L.; Hu, Y.; Wu, X.-Y. Chiral phosphinothiourea-catalyzed asymmetric Morita-Baylis-Hillman reactions of acrylates with aromatic aldehydes. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 8185–8190. [Google Scholar]
  35. The relative configuration of 5 was confirmed by X-ray analysis (CCDC number: 837000 for erythro-5). The stereochemistry of 4 and 6 was determined by 1H NMR analysis in comparison to 5.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jang, Y.-J.; Syu, S.-E.; Jhang, Y.-W.; Lee, Y.-T.; Lee, C.-J.; Chen, K.-W.; Das, U.; Lin, W. Tandem Three-Component Reactions of Aldehyde, Alkyl Acrylate, and Dialkylmalonate Catalyzed by Ethyl Diphenylphosphine. Molecules 2012, 17, 2529-2541. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17032529

AMA Style

Jang Y-J, Syu S-E, Jhang Y-W, Lee Y-T, Lee C-J, Chen K-W, Das U, Lin W. Tandem Three-Component Reactions of Aldehyde, Alkyl Acrylate, and Dialkylmalonate Catalyzed by Ethyl Diphenylphosphine. Molecules. 2012; 17(3):2529-2541. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17032529

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jang, Yeong-Jiunn, Siang-En Syu, Yi-Wun Jhang, Yu-Ting Lee, Chia-Jui Lee, Ko-Wei Chen, Utpal Das, and Wenwei Lin. 2012. "Tandem Three-Component Reactions of Aldehyde, Alkyl Acrylate, and Dialkylmalonate Catalyzed by Ethyl Diphenylphosphine" Molecules 17, no. 3: 2529-2541. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17032529

APA Style

Jang, Y. -J., Syu, S. -E., Jhang, Y. -W., Lee, Y. -T., Lee, C. -J., Chen, K. -W., Das, U., & Lin, W. (2012). Tandem Three-Component Reactions of Aldehyde, Alkyl Acrylate, and Dialkylmalonate Catalyzed by Ethyl Diphenylphosphine. Molecules, 17(3), 2529-2541. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17032529

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop